WEBVTT - BONUS: The Pay Check, Episode 3

0:00:01.639 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey Max, Hello Becca. So you and I went to

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a bar in downtown Manhattan when it was still extremely

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>cold out, and we went to talk to people about

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the gender pay gap. We wanted to hear what the

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>average person on the street has to say about this stuff.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the first guys we talked to works for

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the state of New York. At first he told us

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he believed in the pay gap, and even saw him

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>one of his previous workplaces. But then after talking to

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>him for a little while, he told us what he

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>really thought from what I could see in my current position,

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>if there's a gap, it's not twenty cents on the dollar.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But if that was in fact true, Yes, of course

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>that's not right. But it is true as far as

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I know. That really is what the data shows. I think,

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>yes it is. So this guy knows women are paid less,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but the number he hears it it just doesn't sound

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>right him. He looks around, he sees things getting better

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for women. He just doesn't buy that things could really

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be so bad. I don't think it's a conspiracy um,

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but yes, I think maybe maybe somewhat overmown, especially nowadays,

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of different than it was even ten

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So while I recognize that probably is somewhere

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of a gap, I think that gap is getting smaller.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's more opportunities for women these days to

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>advance in their career. Then he said something that reminded

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>me of what I hear in my reporting all the time.

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not that the pay up isn't real exactly, but

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that I'm misunderstanding the data. Basically, the data doesn't show

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>what I say it does. You could look at data,

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I could look at data, She could look at data,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and we could all come up with our own numbers.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not a black and white thing. There's

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a very great area when you look at the world.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You know what the population like, where is our place like?

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Where is our value? Will deserve people for equal work?

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.279
<v Speaker 1>This woman, we almost put this gender bias and ourselves,

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide the median salary for men is greater than

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>women in ninety nine point six percent of major occupations Women.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>What do they want? We want to end gender inequality,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and to do this we need everyone involved. Well, actually

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the feminist celebrities and politicians spreading this wage cap

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>myth who have the math problem. Ginger Rogers did everything

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that Freda Stare did, She just did it backward did

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in I welcome back to the Paycheck. I'm Rebecca Greenfield.

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>This week we are going to investigate the gray areas

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in the data. We've heard from listeners who feel like

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the guy from the Bar, and we've also heard from

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>people who don't believe in the pay gap at all.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>They say that figure the gap between what women and

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>men make in the US is misleading, that it's just

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>an average that doesn't control for people in the same

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>industries or doing the same job. This is a common

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>critique of pay gap reporting. Here's Britt Hume on Fox

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>News making that same case. Women make different choices about

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of jobs they seek in reaction to marriage

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and childbirth when those things have taken into consideration. Studies

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>have indicated that the pay gap all but evaporates. That phrase,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>all but evaporates. I heard a lot that the pay

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>gap disappears when you control for things like the fields

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>women tend to work in and the time they take

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>off to care for their families. The pay gap does

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get smaller when you control for certain things. But no

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>matter how much Matthew do, it never disappears when you

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>control for job title, company, and industry. One study found

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's still a five point four percent pay gap

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the u US that's unexplained. We know pay discrimination

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is still happening, and that's not right or fair. But

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I also want to talk about another part of this

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>argument that women make choices to focus on family rather

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>than work and that's why we earn on average less

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>than men. Is that what's really happening. The research does

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>show that women start off at near parity with men

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in their careers, but after having a kid the gap widens.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this because women are choosing parenting over working in

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>high paid jobs because that's what they value. I think

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's a more complicated story than simply that women

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>value family more than careers. I think the whole workplace

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>is really set up so that it's harder for women

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to be parents than it is for men. That's Robin Eale.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>She's a business administration professor at Harvard, and she recently

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>co wrote an article with Kathy Tinsley, a management professor

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>at Georgetown, called What Most People Get Wrong About Men

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and Women. When she talks about how the workplace is

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>set up better for men than women. She's partly talking

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about the rigid nine to five work day and how

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes it harder to say, pick up your kids

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>from school. It's challenging for anyone, regardless of gender, to

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>work a full time job and take care of kids,

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.679
<v Speaker 1>but we expect women more than men to make it work.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>And to make it work, women shift to jobs with

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>fewer demands, flexible schedules, or telecommuting options. The culture is

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>telling them that once you become a mother, to be

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a good mother, you really need to take those accommodations,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>whereas for men, it's saying, you know, you really shouldn't

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>take those accommodations because your role is as the breadwinner.

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 1>So men tend to wratch it up after they have kids,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and women will be more likely to wratch it back.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 1>So the culture and the organization interpret what people should

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>be doing once they have children. This idea that we

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>expect women to do less at work when they have

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a child and men to do more. It shows up

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in the data. Women's earnings decrease four then for every

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>child she has. Men's earnings actually increase six percent when

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they have kids. These are known as the motherhood penalty

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and the fatherhood bonus. And even when men and women

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>both act the same at work, the stereotypes we have

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>about women can hurt their earnings. Here's Kathy Tinsley, Robin's

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>co author. So when somebody is absent from a meeting,

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>there's oftentimes uncertainties about why that is occurring. Right, you

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have perfect information and corporations about what everybody is

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>doing all the time. And what happens is when you

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>have imperfect information, your brain doesn't really like that i

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>perfect information, and so it fills in that imperfect information

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with assumptions, with educated guesses about what that missing information is.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And people use gender stereotypes as a way of helping

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>them fill in missing information. And So what can happen

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in any meeting where a man may be absent, The

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>assumption is more likely to be, oh, he could be

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.919
<v Speaker 1>at another client meeting, or he you know, had some

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>emergency come up that was also work related, right, Whereas

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if if a woman is doing it, it would be

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be a family related assumption. So, even

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>if women and men do the same things at work,

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we imagine a woman's work is suffering because of her family,

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>whereas we don't assume the same thing about a man.

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Then there's that other point that paygap skeptics make that

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>women make different choices about what kinds of jobs we seek.

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>As we've talked about on the show before, women do

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>tend to work in jobs that pay less, like teaching

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and secretarial work. Last week we showed you that those

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>jobs pay less because women do them. But is working

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in these jobs always a choice? Take technology, it's a

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>well paid and male dominated field. If women aren't rising

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to the top or succeeding as coders and engineers, some

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>people say it's because they're just not interested in it

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>or not good at it, and that feeds into this

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>general idea that women don't have the aptitude for math, coding,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>or other skills that happen to lead to high paying jobs.

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We're just choosing jobs, lower paying jobs that we just

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>happened to be suited for. Well, there's a couple of

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>things that are going on there. The first is our

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>women as good at math as men, and the answer

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there is yes. Um Shelby Hide has been doing research

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for decades, and all of her research shows that the

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>gap between men and women in math ability is small

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to negligible. You could call it trivial. Then the question becomes, well,

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if there aren't any inherent differences between men and women

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and math ability, then why is it that women aren't

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>entering some fields and men are entering them. One theory

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that Robin brings up is that those fields they aren't

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>hospitable to women. That's where you have to look into

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the context. What is it that men and women experire

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>riants in the workplace and are they given the same

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to thrive? That question, are women given the same

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity as men to thrive? We know that women and

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>men do have different experiences at work, like women experience

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>much higher rates of workplace harassment, and that actually pushes

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>them out of the highest paying jobs in fields. Research

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>has found that when women get harassed, they go to

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>safer jobs, and the more female dominated jobs have much

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>fewer reports of workplace harassment, and those jobs they pay less.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are more subtle ways our experiences are different too.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>There are all kinds of messages that tell women they

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 1>don't belong in the higher tiers of a company. Does

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it mean the same thing to strive for a particular job?

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it harder on women to perform in a job

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>where they have power over other people, probably because the

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>stereotype is that women aren't supposed to want to have power,

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>They aren't supposed to want to be ambitious and so

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>m So it's just it's just harder to live in

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>those jobs. When we talk about the gender pay gap,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about people in power, mostly men, conspiring

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay women less. There's no grand conspiracy, just a

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of systems that don't work well for professional women

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because they were never designed to. As hard as the

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>aggregate number is to understand, even when we hear stories

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>from individual women that are telling us exactly how much

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>less they're making, we don't always see it as a

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the pay gap. Our next story is about

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a time a woman pointed out something that seemed unfair

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and the world came back at her with a million

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons why she can't be mad about it. Earlier this year,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>comedian and actress Monique went public about a salary negotiation

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>with Netflix that went south. She said she was offered

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>way less to do a comedy special than what famous

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>men and white women had been paid it. She asked

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>her fans to do something kind of major boycott Netflix.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Her story went viral, but not in a good way.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>People didn't rally behind Monique like they rallied behind other

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>women in Hollywood. They told her she didn't deserve more money.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I say, what kind of reactions was I expecting. I don't.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't expecting the reaction of, oh, we'll just do

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>it because Monique said it. I was expecting for us

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to research what it is that I'm saying. Jordan Holman

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Monique about her experience. In January, Monique posted

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a video on Instagram. This was not a typical Monique post.

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Her feed is mostly clips of her working out and dancing,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>or promoting the podcast she does with her husband, Sydney.

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time, she starts her videos with hey

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>my Babies. On that Sunday, she went script, hey my

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>loves I Am asking that she stand with me and

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>boycott Nextflix for gender bias and color bias. It was

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>all for a five d dollars deal last week to

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do a comedy special. However, Amy she was afread eleven

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, Chris Rock and Dave Chappelle twenty million dollars.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>A popular fan revolt from Netflix didn't happen. The general

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 1>reaction was not pro Monique. In blog posts and tweets,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>comedy fans were skeptical about the comedians called to action.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Words like delusional, loudmouth, and ignorant were being thrown around.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>A few people defended Monique, but most said she was

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>basically stepping outside of her lane. Here's Tony Rock, Chris

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Rock's brother talking to TMZ. She's calling it color bias

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and gender bias. In her words, not believe the stage

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and how long people. She's been sta A long long time,

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>And I thought it was expressly interesting that people were

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>reacting like this is to Monique. At the start of

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>this year, which was also at the height of the

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Me too movement, the public was learning that other big

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>name actresses like Michelle Williams and Claire Foy from the

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Netflix series The Crown were paid less than their male

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>co stars, But the audience response to those Hollywood pay

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.839
<v Speaker 1>gapps was very different. People got really mad about it.

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Claire Foy even ended up getting back pay. I talked

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to Monique about all of this in March. Hello, Hi,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this is Jordan's Hey Joean, Now you're doing baby, It's

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Monique good. How are you today. I'm wonderful. I'm so glad,

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I asked her if she was surprised that people seemed

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to respond differently to her pay gap then those other actresses.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It didn't surprise me because of what the package looks

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like in Monique, it's a problem. And those sports that

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you named their white women correct. Yes, right. So when

0:13:55.880 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>our wife to say listen, this is not right, we listen,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and we should and we should. Now, if I'm a

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>fat black woman, well people are really looking at me

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like have you lost your mind? You should just be

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>grateful they let you in because you've got three strikes

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>going against you. You're a woman, you black, and you fat,

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and you want to take a stand girl. Monique is

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous black female comedians in America,

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but even before this Instagram post, she has always been

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the type of celebrity that you either love or hate.

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>She has a huge personality in her comedy. Isn't for everyone.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Black women. Don't give a we don't give a we

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>don't give a about, we don't give a way, don't

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>give a fun. Girl, You're gonna work them all, girl,

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that y'all. In the early two thousand's she was everywhere.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>She had the Monique Show, she wrote books, she appeared

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on sitcoms. But what I know her from is The Parkers,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>her number one hit sitcom on the UPN network about

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a single mother and her dizzy daughter. If you were

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a black girl like me, it was Appointment TV. Monique

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>moved to l A to pursue acting. When she was thirty,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>she got the offer to start on her own show,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>The Parkers. After only ninety days in Hollywood, when they

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>told her how much she'd be making, she felt like

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a kid in the candy shop. So I was a

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>little girl. I didn't know the eggs questions. I didn't

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>know to say what's rating because no one told it

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. So when they told me I would be

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>making a week, what you mean every you mean every week?

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I would I would give this. Well, that's more money,

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Jordan than my parents made. Monique star kept rising, and

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine she landed something very rare for

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a black woman, an Oscar nomination, not for her comedy,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but for her role in the serious drama Pruscious. And

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that's when something happened that earned her reputation as a troublemaker.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>In Hollywood. See, winning an Oscar involves its own separate

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of side job. You don't just sit back and

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>let the Academy honor you. You have to do something

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>called an Oscar campaign. It involves going on junkets, doing

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>interviews and pressed lunches, and sometimes being on the road

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for months. Monique she refused to do all of that.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>She says she was busy with her family. She was

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>raising two young twins during the Oscar season for Pruscious.

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>She wanted to stay home with them and watched Curious George.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>She says, the directors and producers didn't care. Everything was

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>simply about the business. We hear all of that, but

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>we need you here, and I understand that because at

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the time it was coming from three people that have

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>no families. Monique won the Oscar anyway, making her one

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of only eight black women to ever when an acting

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Oscar first. I would like to thank the Academy for

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>showing that it can be about the performance and not

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the politics. But looking back, Monique says that even though

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>she won the Oscar, refusing to do that Oscar campaign

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that hurt her career. I got labeled as difficult and

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>demanding It's hard to know how much that difficult and

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.479
<v Speaker 1>demanding label hurt her, but after Pressures, the jobs definitely

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 1>slowed down. She's only done two stand up specials in

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the past decade. She's been in a handful of movies

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>since Pressures, but none of them have been nearly as big.

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So that brings us to the beginning of when she

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>gets this offer from Netflix. Even though she hadn't had

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a big hit in a while, the amount they were offering,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand dollars, sounded really low to her compared

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>to the tens of millions she knew other comedians were offered.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>She says that her team, which includes her attorney, Ricky Anderson,

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and her husband's Sidney Hicks, who is also her manager,

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>had to fight to even get Netflix VP Robbie Prawe

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on the phone to talk about the offer. Netflix declined

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to speak on this podcast, saying that they do not

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>comment on contract negotiations, but the conversation Monique describes once

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they eventually did have a conference call with the studio

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>shows you just how difficult it can be to prove

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>your value as an entertainer. Monique and her team felt

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like they could make a case that she was worth

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>more by any standard Robbie Praue could come up with,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>but whenever they made their case, he would just change

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the standard. Monique's people said she was worth more than

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 1>five hundred thousand dollars because of things like her oscar.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Prau said, that was Monique's resume, and they didn't

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>look at resumes. They asked why Amy Schumer Steel was

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>so much bigger, and he said, well, she sold out

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Madison Square Garden twice and she had a big hit

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>over the summer. So Sidney said, is that not Amy

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Schuma's resume? And you know how quiet it is right now?

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Jordan's yes, that's how quiet it was. On the phone.

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the gender pay gap a lot, but

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>if you're a black woman, you also face a racial

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 1>pay gap. It's really tricky to know which one affects

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you more. We know women make eighty cents to the

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar on average, but if you're a black woman, you

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>get sixty three cents to a white man's dollar and

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety three cents compared to black men. Here is Monique

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>being told that the market value for her entertainment was

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>less way less than a white woman or a black man.

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Was it her qualifications, her race, her gender. It's impossible

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to every say for sure. And that's what's so crazy

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who's ever been in a negotiation like this.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>If you're one of those people who knows Monique as

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a comedian and you're just not into her jokes, you

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>might think she's ridiculous for comparing herself to Amy Schumer

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>or Dave Chappelle. But a few people had her back.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>But then you have those other people saying you better

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>not sit down, you better keep standing, you better keep

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>speaking up and speaking out. After all, she says, Schumer

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>and Chappelle were offered twenty two times more and forty

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>times more respectively than she was for a similar job.

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Or are they worth that much more than her? Comedian

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Wanda Sykes thankful Nique for sharing what Netflix seemed to

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>be offering black women compared to men in white women.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Wanda Sykes, she said Netflix offered her two hundred and

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars for her own comedy special, and when I

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>called for that boycott, there have been people that have

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>said calling for a boycott was extreme, and I want

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to be the first to tell people calling for a

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>boycott is extreme. It was extremely extreme. However, isn't inequality extreme?

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Injustice is extreme. Some people might hear Monique story and

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>say hers was obviously not a case of discrimination. She

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>had barely worked in comedy since the Parker's and some

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't find her appealing, but take the reason since

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>why she hasn't worked and why she's not always appealing,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Her gender, her race, and even her size are all

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.119
<v Speaker 1>part of it. That's how a lot of the gender

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>pay gap plays out. Women make less than men for

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what seemed like innocent reasons, but when you dig deeper,

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the real reasons have everything to do with the fact

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>that they're women. Next week, on the Paycheck, we'll go

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to a country that thinks it knows how to fix

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the pay gap, how by forcing big business to come clean.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The Paychecks. If you like the show,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>head on over to Apple Podcasts and rate, review and subscribe.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate all feedback, even those one star reviews from

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>people who don't believe in the pay gap. This episode

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of The Paycheck was reported by Jordan Holman, Max Abelson

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>and hosted and reported by me Rebecca Greenfield. It was

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>edited by Francesca Levi and produced by Liz Smith. We

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>also had helped from Magnus Henrickson, Gillian Goodman, and Janet Paskin.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Our original music is by Leo Sidron. Carrie Vanderriott did

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the illustrations on our show page, which you can find

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>at bloomberg dot com slash paycheck branchesca Levy is Bloomberg's

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>head of podcasts