WEBVTT - THE LEFT WINS. SOURCES: KIMMEL COULD BE BACK ON ABC THIS MONTH - 9.22.25

0:00:04.795 --> 0:00:24.795
<v Speaker 1>Countdown with Keith Olderman is a production of iHeartRadio. The

0:00:24.955 --> 0:00:29.635
<v Speaker 1>man handling of Jimmy Kimmel and the blackmailing of ABC

0:00:29.915 --> 0:00:32.315
<v Speaker 1>may turn out to be the biggest gift this year

0:00:33.115 --> 0:00:36.675
<v Speaker 1>to the Democrats. And if that is not a big

0:00:36.795 --> 0:00:40.355
<v Speaker 1>enough plot twist, I am hearing from multiple sources that,

0:00:40.395 --> 0:00:45.115
<v Speaker 1>at least right now, ABC thinks Jimmy Kimmel will stay

0:00:45.155 --> 0:00:49.115
<v Speaker 1>on the air and will return on the air in

0:00:49.195 --> 0:00:54.915
<v Speaker 1>the same show as early as later this month, maybe

0:00:54.955 --> 0:01:00.875
<v Speaker 1>even this week. Kirk the Trump self impeaching memo to

0:01:00.915 --> 0:01:04.395
<v Speaker 1>BONDI he tweeted in a stupor a lot more momentarily.

0:01:04.435 --> 0:01:07.915
<v Speaker 1>But is Kimmel news first and a caveat. I'll believe

0:01:07.955 --> 0:01:12.715
<v Speaker 1>it when I see it. However, these are the landmarks

0:01:12.795 --> 0:01:15.435
<v Speaker 1>my sources pointed at, and a couple I thought of

0:01:15.475 --> 0:01:21.155
<v Speaker 1>my own self. First, they haven't fired him. Second, they

0:01:21.195 --> 0:01:25.675
<v Speaker 1>actually haven't said anything about him. ABC has not said

0:01:25.795 --> 0:01:29.955
<v Speaker 1>anything about Jimmy Kimmel since that one sentence announcement about

0:01:29.955 --> 0:01:33.515
<v Speaker 1>taking him off the air. Third, he hasn't said anything

0:01:33.515 --> 0:01:37.275
<v Speaker 1>about ABC good, bad, or indifferent. Can you imagine me

0:01:37.555 --> 0:01:37.755
<v Speaker 1>in this?

0:01:38.515 --> 0:01:38.915
<v Speaker 2>Fourth?

0:01:39.315 --> 0:01:43.155
<v Speaker 1>Remember the Sinclair owned local stations that started all the

0:01:43.195 --> 0:01:46.955
<v Speaker 1>trouble the next Star stations, the ones who were bribing

0:01:47.075 --> 0:01:51.075
<v Speaker 1>Trump and the FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr by demanding kimmelby

0:01:51.275 --> 0:01:54.795
<v Speaker 1>sidelined so Trump and Carr would waive the rules and

0:01:54.875 --> 0:01:58.355
<v Speaker 1>let Sinclair buy more than the legal limit of local

0:01:58.395 --> 0:02:03.355
<v Speaker 1>TV stations. Remember their plan after the Kimmel suspension to

0:02:03.555 --> 0:02:08.755
<v Speaker 1>run a Arly Kirk tribute last Friday Night in Kimmel's timeslot.

0:02:10.035 --> 0:02:15.235
<v Speaker 1>What happened to that? They didn't run it. They didn't

0:02:15.235 --> 0:02:20.435
<v Speaker 1>put it on the Sinclair stations. They put it on YouTube,

0:02:20.475 --> 0:02:24.075
<v Speaker 1>no other explanation, They just didn't run it. Why didn't

0:02:24.115 --> 0:02:27.395
<v Speaker 1>they run it? They won? Fifth, what happened to the

0:02:27.475 --> 0:02:32.315
<v Speaker 1>Sinclair demand that Kimmel apologizes and pays a bribe, I'm sorry,

0:02:32.475 --> 0:02:38.515
<v Speaker 1>make a donation to Kirk's scam Turning Point Company Incorporated? Sixth,

0:02:39.075 --> 0:02:43.075
<v Speaker 1>how much grief did ABC take and how much grief

0:02:43.115 --> 0:02:47.235
<v Speaker 1>did Disney take for folding to Trump and for not

0:02:47.315 --> 0:02:53.315
<v Speaker 1>defending Kimmel as the entire right wing misquoted him so

0:02:53.515 --> 0:02:58.075
<v Speaker 1>much that no human mind can estimate it. And Seventh,

0:02:58.675 --> 0:03:01.995
<v Speaker 1>how could you possibly put all the Kimmel and Kirk

0:03:02.075 --> 0:03:07.635
<v Speaker 1>toothpaste back into the tube? As Eric Idle once sang,

0:03:08.635 --> 0:03:14.795
<v Speaker 1>all you need is cash. The resurrection of Jimmy Kimmel.

0:03:15.595 --> 0:03:19.555
<v Speaker 1>It has been rumored almost since ABC yanked him. Variety

0:03:19.595 --> 0:03:22.755
<v Speaker 1>had a piece over the weekend about peace feelers. CNN

0:03:22.795 --> 0:03:25.395
<v Speaker 1>had a story saying the outreach began the same day

0:03:25.435 --> 0:03:28.075
<v Speaker 1>they took him off, led not by chairman Bob Iger,

0:03:28.115 --> 0:03:30.795
<v Speaker 1>who really did destroy himself over this, no matter how

0:03:30.795 --> 0:03:35.315
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, but by Disney Entertainment co chair Dana Walden,

0:03:35.915 --> 0:03:41.035
<v Speaker 1>whom they report called Kimmel that day quote, everyone deeply

0:03:41.155 --> 0:03:44.075
<v Speaker 1>values him and wants him to come back, but he

0:03:44.155 --> 0:03:48.035
<v Speaker 1>has to take down the temperature. That was when the

0:03:48.075 --> 0:03:51.955
<v Speaker 1>temperature was still warm, before the temperature turned ice cold

0:03:52.035 --> 0:03:54.995
<v Speaker 1>for Disney and Bob Eiger. And that was also before

0:03:55.035 --> 0:03:58.875
<v Speaker 1>anybody realized that any scenario in which Jimmy Kimmel returns

0:03:58.955 --> 0:04:03.275
<v Speaker 1>to the air on ABC is a win for Jimmy

0:04:03.355 --> 0:04:08.675
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel and for ABC and a defeat for Trump and

0:04:08.755 --> 0:04:12.795
<v Speaker 1>a defeat for fascism, and especially a defeat for Brendan Carr,

0:04:12.835 --> 0:04:15.955
<v Speaker 1>who could get fired over this. And one of the

0:04:15.995 --> 0:04:19.475
<v Speaker 1>reasons they realized this was you gov hold on this

0:04:19.595 --> 0:04:26.315
<v Speaker 1>whole story On Thursday, the margin of adults thinking Kimmel's

0:04:26.355 --> 0:04:31.475
<v Speaker 1>monologue on Monday was acceptable was forty three to thirty

0:04:31.515 --> 0:04:36.155
<v Speaker 1>six percent in favor, a lot of undecideds, but barely

0:04:36.235 --> 0:04:39.755
<v Speaker 1>more than one third who were opposed to it. Half

0:04:39.875 --> 0:04:43.915
<v Speaker 1>of adults disapproved of ABC taking Kimmel off the air,

0:04:43.955 --> 0:04:47.115
<v Speaker 1>and forty two percent said they strongly disapproved of it,

0:04:48.515 --> 0:04:52.395
<v Speaker 1>by our margin of forty three to twenty six. Responding

0:04:52.435 --> 0:04:55.795
<v Speaker 1>to the threat by FCC Commissioner car we can do

0:04:55.835 --> 0:04:57.955
<v Speaker 1>this the easy wayer, we can do it the hard

0:04:57.955 --> 0:05:01.475
<v Speaker 1>way quote, forty three to twenty six adults thought that

0:05:01.555 --> 0:05:08.275
<v Speaker 1>was unacceptable. Again, I believe it when I see Jimmy

0:05:08.355 --> 0:05:12.755
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel on my TV on Channel seven. Still, that's what

0:05:12.915 --> 0:05:18.195
<v Speaker 1>everybody is telling me. So why how well? Given that

0:05:18.315 --> 0:05:21.475
<v Speaker 1>last week Trump boasted he had avenged Charlie Kirk by

0:05:21.515 --> 0:05:25.275
<v Speaker 1>getting some guy's show canceled, even though the guy never

0:05:25.315 --> 0:05:28.275
<v Speaker 1>disparaged Kirk, and then he said no, I had nothing

0:05:28.315 --> 0:05:30.835
<v Speaker 1>to do with it, Given that there were still new

0:05:30.955 --> 0:05:34.555
<v Speaker 1>articles saying that Jimmy Kimmel has been canceled that were

0:05:34.595 --> 0:05:38.315
<v Speaker 1>published as late as Saturday night, the answer is the

0:05:38.435 --> 0:05:42.475
<v Speaker 1>fccs Goebbels, Brendan Carr, May in fact, go into history

0:05:42.515 --> 0:05:46.315
<v Speaker 1>as a hero of the left. Because it dawned on

0:05:46.355 --> 0:05:49.155
<v Speaker 1>the right all of a sudden, like a bunch of

0:05:49.235 --> 0:05:53.675
<v Speaker 1>flies deciding all of a sudden to move six feet

0:05:53.755 --> 0:05:55.915
<v Speaker 1>to the left in a box in the middle of summer.

0:05:56.675 --> 0:05:59.235
<v Speaker 1>It dawned on the right all of a sudden, late Thursday,

0:05:59.275 --> 0:06:02.555
<v Speaker 1>early Friday. Maybe that they have not only authorized the

0:06:02.675 --> 0:06:05.315
<v Speaker 1>left to the next time the left is in power,

0:06:05.555 --> 0:06:10.515
<v Speaker 1>shut down Fox and Murdoch and Sinclair, take away all

0:06:10.555 --> 0:06:14.595
<v Speaker 1>of Murdoch's waivers, take away all his stations, manage its

0:06:14.715 --> 0:06:19.595
<v Speaker 1>news channels, destroy Murdoch's newspapers. But the right has now

0:06:19.595 --> 0:06:23.595
<v Speaker 1>made this almost mandatory, and it has awakened in liberals

0:06:23.635 --> 0:06:32.515
<v Speaker 1>something we always and sorely lack imagination. Remember, not every

0:06:32.595 --> 0:06:37.075
<v Speaker 1>maga has a brain, but every other maga has a podcast.

0:06:37.915 --> 0:06:41.475
<v Speaker 1>And as they were recording them and celebrating the downfall

0:06:41.515 --> 0:06:45.515
<v Speaker 1>of Jimmy Kimmel, it hit them what government censorship could

0:06:45.555 --> 0:06:50.115
<v Speaker 1>mean for them. These are the only circumstances in which

0:06:50.115 --> 0:06:52.515
<v Speaker 1>anything will register with any of these people. It's not

0:06:52.715 --> 0:06:55.075
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong, it's not even what they can get

0:06:55.075 --> 0:06:59.115
<v Speaker 1>away with. It's just self interest. I mean, what would

0:06:59.155 --> 0:07:03.835
<v Speaker 1>the world look like if Elon Musk's x was actually

0:07:03.995 --> 0:07:10.755
<v Speaker 1>under true government supervision in a world where cut turn

0:07:11.035 --> 0:07:15.315
<v Speaker 1>posts something that has to wait twenty four hours before

0:07:15.355 --> 0:07:22.675
<v Speaker 1>it is approved or it isn't. At the same time,

0:07:22.715 --> 0:07:24.875
<v Speaker 1>it's awakened the right and the realization that they just

0:07:24.915 --> 0:07:28.275
<v Speaker 1>handed out rocks and said, please, please, everybody hit conservative

0:07:28.315 --> 0:07:35.115
<v Speaker 1>media in the groin with your rocks. The Trump FCC

0:07:35.235 --> 0:07:38.035
<v Speaker 1>blackmailing of ABC and the bullying of Jimmy Kimmel maybe

0:07:38.075 --> 0:07:40.035
<v Speaker 1>a worse cell phone even than Trump's cover up of

0:07:40.155 --> 0:07:43.715
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein fliles. Just the immediate blowback against Trump and

0:07:43.835 --> 0:07:50.835
<v Speaker 1>Carr and for Kimmel from the right has been, I'm sorry, shocking, refreshing. Yesterday,

0:07:50.915 --> 0:07:53.235
<v Speaker 1>Rand Paul went on this Week on ABC instead of

0:07:53.235 --> 0:07:57.755
<v Speaker 1>the Kimmel disaster quote absolutely inappropriate. Brendan Carr has got

0:07:57.795 --> 0:08:00.955
<v Speaker 1>no business weighing in on this. The FCC should have

0:08:01.035 --> 0:08:03.435
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with it. Sinclair pulled out. They were

0:08:03.475 --> 0:08:06.675
<v Speaker 1>disgusted by the comment. That's their rights, but the government's

0:08:06.715 --> 0:08:09.435
<v Speaker 1>got no business in it, and the FCC was wrong

0:08:09.595 --> 0:08:13.915
<v Speaker 1>to weigh in. No, the same, Ran Paul, and I'll

0:08:13.915 --> 0:08:17.075
<v Speaker 1>fight any attempt by the government to get involved with speech.

0:08:18.995 --> 0:08:22.875
<v Speaker 1>And I played these clips from Ted Cruz on his podcast,

0:08:23.075 --> 0:08:25.115
<v Speaker 1>which he knows would be one of the first ones

0:08:25.595 --> 0:08:29.395
<v Speaker 1>we would censor. I played these clips from Ted Cruz

0:08:29.595 --> 0:08:32.915
<v Speaker 1>in the Friday Night bulletin I did on this. They're

0:08:32.955 --> 0:08:37.115
<v Speaker 1>worth hearing again, as tin ear as him suddenly breaking

0:08:37.115 --> 0:08:42.355
<v Speaker 1>into a bad dialect is my god. Otherwise Ted Cruz

0:08:42.395 --> 0:08:44.435
<v Speaker 1>could be reading one of my scripts here.

0:08:45.075 --> 0:08:49.995
<v Speaker 3>I think it is unbelievably dangerous for government to put

0:08:50.035 --> 0:08:53.275
<v Speaker 3>itself in the position of saying, we're going to decide

0:08:53.275 --> 0:08:55.395
<v Speaker 3>what speech we like and what we don't, and we're

0:08:55.395 --> 0:08:57.555
<v Speaker 3>going to threaten to take you off air if we

0:08:57.635 --> 0:09:00.675
<v Speaker 3>don't like what you're saying. And it might feel good

0:09:00.795 --> 0:09:04.035
<v Speaker 3>right now to threaten Jimmy Kimmel, Yeah, but when it

0:09:04.195 --> 0:09:08.035
<v Speaker 3>is you to silence every conservative in America, we will

0:09:08.075 --> 0:09:10.995
<v Speaker 3>regret it. And and and so again. I like Brendan Carr,

0:09:11.635 --> 0:09:14.275
<v Speaker 3>but we should not be in this business. We should

0:09:14.275 --> 0:09:17.635
<v Speaker 3>denounce it. It's fine to say what Jimmy Kimmel said

0:09:17.795 --> 0:09:21.955
<v Speaker 3>was deplorable, it was disgraceful, and he should be off air,

0:09:22.395 --> 0:09:25.595
<v Speaker 3>but we shouldn't be threatening government power to force him

0:09:25.595 --> 0:09:30.475
<v Speaker 3>off air. That's a real mistake. He threatens explicitly, we're

0:09:30.475 --> 0:09:33.035
<v Speaker 3>going to cancel ABC's license. We're gonna take him off

0:09:33.075 --> 0:09:36.915
<v Speaker 3>the air, so ABC cannot broadcast anymore. And I gotta

0:09:36.955 --> 0:09:41.635
<v Speaker 3>say he threatens it. He says, we can do this

0:09:41.835 --> 0:09:44.475
<v Speaker 3>the easy way, but we can do this the hard way.

0:09:44.995 --> 0:09:45.275
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:45.475 --> 0:09:47.595
<v Speaker 3>And I got to say, that's right out of goodfellows.

0:09:47.595 --> 0:09:49.475
<v Speaker 3>That that that that that that's right out of a

0:09:49.515 --> 0:09:53.435
<v Speaker 3>mafioso coming into a bar going nice by you have here,

0:09:53.675 --> 0:09:55.715
<v Speaker 3>it'd be a shame of something happened to it.

0:09:56.035 --> 0:10:00.835
<v Speaker 1>And that was Ted Cruz and not me. Scott Adams

0:10:01.275 --> 0:10:09.955
<v Speaker 1>Gilbert podcast quote I'm on Jimmy Kimmel's side. Unquote Ben Shpiro.

0:10:10.795 --> 0:10:12.995
<v Speaker 1>I do not want the FCC in the business of

0:10:13.035 --> 0:10:15.955
<v Speaker 1>telling local affiliates that their licenses will be removed if

0:10:15.955 --> 0:10:19.875
<v Speaker 1>they broadcast material that the FCC deems to be informationally false.

0:10:19.915 --> 0:10:22.275
<v Speaker 1>Why because one day the shoe will be on the

0:10:22.315 --> 0:10:25.875
<v Speaker 1>other foot. If Democrats win the presidency and you got

0:10:25.875 --> 0:10:28.355
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat in charge of the FCC, you got Adam

0:10:28.435 --> 0:10:31.195
<v Speaker 1>Schiff in charge of the FCC. Please God, Please God,

0:10:31.195 --> 0:10:33.835
<v Speaker 1>Please God. You know which affiliates are going to get threatened,

0:10:33.875 --> 0:10:36.115
<v Speaker 1>all of the Fox affiliates. You know what's gonna happen,

0:10:38.035 --> 0:10:43.595
<v Speaker 1>Ben Shapiro, you have unsuspected depth. With the perspective of

0:10:43.795 --> 0:10:46.755
<v Speaker 1>just a few days, this became such an obvious own

0:10:46.955 --> 0:10:51.235
<v Speaker 1>goal that not only is Trump denying Brendan Carr did this,

0:10:51.755 --> 0:10:55.915
<v Speaker 1>but Ewick Twump called into the mud Travis Bunk Sex

0:10:55.995 --> 0:11:00.155
<v Speaker 1>Bump Show to deny that Dadams had anything to do

0:11:00.195 --> 0:11:03.115
<v Speaker 1>with it. Quote, Listen, the guy has been a jerk. No,

0:11:03.195 --> 0:11:05.475
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about Kimmel, not his father. Listen, the guy

0:11:05.515 --> 0:11:07.875
<v Speaker 1>has been a jerk. He hasn't been funny. But honestly,

0:11:07.915 --> 0:11:09.515
<v Speaker 1>I think the network used this as a way to

0:11:09.515 --> 0:11:14.075
<v Speaker 1>get him out based on, you know, bad ratings. Eeriic

0:11:14.115 --> 0:11:18.155
<v Speaker 1>had to say that because Dadams promised the exact opposite

0:11:18.195 --> 0:11:21.515
<v Speaker 1>of what he and Carr just did to Jimmy Kimmel

0:11:21.675 --> 0:11:26.155
<v Speaker 1>and ABC, and he promised it during his inaugural address.

0:11:26.715 --> 0:11:31.155
<v Speaker 4>After years and years of illegal and unconstitutional federal efforts

0:11:31.195 --> 0:11:35.395
<v Speaker 4>to restrict free expression, I will also sign an executive

0:11:35.515 --> 0:11:40.075
<v Speaker 4>order to immediately stop all government censorship and bring back

0:11:40.395 --> 0:11:42.075
<v Speaker 4>free speech to America.

0:11:42.435 --> 0:11:46.875
<v Speaker 1>Oops. Just say oops and get out now. Just roll

0:11:46.995 --> 0:11:50.955
<v Speaker 1>through the list of the great intellects of MAGA and

0:11:50.995 --> 0:11:53.475
<v Speaker 1>they are one hundred percent on this issue, and they're

0:11:53.515 --> 0:11:57.115
<v Speaker 1>not on Brendan Carr side. Quote. If the idea of

0:11:57.195 --> 0:12:01.515
<v Speaker 1>free speech enrages you, the cornerstone of democratic self government,

0:12:01.835 --> 0:12:05.475
<v Speaker 1>then I regret to inform you that you are a fascist.

0:12:05.875 --> 0:12:13.155
<v Speaker 1>Unquote Stephen Miller, April fifteenth, twenty twenty two. Congratulations, Brendan Carr.

0:12:13.835 --> 0:12:18.875
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Miller just called you a fascist. This is even

0:12:18.955 --> 0:12:22.035
<v Speaker 1>worse than that. The Attorney General of Missouri sued the

0:12:22.035 --> 0:12:25.715
<v Speaker 1>then surgeon general for alleged government suppression of the anti

0:12:25.795 --> 0:12:31.235
<v Speaker 1>vaccine bullshit online Murphy versus Missouri went to the Supreme

0:12:31.275 --> 0:12:35.035
<v Speaker 1>Court listened to this from an amicus brief challenging any

0:12:35.075 --> 0:12:36.795
<v Speaker 1>government censorship or pressure.

0:12:37.395 --> 0:12:37.675
<v Speaker 4>Quote.

0:12:37.715 --> 0:12:40.315
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps most disconcerting of all is the pressure applied to

0:12:40.355 --> 0:12:43.555
<v Speaker 1>the platforms to enforce the government's new role as arbiter

0:12:43.675 --> 0:12:49.195
<v Speaker 1>of truth, imposing a new federal orthodoxy, and that's in

0:12:49.235 --> 0:12:54.795
<v Speaker 1>italics upon citizens speech. That plan clashes with the Court's

0:12:54.835 --> 0:12:58.355
<v Speaker 1>clear declaration that government may not quote prescribe what shall

0:12:58.395 --> 0:13:02.995
<v Speaker 1>be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion.

0:13:04.755 --> 0:13:09.555
<v Speaker 1>Amicus brief was filed by H. Turning Point USA and

0:13:09.675 --> 0:13:16.715
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk. The Claremont Institute filed a similar brief in

0:13:16.795 --> 0:13:20.675
<v Speaker 1>that case, and it has the name on it John Eastman.

0:13:23.035 --> 0:13:26.555
<v Speaker 1>In a separate Supreme Court case last year NRA versus

0:13:26.715 --> 0:13:30.795
<v Speaker 1>Vullo about pressuring groups to cut off the NRA, the

0:13:30.875 --> 0:13:34.435
<v Speaker 1>National Rifle Association, in business dealings and the like. The

0:13:34.475 --> 0:13:40.355
<v Speaker 1>Court ruled nine nothing against government infringement of opinion nothing

0:13:41.035 --> 0:13:44.235
<v Speaker 1>a shutout the forfeit score. The unanimous opinion was written

0:13:44.275 --> 0:13:48.995
<v Speaker 1>by Sonya Soda Mayor. Quote, Government officials cannot attempt to

0:13:49.035 --> 0:13:53.435
<v Speaker 1>coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views

0:13:53.635 --> 0:14:00.035
<v Speaker 1>that the government disfavors. You want more. What Brendan Carr

0:14:00.035 --> 0:14:02.715
<v Speaker 1>did was not only self harm, it may have been

0:14:02.835 --> 0:14:06.875
<v Speaker 1>illegal when the New Republic, quoting Ana Gomez, one of

0:14:06.915 --> 0:14:10.115
<v Speaker 1>the three FCC commissioners, the only one appointed by a

0:14:10.155 --> 0:14:13.955
<v Speaker 1>democratic president, quote, what the administration is doing violates the

0:14:13.955 --> 0:14:18.315
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment and the Communication Acts. This administration is increasingly

0:14:18.395 --> 0:14:23.195
<v Speaker 1>using the weight of government to suppress lawful expression. Gomez

0:14:23.235 --> 0:14:27.955
<v Speaker 1>also decried Trump's campaign of censorship and control to quote

0:14:28.035 --> 0:14:36.755
<v Speaker 1>silence dissent. Brendan Carr may want to relocate. We can

0:14:36.795 --> 0:14:38.675
<v Speaker 1>do this the hard way, Brendan, or we can do

0:14:38.715 --> 0:14:45.395
<v Speaker 1>it the easy way. So now, obviously ABC has to

0:14:45.435 --> 0:14:49.115
<v Speaker 1>get Kimmel back on the air. In the worst case scenario,

0:14:49.155 --> 0:14:54.475
<v Speaker 1>they don't and he sues. He sues the federal government

0:14:54.715 --> 0:14:59.755
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump and Brendan Carr personally. The Trump part

0:14:59.795 --> 0:15:03.475
<v Speaker 1>gets thrown out, but not until after the headlines. Jimmy

0:15:03.555 --> 0:15:06.635
<v Speaker 1>Kimmel right now has a lawsuit against Brendan Carr and

0:15:06.675 --> 0:15:10.155
<v Speaker 1>the FCC, to say nothing of enough lawsuits to potentially

0:15:10.195 --> 0:15:13.995
<v Speaker 1>own Disney. I don't know why you'd want to own Disney,

0:15:13.995 --> 0:15:17.755
<v Speaker 1>but there it is. To get him back on They

0:15:17.795 --> 0:15:20.195
<v Speaker 1>will not give him full ownership of Disney, but they

0:15:20.235 --> 0:15:22.555
<v Speaker 1>will have to throw some sop to the right to

0:15:22.595 --> 0:15:25.755
<v Speaker 1>give them a climb down. Though, why let them fall

0:15:25.795 --> 0:15:29.115
<v Speaker 1>off the cliff. They so carefully built this cliff. But

0:15:29.195 --> 0:15:31.755
<v Speaker 1>they certainly will have to assuage Jimmy Kimmel's fears of

0:15:31.795 --> 0:15:35.475
<v Speaker 1>going through this again. And that's always one of two things.

0:15:35.835 --> 0:15:40.355
<v Speaker 1>A new longer contract his runs out next spring, or

0:15:40.435 --> 0:15:46.835
<v Speaker 1>more money. They're both. I flashed back to my one

0:15:46.915 --> 0:15:50.155
<v Speaker 1>thing that touched on something like this when the Republicans

0:15:50.195 --> 0:15:52.675
<v Speaker 1>came in in two thousand and eight, after I said

0:15:52.675 --> 0:15:55.875
<v Speaker 1>something they didn't like. During the Republican convention when they

0:15:55.875 --> 0:15:58.315
<v Speaker 1>showed a snuff film and claimed it was a nine

0:15:58.355 --> 0:16:00.955
<v Speaker 1>to eleven tribute, and I said, if we had shown

0:16:00.955 --> 0:16:03.555
<v Speaker 1>you that video, I'd be here apologizing for showing you

0:16:03.595 --> 0:16:06.075
<v Speaker 1>the video of the people from the World Trade Center.

0:16:06.315 --> 0:16:09.635
<v Speaker 1>When the Republicans went in and blackmailed Tom Brokaw and said,

0:16:09.675 --> 0:16:12.195
<v Speaker 1>our guy won't show up to your debate, and Brokaw

0:16:12.235 --> 0:16:15.355
<v Speaker 1>went in and blackmailed NBC management into taking me and

0:16:15.435 --> 0:16:18.275
<v Speaker 1>Chris Matthews off the air. They called and told me.

0:16:18.355 --> 0:16:20.555
<v Speaker 1>My agent called and told me while I was at

0:16:20.555 --> 0:16:23.195
<v Speaker 1>a ballgame in the press box, and I told her,

0:16:23.315 --> 0:16:25.875
<v Speaker 1>you called them back and tell them I quit and

0:16:25.915 --> 0:16:28.035
<v Speaker 1>they can deal with the aftermath of this. I got

0:16:28.075 --> 0:16:29.955
<v Speaker 1>in the subway and went home, and by the time

0:16:29.955 --> 0:16:32.035
<v Speaker 1>I got out of the subway twenty five minutes later,

0:16:32.075 --> 0:16:33.995
<v Speaker 1>it had dawned on me that not only was I

0:16:34.075 --> 0:16:36.595
<v Speaker 1>not going to quit, but I was going to say

0:16:36.595 --> 0:16:39.195
<v Speaker 1>to them, I'll make you a deal if I quit,

0:16:39.715 --> 0:16:41.675
<v Speaker 1>or if this just goes out and I don't quit,

0:16:41.995 --> 0:16:45.555
<v Speaker 1>you guys will lose the entire MSNBC audience. They will

0:16:45.635 --> 0:16:49.395
<v Speaker 1>literally walk away. This is either just days before we

0:16:49.395 --> 0:16:52.915
<v Speaker 1>were to premiere Rachel Meadows Show, or days after we did.

0:16:53.035 --> 0:16:55.315
<v Speaker 1>There was no other presence on that network but me.

0:16:55.475 --> 0:16:58.995
<v Speaker 1>I was the network and they were silencing me. And

0:16:59.075 --> 0:17:01.115
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to throw away what we just built,

0:17:01.115 --> 0:17:04.435
<v Speaker 1>they could do that, or I would say it was

0:17:04.515 --> 0:17:09.395
<v Speaker 1>my idea to stop doing the part that the GOP wanted,

0:17:09.395 --> 0:17:13.475
<v Speaker 1>which was me and Matthew's off the debates. I said,

0:17:13.635 --> 0:17:16.515
<v Speaker 1>I'll take myself off that and I'll claim it's my

0:17:16.635 --> 0:17:18.915
<v Speaker 1>idea and I'll sell it as best I can, and

0:17:18.995 --> 0:17:24.835
<v Speaker 1>you give me, let's see, twelve million dollars three million

0:17:24.875 --> 0:17:29.155
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year over four years. They gave me the

0:17:29.195 --> 0:17:34.595
<v Speaker 1>twelve million. So an end result of this might be

0:17:34.755 --> 0:17:37.395
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel gets a raise and a contract when his

0:17:38.355 --> 0:17:41.235
<v Speaker 1>contract and presumably his show was supposed to end next spring.

0:17:42.875 --> 0:17:48.755
<v Speaker 1>But our purposes, we're not all Jimmy Kimmel. Our purposes.

0:17:49.035 --> 0:17:53.195
<v Speaker 1>Given how much Trump fouled this up with his own people,

0:17:53.235 --> 0:17:55.875
<v Speaker 1>with the right wing, how much they are opposed to this,

0:17:56.195 --> 0:18:00.595
<v Speaker 1>Democrats need to hit the gas while it is still

0:18:00.635 --> 0:18:05.475
<v Speaker 1>sitting there. Push on this. We need House and or

0:18:05.555 --> 0:18:09.715
<v Speaker 1>Senate resolutions condemning car that the Republicans have to vote

0:18:09.795 --> 0:18:13.595
<v Speaker 1>for or against. We need Rand Paul co signing something

0:18:14.875 --> 0:18:20.235
<v Speaker 1>with AOC. We need something House and or Senate resolutions,

0:18:20.915 --> 0:18:25.355
<v Speaker 1>something reaffirming the First Amendment. Just something like it is

0:18:25.395 --> 0:18:28.035
<v Speaker 1>the sense of this House that we reaffirm the First Amendment.

0:18:28.075 --> 0:18:30.795
<v Speaker 1>See how many Republicans are willing to sign off against

0:18:30.795 --> 0:18:35.955
<v Speaker 1>that something? I mean just Democrats who go on ABC

0:18:36.075 --> 0:18:39.875
<v Speaker 1>News or ABC shows. They need to hit ABC for

0:18:39.955 --> 0:18:44.155
<v Speaker 1>doing this to Kimmel on ABC until they put Kimmel

0:18:44.195 --> 0:18:48.195
<v Speaker 1>back on the air. The Democrats can do all the

0:18:48.195 --> 0:18:52.195
<v Speaker 1>public investigation they want of this man car and especially

0:18:52.675 --> 0:18:55.915
<v Speaker 1>what is clearly a quid pro quo about Sinclair Next

0:18:55.955 --> 0:18:58.955
<v Speaker 1>Star and approving those stations. They can tie up those

0:18:58.995 --> 0:19:05.475
<v Speaker 1>approval and in court for years. Mister Jeffries, mister Schumer,

0:19:05.835 --> 0:19:11.395
<v Speaker 1>this is something so obvious, so obvious, so easy, so

0:19:11.715 --> 0:19:18.115
<v Speaker 1>win win, win, win win. Even your strategists and consultants

0:19:18.675 --> 0:19:45.955
<v Speaker 1>have probably heard about it by now. Still, maybe the

0:19:45.995 --> 0:19:48.435
<v Speaker 1>best part of the Kimmel Kirk saga is that, of

0:19:48.435 --> 0:19:51.915
<v Speaker 1>course they wind up giving Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon and

0:19:51.955 --> 0:19:57.115
<v Speaker 1>Seth Myers, maybe even Colbert in a different venue, Extra Life.

0:19:57.635 --> 0:20:03.995
<v Speaker 1>Those franchises were are winding down. Myers was down to

0:20:04.035 --> 0:20:09.235
<v Speaker 1>three workdays week. Now, if Kimmel goes back on the air,

0:20:09.715 --> 0:20:13.595
<v Speaker 1>it'll have to be with something providing security for both parties,

0:20:14.275 --> 0:20:16.195
<v Speaker 1>and it will be with the wind at his back.

0:20:16.475 --> 0:20:18.835
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly people will want to see what Jimmy Kimmel has

0:20:18.875 --> 0:20:26.955
<v Speaker 1>to say, and Myers and Fallon and even FN Colbert.

0:20:28.195 --> 0:20:30.675
<v Speaker 1>The second best part of the Kimmel Kirk saga is

0:20:30.795 --> 0:20:34.155
<v Speaker 1>it took the Kirk shooting and it transformed it politically

0:20:34.275 --> 0:20:38.595
<v Speaker 1>into the Kimmel Kirk saga until the weekend began and

0:20:38.675 --> 0:20:43.155
<v Speaker 1>the canonization of Saint Charlie of Kirk in Phoenix yesterday loomed.

0:20:43.675 --> 0:20:47.595
<v Speaker 1>Google searches for Jimmy Kimmel were greater than or equal

0:20:47.675 --> 0:20:52.235
<v Speaker 1>to those of Google searches for Charlie Kirk. And of course,

0:20:52.275 --> 0:20:54.755
<v Speaker 1>as I suggested last week, it is increasingly evident the

0:20:54.835 --> 0:20:57.795
<v Speaker 1>right canon will continue to insist otherwise. But the killing

0:20:57.795 --> 0:21:02.315
<v Speaker 1>of Charlie Kirk was a personal act, maybe with political undertones,

0:21:03.115 --> 0:21:06.915
<v Speaker 1>and BC reported quote one person familiar with the federal

0:21:06.915 --> 0:21:09.715
<v Speaker 1>investigation said that quote. Thus far, there is no evidence

0:21:09.715 --> 0:21:14.555
<v Speaker 1>connecting the suspect with any left wing groups. Every indication

0:21:14.675 --> 0:21:17.595
<v Speaker 1>so far is that this was one guy who did

0:21:17.595 --> 0:21:23.195
<v Speaker 1>one really bad thing because he found Kirk's ideology personally offensive. Unquote.

0:21:24.875 --> 0:21:27.875
<v Speaker 1>I had suggested last week that he saw and again

0:21:27.915 --> 0:21:31.355
<v Speaker 1>I condemned shooting anybody, but I especially condemned shooting political

0:21:31.395 --> 0:21:35.995
<v Speaker 1>commentators because g guess what, I'm a political commentator. I

0:21:36.075 --> 0:21:39.275
<v Speaker 1>condemned shooting anybody, but I suggested the alleged shooter saw

0:21:39.555 --> 0:21:43.635
<v Speaker 1>Kirk's demonizing of transgendered people as a direct threat to

0:21:43.675 --> 0:21:49.635
<v Speaker 1>someone he loved who is transgendered. End of story, not

0:21:49.715 --> 0:21:53.355
<v Speaker 1>that it will end the story. If you heard our

0:21:53.435 --> 0:21:56.555
<v Speaker 1>bulletin Friday night, you know Trump declared criticism of himself

0:21:56.555 --> 0:21:59.715
<v Speaker 1>on television is illegal. He made up statistics that it's

0:21:59.795 --> 0:22:02.755
<v Speaker 1>ninety seven percent bad that coverage is, or maybe he

0:22:02.795 --> 0:22:05.115
<v Speaker 1>didn't make it up. Hell, his presidency is eighty seven

0:22:05.115 --> 0:22:09.875
<v Speaker 1>percent bad. Maybe the coverage is completely accurate. But clearly,

0:22:11.395 --> 0:22:14.715
<v Speaker 1>between that and the whole Kirk mess and everything else

0:22:14.755 --> 0:22:20.235
<v Speaker 1>he did over the weekend, the last remaining fraid damaged, diaphanous,

0:22:20.435 --> 0:22:27.715
<v Speaker 1>decaying line tethering the good blimp Trump to reality has snapped,

0:22:30.035 --> 0:22:33.875
<v Speaker 1>and it's snapped on this subject. Prosecute them anyway, I

0:22:33.875 --> 0:22:36.955
<v Speaker 1>don't care if there's no crime, and convict them anyway.

0:22:37.155 --> 0:22:40.195
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if there's no evidence and jail them anyway.

0:22:40.435 --> 0:22:42.635
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if the jury found them not guilty.

0:22:43.795 --> 0:22:48.475
<v Speaker 1>I'm paraphrasing, of course. That is the memo or text

0:22:48.635 --> 0:22:52.275
<v Speaker 1>or whatever that was he composed Saturday night that began

0:22:52.595 --> 0:22:56.755
<v Speaker 1>perm semi colon that he somehow wound up posting on

0:22:56.875 --> 0:23:00.955
<v Speaker 1>truth Social instead of sending it to somebody to send

0:23:00.995 --> 0:23:03.915
<v Speaker 1>a Pam Bondy or whatever he was trying to do,

0:23:04.035 --> 0:23:08.155
<v Speaker 1>text it to her, email it because Grandpa Shardy really

0:23:08.275 --> 0:23:11.395
<v Speaker 1>is losing it. It was full of stuff that had

0:23:11.395 --> 0:23:14.795
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with Eric Sebret prosecutor resigning rather than

0:23:14.835 --> 0:23:20.075
<v Speaker 1>prosecuting Letitia James over mortgage paperwork. It was full of

0:23:20.075 --> 0:23:22.835
<v Speaker 1>the lies Trump tells himself He's always done this. There's

0:23:22.875 --> 0:23:25.035
<v Speaker 1>one way to never be wrong. When you are wrong,

0:23:25.275 --> 0:23:28.995
<v Speaker 1>just lie to yourself. Is it me or is it them? Oh?

0:23:29.075 --> 0:23:33.475
<v Speaker 1>It's them, Pam. I have reviewed over thirty statements in

0:23:33.555 --> 0:23:36.315
<v Speaker 1>posts saying that essentially same old story as last time.

0:23:36.395 --> 0:23:39.635
<v Speaker 1>All talked, no action, nothing is being done. What about Komy, Adam,

0:23:39.675 --> 0:23:42.555
<v Speaker 1>Shifty Shift, Letitia, They're all guilty as hell, but nothing

0:23:42.635 --> 0:23:44.315
<v Speaker 1>is going to be done. Then we almost put a

0:23:44.355 --> 0:23:47.275
<v Speaker 1>Democrat supported US attorney in Virginia with a really bad

0:23:47.275 --> 0:23:50.275
<v Speaker 1>Republican past, awoke Rhino is never going to do his job.

0:23:50.435 --> 0:23:52.595
<v Speaker 1>That's why two of the worst DEM senators pushed him

0:23:52.635 --> 0:23:54.875
<v Speaker 1>so hard, even lied to the media and said he quit.

0:23:54.955 --> 0:23:56.835
<v Speaker 1>We had no case, No I fired him. There's a

0:23:56.835 --> 0:23:59.995
<v Speaker 1>great case of many layers legal pundency. So Lindsay's a

0:24:00.035 --> 0:24:02.955
<v Speaker 1>really good lawyer, likes you a lot. We can't delay

0:24:02.995 --> 0:24:06.315
<v Speaker 1>any longer. It's killing a ripping and credibility. They impeach

0:24:06.435 --> 0:24:10.315
<v Speaker 1>me twice and knighted me five times exclamation point over nothing.

0:24:10.515 --> 0:24:18.515
<v Speaker 1>Justice must be served now, President dj TA. Oddly enough,

0:24:18.555 --> 0:24:22.395
<v Speaker 1>Trump deleted that rather than lying and pretending he did

0:24:22.395 --> 0:24:27.955
<v Speaker 1>not mean to do that, or lying and pretending he

0:24:27.995 --> 0:24:31.635
<v Speaker 1>did mean to do that. Lindsey, by the way, is

0:24:31.675 --> 0:24:35.035
<v Speaker 1>not Lindsey Graham as you might have thought. It's Lindsey Halligan,

0:24:35.395 --> 0:24:40.875
<v Speaker 1>an insurance attorney who Trump sicked on the Smithsonian, who

0:24:40.955 --> 0:24:45.435
<v Speaker 1>has never prosecuted a case, but has really great TV hair,

0:24:46.835 --> 0:24:54.355
<v Speaker 1>And we'll do whatever Trump wants in exchange for free perms. Next,

0:24:54.435 --> 0:24:57.315
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going after the US attorney in Maryland, Kelly Hayes.

0:24:57.355 --> 0:25:02.315
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants her to prosecute Adam Schiff for I don't know,

0:25:02.595 --> 0:25:08.155
<v Speaker 1>illegal possession of soup spoons. This is different than the

0:25:08.195 --> 0:25:12.355
<v Speaker 1>Siebert case with Letitia James. Trump can tell himself that

0:25:12.395 --> 0:25:17.395
<v Speaker 1>Sebert was a Democratic plant. Hayes is the same prosecutor

0:25:17.435 --> 0:25:19.635
<v Speaker 1>who approved the crack of Dawn's search of the home

0:25:19.635 --> 0:25:24.275
<v Speaker 1>of John Bolton, which turned up found a spoon. Sir,

0:25:26.315 --> 0:25:31.395
<v Speaker 1>she is a loyalist and Trump offing a Trump loyalist

0:25:31.595 --> 0:25:33.955
<v Speaker 1>is a different thin tight rope for the fat man

0:25:33.995 --> 0:25:38.355
<v Speaker 1>to try to walk across his man Poulty over to

0:25:38.435 --> 0:25:41.835
<v Speaker 1>finance the Renfield who dug up the mortgage info, most

0:25:41.835 --> 0:25:45.715
<v Speaker 1>of which appears to be wrong and totally legal, and

0:25:46.195 --> 0:25:49.755
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that Paulty's father did. He's still at it.

0:25:50.315 --> 0:25:55.035
<v Speaker 1>He still doesn't get it. Look up Brendan Carr online,

0:25:55.035 --> 0:25:58.115
<v Speaker 1>mister Poulty. He's still insisting the Fed governor Lisa Cook

0:25:58.195 --> 0:26:00.475
<v Speaker 1>must be prosecuted. He tweeted. Would a doc be allowed

0:26:00.475 --> 0:26:02.515
<v Speaker 1>to see patients if he was accused of a crime

0:26:02.555 --> 0:26:06.395
<v Speaker 1>punishable by jail? No, I don't know, mister pault Is

0:26:06.395 --> 0:26:13.035
<v Speaker 1>this a Trump doctor? Also, this is all incredibly impeachable.

0:26:13.875 --> 0:26:19.035
<v Speaker 1>Pressuring prosecutors to prosecute your political enemies, or not to

0:26:19.115 --> 0:26:24.035
<v Speaker 1>prosecute your friends while you our president. Well, Hillary Clinton

0:26:24.075 --> 0:26:26.635
<v Speaker 1>got it right yesterday writing of the posted memo to

0:26:26.675 --> 0:26:30.115
<v Speaker 1>Pam Bondy. Quote, imagine if Richard Nixon had just tweeted

0:26:30.155 --> 0:26:34.995
<v Speaker 1>out the Watergate scandal rather than putting it on secret tape.

0:26:35.635 --> 0:26:38.875
<v Speaker 1>This is not having the impact it should because he

0:26:38.955 --> 0:26:43.315
<v Speaker 1>did it in front of everybody. Another secret to Trump's success.

0:26:43.915 --> 0:26:48.195
<v Speaker 1>Why waste all that time trying to be secretive when

0:26:48.195 --> 0:26:51.395
<v Speaker 1>most people don't know what they're seeing anyway, And of

0:26:51.435 --> 0:26:54.075
<v Speaker 1>course he can now claim maybe he wasn't writing to

0:26:54.195 --> 0:27:00.275
<v Speaker 1>Pam Bondy, maybe he was writing to Pam Anderson. I

0:27:00.395 --> 0:27:05.355
<v Speaker 1>think you could make a really good attorney general. The

0:27:05.395 --> 0:27:08.595
<v Speaker 1>other thing is you don't do this as high profile,

0:27:08.795 --> 0:27:12.275
<v Speaker 1>front facing goons from your own dictatorship turn out to

0:27:12.315 --> 0:27:16.795
<v Speaker 1>be digging their own professional grapes. You've heard about Tom Homan,

0:27:17.675 --> 0:27:21.075
<v Speaker 1>the bully from Ice, and the recording of him taking

0:27:21.155 --> 0:27:24.915
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars from two FBI agents he thought were

0:27:24.955 --> 0:27:30.675
<v Speaker 1>businessmen who wanted to win Trump government contracts. Firstly, this

0:27:30.835 --> 0:27:35.115
<v Speaker 1>is the cheapest bastard, the cheapest corrupt politician since Spiro

0:27:35.235 --> 0:27:38.955
<v Speaker 1>Agnew took cash in a bag in the White House

0:27:38.995 --> 0:27:43.235
<v Speaker 1>Office when he was Vice president, Like nine hundred dollars

0:27:43.995 --> 0:27:47.115
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars, I could buy Tom Homan for fifty

0:27:47.155 --> 0:27:53.275
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. What do I get for one hundred thousand dollars? Okay?

0:27:53.315 --> 0:27:57.435
<v Speaker 1>So then after this Trump's DOJ shut the investigation down

0:27:57.475 --> 0:27:59.235
<v Speaker 1>even though there is a tape, and the person who

0:27:59.315 --> 0:28:04.995
<v Speaker 1>recommended shutting it down was Emil Beauve. Anybody in this missing, anybody?

0:28:05.075 --> 0:28:07.355
<v Speaker 1>We can't send a jail for this, shouldn't They have

0:28:07.395 --> 0:28:10.395
<v Speaker 1>brought in Alina Habba to f this up. Words come on,

0:28:13.275 --> 0:28:15.475
<v Speaker 1>as I noted online, how in the hell did we

0:28:15.555 --> 0:28:18.835
<v Speaker 1>not see this coming? Tom Holman literally has the word

0:28:18.995 --> 0:28:24.915
<v Speaker 1>ho in his name. Dave It's Cough of the New

0:28:24.995 --> 0:28:28.515
<v Speaker 1>York Times and the Great book about the Movie Network

0:28:28.555 --> 0:28:30.995
<v Speaker 1>pointed out that if you like cliches, the fifty thousand

0:28:30.995 --> 0:28:35.915
<v Speaker 1>dollars was literally inside a bag a bag, as in

0:28:36.235 --> 0:28:39.675
<v Speaker 1>it's in the bag, or he's left holding the bag,

0:28:40.235 --> 0:28:44.675
<v Speaker 1>or Tom Holman is Trump's bag man, but the winner

0:28:45.555 --> 0:28:48.835
<v Speaker 1>is From Saturday Night Live writer Brian Tucker quote, Look,

0:28:49.635 --> 0:28:52.115
<v Speaker 1>Tom Holman has not had a trial and has never

0:28:52.195 --> 0:28:54.475
<v Speaker 1>been proven guilty, So let's all take a step back

0:28:54.715 --> 0:28:57.155
<v Speaker 1>and do what he would do. Send him to a

0:28:57.195 --> 0:29:01.275
<v Speaker 1>secret prison in El Salvador until we can figure this out.

0:29:10.395 --> 0:29:16.795
<v Speaker 1>Cass please well, by the way, Russia violated Estonian airspace

0:29:17.155 --> 0:29:20.155
<v Speaker 1>now fighter jets not drones this time, and Poland had

0:29:20.195 --> 0:29:25.675
<v Speaker 1>to scramble its jets again after another incursion. Trump slept

0:29:25.675 --> 0:29:28.715
<v Speaker 1>through that MAGA is concerned only about one thing. When

0:29:29.035 --> 0:29:33.475
<v Speaker 1>is Charlie Kirk coming back from the dead? And don't

0:29:33.515 --> 0:29:36.995
<v Speaker 1>shout at me about that you think I made up

0:29:37.035 --> 0:29:39.955
<v Speaker 1>that idea. I have lost count of how many social

0:29:39.955 --> 0:29:43.875
<v Speaker 1>media posts there are right this minute asking if that's possible,

0:29:44.555 --> 0:29:46.355
<v Speaker 1>or saying, oh, wouldn't it be great if he came

0:29:46.395 --> 0:29:50.555
<v Speaker 1>back from the dead during the thing you didn't maybe tomorrow.

0:29:52.355 --> 0:29:55.035
<v Speaker 1>The canonization of Saint Charlie of Kirk is the only

0:29:55.075 --> 0:29:58.395
<v Speaker 1>thing they have left here. The Kirk memorial couldn't even

0:29:58.435 --> 0:30:02.795
<v Speaker 1>break the NFL's hold on Sunday afternoon trending topics on

0:30:02.835 --> 0:30:06.475
<v Speaker 1>social media, but they are in full Jesus mode here.

0:30:08.275 --> 0:30:12.235
<v Speaker 1>A spokesman for Kirk's turning point in Doctrination Group actually

0:30:12.235 --> 0:30:16.475
<v Speaker 1>put out a statement transforming the lack of an exit

0:30:16.555 --> 0:30:22.755
<v Speaker 1>wound into a miracle, not a metaphor not like a

0:30:22.795 --> 0:30:27.195
<v Speaker 1>miracle or kind of almost No, a miracle, and he

0:30:27.275 --> 0:30:32.675
<v Speaker 1>quoted a surgeon. Now the surgeon is anonymous, and he's

0:30:32.715 --> 0:30:37.315
<v Speaker 1>being quoted by a spokesman who needs turning point USA

0:30:37.435 --> 0:30:42.315
<v Speaker 1>to continue. Even without Charlie Kirk, Fox ran this as

0:30:42.355 --> 0:30:46.435
<v Speaker 1>a major story yesterday. Are you ready? Even in death,

0:30:46.555 --> 0:30:50.995
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk may have saved lives. The surgeon explained that quote,

0:30:51.115 --> 0:30:53.595
<v Speaker 1>I've seen wounds from this caliber many times, and they

0:30:53.635 --> 0:30:56.115
<v Speaker 1>always just go through everything. This would have taken a

0:30:56.195 --> 0:30:59.275
<v Speaker 1>moose or two down, an elk, et cetera. It was

0:30:59.315 --> 0:31:03.435
<v Speaker 1>an absolute miracle that someone else didn't get killed. The

0:31:03.515 --> 0:31:07.195
<v Speaker 1>doctor described, kirk bone is quote so healthy and quote

0:31:07.315 --> 0:31:13.715
<v Speaker 1>so impressive that he's like the man of steel. All Right,

0:31:14.155 --> 0:31:16.675
<v Speaker 1>anybody recognized the problem with saying he's the man of

0:31:16.715 --> 0:31:21.955
<v Speaker 1>steel when he's not living anymore. Back to this fantasy

0:31:21.995 --> 0:31:25.835
<v Speaker 1>from Fox News, the spokesman concluded, quote, even in death,

0:31:25.995 --> 0:31:34.595
<v Speaker 1>Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him. Remarkable, miraculous. Ah.

0:31:34.955 --> 0:31:37.875
<v Speaker 1>Of course, they are helped by morons like Thomas Cardinal

0:31:37.915 --> 0:31:41.995
<v Speaker 1>Dolan of New York. First, the Cardinal said he'd never

0:31:41.995 --> 0:31:45.715
<v Speaker 1>heard of Charlie Kirk, and then he said on Fox

0:31:45.715 --> 0:31:49.795
<v Speaker 1>that he had looked at some videos, apparently in order

0:31:49.835 --> 0:31:52.475
<v Speaker 1>to get the guest shot on Fox. Guess which videos

0:31:52.475 --> 0:31:55.515
<v Speaker 1>he looked at? He looked at the Bible ones or

0:31:55.675 --> 0:31:59.155
<v Speaker 1>did he look at the we should stone transgendered people

0:31:59.395 --> 0:32:02.675
<v Speaker 1>and execute Biden and force twelve year olds to watch

0:32:02.715 --> 0:32:06.155
<v Speaker 1>public executions with guillotineans and the ones about the great

0:32:06.155 --> 0:32:09.835
<v Speaker 1>Replacement theory? Which ones do you think he watched? Cardinal

0:32:09.875 --> 0:32:12.955
<v Speaker 1>Gullible added, this guy is a modern day Saint Paul.

0:32:13.195 --> 0:32:15.715
<v Speaker 1>He was a missionary. He's an evangelist, he's a hero.

0:32:15.955 --> 0:32:18.275
<v Speaker 1>He's one I think that knows what Jesus meant when

0:32:18.275 --> 0:32:24.235
<v Speaker 1>he said the truth will set you free. Also, Stone

0:32:24.275 --> 0:32:29.675
<v Speaker 1>a transgendered person today, he said, Cardinal Dolan. Also, you

0:32:29.715 --> 0:32:32.835
<v Speaker 1>know that Charlie Kirk called Pope Francis a Marxist and

0:32:32.915 --> 0:32:37.355
<v Speaker 1>suggested Pope Francis was a heretic, right, and that Kirk's

0:32:37.355 --> 0:32:41.835
<v Speaker 1>first religious mentor was Jerry Folwell, Junior, Jerry, have I

0:32:41.915 --> 0:32:44.635
<v Speaker 1>introduced you to my wife? And if so? Can I

0:32:44.755 --> 0:32:52.235
<v Speaker 1>watch Fallwell Junior? They're not doing this well, the canonization

0:32:52.315 --> 0:32:57.555
<v Speaker 1>of Charlie Kirk. There's Congressman Mike Collins of Georgia blasting

0:32:57.595 --> 0:33:00.275
<v Speaker 1>the fifty eight Democrats who did not vote yes on

0:33:00.395 --> 0:33:03.595
<v Speaker 1>the motion condemning the Kirk murder. And that's when somebody

0:33:03.635 --> 0:33:07.275
<v Speaker 1>told Congressman Mike Collins that he also did not vote

0:33:07.355 --> 0:33:11.675
<v Speaker 1>yes on the motion condemning the Kirk murder. Congressman Collins

0:33:12.035 --> 0:33:16.595
<v Speaker 1>walked off the House floor without casting a vote. He said,

0:33:17.435 --> 0:33:21.475
<v Speaker 1>it was a mistake, Mike, You bet your ass it

0:33:21.475 --> 0:33:25.235
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake. But the winner the all time Lou

0:33:25.315 --> 0:33:29.675
<v Speaker 1>Lou kat Kerr, who is a troubled woman who says

0:33:29.715 --> 0:33:35.315
<v Speaker 1>she is a prophetess. She says she was brought to

0:33:35.395 --> 0:33:40.395
<v Speaker 1>heaven to watch Kirk's ascension. She does not stop to

0:33:40.435 --> 0:33:42.795
<v Speaker 1>explain why they went to such trouble to bring her there,

0:33:42.835 --> 0:33:45.635
<v Speaker 1>and yet still nobody in the afterlife will help her

0:33:45.715 --> 0:33:51.475
<v Speaker 1>at all with her purple red nightmare hair. But she

0:33:51.595 --> 0:33:55.035
<v Speaker 1>did explain that Charlie Kirk's reward in the afterlife was

0:33:55.075 --> 0:34:01.355
<v Speaker 1>a quiver with a thousand arrows of light and a

0:34:01.555 --> 0:34:09.155
<v Speaker 1>large ice cream cone. She says she saw him eating

0:34:09.315 --> 0:34:11.395
<v Speaker 1>an ice cream cone in heaven.

0:34:13.315 --> 0:34:18.955
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, there are so many many terrible, terrible jokes

0:34:19.515 --> 0:34:23.235
<v Speaker 2>available here. I don't even have to lean forward in

0:34:23.275 --> 0:34:26.275
<v Speaker 2>my chair to grab the worst of them. But I

0:34:26.355 --> 0:34:30.355
<v Speaker 2>won't make any of them because I won't make any

0:34:30.395 --> 0:34:31.715
<v Speaker 2>of them even.

0:34:31.515 --> 0:34:40.355
<v Speaker 1>About Charlie Kirk. Now, I'll make them about Nancy Mace.

0:34:40.475 --> 0:34:43.155
<v Speaker 1>Also of interest here add me to the list. I

0:34:43.195 --> 0:34:45.715
<v Speaker 1>think Nancy Mace has announced she's going to end my

0:34:45.915 --> 0:34:49.395
<v Speaker 1>career or she's going to end her career. It was

0:34:49.435 --> 0:34:53.315
<v Speaker 1>a little unclear, Like everything else, she says. This would mean, though,

0:34:53.355 --> 0:34:56.475
<v Speaker 1>if it's me, it's now forty one years in a row,

0:34:56.515 --> 0:34:59.035
<v Speaker 1>that somebody has made a threat to end my career

0:34:59.075 --> 0:35:03.915
<v Speaker 1>and I'm still here eating ice cream and they are

0:35:03.955 --> 0:35:08.995
<v Speaker 1>all gone. In fact, some of them are dead. It's

0:35:09.035 --> 0:35:17.435
<v Speaker 1>a general manager in Boston audios. See you. That's next.

0:35:17.555 --> 0:35:20.595
<v Speaker 2>Oh there's ice cream in heaven large cones.

0:35:22.155 --> 0:35:27.955
<v Speaker 1>This is countdown. This is Countdown with Keith old woman

0:35:48.915 --> 0:35:51.955
<v Speaker 1>still ahead on this edition of Countdown. Good old Nancy Mace,

0:35:53.035 --> 0:35:59.555
<v Speaker 1>half congresswoman, half plastic inflatable doll has retweeted me saying

0:35:59.635 --> 0:36:02.715
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk and Sinclair Broadcasting are both going to hell

0:36:04.115 --> 0:36:07.475
<v Speaker 1>if thet nothing else this week. Attacking Charlie Kirk as

0:36:07.475 --> 0:36:11.395
<v Speaker 1>a guaranteed way to end your career, she wrote apart

0:36:11.435 --> 0:36:14.955
<v Speaker 1>from Nancy leaving a few words out there. I mean,

0:36:14.995 --> 0:36:19.275
<v Speaker 1>I get what she means, but technically she's saying the

0:36:19.515 --> 0:36:23.355
<v Speaker 1>left has has already learned this, and it's I'm not

0:36:24.275 --> 0:36:27.595
<v Speaker 1>sure what she wrote. Anyway. What are you gonna do, Nancy?

0:36:27.595 --> 0:36:31.035
<v Speaker 1>Get me fired from Current TV, get me fired from

0:36:31.075 --> 0:36:37.195
<v Speaker 1>my Disney pension. I'm independent. I literally work for nobody,

0:36:37.635 --> 0:36:39.235
<v Speaker 1>and I have all the money I need for the

0:36:39.275 --> 0:36:40.955
<v Speaker 1>rest of my life until I linger to like one

0:36:41.035 --> 0:36:45.315
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty two plus Nancy. People have been threatening

0:36:45.315 --> 0:36:48.915
<v Speaker 1>to end my career since literally nineteen eighty four. He

0:36:48.995 --> 0:36:52.715
<v Speaker 1>will never again work in this business. The Boston executive

0:36:52.755 --> 0:36:57.355
<v Speaker 1>said to my agent, guess what he's dead now. A

0:36:57.395 --> 0:36:59.995
<v Speaker 1>young writer who wrote My career was over in two

0:36:59.995 --> 0:37:03.155
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one in a national magazine just starting there.

0:37:03.275 --> 0:37:08.715
<v Speaker 1>He's already retired and I could die before this finishes posting.

0:37:08.955 --> 0:37:12.835
<v Speaker 1>But professionally, right now, I'm still here and all of

0:37:12.875 --> 0:37:17.755
<v Speaker 1>them are not. Goodbye, Nancy, Good evening, and welcome to

0:37:17.795 --> 0:37:20.755
<v Speaker 1>the end of my career. Well not yet anyway. Next

0:37:20.755 --> 0:37:23.115
<v Speaker 1>in things I promised not to tell first, believe it

0:37:23.155 --> 0:37:25.275
<v Speaker 1>or not, there's still more new idiots to talk about.

0:37:25.275 --> 0:37:28.555
<v Speaker 1>The roundup of the miscreants, morons and Dunning kruegerffect specimens

0:37:28.875 --> 0:37:35.355
<v Speaker 1>who constitute today's other worst persons in the world, The brons,

0:37:35.435 --> 0:37:38.075
<v Speaker 1>Congress and Randy Fine. Now, every time I think they

0:37:38.115 --> 0:37:41.595
<v Speaker 1>found the dumbest person in America and elected them to Congress,

0:37:42.155 --> 0:37:47.555
<v Speaker 1>we locate a dumber one. Now it's Randy Fine. Now,

0:37:47.675 --> 0:37:51.795
<v Speaker 1>I've slimmed down, but I've been overweight my whole life

0:37:51.875 --> 0:37:54.155
<v Speaker 1>since they took my tonsils out when I was six.

0:37:54.595 --> 0:37:58.995
<v Speaker 1>In retrospect, that was a mistake. Swallowing was difficult. Then

0:37:59.035 --> 0:38:01.555
<v Speaker 1>one day it was not difficult at all, and the

0:38:01.595 --> 0:38:06.075
<v Speaker 1>food began to flow night and day. So I genuinely

0:38:06.195 --> 0:38:11.115
<v Speaker 1>start here talking about Congressman Fine in a place of concern.

0:38:12.115 --> 0:38:13.955
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to pretend to you. I don't

0:38:14.115 --> 0:38:17.435
<v Speaker 1>end in a place of concern. But Congressman Fine is

0:38:17.515 --> 0:38:22.715
<v Speaker 1>like three hundred, three hundred and fifty pounds. He's a

0:38:22.755 --> 0:38:24.395
<v Speaker 1>big guy. I want to tell you I saw him

0:38:24.475 --> 0:38:27.115
<v Speaker 1>sitting on the George Washington Bridge dangling his feet in

0:38:27.115 --> 0:38:30.715
<v Speaker 1>the water. Hey, I'll tell you so. Fine goes on

0:38:30.795 --> 0:38:34.035
<v Speaker 1>CNN and bash is Kimmel quote. We live in a

0:38:34.115 --> 0:38:37.955
<v Speaker 1>world where a meaningful percentage of people now believe violence

0:38:38.155 --> 0:38:44.875
<v Speaker 1>is legitimate as in aside Randy, who did that? Yes, Randy,

0:38:44.995 --> 0:38:48.715
<v Speaker 1>it was Trump. I got to flash back to bo

0:38:48.875 --> 0:38:53.515
<v Speaker 1>Jack Horseman there, Randy, is this your fault? Dana Bash?

0:38:53.555 --> 0:38:56.035
<v Speaker 1>And this might as well have been the lead story today.

0:38:56.395 --> 0:39:01.195
<v Speaker 1>Dana Bash actually pushed back against Randy Fine, which, again,

0:39:01.235 --> 0:39:04.115
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen him, it's quite an accomplishment. Quote

0:39:04.355 --> 0:39:09.275
<v Speaker 1>kim didn't legitimize violence. Fine kept throwing his weight around

0:39:09.635 --> 0:39:12.915
<v Speaker 1>those comments, blaming MAGA for the death of Charlie Kirk. Well,

0:39:13.035 --> 0:39:17.355
<v Speaker 1>Bash interrupted him again, that's not what Kimmel said. Fine

0:39:17.435 --> 0:39:23.115
<v Speaker 1>still finished. I gasped when I read it. Randy is

0:39:23.155 --> 0:39:26.755
<v Speaker 1>one fat guy to another. That gasp that may have

0:39:26.795 --> 0:39:31.315
<v Speaker 1>been caused by something else. See Your Doctor Runner up

0:39:31.355 --> 0:39:36.435
<v Speaker 1>worser Stephen A. Smith. Steven A. Smith has decided he

0:39:36.475 --> 0:39:40.395
<v Speaker 1>is a political commentator. He does a show called an

0:39:40.595 --> 0:39:44.715
<v Speaker 1>XM radio show called straight Shooter. Now that's offensive in

0:39:44.795 --> 0:39:48.155
<v Speaker 1>light of Charlie kirk and in the background of the

0:39:48.235 --> 0:39:51.515
<v Speaker 1>video version of this, there's the capitol. So that makes

0:39:51.595 --> 0:39:55.595
<v Speaker 1>him a political commentator. Again, I don't have any objection

0:39:55.635 --> 0:39:58.795
<v Speaker 1>to anybody going sports to politics. That would be like

0:39:58.875 --> 0:40:01.915
<v Speaker 1>me saying, hey, Randy Fine is a big guy. Oh,

0:40:01.955 --> 0:40:05.715
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit like, No, I get it. I did that,

0:40:05.795 --> 0:40:10.155
<v Speaker 1>I know. But the call in line for people calling

0:40:10.195 --> 0:40:14.595
<v Speaker 1>into the Stephen A. Smith Straight Shooter Show, the number

0:40:14.795 --> 0:40:18.755
<v Speaker 1>ends in one of the letter equivalents P O t US,

0:40:19.315 --> 0:40:23.475
<v Speaker 1>so it's you dial whatever the number is potus. Problem

0:40:23.595 --> 0:40:27.395
<v Speaker 1>is Steve is not doing the work on this to

0:40:27.515 --> 0:40:30.515
<v Speaker 1>use the kids phrase, tell me you didn't actually see

0:40:30.555 --> 0:40:34.235
<v Speaker 1>the Jimmy Kimmel references to Kirk. Without telling me you

0:40:34.315 --> 0:40:38.755
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually see the Jimmy Kimmel references to Kirk, the.

0:40:38.715 --> 0:40:40.795
<v Speaker 4>Only thing that I would say, as it pertains to

0:40:40.875 --> 0:40:42.435
<v Speaker 4>Jimmy Kimmel was where was the joke?

0:40:42.475 --> 0:40:44.955
<v Speaker 2>Because you're a late night host and obviously.

0:40:44.515 --> 0:40:46.915
<v Speaker 4>That has a comedic attachment attachment to it.

0:40:47.235 --> 0:40:54.355
<v Speaker 1>Where was the joke? Obviously it wasn't anything funny about that. However, No,

0:40:54.795 --> 0:40:59.115
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a joke. You're right about that. It wasn't

0:40:59.115 --> 0:41:01.275
<v Speaker 1>a joke on a late night show. Surprise, like when

0:41:01.355 --> 0:41:03.355
<v Speaker 1>Letterman did the first show after nine to eleven and

0:41:03.355 --> 0:41:06.515
<v Speaker 1>he didn't make any jokes. You just back tears and

0:41:06.635 --> 0:41:12.035
<v Speaker 1>the shows that were done after every assassination, and you know,

0:41:12.075 --> 0:41:14.595
<v Speaker 1>the night after Martin Luther King was killed, that Johnny

0:41:14.635 --> 0:41:17.315
<v Speaker 1>Carson didn't do jokes, and then you know they postponed

0:41:17.395 --> 0:41:20.275
<v Speaker 1>these show. When you know Charlie Kirk gets shot, you

0:41:20.355 --> 0:41:23.435
<v Speaker 1>don't go for the joke, even if you're Jimmy Kimmel.

0:41:24.075 --> 0:41:27.155
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't supposed to be a joke. Stephen does not

0:41:27.235 --> 0:41:31.235
<v Speaker 1>get this. Stephen thinks the controversy is that whatever was

0:41:31.315 --> 0:41:34.355
<v Speaker 1>said about Kimmel or by Kimmel about Kirk wasn't funny.

0:41:34.835 --> 0:41:37.235
<v Speaker 1>That's what he thinks was wrong. That's what he really thinks.

0:41:37.275 --> 0:41:42.195
<v Speaker 1>This is about. Where is the joke. Steve doesn't doesn't

0:41:42.435 --> 0:41:46.435
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get this. He went on at length to blame Kimmel.

0:41:47.595 --> 0:41:49.675
<v Speaker 1>I ha note Stephen is after all, paid by the

0:41:49.715 --> 0:41:54.515
<v Speaker 1>people who caved on Kimmel, people like Bob Iger. Steven

0:41:54.595 --> 0:41:58.195
<v Speaker 1>is a company man. Steven explained that Jimmy's failure was

0:41:58.235 --> 0:42:01.635
<v Speaker 1>he didn't understand quote the game that he is playing.

0:42:03.835 --> 0:42:05.915
<v Speaker 1>Steven is a very very simple view of the world,

0:42:05.955 --> 0:42:09.035
<v Speaker 1>as evidence by thinking that everything is a game, and

0:42:09.075 --> 0:42:11.995
<v Speaker 1>that every political show is like every sports show, where

0:42:12.035 --> 0:42:14.675
<v Speaker 1>the point is how much time can you kill without

0:42:14.755 --> 0:42:19.395
<v Speaker 1>saying anything? That's Stephen a Smith's specialty. I mean, honest

0:42:19.395 --> 0:42:21.955
<v Speaker 1>to god, he's one of the all time greats. You

0:42:22.035 --> 0:42:24.275
<v Speaker 1>have one idea and stretch it out the three hours

0:42:24.275 --> 0:42:29.675
<v Speaker 1>a day, that's pretty good. That's his specialty. Anyway, Steve's

0:42:29.755 --> 0:42:33.995
<v Speaker 1>naivete and his unwillingness to do the work, like read

0:42:34.035 --> 0:42:37.675
<v Speaker 1>the quotes, watch the videotape, just have somebody pull it

0:42:37.755 --> 0:42:41.635
<v Speaker 1>up on your gold plated machine for you. His unwillingness

0:42:41.715 --> 0:42:44.355
<v Speaker 1>to do the work is going to be terribly exposed

0:42:44.715 --> 0:42:47.075
<v Speaker 1>in the weeks and months to come, as will the

0:42:47.115 --> 0:42:49.875
<v Speaker 1>fact that all those rumors about people encouraging him to

0:42:49.955 --> 0:42:53.595
<v Speaker 1>run for president as a Democrat, they were all started

0:42:53.635 --> 0:42:57.835
<v Speaker 1>by by him. How do we know this because, as

0:42:57.835 --> 0:43:00.635
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, the number for the telephone call in line

0:43:00.675 --> 0:43:06.475
<v Speaker 1>for listeners ends in botus. He chose that, Steve, you

0:43:06.555 --> 0:43:09.115
<v Speaker 1>need to be a little more subtle. Your political audience

0:43:09.155 --> 0:43:13.075
<v Speaker 1>is not as dumb as your sports audience is. Holy crap,

0:43:13.995 --> 0:43:17.555
<v Speaker 1>But our winner the worst. Speaking of naive Vanity Fair

0:43:17.635 --> 0:43:22.235
<v Speaker 1>magazine editor Mark Guiducci, We've already been through this with

0:43:22.315 --> 0:43:25.715
<v Speaker 1>Mark about the new editor there breaking in by trying

0:43:25.715 --> 0:43:29.435
<v Speaker 1>to put Milania Trump on the cover of Vanity Fair

0:43:29.875 --> 0:43:32.355
<v Speaker 1>and the Vanity Fair staff, which leans a little to

0:43:32.435 --> 0:43:37.275
<v Speaker 1>the left, threatening to walk out. It was thought their

0:43:37.315 --> 0:43:40.995
<v Speaker 1>response might lead this guy Mark to reel himself in

0:43:41.035 --> 0:43:44.435
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It did not. Last week he named

0:43:44.435 --> 0:43:48.115
<v Speaker 1>a new West Coast editor for Vanity Fair, responsible for

0:43:48.155 --> 0:43:51.435
<v Speaker 1>some writing and for quote editing stories across platforms and

0:43:51.475 --> 0:43:56.355
<v Speaker 1>topic areas, with a focus on events, industries and culture

0:43:56.475 --> 0:44:02.435
<v Speaker 1>of the Pacific region. And the new editor is Alivia Newsy.

0:44:03.075 --> 0:44:08.475
<v Speaker 1>She's back now. Look, she's the mother of my dogs,

0:44:09.355 --> 0:44:12.075
<v Speaker 1>at least the two oldest dogs. So I'm not being

0:44:12.155 --> 0:44:15.915
<v Speaker 1>cynical or ironic or anything when I say I will

0:44:15.955 --> 0:44:18.315
<v Speaker 1>always value her for that and my introduction to the

0:44:18.315 --> 0:44:21.035
<v Speaker 1>world of dogs, and if she's ever in real trouble,

0:44:22.435 --> 0:44:25.395
<v Speaker 1>I'll help, no questions asked. I offered that last year,

0:44:26.515 --> 0:44:28.395
<v Speaker 1>reached out to her agent and said, I don't know

0:44:28.435 --> 0:44:31.195
<v Speaker 1>what help I could be, probably none. If she can

0:44:31.235 --> 0:44:34.435
<v Speaker 1>think of anything, it's hers. I do have to figure

0:44:34.435 --> 0:44:37.315
<v Speaker 1>out what to tell the dogs, because when we broke up,

0:44:37.395 --> 0:44:40.195
<v Speaker 1>I told Rose and Stevie that Olivia had gone to

0:44:40.235 --> 0:44:44.675
<v Speaker 1>live on a farm upstate. But she wants to make

0:44:44.675 --> 0:44:52.355
<v Speaker 1>a comeback after the whole RFK Junior disaster. I'm fine

0:44:52.355 --> 0:44:55.555
<v Speaker 1>with it. Maybe she learned something from a mistake everybody

0:44:55.595 --> 0:44:58.395
<v Speaker 1>does eventually after mistake number nine hundred, one hopes one

0:44:58.395 --> 0:45:01.155
<v Speaker 1>would learn from that mistake. Any who, she did what

0:45:01.235 --> 0:45:04.435
<v Speaker 1>I always recommend in that situation, she waited. She waited

0:45:04.675 --> 0:45:09.915
<v Speaker 1>nearly a year plus. Selfishly. This lets me remind people

0:45:09.915 --> 0:45:14.195
<v Speaker 1>that it turned out who knew that when we broke up?

0:45:14.235 --> 0:45:19.955
<v Speaker 1>I was too young for her. However, the reaction in

0:45:19.995 --> 0:45:24.395
<v Speaker 1>writing circles has not been as forgiving two writers on

0:45:24.515 --> 0:45:29.675
<v Speaker 1>Blue Sky. These guys made me gfaw Andrew Dignan or Dingion.

0:45:29.795 --> 0:45:34.755
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Vanity Fair bringing Newsy on to cover the all

0:45:34.875 --> 0:45:41.155
<v Speaker 1>important who's sending first traps southeast to members of Trump's cabinet?

0:45:41.315 --> 0:45:46.915
<v Speaker 1>Beat oh oh, oh, man, I can see this is

0:45:46.955 --> 0:45:54.835
<v Speaker 1>going away soon. And then Colin Dicky uh, obviously an

0:45:54.835 --> 0:45:59.075
<v Speaker 1>expert on this subject. I'm sorry, Vanity Fair. Hiring Newsy

0:45:59.195 --> 0:46:02.035
<v Speaker 1>is such a effing gut punch to all the great

0:46:02.155 --> 0:46:06.795
<v Speaker 1>underemployed journalists out there who don't sext with their sources, which,

0:46:06.875 --> 0:46:10.435
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, is pretty much everyone except Olivia Nowsy.

0:46:11.475 --> 0:46:14.475
<v Speaker 1>Oh oh, and you thought I had complaints about her?

0:46:15.035 --> 0:46:20.555
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, Oh Mark, what if I just cut out

0:46:20.595 --> 0:46:24.355
<v Speaker 1>the pretense and named her West Coast sexting editor Guiducci,

0:46:25.555 --> 0:46:30.875
<v Speaker 1>good luck with being Olivia's boss, Today's other worst person

0:46:32.155 --> 0:46:33.235
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

0:46:34.915 --> 0:46:36.075
<v Speaker 2>Call me anytime.

0:46:56.355 --> 0:47:00.515
<v Speaker 1>Oh so, here we go again. As I mentioned an

0:47:00.555 --> 0:47:08.315
<v Speaker 1>offhand comment or retweet by plastic Woman Congresswoman Nancy mace Of,

0:47:09.275 --> 0:47:14.435
<v Speaker 1>I forgot Stupidville has now joined the list of people

0:47:14.475 --> 0:47:17.115
<v Speaker 1>who have promised to end my career or how I

0:47:17.115 --> 0:47:21.035
<v Speaker 1>should know that if you criticize Charlie Kirk, sat Charlie

0:47:21.035 --> 0:47:24.675
<v Speaker 1>of Kirk, your career is over. All I can say

0:47:24.795 --> 0:47:29.835
<v Speaker 1>is madam, take a number. We'll call you when we

0:47:29.915 --> 0:47:33.595
<v Speaker 1>are ready. I'm still dealing with the other three or

0:47:33.635 --> 0:47:35.955
<v Speaker 1>four dozen people who have told me in the last

0:47:35.995 --> 0:47:41.275
<v Speaker 1>forty one years that my career is now over. To

0:47:41.315 --> 0:47:43.835
<v Speaker 1>our number one story on the countdown, and good evening,

0:47:43.875 --> 0:47:47.635
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the end of our careers, or more

0:47:47.675 --> 0:47:51.755
<v Speaker 1>particularly the end of my career. No, I'm not retiring.

0:47:51.795 --> 0:47:54.915
<v Speaker 1>I'm just quoting myself from nineteen ninety three in the

0:47:54.995 --> 0:47:59.675
<v Speaker 1>launch of ESPN two and the subject of career ending announcements.

0:48:00.315 --> 0:48:04.395
<v Speaker 1>Career ending announcements. Recently, a colleague of mine told me

0:48:04.435 --> 0:48:07.315
<v Speaker 1>he was done, and I had to go through all

0:48:07.435 --> 0:48:11.555
<v Speaker 1>of the times I have been told I was done.

0:48:11.635 --> 0:48:15.515
<v Speaker 1>The first one was in nineteen eighty four. This would

0:48:15.555 --> 0:48:17.835
<v Speaker 1>be in a previous century that I know. To a

0:48:17.875 --> 0:48:20.715
<v Speaker 1>lot of younger listeners, seems like it might as well

0:48:20.755 --> 0:48:23.355
<v Speaker 1>be eighteen eighty four. I have told before the story

0:48:23.395 --> 0:48:26.955
<v Speaker 1>of my limited career in Boston, for which I waited

0:48:26.995 --> 0:48:29.715
<v Speaker 1>about a year to start and lasted about half as

0:48:29.795 --> 0:48:32.955
<v Speaker 1>long because I went to work at the wrong place,

0:48:33.075 --> 0:48:36.635
<v Speaker 1>in the wrong city, outside in the wrong suburb of Boston,

0:48:36.915 --> 0:48:40.755
<v Speaker 1>with the wrong boss, where they said, don't make any jokes,

0:48:40.755 --> 0:48:42.395
<v Speaker 1>and I said, what did you hire me for? And

0:48:42.435 --> 0:48:45.275
<v Speaker 1>I left very very quickly, and then they tried to

0:48:45.315 --> 0:48:48.515
<v Speaker 1>fire me while I was filling out the terms of

0:48:48.515 --> 0:48:51.115
<v Speaker 1>my contract and staying there until they could get a replacement.

0:48:51.155 --> 0:48:53.555
<v Speaker 1>And the whole thing went up in flames. And the

0:48:53.595 --> 0:48:56.595
<v Speaker 1>result of this was that the news director of the

0:48:56.635 --> 0:49:00.155
<v Speaker 1>station Channel five in Boston, a man who actually answered

0:49:00.155 --> 0:49:04.235
<v Speaker 1>to the name Philip Scribner Balboni, went to the Boston

0:49:04.275 --> 0:49:07.955
<v Speaker 1>Globe TV sportswriter when they had such things as TV sportswriters,

0:49:08.355 --> 0:49:10.955
<v Speaker 1>and said, oh, it was such a shame about Keith.

0:49:10.995 --> 0:49:14.435
<v Speaker 1>He was potentially such a major talent. I will not

0:49:14.555 --> 0:49:18.075
<v Speaker 1>deny that the use of that phrase did inspire me

0:49:18.275 --> 0:49:21.475
<v Speaker 1>to some degree to get cracking on my career. On

0:49:21.515 --> 0:49:23.995
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, I didn't work for nearly a year later,

0:49:24.035 --> 0:49:26.315
<v Speaker 1>as I was taking care of some family business back

0:49:26.355 --> 0:49:28.835
<v Speaker 1>home and sort of put everything about my own interest

0:49:28.915 --> 0:49:32.715
<v Speaker 1>on the shelf. Off the record, the general manager of

0:49:32.755 --> 0:49:35.515
<v Speaker 1>the station I had worked for, a man named James Coppersmith,

0:49:35.755 --> 0:49:38.595
<v Speaker 1>said to my agent something that made Balbony's statement look

0:49:38.675 --> 0:49:42.755
<v Speaker 1>like a compliment. Coppersmith said, he will never again work

0:49:42.795 --> 0:49:47.275
<v Speaker 1>in our business. That got me motivated. I believe I

0:49:47.315 --> 0:49:51.355
<v Speaker 1>read recently that Coppersmith died. In any event, I worked

0:49:51.355 --> 0:49:55.115
<v Speaker 1>again in his business. The punchline to this one, and

0:49:55.155 --> 0:49:58.715
<v Speaker 1>they all have punchlines, is that at some point around

0:49:58.835 --> 0:50:03.195
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven, I got an email at MSNBC

0:50:03.835 --> 0:50:08.075
<v Speaker 1>and the return of was Philip Scribner Balboni, and there

0:50:08.155 --> 0:50:10.955
<v Speaker 1>was a great email from my old brief news director

0:50:10.995 --> 0:50:14.075
<v Speaker 1>Boston Channel five in Boston, who explained that I had

0:50:14.075 --> 0:50:16.795
<v Speaker 1>been potentially such a major talent and was quoted on

0:50:16.835 --> 0:50:19.315
<v Speaker 1>the record as saying that. And now he was saying

0:50:19.315 --> 0:50:22.155
<v Speaker 1>how he watched Countdown every night and was so proud

0:50:22.555 --> 0:50:25.035
<v Speaker 1>to have been in there at the start of my career.

0:50:25.515 --> 0:50:29.475
<v Speaker 1>Not a word about the other part, about the oh,

0:50:29.515 --> 0:50:32.595
<v Speaker 1>potentially such a major talent. I guess he meant it

0:50:32.595 --> 0:50:36.915
<v Speaker 1>in the past future, perfect sense of the I don't know,

0:50:36.995 --> 0:50:40.475
<v Speaker 1>my grammar education is not what it should be. But

0:50:40.595 --> 0:50:42.595
<v Speaker 1>he managed to wriggle out of it. Never made any

0:50:42.635 --> 0:50:46.435
<v Speaker 1>reference to it. And the one thing about surviving repeated

0:50:46.475 --> 0:50:51.155
<v Speaker 1>announcements that your career is over is to never really

0:50:51.155 --> 0:50:53.715
<v Speaker 1>go back and criticize the people who were wrong about it,

0:50:53.795 --> 0:50:57.275
<v Speaker 1>because they know they were wrong, and your success is

0:50:57.395 --> 0:51:00.595
<v Speaker 1>the best answer. Nevertheless, this all came up, and I

0:51:00.635 --> 0:51:03.475
<v Speaker 1>thought i'd retell it to you because I had to

0:51:03.515 --> 0:51:05.875
<v Speaker 1>retell it to a friend who recently told me his

0:51:05.955 --> 0:51:08.635
<v Speaker 1>career was over. But as I said, that was just

0:51:08.715 --> 0:51:11.115
<v Speaker 1>the first time that had ever happened in a fully

0:51:11.155 --> 0:51:14.195
<v Speaker 1>professional setting. In two thousand and one, and I was

0:51:14.395 --> 0:51:17.835
<v Speaker 1>just reading this, I guess about a year ago. I

0:51:17.955 --> 0:51:21.675
<v Speaker 1>came across it somewhere online. I was reading it for

0:51:21.915 --> 0:51:24.475
<v Speaker 1>a punchline in and of itself. It was a piece

0:51:24.595 --> 0:51:28.155
<v Speaker 1>in Sports illustrated by a man named Chris Ballard, I believe,

0:51:28.715 --> 0:51:31.555
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Baward wrote an article about my being fired

0:51:31.595 --> 0:51:35.635
<v Speaker 1>by Fox Sports, which he wrote as I had resigned

0:51:35.675 --> 0:51:38.715
<v Speaker 1>from Fox Sports, and went on to explain that I

0:51:38.755 --> 0:51:42.195
<v Speaker 1>did not respond as Sports Illustrated's request by emails and

0:51:42.315 --> 0:51:45.115
<v Speaker 1>phones for comment. I never received any of them because

0:51:45.155 --> 0:51:47.755
<v Speaker 1>it never occurred to him that when they fired me

0:51:48.195 --> 0:51:51.395
<v Speaker 1>and told everybody I had resigned, they cut off my

0:51:51.475 --> 0:51:55.035
<v Speaker 1>access to my email and my phone, and they said

0:51:55.035 --> 0:51:57.635
<v Speaker 1>to him when he wanted to talk to me, oh,

0:51:57.155 --> 0:51:59.235
<v Speaker 1>just send him an email. He'll get back to you.

0:51:59.315 --> 0:52:01.475
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't, and thus he made me look like

0:52:01.515 --> 0:52:04.955
<v Speaker 1>a jerk. In any event, The article explained in two

0:52:04.955 --> 0:52:08.195
<v Speaker 1>thousand and one that having gone through ESPN and now

0:52:08.475 --> 0:52:13.875
<v Speaker 1>ESPN's sort of mini me rival, Fox Sports News, that

0:52:13.915 --> 0:52:15.835
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing left for me to do in the business.

0:52:15.955 --> 0:52:18.755
<v Speaker 1>I had tried news briefly in nineteen ninety seven and

0:52:18.875 --> 0:52:22.195
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety eight. Clearly my career in both fields was over.

0:52:22.515 --> 0:52:25.355
<v Speaker 1>I could not possibly work again in television, in news

0:52:25.515 --> 0:52:29.355
<v Speaker 1>or in sports. We're now coming up next year if

0:52:29.395 --> 0:52:32.755
<v Speaker 1>I get to it. Well, it's been twenty three, twenty

0:52:32.795 --> 0:52:37.795
<v Speaker 1>four year. Okay. I recently saw this article and was

0:52:37.835 --> 0:52:41.675
<v Speaker 1>inspired to look for it online because Chris Ballard was

0:52:41.835 --> 0:52:48.275
<v Speaker 1>retiring from Sports Illustrated and I'm still here one question

0:52:48.315 --> 0:52:50.475
<v Speaker 1>that came up as I was retelling the story of

0:52:50.515 --> 0:52:53.395
<v Speaker 1>my various career ending moments that did not in fact

0:52:53.515 --> 0:52:56.875
<v Speaker 1>end my career from my friend who's very worried about this,

0:52:57.875 --> 0:53:00.715
<v Speaker 1>was how I managed not to have my career. And

0:53:01.195 --> 0:53:07.115
<v Speaker 1>when Ballard's premise was not completely wrong, he was certainly

0:53:07.115 --> 0:53:10.315
<v Speaker 1>looking at what he thought happened in television. He was

0:53:10.355 --> 0:53:13.595
<v Speaker 1>not the TV sports writer for Sports Illustrated for very long.

0:53:13.635 --> 0:53:16.275
<v Speaker 1>It was not a natural subject for him. Most people

0:53:16.315 --> 0:53:20.035
<v Speaker 1>who did this job thought that it involved simply watching

0:53:20.075 --> 0:53:22.515
<v Speaker 1>sports on TV and then writing what they thought as

0:53:22.555 --> 0:53:26.195
<v Speaker 1>opposed to understanding an industry or its complexities, or its

0:53:26.235 --> 0:53:31.715
<v Speaker 1>parameters or its sort of weird voodoo customs. In any event,

0:53:32.275 --> 0:53:35.195
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, look, it's not very difficult to survive

0:53:35.275 --> 0:53:38.315
<v Speaker 1>these things. You just have to acknowledge that perhaps your

0:53:38.435 --> 0:53:42.315
<v Speaker 1>next job, after some sort of cataclysmic departure from an

0:53:42.555 --> 0:53:45.755
<v Speaker 1>ESPN or a Fox Sports or an MSNBC or wherever else,

0:53:46.195 --> 0:53:48.915
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it's not going to pay you quite as much

0:53:48.995 --> 0:53:53.035
<v Speaker 1>as the last one did. And so, when my agent

0:53:53.075 --> 0:53:55.075
<v Speaker 1>and I began to look around for more work in

0:53:55.115 --> 0:53:57.115
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, and I might add that after

0:53:57.155 --> 0:53:59.315
<v Speaker 1>Fox fired me, they had to pay me for another

0:53:59.355 --> 0:54:01.715
<v Speaker 1>eight months at one hundred thousand dollars a year. And

0:54:01.835 --> 0:54:05.595
<v Speaker 1>if you can't survive on a job requires you to

0:54:05.715 --> 0:54:08.515
<v Speaker 1>do nothing for eight months and pays you eight hundred

0:54:08.555 --> 0:54:11.795
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars that you can salt away. If you can't

0:54:11.835 --> 0:54:14.715
<v Speaker 1>survive on that and enjoy your life while you're doing it,

0:54:15.115 --> 0:54:19.875
<v Speaker 1>you're doing things wrong. In any event, what I said

0:54:19.995 --> 0:54:22.075
<v Speaker 1>was just the next job. Just take a job that

0:54:22.595 --> 0:54:24.595
<v Speaker 1>allows you to do what you can do and do

0:54:24.675 --> 0:54:27.955
<v Speaker 1>it well, and you will succeed in it. You have

0:54:28.115 --> 0:54:30.835
<v Speaker 1>talent a lot of other people don't. You will be

0:54:31.195 --> 0:54:33.795
<v Speaker 1>low costs, so they're much more likely to overlook anything

0:54:33.795 --> 0:54:36.995
<v Speaker 1>that happened in the past, and most importantly, if it

0:54:37.075 --> 0:54:39.315
<v Speaker 1>is successful, you can then hold them up on the

0:54:39.315 --> 0:54:43.555
<v Speaker 1>second contract negotiation. So I went first to CNN after

0:54:43.595 --> 0:54:46.675
<v Speaker 1>the Fox Sports experience started to work for them for

0:54:47.075 --> 0:54:50.035
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of money, and although they did not

0:54:50.195 --> 0:54:53.075
<v Speaker 1>ultimately exercise this, they signed me to a contract to

0:54:53.115 --> 0:54:55.915
<v Speaker 1>do the eight PM show on CNN for a certain

0:54:55.995 --> 0:54:58.195
<v Speaker 1>large amount of money, and there were two finalists they

0:54:58.235 --> 0:55:00.395
<v Speaker 1>wanted us lined up in advance, and they made the

0:55:00.395 --> 0:55:04.475
<v Speaker 1>clever decision to choose Connie Chung instead of me, but

0:55:05.115 --> 0:55:08.875
<v Speaker 1>they had sort of reauthorized me. They had re established me.

0:55:08.995 --> 0:55:11.555
<v Speaker 1>By it was well known within the industry that I

0:55:11.715 --> 0:55:13.795
<v Speaker 1>was the runner up for the job at eight o'clock,

0:55:14.115 --> 0:55:17.075
<v Speaker 1>and within six months of them saying, nah, we think

0:55:17.155 --> 0:55:19.595
<v Speaker 1>Connie's the right person to lead us into the future here,

0:55:19.875 --> 0:55:22.435
<v Speaker 1>within six months of that, I was doing the eight

0:55:22.475 --> 0:55:26.395
<v Speaker 1>o'clock show on MSNBC for in fact, twice what the

0:55:26.435 --> 0:55:29.315
<v Speaker 1>agreement had been at CNN, And within three years they'd

0:55:29.355 --> 0:55:31.155
<v Speaker 1>signed me to a new deal that was worth three

0:55:31.195 --> 0:55:33.675
<v Speaker 1>times that more than I had ever made in my life.

0:55:33.995 --> 0:55:36.755
<v Speaker 1>So the key thing to it is to be flexible financially.

0:55:37.315 --> 0:55:39.715
<v Speaker 1>You sock them for the money while you're successful. And

0:55:39.755 --> 0:55:43.235
<v Speaker 1>then by the way, once again, if you can't succeed

0:55:43.355 --> 0:55:46.475
<v Speaker 1>in the business, if you can't succeed in life, when

0:55:46.555 --> 0:55:52.155
<v Speaker 1>you have received in one year anything north of three

0:55:52.195 --> 0:55:55.315
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in one year, four million dollars, maybe I

0:55:55.355 --> 0:55:58.195
<v Speaker 1>forget what the actual financial floor is. But if you've

0:55:58.235 --> 0:56:01.155
<v Speaker 1>made that much money in one year and can't live

0:56:01.475 --> 0:56:06.035
<v Speaker 1>basically off that and simply in interest from the bank

0:56:06.275 --> 0:56:08.715
<v Speaker 1>that that will provide you, if you can't do that,

0:56:10.235 --> 0:56:13.635
<v Speaker 1>you must have some sort of addiction to drugs, because

0:56:13.955 --> 0:56:17.715
<v Speaker 1>guess what, you can go a long way still. I mean, yeah,

0:56:17.835 --> 0:56:20.835
<v Speaker 1>it's true, four million dollars is what it used to be,

0:56:20.915 --> 0:56:23.715
<v Speaker 1>but guess what it is now. It's still really good.

0:56:24.835 --> 0:56:27.115
<v Speaker 1>I never failed to see one of these articles in

0:56:27.155 --> 0:56:30.275
<v Speaker 1>which somebody who's lost a job paying in you know,

0:56:30.355 --> 0:56:33.275
<v Speaker 1>the tens of millions of dollars, and I always finished.

0:56:33.275 --> 0:56:37.035
<v Speaker 1>Now It's like, yes, he's finished. Now he can sit

0:56:37.075 --> 0:56:39.635
<v Speaker 1>on a beach, he can hire somebody to do his

0:56:39.715 --> 0:56:42.595
<v Speaker 1>exercise for him. He can sit on a beach and

0:56:43.955 --> 0:56:46.435
<v Speaker 1>eat the money, and it won't make a difference. He

0:56:46.475 --> 0:56:49.595
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to do it again in any event. So

0:56:49.915 --> 0:56:53.355
<v Speaker 1>the pattern here that I have described already has continued

0:56:53.395 --> 0:56:56.075
<v Speaker 1>in subsequent years, even after I came back from the

0:56:56.115 --> 0:56:59.035
<v Speaker 1>dead after my experience in Boston, where I was dubbed

0:56:59.115 --> 0:57:02.875
<v Speaker 1>the dark prints of TV Sports and was winning awards

0:57:02.875 --> 0:57:06.115
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles the next year. Although, to be fair,

0:57:06.475 --> 0:57:08.955
<v Speaker 1>after that quote in nineteen eighty four about how I

0:57:08.995 --> 0:57:11.755
<v Speaker 1>was potentially a great talent, I did get down to

0:57:11.795 --> 0:57:14.755
<v Speaker 1>about my last one hundred dollars in the bank, and

0:57:14.875 --> 0:57:18.955
<v Speaker 1>actually I actually had to borrow money from my dear

0:57:19.035 --> 0:57:22.235
<v Speaker 1>sister to get on the bus to take me to

0:57:22.355 --> 0:57:25.195
<v Speaker 1>the airport in New York so I could take the

0:57:25.235 --> 0:57:28.195
<v Speaker 1>flight to Los Angeles to start my job there. That's

0:57:28.235 --> 0:57:30.795
<v Speaker 1>how close I cut it. Another week and I would

0:57:30.795 --> 0:57:33.795
<v Speaker 1>have been borrowing money for food. That's where I was.

0:57:34.115 --> 0:57:36.435
<v Speaker 1>But you have to be willing to walk that tight

0:57:36.515 --> 0:57:39.435
<v Speaker 1>rope to pull this off in any event. So that

0:57:39.595 --> 0:57:42.315
<v Speaker 1>was Boston became the Los Angeles job, and the Los

0:57:42.355 --> 0:57:44.715
<v Speaker 1>Angeles job. When they eliminated that, it's like, well, his

0:57:44.795 --> 0:57:48.275
<v Speaker 1>career is over now. The next job was ESPN. ESPN

0:57:48.355 --> 0:57:51.395
<v Speaker 1>led to NBC. When that didn't work out and I

0:57:51.515 --> 0:57:53.475
<v Speaker 1>pushed to get out of there, they sold me to

0:57:53.515 --> 0:57:55.395
<v Speaker 1>Fox for a million dollars and they paid me a

0:57:55.395 --> 0:57:57.035
<v Speaker 1>lot of money and continued to pay me a lot

0:57:57.075 --> 0:57:58.995
<v Speaker 1>of money even after they stopped putting me on TV.

0:58:00.155 --> 0:58:02.675
<v Speaker 1>And that led to a doldrum period where I got

0:58:02.675 --> 0:58:05.155
<v Speaker 1>to read about the guy who's now retired from Sports

0:58:05.195 --> 0:58:08.835
<v Speaker 1>Illustrated explaining what network will sign him now, what team

0:58:08.915 --> 0:58:12.315
<v Speaker 1>will sign him now? Whither Keith? This is two thousand

0:58:12.355 --> 0:58:15.115
<v Speaker 1>and one. I was forty two years old. It's like

0:58:15.155 --> 0:58:18.475
<v Speaker 1>I get nostalgic reading that, going, yeah, you were forty

0:58:18.515 --> 0:58:20.955
<v Speaker 1>two years old. They fired you at that point people

0:58:20.955 --> 0:58:23.835
<v Speaker 1>thought your career was over. Yeah, but I was forty two.

0:58:24.915 --> 0:58:29.315
<v Speaker 1>My hair was dark most places in any event, So

0:58:29.555 --> 0:58:32.875
<v Speaker 1>that led into the MSNBC job, and the MSNBC job,

0:58:33.235 --> 0:58:36.395
<v Speaker 1>as sort of messy as that ended, the second one,

0:58:36.435 --> 0:58:40.515
<v Speaker 1>anyway led to the Current TV job, and as disastrous

0:58:40.555 --> 0:58:43.235
<v Speaker 1>as that was, since it was kind of a confidence trick,

0:58:44.155 --> 0:58:46.835
<v Speaker 1>there was a day where between the money I got

0:58:46.875 --> 0:58:49.115
<v Speaker 1>for leaving NBC and the money I got for joining

0:58:49.115 --> 0:58:51.875
<v Speaker 1>Current TV, I made sixty eight million dollars in one day.

0:58:52.515 --> 0:58:54.635
<v Speaker 1>I had to sew a lot of people afterwards to

0:58:54.675 --> 0:58:57.035
<v Speaker 1>get all of it, but I got just about all

0:58:57.075 --> 0:59:00.635
<v Speaker 1>of it. In any event, I'm now boasting back to

0:59:00.675 --> 0:59:03.475
<v Speaker 1>the point of this whole story. An old friend of

0:59:03.515 --> 0:59:05.675
<v Speaker 1>mine came in when I was doing the videos for

0:59:05.835 --> 0:59:09.355
<v Speaker 1>GQ The Closer and The Resistance in twenty sixteen. In

0:59:09.395 --> 0:59:12.475
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, came in to watch me do this and

0:59:12.555 --> 0:59:16.835
<v Speaker 1>started to ask very very graciously and very gently about, well,

0:59:16.875 --> 0:59:19.595
<v Speaker 1>isn't this something of a come down for you from

0:59:19.755 --> 0:59:23.435
<v Speaker 1>the MSNBC experience where you had a staff, And I said, well,

0:59:23.435 --> 0:59:28.635
<v Speaker 1>first off, the MSNBC experience consisted of two cameramen and

0:59:28.715 --> 0:59:32.755
<v Speaker 1>a floor director and me and sometimes a guest in

0:59:32.795 --> 0:59:37.435
<v Speaker 1>a studio. The staff, whereas they were all certainly dedicated

0:59:37.435 --> 0:59:40.435
<v Speaker 1>to the project, consisted of basically a core of six

0:59:40.555 --> 0:59:44.035
<v Speaker 1>or seven people. It never really felt like a big deal.

0:59:44.155 --> 0:59:46.915
<v Speaker 1>I know it had more influence than I was ever

0:59:47.035 --> 0:59:51.395
<v Speaker 1>led to understand, but it wasn't like, oh, well, you

0:59:51.435 --> 0:59:53.875
<v Speaker 1>know those movies that you did with Richard Burton and

0:59:53.875 --> 0:59:57.115
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Taylor and Tom Cruise, and now you're just sitting

0:59:57.115 --> 1:00:00.235
<v Speaker 1>at home with a camera. It didn't have that feel

1:00:00.275 --> 1:00:02.715
<v Speaker 1>in the slightest. And I said to him, did you

1:00:02.755 --> 1:00:05.395
<v Speaker 1>see the thing from CBS News the other day? And

1:00:05.395 --> 1:00:07.595
<v Speaker 1>he went, what thing from CBS News? I said, don't

1:00:07.635 --> 1:00:09.675
<v Speaker 1>you have the Google at the New York Times? And

1:00:09.715 --> 1:00:15.115
<v Speaker 1>he said yes. I said, Google, Social Flow, Facebook, and

1:00:15.195 --> 1:00:18.235
<v Speaker 1>he did on his phone and he read this political

1:00:18.235 --> 1:00:20.875
<v Speaker 1>pundit Keith Alderman found a way to channel concerns about

1:00:20.915 --> 1:00:24.035
<v Speaker 1>mister Trump. This is July twenty seventeen, started hosting a

1:00:24.075 --> 1:00:27.315
<v Speaker 1>series of political commentary and special interviews titled The Resistance

1:00:27.355 --> 1:00:30.515
<v Speaker 1>with Keith Olderman, with the first episode featured on GQ

1:00:30.715 --> 1:00:35.875
<v Speaker 1>on November sixteenth, twenty sixteen, reaching fifty four million people

1:00:36.155 --> 1:00:40.395
<v Speaker 1>equivalent to one in six Americans, And I said, look,

1:00:40.995 --> 1:00:44.315
<v Speaker 1>I understand that if you measure things solely by the

1:00:44.355 --> 1:00:47.315
<v Speaker 1>idea that I'm on your TV every night, Well, yeah,

1:00:47.395 --> 1:00:50.075
<v Speaker 1>that the doing a video and coming into a studio

1:00:50.155 --> 1:00:52.475
<v Speaker 1>that isn't really designed for TV and there's an echo

1:00:52.555 --> 1:00:54.675
<v Speaker 1>in it might seem like the end of my career.

1:00:54.835 --> 1:00:59.035
<v Speaker 1>Fifty four million people saw that video and interacted with

1:00:59.115 --> 1:01:02.315
<v Speaker 1>it in some kind. They either forwarded it, or watched it,

1:01:02.635 --> 1:01:05.475
<v Speaker 1>or put a comment on it, or sometimes all three.

1:01:05.635 --> 1:01:10.435
<v Speaker 1>That was, in fact the number one political video or

1:01:10.515 --> 1:01:13.955
<v Speaker 1>story on Facebook in the period of time after Donald

1:01:13.995 --> 1:01:17.515
<v Speaker 1>Trump's election. I think that's something of a success. And

1:01:17.555 --> 1:01:19.835
<v Speaker 1>I said, by this point, I don't need the damn money.

1:01:19.955 --> 1:01:22.595
<v Speaker 1>The money I'm making from doing this is going to

1:01:22.675 --> 1:01:26.595
<v Speaker 1>dog charities. Okay, So we could go on at length

1:01:26.635 --> 1:01:29.555
<v Speaker 1>about other small versions of that. I once went back

1:01:29.595 --> 1:01:31.395
<v Speaker 1>and forth with this guy who now is one of

1:01:31.395 --> 1:01:34.875
<v Speaker 1>the people at Puck News who insisted that I had

1:01:34.915 --> 1:01:38.915
<v Speaker 1>not been negotiating with the then chairman of NBC Jeff Schell,

1:01:39.115 --> 1:01:43.195
<v Speaker 1>about returning to MSNBC in twenty nineteen twenty and twenty one,

1:01:43.515 --> 1:01:47.035
<v Speaker 1>because NBC News had insisted it wasn't true. And I said,

1:01:47.075 --> 1:01:49.875
<v Speaker 1>who told you that, and they said a spokesman. And

1:01:49.915 --> 1:01:52.155
<v Speaker 1>I said to this guy, his name was Dylan Byers,

1:01:52.595 --> 1:01:54.875
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, who was the spokesman. Well, it's just

1:01:55.115 --> 1:01:56.915
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a spokesman, I said. So. They wouldn't

1:01:56.915 --> 1:01:59.235
<v Speaker 1>even put their own name on it, not even a

1:01:59.355 --> 1:02:03.235
<v Speaker 1>made up name Jim Jones, NBC News spokesman, which would

1:02:03.235 --> 1:02:06.195
<v Speaker 1>have been, by the way, appropriate name for a series

1:02:06.235 --> 1:02:09.835
<v Speaker 1>of NBC News spokespeople. They didn't even do that. And

1:02:09.875 --> 1:02:12.355
<v Speaker 1>he said no. They were insistent, there's never been any

1:02:12.395 --> 1:02:14.875
<v Speaker 1>contact between you and Jeff Shell. And I went hang on,

1:02:15.515 --> 1:02:18.555
<v Speaker 1>and I called up from my phone twenty three emails

1:02:18.555 --> 1:02:22.115
<v Speaker 1>and texts from Jeff Shell. I photo shot at them,

1:02:22.155 --> 1:02:24.355
<v Speaker 1>I screen shotted them and gave him to the guy.

1:02:24.755 --> 1:02:27.395
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think this guy Buyers has recovered since

1:02:27.955 --> 1:02:32.395
<v Speaker 1>his worldview was totally destroyed. He was writing a story

1:02:32.435 --> 1:02:35.235
<v Speaker 1>about how I had deteriorated to the point where I

1:02:35.315 --> 1:02:39.035
<v Speaker 1>was hallucinating about being in contact with Jeff Shell from

1:02:39.155 --> 1:02:43.155
<v Speaker 1>NBC News or from NBC about returning to NBC News

1:02:43.235 --> 1:02:46.275
<v Speaker 1>and MSNBC when we were deep into negotiations about it,

1:02:46.475 --> 1:02:49.235
<v Speaker 1>and we're delayed only by the pandemic. And as I

1:02:49.315 --> 1:02:52.915
<v Speaker 1>pointed out here before the vetos of certain people working

1:02:52.955 --> 1:02:55.755
<v Speaker 1>on the air at MSNBC, most of whose careers I started.

1:02:55.915 --> 1:02:59.675
<v Speaker 1>But that's another story which I've already discussed. His whole

1:02:59.755 --> 1:03:03.915
<v Speaker 1>worldview was shattered by this because should do be He

1:03:04.035 --> 1:03:08.675
<v Speaker 1>could not comprehend that an NBC News spokesperson would lie

1:03:08.755 --> 1:03:11.195
<v Speaker 1>to him, And he really said this. He said, I

1:03:11.235 --> 1:03:13.795
<v Speaker 1>don't understand why would they lie to me? And I said,

1:03:13.835 --> 1:03:15.995
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to understand that the idea that they

1:03:16.035 --> 1:03:18.195
<v Speaker 1>would not put their own name on this statement might

1:03:18.235 --> 1:03:21.275
<v Speaker 1>have suggested to you that they were lying to you. Oh,

1:03:21.515 --> 1:03:23.515
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep that in mind. Well, he didn't keep that

1:03:23.555 --> 1:03:25.955
<v Speaker 1>in mind. But that's again another story about Dylan Byers,

1:03:25.955 --> 1:03:31.315
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get to him somedayday too, somewhere soon. Somebody

1:03:31.435 --> 1:03:34.635
<v Speaker 1>asked towards the end of July twenty twenty four about

1:03:34.675 --> 1:03:37.675
<v Speaker 1>my recent comeback and how I'd just gotten back into

1:03:37.715 --> 1:03:41.715
<v Speaker 1>political commentary now with the new podcast, and I said,

1:03:42.235 --> 1:03:47.075
<v Speaker 1>it's two years old. On August first, it was approaching

1:03:47.155 --> 1:03:52.235
<v Speaker 1>five hundred episodes. We're doing like a million listens a week,

1:03:52.355 --> 1:03:58.275
<v Speaker 1>a million audience participants a week. I mean, it's challenging

1:03:58.355 --> 1:04:02.395
<v Speaker 1>certain hours on CNN for total audience. Good God, what

1:04:02.435 --> 1:04:06.475
<v Speaker 1>do you mean recent comeback? But this is, as I said,

1:04:06.555 --> 1:04:09.075
<v Speaker 1>if I had ten million dollars for every time somebody

1:04:09.075 --> 1:04:15.395
<v Speaker 1>told me my career was over, A career is sort

1:04:15.435 --> 1:04:19.275
<v Speaker 1>of over because I'm now of advanced years and now

1:04:19.355 --> 1:04:23.315
<v Speaker 1>I've done something that I really didn't understand until the

1:04:23.395 --> 1:04:27.715
<v Speaker 1>year twenty eleven, until I left MSNBC to go to

1:04:27.795 --> 1:04:31.475
<v Speaker 1>Current TV, and there was built into this transfer a

1:04:31.555 --> 1:04:34.115
<v Speaker 1>three month period of time where I could not work

1:04:34.195 --> 1:04:38.115
<v Speaker 1>anywhere in television. I had not had such a period

1:04:38.115 --> 1:04:41.395
<v Speaker 1>of time except for the aforementioned period when I was

1:04:41.435 --> 1:04:44.075
<v Speaker 1>taken care of family members who were in trouble in

1:04:44.155 --> 1:04:47.355
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty five after the Boston experience, I hadn't had

1:04:47.355 --> 1:04:50.155
<v Speaker 1>such a length of time without being on the air somewhere.

1:04:50.435 --> 1:04:52.675
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, during that period in nineteen eighty five,

1:04:52.715 --> 1:04:55.395
<v Speaker 1>I did a lot of freelance work just to get

1:04:55.395 --> 1:04:58.035
<v Speaker 1>the cash that I didn't have to borrow from my sister,

1:04:58.075 --> 1:05:01.555
<v Speaker 1>who was, by the way, seventeen years old at the time. Yeah, Jen,

1:05:01.795 --> 1:05:06.035
<v Speaker 1>have you got a twenty Yeah, I need to go

1:05:06.035 --> 1:05:09.155
<v Speaker 1>buy a cigar. In any event, the point of this

1:05:09.435 --> 1:05:12.515
<v Speaker 1>was until twenty eleven, i'd really not had a day

1:05:12.675 --> 1:05:16.395
<v Speaker 1>or at least a week without deadlines media deadlines. You

1:05:16.475 --> 1:05:18.355
<v Speaker 1>have to have this written by eight o'clock because the

1:05:18.355 --> 1:05:20.995
<v Speaker 1>show is starting with or without you. I hadn't had

1:05:20.995 --> 1:05:23.675
<v Speaker 1>a day or a week without those since I was

1:05:23.715 --> 1:05:27.275
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years old. I was to my shock. I found

1:05:27.355 --> 1:05:30.435
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed not having those deadlines. And when we

1:05:30.475 --> 1:05:32.635
<v Speaker 1>went back on the air in Current TV in June

1:05:32.675 --> 1:05:36.995
<v Speaker 1>of twenty eleven, I was kind of disappointed, not because

1:05:37.075 --> 1:05:39.875
<v Speaker 1>the studio was actually not a studio but more like

1:05:39.915 --> 1:05:43.035
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a portal to Hell and not that

1:05:43.195 --> 1:05:45.395
<v Speaker 1>part of it, which was disappointing, but not as much

1:05:45.435 --> 1:05:49.475
<v Speaker 1>as I really enjoyed, you know, not shaving every weekday

1:05:49.515 --> 1:05:54.035
<v Speaker 1>and not having to write, you know, ten thousand words

1:05:54.075 --> 1:05:58.035
<v Speaker 1>a day, and not having to read the twelve seconds

1:05:58.035 --> 1:06:01.995
<v Speaker 1>of script inside the twelve second window before the sound hit,

1:06:02.715 --> 1:06:04.835
<v Speaker 1>and just the number of deadlines I suddenly did and

1:06:04.835 --> 1:06:07.675
<v Speaker 1>a half. So since twenty eleven, I decided to cut

1:06:07.715 --> 1:06:11.115
<v Speaker 1>back to four days work a week generally speaking, that's

1:06:11.195 --> 1:06:15.955
<v Speaker 1>my concession to my mid sixties. And as I was

1:06:15.995 --> 1:06:19.635
<v Speaker 1>preparing this to tell you this story, in light of

1:06:19.675 --> 1:06:21.795
<v Speaker 1>the experience I had with my friend who thought his

1:06:21.875 --> 1:06:24.515
<v Speaker 1>career was over, and I was reciting this, I realized

1:06:24.515 --> 1:06:27.035
<v Speaker 1>that I had left out in telling him the story,

1:06:27.195 --> 1:06:29.955
<v Speaker 1>and I have deliberately left it out of the chronological

1:06:30.075 --> 1:06:33.395
<v Speaker 1>order of these tales of the actual first time I

1:06:33.515 --> 1:06:36.155
<v Speaker 1>was told my career was over, I had forgotten completely

1:06:36.835 --> 1:06:40.155
<v Speaker 1>about the day that the sports director what was then

1:06:40.195 --> 1:06:44.515
<v Speaker 1>a prominent radio station told me that not only would

1:06:44.555 --> 1:06:47.515
<v Speaker 1>he and the news director there not hire me, even

1:06:47.555 --> 1:06:49.275
<v Speaker 1>though I had been told I was a candidate for

1:06:49.315 --> 1:06:51.595
<v Speaker 1>a sports job there, but he told me that I

1:06:51.635 --> 1:06:55.595
<v Speaker 1>would never get a job in radio or television of

1:06:55.675 --> 1:06:59.915
<v Speaker 1>any prominence because of my attitude. No one will ever

1:06:59.995 --> 1:07:04.955
<v Speaker 1>hire you. His name was Ernie Jackson, and I believe

1:07:05.595 --> 1:07:07.995
<v Speaker 1>he left the town we were in to get a

1:07:08.075 --> 1:07:11.395
<v Speaker 1>job selling airtime on a radio station in Cincinnati, and

1:07:11.435 --> 1:07:13.235
<v Speaker 1>after that, I don't know what the hell happened to him.

1:07:13.635 --> 1:07:16.035
<v Speaker 1>The news director was a guy named Bob Lynch, and

1:07:16.115 --> 1:07:19.435
<v Speaker 1>he shortly thereafter moved to a job that I think

1:07:19.475 --> 1:07:23.475
<v Speaker 1>he spent his entire professional career at traffic reporter in

1:07:23.515 --> 1:07:26.795
<v Speaker 1>a plane above the beautiful city of Rochester, New York

1:07:27.795 --> 1:07:31.435
<v Speaker 1>the date that mister Jackson, on mister Lynch's behalf told

1:07:31.435 --> 1:07:34.355
<v Speaker 1>me that my career was over. The first time I

1:07:34.435 --> 1:07:37.875
<v Speaker 1>was told you will never again work in this business,

1:07:38.355 --> 1:07:40.635
<v Speaker 1>the first good evening and welcome to the end of

1:07:40.675 --> 1:08:01.275
<v Speaker 1>my career, was October nineteen seventy seven. I've done all

1:08:01.315 --> 1:08:05.795
<v Speaker 1>the damage I can do here, and yet thank you

1:08:05.835 --> 1:08:09.075
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Most of our countdown music was arranged, produced,

1:08:09.115 --> 1:08:11.995
<v Speaker 1>and performed by Brian Ray and John Phillip Schanel. Our

1:08:12.075 --> 1:08:15.595
<v Speaker 1>musical directors have countdown. Neither of their careers is over.

1:08:15.995 --> 1:08:19.195
<v Speaker 1>It was produced by Tko Brothers. Mister Ray on the guitars,

1:08:19.195 --> 1:08:23.515
<v Speaker 1>bass and drums, mister Chanelle handling, orchestration and keyboards. Our

1:08:23.635 --> 1:08:26.395
<v Speaker 1>satirical and pithy musical comments are by the best baseball

1:08:26.435 --> 1:08:29.955
<v Speaker 1>stadium organist ever, Nancy Faust, who's also heard that same

1:08:30.035 --> 1:08:33.595
<v Speaker 1>message and whose career is also not over. The Olberman

1:08:33.715 --> 1:08:37.155
<v Speaker 1>theme from ESPN two, written by Mitch Warren Davis courtesy

1:08:37.235 --> 1:08:40.875
<v Speaker 1>of ESPN, Inc. Is the sports music I can't speak

1:08:40.875 --> 1:08:43.595
<v Speaker 1>to mister Davis. I don't know him personally, but ah,

1:08:43.715 --> 1:08:47.635
<v Speaker 1>how many times has ESPN been declared dead since nineteen

1:08:47.755 --> 1:08:51.555
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine and it's still here. Other music arranged and

1:08:51.635 --> 1:08:55.115
<v Speaker 1>performed by the group No Horns allowed. I don't think

1:08:55.155 --> 1:08:58.115
<v Speaker 1>they're still in business. Individually, They're all still in business,

1:08:58.115 --> 1:09:00.635
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think the group performs anymore, so maybe

1:09:00.635 --> 1:09:03.115
<v Speaker 1>their career is over. My announcer today was my friend

1:09:03.195 --> 1:09:06.795
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Banks from Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul. His

1:09:06.835 --> 1:09:11.275
<v Speaker 1>career ate over everything else was as always my fault.

1:09:12.035 --> 1:09:14.675
<v Speaker 1>So that's countdown for today. Day two hundred and forty

1:09:14.715 --> 1:09:19.435
<v Speaker 1>six of America held hostage again, just twenty seven days

1:09:19.755 --> 1:09:23.435
<v Speaker 1>until the scheduled end of Trump's lame duck lame brained term,

1:09:23.875 --> 1:09:28.035
<v Speaker 1>unless he is removed sooner by MAGA than Jeffrey Epstein

1:09:28.395 --> 1:09:32.155
<v Speaker 1>or Tom I put the hoe in home Man, or

1:09:32.195 --> 1:09:36.955
<v Speaker 1>the pavement on Trump's hand or whatever. The next scheduled

1:09:36.955 --> 1:09:39.995
<v Speaker 1>countdown is Thursday. Until then, I'm Keith Olberman. Good morning,

1:09:40.115 --> 1:10:08.075
<v Speaker 1>good afternoon, good night, and good luck. Countdown with Keith

1:10:08.115 --> 1:10:13.155
<v Speaker 1>Olderman is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

1:10:13.315 --> 1:10:17.315
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get

1:10:17.355 --> 1:10:18.275
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts.