WEBVTT - Selects: How Free Speech Works

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, Happy Saturday. Good morning. I hope you've had

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your breakfast cereal, and I hope you have had your cartoons.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And I hope you are ready to learn about free

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>speech here. That being thrown around a lot these days,

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>free speech, free speech, But free speech actually means something specific.

0:00:19.000 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not just you can say anything you want, any

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>time you want and without any repercussions at all. That's

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not free speech. We're here to tell you what it

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>really is. In the episode from February How Free Speech Works.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of I

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry. Papers have been shuffled.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Their plumb and true. It's time for Stuff you should

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Know the podcast. You know it's not plumb and true.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>My gut. Anything in my house I went to, Uh,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>all of my house had those gross, cheap, hollow core

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>doors you know. Oh yeah, you know they're not doors.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean they function as doors, but if there's air

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>in your door, then there's not a door. So one

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>by one I've been replacing them with wood, solid doors.

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>And I went and did that for our bedroom. And man,

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>oh man, was it frustrating. Oh hanging them because they

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to hang. It's the worst, like nothing straight, like, oh,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that looks good, and then it goes to shut and

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like whack. Well I'm sure it was straight, you know,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years ago, you know, and then over time

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the house settled in and now it's it's doing its

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>own thing. So I had to shave the door in

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so many places it looks like a Doctor SEUs store.

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh cool, you should plant one of those weird doctor

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Seue's palm trees in your yard to really complete it.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>It's called marijuana. So I'm glad you just said marijuana, chuck,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>because you have every right to say the word marijuana

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in this country. It's a free country. You can say

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the name of a plant, you know, people people do

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 1>say and have long said. This is a free country.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I can say whatever I want. And free speech is

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the basic hallmarks of what makes America free country.

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Freedom of speech. Um, but America is not the only

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>country that enshrines a freedom of speech protection in its charter. Yeah,

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>there are varying degrees of it in many many countries.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>In some countries there's not very much. In other countries

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot. In the US is arguably one of

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>the leaders, although some people point to Europe's and we'll

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about those later, but some people point to Europe's

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>free speech protections and saying they're those people know what

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. Um. In the US, if you look at

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>free speech, you go to the Bill of Rights. Typically

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a great place to start, and you will find

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you will find in the First Amendment of the Constitution,

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the first part of the Bill of Rights,

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it says in there specifically that Congress will make no

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>law right abridging the freedom of speech. It's as simple

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>as that. It doesn't say unless speech says this, unless

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody says that, unless you really don't like the guy,

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>there is no It's absolute. It's an absolute protection of

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech. Yeah, and that goes on. I think, uh,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's pertinent to mention abridging the freedom of speech or

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of the press, or the right of the people to

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>peaceably to assemble founding Father JFK and to petition the

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>government for a redress of grievances. I'm sorry that I'm

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>take Kennedy one because we're all very important, you know,

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>sure they are. Oh yeah, the press right to a symbol,

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty important one. Well yeah, And because we

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>had just left the country uh one, independence from Britain,

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>who at the time was like, no, no, no, we

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we very much want to squash any dissenting opinions about

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the grown uh And people were getting thrown in jail

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for that kind of stuff in the colonies. They were

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to quash a rebellion. And that's a pretty important

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>part of it. If you're if you're a monarchy, an

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>absolute monarchy that wants to keep the rebels in check,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you just say you can't say certain things, and if

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you do, we're going to throw you in jail. It

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>has a freezing effect, yeah, Or they're weird punishments, like

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>when they said stick a sock in it, they went yeah, okay,

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and they went no, really, stick a sock in it

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>by law for eight months, governor, and tape it, tape

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>it shut. With my dirty sock in your mouth, my

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>dirty century sock, my wool sock from my wet boots.

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Um quickly though, I think we should point out that

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>as we were going through this, like I realized you

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>could have an entire podcast called the Ins and Outs

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of Free Speech. Yeah, like a series, a whole show.

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You could have a whole show about it, not just

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>an episode. So this is you know, this is an

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>overview as we do that is going to pick and

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk about various court cases over the years,

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>rulings and writings of judges, um, that are pertinent. But man,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's deep and wide. Yeah, it is, especially considering that

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>again when you go to the Bill of Rights, it

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just says Congress can't pass any laws that abridge the

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech. There they're like, why does he keep

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>writing right there? And chuck. Not only though, was it

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this in retaliation reaction to um, the British monarchy. Yeah,

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it was also a big part of Enlightenment thinking as well.

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>The protection of freedom of speech was a huge aspect

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Enlightenment. And you know, obviously the United States

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>was founded during the Enlightenment and as part of the Enlightenment.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>It was an Enlightenment experiment, right, Yeah, like we don't

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>want to restrict thought or expression, um. And you know,

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>some might say that if if the Britain hadn't been

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so intent on squashing dissenting opinion, then we might not

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have been so enlightenment aside. So uh, heck bent on

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ensuring those rights. So maybe it all worked out for

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the best. Yeah, I think so. And Britain came around. Right.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>You can still get that sock thrown in your mouth,

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>can you? I don't know, man, it's on the book still.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if they do it anymore. Is

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the socks are much nicer now, that's right. They're all

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>happy socks. So since you have this very broad um

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>protection of freedom of speech, right, yeah, then there's nothing

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>more to be said about it. Anybody can say anything

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they want. Not true, quite true. It isn't true because

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we have three branches of government here in the US.

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>We do. Yeah, it turns out I thought that was

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>just one. You got the executive branch, which is the

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>one I think you're thinking. Uh. Then you have the

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>legislative branch Congress, okay, which is actually separate, and then

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you have the third branch, the judicial branch. Yes, they

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are equal and important branch. And with um the congressional

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>legislative branch. They pass laws, people go out and break laws,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>people get convicted, people appeal their convictions, and in some cases,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>those convictions and the laws are questionable enough or interesting

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>enough that it will eventually make it to a high

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>enough court that the court will rule on whether or

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not that law holds to any constitutional standard. Yeah. Over time,

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech has been shaped and expanded and paired away,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>um by the courts here in the United States. Yeah,

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe more so than any other kind of segment

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of law, or maybe not. But I'm gonna just as

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as an complete, um armchair attorney, I'm gonna say that

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>perhaps free speeches has been challenge more and whittled down

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and defined more than maybe any other aspect of law. Yeah,

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because one of the big things that the courts did

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>with freedom of speech was to really expand the definition

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of speech. Yeah, it's not just words that come out

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of your mouth or even right. No, Like it can

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>be a T shirt that says f the police, or

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>could say um um uh yeah, hug the police. Sure

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody might find that offensive. Who knows, thank you for

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>coming to my rescue. It could be a billboard, it

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>could be um, it could be a pamphlet you hand out.

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It could be an act, symbolic act, flag burning. That

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>was a big one to remember that in the eighties

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely or or refusing to say the pledge allegiance that

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>was in the I think World War two, Yeah, which

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually now protected as because free speech can also

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>mean the freedom to not speech. Yeah, because up until

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I think in the Supreme Court ruled on it, kids

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>were being forced to say the pledge whether they wanted

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to or not. In the Supreme quisite. Now we think

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech is really freedom of expression, and if

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel like saying the pledge, you're free to

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>express yourself in that way. Yeah. And as you'll find,

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>um throughout the show, we'll kind of probably say this

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>over and over, freedom of speech doesn't have a lot

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to do with something you might find offensive or repugnant. Um. Generally,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the U S decided on protecting that right regardless of

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you're offended or you think it's awful.

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of what makes America great in a

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways, is you know, what, who are we

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to decide what you know, to legislate morality essentially, and

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what we'll get into all this with obscenity and all

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that stuff and pornography. But um, even when it comes

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to like you know, I don't want to say the pledge.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Because of this reason, the courts have said, you know what,

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that that you're right, this is America. We may not

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like it, but that you're right. Yeah. And the whole

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>reason behind this too, it's it's easy to just take

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it for granted, especially if you were raised in the

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>United States, that you have that right. Who cares what

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the basis of it is. You can say basically whatever

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you want, you know um. But when you really dig

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>into why the founders sought to protect this and why

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been upheld and defended so much over the years,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>is because the idea is that if you are free

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to speak your mind without fear of being put in

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>jail or killed or beaten by a mob um, that

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.479
<v Speaker 1>you are going to introduce new ideas to the marketplace

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of ideas. And through this you're gonna have an exchange

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with other people, and a lot of times it's going

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to be contentious and it's going to be ugly, but

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>over time things can evolve and get better and change

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>for the better through this exchange of ideas. And to

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ensure that the engine of cultural evolution continues unabated, you

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have to have the free exchange of ideas. And to

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>have the free exchange of ideas, you have to have

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>protection of free speech. Yeah, because if not, you have

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the government being the one saying, well, now here are

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>all the ideas, right exactly, and um, don't worry about

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>having any of your own. Yeah, these are these, these

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>are the ones. Yeah. And in a lot of cases,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>those things can come across as really great ideas. Um.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Here in the US, up until the UH, I think

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the mid fifties or early sixties, there were laws on

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the books where it said you can't you can't speak

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ill of groups, like you can't say anything about um,

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Jewish people or Muslim people or any group. You can't

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say these things. It was not protected, right. It was

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>called group libel. And that actually sounds pretty good in

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of in a lot of senses, like, yeah,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't be talking trash about entire groups of people,

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>because it does it can lead to two problems. But

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that same prohibition on speech came to be exploited by

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>white Southerners who were in power in the fifties, who said,

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Martin Luther King, he's trying to incite violent social change

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with his his radical ideas. Somebody needs to uh put

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a duct tape over that guy's mouth. He doesn't have

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the freedom to say this. And actually, our right to

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>say hateful things about other people was a direct result

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the United States of the civil rights movement UM

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>being protected by the courts against white Southerners who sought

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to um to uh squash their their speech. So I

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>hate speech, Yeah, is due in part in part to

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Dr Martin Luther King and and trying to advance civil

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>rights in a weird turn of events, Yeah, it really was. Uh.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>And in Europe, and we'll talk about this a little more. UM,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, some people say they have nailed it.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>They don't protect hate speech, and you can't be uh,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't deny the Holocaust publicly, and you can't um say,

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know Jewish people, you know x y Z or

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>this group of people are like this. Um. Some people

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>say that's you know, that's kind of right on the money.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We have taken a different tech here in the US.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Right in Europe does that because they have a pretty

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>recent example of what can happen if you do have

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech, and that totalitarian government can hijack that

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech and use it as propaganda to incite

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>hatred amongst an entire population. Um or even as as

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>um this this one author put it to prepare them

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for extermination, just basically saying like, hey, everybody, get those guys.

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>They're the reasons you don't have jobs. They're the rapists.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>They're the people who are who are going to kill

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you and steal your your family's wealth and well being.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So get rid of them. Turn on them. And that's

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of saying, nobody can incite hatred through

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>speech in these European democracies. Um, because the state has

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>done it before. Yeah, and we all see what happened there. Um.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Should we take a break? I feel like that's a

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>good intro, broad, all encompassing, passionate, all encompassingly. All right,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Well we'll come back here in a minute and get

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>down to the nitty gritty of some of these court cases. Okay, sorry, gee,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>um large skid all right, trend um, So if you

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>want to go back a little bit to justice Oliver

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Wendell Holmes Jr. Son of Sherlock, one of the famous

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>justice is the United States. Uh, in a lot of ways,

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but very specifically because everyone has sort of heard the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the old thing that, Um, you can't yell fire in

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a movie theater and say that's free speech because that

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>will In the case of in the nineteen nineteen case

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Shink the United States, UM, Charles Schenk was arrested for

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>distributing material basically that said, hey, UM, don't the the

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>US draft military draft is bs um, don't do it.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Fight against it? Uh. And they said, you know what,

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's espionage actually, And that went all the way

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to Supreme Court and they did not protect that right because,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in the words of Oliver Winto Holmes, they said, did

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the words create a clear and present danger that they

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>will bring about substantive evils? Congress has a right to

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>prevent and that sort of in line. And later on

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in that same ruling, he was talking about yelling fire

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in a theater as an example, like, you know, you

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can't do that because I will insight panic if people

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>will get stomped. Right, And in this case this kind

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of set the precedent for or the tone for all

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>free speech cases to follow. UM. It's weighing the the

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>individual right versus the public good, yes, or in this case,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the individual right, says UM, creating some problem or evil

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>as he put it, that Congress has a right and

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>an interest to prevent a danger to the country, right. UM.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>In this case, really what they were saying was they

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>were suppressing criticism of a government program, the Draft. UM.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And then but Holmes was fine with that. But within

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a year I think he saw his UM, his test,

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, does it present a clear and present danger

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>being used in a way to to squash descent when

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of anarchists who were just generally advocating the

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>overthrow of the government. UM, rather than need to do

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this on this date at this time, UM, they were used,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they were convicted under the test that Holmes created. So

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>he took what was called the Great Dissent and actually

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>dissented against his own former test and said, no, it

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>has to present a clear and present danger, present meaning

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's about to happen or you know, the time

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to happen, and it's a clear danger,

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>like this is what's going to happen. Because this person

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>said that, so that that ultimately became the format for

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>UM what we'll talk about in a little bit, which

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is inciting violence. Yeah, and that's not to say that UM,

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like The ruling there, like you said, was about a

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>clear and present danger, not necessarily the fact that Charles

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Schenk was against the war, because we have a long

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>history in this country of being able to uh be

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a wartime dissenter and talk about it and be protected. Um.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>During Vietnam War, there was a man who had he

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>went through an l A courthouse and he had a

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>jacket that said, you know, F the draft, but it

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was really spelled out. It's so ironic that we're censoring

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>ourselves in this one, but it's uh F the draft

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and they um as you will always almost always see here.

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>These people are, like you said, usually arrested, convicted, and

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>then when they're well maybe hippies, you never know, and

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>then that's when the courts take it up and potentially

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>either a protect or don't protect the speech. In this case,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the court said no, you're within your right because someone

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.239
<v Speaker 1>could see your jacket and then not look at it, right,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's a good point. Like you you can just

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>look away from the guy's jacket, right. You can also

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>not take the pamphlet that the guys handing you. You

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>can also you can also not rent the movie that

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>um that you find offensive. You can also turn the

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>TV station. You can also turn the radio down. You

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>can also not go to the website. You can turn

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>our podcast off. To me, well you shouldn't, so you could.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>To me, the alternative of not not receiving some speech

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that you find offensive like being able to get away

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>from it. That to me is the ultimate test for

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 1>for whether speech should be restricted or not. And since

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you can in virtually any situation get away from speech

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>each except maybe skywriting, we should probably really regulate sky

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>riding pretty pretty toughly. Now you can look down on

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the ground, but I guess you could. Yeah, So as

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>long as you can get away from it, or, more

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to the point sheared, shield your children from it, I

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think it should be I don't see any reason

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>for it to be um entailed. For skywriting. You would

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>have to argue in court that it is such a

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>delight to children that they can't help. But look like

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you would have to physically restrain them and put blinders

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>on them, exactly, and that's unreasonable, your honor right. You

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>could write a curse word and then do a drawing

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of Barney and that would satisfy that is Barney still

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>a thing. I think Barney will always be a thing.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Uh So over the years have been,

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like we said, a lot of court cases that have

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of whittled away and defined not whittled away, you know,

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>because that molded shaped, molded and shaped. Uh So Marvin

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Old Marv ran an adult book business, and he what

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he did was he sent out mailers. He liked to

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>send out a mailer, right, and um, these mailers would

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>show up at houses where, you know, something my kid

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>might read it, or someone easily offended might read it,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or not so easily offended might read it. Uh. And

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a mom who uh this was her adult son. Yeah,

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a mom and her grown son who's the

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>manager of I guess the family restaurant. And they childlike

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe he was his eyes were burning. Um, I don't know,

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe his mom was just just treated him like a kid.

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. But they said, you know what, you know,

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this guy shouldn't be mailing these randomly to just whoever.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>We certainly don't want it, so we're gonna call and complaint.

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And Marvin Miller ended up getting arrested for um obscenity.

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is a huge this turned out to be

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge case. Yeah, and went all the way to

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, and um, yeah, it was. It was

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 1>what you call a um, what do you call that? Landmark? Well,

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Landmark's waters watershed. I couldn't think of it. I was like,

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we did a podcast on it recently. It's an Intego

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Girls song. That's right. It was a watershed case. Miller v. California.

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna say V instead of versus. I think

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about that before, right, Um, it makes you

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>sound more legal easy, Yeah, and everyone likes being legal easy. Uh.

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>In three, like I said, the Supreme Court heard the

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>case and they found that his speech did not qualify

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for for protection. Um. But here's the hitch. They didn't

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>rule on the obscenity. They ruled that, hey, we're protecting kids,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can't just mail this stuff to a house

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>because kids live in houses, and so it was inappropriate

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>content for children. Um. And what it did as well

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is it is it specified a test for defining obscenity, which, boy,

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>over the years, this has been a really tough thing

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like over the years of courts round

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>me don't want any part of that. Now. If There's

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>one thing too that as far as restricting free speech goes,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that drives me up the wall. It's obscenity. The Court

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>should not have anything to do with obscenity, and mostly

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't wantling on it. Right, There's this great quote

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>from Hugo Black, who, as of this podcast has become

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>my favorite Supreme Court justice of all time. He said

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in Michigan versus State of New York, Um, I wish

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>once more to express my this is my Hugo Black,

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I wish once more to express my

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>objections to saddling this court with the irksome and an

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>inevitably unpopular and unwholesome task of finally deciding by a

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>case by case, site by site personal judgment of the

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 1>members of this court what pornography, whatever that means is

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>too hardcore for people to see or read. Basically, they

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>were tired of sitting in court and looking at like

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pictures of a B. C. At the least, and ruling

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff like what about this one? What about

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this one? What about? The thing is they were looking

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at like pulp pulp books Like Michigan was a guy

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>who had a publishing house of pulp books that showed

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like B D S M or lesbianism or masturbation or

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever on the cover. He's like, this is this is

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty nice, right, They're like minutes a perk of

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the job. But we shouldn't have to do it anyway.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea that that um, the court is

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ruling what is obscene is and what is not is

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>it's legislating morality, clear and just clearly it's legislating morality.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the court has any any right

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to that at all, but they have. They have a

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>long tradition of it, and over time they've actually come

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to protect pornography, um, with the exception of child pornography,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>which you're not really gonna You're gonna be hard pressed

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to find anybody who argues for freedom of speech as

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>far as child pornography goes UM. And then obscenity, which

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is which came out of this through the three pronged

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tests to determine what's obscene, came out of that Miller

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the California case, and it says this, It says that

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>if the average person using contemporary community standards can look

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at something and says that this arouses the prurient interest?

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Does it meaning sexy time? Yeah? Uh, that's that's the

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 1>wronged one. And you have to satisfy all three of them.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this patently offensive sexual content or patently either one?

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I say patently And I got that from Mr Burns.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, I say, I say patently like Mr Burns does. Yeah.

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.159
<v Speaker 1>And then the final one is a big one. Uh,

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it's whether the work, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic,

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>or potentially or political or scientific value. Right. That's that's subjective,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 1>extremely subjective, like who who it literally says if it's

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>our stick? Right? Who? Who says? What's art and what's not? Yeah?

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And very famously, uh, Justice Potter Stewart the very very

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 1>famous line when asking about obscenity or pornography said I

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>know what when I see it? Right? But they they

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have long said like we we One of them said,

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we may be trying to define the indefinable. Yeah, it

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>is indefinable. You ask a hundred people what pornography is

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and you'll get a hundred different answers. And so as

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a result, some courts have said, uh, yeah, this community

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the jurors decided that this is obscene, So people go

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to jail for depicting sexual acts or something like that

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that some jurors in that town found um distasteful because

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>America has has long had a very puritanical hang up

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with sex and nudity. Uh, violence, bring it on, but

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>nude bodies shame, shame. I think that's probably my issue

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with it too, is we're super like will expose kids

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to violence, extreme violence at a very young age. But sexuality, Hey,

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you wait until you're you wait until your parents are dead.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 1>You understand. Wonders for the therapy industry though it's true,

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So hold on checked. There's one other thing. The other

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>part that the other problem I have with the um

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>defining obscenity is that there's no national standard. The courts

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>even said it would be impossible to come up with

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a national standard. So if Miller had been tried in

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a community of swingers who are like into that stuff, um,

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>he probably would have gotten off right. But because he

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>was tried in a community that decided that no, this

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is this is obscene, it was deemed obscene, whereas in

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>another community it may not have been deemed obscene. That's

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>no test. Well, yeah, and that that became a big

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>deal at one point because they basically, um, the law

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>said that community standards are like you can't have a

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>national stand or because what what the someone thinks in Skokie,

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Illinois is not what in Sin City, Las Vegas. They

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>have an entirely different definition of obscenity and pornography, you know,

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're right. Yeah, I guess they are right, which

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is which is why I you I to me, it's

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one or the other. Either get rid of anything that

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.719
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be considered obscene or you allow it all.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:34.479
<v Speaker 1>So obscenity, it's obscene, it is. Well, we'll get more

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>into obscenity too, but um, there are a lot of

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>other facets of free speech that you might not really

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think about. In two thousand thirteen, that was a case

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Bland v. Roberts where there were these two dudes, um

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that work for a sheriff department. You know sheriff's are elected.

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>They were running for office, and they were fired for

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>commenting and liking UM on an opponent's Facebook page, which

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, this gets into in the digital age and

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the Internet age, a whole different slew of questions to

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>be answered, And they appealed that case and then and

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>one actually, yeah, Bland v. Roberts. As a result, Facebook

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>likes are considered protective protected free speech under the First Amendment.

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Now yeah, but ibronic, well maybe not ironically, but Facebook

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and social media in general you can also, I mean,

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's at their discretion whether or not they take something down,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can't say, well, that's free speech, and it's like, no,

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this is our our private room. Essentially is our home.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And inside a private home you can tell someone to

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>shut up. Private home, private companies, Yeah, social media platform

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Like if you show up to work in uh F,

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the police shirt, they can fire you or tell you

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to change it. And if you say no, no, no,

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like this is my free speech, I'll go no, this

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>is my business. This is not a free speech. So

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.239
<v Speaker 1>like like the mall, remember yeah, oh yeah, that's right,

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>poor Victor Gruing. Uh And here's the thing too is

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and this isn't really section in our notes. But I

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>get kind of a riffin here. I get kind of

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>bugged these days with I think a lot of people

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>have the notion that freedom of speech means also freedom

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>from consequence, and those are two different things. Like freedom

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of speech means that you were not going to be well,

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you might even be arrested and convicted, but eventually it

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>will be overturned. You'll be vindicated. But if a business

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or a comedian or a TV show does something that

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>people find offensive or provocateur YouTube and someone wants to

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>pick at them and shut them down or boycott them,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and they cry free speech, it's like you know, you know,

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you said that you got away with it. You're not

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in jail. Doesn't mean it won't be consequences. Well, yeah,

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the right to protest is enshrined in the same free speech.

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think, yeah, I hear a lot. It seems

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like more and more of these days where people, um,

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>people whine about the consequences of their own free speech

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's not enshrined in the constitution. There there very

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>likely will be consequences, right, people will hate you maybe,

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But it's like you said, though, you know the the

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the it's there to protect the unpopular opinion. There's this

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>guy Um who's a an expert on free speech at

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Penn State. I believe um. He said, we have a

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment to protect unpopular expression or the minority viewpoint,

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because we don't need a constitution to protect the majority,

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>what the majority thinks. The majority takes care of itself.

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a good point. It's the people who everybody else

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>hates and what they have to say. Um, that is

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>protected by the Constitution. Yeah. And uh, Harvard law professor

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Noah Feldman, in a very Unharvard law like way, said, uh,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if your feelings are hurt, then that's your problem, snowflake.

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>You didn't say Harvard like JFK. He didn't say snowflake.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I was kidding, no, but he he. What he was

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>pointing out was basically the sentiment behind free speech in

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States that as long as you are not

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>physically harming somebody you like, emotional harm is whatever. We're

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not even gonna it's not even in a register. Well,

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>although that one article you sent that op ed there

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there was the guy that argued that emotional harm was

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>worse than physical harm and had a longer lasting impact. Um,

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know there are two sides to every argument there. Well,

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons why Europe has said no

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>hate speech. It's harmful. Yeah. Yeah, Like, even if it

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't physically harmful, it's emotionally it's an intellectually harmful it's

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not good alright, So we've dabbled in an obscenity.

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh one of the other and we'll talk a little

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more about it. But one of the other things

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that um, you can you can have insulting speech, but

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>there's something called fighting words, um that is not protected

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's can be difficult to determine. And again over

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the years the courts have tried to do so. But

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in ninety nine that was kind of a landmark case

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Burr v. Ohio, where Clarence Brandenburg was at a

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>clan rally in Ohio and said, we are we're not

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a revengeent organization. But if our president, our Congress, our

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court continues to suppress the white Caucasian race, please,

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that there might have to be some revengeance taken.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So they should have jailed him for grammar. Revengeance is,

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of course not a real word, and make it neither

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>us revenge it. Although I think it's in a video

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>game now someone said, yeah, revengeance too, don't. I don't

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's called that. Revengeance two called our parentheses s

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I C right, what does that stand for? Again? Uh?

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Sick I can't remember, Like, that's so sick they got

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. I don't. I don't know remember now I think, yeah,

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody else send it in people who tend to write

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it after the stuff we write. We don't usually use

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it ourselves. Yeah. It's funny, though. I have this thing,

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just the weird quirky things that everyone sort

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of does in their head in life. Whenever I see

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>s I C written in an article, I always try

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and think of what word either they got wrong or

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>were replacing in the article, you know, to make make

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>more sense. Well, no, they use it too, because well,

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's a misspelling or if it's not a word,

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's basically the writer or the editor saying this guy

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>got it wrong, not me. Yeah, yeah, but am I

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking of a different was it? What is it? When

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they um, that's just when they put it in brackets

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and they put like there or something like the person

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>lets it out. Sick also goes in brackets, but it's

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.320
<v Speaker 1>basically saying I'm aware that this is misspelled. Yeahs to

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>show what a dummy this guy is. I think I

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>do it in both cases, Like if it's a made

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>up word, I'll try and think of what like they meant,

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 1>or like the other one where there's just a parentheses

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and they just basically add something to make it more sense.

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I try and think of, like, what did they say

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to begin with? It's a weird thing. No, I know

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to mean in my head right now I have for

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>your eyes only. I thought you go away. You're trying

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what I'm thinking. The brains brain does

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>some terrible stuff. I had that in my head now too,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>because you came in singing it for your only? Why

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>do you? Doesn't make any sense? It doesn't. I haven't

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>heard the song in decades. A week long ear worm

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>from a song you haven't heard in decades? Was it

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in a dream? I don't think so. You're dreaming about

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 1>She and Easton again. That's a good movie though. Uh,

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>what's the Connery one on it? No? No, that was

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Roger Moore? Are you sure? Yeah? You're sure? I think

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it was Sean Connery's last time? No, all right, I

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>may be right here. Go to the map for that one.

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Um, all right, Getting back to Brandenburg, the

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the clan member who who didn't know how to talk right? Um,

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>he didn't talk good. He was arrested for ad dedicating violence,

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and he won. Supreme Court decided in his favor and

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>thus began the history, the long history of the United

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>States saying, you know what, the clan wants to have

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a rally out in the public town square and they

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>apply for their permit, you gotta let him do it.

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>But again that actually that the clans hate speech being

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>protected was lumped together and came out of the civil

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>rights movements freedom of speech being protected as well, because

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they were like, well, hey man, stokely Carmichael says that

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we gotta like take take the take control

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>from the white He's rise up and take control, like

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that's hate speech, and the Supreme Court says, you know what,

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>you're right, and that's protected. So so it was what

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the clan saying, or Illinois Nazis and Skokie right, second

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>time Skokie's made an appearance in this episode. Yeah, why

0:36:56.080 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not a third um the usual. So yeah, anyway, I

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>think what you're you're saying is as a result, hate

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>speech is has a decades long tradition of being protected

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>at any and all costs unless you are using it

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to incite violence, and that ties in to that original

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>prohibition on free speech that Oliver Wendell Holmes came up

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with is that it presents a clear and present danger.

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>So rather than using that specifically to incite violence, you

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>basically have to be saying it's not enough to um

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 1>to say, uh, like, we black people need to rise

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>up and take control of the United States, and if

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it has to be violent, it has to be violent.

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>But we can't live like this anymore. Right, If if

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Stokely Carmichael saying something like that, or Malcolm X is

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>saying something like that, that is protected speech, even though

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of people, or it made a

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people uneasy to hear that kind of thing

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and they said, hey, they're trying to start a race war,

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>it's still protected speech. On the other hand, if you said,

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>or Stokely Carmichael said everybody needs to go get the

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>shotguns and we're all gonna beet here on Tuesday and

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take the streets Tuesday afternoon, that would not

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 1>be protected because he would be directly inciting violence. Yeah,

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what what are the two things? That violence has to

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>be likely and uh, it has to the advocacy for

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>violence has to be um directed to inciting or producing

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 1>imminent lawless action, and then it has to be likely

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to incite or produce such actions. So it's it has

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to it has to be happening at some point that

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 1>you can point to next Tuesday. Something that's not vague

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>or indefinable, like we should do this in the future

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 1>if um, if we're not granted greater rights. So it

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 1>has to be something specific, and it has to be

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>likely to produce that effect. Right, So if somebody is

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a great order and the people they're telling to get

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>their shotguns all own shotguns at home, that would probably

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:08.399
<v Speaker 1>make it likely. And then a few years after um

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that case. Another one has v Indiana from nineteen three

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to find imminent a little further and it said an

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time. That's protected, right,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 1>so likely and eminent? Yes, interesting? All right, Well let's

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>take a likely and imminent break and we'll talk more,

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>even more about obscenity after this. George Large, I was skid,

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, So did you see the movie Carneal Knowledge?

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I thought, um, for some reason, my I

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>was like body heats not that old that I thought

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the movie was? Wasn't that a sexy one. Body heat

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was quite sexy. I never saw that. One very good movie,

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:18.359
<v Speaker 1>was it? Kathleen Turner, Kathleen Turner. That is correct? Uh,

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Romancing the Stone Kathleen Turner Friends, Kathleen Turner, Romancing the Stones,

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Kathleen Turner. It doesn't matter either way. She's a delight

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>body heat Kathleen Turner. Never saw it. It's good, very steamy.

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>That was going to Palmer, right, I think so? Yeah.

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I think she's also the star of one of my

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>favorite all time movies, which is the War of the

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>roses Man. That is a great movie. I can watch

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that movie a thousand times and not get sick of it.

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>That's on um alright. So Carnal Knowledge was the Mike

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Nichols film with Jack Nicholson, Candice Bergen, and Art car Funkele.

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Of all people, what is our gar Funkle doing in there?

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>He sings in a false that out throughout it's very nice.

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.320
<v Speaker 1>All lines are in sing song. Um no, he he

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>was he acted in it was good? Was he good? Yeah? Yeah?

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 1>It was great movie. He like Paul Simon good, well,

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>he's acted too here and there. Really good movie though,

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like I said, it was Mike Nichols. It

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>was not like porn, but it was just a very

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>frank movie about sex and relationships. Um, Like Nicholson plays

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of a you know what you would think kind

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of a womanizer, and Art gar Funkle a little more

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>uh tinder and um not as big of a womanizer,

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to decide how to put all this, and it

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of just follows him in three points of their

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>life from like college to middle age and their sexual exploits. Anyway,

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it sounds kind of boring. Just really good movie, Yeah,

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and very famously in nineteen seventy four. I think it

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>might have started in seventy three. And right here in

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>All Beneath Georgia, that was a theater manager that was

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>arrested for showing that movie in a theater. Oh is

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that where this case comes from. Yeah, and he was

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>arrested and convicted of distributing obscene material. It's Jenkins v. Georgia, right.

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Jenkins v. Georgia was a court case, and of course

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court ruled, um that Colonel Knowledge was not obscene,

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think in the ruling they said, it's Mike Nichols,

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 1>for God's sake, He's like, what are you thinking, precious treasure? Uh?

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>And um, well, they said that it basically your your

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>opposition to a state of Georgia making us so proud

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is that there's nudity in it. And it's not a

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of nudity. They were like, that's not enough. That

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it's not patently offensive sexual, sexually explicit material that

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>has no artistic value. Yes, it fails the Miller test

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>is what it's called. Yeah, it passes. I guess it

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>would fail the Miller test because if you pass the

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Miller tests, could be it would be obscene. Right, It's

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a weird way to look at it. I guess. Uh.

0:43:00.840 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Here in the modern age, like I said, with the

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Internet opened up a whole host of issues with free speech,

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>and notably the Child Online Protection Act COPA. Yeah, that

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was a big deal, very big deal. COPA was legislation

0:43:14.960 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 1>that was introduced to, you know, protect kids from online smut. Right.

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, uh, freedom of speech, I

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have a kids said, no, they're gonna this is the

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>start of regulating the internet. The Internet is a free,

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>open wild West and it should not be regulated, So

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.320
<v Speaker 1>don't try to regulate it. And again, everybody said except

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for child pornography, and the person talking said, well, yeah,

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>except of course child preno. If you don't be stupid. Well,

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>COPA never actually went into effect. It went through three

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>rounds of litigation over the years, and um, you know,

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>basically one of the big things that the court would

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>say back was there are protections that parents can put

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>in to restrict their kids from this stuff, and that's enough. Yeah,

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge thing. Like the court really tends to

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to not like government overreach and tends to restrict it

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>whenever it comes about, right. Yeah, and this was really

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>tricky because what they were trying to do is apply

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a federal law to community standards for a global product.

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's just I mean, talk about complicated law. That's tricky.

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's very very tricky. Yeah. So, um, the court struck

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it down in part because they thought it was overly broad.

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>They said that the what the government was considering offensive

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 1>material would not would not pass the Miller test, so

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that was overly broad. And then they also said, yeah,

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 1>there's alternatives like parental controls that are widely available are

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can solve the problem that the government's looking to solve,

0:44:46.640 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>which is restrict kids from pornography, um, but without restricting

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone else's individual liberty right, so they said, see around copa.

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh and justice Even Bryer wrote in a concurring opinion,

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a good quote too, to read the statute

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as adopting the community standards of every locality in the

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>United States would provide the most puritan of communities with

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a Heckler's veto affecting the rest of the nation, basically

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 1>saying what many have said was, this is an impossible task,

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>so don't even try. I wish they'd take that that

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>idea with obscenity as well. Well. And here's the other

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:28.919
<v Speaker 1>thing when they struck down cope. And this is another

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>really good quote, and this this one from U. S.

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>District Judge Lowell read Jr. Not lou read, but Lowell read.

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Lou Reid said, take a walk on the wild side.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Lowell said, maybe after a nap. Lowell said, uh. And

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of sums up for me. I think he said,

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:51.359
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we do the miners of this country harm if

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment protections which they uh will with age inherit

0:45:56.320 --> 0:46:00.359
<v Speaker 1>fully are chipped away in the name of their protection right.

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>So basically like in trying to protect these kids, we

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have restricted their free speech when they become adults. Very interesting, Yeah,

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's true, you know. Yeah, Um, the the courts, do

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you go with obscenity, I'm great with it with the

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>courts have also kind of shaped um freedom of speech

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or protective freedom of speech by saying yes, certain types

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of speech are not protected. Obscenity, child pornography, fighting words,

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fighting words, and then libel is another one. But one

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ways they further protected even when they're restricting

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it is to say, not everything that you say is

0:46:44.560 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 1>liabel is actually liable. It's print right. It's very I

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>think it more has to do with slanders words that

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it is okay, so with libel laws, and I would

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>guess slander falls under the same laws, right, don't so,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>But with libel laws, um, it's really difficult to prove

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 1>liabel right because the person printing the libelous um information,

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>which is basically you're defaming someone's character, and that's a

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really old, longstanding prohibition. I think even back in ancient

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Greece they had a certain amount of freedom of speech

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in Athens classical athens Um, but even even that was

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 1>restricted as far as talking trash about someone's character. Right,

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's a that's a really old idea that you

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't You shouldn't put fake stuff about someone's character reputation

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. And if you do, then they have recourse.

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But to prove that that person said something libelous, they

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>have to have had malice of forethought. They had to

0:47:50.400 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have um known that what they were printing was wrong

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or untrue. Yeah, that's the key. It has to be untrue.

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You can express an opinion about something and say someone's

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>a big poopy pants, but you can't say someone's big

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>poopy pants. Who did X, Y and z if that

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't true, right, exactly? Um, And so it's really tough

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to to prove to prove libel right. So it is

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>unprotected speech, but it's also protected in that it's not

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.720
<v Speaker 1>very broad, it's very narrow. And then part and parcel

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 1>with that is um, satire and parody are also very

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>much protected in the United States, thankfully, and we have

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Larry Flint Hustler publisher to thank for that. Yeah, every

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people versus Larry Flint is a very good

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>job of that spelling out that case. But very famously

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:42.280
<v Speaker 1>he went to war with the Reverend Jerry Fallwell because

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>he had a cartoon and his Hustler magazine that was

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 1>an unflattering, uh sexual depiction of Jerry Fallwell. It was No,

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a fake campari ad. It was a spoof

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>campari ad. But it was a cartoon though, No, not

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the one I saw. Really, I saw like a I'm

0:48:58.840 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sure he han drawn. I'm sure he had that too.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But this what the court case was. It was like

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 1>a campari and there was like a campari um ad

0:49:07.920 --> 0:49:10.239
<v Speaker 1>campaign where people talked about their first time they had

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>campari or whatever, and Jerry fall Wells was, uh, he

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and his mother got drunk on campari and had sex

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:18.799
<v Speaker 1>in the outhouse and that was actually how he lost

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>his virginity. Jerry Falwell didn't like that, of course, so

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>he sued um. He sued Larry Flint, and Larry Flint

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 1>won that case. It went all the way up to

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. Yeah, it was a case and they said, Nope,

0:49:32.280 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this is parody. There's a satire. It's protected. If any

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>reasonable person um sees it and would know that it's

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>not true, it's protected. And and Larry Flint said, or

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>no reasonable person, right, pervert frack. That was yours is

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:50.800
<v Speaker 1>better than mine? That was good? Oh yeah, what was

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that going? Yeah? He sounded like what he Harrelson doing

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Larry Flint, which is right on the money. In my head,

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I sound like a muppety tenor doing what do he

0:49:59.400 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Harrelson do? Great movie The Muppets people versus um. Yeah.

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 1>In any way, thankfully satire and is protected here in

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the US because we have a long, rich history of

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:25.800
<v Speaker 1>political cartoons and rich satire that can really make a difference.

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Like you see what's going on with Saturday out Live

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:31.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's like they've had a long, long tradition

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of political satire and and most times that opening bit

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they do is political in nature. Uh, And then you

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>know it's nothing new. They've been doing it forever. So

0:50:45.040 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I just think it's it's when you

0:50:48.320 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 1>start like poking at that and the onion and you

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 1>know some of the great satirical publications that's that goes

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>down a bad road, you know. So took One of

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that's coming up now that we're connected globally

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is this idea that what we talked about at the beginning,

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the US has very broad free speech protections some other

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>countries don't. There's like the the U N Universal Declaration

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of Human Rights, right, some of that has has some

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>free speech protection in it. Not everybody signed on to it,

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people think there will never be

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>any way to to protect freedom of speech worldwide. Normally,

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>up to say the nineties, that wasn't that big of

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:38.480
<v Speaker 1>an issue unless like Salman Rushdie published a book or

0:51:38.520 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that, UM, because each country had its own standards,

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and what what's said in one country typically stayed in

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that country, even if it was offensive to another country.

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Right the the the the two didn't collide. Now that

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the internet's here, what's said in one country can be

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>carried immediately to another country, and the offense can be taken.

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And this went out of hypotheticals and into real world,

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>well into the real world. UM. Back in two thousand twelve,

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>when a guy named Nakula Baseli Nakula released a fourteen

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>minute video called The Innocence of Muslims. Do you remember that?

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't. It was extremely incendiary. If you, um were

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a Muslim, you were going to be offended by this

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>because it basically said the prophet Mohammed was a fraud. Uh.

0:52:34.160 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It had him as a flander, a womanizer, I think,

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a pedophile. It was like, and the people who were

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in it were scared to death because of the reaction.

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.279
<v Speaker 1>There were riots around the world once it was translated

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 1>into Arabic and released. What they think was going to happen,

0:52:50.400 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't know, like I don't, I don't

0:52:52.719 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>remember if the person was a provocateur on purpose or

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 1>if these were their real beliefs son Islam. Regardless, they

0:53:00.920 --> 0:53:05.359
<v Speaker 1>were um Egyptian American, so the video was protected, even

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 1>though elsewhere in the world they were literally rioting the

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:12.359
<v Speaker 1>streets and people were dying because this video existed. They

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.320
<v Speaker 1>were so upset by it. But in the US t

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>s and as far as I know, it's still up

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:21.279
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube right because it's protected by free speech. Well,

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great example of should the US

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have the freedom of speech that is going to cause

0:53:32.400 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>harm in another country now that those two countries are

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>connected via the Internet. There's no easy answer to that.

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That was basically a rhetorical question at this point, but

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it's one that I think is going to have to

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.719
<v Speaker 1>be decided more and more and what goes to the

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:52.239
<v Speaker 1>heart of his blasphemy in this case. Yeah, blasphemy specifically

0:53:52.320 --> 0:53:56.160
<v Speaker 1>means insulting God or any religious or holy person or thing. Uh,

0:53:56.880 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it means different things in different religions. Um, it's actually

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:04.840
<v Speaker 1>still illegal in some states in the US. Um. Oh is,

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought the last one was struck down in two

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:11.359
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. H okay, well but two thousands up until

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:15.279
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven. Um, yeah, yeah, had laws until two

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven. That's right again two thousand seven. Yeah. Uh.

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But the last conviction for blasphemy in the US was

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:26.319
<v Speaker 1>in night. So because these were laws that were sort

0:54:26.320 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of on the books that no one did much about. Well,

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a dude. It was in Little Rock, Arkansas, and

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>he was an anti religious atheist, this white supremacist who

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>um had an office and in the office there was

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a sign out front I guess it was a storefront office,

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>and it said, um, evolution is true, the Bible is

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a lie. God is a ghost. And he got arrested

0:54:50.360 --> 0:54:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and convicted for blasphemy. So again, this is night and

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there were blasphemy laws on the books until two thousand seven,

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, is it's it's really surprising to think that

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States ever had blasphemy laws, but they were

0:55:07.640 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fairly recent. Yeah, and you know when it comes to religion,

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 1>like the United States protects Westboro Baptist Church and they

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>say you can go out and you can have uh,

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>offensive messages on signs at military funerals if you want um,

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:25.319
<v Speaker 1>because as the United States and we allow that. Yeah.

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that kind of brings up that

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>one op ed you're talking about from the Atlantic, that um,

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>free speech isn't free. What's the title of it, Yeah,

0:55:35.239 --> 0:55:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the what's the guy who wrote its name? Garrett

0:55:37.800 --> 0:55:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Epps wrote it? Yeah, and he makes really great He

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:45.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't even make a case, he just kind of presented

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 1>both sides well, and what he did was he was

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 1>a quote. And I think you're right on the money

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:55.279
<v Speaker 1>with that um, with that summation, because he said, Um,

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 1>repressing speech has costs, but so it does allowing it.

0:55:58.920 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And the only mature way to the system is to

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:02.919
<v Speaker 1>look at both sides of the ledger. Right. That really

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of says it all. Yeah, And he's basically saying

0:56:05.239 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>like it's not enough to be to say freedom of

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>speech exists because we have free speech in the U.

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 1>S America is a free country. You have to examine

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>why and you have to defend it or else it's

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just a privilege, and privileges are always subject to attack,

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but actual freedom is should be defensible, and so he

0:56:25.960 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>says we need to defend it, especially based on another

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>op ed that he was actually talking about by a

0:56:32.200 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>law professor from fordom Thane Rosenbaum said, Um, no, there

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:41.840
<v Speaker 1>are actual harms to speech. It does cause physical or

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it does cause emotional harm that can in some cases

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 1>exceed physical harm. It can be longer lasting, it can

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:51.759
<v Speaker 1>have a greater impact on more people at once. Um.

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And so why do we allow hate speech in the

0:56:56.080 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 1>United States? And Garrett Ups doesn't have the answer, He

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 1>just examines the whole question. I think really well, yeah,

0:57:03.239 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting. I mean, you know, he

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 1>makes a point that the same laws that allow for

0:57:09.600 --> 0:57:14.040
<v Speaker 1>strides of civil rights and feminism and gay rights groups

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:17.440
<v Speaker 1>over the years are the same laws that protect the

0:57:17.520 --> 0:57:20.640
<v Speaker 1>people that have done them such harm over the years. Um.

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like you said, you gotta look at

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ledger. It might cause harm and

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>there is a cost to it, but ultimately the freedom, well,

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion least outweighs those harms. So there's this

0:57:34.360 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>guy named Jonathan Rausch who UM Garrett ups quotes, but

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>he wrote another OpEd that I read, and his idea

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of why freedom of speech, including hate speech, is important

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is because he says that if you suppress speech, you're

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 1>suppressing thoughts. Right, So if you suppress hate speech, it's

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>still gonna be there, It's still gonna be boiling under

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the surface. People are still gonna quietly, subtly trade in it,

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but you can't refute it. If you allow hate speech,

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it can be refuted loudly, publicly. And then from that

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and he makes the case that this is why gays

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in America have made such strides in the last few years,

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 1>because of the vicious homophobia that was publicly hurled at them,

0:58:19.800 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that they stood up and said, you know what, this

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't true. You know what, we deserve this right. You

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>know what, we're not pedophiles, you know what, we should

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to adopt everything, and shot down all this

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff systematically. And America was watching this back and forth

0:58:34.280 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, gay people one public sentiment just through logic,

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>he was saying, if you didn't allow that hate speech

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:43.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, there wouldn't have been that position

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to address, um that hate speech. Improve it wrong because

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't suppress hateful ideology. It's going to exist, So

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>allow the speech so it can be publicly refuted and

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 1>just smacked down. Yeah, yeah, I thought. I think that's

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 1>probably the asked explanation for freedom of speech. I've ever

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:05.160
<v Speaker 1>heard a good way to close to huh Man, Thanks

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, Jonathan rosh Ah, You got anything else? No,

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't, but a little tease before listener mail, We're

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:15.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a couple of very intriguing follow ups to

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:18.400
<v Speaker 1>recent questions. Okay, all right, well, if you want to

0:59:18.400 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>know more about free speech, uh to start talking. And

0:59:21.920 --> 0:59:24.760
<v Speaker 1>since I said that, it's time for whatever Chuck's got

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:30.520
<v Speaker 1>up his sleeve. Yeah. Before I read the listener mail, UM,

0:59:31.800 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>two things were on a recent show. We asked about

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:39.760
<v Speaker 1>our old buddy Sarah the Amazing fan and then our

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 1>old buddy Sam, the summer of Sam. Weirdly enough, we

0:59:44.160 --> 0:59:48.240
<v Speaker 1>come into the office and Sam's parents dropped off a

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 1>letter to us. Sam wants to be an intern here.

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So he's around. He's in college, yeah, doing great, and

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>wants to intern and wrote us a letter and we're

0:59:59.000 --> 1:00:00.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and get him in here. Oh yeah. And

1:00:00.760 --> 1:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>he wouldn't be our intern specifically'd be for how stuff works.

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But um, we're going to burn a lot of currency

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to make sure he gets this job. Yeah. I hope

1:00:08.000 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it happens. It'd be great. It was good to hear

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>from him and sounds like college is going great. His

1:00:11.720 --> 1:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>resume was stacked, buddy. Uh. And the other thing is,

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw this because I did

1:00:17.160 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the Facebook, but um, Katherine Mary Stewart of Night of

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the Comet played the older sister Reggie. Uh and was

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>also in the Last Starfighter and we kened to Bernie's

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know it was, you know, sort of the

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>darling in the nineteen eighties and nineties. Uh. And it's

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>still an actor today, does theater, working stuff and movies

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and TV and radio. She does it all. Uh. She

1:00:43.840 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>got in touch with us. She listened to the Malls

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast posted on Facebook that we shouted her out and

1:00:49.360 --> 1:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>also her hometown Edmonton Mall and I was just knocked

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>out and told her to email us. She email that

1:00:56.440 --> 1:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>thinks she lives in New York, and I said, hey,

1:00:58.000 --> 1:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>listen next time. We do a show at the Bell House.

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to act out week end up, Bernie, I'll

1:01:03.840 --> 1:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>play I'll play the dead guy, and you and Josh

1:01:06.480 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>can just pup it me around. Uh Now. It was like,

1:01:09.000 --> 1:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, come and bring your family. We'd love the

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>guest list you. Maybe you can hop up on stage

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and we can chit chat for a minute. Nice. I

1:01:15.800 --> 1:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>took the liberty of doing that. It was very nice.

1:01:18.040 --> 1:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You're like, no, she can't get on stage. We need

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to edit that part out. I just thought that was

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>very cool. Yes, very cool. Thanks for writing in Katherine

1:01:26.720 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Mary Stewart. Yes, and boys, she's found the fountain of youth.

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>She looks exactly the same. Oh yeah, yes, uh and

1:01:33.880 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Sam too, he looks exactly the same. It's like twenty

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>looked like he did when he was seventeen. Well, thanks, dudes. Oh,

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we haven't even done listener mail yet. No, so listener mail. Um, well,

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna read it. It's called would you rather?

1:01:49.800 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel bad for Jerry. She's not gonna know where

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to put the listener mail China. That's all right. Hey, guys,

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>just finishing listening to soil It And uh, I thought

1:01:58.880 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I had a surefire argument starter for you guys. Josh's

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:05.919
<v Speaker 1>rant about the pros and cons of cooking and sharing meals.

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't rain reinforce my position on the subject. I'd

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like to know what you think about it. Here's how

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you play would you rather and it's not the sexy one? Okay,

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you get to forego one thing that humans need to

1:02:17.000 --> 1:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>do in order to live, either eating, sleeping, or breathing.

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>You can do the thing that you choose to forego,

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, you just don't need to in order to live,

1:02:26.280 --> 1:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and you remain neutral in terms of pleasure or discomfort

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>caused by the lack of the necessity. So you don't

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>feel hungry, you don't feel sleepy, you don't feel affixiated.

1:02:38.240 --> 1:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Stop out to me. So he wants to know what

1:02:42.120 --> 1:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>would we rather do without? Um mine is easy. I

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>would easily read not breathe question who would want? Who

1:02:53.440 --> 1:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>would say, like, I don't want to eat. I get

1:02:55.320 --> 1:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot out of breathing. I'd have trouble giving that

1:02:57.520 --> 1:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>one up. Well, Andrew said he would need that's the

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question. He said, I would always forego

1:03:02.400 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>eating because of the money it takes to feed myself.

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And uh, the waking hours I would save. Yeah, I

1:03:10.440 --> 1:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>mean people's that's the two things with food, time and money. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

1:03:16.320 --> 1:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but you get so much pleasure of it. Breathing. Sure

1:03:18.760 --> 1:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it's free, but who cares, especially if you're not going

1:03:21.480 --> 1:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to die from not breathing. And this situation is weird

1:03:25.440 --> 1:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy world of his. I say, anyone who chooses, and

1:03:29.800 --> 1:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this is Andrew talking, I say, anyone who chooses to

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>forego sleep as a dummy, because not only are you

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>not saving on food, you have to entertain yourself for

1:03:36.840 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>an additional five hours a day. You argument there, though,

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is you could get more done. Sure, sometimes I do

1:03:41.360 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>wish that you don't have to sleep enough to sleep.

1:03:43.880 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I also enjoy sleep too, he says. Plus, I

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>could eat socially every now and then under these terms

1:03:49.360 --> 1:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if I wanted to. But who would just take a

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>nap if you don't feel refreshed afterward? Yeah, well I would.

1:03:56.960 --> 1:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I love to sleep. And then the non breather are

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>just like deep sea diving and exploring volcanoes and stuff.

1:04:04.160 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess, oh, what do you think about that perk? Yeah,

1:04:08.360 --> 1:04:10.959
<v Speaker 1>you just go swimming all the way at the bottom forever. Yeah,

1:04:11.080 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's clearly breathing is the answer. It's not even

1:04:14.000 --> 1:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a subjective question at this point that we've proven it. Yeah,

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, keep up the good work. That's from Andrew.

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Andrew, you keep thinking work too. Yeah. Nice, I

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>just want to see you're a sucker for not eating though. Yeah. Uh.

1:04:28.200 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>If you want to try to stump us but fail

1:04:31.080 --> 1:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>at it like Andrew did, you can tweet to us

1:04:33.880 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast. You can join us

1:04:36.280 --> 1:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook dot com. You can or slash Stuff you

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Should Know. You can send us an email to stuff

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and it's always

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>joined us at at home on the web. Stuff you

1:04:45.680 --> 1:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Should Know dot Com. Stuff you Should Know is a

1:04:50.760 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my heart Radio,

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:04:57.360 --> 1:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.