WEBVTT - 7/30, Hour 1: Fantasy Football 2019: First Round Breakdown, MLB Slate

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Networks. Done now

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>welcome you, Bab your host five eight from Man five

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Guy brob say, Francis Frank stand fall, ladies and tile

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in your ps and with now we walking you inside

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>Studio thirty four. He is Frank Staffle. I am Greg Sauceman.

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs on Sports Great of course, of

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Network. Frank, Bud. I'm doing well considering

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I was out pretty late for a Monday. Last night.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We took h b FF Mike Florio out for some

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>dinner Peter Luker's steak. Oh goodness, you are a rich bastard.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I am not. I work with you. In fact, I

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>work under you. Greg, so not rich. I'm not going

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to Peter Lukers. You know what I did last night, Frank,

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>You finished stranger things. I liked it a lot last night,

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, But one of the things, when it was

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 1>to dinner, I went down to Anchor Bar where it

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>was Dollar Wings. I didn't get my invite. You were

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>out with Floria the Peter Lukers where I didn't get

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>my invite. Hey, I'm not the one who set the

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>invites for that, just saying with the Peter Lukers man. Yeah,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how was it? It was pretty good. Steak was a

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>little first time, a little too red for me. You know,

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a steak connoursur by any months. Is the

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>first time? Yes, it was my first time. Man, Wow,

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it's spinach. I did get spinisch. I didn't like it.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Also got red wine. Didn't like that either. Steak was

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>very good, home fries very good. French fries very good.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 1>A little fried onion straws also very good. The bread

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was very good. It sounds like a great night. Spinach

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>come out. This sounds like a great red wine also out.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we went back to my buddy's house. He

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 1>watched some baseball, drank a couple of beers, and that

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was it. I went home. Are you doing, budd? I

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like you didn't sleep well last night, Greg, because

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>in all honesty, you're pretty grapchy today. Man, I'm gonna

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>get your snickers full transparency. Greg, very grouchy, grachy text messages.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to film stuff earlier. He's got an attitude.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>What did you? How did you want to just film

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>me earlier? What's going? Did something happened last night? You

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the ending of Stranger Things? Honest, I wouldna

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>come out and had a great night last night. You're

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be really proud of me because last night Dollar

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Ring night. Boom crushed it last night. Finished Stranger Things

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>a day later than promise, but Boom crushed it last night.

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I finished and I'm ready to rock my twenty nineteen fantasy.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>All rankings, Your rankings are My rankings are done, right.

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I had a big night last night. It's a very

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>big night. It's very productive night. It's not great. I

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was excited to tell you get on the show. So

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>why everybody? My rankings are done. I'm ready to go.

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>How I grach? I'm just hey, that's just the vibe

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>that I'm getting. It's the vibe that I'm getting Grid.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn around here, dude, I am not grautch. You

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>am excited to rankings with you the high point of

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the day. So we're going over the first round today

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on our on our show sheet, I put my first

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>top sixteen on here. Um, Frank did not at all.

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I have it. I have it in my own little note.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>He's surprised you didn't want me to see Now you

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>know everything I'm doing. It's a surprise. Not really that

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>far off from years, to be honest. You know what happened.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.119
<v Speaker 1>You know everything I'm doing. That's okay, it is okay.

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited, man, I'm excited talk fantasy football. I'm excited.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We're like less than a month away from the g

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>S T raft, which I have to do myself, less

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>than a month away for my auction draft when my

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>big draft. Super excited about that, I am. I'm an

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>a great mood to that. I'm in the process of

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>planning my homely draft. We usually do it Labor Day weekend,

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and there's no better way to How about a Saturday,

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg August thirty one draft during the day, a e

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>W pay per view at night. Oh my god, that's

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a great Saturday. That's a great Saturday. I believe this,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I realized that weekend labor the weekend in

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, in Chicago for what, well, all out, we're

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>taking plays in Chicago. No, why not? I'm on Jeff fan,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Jeff's bachelor party. Screw that go to a w It's

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be better. No offense, chef, I don't know, an,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you're probably a pity pissed. That's gonna be a sick show.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's that's what we're looking at. Looking at

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>later in the month, starting to plan some home league drafts. Obviously,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>might do NFFC draft the day before as well. I'm

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at Friday, August. This upcoming Friday, we got the

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>super Flex Fantasy League of experts experts, I'm I guess

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm part of that, but yeah, it's gonna be fun.

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.679
<v Speaker 1>So we'll have draft results from that coming this Friday.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll tweet those out and then I assume Monday or

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>next week sometime we'll talk about the results because I

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like people want to know how a super Flex

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>draft goes down own. I guess in an expert trap

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>right extremely to go based off of have I not

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>told you repeatedly. I am really really going to be

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to what you do from eleven because I

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>have a eleven coming up in my draft the day

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>after Labor Day on that Tuesday. So we're all looking

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>forward to it. We're all looking forward to, man, especially

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>where you're picking. You cannot let me down, Frank, I

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>need a good team from that spot. No pressure. I'll

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>try my best, just be honest. Yeah, it's gonna be interesting.

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm excited myself to see what goes down taken

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>right next to the King's goot angle, Mr King love

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the King. Course you gotta call the King. Yeah, I

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta call the King. Um, all right, So yeah, so

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break. We're gonna get into the first

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>round here, the order, why we think the way we do,

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 1>why our beliefs are the way they are. I'm excited

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>at some point talking about rankings in general with you

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of see where we differ. I found out there's

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of guys I haven't like going over like

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>my favorite guys usual highlight them in white. I have

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>not done that yet. Um, but I'm I'm very excited, man,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about ranking It's like it's a good day. I've

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>been saying for a while I needed to get it done,

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and last night I did it all. I'm really excited

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. Yeah, I like kind of published mine the

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>other day, but it's they're not completely done yet, so

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I still got to go over some things and I

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta update that. Based on this A J. Green news

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>A J. Green, of course, had a minor surgery that

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>came out just before the show here in raports not

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. He still might be good to go by

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>week one. Highly doubt that. I agree, six or eight

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>week timetable seems optimists. I agree, but they said he

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you should be a hundred percent, which is nice. Yeah,

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see what happens all. Sorry, Before the show,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>A columns that a three year, a hundred million dollar

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>extension where the Blazers getting all this money from? Uh,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>they're very rich owners, much richer than us. James Nolan

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is extremely rich as well, although we wouldn't We wouldn't

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know based on be going to Peter Lukers last night,

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Stack in the Big Bucks. I don't know how

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he had money to buy lunch to that I do.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna start to death he's Frank Staff. I'm

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>going where the BFFs very very excited our first round breakdown.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what you guys want to know who were taking

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>when in the first round. We'll let you know over

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the next hour here on the BFFs. Daily Rodo dot Com.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Learn from the game's best DFS players. We don't just

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>give you advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stop. Industry leading DFS tools

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily rodo dot Com

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>optimize her in minutes, build an optimized line up for

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's best DFS players.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Join Daily rodo dot com. Are you or someone you

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 1>love one of the nearly one million Americans living with

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>Parkinson's disease. There is no known cure, but you have

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the power to help change that by participating in a

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>clinical trial. The Michael J. Fawkes Foundation will help get

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you started. Visit Michael J. Fox dot org Forward Slash

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Participant Pack to download the new Parkinson's Trial Participant Pack.

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>It's free and available right now. That's Michael J. Fox

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dot org Forward Slash Participant Pack. Visit today. If you've

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>heard of Weather Tech floor liners. You probably know that

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>for your vehicle's floor, nothing protects better, But what about

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>protection for the rest of your car truck. I'm David McNeil,

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>founder of weather Tech. Besides our floor liners, we design, engineer,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>and manufacture a wide range of automotive accessories right here

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>in America, And just like our floor liners, everything is

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>done to the highest standards possible. We understand what kind

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of investment owning a vehicle can be, so we do

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>everything possible to help you protect it. We don't take shortcuts,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and we never make concessions when it comes to quality

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for everything from cargo liners to cleaning and detailing supplies

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>to mud flaps and car covers. The one place you

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>need to go is weather tech dot com. So if

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you are familiar with our floor liners, just imagine how

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>well the rest of our products will work for you.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Learn more about our full line of automotive accessories at

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>weather tech dot com or call one eight hundred car

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>mats weather tech dot com proudly made in America. Money

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred is not a lender, broker or agent

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of any lender or financial advisor. We do not make

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>loans or credit decisions. You must be eighteen years or

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.439
<v Speaker 1>older and a US resident to qualified. This is not

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>an offer or solicitation to lend. I want the money

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>now one hundred dot com and got the five thousand

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars I needed deposited in my account the next business day.

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>If you need money for any reason, help is here.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Go to money Now one hundred dot com and get

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>the money you need. Need to pay off credit card debt,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>go to money Now one hundred dot com. Need your

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>car repair, need home improvement money, visit money now one

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. If you need fast cash for any reason,

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>go to money Now one hundred dot com. Good, bad,

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>or no credit at all. Go to money Now one

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. You could get up to five thousand

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>dollars as soon as the next business day. Go to

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>money Now one hundred dot com on your phone, tablet,

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>or computer. Type in the address bar money now one

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. That's money now the number one hundred

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Back with you here, BFFs. Frank Staffel, Greg Sausman.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you like the sound, Greg? It's fine game the movie?

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Um Fast Times Baby, that's not the movie. I'mpy Austin

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Powers Original. Oh yeah, ast isn't it Past Times? Also Danny,

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he was just so sexy that he made the robots head.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>The vote is probably the one already. I think it

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Fast Times. Also, I knew, like frame, have no

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>idea what Fast Times it is. I do know what

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that is. My dad loves that movie. I used to

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>watch it with him. It's a good movie. Um, all right,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>so first round man, Yeah, first overall pick, we got Greg.

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna take time on things we know, like

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we agree on like without there's no question, And I

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's how I feel. The first pick, the first

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>pick overall advantage football this year should be Sekwon Barkley.

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's an argument against it. I think

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>people have made arguments, like pretty consensus for other players,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>other these other running backs in this range going ahead

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of say, pretty consensus thought at quon Barkley's the guy. Yeah, yeah,

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say, so. I agree with you. I have

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>him as my number one player, number one running back.

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I did the white board series for the number one

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>overall pick already, and I also had set Kwon Barkley

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as the number one pick. Yeah, I mean, even if

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones gets in there at some point, which I

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>guess is the downside can really be that much worse

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>than Eli. I don't think it's downside. It's a good side.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>For everything I've read about Giants training, cap Daniel Jones

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>actually better throwing the screen, which could result in even

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>more yards and more points, especially for a rookie. Right

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>so if he goes through his progressions and you know

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>he's crumbling, to throw the ball up to say Kwon Barkley.

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean, I understand a lot of people

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>are gonna say, like, you obviously want a running back

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in a better offense as your as your number one

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>overall pick, as your first round pick, but say Klon

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Barkley was in a subpar offense last year as well

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and still finish as the number two running back behind

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. I will say this, a lot of Barkley's

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>yards int come in chunks. There are times where yards

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>were carry not your Georgs were carry but there's a

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of nothing that was there because the box was

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>stacked because the Giants do you stink? But Barkley always

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>be better. This year is absolutely that right side, totally redone.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Zeisler and Mike Grammars, so that should be better.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Say yeah, so, look, you won't get an argument from

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>me here. Obviously, his usage in the past game dred

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and twenty targets last year from say Kwon Barkley cent

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>of that snapso was fourth most amongst running backs. His

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you should in the red zone. I mean, he is

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate, legitimate workhorse. You don't really have to worry

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>about anyone stealing carries away from him either. There's no

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>brainer for me, Greg, absolutely, Okay. Then you get the

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>number two where it is a little bit more exciting,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, because if Sakwan is the no brainer at

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>number two. I told you I was in the cab

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>with bar Bacon's John and John Bacon By the way,

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you want? John has the number two pick

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in his draft, he was telling me, and he goes,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>he knows Sa Kuan's gonna go one. He wants to

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>take Avin Kamara at two. And I go, well, I

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>mean it's really hard between Kamara, McCaffrey, uh and Ezekiel Elliott.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I know previously, Frank, you and I had talked and

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel Elliott was your number two pick. A couple of

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks back, when we originally had this discussion. But I

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was looking at it when I was making my rankings,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and I decided, you always want to minimize risk at two,

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and I thought the person that minimized the risk the

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>most for me was Christian McCaffrey at number two. And

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll just tell you why very briefly, and you can

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>give me your number two. Obviously, this Ezekiel Elliott holdout

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is for now still a thing. He's in Cabo chilling

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and Jerry Jones saying things, Oh, you don't need to

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pay running back to make to win a super Bowl.

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>It's all postraight right, him and Carbo, him doing his thing,

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all austring. I think Ezekiel Elliott does show up.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets a raise for this year, for

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>next year, whatever. I'm not worried about Ezekiel Elliott like

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I am about Melvin Gordon. He's got an extra year

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on him, so I'm not worried about that necessarily. But

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>when there aren't two guys are very comparable that I

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>could put in the same range, that drop seek a

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>spot for Albert Camara. He's incredible, no doubt about it.

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But this is a small button again, it's apples. It's apples,

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the apples, but you're splitting hairs. Latavius Murray was signed.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him be a goal line back in the past,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen the Saints forever under Sean Payton used

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>multiple running backs. Comara is the guy. I'm not worried

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about him in the least. But if we're splitting hairs

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're just a little bit worried about a couple

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns being lost or a couple of touches not

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>going your way, right, we saw a game where mark

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Ingram had twenty touches and a Mcamara only had a few.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>That drops him down a peg, which leads me to

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, who have like three hundred and fifty touches

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>last year. Although new of Turner and Ron Rivera has

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>said we want to scale that back that exactly said

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>how because it's not like they trust anybody behind him.

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you involved Curtis Samuel in the backfield because he

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is so talented you want him to get the ball.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but there is nobody in that backfield

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that scares me at all. Well, Christian McCaffrey is there.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>He is Uh, the player that this offense is going

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to run through. It's not like they have a wide

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>receivers who can to throw it too. It's gonna be

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dope to christ McCaffrey, a lot of

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>running to Christan McCaffrey. It is going to be a monstrous,

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>monstrous year from McCaffrey. CMC is my number two a

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>player overall. It can't really argue much about it. I

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have Alvin Kamara as my number two running back. And look,

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>if you just want to go based on volume, and

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>because of that you take Christian McCaffrey, I can't blame

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you for that. Volume is key when it comes to

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. But Alvin Kamara has kind of been the

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>exception to that over his first two seasons, where he

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>finishes a top four running back each of his first

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>two years in the NFL, one plus targets exactly eighty

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one receptions in each of his first two seasons. Last year,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we thought that he was going to regress from his

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>thirteen touchdowns that he had as a rookie. He did not.

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You had eight team total touchdown. It's just while he

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't see the same amount of snaps as a guy

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like Christian McCaffrey. McCaffrey played of his team snaps last year,

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and Greg's right about they don't really have a running

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>back to speak of behind him, like they have Cameron

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>artists Pain but whatever, that's fine. Alvin Kamar just really

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>kind of defies all logic in terms of his efficiency,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>ability to score touchdowns. His red zone usage went up

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>last year. He had fifty one red zone carries that

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was the second most among all players in the NFL

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>last year. Is red zone targets went up, So it's

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>usage in the red zone, the fact that he really

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he still plays in a really really good offense indoors

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>on the fast track. You're splitting hairs here, I get it.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a little bit more downside when

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Christian McCaffrey and the Panthers, just because

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton is coming off that shoulder surgery, so it's

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody to pay attention to. He has looked good in

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>training camp so far, so I will give him that.

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that the Panthers have said that they're

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>going to scale Christian McCaffrey back a little bit. So

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>again we're splitting hairs here. But I think Alvin Kamara

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is a had been safer, So he's my number two player.

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey my number three. It's interesting because we're both

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>putting the player at two that we think tad been safer.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>For me, that's McCaffrey. For you, it's Camara. I think

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in an auction, I am gonna keep saying this I

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>do in my auction coming up. I think in auction

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at the same price, like there's still, um, there's no

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>one I'm spending like a dollar more for you. You

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>go with which uh, you go to, whichever one ultimately

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is cheaper. Uh. You look at these numbers and they're

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>extremely extremely comparable in both directions. Hundred and seven receptions

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>last year for Christian McCaffrey, a thousand yards on the

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ground as well um for Alvin Camara eighty one receptions

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>back to back seasons. Although I do find an interesting

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't really get going um in the in

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>his first season. There's a couple of games in I

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know whatever that whatever to make of that in

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of Christian McCaffrey Camara, because it's reek a year

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.239
<v Speaker 1>like if he was there, he was there. So they

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they's had a lot of running backs to start the season.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I just find it interesting that his reception

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to didn't go up from year one a year two. Yeah,

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's fair. I mean, Michael Thomas has did

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>last year, so perhaps a few of those targets, and

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook is now there too, And we know that,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, having a good tight end. There's a direct

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>correlation between tight end targets and running back targets. But

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Saints and Sean Payton, they know

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>how valuable Alvin Kamara is in the past game and

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the type of mismatched mismatches that he creates. The same

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>thing could be said for Christian McCaffrey. But I just

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 1>trust the Saints offense a little bit more and the

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that we've seen Alvin Kamara now do it for

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>two straight years. Christian McCaffrey was awesome last year, and

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>again we're splitting hairs. So I still have McCaffrey as

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>my RB three, But obviously I have to make the

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>argument for why I have Kamar number two. Those are

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why, all right, And you heard my reasons

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of course for CMSC at two verses of Camara. There

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>are two three for both of us, just in opposite directions.

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>UM at number four, and we we both have zeq

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Eli I mentioned him briefly. Are you not concerned? Not

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>not concerned about the holdout but cant turned enough to

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>ease at four now? UM, But you're not concerned that

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it will last the regular season or anything like that.

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Again, the date is August six

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that we have to pay attention to. If he's not

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>there by August six, then this upcoming season will not

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>count as an accrude season. And Ezekiel Elliott needs that

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to eventually get to free agency if that's

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to do and get paid ultimately. But

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 1>as of now, Ezekiel Elliott is my RB four because

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>he's holding out. If he were not holding out, I

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>would actually have him ahead of Christian McCaffrey as well,

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just because he let the NFL and touches last year

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>three one touches. He only scored nine touchdowns, which is

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>weird because that was in fifteen games. The year before

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he had nine touchdowns and only ten games. So based

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on how much he touches the ball, you would imagine

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that his touchdown regression should be positive this year, and

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at Zeke anywhere from like ten to

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>twelve touchdowns, maybe even more than that personally, But because

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>he's holding out, if I were drafting right now, I

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>would take those other running backs ahead of him, just

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because I don't have that threat of a hold up.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Fair to say that in a super flex these four

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>would be the same before. No matter what format, these

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 1>four the four. Yes, I agree, I would not take

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>patrohomes over any of them. I agree with you. Number

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>five is where it's interesting for both of us. Let

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>you know what's going on next. Lit Daily Rodo dot

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Com guide you to victory as you swing for the

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>fences playing Daily Fantasy Baseball, Become the eighth Daily Rodo

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>lineup optimizer to win one million dollars in a Fan

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Duela Draft Kings tournament, or become part of the growing

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>community we have won thousands of dollars. If you're playing

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>MLB dfs and not using Daily Rodo dot Com, you're

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Enter promo code f n t s

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Y for a ten percent discount the two thousand and

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen MLB Daily Rodo Premium Package at Daily Rodo dot com.

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Use a promo code f n T s Y and

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>get your ten percent discount today. Get in the game

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.679
<v Speaker 1>with Draft Kings sports Book where listeners if this network

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>can get a risk free bet up to five dollars.

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's how it works. First, create a Draft Kings sports

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>book account, Then make a deposit and place your first

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bet and Draft Kings will match it up to five

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars. Just go to sports spridt dot com slash

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>dk to play at sports script dot com slash d

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>k at quickly. This offer won't be around forever. Gambling

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>problem gamblers twenty one and over New Jersey only. Eligibility

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>restrictions apply. See website for details. I had great results.

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I lost seventy pounds my way to sixty five and

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>went down to my doctor. Told me, if it works

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>for you, then do it. But a lot of people

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>say to me, howlergy lose the weight? I said, I

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>take Andrew four hundred every day. I'm gonna take it forever.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>That was Walt talking about Andrew four hundred. Now listen

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to what Bob has to say. When you listen to

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>your radio commercials, you say that's not possible, but since

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I've experienced it. Your commercials aren't strong enough. I am

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy and I've had a belly for way too long.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>My whole body is shrinking. My energy level has gone up,

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and don't think differences, and it's great stuff. I tried

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>other products and nothing happened. Guys, if you'd like to

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>lose stubborn belly fat, gain energy, and feel years younger,

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>try Andro four hundred, the safe, natural and affordable way

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to boost your testosterone. Go to Androw four hundred dot

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>com or call eight eight eight four hundred zero four

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>three five eight eight four hundred zero four three five

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Androw four hundred dot com. Lose weight now. Got a

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>fat one hundred dot com. Lose that unwanted belly fat

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>today and get free information at fat one hundred dot com.

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Fit in the dress or pets or bathing suits you've

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to. Got a fat one hundred dot com

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Lose ten twenty or more pounds immediately. Go to fat

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dot com. For free information on how you

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>can lose weight. Go to fat one hundred dot com

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Fat one hundred dot com. That's fat one dot com.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't get enough Fantasy football Roto Experts is launched

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>their NFL three sixty five Fantasy Football package, which includes

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet. Davis Madigan the Ruggawa Sports are providing

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>dynasty season long betting, best ball and NFL Draft content

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>every day of the year to give you an edge

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>regardless of what type of fantasy football you play. Sytember

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>sent at roto Experts dot com with the promo code

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>v n t s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Football package only at rhoto Experts dot com. NFL season

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is now upon us. You become the eighth person of

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>win a million bucks in the vanduel or Draft Kings

0:24:37.840 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>tournament sending their lineups using the Daily Redder dot com

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>DFS lineup Optimizer. You become one of the countless number

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of people who won thousands of dollars playing DFS using

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot com. If you're playing DFS and not

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>using Daily Rodor dot com, you're doing it wrong and

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>on over and check out their tools the NFL, n L,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>V p g A, n b A, NHL, and sports

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>wagering and get access to all of them. Daily Rodo

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Elite package and to the promo code action for a

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>tempercent discount, You'll get a lot of alerts, projected ownership percentages,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>whether updates, fantasy projections. And he's in the same Daily

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Road a lot of optimizers that have produced millions in

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the FS winnings. And that's Daily Roader dot Com. And

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the promo code is action. All right, Frank, We're going

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to the top four. For me, it goes Barkley, McCaffrey,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Kimara Zeke. For you, it goes Barkley, Kmara, McCaffrey, Zeke,

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>same four, slightly different order with two three. Now we

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>get to number five. What do you got? So this

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is where we're most likely going to differ. But I'm

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with David Johnson. And you're seeing that with

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the ADP this year, the first round running backs are back.

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants a workhorse running back. And you know, despite

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, you know, playing in an neft offense last year,

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he still finishes a top twelve running back. He played

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of the snaps, that was fifth most amongst

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>running backs last season, uh sixteen attempts inside of the

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>ten sent of his team's carriage He's gonna still be

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>used inside of the inside of the red zone and

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on the go line. There's just no doubt about that.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>He's getting paid a ton of money. The bat, the

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>running back behind him, Chase Edmonds, is not built the

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>same type of way that David Johnson is. And you

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>can just see it last year the way that Mike

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>McCoy and the Cardinals were using David Johnson basically just

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>running him into the back of the offensive line right

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>up the middle, over and over. That's not the way

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to get the most out of David Johnson. And I

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think that Cliff Kingsbury is equipped to figure that out.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years ago, when David Johnson had that

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>monster year, Bruce Arians used him as a wide receiver

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He got him out in the screen game.

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where he had all those receptions, scored twenty total touchdowns.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>He was amazing. And last year they the Cardinals were

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>only thirty first in offensive plays ran. There's no doubt

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in my mind that pace is going to go up

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>under Cliff Kingsbury. Texas Tech each of the past four

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>seasons ranked top ten in offensive plays per game. Last year, specifically,

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>they ranked fourth obviously Kyler Murray is there. I just

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>expect this offense to be much better, run more plays.

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>They're going to be electric. There's gonna be scoring opportunities,

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and David Johnson is going to be at the forefront

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>of that. Still some concerns about the offensive line, but

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we have to remember last year their offensive line was

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>so bad because basically everybody was hurt. If it's a

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>big if they can stay healthy, this offensive line I

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think can be decent, decent enough for David Johnson to

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of it. He's my fifth overall player, Greg,

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So for all the reasons that you mentioned, David Johnson

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is my next running back on the board. He he is,

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's upside. You've changed that, then, didn't

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you have James Conner? Originally I did, And I've changed

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that when I kind of did some research last night,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.159
<v Speaker 1>and I think the upside for David Johnson is simply

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>higher than my man James Conner or Levian Bell. And

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>this pass game usage is just mass And because of that,

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I changed it and had David Johnson as my next

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>ranked running back. The amount of plays are gonna run

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to multiply. Uh, The amount that I think

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the rookie running back will use David Johnson and Cliff

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Kingsbury will use the talent around him. He's just gonna

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>be better than what Steve Wilkson Mike McCoy did last year.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>As long as you can stay healthy. I think he

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>has the most upside and that's why I have him

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as my next rank running back. But that doesn't make

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>my next ranked player because in the first round, I

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>think you're trying to minimize as much risk as humanly possible,

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and there is risk with David Johnson as as good

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>as he was last year, finishing inside the top ten

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at the running back spot on the week to week basis,

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it was frustrating. As I've talked to David Johnson owners,

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you didn't get what you were hoping for.

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And when you're drafting the first round, I don't want

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to not get what I'm hoping for. I don't want

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to have to worry. And that's why my number five

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>overall player is my top wide receiver on the board,

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is DeAndre Hopkins. Now, for me, you're splitting

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>hairs when it comes to Davante Adams and DeAndre Hopkins

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they're both remarkable. Nobody has read more red zone targets

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last two seasons than Davante Adams. It's a

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>better office with Green Bay eats Aaron Rodgers. I know, Frank,

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you've talked about how Davanta Adams is your top wide

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver on the board, but once again we're talking about

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the running backs. We were splitting hairs a little bit.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>You're just trying to find a little a few differences.

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I do want to go back to a couple of

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago where Demanta Adams had these major concussion issues,

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and that small thing made me last year whoever was

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>extremely hired Debonta Adams. If you remember, I dread to

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Geronimo Allison everywhere as a handcuff, and I was just

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>nervous because I know how amazing that Adams is. If

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you can stay healthy, he's going to produce a season

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like he did last year, where it's an unbelievable amount

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of touchdown, unbelievable amount of yards in that offense, and

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's only going to sustain that there is he's the

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>true number one guy. He's amazing and he's great. I

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>trust that DeAndre Hopkins has been nicked up. He's had

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>some muscle injuries. But don't don't get me wrong, but

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the other the Adams can be one concussion away from

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>missing the season, and that really really scared me enough

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to move DeAndre Hopkins over him. DeAndre Hopkins is that

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>physical freak that is always gonna be involved. Uh, certainly

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in the offense. Again, you're splitting hairs here for me.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>That one little bit that I think Hopkins is a

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>better bet to stay healthy than Adams pushes me. Having

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins ahead of Adams, and he's simply more of a

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>short thing than any of the next running backs, including

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Levy on Bell, James Conner, and the man that we

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>both have as our next running back, David Johnson. Yeah,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't disagree with you. I can't disagree with anybody

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>who wants to take DeAndre Hopkins over Advantae Adams. Me personally,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Greg mentioned it. I do have Davontae Adams as my

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one, even with the concussion issues. He's played

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>at least fourteen games in each of the past three seasons.

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is more durable. He is one of, if

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not the most durable wide receiver in the game. I

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>believe He's only just one game in his five or

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>six year career, so he's extremely durable. And you know,

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of a season with Brock Osweiler as his quarterback,

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>He's finished basically as a top four wide receiver each

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the past three seasons, so he's just incredibly consistent.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Might be the pound for pound best wide receiver in

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the game. For me, I have Davontae Adams just one

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>spot ahead of him. He's my sixth rank player, just

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>behind uh David Johnson. So those top five running backs

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>off the board, I would go with Davanta Adams, and

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>then I have Hopkins as my seventh overall player. But

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>for Adams, it's just the combination of having Aaron Rodgers

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>trust Aaron Rodgers as his quarterback. His usage in the

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>red zone. Nobody has more red zone targets then Davante

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Adams over the past three seasons is seventy seven red

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>zone targets. Nobody has more receiving touchdowns than Davantae Adams

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>over the past three seasons thirty five touchdowns in forty

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>five games. It's just a massive, massive rate. And there

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>were some reports in the off season of Aaron Rodgers saying,

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, he wants to get Davanta Adams even more

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>targets this season. I will admit a couple of years ago,

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>more than a couple of it was like four or

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. Now, at this time, Jordy Nelson goes

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.239
<v Speaker 1>down with to a C. L. Gray. We were all

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting Davanta Adams to take that next step. He was

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not ready. It was painfully obvious to watch. He was

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not ready to be a wide receiver one. He has

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>come a long way in terms of his route running,

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is releases off the line of scrimmage, his hands, uh,

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>his ability to show up against top corners. He is

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>every bit a wide receiver one at the NFL level

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to find. I truly do believe that.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So because of those reasons, I have as my wide

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver one my six pick, and I have DeAndre Hopkins

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>as my seventh. I'm obviously not worried about Davonte Adams

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>not being the true wide receiver one. We've long passed

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>those days. With some people that don't believe it, that's stupid.

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's stupid. And I'm looking at the numbers between

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins and Adams and just for the record, there are

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>five six For me, I have David Johnson at number seven,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:28.959
<v Speaker 1>So again it's more about short thing. I trust those

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>guys simply more than I trust David Johnson. That's how

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it's five, six and seven for me. Frank has the

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>five same five six and seven, just a little bit

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of a different order. Um. Dere Hopkins last year had

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>four more receptions, had like two or so more yards,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and had two less touchdowns. Ultimately, DeVante Adams toucheddown. I'm

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not saying they're flukey, but that can go either way.

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Two more touchdowns right in either direction. Yes, Hopkins did

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>play one extra game than Adams day, but I could

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>be expected given adams injury history. Adams did average one

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>war point per game fantasy wise than Hopkins did. But again,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you're literally splitting hairs. They're so consistent, Greg, how about that.

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Davanta Adams had eight yards are touched on in every

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>game he played last year. DeAndre Hopkins seventy four yards

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are touched on in every game. I mean, that type

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of consistency is just massive. It's unmatched when you're looking

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at the half point PPR format, which is what we

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>typically play in. But Basically, these top wide receivers, specifically

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins and Adams are just a tad behind what those

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs have done the past couple of So you know,

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone's saying, oh, well, you I want to lock down

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a running back. They they touched the ball more, they're

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>they're prones who scoring more points. It's not necessarily true

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they scored more points, but it's very very close. Like

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>these wide receivers are just behind those top work horse

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Correct, both of these wide receivers outside the

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>top four running backs for me, that workhorse running back.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>That's it, right, those four in my mind, or those

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>workhorse running backs. And that's why I have Hopkins and

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Adams at five, six, and then David Johnson to kind

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of start the next year running backs. You don't obviously.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Now before we move on, um is to number eight

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for both of us. Before we move on there, I

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>do want to bring up the super flex once again,

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because more and more people are playing in super flex.

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you take Patrick Mahomes before any of these three players? No,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>not me personally. You can make the argument for it, obviously,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and I do believe this gives you a huge advantage

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and super flex I do think that he is that

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>much better than the next quarterback. But me personally, I

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't do it, so I actually would. I would take

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes at five, ahead of both wide receivers and

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. I think the advantage you get from Patrick

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes in this Chief's offense, He's just astronomical. Andrew Luck

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>bad only a bit of a calf injury, Aaron Rodgers

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>had some injury issues to Shawn Watson. Uh, not nearly

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>as consistent as the other three in my estimation. Uh.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So Mahomes gives you the significant advantage in the super

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>flex league where it's so so valuable to get a

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 1>quarterback now depending on the four point four point touch

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns versus six point. So for me, Mahomes actually

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>would be my number five player in a super flex league. Uh.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Then I would get to Adams and Hopkins. Uh and

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. What if I told you you can get

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Watson or Rogers in round two? Does that change your opinion? No,

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>because I think you can do that like that that

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would expect Luck would go in round

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>one with Mahomes and the other two would go in

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>round two. Okay, so just for a reference, the scott

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Fish Bowl league that we play, and it's a little

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>bit different, but it is super flex is the tight

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>end also works has a premium. But Patrick Mahomes and

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>my draft went with the seventh pick, so he isn't

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that range. And then the next quarterback was the Shawn

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Watson who went in the middle of the second round.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's again I would take Luck and Rodgers before

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Watson personally, but Mahomes in the first round. I have

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a number five I think when I come to super flex,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but again, it's so hard with rankings. You just gotta

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have a feel for the draft basic and quarterback is

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>just still so deep too. I keep hitting on that

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>number twenty two. There's twenty two quarterbacks that I wouldn't

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>mind having as my QB one or super flex, and

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:49.719
<v Speaker 1>you can get those guys all the way into like

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>round eight or nine in a super flex draft, so

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't really mind going that route. Seven players down,

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>eat through twelve coming up next, Craggy, you kind of

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>know what my my rounds looking like. I'm excited to

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>see your first round conclusion how it looks when we return.

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the fantasy best Friends forever. This is the

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network, brought to you by Sports. The Fantasy

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network is ready to take you out to the

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.439
<v Speaker 1>ball game. Our experts and analysts are following the Boys

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of Summer through all one and sixty two games of

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>baseball analysis in the industry. Catch the latest news and

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>notes every day to help you win your fantasy leagues

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and Geordi a Best Tournaments will always want you back

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>listening and watching the Fantasy Sports Network on the vants

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio app and the f f t s Y

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>rooting for your fantasy baseball team. Mori s Allen two

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>thousand and fifteen, two thousands and sixteen Europe, being Long

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen World number one me personally,

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I keep my game face on me all the time,

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>especially coming out with the bucker, leaving the range, or

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>even leaving the sports. What's your story? Go to Game

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>based Grooming dot Com from all your athletic facial wipes

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and body cleansing needs. Get in the game with Draft

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>King Sports Book, where listeners if this network can get

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 1>a risk free bet up to five hundred dollars. Here's

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>how it works. First, create a Draft Kings sports book account.

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Then make a deposit and place your first bet and

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Draft Kings will match it up to five hundred dollars.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Just go to sports spridt dot com slash dk to

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>play that sports spript dot com slash dk at quickly.

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>This all for won't be around forever gambling problem called

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 1>gambling twenty one and over New Jersey only. Eligibility restrictions apply.

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>See website for details. If you've heard of weather Tech

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.839
<v Speaker 1>floor liners, you probably know that for your vehicle's floor,

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>nothing protects better. But what about protection for the rest

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of your car or truck. I'm David McNeil, founder of

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.560
<v Speaker 1>weather Tech. Besides our floor liners, we design, engineer, and

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>manufacture a wide range of automotive accessories right here in America.

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And just like our floor liners, everything is done to

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the highest standards possible. We understand what kind of investment

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>owning a vehicle can be, so we do everything possible

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to help you protect it. We don't take shortcuts and

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>we never make concessions when it comes to quality for

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>everything from cargo liners, to cleaning and detailing supplies, to

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>mud flaps and car covers. The one place you need

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to go is weather tech dot com. So if you

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with our floor liners, just imagine how well

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the rest of our products will work for you. Learn

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more about our full line of automotive accessories at WeatherTech

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com or call one eight hundred car mets weather

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>tech dot com. Proudly made in America. If it was

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the same foot he hurt last year, I would think

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>more along the lines you are. But since it's the

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>other foot, you know it just twisted it then just

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>twist acol injuries don't I've twin ligments and full thankles.

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>They do not heal. And how long ago? If you

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>let me answer, Jim, you keep it ruptly. I'm sorry,

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to answer again, and you're talking. Watch live

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>week days one to two pm e start on the

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>M and T s Y YouTube channel. So we're at

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>pick number eight here. Frank Stafle and Greg Susman the

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>BFPS hope you're enjoying our first down breakdown. Tomorrow we'll

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>continue the round round break think it's the number two.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Of course, of course, as we get in the middle rounds,

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it will be very, very different. So it's like we'll

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 1>probably just at that point get like player comparisons and

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>we'll break off from there. You just do I guess

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like mid round analysis. It's I'm gonna go like, oh, fourth, fifth, six, correct,

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll do We'll do the second round. Maybe you'll do

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 1>the third round. That would probably be let's say, yeah,

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I think next week we're getting a player analysis mid

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>round players and then trying to do some comparisons, get

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a sleeper's bust, a lot of good stuff, all right,

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense? Cool? So oh, at player number eight, Frankie,

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we have we have the same top seven, which is

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>not which is not like the guarantee of this year.

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:09.839
<v Speaker 1>By the way, like we happen to have the same

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>top seven. We needn't talk about it at all. First four,

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna have. But after that it's kind of a

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>crapshot a little bit. We do have the next five,

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>same five, six, and seven, different order, the same top seven.

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Indeed my top seven and frank would be his in

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a moment. It begins with Sae Kwon Barkley, Christian McCaffrey,

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camara, Isekuel Elliott, DeAndre Hopkins, DeVante Adams, and David Johnson.

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>That's my top seven for Frank. He goes sa Kwon Barkley,

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Alban Camara, Christian McCaffrey, Ezekiel Elliott, David Johnson, DeVante Adams,

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and DeAndre Hopkins at number eight. Frank, who you got

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>number eight? I actually have Julio Jones for a lot

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that you had the wide receivers ahead

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of David Johnson. It's just that for me, the next

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:51.400
<v Speaker 1>running backs that are up, Levian Bell, Joe Mixon, James Conner,

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit more risk involved with those picks,

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just think Julio Jones is so safe. He

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't finished lower than wide receiver seven each of the

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>past three seasons. He's had fourteen hundred or more receiving

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>yards each of the past three seasons as well. He

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 1>scored eight touchdowns last year. All eight of those came

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>from Week eight on, and the last time he played

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>with Dirt Cutter as the o C he actually had

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a career high in terms of red zone targets. So

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that we can get back there, and you know,

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can get to that double digit touchdown range

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for Julio Jones. If that's the case, he might threaten

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the wide receiver one. We know that the catches,

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the catches, the targets, the yards are all going to

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>be there. The Atlanta Falcons have a ton of games

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>indoors this year, which just bodes well for Julio Jones.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So for the same reasons you have those wide receivers

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 1>at five and six, Greg, I have Julio Jones a

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 1>couple of spots ahead of these next this next group

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of running backs because I think that there's a little

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more risk involved with those guys, So I have

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones at eight. I think it's interesting because people

0:41:47.640 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>always think about Hula Jones. You think, with the nagging

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.400
<v Speaker 1>foot and he's not playing at all in the preseason,

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest that foot and rest his body. But Julio

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Jones has played sixteen games and three of the last

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:57.840
<v Speaker 1>four seasons, and a lot of those injury issues that

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 1>he had earlier's career they're gone. Last year might have

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>been his best season yet with those sixteen hundred and

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy seventy yards, a hundred seventy targets second most of

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 1>his career UH and eight touchdowns second most of his career,

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and as Frank said, all those touchdowns came after Week

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>number eight. Preshdowns are probably probably going on as long

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>as he can stay healthy back in this Dirk Cutter offense.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>He is just thirty years old still, so he's not

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like old for a wide receiver. And a lot of

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>people thought maybe they're Geff and Calvin Realley the second

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>coming here, but Julia Jones still in a class of

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 1>his own, and he is once again the next wide

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver that I have on my board, and he is,

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:32.879
<v Speaker 1>but I don't have him yet. I'm gonna go back

0:42:32.960 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to the well with the running backs, and I'm actually

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>going to I'm gonna go with Levyan Bell. And I know, Greggy,

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 1>come on yesterday or or the other day, you said

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>James Conner was your RB five. Now he's dropping down

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the board now, and now he's dropped all the way

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>down to RB seven. Spoiler Alerter. But Levyan Bell again,

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for safety and I'm not taking I don't

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.759
<v Speaker 1>want to take too much out of contacts. But I

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.760
<v Speaker 1>love James Connas. I don't buy any of the nonsense

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that he he's not going to be the guy like

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>there's that birdie in the back of your head that

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>like maybe Jalen Samuel's is a little bit more involved

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>than you want him to be. I still trust James

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Conner in every fast of the game. Lavian Bell is

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>ready to carry the ball five hundred times, as he

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.439
<v Speaker 1>apologized to fantasy owners yesterday, as much as Adam Gays

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 1>will give him the ball, he'll get it. And we

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>saw last year with Adam Gates Hope he handed the

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>ball repeatedly to Frank Gore, Frank freaking Gore, and it

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a split running back situation. And mean Kennyan Drake

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>was a passing down back. Sometimes it was Frank Gore's

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>backfield man. And when you have a guy the quality

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of Lavian Bell, he's going to hand him the ball.

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 1>He's going to get the ball out of the backfield

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>from Sam Donald. And I think Lavian Bell just is

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it just like tad Bit Safer probably then James Conner. Now,

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the Steeler's offensive line is going to be better than

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Jets offensive line, no doubt in my mind. So

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly a check mark in the column for James

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>might have a top five unit for the Steelers versus

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a bottom five units. So I think that's an argument.

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>And to me, I go back in the fourth as

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, right this second, I put lady On Bell

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one spot higher than Connor, who is next. They are

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>eight nine. Uh, Julio Jones is ten for me. But

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at Will Laban did in his last full

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 1>season fifteen games in seventeen for Pittsburgh yards four touchdowns

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, two more in the air with eighty

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>five receptions. It's a different offense. I get it. But

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>even Adam Gays Campy, that's stupid not to utilize his

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 1>best offensive weapon, that's Levian Bell. For me, we're in

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>dangerous territory here, Greg, I know. And and then you're

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:27.399
<v Speaker 1>after what I just said, you thought maybe I should

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:29.960
<v Speaker 1>put Julio next, Like I get it, right, um, And

0:44:30.040 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe I will ultimately, But when I got back to

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the running backs before they go up, I have Julio

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the next year with the other wide receivers,

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:37.880
<v Speaker 1>with Michael Thomas and somebody else, which I get to

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you last. I want to reveal that yet. Um. But

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>for me, Lady On Bell is sitting at player number eight,

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>followed by James Conner at nine, followed by Julio Jones

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>at ten. So who is your all? Right? Your seven

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was David Johnson? Then okay, so I have I have

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones at eight, I have Levian Bell at nine,

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I have James Conner attend So through ten, same guys,

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>we have the same group of players, just not in

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the same order. And that's changed a little bit too,

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.959
<v Speaker 1>because I believe earlier had Joe Mixing ahead of James Connor.

0:45:07.040 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Now a little bit earlier, yes I did, but I

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:13.439
<v Speaker 1>changed that actually, like last week, just it just didn't

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>make sense to have Joe Mixing ahead of James Conner.

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Just Connor's offensive line so much better, his offense overall

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just much better. His quarterback is better. I mean, a

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>system that we can trust, that we have trusted for

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.920
<v Speaker 1>years now when it comes to fantasy. So you know,

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I really like Joe Mixing, that I needed a talented player,

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think the situation for James Connor and the

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Steelers overall is just a better one when it comes

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to Levian Bell. Look, there is risk involved. Shout out

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to shout out to Blake Bailey and uh he had

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Taglier on his podcast recently and I listened to

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that yesterday and they were making the case against Levian Bell,

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and it basically had this to say that if you

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have a top fifteen offense, it's much harder to

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>finish as a top twelve running back if you play

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in like what the bottom half of the league offenses.

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And we all expect the Jets too well, we expect

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.239
<v Speaker 1>them to progress and be better offensively, they're probably still

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>not a top half of the league offense. So it

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>just makes things difficult for a running back because your

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to score touchdowns to get down the field. Obviously

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we expect Levian Bell to be used in the red zone,

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but how often are the Jets going to be in

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the red zone? Are they gonna have a lot of

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>three and ounce this year? If you know their offense

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is not clicking. And you also have to bring in

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>bring into the back of your mind the fact that

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Adam Gates the past couple of years with the Miami

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins has been one of the slowest offensive teams in

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the league in terms of plays run. So that's why

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a little bit more risk involved obviously.

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>With with Levian Bell and the Jets, I still have

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>them ranked ahead of James Connor because for the reasons

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that Greg mentioned, they're still jail and Sam Samuel's they've

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 1>talked him up, they drafted Benny Snell, so you have

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that kind of in the back of your mind. I think,

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>at least when it comes to Bell, I don't really

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>worry about Time Montgomery, I don't really worry about anyone

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>else on the Jets. Powell, I don't really worry about

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>these guys. They're paying Levian Bell a boatload of money.

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that he's going to be a workhorse running

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:08.839
<v Speaker 1>back and they're going to try and get the most

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:11.239
<v Speaker 1>out of him that they possibly can. So because of

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that volume, I have him one spot ahead of James Conner.

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But you can definitely make the argument that James Conner's

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 1>situation overall is better than that of Levian Bell. So

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 1>we're totally in the same in the same ballpark. Here.

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>The reason why we have Bell over Connor ever so slightly,

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the reason why we have David Johnson over both of

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>those guys ever so slightly, Julio Jones for both of us,

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>that next wide receiver. So we have the same top

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>ten a little bit different order. But again, I can't

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.280
<v Speaker 1>kill you if you want to. If you feel strongly

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in a different way like you want Pellulio Jones up

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:40.359
<v Speaker 1>like frank did, he doesn't bother me. I actually feel

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>more strongly about drafting Hopkins and Adams at five six

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>over David Johnson than I do drafting Bell and Connor

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>over Julio Jones in all honesty. Yeah, that's that's that's me,

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And I know you have your reasons too. Now, two

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>more spots to go. We get to number eleven. In

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>number twelve, Frankie, for you, who do you have an eleven?

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Number eleven? I do have Joe Mixon. I have these

0:48:00.800 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 1>three running backs back to back to back. It's Levian Bell,

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>James Connor, and Joe Mixon. Again, I think that Joe

0:48:05.760 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Mixon is a really talented player. You know, everyone's talking

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.959
<v Speaker 1>about how bad their offensive line is. They've already lost

0:48:11.320 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Joan Williams their first round pick, and a J. Green

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>goes down and that obviously hurts the offense. But their

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>offensive line was really bad last year. Their offense was

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in shambles last year. There were a lot of injuries

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Mixon still finishes the RB nine overall, He's

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>still finished four point nine yards per carry behind a

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not so good offensive line. He is that talented, oh

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a player. He played of the snatch that was tied

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for eighth most amongst running backs. So it was a

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>different regime. But Zach Taylor comes in and he was

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator under Sean McVeigh. He didn't call plays there.

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe this is the second time he'll be calling

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>plays in his life. He was like an interim offensive

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>coordinator for the Miami Dolphins a couple of years ago.

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But he's studied under Sean McVeigh, and my hope is

0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to use Joe Mixon similar to the

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.279
<v Speaker 1>way that Sean McVeigh has used Odd Girley, in that

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 1>he's a workhorse. The receptions could go up for Joe Mixon.

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Um He averaged exactly twenty touches per game already last year,

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.879
<v Speaker 1>sixteen point nine carries per game, three point one receptions,

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So I like him. I think that he's gonna be

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>used a lot. He's gonna be used a lot in

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the red zone. I think the receptions go up I'm

0:49:19.640 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping that Giovanni Bernard doesn't take that much away

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:26.319
<v Speaker 1>from him. Um. And for all those reasons, I still

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 1>do want a workhorse running back at this end of

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the first round area, and I trust that no matter

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>who comes back to me in the second round as

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver, I'm gonna get a really good one,

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:38.399
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Juju, Michael Thomas, Odell Beckham. So I don't

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>mind taking Joe Mixon first and then taking whatever wide

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 1>receivers available in round two. So I have Joe Mixon

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as my eleventh rank player, so I understand the strategy there.

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I do question that offensive line in

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a major way. And I don't know the Zack Taylor offense.

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Like throw out the Miami year. He's learned a lot

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:57.080
<v Speaker 1>from Sean McVeigh. I think it's very impressive what he

0:49:57.120 --> 0:49:58.960
<v Speaker 1>did finishing as the top ten running back with his

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>brutal offensive line. But I think there are a question

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:02.800
<v Speaker 1>marks about how bad this Bengals team will be. And

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned what Mike Tagle year, right, sure, if we

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine what Mike Tagler said, it's just it's it's harder

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>when this team is bad. It's harder, and because of that,

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I do not have Joe Mixon drafted in the first round.

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 1>From it, I'm gonna go with my next ranked wide receiver,

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is the Saints Michael Thomas. I know he

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 1>has not reported a training camp yet. I think he

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:24.879
<v Speaker 1>ultimately will. I'm not concerned about to hold out there.

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I just played sixteen games each the last two years,

0:50:27.680 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>um and last season, I mean, he was a man

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:32.880
<v Speaker 1>amongst boys for much of the year. You know, he

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 1>went through a middle stretch in the middle of the year.

0:50:34.719 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>We score the whole touchdowns, but the receptions are always there.

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He's by far the number one target in this opense.

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of want obviously push the ball down the field. Yes,

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned that you run the ball more. Yes, you're

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>concerned that Drew Brees isn't the same quarterback he used

0:50:47.080 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to be when Michael Thomas is just on another level.

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think we saw even at that opening game

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.319
<v Speaker 1>with Tampa Bay, It's like, sure many people can' get

0:50:54.320 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 1>out of their minds. Sixteen receptions for eighty yards of

0:50:56.920 --> 0:51:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. That's how dominant Michael Thomas can be. H

0:51:00.239 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>And for the most part, he keeps his mouth shut

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and he just plays. And uh, there's a lot to

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 1>be said. Now, Joe Mixon does did average last year

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 1>over fourteen Fantasy points per game. Michael Thomas only about

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve Fantasy points per game. That is a significant difference.

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon finished without ten more Fantasy points in total.

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that's one point per game. Whatever. Um, I

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:19.959
<v Speaker 1>think Michael Thomas just a little bit safer than Joe Mixon.

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas is my number eleven player overall. Yeah, I

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>don't have Michael Thomas as a first round player for me.

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a fine player. But as we've seen

0:51:29.120 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 1>from Drew Brees and the Saints offensives past couple of years,

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:34.640
<v Speaker 1>there's been a direct correlation that they want to run

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the football and they want to play defense. I don't

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>know that they want to ask Hrew Rees to throw

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball all that much. So I worry about volume.

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I know that Michael Thomas is still going to lead

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this team and targets lead this team and targets share.

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But he's finished exactly wide receiver seven each of his

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 1>first three seasons, so you basically know what you're getting

0:51:52.120 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>from Michael Thomas. I don't know how much better he's

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.399
<v Speaker 1>going to get from that. That's fine if you want

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to if you want a consistent player at the end

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of the first round. I don't have a problem with

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Thomas, but I think you can argue that players

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like Juju Smith Schuster and Tyreek Hill obviously have more

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>upside than in Michael Thomas. And that's where I'm gonna

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>go with my twelfth and last player of the first round.

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It is Jujuice Smith Schuster of the Pittsburgh Steelers. He

0:52:16.160 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>finished wide receiver nine last year. I think more touchdowns

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are coming this season. You know, he only had he

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had believe it was seven or eight touchdowns and Antonio

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown had fifteen. Yet Judic Smith Schuster had more red

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>zone targets in Antonio Brown a year ago. And the

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 1>volume you want to talk about volume for a wide receiver.

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>They have to replace almost thirteen hundred yards, fifteen touchdowns

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and over a hundred and sixty targets of Antonio Brown

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from last year. Obviously, that's not gonna only go all

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster's way, but he is unquestionably the wide

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver one for this team. I don't worry about him

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:53.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing opposing teams number one corners he plays in the slot.

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster my number twelve player Rounnie at the

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>first round. Jujus also my number twelve player Roundnie at

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the shround. I'll tell you exactly why on the other side,

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>as you have up the fantasy hour here on the BFFs.

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Lose weight now got a fat one dot com. Lose

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>that unwanted belly fat today and get free information at

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.360
<v Speaker 1>fat one hundred dot com. Fit in the dress or

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 1>pets or bathing suits you've always wanted to Go to

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>fat one dot com. Lose ten, twenty or more pounds

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>immediately go to fat one hundred dot com. For free

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>information on how you can lose weight. Go to fat

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:43.919
<v Speaker 1>one dot com fat one hundred dot com. That's fat

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:48.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hi, I'm Keith other. I believe every child

0:53:49.040 --> 0:53:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is entitled to a complete and inspiring education. Music education

0:53:52.800 --> 0:53:56.600
<v Speaker 1>programs in our schools help kids learn, socialize, gag confidence,

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and stay in school. But they need you will help

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to survive. Mr Allan dot Foundation give school music programs

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the instruments they need to make this opportunity available to

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>every student who wants to play If you will help,

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we can keep music alive and ask schools and give

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 1>all kids education data. Visit mhois dot org now to

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 1>find out how you can help. Money Now one hundred

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:19.439
<v Speaker 1>is not a lender, broker, or agent of any lender

0:54:19.560 --> 0:54:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or financial advisor. We do not make loans or credit decisions.

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 1>You must be eighteen years or older and a US

0:54:24.200 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>resident to qualified. This is not an offer or solicitation

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to lend. I want the money Now one hundred dot

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:32.920
<v Speaker 1>com and got the five thousand dollars I needed deposited

0:54:32.960 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in my account the next business day. If you need

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>money for any reason, help is here. Go to money

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred dot com and get the money you need.

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Need to pay off credit card debt, go to money

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Now one hundred dot com. Need your car repair, need

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:50.879
<v Speaker 1>home improvement money? Visit money Now one hundred dot com.

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>If you need fast cash for any reason, go to

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>money Now one hundred dot com. Good, bad, or no

0:54:57.520 --> 0:55:00.520
<v Speaker 1>credit at all. Go to money Now one hundred dot com.

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 1>You could get up to five thousand dollars as soon

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as the next business day. Go to money Now one

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:09.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com on your phone, tablet, or computer. Type

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>in the address bar money now one hundred dot com.

0:55:13.000 --> 0:55:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That's money now the number one hundred dot com. Are

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you single? Everyone single is looking for the best day possible. Well,

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I found one website that can find you the best

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:28.560
<v Speaker 1>date and it's called the Best Date one hundred dot com.

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Just go there and log in for your free trial

0:55:31.239 --> 0:55:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and see if you can find your new and maybe

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 1>last best date. Remember, you can find the best date

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:39.799
<v Speaker 1>of your life at the Best Date one hundred dot com.

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:43.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the Best Date one hundred dot com. One more time,

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>The Best Date one hundred dot com. Do you want

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to risk free wagers up to one thousand dollars? If so,

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>go to points pep dot com forward slash grid, open

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 1>yourself up a points beat sports wagering account and or

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the promo code grid, and you'll get to risk free

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:00.560
<v Speaker 1>bets of up to one tho dollars. In addition to

0:56:00.680 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>traditional betting, points bets also offers its own betting concept

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:06.400
<v Speaker 1>where customers they're rewarded by how much they win their batting.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>That's points pet dot com, Forward slash Grid. Enter the

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and get your two risk free bets

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>of up to one thousand dollars today gambling problem called

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 1>one Gambler twenty went over New Jersey Only. Eligibility restrictions apply.

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:29.160
<v Speaker 1>See website for details. Joan Osborne for a heir, I

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:34.799
<v Speaker 1>love its plut up bff's raving up here the final

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>three minutes. As I mentioned before the break at number twelve.

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>For me, I also have Jujuic Smith Schuster. I'm high

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Steeler's offense obviously, and maybe it's just me,

0:56:42.280 --> 0:56:44.759
<v Speaker 1>but I'm buying the scheme right Like Levan's gone, a

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>b is gone, and I think you can kind of

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just plug in the pieces there and kind of get

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the same result. That's why I'm really high on James Conner.

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That's why I'm really high on Juju Smith Schuster. Juju

0:56:53.440 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>has proven with Antonio Brown in the line up, Without

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown in the lineup, he's a true wide receiver one.

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And I believe that without a V there, Ben's gonna

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:03.360
<v Speaker 1>have a trust factor with him and it's gonna be

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>all Juju all the time. He's absolutely my number twelve player,

0:57:07.080 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's someone very much targeting. Yeah, a lot of

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 1>people are probably gonna ask, you know, why Odell Beckham

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't part of his crew. Tyreek Hill is part of

0:57:15.960 --> 0:57:18.440
<v Speaker 1>his crew. Odell Beckham. While I think he does have

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>a mental upside playing with Baker Mayfield, no doubt, the

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback that he's played with now of his career,

0:57:23.920 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>there is some downside because he has dealt with a

0:57:25.800 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of leg injuries so far already, and when it

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to Tyreek Hill, there's still, you know, just creeping

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the back of my mind, the possibility of something

0:57:34.160 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out that forces him to be suspended. The upside

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is insane, but again, you know, as Greg has hit

0:57:39.920 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 1>on a lot today with my first two picks, I

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:45.960
<v Speaker 1>really really just want safe players like you can attack

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>all the upside in the middle rounds that you can

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>possibly get you. This is your foundation, your round one

0:57:50.480 --> 0:57:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and round two pick. So while I think Odell Beckham

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tyreek Hill do have massive upside, I think the

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:57.520
<v Speaker 1>downside is higher for those guys as well. We haven't

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.480
<v Speaker 1>seen juduced miss Schuster b you know, a wide receiver

0:58:00.640 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 1>one for an extended period of time. But in the

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>three games that he has done it so far, he

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:06.560
<v Speaker 1>has scored a touchdown in each one of those games.

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 1>In games that he's played without Antonio Brown, so I

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 1>don't really worried about it. He played fifty percent of

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>his of his snaps in the slot last year, and

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this is something I'm just gonna continue hitting on. Greg.

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I love slot receivers. Their targets are more valuable than

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers who play on the outside. It's just it's

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>harder to defend slot receivers. At least, you know, if

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you are a really really talented cornerback and you're playing

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 1>up against the wide receiver on the outside, you have

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the sideline to play against where you can pin those

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:39.400
<v Speaker 1>guys up against the sideline. If you go into the slot,

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just so hard to guard those receivers. You don't

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>know if they're gonna go left, right, they're gonna go straight.

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's an advantage that Judice Simith Schuster has

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>over some of these other names. Totally agree with that, Odellvuk.

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm also playing a lot essentially in the slot, although

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Drummers Lager is there as well. It's a lot of

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:55.760
<v Speaker 1>question marks. I would Cleveland tomorrow, Freak and I will

0:58:55.760 --> 0:58:57.520
<v Speaker 1>go over our first round again, reveal who we have

0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in round number two. Have a great night. We came

0:59:01.280 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 1>back the fantasy hour is over, actually hours next m

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>hmmm