1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,360
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. I'll turn it over

2
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:10,400
Speaker 1: to my colleague Saliah Molson, who is live at the

3
00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:15,720
Speaker 1: Treasury Department with the new Secretary, Scott Beston Seleiah, thank you, Kayley.

4
00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:19,079
Speaker 2: I'm here with US Treasure Secretary Scott Besson and Washington.

5
00:00:19,120 --> 00:00:21,520
Speaker 2: Mister Secretary, thank you for joining me. So good to

6
00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:25,480
Speaker 2: see you, mister Secretary. We are inside the cashroom at

7
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:29,200
Speaker 2: the Treasure Department. It is almost impossible to overstate how

8
00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:31,880
Speaker 2: important the work that is done in this building is

9
00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:35,839
Speaker 2: the US financial system. Yet right now there is widespread

10
00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:40,240
Speaker 2: concern about the DOGE team's access to sensitive payment systems.

11
00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:44,040
Speaker 2: Are you worried at all that that access and that

12
00:00:44,200 --> 00:00:48,200
Speaker 2: tinkering of the payment systems could affect the Treasury's market

13
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:49,159
Speaker 2: or cause any disruption?

14
00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:52,199
Speaker 1: Good? Well, so, Leiah, thank you for asking me about that,

15
00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:55,040
Speaker 1: because there's a lot of misinformation out there. First of all,

16
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:58,920
Speaker 1: when you say the DOGE team, these are Treasury employees

17
00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:03,400
Speaker 1: a two employees, one of whom I personally interviewed in

18
00:01:03,440 --> 00:01:07,120
Speaker 1: his final round. There is no tinkering with the system.

19
00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,800
Speaker 1: They are on read only, they are looking. They can

20
00:01:11,880 --> 00:01:16,720
Speaker 1: make no changes. It is an operational program to suggest improvement.

21
00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:20,360
Speaker 1: So we make one point three billion payments a year,

22
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:25,120
Speaker 1: and this is two employees who are working with a

23
00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:27,080
Speaker 1: group of long standing employees.

24
00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:31,520
Speaker 2: The letter that the Treasure Department sent earlier this week

25
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:36,600
Speaker 2: talked about how the team currently does not have access

26
00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:39,200
Speaker 2: to change the system. Have they, at any point this

27
00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:41,440
Speaker 2: year had the ability to make changes.

28
00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:44,560
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. This is no different than you would have

29
00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:47,800
Speaker 1: at a private company. And by the way, the ability

30
00:01:47,840 --> 00:01:50,440
Speaker 1: to change the system sits over at the Federal Reserve,

31
00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:54,680
Speaker 1: so it doesn't even lie in this building. So they

32
00:01:54,680 --> 00:01:58,600
Speaker 1: could make suggestions on how to change the system, but

33
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:00,400
Speaker 1: we don't even run this system.

34
00:02:01,040 --> 00:02:04,400
Speaker 2: And if they ask for if they request the ability

35
00:02:04,440 --> 00:02:06,000
Speaker 2: to change the system, would you grant that.

36
00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:10,360
Speaker 1: No, Again, they have no ability to change the system.

37
00:02:10,440 --> 00:02:14,160
Speaker 1: I have no ability to grant that change. That they

38
00:02:14,360 --> 00:02:17,160
Speaker 1: can make suggestions, then it would go to the Federal

39
00:02:17,200 --> 00:02:21,919
Speaker 1: Reserve and just like any large erp system, there would

40
00:02:21,960 --> 00:02:24,160
Speaker 1: be tests, there would be this, there would be that,

41
00:02:24,560 --> 00:02:27,840
Speaker 1: and then the Fed will determine whether these changes are

42
00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:28,600
Speaker 1: robust or not.

43
00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:32,680
Speaker 2: As the Secretary of Treasure, you also oversee the IRS.

44
00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,640
Speaker 2: Do you know what kind of access the team has

45
00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:38,880
Speaker 2: to IRS data or individual taxpayer data.

46
00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:42,280
Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad you asked that too, because look, THERIRS,

47
00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:46,560
Speaker 1: the privacy issue is one of the biggest issues, and

48
00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:50,280
Speaker 1: over the past four years we've seen a lot of

49
00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:54,520
Speaker 1: leaks out of there. The IRS systems are quite poor.

50
00:02:54,960 --> 00:02:58,639
Speaker 1: When I started in college in nineteen eighty I learned

51
00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:01,960
Speaker 1: the program in COBAL. I think there are twelve different

52
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:05,600
Speaker 1: systems at the IRS that still run on COBOL. But

53
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 1: as of now, there is no engagement at the IRS.

54
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:12,680
Speaker 2: And if they request that access, would you sign off

55
00:03:12,680 --> 00:03:13,320
Speaker 2: on that request?

56
00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:16,840
Speaker 1: They haven't, so we'll take that when it comes to it.

57
00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:19,960
Speaker 1: I think there is a lot to do there, but

58
00:03:20,800 --> 00:03:26,040
Speaker 1: the president was elected with a big agenda and to

59
00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:31,600
Speaker 1: the extent that getting the IRS in better shape is

60
00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:35,080
Speaker 1: part of that. Sure, because look, with the IRS, what

61
00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:39,600
Speaker 1: am I concerned about? I am concerned about collections, I'm

62
00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:44,800
Speaker 1: concerned about privacy, and I am concerned that the system

63
00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,640
Speaker 1: is robust and customer service.

64
00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:51,000
Speaker 2: But do you think that if they ask for access,

65
00:03:51,080 --> 00:03:52,880
Speaker 2: that is something you would consider signing off on.

66
00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:55,400
Speaker 1: There are a lot of things I'd consider, But look,

67
00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:57,960
Speaker 1: we're in the middle of the tax filing season right now.

68
00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:02,720
Speaker 1: Even with the government outs that are being that expire

69
00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:06,920
Speaker 1: at midnight tonight. We have been mandated that the IRS

70
00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:12,840
Speaker 1: customer facing employees that they're not eligible for that until

71
00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:16,120
Speaker 1: May fifteenth, So I don't imagine anything's going to go

72
00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:18,520
Speaker 1: on at the IRS until then or beyond.

73
00:04:19,160 --> 00:04:22,000
Speaker 2: Elon must just a few half an hour ago tweeted

74
00:04:22,040 --> 00:04:26,080
Speaker 2: out that Treasury needs to stop approving certain payments. Has

75
00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:28,880
Speaker 2: your staff tried to block any payments here at Treasury?

76
00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:31,320
Speaker 1: We have not, and I'm glad you asked that too.

77
00:04:31,640 --> 00:04:33,800
Speaker 1: And just to put in perspective, Elon and I are

78
00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:39,119
Speaker 1: completely aligned in terms of cutting waste and increasing accountability

79
00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:44,440
Speaker 1: and transparency for the American people. I believe that this

80
00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:48,200
Speaker 1: Dove program in my adult life is one of the

81
00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:52,279
Speaker 1: most important audits of government or changes to government structure.

82
00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:56,800
Speaker 1: We have seen that. When I was in my twenties,

83
00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:00,600
Speaker 1: we had the Grace Report, and there's some great suggestions

84
00:05:00,600 --> 00:05:05,040
Speaker 1: that came out of that never implemented under Clinton and Gore.

85
00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,160
Speaker 1: I think it was to government efficiency or reduce government.

86
00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:14,640
Speaker 1: Nothing happened. So President Trump came in, there's a big agenda,

87
00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:17,520
Speaker 1: and I think that there are gigantic cost savings for

88
00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:20,520
Speaker 1: the American people here. And I think It's unfortunate the

89
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:23,880
Speaker 1: way the media wants to lampoon what is going on.

90
00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:29,160
Speaker 1: These are highly trained professionals. This is not some roving

91
00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:33,400
Speaker 1: ban going around doing things. This is methodical and it

92
00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:35,720
Speaker 1: is going to yield big savings.

93
00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,560
Speaker 2: At any point, would you heed what Musk just tweeted

94
00:05:39,640 --> 00:05:42,839
Speaker 2: and stop payments from coming through Treasury?

95
00:05:43,279 --> 00:05:48,400
Speaker 1: Well, most of that happens above us, that it comes

96
00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:52,800
Speaker 1: from the departments and the agencies. We are doing a

97
00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:56,159
Speaker 1: complete review, and I want to emphasize to you and

98
00:05:56,200 --> 00:06:00,440
Speaker 1: everyone watching that it is an operational review. It is

99
00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:03,480
Speaker 1: not an ideological review. We want to make sure that

100
00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:07,359
Speaker 1: the American people are getting the best practices, and I

101
00:06:07,360 --> 00:06:08,839
Speaker 1: don't think that's happening right now.

102
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:12,200
Speaker 2: The systems here at Treasury they're known to be a

103
00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:16,160
Speaker 2: little antiquated, but very very sensitive, but also they're working.

104
00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:19,360
Speaker 2: I'm hearing you. At Bloomberg, we hear a lot about

105
00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:23,440
Speaker 2: investors being concerned that this could hit markets in some

106
00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:28,360
Speaker 2: way or start to cause a loss of confidence. What

107
00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:31,599
Speaker 2: as a long time hedge fund and investor like, do

108
00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:33,760
Speaker 2: you have a response to those concerns.

109
00:06:34,920 --> 00:06:40,039
Speaker 1: People shouldn't be concerned that at Treasury we move deliberately

110
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:43,800
Speaker 1: and we fix things. That's the way we work. So

111
00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:47,200
Speaker 1: everyone should know that all the payments are going to

112
00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:49,800
Speaker 1: be made, they're going to be in good order, and

113
00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:52,479
Speaker 1: at the end of this review, they're going to be

114
00:06:52,600 --> 00:06:55,960
Speaker 1: substantial savings for the American taxpayer.

115
00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:00,080
Speaker 2: Mister Secretary, you have experience in currency markets, and now,

116
00:07:00,200 --> 00:07:04,080
Speaker 2: as in your new role, you oversee US currency policy.

117
00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:06,760
Speaker 2: I'd like to ask you what does a strong dollar

118
00:07:06,839 --> 00:07:07,240
Speaker 2: mean to you.

119
00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:12,240
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, the strong dollar policy is completely

120
00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:17,400
Speaker 1: intact with President Trump, and I'm very happy at his

121
00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:23,440
Speaker 1: Economic clob of New York speech in August when he

122
00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:29,040
Speaker 1: re emphasized the importance of maintaining the dollar reserve currency status.

123
00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:32,080
Speaker 1: But let's think about what does a strong dollar mean.

124
00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:36,520
Speaker 1: It really means four things. One that when we think

125
00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:41,480
Speaker 1: about a fiat currency, a piece of paper is credibility.

126
00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:45,800
Speaker 1: So a strong dollar is credibility and a rule of

127
00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:50,120
Speaker 1: law that is backing it up. Two, it means a

128
00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:54,080
Speaker 1: composite price in the screen the Bloomberg Currency Index, that

129
00:07:54,480 --> 00:07:58,400
Speaker 1: is the dollar moving up against that. Three, it is

130
00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:03,840
Speaker 1: a bilateral price. So what's important to remember is the

131
00:08:03,920 --> 00:08:08,000
Speaker 1: dollar is either weak or strong versus something else. So

132
00:08:09,440 --> 00:08:12,800
Speaker 1: we want the dollar to be strong. What we don't

133
00:08:12,880 --> 00:08:18,040
Speaker 1: want is other countries to weaken their currencies to manipulate

134
00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:22,440
Speaker 1: their trade. And then fourth that we want to have

135
00:08:22,480 --> 00:08:26,480
Speaker 1: the best policies that create the environment for a strong dollar.

136
00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:31,400
Speaker 2: Let's talk about other nations and how they manage their currencies.

137
00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:35,000
Speaker 2: The President has asked for a tariff study from several

138
00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:39,240
Speaker 2: of his cabinet officers or incoming cabinet officers do April first,

139
00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:42,120
Speaker 2: and the Treasury piece of that is to assess how

140
00:08:42,160 --> 00:08:45,880
Speaker 2: to handle when foreign nations manipulate their currencies. Do you

141
00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:48,920
Speaker 2: see any evidence of manipulation in foreign exchange rate markets

142
00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:49,400
Speaker 2: right now?

143
00:08:49,679 --> 00:08:53,520
Speaker 1: Well, we'll wait till the study comes out, But I

144
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:57,000
Speaker 1: think just intuitively, you and I could agree that when

145
00:08:57,080 --> 00:09:00,960
Speaker 1: you see the accumulation of these large surpluses, that there

146
00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:05,920
Speaker 1: is not a free form trading system that's going. It

147
00:09:05,960 --> 00:09:08,400
Speaker 1: could be due to the level of the currency. It

148
00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:14,000
Speaker 1: could be due to trade restrictions, it could be due

149
00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:18,000
Speaker 1: to some interest rate repression policy. So it could be

150
00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:18,560
Speaker 1: any of those.

151
00:09:19,520 --> 00:09:22,400
Speaker 2: Are there any countries that you're monitoring or watching specifically

152
00:09:22,520 --> 00:09:24,520
Speaker 2: right now? I know the President in the past has

153
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:27,360
Speaker 2: labeled China as a currency manipulator. Do you see any

154
00:09:27,360 --> 00:09:29,600
Speaker 2: other nations that need to be closely watched.

155
00:09:29,800 --> 00:09:33,440
Speaker 1: Well, I think we'll see on April first. And as

156
00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:37,680
Speaker 1: you know that China's the most imbalanced unbalanced economy in

157
00:09:37,679 --> 00:09:41,440
Speaker 1: the history of the world, and they are in a

158
00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:46,320
Speaker 1: deep recession right now. They're experience in deflation and they're

159
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:49,280
Speaker 1: trying to export their way out of that, and we

160
00:09:49,320 --> 00:09:53,320
Speaker 1: can't allow that. We want fair trade, and part of

161
00:09:53,320 --> 00:09:58,080
Speaker 1: that is taking a strong position on the currency and

162
00:09:58,160 --> 00:09:59,520
Speaker 1: the terms of trade.

163
00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:03,600
Speaker 2: Yesterday, the Treasure Department had its first quarterly refunding since

164
00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:08,040
Speaker 2: you were confirmed. Do you have any plans of looking

165
00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:12,040
Speaker 2: at how the Treasury's debt issuance strategy comes together.

166
00:10:12,720 --> 00:10:17,040
Speaker 1: Well, I think the good news is that the trajectory

167
00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:22,840
Speaker 1: of the borrowing is dropping, so I was very happy

168
00:10:22,840 --> 00:10:26,239
Speaker 1: to see that. It's one of the few good surprises

169
00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:29,840
Speaker 1: I was left by the previous administration. So the trajectory

170
00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:35,520
Speaker 1: is good, and the government's well financed into the third quarter.

171
00:10:36,040 --> 00:10:41,760
Speaker 1: And I believe that as it becomes apparent that the

172
00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:45,360
Speaker 1: present's agenda is working, that we'll see a great deal

173
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:49,400
Speaker 1: of non inflationary growth, and I think that that will

174
00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:53,160
Speaker 1: help us calibrate what the debt policy should be but

175
00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:57,560
Speaker 1: I don't foresee any changes in the issuance for the

176
00:10:57,600 --> 00:10:58,559
Speaker 1: foreseeable future.

177
00:10:58,840 --> 00:11:00,760
Speaker 2: And what about the process. Do you think that tea

178
00:11:00,800 --> 00:11:04,320
Speaker 2: BAC is the most effective way of getting feedback from markets?

179
00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:08,319
Speaker 1: Well, I want to thank all the members of tea

180
00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:12,240
Speaker 1: BAC who are here this week. They are a very

181
00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:18,640
Speaker 1: elite group. I think that maybe over time we need

182
00:11:18,679 --> 00:11:21,440
Speaker 1: to think about the style of engagement. It is turned

183
00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:26,640
Speaker 1: into more of a research think tank than direct market engagement,

184
00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:29,840
Speaker 1: and that's going to require some changes from both sides.

185
00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:32,400
Speaker 1: I believe when tea BAC was originally started, it was

186
00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:36,679
Speaker 1: supposed to be a market feedback mechanism, a little less

187
00:11:36,880 --> 00:11:41,400
Speaker 1: of a think tank, and we've been assigning research projects.

188
00:11:41,440 --> 00:11:45,200
Speaker 1: So I think there's some recalibration on both sides. But

189
00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:50,280
Speaker 1: I think that whatever we do, tea BAC will still exist.

190
00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:54,800
Speaker 2: Mistress Secretary you said yesterday in an interview that the

191
00:11:54,800 --> 00:11:58,839
Speaker 2: Trump administration is more focused on long term deals than

192
00:11:58,960 --> 00:12:01,959
Speaker 2: what the Federal Reserve is doing, which is a bold statement.

193
00:12:02,520 --> 00:12:05,280
Speaker 2: I want to ask, how do you plan to keep

194
00:12:05,280 --> 00:12:08,800
Speaker 2: a lid on yields considering the deluge of debt issuance

195
00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:10,840
Speaker 2: that is coming down the pike, and also some of

196
00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:12,440
Speaker 2: the inflationary risks that are ahead.

197
00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:16,160
Speaker 1: Well, one of the things I wanted to emphasize is

198
00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:20,760
Speaker 1: that we are not focused on whether the FED is

199
00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:24,040
Speaker 1: going to cut not cut. What we are focused on

200
00:12:24,280 --> 00:12:28,160
Speaker 1: is lowering rates, So we are less focused on the

201
00:12:28,200 --> 00:12:30,599
Speaker 1: specific of rate cuts and how do we get the

202
00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:34,600
Speaker 1: whole curve down. I mentioned that the tenure I believe

203
00:12:35,080 --> 00:12:39,640
Speaker 1: is the important price to focus on its mortgages. It's

204
00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:45,600
Speaker 1: long term capital formation. So look, I think with the

205
00:12:45,640 --> 00:12:52,640
Speaker 1: President's policies of energy, dominance, deregulation, and non inflationary growth,

206
00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:57,400
Speaker 1: I think that the tenure is going to naturally come down.

207
00:12:57,720 --> 00:13:00,760
Speaker 1: And then look, on top of it, we do get

208
00:13:00,840 --> 00:13:04,880
Speaker 1: some big savings on the spending side from the dose programs.

209
00:13:05,200 --> 00:13:09,960
Speaker 1: Like let's think of a naive formula government equals spending

210
00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:16,080
Speaker 1: minus taxes for my entire career and beyond, maybe even

211
00:13:16,520 --> 00:13:24,520
Speaker 1: back to pre FDR the government equal spending minus taxes.

212
00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:29,840
Speaker 1: The S the Republicans that we liked spending, We just

213
00:13:29,880 --> 00:13:32,040
Speaker 1: wanted to raise it less. The Democrats want to raise

214
00:13:32,080 --> 00:13:37,640
Speaker 1: it more taxes. Democrats want tax increases. We want tax cuts.

215
00:13:37,840 --> 00:13:41,000
Speaker 1: What nobody's singing about is what if the S actually

216
00:13:41,040 --> 00:13:44,520
Speaker 1: went down. What if it actually goes down because of

217
00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:46,000
Speaker 1: everything we're doing right now?

218
00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:49,040
Speaker 2: But what about the inflation concerns that are stumming from

219
00:13:49,080 --> 00:13:50,560
Speaker 2: the tariffs and tariff threats.

220
00:13:51,080 --> 00:13:55,840
Speaker 1: Uh, Look that I'm not sure that where this narrative

221
00:13:55,880 --> 00:14:00,679
Speaker 1: the tariffs for the country putting on the tariffs is inflationary.

222
00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:04,319
Speaker 1: That we could have a small one time price adjustment

223
00:14:04,800 --> 00:14:08,120
Speaker 1: that as we saw in Trump one point zero, that

224
00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:12,600
Speaker 1: the deregulation and the other policies we stayed right around

225
00:14:12,640 --> 00:14:17,800
Speaker 1: the Fed's target level. So I'm unconcerned about that. I

226
00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:22,680
Speaker 1: think especially that China, now given all their excess capacity,

227
00:14:23,720 --> 00:14:27,080
Speaker 1: will no matter the level of the tariffs, will end

228
00:14:27,160 --> 00:14:28,320
Speaker 1: up eating quite a bit.

229
00:14:29,360 --> 00:14:33,360
Speaker 2: There's a lot of uncertainty around tariffs. We see them

230
00:14:33,400 --> 00:14:38,440
Speaker 2: threatened or signaled, and that they're taken back. It appears

231
00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,840
Speaker 2: as if this administration might be unfriendly to businesses.

232
00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:47,200
Speaker 1: Is that right? Really? I think it's just the opposite.

233
00:14:47,480 --> 00:14:52,280
Speaker 1: I think this is the most pro business administration in history,

234
00:14:52,680 --> 00:14:57,000
Speaker 1: and everything we are doing is going to increase the

235
00:14:57,040 --> 00:15:02,640
Speaker 1: after tax return capital and as result, working Americans will

236
00:15:02,720 --> 00:15:06,800
Speaker 1: have very high real wage growth. That what we've seen

237
00:15:06,840 --> 00:15:10,240
Speaker 1: over the past four years is the government and government

238
00:15:10,320 --> 00:15:14,600
Speaker 1: adjacent sectors providing the employment growth. And why have we

239
00:15:14,760 --> 00:15:18,880
Speaker 1: experienced a supportability crisis? First there was a massive spending

240
00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:23,720
Speaker 1: met by increased regulation which caused inflation, and then government

241
00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:27,440
Speaker 1: and government adjacent jobs do not call real wage growth

242
00:15:27,520 --> 00:15:31,880
Speaker 1: because they move up at CPI. So I think that

243
00:15:32,000 --> 00:15:34,760
Speaker 1: we are going to not only be business friendly, but

244
00:15:35,080 --> 00:15:37,560
Speaker 1: very very friendly for working Americans.

245
00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:41,920
Speaker 2: We're seeing companies already under some stress from the tariff threats,

246
00:15:42,080 --> 00:15:45,800
Speaker 2: China is investigating Google, and also, as you know, are

247
00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:47,800
Speaker 2: well aware that business is like to be able to

248
00:15:47,880 --> 00:15:51,360
Speaker 2: plan ahead, but with so much policy uncertainty, that predictability

249
00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:54,240
Speaker 2: factor is gone. That all points to a little bit

250
00:15:54,280 --> 00:15:55,280
Speaker 2: of a tougher environment.

251
00:15:55,600 --> 00:15:57,600
Speaker 1: Well, look, I think the best thing we can do

252
00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:01,760
Speaker 1: for predictability is make the tax cuts and jaw back permanent.

253
00:16:02,120 --> 00:16:04,160
Speaker 1: That would be the single best thing we could do

254
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:07,080
Speaker 1: for predictability. We can go back to the one hundred

255
00:16:07,080 --> 00:16:12,080
Speaker 1: percent expensing and add some new features that I think

256
00:16:12,160 --> 00:16:14,600
Speaker 1: business is going to be very happy with. But again

257
00:16:14,640 --> 00:16:18,960
Speaker 1: the most important thing is that it filters down to

258
00:16:19,480 --> 00:16:23,640
Speaker 1: working wages, which is what we saw the President Trump's

259
00:16:23,640 --> 00:16:28,120
Speaker 1: first administration, hourly workers did better than supervisory workers.

260
00:16:28,880 --> 00:16:30,760
Speaker 2: Well, let me ask you about the tax plan. Then,

261
00:16:31,320 --> 00:16:36,040
Speaker 2: on the campaign trail, Trump floated no taxes on tips

262
00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:39,880
Speaker 2: and cutting the corporate rate and a lot of other proposals.

263
00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:42,760
Speaker 2: How are you going to juggle which campaign promises are

264
00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:46,600
Speaker 2: high on that the priority list for the bill, considering

265
00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:48,280
Speaker 2: how costly everything would be.

266
00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:53,040
Speaker 1: Well, that we're just starting the process now and that

267
00:16:53,160 --> 00:16:56,920
Speaker 1: we'll do what President Trump will give us his priorities.

268
00:16:57,160 --> 00:17:00,840
Speaker 1: But I can tell you the real priority is fixing

269
00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:03,920
Speaker 1: this affordability crisis for the American people. And when you

270
00:17:03,920 --> 00:17:07,080
Speaker 1: think about no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security,

271
00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:12,440
Speaker 1: no tax on overtime, potentially putting back in auto loan deductibility,

272
00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:16,119
Speaker 1: all of those benefits accrue to the bottom fifty percent

273
00:17:16,640 --> 00:17:20,840
Speaker 1: of income earners in America if they have really taken

274
00:17:20,880 --> 00:17:24,480
Speaker 1: it the between the eyes for the past four years,

275
00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:27,239
Speaker 1: and that that's unsustainable. Uh.

276
00:17:27,280 --> 00:17:28,960
Speaker 2: Before I let you go, mister secretary, I want to

277
00:17:29,000 --> 00:17:31,600
Speaker 2: ask you if you have had your m uh traditional

278
00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:33,560
Speaker 2: weekly meeting with FED Chair Powell.

279
00:17:33,640 --> 00:17:36,840
Speaker 1: Yet we did that. I did an away game over

280
00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:40,240
Speaker 1: the FED. We we had a very nice breakfast. Uh.

281
00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:43,080
Speaker 1: Chair Powell and I don't know each other well, so

282
00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:44,480
Speaker 1: it was very constructive.

283
00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:47,160
Speaker 2: How do you view that relationship involving the two agencies

284
00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:49,960
Speaker 2: are and buildings are supposed to work very closely together.

285
00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:52,760
Speaker 2: And you've had some criticism in the past of his work.

286
00:17:53,040 --> 00:17:56,160
Speaker 1: Uh. And as I said at my hearing, everything I'm

287
00:17:56,160 --> 00:17:58,680
Speaker 1: gonna talk about is things FED the Fed's done in

288
00:17:58,720 --> 00:18:03,720
Speaker 1: the past actively monetary policy. I will not comment on,

289
00:18:04,280 --> 00:18:06,080
Speaker 1: and I'm sure he's going to do the right thing,

290
00:18:06,320 --> 00:18:08,399
Speaker 1: so there'll be no criticism. All right.

291
00:18:08,440 --> 00:18:10,359
Speaker 2: Well, mister Secretary, thank you so much for joining