WEBVTT - #905 Packers Unscripted: Missed opportunity in Minnesota

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:11.049
<v Speaker 1>Hi everybody, welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from Packers.com.

0:00:11.150 --> 0:00:14.190
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford, joined as always by my trusted

0:00:14.210 --> 0:00:16.209
<v Speaker 1>colleague Wes Hodkowitz. We're coming to you here from the

0:00:16.270 --> 0:00:21.029
<v Speaker 1>Pottawatomie Sportsbook studio inside the walls of Lambeau Field. Wes,

0:00:21.070 --> 0:00:24.270
<v Speaker 1>we are back from the trip to Minneapolis. A season

0:00:24.340 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>opening 39-22 loss to the Minnesota Vikings. Very disappointing the

0:00:28.860 --> 0:00:31.620
<v Speaker 1>way this one went. finished the way it played out

0:00:31.740 --> 0:00:34.580
<v Speaker 1>at the end. The long and the short of it

0:00:34.659 --> 0:00:39.949
<v Speaker 1>is it was a snowball effect and the Packers couldn't

0:00:40.010 --> 0:00:43.870
<v Speaker 1>stop that snowball from rolling downhill and burying them at

0:00:43.909 --> 0:00:44.530
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day.

0:00:45.570 --> 0:00:49.170
<v Speaker 2>We did five final thoughts on Friday. You and I

0:00:49.229 --> 0:00:51.910
<v Speaker 2>stepped in the studio Friday morning before anything really got

0:00:51.970 --> 0:00:54.390
<v Speaker 2>started here at Lambeau, before we were in Minneapolis, before

0:00:54.430 --> 0:00:56.170
<v Speaker 2>we took the plane ride, before we stepped into US

0:00:56.220 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Bank Stadium. And I think both of us in our

0:00:59.460 --> 0:01:02.340
<v Speaker 2>keys to victory kind of laid out what had to

0:01:02.380 --> 0:01:04.020
<v Speaker 2>happen in this game to get it done. And in

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.459
<v Speaker 2>mine in particular was the need to finish and the

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 2>need to do it in the fourth quarter. And not

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>because it was a narrative coming out of last season,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>not because it's something that has been just overemphasized and

0:01:13.340 --> 0:01:16.750
<v Speaker 2>reiterated this offseason, because that's what it was going to

0:01:16.790 --> 0:01:18.740
<v Speaker 2>take in that environment. Because you and I felt it.

0:01:18.810 --> 0:01:21.569
<v Speaker 2>We felt it a half dozen times already now at U.S.

0:01:21.610 --> 0:01:24.910
<v Speaker 2>Bank Stadium. What this can be like in there when

0:01:24.950 --> 0:01:27.870
<v Speaker 2>that team is playing well, when momentum is on the

0:01:27.910 --> 0:01:32.230
<v Speaker 2>Viking side, and you can't stop it. Now, obviously, as

0:01:32.450 --> 0:01:36.650
<v Speaker 2>the followers on X would tell you, I had certain

0:01:36.690 --> 0:01:38.830
<v Speaker 2>feelings about how a couple things went during the course

0:01:38.850 --> 0:01:43.229
<v Speaker 2>of that game, compliments of Ed Hockley's son, but the

0:01:43.270 --> 0:01:46.450
<v Speaker 2>fact is you still have to find a way to

0:01:46.709 --> 0:01:49.300
<v Speaker 2>get some stops and to get some momentum rallying your way,

0:01:49.330 --> 0:01:53.900
<v Speaker 2>and I just felt like that series, the go-ahead drive

0:01:53.940 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>by Minnesota, That was the turning point, and Green Bay

0:01:57.500 --> 0:02:00.060
<v Speaker 2>just was not able to recapture any of its early

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:01.170
<v Speaker 2>room momentum after that.

0:02:01.340 --> 0:02:04.050
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was really, I guess, what I would say

0:02:04.090 --> 0:02:07.430
<v Speaker 1>was the most disheartening thing about it is that even

0:02:07.470 --> 0:02:11.169
<v Speaker 1>with everything that had started to go wrong, you know,

0:02:11.290 --> 0:02:13.790
<v Speaker 1>you take the points off the board, you get stopped

0:02:13.830 --> 0:02:15.980
<v Speaker 1>on the fourth and one, the Vikings go the other way,

0:02:16.020 --> 0:02:19.540
<v Speaker 1>you have the three third down penalties, and the Vikings

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:21.540
<v Speaker 1>take the lead. They take their first lead of the game.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But in that moment... It is a three-point game with

0:02:26.940 --> 0:02:28.959
<v Speaker 1>six and a half minutes on the clock, and Jordan

0:02:28.980 --> 0:02:31.420
<v Speaker 1>Love is taking the field, having thrown for over 300

0:02:31.419 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>yards already at that point in the game. Anytime the

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers are on the road, down by three, with six

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>minutes on the clock, and Jordan Love has the ball,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.710
<v Speaker 1>that's a situation that, as a Packers fan, you should

0:02:43.730 --> 0:02:45.829
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about, and that's a situation where I

0:02:45.889 --> 0:02:47.889
<v Speaker 1>think the Packers are going to win their fair share

0:02:47.910 --> 0:02:50.989
<v Speaker 1>of games because of who Jordan Love is and what

0:02:51.030 --> 0:02:55.060
<v Speaker 1>this offense can be. But it couldn't find anything. There

0:02:55.130 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was no answer. There was no answer to the things

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.820
<v Speaker 1>that had gone wrong. And that is the narrative that

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>this team is going to have to change because now

0:03:05.540 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it has carried over from last season, fair or unfair, whatever.

0:03:09.060 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>All of the comebacks by the opponents when the Packers

0:03:12.620 --> 0:03:16.100
<v Speaker 1>have been on the road over the last however many weeks,

0:03:16.139 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>months you want to look at it, they've all had

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>their different circumstances. They haven't all been the same. But

0:03:22.020 --> 0:03:25.579
<v Speaker 1>the results have been the same, and so that's why

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.950
<v Speaker 1>the narrative is there, and that's what the Packers need

0:03:29.970 --> 0:03:34.310
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. Because the bottom line is you have

0:03:34.350 --> 0:03:37.730
<v Speaker 1>to be, especially to win on the road in this league,

0:03:38.250 --> 0:03:40.310
<v Speaker 1>you have to be the better team at crunch time.

0:03:40.490 --> 0:03:42.780
<v Speaker 1>And that's the one thing that the Packers haven't been

0:03:42.820 --> 0:03:43.820
<v Speaker 1>able to solve just yet.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 2>No, and— We've talked a lot about that. As you said,

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:48.780
<v Speaker 2>it's been a part of the narrative. And I wrote

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.860
<v Speaker 2>in our insider inbox column that the thing that actually

0:03:50.900 --> 0:03:52.620
<v Speaker 2>bothered me the most coming out of the game was

0:03:52.660 --> 0:03:55.100
<v Speaker 2>the red zone. Because this is an area, I mean,

0:03:55.140 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>you look statistically, Green Bay wasn't bad in it per

0:03:57.580 --> 0:03:59.310
<v Speaker 2>se last year. I think they were middle of the pack,

0:03:59.340 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 2>but they've been nowhere near what they were in like

0:04:03.090 --> 0:04:07.590
<v Speaker 2>the gold zone era. And what is one big reason

0:04:07.670 --> 0:04:10.620
<v Speaker 2>why teams can come back in the fourth quarter. What's

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>one big reason teams can come back in the second half?

0:04:13.330 --> 0:04:15.190
<v Speaker 2>This has nothing to do with Matt LaFleur. This goes

0:04:15.230 --> 0:04:17.150
<v Speaker 2>back to the Mike McCarthy era. It happens across the

0:04:17.190 --> 0:04:21.350
<v Speaker 2>league constantly. If you don't punch the ball in, if

0:04:21.370 --> 0:04:24.910
<v Speaker 2>you don't finish for seven, you're going to find a

0:04:24.930 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 2>way to let the opponent come back in. And that

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.179
<v Speaker 2>was probably the biggest takeaway from this. I love the fact,

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was a gutsy call, but I thought

0:04:33.420 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 2>it set the tone for Trey Smack to go out

0:04:35.860 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 2>there and make the 59-yarder's second longest field goal in

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Packers history in his first NFL game.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.460
<v Speaker 1>Amazing to me that a guy who's going to be

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Packers Hall of Fame here before too much longer,

0:04:45.860 --> 0:04:50.700
<v Speaker 1>Mason Crosby, that in Trey Smack's first regular season NFL game,

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.420
<v Speaker 1>he made a field goal longer than Mason Crosby ever

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>made in a game in his 16-year career. And that's

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.180
<v Speaker 1>not a knock on Crosby. It's just incredible to me

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:01.180
<v Speaker 1>that that's how it played out.

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.300
<v Speaker 2>You know what it is? And I think this is

0:05:02.339 --> 0:05:03.980
<v Speaker 2>going to happen given another five years. We can talk

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 2>about this probably in another episode, but given another five,

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 2>10 years, I think you're going to see the, the,

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:12.060
<v Speaker 2>the kicker numbers specifically on field goals. Almost like when

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.789
<v Speaker 2>you look back at the nineties quarterback numbers, right? When

0:05:14.810 --> 0:05:16.910
<v Speaker 2>you look at Troy Aikman's numbers and the standard kid

0:05:16.930 --> 0:05:19.390
<v Speaker 2>looks at him and goes, man. those weren't that impressive. Well,

0:05:19.410 --> 0:05:21.310
<v Speaker 2>you had to be there to witness it. The game

0:05:21.350 --> 0:05:24.150
<v Speaker 2>kind of changed. And obviously the way that the quarterback

0:05:24.190 --> 0:05:27.590
<v Speaker 2>was utilized and what it took to win, right? The

0:05:27.670 --> 0:05:29.550
<v Speaker 2>field goal thing is just out of this world now.

0:05:29.990 --> 0:05:31.590
<v Speaker 2>You have to have a guy that can make a

0:05:31.610 --> 0:05:35.390
<v Speaker 2>59-yard kick because head coaches want to try it. Whereas,

0:05:35.430 --> 0:05:38.150
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe 10, 15 years ago, if that's in

0:05:38.170 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the Metrodome, are you punting, trying to pin them back?

0:05:40.710 --> 0:05:42.690
<v Speaker 2>You know, what exactly is the play there, you know?

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.660
<v Speaker 2>So it's just funny to see how that game has turned.

0:05:45.060 --> 0:05:47.779
<v Speaker 2>That being said... there was way too much of Trey

0:05:47.820 --> 0:05:49.940
<v Speaker 2>Smack in this game. There were too many times where,

0:05:49.980 --> 0:05:52.260
<v Speaker 2>you know, you get 240-plus yards. You know, Matt LaFleur

0:05:52.310 --> 0:05:55.620
<v Speaker 2>talked about it. There was 10 plays he had explosives

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:57.830
<v Speaker 2>for over 350 yards, I think is what he said.

0:05:58.650 --> 0:06:01.929
<v Speaker 2>But there were two in specific that I think about

0:06:02.089 --> 0:06:04.469
<v Speaker 2>with the Matthew Golden catch and the Jonu Smith catch,

0:06:04.890 --> 0:06:07.190
<v Speaker 2>and he only got three points out of those. And

0:06:08.110 --> 0:06:10.530
<v Speaker 2>he could have potentially had six, but obviously the fourth

0:06:10.570 --> 0:06:12.070
<v Speaker 2>and one thing happened. But either way, you didn't score

0:06:12.089 --> 0:06:13.650
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown off either of those opportunities.

0:06:13.690 --> 0:06:13.890
<v Speaker 1>Correct.

0:06:14.350 --> 0:06:16.330
<v Speaker 2>And that's why the door was left open for Minnesota

0:06:16.350 --> 0:06:16.910
<v Speaker 2>to do what they did.

0:06:17.210 --> 0:06:20.130
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And when you talk about the, you know, kicking

0:06:20.150 --> 0:06:21.810
<v Speaker 1>too many field goals thing, I mean, all you have

0:06:21.830 --> 0:06:25.690
<v Speaker 1>to do is look at what almost became a disastrous

0:06:25.750 --> 0:06:29.229
<v Speaker 1>home week one loss for the Detroit Lions because they

0:06:29.250 --> 0:06:31.570
<v Speaker 1>were in goal to go with a couple minutes left

0:06:31.630 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on the clock and up by four points and they

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>got stopped and couldn't punch it in. They kicked the

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.980
<v Speaker 1>chip shot field goal. The Saints came back the other

0:06:40.020 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>way and got the touchdown that sent the game to overtime,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Lions ended up coming just a two-point conversion

0:06:45.050 --> 0:06:48.050
<v Speaker 1>by New Orleans away from losing a home game in

0:06:48.089 --> 0:06:51.130
<v Speaker 1>week one that nobody thought they would have any business losing.

0:06:51.510 --> 0:06:55.250
<v Speaker 1>So that's just another example of that. The other thing

0:06:55.290 --> 0:06:58.150
<v Speaker 1>I thought, when it comes to the regrets, and I

0:06:58.190 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>do want to get into some of the fourth quarter

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff later, but earlier on in this game, as far

0:07:03.820 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as the regrets are concerned, you had The Packers had

0:07:08.300 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a possession. The defense got a stop deep in Minnesota territory,

0:07:13.020 --> 0:07:15.950
<v Speaker 1>a punt that was downed inside the five. Defense completely

0:07:16.010 --> 0:07:18.870
<v Speaker 1>shut them down. The Vikings punter is in the back

0:07:18.890 --> 0:07:22.510
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone. Sky Moore gets a nice return,

0:07:22.650 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's first down on the Minnesota 36-yard line. Now,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't do it this way, but you could literally

0:07:29.300 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>take a knee three times and put three points on

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.300
<v Speaker 1>the board right there. but the Packers went backwards because

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of penalties, and on a drive that starts at the

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota 36-yard line, you end up with zero points. Combine

0:07:42.020 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that with the red zone failures and too much Trey

0:07:45.020 --> 0:07:48.670
<v Speaker 1>Smack in this game. I mean, that's, you know, I

0:07:48.750 --> 0:07:51.260
<v Speaker 1>am the last person, as I said in Insider Inbox,

0:07:51.350 --> 0:07:54.670
<v Speaker 1>I'm the last person to preach trying to avoid crunch

0:07:54.710 --> 0:07:57.230
<v Speaker 1>time because you have to be able to perform in

0:07:57.270 --> 0:08:01.630
<v Speaker 1>those moments. But that 22-10 lead the Packers had in

0:08:01.670 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter absolutely positively should have been larger because

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.260
<v Speaker 1>they were in more control of that game than just

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a 12-point lead. And when you're playing on the road

0:08:12.900 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and the home team starts to get the momentum with

0:08:15.660 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the crowd behind it and everything, it can be tough

0:08:18.460 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to stop, and the Packers couldn't stop it.

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Vikings had 239 total yards of offense in this game.

0:08:24.810 --> 0:08:28.850
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love threw for 387 yards in this game. It

0:08:28.890 --> 0:08:31.050
<v Speaker 2>just shows you that if you don't do the right things,

0:08:31.110 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 2>if there's too many penalties, if you have turnovers, obviously

0:08:34.890 --> 0:08:36.699
<v Speaker 2>the thing got out of control there at the end.

0:08:38.140 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 2>But when the moments happen where Green Bay was able

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:48.339
<v Speaker 2>to find the sort of take-them-out-of-the-game moments, right? I'm trying

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>to find the correct way to say this because I

0:08:50.300 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be too violent. But the thing where

0:08:53.780 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 2>you knock them out. They had them on the ropes

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 2>and they didn't swing for it, right?

0:08:56.540 --> 0:08:56.620
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:08:57.170 --> 0:08:59.329
<v Speaker 2>They might have tried to swing for it. They didn't connect.

0:08:59.370 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it didn't work out.

0:09:00.730 --> 0:09:05.660
<v Speaker 2>It's just to find yourself in a situation then where

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 2>it gets to one score. You know, we talk about,

0:09:08.340 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, Matt LeFleur mentioning that one of the reasons

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>why they make the 40-yard kick with smack, there's the

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.980
<v Speaker 2>offsides penalty, you know, the encroachment penalty. So it goes

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:19.860
<v Speaker 2>to fourth and one. They decide to try to go

0:09:19.940 --> 0:09:23.699
<v Speaker 2>for it with the sneak. Right. And I talked about

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>this in inbox because people are like leaving the points.

0:09:25.700 --> 0:09:28.020
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that was yet another field goal and you're

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:31.260
<v Speaker 2>still only up eight points. I understand if you don't convert,

0:09:31.420 --> 0:09:33.300
<v Speaker 2>everyone's going to say, well, why didn't you take three points?

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.290
<v Speaker 2>I think it was bigger than that. The other aspect

0:09:36.330 --> 0:09:38.729
<v Speaker 2>of it too, though, is if you don't come up

0:09:38.770 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>with a touchdown there, when are you going to get it?

0:09:41.470 --> 0:09:44.590
<v Speaker 2>And I think for the Packers to go into this game,

0:09:44.670 --> 0:09:47.450
<v Speaker 2>knowing that they had to, let me put it this way.

0:09:47.929 --> 0:09:49.930
<v Speaker 2>The two touchdowns of Christian Watson, right? Christian Watson has

0:09:49.970 --> 0:09:53.500
<v Speaker 2>this tremendous first half, right? Five catches, 131 yards, whatever

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>it was, two touchdowns. How quiet did it get in U.S.

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.860
<v Speaker 2>Bank Stadium after all that? I mean, pin-droppingly quiet. Wes

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Hodkowitz could have shouted from one side to the other, hey,

0:10:02.900 --> 0:10:05.460
<v Speaker 2>how's it going, Nate Lacascio? And somebody would have heard me, right?

0:10:06.820 --> 0:10:08.819
<v Speaker 2>What was it like then in the fourth quarter after

0:10:08.860 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 2>that swing? That's the point I want to make with

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.219
<v Speaker 2>all this. If you have a chance not only to

0:10:13.260 --> 0:10:14.700
<v Speaker 2>take the Vikings out of it, but to take that

0:10:14.780 --> 0:10:17.660
<v Speaker 2>crowd out of it, you have to find a way

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:18.140
<v Speaker 2>to do it.

0:10:18.270 --> 0:10:21.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a couple of comments I'll make there with regard

0:10:21.030 --> 0:10:24.950
<v Speaker 1>to the noise. You and I have been going to U.S.

0:10:24.990 --> 0:10:27.740
<v Speaker 1>Bank Stadium since it opened in 2016. There were a

0:10:27.750 --> 0:10:29.859
<v Speaker 1>couple years we didn't travel with the team, so I

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.420
<v Speaker 1>believe you and I have covered nine games there in

0:10:33.420 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>11 years. I don't think I have ever heard that

0:10:37.580 --> 0:10:44.350
<v Speaker 1>crowd louder than the third down on the series right

0:10:44.470 --> 0:10:48.010
<v Speaker 1>after the Vikings had taken the three-point lead the third

0:10:48.070 --> 0:10:50.850
<v Speaker 1>down and the Packers are a little bit late getting

0:10:50.910 --> 0:10:52.510
<v Speaker 1>out of the huddle and Jordan loves trying to make

0:10:52.550 --> 0:10:54.790
<v Speaker 1>an adjustment. And then he's like stomping his foot and

0:10:54.830 --> 0:10:56.710
<v Speaker 1>clapping his hands and wanting the ball to be snapped

0:10:56.730 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>because the play clock is running down. And then, and then,

0:10:59.500 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the sack and they strip the ball

0:11:01.460 --> 0:11:05.500
<v Speaker 1>and Minnesota gets the ball back. That even before the

0:11:05.540 --> 0:11:08.100
<v Speaker 1>ball was snapped, I don't know if I've ever heard

0:11:08.140 --> 0:11:09.740
<v Speaker 1>that place any louder than that. I mean, it was,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.300
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was insane. Now, You can certainly argue

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a timeout there might have been a good call because

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:21.700
<v Speaker 1>the Packers were completely discombobulated. But that aside, it was

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly difficult environment in which to operate, and the

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:29.110
<v Speaker 1>Packers brought that on themselves because they let the Vikings

0:11:29.140 --> 0:11:34.090
<v Speaker 1>get the momentum. The other thing I want to say

0:11:34.170 --> 0:11:37.870
<v Speaker 1>with regard to when the game started to go the

0:11:37.910 --> 0:11:42.270
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction Everything in this game ties together, right? There

0:11:42.330 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't anything that happens in a vacuum. Matt LaFleur, to

0:11:46.050 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>explain his decision to take the points off the board

0:11:48.460 --> 0:11:50.340
<v Speaker 1>and go for it on the fourth and one, and

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.340
<v Speaker 1>he reiterated his rationale again on Monday, he was focused

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:58.750
<v Speaker 1>on trying to make it a two-score game. Well, if

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.870
<v Speaker 1>Trey Smack doesn't miss an extra point in the first half,

0:12:02.690 --> 0:12:05.390
<v Speaker 1>then the three points in the fourth quarter puts the

0:12:05.429 --> 0:12:08.290
<v Speaker 1>Packers up nine, and it is a two-score game. And

0:12:08.429 --> 0:12:10.949
<v Speaker 1>Matt LaFleur probably does not take the points off the

0:12:10.990 --> 0:12:13.190
<v Speaker 1>board and go for it on fourth and one because

0:12:13.210 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to be up by two scores. So again,

0:12:16.250 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it's all those little things. You mentioned the total yards

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings ended up with. Not an impressive day offensively,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but how did they start to get back into the game?

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.330
<v Speaker 1>Because a Packers special teams unit that had put a

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.910
<v Speaker 1>good kickoff return from Bo Melton on the board to

0:12:31.990 --> 0:12:35.510
<v Speaker 1>help the Packers get some points gave up a long

0:12:35.550 --> 0:12:37.869
<v Speaker 1>kickoff return the other way, and Minnesota only had to

0:12:37.910 --> 0:12:41.580
<v Speaker 1>go 28 yards to after the long kickoff return to

0:12:41.620 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>go from 22 to 10 to 22 to 17. That

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.620
<v Speaker 1>was where the comeback started. It was, it was on

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.660
<v Speaker 1>the long kickoff return. So it's, it's all of the,

0:12:49.780 --> 0:12:52.130
<v Speaker 1>it's all these things. I thought when you look at

0:12:52.170 --> 0:12:55.829
<v Speaker 1>the explosive plays on offense, you look at, you look

0:12:55.850 --> 0:13:00.450
<v Speaker 1>at what Edger and Cooper particularly, and quite frankly, most

0:13:00.490 --> 0:13:02.689
<v Speaker 1>of the defensive front for Green Bay, what they were

0:13:02.730 --> 0:13:06.850
<v Speaker 1>doing defensively against Carson Wentz and against Kyler Murray before

0:13:06.890 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he left the game with the concussion. you look at

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Melton's kickoff return and smacks long field goal. I mean,

0:13:13.420 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>there was some really good stuff. The Packers did in

0:13:16.300 --> 0:13:19.350
<v Speaker 1>all three phases in this game, but then there were

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:24.530
<v Speaker 1>also things that went wrong. Things weren't sustained things that

0:13:24.590 --> 0:13:28.170
<v Speaker 1>went wrong. And unfortunately for the Packers, what's, what's been

0:13:28.190 --> 0:13:29.990
<v Speaker 1>the case and what's been the narrative is the things

0:13:30.030 --> 0:13:33.819
<v Speaker 1>go wrong at the wrong time in the game. And, uh,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.990
<v Speaker 1>and then the game gets away. And so it's, uh, extremely,

0:13:38.210 --> 0:13:42.309
<v Speaker 1>extremely frustrating in that regard. And, um, I'm going to

0:13:42.330 --> 0:13:44.330
<v Speaker 1>turn it back to you right now because I want

0:13:44.370 --> 0:13:46.250
<v Speaker 1>to get to another topic in a minute, but I

0:13:46.290 --> 0:13:47.970
<v Speaker 1>want you to be able to say something before the break.

0:13:48.010 --> 0:13:49.750
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I just want to throw in there too, because

0:13:49.809 --> 0:13:52.620
<v Speaker 2>the kickoffs, let's just touch on that really quick. The

0:13:52.650 --> 0:13:55.699
<v Speaker 2>miles press thing can happen. I mean, just again, absolutely

0:13:55.740 --> 0:13:59.459
<v Speaker 2>atrocious officiating for four quarters. Another instance there where there's

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.180
<v Speaker 2>probably two or three holding penalties on that play. But

0:14:02.250 --> 0:14:04.689
<v Speaker 2>what was the difference, Mike? The fact that the Vikings

0:14:04.870 --> 0:14:07.250
<v Speaker 2>did punch that in for a touchdown. Right. Bo Melton

0:14:07.490 --> 0:14:09.910
<v Speaker 2>cranks that 59-yard or 58-yard or whatever it was in

0:14:09.929 --> 0:14:12.470
<v Speaker 2>the first half. Packers have to settle for a 43-yard

0:14:12.490 --> 0:14:12.810
<v Speaker 2>field goal.

0:14:12.830 --> 0:14:13.449
<v Speaker 1>Field goal, right.

0:14:13.470 --> 0:14:15.930
<v Speaker 2>Again, not getting it done in the red area is

0:14:15.970 --> 0:14:18.770
<v Speaker 2>what's ultimately going to end up happening. At the time

0:14:18.790 --> 0:14:21.109
<v Speaker 2>in which we're doing this, we haven't talked to Cam Acord.

0:14:21.190 --> 0:14:23.150
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how he's going to handle that. I mean,

0:14:23.170 --> 0:14:26.470
<v Speaker 2>I've watched that return from Price four or five times now.

0:14:27.170 --> 0:14:29.190
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the coaching point is there other

0:14:29.230 --> 0:14:32.290
<v Speaker 2>than they lost containment on the right wing, the outside wing,

0:14:32.310 --> 0:14:34.430
<v Speaker 2>but that's not even where he brought it. He brought

0:14:34.470 --> 0:14:36.430
<v Speaker 2>it up through the gap and he got two guys

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>with their, with their hands on the outside shoulder of,

0:14:40.180 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the Christian Welch one is just an abomination.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.460
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Welch is literally being turned a different direction,

0:14:46.140 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 2>but again, at Hocula's kid wasn't interested in calling it. Yeah.

0:14:50.140 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>We do need to pay some bills. So I'm going

0:14:52.380 --> 0:14:54.180
<v Speaker 1>to take a quick break so we can hear a

0:14:54.260 --> 0:14:59.090
<v Speaker 1>word from our sponsors. Sirius XM NFL Radio delivers hard-hitting

0:14:59.130 --> 0:15:06.190
<v Speaker 1>analysis and up-to-the-minute NFL news that true football fanatics need 24-7, 365.

0:15:06.190 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you know Lambeau Field is just one of our

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:12.780
<v Speaker 1>state's many wonders? Start making unforgettable memories on your next vacation.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:18.380
<v Speaker 1>Discover the Apostle Islands and more at TravelWisconsin.com slash wonders.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.870
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Packers Unscripted. All right, Wes, I didn't

0:15:22.890 --> 0:15:24.610
<v Speaker 1>really want to go there, but I'm going to go there.

0:15:25.750 --> 0:15:31.450
<v Speaker 1>Because I took a look at the Vikings go-ahead touchdown

0:15:31.470 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>drive with the three penalties on third down. What bothered

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>me the most, as I noted in Insider Inbox and

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.290
<v Speaker 1>you've repeated in certain platforms, is that there wasn't a

0:15:47.350 --> 0:15:52.450
<v Speaker 1>single illegal contact, defensive holding, or roughing the passer and passing.

0:15:52.710 --> 0:15:54.530
<v Speaker 1>Take a look at some of those hits on Jordan Love,

0:15:54.710 --> 0:15:56.630
<v Speaker 1>as many of the fans in the live blog, the

0:15:56.670 --> 0:15:58.430
<v Speaker 1>live chat were saying to me as the game was

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>going on. Not a single one of those three infractions

0:16:04.260 --> 0:16:07.380
<v Speaker 1>called throughout the game, and then all three of them

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>get called on the same drive, all on third down

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:15.590
<v Speaker 1>against Green Bay. I went back and looked at them. Surprisingly,

0:16:15.930 --> 0:16:19.570
<v Speaker 1>I'll start by saying this, surprisingly, The defensive holding on

0:16:19.630 --> 0:16:22.230
<v Speaker 1>McKinney is the one I understood the most when you

0:16:22.290 --> 0:16:25.530
<v Speaker 1>looked at the video. Unfortunately for McKinney, he puts his

0:16:25.570 --> 0:16:29.170
<v Speaker 1>hands on the tight end and one of his teammates

0:16:29.270 --> 0:16:33.100
<v Speaker 1>who's chasing somebody else running a route essentially trips McKinney

0:16:33.260 --> 0:16:36.300
<v Speaker 1>from behind. And so then as McKinney is falling to

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the ground, he's kind of dragging the tight end down

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.100
<v Speaker 1>to the ground with him, which is not a bad

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.220
<v Speaker 1>move because otherwise the guy's going to be wide open

0:16:43.260 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown. The official standing back by the goalpost

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.930
<v Speaker 1>like sees it, throws the flag Before Carson Wentz throws

0:16:49.990 --> 0:16:51.970
<v Speaker 1>the pass. So I get that one.

0:16:52.050 --> 0:16:54.370
<v Speaker 2>Same official, by the way, that missed the contact on

0:16:54.430 --> 0:16:56.070
<v Speaker 2>Matthew Golden in the back of the end zone earlier

0:16:56.090 --> 0:16:57.210
<v Speaker 2>in the game. Yeah, yeah.

0:16:58.130 --> 0:17:02.870
<v Speaker 1>But I get that one. But the other two, the

0:17:02.930 --> 0:17:05.390
<v Speaker 1>one that bothered me the most was the illegal contact

0:17:05.470 --> 0:17:09.340
<v Speaker 1>on Javon Bullard. And this is the larger problem to

0:17:09.380 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>me with NFL officiating is that when you look at

0:17:13.140 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that play, yes, Javon Bullard made contact with the receiver downfield.

0:17:18.730 --> 0:17:22.430
<v Speaker 1>When he made contact with the receiver downfield, Carson Wentz

0:17:22.470 --> 0:17:26.649
<v Speaker 1>was already turtling up to take the sack in the pocket.

0:17:26.690 --> 0:17:30.670
<v Speaker 1>He was going down to avoid the hit. That contact

0:17:30.710 --> 0:17:35.780
<v Speaker 1>with the receiver had zero material impact on the play whatsoever.

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.820
<v Speaker 1>But in NFL officiating, these guys are graded and evaluated

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>by you have to call what you see. There's no discretion.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.430
<v Speaker 1>There's no judgment in terms of the impact on the play.

0:17:50.030 --> 0:17:53.090
<v Speaker 1>So the guy who's standing and he's standing 30 yards

0:17:53.150 --> 0:17:55.889
<v Speaker 1>behind Javon Bullard, but he just sees that contact and

0:17:55.910 --> 0:17:58.830
<v Speaker 1>he throws the flag when the contact is occurring while

0:17:58.850 --> 0:18:05.169
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback is getting sacked. So it's a completely ridiculous call.

0:18:06.369 --> 0:18:09.270
<v Speaker 1>But if this is how the league is going to

0:18:09.310 --> 0:18:13.730
<v Speaker 1>evaluate its officials... then, and not allow them to use

0:18:14.150 --> 0:18:16.710
<v Speaker 1>judgment and discretion in terms of how, in terms of

0:18:16.750 --> 0:18:19.910
<v Speaker 1>how something actually impacts the play, if they just only

0:18:19.970 --> 0:18:23.070
<v Speaker 1>call things by the letter of the law, well, then this,

0:18:23.150 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>this is, this is what you get. And I will

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:31.810
<v Speaker 1>add without that element of judgment or discretion. Or I

0:18:31.850 --> 0:18:35.470
<v Speaker 1>should say, there are some officials who use that. And

0:18:35.490 --> 0:18:37.649
<v Speaker 1>there are some who don't. And that is why the

0:18:37.890 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>officiating in this league is wildly inconsistent. And that's a

0:18:45.420 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>problem that's not going away. The roughing the passer on

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.340
<v Speaker 1>Chris McClellan, I think it's a tough break for the rookie.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.860
<v Speaker 1>I see why it was called, but I also thought

0:18:53.900 --> 0:18:56.780
<v Speaker 1>McClellan was in a tough spot and he was trying

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to do what he could not to do the body

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.740
<v Speaker 1>weight thing on the quarterback. And I thought, I thought

0:19:02.780 --> 0:19:05.310
<v Speaker 1>roughing the passer was supposedly going to be part of

0:19:05.380 --> 0:19:06.550
<v Speaker 1>replay reviews this year.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:07.660
<v Speaker 2>Nothing.

0:19:07.970 --> 0:19:11.070
<v Speaker 1>But nobody looked at it. Nobody saw that McClellan was

0:19:11.150 --> 0:19:13.649
<v Speaker 1>trying not to land on him to then wipe out

0:19:13.710 --> 0:19:16.540
<v Speaker 1>the penalty. They just took Sean Hockley's word for it,

0:19:16.890 --> 0:19:20.230
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings got another fresh set of downs. Okay,

0:19:20.609 --> 0:19:22.669
<v Speaker 1>I'm done. No. I'll turn it over to you.

0:19:22.790 --> 0:19:24.590
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you did it because I think I've calmed

0:19:24.630 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>down over the last two days in real time. Incredibly frustrating.

0:19:29.380 --> 0:19:31.460
<v Speaker 2>And the main reason why is like, I mean, people

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.659
<v Speaker 2>can be like, oh, you're wearing a Packers shirt and

0:19:34.700 --> 0:19:36.860
<v Speaker 2>this is your team and you're rooting for your team.

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's actually not above that. For me, it's about

0:19:40.510 --> 0:19:42.609
<v Speaker 2>the fact that I feel like officiating, and you've heard

0:19:42.630 --> 0:19:44.430
<v Speaker 2>me talk about it for the last 10 years now,

0:19:44.910 --> 0:19:48.149
<v Speaker 2>since Dean Blandino left the league office has been on

0:19:48.190 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 2>a down road slope and it has not stopped. if

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:55.190
<v Speaker 2>anything it's gained momentum and it is affecting the enjoyment

0:19:55.210 --> 0:19:58.130
<v Speaker 2>of watching the game because it's becoming an officials game

0:19:58.810 --> 0:20:01.340
<v Speaker 2>Whereas I thought at one point it was more about

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.980
<v Speaker 2>letting them play, seeing what happens. But now we are

0:20:05.100 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 2>so in this weird gray area between player safety and

0:20:09.500 --> 0:20:11.869
<v Speaker 2>still trying to have contact and they can't figure out

0:20:11.900 --> 0:20:14.950
<v Speaker 2>how they want to do it. Me personally, the only

0:20:14.990 --> 0:20:17.010
<v Speaker 2>way I feel like you can officiate the National Football League,

0:20:17.030 --> 0:20:20.109
<v Speaker 2>I've reiterated this since the 2020 NFC title game, is

0:20:20.609 --> 0:20:22.710
<v Speaker 2>you establish in the first half how the game is

0:20:22.750 --> 0:20:24.980
<v Speaker 2>going to be played. And then that's how the game

0:20:25.020 --> 0:20:27.650
<v Speaker 2>is played in the second half. Where I was really

0:20:27.690 --> 0:20:31.100
<v Speaker 2>struggling with what Ed Hockley's son did was, to your point,

0:20:31.850 --> 0:20:36.370
<v Speaker 2>everything switched. The emphasis changed. The quarterback hits in the

0:20:36.430 --> 0:20:40.170
<v Speaker 2>little after contact wasn't being called anymore. You know, Carl

0:20:40.190 --> 0:20:43.379
<v Speaker 2>Brooks getting shoved after a field goal and, you know,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.379
<v Speaker 2>after the play wasn't called. All these things I'm really,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.300
<v Speaker 2>you know, struggling with. But what I look at is

0:20:49.340 --> 0:20:52.379
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily from the, okay, what benefits Mike Spofford and

0:20:52.420 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Wes Huckwitz? No, it's what benefits the consumer, the consumer

0:20:54.820 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that's investing this money into this product, this consumer that's

0:20:58.180 --> 0:21:01.130
<v Speaker 2>expecting the best athletes in the world to you would

0:21:01.190 --> 0:21:04.070
<v Speaker 2>think would also have the best officiating in the world.

0:21:04.170 --> 0:21:06.550
<v Speaker 2>And I felt for many years now that it is subpar.

0:21:06.830 --> 0:21:09.370
<v Speaker 2>I think when you look at what major league baseball

0:21:09.390 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>has done now with the, you know, the umpire reviews

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.460
<v Speaker 2>and everything like that, you're the biggest baseball fan in

0:21:14.500 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the world. One of the biggest baseball fans I know.

0:21:16.740 --> 0:21:18.300
<v Speaker 2>Would you say that that has made the game better?

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>A hundred percent.

0:21:19.380 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 2>A hundred percent. And yet they've done it in a

0:21:21.140 --> 0:21:24.260
<v Speaker 2>way in which they still pace of play is a consideration,

0:21:24.340 --> 0:21:27.210
<v Speaker 2>getting things moving, getting people back home three hours after game,

0:21:27.250 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff is a consideration. Yeah. We're still playing,

0:21:30.859 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're not playing the game like it's 1984 anymore,

0:21:33.780 --> 0:21:35.980
<v Speaker 2>but we are officiating the game like it. And it

0:21:36.020 --> 0:21:38.689
<v Speaker 2>just seems like technology and advancement is just, okay, well,

0:21:38.710 --> 0:21:40.930
<v Speaker 2>we have to do this. The NFL has to take

0:21:40.970 --> 0:21:42.210
<v Speaker 2>it seriously. Or you and I are just going to

0:21:42.250 --> 0:21:44.270
<v Speaker 2>keep talking about this five, six times a season.

0:21:44.570 --> 0:21:45.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:21:45.350 --> 0:21:47.709
<v Speaker 2>Just a very disappointing game all around. The other thing

0:21:47.730 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>I was curious about with the Javon Bullard thing, I

0:21:49.390 --> 0:21:51.580
<v Speaker 2>saw this on Twitter and I was thinking about it

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.580
<v Speaker 2>and I watched it in real time. I thought there

0:21:53.619 --> 0:21:56.859
<v Speaker 2>were considerations that if the receiver does initiate the contact,

0:21:57.410 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>the illegal contact penalty changes. It shifts within five yards.

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.439
<v Speaker 2>And to me, it looked like Bullard wasn't even the

0:22:03.460 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 2>first one to throw hands on that play. So here's

0:22:07.180 --> 0:22:09.379
<v Speaker 2>the worst thing of all, I felt just in far

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 2>as there was no calls made in that game that

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:16.460
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel like your standard official at the Bayport-De

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.330
<v Speaker 2>Pere football game couldn't have made. I don't think there

0:22:19.350 --> 0:22:21.890
<v Speaker 2>was any delineation whatsoever of, and if anything, they missed

0:22:21.910 --> 0:22:24.510
<v Speaker 2>quite a bit. Um, even like later in the game,

0:22:24.530 --> 0:22:26.350
<v Speaker 2>I know there was some Vikings fans that were talking

0:22:26.390 --> 0:22:28.129
<v Speaker 2>about legal hands of the face. I think they've got

0:22:28.170 --> 0:22:30.250
<v Speaker 2>pretty close there with Brenton Cox Jr. on the sideline

0:22:30.270 --> 0:22:32.750
<v Speaker 2>with the hand on the helmet. I'm not sure how

0:22:32.770 --> 0:22:34.550
<v Speaker 2>the side judge didn't call that just based on the

0:22:34.590 --> 0:22:36.610
<v Speaker 2>fact that they've been calling so much obvious stuff. Yeah.

0:22:36.810 --> 0:22:39.830
<v Speaker 2>In terms of when it's just isolated like that. Sure. Um,

0:22:40.950 --> 0:22:42.669
<v Speaker 2>be that as it may, the game turned out how

0:22:42.690 --> 0:22:44.780
<v Speaker 2>it turned out. And my point, the last thing I'll

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:46.700
<v Speaker 2>say on this, uh, and it was the thing I

0:22:46.740 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 2>closed inbox with. If I'm the Packers, I almost feel

0:22:49.780 --> 0:22:52.020
<v Speaker 2>like you got to forget that this game happened while

0:22:52.060 --> 0:22:54.700
<v Speaker 2>also understanding all the reasons why you lost the game.

0:22:55.340 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Whether it was the inconsistency up front, whether it was

0:22:57.540 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the inability to establish the run, whether it was the

0:22:59.859 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 2>red zone issues, whether it was the fact that when

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:04.620
<v Speaker 2>that snowball started rolling in the Vikings favor, there was

0:23:04.660 --> 0:23:07.530
<v Speaker 2>no response. I think back to the first half, right?

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.730
<v Speaker 2>Justin Jefferson gets that big touchdown. Big response right after

0:23:11.770 --> 0:23:12.770
<v Speaker 2>that from Green Bay's offense.

0:23:12.770 --> 0:23:13.410
<v Speaker 1>100%.

0:23:13.410 --> 0:23:14.650
<v Speaker 2>This time they didn't find it. Yeah.

0:23:15.930 --> 0:23:18.790
<v Speaker 1>Here's a couple other things. Because I said I was

0:23:18.830 --> 0:23:20.190
<v Speaker 1>done on officiating. Now I'm not.

0:23:20.330 --> 0:23:21.889
<v Speaker 2>I've talked for three days, so you can talk for

0:23:21.890 --> 0:23:24.669
<v Speaker 2>10 minutes if you want.

0:23:24.690 --> 0:23:28.210
<v Speaker 1>I chuckle when you talk about, oh, weren't they going

0:23:28.230 --> 0:23:31.939
<v Speaker 1>to say on illegal contact if the receiver initiates it,

0:23:31.950 --> 0:23:34.690
<v Speaker 1>then they don't need it. It's like the college game

0:23:34.730 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 1>does not have an illegal contact penalty. Contact with receivers

0:23:38.650 --> 0:23:41.980
<v Speaker 1>downfield is fine as long as it's not restrictive, as

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.740
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not grabbing a jersey, which is defensive holding.

0:23:45.990 --> 0:23:48.980
<v Speaker 1>Contact downfield is fine until the ball is thrown. And

0:23:49.020 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the college game functions just fine. Illegal contact in the

0:23:53.020 --> 0:23:57.140
<v Speaker 1>NFL is nothing but a rule to generate offense, to

0:23:57.220 --> 0:24:00.390
<v Speaker 1>generate points, to make it hard to play defense. That

0:24:00.450 --> 0:24:03.030
<v Speaker 1>is all that it is. And the game would be

0:24:03.090 --> 0:24:06.030
<v Speaker 1>better off without that penalty. There is no doubt in

0:24:06.050 --> 0:24:09.179
<v Speaker 1>my mind. And it's probably the one penalty that That

0:24:09.220 --> 0:24:12.610
<v Speaker 1>is called more inconsistently across the board than any other.

0:24:12.619 --> 0:24:15.169
<v Speaker 2>Somebody said there was– somebody– I don't know this for

0:24:15.190 --> 0:24:18.340
<v Speaker 2>a fact, so don't– somebody fact check this. Somebody said that–

0:24:18.369 --> 0:24:20.109
<v Speaker 2>tweeted at me that that was the only illegal contact

0:24:20.130 --> 0:24:21.230
<v Speaker 2>penalty in the league this week.

0:24:22.550 --> 0:24:22.930
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:24:23.190 --> 0:24:25.230
<v Speaker 2>So I have not had a time to fact check that.

0:24:25.619 --> 0:24:27.020
<v Speaker 2>Here's what I'll do. When we get done here, I

0:24:27.060 --> 0:24:29.340
<v Speaker 2>will go do that, and then we'll follow up on Thursday.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.100
<v Speaker 2>But if that's the case, man– Yeah.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>A couple other things. Backtracking a little bit. I think

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.940
<v Speaker 1>the most– The most disappointing thing, because as we started

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.810
<v Speaker 1>the show talking about the narrative with the Packers and

0:24:42.350 --> 0:24:46.310
<v Speaker 1>the late game collapses and we talked about the Packers

0:24:46.350 --> 0:24:51.450
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a response. Well, on that drive, the defensive

0:24:51.490 --> 0:24:54.490
<v Speaker 1>drive after the fourth and one stop, the Packers had

0:24:54.950 --> 0:24:57.790
<v Speaker 1>three pretty good defensive responses. They got a sack on

0:24:57.850 --> 0:25:00.650
<v Speaker 1>third down that got wiped out by a highly questionable call.

0:25:01.030 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 1>They got a pressure from the rookie defensive tackle that

0:25:03.619 --> 0:25:07.460
<v Speaker 1>forced a throwaway. that then that incomplete pass gets wiped

0:25:07.510 --> 0:25:10.250
<v Speaker 1>out because of the RTP, and then they make an

0:25:10.290 --> 0:25:13.090
<v Speaker 1>interception in the end zone. But I will concede I

0:25:13.390 --> 0:25:16.170
<v Speaker 1>totally understand why that flag in the end zone. So

0:25:17.350 --> 0:25:20.010
<v Speaker 1>the Packers didn't respond, but yet they sort of did

0:25:20.050 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>at least initially, and then things didn't go their way, right?

0:25:23.300 --> 0:25:25.300
<v Speaker 1>So I want to get that out of the way.

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is– Where things are in officiating in

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.409
<v Speaker 1>this league to me reach has reached a height of absurdity.

0:25:34.470 --> 0:25:37.270
<v Speaker 1>When you look at what happened at Ford field in Detroit,

0:25:38.710 --> 0:25:42.909
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Mike Pereira is on Fox talking and

0:25:42.990 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>twisting himself in knots, trying to explain how Jared golf

0:25:46.940 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is trying to throw the ball forward. His intent is

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to throw the ball forward, but he gets hit and

0:25:53.020 --> 0:25:55.300
<v Speaker 1>the ball goes backward and the saints pick it up

0:25:55.340 --> 0:25:58.369
<v Speaker 1>and run it for defensive touchdown. And it gets wiped

0:25:58.430 --> 0:26:01.530
<v Speaker 1>out because it's called a forward pass because his intent

0:26:01.570 --> 0:26:04.170
<v Speaker 1>was to throw the ball forward, but the ball never

0:26:04.250 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>went forward. When did that rule get put in place?

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.940
<v Speaker 1>What you're telling me there is then anytime a quarterback

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.530
<v Speaker 1>cocks his arm and the ball comes out... that it's

0:26:16.550 --> 0:26:18.910
<v Speaker 1>an incomplete pass no matter where the ball goes. That's

0:26:19.109 --> 0:26:22.690
<v Speaker 1>literally what they said, and they took a touchdown off

0:26:22.730 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the board from the New Orleans Saints. Like, what in

0:26:26.340 --> 0:26:32.619
<v Speaker 1>the world is that? It's absolutely mind-boggling. It's making stuff

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:39.810
<v Speaker 1>up that doesn't exist. It doesn't make any sense. It

0:26:39.850 --> 0:26:44.669
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense whatsoever. So the league has a problem.

0:26:45.290 --> 0:26:48.869
<v Speaker 1>The league has a problem, but they're really not interested

0:26:48.890 --> 0:26:49.490
<v Speaker 1>in doing anything about it.

0:26:49.490 --> 0:26:51.210
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say, this is the quietest offseason.

0:26:51.380 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>There's not even any true emphasis this year. It was

0:26:55.580 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 2>quiet at the owners' meetings. It was quiet throughout the summer.

0:26:57.859 --> 0:26:59.540
<v Speaker 2>We didn't even talk to the officials this summer in

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:00.100
<v Speaker 2>training camp.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:07.030
<v Speaker 1>It is what it is. Well, glancing around the league quickly,

0:27:07.070 --> 0:27:10.170
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC North, the Detroit Lions did survive thanks

0:27:10.210 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to the two-point conversion stop, thanks to the Saints getting

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown taken off the board by the most bizarre

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>call I've ever seen. The Chicago Bears get a win. Um,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>their game in Carolina goes from 31-31 with nine minutes

0:27:26.180 --> 0:27:31.830
<v Speaker 1>left in the third quarter to 59-37 was the final score.

0:27:32.430 --> 0:27:34.889
<v Speaker 1>So the Chicago Bears nearly put up 60 points in

0:27:34.930 --> 0:27:40.310
<v Speaker 1>week one. Um, Ben Johnson and Caleb Williams in that offense. Um,

0:27:40.730 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>and then, uh, I'll just do a couple tip of

0:27:43.420 --> 0:27:48.929
<v Speaker 1>the caps. Mike LaFleur, Arizona Cardinals get a win in

0:27:48.970 --> 0:27:52.530
<v Speaker 1>week one on the road against the Los Angeles Chargers.

0:27:53.630 --> 0:27:56.670
<v Speaker 1>Mike LaFleur is in the win column. And then the

0:27:57.109 --> 0:28:00.149
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills survive a shootout down in Houston. If you

0:28:00.190 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>want to know, and again, we'll have these conversations throughout

0:28:04.859 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the course of the season. People get tired of me.

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.260
<v Speaker 1>because I say it on this show, I say it

0:28:10.300 --> 0:28:12.500
<v Speaker 1>in Insider Inbox, I say it everywhere. They get tired

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of me saying it's a week-to-week league. The Houston Texans

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:23.460
<v Speaker 1>were being billed as the greatest defense since the 1985

0:28:23.460 --> 0:28:27.660
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears, since the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. And what happened?

0:28:28.260 --> 0:28:31.350
<v Speaker 1>They gave up 36 points at home to the Buffalo Bills. Now,

0:28:31.369 --> 0:28:34.709
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying the Houston Texans defense stinks, because it doesn't.

0:28:36.580 --> 0:28:38.700
<v Speaker 1>The reason I say it's a week to week league

0:28:38.790 --> 0:28:41.690
<v Speaker 1>is because it's 100 percent true. You just don't know

0:28:41.770 --> 0:28:43.630
<v Speaker 1>what is going to happen on a week to week

0:28:43.690 --> 0:28:46.810
<v Speaker 1>basis in this league. And from the Packers perspective, it's like,

0:28:46.890 --> 0:28:50.490
<v Speaker 1>all right, game one got away. It's unfortunate. It was

0:28:50.510 --> 0:28:53.890
<v Speaker 1>a missed opportunity. You throw it in the trash and

0:28:53.910 --> 0:28:56.370
<v Speaker 1>you move on because the New York Jets are waiting

0:28:56.430 --> 0:28:57.850
<v Speaker 1>for you in week two. Here we go.

0:28:58.030 --> 0:28:59.890
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, even you can take a two on

0:28:59.950 --> 0:29:03.170
<v Speaker 2>Sunday night football. Kansas City just completely runs through Denver.

0:29:03.190 --> 0:29:05.310
<v Speaker 2>Denver doesn't get 200 yards of total offense in that game.

0:29:05.350 --> 0:29:08.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The team everybody thought was going to go to

0:29:08.540 --> 0:29:10.500
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl if Bo Nix doesn't get hurt in

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.979
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs last year. um, they, uh, um, they get

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>completely blown out by a division rival on, on the

0:29:17.100 --> 0:29:17.810
<v Speaker 1>opening Monday night.

0:29:18.010 --> 0:29:21.290
<v Speaker 2>Very interesting week one all around. And I think obviously

0:29:21.310 --> 0:29:23.550
<v Speaker 2>you put out the bills thing. I mean, if anything,

0:29:24.090 --> 0:29:25.650
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like college football when you get those

0:29:25.730 --> 0:29:28.970
<v Speaker 2>marquee matchups right off the bat, I think that shows Houston, okay,

0:29:29.030 --> 0:29:31.390
<v Speaker 2>this is what the standard is. I mean, Josh Allen

0:29:31.410 --> 0:29:35.070
<v Speaker 2>was exemplary in that game in all facets and kept

0:29:35.110 --> 0:29:37.030
<v Speaker 2>the bills in their game a chance to win. There's

0:29:37.050 --> 0:29:38.870
<v Speaker 2>a reason why he's a league MVP at this point.

0:29:40.410 --> 0:29:43.260
<v Speaker 2>Don't know what to make out of that Chicago Carolina game.

0:29:43.300 --> 0:29:44.420
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to learn a lot about the

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Bears moving forward. I don't think we've got the full

0:29:46.500 --> 0:29:50.190
<v Speaker 2>story in that game against Carolina, but For a team

0:29:50.210 --> 0:29:52.490
<v Speaker 2>that was feeling themselves coming in, that's another thing that's

0:29:52.510 --> 0:29:53.490
<v Speaker 2>going to be a feather in their cap.

0:29:53.570 --> 0:29:55.650
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're going to be asking with regard

0:29:55.690 --> 0:30:00.130
<v Speaker 1>to the Bears, because you can't overreact or oversimplify anything

0:30:00.170 --> 0:30:02.990
<v Speaker 1>with regard to Week 1, are the Bears really that

0:30:03.050 --> 0:30:06.170
<v Speaker 1>good at running the ball? Or does Carolina have some

0:30:06.450 --> 0:30:10.060
<v Speaker 1>legitimate problems with their run defense? Because the 59 points

0:30:10.130 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was not all Caleb Williams. And it was somewhat Caleb

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:17.900
<v Speaker 1>Williams scrambling, but it was a lot of big running plays,

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.950
<v Speaker 1>gashing Carolina with the run that Chicago put up rushing

0:30:22.990 --> 0:30:25.270
<v Speaker 1>numbers that were off the charts.

0:30:25.370 --> 0:30:26.580
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I want to mention this because we

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 2>won't talk about it on Thursday. Something to follow for

0:30:28.660 --> 0:30:30.820
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the season here moving forward. In addition

0:30:30.860 --> 0:30:32.900
<v Speaker 2>to the fact we never even talked about Tucker Craft's extension.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll get to that at some point here too. But

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.150
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love using his feet. I tweeted about it during

0:30:38.170 --> 0:30:39.950
<v Speaker 2>the game. Now obviously you want the offensive line to

0:30:39.970 --> 0:30:42.210
<v Speaker 2>hold up. You need to make some improvements there. They

0:30:42.230 --> 0:30:44.910
<v Speaker 2>didn't have Aaron Banks. They plugged in Donovan Jennings. We'll

0:30:44.930 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 2>see how that unfolds this week. I did like, though,

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.790
<v Speaker 2>what we saw in terms of Jordan Love in this game.

0:30:51.110 --> 0:30:53.350
<v Speaker 2>He stood tall in the pocket when the protection was there,

0:30:53.790 --> 0:30:56.450
<v Speaker 2>when he needed to extend plays, he did. And my God, Mike,

0:30:56.490 --> 0:31:00.070
<v Speaker 2>I said this to Dominique Yates from Gannett at halftime.

0:31:00.910 --> 0:31:05.210
<v Speaker 2>The amount of precision and speed and power that Jordan

0:31:05.230 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 2>was throwing with the ball on the run, that pass

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:13.090
<v Speaker 2>to Matthew Golden... Along the sideline, holy shnikes. Yeah. I thought, again,

0:31:13.290 --> 0:31:16.490
<v Speaker 2>too many hits on Jordan, 15 overall. Yep. But QB1

0:31:16.810 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 2>came to play in week one, and hopefully that's a

0:31:18.890 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 2>good sign for the Packers.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.940
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he absolutely did. I mean, and you mentioned Tucker Kraft,

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson, Matthew Golden. And, yeah, the Packers have some

0:31:27.060 --> 0:31:29.060
<v Speaker 1>work to do on the offensive line. They need to

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.180
<v Speaker 1>get the running game going because the lack of the

0:31:31.220 --> 0:31:33.830
<v Speaker 1>running game is why Brian Flores wasn't playing honestly. He

0:31:33.850 --> 0:31:37.430
<v Speaker 1>just kept blitzing, you know, at will. all of those

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>things factored into this game. But, but, you know, it's

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.620
<v Speaker 1>week one and the Packers are moving on and, and this,

0:31:45.780 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this game, this game will not define the 2026 Packers.

0:31:49.580 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I am confident of that. No.

0:31:50.790 --> 0:31:51.940
<v Speaker 2>And the reason I want to bring that up is

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.110
<v Speaker 2>because you think about, I know Caleb Williams is getting

0:31:54.130 --> 0:31:56.570
<v Speaker 2>his flowers right now. Oh, he's scrambling and all this scrambling.

0:31:56.630 --> 0:31:58.370
<v Speaker 2>Isn't always just about the yards that you gain. It's

0:31:58.390 --> 0:32:00.270
<v Speaker 2>about the plays that you create off of it. And

0:32:00.310 --> 0:32:02.530
<v Speaker 2>I felt like Jordan Love, whatever, he might not even

0:32:02.570 --> 0:32:05.330
<v Speaker 2>had a carry in this game, but I thought in general, well,

0:32:05.350 --> 0:32:07.530
<v Speaker 2>other than the sneak, obviously, but I thought in general

0:32:08.270 --> 0:32:09.670
<v Speaker 2>really used his feet well on this one.

0:32:09.810 --> 0:32:10.690
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely.

0:32:10.970 --> 0:32:11.190
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:32:11.210 --> 0:32:14.690
<v Speaker 1>Well, We've gone a little bit over time, so for

0:32:14.770 --> 0:32:17.450
<v Speaker 1>as much as there is still to talk about, we'll

0:32:17.470 --> 0:32:20.170
<v Speaker 1>call it a wrap for now on Packers Unscripted. Be

0:32:20.210 --> 0:32:21.930
<v Speaker 1>sure to follow all of our coverage of the team

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on Packers.com. For Wes, I'm Mike. Thank you for tuning in.