WEBVTT - $28,841,673,978,652

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Twenty eight trillion, eight hundred forty one billion, six hundred

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy three million, nine hundred seventy eight thousand, six hundred

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty two dollars. That is the national debt of the

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>United States. Democrats want to add a lot more money

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>even to that colossal number, and the fight over raising

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the US debt ceiling is the epicenter of what's going

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on in Washington right now. President Joe Biden demanding that

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Republican centers get out of the way, that they use

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity to push through the most radical aspects of

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>their agenda and using the debt ceiling crisis to do it.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>What happens if the United States defaults on its debt.

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>It's never happened before. We have no idea what will

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>happen now, Washington playing with fire. This is Verdict with

0:00:54.360 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdicts with Ted Cruz. I'm

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles, and I have a whole lot of questions here, Senator.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll get right into it very simply. I hate to

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>ask a stupid question, but even I and I've paid

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention to these things, even I don't

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>quite understand what this is what is the debt ceiling?

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Why does the debt ceiling matter? Why do the debt

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ceiling fights come up every few years? And what happens

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if we do not raise the debt ceiling and default

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>on our debt. Well, probably the easiest way to think

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>about it is like it's the limit on your credit card.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>The debt ceiling is the cap on how much money

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the federal government can pass, and it's a statutory limit

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.559
<v Speaker 1>that's passed into law that limits how much the United

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>States government can borrow. Just like if you have a

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>credit card that has a ten thousand dollars limit, you

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can't borrow eleven thousand, And if you want to borrow

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>more than ten thousand, you have to get on the

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>phone and try to ask them to raise it to

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or raise it to money. That's the same principle

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>as the debt ceiling. It is a tool designed to

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>try to force Congress to confront spending and to rein

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in out of control spending and out of control debt.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And the debt ceiling expired on July thirty first, the

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>end of July. Now, the Department of Treasury has the

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ability to kind of push the date when the US

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>needs to borrow back a couple of months, it's called

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>using extraordinary measures, and so Janet Janet Yell and the

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary is able to delay the date to sometime

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to mid delayed October. But if the debt ceiling is

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not raised, then the United States government cannot continue to

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>borrow borrow money, and so that puts pressure on Washington.

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>We're right now in the middle of a battle because

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of two things. Number One, Chuck Schumer and the Democrats

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>have the total and complete ability to raise the debt

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>ceiling on their own. So Democrats control the Senate, Democrats

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>control the House, Democrats control the White House. There's a

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>process called budget reconciliation. We've talked about that quite a

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>bit on this podcast. Budget reconciliation is the process that

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>comes from the Budget Act in nineteen seventy four. The

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>part that is really relevant and that comes up with

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>some regularity, is it is the major exception to the filibuster.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So ordinarily, to move to precede the legislation in the

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Senate takes sixty votes. Under budget reconciliation, it only takes fifty,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and so Schumer and Pelosi and Biden because they have

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>control of all the elected branches of government, have the

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>ability with just Democratic votes to raise the debt ceiling.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And they could have done it a week ago, they

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>could have done it a month ago, they could have

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>done it three months ago. So what's happening? Schumer and

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are nervous, And they're nervous because the Democrats

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>are in the middle of a massive spending street spree.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is reckless. It is the biggest spending

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>spree since World War Two. It is massive. And in

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the face of that, Democrats don't want to vote for

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the debt to pay for their trillions in new spending.

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>So what Schumer is doing instead is he keeps bringing

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up the debt ceiling in a legislative vehicle that requires

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty votes. So he doesn't want to use reconciliation, which

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>he can, and there's nothing Republicans can do to stop

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in from using reconciliation, but he wants to bring it

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>up through a vehicle that requires sixty votes. Why because

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he wants ten Republicans to vote for raising the debt ceiling.

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want it to be just Democrats who own

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their trillions in debt. What's amazing about that explanation, which

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I think spells it out pretty well, is it's the

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what we're being told in the media. What

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>we're being told in the media is that Republicans who

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>are fanatical about spending and they're neurotic about not raising

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling, and or they're opportunistic or their cynical,

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they are holding America's good credit hostage because they don't

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 1>want to vote for this thing. But what you're saying is, actually,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer could pass this tomorrow. So it's really Chuck

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Schumer and the Democrats who are holding this hostage and

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>who are drawing this out and making a big spectacle

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. What happens just at a practical level, I

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>guess we're kind of dealing with a crystal ball here

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's never happened before. But what would happen if

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we just defaulted on our debt? It would be a

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.159
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic impact in the market. It would cause the stock

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>market to tumble, it would cause bonds to tumble, it

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>would cause the credit rating of the United States to

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>be downgraded. That the cascading effects could be enormous. It

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 1>would be wildly irresponsible. No rational person wants to see

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States default on its debt. America pays our debt.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta, you know, I gotta say, it's worth

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>stopping and reflecting it. What a wildly different position we

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>are in today versus twenty fourteen, and and and if

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I can take us back to the way back machine

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to twenty fourteen. So twenty fourteen was was my second

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>year in the Senate. So I was still a freshman

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>in a newbie And the single biggest fight I have

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had in nine years in the Senate occurred on the

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling occurred on this issue. And it's as you know,

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I've written two books. Last year I wrote One Vote

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Away about the Supreme Court, great book, go by it.

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>But the first book I wrote was called A Time

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>for Truth, and A Time for Truth was my life story.

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I wrote it in twenty fifteen. The opening chapter of

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.279
<v Speaker 1>my first book, A Time for Truth is entitled Mendacity,

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and it is the inside story of the death ceiling fight.

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's go back to twenty fourteen. Twenty fourteen, Democrats

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>controlled the Senate. It was Harry Reid instead of Chuck Schumer,

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>who was the majority leader. Republicans controlled the House, Barack

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Obama was president, and there was another debt ceiling coming up.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>We were going to our Senate Republican lunch and every Tuesday,

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday Thursday, all the Senate Republicans we have lunch together.

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>And at one of the lunches, Mitch McConnell, who was

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the minority leader at the time, he stood up and

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he said, I've got a great plan. I want all

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of us to consent to unanimously consent to lower the

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>threshold for Harry Reid to raise the death ceiling from

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty votes to fifty votes. Now, in the Senate, you

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>do pretty much anything by unanimous consent. But unanimous consent,

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>as the name suggests, takes all one hundred senators agree.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So Mitch said, I want all of us to unanimously

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>consent to lower the threshold for Harry Reid from sixty

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>vote to votes. And the beauty of it is, once

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we do that, we can all vote no, the Democrats

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>can all vote yes, and we could all tell our

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>constituents at home we voted no on the thing we

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>just consented to allow happen. And I was sitting there,

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I was frankly expecting leadership to come up with some

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of kind of lame and tepid strategy. It had

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not occurred to me that their strategy was absolute and

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>total capitulation from the outset. And so I sat there

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in the room and I just raised my hand and

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>I said, Mitch, you need to understand there is no

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>universe in which I will consent to lowering the threshold

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for Harry Reid and Barack Obama to raise our debt

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>from sixty votes to fifty votes. I was elected by

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the people of Texas promising to do everything humanly possible

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>to stop the out of control spending and debt that

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is bankrupting our kids and grandkids. And I'm not willing

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Michael. There is nothing I've done in

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>my entire time in the Senate that has generated more rage,

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>more fury, more red faced senators yelling and cursing at

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>me than that simple act of objecting. It was much worse,

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, than the Obamacare. It was much worse

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>than the Obamacare filibuster. So leadership was mad that I

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>had spent twenty one hours filibustering Obamacare the previous years.

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>They were mad about that, But when I objected to

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>their scheme to raise the death ceiling. It the fury

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it caused was massive. It's fascinating how much things have

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>changed from twenty fourteen to now. In twenty fourteen, Republican

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>leadership carpent bomb me, attacked me, planted planted editorials criticizing me. So,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Wall Street Journal, which, by the way,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 1>when Republican leadership is mad at you, the editorial page

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Wall Street Journal is their preferred whipping post,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's where they take you out, and it comes

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>straight from Republican leadership. They go to the Journal. The

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Journal wrote an editorial entitled Minority Maker, and it said

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Cruz is going to ensure that Republicans remain in the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.359
<v Speaker 1>minority in the Senate forever, and that Harry Reid remains

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>majority leader because he is fighting and objecting on the

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>death ceiling. Now, I point out they wrote that in

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen, and just a few months later we had

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the elections in twenty fourteen. And you know, Michael, in

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the Old Testament, if someone came forward and said they

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>were a prophet, the Old Testament actually just discussed what

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you should do. You should ask them to make short

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>term prophecy, short term predictions, and see if they come true. Well,

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>the Journal's prediction that I was going to make Republicans

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a permanent majority, it turned out just a little bit wrong,

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>but categorically wrong. And in November twenty fourteen, we won

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>nine Senate seats, we retired Harry Read as majority leader,

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and we won the biggest majority in the House of

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Representatives since nineteen twenty eight. And so miraculously, standing and

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>fighting also wins elections. The voters like it when Republicans

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>don't roll over and surrender to the Democrat. Well, this,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think is what really relates to what's going on

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>right now today, because I politically, I came of age

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>during that era from twenty ten to twenty fourteen, the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Tea Party movement, your election, Actually you've politically come of age.

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm still coming of age. Actually, you know, I

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to get a little hair on my face.

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was like a teen drama. Oh, I remember,

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>even when I was fresher and facer at the time.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember every Republican, every Conservative who was worth his salt,

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>was focused on the debt, on deficit spending, on this

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that the inheritance we're leaving to our kids is debt.

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what kind of a country does that, what

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a generation does that. They're actually going to

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>be responsible, We're going to get our own house in order.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We're going to enact to these principles that we all

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>like to talk about. And then your story here, I

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>think is very important. What happened is the Republican leadership

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in those back rooms just said, yeah, that was all bunk.

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to follow any of that. We're just

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>going to make it easier. That was just a way

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to win elections. And now when we're focusing on this

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>debt fight, it seems to me that many Republicans and

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives don't really care anymore. I mean that focus from

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten years ago, it seems to have moved

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on to other issues. And I wonder if it's because

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>we just got burned during the tea party and nothing

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>really changed. Well, look, I say a couple of things,

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you know. Number one, if you go back to the

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen fight, it's important to note what I was

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>fighting for at the time, and I was not fighting

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for never raising the debt ceiling. I've never been someone

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 1>who promises I will never raise the debt ceiling. We've

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 1>got you know, typically the figure is about forty percent

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of what the government spends has borrowed money. So unless

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you're prepared to instantaneously cut government spending by forty percent,

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that's not a reasonable position to say we will never

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>raise the debt ceiling. My position in twenty fourteen, my

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>position today is that I'm not willing to support raising

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling unless it is accompanied by meaningful structural

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 1>reforms that address spending and rain in the out of

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>control spending. In twenty fourteen, the case I made to

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the conferences, I said, look, if you look historically, the

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>debt scene ceiling has been the lever point where we

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>actually get spending constraints. So at the time these figures

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit out of date because they're twenty

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>fourteen figures. But at the time of the last fifty

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>two times Congress had raised the debt ceiling, so this

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>comes up a lot. Twenty seven of those times Congress

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>had attached meaningful spending reforms to the debt ceiling. So,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, the Budget Control Act in twenty ten, which

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>made major progress reigning in out of control spending that

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>came through a debt ceiling fight. Graham Rudman. Probably the

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>most significant spending restraint legislation enacted in the law and

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>modern times came through a debt ceiling fight. So it

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is possible to make progress on spending by using the

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>death ceiling as leverage. And so what I argued in

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen is let's not let this lever point go.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's use it to actually honor our promises to the voters.

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Some of the differences Number one, I think Republican leadership

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>has learned Unlike in twenty fourteen, twenty fourteen they thought

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I was bluffing at this point, they don't think I'm

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>bluffing anymore. So nobody asked this time, Ted, will you

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>consent to lower the thresholds reporters asked. They ran up

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, Cruz, are you going to object to

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Laurie the threshold? I was like, h of course. But

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>what was interesting is when people learn you don't bluff,

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Nobody in the conference thought I would possibly not object.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They They're just like, yeah, okay, Ted will object to that.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So that option ain't gonna work. So leadership didn't even

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>try it. A second difference, and this is an important difference,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>is unlike in twenty fourteen when we had a Republican house,

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>now they've got a Democratic House, so now they can

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>raise the debt ceiling on their own without us. We

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>can't stop them. I wish we could, but we can't

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>stop them. There does seem to be a lot of

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>turmoil within the Democratic Conference. I mean, I guess this

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is a slightly related matter, but in a very different context.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Cinema, one of two semi moderate Democrats in the Senate,

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is being accosted everywhere she goes. She's being costed on airplanes.

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>She was accosted in the bathroom by an ille alien

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>screaming at her to push for a mass amnesty. This

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is a we always lament civility breaking down, and sometimes

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it's exaggerated and at sometimes it's real. But this seems

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to be crossing a line when you follow female senators

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>into the bathroom and start screaming at them. By the way,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as a foreign national demanding that you give legal status

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to millions of people. Now, look that that is exactly right.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And the degree to which Kirsten Cinema and Joe mansion

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>are being harassed. You look at Cinema and these left

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>wing activists that she teaches a university class in Arizona,

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and they followed her into her class, they harassed her class,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and then they followed her from her class into the restroom.

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>She went into the stall to use the restroom and

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they sat there filming it and berating her. And by

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, they were so proud of what they were doing.

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>They were filming doing it. As you noted, they all

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>so harassed her on the airplane, the harassed her in

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the airport, and I got to say yesterday there was

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>really something shameful because Joe Biden was asked about it

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and he just said, you know, it's part of the process.

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>What utter crap. No, I mean, that was an opportunity

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>for Biden to show some leadership and say, you know, no,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't harass someone and chase them into the ladies room.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That is not the way people behave in a civilized democracy.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But but the left is so angry that they believe

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>intimidation and threats are an appropriate way of behaving. And

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>right now they are trying to rain the nastiest pressure

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 1>imaginable down on Cinema and Mansion to pressure them to

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>flip their votes. At least so far they haven't. This

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is on the big Bernie Sanders three point five trillion

0:17:55.160 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars socialist budget. Right now, Mansion and Cinema are saying

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to support it, that it's too big

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's too irresponsible, and the left is furious. Well, center,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I do have to ask you, though I can't believe

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm giving Joe Biden the benefit of the doubt.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It feels very unnatural to me, But I do want

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to ask if he's got a point. Biden says, if

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in public life, you're going to get accosted. People

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to yell at you. It's and it does

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>happen to a lot of people. So to what degree

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>is this historic incivility that we're seeing, not just with

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>cinema but in recent years even on say, both sides

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle, And to what degree is this just

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>business as usual? Look, it actually is markedly different. In

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. When Donald Trump got elected,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>left lost their mind. He broke them. Their brains are broken.

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.719
<v Speaker 1>And I can tell you it is very, very different

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>serving in public office Look, I've been in some contentious battles,

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's only been the last couple of years. Remember

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of year years ago, Heidi and I were

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at a restaurant in DC at a group of screaming,

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>angry anarchist came in harassed us. We had to leave

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant because we didn't want to disturb the other

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>people who were having dinner, and they chased us down

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the street and into a dark alley. I mean, it

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>had the potential of being a very dangerous gathering. It

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>was a dozen angry leftists with Heidi and me, and

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it was threatening and serious. Rand Paul and his wife

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Paul, the Black Lives Matter protesters when Trump gave

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>his speech at the White House during the RNC convention.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>They were scared for their lives. They had police officers

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that were fighting back what was close to a riot,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and Rand and Kelly both were frightened that they were

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be seriously injured, if not worse. This has

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>all gotten nastier than it used to be. I can

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you in nine years I've been in the Senate

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for eight of them, I never or had a protest

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at my house in the last year or so, I've

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>had probably twenty five or thirty. Wow. We now have

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour security at the house, which which we

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have to do because the protesters have gotten so nasty.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>They have showed up at five in the morning, banging pots,

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>shining flashlights in the windows of our neighbors, including neighbors

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>who have little children, screaming profanities, dropping the F bomb

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.239
<v Speaker 1>at five in the morning, designed to wake people up

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and harass them. And so, what what is happening to Cinema?

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, mansion mansion? When he's in DC, lives

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on a houseboat, and he had protesters row their kayaks

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>up to his houseboat and engage with him at his houseboat.

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>This is a far nastier form of engagement than used

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to be typical. And I think it is as a

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>result of Trump's presidency. The left just they convinced themselves

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he's Adolf Hitler, and so all rage and fury is

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>justified in opposition to someone who they hate so much.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's an interesting case study. I mean, I'm

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sorry that you're going through it, but you are a

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of an interesting case study here because you you

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 1>were outspoken, you were something of a firebrand the minute

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you got to the Senate. So it's not as though

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they ignored you just because you were a wallflower. And

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>then later on they started going after you. I mean

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you going back to twenty twenty fourteen. Yet this never

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>happened at twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, this never happened. Yeah,

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>so this something clearly has changed. And you know, I

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>mentioned to try to sound nice and open minded, I

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>said that there is incivility on both sides of the aisle,

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.400
<v Speaker 1>but we really should not make a comparison here. When

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>when you have Maxine Waters saying, go get up in

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>their face, go shout at them in public, meaning Republicans,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>when you have Hillary Clinton saying you can't be civil

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with your opponents, when you've got the sitting Vice president

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>now Kamala Harris bailing out rioters and looters, that is

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a very different thing than what the Republicans are doing.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But the Republicans are being uncivil as well, though much

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>less violent. And this is the way they're being uncivil

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>as they're chanting. According to the news report, let's go Brandon, Senator,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>can you explain that to me? Well, it's an amazing

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon that seems to be occurring at college football games

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>across the country, and it appears to be spontaneous, but

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>very large groups of people are are chanting expletives at

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, and in particular, they're chanting F Joe Biden,

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but they're they're not abbreviating it. And it's a fairly

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>remarkable thing that seems to be springing up. And the

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>story you're telling as there was a NASCAR race a

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of days ago, and the winner of the race

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>was whose name was Brandon was being interviewed and the

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>crowd behind him is yelling and yelling loudly F Joe

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden in clear and very distinct words, and and the

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>NBC interviewer who is interviewing him says, Oh, the crowd's

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>so excited. You can hear them channing. Let's go Brandon.

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you just watch the clip that that is

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>not what they're chanting. In her defense, NASCAR races are loud.

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she had headphones on, maybe she couldn't hear, or

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was one of the more remarkable examples of

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>fake news. I you know, I did tweet nast. Is

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>NBC News going to issue a correction because I'm quite

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>confident they were not channing Let's go Brandon, and it's

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>now become a thing. In fact, the Daily Wire I

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>saw is selling let's go Brandon shirts. I got to

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>admit I was awfully tempted to have verdict, just steal

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea and do the same thing. We may put

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a Let's go Brandon shirt on our cactus friend. You know,

0:23:54.640 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I find it it u in the world to fake news.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>It was a pretty remarkable moment. It was. This was

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>what was so shocking about the whole thing is there

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are a great many people in this country who believe

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that Brandon should go go himself. Let's put it that way.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And so obviously there is something of a popular uprising here,

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>especially when people are rowdy at games and things like that.

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's the gas lighting. I think that got people

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that the media would would tell you, no, don't believe

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you're lying, eyes, don't believe you're lying. Ears, and even

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that this ties into something probably a little

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>more urgent and serious to two people in the way,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>quick story, I'll tell you on that. So when I

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>first ran for Senate in twenty twelve, my opponent was

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>David Duhurst, and he was the Lieutenant governor of Texas.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He's worth about two hundred million dollars. He was viewed

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>as unstoppable and unbeatable. He had universal name idea. I

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>was at two percent. Nobody had ever heard of me.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have any money, I didn't have a prayer.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And there was a moment really when when everything flipped.

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So the primary, neither of us got fifty percent. On

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>primary night, he got forty four percent. I got thirty

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>four percent, which shocked people because no one got fifty.

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>We went to a runoff. And in between the primary

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and the runoff was the Texas State Convention, about fifteen

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand activists from all across Texas. It's the largest Republican

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>convention in the country other than the National Republican Convention.

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And Rick Perry, who was a friend but in that race.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Rick Perry had endorsed David Duhurst, and he was there

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>speaking and he said in his speech, and he was

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>speaking the day before I was going to speak, he

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>said everyone should vote for David Dwhurst for Senate. And

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the entire convention erupted in booze, loud, angry, booze and

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of a it was a wild moment

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>because at that point all of our supporters felt they

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:58.120
<v Speaker 1>were alone, like this cruise character as no prayer, nobody

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>else's voting for him, you can't win, and like each

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of the activists looked in holy cow, everyone else was booing. Well. Afterwards,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Rick Perry did a press conference where reporters asked, Wow,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole convention booed you when you said David do

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Hurst name, and Perry, to his credit, he said no, no no, no, no.

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>They were not saying boo They were saying do do

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>do hers? And that was pretty damn funny. I mean,

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, Okay, it's not true, but but that's

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty clever. That's thinking on your feet though.

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>That is thing is Dohurst do yes? Well? You you

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>actually you do? You do see this phenomenon, And sometimes

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's to express their anger at Brandon or Joe Biden,

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on your interpretation. Sometimes it's at a political convention,

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes it's bubbling up from the way that the

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>government is actually working. And this is something you've been

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing for months and months now, specifically with regard to

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>critical race theory and gender theory. In schools. Parents are

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>showing up to their school boards and they're pushing back

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on these policies, and they're saying, no, get this nonsense

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the classroom. This is harming my child's education.

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>We don't want any part of it. So there have

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>been many protest movements in the history of the United States,

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>going back a very very long time. Very recently, we

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>had a protest movement last year, the BLM and Antifa riots,

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>which often turned violent and resulted in lots of people

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.640
<v Speaker 1>dying and lots of businesses being torn down and places

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>being set on fire. And we were told those were

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly peaceful protests. Well, now we are hearing from the

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General of the United States, Merrick Garland, that the

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>parents who were showing up to protest radical gender theory

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in kindergarten classrooms are very possibly domestic terrorists. A momorandum

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>just went out the Attorney General instructing the DOJ to

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>watch the disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats against

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff who participate in

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the vital work of running our nation's public schools. The

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Department takes his incidents seriously. And is committed to using

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>its authority and resources to counter them. Are we now

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at the point where we believe that people throwing molotov

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cocktails at federal buildings last year in twenty twenty, they're

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly peaceful protesters, but parents protesting radicalism and their kids' schools,

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they're the domestic terrorists. I wish you were exaggerating, but

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the statement you just made on its face is so

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>utterly ludicrous, and it's also true. You know Merrick Garland,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>who's the Attorney General. He was a Court of Appeals

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.959
<v Speaker 1>judge for twenty some odd years. As you recall, he

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>was who Barack Obama had nominated to the Supreme Court

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to replace Scalia. But he didn't get that vacancy because

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we didn't take it up because it was the presidential

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>election year and Republicans controlled the Senate and we said,

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the voters are going to decide who filled the seat.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland is now Attorney General. At his confirmation hearing,

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I asked Garland he actually had a reputation as a

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Court of Appeals judge for being relatively fair and impartial.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>He was not viewed as a hard partisan when he

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>was a judge and I cross examined Garland at his

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>confirmation hearing, and I said, look, under Barack Obama, the

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice was politicized and it was weaponized. It

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>was turned into a weapon to target people that were

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>perceived to be the political enemies of the White House.

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And that includes the IRS that went after Tea Party groups,

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.719
<v Speaker 1>when after pro life groups, went after pro Israel groups.

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>That includes the intelligence community in the FBI that went

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>so far as wire tapping the Donald Trump campaign and

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>sending in people wearing wires to record them. And I asked,

0:29:55.960 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Merrick Garland, will you commit, if you're confirmed no to

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>use the Department of Justice as a partisan weapon to

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>attack the other side. And he did, He made that commitment,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>he said he would not. That memo you're holding is

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>really disturbing because I think he has been breaking that

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>promise almost from the moment he got there. But that

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>memo is the clearest example of it. So, look, we're

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>saying a phenomenal example of democracy and action in that

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>parents are rising up at school board meetings and expressing

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>dismay over critical race theory that's being taught in schools,

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that our kids are being taught lies they're being taught

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that America is fundamentally racist. They're being taught that all

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>whites are racists. They're being taught that the entire history

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of America as a history of oppression. And these lies

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are dividing kids based on racial lines, and parents are

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>upset about that. They don't like it, and so they're

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>going to their school boards and saying, don't teach this

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 1>garbage to our kids. That's actually how our democratic process

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to work, that elected officials are supposed to

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>be accountable to the voters. The left doesn't like accountability.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>They like to be insulated. They're perfectly happy to harass

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>people they don't like, but they themselves don't like to

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>be held accountable. But now the Department of Justice, Merrick

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Garland is saying they're going to treat a parent going

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to a school board meeting as a terrorist and a threat,

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to go after them and they're going

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to persecute them. And this is absurd, It is a

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous abuse of power. And listen, you pointed out last

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year the BLM and Antifa riots. They burned storefront after storefront,

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they robbed, they looted, they murdered police officers, and yet

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice treated it as isolated issues. Look,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they were firebombing of federal courthouse night after night after night,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and yet the Department of Justice that you know, this

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>DJ under Merrick Garland traits. It is just, oh, isn't

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that nice that their throat literally throwing Molotov cocktails. This

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>is sad that the Democrats. Look, COVID has really revealed

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>this as well. Democrats are in they are authoritarians. You

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>want to know the basic difference between liberals and conservatives.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Liberals are comfortable using the coercive power of government to

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>force you to comply, to force you to obey, whereas

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>conservatives believe in liberty, believe in individual choice. You can

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>say what you want, even if it is dumbass stuff.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You can say it on religion, you can believe what

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.719
<v Speaker 1>you want, even if it's dumbass stuff. You can go

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>worship a golden calf in your backyard if you want to.

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>We believe in individual choice. On vaccines, Look, you and

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I have talked about vaccines. I believe in vaccines. I've

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>taken the vaccine, my family's taken the vaccine. But individual

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>choice means it's up to you whether you get a

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>medical procedure, whether you take a vaccine. Gavin Newsom is

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ordering every school child in California to get the vaccine.

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>That is horrific. It is a violation of medical privacy

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and autonomy to do that. And the Left doesn't care.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And so when it comes to parents protesting the radical

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Marxist theories being taught to their kids, the Department of

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice will come in and threaten mom at the PTA meeting,

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put you in handcuffs. Holy crap, that

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is offensive. This is the irony is that the left

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is all for liberation and expression and descent is patriotic

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and protesting when it suits their interests. But then, of course,

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment that a concerned parent says, actually, I don't

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think little Johnny should be told that white people are

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>evil and that America's are rotten place, and that boys

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>can become little girls, and you know, maybe we should

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 1>just stick to the you know, reading and arithmetic. Maybe

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we should stick to the basically building blocks of education.

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>They are labeled as domestic terrorists. And what is so

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>dismaying to me is as you said, and as you

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>made clear during his confirmation hearings, Mary Garland was the

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 1>moderate one. He's supposed to be one of the most

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>moderate people in the entire administration, So that that is

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a great fear. And actually, something else that you touched

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 1>on here is democracy in action. Who sets these kinds

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of standards, Who decides these things? What does our public square?

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>What does it look like? We only have a Let

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>me make it. Let me make a brief point on that, Michael,

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>let me make actually two points on that. Number one.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of the sort of Twitter lefties who said, oh well,

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is threats, this is let me be clear.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Nobody has a right to threaten anyone. Nobody has a

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>right to carry out violence. And if you have someone

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>who makes a threat of violence or carries out violence

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>against a school member, school board member, even if they're

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>some not elefty, if you have violence against someone, they

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>should be prosecuted and sent to jail. That violence is

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:11.479
<v Speaker 1>not acceptable. Secondly, look, I going back to the point

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 1>about you know, harassing Kirsten's cinema in the ladies room.

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>The parents are doing this at school board meetings that

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>are designed to be a forum for parents to be

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>able to express their views. They're not going to the

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>homes of the school board meetings, they're not going into

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom with them. They're going to a public forum.

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.439
<v Speaker 1>And and I am all four listen. I mean, I've

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>done hundreds of town halls. I've had people come and

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>disagree with me, and I'm perfectly fine to get in

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in a robust discussion in a forum that is appropriate

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>for that. I'll tell you one time, it's kind of fun.

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, I was actually

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>part of a protest at the White House against the

0:35:54.480 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Obama Iran nuclear deal, and there were protesters from that

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>showed up, Code Pink, the sort of lefty group. They

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>were there screaming and yelling and they were angry, and

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I actually stopped and I said, all right, look, the

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment gives you a right to speak, it gives

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>me a right to speak, but it doesn't give either

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>one of us a right to shout the other down

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and prevent people from hearing what we have to say.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So I said, I'll tell you what. Pick someone from

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>your group, You tell me who pick whoever it is,

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>come on up here, and I'm going to hand you

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this microphone, and I'm going to let you tell this

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 1>crowd why you think the Iran deal is a good deal.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm going to give you a response, and you

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>may not like my response. And so they selected Medea

0:36:40.719 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin as one of the founders of code Pink. She

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>came up there and I said, now, look, if I

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>give her this microphone, you guys don't get to be

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>disruptive and scream and yell and shout everyone down. And

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we proceeded to have I think it was a fifteen

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or twenty minute debate on the merits of the Iran deal.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Was all televised. If you go online, you can google

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 1>it and watch me debating the head of Code Pink

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on the irand deal. That that is that's democracy in

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>action too. So I'm not saying that, you know, but

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference between that and following someone into the

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>bathroom while they'll try to trying to use the facilities right.

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>And this actually ties in pretty directly as we think

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the way our public square has changed. Now. So

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>many of these debates happen on social media, and as

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies get more and more and more power,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be controlling speech in the republic, and

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>if you control speech in a republic, you basically control

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. The way we govern each other is

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that we persuade one another and deliberate and debate. There

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>is a story here, and I know, as always, i'm

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 1>running late and we've only got a little bit of

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>time left, but but I really want to touch on

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it because you were there, you actually saw it firsthand.

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>There was a Facebook quote unquote whistleblower. This is a

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>woman who is calling out what she seems to think

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>are the most nefarious activities and operations at Facebook. But

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what's strange here, what has me feeling a little weird

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>about the story is typically whistleblowers against entrenched powers are

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of quieted by those powers. They're not promoted, they're suppressed,

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they're pushed to the side. And yet this whistleblower is

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:20.479
<v Speaker 1>being lauded in the media by established democrats, by other

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 1>people in what you might call the ruling class. So

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>what is going on here? A lot of conservatives don't

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like what Facebook is doing when they suppress our speech,

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But what is the angle coming out here from this whistleblower?

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>So there are two things that are going on two

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>major concerns about Facebook and this so called whistle whistleblowers

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at the intersection of them both. The first thing that

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is going on is that Facebook has a practice of

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>targeting children, and in particular teenage girls and Instagram, which

0:38:55.800 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook owns. The algorithm is designed to appeal to teenage girls,

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but also to reinforce very negative trends with teenage girls.

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So for example, body image problems and eating disorders and

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>suicidal tendencies, the algorithm feeds all of that. And and

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't you don't have to take my word for it,

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you can actually take Facebook's word for it. So the

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal a couple of weeks ago broke a

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 1>bombshell story that Facebook conducted its own research on what

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>is the effect of our product on kids and their

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>marketing to kids, and they concluded that teenage girls, in

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>particular Instagram was really toxic and British girls thirteen percent

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>said they had gotten their suicidal ideas from Instagram. American

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>girls six percent of them said they had their suicidal

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ideas from Instagram. And so Facebook had this research, which

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was handed over to the Wall Street Journal. In the

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal reported on it, We've had now three

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hearings in the last couple of weeks in the Senate.

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I participated in all of them with Facebook witnesses. The

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook witnesses have been terrible. They're essentially giving the Sergeant

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Schultz defense. I hear nothing, I see nothing from Hogan

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Heroes a show before you were born, Michael, but a

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>great show. For I was a glint in my father's eye.

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But I used to watch it as a little kid

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with my dad. Hogan's Heres was awesome. So their defense,

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so I've asked. I've asked. There were two witnesses from

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Facebook the last two weeks. I've asked them number one,

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>is this research true? They say, well, no, it's out

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of context. I said, great, what's the context? Oh no, no,

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we won't release the research. We're not going to tell

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you what the research says. But but we don't like

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:56.800
<v Speaker 1>what the journal reported. And I said, okay, the journal

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>reported Mark Zuckerberg personally review this research. Is that true

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to seeing your Facebook witnesses? I don't know. I don't know.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Zuckerbook knows. Who knows? Who knows? No, no, no,

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to say anything about what Zuckerberg knew.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I asked another follow up, which is has Facebook quantified

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 1>how many teenage girls have taken their lives because of

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>your product? Facebook witnesses refused to answer that question, and

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I asked the natural follow up, Okay, you got research

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>telling you that your product is hurting children. What'd you

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>do to fix it? What changes did you implement to

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>fix this problem? And the short answer is the Facebook

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>witnesses said nothing, nothing, nothing. We didn't do a damn thing.

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>So this week, the so called whistleblower who had been

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>an employee at Facebook was testifying. I asked her the

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>same questions. She was actually much more cooperative in the question.

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>She said, yes, that's what the research said. She said, yes,

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg was aware of it. She didn't know if they'd

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>quantify how many teenage girls had taken their lives because

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Facebook's product, But in terms of what they

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>did to change it, she said, not a damn thing.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, she watched the testimony of the previous two

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Facebook witnesses, she said, it was amazing when you asked

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>them that question. She assumed they'd come out with a

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>five point plan. We did the following five things in

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 1>response to it. Which sort of anyone you would think

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if you got a report that you were marketing a

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 1>product that was killing children, you would think you would say,

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, how can we change this so that doesn't happen.

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>She confirmed Facebook didn't do anything so on that. The

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hearing we had today, there was actually bipartisan concern about that,

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 1>both Republicans and Democrats. Nobody's defending Facebook in what it's

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>doing to teenage girls. And the analogy that most frequently

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gets invoked is the tobacco companies. When the tobacco companies,

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe Cammell, when they marketed to kids to

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>try to get them addicted to cigarettes as young teenagers

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>so they would be lifelong customers. Facebook is kind of

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>falling into the same category of deliberately engaging in business

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>practices that hurt kids. That's category one. Category two is

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.320
<v Speaker 1>political censorship, and we've talked a ton on this podcast

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>about political censorship. In category two, there is a yawning

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 1>divide between Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Most if not all,

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans in Congress are very worried about political censorship, about

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley billionaires silencing conservative views they disagree with. Most

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>congressional Democrats. Not only are they not worried about it,

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not only do many of them deny that it exists

0:43:54.800 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>or that it happens. Their position is, we want more

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of it, We want more censorships, silence every quote extremist voice.

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's their code word. When you hear liberals using

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the word extremist. What they mean is youth. What they

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>mean is any conservative. What they mean is any libertarian.

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>What they mean is Donald Trump. What they mean as

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone who voted for Donald Trump. What they mean is

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's pro life. What they mean is anyone who

0:44:24.800 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>believes that there are two genders. All of that they

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>believe is extremist. And they want social media to silence

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. And so the hearing today and listen, my

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>sense of this whistleblower is that she's very much politically

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>on the left, so she wants Facebook to censor even

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>more so on that component. Yes, the media and yes,

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are jumping on this whistleblower because they're trying to

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:59.439
<v Speaker 1>use her testimony to further their preferred political outcome, which

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>is for face book to censor every conservative view so

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>that the only view anyone is allowed to express is

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the left wing view, another bait and switch, another if

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you focus on the legitimate problems at Facebook, which we

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>would all acknowledge, and use that as a way to

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>push through even more censorship of conservatives. You're seeing this

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>happen a lot around the country right now, a lot

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>around Washington. There is one place where you will not

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be censored. That is on the Verdict Live Fall Tour.

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 1>We are coming to schools hopefully near you. We're going

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to University Wisconsin Madison on the thirteenth of this month,

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:42.399
<v Speaker 1>so just next week, we are going to Texas. We're

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>going to Texas A and M on the fourteenth. It's

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a great deal of fun. I can't

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wait to see everybody there. We've got more schools that

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 1>are going to be announced, but get ready. So, Michael,

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>where can they get their tickets? How can they go?

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>If they want to come see either University Wisconsin Madison

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>or Texas A and M. How can they come see

0:46:02.800 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Verdict Live. You've got to go to YAF dot org.

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That is a Young America's Foundation partnering up with us

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for this fall tour. Head on over there, click on

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the tour, click on your school you can go get

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the information there. It's going to be me,

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be Senator Cruz. It is going to

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.880
<v Speaker 1>be our trusty cactus friend. We didn't get time for

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the mailbag. Don't worry. We're gonna have a whole lot

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of time for the mailbag in person with all of you.

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>You can also stream the events live. You can do

0:46:31.520 --> 0:46:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that on the Young America's Foundation, why AF or Verdict

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channels. We can't wait to see everybody in person,

0:46:38.239 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but for now, Senator, we have to say goodbye. I'm

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought to you

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country.

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security Pack plans

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party across the nation.