WEBVTT - The Da Vinci Code

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>On the beck Del Cast, the questions asked if movies

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have women in um, are all their discussions just boyfriends

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and husbands or do they have individualism the patriarchy? Zef

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>invest start changing it with the Bechdel Cast. Hello, Becktel

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Cast listeners, It's me Kitlin Toronto and me Jamie Loftus

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're back for yet another episode of the Bechdel Cast.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But wait, it's a little different today. Oh my gosh,

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>we're unlocking one of our Patreon a k a. Matreon episodes. Gasp.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I know we do it every so often, and this

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>week we're doing it for a special little occasion. Tell

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>me more, Okay, I will um So. I have a

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>new solo series coming out. It's one of my one

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of Jamie's a Little investigations. It does not have a

0:00:55.920 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ton to do with the subject matter of today's movie,

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the Da Vinci Code, which spoiler alert is Apple.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>But in any case, uh no, we're we're unlocking an

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>episode today because it's an episode about kind of religious

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>conspiracies and esoteric bizarre ship and uh that is what

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>my new show is about. It it's out starting now.

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It will be releasing episodes every single Monday. It's called

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Ghost Church, and what it is is, UM, it's kind

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of half investigation, half history of a fringe religion in UM.

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That's it's across the West called Spiritualism. And so what

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the show is about is it's kind of two tracks.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>The first is the history of Spiritualism, which is really

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating. It's it kind of came up in the

0:01:54.720 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>mid eighteen hundreds, beginning with two young girls. Wow, girl,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>us go off just like us, Well if we were

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>eleven and fourteen, Um, they're y are we are? We

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>have to get permission slips to record this today. UM.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it kind of UM on windside tracks their story.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Their names are Maggie and Kate Fox, and they kind

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of um accidentally started a religion that is built around

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the concept of being able to communicate with spirit or

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>ghosts and communicating with the dead. Um, which is just

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like a very roller coastery kind of story that I

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 1>couldn't possibly summarize for you here and I won't because

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you gotta go listen to that damn show. And then

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other end, because the religion is UM still

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>very much around, mostly in h small camps throughout the country,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>too in particular, and I spent a week at one

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of them, uh in Florida, in the Orlando area. I

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hung out with a bunch of mediums all week to

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>learn more about what the religion looks like now, UM

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:08.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of how a how a fringe religion develops over time, UM,

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>what brings people to it? And uh watching people communicate

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>with the dead in real time? It was. It was

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a weird one. It was an adventure. Um. And so

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I won't I won't spoil anything else from there. If

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you're into spiritual stuff, I would recommend you check it out.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're not into spiritual stuff, I would also recommend

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you check it out because I'm not trying to really

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>sway anyone one way or another. It's it's more just

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a very bizarrow journey. And I had a lot of

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fun putting it together. It's a show for everyone. It's

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. You think we can talk to ghosts, well

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you better check it out. You don't think we can

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>talk to ghosts, Well, there's plenty of people on the

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>show who feel exactly that way. Me. I don't fucking know.

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>It's in. The more I talk to people, the less

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I know. Wow, I'm sure, there's a folk song about that,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so where, but that is true. I it's such a

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's such a fascinating topic. Everyone feels strongly one way

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>or another. Um, and I'm just kind of floating in

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the goo in the middle, uh, you know, trying to

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to not get yelled at by mediums in Florida,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>which isn't too hard. But you'll have to listen to

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the show in any case. That is what we are

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>celebrating on the show today. We'll have another episode coming

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up that will also sort of be addressing this kind

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. The Da Vinci code today. This is a

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>little more of like on the like weird religion side

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And what I will say for spiritualism is

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>it is nowhere near as fucked up as Christianity. So

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>blockl in because yeah, we recorded this. When did this

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>come out? This came out I believe sometime on the

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Matreon last year, Yes, March twenty one. I believe in

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that ballpark and so this If you're not a Matreon subscriber,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this is also a reminder that if you are running

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>thinn On episodes on our main free feed, we do

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to bonus episodes a month with just Caitlin and myself

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>most of the time. Over on our patreon aka Matreon,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>there's over a hundred episodes there. This is just one

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of them. We keep it loose, do a lot of

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of bits. I'm sure I shout the

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Da Vinci code as Apple no less than seven thousand

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>times in this episode conservatively. Yeah. So yeah, enjoy it

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and we will be linking to the patreon ak matreon

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in joining that community. It's such a blast.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>D But first, before we get into it, we over

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Matreon, we assume that everyone knows what the

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Battel Test is and what the show is, because you know,

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>you're you're there, you're you're part, you're in the Inn crew,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. So we don't waste time being like, well,

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>here's who we are, here's what the Bechdel Test is.

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I love we're making fun of what we're about to do.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh like, but but that's said, even though Caitlin thinks

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous, apparently we are going to do it right now.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We are going to tell you that this is our show,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The Bechtel Cast, in which we examine movies through an

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>intersectional feminist lens. Using the Bechtel test simply is a

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>jumping off point. Now. The Bechdel Test, of course, is

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>a media metric created by queer cartoonist Alison Bechtel, sometimes

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>called the Bechtel Wallace Test, where by our version because

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>there are many renditions of the test, but the one

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that we currently use requires that two characters of a

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>marginalized gender have names, speak to each other about something

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>other than a may on, and ideally that conversation is

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 1>narratively meaningful. Yes, so, if you've seen the Da Vinci Code,

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>don't hold your breath. But you know, if you're a

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks fan, also, don't hold your breath. It's not

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:22.559
<v Speaker 1>his best and with with no further ado, without further

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>with no without without without much further ado. Hello, oh

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>my god, without further ado, please enjoy the unlocked Da

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Vinci Code. It's Apple Cast. Welcome back, matrons. Wow. Is

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this the main event? This is what this entire podcast

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>has been leading up to. He I am really excited

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>in a way. This movie is all my feeavorite parts

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of I Frankenstein mixed with all my favorite parts from

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>National Treasure. But when all of the fun just sucked

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out through a straw. It's shocking. Uh huh. This is

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a very similar premise, but none of my favorite parts.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's wild that a movie is toxic as Indiana

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Jones and The Last Crusade is a far more enjoyable

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>movie to watch for me, at least than this suck fest.

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>You didn't have fun watching The Da Vinci Cup The

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Da Vinci I honestly, it was like such a journey.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>It was such a right because it was like I

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>started out being like, oh, yeah, this movie is just

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>people saying words. This could be fun, right, because there's

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that whole oh my god, the moment where I was like,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, what if this movie fucking rocks? Is

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>when Tom Hanks is staring at the Mona Lisa and

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>then he just goes moons, sermons, charms, demons, sermons, monks, ranks, rocks,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, oh, this movie is nonsense. I'm

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna love it. But then it gets but then it

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>gets really boring for like an hour and a half,

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it gets funny again at the end. Like

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it starts funny and then it's boring for a long time,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and then it gets funny again at the very end

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>where he's like, Okay, first of all, Matrons, if you

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>were wondering if you went into the da Vinci Code

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>thinking I don't know, I was like, did not in

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>spite of the fact that I definitely like interacted with

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>this property at it in its heyday, I did not

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>remember what the da Vinci code was, and I was

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.959
<v Speaker 1>knocked on my do you know have you been watching

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>one division? I have not at this time. Here's a

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>scene where a character is sent through like fort walls

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in a row, and that's how I felt when I

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>found out that the da Vinci code is Apple, and

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I have I have a whole theory to go with. Okay, Caitlin,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this episode is going to be chaos, by the way,

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.959
<v Speaker 1>of course, So the da Vinci code is Apple. That's

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I'm the fact that that's the funniest thing

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard in my entire life is you've been

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 1>watching this movie for six hours and then they're like, oh,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the da Vinci code was literally Apple, not Apple in Latin,

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>not Apple in and just Apple. So if you were

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>reading the book, which I definitely I read it when

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like eleven maybe, and I was like, whoa

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I really understand this. I did it, but you have

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to imagine once by the time you it's just kind

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of like aggressively mean towards the reader because you you

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have to probably find out that the da Vinci code

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is Apple on page like five hundred, and you're like,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I went all this way for this. The da Vinci

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>code is Apple. Here's my theory. Yes, please, and keep

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in mind neither of us have reread the book and

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to. I thought about it, but guess what,

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for some reason on the library app every copy is

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>checked out. WHOA, it's still I genuinely was thinking about, like, oh,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll get like the audio book and like funk

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>around a little. It could be fun. It's it's a

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>waiting list around the corner to get. Even in the year,

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>people are still reading the da Vinci Code. It's shocking.

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I'm sure stuff is different in

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the book. If you're yelling at someone about what happens

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Da Vinci Code book versus the movie, you

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>have to move on, right. But my theory is because

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>in the movie, it's one of the funniest scenes in

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the movie because it's Ian McKellen is literally like the spy,

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's full Star Wars. He's the spy, Audrey. I'm

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just gonna call her Omily the whole episode, Sorry, Omily.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't know what the da Vinci code is because

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't know anything the whole movie. And then Tom

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Hanks is like, I know what the da Vinci code is,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, huh, what how? And then he's like

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>standing and he all of a sudden sees the solar system.

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of that meme where a bunch of

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>math problems happened in front of that lady's face. Um,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's that, but it's supposed to be really serious. And

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>then he smashes the cryptex he's he figures out. So

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>here's my theory. The da Vinci code was not Apple.

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>We never found he we never saw him put the

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>code into the crypt He broke it and he smashed it,

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and then he the da Vinci code was not Apple,

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it was something else. It was I like how he

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just said it so matter of factly, and were so

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>conditioned to trust, like you know, men with bad haircuts,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and also like you know professors, right, But there's there

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was no proof that the DaVinci code was Apple, and

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's and honestly I don't think that da Vinci was,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>which is weird that what DaVinci my theory is Tom

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Haks was dead wrong and we'll never know. Well never

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>know because the movie too much. I would argue, cuts

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in two flashbacks that look like absolute hell. They look

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like should they look like it's like a really but

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you can tell it's expensive too, But it looks like

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it was edited in like Windows movie maker. Yeah, they

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>put some weird filter over the flashbacks to like let

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the audience know, don't like, don't be confused, this didn't happen. Now,

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this happened before, but like they look like ship but

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. There's just so many scenes. There will be

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a fly back to like to clue the audience in, oh,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you weren't sure how this came to be. Here's a

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>flashback to fill in the gaps, but it doesn't do that.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>With Robert Langdon putting in Apple into the cryptex, so yeah,

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he just sees the solar system and he's like, it's Apple. Yeah,

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I maybe in the book, it's like definitively he puts

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it into the cryptex. The cryptex goes it opens in

0:14:25.800 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the movie. I'm going to say, canonically, there's no way

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it was Apple. That is a ridiculous answer. Everything else

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>happened in this movie and fucking Latin and anagrams that

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci code was not Apple. A fourth grader

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>could figure that out. But that's kind of part of

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the point. That's part of the appeal of the Da

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Vinci Code is it just like makes you feel really smart,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but then you're like, wait a second, I didn't understand

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a word of that, and I'm pretty sure that it's

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all made up. But it's good. I kind of like

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this was a kind of an interesting case study for like,

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not an easy thing to do, and

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I would argue this movie fails it doing it by

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to like take something super complex that requires this

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>vast knowledge base and make it easy to understand for

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like the widest audience possible. Like I can't think of

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>an example of it of that going well, because when

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the people they it's like this movie stops every two

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>seconds to explain to you something that happened three thousand

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and then you're like huh, and then they're like,

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's fine, the da Vinci Code is Apple. Like they

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they make it sound really hard, but the solutions are

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like not that hard and they kind of and they

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like make basically no sense. But those feels smart because

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you like Ian McKellan read forty five Wikipedia articles at

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you about how he's a male feminist. This movie is

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I was cracking up. I was this the beginning and

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>end of this movie. It just really puts you in

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a really specific time and plays because we really were

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just like sitting in our seats in two thousand and six,

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the fucking Bush administration and we're like, the da

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Vinci Code is Apple? That like I would, you couldn't

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>pay me to go back there. What's going on? What

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is your relationship with the da Vinci Code, The book,

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the movie, Dan Brown's Ubra in general, Robert Langdon, first

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, Sunny loves Robert lancoln. Of course, Sonny the

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Dog loves Robert Lee like Robert Langdon, literal genius. Robert

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Langdon should be in the m c U. That's his

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. Um. He thinks that Robert Langdon could really

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>make a killing in the NCU. My my history with

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the da Vinci Code is that I don't know. I

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that I was like just old enough

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to participate, and I was really excited because the book

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>came out in two thousand three, so I was like young,

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>but like I could read. I could read, so I

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thought I could understand everything, so I was really excited.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember that there was like a raggedy copy of

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci Code that made its way across my

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>entire family throughout probably two thousand four, two thousand five

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or something. I remember I read the whole thing really fast.

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I read most of it in like a bathtub over

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the course of eight hours, and then I got sick

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>because I don't sit in a bath for eight hours.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>That's gross. But I did, and I just remember feeling

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really cool that I read the book, and I remember

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 1>low keeping like I didn't catch a word of it,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but I read every word and that's what counts. And

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>then I did see the movie. But by that point,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, even like for because I was like twelve

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>or thirteen when the movie came out, and even by then,

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I was like I already did it know.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I was like that, that's so whatever, like sixth grade

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 1>or what. Um. But then I I don't know, and

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I also I learned because I haven't revisited it since that,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I retained like nothing. All I remembered going in was

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Fibonacci numbers. I just remember the phrase. I don't remember

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>what it meant, but I remember Fibonacci numbers. But but

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting watching the movie because it was like

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>plot points were slowly coming back to me, like it

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was just a long forgotten dream, like as I was like, oh,

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>because like when Ian McKellan came on screen, I'm like,

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>there's something going on with this guy, but I don't

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>remember what. And then he's like, I'm the spy, and

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You're like, right, he was a spy. I forget. Yeah,

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's my history. What about yours? Well, I

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>too read the book in probably two thousand three. I

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was nearing the end of high school at that point,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and I did you understand it? Yes, I was old

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>enough to Yeah, I understood the duvincicode. And I'll be honest,

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this is a property that is

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>very easy and popular to dunk on now. But if

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm being perfectly honest with myself and others, I fucking

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>loved this book. When I first read it as a

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sighting at the time, I remember like the trajectory of

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it too, so basically like it got published, word caught

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>on that it was really fun and really good. So

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>I I read it. All my high school friends read it.

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We were like, this is the best book I've ever read.

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Then I read Angels and Demons and I and I

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, because it's like, this type of story is

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>like very up my alley in terms of just like

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>an adventure quest, like let's follow clue news and it

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was like again reminiscent of Indiana Jones. And I was like, cool, fun, fun.

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And then I also just appreciate as a lifelong devout atheist,

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate anything that like criticizes and comments on Christianity.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>So I just felt very cool and I was like, oh,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this is like anyway, it was exciting, So I read

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the book rather those two books. I have not read Inferno,

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's apparently a fourth one also Origin I did.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading Angels and Demons and then being like, wow,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's so cool to know what Robert Langdon was doing

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>before the Da Vinci Code. Didn't they make that into

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie too, Yes, And So Inferno is also a

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>movie that came out in You're lying, I am telling

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tom Tom Hanks is in it, Yes, as is

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Zoe Deschanelle. But I truly only looked

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>at one still image of the movie and I don't

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>know if that's who it is or not. That's so

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:08.959
<v Speaker 1>bold because it's like who was who cares? So anyway,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So I had read those books, and by the time

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the movie came out, I was in college and I

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>went to go see it in theaters. I remember, like

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>my enthusiasm for the books had definitely waned by that point,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>but I was excited enough that I still like went

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>to go see the movie opening night, and then the

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>movie was such a turd that I was like, oh,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you hated it. Yeah, I was like, this is bad,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.959
<v Speaker 1>like I could like, I still probably enjoyed myself, and

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>like because I was. I went with friends and we

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>were like we a night out on the town. But um,

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I knew then that the like the dialogue especially was

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just like clunky. I hated Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon.

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who I thought Robert Langdon should have

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>been played by, but definitely not Tom Hanks. I was

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>picturing someone a little more young. I don't know, I

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>just didn't I forget how old Robert Linkedon was. But

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I like the book. I don't know if the book

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wants you to kind of have a crush on him,

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>but like, as an eleven year old, I'm like, Wow,

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he's so cool and so smart. Like you picture kind

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of like a movie. Maybe Tom Hanks ten years before

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this movie came up, maybe with a different haircut, with

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>a different His haircut is so distracting that I like,

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what the movie is about. I

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>just was looking at this terrible haircut the entire time.

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember, um, do you remember if in the

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:45.719
<v Speaker 1>book the Da Vinci Could is there a romance in

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the book or is it also scaled back? Because I

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>was like, are they scaling it back in the movie

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>because the age gap is so icky? Or like, what's

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>going on? If I'm remembering correctly, and this is again

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>strictly from my memory bank, so I might be wrong

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>about this, but there is no romance in the book

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>between Sophie and Robert Langdon in the Da Vinci Code. However,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in the movie, I feel like they want you to

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 1>want it, but they don't want it. But I think

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a like romance and like I think even

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Robert Langdon has sex with like the female lead of

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Book of Angels and Demons. I've not seen the

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>movie Angels and Demons. I don't know if they include

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that or not, or if even I'm remembering this correctly,

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>but I remember being like, oh, wow, Robert Langdon Fox

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>because he like Fox the Lady. Maybe that's why I

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was thrown by it being like Woody, because that would

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>have been like, I'm like, why is Woody playing like

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>this character I was told was like this kind of

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like low key intellectual sex god, Like that's not what

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he's serving me in this movie. And I feel like, okay,

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of the I think that you are, like you are

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to think that you want them to kiss at

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the end, and then they don't write like that seemed

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>was so it was so icky because it was like

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>even in two thousand six, nobody wants that, Like nobody

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted Woody to kiss Emily, Like no, no, no, that's gross.

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's like there's that like there's like a few

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>moments where I'm like, I think they want me to

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>want this to happen, where like when Robert Langton goes,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I never knew a girl who knew that much, and

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, no, gross, get away from her. And then

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that part at the end where they like hug for

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a weird amount of time and then he kisses her

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>forehead and you're like, creepy uncle, energy don't like it? Uh,

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>well should we? I guess we should just get into it.

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Also happy Alfred Molina Month on the Matreon Alfred March,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Lena and Melina March Welcome he's playing? Is his character Italian? What?

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>What is his character? I think his character is from Spain,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but I oh, I am not certain. Wow, that would

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>actually be Alpha Molena canon, because yeah, he he is

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>speaking well, speaking Latin a lot of the time. But

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>he's also I believe, speaking in Spanish to Silas on

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>different occasions. Yes, oh yes he is. But I also

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I cannot detect a Spanish accent from an Italian accent

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>as um an uncultured American. So I don't really know.

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's how here's how simple my my understanding of the

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Catholic churches. I was like, oh, well, the pope lives

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in Italy, so he's Italian. I mean that that I

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>see your logic. I'm probably wrong, but yeah, I think

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>he's from Spain. Question Mark, Wait, what is your like? Okay,

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're an atheist now, but where you

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>raised cass Flick know, I was, I was raised in atheists.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>You were rased, okay, because I was like baptized Catholic,

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but then we immediately went to like a different flavor

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of Christianity. And then when I was eleven, my mom

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was like, Land, this is boring and toxic. So my

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 1>like most of my family is Catholic because they're from

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Massachusetts and it's like the law, and but I feel like, yeah,

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I only I only understand. I don't understand the ins

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and outs of Catholicism like canonically, I just understand the

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 1>negative traits it brings out in New England families. Sure. Yeah,

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>I know very little about the mythology, if you will,

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of Christianity, Like I know the main Bible stories that

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>most people know, but beyond that, I know very little.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I kind of appreciate that this movie does,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like you're you don't need to know that much to

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 1>watch this movie. They're going to tell you everything. They're

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like this is Jesus and you're like, thank I'm with you.

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>And then then literally the most iconic movie speech. I

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know why it's not on an an FHI list,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Moon Sermons, Charms, Damon Sermons, Monks, Rank Rocks, Madonna of

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the Rocks, Vinci And that's how this like, this is genius.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>This is genius dialogue. The dialogue sucks so bad and

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's delivery is terrible. If what a mess. I don't

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>know what it is like because Ron Howard has made

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>very I like Ron Howard. I yeah, I mean I

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, I don't think he's a bad but this

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh boy, the way people are talking to

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>each other, it's like so it just sounds like they're

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not even in the same room. Like the conversations feel

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so like this and I don't know what it is.

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I've never in my life seen such expository dialogue. In

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>every single line of dialogue, it's just like, I mean,

0:28:07.880 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I I am very pro like, don't talk down to

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>your audience, but if you want this to be like,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this is just like a really difficult it's a it's

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>too dense too. I feel like fit into like a

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:24.239
<v Speaker 1>fun movie like it's there's just too much you have

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to you have to stop and explain things every two seconds,

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and then that's just most of the movie, right, Yeah,

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>they tried. The da Vinci code was literally Apple, so

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it turns out none of it mattered. I can't get

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>over it. I feel interesting that you're you're like isolating

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the da Vinci code into that one particular code that

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you punched into the cryptext. To me, the da Vinci

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>code is like it's a feeling, it's a sensation, it's

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the whole experience. It's the roller coaster ride that is

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the whole movie. Oh I thought it was silly me.

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was the code you put into the

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Da Vinci thing. You fool there. I don't know what

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or the da Vinci code. The da Vinci code was

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>either Apple or women unclear to me. What I can't

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>wait to talk about this movie is so male feminist.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like we were talking about this in our

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>last episode of Just Like the Most Like it's like

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>when a guy's like, oh, I'm I'm such a male

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>feminist and then they just explained what feminism is to

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you for two and a half hours, and then you're

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>like wait, I haven't talked yet, and he's like, yeah,

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I respect you so much. I don't even want to

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>know a thing about you. Like I just it's so

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>exhausting the fact that there are so many opportunities to

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bring Sophie into the narrative and bring her expertise into

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the narrative constantly, and she's literally a cryptologist, not that

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd know based on how many could she solves, like,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and then just Ian McKellan shows up. He's like, oh,

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>actually I know everything that it would be way more

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting if the if the only woman in the story knew.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>But let's just tell her. Let's just tell her what's

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>going on. And then she goes, wait, that can't be,

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Like that's everything. She says, wait, that can't be, and

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like you're Jesus's niece. Get used to it, lady there.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>And then she's like, well, I don't know any of

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff because I hate history. And then Tom Hanks,

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you hate history? What do you mean? No one hates history.

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>They hate their own histories. And it's just like Robert Lincton,

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>what shut up? That's a really annoying thing for Robert

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Lindon to say, But also I would argue, that's a

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>really like bizarre thing for so, like, who's like I

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hate history? Like that is such a broad concept to hate,

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like you've hated everything that's ever happened. Ever, Like what

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>do you mean? What do you mean when you say

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's like I hate history, I hate everything that's

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ever happened? Is I just hate it? Like, well, I

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to tell you. Oh my god, I'm

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>just laughing, laughing, laughing this whole movie. It makes no sense. Also,

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the character names are so silly teeming a ringa Rosa.

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>You're just like, I'm sure it's all I'm like, maybe

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it means, oh, here's something fun. Uh there? This was okay.

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So when I was like younger, like probably more like

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>high school, I used to love when like famous writers

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>would give information on like this is my writing routine

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and like this is how I write. And I used

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to like look up whatever. I would love stories like that.

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And Dan Brown has done this several times. I guess

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>he most recently did it a couple of years ago.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of something from like fifteen years ago. But

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he like discussed his writing routine and it's like so

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>fucked up. Like he wakes up. It sounds like do

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you remember when like Mark, what's his name, the evil

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>one from Ted Mark Wahlberg Wallberg, Mark Wallberg released his

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>like workout routine. He's like, I wake up at three

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 1>am and scream, like it's like scary. Dan Brown is

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like that, but for writing shitty books about Robert Langton.

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Like he's he wakes up at four am and drinks

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like a spinach milkshake and then he writes for like

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hours, and then he's like then I whatever, like

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>give my son a encouraging pat on the back and

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 1>go right to bed. And I was like, he sounds

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he sounds like the worst. He just sounds like he's horrible.

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, he has a masterclass. We should watch it.

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We should. He just seems like such a like snobby jerk.

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he thinks I mean, he probably thinks he's

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert langdon I bet? Yeah? Well shall we? I need

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to get some wine. Yeah, go get someone fills um

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>fill your chelice and by that I mean your womb

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>like wine and drink your womb wine out of your vagina,

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's what this movie is about. Because woman is mother. Okay, okay,

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm here, all right, welcome back. I'm gonna do the recap.

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I am going to skip over a lot of details

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>because there are just too many things, and I'm gonna

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>flash back and say exactly what happened. And he's like,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with Constantine. Actually Constantine was a pagan,

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just shut up, shut up, I very. It's like,

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it speaks to this movie's exhausting nature

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>that I never want Ian McKellen to shut up, but

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>in this movie, I really wanted him to shut up constantly.

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, stop talking, but not as much as I

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted Tom Hanks to shut up. I know. It's really

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>taking like the icons that are pretty like culturally untouchable

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 1>at the time of this recording and makes you just

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like absolutely despise hearing their voice. It's remarkable. So yeah,

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I skip over a lot of things in the recap,

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.799
<v Speaker 1>so it might not make any sense, but I did

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>my best. So the movie opens in the Louvery. Oh

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>my god. The closing shot of this movie at the

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>loube speak. Okay, this movie much like Ralph Freaks the Internet,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>except this movie is horrible and it's I would say

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that this movie is like almost camp. It's so bad,

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Like this movie ends forty five different times, but the

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>final ending is the funniest one where Robert Liked runs

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>back to the louver and like she feels on the

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>louver like it's oh boy, it's remarkable. Perfect. Okay, So

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we're in the louver and there's a monk named Silas

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>played by Paul Bettany, and he is trying to get

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>some information from uh, this man who I don't know

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>if he's a curator there, I don't know. He's in

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the louver and the link gets the information and then

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>shoots sonya. Let me cut to Robert Langdon played by

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks, of course, and he is a professor of

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>religious symbology giving a presentation in Paris, and then he

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 1>is approached by the French FBI and they want to

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>talk to Langdon French b I, if you will um,

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>the French Bureau of Investigations. They want to talk to

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Langdon about the murder that we just saw take place.

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Then we cut back to Silas, the monk. He is

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>talking on the phone with someone who he calls teacher,

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and guess who else is talking on the phone in

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a different scene with the teacher is Alfred Molina, and

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>he's doing an accent, and we don't know what the

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>accent is. I love to see him in his Catholic hat.

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>It's what I mean. He feels like he's playing a

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>very similar character to me. I mean, we know him

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>as a great villain. He plays the hell out of

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a villain. He's playing a very similar villain to me

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as a character he plays in Chakola I I totally agree,

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>except with none of the like lovable. I'm like, what

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>if there just floating some ideas for our reboot of

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci Code. Uh, what if there were a

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a cake scene? Where is the cake scene in the

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Vinci Where is the scene where this Bishop of Opus

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>day is refusing to indulge in any sort of sweets

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>or chocolates until he hits a breaking point in which

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.279
<v Speaker 1>he just goes balls to the wall, eating every bit

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of chocolate in sight to the point where he's basically

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>having sex with chocolate. Why isn't that scene in the

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Da Vinci Code? What's going on? There are a few

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like really iconically good shots of Alfred Bolina. The first

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>was like Paul Betny wakes up and Alfred Bolina is

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just like standing over him, and I was like, this

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>is for me ideal, Like I wish I were Paul

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Bettany in the scene. Um I. Then there's the clip

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that you sent me of like launching out of a car,

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it's so good, it's really that is the literally

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the best part of the movie because there's this really

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>like epic music playing and it's like one of the

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>few times in the movie where like interesting camera work

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is actually happening. And like I'm not normally a big

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>snob about like the mechanics of filmmaking in terms of

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like cinematography and editing and stuff like that, but like

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 1>this movie does everything so poorly that you can't help

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>but notice it. But like there is one moment where

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, look at this camera work where the camera's

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like it's tracking with one person and then

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it kind of shifts over to focus on Alt from

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Lena getting out of a car and then he like

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sees something and then starts sprinting out of frame and

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just like this beautiful fluid movement and h it's

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>a scene from a better movie. I was like, that

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was a singular gorgeous shot. Indeed, I wish I knew.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I wish I didn't know what movie it was in.

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh okay. So Alfred Molina plays Bishop Aaron Garossa, who

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is a religious figure of Opus Day, a sect of

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Catholicism that seems, according to this movie, pretty scary, and

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he is like Silas's mentor. So meanwhile, Langdon is taken

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Louver and Captain Fash a k genre no,

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>you're literally like Fash And then I was like, I

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and then I just kept watching because that's

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>how you that's the only way you can watch the

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Da Vincico this to be like hmmm, maybe that's something,

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you're like, well, I don't know. Okay, something

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>else is happening now. Now we're talking about Constantine and

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Holy Wars. Yeah, so Captain Fash is Genrino and

0:39:52.520 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>he is. He's there as well as Sophie. It's very French,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's they literally cast Emily, so we're like, okay,

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>she is for French. So it's yeah, Audrey Tattoo or

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>however you say any name in French. And I love her.

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I wish she had been given a single thing to

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:18.439
<v Speaker 1>do in this entire movie. Truly, I hope she made

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 1>so much money. That's it would give me peace to

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>know that Audrey Tattoo made a lot of money. But

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that she probably made much less

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>money than literally every man on screen. That's probably true,

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's upsetting. Her character is a cryptologist for the

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>French police, and she's like, hey, Robert, they think the

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>police think that you killed sna Also, by the way,

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>he was my grandfather and as he was dying, he

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>left all of these clues, so you and I have

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to work together to solve them. Because basically Sania had

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>put himself in the position of the Vitruvian man. And

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>then he also wrote a bunch of words on the

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>floor an invisible ink, which read how long was this

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>man dying? Like this? I had a funny because I

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>forgot what the because I remember, like as a kid,

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>being like whoa the like long ass codes where he's

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>just stumbling around the loop like writing poems and ship

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and but I was I couldn't remember, and so I

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, what if it was what if he just

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>smeared some pig out in bluff like that would be

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:27.399
<v Speaker 1>a more interesting choice to be than whatever the funk

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he did, thoughts something to consider for our reboot. Yeah,

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>like could be a fun iconic message relieve. Also, I

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>forget who someone it might have been a friend of

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the show, Matt Rogers, but like someone recently tweeted like

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what what a like weak endorsement that was on the

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>part of Charlotte and her web, like like, who's this guy?

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:58.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, some pig. He is some pig And

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone was like, wow, he must be really special and

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well, that's not what she said. Oh goodness,

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to women and what they weave in their web. Okay,

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>So um Sonia had written O draconian devil, oh lame

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>st and Langdon figures out that these words are an

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 1>anagram and shout out to anagrams and my very anagrammable name,

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>please and thank you. Um that anagrams to Leonardo da

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Vinci the Mona Lisa, and then we're like, wow, Da

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Vinci code alert it's starting. So they go over to

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the Mona Lisa and there's another clue there, and that

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>leads to another clue and then another and it's like

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>National Treasure all over again. It's yeah, National Treasure. If

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>fept way longer and worse, way less fun and there's

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>no where is my Bartinary Bartha insight, I feel like

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>this movie really would benefit from a Bartha type chater,

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.279
<v Speaker 1>like because you have the similar set, because whatever in

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the National in the Da Vinci National Treasure Frankenstein Code,

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like you have it's kind of like a sacred,

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>sacred triptych right, Like you have your like agro hero

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in Nicolas Cage. You have a woman who will not

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to do anything but is there in the

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:27.240
<v Speaker 1>form of Abigail. And then you have a little cartoon

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>squirrel guy in the form of Justin Bartha. And I

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like the da Vinci Code could really have used

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the Justin Bartha character to keep us, to keep us

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>having some fun in a movie that is really not

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that fun to watch. Right, Yeah, we need some kind

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of comic relief for squirrel relief, for Bartha relief. It's

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>not like Justin Bartha wasn't available, you know, was his

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>availability is open? Okay? So then they pick up the

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 1>flur de Leys, which is this like key like object

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>as they're going around the louver discovering clues. But then

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Langdon and Sophie have to run because the cops are

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>chasing them, and while they're on the run, Langdon tells

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Sophie about the Priory of Ssion, which is a secret

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 1>society that protects a secret treasure, the Holy Grail. Um. So,

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>now I guess the story is about finding the Holy Grail, right,

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>which I was like, I think, oh right, that was

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>another thing. I was like, oh right, that's what the

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Da Vinci code was looking for. Question mark. Yes. So meanwhile,

0:44:42.480 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Silas has followed the clue that Son had given him,

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out to be a decoy and he

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>is so mad that he murders a nun about it.

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>He really is on a mission from God, and that

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>mission is to kill as many nuns as he possibly can,

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because he kills a lot of one. Yeah. So then

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:07.839
<v Speaker 1>we cut back to Langdon and Sophie. They take the

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>flur dey key thing to this like very fancy bank,

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess where in a safety deposit box there is

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a smaller wooden box with a rose on it, and

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>inside that box is the DaVinci. That's the only thing

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that Sophie knows in the entire movie is like, how

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci could works, but she doesn't know how

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to unlock it, and she doesn't try. And yes, she

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>knows what a cryptics is, which is the thing that's

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>in this little box, and it's this device that you

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>have to spell out a five letter word to unlock

0:45:45.800 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>it and retrieve like a little piece of papyrus inside.

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you break it, then the vinegar also inside

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the cryptics will dissolve the papyrus and then the secrets

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>lost forever. So that's a lot of exposition that she

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>very clunk Lee delivers to us. Mess I liked it

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 1>better when it was just squirting like lemon juice on

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the Declaration of Independence. That was a little more my speed.

0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But whatever, they made a choice, sure, sure, sure, But

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>now they've hit a dead end because Langdon doesn't know

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>enough stuff about the Grail legend. So they go to

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Lee Teping aka Ian McKellen, who is a Grail historian

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>who is also a billionaire, and it is not clear

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>how he has any of his money. That was my thing, Like,

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:39.919
<v Speaker 1>once you find out he's the spy, you're like, well,

0:46:39.920 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of course he had to have some grift going on,

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because like Grail historians, that has to pay four dollars

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a year, Like what who is? Like? I feel like

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not like a thriving job market where you would

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:57.839
<v Speaker 1>have like entire zip code to yourself. Maybe he's nepotism,

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, could be who care that being a

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Grail historian is the type of job that you would

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>have if you're like the kid of a very wealthy

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.759
<v Speaker 1>family and you don't have to actually have a real

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>job or work or anything. I got so bored at

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 1>this part that I started to do a thought experiment

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of like what if you were on a date with

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 1>someone and you were getting along and then you're like,

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? And they were like, I'm a

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Grail historian. Would you feel like I need to go?

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Or would you say I'd better stay. I feel like

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I would be kind of turned off by a Grail historian.

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm inclined to agree in the same way many people

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>are like comedian, I have to go, and it's like

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Um, that's how I would feel about

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a Grail historian, And actually maybe I would feel a

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>little superior. I'm like, oh, you found a job that's

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>more embarrassing than nine. Yeah. True. Um. So they go

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to Lee teeping, and Lee explains that the Holy Grail

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is not a cup, which is what it is commonly

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:09.920
<v Speaker 1>thought to be. It's a woman, but not just any woman.

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>It's which one Mary Magdalen. And not only that Mary

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Magdalene was Jesus's his wife what and then but wait,

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>there's more. There's more, which is that that she was

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>gregnant as hell with Jesus as greg That wasn't in

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ Superstar. My mind was blown once that platfoin

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>came up. I'm like, oh, I do remember reading that

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 1>in the book and being like, oh, what how could

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 1>it be? Or like does all this like you know,

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it's like high key bullshit, but it is fun. Like

0:48:55.080 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was more fun in the early two thousand's

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>when like online conspiracies were not um killing people at

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the same rates they are these days. But at the time,

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, yeah, there is no cup in

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that painting. It must mean that Emily is Jesus's niece

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 1>like that it's so conspiratorial and weird, and yeah, I

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 1>mean it is, like those kinds of scenes are really

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>fun to watch, especially when they end up being correct.

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:26.000
<v Speaker 1>You're like, wow, you you you made a big swing

0:49:26.560 --> 0:49:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and you were right. Yeah. So basically t Being is

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>making the argument here that da Vinci had left all

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>these clues in his work that Mary Magdalene was Jesus's

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>his wife and that she is the actual Grail and

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's not this like Chilice thing anyway. So he's

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>like going through this whole power point presentation, and then

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he says that once Jesus was crucified, Mary Magdalen fled

0:49:54.840 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to France and gave birth to a daughter. So basically,

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the secret that the Priory of Scion has been protecting

0:50:02.960 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for the past two thousand years is the fact that

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Jesus has a bloodline. And this whole string of airs

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>makes you think and the reason that like Silas and

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Molina's character and like Opus Day exists is that

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to kill Jesus. Is fair the descendants

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of Jesus family, because the revelation that Jesus was like

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a mortal man who can get people gregnant would kind

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of unravel the church's teachings of like the divinity of

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ, we can't be having that. It was Oh

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:47.760
<v Speaker 1>my god, it's so sailing, And this whole scene takes

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like twenty minutes. It takes a lot. They cut away

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to other stuff every once in a while, but I'm like,

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:55.479
<v Speaker 1>you think I don't notice that Ian McKellan and Tom

0:50:55.520 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Hanks have been debating for twenty minutes about Mary Magdalen

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 1>because I did Audrey tattoo is barely there. She's like

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it could it can't be what? No, And then like

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Ian McLellan keeps asking her rhetorical questions that she gets wrong,

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the whole. It's so much. I think that

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning, just in keeping with our male feminist

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>king narrative that Robert Langton he's written a book and

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you know because we see him reading his own book

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:34.839
<v Speaker 1>at multiple points in the UH and it's called Feminine Saclair,

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 1>The Sacred Feminine, and you're like, god, he's so toxic,

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but he like the whole it's so two thousand and six,

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's still kind of like something that doesn't not

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>exist now, where it's like sure like siss head men

0:51:51.160 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>who are so invested in proving their respect women that

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they just speak over women for hours on end without

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>even noticing, Like at every man who is like good

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote in this movie, it's just talking over women

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and explaining women to them, and to extend being like, no,

0:52:14.360 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I am obsessed with him and I respect them, but

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>only if they are says reproducing wives. Does that make sense?

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:25.799
<v Speaker 1>And you're just like, okay, the way we're defining womenhood

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is also toxic, Robert langdon oh. Yes. So it's at

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this point in the story where after all this stuff

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 1>has been explained to the only woman in the narrative

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>who has no idea what's going on, right, Lee starts

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to decipher the cryptics, which is against supposed to have

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a map inside that's going to lead to the Holy Grail.

0:52:51.040 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>But just then Silas Sneak attacks them, so they have

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>to flee in Lee Teebing's plane, which he has a

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of a jet of the plane, and they go to

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.520
<v Speaker 1>London and they take Silas as a hostage, and on

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the plane, Robert finds another clue in the box that

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the cryptics came in, so they go to the tomb

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that this clue speaks of, and they're they're trying to

0:53:17.760 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 1>get more information or something. This is a whole this

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 1>is another like and then or something happens where I

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 1>don't really know why anyone is doing anything. So they're

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to find some information. But te Bing's servant man Remy,

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of turns on them and he turns out to

0:53:35.080 --> 0:53:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be the teacher. But oh wait, just kidding, it's Lee.

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Ian McKellen is the teacher. He was the spy. He

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>was the spy again, another wide swing that ends up

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>working out for Ian McKellan. I'm like, how did you

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>get away with that? He's calling from his home phone number,

0:53:55.800 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like being like, I, oh, yeah, I know, Jesus is niece.

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry about it, like just weird stuff, weird stuff

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Um, But so he's not he's the

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bad guy. And then so he he in like Langdon

0:54:14.640 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and Sophie have kind of like gotten away from each other,

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but then they crossed paths again and he's trying to

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>get them to like solve the cryptexs and he his

0:54:22.239 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is he wants the secret of the Grail

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to be exposed. So that's why he's like obsessed with

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like finding the location of I don't know they're looking

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for like Mary Magdalen's sarcophagus. I don't even know what's happening.

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know what. And then Robert Langdon it's

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 1>at the right. That also made no sense to me.

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, so the louve is just why do they

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have it? What? And who put it there? I guess

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:51.839
<v Speaker 1>the priory of Scion put it there, but how did

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:55.919
<v Speaker 1>they manage that? I feel like these are questions who

0:54:56.160 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that weren't intended to be asked. So then we see

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a scene where Silas accidentally shoots Alfred Molina but he survives,

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's okay, yes, but Silas guess what he dies?

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>He dies? And then um, let's see okay, So this

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 1>is where Lee finds Sophie and Langdon again, and he's

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>holding them at gunpoint trying to make them open the

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>cryptechs and then Robert breaks it on purpose, knowing that

0:55:26.719 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's going to destroy whatever's inside, but he knows what

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci code is K and and right. I

0:55:32.440 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't even I'd like skipped over the whole Apple thing

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:37.959
<v Speaker 1>in I was like, this is too preposterous. I can't

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 1>even include It's the most important part of the movie.

0:55:40.400 --> 0:55:45.000
<v Speaker 1>When Tom Hanks turns away from where Audrey tattoos in

0:55:45.040 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle of being damseled root of him. Right, he

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 1>turns around, envisions the solar system, figures out the da

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Vinci code was Apple. They smashes the da Vinci code

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>just in case it wasn't Apple, and he doesn't want

0:55:57.440 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to embarrass himself. That was I I think that Audrey

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Tattoo should have been like she seems okay, Like she

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 1>seems just like kind of like not invested enough in

0:56:08.760 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on, as even though it's like it's theoretically

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:15.840
<v Speaker 1>she's got the most on the line here, she seems

0:56:15.920 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of indifferent towards a lot of the events of

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:20.839
<v Speaker 1>the movie. When he smashes the da Vinci code. Later,

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:23.760
<v Speaker 1>she's just like, why did you smash the da Vinci code?

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I was like, dude, like Jesus's map was in there,

0:56:28.320 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Like why are why do you care so little? It's

0:56:32.840 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>just like her character is just so underwritten that she's like,

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 1>why why would you smash a da Vinci code. He's like,

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:41.800
<v Speaker 1>while it was Apple, and she's like, you're so smart,

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 1>like so the da Vinci code is Apple? Question. Also,

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there's just really bad storytelling here where somehow, I mean

0:56:51.680 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 1>everywhere in this movie, but yeah, here, especially where the

0:56:55.440 --> 0:56:59.800
<v Speaker 1>police come in and arrest Lee because Fash had figured

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:01.880
<v Speaker 1>out that he's the bad guy. And I don't remember

0:57:01.920 --> 0:57:05.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly how that happens, but they know that Lee is bad,

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>so they arrest him. And as he's getting arrested, he

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like somehow realizes that Langdon had figured out the cryptics

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's like screaming about He's like, you figured it out,

0:57:17.080 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that's awesome, good for you. So he's like carrying on

0:57:20.200 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>as he's getting arrested, which spoils what should have been

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a reveal that yes, he did figure it out and

0:57:27.520 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>he had he did know that it was Apple, and

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 1>he had taken the map out like it was a

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>lucky guess. I still think it's a really lucky guess,

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way I just have call me a

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>da Vinci truther. But I just think he would have

0:57:40.880 --> 0:57:44.920
<v Speaker 1>thought it out more than Apple in in modern English.

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't make sense. Well, I think that is

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like Son was the one who devised that cryptex, because

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they've got to like figure out like as the secret

0:57:56.480 --> 0:57:59.560
<v Speaker 1>gets passed on down the centuries, not not to be

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a defender being Apple. I'm actually fully defending this choice.

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's brilliant. I think the clue of like fleshy,

0:58:14.200 --> 0:58:21.439
<v Speaker 1>red seated womb equals apple. That's a perfect clue. The

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>more you think about the da Vinci could being apple,

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the worth a grocer, it gets yes. Anyway, so the

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 1>reveal gets spoiled that in fact, Langdon did solve the

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:37.040
<v Speaker 1>cryptics and he took the map out, and the map

0:58:37.200 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is just another clue which leads them to Roslyn Chapel,

0:58:42.200 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 1>which is this like Church of Many Faiths built by

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Priory of Scion or something. And then they find

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>this secret room with a bunch of documents about the Grail,

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and Langdon discovers that Son was not actually Sophie's grandfather.

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:06.080
<v Speaker 1>He was just protecting Sophie because she is the Holy Grail.

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:09.840
<v Speaker 1>She is the heir of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene.

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>At this point, I'm just like, who cares, not Sophie,

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So why should I care? Sophie literally could not react

0:59:18.240 --> 0:59:23.080
<v Speaker 1>less to being Jesus's niece. It's so she she just

0:59:23.240 --> 0:59:25.760
<v Speaker 1>once again, it's like it can't be. I'm like, you're

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in the National Treasure Basement, like what is what are

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you talking about? She's so just We're getting nothing from her. Nothing.

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 1>What if you if you thought out you were Jesus's

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>biological niece, you would react, Yeah, one would. I wouldn't

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:47.760
<v Speaker 1>say nothing. Everyone react a little different, but I wouldn't

0:59:47.800 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>say nothing. And god, God, so frustrating. I'm like, she really,

0:59:56.840 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>she really just said huh okay me but I'm so boring,

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, you're not wrong there. So then meanwhile,

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>all all of the priory of scion has gathered because

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they live a half hour away or something, yeah, and

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they're like, Hi, sophieze, we've known who you were this

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>whole time. And then her grandmother is there? Is that

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>her biological grandmother? I don't know. I was really unclear

1:00:28.160 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in that. I'm like, is that Jackson's wife or is

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that her biological because they were like, oh, Sophie is

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the only living person, and I'm like, but wait, what

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>about that lady? Yeah, we don't know. She doesn't have

1:00:40.840 --> 1:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>her womb doesn't work anymore, so she's rendered obsolete. I

1:00:44.720 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>guess who doesn't give a ship either way. Sophie. She

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ask a single question. She just goes, oh, what

1:00:53.880 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a day, What a day I'm having? Like, yeah, gosh, okay,

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so then Robert Langdon and Sophie say goodbye. But later

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Langdon's like, hang on, Mary Magdalen's sarcophagus wasn't there? Where

1:01:09.160 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>was it? The mystery still isn't He reads his own

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>book again, reads his own book to find the answers,

1:01:15.080 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, bloodline Rose, line Rose, what does it

1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>all mean? And then he realizes sarcophages rocks, ranks socks

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm just like, I don't think he figured

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>anything out. I think he just stumbled around guess an

1:01:35.520 --> 1:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>old library. And then he's like, I can't believe Mary

1:01:39.600 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Magdalen's buried at the louver, Like what are a perfect

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>ending shot? Though so expensive looking? So yeah, so he

1:01:48.360 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>goes to he realizes somehow that Mary Magdalen's sarcophagus is

1:01:52.840 --> 1:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>under the louver or like somewhere in the loop. I

1:01:56.080 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and then he kneels down and he prays,

1:02:00.400 --> 1:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and that's the end of the movie. Questions, No, it

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>made total sense to me. I this movie is hilarious,

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Like there's just it's just so expensive it wants you

1:02:24.000 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to think it's It's like, I don't know. It is

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like fun to watch a movie that really thinks it's

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>doing something, you know, and it's like so like sweeping

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and engaging, and you know that people really liked it

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>when it came out, and then there was like, I mean,

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>there was such a huge controversy around this movie and

1:02:42.280 --> 1:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone was like, you know, but but then you watch

1:02:44.840 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it and you're like, this is ridiculous. I wanted to

1:02:49.600 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>start by I want to just kind of uh start

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>by talking about how albinism is portrayed in this movie

1:02:58.720 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and many so that's I think one of the biggest

1:03:04.640 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>missteps in the I mean just the story as a whole,

1:03:08.520 --> 1:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>because I know that that is I believe Cannon to

1:03:11.400 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the book as well. Yes, I believe so so um

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. I mean there is just a very traceable

1:03:18.800 --> 1:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>history of, um not just prejudice against albino people, but

1:03:23.840 --> 1:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>prejudice against albinism in movies specifically and using albinism as

1:03:29.840 --> 1:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a shorthand for demonizing a character. I have an article

1:03:36.040 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that came out at the time this movie was released

1:03:38.880 --> 1:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>in summer two thousand and six. It was in Shadow

1:03:42.520 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Penn State News. I found that one as well. I thought,

1:03:47.000 --> 1:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it's kind of a cursory or review,

1:03:49.560 --> 1:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but kind of gives you a short history of villains

1:03:53.280 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who are albino in movies. There's also, I mean, I

1:03:56.800 --> 1:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's worth saying that there is part of

1:04:00.400 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason this shows up in movies a lot is

1:04:02.080 --> 1:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>because there has been prejudice that has been extremely violent

1:04:06.280 --> 1:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>towards albino people from all over the world for like

1:04:10.680 --> 1:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of years. There were people who were

1:04:13.840 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>sent to prison for hunting albino people as recently as

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine. Like it is like a very

1:04:21.920 --> 1:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>very pervasive prejudice that is really really rarely discussed, and

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very present in this movie through the character of Silas,

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>who is played by Paul Bettany, who we know is

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not an albino person. So I just wanted to read

1:04:38.240 --> 1:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a quote from this piece from the Penn State News

1:04:44.440 --> 1:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of open the discussion. It's from Marybeth Oliver,

1:04:48.600 --> 1:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>who is a Penn State professor and talks about the

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>psychological effects of media. Basically breaks down that a lot

1:04:57.280 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of albino stereotypes are connected to vampires, going back as

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>far as nose furraw too, and just associating paleness and

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>like really really light pigmentation of the eyes, of the hair,

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and of this skin, with zombies, with vampires, and just

1:05:15.840 --> 1:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>with inherent badness. So and and uh, the article kind

1:05:20.240 --> 1:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of goes down to and Silas in the Da Vinci

1:05:23.360 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Code is kind of the most recent version of this

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>prejudice seeping into a villain because it is in no

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>way necessary to Silas's character for him to be an

1:05:34.320 --> 1:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>albino character. He is a religious extremist with a traumatic

1:05:38.640 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>pass that can be literally anybody. So the choice for

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>him to be an albino character an extremely underrepresented population

1:05:46.520 --> 1:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>in movies is really intentional, you know. And so uh,

1:05:50.520 --> 1:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Mary Beth Oliver says, quote to portray any group as

1:05:54.840 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>one dimensional is a problematic thing, even if negative portrayals

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>are infrequent. If it's the case that every time albinos

1:06:01.120 --> 1:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>are depicted it's negatively, then the images become connected. Demonization

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of any group runs the risk of affecting us in

1:06:07.480 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>ways we might not be aware of. Um and then

1:06:10.400 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of notes that Silas is uh symptomatic of this prejudice,

1:06:15.320 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but is in no way singular. This is like a

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>very distinct media trend that is like very rarely discuss Yes, indeed, UM.

1:06:26.440 --> 1:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I did a little bit of research on this as

1:06:28.760 --> 1:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>well and wanted to share something I found from the

1:06:32.840 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Tri City Herald shout out UM so this was published

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in It talks about a study from the University of

1:06:44.760 --> 1:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas that examined heroes and villains the top ten heroes

1:06:50.000 --> 1:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and villains from the a f i S Greatest Heroes

1:06:53.840 --> 1:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and Villains list and found that sixty percent of the

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>villains had some form of skin disease and none of

1:06:59.520 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the hero none of the heroes did. So just like

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>extending beyond Albanism, there's like a just a huge We've

1:07:05.600 --> 1:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about this before in terms of like disability often

1:07:08.600 --> 1:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>being ascribed to villains absolutely and then therefore demonizing disability

1:07:14.800 --> 1:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and then quote. The study also mentions the widespread

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>trope of the evil albino, in which TV shows, movies,

1:07:22.320 --> 1:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and other media treat albino characters as untrustworthy, ill intentioned,

1:07:26.600 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and villainous. According to the National Organization for Albanism and

1:07:30.520 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>hypo Pigmentation, sixty eight movies released between nineteen sixty and

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six feature evil albino characters, with a large

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>portion of those coming after the year two thousand. UM

1:07:44.280 --> 1:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it talks about how this movie was protested by the

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>National Organization for Albanism and hypo Pigmentation, but you know,

1:07:52.760 --> 1:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the filmmakers still made the choice to include this trope.

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is a quote from Michael McGowan, the president

1:08:03.320 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of NOAH at the time that he did an interview

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Associated Press in the earlier mid two thousand's said, quote,

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that there has been no balance. There

1:08:15.040 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are no realistic, sympathetic or heroic characters with Albanism that

1:08:19.479 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you can find in movies or popular culture. So it's

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the same end quote. So it's the same thing that

1:08:26.439 --> 1:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>we see all the time with villains being mothered in

1:08:31.520 --> 1:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>some way that ends up being very toxic and harmful

1:08:34.920 --> 1:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for people, an extremely marginalized group. And it's I mean,

1:08:39.960 --> 1:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and on top of that, I mean, in the in

1:08:41.720 --> 1:08:45.599
<v Speaker 1>the same way that we've been having ongoing conversations about

1:08:45.640 --> 1:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how disabled characters and and just are are very rarely

1:08:50.360 --> 1:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>played by actors who have that disability. And Paul Bettany

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is a wonderful actor, but certainly cannot speak to that experience.

1:09:00.120 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's just it couldn't be more obvious in the

1:09:03.080 --> 1:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>context of this movie that albinism is used to other

1:09:08.160 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>this character. It is used to make the character look

1:09:12.120 --> 1:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>different from other people and to some extent like justify, well, oh,

1:09:16.720 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they look so different from what I'm used to. Of course,

1:09:19.400 --> 1:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be the good guy in this movie.

1:09:23.200 --> 1:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's it's so it's really I mean, I

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:28.639
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the first time we've talked about

1:09:28.680 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 1>it extensively on this show. But it is like such

1:09:33.880 --> 1:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>uh longstanding issue, and there are still not like, I mean,

1:09:38.920 --> 1:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of like an extremely successful albino actor,

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>even though there are you know, many who are working

1:09:46.680 --> 1:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, I don't know, I mean this, yeah,

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just for me. It's like the worst part of

1:09:57.600 --> 1:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the movie by a long shot. And what will link

1:10:02.000 --> 1:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>in the description of the episode some resources where you

1:10:04.800 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can learn more as well. Yeah, I mean that's where

1:10:09.320 --> 1:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just there's absolutely no argument to be made by

1:10:12.800 --> 1:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>perpetuating this stereotype in two thousand and six in a

1:10:16.000 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>way that like it couldn't be less necessary. This is

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a religious extremist character. You don't need to marginalize a

1:10:25.479 --> 1:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>community to get across that religious extremism is not good. Like,

1:10:31.720 --> 1:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just so absurd that it's uh, it's it's really

1:10:37.920 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>upsetting to watch. And then similarly, one of the other

1:10:41.920 --> 1:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>characters who ends up being a major villain the t

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>being a k Ian McKellen is a character with a

1:10:49.320 --> 1:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>physical disability. He uses canes and they like repeatedly refer

1:10:54.479 --> 1:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>to him jokingly as he, oh, he's a cripple, and

1:10:57.640 --> 1:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like everyone is like may being fun of his and

1:11:01.200 --> 1:11:03.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like you can still see it's it's being done

1:11:03.600 --> 1:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>for this very unnecessary, ablest narrative reason. It's like, oh,

1:11:09.280 --> 1:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to make him look, you know, harmless, So

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what will we do. Let's give him a disability And

1:11:15.240 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like that is just I mean it we talked

1:11:19.200 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>about it a lot, but it's just it's so harmful

1:11:23.479 --> 1:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and lazy. It's really it's it sucks. And then also

1:11:27.320 --> 1:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that you see like him like pushed around while he's

1:11:32.640 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>navigating with canes and just like it's it's so it's

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just so aggressively unnecessary. That is trash. It is simply trash,

1:11:43.600 --> 1:11:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and we do not like it. Um but wait, there's

1:11:48.680 --> 1:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>more more that we don't like. I mean, we we

1:11:52.960 --> 1:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>already started to kind of get it that like let's

1:11:55.320 --> 1:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>just get like we're going to get all the like

1:11:57.520 --> 1:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>truly harmful evil ship out of the way, and then

1:12:00.360 --> 1:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna dunk on the Da Vinci code. But yeah,

1:12:04.800 --> 1:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the this movie's view of valuing and respecting

1:12:11.040 --> 1:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>women is so fucking goofy. It's it's for I mean,

1:12:18.479 --> 1:12:22.479
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely siss normative, where it's like, well, the reason

1:12:22.520 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that Mary Magdalene is important is because of like her womb.

1:12:26.560 --> 1:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, it's just like creepy, turfy language. And then

1:12:31.120 --> 1:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, it's like I feel like we're

1:12:33.439 --> 1:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed to believe that Robert Langdon and like what Lee

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>t being are like feminists because they acknowledged a woman's existence,

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just so bottom of the barrel. And then

1:12:48.920 --> 1:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>even but even so, it's like, well, of course we

1:12:51.200 --> 1:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>valued her because she was as a wife and a mother,

1:12:53.520 --> 1:12:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but we acknowledged that she was a real person. And also,

1:12:58.000 --> 1:13:00.639
<v Speaker 1>don't say she's a sex worker because I like that,

1:13:01.040 --> 1:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and like that offhand comment of like Ian McKellan being,

1:13:06.000 --> 1:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, horrified that it was suggested that Mary Magdalen

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>was a sex worker, which, as we I mean, it's

1:13:12.920 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>just another extremely marginalized and stereotyped community in film, and

1:13:18.960 --> 1:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just God, I'm like, this is this the feminism

1:13:23.640 --> 1:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you ordered? I guess this is Bush administration. Feminism is

1:13:27.200 --> 1:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>so a man, a man screaming at you that it's

1:13:30.400 --> 1:13:33.519
<v Speaker 1>okay to be a wife and a mother, Like shut up.

1:13:33.960 --> 1:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>A huge component of this movie is like the symbology

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>surrounding Oh, this symbol equals male, and this symbol equals female,

1:13:47.000 --> 1:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and Holy Grail equals woman's womb and is as you said,

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just like reductive, insist normative. And but the characters are

1:13:58.160 --> 1:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>presenting this information as if they're like, actually, it's awesome

1:14:03.080 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Holy Grail is Mary Magdalen's womb and her bloodline.

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's and it's because of the church hated women

1:14:13.280 --> 1:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and they and they burned witches at the steak. But

1:14:15.720 --> 1:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>women are actually cool because of their ability to have

1:14:20.080 --> 1:14:26.599
<v Speaker 1>sex with men and give them children. It's so it's

1:14:26.800 --> 1:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like just so frustrating that they're like, this is

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what women this mel Gibson thought he knew what women wanted.

1:14:34.479 --> 1:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>This is what women want to be called God. It's

1:14:39.160 --> 1:14:41.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously we say this all the time too. It's like

1:14:41.640 --> 1:14:45.559
<v Speaker 1>no disrespect to like people who have babies and people

1:14:45.560 --> 1:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>who give birth like amazing, keep it up if you

1:14:48.800 --> 1:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>want to write. But yeah, it's just like the most basic, reductive,

1:14:54.520 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>incorrect way to define. It's just so annoying. They don't

1:14:59.800 --> 1:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>say anything about Mary Magdalene except that she was a wife,

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:07.599
<v Speaker 1>a mother and moved to France, like and not a

1:15:07.600 --> 1:15:10.519
<v Speaker 1>sex worker. And on top of that, this kind of

1:15:10.600 --> 1:15:14.639
<v Speaker 1>like dovetails into what there is to discuss about Sophie.

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:17.559
<v Speaker 1>It's like they're just talking at a woman the entire

1:15:17.680 --> 1:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>movie who is Like again, it's it's kind of I

1:15:21.680 --> 1:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>don't I guess it's the opposite of a Mary Sue.

1:15:24.160 --> 1:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't, it's a it's a Susan Marie, where where

1:15:28.880 --> 1:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we're presented with a woman who should know how to

1:15:31.320 --> 1:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of things but is not allowed to

1:15:33.439 --> 1:15:37.519
<v Speaker 1>do anything. Like we meet Sophie as like a well

1:15:37.600 --> 1:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>respected cryptologist. I kind of like how she's introduced. She

1:15:41.680 --> 1:15:44.559
<v Speaker 1>enters very authoritatively, She's like, I am Sophie, I am

1:15:44.640 --> 1:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a cryptologist. Everyone takes her very seriously, like it's immediately

1:15:48.280 --> 1:15:50.799
<v Speaker 1>she's in control of the situation. She gets a little

1:15:50.840 --> 1:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>code across to Langdon and yeah, I thought it was

1:15:54.880 --> 1:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>generally kind of a strong introduction to that character. But

1:15:57.840 --> 1:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>then it's just like she proceeds to contribute nothing to

1:16:01.120 --> 1:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the story, not seem to really care what's going on

1:16:04.080 --> 1:16:06.519
<v Speaker 1>in this story, even though it very much concerns her,

1:16:07.000 --> 1:16:10.679
<v Speaker 1>like and it's just like she she's she's damseled several times,

1:16:10.800 --> 1:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>even though usually when she's damseled, she's damseled first, but

1:16:14.760 --> 1:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>then everyone's damseled and you're just like, okay, what It's

1:16:19.200 --> 1:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>just there's just like we find out. I mean, I

1:16:22.920 --> 1:16:26.639
<v Speaker 1>guess the things I can say about her are I

1:16:26.720 --> 1:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>love Audrey Tattoo. She's great. We do know more I

1:16:31.960 --> 1:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>think about, like Sophie's background than we know about Robert Langdon's.

1:16:36.320 --> 1:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Like all we really know about Robert Langdon as he

1:16:38.000 --> 1:16:41.639
<v Speaker 1>teaches at Harvard and he fell in a well true,

1:16:41.720 --> 1:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but I would argue that a lot of like men

1:16:45.040 --> 1:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who are writing a female, like a strong female character, well,

1:16:49.280 --> 1:16:52.719
<v Speaker 1>she's defined by her trauma exactly. It's like a character

1:16:52.800 --> 1:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>who has a tragic backstory and then it has turned

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>them into this kind of like stoic, almost cold, emotionless personality.

1:17:04.600 --> 1:17:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Lists is that even what she's supposed to be coming

1:17:07.640 --> 1:17:10.360
<v Speaker 1>off as like, it's so uncure how we're supposed to

1:17:10.360 --> 1:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be receiving her, because there's just nothing. It's just I

1:17:13.040 --> 1:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>just woke, I just woke flee up with my screaming

1:17:16.240 --> 1:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>about the Da Vinci code. But yeah, I mean, she

1:17:19.920 --> 1:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>just like she's devoid of any kind of personality, humor,

1:17:25.920 --> 1:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>emotion of any kind. Nothing. She's like, I hate history.

1:17:30.560 --> 1:17:33.439
<v Speaker 1>I was like, but what do you like? Like, do

1:17:33.479 --> 1:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you even like breaking codes? It sure doesn't seem that way,

1:17:37.439 --> 1:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>right because you don't have any You don't seem to

1:17:39.720 --> 1:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to do it, because we don't see you

1:17:41.760 --> 1:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>do it at any point, except she knows that PS

1:17:45.360 --> 1:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>equals Princess Sophie I'm which is like, well, if we're

1:17:51.320 --> 1:17:53.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess while we're in the reductive zone, why not

1:17:54.360 --> 1:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm gonna I'm gonna try to coin this. She's

1:17:56.880 --> 1:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a full on Susan Marie. She should know how to

1:17:59.280 --> 1:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>solve a number of problems that are going on in

1:18:02.160 --> 1:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this story were introduced to her as a person who

1:18:04.960 --> 1:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is extremely qualified to solve this, but instead of her

1:18:09.280 --> 1:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>solving anything, we are just introduced by Robert Langdon to

1:18:13.680 --> 1:18:16.599
<v Speaker 1>other characters who should be able to break a code

1:18:16.840 --> 1:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, but she's right there, like it's it's

1:18:20.680 --> 1:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so and it is like doubly frustrating to me that

1:18:23.720 --> 1:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>she just doesn't even seem interested in codes, And it's like, well,

1:18:29.520 --> 1:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're not interested in codes, why were we introduced

1:18:32.960 --> 1:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to you as a code expert? Like if she was

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>just I would I would feel less insulted by this choice. Honestly,

1:18:39.720 --> 1:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>if she was just like a regular person, she's like,

1:18:42.280 --> 1:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I own a I own a plant shop.

1:18:44.439 --> 1:18:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about this, Like that would make more

1:18:47.439 --> 1:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>narrative sense, given how little she does, if she had

1:18:50.280 --> 1:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>no expertise in this, but we're told she has extreme expertise.

1:18:53.479 --> 1:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And then she's just like I don't know. Like when

1:18:56.479 --> 1:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Ian McKellan has a gun to her head and he's like,

1:18:59.720 --> 1:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what the da Vinci code, she's like, I d K,

1:19:03.720 --> 1:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I d K my bff gill, I guess he'll just

1:19:06.400 --> 1:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have to kill me, and like she doesn't even try.

1:19:10.479 --> 1:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>She hasn't think for a second about what the da

1:19:13.520 --> 1:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Vinci code might be. She doesn't seem to care, like

1:19:16.840 --> 1:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just so bizarre. And then when they're like looking

1:19:21.120 --> 1:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at all the invisible ink scrawled all over the floor,

1:19:24.439 --> 1:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, wait a minute, the Fibonacci sequence, they're

1:19:28.400 --> 1:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>out of order. Maybe that's a clue that the letters

1:19:31.880 --> 1:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>are out of order. And she's like, oh, an anagram.

1:19:34.840 --> 1:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And then, rather than trying to solve an anagram as

1:19:38.120 --> 1:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a fucking cryptologist, she's like, shrug, can you do it? Robert,

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's like, you bet you then, and then he

1:19:46.240 --> 1:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>iconically says moons, sermons, charms, demons, sermons, monks. He's has

1:19:51.840 --> 1:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>servants twice, also monks, ranks, rocks, like at least Robert

1:19:56.479 --> 1:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Langdon for someone who is not a cryptologist. Uh, seems

1:20:00.040 --> 1:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>drisketed in breaking coach like it's even though he clearly

1:20:04.479 --> 1:20:06.439
<v Speaker 1>sucks at it. And he thought that Da Vinci Coulde

1:20:06.479 --> 1:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was Apple, which I am increasingly convinced it was not. Okay,

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>here's another thing I'm I'm realizing in real time here,

1:20:14.320 --> 1:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>so bear with me. But okay, okay, So Sen what's

1:20:18.520 --> 1:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>is his name? Sennier? I don't I don't know how

1:20:21.240 --> 1:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>French Jacqueslier I feel. I also think that Dan Brown.

1:20:26.439 --> 1:20:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm totally right if we have French matrons. Uh,

1:20:29.840 --> 1:20:32.479
<v Speaker 1>please correct me if I'm wrong, But it does just

1:20:32.479 --> 1:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sound like Dan Brown is writing down the most French

1:20:35.320 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>names he can think of. Like he's like, um, Jacques Soldier, sure, yeah,

1:20:40.680 --> 1:20:44.360
<v Speaker 1>print it. I'm a billionaire. Now watch my master class.

1:20:44.439 --> 1:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to watch his masterclass and he's going to

1:20:47.360 --> 1:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>talk have a four am and eat spinach, and I'm

1:20:49.840 --> 1:20:51.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn it off and then you're going to be

1:20:51.920 --> 1:20:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the most successful writer of all time, Jamie. Um. Okay.

1:20:55.560 --> 1:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So Jacques, who we learned through flashbacks, has been training

1:21:02.280 --> 1:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Sophie to break codes and follow clues and like he's

1:21:08.240 --> 1:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>been like prepping her for her entire life for this

1:21:11.720 --> 1:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. But she cares, which she doesn't care.

1:21:15.600 --> 1:21:19.479
<v Speaker 1>And he has so little faith apparently that she will

1:21:19.520 --> 1:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to solve any of this stuff that he

1:21:22.720 --> 1:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>explicitly tells her find Robert Langdon, even though he is

1:21:27.880 --> 1:21:31.719
<v Speaker 1>not a cryptologist and is not an expert in deciphering code.

1:21:31.960 --> 1:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of wondering that, like why, because Robert

1:21:34.960 --> 1:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Langdon himself says, I don't know why I would be

1:21:38.439 --> 1:21:41.599
<v Speaker 1>the person to go to, right But this the entire

1:21:41.680 --> 1:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>plot of this movie hinges on the fact that a

1:21:44.880 --> 1:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>man had so little faith in a woman to be

1:21:48.360 --> 1:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>able to propel the story forward that he's like, Okay,

1:21:53.360 --> 1:21:56.559
<v Speaker 1>woman who I know, find this man over here because

1:21:56.560 --> 1:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he'll be able to help you. Okay, But also canonically

1:22:02.000 --> 1:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it was he wrong. It wasn't like Sophie could solve

1:22:05.560 --> 1:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the codes. He solves zero of the codes.

1:22:09.240 --> 1:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>She just knew that one thing had a code inside

1:22:11.760 --> 1:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of it. True, But that is just because the writing

1:22:14.800 --> 1:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is such dogshit. Well yeah, like of course it's it's

1:22:18.360 --> 1:22:22.519
<v Speaker 1>because Dan Brown doesn't actually care about women, Like that's obvious.

1:22:22.800 --> 1:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But like in the Cannon, it makes total sense to

1:22:25.720 --> 1:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>me that Chaque Sag would have very little faith in

1:22:28.280 --> 1:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Sophie's ability to solve this code because she doesn't solve

1:22:31.000 --> 1:22:34.479
<v Speaker 1>a single code. And the movies four hours long. I'm

1:22:34.479 --> 1:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>also realizing I have all these notes saying Robert and Sophie,

1:22:38.040 --> 1:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Robert and Sophie, Robert and Sophie, and I'm like, literally

1:22:41.320 --> 1:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Robert Evans and Sophie was literally our friends. I wrote

1:22:44.680 --> 1:22:46.599
<v Speaker 1>it down five hundred times last night, and I literally

1:22:46.640 --> 1:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at one point like, this feels weird. I feel like

1:22:48.240 --> 1:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I've written this before. Uh because wait, wait, what if

1:22:53.040 --> 1:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that's of my closest friends. Wait a minute, just saying

1:22:56.200 --> 1:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what if that's code. What if the movie is trying

1:22:59.040 --> 1:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to tell us something about friends Robert and Sophie. I

1:23:02.400 --> 1:23:08.480
<v Speaker 1>hope not. Let's just say, as someone who really detests

1:23:08.600 --> 1:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>both of these characters, I hope not. I hope. Oh

1:23:12.760 --> 1:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>my god, that's so funny, though. They should. They should

1:23:15.320 --> 1:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>start in our reboot. Yeah, yeah, absolutely, Robert and so

1:23:18.880 --> 1:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>except this time Sophie does know how to do things

1:23:23.240 --> 1:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and Robert isn't. He's just carrying guns around. Yeah, he

1:23:28.120 --> 1:23:30.479
<v Speaker 1>just has he doesn't really, Yeah, he just has the

1:23:30.600 --> 1:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of the muscle of the operation. Um, I

1:23:34.360 --> 1:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know who Ian McKellen is in this situation. We'll

1:23:36.760 --> 1:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. Let's think on it. But um, yeah,

1:23:41.040 --> 1:23:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of go back to just like a lot

1:23:43.240 --> 1:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of this plot is men explaining things to women. This

1:23:47.760 --> 1:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>happens a lot in a lot of movies across many genres,

1:23:51.960 --> 1:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's like basically a storytelling device, and I think

1:23:56.120 --> 1:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually um composes like the vast majority

1:24:00.080 --> 1:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of human interaction. I've had so many things that I

1:24:07.160 --> 1:24:10.679
<v Speaker 1>already know explained to me by men and it doesn't

1:24:10.680 --> 1:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>come from nowhere, right, Um, So what happens here with

1:24:15.400 --> 1:24:19.479
<v Speaker 1>this kind of trope even is that there's a story

1:24:19.520 --> 1:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that requires a lot of like world building or exposition,

1:24:23.240 --> 1:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and the writer needs to figure out a way to

1:24:25.280 --> 1:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>get this across clearly to the audience. So what they

1:24:29.000 --> 1:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>usually do is pull in a character, like, you know,

1:24:32.240 --> 1:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>an audience proxy who the other characters can explain things too,

1:24:37.080 --> 1:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>so that the audience can get this information. What usually happens,

1:24:40.280 --> 1:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>or what often happens, is that this character is like

1:24:43.120 --> 1:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the only woman or one of only a very few

1:24:45.960 --> 1:24:50.599
<v Speaker 1>number of women in the story. I remember talking about

1:24:50.640 --> 1:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this in the Casino Royale episode. This happens in Laura Croft,

1:24:55.240 --> 1:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this happens literally. I mean, I think it's like honestly

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:01.839
<v Speaker 1>part and parcel to every genre, but it's like it's

1:25:01.880 --> 1:25:07.599
<v Speaker 1>prevalent in the action genre, like action sci fi. Yeah,

1:25:07.720 --> 1:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>world building genres especially, and I think that it has

1:25:11.439 --> 1:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot to do with I would guess that genres

1:25:14.479 --> 1:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that people assumed for a very long time that men

1:25:17.800 --> 1:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>are the main audience for this genre, that it features

1:25:21.000 --> 1:25:24.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of men talking at women, right, And it's

1:25:24.640 --> 1:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just like it's just a it's a trope that operates

1:25:27.120 --> 1:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>under and reinforces the assumption that like women don't know things,

1:25:33.200 --> 1:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>women don't know as much as men. Women aren't smart.

1:25:36.400 --> 1:25:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Men are smart. Men need to explain things to women,

1:25:39.680 --> 1:25:43.599
<v Speaker 1>and like that is just like such a widely held

1:25:44.080 --> 1:25:48.599
<v Speaker 1>belief still, particularly by men. But this one is like

1:25:48.760 --> 1:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>even it just feels like a very weird mutation of

1:25:53.800 --> 1:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that trope because it's men talking at women, not just

1:25:58.400 --> 1:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>about anything. Of this is how spaceship work, this is

1:26:02.080 --> 1:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>how computer work, or like extremely binary assumptions of like

1:26:05.920 --> 1:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>men know about this thing, women know about this thing.

1:26:08.680 --> 1:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>These are men who are talking about women a woman

1:26:12.680 --> 1:26:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's like worse than the normal one because

1:26:15.880 --> 1:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>like it's all bad, but it's especially annoying to hear

1:26:19.320 --> 1:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>men explain women to them Like that is just like

1:26:23.040 --> 1:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing? Like the room couldn't be less

1:26:26.280 --> 1:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>read in this scenario. There's at that scene is fucking

1:26:30.160 --> 1:26:36.519
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes long where they're explaining birth and marriage and

1:26:36.720 --> 1:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like just and what aren't they explaining about sis women

1:26:41.840 --> 1:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to us this woman who's sitting right there, Like it's

1:26:44.800 --> 1:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just so And then it just means that like because

1:26:49.040 --> 1:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the two men already know things about this and they

1:26:52.479 --> 1:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>formed their own theories, they get to like debate and

1:26:57.000 --> 1:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like actually have a discussion, whereas Sophie is just talked

1:27:02.520 --> 1:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>at and explained to. And it's just but again, the

1:27:05.800 --> 1:27:09.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is, like Sophie should be able to engage with

1:27:09.479 --> 1:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this discussion to some extent based on what we know

1:27:12.880 --> 1:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about her. She just the writer's Dan Brown slash the

1:27:17.760 --> 1:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who wrote this movie. Don't let her. That's why

1:27:20.880 --> 1:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it really bothers me. Is like we have been told

1:27:23.400 --> 1:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>that she has a level of knowledge that at least,

1:27:27.479 --> 1:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>even if she doesn't know jack shit about the Bible,

1:27:30.479 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>she is a cryptologist. She's a very critical thinker, Like

1:27:33.520 --> 1:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>she would be able to engage with this conversation actively,

1:27:38.080 --> 1:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>even if she wasn't the expert on the subject, she

1:27:40.960 --> 1:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>would at least be able to intelligently interact with this topic.

1:27:44.800 --> 1:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But she just doesn't. She just say they don't just

1:27:48.680 --> 1:27:52.599
<v Speaker 1>make her sit there and like be like, huh what,

1:27:52.960 --> 1:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I heard. And then I cut to

1:27:56.120 --> 1:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Audrey Tattoo, who like wakes up from the nap she

1:27:58.800 --> 1:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>was taking because she hasn't they haven't put a camera

1:28:01.840 --> 1:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on her in fourteen hours, and she goes that can't

1:28:04.960 --> 1:28:08.559
<v Speaker 1>be or she goes like but wait, or like Ian mceellan,

1:28:08.640 --> 1:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>like multiple with that scene asks her questions that he

1:28:12.040 --> 1:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>knows the answer to that he knows she doesn't know

1:28:14.160 --> 1:28:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer to, and then she will answer it wrong,

1:28:18.000 --> 1:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll be like ha ha ha ha, No,

1:28:20.680 --> 1:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you fool, it's Mary Magdalene and she's your mom. And

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:31.360
<v Speaker 1>then you're just like, oh my god, this is exhausting.

1:28:31.760 --> 1:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>It also makes you wonder why Jacques would not tell

1:28:38.080 --> 1:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Sophie anything about her true identity or her history. Like

1:28:43.280 --> 1:28:45.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not like she's too young. She's like in her thirties.

1:28:46.120 --> 1:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, oh, I couldn't tell her she was

1:28:48.120 --> 1:28:50.679
<v Speaker 1>only you know, she's ten years old. She couldn't handle

1:28:50.680 --> 1:28:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the truth. Yet it's like, no, she's like she's thirty

1:28:53.560 --> 1:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>three years And I think the movie tries to like

1:28:56.320 --> 1:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>explain this, this story of the book whatever, tries to

1:28:59.160 --> 1:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>explain this away by like saying, oh, no, they lost touch.

1:29:02.640 --> 1:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But why would the grand Master of the Priory of

1:29:07.320 --> 1:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Scion let that happen, let himself lose touch with the

1:29:11.520 --> 1:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>last living air of Jesus if his whole thing is

1:29:16.080 --> 1:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>protecting this air, Like he literally had one job. He

1:29:20.720 --> 1:29:24.639
<v Speaker 1>had one job and then he like, I just it's

1:29:24.720 --> 1:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>so funny. I would love not the let's scale that down.

1:29:29.640 --> 1:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it would be really funny, like the amount

1:29:33.640 --> 1:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>started to go back to the whole, like invisible ink

1:29:37.240 --> 1:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in the loop, But how long must it have taken?

1:29:43.960 --> 1:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Like and you never see you see? I think I

1:29:47.320 --> 1:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>mean were to assume all of the invisible ink he

1:29:50.200 --> 1:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>had on hand when he died at the louver. But

1:29:56.640 --> 1:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>his his hand never falters. It's all in the same fond.

1:30:00.400 --> 1:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>It's all in like comics hands b and he just

1:30:04.360 --> 1:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>is like whoop, whoop, whoop. He's doing like anagrams in

1:30:07.479 --> 1:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>his head as he's like bleeding out from his stomach

1:30:11.680 --> 1:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like god the okay, yes, so ultimately the point So

1:30:17.200 --> 1:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't Caitly and I agreed, we're not going

1:30:19.880 --> 1:30:24.759
<v Speaker 1>to get into the extreme sexism in Catholicism or organized

1:30:24.760 --> 1:30:27.639
<v Speaker 1>religion in any way because it is just too vast

1:30:27.720 --> 1:30:31.479
<v Speaker 1>and we wanted to have fun today. Okay, But I

1:30:31.520 --> 1:30:39.879
<v Speaker 1>do feel like Dan Brown uses extreme misogyny in organized

1:30:39.880 --> 1:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>religion to make his misogyny look not that bad. I

1:30:44.200 --> 1:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like he kind of offsets it, like any time

1:30:47.560 --> 1:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he is there's like a scene of a woman being

1:30:51.000 --> 1:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>talked over, ignored, whatever, it's you know, a crime against

1:30:55.080 --> 1:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>women that is far more violent. Is like invoked almost

1:30:59.439 --> 1:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>as if to say, like, sure, I'm an asshole to women,

1:31:02.439 --> 1:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't murder one in the Holy Wars. Like

1:31:05.960 --> 1:31:08.479
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of this weird equivalent. I wouldn't burn

1:31:08.520 --> 1:31:14.519
<v Speaker 1>a witch at the steak for free like that. It's

1:31:14.600 --> 1:31:19.679
<v Speaker 1>just yeah, I think he again, I just really think

1:31:19.680 --> 1:31:23.439
<v Speaker 1>he thinks he's doing something. Um when it's like a

1:31:23.800 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>tattoo has is technically in the scene, but she hasn't

1:31:26.360 --> 1:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>had a line of dialogue in minutes. Um, it's just ridiculous. Yeah,

1:31:33.720 --> 1:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this is just such a It's it's just like a

1:31:37.400 --> 1:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>female character who is couldn't be more important to the

1:31:41.840 --> 1:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>story and couldn't be worse written, less engaged. But I

1:31:47.720 --> 1:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's just like whatever, it's two thousand six

1:31:50.200 --> 1:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and having a woman physically present is like we did it,

1:31:55.120 --> 1:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like it's just so have asked and annoying.

1:32:00.000 --> 1:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>He's just right, She's just there to basically be a

1:32:03.360 --> 1:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>big reveal, Like her function in the story is to

1:32:06.960 --> 1:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like be the twist. She's just he's just carrying around

1:32:10.200 --> 1:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Chekhov's womb, right, So, but if that is something you

1:32:15.439 --> 1:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>want to do in your story. Fine, I guess, but

1:32:19.400 --> 1:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>also you have to spend the rest of the story

1:32:22.040 --> 1:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>carefully characterizing her and not just like having her tag along.

1:32:26.760 --> 1:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that really annoys me about it is

1:32:28.840 --> 1:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that um they keep referring to once. They like they're like, yes,

1:32:32.840 --> 1:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, well, let's agree that the Holy Grail is

1:32:36.280 --> 1:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a human as the sun, the heir to the air

1:32:39.920 --> 1:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of Jesus. And they keep using he pronouns, you know,

1:32:44.920 --> 1:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>whoever this living air of Jesus, because because they just assume.

1:32:49.280 --> 1:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's also I think the air they can take

1:32:50.960 --> 1:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>seriously that, but it's also I think just done to

1:32:54.960 --> 1:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like throw you off the trail of the big twist

1:32:58.360 --> 1:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's Sophie. So it feels like that thing where

1:33:01.160 --> 1:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, the person who was like writing that

1:33:04.200 --> 1:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>motorcycle and had a helmet on, who you thought was

1:33:06.840 --> 1:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a man. Oh, they took the helmet off and it's

1:33:10.120 --> 1:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>actually a woman. It feels like adjacent to that, right,

1:33:13.400 --> 1:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and then it's like end of observation. I've gotta I've

1:33:18.800 --> 1:33:21.839
<v Speaker 1>got to I've got a quote. I've got a quote. Okay,

1:33:21.920 --> 1:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this is classic backdel cast citation process. This is the

1:33:26.880 --> 1:33:30.599
<v Speaker 1>abstract of a paper I would have had to pay

1:33:30.640 --> 1:33:33.919
<v Speaker 1>forty dollars to read, So I'm gonna go into the abstract.

1:33:34.040 --> 1:33:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I would like to find this paper for not forty dollars.

1:33:36.920 --> 1:33:40.559
<v Speaker 1>No disrespect to its author um. This was published in

1:33:40.640 --> 1:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>two eight. It is by a professor at the University

1:33:45.520 --> 1:33:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of Robert UH feminist King UH by Professor Christie Maddox,

1:33:55.640 --> 1:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is called the da Vinci Code and the

1:33:58.040 --> 1:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>regressive gender politics of Celebrate Wating Women. And I really

1:34:01.720 --> 1:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>uh should read this paper because it's the abstract I

1:34:06.080 --> 1:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like really concisely boils down the kind of like

1:34:10.439 --> 1:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>both nous of like them thinking they're being feminist while

1:34:14.439 --> 1:34:20.280
<v Speaker 1>ignoring all female characters. So here's what Christian Maddox says. Quote.

1:34:20.439 --> 1:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>The public outcry prompted by the Da Vinci Code accused

1:34:23.439 --> 1:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the novel of being a radical feminist text with potentially

1:34:26.640 --> 1:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>dangerous implications for Christianity. The novel celebrates women, the quote

1:34:31.080 --> 1:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>unquote sacred feminism and quote unquote goddess worship, which on

1:34:35.360 --> 1:34:38.639
<v Speaker 1>one level gives it ideological kinship with the important tradition

1:34:39.000 --> 1:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of difference or cultural feminism. This analysis, however, argues that

1:34:43.400 --> 1:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the novel undercuts its feminist moves through its persistent recourse

1:34:46.800 --> 1:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to the private sphere and it's unremitting celebration of the biological.

1:34:51.560 --> 1:34:54.559
<v Speaker 1>The narrative falls victim to the problem that commonly inheres

1:34:54.800 --> 1:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in different slash cultural feminism. It redefines the binary system

1:34:59.040 --> 1:35:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of gender as well as resulting heterosexuality. Through these anti

1:35:03.680 --> 1:35:06.519
<v Speaker 1>feminist impulses, the da Vinci Code makes plain that celebrating

1:35:06.560 --> 1:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>women does not always make for feminist progress. Instead, the

1:35:09.680 --> 1:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>da Vinci Code highlights the dangerous inherent in cultural slash

1:35:13.160 --> 1:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>difference feminism. Finally situated with its religious context, the da

1:35:17.680 --> 1:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Vinci Code demonstrates the possibility for feminisms co optation by

1:35:21.800 --> 1:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>moral reform politics, which I think is just kind of

1:35:24.720 --> 1:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>an academic way of saying like sort of what we've

1:35:28.439 --> 1:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been circling around this whole time, which is that, you know,

1:35:33.680 --> 1:35:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Dan Brown, this movie in general seems to be saying

1:35:38.680 --> 1:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that by you know, celebrating women in any narrow, extremely

1:35:44.200 --> 1:35:48.599
<v Speaker 1>sis binary way is enough of a win to call

1:35:48.680 --> 1:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>itself a feminist text, which wasn't helped by how this

1:35:52.200 --> 1:35:56.760
<v Speaker 1>movie was received because it was, you know, like denounced

1:35:56.760 --> 1:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>by the Catholic Church. And I mean it's like I

1:35:59.640 --> 1:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like we both kind of remember and like ever

1:36:04.160 --> 1:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>helps a movie ever like, But part of the ground

1:36:08.000 --> 1:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that was banned on was like, well, they're deifying women

1:36:11.160 --> 1:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and we don't do that in Catholicism, which is you know, true, right,

1:36:17.240 --> 1:36:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but it resulted in this property being cast in this

1:36:21.439 --> 1:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like radical feminist lens, in a property where there's only

1:36:25.960 --> 1:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>one female character who has nothing going on like at

1:36:30.920 --> 1:36:35.320
<v Speaker 1>any point, and so um yeah, I wanted to shout

1:36:35.320 --> 1:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>out Christie Maddox. I feel like she very intelligently said

1:36:38.600 --> 1:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>something that I felt strongly watching this movie, but couldn't

1:36:42.160 --> 1:36:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like get into those words. It's like, it's just it

1:36:46.920 --> 1:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>just speaks to I think this bar on the floor

1:36:51.240 --> 1:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at this time. Well, it's it's kind of operating under

1:36:55.439 --> 1:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the same logic that like conservative like the way that

1:37:00.720 --> 1:37:05.519
<v Speaker 1>the patriarchy values women, because you'll find plenty of like

1:37:05.720 --> 1:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>misogynists people out there who are like, no, I love women,

1:37:10.439 --> 1:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>their sacred. We have to protect them because there are

1:37:13.080 --> 1:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>mothers and our wives like it's and our daughters and

1:37:15.760 --> 1:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>our daughters. And it's literally like Ted Crustyle, like I

1:37:19.080 --> 1:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have a daughter, I cannot possibly be a bad person,

1:37:22.320 --> 1:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you're just like sir, right, and it's just like

1:37:24.960 --> 1:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>operating under the same logic almost like of well, women

1:37:29.400 --> 1:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>are so special to the world because they're the ones

1:37:32.800 --> 1:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who give life and who are wombs walking wombs, which

1:37:39.080 --> 1:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is like no disrespect to people with whoobs that you

1:37:41.680 --> 1:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have babies with the whoops. It's just

1:37:45.160 --> 1:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the reductive ism of of the thing that it just

1:37:48.040 --> 1:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>excludes so many people. And it's a god I mean,

1:37:55.080 --> 1:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just like sciss men are never reduced to a biological function.

1:38:00.000 --> 1:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And in this way ever, like to the point where

1:38:05.479 --> 1:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>as Robert Langdon is explaining male and female symbology to Sophie,

1:38:13.080 --> 1:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he's like, the the the triangle that whatever, I don't

1:38:16.920 --> 1:38:19.639
<v Speaker 1>even know what that symbol is, but like an upside

1:38:19.640 --> 1:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>down V. That's the symbol for man. It's a rudimentary

1:38:23.560 --> 1:38:28.519
<v Speaker 1>fallast known as the blade represents aggression and manhood. And

1:38:28.560 --> 1:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>then he's like, as you might imagine, the exact opposite

1:38:32.200 --> 1:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of that is the female symbol, as if male and

1:38:35.439 --> 1:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>female are opposite things like that, I mean, I think,

1:38:39.520 --> 1:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess, not in defense of him, but like I

1:38:42.040 --> 1:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I do understand, like that is like a historical like

1:38:45.240 --> 1:38:47.559
<v Speaker 1>that is like a symbolic thing that's existed for a

1:38:47.600 --> 1:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>long time, but he just presents it as kind of

1:38:49.920 --> 1:38:53.479
<v Speaker 1>like this is a fact, right, I mean, which I

1:38:53.479 --> 1:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>think is is extremely of the time. It's like in

1:38:56.439 --> 1:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, there I don't think they're I mean,

1:38:58.800 --> 1:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>there really wasn't much conversation in depth in the mainstream

1:39:04.160 --> 1:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about challenging gender roles and like the sis binary gender

1:39:12.040 --> 1:39:14.519
<v Speaker 1>dynamic in in really any way. And I feel like

1:39:14.600 --> 1:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that scenes like that, really it takes like an ancient

1:39:18.080 --> 1:39:22.879
<v Speaker 1>symbol and obviously the further you go back, the worst

1:39:22.960 --> 1:39:26.479
<v Speaker 1>gender politics grow, like, but it's still presenting it in

1:39:26.600 --> 1:39:29.559
<v Speaker 1>a very matter of fact way of like, well, of

1:39:29.640 --> 1:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>course this is boy and this is the it resembles

1:39:36.120 --> 1:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the shape of a woman's womb, and it's like, why,

1:39:39.760 --> 1:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>why is this the way you're presenting this information. I mean,

1:39:42.960 --> 1:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's it isn't surprising and like I didn't

1:39:46.200 --> 1:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>expect better of this movie, but it's yeah, it's it's

1:39:51.360 --> 1:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>just like it's an extremely of its time movie that

1:39:56.479 --> 1:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>like the fact that that is like a very matter

1:39:59.240 --> 1:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of fact line dialogue delivered in a movie that is

1:40:01.640 --> 1:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>supposedly progressive on gender politics is like, well, that's all

1:40:05.360 --> 1:40:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to know, right, I wanted to go. We

1:40:08.280 --> 1:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>touched on this also a little bit about like the

1:40:11.600 --> 1:40:15.479
<v Speaker 1>lack of romantic subplot in the story that like it

1:40:15.560 --> 1:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>almost seems like, well, maybe it was going to be there,

1:40:19.000 --> 1:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but then and then it's just not. I think they

1:40:21.520 --> 1:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted us to do a will there, won't they? But

1:40:24.640 --> 1:40:28.679
<v Speaker 1>but I can't. I cannot think of a single were

1:40:28.960 --> 1:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we really was anyone in the audience like kids, like right,

1:40:34.560 --> 1:40:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't feeling that. I appreciate that they didn't force

1:40:39.080 --> 1:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>any kind of like romantic subplot. Although there's this one moment.

1:40:44.400 --> 1:40:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It's the scene where Lee he's like holding them at

1:40:47.200 --> 1:40:51.439
<v Speaker 1>gunpoint and he's threatening to kill Robert Langdon, and he's

1:40:51.439 --> 1:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>talking to Sophie and he's like, oh, by the way

1:40:53.960 --> 1:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that you've been looking at your hero, you wouldn't let

1:40:57.240 --> 1:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>him die, would you? And I'm like, is the aplication

1:41:00.479 --> 1:41:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there that like she is romantically interested in him and

1:41:03.840 --> 1:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>he's sort of like using Langdon as leverage to get

1:41:08.040 --> 1:41:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what he wants, because he thinks that Sophie's in love

1:41:10.880 --> 1:41:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with him. Huh. And I was like, what is what?

1:41:15.840 --> 1:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Why is that there? I It's just like I don't

1:41:22.720 --> 1:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to think about it. I don't. I

1:41:25.920 --> 1:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you you you, and the fact that we are like

1:41:29.080 --> 1:41:34.599
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, yeah, it's again, it's just maybe so tired,

1:41:34.720 --> 1:41:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Kaitlin that you can think about like, first of all,

1:41:37.680 --> 1:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>impossible to root for it because it's like even large

1:41:42.479 --> 1:41:45.639
<v Speaker 1>age gap aside, which is another like trophy tropy trophy

1:41:45.760 --> 1:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>element of this genre, specifically action genre loves an enormous

1:41:53.160 --> 1:41:55.120
<v Speaker 1>age gap. And that is not too I want to

1:41:55.200 --> 1:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>be a little clearer on that, because I feel like

1:41:58.280 --> 1:42:00.760
<v Speaker 1>there is just kind of like a general feeling that

1:42:01.040 --> 1:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>any age gap is not okay, that is not you

1:42:05.640 --> 1:42:08.559
<v Speaker 1>know that that's that's not true. I mean, there's many

1:42:08.840 --> 1:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>relationships in which an age gap is present and the

1:42:11.720 --> 1:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>relationship is perfectly healthy and it's fine. And like, I

1:42:15.120 --> 1:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to like cast that net so widely as

1:42:18.320 --> 1:42:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we have in the past. I just I

1:42:21.880 --> 1:42:24.800
<v Speaker 1>just think that it is in this case, I think

1:42:24.840 --> 1:42:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty clearly done because of the value that a woman's

1:42:28.479 --> 1:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>youth has on screen and how that is not as

1:42:32.240 --> 1:42:34.599
<v Speaker 1>much of an issue when it comes to assist male actor,

1:42:34.800 --> 1:42:37.639
<v Speaker 1>and that is I think, you know, a huge reason

1:42:37.680 --> 1:42:40.840
<v Speaker 1>why we see those age gaps present is because even

1:42:40.920 --> 1:42:43.599
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six, it was only acceptable to see

1:42:43.720 --> 1:42:48.479
<v Speaker 1>a female lead in an action movie. You know, you

1:42:48.640 --> 1:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>cannot crust the age of forty or all of a

1:42:51.120 --> 1:42:54.320
<v Speaker 1>sudden you need to be an Oscar winner or extremely famous,

1:42:54.520 --> 1:42:57.439
<v Speaker 1>or we have a problem, and like there's just kind

1:42:57.479 --> 1:43:00.439
<v Speaker 1>of this unspoken set of rules. And then on top

1:43:00.520 --> 1:43:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of that, if you're Tom Hanks and Audrey Tattoo and

1:43:03.920 --> 1:43:08.519
<v Speaker 1>you have no chemistry, and part of the reason I

1:43:08.560 --> 1:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't even want to put that on them

1:43:10.160 --> 1:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>too much because it's because they didn't write Audrey a

1:43:12.880 --> 1:43:17.400
<v Speaker 1>character like maybe there would have been some chemistry between

1:43:17.479 --> 1:43:20.479
<v Speaker 1>them if she had had anything to do or say

1:43:20.720 --> 1:43:24.599
<v Speaker 1>or think. Like I feel like that whole thing speaks

1:43:24.640 --> 1:43:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to like a series of small issues that it's like,

1:43:29.760 --> 1:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we've talked about this recently, is

1:43:32.080 --> 1:43:36.439
<v Speaker 1>like we're not like completely against a romance in a movie.

1:43:36.520 --> 1:43:39.719
<v Speaker 1>The romance just has to like be healthy and makes sense.

1:43:40.280 --> 1:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Like it's really like, I mean, it is kind of

1:43:43.840 --> 1:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a high bar. Declare just speaking from experience, but like

1:43:47.120 --> 1:43:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it is not an impossible thing to be rooting for

1:43:50.400 --> 1:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a romance in a movie, even ahead or a rim romance,

1:43:54.479 --> 1:43:59.519
<v Speaker 1>like it can be done. We've done it, maybe we'll

1:43:59.560 --> 1:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>do it again and we don't know. But but it's

1:44:02.080 --> 1:44:05.559
<v Speaker 1>just the way that this is set up is like God,

1:44:05.600 --> 1:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's impossible to root for because we're just

1:44:08.240 --> 1:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>given nothing. We're given Tom Hanks and the expectation that

1:44:13.280 --> 1:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we want Tom Hanks to fuck and it's like I'm

1:44:16.240 --> 1:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>just not really there, like he you know, he can

1:44:20.280 --> 1:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>mind his business, and but it's yeah, okay, that was

1:44:24.560 --> 1:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>my Jamie's a little ran no please. And to just

1:44:27.280 --> 1:44:30.800
<v Speaker 1>add to that the age gap thing. Another component of

1:44:31.240 --> 1:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>how it can become problematic is when there's like a

1:44:35.280 --> 1:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>series where we see the same male star aging James

1:44:40.800 --> 1:44:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Bond syndrome, yeah, and then the female lead cast alongside

1:44:44.880 --> 1:44:48.760
<v Speaker 1>him is usually different. In every movie, it's literally McConaughey ship,

1:44:49.000 --> 1:44:52.759
<v Speaker 1>like they stay the same age and he stops getting

1:44:52.800 --> 1:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>over there like exactly. Yeah. We've talked about that before

1:44:55.800 --> 1:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on different episodes. But and it's I mean, with let

1:44:59.280 --> 1:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>me look up, what the hell is this movie called.

1:45:01.120 --> 1:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It's Felicity. It's Felicity Jones, who is younger. So it's

1:45:06.320 --> 1:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>not Zoe Deschanel got it similar haircut. I think you

1:45:11.240 --> 1:45:13.240
<v Speaker 1>were you were tricked by the haircut, because she does

1:45:13.320 --> 1:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have bangs in this movie. But it's Felicity Jones, who

1:45:17.240 --> 1:45:20.479
<v Speaker 1>is I think almost ten years younger than Audrey Tattoo.

1:45:21.320 --> 1:45:23.519
<v Speaker 1>Um because the movie came out ten years later, so

1:45:23.760 --> 1:45:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they legally need to be thirty five. No matter what,

1:45:27.439 --> 1:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>even if there isn't a actual romantic subplot in a

1:45:30.920 --> 1:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>movie like this, it's still framed as like, look at

1:45:34.720 --> 1:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>these two people doing action scenes together, and they're spending

1:45:39.160 --> 1:45:42.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time together, and they're both attractive, especially

1:45:42.840 --> 1:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the woman that it's presented as if it is from,

1:45:46.320 --> 1:45:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the I mean even on

1:45:49.200 --> 1:45:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci code poster on Wikipedia, I think it's

1:45:53.280 --> 1:45:57.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty unambiguously like Audrey Tattoo is like afraid impressed against

1:45:57.720 --> 1:46:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Tom Hanks's chest, like you are supposed to be thinking

1:46:01.600 --> 1:46:06.439
<v Speaker 1>of this as a potential for romance, Like it's pretty

1:46:06.520 --> 1:46:09.760
<v Speaker 1>unambiguously like that's what you're supposed to think. And even

1:46:09.840 --> 1:46:12.479
<v Speaker 1>if they don't even actually like kiss or have sex

1:46:12.640 --> 1:46:16.559
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that in the story, and thank god

1:46:16.640 --> 1:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't. Just like the quest the adventure, the like

1:46:20.360 --> 1:46:23.479
<v Speaker 1>close proximity they're in is just like yes, like presented,

1:46:23.600 --> 1:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is this like sexy thing, the fact that she heals

1:46:26.560 --> 1:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>him with her christ like power, hears him of his

1:46:30.240 --> 1:46:33.519
<v Speaker 1>fear of falling in a well again with her christ

1:46:33.680 --> 1:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like hands, and you're like, I mean whatever, it's just

1:46:37.600 --> 1:46:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's just annoying. I just I wanted to bring up

1:46:39.760 --> 1:46:42.559
<v Speaker 1>that age gap thing because I I was thinking about

1:46:43.520 --> 1:46:46.760
<v Speaker 1>how Florence Pew took a ton of ship and even

1:46:46.840 --> 1:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like I was like on the wrong side of that

1:46:49.080 --> 1:46:53.479
<v Speaker 1>issue originally, where like Florence Pew is dating Zac Breath,

1:46:53.560 --> 1:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they seem to be very happy together and people were,

1:46:57.120 --> 1:46:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving them a ton of ship for their

1:46:58.720 --> 1:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>being and not in faking age gap, I guess in

1:47:01.280 --> 1:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that relationship. And she was like, I am an adult.

1:47:05.439 --> 1:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm like twenty six years old. Shut the funk up,

1:47:08.479 --> 1:47:11.559
<v Speaker 1>like stay out of my life. And it's like, yeah,

1:47:11.680 --> 1:47:15.400
<v Speaker 1>point take it, like live your life like it's it's

1:47:15.600 --> 1:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>just it's But in terms of like this kind of universe,

1:47:20.280 --> 1:47:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it has I don't know, it's I feel

1:47:22.680 --> 1:47:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like it's slightly it's kind of a different discussion between

1:47:25.520 --> 1:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like people that exist in the world and are in

1:47:28.160 --> 1:47:32.720
<v Speaker 1>love in the world versus a forced movie couple with

1:47:32.960 --> 1:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no chemistry, like it's two different discussions, and we're

1:47:39.120 --> 1:47:42.639
<v Speaker 1>having the movie discussion here. And because like, at least

1:47:42.680 --> 1:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>where I usually come from is like, because a woman's

1:47:47.200 --> 1:47:53.320
<v Speaker 1>youth is usually valued far beyond other qualities about them.

1:47:54.200 --> 1:47:56.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just something that always pings me. And we see

1:47:56.760 --> 1:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>these trends in media of age gaps that usually have

1:48:00.680 --> 1:48:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the implication of demonizing a woman aging. And you know,

1:48:05.800 --> 1:48:09.559
<v Speaker 1>there's the this idea that men are allowed to age,

1:48:09.840 --> 1:48:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but people only want to see women on screen who

1:48:12.760 --> 1:48:17.160
<v Speaker 1>were young. But again, it's worthwhile to examine this on

1:48:17.320 --> 1:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a case by case basis rather than making any kind

1:48:20.360 --> 1:48:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of sweeping generalizations about it. It's a fair I mean,

1:48:23.960 --> 1:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a really complicated issue, and I will fully admit

1:48:26.920 --> 1:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that I have like had kind of an unfair take

1:48:30.000 --> 1:48:32.840
<v Speaker 1>uh in the past in some cases, in cases like this,

1:48:33.120 --> 1:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's kind of unambiguously like what the fuck? Uh.

1:48:39.880 --> 1:48:44.679
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's the da Vinci code. I don't

1:48:44.680 --> 1:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>know what we expected. The da Vinci code is Apple,

1:48:49.400 --> 1:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So any question none. Um. There were a few scenes

1:48:56.040 --> 1:48:59.599
<v Speaker 1>where I was like, where Sophie participates in the action

1:48:59.680 --> 1:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that I was kind of surprised. I was like, oh,

1:49:02.600 --> 1:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>she like bashes Silas's head against the ground after he

1:49:06.439 --> 1:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>attacks them at the chateau, and then later she like

1:49:09.160 --> 1:49:11.880
<v Speaker 1>picks up Lee's gun after he's been disarmed. And then

1:49:11.920 --> 1:49:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, she does that because she's

1:49:14.760 --> 1:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a cop, Like I forgot that. She was, like what

1:49:18.400 --> 1:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>her even background in training is because the movie cares

1:49:22.080 --> 1:49:24.720
<v Speaker 1>so little about letting you know anything about her that

1:49:24.800 --> 1:49:27.479
<v Speaker 1>she would like have some like combat skills and she

1:49:27.520 --> 1:49:30.439
<v Speaker 1>would know how to handle a gun. But it was

1:49:30.520 --> 1:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh, Okay, she's allowed to. She's not like

1:49:33.600 --> 1:49:36.800
<v Speaker 1>fully sidelined every time. She actually does participate in some

1:49:36.920 --> 1:49:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of the action. And then I was like, all right,

1:49:39.000 --> 1:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>she knows how to do that because she's like a

1:49:40.600 --> 1:49:43.439
<v Speaker 1>trained police officer anyway. So I was like, well, I

1:49:43.479 --> 1:49:46.439
<v Speaker 1>guess points and then points taken back away. The other

1:49:46.520 --> 1:49:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is that like, and this is just this is

1:49:49.520 --> 1:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>probably neither here nor there, but she is wearing high

1:49:53.080 --> 1:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>heels and a pencil skirt throughout the entire movie. And

1:49:56.560 --> 1:49:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if it were me and I found myself in the

1:49:58.439 --> 1:50:01.160
<v Speaker 1>middle of a Grail quest, the first thing I would

1:50:01.160 --> 1:50:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do is be like, hey, can we go to a

1:50:03.080 --> 1:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>store or like to my apartment so I can change

1:50:06.640 --> 1:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>into like pants and well it's comfortable cloth. I also

1:50:13.200 --> 1:50:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like going back to the romance platform a second. The

1:50:16.200 --> 1:50:18.519
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're supposed to like they have spent a

1:50:18.720 --> 1:50:23.000
<v Speaker 1>maximum of thirty six hours together, Like I understand that

1:50:23.240 --> 1:50:25.559
<v Speaker 1>a good old fashioned trauma bond, but it's not been

1:50:25.600 --> 1:50:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that long. Yeah, I do. And I think that that

1:50:27.880 --> 1:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is the problem you're describing is a Howard specific problem

1:50:33.240 --> 1:50:35.880
<v Speaker 1>because was that not the exact same thing that came

1:50:35.960 --> 1:50:38.639
<v Speaker 1>up with Bryce Dallas Howard when she was in those

1:50:38.760 --> 1:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>damn Jurassic Park movies. I didn't watch. Yes, that is

1:50:42.280 --> 1:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly it. It was like she was wearing high heels,

1:50:45.439 --> 1:50:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but she was a genius scientist running from the Jurassic Park. Yeah, Like, yeah,

1:50:52.000 --> 1:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of a similar thing where it's like

1:50:54.760 --> 1:50:57.760
<v Speaker 1>again it's it's it's frustrating to me because it's like

1:50:57.960 --> 1:51:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we we know as lovers of cinema. Then Audrey Tattoo

1:51:03.200 --> 1:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly dynamic like character actress. She can pull

1:51:07.960 --> 1:51:09.880
<v Speaker 1>off a lot of looks, she can pull off a

1:51:10.000 --> 1:51:14.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of different energies. Like she's really talented and we're

1:51:14.360 --> 1:51:18.519
<v Speaker 1>just thrown into like I feel bad for her watching

1:51:18.600 --> 1:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this movie because it's just like she's just thrown into

1:51:22.000 --> 1:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this generic ass role where it's like she's dressed generically,

1:51:26.520 --> 1:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>her character is written barely, and when it is, it's generically,

1:51:31.080 --> 1:51:33.519
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, God, you were like you've been given

1:51:33.600 --> 1:51:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this incredible I mean to invoke another French actress who

1:51:37.880 --> 1:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>people try to like inject into like aggro male American movies.

1:51:42.320 --> 1:51:46.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like Marianne Courtyard and Inception, where you're like, here's

1:51:46.720 --> 1:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this enormously talented actor who is like being given just

1:51:52.760 --> 1:51:58.320
<v Speaker 1>wife shit to do. It's just yeah, it's just annoying, man.

1:51:58.560 --> 1:52:02.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like, if you want to I I resent that,

1:52:03.160 --> 1:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Like these really talented female actors are hired because they're talented,

1:52:10.200 --> 1:52:12.599
<v Speaker 1>and then they're not given anything to do that would

1:52:12.880 --> 1:52:15.400
<v Speaker 1>showcase that talent in any way. It ends up making

1:52:15.560 --> 1:52:19.240
<v Speaker 1>them look bad. And that's like just not fair, Like

1:52:19.400 --> 1:52:22.479
<v Speaker 1>that's such an unfair exchange to have to make. But

1:52:22.600 --> 1:52:25.519
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like very often with like and this

1:52:25.720 --> 1:52:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is again, this is changing over time, and it is

1:52:29.320 --> 1:52:34.439
<v Speaker 1>more significant in marginalized communities. And but this exchange of

1:52:34.600 --> 1:52:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like to go from like being an indie darling to

1:52:37.840 --> 1:52:40.439
<v Speaker 1>being a mainstream star means that you need to kind

1:52:40.439 --> 1:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of like sacrifice everything about yourself that was interesting and

1:52:45.360 --> 1:52:49.280
<v Speaker 1>showed like that you were like this, you know, dynamic actor.

1:52:49.560 --> 1:52:53.599
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just when that isn't true for for most

1:52:53.720 --> 1:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sis male actors. They're allowed to, you know, take the

1:52:56.160 --> 1:52:59.360
<v Speaker 1>charisma that made them successful and carry it into the

1:52:59.400 --> 1:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>mainstream because that fucking makes sense. Like why would you

1:53:03.560 --> 1:53:08.280
<v Speaker 1>hire a really interesting, talented actor and then give them

1:53:08.479 --> 1:53:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I just don't get it. It's like, in that case,

1:53:10.760 --> 1:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then hire fucking anybody, Hire someone who sucks it acting.

1:53:13.880 --> 1:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't even know the difference, you know, like it's

1:53:17.200 --> 1:53:22.160
<v Speaker 1>just weird. Hire me, I suck at acting, and yeah,

1:53:22.320 --> 1:53:24.559
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't. You would never know because I wouldn't

1:53:24.560 --> 1:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>have to say anything. But can you wear a shoe?

1:53:27.280 --> 1:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Like that's all used that to be able to like

1:53:29.800 --> 1:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>talk at Tom Hanks and just be like, what, No,

1:53:34.400 --> 1:53:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that can't be. It couldn't be. Like it's any any

1:53:39.280 --> 1:53:41.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, human person who could say it couldn't be

1:53:41.560 --> 1:53:43.960
<v Speaker 1>could have played that role. So it's it's extra shitty

1:53:44.120 --> 1:53:47.479
<v Speaker 1>that it took a very talented actor who deserved a

1:53:47.680 --> 1:53:55.000
<v Speaker 1>meteor mainstream role and was given nothing well but anything else.

1:53:55.600 --> 1:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I've said everything that the Vinci code was ultimately,

1:54:03.640 --> 1:54:06.519
<v Speaker 1>did this movie pass the excelsas I honestly, I'm going

1:54:06.560 --> 1:54:09.599
<v Speaker 1>to guess no. I don't think so. I didn't forget

1:54:09.640 --> 1:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay because the only other female characters who we

1:54:15.280 --> 1:54:20.760
<v Speaker 1>see are like the occasional none or are there any?

1:54:21.120 --> 1:54:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I really don't the fact that we're talking about women

1:54:24.880 --> 1:54:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this entire movie, barely any appear. Yeah. I do not

1:54:29.360 --> 1:54:34.720
<v Speaker 1>believe that this passes the Bectel test. It's what a

1:54:35.000 --> 1:54:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what a stinker? Wait, I just I just googled that

1:54:37.920 --> 1:54:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this is funny. Okay, So there is this website that

1:54:41.440 --> 1:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've ever directly cited, even though it's

1:54:44.600 --> 1:54:47.320
<v Speaker 1>hilariously perfect thing for us to talk about. It's Bectel

1:54:47.360 --> 1:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>test dot com. Uh, and it's it's a pretty I

1:54:51.600 --> 1:54:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of an old website. It looks kind

1:54:53.560 --> 1:54:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of html E and then it just you can just

1:54:56.560 --> 1:54:58.320
<v Speaker 1>look up the name of a movie and then people

1:54:58.640 --> 1:55:01.000
<v Speaker 1>will comment whether you think it passed the Back to

1:55:01.160 --> 1:55:04.879
<v Speaker 1>Tis by our Magic. I do not think it passes.

1:55:05.520 --> 1:55:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But here are the three comments. Dr space Goat said this.

1:55:11.840 --> 1:55:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Dr space Goat said it passes. Sophie and Sister San

1:55:16.120 --> 1:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Dreen the letter of which is killed off in the

1:55:19.000 --> 1:55:21.800
<v Speaker 1>third of the first third of the movie, and I'm like, well,

1:55:21.960 --> 1:55:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whose sister Sandrin is, so that's a no.

1:55:24.520 --> 1:55:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And maybe she was credited on IMDb. I didn't hear

1:55:27.720 --> 1:55:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that name spoken. But I don't think she and Sophie

1:55:30.920 --> 1:55:33.400
<v Speaker 1>even do they talk to each other. She's I think

1:55:33.480 --> 1:55:37.840
<v Speaker 1>she's the nun who gets killed by Silas. Uh. See

1:55:37.880 --> 1:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we even have this question is I mean,

1:55:40.000 --> 1:55:42.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's another nun. Does she talk to a different nun?

1:55:43.240 --> 1:55:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Sophie does talk to her grandma, who is maybe not

1:55:47.400 --> 1:55:50.360
<v Speaker 1>actually her grandma, and she's like, I'm your grandma, So

1:55:50.920 --> 1:55:54.720
<v Speaker 1>does I don't know? Okay, So Larissa five six five

1:55:54.800 --> 1:55:59.000
<v Speaker 1>six had something to say about that. Larissa says the

1:55:59.080 --> 1:56:02.760
<v Speaker 1>grandmother doesn't count as a named character. While book readers

1:56:02.800 --> 1:56:06.280
<v Speaker 1>will recognize her as Marie Chauvel, she doesn't say this

1:56:06.440 --> 1:56:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in the movie, and it's credited only as elegant woman

1:56:09.800 --> 1:56:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at ross Lynn in the film's credits, So I'm gonna

1:56:13.680 --> 1:56:17.160
<v Speaker 1>say that doesn't count. Wow. So you know, there's a

1:56:17.200 --> 1:56:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little and then there's a guy named Greg who threw

1:56:19.720 --> 1:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>his hat into the ring and said it did pass.

1:56:22.640 --> 1:56:27.760
<v Speaker 1>But Okay, this is fun. Greg says Sophie and her

1:56:27.800 --> 1:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>grandmother have a conversation. In the end, it is about

1:56:30.560 --> 1:56:33.400
<v Speaker 1>giving her up to Jacques Sonyer, I don't think that

1:56:33.600 --> 1:56:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is really about a man. And it's like, Greg, do

1:56:36.080 --> 1:56:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you hear yourself when you talk? Um? So, I'm gonna say,

1:56:39.920 --> 1:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>based on Bechtel test dot com, I can't think of

1:56:42.600 --> 1:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>about a resource. Uh doesn't pass. I guess that's Sophie

1:56:47.880 --> 1:56:50.680
<v Speaker 1>does talk to someone who identifies as her grandmother, but

1:56:50.880 --> 1:56:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we only know as elegant woman at ross Lynn. Well,

1:56:53.920 --> 1:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>if we're going by my new caveat that I'm going

1:56:58.480 --> 1:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to add into the mix from now on, which is

1:57:02.840 --> 1:57:07.120
<v Speaker 1>does the interaction between women is it meaningful to the story?

1:57:07.560 --> 1:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Could it be taken out and the story would be

1:57:10.240 --> 1:57:13.160
<v Speaker 1>or feel no different? And in this case, you could

1:57:13.200 --> 1:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>take Sophie. You could take Sophia. She could be The

1:57:17.360 --> 1:57:21.960
<v Speaker 1>thing is like, ultimately Sophie could exist in the narrative

1:57:22.120 --> 1:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and be off screen the entire movie period, and that

1:57:27.040 --> 1:57:29.600
<v Speaker 1>does not bode well. Like they could be like, there's

1:57:29.640 --> 1:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>this woman named Sophie, she's Jesus's niece. I've never met her,

1:57:34.000 --> 1:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and the movie could basically play out the same way. Yeah,

1:57:37.560 --> 1:57:40.120
<v Speaker 1>more or less outside of one or two buks on

1:57:40.200 --> 1:57:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the head. So uh, this for me is a no

1:57:44.960 --> 1:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as far as passing the test um. It's also a

1:57:50.400 --> 1:57:55.600
<v Speaker 1>painfully white movie. Absolutely yes. So um, this movie sucks

1:57:55.920 --> 1:58:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and I would give it. I guess, like I don't

1:58:01.160 --> 1:58:05.040
<v Speaker 1>half nipples, zero nipples. I don't know, does it deserve anything.

1:58:05.480 --> 1:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving a zero. I'm giving a zero for Hubris

1:58:09.160 --> 1:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>because it really thinks it's doing a lot and it's

1:58:11.760 --> 1:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just not I'll say I love the first at

1:58:15.720 --> 1:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>last twenty minutes of this movie are just hilarious. They're

1:58:20.600 --> 1:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so funny. There's so much going on. You have no

1:58:23.560 --> 1:58:26.040
<v Speaker 1>idea what's going on, and it's just like happening at

1:58:26.120 --> 1:58:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you and you're like, like, it's it's very it's a

1:58:31.240 --> 1:58:34.320
<v Speaker 1>very engaging experience because you're just like, why are they

1:58:34.440 --> 1:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>yelling at me? And they're they're like, I've got it,

1:58:37.320 --> 1:58:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Moon Sun Star Isaac Newton, Like it's just it's really

1:58:42.520 --> 1:58:45.200
<v Speaker 1>funny on that like it's it's hilarious, but it is.

1:58:45.400 --> 1:58:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It's not doing anything for anybody. It's just it's just

1:58:49.360 --> 1:58:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of bullshit, you know whatever. Some guy that

1:58:52.760 --> 1:58:55.800
<v Speaker 1>has like a christ complex made a million dollars off

1:58:55.880 --> 1:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, and now we can watch his masterclass. But

1:58:58.200 --> 1:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's no nipple. What it what? What? It's

1:59:02.320 --> 1:59:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like the most reductive interpretation of women period that excludes

1:59:09.360 --> 1:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a great many women. It's it's like defining womanhood in

1:59:13.800 --> 1:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a very disingenuous way, which is having a womb and

1:59:17.160 --> 1:59:21.640
<v Speaker 1>being married to Jesus. Well, guess what that's that's a

1:59:21.840 --> 1:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>really weird bar to clear. Well, as someone who identifies

1:59:28.040 --> 1:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>as a womb first and second as Jesus is his wife,

1:59:32.600 --> 1:59:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I take offense to that. Jamie, Well, honestly, you are

1:59:36.160 --> 1:59:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the target demo. It's just a disaster. Like it's It's

1:59:40.520 --> 1:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just it's reductive in so many ways. It's ablest. It's

1:59:44.760 --> 1:59:48.480
<v Speaker 1>all white people. Really. I mean, if if I had

1:59:48.520 --> 1:59:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a nipple, I would give it to that hilarious Tom Hanks,

1:59:53.880 --> 1:59:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Moon Sermons, Charmed, Demon Sermons, Muggs, Rank Rocks, Madonna of

1:59:57.720 --> 2:00:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the Rocks, Da Vinci. That should be on the A

2:00:01.000 --> 2:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>five Best movie lines list. But outside of that, I

2:00:04.440 --> 2:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>just I just even if this movie is attempting to

2:00:08.400 --> 2:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think it is attempting to with some success,

2:00:12.400 --> 2:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in a very narrow amount of time attempting to include

2:00:17.160 --> 2:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>women at a fundamental level in Christianity, which is not

2:00:21.240 --> 2:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>an insignificant attempt, right, Like that is that's not the

2:00:25.800 --> 2:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>worst thing I've ever heard of. Sure, let's get women

2:00:28.120 --> 2:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in there, let's throw a girl boss into Christianity, see

2:00:31.160 --> 2:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens. But but ultimately, I just I'm just kind

2:00:34.840 --> 2:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of like rolling my eyes at like how much this

2:00:39.080 --> 2:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>movie thinks it's doing versus what it's actually doing, which

2:00:42.520 --> 2:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is being really long and boring. Zero nipples. Yes, but

2:00:48.160 --> 2:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Alfred Molina, a character who I also

2:00:51.960 --> 2:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think could be taken out of the movie and

2:00:53.640 --> 2:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie would really be not that much different. But

2:00:56.160 --> 2:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we're so glad that he's there. We're thrilled he's there.

2:00:59.400 --> 2:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>He's really um he's I mean, he's great in the

2:01:02.680 --> 2:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>scenes he's in I don't know what he's sucking talking about.

2:01:05.720 --> 2:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Like every time they brought up the name of his cult,

2:01:08.480 --> 2:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they're like opus day and I was like, what is that?

2:01:11.040 --> 2:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that like a computer but it's a group? Uh.

2:01:14.400 --> 2:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what he's talking about at any point,

2:01:17.960 --> 2:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but I did love to see him, So this is weird.

2:01:23.000 --> 2:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>This is like, I mean, speaking to life of a

2:01:26.240 --> 2:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>character actor, much like Alfred Mallina is an iconic character actor.

2:01:30.240 --> 2:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But he's in both movies we've covered this week. Uh

2:01:34.320 --> 2:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>really not that much at all, very minimally in pretty

2:01:38.000 --> 2:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like kind of villainous, antagonistic roles. Let Alfred Molina play

2:01:43.600 --> 2:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the lead? Why didn't he play the lead? More? Come on?

2:01:48.400 --> 2:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And Dad thinks he's nice? Well? Um tuned back in

2:01:53.520 --> 2:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point down the road for March Fred Molina

2:01:58.400 --> 2:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Part two, in which will cover an education as well

2:02:02.800 --> 2:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>as species. I insist I want to see Alfred willing

2:02:07.880 --> 2:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to have sex with an alien. So no pushback here.

2:02:10.920 --> 2:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It's on. It's on Hulu. It's it's quite excited it's

2:02:13.320 --> 2:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on Hulu. Are there no? Oh yeah, Oh. I thought

2:02:17.040 --> 2:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh yeah, there's a ton of vestors. There's nothing,

2:02:20.400 --> 2:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but okay, I'll watch it. I'm excited, but I think

2:02:25.680 --> 2:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as it stands, Um, first of all, to everyone, for

2:02:28.560 --> 2:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to all over four hundred of you who voted for

2:02:31.680 --> 2:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci code, I hope you're happy. I don't

2:02:34.880 --> 2:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>know what you wanted or what you expected. We basically

2:02:38.320 --> 2:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>included the Da Vinci choked, the Da Vinci chode Okay,

2:02:42.400 --> 2:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I've had two glasses of wine and I'm the division.

2:02:47.600 --> 2:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what our reboot is called. It's called The Boy.

2:03:01.040 --> 2:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, I don't know what you

2:03:03.480 --> 2:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what what this little joke was that you were playing.

2:03:06.640 --> 2:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But us, it feels like the Matrons are pranking us

2:03:11.760 --> 2:03:15.839
<v Speaker 1>by voting for I think I think that the Matron's

2:03:16.040 --> 2:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>historically like a movie that it seems like we'll have

2:03:18.880 --> 2:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing to say about, and then we always have two

2:03:21.320 --> 2:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>hours worth of more hours worth of things to say.

2:03:24.960 --> 2:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>My little theorious people don't come to the Matreon for

2:03:27.280 --> 2:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>productive discussion. Sound off of the comments if you agree

2:03:33.360 --> 2:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is where we drink wine and get confused.

2:03:37.440 --> 2:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh this yeah, this movie is trash. What I think

2:03:42.040 --> 2:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be really fun is that guaranteed? Like

2:03:46.280 --> 2:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe if the if the world doesn't burnt to a

2:03:49.160 --> 2:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>crisp in ten years, um, I will watch the Da

2:03:52.080 --> 2:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Vinci Code again in ten years and have no recollection

2:03:56.080 --> 2:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of anything. And this is just kind of like a

2:03:59.080 --> 2:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>once a decade they weekend experience, UM, where we're like, wait,

2:04:03.560 --> 2:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci Code is Apple, That's what the fuck?

2:04:07.200 --> 2:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And we can just have this. I think in that

2:04:09.400 --> 2:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>way it was all worth it because we just get

2:04:12.040 --> 2:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to have this gorgeous experience of realizing that that we've

2:04:17.680 --> 2:04:21.160
<v Speaker 1>been watching this long ass movie for the worst twist

2:04:21.240 --> 2:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of all time. I'm tempted to because even though I've

2:04:24.680 --> 2:04:27.520
<v Speaker 1>read the book Angels and Demons, I simply don't remember

2:04:27.560 --> 2:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>anything about it. So now I'm tempted to watch that

2:04:30.160 --> 2:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>movie and just have a similar experience Angels and Demons, April.

2:04:39.040 --> 2:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't want it. They don't want to. You know,

2:04:40.840 --> 2:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>what what if we what if we punish the if

2:04:43.840 --> 2:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we punish the Matreon by being like, oh, you wanted

2:04:46.960 --> 2:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the Da Vinci code, Well, now we're doing an I

2:04:53.480 --> 2:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>hope you thought that little joke was funny everybody, because

2:04:57.520 --> 2:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're never going to stop talking about the Robert Langdon universe.

2:05:00.920 --> 2:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, Robert Langdon is the most basic name

2:05:05.840 --> 2:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>for a man. There. Robert Langdon study was like just

2:05:10.480 --> 2:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>absolutely going off. Um, well, thanks for tuning in Matrons

2:05:18.160 --> 2:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to Alfred marsh Lena. We love you. We resent you

2:05:21.680 --> 2:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for this one, but we love you. I'm gonna go

2:05:26.560 --> 2:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm about to do, Jamie read every word

2:05:29.800 --> 2:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of Angels and Demons without pea breaks. I'm gonna sit

2:05:35.080 --> 2:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the bathtub for eight hours. I literally got sick.

2:05:39.560 --> 2:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>My mom was so mad at me, It's like, why

2:05:42.560 --> 2:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>are you sneezing? Was like, I didn't leave the baths

2:05:45.800 --> 2:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>up until I finished the Da Vinci. It was like

2:05:48.760 --> 2:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the most two thousand four interaction I've ever had. That's

2:05:51.360 --> 2:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>impressive that you read in eight hours. I don't know.

2:05:54.640 --> 2:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I read like I finished it. I probably

2:05:57.520 --> 2:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>came in with it like whatever, a percentage the way

2:06:00.720 --> 2:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and then refuse to leave until I had full on pneumonia,

2:06:06.320 --> 2:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>like well, I'm gonna I'm about to suffer the same fate.

2:06:10.560 --> 2:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So but I want what I'm going to read it

2:06:13.880 --> 2:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say is that I'm gonna go

2:06:16.840 --> 2:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>eat an apple. It's better feel really symbolic. I want

2:06:22.120 --> 2:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you to think of my womb when you you're rosy,

2:06:27.080 --> 2:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>fleshy womb, my rosy fleshy, fertile Jesus womb full of seeds.

2:06:33.640 --> 2:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And then I want you to run. I want you

2:06:35.280 --> 2:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to sprint. I don't want you to take a bus

2:06:37.880 --> 2:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or an uber or I don't want you to drive.

2:06:40.040 --> 2:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I want you to run to the louver and neil

2:06:44.440 --> 2:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at the loom and think of my fertile womb, because

2:06:47.920 --> 2:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that is what it's all about. That is the real apple,

2:06:52.120 --> 2:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the sacred feminine. Honestly, I feel like, ultimately you can

2:06:56.880 --> 2:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>get all the same story beats out of I Frankenstein

2:06:59.560 --> 2:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's more fun to watch, Like the Holy Wars are.

2:07:03.240 --> 2:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Literally it's just like the battle between demons and gargoyles.

2:07:07.680 --> 2:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's the same. It's all the same, and I Frankenstein

2:07:11.760 --> 2:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is a more fun movie to watch. Justice for I

2:07:14.400 --> 2:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Frankenstein fingers crossed for this year's Oscars, Oh gosh, Well,

2:07:22.720 --> 2:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, I if I'm gonna go, I'm gonna go

2:07:25.000 --> 2:07:31.879
<v Speaker 1>laid down, lie down. I don't know. Okay, thanks everyone,

2:07:32.000 --> 2:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye,