1 00:00:00,840 --> 00:00:04,200 Speaker 1: Hey, everybody, Happy Saturday. Good morning. I hope you've had 2 00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: your breakfast cereal, and I hope you have had your cartoons. 3 00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 1: And I hope you are ready to learn about free 4 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,920 Speaker 1: speech here. That being thrown around a lot these days, 5 00:00:14,000 --> 00:00:18,400 Speaker 1: free speech, free speech, But free speech actually means something specific. 6 00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:21,400 Speaker 1: It's not just you can say anything you want, any 7 00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,279 Speaker 1: time you want and without any repercussions at all. That's 8 00:00:24,280 --> 00:00:26,160 Speaker 1: not free speech. We're here to tell you what it 9 00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:31,840 Speaker 1: really is. In the episode from February How Free Speech Works. 10 00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,239 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of I 11 00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 1: Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, 12 00:00:48,720 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 1: There's Charles w Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry. Papers have been shuffled. 13 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: Their plumb and true. It's time for Stuff you should 14 00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:58,920 Speaker 1: Know the podcast. You know it's not plumb and true. 15 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:04,760 Speaker 1: My gut. Anything in my house I went to, Uh, 16 00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 1: all of my house had those gross, cheap, hollow core 17 00:01:09,760 --> 00:01:15,160 Speaker 1: doors you know. Oh yeah, you know they're not doors. 18 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:17,840 Speaker 1: I mean they function as doors, but if there's air 19 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:20,759 Speaker 1: in your door, then there's not a door. So one 20 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 1: by one I've been replacing them with wood, solid doors. 21 00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:25,679 Speaker 1: And I went and did that for our bedroom. And man, 22 00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:29,560 Speaker 1: oh man, was it frustrating. Oh hanging them because they 23 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:33,040 Speaker 1: didn't want to hang. It's the worst, like nothing straight, like, oh, 24 00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:34,760 Speaker 1: that looks good, and then it goes to shut and 25 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 1: it's like whack. Well I'm sure it was straight, you know, 26 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:41,080 Speaker 1: a hundred years ago, you know, and then over time 27 00:01:41,080 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 1: the house settled in and now it's it's doing its 28 00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:45,600 Speaker 1: own thing. So I had to shave the door in 29 00:01:45,640 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 1: so many places it looks like a Doctor SEUs store. 30 00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:51,400 Speaker 1: Oh cool, you should plant one of those weird doctor 31 00:01:51,440 --> 00:01:53,840 Speaker 1: Seue's palm trees in your yard to really complete it. 32 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:59,240 Speaker 1: It's called marijuana. So I'm glad you just said marijuana, chuck, 33 00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 1: because you have every right to say the word marijuana 34 00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:05,840 Speaker 1: in this country. It's a free country. You can say 35 00:02:05,880 --> 00:02:08,560 Speaker 1: the name of a plant, you know, people people do 36 00:02:08,680 --> 00:02:12,799 Speaker 1: say and have long said. This is a free country. 37 00:02:12,960 --> 00:02:15,920 Speaker 1: I can say whatever I want. And free speech is 38 00:02:16,360 --> 00:02:21,960 Speaker 1: one of the basic hallmarks of what makes America free country. 39 00:02:22,520 --> 00:02:27,000 Speaker 1: Freedom of speech. Um, but America is not the only 40 00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 1: country that enshrines a freedom of speech protection in its charter. Yeah, 41 00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:36,440 Speaker 1: there are varying degrees of it in many many countries. 42 00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:40,359 Speaker 1: In some countries there's not very much. In other countries 43 00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:44,240 Speaker 1: there's a lot. In the US is arguably one of 44 00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:48,079 Speaker 1: the leaders, although some people point to Europe's and we'll 45 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:50,639 Speaker 1: talk about those later, but some people point to Europe's 46 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:55,080 Speaker 1: free speech protections and saying they're those people know what 47 00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:59,000 Speaker 1: they're doing. Um. In the US, if you look at 48 00:02:59,440 --> 00:03:03,320 Speaker 1: free speech, you go to the Bill of Rights. Typically 49 00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:07,120 Speaker 1: it's a great place to start, and you will find 50 00:03:07,520 --> 00:03:11,560 Speaker 1: you will find in the First Amendment of the Constitution, 51 00:03:12,160 --> 00:03:14,560 Speaker 1: which is the first part of the Bill of Rights, 52 00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 1: it says in there specifically that Congress will make no 53 00:03:20,600 --> 00:03:26,519 Speaker 1: law right abridging the freedom of speech. It's as simple 54 00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:30,200 Speaker 1: as that. It doesn't say unless speech says this, unless 55 00:03:30,320 --> 00:03:33,360 Speaker 1: somebody says that, unless you really don't like the guy, 56 00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:39,240 Speaker 1: there is no It's absolute. It's an absolute protection of 57 00:03:39,280 --> 00:03:43,240 Speaker 1: freedom of speech. Yeah, and that goes on. I think, uh, 58 00:03:43,280 --> 00:03:46,560 Speaker 1: it's pertinent to mention abridging the freedom of speech or 59 00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:50,640 Speaker 1: of the press, or the right of the people to 60 00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:55,840 Speaker 1: peaceably to assemble founding Father JFK and to petition the 61 00:03:55,880 --> 00:03:59,960 Speaker 1: government for a redress of grievances. I'm sorry that I'm 62 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 1: take Kennedy one because we're all very important, you know, 63 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: sure they are. Oh yeah, the press right to a symbol, 64 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:08,040 Speaker 1: it's a pretty important one. Well yeah, And because we 65 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:13,840 Speaker 1: had just left the country uh one, independence from Britain, 66 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:17,760 Speaker 1: who at the time was like, no, no, no, we 67 00:04:17,760 --> 00:04:21,800 Speaker 1: we very much want to squash any dissenting opinions about 68 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 1: the grown uh And people were getting thrown in jail 69 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:28,080 Speaker 1: for that kind of stuff in the colonies. They were 70 00:04:28,440 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: trying to quash a rebellion. And that's a pretty important 71 00:04:32,560 --> 00:04:35,040 Speaker 1: part of it. If you're if you're a monarchy, an 72 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:39,840 Speaker 1: absolute monarchy that wants to keep the rebels in check, 73 00:04:41,600 --> 00:04:44,280 Speaker 1: you just say you can't say certain things, and if 74 00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:45,760 Speaker 1: you do, we're going to throw you in jail. It 75 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 1: has a freezing effect, yeah, Or they're weird punishments, like 76 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:50,800 Speaker 1: when they said stick a sock in it, they went yeah, okay, 77 00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 1: and they went no, really, stick a sock in it 78 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:56,760 Speaker 1: by law for eight months, governor, and tape it, tape 79 00:04:56,760 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 1: it shut. With my dirty sock in your mouth, my 80 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:04,400 Speaker 1: dirty century sock, my wool sock from my wet boots. 81 00:05:05,640 --> 00:05:07,920 Speaker 1: Um quickly though, I think we should point out that 82 00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:11,680 Speaker 1: as we were going through this, like I realized you 83 00:05:11,720 --> 00:05:14,839 Speaker 1: could have an entire podcast called the Ins and Outs 84 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:17,280 Speaker 1: of Free Speech. Yeah, like a series, a whole show. 85 00:05:17,360 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 1: You could have a whole show about it, not just 86 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:21,160 Speaker 1: an episode. So this is you know, this is an 87 00:05:21,200 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: overview as we do that is going to pick and 88 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:28,159 Speaker 1: you know, talk about various court cases over the years, 89 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:33,120 Speaker 1: rulings and writings of judges, um, that are pertinent. But man, 90 00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:37,960 Speaker 1: it's deep and wide. Yeah, it is, especially considering that 91 00:05:38,800 --> 00:05:40,760 Speaker 1: again when you go to the Bill of Rights, it 92 00:05:40,839 --> 00:05:44,200 Speaker 1: just says Congress can't pass any laws that abridge the 93 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:47,640 Speaker 1: freedom of speech. There they're like, why does he keep 94 00:05:47,640 --> 00:05:52,600 Speaker 1: writing right there? And chuck. Not only though, was it 95 00:05:53,200 --> 00:05:59,200 Speaker 1: this in retaliation reaction to um, the British monarchy. Yeah, 96 00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: it was also a big part of Enlightenment thinking as well. 97 00:06:02,680 --> 00:06:06,520 Speaker 1: The protection of freedom of speech was a huge aspect 98 00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:09,839 Speaker 1: of the Enlightenment. And you know, obviously the United States 99 00:06:09,839 --> 00:06:14,080 Speaker 1: was founded during the Enlightenment and as part of the Enlightenment. 100 00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:17,000 Speaker 1: It was an Enlightenment experiment, right, Yeah, like we don't 101 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:21,640 Speaker 1: want to restrict thought or expression, um. And you know, 102 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,880 Speaker 1: some might say that if if the Britain hadn't been 103 00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 1: so intent on squashing dissenting opinion, then we might not 104 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:36,280 Speaker 1: have been so enlightenment aside. So uh, heck bent on 105 00:06:36,880 --> 00:06:38,920 Speaker 1: ensuring those rights. So maybe it all worked out for 106 00:06:38,960 --> 00:06:42,040 Speaker 1: the best. Yeah, I think so. And Britain came around. Right. 107 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:44,599 Speaker 1: You can still get that sock thrown in your mouth, 108 00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:47,800 Speaker 1: can you? I don't know, man, it's on the book still. 109 00:06:47,839 --> 00:06:49,520 Speaker 1: I just don't know if they do it anymore. Is 110 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: the socks are much nicer now, that's right. They're all 111 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:56,680 Speaker 1: happy socks. So since you have this very broad um 112 00:06:56,960 --> 00:07:01,120 Speaker 1: protection of freedom of speech, right, yeah, then there's nothing 113 00:07:01,120 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 1: more to be said about it. Anybody can say anything 114 00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 1: they want. Not true, quite true. It isn't true because 115 00:07:06,480 --> 00:07:10,240 Speaker 1: we have three branches of government here in the US. 116 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:12,640 Speaker 1: We do. Yeah, it turns out I thought that was 117 00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 1: just one. You got the executive branch, which is the 118 00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:19,200 Speaker 1: one I think you're thinking. Uh. Then you have the 119 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:24,760 Speaker 1: legislative branch Congress, okay, which is actually separate, and then 120 00:07:24,920 --> 00:07:28,520 Speaker 1: you have the third branch, the judicial branch. Yes, they 121 00:07:28,640 --> 00:07:33,040 Speaker 1: are equal and important branch. And with um the congressional 122 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 1: legislative branch. They pass laws, people go out and break laws, 123 00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:45,400 Speaker 1: people get convicted, people appeal their convictions, and in some cases, 124 00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:51,240 Speaker 1: those convictions and the laws are questionable enough or interesting 125 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 1: enough that it will eventually make it to a high 126 00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 1: enough court that the court will rule on whether or 127 00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 1: not that law holds to any constitutional standard. Yeah. Over time, 128 00:08:04,440 --> 00:08:09,080 Speaker 1: freedom of speech has been shaped and expanded and paired away, 129 00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 1: um by the courts here in the United States. Yeah, 130 00:08:12,800 --> 00:08:16,400 Speaker 1: Like maybe more so than any other kind of segment 131 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:19,840 Speaker 1: of law, or maybe not. But I'm gonna just as 132 00:08:19,920 --> 00:08:25,560 Speaker 1: as an complete, um armchair attorney, I'm gonna say that 133 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:30,800 Speaker 1: perhaps free speeches has been challenge more and whittled down 134 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:35,480 Speaker 1: and defined more than maybe any other aspect of law. Yeah, 135 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:38,920 Speaker 1: because one of the big things that the courts did 136 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:41,880 Speaker 1: with freedom of speech was to really expand the definition 137 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:44,400 Speaker 1: of speech. Yeah, it's not just words that come out 138 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:47,160 Speaker 1: of your mouth or even right. No, Like it can 139 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 1: be a T shirt that says f the police, or 140 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:55,959 Speaker 1: could say um um uh yeah, hug the police. Sure 141 00:08:57,120 --> 00:08:59,120 Speaker 1: somebody might find that offensive. Who knows, thank you for 142 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:02,560 Speaker 1: coming to my rescue. It could be a billboard, it 143 00:09:02,600 --> 00:09:06,280 Speaker 1: could be um, it could be a pamphlet you hand out. 144 00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:09,520 Speaker 1: It could be an act, symbolic act, flag burning. That 145 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:11,120 Speaker 1: was a big one to remember that in the eighties 146 00:09:11,160 --> 00:09:15,040 Speaker 1: absolutely or or refusing to say the pledge allegiance that 147 00:09:15,080 --> 00:09:17,720 Speaker 1: was in the I think World War two, Yeah, which 148 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:21,600 Speaker 1: is actually now protected as because free speech can also 149 00:09:21,720 --> 00:09:25,520 Speaker 1: mean the freedom to not speech. Yeah, because up until 150 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:28,960 Speaker 1: I think in the Supreme Court ruled on it, kids 151 00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:32,319 Speaker 1: were being forced to say the pledge whether they wanted 152 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 1: to or not. In the Supreme quisite. Now we think 153 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:39,960 Speaker 1: freedom of speech is really freedom of expression, and if 154 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:42,040 Speaker 1: you don't feel like saying the pledge, you're free to 155 00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:44,800 Speaker 1: express yourself in that way. Yeah. And as you'll find, 156 00:09:45,200 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 1: um throughout the show, we'll kind of probably say this 157 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:52,720 Speaker 1: over and over, freedom of speech doesn't have a lot 158 00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:59,400 Speaker 1: to do with something you might find offensive or repugnant. Um. Generally, 159 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:03,520 Speaker 1: the U S decided on protecting that right regardless of 160 00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:05,400 Speaker 1: whether or not you're offended or you think it's awful. 161 00:10:06,040 --> 00:10:08,400 Speaker 1: And that's kind of what makes America great in a 162 00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:11,199 Speaker 1: lot of ways, is you know, what, who are we 163 00:10:11,280 --> 00:10:16,200 Speaker 1: to decide what you know, to legislate morality essentially, and 164 00:10:16,200 --> 00:10:18,320 Speaker 1: what we'll get into all this with obscenity and all 165 00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:21,680 Speaker 1: that stuff and pornography. But um, even when it comes 166 00:10:21,679 --> 00:10:24,280 Speaker 1: to like you know, I don't want to say the pledge. 167 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:27,480 Speaker 1: Because of this reason, the courts have said, you know what, 168 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:29,679 Speaker 1: that that you're right, this is America. We may not 169 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,480 Speaker 1: like it, but that you're right. Yeah. And the whole 170 00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:35,040 Speaker 1: reason behind this too, it's it's easy to just take 171 00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 1: it for granted, especially if you were raised in the 172 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:41,400 Speaker 1: United States, that you have that right. Who cares what 173 00:10:41,480 --> 00:10:44,360 Speaker 1: the basis of it is. You can say basically whatever 174 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:47,280 Speaker 1: you want, you know um. But when you really dig 175 00:10:47,320 --> 00:10:50,480 Speaker 1: into why the founders sought to protect this and why 176 00:10:50,520 --> 00:10:54,400 Speaker 1: it's been upheld and defended so much over the years, 177 00:10:54,840 --> 00:10:58,280 Speaker 1: is because the idea is that if you are free 178 00:10:58,320 --> 00:11:01,000 Speaker 1: to speak your mind without fear of being put in 179 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:05,800 Speaker 1: jail or killed or beaten by a mob um, that 180 00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:09,479 Speaker 1: you are going to introduce new ideas to the marketplace 181 00:11:09,520 --> 00:11:12,840 Speaker 1: of ideas. And through this you're gonna have an exchange 182 00:11:12,840 --> 00:11:14,840 Speaker 1: with other people, and a lot of times it's going 183 00:11:14,880 --> 00:11:17,120 Speaker 1: to be contentious and it's going to be ugly, but 184 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:21,400 Speaker 1: over time things can evolve and get better and change 185 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 1: for the better through this exchange of ideas. And to 186 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:31,120 Speaker 1: ensure that the engine of cultural evolution continues unabated, you 187 00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:33,280 Speaker 1: have to have the free exchange of ideas. And to 188 00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:35,360 Speaker 1: have the free exchange of ideas, you have to have 189 00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:38,680 Speaker 1: protection of free speech. Yeah, because if not, you have 190 00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:41,680 Speaker 1: the government being the one saying, well, now here are 191 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 1: all the ideas, right exactly, and um, don't worry about 192 00:11:45,280 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 1: having any of your own. Yeah, these are these, these 193 00:11:47,240 --> 00:11:49,199 Speaker 1: are the ones. Yeah. And in a lot of cases, 194 00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 1: those things can come across as really great ideas. Um. 195 00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 1: Here in the US, up until the UH, I think 196 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:02,040 Speaker 1: the mid fifties or early sixties, there were laws on 197 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:05,440 Speaker 1: the books where it said you can't you can't speak 198 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:09,880 Speaker 1: ill of groups, like you can't say anything about um, 199 00:12:10,080 --> 00:12:15,040 Speaker 1: Jewish people or Muslim people or any group. You can't 200 00:12:15,080 --> 00:12:19,080 Speaker 1: say these things. It was not protected, right. It was 201 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:23,440 Speaker 1: called group libel. And that actually sounds pretty good in 202 00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:25,360 Speaker 1: a lot of in a lot of senses, like, yeah, 203 00:12:25,360 --> 00:12:28,000 Speaker 1: we shouldn't be talking trash about entire groups of people, 204 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:31,320 Speaker 1: because it does it can lead to two problems. But 205 00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:36,680 Speaker 1: that same prohibition on speech came to be exploited by 206 00:12:36,760 --> 00:12:40,880 Speaker 1: white Southerners who were in power in the fifties, who said, 207 00:12:41,240 --> 00:12:45,360 Speaker 1: Martin Luther King, he's trying to incite violent social change 208 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:50,360 Speaker 1: with his his radical ideas. Somebody needs to uh put 209 00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:54,040 Speaker 1: a duct tape over that guy's mouth. He doesn't have 210 00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:57,240 Speaker 1: the freedom to say this. And actually, our right to 211 00:12:57,400 --> 00:13:01,760 Speaker 1: say hateful things about other people was a direct result 212 00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:05,800 Speaker 1: in the United States of the civil rights movement UM 213 00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:10,560 Speaker 1: being protected by the courts against white Southerners who sought 214 00:13:10,600 --> 00:13:16,079 Speaker 1: to um to uh squash their their speech. So I 215 00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:20,480 Speaker 1: hate speech, Yeah, is due in part in part to 216 00:13:20,880 --> 00:13:24,079 Speaker 1: Dr Martin Luther King and and trying to advance civil 217 00:13:24,160 --> 00:13:27,719 Speaker 1: rights in a weird turn of events, Yeah, it really was. Uh. 218 00:13:27,760 --> 00:13:31,199 Speaker 1: And in Europe, and we'll talk about this a little more. UM, 219 00:13:31,320 --> 00:13:33,240 Speaker 1: Like you said, some people say they have nailed it. 220 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 1: They don't protect hate speech, and you can't be uh, 221 00:13:38,120 --> 00:13:43,480 Speaker 1: you can't deny the Holocaust publicly, and you can't um say, 222 00:13:43,559 --> 00:13:46,880 Speaker 1: you know Jewish people, you know x y Z or 223 00:13:46,920 --> 00:13:50,839 Speaker 1: this group of people are like this. Um. Some people 224 00:13:50,880 --> 00:13:52,679 Speaker 1: say that's you know, that's kind of right on the money. 225 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 1: We have taken a different tech here in the US. 226 00:13:55,280 --> 00:13:58,200 Speaker 1: Right in Europe does that because they have a pretty 227 00:13:58,320 --> 00:14:01,280 Speaker 1: recent example of what can happen if you do have 228 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:06,200 Speaker 1: freedom of speech, and that totalitarian government can hijack that 229 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:09,079 Speaker 1: freedom of speech and use it as propaganda to incite 230 00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:13,920 Speaker 1: hatred amongst an entire population. Um or even as as 231 00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:17,440 Speaker 1: um this this one author put it to prepare them 232 00:14:17,480 --> 00:14:22,200 Speaker 1: for extermination, just basically saying like, hey, everybody, get those guys. 233 00:14:22,560 --> 00:14:25,840 Speaker 1: They're the reasons you don't have jobs. They're the rapists. 234 00:14:25,880 --> 00:14:28,120 Speaker 1: They're the people who are who are going to kill 235 00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:31,880 Speaker 1: you and steal your your family's wealth and well being. 236 00:14:32,440 --> 00:14:35,280 Speaker 1: So get rid of them. Turn on them. And that's 237 00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 1: the whole point of saying, nobody can incite hatred through 238 00:14:40,680 --> 00:14:46,000 Speaker 1: speech in these European democracies. Um, because the state has 239 00:14:46,040 --> 00:14:51,360 Speaker 1: done it before. Yeah, and we all see what happened there. Um. 240 00:14:51,440 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 1: Should we take a break? I feel like that's a 241 00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:58,720 Speaker 1: good intro, broad, all encompassing, passionate, all encompassingly. All right, 242 00:14:58,760 --> 00:15:00,000 Speaker 1: Well we'll come back here in a minute and get 243 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:05,880 Speaker 1: down to the nitty gritty of some of these court cases. Okay, sorry, gee, 244 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:30,440 Speaker 1: um large skid all right, trend um, So if you 245 00:15:30,480 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 1: want to go back a little bit to justice Oliver 246 00:15:33,480 --> 00:15:38,760 Speaker 1: Wendell Holmes Jr. Son of Sherlock, one of the famous 247 00:15:39,600 --> 00:15:44,520 Speaker 1: justice is the United States. Uh, in a lot of ways, 248 00:15:44,600 --> 00:15:48,480 Speaker 1: but very specifically because everyone has sort of heard the 249 00:15:48,680 --> 00:15:52,840 Speaker 1: the old thing that, Um, you can't yell fire in 250 00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:56,560 Speaker 1: a movie theater and say that's free speech because that 251 00:15:56,720 --> 00:16:00,280 Speaker 1: will In the case of in the nineteen nineteen case 252 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:05,160 Speaker 1: Shink the United States, UM, Charles Schenk was arrested for 253 00:16:05,240 --> 00:16:10,680 Speaker 1: distributing material basically that said, hey, UM, don't the the 254 00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 1: US draft military draft is bs um, don't do it. 255 00:16:15,480 --> 00:16:18,240 Speaker 1: Fight against it? Uh. And they said, you know what, 256 00:16:18,400 --> 00:16:22,160 Speaker 1: that's that's espionage actually, And that went all the way 257 00:16:22,160 --> 00:16:25,400 Speaker 1: to Supreme Court and they did not protect that right because, 258 00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:28,440 Speaker 1: in the words of Oliver Winto Holmes, they said, did 259 00:16:28,480 --> 00:16:31,120 Speaker 1: the words create a clear and present danger that they 260 00:16:31,160 --> 00:16:33,920 Speaker 1: will bring about substantive evils? Congress has a right to 261 00:16:34,000 --> 00:16:36,960 Speaker 1: prevent and that sort of in line. And later on 262 00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:38,680 Speaker 1: in that same ruling, he was talking about yelling fire 263 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:41,120 Speaker 1: in a theater as an example, like, you know, you 264 00:16:41,160 --> 00:16:42,960 Speaker 1: can't do that because I will insight panic if people 265 00:16:42,960 --> 00:16:45,560 Speaker 1: will get stomped. Right, And in this case this kind 266 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:49,120 Speaker 1: of set the precedent for or the tone for all 267 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:54,280 Speaker 1: free speech cases to follow. UM. It's weighing the the 268 00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:58,240 Speaker 1: individual right versus the public good, yes, or in this case, 269 00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:04,760 Speaker 1: the individual right, says UM, creating some problem or evil 270 00:17:04,840 --> 00:17:07,280 Speaker 1: as he put it, that Congress has a right and 271 00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:11,639 Speaker 1: an interest to prevent a danger to the country, right. UM. 272 00:17:11,760 --> 00:17:15,119 Speaker 1: In this case, really what they were saying was they 273 00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:20,760 Speaker 1: were suppressing criticism of a government program, the Draft. UM. 274 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:24,960 Speaker 1: And then but Holmes was fine with that. But within 275 00:17:25,040 --> 00:17:29,159 Speaker 1: a year I think he saw his UM, his test, 276 00:17:29,520 --> 00:17:31,400 Speaker 1: you know, does it present a clear and present danger 277 00:17:31,760 --> 00:17:35,479 Speaker 1: being used in a way to to squash descent when 278 00:17:35,520 --> 00:17:39,119 Speaker 1: a bunch of anarchists who were just generally advocating the 279 00:17:39,240 --> 00:17:43,040 Speaker 1: overthrow of the government. UM, rather than need to do 280 00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:48,560 Speaker 1: this on this date at this time, UM, they were used, 281 00:17:48,760 --> 00:17:52,240 Speaker 1: they were convicted under the test that Holmes created. So 282 00:17:52,359 --> 00:17:54,840 Speaker 1: he took what was called the Great Dissent and actually 283 00:17:54,920 --> 00:17:59,359 Speaker 1: dissented against his own former test and said, no, it 284 00:17:59,440 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 1: has to present a clear and present danger, present meaning 285 00:18:02,160 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 1: like it's about to happen or you know, the time 286 00:18:04,760 --> 00:18:07,439 Speaker 1: that it's going to happen, and it's a clear danger, 287 00:18:07,600 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 1: like this is what's going to happen. Because this person 288 00:18:10,920 --> 00:18:15,119 Speaker 1: said that, so that that ultimately became the format for 289 00:18:15,960 --> 00:18:18,080 Speaker 1: UM what we'll talk about in a little bit, which 290 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:22,320 Speaker 1: is inciting violence. Yeah, and that's not to say that UM, 291 00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:24,680 Speaker 1: like The ruling there, like you said, was about a 292 00:18:24,720 --> 00:18:27,920 Speaker 1: clear and present danger, not necessarily the fact that Charles 293 00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:30,400 Speaker 1: Schenk was against the war, because we have a long 294 00:18:30,520 --> 00:18:33,520 Speaker 1: history in this country of being able to uh be 295 00:18:33,680 --> 00:18:37,480 Speaker 1: a wartime dissenter and talk about it and be protected. Um. 296 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:40,080 Speaker 1: During Vietnam War, there was a man who had he 297 00:18:40,119 --> 00:18:41,680 Speaker 1: went through an l A courthouse and he had a 298 00:18:41,760 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 1: jacket that said, you know, F the draft, but it 299 00:18:45,720 --> 00:18:48,840 Speaker 1: was really spelled out. It's so ironic that we're censoring 300 00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:53,119 Speaker 1: ourselves in this one, but it's uh F the draft 301 00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:57,000 Speaker 1: and they um as you will always almost always see here. 302 00:18:57,320 --> 00:19:00,280 Speaker 1: These people are, like you said, usually arrested, convicted, and 303 00:19:00,359 --> 00:19:05,159 Speaker 1: then when they're well maybe hippies, you never know, and 304 00:19:05,280 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 1: then that's when the courts take it up and potentially 305 00:19:07,640 --> 00:19:10,480 Speaker 1: either a protect or don't protect the speech. In this case, 306 00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:14,640 Speaker 1: the court said no, you're within your right because someone 307 00:19:14,720 --> 00:19:17,239 Speaker 1: could see your jacket and then not look at it, right, 308 00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:19,320 Speaker 1: And that's a good point. Like you you can just 309 00:19:19,440 --> 00:19:22,160 Speaker 1: look away from the guy's jacket, right. You can also 310 00:19:22,560 --> 00:19:25,480 Speaker 1: not take the pamphlet that the guys handing you. You 311 00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:29,119 Speaker 1: can also you can also not rent the movie that 312 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:31,920 Speaker 1: um that you find offensive. You can also turn the 313 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:34,520 Speaker 1: TV station. You can also turn the radio down. You 314 00:19:34,560 --> 00:19:36,440 Speaker 1: can also not go to the website. You can turn 315 00:19:36,520 --> 00:19:39,600 Speaker 1: our podcast off. To me, well you shouldn't, so you could. 316 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:45,760 Speaker 1: To me, the alternative of not not receiving some speech 317 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:49,480 Speaker 1: that you find offensive like being able to get away 318 00:19:49,560 --> 00:19:52,560 Speaker 1: from it. That to me is the ultimate test for 319 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:56,160 Speaker 1: for whether speech should be restricted or not. And since 320 00:19:56,200 --> 00:20:00,000 Speaker 1: you can in virtually any situation get away from speech 321 00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:05,040 Speaker 1: each except maybe skywriting, we should probably really regulate sky 322 00:20:05,240 --> 00:20:07,440 Speaker 1: riding pretty pretty toughly. Now you can look down on 323 00:20:07,440 --> 00:20:09,760 Speaker 1: the ground, but I guess you could. Yeah, So as 324 00:20:09,800 --> 00:20:12,440 Speaker 1: long as you can get away from it, or, more 325 00:20:12,480 --> 00:20:15,520 Speaker 1: to the point sheared, shield your children from it, I 326 00:20:15,600 --> 00:20:18,560 Speaker 1: don't think it should be I don't see any reason 327 00:20:18,640 --> 00:20:23,680 Speaker 1: for it to be um entailed. For skywriting. You would 328 00:20:23,680 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 1: have to argue in court that it is such a 329 00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:29,040 Speaker 1: delight to children that they can't help. But look like 330 00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:32,000 Speaker 1: you would have to physically restrain them and put blinders 331 00:20:32,040 --> 00:20:34,639 Speaker 1: on them, exactly, and that's unreasonable, your honor right. You 332 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:36,520 Speaker 1: could write a curse word and then do a drawing 333 00:20:36,560 --> 00:20:40,040 Speaker 1: of Barney and that would satisfy that is Barney still 334 00:20:40,040 --> 00:20:42,919 Speaker 1: a thing. I think Barney will always be a thing. 335 00:20:43,240 --> 00:20:46,040 Speaker 1: I don't know. Uh So over the years have been, 336 00:20:46,200 --> 00:20:48,200 Speaker 1: like we said, a lot of court cases that have 337 00:20:49,080 --> 00:20:52,320 Speaker 1: kind of whittled away and defined not whittled away, you know, 338 00:20:52,560 --> 00:20:58,000 Speaker 1: because that molded shaped, molded and shaped. Uh So Marvin 339 00:20:58,320 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 1: Old Marv ran an adult book business, and he what 340 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:05,600 Speaker 1: he did was he sent out mailers. He liked to 341 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:09,320 Speaker 1: send out a mailer, right, and um, these mailers would 342 00:21:09,320 --> 00:21:11,879 Speaker 1: show up at houses where, you know, something my kid 343 00:21:11,960 --> 00:21:14,680 Speaker 1: might read it, or someone easily offended might read it, 344 00:21:15,200 --> 00:21:17,960 Speaker 1: or not so easily offended might read it. Uh. And 345 00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:22,280 Speaker 1: there was a mom who uh this was her adult son. Yeah, 346 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:24,280 Speaker 1: it was a mom and her grown son who's the 347 00:21:24,359 --> 00:21:28,160 Speaker 1: manager of I guess the family restaurant. And they childlike 348 00:21:28,800 --> 00:21:33,119 Speaker 1: maybe he was his eyes were burning. Um, I don't know, 349 00:21:33,240 --> 00:21:35,760 Speaker 1: maybe his mom was just just treated him like a kid. 350 00:21:35,840 --> 00:21:38,280 Speaker 1: Who knows. But they said, you know what, you know, 351 00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:42,280 Speaker 1: this guy shouldn't be mailing these randomly to just whoever. 352 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:44,760 Speaker 1: We certainly don't want it, so we're gonna call and complaint. 353 00:21:45,440 --> 00:21:49,320 Speaker 1: And Marvin Miller ended up getting arrested for um obscenity. 354 00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:52,000 Speaker 1: And this is a huge this turned out to be 355 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:53,720 Speaker 1: a huge case. Yeah, and went all the way to 356 00:21:53,720 --> 00:21:57,399 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, and um, yeah, it was. It was 357 00:21:57,680 --> 00:22:03,360 Speaker 1: what you call a um, what do you call that? Landmark? Well, 358 00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:07,920 Speaker 1: Landmark's waters watershed. I couldn't think of it. I was like, 359 00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:10,600 Speaker 1: we did a podcast on it recently. It's an Intego 360 00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:15,200 Speaker 1: Girls song. That's right. It was a watershed case. Miller v. California. 361 00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:17,760 Speaker 1: And I'm gonna say V instead of versus. I think 362 00:22:17,800 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: we've talked about that before, right, Um, it makes you 363 00:22:20,640 --> 00:22:25,840 Speaker 1: sound more legal easy, Yeah, and everyone likes being legal easy. Uh. 364 00:22:25,920 --> 00:22:29,320 Speaker 1: In three, like I said, the Supreme Court heard the 365 00:22:29,400 --> 00:22:32,280 Speaker 1: case and they found that his speech did not qualify 366 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:36,760 Speaker 1: for for protection. Um. But here's the hitch. They didn't 367 00:22:36,840 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 1: rule on the obscenity. They ruled that, hey, we're protecting kids, 368 00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 1: and you can't just mail this stuff to a house 369 00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:48,880 Speaker 1: because kids live in houses, and so it was inappropriate 370 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:52,480 Speaker 1: content for children. Um. And what it did as well 371 00:22:52,640 --> 00:22:57,400 Speaker 1: is it is it specified a test for defining obscenity, which, boy, 372 00:22:57,480 --> 00:22:59,880 Speaker 1: over the years, this has been a really tough thing 373 00:23:00,240 --> 00:23:03,359 Speaker 1: and it seems like over the years of courts round 374 00:23:03,400 --> 00:23:05,480 Speaker 1: me don't want any part of that. Now. If There's 375 00:23:05,560 --> 00:23:08,560 Speaker 1: one thing too that as far as restricting free speech goes, 376 00:23:08,640 --> 00:23:12,160 Speaker 1: that drives me up the wall. It's obscenity. The Court 377 00:23:12,200 --> 00:23:15,920 Speaker 1: should not have anything to do with obscenity, and mostly 378 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:18,760 Speaker 1: they don't wantling on it. Right, There's this great quote 379 00:23:18,880 --> 00:23:22,800 Speaker 1: from Hugo Black, who, as of this podcast has become 380 00:23:22,880 --> 00:23:26,000 Speaker 1: my favorite Supreme Court justice of all time. He said 381 00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:30,040 Speaker 1: in Michigan versus State of New York, Um, I wish 382 00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:32,720 Speaker 1: once more to express my this is my Hugo Black, 383 00:23:32,760 --> 00:23:35,200 Speaker 1: by the way, I wish once more to express my 384 00:23:35,320 --> 00:23:38,480 Speaker 1: objections to saddling this court with the irksome and an 385 00:23:38,680 --> 00:23:43,960 Speaker 1: inevitably unpopular and unwholesome task of finally deciding by a 386 00:23:44,160 --> 00:23:47,359 Speaker 1: case by case, site by site personal judgment of the 387 00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:50,680 Speaker 1: members of this court what pornography, whatever that means is 388 00:23:50,760 --> 00:23:55,200 Speaker 1: too hardcore for people to see or read. Basically, they 389 00:23:55,240 --> 00:23:57,280 Speaker 1: were tired of sitting in court and looking at like 390 00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:01,920 Speaker 1: pictures of a B. C. At the least, and ruling 391 00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:04,400 Speaker 1: on this stuff like what about this one? What about 392 00:24:04,440 --> 00:24:06,600 Speaker 1: this one? What about? The thing is they were looking 393 00:24:06,680 --> 00:24:09,880 Speaker 1: at like pulp pulp books Like Michigan was a guy 394 00:24:09,960 --> 00:24:13,359 Speaker 1: who had a publishing house of pulp books that showed 395 00:24:13,400 --> 00:24:17,480 Speaker 1: like B D S M or lesbianism or masturbation or 396 00:24:17,520 --> 00:24:19,720 Speaker 1: whatever on the cover. He's like, this is this is 397 00:24:19,720 --> 00:24:22,600 Speaker 1: actually pretty nice, right, They're like minutes a perk of 398 00:24:22,680 --> 00:24:24,760 Speaker 1: the job. But we shouldn't have to do it anyway. 399 00:24:25,440 --> 00:24:28,320 Speaker 1: And so the idea that that um, the court is 400 00:24:28,440 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 1: ruling what is obscene is and what is not is 401 00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:37,400 Speaker 1: it's legislating morality, clear and just clearly it's legislating morality. 402 00:24:38,040 --> 00:24:40,360 Speaker 1: And I don't think the court has any any right 403 00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:42,639 Speaker 1: to that at all, but they have. They have a 404 00:24:42,680 --> 00:24:45,800 Speaker 1: long tradition of it, and over time they've actually come 405 00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:51,560 Speaker 1: to protect pornography, um, with the exception of child pornography, 406 00:24:52,040 --> 00:24:54,480 Speaker 1: which you're not really gonna You're gonna be hard pressed 407 00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:57,720 Speaker 1: to find anybody who argues for freedom of speech as 408 00:24:57,760 --> 00:25:03,080 Speaker 1: far as child pornography goes UM. And then obscenity, which 409 00:25:03,359 --> 00:25:07,600 Speaker 1: is which came out of this through the three pronged 410 00:25:07,640 --> 00:25:11,040 Speaker 1: tests to determine what's obscene, came out of that Miller 411 00:25:11,400 --> 00:25:14,280 Speaker 1: the California case, and it says this, It says that 412 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:20,600 Speaker 1: if the average person using contemporary community standards can look 413 00:25:20,600 --> 00:25:23,760 Speaker 1: at something and says that this arouses the prurient interest? 414 00:25:24,800 --> 00:25:28,000 Speaker 1: Does it meaning sexy time? Yeah? Uh, that's that's the 415 00:25:28,040 --> 00:25:30,479 Speaker 1: wronged one. And you have to satisfy all three of them. 416 00:25:31,280 --> 00:25:36,160 Speaker 1: Is this patently offensive sexual content or patently either one? 417 00:25:36,359 --> 00:25:39,240 Speaker 1: I say patently And I got that from Mr Burns. 418 00:25:39,960 --> 00:25:43,640 Speaker 1: Oh well, I say, I say patently like Mr Burns does. Yeah. 419 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:45,159 Speaker 1: And then the final one is a big one. Uh, 420 00:25:45,240 --> 00:25:49,320 Speaker 1: it's whether the work, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, 421 00:25:49,440 --> 00:25:55,199 Speaker 1: or potentially or political or scientific value. Right. That's that's subjective, 422 00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:59,640 Speaker 1: extremely subjective, like who who it literally says if it's 423 00:25:59,680 --> 00:26:03,600 Speaker 1: our stick? Right? Who? Who says? What's art and what's not? Yeah? 424 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 1: And very famously, uh, Justice Potter Stewart the very very 425 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:12,159 Speaker 1: famous line when asking about obscenity or pornography said I 426 00:26:12,240 --> 00:26:14,399 Speaker 1: know what when I see it? Right? But they they 427 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:17,040 Speaker 1: have long said like we we One of them said, 428 00:26:17,160 --> 00:26:20,280 Speaker 1: we may be trying to define the indefinable. Yeah, it 429 00:26:20,359 --> 00:26:24,399 Speaker 1: is indefinable. You ask a hundred people what pornography is 430 00:26:24,680 --> 00:26:26,840 Speaker 1: and you'll get a hundred different answers. And so as 431 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:31,119 Speaker 1: a result, some courts have said, uh, yeah, this community 432 00:26:31,320 --> 00:26:35,359 Speaker 1: the jurors decided that this is obscene, So people go 433 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:38,720 Speaker 1: to jail for depicting sexual acts or something like that 434 00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:44,879 Speaker 1: that some jurors in that town found um distasteful because 435 00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:48,920 Speaker 1: America has has long had a very puritanical hang up 436 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:53,560 Speaker 1: with sex and nudity. Uh, violence, bring it on, but 437 00:26:54,720 --> 00:26:58,359 Speaker 1: nude bodies shame, shame. I think that's probably my issue 438 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:01,000 Speaker 1: with it too, is we're super like will expose kids 439 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:06,440 Speaker 1: to violence, extreme violence at a very young age. But sexuality, Hey, 440 00:27:07,160 --> 00:27:10,760 Speaker 1: you wait until you're you wait until your parents are dead. 441 00:27:11,520 --> 00:27:14,880 Speaker 1: You understand. Wonders for the therapy industry though it's true, 442 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:18,000 Speaker 1: So hold on checked. There's one other thing. The other 443 00:27:18,119 --> 00:27:20,159 Speaker 1: part that the other problem I have with the um 444 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:24,000 Speaker 1: defining obscenity is that there's no national standard. The courts 445 00:27:24,040 --> 00:27:26,320 Speaker 1: even said it would be impossible to come up with 446 00:27:26,359 --> 00:27:29,879 Speaker 1: a national standard. So if Miller had been tried in 447 00:27:30,000 --> 00:27:34,560 Speaker 1: a community of swingers who are like into that stuff, um, 448 00:27:35,200 --> 00:27:40,119 Speaker 1: he probably would have gotten off right. But because he 449 00:27:40,280 --> 00:27:43,320 Speaker 1: was tried in a community that decided that no, this 450 00:27:43,520 --> 00:27:46,560 Speaker 1: is this is obscene, it was deemed obscene, whereas in 451 00:27:46,640 --> 00:27:49,480 Speaker 1: another community it may not have been deemed obscene. That's 452 00:27:49,520 --> 00:27:52,000 Speaker 1: no test. Well, yeah, and that that became a big 453 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:54,760 Speaker 1: deal at one point because they basically, um, the law 454 00:27:54,880 --> 00:27:59,320 Speaker 1: said that community standards are like you can't have a 455 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:03,560 Speaker 1: national stand or because what what the someone thinks in Skokie, 456 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:06,919 Speaker 1: Illinois is not what in Sin City, Las Vegas. They 457 00:28:06,960 --> 00:28:11,800 Speaker 1: have an entirely different definition of obscenity and pornography, you know, 458 00:28:12,520 --> 00:28:15,960 Speaker 1: and they're right. Yeah, I guess they are right, which 459 00:28:16,040 --> 00:28:20,680 Speaker 1: is which is why I you I to me, it's 460 00:28:20,720 --> 00:28:23,480 Speaker 1: one or the other. Either get rid of anything that 461 00:28:23,560 --> 00:28:27,719 Speaker 1: could possibly be considered obscene or you allow it all. 462 00:28:28,880 --> 00:28:34,479 Speaker 1: So obscenity, it's obscene, it is. Well, we'll get more 463 00:28:34,520 --> 00:28:37,639 Speaker 1: into obscenity too, but um, there are a lot of 464 00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:40,280 Speaker 1: other facets of free speech that you might not really 465 00:28:40,360 --> 00:28:43,080 Speaker 1: think about. In two thousand thirteen, that was a case 466 00:28:44,000 --> 00:28:48,000 Speaker 1: Bland v. Roberts where there were these two dudes, um 467 00:28:48,120 --> 00:28:50,440 Speaker 1: that work for a sheriff department. You know sheriff's are elected. 468 00:28:50,840 --> 00:28:53,360 Speaker 1: They were running for office, and they were fired for 469 00:28:53,760 --> 00:28:58,160 Speaker 1: commenting and liking UM on an opponent's Facebook page, which 470 00:28:58,560 --> 00:29:00,840 Speaker 1: you know, this gets into in the digital age and 471 00:29:00,880 --> 00:29:04,040 Speaker 1: the Internet age, a whole different slew of questions to 472 00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:07,320 Speaker 1: be answered, And they appealed that case and then and 473 00:29:07,480 --> 00:29:11,760 Speaker 1: one actually, yeah, Bland v. Roberts. As a result, Facebook 474 00:29:11,840 --> 00:29:16,200 Speaker 1: likes are considered protective protected free speech under the First Amendment. 475 00:29:16,240 --> 00:29:19,440 Speaker 1: Now yeah, but ibronic, well maybe not ironically, but Facebook 476 00:29:19,480 --> 00:29:22,360 Speaker 1: and social media in general you can also, I mean, 477 00:29:22,400 --> 00:29:24,680 Speaker 1: it's at their discretion whether or not they take something down, 478 00:29:25,160 --> 00:29:27,320 Speaker 1: and you can't say, well, that's free speech, and it's like, no, 479 00:29:27,520 --> 00:29:31,080 Speaker 1: this is our our private room. Essentially is our home. 480 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:34,760 Speaker 1: And inside a private home you can tell someone to 481 00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:39,080 Speaker 1: shut up. Private home, private companies, Yeah, social media platform 482 00:29:39,160 --> 00:29:41,160 Speaker 1: Like if you show up to work in uh F, 483 00:29:41,320 --> 00:29:43,720 Speaker 1: the police shirt, they can fire you or tell you 484 00:29:43,840 --> 00:29:46,520 Speaker 1: to change it. And if you say no, no, no, 485 00:29:46,760 --> 00:29:48,920 Speaker 1: like this is my free speech, I'll go no, this 486 00:29:49,120 --> 00:29:51,440 Speaker 1: is my business. This is not a free speech. So 487 00:29:51,960 --> 00:29:55,239 Speaker 1: like like the mall, remember yeah, oh yeah, that's right, 488 00:29:55,400 --> 00:29:58,080 Speaker 1: poor Victor Gruing. Uh And here's the thing too is 489 00:29:58,240 --> 00:30:03,080 Speaker 1: and this isn't really section in our notes. But I 490 00:30:03,120 --> 00:30:04,680 Speaker 1: get kind of a riffin here. I get kind of 491 00:30:04,720 --> 00:30:07,360 Speaker 1: bugged these days with I think a lot of people 492 00:30:07,400 --> 00:30:09,840 Speaker 1: have the notion that freedom of speech means also freedom 493 00:30:09,960 --> 00:30:13,640 Speaker 1: from consequence, and those are two different things. Like freedom 494 00:30:13,680 --> 00:30:16,360 Speaker 1: of speech means that you were not going to be well, 495 00:30:16,400 --> 00:30:18,640 Speaker 1: you might even be arrested and convicted, but eventually it 496 00:30:18,720 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 1: will be overturned. You'll be vindicated. But if a business 497 00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:27,080 Speaker 1: or a comedian or a TV show does something that 498 00:30:27,160 --> 00:30:31,800 Speaker 1: people find offensive or provocateur YouTube and someone wants to 499 00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:33,920 Speaker 1: pick at them and shut them down or boycott them, 500 00:30:34,520 --> 00:30:37,640 Speaker 1: and they cry free speech, it's like you know, you know, 501 00:30:38,720 --> 00:30:40,280 Speaker 1: you said that you got away with it. You're not 502 00:30:40,360 --> 00:30:42,760 Speaker 1: in jail. Doesn't mean it won't be consequences. Well, yeah, 503 00:30:42,760 --> 00:30:46,959 Speaker 1: the right to protest is enshrined in the same free speech. 504 00:30:47,400 --> 00:30:49,400 Speaker 1: But I think, yeah, I hear a lot. It seems 505 00:30:49,400 --> 00:30:51,840 Speaker 1: like more and more of these days where people, um, 506 00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:55,760 Speaker 1: people whine about the consequences of their own free speech 507 00:30:56,720 --> 00:31:00,320 Speaker 1: and that's not enshrined in the constitution. There there very 508 00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:03,440 Speaker 1: likely will be consequences, right, people will hate you maybe, 509 00:31:03,760 --> 00:31:05,800 Speaker 1: But it's like you said, though, you know the the 510 00:31:06,120 --> 00:31:10,480 Speaker 1: the it's there to protect the unpopular opinion. There's this 511 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:14,360 Speaker 1: guy Um who's a an expert on free speech at 512 00:31:14,520 --> 00:31:18,680 Speaker 1: Penn State. I believe um. He said, we have a 513 00:31:18,840 --> 00:31:22,960 Speaker 1: First Amendment to protect unpopular expression or the minority viewpoint, 514 00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:26,200 Speaker 1: because we don't need a constitution to protect the majority, 515 00:31:26,240 --> 00:31:28,960 Speaker 1: what the majority thinks. The majority takes care of itself. 516 00:31:29,120 --> 00:31:31,160 Speaker 1: It's a good point. It's the people who everybody else 517 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:34,720 Speaker 1: hates and what they have to say. Um, that is 518 00:31:35,040 --> 00:31:38,840 Speaker 1: protected by the Constitution. Yeah. And uh, Harvard law professor 519 00:31:38,920 --> 00:31:43,440 Speaker 1: Noah Feldman, in a very Unharvard law like way, said, uh, 520 00:31:43,680 --> 00:31:47,080 Speaker 1: if your feelings are hurt, then that's your problem, snowflake. 521 00:31:47,400 --> 00:31:51,480 Speaker 1: You didn't say Harvard like JFK. He didn't say snowflake. 522 00:31:51,520 --> 00:31:53,800 Speaker 1: I was kidding, no, but he he. What he was 523 00:31:53,880 --> 00:31:57,400 Speaker 1: pointing out was basically the sentiment behind free speech in 524 00:31:57,440 --> 00:32:00,080 Speaker 1: the United States that as long as you are not 525 00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:06,280 Speaker 1: physically harming somebody you like, emotional harm is whatever. We're 526 00:32:06,320 --> 00:32:08,640 Speaker 1: not even gonna it's not even in a register. Well, 527 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:12,160 Speaker 1: although that one article you sent that op ed there 528 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:15,920 Speaker 1: there was the guy that argued that emotional harm was 529 00:32:16,040 --> 00:32:20,760 Speaker 1: worse than physical harm and had a longer lasting impact. Um, 530 00:32:21,480 --> 00:32:24,040 Speaker 1: so you know there are two sides to every argument there. Well, 531 00:32:24,080 --> 00:32:25,960 Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons why Europe has said no 532 00:32:26,120 --> 00:32:29,120 Speaker 1: hate speech. It's harmful. Yeah. Yeah, Like, even if it 533 00:32:29,240 --> 00:32:33,240 Speaker 1: isn't physically harmful, it's emotionally it's an intellectually harmful it's 534 00:32:33,680 --> 00:32:36,680 Speaker 1: it's not good alright, So we've dabbled in an obscenity. 535 00:32:39,360 --> 00:32:41,280 Speaker 1: Uh one of the other and we'll talk a little 536 00:32:41,280 --> 00:32:42,840 Speaker 1: bit more about it. But one of the other things 537 00:32:43,000 --> 00:32:46,000 Speaker 1: that um, you can you can have insulting speech, but 538 00:32:46,280 --> 00:32:50,120 Speaker 1: there's something called fighting words, um that is not protected 539 00:32:50,320 --> 00:32:53,680 Speaker 1: and it's can be difficult to determine. And again over 540 00:32:53,720 --> 00:32:56,400 Speaker 1: the years the courts have tried to do so. But 541 00:32:56,480 --> 00:32:58,800 Speaker 1: in ninety nine that was kind of a landmark case 542 00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:04,640 Speaker 1: Brandon Burr v. Ohio, where Clarence Brandenburg was at a 543 00:33:04,760 --> 00:33:08,680 Speaker 1: clan rally in Ohio and said, we are we're not 544 00:33:09,000 --> 00:33:12,880 Speaker 1: a revengeent organization. But if our president, our Congress, our 545 00:33:12,920 --> 00:33:17,840 Speaker 1: Supreme Court continues to suppress the white Caucasian race, please, 546 00:33:18,360 --> 00:33:22,360 Speaker 1: it's possible that there might have to be some revengeance taken. 547 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:27,760 Speaker 1: So they should have jailed him for grammar. Revengeance is, 548 00:33:27,840 --> 00:33:29,720 Speaker 1: of course not a real word, and make it neither 549 00:33:29,840 --> 00:33:31,840 Speaker 1: us revenge it. Although I think it's in a video 550 00:33:31,920 --> 00:33:37,960 Speaker 1: game now someone said, yeah, revengeance too, don't. I don't 551 00:33:37,960 --> 00:33:43,560 Speaker 1: think it's called that. Revengeance two called our parentheses s 552 00:33:43,680 --> 00:33:47,320 Speaker 1: I C right, what does that stand for? Again? Uh? 553 00:33:48,000 --> 00:33:51,360 Speaker 1: Sick I can't remember, Like, that's so sick they got 554 00:33:51,400 --> 00:33:55,800 Speaker 1: it wrong. I don't. I don't know remember now I think, yeah, 555 00:33:55,880 --> 00:33:57,720 Speaker 1: somebody else send it in people who tend to write 556 00:33:57,720 --> 00:34:00,200 Speaker 1: it after the stuff we write. We don't usually use 557 00:34:00,240 --> 00:34:02,600 Speaker 1: it ourselves. Yeah. It's funny, though. I have this thing, 558 00:34:03,680 --> 00:34:05,520 Speaker 1: you know, just the weird quirky things that everyone sort 559 00:34:05,560 --> 00:34:08,919 Speaker 1: of does in their head in life. Whenever I see 560 00:34:09,320 --> 00:34:11,319 Speaker 1: s I C written in an article, I always try 561 00:34:11,360 --> 00:34:15,719 Speaker 1: and think of what word either they got wrong or 562 00:34:15,800 --> 00:34:19,000 Speaker 1: were replacing in the article, you know, to make make 563 00:34:19,080 --> 00:34:23,359 Speaker 1: more sense. Well, no, they use it too, because well, 564 00:34:23,680 --> 00:34:25,680 Speaker 1: if it's a misspelling or if it's not a word, 565 00:34:25,760 --> 00:34:29,440 Speaker 1: it's basically the writer or the editor saying this guy 566 00:34:29,520 --> 00:34:32,440 Speaker 1: got it wrong, not me. Yeah, yeah, but am I 567 00:34:32,480 --> 00:34:34,120 Speaker 1: thinking of a different was it? What is it? When 568 00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:37,680 Speaker 1: they um, that's just when they put it in brackets 569 00:34:37,840 --> 00:34:40,680 Speaker 1: and they put like there or something like the person 570 00:34:40,800 --> 00:34:43,359 Speaker 1: lets it out. Sick also goes in brackets, but it's 571 00:34:43,400 --> 00:34:47,320 Speaker 1: basically saying I'm aware that this is misspelled. Yeahs to 572 00:34:47,440 --> 00:34:49,400 Speaker 1: show what a dummy this guy is. I think I 573 00:34:49,480 --> 00:34:52,279 Speaker 1: do it in both cases, Like if it's a made 574 00:34:52,360 --> 00:34:54,799 Speaker 1: up word, I'll try and think of what like they meant, 575 00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:57,919 Speaker 1: or like the other one where there's just a parentheses 576 00:34:58,480 --> 00:35:01,800 Speaker 1: and they just basically add something to make it more sense. 577 00:35:02,320 --> 00:35:04,120 Speaker 1: I try and think of, like, what did they say 578 00:35:04,200 --> 00:35:06,960 Speaker 1: to begin with? It's a weird thing. No, I know 579 00:35:07,080 --> 00:35:09,040 Speaker 1: to mean in my head right now I have for 580 00:35:09,160 --> 00:35:11,560 Speaker 1: your eyes only. I thought you go away. You're trying 581 00:35:11,560 --> 00:35:13,799 Speaker 1: to figure out what I'm thinking. The brains brain does 582 00:35:13,880 --> 00:35:16,680 Speaker 1: some terrible stuff. I had that in my head now too, 583 00:35:16,719 --> 00:35:20,480 Speaker 1: because you came in singing it for your only? Why 584 00:35:20,560 --> 00:35:23,759 Speaker 1: do you? Doesn't make any sense? It doesn't. I haven't 585 00:35:23,800 --> 00:35:26,520 Speaker 1: heard the song in decades. A week long ear worm 586 00:35:26,600 --> 00:35:28,600 Speaker 1: from a song you haven't heard in decades? Was it 587 00:35:28,680 --> 00:35:31,120 Speaker 1: in a dream? I don't think so. You're dreaming about 588 00:35:31,160 --> 00:35:35,480 Speaker 1: She and Easton again. That's a good movie though. Uh, 589 00:35:35,880 --> 00:35:38,239 Speaker 1: what's the Connery one on it? No? No, that was 590 00:35:39,320 --> 00:35:43,600 Speaker 1: Roger Moore? Are you sure? Yeah? You're sure? I think 591 00:35:43,640 --> 00:35:47,279 Speaker 1: it was Sean Connery's last time? No, all right, I 592 00:35:47,440 --> 00:35:49,040 Speaker 1: may be right here. Go to the map for that one. 593 00:35:49,080 --> 00:35:52,520 Speaker 1: All right, Um, all right, Getting back to Brandenburg, the 594 00:35:54,160 --> 00:35:57,200 Speaker 1: the clan member who who didn't know how to talk right? Um, 595 00:35:57,560 --> 00:36:00,840 Speaker 1: he didn't talk good. He was arrested for ad dedicating violence, 596 00:36:01,480 --> 00:36:04,800 Speaker 1: and he won. Supreme Court decided in his favor and 597 00:36:05,520 --> 00:36:10,000 Speaker 1: thus began the history, the long history of the United 598 00:36:10,040 --> 00:36:12,920 Speaker 1: States saying, you know what, the clan wants to have 599 00:36:13,000 --> 00:36:15,200 Speaker 1: a rally out in the public town square and they 600 00:36:15,200 --> 00:36:17,520 Speaker 1: apply for their permit, you gotta let him do it. 601 00:36:17,800 --> 00:36:21,799 Speaker 1: But again that actually that the clans hate speech being 602 00:36:21,880 --> 00:36:26,600 Speaker 1: protected was lumped together and came out of the civil 603 00:36:26,760 --> 00:36:31,400 Speaker 1: rights movements freedom of speech being protected as well, because 604 00:36:31,520 --> 00:36:34,080 Speaker 1: they were like, well, hey man, stokely Carmichael says that 605 00:36:34,560 --> 00:36:38,240 Speaker 1: you know, we gotta like take take the take control 606 00:36:38,320 --> 00:36:41,040 Speaker 1: from the white He's rise up and take control, like 607 00:36:41,480 --> 00:36:44,360 Speaker 1: that's hate speech, and the Supreme Court says, you know what, 608 00:36:44,560 --> 00:36:47,719 Speaker 1: you're right, and that's protected. So so it was what 609 00:36:47,840 --> 00:36:51,680 Speaker 1: the clan saying, or Illinois Nazis and Skokie right, second 610 00:36:51,719 --> 00:36:56,000 Speaker 1: time Skokie's made an appearance in this episode. Yeah, why 611 00:36:56,080 --> 00:37:03,080 Speaker 1: not a third um the usual. So yeah, anyway, I 612 00:37:03,120 --> 00:37:05,520 Speaker 1: think what you're you're saying is as a result, hate 613 00:37:05,560 --> 00:37:10,600 Speaker 1: speech is has a decades long tradition of being protected 614 00:37:11,040 --> 00:37:15,719 Speaker 1: at any and all costs unless you are using it 615 00:37:15,840 --> 00:37:21,719 Speaker 1: to incite violence, and that ties in to that original 616 00:37:21,840 --> 00:37:26,440 Speaker 1: prohibition on free speech that Oliver Wendell Holmes came up 617 00:37:26,480 --> 00:37:29,000 Speaker 1: with is that it presents a clear and present danger. 618 00:37:29,400 --> 00:37:33,719 Speaker 1: So rather than using that specifically to incite violence, you 619 00:37:33,840 --> 00:37:37,000 Speaker 1: basically have to be saying it's not enough to um 620 00:37:37,440 --> 00:37:42,839 Speaker 1: to say, uh, like, we black people need to rise 621 00:37:42,960 --> 00:37:45,680 Speaker 1: up and take control of the United States, and if 622 00:37:45,760 --> 00:37:47,440 Speaker 1: it has to be violent, it has to be violent. 623 00:37:47,480 --> 00:37:50,239 Speaker 1: But we can't live like this anymore. Right, If if 624 00:37:50,320 --> 00:37:52,759 Speaker 1: Stokely Carmichael saying something like that, or Malcolm X is 625 00:37:52,800 --> 00:37:56,520 Speaker 1: saying something like that, that is protected speech, even though 626 00:37:57,000 --> 00:37:59,120 Speaker 1: it makes a lot of people, or it made a 627 00:37:59,160 --> 00:38:01,600 Speaker 1: lot of people uneasy to hear that kind of thing 628 00:38:02,360 --> 00:38:04,759 Speaker 1: and they said, hey, they're trying to start a race war, 629 00:38:05,160 --> 00:38:08,799 Speaker 1: it's still protected speech. On the other hand, if you said, 630 00:38:09,960 --> 00:38:13,320 Speaker 1: or Stokely Carmichael said everybody needs to go get the 631 00:38:13,400 --> 00:38:15,320 Speaker 1: shotguns and we're all gonna beet here on Tuesday and 632 00:38:15,360 --> 00:38:19,080 Speaker 1: we're gonna take the streets Tuesday afternoon, that would not 633 00:38:19,200 --> 00:38:23,640 Speaker 1: be protected because he would be directly inciting violence. Yeah, 634 00:38:23,680 --> 00:38:25,360 Speaker 1: what what are the two things? That violence has to 635 00:38:25,400 --> 00:38:28,840 Speaker 1: be likely and uh, it has to the advocacy for 636 00:38:29,080 --> 00:38:33,360 Speaker 1: violence has to be um directed to inciting or producing 637 00:38:33,560 --> 00:38:37,280 Speaker 1: imminent lawless action, and then it has to be likely 638 00:38:37,480 --> 00:38:40,759 Speaker 1: to incite or produce such actions. So it's it has 639 00:38:40,840 --> 00:38:43,440 Speaker 1: to it has to be happening at some point that 640 00:38:43,560 --> 00:38:46,879 Speaker 1: you can point to next Tuesday. Something that's not vague 641 00:38:46,960 --> 00:38:49,400 Speaker 1: or indefinable, like we should do this in the future 642 00:38:49,560 --> 00:38:53,719 Speaker 1: if um, if we're not granted greater rights. So it 643 00:38:53,800 --> 00:38:55,719 Speaker 1: has to be something specific, and it has to be 644 00:38:55,920 --> 00:38:59,000 Speaker 1: likely to produce that effect. Right, So if somebody is 645 00:38:59,040 --> 00:39:01,319 Speaker 1: a great order and the people they're telling to get 646 00:39:01,320 --> 00:39:04,640 Speaker 1: their shotguns all own shotguns at home, that would probably 647 00:39:04,680 --> 00:39:08,399 Speaker 1: make it likely. And then a few years after um 648 00:39:08,680 --> 00:39:13,440 Speaker 1: that case. Another one has v Indiana from nineteen three 649 00:39:13,680 --> 00:39:16,279 Speaker 1: to find imminent a little further and it said an 650 00:39:16,320 --> 00:39:22,120 Speaker 1: advocacy of illegal action at some indefinite future time. That's protected, right, 651 00:39:22,239 --> 00:39:25,399 Speaker 1: so likely and eminent? Yes, interesting? All right, Well let's 652 00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:30,000 Speaker 1: take a likely and imminent break and we'll talk more, 653 00:39:30,080 --> 00:39:53,960 Speaker 1: even more about obscenity after this. George Large, I was skid, 654 00:39:55,640 --> 00:39:58,120 Speaker 1: all right, So did you see the movie Carneal Knowledge? 655 00:39:59,000 --> 00:40:02,080 Speaker 1: I didn't. I thought, um, for some reason, my I 656 00:40:02,200 --> 00:40:05,839 Speaker 1: was like body heats not that old that I thought 657 00:40:05,880 --> 00:40:08,879 Speaker 1: the movie was? Wasn't that a sexy one. Body heat 658 00:40:08,960 --> 00:40:12,000 Speaker 1: was quite sexy. I never saw that. One very good movie, 659 00:40:12,320 --> 00:40:18,359 Speaker 1: was it? Kathleen Turner, Kathleen Turner. That is correct? Uh, 660 00:40:19,960 --> 00:40:24,400 Speaker 1: Romancing the Stone Kathleen Turner Friends, Kathleen Turner, Romancing the Stones, 661 00:40:24,640 --> 00:40:27,360 Speaker 1: Kathleen Turner. It doesn't matter either way. She's a delight 662 00:40:27,480 --> 00:40:31,200 Speaker 1: body heat Kathleen Turner. Never saw it. It's good, very steamy. 663 00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:35,120 Speaker 1: That was going to Palmer, right, I think so? Yeah. 664 00:40:35,160 --> 00:40:37,000 Speaker 1: I think she's also the star of one of my 665 00:40:37,040 --> 00:40:39,320 Speaker 1: favorite all time movies, which is the War of the 666 00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:42,279 Speaker 1: roses Man. That is a great movie. I can watch 667 00:40:42,400 --> 00:40:45,080 Speaker 1: that movie a thousand times and not get sick of it. 668 00:40:45,160 --> 00:40:49,279 Speaker 1: That's on um alright. So Carnal Knowledge was the Mike 669 00:40:49,440 --> 00:40:55,160 Speaker 1: Nichols film with Jack Nicholson, Candice Bergen, and Art car Funkele. 670 00:40:55,320 --> 00:40:58,480 Speaker 1: Of all people, what is our gar Funkle doing in there? 671 00:40:58,880 --> 00:41:01,439 Speaker 1: He sings in a false that out throughout it's very nice. 672 00:41:04,239 --> 00:41:08,320 Speaker 1: All lines are in sing song. Um no, he he 673 00:41:08,480 --> 00:41:11,120 Speaker 1: was he acted in it was good? Was he good? Yeah? Yeah? 674 00:41:11,160 --> 00:41:15,239 Speaker 1: It was great movie. He like Paul Simon good, well, 675 00:41:15,280 --> 00:41:18,239 Speaker 1: he's acted too here and there. Really good movie though, 676 00:41:18,320 --> 00:41:19,880 Speaker 1: I mean, like I said, it was Mike Nichols. It 677 00:41:19,960 --> 00:41:22,000 Speaker 1: was not like porn, but it was just a very 678 00:41:22,120 --> 00:41:27,799 Speaker 1: frank movie about sex and relationships. Um, Like Nicholson plays 679 00:41:27,840 --> 00:41:30,239 Speaker 1: sort of a you know what you would think kind 680 00:41:30,239 --> 00:41:34,239 Speaker 1: of a womanizer, and Art gar Funkle a little more 681 00:41:35,280 --> 00:41:39,920 Speaker 1: uh tinder and um not as big of a womanizer, 682 00:41:40,360 --> 00:41:42,320 Speaker 1: trying to decide how to put all this, and it 683 00:41:42,400 --> 00:41:43,880 Speaker 1: kind of just follows him in three points of their 684 00:41:43,960 --> 00:41:49,320 Speaker 1: life from like college to middle age and their sexual exploits. Anyway, 685 00:41:49,400 --> 00:41:52,000 Speaker 1: it sounds kind of boring. Just really good movie, Yeah, 686 00:41:52,239 --> 00:41:56,080 Speaker 1: and very famously in nineteen seventy four. I think it 687 00:41:56,160 --> 00:41:58,480 Speaker 1: might have started in seventy three. And right here in 688 00:41:58,520 --> 00:42:01,640 Speaker 1: All Beneath Georgia, that was a theater manager that was 689 00:42:01,760 --> 00:42:04,440 Speaker 1: arrested for showing that movie in a theater. Oh is 690 00:42:04,480 --> 00:42:06,640 Speaker 1: that where this case comes from. Yeah, and he was 691 00:42:06,760 --> 00:42:11,120 Speaker 1: arrested and convicted of distributing obscene material. It's Jenkins v. Georgia, right. 692 00:42:11,280 --> 00:42:13,480 Speaker 1: Jenkins v. Georgia was a court case, and of course 693 00:42:13,520 --> 00:42:17,880 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court ruled, um that Colonel Knowledge was not obscene, 694 00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:21,320 Speaker 1: and I think in the ruling they said, it's Mike Nichols, 695 00:42:21,400 --> 00:42:25,279 Speaker 1: for God's sake, He's like, what are you thinking, precious treasure? Uh? 696 00:42:26,040 --> 00:42:29,080 Speaker 1: And um, well, they said that it basically your your 697 00:42:29,160 --> 00:42:32,680 Speaker 1: opposition to a state of Georgia making us so proud 698 00:42:33,080 --> 00:42:34,800 Speaker 1: is that there's nudity in it. And it's not a 699 00:42:34,880 --> 00:42:37,480 Speaker 1: lot of nudity. They were like, that's not enough. That 700 00:42:37,600 --> 00:42:44,279 Speaker 1: doesn't it's not patently offensive sexual, sexually explicit material that 701 00:42:44,440 --> 00:42:49,239 Speaker 1: has no artistic value. Yes, it fails the Miller test 702 00:42:49,360 --> 00:42:53,040 Speaker 1: is what it's called. Yeah, it passes. I guess it 703 00:42:53,040 --> 00:42:55,040 Speaker 1: would fail the Miller test because if you pass the 704 00:42:55,120 --> 00:42:58,359 Speaker 1: Miller tests, could be it would be obscene. Right, It's 705 00:42:58,400 --> 00:43:00,680 Speaker 1: a weird way to look at it. I guess. Uh. 706 00:43:00,840 --> 00:43:03,960 Speaker 1: Here in the modern age, like I said, with the 707 00:43:04,040 --> 00:43:06,960 Speaker 1: Internet opened up a whole host of issues with free speech, 708 00:43:07,680 --> 00:43:12,279 Speaker 1: and notably the Child Online Protection Act COPA. Yeah, that 709 00:43:12,400 --> 00:43:14,920 Speaker 1: was a big deal, very big deal. COPA was legislation 710 00:43:14,960 --> 00:43:20,239 Speaker 1: that was introduced to, you know, protect kids from online smut. Right. 711 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:23,360 Speaker 1: But on the other hand, uh, freedom of speech, I 712 00:43:23,400 --> 00:43:25,800 Speaker 1: have a kids said, no, they're gonna this is the 713 00:43:25,880 --> 00:43:28,600 Speaker 1: start of regulating the internet. The Internet is a free, 714 00:43:28,800 --> 00:43:32,239 Speaker 1: open wild West and it should not be regulated, So 715 00:43:32,560 --> 00:43:35,320 Speaker 1: don't try to regulate it. And again, everybody said except 716 00:43:35,320 --> 00:43:37,640 Speaker 1: for child pornography, and the person talking said, well, yeah, 717 00:43:37,960 --> 00:43:41,319 Speaker 1: except of course child preno. If you don't be stupid. Well, 718 00:43:41,400 --> 00:43:43,640 Speaker 1: COPA never actually went into effect. It went through three 719 00:43:43,719 --> 00:43:48,160 Speaker 1: rounds of litigation over the years, and um, you know, 720 00:43:48,280 --> 00:43:50,960 Speaker 1: basically one of the big things that the court would 721 00:43:51,000 --> 00:43:53,759 Speaker 1: say back was there are protections that parents can put 722 00:43:53,800 --> 00:43:58,160 Speaker 1: in to restrict their kids from this stuff, and that's enough. Yeah, 723 00:43:58,239 --> 00:44:00,800 Speaker 1: that's a huge thing. Like the court really tends to 724 00:44:01,400 --> 00:44:05,080 Speaker 1: to not like government overreach and tends to restrict it 725 00:44:05,160 --> 00:44:07,640 Speaker 1: whenever it comes about, right. Yeah, and this was really 726 00:44:07,719 --> 00:44:10,720 Speaker 1: tricky because what they were trying to do is apply 727 00:44:10,800 --> 00:44:14,360 Speaker 1: a federal law to community standards for a global product. 728 00:44:15,120 --> 00:44:18,200 Speaker 1: And that's just I mean, talk about complicated law. That's tricky. 729 00:44:18,320 --> 00:44:22,080 Speaker 1: It's very very tricky. Yeah. So, um, the court struck 730 00:44:22,160 --> 00:44:25,880 Speaker 1: it down in part because they thought it was overly broad. 731 00:44:26,000 --> 00:44:29,680 Speaker 1: They said that the what the government was considering offensive 732 00:44:29,719 --> 00:44:35,400 Speaker 1: material would not would not pass the Miller test, so 733 00:44:36,200 --> 00:44:38,399 Speaker 1: that was overly broad. And then they also said, yeah, 734 00:44:38,400 --> 00:44:42,799 Speaker 1: there's alternatives like parental controls that are widely available are 735 00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:46,600 Speaker 1: can solve the problem that the government's looking to solve, 736 00:44:46,640 --> 00:44:52,680 Speaker 1: which is restrict kids from pornography, um, but without restricting 737 00:44:52,760 --> 00:44:57,880 Speaker 1: anyone else's individual liberty right, so they said, see around copa. 738 00:44:58,520 --> 00:45:02,200 Speaker 1: Uh and justice Even Bryer wrote in a concurring opinion, 739 00:45:02,280 --> 00:45:04,680 Speaker 1: this is a good quote too, to read the statute 740 00:45:04,719 --> 00:45:08,440 Speaker 1: as adopting the community standards of every locality in the 741 00:45:08,520 --> 00:45:12,920 Speaker 1: United States would provide the most puritan of communities with 742 00:45:13,040 --> 00:45:16,640 Speaker 1: a Heckler's veto affecting the rest of the nation, basically 743 00:45:17,120 --> 00:45:20,080 Speaker 1: saying what many have said was, this is an impossible task, 744 00:45:20,960 --> 00:45:23,719 Speaker 1: so don't even try. I wish they'd take that that 745 00:45:24,040 --> 00:45:27,160 Speaker 1: idea with obscenity as well. Well. And here's the other 746 00:45:27,280 --> 00:45:28,919 Speaker 1: thing when they struck down cope. And this is another 747 00:45:29,000 --> 00:45:31,440 Speaker 1: really good quote, and this this one from U. S. 748 00:45:31,520 --> 00:45:36,120 Speaker 1: District Judge Lowell read Jr. Not lou read, but Lowell read. 749 00:45:37,480 --> 00:45:39,200 Speaker 1: Lou Reid said, take a walk on the wild side. 750 00:45:39,920 --> 00:45:45,480 Speaker 1: Lowell said, maybe after a nap. Lowell said, uh. And 751 00:45:45,560 --> 00:45:47,640 Speaker 1: this kind of sums up for me. I think he said, 752 00:45:48,040 --> 00:45:51,359 Speaker 1: perhaps we do the miners of this country harm if 753 00:45:51,440 --> 00:45:56,200 Speaker 1: First Amendment protections which they uh will with age inherit 754 00:45:56,320 --> 00:46:00,359 Speaker 1: fully are chipped away in the name of their protection right. 755 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,759 Speaker 1: So basically like in trying to protect these kids, we 756 00:46:03,840 --> 00:46:08,600 Speaker 1: have restricted their free speech when they become adults. Very interesting, Yeah, 757 00:46:08,680 --> 00:46:14,680 Speaker 1: it's true, you know. Yeah, Um, the the courts, do 758 00:46:14,800 --> 00:46:18,520 Speaker 1: you go with obscenity, I'm great with it with the 759 00:46:18,920 --> 00:46:23,840 Speaker 1: courts have also kind of shaped um freedom of speech 760 00:46:24,000 --> 00:46:28,800 Speaker 1: or protective freedom of speech by saying yes, certain types 761 00:46:28,840 --> 00:46:34,720 Speaker 1: of speech are not protected. Obscenity, child pornography, fighting words, 762 00:46:34,920 --> 00:46:38,160 Speaker 1: fighting words, and then libel is another one. But one 763 00:46:38,200 --> 00:46:41,520 Speaker 1: of the ways they further protected even when they're restricting 764 00:46:41,600 --> 00:46:44,520 Speaker 1: it is to say, not everything that you say is 765 00:46:44,560 --> 00:46:49,360 Speaker 1: liabel is actually liable. It's print right. It's very I 766 00:46:49,480 --> 00:46:54,400 Speaker 1: think it more has to do with slanders words that 767 00:46:54,680 --> 00:46:57,640 Speaker 1: it is okay, so with libel laws, and I would 768 00:46:57,680 --> 00:47:01,360 Speaker 1: guess slander falls under the same laws, right, don't so, 769 00:47:01,560 --> 00:47:04,879 Speaker 1: But with libel laws, um, it's really difficult to prove 770 00:47:05,239 --> 00:47:10,279 Speaker 1: liabel right because the person printing the libelous um information, 771 00:47:10,480 --> 00:47:13,920 Speaker 1: which is basically you're defaming someone's character, and that's a 772 00:47:14,000 --> 00:47:18,520 Speaker 1: really old, longstanding prohibition. I think even back in ancient 773 00:47:18,640 --> 00:47:21,800 Speaker 1: Greece they had a certain amount of freedom of speech 774 00:47:22,360 --> 00:47:26,520 Speaker 1: in Athens classical athens Um, but even even that was 775 00:47:26,680 --> 00:47:31,480 Speaker 1: restricted as far as talking trash about someone's character. Right, 776 00:47:31,840 --> 00:47:34,480 Speaker 1: So that's a that's a really old idea that you 777 00:47:34,520 --> 00:47:38,440 Speaker 1: shouldn't You shouldn't put fake stuff about someone's character reputation 778 00:47:38,480 --> 00:47:40,960 Speaker 1: out there. And if you do, then they have recourse. 779 00:47:41,480 --> 00:47:46,480 Speaker 1: But to prove that that person said something libelous, they 780 00:47:46,560 --> 00:47:50,239 Speaker 1: have to have had malice of forethought. They had to 781 00:47:50,400 --> 00:47:54,520 Speaker 1: have um known that what they were printing was wrong 782 00:47:54,920 --> 00:47:58,080 Speaker 1: or untrue. Yeah, that's the key. It has to be untrue. 783 00:47:58,160 --> 00:48:01,520 Speaker 1: You can express an opinion about something and say someone's 784 00:48:01,520 --> 00:48:03,920 Speaker 1: a big poopy pants, but you can't say someone's big 785 00:48:03,920 --> 00:48:05,719 Speaker 1: poopy pants. Who did X, Y and z if that 786 00:48:05,800 --> 00:48:09,120 Speaker 1: isn't true, right, exactly? Um, And so it's really tough 787 00:48:09,160 --> 00:48:13,080 Speaker 1: to to prove to prove libel right. So it is 788 00:48:14,360 --> 00:48:17,520 Speaker 1: unprotected speech, but it's also protected in that it's not 789 00:48:17,760 --> 00:48:20,720 Speaker 1: very broad, it's very narrow. And then part and parcel 790 00:48:20,800 --> 00:48:24,879 Speaker 1: with that is um, satire and parody are also very 791 00:48:24,960 --> 00:48:27,480 Speaker 1: much protected in the United States, thankfully, and we have 792 00:48:28,040 --> 00:48:31,960 Speaker 1: Larry Flint Hustler publisher to thank for that. Yeah, every 793 00:48:32,160 --> 00:48:34,960 Speaker 1: I mean, people versus Larry Flint is a very good 794 00:48:35,040 --> 00:48:38,560 Speaker 1: job of that spelling out that case. But very famously 795 00:48:38,680 --> 00:48:42,280 Speaker 1: he went to war with the Reverend Jerry Fallwell because 796 00:48:42,360 --> 00:48:45,960 Speaker 1: he had a cartoon and his Hustler magazine that was 797 00:48:46,160 --> 00:48:50,719 Speaker 1: an unflattering, uh sexual depiction of Jerry Fallwell. It was No, 798 00:48:50,880 --> 00:48:53,360 Speaker 1: it was a fake campari ad. It was a spoof 799 00:48:53,400 --> 00:48:56,000 Speaker 1: campari ad. But it was a cartoon though, No, not 800 00:48:56,080 --> 00:48:58,799 Speaker 1: the one I saw. Really, I saw like a I'm 801 00:48:58,840 --> 00:49:01,120 Speaker 1: sure he han drawn. I'm sure he had that too. 802 00:49:01,760 --> 00:49:04,080 Speaker 1: But this what the court case was. It was like 803 00:49:04,160 --> 00:49:07,759 Speaker 1: a campari and there was like a campari um ad 804 00:49:07,920 --> 00:49:10,239 Speaker 1: campaign where people talked about their first time they had 805 00:49:10,320 --> 00:49:13,480 Speaker 1: campari or whatever, and Jerry fall Wells was, uh, he 806 00:49:13,680 --> 00:49:16,919 Speaker 1: and his mother got drunk on campari and had sex 807 00:49:17,000 --> 00:49:18,799 Speaker 1: in the outhouse and that was actually how he lost 808 00:49:18,840 --> 00:49:22,400 Speaker 1: his virginity. Jerry Falwell didn't like that, of course, so 809 00:49:22,600 --> 00:49:26,640 Speaker 1: he sued um. He sued Larry Flint, and Larry Flint 810 00:49:26,760 --> 00:49:28,600 Speaker 1: won that case. It went all the way up to 811 00:49:28,680 --> 00:49:32,239 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. Yeah, it was a case and they said, Nope, 812 00:49:32,280 --> 00:49:35,520 Speaker 1: this is parody. There's a satire. It's protected. If any 813 00:49:35,640 --> 00:49:39,000 Speaker 1: reasonable person um sees it and would know that it's 814 00:49:39,040 --> 00:49:42,759 Speaker 1: not true, it's protected. And and Larry Flint said, or 815 00:49:43,360 --> 00:49:49,160 Speaker 1: no reasonable person, right, pervert frack. That was yours is 816 00:49:49,239 --> 00:49:50,800 Speaker 1: better than mine? That was good? Oh yeah, what was 817 00:49:50,840 --> 00:49:53,160 Speaker 1: that going? Yeah? He sounded like what he Harrelson doing 818 00:49:53,600 --> 00:49:56,399 Speaker 1: Larry Flint, which is right on the money. In my head, 819 00:49:56,480 --> 00:49:59,360 Speaker 1: I sound like a muppety tenor doing what do he 820 00:49:59,400 --> 00:50:10,680 Speaker 1: Harrelson do? Great movie The Muppets people versus um. Yeah. 821 00:50:10,760 --> 00:50:14,560 Speaker 1: In any way, thankfully satire and is protected here in 822 00:50:14,560 --> 00:50:18,440 Speaker 1: the US because we have a long, rich history of 823 00:50:19,040 --> 00:50:25,800 Speaker 1: political cartoons and rich satire that can really make a difference. 824 00:50:25,920 --> 00:50:27,680 Speaker 1: Like you see what's going on with Saturday out Live 825 00:50:27,760 --> 00:50:31,600 Speaker 1: right now. It's like they've had a long, long tradition 826 00:50:31,680 --> 00:50:37,640 Speaker 1: of political satire and and most times that opening bit 827 00:50:37,760 --> 00:50:41,520 Speaker 1: they do is political in nature. Uh, And then you 828 00:50:41,560 --> 00:50:44,080 Speaker 1: know it's nothing new. They've been doing it forever. So 829 00:50:45,040 --> 00:50:48,239 Speaker 1: I don't know. I just think it's it's when you 830 00:50:48,320 --> 00:50:51,800 Speaker 1: start like poking at that and the onion and you 831 00:50:51,880 --> 00:50:54,399 Speaker 1: know some of the great satirical publications that's that goes 832 00:50:54,440 --> 00:50:57,800 Speaker 1: down a bad road, you know. So took One of 833 00:50:57,800 --> 00:51:01,880 Speaker 1: the things that's coming up now that we're connected globally 834 00:51:02,520 --> 00:51:05,160 Speaker 1: is this idea that what we talked about at the beginning, 835 00:51:05,360 --> 00:51:10,319 Speaker 1: the US has very broad free speech protections some other 836 00:51:10,440 --> 00:51:15,560 Speaker 1: countries don't. There's like the the U N Universal Declaration 837 00:51:15,600 --> 00:51:19,680 Speaker 1: of Human Rights, right, some of that has has some 838 00:51:20,040 --> 00:51:23,920 Speaker 1: free speech protection in it. Not everybody signed on to it, 839 00:51:24,160 --> 00:51:26,239 Speaker 1: and a lot of people think there will never be 840 00:51:26,360 --> 00:51:32,440 Speaker 1: any way to to protect freedom of speech worldwide. Normally, 841 00:51:33,280 --> 00:51:35,560 Speaker 1: up to say the nineties, that wasn't that big of 842 00:51:35,600 --> 00:51:38,480 Speaker 1: an issue unless like Salman Rushdie published a book or 843 00:51:38,520 --> 00:51:44,520 Speaker 1: something like that, UM, because each country had its own standards, 844 00:51:44,920 --> 00:51:47,600 Speaker 1: and what what's said in one country typically stayed in 845 00:51:47,680 --> 00:51:50,440 Speaker 1: that country, even if it was offensive to another country. 846 00:51:50,600 --> 00:51:54,279 Speaker 1: Right the the the the two didn't collide. Now that 847 00:51:54,400 --> 00:51:57,520 Speaker 1: the internet's here, what's said in one country can be 848 00:51:57,719 --> 00:52:02,200 Speaker 1: carried immediately to another country, and the offense can be taken. 849 00:52:02,640 --> 00:52:06,560 Speaker 1: And this went out of hypotheticals and into real world, 850 00:52:07,640 --> 00:52:10,840 Speaker 1: well into the real world. UM. Back in two thousand twelve, 851 00:52:11,560 --> 00:52:17,200 Speaker 1: when a guy named Nakula Baseli Nakula released a fourteen 852 00:52:17,280 --> 00:52:20,040 Speaker 1: minute video called The Innocence of Muslims. Do you remember that? 853 00:52:20,719 --> 00:52:25,759 Speaker 1: I don't. It was extremely incendiary. If you, um were 854 00:52:26,080 --> 00:52:30,160 Speaker 1: a Muslim, you were going to be offended by this 855 00:52:30,280 --> 00:52:33,680 Speaker 1: because it basically said the prophet Mohammed was a fraud. Uh. 856 00:52:34,160 --> 00:52:38,120 Speaker 1: It had him as a flander, a womanizer, I think, 857 00:52:38,160 --> 00:52:41,680 Speaker 1: a pedophile. It was like, and the people who were 858 00:52:41,719 --> 00:52:44,360 Speaker 1: in it were scared to death because of the reaction. 859 00:52:44,400 --> 00:52:47,279 Speaker 1: There were riots around the world once it was translated 860 00:52:47,320 --> 00:52:49,839 Speaker 1: into Arabic and released. What they think was going to happen, 861 00:52:50,400 --> 00:52:52,640 Speaker 1: I don't, I don't know, like I don't, I don't 862 00:52:52,719 --> 00:52:56,680 Speaker 1: remember if the person was a provocateur on purpose or 863 00:52:56,880 --> 00:53:00,880 Speaker 1: if these were their real beliefs son Islam. Regardless, they 864 00:53:00,920 --> 00:53:05,359 Speaker 1: were um Egyptian American, so the video was protected, even 865 00:53:05,400 --> 00:53:08,440 Speaker 1: though elsewhere in the world they were literally rioting the 866 00:53:08,480 --> 00:53:12,359 Speaker 1: streets and people were dying because this video existed. They 867 00:53:12,400 --> 00:53:15,320 Speaker 1: were so upset by it. But in the US t 868 00:53:15,719 --> 00:53:17,279 Speaker 1: s and as far as I know, it's still up 869 00:53:17,320 --> 00:53:21,279 Speaker 1: on YouTube right because it's protected by free speech. Well, 870 00:53:22,120 --> 00:53:26,960 Speaker 1: that's a that's a great example of should the US 871 00:53:27,080 --> 00:53:31,960 Speaker 1: have the freedom of speech that is going to cause 872 00:53:32,400 --> 00:53:36,160 Speaker 1: harm in another country now that those two countries are 873 00:53:36,200 --> 00:53:39,400 Speaker 1: connected via the Internet. There's no easy answer to that. 874 00:53:40,120 --> 00:53:42,680 Speaker 1: That was basically a rhetorical question at this point, but 875 00:53:42,719 --> 00:53:44,120 Speaker 1: it's one that I think is going to have to 876 00:53:44,160 --> 00:53:46,719 Speaker 1: be decided more and more and what goes to the 877 00:53:46,760 --> 00:53:52,239 Speaker 1: heart of his blasphemy in this case. Yeah, blasphemy specifically 878 00:53:52,320 --> 00:53:56,160 Speaker 1: means insulting God or any religious or holy person or thing. Uh, 879 00:53:56,880 --> 00:54:00,480 Speaker 1: it means different things in different religions. Um, it's actually 880 00:54:00,680 --> 00:54:04,840 Speaker 1: still illegal in some states in the US. Um. Oh is, 881 00:54:04,960 --> 00:54:06,600 Speaker 1: I thought the last one was struck down in two 882 00:54:06,640 --> 00:54:11,359 Speaker 1: thousand seven. H okay, well but two thousands up until 883 00:54:11,400 --> 00:54:15,279 Speaker 1: two thousand seven. Um, yeah, yeah, had laws until two 884 00:54:15,280 --> 00:54:19,560 Speaker 1: thousand seven. That's right again two thousand seven. Yeah. Uh. 885 00:54:20,640 --> 00:54:23,080 Speaker 1: But the last conviction for blasphemy in the US was 886 00:54:23,200 --> 00:54:26,319 Speaker 1: in night. So because these were laws that were sort 887 00:54:26,320 --> 00:54:28,520 Speaker 1: of on the books that no one did much about. Well, 888 00:54:28,560 --> 00:54:30,680 Speaker 1: there's a dude. It was in Little Rock, Arkansas, and 889 00:54:30,760 --> 00:54:36,680 Speaker 1: he was an anti religious atheist, this white supremacist who 890 00:54:36,920 --> 00:54:40,160 Speaker 1: um had an office and in the office there was 891 00:54:40,200 --> 00:54:43,160 Speaker 1: a sign out front I guess it was a storefront office, 892 00:54:43,200 --> 00:54:47,239 Speaker 1: and it said, um, evolution is true, the Bible is 893 00:54:47,280 --> 00:54:50,320 Speaker 1: a lie. God is a ghost. And he got arrested 894 00:54:50,360 --> 00:54:55,520 Speaker 1: and convicted for blasphemy. So again, this is night and 895 00:54:55,640 --> 00:54:58,560 Speaker 1: there were blasphemy laws on the books until two thousand seven, 896 00:54:59,400 --> 00:55:02,719 Speaker 1: and yeah, is it's it's really surprising to think that 897 00:55:02,920 --> 00:55:07,480 Speaker 1: the United States ever had blasphemy laws, but they were 898 00:55:07,640 --> 00:55:11,000 Speaker 1: fairly recent. Yeah, and you know when it comes to religion, 899 00:55:11,120 --> 00:55:15,000 Speaker 1: like the United States protects Westboro Baptist Church and they 900 00:55:15,040 --> 00:55:17,680 Speaker 1: say you can go out and you can have uh, 901 00:55:18,400 --> 00:55:23,000 Speaker 1: offensive messages on signs at military funerals if you want um, 902 00:55:23,160 --> 00:55:25,319 Speaker 1: because as the United States and we allow that. Yeah. 903 00:55:25,560 --> 00:55:27,480 Speaker 1: And so I think that kind of brings up that 904 00:55:27,640 --> 00:55:32,560 Speaker 1: one op ed you're talking about from the Atlantic, that um, 905 00:55:32,840 --> 00:55:35,160 Speaker 1: free speech isn't free. What's the title of it, Yeah, 906 00:55:35,239 --> 00:55:37,800 Speaker 1: what's the what's the guy who wrote its name? Garrett 907 00:55:37,800 --> 00:55:43,400 Speaker 1: Epps wrote it? Yeah, and he makes really great He 908 00:55:43,480 --> 00:55:45,840 Speaker 1: didn't even make a case, he just kind of presented 909 00:55:45,920 --> 00:55:48,040 Speaker 1: both sides well, and what he did was he was 910 00:55:48,120 --> 00:55:50,759 Speaker 1: a quote. And I think you're right on the money 911 00:55:50,800 --> 00:55:55,279 Speaker 1: with that um, with that summation, because he said, Um, 912 00:55:56,280 --> 00:55:58,520 Speaker 1: repressing speech has costs, but so it does allowing it. 913 00:55:58,920 --> 00:56:00,800 Speaker 1: And the only mature way to the system is to 914 00:56:00,840 --> 00:56:02,919 Speaker 1: look at both sides of the ledger. Right. That really 915 00:56:02,960 --> 00:56:05,160 Speaker 1: kind of says it all. Yeah, And he's basically saying 916 00:56:05,239 --> 00:56:08,279 Speaker 1: like it's not enough to be to say freedom of 917 00:56:08,320 --> 00:56:11,080 Speaker 1: speech exists because we have free speech in the U. 918 00:56:11,280 --> 00:56:14,239 Speaker 1: S America is a free country. You have to examine 919 00:56:14,239 --> 00:56:16,560 Speaker 1: why and you have to defend it or else it's 920 00:56:16,600 --> 00:56:20,200 Speaker 1: just a privilege, and privileges are always subject to attack, 921 00:56:20,880 --> 00:56:25,880 Speaker 1: but actual freedom is should be defensible, and so he 922 00:56:25,960 --> 00:56:29,680 Speaker 1: says we need to defend it, especially based on another 923 00:56:29,840 --> 00:56:32,120 Speaker 1: op ed that he was actually talking about by a 924 00:56:32,200 --> 00:56:37,680 Speaker 1: law professor from fordom Thane Rosenbaum said, Um, no, there 925 00:56:37,719 --> 00:56:41,840 Speaker 1: are actual harms to speech. It does cause physical or 926 00:56:41,960 --> 00:56:44,800 Speaker 1: it does cause emotional harm that can in some cases 927 00:56:44,880 --> 00:56:47,759 Speaker 1: exceed physical harm. It can be longer lasting, it can 928 00:56:47,840 --> 00:56:51,759 Speaker 1: have a greater impact on more people at once. Um. 929 00:56:52,080 --> 00:56:55,960 Speaker 1: And so why do we allow hate speech in the 930 00:56:56,080 --> 00:56:59,400 Speaker 1: United States? And Garrett Ups doesn't have the answer, He 931 00:57:00,160 --> 00:57:03,239 Speaker 1: just examines the whole question. I think really well, yeah, 932 00:57:03,239 --> 00:57:05,560 Speaker 1: I thought it was interesting. I mean, you know, he 933 00:57:05,680 --> 00:57:09,239 Speaker 1: makes a point that the same laws that allow for 934 00:57:09,600 --> 00:57:14,040 Speaker 1: strides of civil rights and feminism and gay rights groups 935 00:57:14,080 --> 00:57:17,440 Speaker 1: over the years are the same laws that protect the 936 00:57:17,520 --> 00:57:20,640 Speaker 1: people that have done them such harm over the years. Um. 937 00:57:21,360 --> 00:57:22,960 Speaker 1: And you know, like you said, you gotta look at 938 00:57:22,960 --> 00:57:25,280 Speaker 1: both sides of the ledger. It might cause harm and 939 00:57:25,360 --> 00:57:31,000 Speaker 1: there is a cost to it, but ultimately the freedom, well, 940 00:57:31,080 --> 00:57:34,320 Speaker 1: in my opinion least outweighs those harms. So there's this 941 00:57:34,360 --> 00:57:37,840 Speaker 1: guy named Jonathan Rausch who UM Garrett ups quotes, but 942 00:57:38,000 --> 00:57:41,400 Speaker 1: he wrote another OpEd that I read, and his idea 943 00:57:41,480 --> 00:57:45,080 Speaker 1: of why freedom of speech, including hate speech, is important 944 00:57:45,440 --> 00:57:49,160 Speaker 1: is because he says that if you suppress speech, you're 945 00:57:49,200 --> 00:57:53,800 Speaker 1: suppressing thoughts. Right, So if you suppress hate speech, it's 946 00:57:53,840 --> 00:57:55,840 Speaker 1: still gonna be there, It's still gonna be boiling under 947 00:57:55,880 --> 00:57:59,120 Speaker 1: the surface. People are still gonna quietly, subtly trade in it, 948 00:57:59,600 --> 00:58:03,200 Speaker 1: but you can't refute it. If you allow hate speech, 949 00:58:03,560 --> 00:58:07,160 Speaker 1: it can be refuted loudly, publicly. And then from that 950 00:58:07,280 --> 00:58:11,000 Speaker 1: and he makes the case that this is why gays 951 00:58:11,040 --> 00:58:14,000 Speaker 1: in America have made such strides in the last few years, 952 00:58:14,280 --> 00:58:19,240 Speaker 1: because of the vicious homophobia that was publicly hurled at them, 953 00:58:19,800 --> 00:58:21,680 Speaker 1: that they stood up and said, you know what, this 954 00:58:21,880 --> 00:58:24,120 Speaker 1: isn't true. You know what, we deserve this right. You 955 00:58:24,200 --> 00:58:26,720 Speaker 1: know what, we're not pedophiles, you know what, we should 956 00:58:26,760 --> 00:58:29,640 Speaker 1: be able to adopt everything, and shot down all this 957 00:58:29,720 --> 00:58:33,800 Speaker 1: stuff systematically. And America was watching this back and forth 958 00:58:34,280 --> 00:58:38,520 Speaker 1: and um, gay people one public sentiment just through logic, 959 00:58:39,280 --> 00:58:41,400 Speaker 1: he was saying, if you didn't allow that hate speech 960 00:58:41,400 --> 00:58:43,760 Speaker 1: in the first place, there wouldn't have been that position 961 00:58:43,840 --> 00:58:48,439 Speaker 1: to address, um that hate speech. Improve it wrong because 962 00:58:48,480 --> 00:58:52,600 Speaker 1: you can't suppress hateful ideology. It's going to exist, So 963 00:58:52,880 --> 00:58:56,040 Speaker 1: allow the speech so it can be publicly refuted and 964 00:58:56,160 --> 00:58:59,240 Speaker 1: just smacked down. Yeah, yeah, I thought. I think that's 965 00:58:59,280 --> 00:59:02,720 Speaker 1: probably the asked explanation for freedom of speech. I've ever 966 00:59:02,800 --> 00:59:05,160 Speaker 1: heard a good way to close to huh Man, Thanks 967 00:59:05,200 --> 00:59:08,960 Speaker 1: a lot, Jonathan rosh Ah, You got anything else? No, 968 00:59:09,120 --> 00:59:11,680 Speaker 1: I don't, but a little tease before listener mail, We're 969 00:59:11,680 --> 00:59:15,240 Speaker 1: gonna have a couple of very intriguing follow ups to 970 00:59:15,360 --> 00:59:18,400 Speaker 1: recent questions. Okay, all right, well, if you want to 971 00:59:18,400 --> 00:59:21,800 Speaker 1: know more about free speech, uh to start talking. And 972 00:59:21,920 --> 00:59:24,760 Speaker 1: since I said that, it's time for whatever Chuck's got 973 00:59:24,880 --> 00:59:30,520 Speaker 1: up his sleeve. Yeah. Before I read the listener mail, UM, 974 00:59:31,800 --> 00:59:35,640 Speaker 1: two things were on a recent show. We asked about 975 00:59:35,920 --> 00:59:39,760 Speaker 1: our old buddy Sarah the Amazing fan and then our 976 00:59:39,840 --> 00:59:44,040 Speaker 1: old buddy Sam, the summer of Sam. Weirdly enough, we 977 00:59:44,160 --> 00:59:48,240 Speaker 1: come into the office and Sam's parents dropped off a 978 00:59:49,120 --> 00:59:51,880 Speaker 1: letter to us. Sam wants to be an intern here. 979 00:59:52,400 --> 00:59:55,560 Speaker 1: So he's around. He's in college, yeah, doing great, and 980 00:59:56,160 --> 00:59:58,800 Speaker 1: wants to intern and wrote us a letter and we're 981 00:59:59,000 --> 01:00:00,720 Speaker 1: gonna try and get him in here. Oh yeah. And 982 01:00:00,760 --> 01:00:03,400 Speaker 1: he wouldn't be our intern specifically'd be for how stuff works. 983 01:00:04,120 --> 01:00:06,080 Speaker 1: But um, we're going to burn a lot of currency 984 01:00:06,160 --> 01:00:07,960 Speaker 1: to make sure he gets this job. Yeah. I hope 985 01:00:08,000 --> 01:00:09,360 Speaker 1: it happens. It'd be great. It was good to hear 986 01:00:09,360 --> 01:00:11,640 Speaker 1: from him and sounds like college is going great. His 987 01:00:11,720 --> 01:00:15,600 Speaker 1: resume was stacked, buddy. Uh. And the other thing is, 988 01:00:15,680 --> 01:00:17,120 Speaker 1: I don't know if you saw this because I did 989 01:00:17,160 --> 01:00:22,160 Speaker 1: the Facebook, but um, Katherine Mary Stewart of Night of 990 01:00:22,200 --> 01:00:26,920 Speaker 1: the Comet played the older sister Reggie. Uh and was 991 01:00:27,000 --> 01:00:29,040 Speaker 1: also in the Last Starfighter and we kened to Bernie's 992 01:00:29,920 --> 01:00:32,040 Speaker 1: and you know it was, you know, sort of the 993 01:00:32,120 --> 01:00:35,680 Speaker 1: darling in the nineteen eighties and nineties. Uh. And it's 994 01:00:35,680 --> 01:00:38,640 Speaker 1: still an actor today, does theater, working stuff and movies 995 01:00:39,080 --> 01:00:43,640 Speaker 1: and TV and radio. She does it all. Uh. She 996 01:00:43,840 --> 01:00:45,320 Speaker 1: got in touch with us. She listened to the Malls 997 01:00:45,400 --> 01:00:49,240 Speaker 1: podcast posted on Facebook that we shouted her out and 998 01:00:49,360 --> 01:00:53,560 Speaker 1: also her hometown Edmonton Mall and I was just knocked 999 01:00:53,600 --> 01:00:56,360 Speaker 1: out and told her to email us. She email that 1000 01:00:56,440 --> 01:00:57,960 Speaker 1: thinks she lives in New York, and I said, hey, 1001 01:00:58,000 --> 01:01:01,160 Speaker 1: listen next time. We do a show at the Bell House. 1002 01:01:01,320 --> 01:01:03,800 Speaker 1: I want to act out week end up, Bernie, I'll 1003 01:01:03,840 --> 01:01:06,400 Speaker 1: play I'll play the dead guy, and you and Josh 1004 01:01:06,480 --> 01:01:08,880 Speaker 1: can just pup it me around. Uh Now. It was like, 1005 01:01:09,000 --> 01:01:11,240 Speaker 1: you know, come and bring your family. We'd love the 1006 01:01:11,240 --> 01:01:13,840 Speaker 1: guest list you. Maybe you can hop up on stage 1007 01:01:13,880 --> 01:01:15,720 Speaker 1: and we can chit chat for a minute. Nice. I 1008 01:01:15,800 --> 01:01:17,959 Speaker 1: took the liberty of doing that. It was very nice. 1009 01:01:18,040 --> 01:01:21,200 Speaker 1: You're like, no, she can't get on stage. We need 1010 01:01:21,320 --> 01:01:23,080 Speaker 1: to edit that part out. I just thought that was 1011 01:01:23,200 --> 01:01:26,640 Speaker 1: very cool. Yes, very cool. Thanks for writing in Katherine 1012 01:01:26,720 --> 01:01:29,400 Speaker 1: Mary Stewart. Yes, and boys, she's found the fountain of youth. 1013 01:01:29,880 --> 01:01:33,760 Speaker 1: She looks exactly the same. Oh yeah, yes, uh and 1014 01:01:33,880 --> 01:01:37,520 Speaker 1: Sam too, he looks exactly the same. It's like twenty 1015 01:01:38,360 --> 01:01:41,560 Speaker 1: looked like he did when he was seventeen. Well, thanks, dudes. Oh, 1016 01:01:41,640 --> 01:01:46,800 Speaker 1: we haven't even done listener mail yet. No, so listener mail. Um, well, 1017 01:01:46,840 --> 01:01:49,360 Speaker 1: I'm just gonna read it. It's called would you rather? 1018 01:01:49,800 --> 01:01:51,720 Speaker 1: I feel bad for Jerry. She's not gonna know where 1019 01:01:51,800 --> 01:01:55,200 Speaker 1: to put the listener mail China. That's all right. Hey, guys, 1020 01:01:55,240 --> 01:01:58,840 Speaker 1: just finishing listening to soil It And uh, I thought 1021 01:01:58,880 --> 01:02:03,160 Speaker 1: I had a surefire argument starter for you guys. Josh's 1022 01:02:03,200 --> 01:02:05,919 Speaker 1: rant about the pros and cons of cooking and sharing meals. 1023 01:02:06,040 --> 01:02:09,120 Speaker 1: I don't rain reinforce my position on the subject. I'd 1024 01:02:09,160 --> 01:02:10,720 Speaker 1: like to know what you think about it. Here's how 1025 01:02:10,760 --> 01:02:13,440 Speaker 1: you play would you rather and it's not the sexy one? Okay, 1026 01:02:14,640 --> 01:02:16,960 Speaker 1: you get to forego one thing that humans need to 1027 01:02:17,000 --> 01:02:19,840 Speaker 1: do in order to live, either eating, sleeping, or breathing. 1028 01:02:20,800 --> 01:02:23,280 Speaker 1: You can do the thing that you choose to forego, 1029 01:02:23,360 --> 01:02:25,760 Speaker 1: of course, you just don't need to in order to live, 1030 01:02:26,280 --> 01:02:29,800 Speaker 1: and you remain neutral in terms of pleasure or discomfort 1031 01:02:29,880 --> 01:02:32,800 Speaker 1: caused by the lack of the necessity. So you don't 1032 01:02:32,840 --> 01:02:35,760 Speaker 1: feel hungry, you don't feel sleepy, you don't feel affixiated. 1033 01:02:38,240 --> 01:02:42,000 Speaker 1: Stop out to me. So he wants to know what 1034 01:02:42,120 --> 01:02:46,000 Speaker 1: would we rather do without? Um mine is easy. I 1035 01:02:46,000 --> 01:02:53,400 Speaker 1: would easily read not breathe question who would want? Who 1036 01:02:53,440 --> 01:02:55,280 Speaker 1: would say, like, I don't want to eat. I get 1037 01:02:55,320 --> 01:02:57,440 Speaker 1: a lot out of breathing. I'd have trouble giving that 1038 01:02:57,520 --> 01:02:59,920 Speaker 1: one up. Well, Andrew said he would need that's the 1039 01:03:00,000 --> 01:03:02,360 Speaker 1: answer to that question. He said, I would always forego 1040 01:03:02,400 --> 01:03:05,600 Speaker 1: eating because of the money it takes to feed myself. 1041 01:03:06,840 --> 01:03:10,360 Speaker 1: And uh, the waking hours I would save. Yeah, I 1042 01:03:10,440 --> 01:03:16,240 Speaker 1: mean people's that's the two things with food, time and money. Yeah, yeah, yeah, 1043 01:03:16,320 --> 01:03:18,680 Speaker 1: but you get so much pleasure of it. Breathing. Sure 1044 01:03:18,760 --> 01:03:21,440 Speaker 1: it's free, but who cares, especially if you're not going 1045 01:03:21,480 --> 01:03:25,200 Speaker 1: to die from not breathing. And this situation is weird 1046 01:03:25,440 --> 01:03:29,680 Speaker 1: fantasy world of his. I say, anyone who chooses, and 1047 01:03:29,800 --> 01:03:32,160 Speaker 1: this is Andrew talking, I say, anyone who chooses to 1048 01:03:32,200 --> 01:03:34,600 Speaker 1: forego sleep as a dummy, because not only are you 1049 01:03:34,680 --> 01:03:36,840 Speaker 1: not saving on food, you have to entertain yourself for 1050 01:03:36,840 --> 01:03:39,200 Speaker 1: an additional five hours a day. You argument there, though, 1051 01:03:39,240 --> 01:03:41,200 Speaker 1: is you could get more done. Sure, sometimes I do 1052 01:03:41,360 --> 01:03:43,680 Speaker 1: wish that you don't have to sleep enough to sleep. 1053 01:03:43,880 --> 01:03:46,960 Speaker 1: Sometimes I also enjoy sleep too, he says. Plus, I 1054 01:03:47,040 --> 01:03:49,160 Speaker 1: could eat socially every now and then under these terms 1055 01:03:49,360 --> 01:03:51,960 Speaker 1: if I wanted to. But who would just take a 1056 01:03:52,080 --> 01:03:55,520 Speaker 1: nap if you don't feel refreshed afterward? Yeah, well I would. 1057 01:03:56,960 --> 01:04:00,320 Speaker 1: I love to sleep. And then the non breather are 1058 01:04:00,440 --> 01:04:04,120 Speaker 1: just like deep sea diving and exploring volcanoes and stuff. 1059 01:04:04,160 --> 01:04:08,080 Speaker 1: I guess, oh, what do you think about that perk? Yeah, 1060 01:04:08,360 --> 01:04:10,959 Speaker 1: you just go swimming all the way at the bottom forever. Yeah, 1061 01:04:11,080 --> 01:04:13,920 Speaker 1: so it's clearly breathing is the answer. It's not even 1062 01:04:14,000 --> 01:04:17,040 Speaker 1: a subjective question at this point that we've proven it. Yeah, 1063 01:04:19,320 --> 01:04:21,480 Speaker 1: all right, keep up the good work. That's from Andrew. 1064 01:04:21,600 --> 01:04:25,080 Speaker 1: Thanks Andrew, you keep thinking work too. Yeah. Nice, I 1065 01:04:25,200 --> 01:04:28,080 Speaker 1: just want to see you're a sucker for not eating though. Yeah. Uh. 1066 01:04:28,200 --> 01:04:31,000 Speaker 1: If you want to try to stump us but fail 1067 01:04:31,080 --> 01:04:33,840 Speaker 1: at it like Andrew did, you can tweet to us 1068 01:04:33,880 --> 01:04:36,280 Speaker 1: at s y s K podcast. You can join us 1069 01:04:36,280 --> 01:04:39,800 Speaker 1: on Facebook dot com. You can or slash Stuff you 1070 01:04:39,800 --> 01:04:41,840 Speaker 1: Should Know. You can send us an email to stuff 1071 01:04:41,880 --> 01:04:43,920 Speaker 1: Podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and it's always 1072 01:04:43,960 --> 01:04:45,640 Speaker 1: joined us at at home on the web. Stuff you 1073 01:04:45,680 --> 01:04:50,720 Speaker 1: Should Know dot Com. Stuff you Should Know is a 1074 01:04:50,760 --> 01:04:54,080 Speaker 1: production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my heart Radio, 1075 01:04:54,360 --> 01:04:57,280 Speaker 1: visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever 1076 01:04:57,360 --> 01:04:58,760 Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows.