WEBVTT - The Cycle: Pitching Streamers and Two-Start Pitcher Competition (Ep. 1059)

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle. I am Ryan Warmley,

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.559
<v Speaker 1>joined by Mike Mayer. This is part three of our episode.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>This week we are talking pitching streamers and our two

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>start picture competition. Quick reminder for everybody, if you are

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>struggling with lineup decisions, our lineup Assistant recommends optimal lineup

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>suggestions to maximize your team's performance each day or week.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Just sink your league for tailored guidance based on your

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>roster and league settings. Download the Fantasy Baseball My Playbook

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>app or visit Fantasypros dot com slash MLB My Playbook

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to set your winning lineup today. Mayor you did not

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>prep for our starting pitcher streamers for next week segment,

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so we will be doing this live, running through the

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros tool and pick. We will do it live.

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>We will not say that folk quote, but we will

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>do it live and we will go through some streamers

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>here each day of the upcoming week. Go ahead and

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>start us.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Off well, Worm, I don't have to prep because I

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>have the Fantasy Pros Starting Pitture Streamer tool, So we're

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>just going to do it together, just like on the

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 2>last episode we updated my rankings together now we're going

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>to go through streaming pictures together, and so we'll go through,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 2>like you said, day by day, and I'll read off

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 2>some of the ones. I'm not going to mention players

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>that are rostered in a majority of places, and so

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 2>I kind of filtered this by I put in my

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 2>shallowest league, which happens to be our internal ESPN league,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 2>because ESPN is a small roster, shallow format, and so

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I have I'm only showing to myself players who are

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>available in that shallow league so that they should be

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 2>available in your league for streaming on Monday. The top

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 2>ranked pictures are Ben Brown, who has been hot of

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>late at Saint Louis, Eduardo Rodriguez at the White Sox,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>which on our tool is highlighted in green as a

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>very you know, a top five matchup at the White Sox,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>which you know I would agree, Nick Lodola, who he

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 2>might not be available in your league anyway, he's fifty

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>one percent rostered, but he's against the Yankees. I'm gonna

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 2>stay away from that one. And then Chad Patrick against

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates, or Shane Smith against the Diamondbacks, or Walker

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Bueller against the Angels. Shane Smith is coming off a clunker,

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>and the Diamondbacks, even though they haven't been playing great,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 2>it's still not a matchup. I want to target Chad Patrick.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Even though it's a good matchup, I don't know that

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I trust him enough to even though it's a Pirates.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I think for Monday, even though it's a it's kind

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 2>of a terrifying thing to do. I think I'm gonna

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 2>roll the dice with Edward or Roady, you guys against

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox because you're gonna get strikeouts, even though

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>he's a terrifying pitcher.

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>That was gonna be my pick too, of the names

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you write out.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 2>All right on to Tuesday. So for Tuesday, the top

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>ranked pitcher is probably the one I would go with

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>TODs Bradley at the Royals. He's the top rand picture

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>for Tuesday, and the Royals are, according to the tool,

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>a top five matchup. You could also justin Berylanders on this.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Every week he's always like near the top. I just

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe once I had the stones to do it.

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 2>This week it is the Marlins, though, who I'm shocked

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 2>to see in the tool, even though it's an offense.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.799
<v Speaker 2>We've been targeting a lot They're not a top five

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>offense to target like, meaning they're a bottom five offense

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>for fantasy in the league. So it's surprising that that

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 2>they're not. But Nick Martinez against Yankee's not doing that.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Nelson has a White Sox, not enough upside for there.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>He's not a big strikeout guy. Luis Avarno is a Tiger,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>is staying away from that. I think I'm just gonna

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>stick with TODJ. Bradley at the Royals.

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're crazy, you think.

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>So TOJS Stash, Bradley's last three starts four innings, seven

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>to earned runs, two walks, two strikeouts, four innings, five runs,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>none of them earned but still five runs.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked about that in the first segment. That's still something.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Four walks, five strikeouts, and then the most recent one

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>one in the third innings six earned runs and two strikeouts.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>That's three straight Really.

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Poor to do for a bounce back. I actually thought

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 2>his last start was better than that, So maybe I'm mistaken.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>He thought his last start where he gave up six

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>earned runs in an inning at.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>No better than That's what I'm saying. I thought his

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>last start was like a good one and not that clunker,

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 2>so I must be thinking of a different picture. Was

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Shane bob that was recently?

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Shane Boss that I couldn't tell you, but

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>I only know because the Orioles scored like eight runs

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>off Bradley, or I guess it was only six earned runs,

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>but they destroyed him last night, which is why I'm

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking of it.

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>All right. I'm might have to rethink this then, because

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 2>in my mind Todd Bradley had a good start his

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>last time out. But I'm I must be. I'm going

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 2>to see how his.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Last good, actual good start was June first.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Now I was just talking about it must be mixing

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 2>up my pictures here. I'm glad you called me. It

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 2>was Shane Bass, Shane Boz six shutout innings, six strikeouts,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.799
<v Speaker 2>So I was mixing up my raised pictures.

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Your talented rais Yeah, so.

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what I was thinking. I thought he was heating up,

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 2>but quite the opposite. So you're right, let's stay away

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 2>from Dosh Bradley. We'll leave that in. We don't need

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 2>to edit that out. That's just my mistake where I'm

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>calling you out.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I would am, I insist that would let that in.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think are you going to go

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>with Justin Berlander against the Marlins?

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, none of them stitd out to me this might

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be a day I skip. I always say sometimes the

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>best streamer is to not stream anyone.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what I would maybe.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Do, Nick Martinez if he wasn't facing the Yankees, although

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees have not scored well lately, so maybe.

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 2>There is a dark horse here. He is possibly rostered

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 2>in your league. He's got a fifty percent consensus roster

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 2>rate across the leagues, which means like he's probably rostered

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 2>in CBS, he's not rostered in ESPN, and it's fifty

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to fifty whether or not he's rostered in your Yahoo league.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>But Jacob is Eroski, it was like a really exciting prospect.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 2>He's he gets the Pirates, so he's a really fun,

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 2>exciting picture with a big arm, and he has a

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>good matchup. I think if he's available, that's what I'm doing.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And he's not like highly rated, but that's because it's

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>he's just, you know, so new.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I considered him in our waivers segment, but he

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>was too rostered for it. I I would pick him

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>over the other names you read, Yeah, I just swing

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for the upside.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Jacob Missy Ross available obviously. Yeah, Tuesday, all right,

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>let's do Wednesday. This this day is also not looking great.

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Williams against the Blue Ja Blue Jays is not

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 2>doing that. Michael Waka against the Rays at home. I

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 2>don't hate that one.

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Raise a bit hot lately though.

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And when it comes to streaming, I always kind of,

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, you look at like best and worst case scenario,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 2>and even in the best case scenario, Waka does not

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>strike out a lot of a lot of batters, and

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>so it's you know, it's more likely this is not

0:06:58.200 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 2>going to go all for you than if it then

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>if it is going to go well for you. Edward

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Cabrera at San Francisco with with Raphael Endeavors, I'm probably

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 2>not doing that. I don't trust Cabrera just yet. Colton

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Gordon against the Phillies, Nope. Brady Singer against the Yankees, Nope.

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 2>I think this is a stay away. Maybe maybe you do.

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Tomy Yuki Sigano against the Rangers. But and the other

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>name I would considers Hunter Dobbins, who's been hot against

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the Angels. Those are those are the two pictures with

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 2>decent matchups who should be available. But I think if

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>you really unless you really need endings, it's probably a

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 2>stay away.

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think i'd largely stay away, like Dobbins is

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>probably my favorite.

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>But I'm gonna have to adjust my filters because Thursday,

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not even seeing any matchups for like Thursday, and

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>there were the rest of the week in the tool.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Unless what unless I'm just just my.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Filters, we're gonna SeeMe this is operator error and not

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>an issue.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully, what there are we on Thursday?

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know what, maybe you should prep for these

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>segments in the future.

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm always looking at the tool. The tool right

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 2>now is blank. Let me adjust my filter again.

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you look at Friday and see if it's

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just a one.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Day four days it's through the weekend. It could just

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>be a glitch with what's going on. But well, I'll

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>just look at the schedule. So for Thursday, he's been

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 2>good since it's been back. He's probably roster in a

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>decent amount of places. But are any interest in Clayton

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Kershaw at the Rockies?

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Not really? Is do you have interest in him? Uh?

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 2>He's been good. I don't know if I mean, it's

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 2>also like the Rockies offense has been better, and Coursefield

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 2>isn't like the scary monster that it used to be

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>because their offense hasn't been great, but they have been better.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 2>But that's probably like a low upside, low floor situation.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Shane Boss at the Royals, your.

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Boy, it's been hot, definitely him.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he might be rostered Eric Lower against the Guardians.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that I'm going to do that one.

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>It's again a low op side. It's a really small

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 2>slate on Thursday, and this is probably another stay away

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>day unless Bass unless available. I don't think many of

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 2>these other guys are going to be available Friday. Do

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 2>uh you know he's been hot. It's a bad matchup, though,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 2>is Brian Beao. He's been hot. He just shut down

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>the Yankees. But it is at home against the Blue Jays.

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that I want to mess around with

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Blue Jays. That offense has been been good, but BeO

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 2>has been pretty good too. He just.

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd I think I'd be interested in it. I'd be

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>open to it if I really wanted to.

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>The Yankee Star looked a lot better before the Yankees

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 2>just like haven't scored a run since that starts, So

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't look as good now when you were like, wow,

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:04.599
<v Speaker 2>you shut down the Yankees, and it's like, oh, the

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Yankees actually stinking right now. Or maybe he broke he

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 2>might have broken the Yank freeland at the Brewers not

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>doing that, Noah Cameron. He's probably rostered though. And also

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 2>it's against the Dodgers, so no, no, I have about Jose

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Ciriano Soriano against the Nationals.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Man, the Nationals stinky. They still lost like eleven in

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a row. They haven't won one yet. Right, I'm not

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>forgetting away.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm bid I know that there. Their manager came out

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and was like, well, I can tell you one thing.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not the coaches, and I was like, yikes, I've

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>never even when they won the World Series. I've never

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>been a big Davey Martinez guy.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, what a quote. Yeah, Nick abel is probably

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 2>rostered landing group against the White Sox, and I could

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 2>do that. He's also if you're in points leagues, he's

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>probably rostered in points leagues though, because of their relief

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 2>picture eligibility, I've I roster him in a couple of

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 2>point leagues for that reason. So that he's you know,

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>you can start him in a reliever spot. I pretty

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>much roll him out there whenever. He's a two star

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 2>pitcher in my relief spot. Yeah, that's that's probably it

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>for Friday. But I got to be honest, that's more

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>than we normally get out of Fridays, So it's not bad. Yeah,

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 2>onto the weekend Saturday sears at the Yankees. Nope, even

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>though the Yankees are not the Yankees right now, it's

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 2>in Yankee Stadium and at some point they're going to

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>be the Yankees again, and I'm not. I don't want

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 2>to be like holding the hot potato when they when

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>they turn back of the Yankees. So how about your

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 2>boy Kramer against the Rays? You said the Rays have

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 2>been hot.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Though they have been hot, it's still not a.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Very scary line.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>So I would say no.

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he's not a good pitcher, but they're not

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 2>scary line up either.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, he's capable of having a good start, but I

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just find him too hard to predict, so I wouldn't

0:11:59.200 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>risk it.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>This guy's astorship is he's been a streamer in the past.

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>The past few weeks, his Rochester has been coming up

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>with Colin Ray. He gets the Astros, which we normally

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>think are the Astros as a scary offense, and they're

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.080
<v Speaker 2>not very good right now, and so they're actually an

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 2>offense you want to target.

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And so Colin Ray, is it not RAYA? Is it Ray?

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I used to say Ray, and I've heard keep other

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 2>people say Ray. So I think it's Ray.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it is Ray. I don't know. I'm not going

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to claim to know that one.

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we can look it up. We have the

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>resources on our at our disposal. We got nine minutes,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>nine minutes to play with and gosh darn it, we're

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna use all of them. It's just Ray, it.

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Is I would prefer that we don't because I have

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>another show.

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 2>It is Ray, Yeah, but I don't, So it's fine, okay.

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Andrew Abbott's.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh, no.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Houser, no Gusto, no Casparius for the Dodgers is not

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>a bad one. He's available in a lot of places,

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and he's pitched pretty well when he's got a chance,

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 2>and he's at the Royals, it's a he's a good one.

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Good offense behind him facing the Royals. That's probably my

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>choice is casparious. Will Warren has also been Britain pretty.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Hot eleven strikeouts last year.

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Athletics, that's a weird offense because like if

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 2>they feel like they should be a lot better than

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 2>they are. They have a lot of big, big names,

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 2>they have firepower, but it feels like they go quiet

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 2>a lot. But I also don't know that I want

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 2>to like tease that like this game. I mean, for

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 2>that game, it wouldn't matter which ballpark's in because they're

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 2>both good for hitters, but that one is in Yankee Stadium,

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'm probab gonna say away from them, but I'll

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 2>probably just go Cosparius for Saturday and then on to Sunday.

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Not doing Sevarino against the Yankees, not doing your boy,

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Trevor Rodgers, not doing Walker Bueller against the Blue Jays.

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Jamison Tyone, He's roster in a lot of places, but

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 2>he should be more roster because he's been like sneaky

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 2>really good this year. James and Tyone, he's got the astros.

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 2>If he's available, I'm definitely streaming him. He also would

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 2>be a two star pitcher this week. If you want

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 2>to if you're you want to get down with that,

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 2>he's rostered in a lot of places, but he's available

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of leagues too, because I was just

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at him last night for a couple of my

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>leagues when I was prepping my bids for the weekend.

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 2>And then the other one is Chad Patrick, who we

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of put our nose up at him for Monday.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 2>But if you want to go with Patrick in a

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>weekly league, he is home against the Pirates, home against

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the Rockies. So that's not a bad two star pitcher.

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's pretty good.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'll probably just stop there. That's probably what I'll

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 2>do and rangers for us if he's available, pick him

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 2>up two star picture this week, but he's probably not available.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And then I assume you prepared a bunch of honorable

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>mentions too.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Uh No, we just talked about all of them. We

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>honored all of them.

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get let's go to the two start

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>picture competition here. Uh we're a couple of weeks delayed

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and catching up with the scoring because we missed last week,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>so we had Carlos for down against Joe Ryan. I

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>made the decision that were Don was better. The total

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points was close, but I think if you look

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at the two stat lines across those, it was pretty

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>clear that Radon not by much but was slightly better.

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Now we have an interesting scenario with the most recently

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>completed week. We obviously didn't do one last week, so

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we actually don't have anything besides this most completed week.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You had Andrew Abbit, I had Chris Sale. Kelly picked

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale for me. Actually neither of them made two

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>starts to that, and both of them made had excellent starts,

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but they each only made one start. So I don't

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>really know how we want to proceed with this, and

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we just throw it out just throughout the week. Okay,

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that, mostly because the one start for

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Abbott was a complete game shutout, so I would have

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>lost if we did the one start to each other.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that it happened for both I think,

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know why it happened because it happened

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>whill I was on vacation, so I wasn't paying attention.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there was like injury related. It just

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>seemed like both some schedule was reworked at some point

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation in and neither of them happened, So

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>both great starts now here. Here's what I will ask

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you this. Can we reuse those players?

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I would say yes?

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so I am so eligible to use Chris Sale.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You are so eligible to use Andrew Abbit?

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to use him right now this week?

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Because he's I'll take that trade?

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh No?

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Truthfully, I didn't actually remember to look, so.

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 2>He does make two stared look.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well maybe I will. Who are you going with?

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Three years? Well, I should tell you his matchups before

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>you decided to pick him, because it is.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna pull it up now because I

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>just I completely forgot to actually prepare this, and I'm

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>only realizing now.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>So I knew I didn't prepare mine now, but I

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>also didn't make a pick. But I I already picked

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Treek School. It would have been my school, would have

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>been my pick. We've both already used to Reek Schooble,

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>so I can't use him.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, who's who are Sales matchups? I might just

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>pick him he's.

0:16:54.040 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 2>At the Mets and then home versus the Phillies. I'm

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with Brian Woo Woo Woo, Brian Woo Mighty

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Ducks two for you. I know you love that movie. Yeah?

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Classic? Uh oh? Should I go Ranger Sores?

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? If not?

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Now he does have he gets he does have at

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta and at Houston. I don't know if I like that.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Combo thinks boo bitch gets the Dodgers, which is unfortunate.

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Framberg gets the Phillies and the Cubs. I've used Scooble,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>which who would be the obvious choice?

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Of course, which I said. If you're listening when I

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>was talking, I.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Know I'm thinking out loud. I did hear you say that?

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Clay Holmes also gets the Braves in a start? Do

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a Castillo? Has been bad, but

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>he has a couple of decent matchup no stop stop,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should do Chad Mitchell Parker. I will go

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>with I could do ty Own. You're selling him. But

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in this scoring setting.

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know this economy.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, he doesn't get enough strikeouts and so in our

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>league settings that's gonna really hurt me. I will go,

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just I'm just delaying at this point. I

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>go Taj Bradley.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Coming off a great start.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Now Bradley, Yeah, now joking aside. I will go with

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'll go Ranger Suarez.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's do it.

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Lean into it all right.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully this is not.

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say. It may very well be all right,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see how that goes. I got a guy

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>out here to go do another show, so we'll go

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead and wrap up there. Thanks very ready for tuning

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in for Mayor. I'm Ryan Warman. We'll see you again

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>next time. Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Pod. If you love the show, the best freeway

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to support us is by leaving a positive review on

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB