WEBVTT - Speaker Battle -11 Votes & Counting

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Welcome. Its verdict was Senator Ted Cruz ben Ferguson with you, Senator.

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:10.960
<v Speaker 1>The House has adjourned until Friday after an eleventh failed

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>vote to come up with a speaker. Deals are being made,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>they're saying, or trying to get done behind the scenes,

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>and then there's some people that are deciding to call

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people in their own party terrorists. Representative Dan Crnshaw said,

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this get another scalp and another scalp, whether it's whether

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's Byner or Paul Ryan or then McCarthy. Scalise would

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just be next. And we all know it. We just

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>can't allow that to happen. That's why those of us

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are saying, like, look, you push us into this corner.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So now we're now we're saying we won't vote for

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>anyone but McCarthy. That's why we're saying it because we

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>cannot let the terrorists win. That's basically what's happening. Since

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you and I talked last time, Senator, I didn't think

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>any of this could actually happen. I didn't think we'd

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>get to vote eleven. Here we are, we're going into Friday,

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it could be into the weekend. There are people now

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>claiming that this is an embarrassment. I'm still not there yet.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to know what you think. I think that's

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>just part of the great process. Yeah, Look, my view

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>is settled down. This will work out and it'll be fine.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>That that kind of overheated rhetoric calling people terrorists is

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>not terribly conducive to anything resembling Republican unity. It's it's

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>not conducive to having a strong leadership for the next

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>two years in the House. Engaging in vitriol and personal attacks. Listen,

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the catterwalling we're hearing is

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 1>from the media, and it's from the Democrats. And to

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest, the media and the Democrats are one and

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the same, and they have an agenda. Their agenda is

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to say the Republicans are a failure, the Republicans are terrible,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the Republicans are disaster. That's what they're going to say,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, no matter what is happening, that's going

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to be their talking points. And so all of the

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>screaming of the media, I think is is overwrought. This

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is the democratic process, and it is true that we

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a contested speaker race like this in a

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, but it's also part of the way the

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>process operates. We've had at this point eleven different votes,

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it's run a couple of days. The

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.079
<v Speaker 1>votes there's been some movement. So for the first round,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>all the Democrats voted together. First round, Hakim Jeffries, who's

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the new Democrat leader, got two hundred and twelve votes.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>It takes two eighteen to be speaker. Hakim Jeffries is

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be speaker. It's going to be a

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican speaker. Kevin McCarthy got two hundred and three, and

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>there were a collection of people. Ten Republicans voted for

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Andy Biggs from Arizona, six for Jim Jordan, one for

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Jim Banks from Indiana, one for former Representative Lee's Eldon,

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and one for Byron Donald. So there were initially nineteen

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that was the first round. The second round, the numbers

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't change, but they shifted who they voted for. In

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the second round again, McCarthy got two oh three, but

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the second round, Jim Jordan got all nineteen of the defectors,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and so the votes for Bigs, the votes for Banks, Zelden's,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Byron Donalds, all of them went behind Jim Jordan, he

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>got nineteen. How about the third round, Well, the third round,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy lost a vote. McCarthy dropped to two o two

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and Jim Jordan got twenty votes. And then the vote

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that shifted was Byron Donalds, who had committed to McCarthy

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that he would vote for him for two rounds but

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>not the third. And what he publicly said as he

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>shifted his vote because he thought he thought Kevin was

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to get to eighteen. I don't know if

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that's right or not. The fourth round it continues, but

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 1>that but then we had, as just a little bit

0:03:55.160 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>more of a complication, we had one more Republican victorious Sparts,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>who voted present. So McCarthy lost a vote, he went

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>down from from two o two to two oh one.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And in the fourth round, also Byron Donalds is who

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the dissenters voted for. So Donald's got twenty. So Jim

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Jordan had gotten twenty votes. Then Byron Donald's got twenty votes,

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and then you had the fifth round. The numbers are

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the same. Sixth round the numbers are the same. Seventh

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>round the numbers are the same except for one tweak,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>which is that Matt Gates voted for Donald Trump. Can

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we just pause there for a second to talk about Sure,

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that was a funny moment. And I say this because

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump had been tweeting out on his our true

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>socially on his platform, I'm supporting Kevin McCarthy. Let's move on,

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 1>let's make him the guy, and then Matt Gates, who

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it was one and the same with Donald Trump hit

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>through is basically the entire time I means in the

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>White House nominates him and he's saying no, no, like

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>that's I don't want this job. Obviously, I'm telling you

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to go Kevin McCarthy. That was one if you just

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>want to sit back and pop some popcorn and eat it,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that was one of those moments for me, like, wait,

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what is happening right now? Well, and to be fair,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the same thing that happened with Jim Jordan. You know,

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Jim Jordan was nominated. The first time Jim Jordan was

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>nominated was immediately after he had nominated Kevin McCarthy. Yeah,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 1>and so he's likewise said that he doesn't want the job,

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're nominating and voting for him anyway. Look, the

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>speaker of the House does not have to be a

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>member of the House, so theoretically Donald Trump could be

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House. Now that's not gonna happen. Don't

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>hold your breath. There was one vote cast for that,

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and that was You're not gonna see two hundred eighteen

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>votes cast for Trump as speaker. It's gets going to

0:05:51.960 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be a House member. What played out in the ninth

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>rounds we had Kevin hearn from Oklahoma who got three

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>votes initially and then got seven votes, and then on

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the eleventh round got seven votes. And so where we

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>are right now is McCarthy is at two hundred, so

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he's eighteen votes short. The last round of balloting, mckeem

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeffreys had two twelve. He's had it the whole time,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so all the Democrats are just voting for him. McCarthy's

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>down to two hundred. Byron Donalds got twelve, Kevin Hearne

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>from Oklahoma got seven. Former President Trump the last round

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>again got one vote and then and then there was

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a present vote. So that's where the votes are now.

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, my reaction to all the histrionics is this

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna shake out, and it's gonna shake out. One

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of two ways. One and this may well be the

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>most likely outcome, which is they negotiate an agreement. Where

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy has been making concessions to the dissenters, making concessions

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>based on rules, making concessions based on how the House operates,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>making concessions making it easier for members to offer amendments,

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>easier for amendment for members to fight for conservative principles.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It may be that that McCarthy makes enough concessions that

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets the votes he needs. He needs to pick

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>up eighteen more votes. But if he does that, then

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>we could have an agreement. And I will say so

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>probably the ringleader of the dissenters has been Chip Roy

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>from Texas, who, by the way, if you if you're

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>teaching a master class on speaker votes and bringing people

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.559
<v Speaker 1>together or at least making people understand where you're coming from.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Chip Roy I think has played this perfectly, and I

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that sincerely in the fact that he let people

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>understand why he was not voting for McCarthy, and he

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>also explained very clearly what it would take for him

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to vote for Kevin McCarthy and the rules changes that

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he wanted. I think there are so many Americans that go, Okay,

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy I understand, I respect him. And

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're teaching a masterclass, if there's anything to learn

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from this, don't keep moving the goalposts when you're objecting

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to someone. And if it's as simple as I just

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>don't like him, then stick with that, but don't keep

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>changing it. I think he has done the best job

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of articulating some of the concerns and the things that

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to change. I would give him an a

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>plus in class. Well, look, there's no doubt Chip has

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>been effective, and he's been articulate, and he's been focused

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on substance. I mean part of you know what makes

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>us complicated as you've got twenty players and the twenty

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>folks who have been the dissenters, many of them are

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>operating from for different reasons. Chip at least has not

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>focused his opposition on a personal animosity to Kevin McCarthy.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been focused on demonizing or attacking him personally. Rather,

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he's been focused on the rules. He's been focused on

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the procedures. He's been focused on how the house operates.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>One very significant concession that that McCarthy made on Wednesday

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>night is that Kevin made a public commitment that going

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>forward he would not engage in Republican primaries. There were

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a number of primaries this past cycle where Kevin McCarthy's

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>pack supported the much more moderate Republican An attacked the

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>more conservative Republican even in bright red seats where whoever

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>wins was going to be the nominee, and quite a

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>few of the House Conservatives were unhappy that Kevin was

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>raising significant amounts of money and spending it that money

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>against conservatives and primaries. Well, McCarthy made a public commitment,

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and interestingly enough, he made a commitment in the Club

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for Growth, which often fights against at least in past

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>cycles McCarthy, and these primaries in turn express their willingness

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to support McCarthy if he would stay out of primaries.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal, that commitment. When you said that's

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, explain scenarios where this could have changed

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>outcome of House races, because I don't think people understand

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>how much the money can really decide who's going to

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>win these things. In money plays a massive role in

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of elections, it doesn't necessarily decide them. But

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that there were mull to pull elections across the country.

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Where where McCarthy's pack got involved in the primary, not

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in the general, not trying to support the Republican against

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat. Now they did that, to be clear, Kevin's

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>pack spent hundreds of millions of dollars supporting Republicans in

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the general. So I don't want to diminish he worked

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>very hard trying to elect Republicans across the country. But

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>they're a number of House Conservatives who were angry that

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he was he was playing in primaries. And by the way,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's reprising a battle that happened in the Senate over

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago. You know, if you remember back to

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the twenty ten cycle, Yeah, where Senate leadership engaged at

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of primaries. And so for example, Senate leadership

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>came in the primary against Rand Paul in Kentucky. They

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>came in the primary against Mike Lee in Utah, They

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>came in the primary against Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania, they

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>came in the primary again it's Marco Rubio in Florida,

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and and Senate leadership just screwed it up. I mean,

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean all four of those they got clawberd and

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they got a black eye. And I will say, actually,

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>as a bit of interesting trivia, I may have been

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a beneficiary because twenty ten Senate leadership got such a

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>black eye for making the wrong call in race after

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.680
<v Speaker 1>race after race and losing that. In twenty twelve, which

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is that with the year I got elected to the Senate,

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Senate leadership stayed out of primaries, and look, I got

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 1>to say in hindsight that that that probably is a

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>good thing for me, because that they would not have

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>been supporting me in that primary, No, no way at

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>all they would. They would have definitely been supporting your opponent,

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>who was the safe Republican establishment candidate that you were

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>clearly up against. And he had tons of funding as

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>well well, and he had as he had a every

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>lobbyist in the state of Texas was with him because

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>he was sitting lieutenant governor, and b he was worth

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred million dollars, so he wrote a thirty

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar check. But the point was, Senate Republican

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>leadership kind of stepped in it in twenty ten and

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>has been much more wary of getting in primaries since then.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>This last cycle, McCarthy was pretty vocal engaging in primaries,

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's one of the concerns that is

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>animating these dissenters. Let me ask you this, one of

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the things. You look at these twenty and I think

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that some of the twenty it's just personal.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know there has to be moments in your

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>career center where there's certain people in the Senate on

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>your side that you just don't click with, You just

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like. Maybe they they flat out lied to your face,

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe they've lied to you about something they were going

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to work with you on or support or a bill.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But you do have to remind yourself, I'm this isn't

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>me personally. I'm here to represent the interests of the

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people of the state or the community right where you

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are from, if you're a congressman, for example, how much

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 1>how many blunders could be happening here because people are

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>making this too much about them personally, not enough about

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe their constituents. Look, emotions matter, and and people have

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>personal sentiments and hurt feelings. And I certainly don't know

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>what went on behind closed doors. But what makes this

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>complicated to to reach a negotiated settlement is each of

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>these twenty are operating on their own. So if if,

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, if Chip Roy had the authority to commit

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for all twenty of them, if they all essentially gave

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gave him their proxy and said, if you cut a deal,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll stick with you, I think the odds are pretty

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>good that Chip and McCarthy could reach a deal, because

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think Chip has done a good job of

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>focusing on procedural issues to expand debate, expand the ability

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to offer amendments, expand leverage conservatives would have in the House,

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think they could probably get to the same page.

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>What may make it impossible is I don't know how

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>many of these players are just emotional and have hurt feelings.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know for how many of them it's personal

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin or not. Look yet, you know when you've

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>got when you've got folks using rhetoric like calling them terrorists.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you call someone a terrorist, that's not

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>terribly conducive to getting them to come along and play nice. Yeah.

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that goes back to us saying earlier about

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're teaching a master class here the dues and

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>don't are don't go and make it even more personal

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>and think oh, well, that's going to get the twenty

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to really come around. When that type of rhetorics being

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>used while you desperately need their votes to give yourself

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and and some of your guys are going out there

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as surrogance and saying things like that, that's not going

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to help you get the twenty to come over. It's

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not like that's going to get them to see the

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>light of day. That's gonna make them, I would assume,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>just by human nature dig in, you know, as a

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>general matter, relying on insults to try to bludge in

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>your opposition is it's a perilous path unless you have

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>all the leverage, and at this point, with just a

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>four vote majority, I'm not sure anyone has all the leverage.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>That is a very perilous path. And so I think

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we will either see some negotiated settlement that involves procedural

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>concessions from McCarthy, or at some point if if the

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>votes don't move, and the votes don't move, and the

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>votes don't move, presumably there will be some other candidate

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>who becomes a consensus candidate. Now, I don't think that

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>would happen unless McCarthy decided okay, the votes aren't here

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, because Kevin would certainly have the votes to

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>stop anybody else, so so it would take it would

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 1>take Kevin making the decision. This isn't gonna happen. And

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>I think I have not spoken. I haven't spoken to

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>any of the players actually during this, so I haven't

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I haven't spoken to Kevin during this. I haven't spoken

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to Chip, I haven't spoken any of the folks there.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm watching it on TV. I'm watching it

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter like everybody else. And I know most of

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the players quite well. I mean, these members of Congress,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 1>almost all of them are close friends of mine, so

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know know who they are as people,

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, these folks are principles and they believe

0:17:52.760 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in what they're trying to do. But you'll either see

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a negotiated settlement. I don't know what the terms are

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>if there is one, or presumably at some point someone

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>else becomes a consensus candidate, and I don't know who

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be. And I suspected an enormous amount of

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that would depend on Kevin McCarthy in the decision making. Hemdell,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about another aspect of this, and that is

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the media. Obviously they're trying to grab on and fine

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>headlines to fearmonger people. Earlier today, they had a big,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>long discussion I think it was on CNN where they

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>were saying, Wow, this could become a national security issue

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because they can't get briefings and there's people that aren't

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>even elected that they're going to get better briefings than

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the people that haven't been torn in yet with this

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>new Congress on the House side, and this is going

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue. I mean, they're trying to give

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>us a doomsday scenario here. How long can this go?

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>And everything really is just fine. Oh look, I think

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the national security argument is just gobbledygook. This is going

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to get resolved, and I think it'll get resolved fairly quickly.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It could get resolved today, It could get resolved in

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a few days. I imagine there are scenarios where it

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>could take a couple of weeks. I don't envision any

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>world where it takes longer than that. And I don't

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>even think it'll take a couple of weeks. I think

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it it's gonna end up one way or the other.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be resolved. So the idea that

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>it is this horrible affront to the Republic for the

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>House to spend a couple of days debating their leadership.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>That's just a weird idea. As as as we talked

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about in the last podcast, there's a reason I led

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the fight in the Senate for us to have several

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks of debate on Senate leadership. And we had that

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.159
<v Speaker 1>debate at least the beginnings of the debate, which we

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't had in a long time now, because the Senate

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a procedure like this where where the leader

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is elected on the floor. It wasn't done on c Span. Yeah,

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't done in a context that holds up

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the House for a period of time. It was. It

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>was done behind closed door with the Senate. But I

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>think in both houses having a debate about what leadership

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to do, how they're going to approach it,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>what their priorities are, what fights they're willing to fight. Look,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the question that I asked Mitch McConnell repeatedly, what are

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you willing to fight for? Give me one thing, anything,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And tragically it appeared the only thing that that so

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.720
<v Speaker 1>far Republican leadership was willing to fight for was the

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>disaster of a one point seven trillion dollars omnibus bill,

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the Pelosi Schumer's spending bill. So the reason for the

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>frustration that I think a lot of voters have is evident.

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But my overarching message also is, you know, folks need

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to relax a little bit. This will get resolved. We're

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have a House of Majority. We're gonna have

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a Republican speaker. We're gonna have Republican chairman in the committees.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have oversight hearings, we're gonna have subpoenas, we're

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have legislation moving forward. All of that is going

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to happen. And at the end of the day, the

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>cosmos is not dramatically different if it happens in a

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>week or two days ago. Yeah. Well, and I laugh

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>because Democrats it was like they were throwing jello at

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the wall on TV and the commentators because Jeffreys came

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>out the first one. They basically tried early in the

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>day on Thursday, Senator was, oh, this could become a

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>national security issue. By mid afternoon they had switched from

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that and represented national security. Look, we've got a Senate

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate. We all have our security clearances and

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the ability to be read read into things, and you

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>know we also have when it really comes to national security.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>What you know, you've got a president and a Secretary

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of State in the Secretary of Defense and a chairman

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Joint chiefs. Now, you and I aren't very

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>happy with the job they're doing when you actually talk

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>about national security. I think the people in the Biden

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>administration are affirmatively harmful for that. But the idea that

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it would somehow impact national security to have a few

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>days debate over leadership is a weird argument. Well, and

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I laugh because they went from that earlier the day

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and then it was like, all right, well, we need

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>something else that through out there. And then Representative Jeffreys

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>comes out and he says this national security vulnerabilities. This

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is a dangerous moment for Americans and for the world.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the reasons why the Congress needs to organize.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There are public health vulnerabilities. It's one of the reasons

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>why the Congress needs to organize and Republicans need to

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>get thereck together. So they threw that on there. It

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>became well, now it's also it's not just now security now,

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's probably health. I'm laughing because the Senate and recess

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. If if they had picked the speaker, wouldn't

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>most of these people be home by now? That they'd

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all be home, right, every one of them? Would They

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>would have changed right actually that they're in DC now.

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>The irity is that the reason the House is there

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>is because of this. If they'd picked the speaker, they

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>would they would have gone home. Um. And look, I

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>don't fall to keem Jeffreys for doing what he's doing.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>That's what you do. Look, if you're the opposing party

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other side is having an internal food fight,

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you stand there and laugh and eat popcorn and and

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you throw rocks in the cheap seats. So

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of course that's what he's doing. Um. And to be clear,

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>if if the shoe were on the other foot, we'd

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be Democrats. We're having If it was AOC challenging h

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, you and I'd be sitting there going, man,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they can't get their act together, and we would be

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>doing exactly what would Jefferies is doing. So I don't

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:16.919
<v Speaker 1>fault it for that. I'll tell you what I do

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>fault though it is there are some who are engaged

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>in nasty rhetoric on the Republican side, but also on

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats side. Corey Bush, That's That's what I was

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna say to you, was you just said the laughing

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.959
<v Speaker 1>and you'd sit back. How hard is it not to

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>screw this moment? After you're a Democrat, you make you

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>laugh at some of this, you say some of this.

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>But if there's anything that the Democratic Party should have

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>figured out was just kind of sit back, take a

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>moment and let and don't steal a headline away by

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>doing something stupid. Insert Corey Bush and where you're going

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>with us right now? One of the biggest racist blunders

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that never had the even get close to where they

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>took it. And all of a sudden the story changes.

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure people when the Democrats that are like, really,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you had to do this right now? Well, look, Corey

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Bush is one of the most radical members of the

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Democrat Party of the House. She is on the extreme left.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>She's one of the biggest advocates of abolishing the police. Ironically,

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>she spends massive amounts on private security while arguing for

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>abolishing the police. So it's rules for thee and not

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>for me, And unfortunately she's been willing to really engage

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in in racist rhetorics. So she sent a tweet that reads,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth, Byron Donalds is not an historic

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>candidate for speaker. He is a prop despite being black.

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>He supports a policy agenda intent on upholding and perpetuating

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy. His name being in the mix is not progress.

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It's pathetic. And and I gotta say that is that

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>is nasty. That is racist. By the way, it echoes. Uh,

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what what Dick Durban said in the Senate when Tim Scott,

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the Republican from South Carolina, African American, UH, was standing

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>up and trying to lead legislation on police and and

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and both UH preventing UH, preventing violence to to to

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>those who who are being arrested, but also protecting police

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. And and Durban ridiculed Tim Scott

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as a token um. And it's the same leftists have

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I retweeted Corey Bush and what I said, as I said,

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>open racism is normalized on the radical left. Now the

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Dems are calling Byron Donalds, who a black man, who's

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>who's a conservative, who's strong articulate. They're calling him effectively

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a white supremacist. That's just nuts. That's but look, whether

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's Corey Bush or Dick Durbin, when they see a

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>black Republican, there is a level of anger, of animus,

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of bile. That's why they come out with things like

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 1>token and prop um, the same thing Clarence Thomas faces,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>because that they view them. And and and by the way,

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this as an Hispanic there is some of that.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not nearly as nasty being an Hispanic Republican as

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it as it is how the left treats Black Republicans.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But uh, but you know, I had Jorge Ramos on

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>national television called be a traitor to my race because

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe in securing the border. I mean, it's there's

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a nastiness. And unfortunately when you have someone you know,

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>when Byron Donalds was was not needed and actually Chip

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Roy was nominating him, he pointed out a Kim Jeffreys

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>had been nominated. He said, this is the first time

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in the history of our cree that two black, black

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>people African Americans have been nominated to be Speaker of

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the House. And there was significant applause in the House

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>at that I mean, that is meaningful and positive, but

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it drives the Democrats crazy. They cannot acknowledge. To the

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>leftists Byron Donalds is not black, Clarence Thomas is not black.

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim Scott is not black. I'm not hispanic. Markt Rubio

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>is not Hispanic. You must be a leftist account in

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>their in their bean counting world. How is it that

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>not a single member of the media gets his tweet

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and immediately goes and demands a comment from the Democratic

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>leadership because it is racist. It's very clearly racist, and

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they act like it doesn't even happen, I mean even

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and I would say the Washington, DC Capitol Hill Press

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Corps is a little bit more formal than maybe some

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of the other press members outside in the world, where

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more dignity in their group. And

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>yet they just completely looked the other direction when a

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress says something this racist in this moment

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about an African American man who is who's been nominated

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in a historic way, in a moment that has one

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred push years of history involved in it, Well, look,

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>part of it is the media agrees with those same

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>radical senses you remember back when Larry Elder was running

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for governor of California and the Los Angeles Time published

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>an op ed the title of which was, Larry Elder

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is the black face of white supremacy. I mean, this

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is nasty, and they do it over and over and

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>over again. It is particularly the hard left. They they

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not only revel in racism, they know they won't get

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>called out on it from the press because the press

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>agrees with them, or too many of them do at least. Yeah,

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's total silence on this one. And it's

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those moments when you see the Democrats and

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it reminds you of what you're up against across the aisle.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>And they allowed this to fester within the Democratic Party.

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Anytime a minority stands up that is a conservative, they

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately lose their race and their minority status and they

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they can to absolutely destroy them. Senator, it's

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this has been a fun moment. As I said earlier,

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>master class, ask on all of this, there's a lot

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of history involved. I know people wanted to hear what

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you thought about this, and I think the big takeaway

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>from you is this is okay, this is going to

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>play out and things are going to end well for us.

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And don't take debate for the media implying this is

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a national security risk or a health crisis risk. This

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is totally fine. Look my message is simple, keep calm

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and carry on. This is debate, this is democracy. It

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>will play out. It will resolve itself. I think it

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>will resolve itself in a matter of days or at

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>most weeks. And I don't know how it will resolve it.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I have genuinely no idea what the resolution will be.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think the process of elected members debating

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>amongst themselves their agenda, their rules, their policies, how they're

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>going to conduct themselves. I think that debate is a

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>healthy thing in either House of Congress. It's gonna be interesting,

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be fun to watch crabs, some more popcorn.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>My friends. We will be back with you on Monday.

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>There may be a chance if you get a speaker

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>before then, you might get something else from us. So

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure you hit that subscribe button, auto download button

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening to this podcast, make sure you rise

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a five star review center. It's the Pleasures always, and

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see all you guys back here on Monday