WEBVTT - Surveillance: SoftBank's WeWork Rescue With Galloway

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. We're

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna digressing out of one of our monthly joys, which

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is Foreign Affairs magazine. I don't know how Gideon Rose

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>does it. Johnny gets out front of the zeitgeist with

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Middle East this month. It is a spectacular essay.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And John, what is so trenchant? Here? Is? A few

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>years back, Mr Rose wrote an essay why we always

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>fight the last battle? And there's the news. Say, there's

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the news flow of the last few days, including Mr

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Putin and Mr Ari Juan shaking hands, not over an

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Olympic medal in soci So getting this talk about it.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>If there's one take away from this addition, what would

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that be? Uh? Well, that the Middle East is going

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>back into its historical mode of a local region in

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>which the local power powers play a great game of

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>jockeying among each other, with occasional outsiders coming in to

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>back them. With the US essentially signaling first with Obama

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>and then with Trump that it was going to pull out.

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>What we're actually seeing is the local powers adjusting to

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a Middle East without the United States playing a major role.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And so in America this is couched as oh, the

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Russians are coming in, or we've a been in the

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>curves and all that's true. But from the local powers,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the larger picture is, Okay, the Americans aren't really going

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to be here or be able to be counted on

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to protect us, So we have to make our own

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>deals with the locals in the region. And so when

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians send a signal to the saudiast and Americans

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>by arranging the drone bombing of the Saudi oil fields

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as a signal you keep messing with us and we

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>will can we can hurt you, then the Americans don't

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>do anything one If the Saudis realized from that, we

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>cannot afford to anger Iran because they can come and

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>blow us up next time. Even worse, so the Saudis

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>mute their response and start making an accommodation with Iran.

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with the Israelis, who are now making deals

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Russians to protect their interests in Syria because

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States is no longer able to protect the

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Israelis from the problems in Syria. So essentially what you're

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing is the emergence of a post American Middle East. Uh,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>even quicker than we thought would happen. Well, let's talk

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about that. The broadest strategy in the region hinged on

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>two big alliances, one with the Israelis, another with the Saudis.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Did the Saudis look a little lonely now, yes, exactly. So.

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The fact is that the Trump administration wanted to have

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>its cake and eat it too. It wanted to continue

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to walk away from the region and not get Americans

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>trapped in endless wars blah blah blah blah blah. Uh.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, it wanted to confront Iran

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and avoid the consequences of justicely walking away. So it

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to essentially contract out US diplomacy in the region

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and US strategy in the region to its two powerful proxies,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Israel and Saudi Arabia, and said, well, you guys can

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>confront Iran, Israel in the Levant and Saudi in the Gulf,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and we'll back you and we'll give you whatever you

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to contract out that job. The problem is that

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the locals were very clever, took the American UH offer

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and got whatever they wanted with their local conflicts. But

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>they actually can't counter Iran because the Saudis are essentially

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a rich gas station without a strong military, their prey

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>not a counterweight. And these and the Israeli's are off

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the region because no, the Arab

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>powers won't allie with them formally because of the Palestinian issue.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And so essentially what has happened now is the Israelis

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Saudis played the Americans got what they wanted

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years, and now see the

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Americans walking away, leaving them with gains they've had. NBS

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is strong and in power and has established authoritarian control.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Netanyaho has gotten a whole bunch of things that he wanted.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And yet now the question is will the US be

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>there in the long run to protect against the Iranians.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think the answer is now that the Iranians

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and sorry, the Saudis and the Israelis are starting to think, okay,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we need to make deals with the Russians, with the

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Iranians because we can't count in the Americans. The United

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>States is pulling back. Why is this administration sending troops

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to Saudi Arabia Because it can't pull back completely from

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the region. And what Trump would like to do is

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>unwind American commitments. But at the heart of those commitments,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the external ones seem disposable. It doesn't really bother many

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Americans except for the dishonor about what we're doing to

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the Kurds. But the point is the courage, the front

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>line of defense. If you keep good northern Syria, if

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you keep going further and further away, eventually you get

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>to Saudi Arabia, and that's the world's gas station. You

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>have to protect it for the stability of the global economy.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>And so the problem is not the first places you

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>withdraw from. It's when you start taking out those things.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>When you play the game of Jenga, when you're left

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at the bottom, if you have no other pieces there,

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you're screwed very quickly. Michael Durant and you're Wonderful Magazine.

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Why seeding land will not bring peace? Are we building

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty mile wide new gaza strip between Syria and Turkey?

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So the most interesting part actually no, because we're essentially

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>allowing the locals to deal with it. And the difference

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>there is the outside powers aren't going to play. It

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>will be the local powers uh Russia, Syria, Turkey. Um.

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing about the Palestinian issue is that has

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>been kept alive for several decades because of the external

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>involvement of other powers and the international system, including Turkey,

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>including Turkey and their refugee. The fact is that the

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>most interesting thing we've learned from this issue, at least

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for me, is that nobody cares about the Palestinians anymore.

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Because the Trump policy has essentially given Israel everything it

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted and nobody has acted to it. We gotta leave

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it there. It is a triumph. Gideon Rose, in his

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>team at Foreign Affairs magazine Trump's Middle East. We've been

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>following Brexit since the Suez Canal crisis, and I must say, John,

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>to cut to the chase. That was actually a good one.

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>This is my favor. It's a good one. I watched

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the Crown. Come on, Anthony's a good I know, you

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>know there's that scene in Lawrence of Arabia where he's

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>out starving in the desert, drying and Boomy comes over.

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>There's a screen door and the boom. There's a suisque

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>now and then the music. My eyes just thinking of you.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>This is really good. I was twive years or something. UM.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>This is my favorite Brexit guest, my absolute favorite Brexit

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>guest from Cambridge University, The Big Financial Launch. Katherine Barnard,

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>The UK in a Changing Europe. Senior Fellow, Katherine, Great

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us on the program. Talk to

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>me about what happened in the House of Commons in

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours and what's happening right now. Well,

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it's remarkable. I mean, this is voice. Johnson became Prime

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Minister in the summer. He said he was going to

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>get Brexit done. The only way he gets Brexit done

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was to revise the deal that Treason Maine had entered into. UM.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>He successfully did that last week. In facts it's primarily

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Treason Mains deal but with knobs On and the knobs

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>relate to Northern Ireland. Because they have he's changed the

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>position on Northern Ireland. It's no longer a backstop, a

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of default position, insurance position. What he's done is

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>create a special situation for Northern Ireland and he said, right,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to put that to a vote and that

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and then that vote failed. Um. But um. What did

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he was forced to do as a result is right

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to the EU and say we want an extension. He

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>did that very grudgingly, as he was obliged to do

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it nder what's called the ben Act. And if you remember,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>he sent three letters on Saturday night to say I'm

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>forced to ask an extension. I don't really want it,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but I'm asking for one anyway. And then this week

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he tabled the WEB now the webs another bit of jargon,

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the web as the Withdrawn Implementation Bill. Um, and we

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>got it on late Monday night. It's a hundred and

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ten pages long. It's eiddishly complicated, really difficult legal text.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And m he said, right, MPs, you've got three days

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate or to to rule on this. You can

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>discuss it for three days, and that is it. MPs

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>were very cross and so there was what's called something

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>really very dull but a motion on how to actually

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>manage this process and he lost that too. But what

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he did win, and he doesn't have a great record

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of winning votes, he did win what was called the

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>second reading vote, which basically said grudging we like this deal.

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the good news. So now we have this situation

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on whether they can agree on the time to discuss

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the overall bill, and Catherine, I wonder if they can

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do that. There was a suggestion before these votes yesterday

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps the Prime Minister just withdraws the whole thing

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and calls an election. That hasn't happened. What do you

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>think the next steps are, Well, that's the question. So

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, if you think about this in terms

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the game of ping pong, the ball is currently

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in the e US court because the eu've got to

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>decide whether they'll grant the extension that for as Johnson

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>so grudgingly and ungraciously asked for on Saturday night. All

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of the omens look reasonably good that they will do. Remember,

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>they've got to act unanimously. President mcron, the a French president,

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is being really quite cross for about this and saying

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not very keen on granting an extension because the Brits

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>can't get their house in order. As you've helpfully pointed out,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on since the time of Sewers and

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>the friendship had enough. But I think it's likely they

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>will grant the extension till the thirty one January. Then

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the big question is will be won election and what

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>effect might the fact that we haven't left had on

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the Tory prospects in the election. Catherine Bernard with us

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a British legal scholar, which barely describes her accomplishments. She

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>is a fellow of Trinity College at Cambridge. Professor Barnard,

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I am looking at the complexities of the parliamentary voting

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>system and Constituencies Act of two thousand and eleven. Is

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this insanity coming out of this revolutionary change

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in Parliament eight years ago? Well, partly you're right, but

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>there's another act that has really changed the dynamics, and

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that's the Sixth Term of Parliament's Act. And that Act says,

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to call an election out of sequence that

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>we know we have elections every five years, you need

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to have two thirds majority in Parliament. And we're in

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a very unusual situation because usually the Opposition are jumping

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>up and down saying, oh, yes, we absolutely want an

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>election because we want to replace you lot in government.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But this time Labor is saying, actually, we're not very keen,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>one because it's good to keep Boris Johnson dangling on

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the string, and secondly because Labors not actually convinced it

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>would win the election if there was one. So, Catherine,

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about where we have actually made some progress

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last six weeks. The Prime Minister has gone

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>from saying that he would rather be dead in a

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ditch than remain in the EU but loot beyond October

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one with or without a deal, and now he

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>is saying that we will leave the EU with this deal.

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the big takeaway for a lot of people,

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not just for markets, but just more broadly, that the

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>chances of a hard Brexit so to speak, may not

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have completely been reserve holved, but they have receded and

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>quite marked the Catherine, would you agree with that. I

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>agree they receded on the one of October. It's not

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>clear when they've receded on the thirty one January, assuming

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a date for the extension. It's also not clear

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>even if we can overcome those hurdles and the web,

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.439
<v Speaker 1>remember that's the domestic piece of legislation giving effect to

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Boris Johnson, treason may feel that even the web goes through.

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>What we do is we go into what's called a

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>period of transition, which is essentially status quo, but there

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is a big trap door at the end of that transition,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and if there's no future deal concluded, that's on what

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the future relationship that we end up with no deal

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at that moment, and that's what some of the remainder

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 1>orban no no deal politicians are really worried about. At

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this moment. Do the other parties, besides a diminished labor

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Conservatives, that all the other parties do they

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.199
<v Speaker 1>have quote unquote power? Do they have a a in

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the process forward? Well, they do because until a single

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>party gets majority in Parliament, they hold the balance of power.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>And the party you need to watch particularly is the DUP,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Union because they only have ten seats. But

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>remember they were in what's called a confidence and supply

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>agreement with the Conservatives and that gave the Conservatives of

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>their majority before one were thrown out of the Conservative part.

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting is DUP very cross with Boris Johnpson at

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>the moment. They don't like his new deal, and yesterday

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on the motion they voted against to the man the

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Conservative position Catherine Barnard, thank you so much, from Cambridge

0:13:49.480 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>University as well. She has prodigious math chops with black Rock.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>We lee with us right now and John, A lot

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of this is the dynamics in the known unknowns within

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>the fixed in com market. Can we agree John before

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we go to Wally, that there's a new belief in

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a lower rate regime over the last ninety days, over

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the last year. I think that's been cemented in a

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people's minds. The other story we've got to

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about it is just the amount of flows into

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Europe of all places. Waite joining us now black Rock

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>head of Ice shares a mere investment strategy M E

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>M E A you know with Mia. Yeah, they're like

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a but but they didn't have that. Yeah, Okay, these

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are conversations we can do in a commercial broke Okay, Wiley,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that just don't go there. Let's talk about Europe and

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the inflow. Shall we your thoughts on what we have

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>seen through September into October? And why? Um? Yeah, wish

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I could join your other conversation during the commercial break. Yes,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to speak or maybe not. Um, Yes, we're

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to see inflows into European equities. And this is

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>really um notable and important because on a year today basis,

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we're still having closed to a hundred billion dollars out

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of European equities and the flows are only starting to

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tentatively come back. In part of that have to do

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that some of the uh non risks

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to markets incrementally improving. So if you think about the

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>US China trade, the escalation, if you think about the Brexit,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>incremental improvements that has boosted sentiments. But we're talking about

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>really coming from very very low base because most of

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the investors that we stick to under own Europe under

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>on European aquitis, specifically record outflows followed by record inflows.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Real what does that say about how fragile sentiment is

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, Well, it's very junky, right, So if

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we have this interview yesterday, this time will be totally

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about very very different mood music compared to what

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we are speaking to today. So even this, like a

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>matter of twenty four hours, can change sentiments completely, which

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is why we think that it is so important to

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>build portfolio resilience no matter how good you feel, no

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>matter how good market feel, especially given how much treasury

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and European government bonds have pulled back in recent weeks,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>they actually offer interesting entry point to build that portfolio

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>resilience which you're going to need for a long time.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We should point out a mia folks is a wonderful

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>abbreviation actually really works for Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That's used across all of global Wall Street and Walie.

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course out of I shares that well, we're jogging free.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know. That's amazing how Wikipedia can save me. Really,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>when I look at this and I want to go

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>back again to this important five pages of the I

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>m F. Everybody is a yielder had right now and

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>other nations are loading up on US high yield and

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>even moderate yield paper. Is that a source of concern

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>for you? Do you see just this addiction to I've

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta own US paper? Um? Yes, we have seen a

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of demand for optically higher ulding US fixed income markets,

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and that applies to high but it applies to government

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bonds as well. Speaking to India investors here based in Europe,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the level of income that one can get is significantly

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>lower than than than than what one can get in

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the US. But the important UH concerned consideration here is

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>also haging costs. Right when it comes to fixing income,

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to investing in developed market fix

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 1>income exposures, clients oftentimes have to hatch back into their

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>base currency. So the optical you'd pick up then that

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that one gets actually get eroded quite a lot when

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you convert US exposure back to your Euro based currency,

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which is why that the demand is there, but not crazily.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So now back to US high market UH with we

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have seen actually influenced into the US high old market

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>and whilst too much frost should be a source of concern,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at the default profile, it's not

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>biking even at this point in the in the in

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the late cycle, and given the very the nine founding environments,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>we definitely pay a lot of attention to it, but

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>currently not a significant source of stress. What's the foreign

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>bid like in European fixed income right now? What what's

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the foreign what's the foreign bid? The foreign demand in

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>European fixed income strong? Yeah, absolutely, um. Some of the

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>clients that we speak to in APEX, for example, Japanese

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>investors have been a consistent source of the deed uh

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a buyer also sovereign Semichael European government bonds. Even when

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you converted back into Japanese, YENNI looks and it looks,

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>it still looks attractive. And frankly, domestic investors are also

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>buying fixed income. You think about first of November, Quey

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>starts again. Um, that should sustain the demand for government bonds.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But as a corporate bound high grade, well, thank you

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>so much. It is with black Rock. We greatly appreciate

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>her times this morning. We always inform here at Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>As we look at email, we would also note ABA

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is the first names the letter acronymic kind of thing

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of Agnetha, Bjorn, Benny and Annie Freed. Why why I

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just we want to inform we got an email. I'm

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lie. Actually didn't know that. Actually I didn't

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>know that either. Okay, here's what we're gonna do it

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>by popular claim, we are thrilled to bring you Mr Galloway,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott Galloway at my book of the Year a couple

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of years ago on before, I still recommend to throw

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it at the nearest smart child you have and say

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>shut up and read this on all this technology and

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the way he writes and abruptly hits you over the

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>head an Amazon, and he is needless to saying out front,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>what are we calling it? That we disaster, that we

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>can do, we work whatever? Can? We give him a

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>massive shout out before we bring him in because Scott

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>won't say this about himself. Scott has been so so

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>critical of this company, and I've seen the amount of

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>abuse he's taken from the Silicon Valley guys who have

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to push back aggressively. Of the last two Unicorn crew,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Scott was right, the Union crew with debt the Union,

0:20:56.680 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Unicorn with debt wrong. I want to bring its

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>got Nascot got away n y U Stone Professor, Good

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>morning to Scott, good morning and thanks for the kind words.

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you think this ends? Uh? My guess is

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is more a cautionary tale that's historic.

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the company will either be a nice little

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>coat working space it's worth three to five billion, or

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we have some sort of restructuring in a year to

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months. It's still a company with forty three billion

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>dollars in long term obligations over fifteen years, and it's

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult to see how this company survives and cuts cost

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>cuts costs as fast as they need to, so either

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>as much smaller company or bankruptcy. In two thousand and twenty,

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Scott in the blame game, a lot of people are

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just looking at Adam Newman. How much attention should we

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>be paying to the likes of soft bank and the

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Vision Fund. Well, you know, Adam Newman makes for a

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>more interesting story, but the reality is if you tell

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year old male that he's Jesus Christ, who's

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>inclined to believe you the fiducia wait wait, wait, wait,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>wait do we do that? Was Pharaoh? Every day? Every day?

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Ignore and Scott carry on place. Yeah, look, the fiduciaries here,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>we're not acting as fiduciaries. And at some point the

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>limited partners are going to ask uh Massioshi san, you know,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>how can you give somebody one point seven billion dollars

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>which is more than eBay paid for PayPal to get

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the way. So that's what you could pay

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>severance two employees. This is the big learning here will

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be the dual class shareholder structures combined with the idolatry

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of innovators needs more scrutiny that power corrupts, and they

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>put too much power in the hands of one individual

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>and that was out of him. Tim Colpin and Shuley

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Ran have a brilliant essay. Washington Post picked it up

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>as well off Bloomberg Opinion and and and it goes

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to Galloway one on one, which is we work will

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>be an associate of soft Bank. The accounting is really suspect.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And the announcements of the last number of hours, including

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>a five million dollar consultant fee, could that happen to

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>an American corporation if soft Bank was American, given their

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>general counsel, given their outside council, and given any kind

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of accountancy and regulation. You know, I don't, I don't

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know the accounting. This is definitely gonna be one of

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the history books and we'll be teaching about this in

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>accounting classes for a long time because they figured out

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a way to give commissions to fill up their office

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and then figured out a way to turn those commissions

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>from expenses into revenues. So the accountant here has just

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten crazy. That the cultural divider. The most interesting thing

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>here in terms of it contrast and cultures is I

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do believe This will go down as the most expensive

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>or costly exercise and saving face in the history of

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the private markets, because there really isn't a bowl case

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>or an economic case for putting seven or eight billion

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars in good capital after bad here. And the reason

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that soft Bank did it is this isn't as an

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 1>investment as much, and we work as it is an

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>investment in trying to safe base, or repair or buttress

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the reputation of soft Bank and Vision one fund. This

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>economically makes no sense, Scott. We were weeks away from

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>retail getting absolutely host and getting caught picking up all

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of this mess for themselves. In an I p O.

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Some people asking as to whether there is more than

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one we work Scott, you called out, we work quite

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>correctly given the events of the last month. As you

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>look around yourself right now, do you see any more

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>any more big issues brewing ousewhere well the place to look,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, is the same judgment, the same algorithms for

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>decision making around we work in that as a disaster

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that went from forty eight billion dollars to eight generously

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in about forty five days, and that is still look

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at softbanks other investments I Think. If you were to

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>try and sniff out other real estate soft bank backed

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>real estate companies, you would find Oil, the Indian based

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>company that is trying to roll up budget hotels that

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>has a twenty five year old founder who had it's

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>borrowed money against his own stock to be part of

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a one and a half billion dollars round that no

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>one else but the founder, and of course soft Think

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>would invest in. I think the I buying space, specifically

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>open Door, that is using algorithms to buy real estate

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and what is typically a very nuanced local market, deserves

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>more scrutiny. And then there's the crazy three million dollars

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>into a company called wag so you can have an

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>AFT to get somebody walk your dog. There's definitely Scott

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Galloway twenty seconds Airbnb, How unicorny is Airbnb this morning?

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually think Airbnb is one of the winners. Tom

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Cargons is strong hair, positive, positive margins, very strong modes

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.679
<v Speaker 1>both global global demands and global supply. I do not

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>think Airbnb is no we work. This is wonderful. Scott Galloway,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, congratulations on a driving for the

0:25:51.520 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>global Wall Street Conversation. This is important, and it usually

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>comes into a stack of world class researcher Michael Nathanson

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with us writing with MOFA. Nathanson, it's just first glass.

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney has lined up with all sorts of intelligent questions.

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael Nathanson, you are such a stud Mrs Keane said,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 1>can you just start the interview today with one question?

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>She wants to know? Is kemball Roy for real? In Succession?

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you watch this showever? Is it accurate? Is Kendall

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that big of a tool? I think it's you know,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bit of exaggeration. But you know,

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>someone said to me, Michael Jordan's was a great basketball player,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean his sounds a great basketball player, right? So

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>really yeah, So this whole idea of like legacy and

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.239
<v Speaker 1>succession in media, unfortunately that's part of the industry, right,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It's passed on down. There's no guarantee that year. So

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>when you was a the mother of all content, King's

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>grizzled pros, when you watch Succession, it rings true. It

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>rings true. The whole pivot of old media new media.

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You have to consolidate quickly. It's like this past season

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>was really wait quickly here, well, because you know the

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>walls are closing and media needs to consolidate, right, and

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>do you want to buy new old TV stations? Do

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you want to get at it? Like? How do you

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>fix your empire to get ready for Have you been

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>on a yacht that big? I think he has several times. So, Michael,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>you know the big thing you've been covering. You've been

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 1>covering to media sector for such a long time, and

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's really at a pivotal time for the

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>media companies as they try to pivot towards technology and streaming,

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>and probably no greater example as Walt Disney Company what

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do. Give us your sense of how

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you think media will make that transition. Yeah, it's going

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to be really, really lumpy. So it starts with the

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>question Tom always asked us, which is what does court

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting look like? What's the future for the bundle? So

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, let's call it about eight million people who

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>pay for a monthly video subscription. We think that falls

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the sixty million subs. Okay, the sixty million subscribers were there.

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They care about the Toronto Maple Leafs, they care about

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Premier League soccer, They care about the NHL, the NFL,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. They'll be there for sports and news, right.

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So that means you'll lose a ton of subscribers you

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>have now, if you have assets that play in the

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>live sports and news business, you'll be fine. So Disney

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>has ESPN, Fox which we like, has Fox News, Fox Sports,

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the long tail of entertainment networks. Anything you're gonna watch

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that's entertainment based will be on demand, right. So then

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the world's gonna shrink for kale networks. At the same time,

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be this war we're watching now to play

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in the on demand space. Right. So Netflix was the

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>first mover than Hulu and Amazon. Now at Disney, Apple, right,

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>cbsl access just more and more pressure to fight for

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that spot opportunity, right, Does that makes sense? Yeah? Yeah.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things Tom and I, you know,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>always talk about because Tom is afraid he's he's spending.

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He pays so many bills every month and he's got

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>so many streaming bills. He doesn't know what's going on

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in his bank accounts all direct you know, payment, he

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what's going on. So how many payments will

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>people make for streaming services. Do you think rethink on

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>average U be four to five streaming services, right, there

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be four to five products, maybe three to four. But

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen is in homes have given up the bundle,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll have surplus surplus spending, right because basically they've traded

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>down from a hundred dollar bundle and to maybe four

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or five products that will costs, right, So you're gonna

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>have extra opportunities to spend from households that have spun

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>down spun out right. At the same time, what's gonna

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>happen is Tom's not gonna go to the movies as much.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely not buying home videos anymore. He's not gonna

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>buy you know, he's gonna stream his music. So there's

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning to see an erosion and consumer spending in categories

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>where technology is disrupted. So he'll find excess, you know,

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>savings from things that he no longer does. So the

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>long history media is I would have said to you

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>five ten years ago you have said how much more

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>can the bundle price and go up? And we would

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have said it goes up five percent every year because

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't find succession away from the bundle, right, So

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I I p is very very you know, it's got

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>pricing power. Give it to me. The entire hinge here

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is the belief by well meaning executives the younger people

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>who don't use this stuff will shift and use it

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>when they get older. How certain is that foundational gospel

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's no longer a foundational gospel? That's not certainty. I

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>think twenty three year old will or will not shifty years.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>They will not become us when they become our age.

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>They just will not. Right, You go to anyone who's

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a college kid, look at their dorm structure versus ten

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago dorms. There's no TV sets anywhere, right, it's

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>all it's all laptop, it's iPad. They're just going to

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>basically hang a connected TV set on the wall, not

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>paid for cable or satellite, and use apps, use apps

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to watch what they want. Maybe they'll use the parents apps. Right,

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they just basically share passwords and put it on. Really yeah,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Like the whole point Tom is like we we're gonna

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>see basically a race to the bottom. Like your point

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of there has been life cycles and people usually follow

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>their previous generation's behavior. That's broken down that's not going

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to Is there a profit for anyone on the race

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom? I think no, you know, the next

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>three or four or five years. That is my big

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>worry that we don't have a profit here. You know,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has never actually created free cash flow. You know

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's never been free cash generation. But the bond

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>market is there for Netflix. Why is the bond market

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>there for Netflix if they've never developed free cash flow?

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It's on the edge of weak company, right, because there's

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the belief embedded in the equity that cash flow positives

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. Okay, like Comcast flipped the switch and

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they did that. The Roberts family executed that on the

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>edge of brilliant, right, do you have the same confidence

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that content greaders can do a Comcast? They will have

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>to be slowing top line growth and slowing content spending. Right.

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:08.480
<v Speaker 1>It's you've got the decision is going to have to

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>be when the top land starts to slow, you have

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to basically hit the brakes on content spending. But we

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 1>don't see that anywhere at the moment. Obviously, it just

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>continuing to go up like crazy, and uh, you know

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get it even worse. Now with Disney coming

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.239
<v Speaker 1>to Marketplace and all these other streaming services. So just

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 1>before I know, so Disney, you to let you know

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>with what we have in our model, we think Disney

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna lose in this current year four point six

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in FIST year twenty on streaming and that's

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>part of their guys six billion dollars. Yes, she just

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>figured it out. You're dressed like Connor Roy. I mean

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he is you set the casual thing going. Yeah, you know,

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>since they left Sanford Bernstein, they just the whole mode

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is changed. I mean he and Craig used to be

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>buttoned down, sharp, you could be here presentable, you know.

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Now it's like succession like that's in Senior Ann's joining

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>us here in studio. We appreciate him coming in and

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>giving us his time. Lots to talk about in this

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>media space. Lots of convergence, lots of consolidation, lots of

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>big companies getting even bigger, lots of bills that Tom

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is paying for various kids around the world. He does

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>not even sure what he's paying for, but he's writing

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the checks. Nonetheless, Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Keene before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio