1
00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:03,800
Speaker 1: Part six of our deep dive expose into the new

2
00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:08,719
Speaker 1: indictments coming now from the Durham investigation and the media.

3
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:13,120
Speaker 1: The biggest newsday of the week on Sunday, they started

4
00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:16,800
Speaker 1: to move into what we're referring to is damage control.

5
00:00:17,880 --> 00:00:22,000
Speaker 1: Liberal media outlets have not been following what some in

6
00:00:22,040 --> 00:00:25,560
Speaker 1: the media have decided to start doing, which is to

7
00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:32,000
Speaker 1: delete bad information on the erroneous Still dossier. Even the

8
00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:38,320
Speaker 1: Washington Post now quietly is now correcting their own reporting. Now,

9
00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:44,239
Speaker 1: ABC News, CNN, and MSNBC are among news organizations that

10
00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:49,640
Speaker 1: actually relied on the Washington Posts now corrected reporting. Yet

11
00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:53,800
Speaker 1: they have not come out and corrected what they told

12
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:57,880
Speaker 1: the American people for virtually two years now. The Washington

13
00:00:57,880 --> 00:00:59,800
Speaker 1: Post didn't do it like on a front page we

14
00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:02,520
Speaker 1: were wrong or we must correct this. They just went

15
00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:06,840
Speaker 1: back to the online stories, and in those online stories

16
00:01:06,880 --> 00:01:11,520
Speaker 1: they decided to hit that pause button and delete some

17
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:15,040
Speaker 1: of the erroneous Still dossier reporting that they did. Now,

18
00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:17,640
Speaker 1: the Washington Post was the lead on this. Don't forget that.

19
00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:21,600
Speaker 1: Remember this is you know, this is Amazon Bezos. They

20
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:24,400
Speaker 1: own this thing, right, This is pure propaganda. And the

21
00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:30,080
Speaker 1: liberal media outlets took the Washington Post reporting. Why why

22
00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:32,880
Speaker 1: would they do it? Well, they're the Washington Post, the

23
00:01:32,959 --> 00:01:35,119
Speaker 1: Washington Post, the same group of people that brought down

24
00:01:35,120 --> 00:01:37,840
Speaker 1: the Knicks administration. They're the same ones that did the

25
00:01:37,880 --> 00:01:40,880
Speaker 1: deep dive investigation into Watergate. They're the ones that are

26
00:01:40,920 --> 00:01:44,480
Speaker 1: you know, the print of the Pentagon papers. They're the

27
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:48,200
Speaker 1: most trusted name in DC. So every other news organization

28
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:52,120
Speaker 1: relied on them. Put it on them. Oh well, the

29
00:01:52,160 --> 00:01:54,360
Speaker 1: Washington Post reporting, So therefore we can do what we

30
00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:59,919
Speaker 1: want to do now. This weekend, you also had something

31
00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:03,320
Speaker 1: else that happened. Representive Adam Schiff went on TV to

32
00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:06,920
Speaker 1: take a few slaps. Now I say a few slaps,

33
00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:10,200
Speaker 1: because that's really all that it was. It was very

34
00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:13,960
Speaker 1: clear that the Biden administration, now with their connections directly

35
00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:18,200
Speaker 1: to steal dossier, needed a distraction and kind of need

36
00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:19,600
Speaker 1: this thing to go away. And how do you get

37
00:02:19,639 --> 00:02:21,800
Speaker 1: to go away? What you do is you say, well,

38
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:27,040
Speaker 1: all right, here's the deal. You need to go on TV,

39
00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:29,560
Speaker 1: and we'll get you to go on TV. And then

40
00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:32,280
Speaker 1: when you do go on TV, what we'll end up

41
00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:35,080
Speaker 1: doing is we'll kind of tell everybody that, well, some

42
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:37,240
Speaker 1: of this was wrong, but you can just say, well,

43
00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:39,480
Speaker 1: a lot of it was right, and then we get

44
00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:41,799
Speaker 1: to check the box and the media that we covered

45
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:45,320
Speaker 1: the fact that this thing is completely totally full of crap.

46
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:49,160
Speaker 1: It's been totally discredited, and you can spend it how

47
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:50,480
Speaker 1: you want to, but we need you to come on

48
00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:53,640
Speaker 1: TV because for two years, three years, four years, not

49
00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:55,200
Speaker 1: only do we help you sell this thing, we were

50
00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,000
Speaker 1: a part of the conspiracy to overthrow the will of

51
00:02:57,000 --> 00:03:02,240
Speaker 1: the people. So this is what some referred to as

52
00:03:02,280 --> 00:03:09,600
Speaker 1: a confrontation. Quote Meet the Press confronted Representive Adam Schiff

53
00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:13,639
Speaker 1: on the fake steel Dolcier Democrat Representative Schiff and says

54
00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:17,000
Speaker 1: he doesn't regret pushing it. Now, if this is confronting,

55
00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:20,480
Speaker 1: then I'm sorry. But they haven't watched their own show

56
00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:24,480
Speaker 1: when they're attacking people on the right. Go look at

57
00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:27,399
Speaker 1: the venom that was being spewed at Trump for four

58
00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,240
Speaker 1: years from Meet the Press and Chuck Todd over the

59
00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:32,600
Speaker 1: fake reporting. Now, did he come on TV and say

60
00:03:32,639 --> 00:03:35,800
Speaker 1: to the American people, we got it wrong. Did he

61
00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:38,480
Speaker 1: come on there and say the American people, I'm sorry

62
00:03:38,520 --> 00:03:41,720
Speaker 1: that we got this thing so wrong. Did he come

63
00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:46,480
Speaker 1: on TV and say I apologize for misleading you, I

64
00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:51,760
Speaker 1: apologize to former President Donald Trump for undermining and slandering

65
00:03:51,800 --> 00:03:55,160
Speaker 1: his entire administration for the entire time that they were

66
00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:57,520
Speaker 1: in office. Of course, not right. Why would you do that,

67
00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:00,880
Speaker 1: because if you really are reaching tracting this, and you

68
00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:04,480
Speaker 1: really aren't admitting that what you did was wrong, then

69
00:04:04,480 --> 00:04:07,880
Speaker 1: you would have no problem saying it this way. You

70
00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:10,200
Speaker 1: should start your show by saying, we like to say

71
00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:12,400
Speaker 1: here at me NBC News and meet the press to

72
00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:15,520
Speaker 1: form President Donald Trump. We are sorry. We got this

73
00:04:15,560 --> 00:04:18,680
Speaker 1: story wrong. We relied on the Washington Post, throw them

74
00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:21,599
Speaker 1: under the bus for this reporting, and we were wrong,

75
00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:23,400
Speaker 1: and we were unfair to you the way that we

76
00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:25,840
Speaker 1: dealt with things. We are sorry. You could do that,

77
00:04:26,000 --> 00:04:29,280
Speaker 1: You could say that, and then you might have some credibility.

78
00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:33,880
Speaker 1: But they're not. Instead, they act like they are the

79
00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:36,400
Speaker 1: conveyors of truth and only truth, and so they're going

80
00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:39,440
Speaker 1: to ask the tough question, right, They're going to ask

81
00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:43,440
Speaker 1: the hard question and go, well, Adam Schiff, do you

82
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:47,000
Speaker 1: regret pushing something that was wrong? That's it, And then

83
00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:49,440
Speaker 1: we get to close this book and move on. What

84
00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:51,960
Speaker 1: ask you something about the steel dosier because it is

85
00:04:52,200 --> 00:04:54,919
Speaker 1: been in the news for a lot of other reasons,

86
00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:58,080
Speaker 1: including some questions about its validity. By the way, I

87
00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:00,360
Speaker 1: love how he says that some questions about it validity.

88
00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:04,840
Speaker 1: It's not some questions, folks. The fact is, and it's

89
00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:09,000
Speaker 1: confirmed now. There is no validity to the Steel dossier.

90
00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:14,080
Speaker 1: Don't say some questions about its validity. The only reason

91
00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:16,800
Speaker 1: why it's in the news right now is because of

92
00:05:16,920 --> 00:05:20,840
Speaker 1: the fact that there is no validity to the information.

93
00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:25,640
Speaker 1: That's a fact, plain and simple. We wouldn't be talking

94
00:05:25,680 --> 00:05:27,560
Speaker 1: about this right now if it wasn't for the German

95
00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:30,320
Speaker 1: investigation and doubting the people that created the dossier for

96
00:05:30,440 --> 00:05:33,440
Speaker 1: lying about what's in the dossier. Don't don't. Don't sit

97
00:05:33,520 --> 00:05:35,599
Speaker 1: there and tell me and think I'm stupid enough to

98
00:05:35,640 --> 00:05:37,520
Speaker 1: buy this crap checked out where you say, well, it's

99
00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:40,560
Speaker 1: been the news this week for some questioning the validity. No,

100
00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:43,360
Speaker 1: it's not even questioning. It's a fact. It's not true.

101
00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:46,520
Speaker 1: The Steal dossier is not true. It's the Clinton dotsier.

102
00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:48,760
Speaker 1: We need to stop calling it the steal dossier. We

103
00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:51,200
Speaker 1: need to call it the Clinton Dotier. Ink some questions

104
00:05:51,240 --> 00:05:56,760
Speaker 1: about its validity. I want to play some recent a

105
00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:59,400
Speaker 1: sound that you had on the Steel dossia over the years.

106
00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:04,280
Speaker 1: Take a listen. According to Christopher Steele, a British a

107
00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:08,200
Speaker 1: former British intelligence officer who was reportedly held in high

108
00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:10,919
Speaker 1: regard by US intelligence. When you look at just what

109
00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:15,039
Speaker 1: has become public, some of the public information is very

110
00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:17,520
Speaker 1: much in line with what is reported in that dossier.

111
00:06:17,680 --> 00:06:20,200
Speaker 1: The most significant thing to me is that Christopher Steele

112
00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:23,240
Speaker 1: may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies,

113
00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:26,080
Speaker 1: that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald

114
00:06:26,080 --> 00:06:29,120
Speaker 1: Trump in the election. As Chair of the House Intelligence Committee,

115
00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:32,279
Speaker 1: do you regret giving some credibility to the Steele dossier?

116
00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:35,440
Speaker 1: Before hold on, he just says, do you regret giving

117
00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:38,640
Speaker 1: some credibility? You didn't give it some credit ability. You

118
00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:43,040
Speaker 1: preached it like it was the gospel. You didn't There

119
00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:45,880
Speaker 1: wasn't a moment where you said, look, we need to

120
00:06:45,880 --> 00:06:47,600
Speaker 1: be careful here, we need to pause here, we need

121
00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:49,599
Speaker 1: to take a moment here, we need to step back

122
00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:52,040
Speaker 1: and look, there's certainly some concerning issues, but we also

123
00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,200
Speaker 1: need to check the ability. That's what That's not what

124
00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:56,520
Speaker 1: they did. That's not what the media did. By the way,

125
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,720
Speaker 1: none of them did this. They all went the completely

126
00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:06,919
Speaker 1: opposite direction on this. Don't don't act like this was

127
00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:09,760
Speaker 1: a you know, well, we played both sides of it.

128
00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:13,520
Speaker 1: You didn't. You didn't play both sides of this at all.

129
00:07:14,480 --> 00:07:17,760
Speaker 1: You were one hundred percent all in on it. You

130
00:07:17,800 --> 00:07:20,800
Speaker 1: were one hundred percent moving forward with this. And to

131
00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:22,880
Speaker 1: sit there and go, well, should you have paused a

132
00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:27,080
Speaker 1: little bit? There was no pausing here, Give me a break.

133
00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:32,600
Speaker 1: There was zero pause, folks, no pause at all. Don't

134
00:07:32,640 --> 00:07:35,440
Speaker 1: tell me there was a pause when there wasn't a pause.

135
00:07:36,520 --> 00:07:38,720
Speaker 1: You guys ran with it, and you wanted to run

136
00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:42,400
Speaker 1: with it because you wanted to destroy people's lives, and

137
00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:45,600
Speaker 1: that's why you did it. You did it to destroy

138
00:07:45,720 --> 00:07:49,280
Speaker 1: and to put people in jail. You did it to

139
00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:52,400
Speaker 1: overthrow the will of the people and this idea that

140
00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:55,000
Speaker 1: you know. Now I'm gonna ask Chuck Todd, I'm gonna

141
00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:57,200
Speaker 1: come out of this. You know you're comments. I'm gonna

142
00:07:57,200 --> 00:07:59,200
Speaker 1: ask you this question. Do you regret it a little bit?

143
00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:02,720
Speaker 1: Give me a break. As chair of the House Intelligence Committee,

144
00:08:02,720 --> 00:08:05,840
Speaker 1: do you regret giving some credibility to the steal dosia

145
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:10,680
Speaker 1: before anybody had been able to verify anything in that

146
00:08:11,040 --> 00:08:13,200
Speaker 1: A lot of those clips were done before there was

147
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:16,080
Speaker 1: any good verification. Look, there's some news organizations that made

148
00:08:16,120 --> 00:08:19,320
Speaker 1: the mistake of publishing this docier without verifying it. That's

149
00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,640
Speaker 1: a separate conversation with those I love this well, there's

150
00:08:21,680 --> 00:08:26,920
Speaker 1: some media organizations. Let's go with all of them, yours included.

151
00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:29,760
Speaker 1: By the way, NBC News put the dossier out there,

152
00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:33,120
Speaker 1: you're on NBC News right now. You guys ran with

153
00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:35,280
Speaker 1: the story, and you ran with it for four years

154
00:08:35,320 --> 00:08:37,439
Speaker 1: and use it to impeach the president, to undermine the president.

155
00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:39,920
Speaker 1: Now you're trying to separate yourself from it, acting like

156
00:08:39,960 --> 00:08:43,200
Speaker 1: you weren't a part of the mob that was trying

157
00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:45,000
Speaker 1: to take down Donald Trump, that you weren't a part

158
00:08:45,040 --> 00:08:47,760
Speaker 1: of the conspiracy to overthrow the will of the American

159
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:50,560
Speaker 1: people and who they voted for. NBC News was in

160
00:08:50,640 --> 00:08:54,080
Speaker 1: on it now, and they're trying to act like they weren't. Listen, Listen,

161
00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:56,760
Speaker 1: listen to the way Chuck Todd says this again, patients

162
00:08:56,800 --> 00:08:59,880
Speaker 1: that made the mistake of publishing this docier without verifying it.

163
00:09:00,200 --> 00:09:03,040
Speaker 1: That's a separate conversation with those news organizations. By the way,

164
00:09:03,160 --> 00:09:05,400
Speaker 1: NBC News, you really want to act like you were different.

165
00:09:07,080 --> 00:09:09,680
Speaker 1: Do we need to go back and look at the propaganda.

166
00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:14,000
Speaker 1: Look at the number of appearances that you had from

167
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:17,280
Speaker 1: people that were on your air saying that Donald Trump

168
00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:19,640
Speaker 1: colluded with the Russians, The number of guests that you

169
00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:21,959
Speaker 1: allowed to come on the air and to sell this

170
00:09:22,120 --> 00:09:25,160
Speaker 1: crap and act like this was totally factual when it

171
00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:31,560
Speaker 1: clearly wasn't. None of this was factual, and everybody knew,

172
00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,199
Speaker 1: including you, that was based on crap. And you did

173
00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:41,319
Speaker 1: it anyway. You did it anyway, and the reason why

174
00:09:41,400 --> 00:09:44,520
Speaker 1: is because you were part of the conspiracy to take

175
00:09:44,760 --> 00:09:48,240
Speaker 1: down Donald Trump. That's what you did. Now listen to

176
00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:53,240
Speaker 1: the response quickly of Adam Schiff, But you helped give

177
00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:58,320
Speaker 1: it credibility. Do you regret it? I don't regret saying

178
00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:01,320
Speaker 1: that we should investigate claims of someone who frankly was

179
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:05,559
Speaker 1: a well respected British intelligence officer, and we couldn't have known,

180
00:10:05,600 --> 00:10:08,080
Speaker 1: of course, years ago, that we would learn years later

181
00:10:08,120 --> 00:10:10,880
Speaker 1: that someone who was a primary source lied to him.

182
00:10:11,240 --> 00:10:13,720
Speaker 1: But what I love it there, Well, I don't regret it.

183
00:10:14,000 --> 00:10:16,079
Speaker 1: You undermind the president I tates America. You try to

184
00:10:16,080 --> 00:10:18,880
Speaker 1: overthrow In many ways you did. You were successful. You

185
00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:22,040
Speaker 1: undermined the point where he didn't get reelected. You damage

186
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,720
Speaker 1: his presidency to the point where the country was trade

187
00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:27,360
Speaker 1: up divided on this, and you guys kept saying he's

188
00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:30,079
Speaker 1: a Russian, he worked with the Russians, he colluded with

189
00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:33,040
Speaker 1: the Russians. The last election wasn't fair. You guys did it,

190
00:10:33,040 --> 00:10:35,319
Speaker 1: and so did NBC News. And for NBC News to

191
00:10:35,400 --> 00:10:36,959
Speaker 1: do this interview and act like they weren't a part

192
00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:42,080
Speaker 1: of it, give me a break. Liberal media outlets, like

193
00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:46,400
Speaker 1: I said, if not followed the lead of the Washington Posts,

194
00:10:46,840 --> 00:10:51,160
Speaker 1: they were forced to correct their erroneous steal dossier reporting claims.

195
00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:53,880
Speaker 1: They just did you know, little hey updates on their

196
00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:57,880
Speaker 1: major stories they had on their website, and the Washington

197
00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:03,400
Speaker 1: Post not only corrected, but also removed large chunks of

198
00:11:03,400 --> 00:11:08,040
Speaker 1: its own reporting on the anti Trump Clinton doc. Let's

199
00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:11,280
Speaker 1: just start calling it that Friday the middle of the night,

200
00:11:11,280 --> 00:11:14,280
Speaker 1: admitting quote it could no longer stand by the accuracy

201
00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:18,880
Speaker 1: of those elements. Their words, not mine. ABC News hadn't

202
00:11:18,960 --> 00:11:22,560
Speaker 1: changed their reporting, MSNBC hasn't changed it. M our CNN

203
00:11:22,960 --> 00:11:27,360
Speaker 1: hasn't followed the Post lead on their erroneous reporting. It

204
00:11:27,480 --> 00:11:34,320
Speaker 1: still remains uncorrected. The mainstream media was always united in

205
00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:40,760
Speaker 1: their unverified reporting for one reason. They were in on

206
00:11:40,800 --> 00:11:44,920
Speaker 1: the conspiracy to overthrow the will of the people and

207
00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:47,840
Speaker 1: declare that former President Donald Trump was somehow compromised by

208
00:11:47,840 --> 00:11:50,720
Speaker 1: the Russians, when reality it was Hillary Clinton her campaign

209
00:11:50,720 --> 00:11:56,080
Speaker 1: in the DNC. Here's how Fox had it this weekend

210
00:11:56,840 --> 00:11:59,280
Speaker 1: when they broke the story that the Washington Post was

211
00:11:59,360 --> 00:12:05,360
Speaker 1: pulling their stories on the Steel Dossier. A major walk

212
00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:09,080
Speaker 1: back from the Washington Post a paper correcting and retracting

213
00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:12,959
Speaker 1: large portions of two articles based on the now discredited

214
00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:16,840
Speaker 1: Steel Dossier. A Post media reporter explaining that the piece

215
00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:21,680
Speaker 1: quote identified a Belarussian American businessman as the key source

216
00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:25,400
Speaker 1: of the Steel Dossier, a collection of largely unverified reports

217
00:12:25,400 --> 00:12:28,600
Speaker 1: that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then

218
00:12:28,640 --> 00:12:32,840
Speaker 1: candidate Donald Trump. Executive editor Sally Buzzby said the Post

219
00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:35,560
Speaker 1: could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements

220
00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:38,600
Speaker 1: of the story. Here now to react. Fox News contributor

221
00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:41,680
Speaker 1: Joe Concha, Joe, good morning to you. You know, I

222
00:12:41,800 --> 00:12:45,320
Speaker 1: described it there as a major correction, But what shocking

223
00:12:45,320 --> 00:12:49,440
Speaker 1: to me is this entire story, Joe, has completely fallen

224
00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:52,800
Speaker 1: apart as we all knew that it would. It was

225
00:12:52,880 --> 00:12:56,040
Speaker 1: largely built upon a falsehood on lies. And I think

226
00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:59,959
Speaker 1: it's been relative silence from the mainstream media about this revelation.

227
00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,520
Speaker 1: I'm amazed will that they even counted on the dossier

228
00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:06,600
Speaker 1: in the first place. Right. I'm old enough to remember

229
00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:09,240
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, this was pitched around to every major

230
00:13:09,280 --> 00:13:11,199
Speaker 1: news organization, whether it be Fox News, whether it be

231
00:13:11,280 --> 00:13:13,120
Speaker 1: The Hill, whether it be political. I could go down

232
00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:15,920
Speaker 1: the list, and almost nobody touched it. Almost no one

233
00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:17,800
Speaker 1: except for BuzzFeed and c the NN that got it

234
00:13:17,840 --> 00:13:20,040
Speaker 1: out into public domain and off it went. But but

235
00:13:20,080 --> 00:13:23,200
Speaker 1: the removal of the parts of the Steel reporting from

236
00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:26,320
Speaker 1: this initial report, it's a start, but almost no one's

237
00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:27,800
Speaker 1: going to see that. We know that, right, and the

238
00:13:27,880 --> 00:13:30,160
Speaker 1: damage has already done. To your point, if the Washington

239
00:13:30,160 --> 00:13:32,160
Speaker 1: Post New York Times were truly serious about getting it right,

240
00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,959
Speaker 1: the pulsers they won would be returned. And you remember

241
00:13:35,040 --> 00:13:37,440
Speaker 1: Dan Rathergate Rights two thousand and four, rather than producer

242
00:13:37,480 --> 00:13:39,760
Speaker 1: Mary mats And put on a false report on sixty

243
00:13:39,800 --> 00:13:42,600
Speaker 1: minutes about George W. Bush's National Guard Service just days

244
00:13:42,600 --> 00:13:45,120
Speaker 1: before a tight election, And after that story was decided

245
00:13:45,160 --> 00:13:47,120
Speaker 1: to be a crop, it was decidedly proven to be

246
00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:51,120
Speaker 1: a croc. CBS conducts a thorough investigation, and rather's fired

247
00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:54,400
Speaker 1: along with his producer and mats. No such investigation here

248
00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:57,160
Speaker 1: will is going to be conducted by any news organizations

249
00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:59,960
Speaker 1: here because there are no real standards anymore, no accountability.

250
00:14:00,120 --> 00:14:02,360
Speaker 1: And again, the damage was done. Means to an end

251
00:14:02,600 --> 00:14:05,240
Speaker 1: three years of a presidency consumed by this tall tale

252
00:14:05,400 --> 00:14:07,960
Speaker 1: conjured up by the Clinton administration. In fact, you know, well,

253
00:14:08,000 --> 00:14:11,520
Speaker 1: the liars get rewarded, right. Rachel Maddow MSNBC the biggest

254
00:14:12,120 --> 00:14:15,440
Speaker 1: narrative in terms of the megaphone of this narrative, and

255
00:14:15,880 --> 00:14:17,640
Speaker 1: we hear now there's a bidding war for her where

256
00:14:17,640 --> 00:14:20,600
Speaker 1: CNN is considering hiring her away with a substantial raise

257
00:14:20,840 --> 00:14:23,960
Speaker 1: that didn't go through, but now she's even more attractive

258
00:14:24,080 --> 00:14:27,400
Speaker 1: to certain news organizations. Adam Schiff gets a multimillion dollar

259
00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:30,960
Speaker 1: book deal and still hilariously claims that this collusion occurred

260
00:14:31,040 --> 00:14:32,880
Speaker 1: in that book, and he will continue to be the

261
00:14:32,920 --> 00:14:35,840
Speaker 1: Michael Abanatti on two thirds of cable news despite him

262
00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:39,200
Speaker 1: being completely disproven, because that's just the way it works. Now.

263
00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:42,360
Speaker 1: Such a good point, Joe. The damage is done. A

264
00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:46,320
Speaker 1: presidential election was swung. Rachel Maddow showered between twenty and

265
00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:51,400
Speaker 1: thirty million dollars awarded themselves Pulitzers based upon a complete

266
00:14:51,400 --> 00:14:58,480
Speaker 1: fake story. Again, the media not correcting this. They can't

267
00:14:58,520 --> 00:15:01,720
Speaker 1: correct it. They're terrified that if they correct it, what's

268
00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:05,680
Speaker 1: going to happen If they correct this story, it is

269
00:15:05,720 --> 00:15:08,960
Speaker 1: going to be so damning to their credibility that I

270
00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,120
Speaker 1: think at this point they finally just decided, we'll just

271
00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:16,800
Speaker 1: look the other way. What else can we do. We'll

272
00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:19,840
Speaker 1: just act like it was true, and then we'll blame

273
00:15:19,840 --> 00:15:25,560
Speaker 1: the Washington Post. That's how we'll pull this off. You know,

274
00:15:25,640 --> 00:15:28,280
Speaker 1: you look at what the Wall Street Journal said this week,

275
00:15:28,280 --> 00:15:30,840
Speaker 1: and it was a brilliant article that they put out

276
00:15:31,680 --> 00:15:35,160
Speaker 1: saying that this Steel dossier should be called the Clinton dossier,

277
00:15:35,400 --> 00:15:40,200
Speaker 1: not the Steel Dossier. You look at the Washington Post,

278
00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:43,280
Speaker 1: the Hill now reporting this morning. Washington Post removes large

279
00:15:43,280 --> 00:15:45,840
Speaker 1: portions of two stories and the Steel dossier quote. The

280
00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:51,720
Speaker 1: Washington Post Post was forced on Friday to amend and

281
00:15:51,720 --> 00:15:55,680
Speaker 1: eliminate major parts of two stories the newspaper did regarding

282
00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,280
Speaker 1: the Steel Dossier and light of the recent indictment and

283
00:15:58,360 --> 00:16:01,640
Speaker 1: new reporting. A story published in March twenty seventeen and

284
00:16:01,720 --> 00:16:04,760
Speaker 1: one of February twenty nineteen, So think about the distance

285
00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:10,040
Speaker 1: almost two years apart, that connected Source D in former

286
00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:16,479
Speaker 1: British intelligence analyst Crystal Steals Dowsier to a Belarus American businessman,

287
00:16:17,440 --> 00:16:22,240
Speaker 1: Sergey Milan, were corrected and had portions of the story removed.

288
00:16:22,960 --> 00:16:25,640
Speaker 1: An editor's note appeared on each one, providing those of

289
00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,160
Speaker 1: the articles had been amended. That's it, That's how they

290
00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:33,200
Speaker 1: fixed this right. The March twenty seventeen article identified Milan

291
00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:36,040
Speaker 1: is sourced and Source E is different in different areas

292
00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:39,960
Speaker 1: of steal dossier, including identifying m as source D behind

293
00:16:40,000 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 1: a claim that Russian intelligence learned that a hotel room

294
00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,760
Speaker 1: in Moscow once was used by former President Obama and

295
00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:52,320
Speaker 1: his wife was defiled by President Trump hire prostitutes. According

296
00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:56,000
Speaker 1: to The Washington Post, the Downsier said that Source E

297
00:16:56,200 --> 00:16:59,760
Speaker 1: also substantiate the claim. Those of the newspapers said that

298
00:16:59,760 --> 00:17:04,359
Speaker 1: those allegations have not been proven true. You think. The

299
00:17:04,440 --> 00:17:08,360
Speaker 1: Post also reported on a February twenty nineteen story which

300
00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:11,639
Speaker 1: ran with a headline Belarus born businessman sought proximity to

301
00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:15,800
Speaker 1: Trump's world in twenty sixteen, discussing the man's involvement in

302
00:17:15,800 --> 00:17:20,200
Speaker 1: some business activities of the former president analysts. Du Chenko,

303
00:17:20,359 --> 00:17:26,200
Speaker 1: who was indicted earlier this month, helped put together information

304
00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:28,720
Speaker 1: for the Steele dossier, which should be called the Clinton

305
00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:34,040
Speaker 1: dossier at this point. Dushenko's indictment alleges at the analysts

306
00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:37,679
Speaker 1: might have received information regarding these delicious claims in the

307
00:17:37,760 --> 00:17:41,600
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen story from an operative of the Democratic Party

308
00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:46,720
Speaker 1: from Hillary Clinton and her campaign instead of Milan. According

309
00:17:46,720 --> 00:17:51,840
Speaker 1: to the newspaper The Post that it also was The

310
00:17:51,880 --> 00:17:55,639
Speaker 1: Post that it was also not clear if Milan was

311
00:17:55,680 --> 00:17:58,280
Speaker 1: sourced d in the dossier, based upon her recent review

312
00:17:58,760 --> 00:18:01,800
Speaker 1: an interview with one of the two sources cited in

313
00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:05,400
Speaker 1: the March twenty seventeen article. So, in other words, the

314
00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:07,679
Speaker 1: Washington Post can put this out there and run with

315
00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:10,239
Speaker 1: it for years and years and years, and now they

316
00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:11,720
Speaker 1: just get the point the being here at something else

317
00:18:11,680 --> 00:18:13,520
Speaker 1: to say when we were lied to by multiple sources,

318
00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,000
Speaker 1: not really our fault. So we're not gonna say we're

319
00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:18,639
Speaker 1: sorry to Trump. We're not gonna apologize for misleading you

320
00:18:18,720 --> 00:18:21,200
Speaker 1: the readers. We're gonna we're not gonna say that. We're

321
00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:24,760
Speaker 1: just gonna say we got duped our bad. As a result,

322
00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:28,879
Speaker 1: it created doubts amid the new reporting, The Post writes

323
00:18:29,359 --> 00:18:33,359
Speaker 1: and indicated that after the indictment. Regarding the publication of

324
00:18:33,359 --> 00:18:37,560
Speaker 1: the two stories, the executive editor, Sally Busby said, according

325
00:18:37,600 --> 00:18:40,840
Speaker 1: to the newspaper, we needed to make the corrections. When

326
00:18:40,880 --> 00:18:43,720
Speaker 1: asked for common as spokesperson for the Washington Post directed

327
00:18:44,200 --> 00:18:47,240
Speaker 1: The Hill Newspaper to an editor's note that was put

328
00:18:47,280 --> 00:18:51,320
Speaker 1: on the twenty seventeen story. This is what it read.

329
00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:54,840
Speaker 1: The original version of this article, published on March twenty nine,

330
00:18:54,880 --> 00:19:00,200
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, said that Sergey Milan was a source are

331
00:19:00,359 --> 00:19:05,440
Speaker 1: parts of a doosier of unverified allegations against Donald Trump.

332
00:19:06,760 --> 00:19:10,000
Speaker 1: The account has been contradicted by allegations contained in a

333
00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:14,159
Speaker 1: federal indictment filed in November twenty twenty one, and undermine

334
00:19:14,560 --> 00:19:18,360
Speaker 1: by further reporting by The Washington Post. As a result,

335
00:19:18,920 --> 00:19:21,600
Speaker 1: portions of the story and an accompanying video have been

336
00:19:21,640 --> 00:19:25,000
Speaker 1: removed and the headline has been changed. The editor's note

337
00:19:25,000 --> 00:19:28,240
Speaker 1: read the original account was based on two people who

338
00:19:28,240 --> 00:19:33,359
Speaker 1: spoke on the condition of amenity to provide sense of information.

339
00:19:34,000 --> 00:19:36,520
Speaker 1: One of those people now say the information the new

340
00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:41,119
Speaker 1: information quote puts engraved doubt that Milan was a source

341
00:19:41,160 --> 00:19:44,080
Speaker 1: for parts of the dossier. The other declined to comment.

342
00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:47,800
Speaker 1: It continued, So the Washington Post doesn't have to be

343
00:19:47,840 --> 00:19:51,440
Speaker 1: held accountable for this, because it's not our fault. Other

344
00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:53,560
Speaker 1: people I do us. We just gave you the best information,

345
00:19:53,600 --> 00:19:55,800
Speaker 1: stuck with it for four years, undermine the present, try

346
00:19:55,800 --> 00:19:58,200
Speaker 1: to overthrow the world, the people, and now we'll correct you.

347
00:19:58,240 --> 00:20:02,000
Speaker 1: We're not gonna say we're sorry. Okay, everybody calmed down.

348
00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:05,560
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say we're sorry. We're not gonna apologize

349
00:20:05,560 --> 00:20:08,359
Speaker 1: at Trump. We're not gonna apologize our readers. We're not

350
00:20:08,359 --> 00:20:10,840
Speaker 1: going to run a full retraction on page one. We're

351
00:20:10,880 --> 00:20:13,000
Speaker 1: just gonna update the online story. In fact, if you

352
00:20:13,119 --> 00:20:15,879
Speaker 1: buy the Washington Post, you wouldn't even know this happened

353
00:20:15,920 --> 00:20:17,520
Speaker 1: if you get the real newspaper, because it's not in

354
00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:21,639
Speaker 1: the real newspaper. Just so you know, this goes back

355
00:20:21,680 --> 00:20:25,480
Speaker 1: to exactly why the Wall Street Journal has now come

356
00:20:25,480 --> 00:20:27,639
Speaker 1: out and said the Steel dossier should not be called

357
00:20:27,640 --> 00:20:30,240
Speaker 1: the steal dossier, should be called the Clinton dot Cia.

358
00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:36,960
Speaker 1: Howard Kurtz on Fox put it this way brilliantly. The

359
00:20:37,080 --> 00:20:40,440
Speaker 1: indictment of Igor Danchenko, the key source for the Tarners

360
00:20:40,480 --> 00:20:43,840
Speaker 1: Steel dossier that was intertwined with the investigation of President

361
00:20:43,840 --> 00:20:47,560
Speaker 1: Trump and Russia triggered this admission from The Washington Post,

362
00:20:48,040 --> 00:20:51,440
Speaker 1: the paper set in today's lead story. The allegations cast

363
00:20:51,520 --> 00:20:54,680
Speaker 1: new uncertainty on some past reporting on the dossier by

364
00:20:54,680 --> 00:20:59,480
Speaker 1: news organizations, including The Washington Post. Yet, despite the enormous

365
00:20:59,520 --> 00:21:03,680
Speaker 1: media tension to the Russia investigation, including the dossier, the NBC,

366
00:21:04,040 --> 00:21:09,080
Speaker 1: ABC and CBS Evening newscast ignored the Danchenko indictment. Yesterday.

367
00:21:09,520 --> 00:21:12,440
Speaker 1: Dan Chenko was charged with lying to the FBI about

368
00:21:12,520 --> 00:21:16,040
Speaker 1: false information he fed to former British buy Christopher Steele,

369
00:21:16,080 --> 00:21:21,800
Speaker 1: including unsubstantiated and selacious accusations against Trump. Dan Chenko allegedly

370
00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:24,879
Speaker 1: fed some of his falsehoods to Charles Dolan, a former

371
00:21:24,920 --> 00:21:28,600
Speaker 1: Clinton administration official. The FBI has said it launched the

372
00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:31,480
Speaker 1: Russia probe before seeing the Steele dossier, but in a

373
00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:35,119
Speaker 1: wire tap application for former Trump advisor Carter Page, the

374
00:21:35,200 --> 00:21:40,240
Speaker 1: bureau used the dossier's claims. Fox News covered the story extensively.

375
00:21:40,720 --> 00:21:43,119
Speaker 1: There were obvious red flags with the dossier from the

376
00:21:43,200 --> 00:21:46,280
Speaker 1: very beginning. For one thing, Christopher Steele was working for

377
00:21:46,320 --> 00:21:50,399
Speaker 1: an opposition research firm called Fusion GPS, which was funded

378
00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:54,359
Speaker 1: by the Hillary Clinton campaign. CNN and MSNBC did not

379
00:21:54,440 --> 00:21:57,639
Speaker 1: cover the story after five PM, except for Rachel Maddow,

380
00:21:57,880 --> 00:22:02,440
Speaker 1: who had relentlessly trumpeted the investigation. This report comes in

381
00:22:02,800 --> 00:22:06,879
Speaker 1: the midst of a concerted attack on Christopher Steele himself

382
00:22:06,880 --> 00:22:11,000
Speaker 1: from Republicans in Congress, their alleging that he was basically

383
00:22:11,119 --> 00:22:15,399
Speaker 1: peddling false information, and last night she slams Special Counsel

384
00:22:15,520 --> 00:22:19,119
Speaker 1: John Durham's case. The unmistakable impression is that this indictment

385
00:22:19,600 --> 00:22:25,720
Speaker 1: is designed to smear Christopher Steele's intelligence reports as things

386
00:22:25,720 --> 00:22:29,480
Speaker 1: that were deliberately made up and concocted by rascally Democrats.

387
00:22:29,960 --> 00:22:32,359
Speaker 1: The Steel dossier may seem like a mere footnote of

388
00:22:32,440 --> 00:22:36,240
Speaker 1: the incredibly complicated saga that once dominated our national politics.

389
00:22:36,480 --> 00:22:39,400
Speaker 1: But now that it's wild chargers are being further discredited,

390
00:22:39,600 --> 00:22:43,080
Speaker 1: many in the media have lost interest. You want to

391
00:22:43,119 --> 00:22:48,520
Speaker 1: know how much they've lost interest. CNN's Brian Skelpter. He

392
00:22:48,680 --> 00:22:54,800
Speaker 1: is the guy whose entire job is to police the media,

393
00:22:55,040 --> 00:22:57,600
Speaker 1: tell the stories about the media, the big stories that

394
00:22:57,640 --> 00:23:03,320
Speaker 1: happen each week. He has a history of ignoring stories

395
00:23:03,320 --> 00:23:07,199
Speaker 1: that would make Democrats and liberal news outlets organizations like

396
00:23:07,320 --> 00:23:15,159
Speaker 1: his own CNN look bad. It's a bombshell media story

397
00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:18,440
Speaker 1: in the media world that the Washington Post had to

398
00:23:18,480 --> 00:23:22,320
Speaker 1: go back and correct years and remove large chunks of

399
00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:29,560
Speaker 1: its own reporting on a discredited Clinton dossier. Americans, by

400
00:23:29,600 --> 00:23:33,520
Speaker 1: the way, rely on CNN right for their news. They

401
00:23:33,600 --> 00:23:35,960
Speaker 1: pushed this for four years. I know, I was there

402
00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:40,080
Speaker 1: the entire time, fighting back and defending Trump and defending

403
00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:46,679
Speaker 1: these ridiculous allegations. CNN's media program is called Reliable Sources.

404
00:23:48,160 --> 00:23:51,200
Speaker 1: If you want such show, you wouldn't even know any

405
00:23:51,200 --> 00:23:56,640
Speaker 1: of this happened because they ignored it. So roniccket's named

406
00:23:56,640 --> 00:24:00,960
Speaker 1: reliable Sources right. They claim to examine their words, not

407
00:24:01,040 --> 00:24:05,000
Speaker 1: mine the top media stories every Sunday. So the Washington

408
00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:09,719
Speaker 1: Post adding editors notes, amending headlines, and removing sections of

409
00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:14,720
Speaker 1: major stories that didn't make the cut when it came

410
00:24:14,760 --> 00:24:20,040
Speaker 1: to truth, we're actually cut by CNN. The Post corrections

411
00:24:20,119 --> 00:24:27,320
Speaker 1: came as other news outlets, including CNN, have criticized have

412
00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:30,440
Speaker 1: been criticized, I should say, for failing to adjust reporting

413
00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:35,080
Speaker 1: after the Special Councilderham's investigation the Trump Russia probe has

414
00:24:35,280 --> 00:24:39,040
Speaker 1: further discredited the r already shaky dot sier now the

415
00:24:39,040 --> 00:24:44,120
Speaker 1: point where people are getting indicted. Reliable Sources Right, which

416
00:24:44,160 --> 00:24:46,720
Speaker 1: got a pretty big audience six forty five thousand viewers

417
00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:50,359
Speaker 1: last week, granted that was its smallest audience of the year,

418
00:24:51,760 --> 00:24:57,640
Speaker 1: ignored the scandal because it made Democrats and CNN look bad.

419
00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:02,840
Speaker 1: Instead of covering the post massive and significant corrections because

420
00:25:02,880 --> 00:25:06,280
Speaker 1: they were in on this collusion with Russia. CNN and

421
00:25:06,320 --> 00:25:08,960
Speaker 1: Sculptor were in on it from day one. They wanted

422
00:25:08,960 --> 00:25:10,679
Speaker 1: to bring down Trump at all costs. I didn't care

423
00:25:10,720 --> 00:25:15,600
Speaker 1: what lies I had to tell you. Instead, you know

424
00:25:15,640 --> 00:25:21,919
Speaker 1: what they did said covering this issue, CNN treated viewers

425
00:25:21,920 --> 00:25:28,600
Speaker 1: to segment after segment about Steve Bannon. Yeah, they did

426
00:25:28,640 --> 00:25:32,840
Speaker 1: segments about Brian Williams leaving MSNBC. They did a segment

427
00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:36,840
Speaker 1: on Steve Bannon's podcast whether or not Americans should believe

428
00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:42,000
Speaker 1: inflation headlines even though inflation is real. American journalist Any

429
00:25:42,800 --> 00:25:46,520
Speaker 1: Finster being jailed, demere Mark and Britney Spears in a

430
00:25:46,560 --> 00:25:50,240
Speaker 1: local newspaper fighting to survive. That is what they reported

431
00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:57,320
Speaker 1: on during their media watchdog show Reliable Sources. Skelpter avoided

432
00:25:57,359 --> 00:26:03,000
Speaker 1: the significant media story on his program because it didn't fit.

433
00:26:04,600 --> 00:26:06,439
Speaker 1: They don't want to tell people that they lied to you,

434
00:26:06,760 --> 00:26:09,679
Speaker 1: And they don't want to tell people that Donald Trump

435
00:26:09,720 --> 00:26:12,480
Speaker 1: is innocent and that the people that were around and

436
00:26:12,560 --> 00:26:15,600
Speaker 1: that were harassed and their lives were being pushed. People

437
00:26:15,600 --> 00:26:17,440
Speaker 1: were trying to ruin their lives. That's really what we're

438
00:26:17,480 --> 00:26:20,960
Speaker 1: talking about here. People were trying to ruin their lives,

439
00:26:20,960 --> 00:26:25,760
Speaker 1: and people's lives were ruined financially. Certainly, they just wanted

440
00:26:25,760 --> 00:26:29,159
Speaker 1: to look the other way. That's all they wanted to

441
00:26:29,160 --> 00:26:33,640
Speaker 1: do was look the other way. Look the other way

442
00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:36,480
Speaker 1: at all costs, and make sure that we never tell

443
00:26:36,520 --> 00:26:39,119
Speaker 1: people that we lied because we ultimately got what we wanted.

444
00:26:39,400 --> 00:26:41,720
Speaker 1: We got rid of Trump. That was our goal, and

445
00:26:41,760 --> 00:26:46,040
Speaker 1: we accomplished it. We did it. That was the objective,

446
00:26:46,200 --> 00:26:49,639
Speaker 1: and we accomplished it. Why would we tell you that

447
00:26:49,680 --> 00:26:54,080
Speaker 1: the entire thing was a fraud. Why on earth would

448
00:26:54,160 --> 00:26:56,719
Speaker 1: we tell you that the entire thing was a fraud.

449
00:26:58,840 --> 00:27:00,880
Speaker 1: The same thing they did with d House. By the way,

450
00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:06,080
Speaker 1: there's no difference here. Look at how they've attacked written House.

451
00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:09,320
Speaker 1: You know, the media is bracing for the closing arguments

452
00:27:09,320 --> 00:27:13,199
Speaker 1: in that trial. Why because they know they lied to you.

453
00:27:13,520 --> 00:27:15,920
Speaker 1: They said the guy was a white supremacist murderer who

454
00:27:16,200 --> 00:27:19,240
Speaker 1: wanted to know as a Trump supporter, even though there's

455
00:27:19,359 --> 00:27:21,960
Speaker 1: nothing to back that up. Doesn't matter, right, because this

456
00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:26,800
Speaker 1: is what we do now. The media all we can

457
00:27:26,840 --> 00:27:28,920
Speaker 1: along was saying the only reason Written House will walk

458
00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:33,159
Speaker 1: is because the judge sucks and he's white. That's what

459
00:27:33,240 --> 00:27:36,560
Speaker 1: they're now saying. I don't see how anybody can say

460
00:27:36,600 --> 00:27:39,879
Speaker 1: that this judge is not biased and is not leaning

461
00:27:40,040 --> 00:27:42,280
Speaker 1: in a certain direction. I think that the behavior of

462
00:27:42,320 --> 00:27:45,639
Speaker 1: the judge in totality is the problem. Is judge is

463
00:27:45,680 --> 00:27:49,240
Speaker 1: an absolute joke. He's been a joke from the very beginning. Clearly,

464
00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:52,119
Speaker 1: this guy has biases that are affecting the administration of

465
00:27:52,160 --> 00:27:55,040
Speaker 1: this case. I completely agree from my observation that the

466
00:27:55,160 --> 00:27:58,960
Speaker 1: judge is entirely biased. The judge is making it pretty

467
00:27:59,040 --> 00:28:02,960
Speaker 1: much impossible will for the jury to actually consider all

468
00:28:03,000 --> 00:28:07,760
Speaker 1: the facts and come up with a verdict where justice

469
00:28:07,840 --> 00:28:10,600
Speaker 1: will be served. You've tweeted and talked about the fact

470
00:28:10,680 --> 00:28:14,600
Speaker 1: that the judge is racist, and you think that impacts

471
00:28:14,600 --> 00:28:17,080
Speaker 1: how he is managing this trial. He has made a

472
00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:21,440
Speaker 1: series of decisions, each one perhaps may be individually defensible,

473
00:28:21,640 --> 00:28:26,000
Speaker 1: but in totality lead to the impression of a biased,

474
00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:30,119
Speaker 1: racist judge. Bias and racist. So a white guy shoots

475
00:28:30,119 --> 00:28:33,800
Speaker 1: people in self defense, A white guy shoots white guys

476
00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:37,359
Speaker 1: in self defense, not even not black people, white people

477
00:28:37,480 --> 00:28:42,120
Speaker 1: in self defense, and we don't like the outcome because

478
00:28:42,160 --> 00:28:45,840
Speaker 1: it's a white guy that defended himself after convicted felons

479
00:28:45,880 --> 00:28:47,840
Speaker 1: who had illegal guns pointed the guns at him and

480
00:28:47,880 --> 00:28:50,360
Speaker 1: tried to kill him, and he defended himself, all caught

481
00:28:50,360 --> 00:28:53,360
Speaker 1: on tape. Well, it's a white racist judge. If it's

482
00:28:53,360 --> 00:28:55,720
Speaker 1: a narrative, let's keep going with it on national TV

483
00:28:55,880 --> 00:29:00,680
Speaker 1: all day long with his Trump rally cell phone that

484
00:29:00,840 --> 00:29:03,360
Speaker 1: is trying to get rid the house a walk, God

485
00:29:03,360 --> 00:29:08,840
Speaker 1: Bless the USA ring tone, which is the I love

486
00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:13,000
Speaker 1: this right you got the guy's ring tone goes off it.

487
00:29:13,160 --> 00:29:17,280
Speaker 1: He's a guy that represents his country, he serves his country.

488
00:29:18,400 --> 00:29:22,480
Speaker 1: He has a ring tone that is about God Bless America,

489
00:29:22,760 --> 00:29:25,400
Speaker 1: God Bless the USA. And now they say it's a

490
00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:27,760
Speaker 1: Trump breading tone. This is how much they hate America.

491
00:29:27,800 --> 00:29:29,520
Speaker 1: By the way, this goes back to exactly what I'm

492
00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:33,480
Speaker 1: saying connectness with this Clinton story. They hate America this much,

493
00:29:33,920 --> 00:29:36,520
Speaker 1: You need to understand that. This is how much they

494
00:29:36,520 --> 00:29:47,040
Speaker 1: hate America. They despise America, They cannot stand America. You're

495
00:29:47,080 --> 00:29:55,040
Speaker 1: now the worst person in the world, the worst person

496
00:29:55,360 --> 00:29:59,480
Speaker 1: in the world if you love America. And if you're

497
00:29:59,520 --> 00:30:03,240
Speaker 1: a judge who doesn't convict somebody of a crime that

498
00:30:03,320 --> 00:30:06,560
Speaker 1: the media says you need to convict them of, you're

499
00:30:06,560 --> 00:30:09,600
Speaker 1: a racist judge and you're a Trump judge, and you're evil.

500
00:30:09,800 --> 00:30:12,440
Speaker 1: They've just moved on from the Clinton dossiers straight into this.

501
00:30:12,440 --> 00:30:15,440
Speaker 1: This will be the new controversy in Kenosha when when

502
00:30:15,560 --> 00:30:18,560
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse and the jury comes back with their decision. If

503
00:30:18,560 --> 00:30:20,320
Speaker 1: they don't get what they want, this is what they'll

504
00:30:20,360 --> 00:30:22,560
Speaker 1: say for months. So use this as an election issue.

505
00:30:22,840 --> 00:30:25,520
Speaker 1: White kid walked, he killed two white people that attacked him.

506
00:30:25,680 --> 00:30:29,000
Speaker 1: Nothing wrong with that's called self defense. Judge is auditioning

507
00:30:29,000 --> 00:30:30,920
Speaker 1: for the cameras and looking for his next gig on

508
00:30:30,960 --> 00:30:33,880
Speaker 1: Fox News. He sounds like he's watched too much Bill O'Reilly.

509
00:30:33,920 --> 00:30:36,160
Speaker 1: I mean he's acting like Archie Bunker in there. When

510
00:30:36,200 --> 00:30:38,680
Speaker 1: the judge asked the entire room if there are any

511
00:30:38,760 --> 00:30:41,920
Speaker 1: veterans here and demands that the entire room clap for

512
00:30:41,960 --> 00:30:44,160
Speaker 1: a veteran, and the one veteranan room happens to be

513
00:30:44,200 --> 00:30:47,120
Speaker 1: the expert witness coming forth to testify on behalf of

514
00:30:47,200 --> 00:30:50,720
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse. That's an example of a pretty biased courtroom.

515
00:30:50,760 --> 00:30:53,320
Speaker 1: How the guy talked about the lunch order. I don't

516
00:30:53,360 --> 00:30:56,480
Speaker 1: get it. Asian joke. I don't get it. I don't

517
00:30:56,480 --> 00:30:59,200
Speaker 1: know that he even made an Asian joke. Well, I

518
00:30:59,280 --> 00:31:01,120
Speaker 1: know that I'm not allowed to judge it because I'm

519
00:31:01,160 --> 00:31:03,680
Speaker 1: not Asian. The judge has had so many moments in

520
00:31:03,680 --> 00:31:08,800
Speaker 1: this case that bring into question his own biases. Whether

521
00:31:08,880 --> 00:31:12,880
Speaker 1: it's the ring tone, whether it's the Asian statement, whether

522
00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:15,960
Speaker 1: it's the applause. You mentioned the applause for a defense

523
00:31:16,040 --> 00:31:20,200
Speaker 1: witness because he was a veteran. Those things really impact

524
00:31:20,200 --> 00:31:22,840
Speaker 1: people's feeling that that this is a courtroom that we

525
00:31:22,880 --> 00:31:27,200
Speaker 1: can have to trust him. This guy. Maybe you know

526
00:31:27,320 --> 00:31:29,640
Speaker 1: legally he's right about things. I've been listening to the

527
00:31:29,720 --> 00:31:33,160
Speaker 1: legal folks, but certainly his demeanor, the way he speaks

528
00:31:33,200 --> 00:31:36,160
Speaker 1: to the prosecution, the way he looks at Kyle Rittenhouse

529
00:31:36,200 --> 00:31:40,880
Speaker 1: like as his grandson. I mean, come on, America, he

530
00:31:40,920 --> 00:31:45,000
Speaker 1: looks at him like he's his grandson. I mean, you

531
00:31:45,080 --> 00:31:50,160
Speaker 1: want to talk about insanity. This is the media. Don't

532
00:31:50,160 --> 00:31:52,880
Speaker 1: ever trust him. Look at whether it's the Clinton story

533
00:31:53,360 --> 00:31:55,840
Speaker 1: or the Rittenhouse story. They do the same thing over

534
00:31:55,920 --> 00:31:58,960
Speaker 1: and over again. They decide their narrative and they stick

535
00:31:59,040 --> 00:32:01,320
Speaker 1: with it, regardless of the facts. And they don't care

536
00:32:01,400 --> 00:32:03,080
Speaker 1: if you burn in hell because of it. They don't

537
00:32:03,080 --> 00:32:04,520
Speaker 1: care if you get the death penalty because of it.

538
00:32:04,800 --> 00:32:06,280
Speaker 1: They don't care if you get locked up for the

539
00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:08,480
Speaker 1: rest of your life because of it. They don't care.

540
00:32:09,600 --> 00:32:12,400
Speaker 1: They don't care. I hope every one of you will

541
00:32:12,440 --> 00:32:15,920
Speaker 1: share this deep dive expose Part six go back if

542
00:32:15,960 --> 00:32:18,240
Speaker 1: you miss part one, two, three, or four on this

543
00:32:18,360 --> 00:32:22,160
Speaker 1: Clinton deep dive. Make sure you like our podcasts and subscribe.

544
00:32:22,240 --> 00:32:25,080
Speaker 1: It's free. Hit that auto download button or subscribe, and

545
00:32:25,280 --> 00:32:28,080
Speaker 1: please share it on social media. I'll see you, but

546
00:32:28,240 --> 00:32:29,160
Speaker 1: guys back here tomorrow