WEBVTT - NBA Suspension Costs Lebron James $404K Per Game

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Wicks. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money. Whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that Bloomberg dot Com. A piece of news that really

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>shocked not just the sports world, but I think the

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>market in general. Was the n b A coming out

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and suspending their season until further notice, really came out

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere. To get a sense of what that means

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for everybody involved, we welcome Scott Sashnik, sports business reporter

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, joining us here on a Bloomberg Interactive

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>broker studio. So, Scott, really kind of shocking piece of

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>news by the NBA. What are the ramifications? But shocking

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in that it happened, but in where we were headed

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and the news that we were looking at not really

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>shocking at all. Because you had the nuclear scenario of

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a player testing positive for Corona. What are they to do?

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>That player and his teammates must be isolated that had

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Phase six teams in that incubation period. They have to

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>be isolated. You just cannot play. The referees have to

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>be isolated. You don't have enough players to go around

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>her teams anymore. You had no choice but to suspend

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>this season. Can you give us some color on that

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>one player who made fun of this whole thing and

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>went around touching all the Michael that's the guy who

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>tested positives, Rudy Gilbert, So I'm not sure he was

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>making fun as much he was he. I believe from

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the folks I've read and talked to in the city,

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Salt Lake City that it was a bit

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of solidarity with the reporters saying this is not a

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>solution to the problem, that you guys are six to

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>eight feet away from us, and they were worried about

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way the reporters giving it to the players,

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and a solidarity, okay. At the same time, with hindsight,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it seems seriously irresponse, absolutely insane that he went around

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and touched every absolutely And I'm wondering, you know, is

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>there going to be some sort of penalty or something.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just throwing this out there because I read this,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just thinking from a social responsibility, my guests

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>would be no, there will be no penalty, but the

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ramifications we don't know yet. As you know, Paul, the

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>NBA's backbone is the billion dollar TV contracts. That's Turner

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and espn Um. There are fource maasure clauses in the

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the labor contract with the players, by

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, inserted after nine eleven, so you've got things

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like earthquakes, terrorism specifically inserted at that time, epidemics, so

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you would think, Uh, the labor contract calls for a

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>forfeiture on the players for every game one nineties second

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>point six of their salary, accounting for regular season, h

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>preseason and the average of postseason games. So we did

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the math Lebron James, for instance, loses four and four

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars per game not played. How long is this

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna lasts or any speculation from the NBA office or

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>owners or anything like that. Mark Cuban is the one

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>who speculated the most, saying we could be looking at

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the NBA into August, the most valuable from a TV perspective,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>from a ticket perspective, the most valuable time of year

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for the sports leagues, especially the NBA is the playoffs.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to lose your playoffs. If you can

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>nix six to eight weeks and come back in stage

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of playoffs, perhaps with the current standings, that would be

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario. How well do you play basketball? Not

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>that well? All right, we can't. We can't count on

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>just watching Scotch sashnik is, Bloomberg Sports columnist. Markets continue

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to sell off in a big way, off seven percent

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>across the board. We did have that circuit breaker triggered

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier this morning. We were now trading again. One area

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to spend a few minutes on least night

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>were we really like to focus on crude oil and

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it continues a free fall here West West Texas Intermediate

0:03:56.800 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>crew down six percent today, about thirty one dollar a barrel.

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Really on that thirty dollar barrel, kind of a support

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>level right there. Obviously a big issues in global supply

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>demand concerns. So let's dig into that for a few minutes. Here.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Wells Fitzpatrick, he's a managing director for E and P

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Research at sun Trust Robinson Hump. He joins us on

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Houston, Texas. So, Wells, I mean clearly

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a demand issue out there. We've seen that brewing

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in the coronavirus really putting a point on it. But

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last week we've also gotten a supply shock

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>here and we've had a you know, a week or

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so here to kind of digest what's going on between

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia and Russia. I want to get your informed

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion about what do you think Saudi's and the Russians

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 1>are actually thinking here. Yeah, it's clearly a game of brinksmanship,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and Saudi Is is putting in all the cards on

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the table to make it a credible, uh move for

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>them to go up north of twelve million barrels a day. Obviously,

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they've they've contracted a fleet of tankers. Um, you know,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they've they've they've lowered their selling prices. They you know,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they are trying to gut check Rush. Um, you know,

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a game of chicken at this point. I mean,

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact is is that Saudi and the golf increasing

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>production by you know, well over two million barrels means

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>that they're selling out of storage. So is it a

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>long term strategy? I don't know. I mean, swapping your

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>storage for Chinese storage at less than thirty thirty dollars

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of barrel doesn't seem like it, but but clearly at

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this point it's a game of chicken, and specifically a

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>game of chicken between UH two men, MBS and and putin.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm looking at the shale patch, in particular

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>high yield debt of the energy companies in the United States.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to understand how deep the pain is going

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>to go. I'm looking right now at the market value

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of high yield junk of energy junk bonds. It's fallen

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>by fifty billion dollars since the beginning of this year. Yeah,

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's been it's been brutal. Um, it's been brutal, and

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know the market caps are are something similar.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, all the traditional avenues for UH financing for

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the industry have have essentially been shut off. I mean,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>A and D was down over UH in in four

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Q before we really hit the skids. High yield, as

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you said, yield the worst is more than double. The

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>bank revolvers are going to be down in the upcoming

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>revolver redetermination season. And you know, no one's talking about

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>issuing equities. So if you have uh near term debt maturities. Um,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really something that you have to pay out of

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>cash flow or out of some sort of fire sales.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>So the companies that were most cautious on are the

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>ones with near term debt maturities and the ones that

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are largely drawn on their bank lines, because obviously those

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>bank lines are gonna come down. So if if you

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>have seventy out, um, you know, it's reasonable to expect

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>that you would be a hundred percent or even overdrawn

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the spring redeterminations. Just to give

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the scope of the pain, what proportion

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the shell producers, whether in the premium basin or

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere in the United States, what percentage do you think

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll run into solvency issues and have to either restructure

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>or declare bankruptcy. Yeah, that's that's a great question. Um.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that I think that there's a

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a very reasonable case if this continues for a

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>couple more quarters that we that we challenge the I

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to even call it a record, but the

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>previous record of of thirty four uh e MP bankruptcies

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in a quarter, and that was second quarter. A few

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen. Um, you know, it couldn't get that

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>brutal again. Yeah, if they go through with this, with

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this price war, and and oil stays in in the

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>low thirties or even dips into the twenties, it gets

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty bad pretty quick for a lot of these folks.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Um and other perhaps under appreciated aspect of a lot

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of these companies had three way hedges, so you know,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you sell another put to get a little bit more upside. Uh.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's so far out of the money that two

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>months ago we didn't really think about them. But you

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>know now you have to build all those into your model,

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and these companies have them. Uh And and it limits

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the downside protection. It essentially it limits your insurance. So

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of moving parts, um and frankly, not

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them are good, except for maybe maybe

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the gas side. So well, when are we going to

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>see some of the majors come in here and just

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>scoop up and buy some quality assets that really just

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>kount of prices. You know, that's a great question. I mean,

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are in in full uh full

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>defense of their uh their distributions. Um. I mean it's

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hard for the big guys, even Exxon to

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to to defend their dividends, uh with with thirty dollar

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>w T. I maybe maybe they can do stock deals

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for some of these companies, come in and rescue them.

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, to to it to your earlier point,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>If a company's debt is trading at thirty cents on

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, do you really want to go in and

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>buy them out and and make those bond holders whole?

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Um when when you know that value might not be there.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So when when bonds get this low, I think it

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>actually freezes up to a and D market a little

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more than the valuation should in theory. Help Wells.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for being with us well as Fitzpatrick,

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Managing director of NP Research at SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, there

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is a question just to go back to this, uh,

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this sort of idea that the bear market is signaling

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>an over chance of recession. Luckily we have someone who

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can kind of weigh it on what to expect in

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a potential downturn in a recession this time around, given

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the lead up, Robert Lawrence, We're so glad to have

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he has, Professor of International Trade and Investment at Harvard

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy School, former economic advisor to President Clinton, with decades

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of experience throughout watching the economy. I'm trying to get

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>your sense of where we are. People say that we

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of momentum in the United States heading

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>into this coronavirus induced slow down. Do you agree with

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that let's start there. Well, I think we we did

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>have momentum, but I think it's come to a halt.

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that all of the movement is obviously in

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction. I think not only is the stock

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>market signaling immense uh trouble lies ahead, um. But in

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a sense, the big issue is is there enough liquidity

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the system. Currently? The big banks look like they're

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in good shape, but the question is are they going

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to be lending to many other companies who have cash

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>flow issues? Um. Ironically, I think because we're fighting the

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>last war where there was a lot of credit risk

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the current issues that that may have made them more prudent,

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>But in a sense, that's simply shifting some of the

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>problems onto those who are much less, much more liquidity constrained. So, Robert,

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the administration needs to do here?

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>The U S Government needs to do here, aside from

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what we're already seeing from the federal Reserve, in order

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to combat this coronavirus and mitigate its economic impacts. Well,

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly it has to be fiscal policy. Uh. First,

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the administration has to give the public a

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sense it knows what it's doing. UM. The idea of

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>prematurely going public with programs that weren't fully conceived, I

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think was extremely undermining of confidence. Uh. Secondly, I think

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>we need across the board physical stimulus UM. You know,

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>with with numerous dimensions helping people. I'm less impressed with

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea of dealing with payroll taxes, but I think, um,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>we need a We need a whole host of issues

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>focused on problems that people are now going to face

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in those who are out of work, UM, extending unemployment,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>insurance helping. By the way, with medical testing, it's very striking.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>We just heard about Tom Hanks UH in Australia where

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>tests are available for free. I think, uh that should

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be true in the United States as well. UM. So,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I think health related dimensions in all respects should be

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on and and and physical stimul list should be

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>used in order to UH. To do that, the focus

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>increasingly on fiscal stimulus. Meanwhile, central banks are throwing what

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they can at the problem, or they're throwing some things

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they can at the problem. Federals are of cutting rates

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>by an emergency fifty basis points. They're expected to cut

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>rates by another hunter basis points based on FED funds

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>futures next week. Meanwhile, the ECB today we got out uh,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>something that was highly disappointing for markets. With now the

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>European stock markets tumbling the most on record, is this

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the year the central bank put died? Maybe? I mean, uh,

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh quite frankly that they appeared cheap, uh

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not moving down and expected the ten basis points, a

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>rather small movement by any measure. Um, really deeply disappointed

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the markets. So what we what we've seen is a

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>host of measures by policy makers. The markets have have

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>viewed these as an inadequate and and that's a striking

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>contrast to uh, you know what Mario Druggi did, where

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he made it very evident that he would do whatever

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it would take in order to change the situation. And

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what the central banks and and particularly

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>as we've indicated the physical authorities need to be doing so, Professor,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>if this coronavirus spread a mirror somewhat like what happened

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in China, what do you think the economic impact will

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be on the US? Is that almost guarantee a recession? Well,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what's very striking is that today that China

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look in bad shape, um so. And that's because

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I think off to Wuhan, they took very decisive action.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's very interesting you eyeball what's happened to stock

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>markets around the world. You see the one that's the

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>most stable is actually the Chinese. So um so. I

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>think the real problem is we if we don't mirror

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what happened in China, where after the Wuhan debacle they

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>took very very decisive action, and I think, um it's

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not too late, but social distancing as a matter of

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>overt public policy is essential, and so we actually have

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>numerous examples in Asia now where countries have been able

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to stem the acceleration, and I think that's the key.

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>If we fail to do that, then I think a

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>recession is almost inevitable. So do you think, professor, this

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually a really compelling point here that China will

0:15:55.240 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>emerge stronger or actually be the fastest to record our

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>economically just in general, despite the fact that they're still

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of affected by the slowdown globally of commerce and growth.

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that is right. I think it's ironic.

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, they'll lose a point or two um from

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>there from the expected growth rate, you know. So so

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>from our standpoint, we'd love to have their growth rate

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of say it will be four percent instead of six.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But um, the fact is that they have taken very,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>very decisive, coordinated action. And what's very striking is if

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at what's happening to infection rates outside of Wuhan, um,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and they've seemed to have flattened out. So um, So

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, it could turn out. And and certainly

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this is what the Chinese already saying that the centralized

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>system has great advantages. We couldn't have had, you know,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a stronger demonstration of the failures of our health system.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.479
<v Speaker 1>We have a we have a we have a we

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have a health system that is basically essentially designed to

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as if all health problems are private. Robert Lawrence, Professor

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of Trade and Investment at the Kennedy School of Government

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>at Harvard University. Is also a Senior Fellow at the

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Peterson Institute for International Economics. We appreciate you for coming

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>on and sharing your thoughts here on the coronavirus and

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>potential economic impact. We keep quoting the stock markets today

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because the swoons are remarkable. That said, the focus of

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going on right now very much is in credit,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>is in solvency, It is in cash flow. It is

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>do companies have enough money on hand and can they

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>get it quickly enough to stay in business even if

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>people stop coming at their doors and doing business and

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>giving them money because of the social distancing and other

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>measures due to the coronavirus. Joining us here is someone

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>who's been covering this very closely, broken a lot of

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>really important news on this matter, Shradar naturage and finance

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg News. Joining us here in our interactive

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Brokers Studios three. I want to get started with this

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>concept of drawing down credit lines. That companies basically have

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>these revolving lines of credit credit at banks, and they

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have been prophylactically drawing the entire day down so that

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 1>they can have cash in their balance sheets. What do

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we know so far? Well, so let's let's start with

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>what a revolvers essentially a credit cards for companies, right, You,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>You drawn them periodically, you pay them down when things

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are going fine, you needed for some specific reason of

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the other, use it, pay back the banks. Everything's good.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>These are These are essentially relationship loans. Banks don't expect

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>companies to be tapping them. It's basically saying, hey, here's

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>there any day fun for you. If you need it,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you can use it when you want. But the expectation

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is never that on mass every one will come for it.

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That seems to have changed in the last few weeks,

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or at least the sentiment about how to treat these

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>revolvers has changed in the last few weeks. Yesterday we

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>had news leaking at one after the other. You had

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>going willing to tap down its entire fourteen billion dollar

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>alone win Hilton Blackstone and Carlisle, two big private equity shops,

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>urging some of their companies. Blackstones, especially those companies that

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>are in the virus hit sectors, urging them to go

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>out there and draw down their credit lines. Now, that

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>seems like a prudent move, that seems like a smart move,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, you have to wonder if

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that accelerates, if that spreads to other companies and to

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>other sectors, how does it affect banks which then suddenly

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of exposure to companies that seem to

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>be in a lot of pain right now. Again, if

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>everything were to turn around today and we're magically stopped

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going down, we're okay. If it deteriorates, then you have

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the second order effects. So are the

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>banks here do they? I guess? The question is do

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they have if something comes in and draws down their

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>credit line or borrows off of their facility? The banks

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>can't say no, can they? I guess the rule of

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>law upright? So you have governance and you have you

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you have things on dotted lines that tell you in

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the contract how much you can with draw how much

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you can't. The energy sector, for for example, it's a

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>very interesting space right every six months or so, they

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>have these borrowing base redeterminations where the amount of credit

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that extended to these oil and natural gas producers, for instance,

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>is driven off commodity prices. Commodity prices one month ago

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty sixty dollars on the barrel commodity prices now horrible.

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So when prices now horrible, and when you go and

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>do the redetermination again, their credit line availability is going

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to shrink remarkably. So they're going out there and tapping

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that as much as they can. And the other interesting

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>aspect that we have to think about here is the

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>thing that people always tell you about credit lines is

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's always available until you need it was back in

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>no wait, there was the other dynamic. Banks were trying

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to freeze the credit lines, were trying to walk out

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of contracts and uh negotiations that they've had with these companies.

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's how much you needed, how much banks are

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to lend. When it's sort of attacking you from

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>both sides, then we have a problem. You wrote a

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>story on the Bloomberg that said that two and a

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>half trillion dollars of lines undrawn. That's how much credit

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>companies have to withdraw. At least it was at the

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>end of last year. Probably a somewhat different now given

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>how many are actually started to draw them down. Two

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>thirds of that held or extended by the four of

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest banks, JP, Morgan City Group, Bank of America,

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and Wells Fargo. How concerned are people about the ability

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of these banks and others to make good on these

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>credit lines, extend these loans to companies that could be

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially in perilous positions. So let's let's look at that

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>based on the people who would who would presumably have

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the best insight into it, the executives of the banks,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the analyst covering the banks, the investors sort of invested

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in these stocks, executives at the banks. Yet Brian moynihan,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Michael Corbett sitting next to Donald J. Trump yesterday in

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the over well in the White House and talking about

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>how they could help in this time. But there's a

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the questions were also around how strong our banks,

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and one after the other, all the senior executives said,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>we're in great shape, well capitalized. Perhaps a lot of

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>it does go down to the fact as to what

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>happened after the previous global financial crisis, where we put

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in place a lot of measures that that ten years

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>later have resulted in people being able to comfortably say

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that banks are well capitalized, banks are healthy, and banks

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are in a good position. That's what the banks say,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what a lot of the bank analysts say. We're

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a note from City Group today that said, you know,

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>they have been getting a lot of questions on what

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>happens if everyone starts drawing these credit lines, and they

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>said even a hundred percent of the lines were to

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be drawn, we don't think the impact would be dramatic

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that you would have to worry about it in in

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>any sort of systemic sense. But then it goes back

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to the discussion we were having off Fair just before

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we started, right where we spoke to Jim biuncle and

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>he said he whipped out the crisis at our joke

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about the window washer falling from the tenth floor. When

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he's going by the third floor, he looks in and says,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so far, so good. That's the problem. We don't know

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>what the bottom is. That's the struggle. We don't know

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>how to model it, and that is why you're seeing

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.399
<v Speaker 1>this sort of a bout of panic in the markets

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>out there. All right, Well, the good news is for us,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>as we know, you're going to continue to follow this

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>story and keep us up to date on kind of

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>where what floor we're on at them on the street

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>not a rog and Financial reporter Bloomberg News joining us

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 1>here on a Bloomberg in our Active Broker Studio. Thanks

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abramoy. It's I'm on Twitter

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at Lisa A. Bramo. It's one before the podcast. You

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on'm Bloomberg Radio