Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. A Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: leader says they will burn this system down if they
Speaker 1: don't get what they want. Us marshals are going to
Speaker 1: be protecting federal monuments. Minneapolis neighborhood goes COP three, a
Speaker 1: big court win for Trump on immigration. COVID case is
Speaker 1: spiking in some big states, and the Dixie Chicks have
Speaker 1: a new name coming up. Buck Sexton initially decoding the
Speaker 1: news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, Frank,
Speaker 1: You're a great American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Homeless CIA analysts, I can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No. Welcome, my friends, Welcome,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. As always, honor and
Speaker 1: privilege to have you here with me. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: We have a ton to discuss. We always do these days,
Speaker 1: right because, as we know, we have the big issues
Speaker 1: all jammed together right now, of the election of COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: of the economy, of the Black Lives Matter protest movement,
Speaker 1: right all these things. It's going to be a busy,
Speaker 1: busy summer. That much we can all count on. And
Speaker 1: let's start with where we are now in the Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter protests, and because I will talk to you
Speaker 1: about COVID nineteen and then we'll discuss a bit of
Speaker 1: how Trump is doing politically speaking across the country. Well,
Speaker 1: let's just first say this, Does anyone really believe at
Speaker 1: this point that this is ultimately meant to make this
Speaker 1: a better country? Or is this really about an expression
Speaker 1: of outrage and a political mobilization for a party that
Speaker 1: is willing to use the emotional outburst. That's really what
Speaker 1: this is. The emotional outburst that is also tied I
Speaker 1: think to the stress and the psychological duress of this
Speaker 1: lockdown for the purposes of achieving power. When you think
Speaker 1: of it that way, it becomes very clear. I think
Speaker 1: what's going to be happening in the weeks and months ahead.
Speaker 1: I can't say that I can predict the future, but
Speaker 1: I do think we should recognize that this is not
Speaker 1: going to get better anytime soon, and the lessons that
Speaker 1: have been learned in recent weeks and months will be
Speaker 1: forgotten by the media the second that it is convenient
Speaker 1: for them, so they'll just go back to the old stories.
Speaker 1: They'll go back to what they were saying before it
Speaker 1: does not matter that we have proven the argument that
Speaker 1: they made to be wrong. It does not matter that
Speaker 1: we have learned the lesson or should have based on
Speaker 1: the data and based on recent history. You're going to
Speaker 1: hear the same stuff from them. And one of the
Speaker 1: things that's going to keep coming up is that this movement,
Speaker 1: the Black Lives Matter movement, is about police reform. It's not.
Speaker 1: It's not about police reform, because if you look at
Speaker 1: the numbers, police are doing a very good job in
Speaker 1: this country. The last twenty years, violence has been going down, down, down.
Speaker 1: The exceptions to that are overwhelmingly Democrat controlled cities in
Speaker 1: a few places, and that's something that the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: somehow never is held to account for. I mean, now
Speaker 1: we're looking they keep talking about the system, and we'll
Speaker 1: discuss what one Black Lives leader, black Lives Matter leader
Speaker 1: said about this, But first I just want to say
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party is never, never, going to turn around
Speaker 1: and look at its constituency in the eye and say,
Speaker 1: you know what we've been saying, what we've been creating
Speaker 1: for decades and decades, the supporting welfare policies without any
Speaker 1: regard for what it does for intact families, and whether
Speaker 1: the state is effectively subsidizing social policies that are not
Speaker 1: a good idea of social decisions, that can be deleterious,
Speaker 1: that can be damaging to certain communities. The Democratic Party
Speaker 1: cannot will not ever do that, and in fact they'll
Speaker 1: shut down discussions of this. And these are discussions that
Speaker 1: also should be had in all impoverished communities, including those
Speaker 1: in the country that are overwhelmingly white. People talk about
Speaker 1: the poorest per capita counties in the United States, and
Speaker 1: Eastern Kentucky is usually the very top of the list,
Speaker 1: which is almost entirely white. Social dysfunction, despair, hopelessness exists
Speaker 1: in places all around the country for people of all
Speaker 1: different races. And there are some things that we have learned,
Speaker 1: some things that we know Finnish high school, stay married,
Speaker 1: don't have children before you're married. If you look at
Speaker 1: the social science, that's the three pronged approach to not
Speaker 1: being in poverty. Now do you see any big campaign
Speaker 1: out there that's trying to promote this. Do you see
Speaker 1: anyone saying, hey, just let's let's teach this in schools.
Speaker 1: Look at all the things that are being taught in schools,
Speaker 1: all the time. Look at the different revisionist histories that
Speaker 1: are out there now and the way that we're all
Speaker 1: undermining the narrative of the country of the founders coming
Speaker 1: up with all this new stuff. These are focusing that
Speaker 1: they're focusing on what's meant to divide us and meant
Speaker 1: to excuse the unbelievable failures of the Democrat urban project
Speaker 1: stretching back for at least my entire lifetime. And when
Speaker 1: it comes to reductions of out of wedlock births, when
Speaker 1: it comes to intact families stretching through now multiple generations,
Speaker 1: has been it's been terrible. But if you even talk
Speaker 1: about families, you're considered some kind of out of touch
Speaker 1: elitist or something even much worse than that. When all
Speaker 1: the data shows us, as they pretend to care about
Speaker 1: the data, the numbers. If we were having a serious
Speaker 1: conversation about how to try to fix parts of our
Speaker 1: society that are dysfunctional, cities that are plagued by crime,
Speaker 1: regions that have way too much poverty and illiteracy, and
Speaker 1: opioid overdose or crack overdose or either whatever drug we're
Speaker 1: talking about, it's all some of the factors underlying this
Speaker 1: are the same, and they're human failings. There are problems
Speaker 1: that come up because people need us at people need
Speaker 1: if they can a two parent household. It is the
Speaker 1: social science tells you this. Now, this isn't I'm not
Speaker 1: putting anyone down. I'm not suggesting that I sit here
Speaker 1: in judgment of anyone's life. But if we're going to
Speaker 1: talk about the data and what it tells us about
Speaker 1: public policy, a two parent household is a stronger, stronger
Speaker 1: formula for stable generations going forward, right that won't get
Speaker 1: involved with drugs and crime and gangs and poverty. None
Speaker 1: of this is even part of the conversation. We push
Speaker 1: all of that aside, that's not even something we can discuss. Instead,
Speaker 1: we're getting lectures about white fragility, which you know, I've
Speaker 1: gone back and forth on whether I'm going to read
Speaker 1: the book that's out there now by an author who's
Speaker 1: one of these really one of these race grievance grifters
Speaker 1: who are out and there are many of them, is
Speaker 1: a huge industry, and they're actually quite powerful. I mean,
Speaker 1: I've come across many of them over the years, and
Speaker 1: they remind me now because they used to be in
Speaker 1: colleges you would have this would you would have because
Speaker 1: I was an employee at one point part time at
Speaker 1: Amherst College where I went to school, and we would
Speaker 1: get the Diverse City Indoctrination training at the beginning of
Speaker 1: every year, and you would have people who would come
Speaker 1: in and they would have all these explanations for how
Speaker 1: if you don't effectively sign on for the entire progressive agenda,
Speaker 1: you might be a little bit racist. And if you
Speaker 1: don't accept things like white privilege, you're If you don't
Speaker 1: accept white privilege, you are showing your white fragility, and
Speaker 1: you're a white fragility. It's evidence of an underlying racism.
Speaker 1: This is very similar. I mean, I've always been fascinated
Speaker 1: by the totalitarianism, as you know, of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 1: I read about it. I have a bunch of Stalin
Speaker 1: biographies I've read that are sitting on the bookshelf that
Speaker 1: you can't see right now, but it's right next to me.
Speaker 1: I find the Soviet Union fascinating because how could you
Speaker 1: take a very large and culturally rich and sophisticated country
Speaker 1: and completely ruin it, I mean just completely destroy it
Speaker 1: for generations, and it is using many of the same Mark.
Speaker 1: It's using the same Marxist and division first attitudes and
Speaker 1: approaches that we see currently being used here in America,
Speaker 1: and that do stretch back to the French Revolution. I've
Speaker 1: been fascinated by the lack of you know, that they
Speaker 1: need a revolution that did not end in misery, heinous
Speaker 1: bloodshed and destruction of everything on the left. And so
Speaker 1: this is why they've created this mythology of the French
Speaker 1: Revolution as something that is to be celebrated. The French
Speaker 1: Revolution was an abject failure that resulted in misery, murder, despair,
Speaker 1: and poverty. All right. They had people desecrating churches, intentionally
Speaker 1: having sex on the altar of Catholic churches to just
Speaker 1: show how much they had defeated religion. They were coming
Speaker 1: up with new names for the calendar year. They're coming
Speaker 1: up with all this remaking society top to bottom. You
Speaker 1: know what ended up with the Twelve The committee of
Speaker 1: the twelve people gathering together in a room decide who's
Speaker 1: got to get got, if you will, who's going to
Speaker 1: get their head chopped off? Robespierre the most famous, but
Speaker 1: one of many. And what was the end result of
Speaker 1: the French Revolution. Well, as we know it turned into
Speaker 1: an autocracy, and then it led to fifteen years of
Speaker 1: war and countless people killed, maimed, lives ruined. They had
Speaker 1: to institute price controls because of the lack of basic
Speaker 1: goods that people could actually get, you know, no milk,
Speaker 1: no bread, all that gone. The war in the Vomdee
Speaker 1: a war to suppress people who tried to maintain their
Speaker 1: Catholic faith, who believe that they should still have a
Speaker 1: relationship with God, not you know, liberte egalite, fraternite. They
Speaker 1: actually wanted something more than that. And then it led
Speaker 1: to the tyrant Napoleon, the autocrat in charge, and that
Speaker 1: eventually the restoration of the monarchy. Right, So it was
Speaker 1: a failure. Our experiment here America, natural law God this worked.
Speaker 1: The revolution in France that they pretended was modeled on
Speaker 1: ours went off the rails. Why because radical equality and
Speaker 1: not the individual rights of human beings and contracts and
Speaker 1: private properties still being held sacred by the state. They
Speaker 1: took a different direction. Now we could have a whole
Speaker 1: I could do a whole shows for you on the
Speaker 1: French Revolution. We could talk more about that. But if
Speaker 1: you see now I probably have just committed to that.
Speaker 1: I still owe you a multipodcast, which people have started
Speaker 1: to remind me of this week, and I have not forgotten.
Speaker 1: I think it'll be there for fourth of July weekend.
Speaker 1: All right, that's my new plan. But here's here's what
Speaker 1: I want us to remember as we're having this convert
Speaker 1: because we're going to get dragged through this. They're not
Speaker 1: really trying to make things better. They pretend that they're
Speaker 1: going to make things better, but nobody, no serious person
Speaker 1: believes that all of us bending the knee and pretending,
Speaker 1: for example, that a noose that's not a noose, but
Speaker 1: that some people could think as a noose that wasn't
Speaker 1: directed at an African America African American, but was used
Speaker 1: to pull down a garage door. Wall Street Journal is
Speaker 1: still writing think pieces on this. Well, it is really
Speaker 1: a noose, and it wasn't put there for him, but
Speaker 1: you know, it's still a noose that existed, and we
Speaker 1: have to eradicate these ropes from society that are used
Speaker 1: to pull down garage doors. It's crazy. It's crazy. We
Speaker 1: are being dragged through a mass hysteria because the country
Speaker 1: has been so psychologically damaged by these lockdowns, and people
Speaker 1: are exploiting it. That's what's really happening. And there's a
Speaker 1: lot of rage and anger against Trump, which is also
Speaker 1: being just mixed into this stew of anger and division
Speaker 1: and despair and outrage and demands for power. Right, all
Speaker 1: of this is coming together at this point. But I
Speaker 1: want to say, we're not even having We're not even
Speaker 1: focusing on the right things as a country here on
Speaker 1: this show. I think we certainly are, But as a country,
Speaker 1: the conversation is increasingly one that we can see as
Speaker 1: a massive power our grab and also a catharsis for
Speaker 1: an insanity that has been bubbling up on the left
Speaker 1: for a long time. Right, this is they're expelling. They're
Speaker 1: purging all this rage against Trump that he could be
Speaker 1: president for three years and everything goes so well, Now, oh,
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen hits. Let's just tear the country. This is
Speaker 1: their opening to tear the country, tear the country down,
Speaker 1: and blame Trump for it, and then have the rise
Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party going forward. And there will be
Speaker 1: no lessons learned from all of their whether it's the
Speaker 1: soft coup or the Trump is a fascist and all
Speaker 1: the things that they've said. In fact, they'll view that
Speaker 1: as a worthwhile part of the resistance. To get us
Speaker 1: to this point where they could make everybody miserable and
Speaker 1: vote Trump out of office. That's really the plan. It's
Speaker 1: not about making this a better, safer, happier country, because
Speaker 1: none of the things that are being discussed are. They're
Speaker 1: not intelligent, they're not workable. I mean, at the national level,
Speaker 1: we're all being forced to play along with a fantasy, right,
Speaker 1: the fantasy that this is a deeply racist country, that
Speaker 1: our cops are evil racists, that the only reason for
Speaker 1: any of the disparity and crime rates and different communities
Speaker 1: across the country is the evil system and the cops
Speaker 1: who are the stormtroopers of it. You know, that's the
Speaker 1: that's the lie that we're all being told. Okay, we
Speaker 1: all have to play along with this, we all have
Speaker 1: to do this. I say, no. I say, at least
Speaker 1: this place, the Freedom Hunt gets to be an island
Speaker 1: of sanity, amist all that noise, and I think we'll
Speaker 1: continue to be just that. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You said, burn
Speaker 1: it down, it's time. So that makes me think that
Speaker 1: you want I said, if this country, if this country
Speaker 1: doesn't give us what we want, Dane, we will burn
Speaker 1: down this system and replace it, all right. And I
Speaker 1: could be speaking figuratively, I could be speaking literally. As
Speaker 1: a matter of interpretation. That's what we would call a
Speaker 1: veiled threat or maybe just a threat. I was on
Speaker 1: Fox News last night on Martha McCallum show, a leader
Speaker 1: a self describe. I haven't heard anyone challenge this. A
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter leader BLM who is telling us that
Speaker 1: this is not a negotiation. And I want everyone be
Speaker 1: very clear on this. The true radicals in this movement,
Speaker 1: I mean the true believers, because it is a radical
Speaker 1: movement to start with. But the true believers, they're they're
Speaker 1: making demands. This is not I keep returning to this.
Speaker 1: This is not a dialogue. They're not asking for your input.
Speaker 1: They pretend that this is all about the data on
Speaker 1: the science and will the numbers say no, that's all please.
Speaker 1: These marches in the streets are all meant to show
Speaker 1: people not just the numbers that they can get in
Speaker 1: support of this movement, but that if you don't do
Speaker 1: what they say, then some percentage of these marches are
Speaker 1: going to trash your neighborhood and maybe they'll even show
Speaker 1: up outside your house. This is a threat. This is
Speaker 1: a threat against the system explicitly by a group that
Speaker 1: is just the vanguard of the Democrat Party lunatics. That's
Speaker 1: what's happening here. I mean, the Democrat Party no longer,
Speaker 1: I think, is even making an effort to have any
Speaker 1: bipartisan solution. I mean, they don't even pretend that sometimes
Speaker 1: I'll go through this, Oh we'll talk to the other
Speaker 1: side now on these issues. They want to let the
Speaker 1: radicals go out there and lay the groundwork for a
Speaker 1: Democrat system takeover. If the Black Lives Matter movement was
Speaker 1: not was not an extension of the actual Democrat Party apparatus,
Speaker 1: Why are there never any words of criticism about the
Speaker 1: truth of American cities that have been in Democrat hands
Speaker 1: for decades that aren't able to have the progress that
Speaker 1: we're supposed to have right, that aren't able to fix
Speaker 1: these problems. Why is it that you can have a
Speaker 1: Democrat chief of police in a minority majority police force,
Speaker 1: and a Democrat chief of police and a Democrat mayor
Speaker 1: in a place like Atlanta, for example, and the Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter movement is never criticizing the Democrat politicians in charge,
Speaker 1: of course not they're making these demands, but it's all
Speaker 1: meant to be taken as Trump is the problem. Republicans
Speaker 1: are at fault. White supremacy is what's really being attacked here.
Speaker 1: How are you going to let me ask this if
Speaker 1: this isn't just about agitation, Marxist agitation creating divisions in society,
Speaker 1: exploiting them, making people fearful to share thoughts, never mind
Speaker 1: to take actions that are not part of what the
Speaker 1: new system he described it. They're going to replace it
Speaker 1: with a new system. Right, we've seen what that looks
Speaker 1: like in other countries. Let's go read. Go read a
Speaker 1: little bit about what it was like under the Soviet's
Speaker 1: not fun or gorgeous. Read about Venezuela. It's not fun,
Speaker 1: not a good place. They understand that. Right now, there's
Speaker 1: so much fear that even those who recognize this for
Speaker 1: the destructive force that it is, they won't speak out.
Speaker 1: And you know why in a country we're being told
Speaker 1: we're racist all the time. Socially, the most terrifying thing
Speaker 1: that you could really be called, that you could be
Speaker 1: considered is a racist. There were you could argue maybe
Speaker 1: maybe being an abuser of children is worse. That's it racist,
Speaker 1: an epithet that will ruin your life. But we're told
Speaker 1: that there's so much white supremacy holl across society. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the bus sess and show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. In other words, for something to happen,
Speaker 1: they're going to have to face the reality of plice, brutality,
Speaker 1: the rallies of the need for justice and policing, and
Speaker 1: then recognition that there are many many good people and
Speaker 1: law enforcement but not all and that we have to
Speaker 1: address those concerns. So when they admit that and have
Speaker 1: some suggestions that are worthy of consideration, but so far
Speaker 1: they were trying to get away with murder. Actually, the
Speaker 1: murder of George Floyd. What a reckless and stupid thing
Speaker 1: for Nancy Pelosi to say. I wish, I wish that
Speaker 1: I could tell you that this was the result of
Speaker 1: n she having one too many white wine splitzers out
Speaker 1: on the out on the veranda or the balcony or
Speaker 1: whatever of her mansion in the San Francisco Bay area.
Speaker 1: But no, because she actually doubled down on this one.
Speaker 1: Play clip two. When you were speaking yesterday, you said
Speaker 1: that Republicans are quote trying to get away with murder,
Speaker 1: actually the murder of George Floyd Senter. Republicans are demanding
Speaker 1: an apology for that statement. Will you apologize absolutely positively? Not.
Speaker 1: The fact is, people say, I think you, frankly an
Speaker 1: oppressive given them, aren't too much credit for a bill
Speaker 1: that does nothing. They're saying, Wall you have your bill,
Speaker 1: they had theirs. Yeah, our bill just don't think there's doesn't.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Well, start working in good faith. Is this
Speaker 1: a good starting point? I'm trying about Mitch McConnell. I'm
Speaker 1: trying about Mitch McConnell tying on Mitch McConnell. Yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: she is, of course, because Nancy Pelosi knows a lot
Speaker 1: about law enforcement and policing, and she's a serious person
Speaker 1: that intelligent people should listen to on any complicated matter
Speaker 1: of social policy or law and justice. Nope, has no
Speaker 1: idea what you're talking about. Nancy Pelosi is a nincom poop,
Speaker 1: a very powerful and rich nincom poop. We have a
Speaker 1: lot of those in America. Just take a little gander
Speaker 1: around the Twitter accounts of Hollywood celebrities, people who have
Speaker 1: won one the lottery. Oh, they're so talented. Yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of talented people running into Hollywood. But some
Speaker 1: people get very lucky. Luck is a real thing in life,
Speaker 1: better lucky than good. I think that's true. It's even
Speaker 1: true of some people in conservative media. But Pelosi saying
Speaker 1: this just shows you there's no effort to notice how
Speaker 1: she never talks about Okay, what do they want? There's
Speaker 1: no effort to reach out to the other side and
Speaker 1: have police reform in a serious fashion. Here. They should
Speaker 1: be asking your Hey, Nancy Peloe, what do you think
Speaker 1: If we had a real press corps that was trying
Speaker 1: to find stuff out, they would ask Nancy Pelosi, what
Speaker 1: do you think about using the US marshals to protect
Speaker 1: federal monuments? Push her on that issue and see what
Speaker 1: she says. Yeah, but I just id she would have
Speaker 1: no idea, no idea what to say, no idea what
Speaker 1: to do, because she just is part of this Democrat
Speaker 1: agitation machine where people who have been in power for
Speaker 1: a long time, and people who have had plenty of
Speaker 1: opportunities to address these inequalities do the Lynsky tactic of
Speaker 1: mobilized people based on rage and emotion. Pick an enemy,
Speaker 1: isolate it, freeze it, make that enemy the problem, and
Speaker 1: guess what happens. You've gotten them to destroy your competition,
Speaker 1: your opposition, and then you knew whatever you want, there's
Speaker 1: no accountability for you would point it's all Nancy Pelosi's
Speaker 1: trying to do here. This is textbook power politics from
Speaker 1: people who are ruthless and absolutely not slowed in the
Speaker 1: least by ethics or concerns about the country or what's
Speaker 1: going to happen. Those people are called Democrats. I'm happy
Speaker 1: that I'm seeing more of this now. And you know,
Speaker 1: I've been saying this year on the show for weeks.
Speaker 1: On a few of Tucker's recent monologues, he is referred
Speaker 1: to the the Black Lives Matter movement as the paramilitary
Speaker 1: arm or the activist arm or the you know, and
Speaker 1: and throwing Antifa in there too, of the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: right that that that's effectively what this is, that these
Speaker 1: are people out in the streets, they're activists, they're agitators,
Speaker 1: and they're going after and people are talking about how
Speaker 1: sometimes this is domestic terrorism, burning down buildings and saying
Speaker 1: give us what we want or else. Is domestic terrorism
Speaker 1: a definition of terrorism using violence or threats of violence
Speaker 1: to get something political? What is this movement doing? Oh,
Speaker 1: that does sound like there are some acts of domestic terrorism.
Speaker 1: And Antifa Antifa, for example, may be a group that
Speaker 1: we have to look at now and understand is a
Speaker 1: domestic terrorist group. But now, I don't think that that
Speaker 1: alone is going to be enough to solve this problem, right.
Speaker 1: I don't think that alone is going to change things.
Speaker 1: But I do think that we should at least speak
Speaker 1: honestly and openly about this. And remember, I give Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi a hard time, but it's not just Pelosi. It's
Speaker 1: not just Pelosi that is saying stuff like this, which
Speaker 1: is can we also just say reckless? Absolutely, Republicans are
Speaker 1: trying to get away with the murder of George Floyd.
Speaker 1: The guy who killed George Floyd is facing life in prison.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna ask this question, though, I'm just asking a question,
Speaker 1: and I really mean this. I am just asking a question.
Speaker 1: Why haven't we seen the bodycam footage of the arrest
Speaker 1: of George Floyd. It might be nothing, and I believe
Speaker 1: that it might not really tell us very much at all.
Speaker 1: But I do think we should see it, don't you.
Speaker 1: Isn't the purpose of the bodycam footage so that there's
Speaker 1: full transparency. Why haven't we seen that yet? Oh? People,
Speaker 1: people are I will tell you right now, people are
Speaker 1: scared to even ask that question. It's not possible to
Speaker 1: believe in due process and not also believe in transparency.
Speaker 1: Due process for the officer, due process for the family
Speaker 1: of the man who was killed here, George Floyd. We
Speaker 1: should all know everything that happened. That's the way that
Speaker 1: a society, that's the way that a people, the American people,
Speaker 1: can look at issues and come to solutions. If things
Speaker 1: are hidden from us, how can we know? But nobody
Speaker 1: will even ask this right now. Everyone's everyone is avoiding,
Speaker 1: avoiding very sensitive areas of discussion at a time, and
Speaker 1: we're told that the whole point is to get discussion going.
Speaker 1: That's obviously not true. But the recklessness of the Democrats
Speaker 1: is on display constantly trying to make sure that we
Speaker 1: all know. You step out a line, well, we'll accuse
Speaker 1: you of being complicit in the murder of a man
Speaker 1: whose murder has been used by the activist left Democrat
Speaker 1: Party as a justification for destruction and violence and hatred.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening, you know, people that are out there protesting.
Speaker 1: First of all, you see the way that some of
Speaker 1: these young white women that have been on videos taken
Speaker 1: by my friend Henry Rogers the Daily Caller, are screaming
Speaker 1: at cops and just saying that they're part of you know,
Speaker 1: white supremacists, and they'll scream this at black cops in DC,
Speaker 1: part of a white supremacist system, and that they're how
Speaker 1: do they sleep at night? And all this stuff. Do
Speaker 1: they really not understand what happens in society if we
Speaker 1: don't have cops. Unfortunately, I think the answers they don't.
Speaker 1: These people are unhinged. They're deranged. No serious person who
Speaker 1: considers themselves to have good judgment, any knowledge of history,
Speaker 1: and really any intellectual ability thinks that a society without
Speaker 1: law enforcement officers is going to function well, I mean,
Speaker 1: it's going to turn into a nightmare and there'll be
Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of misery and pain and violence because
Speaker 1: of that decision. They can't see that. No, they there
Speaker 1: they want to talk about there's an article circulating today,
Speaker 1: let's get rid of the National Anthem and the author
Speaker 1: advises that we should replace it with John Legends. Imagine. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's where we are now, replace it with John I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: did I said John Legend? I meant John Lennon. I
Speaker 1: might have said John Legend. I meant John Lennon, John
Speaker 1: Lennon's imagine And guess what that's I mean. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: say it. I'm not a huge Beatles fan. I think
Speaker 1: the Beatles have a lot of bad songs. I think
Speaker 1: the Beatles have a lot of bad songs. And imagine,
Speaker 1: which is a Lenin song? Not even really a Beatle song,
Speaker 1: is a bad song. It's it's stupid as I mean,
Speaker 1: the lyrics are dumb, and it's not fun to listen to,
Speaker 1: and it's kind of depressing. But this is where we
Speaker 1: are now, We're gonna start arguing about things like this. Yeah, imagine.
Speaker 1: Oh it's horrible. It's a horrible song. I can't even
Speaker 1: speaking of songs and music and these little cultural fights
Speaker 1: that are gonna keep playing out more people bending the knee.
Speaker 1: The Dixie Chicks no longer known as the Dixie Chicks
Speaker 1: as of today, they're just called They're just called the chicks. Okay,
Speaker 1: Racism solved. Good job, Dixie Chicks. I'm sorry, chicks, you're
Speaker 1: in the freedom Hunt. This is the bucks In Show podcast.
Speaker 1: And why did you make the Senator durban a speaker
Speaker 1: Pelosi saying Republicans are trying to quote get away with
Speaker 1: the murder of George Floyd. Well, if she has explained
Speaker 1: what that was all about, and I'll stand by her
Speaker 1: words on this, but we shouldn't let something this historic
Speaker 1: and this meaningful be diverted by one word here, one
Speaker 1: word there. You know, each of us who does this
Speaker 1: for a living counts on being a Warren Smith. It's
Speaker 1: a like moment. Sometimes we're better than others. Stands by
Speaker 1: her words, Dick Durbins. I don't think it's just Pelosi
Speaker 1: saying Republicans are complicit in the murder of George Floyd.
Speaker 1: I don't know what could be more inflammatory and idiotic
Speaker 1: than that. But that's Nancy Pelosi for you. He sometimes
Speaker 1: I like to just set the fire and see where
Speaker 1: it happens. Then you've also got the reality of what
Speaker 1: this means. Now in places where people think that Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi and the Democrats are being honest in this conversation,
Speaker 1: that they really want to make things better. They want
Speaker 1: to improve this country. They don't, but they know that
Speaker 1: right now, as I've said, make America miserable again. That
Speaker 1: is the Democrat plan. That's all they have to do,
Speaker 1: and they will win, and they'll figure it out after
Speaker 1: they win. They don't care. They got this, this empty
Speaker 1: vessel of Joe Biden. I'm carnagers, a little too old
Speaker 1: and like to yell conn of a dumbass. But you know,
Speaker 1: I've been in politics, man, I've been in politics a
Speaker 1: long time. Let's have a push up contest. That's Joe
Speaker 1: Biden for you. But places are suffering. There's actual bad
Speaker 1: stuff happening because of the insanity of this movement right now,
Speaker 1: which then brings me to well, Senator Kennedy. I thought
Speaker 1: that Louisiana had a good had a good line on
Speaker 1: this one. And also he's just you know, I love
Speaker 1: a good Southern accent. But Kennedy, his is great. Play
Speaker 1: Clip nine. We had people on Capitol Hell, I'm sad
Speaker 1: to say, I to thank cops are guilty until proven innacence.
Speaker 1: And I'm gonna say what I said the other day,
Speaker 1: if you hate cops just because you're they're cops. Next
Speaker 1: time you get in trouble, call them a crackhead. I
Speaker 1: don't think. I don't think. Well, I only put it
Speaker 1: in another way. I think we got more honest cops
Speaker 1: and we got honest politicians. We definitely have more honest
Speaker 1: cops than we do honest politicians. So that's a good line.
Speaker 1: And yeah, I mean, if you don't like cops, what
Speaker 1: are you gonna do when bad things happen to you?
Speaker 1: What you're gonna do when they come for you? Bad boys?
Speaker 1: Bad boy? I mean, it's we can't even watch it anymore.
Speaker 1: The show is gone. I remember back. I remember I'll
Speaker 1: being like a really young kid and I sometimes get
Speaker 1: to go in and sneak into my parents room as
Speaker 1: they were watching the show or a movie, and if
Speaker 1: I was kind of quiet and we'll behave I just
Speaker 1: sort of, you know, sit on the floor or whatever,
Speaker 1: and uh, and they would watch that. My dad at
Speaker 1: least used to watch that show sometimes. And yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean the cops are the good guys. It shows you
Speaker 1: what it's liked to be a cop, and they are
Speaker 1: the good guys and gals, of course, But speaking of
Speaker 1: what happens when you don't have cops, we're getting a
Speaker 1: neighborhood in Minneapolis. And I know we're on a great
Speaker 1: station up in Minneapolis, and we've got a really loyal
Speaker 1: audience there and it's growing every month. So thank you
Speaker 1: very much for that. And my heart goes out to
Speaker 1: all of a team Buck in the Minneapolis area because man,
Speaker 1: that city is just ground zero for the crazy right now.
Speaker 1: It really is. So there's this area called powder Horn
Speaker 1: Park and the decision was made because people started showing
Speaker 1: up here, vagrants and such. People's decided in this area
Speaker 1: that they weren't going to call the cops. They wanted
Speaker 1: to be welcoming. They wanted to be welcoming. And now
Speaker 1: guess what ends up happening. Well, when you take an area,
Speaker 1: we take a park where you're creating and I'm not
Speaker 1: a cop free zone. It's not quite as bad as Seattle,
Speaker 1: but where no one's gonna call the cops and what's
Speaker 1: going on. The police can't be everywhere, so they probably
Speaker 1: don't want to get involved in this situation at all.
Speaker 1: What you have is now an area where there's a
Speaker 1: lot of bad stuff happening. Oh my gosh, you mean
Speaker 1: that when you refuse to call police because you think
Speaker 1: calling cops is racist. Bringing in the cops is a racist.
Speaker 1: When you refuse to do that, bad things are going
Speaker 1: to happen. Yeah, this was the daily mail piece. Minneapolis
Speaker 1: neighborhood that vowed not to call cops after George Floyd's
Speaker 1: death is now struggling with a three hundred person homeless
Speaker 1: camp plagued by drug dealers in their local park. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So here they've they've set up this. It's effectively like
Speaker 1: an occupy encampment. And this was those who lived near
Speaker 1: by to where Floyd was killed the hands of cops
Speaker 1: on twenty fifth of man welcome dozens of tents to
Speaker 1: powder Horn Park while the displaced people look for permanent
Speaker 1: accommodation and urging officials not to a victim for now.
Speaker 1: But in the past two weeks they've been using the
Speaker 1: open space. Some people house have complained about a heavy
Speaker 1: flow of traffic at night keeping them up and drug dealers,
Speaker 1: and two people have already overdosed and been carted away
Speaker 1: by the of EMS services. Yep, that's right. People think
Speaker 1: that they're it's fine, you know, we're not going to
Speaker 1: call the cops. A lot of drug dealing going on.
Speaker 1: Bad things are going to happen here, but don't call it.
Speaker 1: To call the cops on those displaced into this park
Speaker 1: would be racist. Okay, this reminds me a little bit
Speaker 1: of from my childhood. I lived on the East Side
Speaker 1: in Manhattan at a time when all of Manhattan was
Speaker 1: pretty sketchy at night, and there was an encampment that
Speaker 1: was set up and it was under a temple, a
Speaker 1: Jewish temple, because it had an overhang over the street,
Speaker 1: so it wasn't side the temple, but there was an
Speaker 1: area that was sheltered and this became an open air
Speaker 1: homeless and vagrant shelter, although it wasn't supposed to be,
Speaker 1: and you would have fifty to one hundred people who
Speaker 1: would show up, and there was a city councilman here
Speaker 1: in New York. This was I remember this very well
Speaker 1: for when I was a kid city councilman in New York,
Speaker 1: and they would show up and give out little cooking stoves,
Speaker 1: and they would give out, you know, mattresses and cardboard boxes,
Speaker 1: and they would set up this incamment. And this was
Speaker 1: right around the corner, I mean fifty feet from the
Speaker 1: entrance of the building that I lived in with my
Speaker 1: whole family, and I was a little kid then. I
Speaker 1: remember at night hearing the you know, the yells from
Speaker 1: in there and everything else. And this was in what
Speaker 1: would be considered a well off neighborhood of New York.
Speaker 1: But the city council didn't want to move them. Didn't
Speaker 1: want to move that would be that would be I
Speaker 1: don't know, racist or not enough social justice if you
Speaker 1: move them. And they had to and the city council
Speaker 1: that and the NYPD this is under the Dinkins administration,
Speaker 1: they wouldn't deal with it. That Jewish temple had to
Speaker 1: raise I think it was a million dollars to build
Speaker 1: a steel gate to put up because the city would
Speaker 1: not clear out this open air homeless shelter that I
Speaker 1: remember being a little ten year old kid, you know,
Speaker 1: holding my mom's hand going to church and thinking this
Speaker 1: doesn't feel safe because it wasn't. But that's liberal Democrat
Speaker 1: policy for you, folks, that's what it gets you. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. It is exactly as I predicted and
Speaker 1: others as well. I don't like to me the gods, Oh,
Speaker 1: I see you, everything coming, you know, and it's smashed. No,
Speaker 1: I actually like to give credit where it's due. And
Speaker 1: many of my fellow conservatives out there were pression on this,
Speaker 1: saw this one. But I've been hitting it hard because
Speaker 1: I know here in New York City this is I
Speaker 1: knew it was going to happen, and I know that
Speaker 1: this media can justify think of it this way, if
Speaker 1: they can justify being a part of the soft coup
Speaker 1: attempt against the President, weaponizing dj and FBI and the
Speaker 1: rest of the intelligence community with this Russia collusion fairy tale,
Speaker 1: not a very good fairy tale, but a total farce
Speaker 1: and a lie. If they'll go along with that, what
Speaker 1: won't they go along with? Right? Where will they draw
Speaker 1: the line? The answer is whatever is useful for them,
Speaker 1: That's what they'll do. Whatever lie helps, whatever narrative pushes
Speaker 1: forward their interests, that becomes all that matters. That is
Speaker 1: the only organizing principle, that's the only thing that matters
Speaker 1: to them. And that's why it was so clear, so
Speaker 1: abundantly clear, that they would the moment the moment, it
Speaker 1: was advantageous for the Democrats pretend that we haven't been
Speaker 1: through weeks of protests where there is likely spread of
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen, and all of a sudden, we're hearing about
Speaker 1: how oh the reopening and the Trump rallies and the
Speaker 1: reopening and the Trump rallies, and I want to dig
Speaker 1: into this right now. Now. There are some aspects of
Speaker 1: this that are not clear. One aspect that is I
Speaker 1: meaning that when we look at the numbers, and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you I don't have all the answers. If
Speaker 1: I did, I should be the Space Lord, God, Superstar, Ninja,
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut, Commander in Chief or something. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: not perfect. I'm not all knowing, and we already all
Speaker 1: know that for sure. Where As producer Mark to chime in, oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, he's off this week. That's gonna say this
Speaker 1: is Usually he'd be like, yeah, that's right, not perfect Buck,
Speaker 1: but we miss him. I know we miss him. But
Speaker 1: here's what I will say. There are the morons out there,
Speaker 1: the people that are just going to pretend well, again,
Speaker 1: there's no acountability mechanism because their audience just wants to
Speaker 1: hear the stuff that they're saying, and normal people who
Speaker 1: are intelligent don't watch normal people who are honest and
Speaker 1: want real analysis from people who are highly literate, intelligent,
Speaker 1: honest and worthwhile. They don't watch Morning Joe. Right, so
Speaker 1: you know, you get what you pay for, so to speak,
Speaker 1: by spending your time watching Morning Joe. But you know,
Speaker 1: here's what he'll say, exactly as we knew he would,
Speaker 1: and others play clip four in any area that kills
Speaker 1: that will kill senior citizens, Arizona's senior citizens. Their lives
Speaker 1: just got a lot more complicated after the super spread
Speaker 1: Er event that Donald Trump pushed in Arizona so he
Speaker 1: could do what so he can spread conspiracy theories about
Speaker 1: American democracy, and so he could say racist ramblings met
Speaker 1: to inspire his thirty five percent when it was helpful
Speaker 1: for his ratings and his media profile. Joe Scarborough couldn't
Speaker 1: couldn't kiss up to Trump enough. Let's remember that, and
Speaker 1: then they had a falling out for whatever reason, and
Speaker 1: now he is a Trump deranged lunatic. But let's remember
Speaker 1: Joe Scarborough had no things to say like this about
Speaker 1: the super Spreader events that were the looting and the
Speaker 1: rioters and the protesters. There were actually precautions that were
Speaker 1: taken at the Tulsa rally, and they're doing temperature checks
Speaker 1: and they passed out masks, they did things like that.
Speaker 1: But we're gonna pretend that the looters are like, whoa, WHOA,
Speaker 1: hold on, before you run off with that bag from
Speaker 1: Dulce and Gabbana or Gucci or Coach or whatever, has
Speaker 1: someone taken a temperature check because you're closer than six
Speaker 1: feet to me? Of course not, of course not. So
Speaker 1: here's what's really happening. I have some of the numbers.
Speaker 1: I've been looking at them trying to get a sense
Speaker 1: of what we're really facing. And I think it's very,
Speaker 1: very important that we all know that the media is
Speaker 1: gonna lie about this from now until election day. You
Speaker 1: will not have an honest This is a life and
Speaker 1: death issue. It is COVID nineteen is a life and
Speaker 1: death issue, and the media will not be honest about this.
Speaker 1: It is more important to them that their power, their narrative,
Speaker 1: and their political party are advantage through all of this
Speaker 1: than anything else. That's what has been proven to us
Speaker 1: by the silence about COVID nineteen during the BLM protests
Speaker 1: and riots and now the sudden oh my gosh, look
Speaker 1: at this look what's going on. So let's take a moment,
Speaker 1: shall we. There are more cases now, There are more
Speaker 1: cases than at any point since April. Forty five thousand,
Speaker 1: five hundred cases in a days. That's the number that's
Speaker 1: getting everyone's attention now. A portion of there's what we know,
Speaker 1: there's what they're lying about, and there's what we don't know.
Speaker 1: We need to break these down. This is how to
Speaker 1: have a serious that's because it does really matter. There's
Speaker 1: forty five thousand, five hundred cases in a day. That's
Speaker 1: the new record. And California, Texas, and Florida are the
Speaker 1: states where we've seen the numbers spike the most in
Speaker 1: terms of cases. Cases alone is not a particularly useful
Speaker 1: metric because we are also testing a lot more and
Speaker 1: on a per capita basis, have tested a lot more
Speaker 1: than Europe. Now, Europe has not had a resurgence. So
Speaker 1: and I'm gonna be jumping around between what we know,
Speaker 1: what we don't know, and what they're lying about. Europe
Speaker 1: has not had a resurgence the way that we've seen
Speaker 1: in some of these places, or a spike. You could
Speaker 1: say that we've seen it's a spike really in this
Speaker 1: case because we haven't had cases like this before in Arizona,
Speaker 1: in Florida and in Texas. Show this is not an
Speaker 1: area where we really know quite yet. We don't have
Speaker 1: a full understanding of what has caused this, but cases
Speaker 1: alone don't really mean all that much. There's more testing.
Speaker 1: I also will point out that remember how I was
Speaker 1: telling you last month, in the month before that tracing
Speaker 1: this is a fantasy that at this stage of an
Speaker 1: epidemic to do tracing is preposterous. I was right, Oh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna find there's forty five thousand cases in a day.
Speaker 1: One day, forty five thousand people, okay, are test positive
Speaker 1: for COVID nineteen, and we're going to trace everyone they've
Speaker 1: been in contact with for the last two weeks. This
Speaker 1: is it's so, But that goes to remember the experts.
Speaker 1: We're telling you we're gonna do trace. We're gonna do trace. Oh,
Speaker 1: it works very well, And I was saying, this is insane.
Speaker 1: I'm going to trace this if the virus had effectively
Speaker 1: entirely disappeared, right, and then you set up trace programs
Speaker 1: for a resurgence of the virus to try to get
Speaker 1: ahead of it in some places, maybe then there could
Speaker 1: be some usefulness to it, but to pretend, I mean,
Speaker 1: we have been slowed in New York in the reopening,
Speaker 1: for example, because we don't have enough tracers. What they're
Speaker 1: never gonna be able to trace. It's already there's community
Speaker 1: spreadle of the country. There's people moving around now in
Speaker 1: New York and Connecticut and New Jersey. There's voluntary quarantines
Speaker 1: that are going in place. Instead of looking at what
Speaker 1: we've learned though, I remember the quarantine's not really voluntary,
Speaker 1: but it's on the honor system, so it's voluntary. How
Speaker 1: are they how are they gonna they're gonna stop people
Speaker 1: with out of state license plates? Now, this is this
Speaker 1: is crazy. But what you're hearing is a lot of
Speaker 1: despair around the issue that then very quickly transitions into
Speaker 1: its Republicans fault. Right here you have a perfect example
Speaker 1: of this governor, Governor Cuomo who presided, but the worst
Speaker 1: response to COVID nineteen of any person in the country.
Speaker 1: What do I mean by person person? Play Governor Cuomo
Speaker 1: talking about others using this for political reasons as he
Speaker 1: does exactly that play clip three. I say to them all,
Speaker 1: look at the numbers you played politics with this virus
Speaker 1: and you lost. You told the people of your state,
Speaker 1: and you told the people of this country, White House,
Speaker 1: don't worry about it. Just open up, go about your business.
Speaker 1: This is all democratic hyperbole. Oh really, Now you see
Speaker 1: twenty seven states with the numbers going up, You see
Speaker 1: the death projections going up, you see the economy going down.
Speaker 1: It wasn't never politics, it was always science. And they
Speaker 1: were in denial. And denial is not a life strategy.
Speaker 1: You see now they're saying, oh, don't worry that, it's
Speaker 1: not really that the virus is going up, just the
Speaker 1: testing numbers are going up. Don't even know what that
Speaker 1: means mathematically. And forget that your hospital beds are filling up.
Speaker 1: You know what that means. When your hospital beds fill up,
Speaker 1: it means more people are getting sick. That's what's happening.
Speaker 1: And it's now undeniable. This country paid a terrible price. Yeah,
Speaker 1: paid a terrible price, certainly in New York where we
Speaker 1: had over five thousand seniors die in nursing homes that
Speaker 1: were filled with people who are COVID positive because Cuomo
Speaker 1: said that's where they have to go. The dumbest, most reckless,
Speaker 1: most lethal decision that could be made. Remember, this virus
Speaker 1: is still really only a danger to people who are
Speaker 1: over sixty, and it's mostly over seventy. I believe the
Speaker 1: median age of fatalities in this country from COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: is over eighty the median age, not the average ation.
Speaker 1: But this is a disease that is very dangerous to
Speaker 1: one segment of our society, and it is to our seniors.
Speaker 1: I don't know for a lot of us. That's either
Speaker 1: those who are listening to this, moms and dads, grandmas
Speaker 1: and grandpas. So of course we need to take precautions
Speaker 1: to protect seniors, but we also have to remember what
Speaker 1: has been learned the hard way through this. We had
Speaker 1: a total lockdown in New York City, and you know
Speaker 1: what happened. There were still a lot of cases, a
Speaker 1: lot of people. We were locked down for weeks and
Speaker 1: weeks and weeks and a lot of cases. And if
Speaker 1: you look at places in Europe where they had lockdowns
Speaker 1: that were severe versus lockdowns that were not that severe,
Speaker 1: there's they can't prove a correlation between the severity of
Speaker 1: lockdown and saving lives. They actually can't prove this in
Speaker 1: Europe they're like, oh wait, there's a lot about this
Speaker 1: disease that we don't even understand yet, a lot about
Speaker 1: the spread that we don't understand. And anybody who's going
Speaker 1: to challenge me on this or say, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: you don't know. All I do is read about this
Speaker 1: all the time. And we know that they said no masks,
Speaker 1: and then maybe masks, and now definitely masks, and okay,
Speaker 1: well you can get it in your eyes if it's arsoli.
Speaker 1: So we're get too mask and goggles. At what point
Speaker 1: does this become so absurd that no one's going to
Speaker 1: comply anymore. Also, aerosolis virus droplets. We think we're told
Speaker 1: that masks are really useful against this. CDC has a
Speaker 1: study on influenza virus and mask wearing and you know,
Speaker 1: how much does it How much did it help? The
Speaker 1: CDC study said that doesn't really seem like it helps
Speaker 1: very much at all. But you gotta wear the mask.
Speaker 1: Cuomo said, wear a mask. It's about to start. And
Speaker 1: Cuomo has had the worst response. That's the most cases,
Speaker 1: the most death, the dumbest decisions, And now he's lecturing
Speaker 1: other places. I think Florida has had about three or
Speaker 1: four thousand deaths total. New York is at thirty thousand.
Speaker 1: Florida has a lot of seniors, dense population. No, Cuomo
Speaker 1: is a no position to lecture anybody about this. Well,
Speaker 1: how does he not understand that more testing means more cases. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you're catching about ten percent of actual cases that
Speaker 1: are happening in a community, and then you do more
Speaker 1: and more testing and you're catching twenty percent of cases,
Speaker 1: your number of cases will go up. But it's not
Speaker 1: that more people are infected. This is not hard to understand.
Speaker 1: And he brings up hospitalizations concerning that's a real See,
Speaker 1: this is where I get intoy. We don't know. I
Speaker 1: don't pretend to know everything. We don't know. There is
Speaker 1: a dynamic where people are going to the hospital and
Speaker 1: they had not been going before and they are tested
Speaker 1: for COVID when they're there and they're positive. They did
Speaker 1: not know, so that's occurred and they're considered a COVID hospital.
Speaker 1: Admit the real number that the real thing that we
Speaker 1: have to figure out here is how many people are
Speaker 1: in the ICU because of COVID nineteen now, and yes,
Speaker 1: how many people are dying from COVID nineteen not dying
Speaker 1: and have COVID nineteen, which is another You know that
Speaker 1: the numbers here are very You'll have to parse them.
Speaker 1: You have to get very specific. Otherwise you just go
Speaker 1: into this cycle of panic as, oh, well, are we
Speaker 1: actually seeing more cases? Are we actually in a phase
Speaker 1: two of the or a two point zero of the
Speaker 1: virus spreaders? It's just the continuation of the original spread.
Speaker 1: We have to ask these questions. But I'm gonna I'm
Speaker 1: gonna try to remind everybody here if something that's really
Speaker 1: important because this it's all over. If we go into
Speaker 1: the election and they're still, oh my gosh, we're in
Speaker 1: lockdowns and panic, Trump loses, Trump loses, Democrats know that
Speaker 1: everybody should know that it's done. It's not gonna win.
Speaker 1: So you gotta remember that as they're telling us all
Speaker 1: this information. But there's something else. They lied to us
Speaker 1: about the purpose of the lockdowns. Let me repeat, they
Speaker 1: lied to us about the purpose of the lockdowns government.
Speaker 1: Why let's talk more about it. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I've been getting
Speaker 1: up at four thirty in the morning every day for
Speaker 1: five months. I go to bed eleven thirty every night.
Speaker 1: All I do is read and immerse myself in this virus.
Speaker 1: I talk to people all over the world trying to
Speaker 1: figure out what's going on. And I cannot believe that
Speaker 1: we are in the predicament that we are in right now,
Speaker 1: with all that we have known, with all the bells
Speaker 1: that have been sounded, the alarms that have been made
Speaker 1: across the world, I cannot believe we're in the position
Speaker 1: that we're in right now. We're the greatest country on earth.
Speaker 1: We should have been able to figure this out early.
Speaker 1: We should have been able to test And now we're
Speaker 1: still having arguments about whether or not we should put
Speaker 1: these these band aids on the problems, such as masks
Speaker 1: effective band aids, but still band aids on this problem
Speaker 1: and we're still not even sure that we want to
Speaker 1: do that. We got a patient bleeding out in front
Speaker 1: of us. We know what to do, and we are
Speaker 1: not doing it. And it is Yeah, it's frustrating for sure,
Speaker 1: Doctor Sandre Gupto over at CNN. We know what to do, Like,
Speaker 1: what what are we supposed to do? I just oh,
Speaker 1: lockdown again? Is that the plan? Lockdown again? There was
Speaker 1: a period in New York where I'm telling you it
Speaker 1: was a total ghost town here, okay, and everybody, and
Speaker 1: I mean everybody was wearing masks, and guess what, the
Speaker 1: virus was still spreading in the community. So if the
Speaker 1: virus is still going to spread even when people are
Speaker 1: in absolute panic as we were here and we have
Speaker 1: the worst COVID outbreak of anywhere in the country, if
Speaker 1: the virus is in that is that easy to spread,
Speaker 1: then what is the answer? What are they really are
Speaker 1: we really just supposed to stay locked in our homes forever?
Speaker 1: Is that? Is that what we're going to do? Because
Speaker 1: I'm also going to point out that the virus may
Speaker 1: very well have mutations that don't make it that much
Speaker 1: less lethal, but do make it hard for a vaccine
Speaker 1: to give permanent immunity. We don't have great treatments for
Speaker 1: it yet. We have some treatments that are a little
Speaker 1: bit you know, there's decks of meta zone for example.
Speaker 1: We have some treatments that are working for it a
Speaker 1: little bit, but just a little bit. I mean, that's
Speaker 1: that's only you're in the hospital and you're really close
Speaker 1: to death's door. I mean, they're not using these as
Speaker 1: a proper lactic They're not using these as a means
Speaker 1: of stopping people from getting this. But why did I
Speaker 1: say that we were lied to about this to get
Speaker 1: us to comply with the initial lockdown. What was the argument?
Speaker 1: It wasn't that we're going to stop the virus from spreading.
Speaker 1: That was not what we were told, and I have
Speaker 1: not forgotten. We were told it was to keep hospitals
Speaker 1: from being overwhelmed. We went through periods of weeks, months
Speaker 1: of unrestrained spread throughout the entire United States. We had
Speaker 1: places like New York City hit incredibly hard with it
Speaker 1: was a single high hospital system overwhelmed. Was a single
Speaker 1: hospital unable to treat a patient? No, So do we
Speaker 1: think that we're now going Is that going to happen now?
Speaker 1: Is that we're being told, Oh, now it's going to
Speaker 1: be because there's been some restriction. I don't have all
Speaker 1: the answers, but I also have questions. I don't have
Speaker 1: answers too. Why is it that we've been in We've
Speaker 1: been had states where there was reopening, more contact with
Speaker 1: people reopening. Georgia was one of them. Texas Florida open
Speaker 1: for weeks and weeks and weeks, and they didn't see
Speaker 1: the hospitals getting fuller and fuller and more and more
Speaker 1: people dying. Doctor Gupta is pretending like we all know
Speaker 1: the answer. No, we don't have the answers. We don't know.
Speaker 1: But here's one answer I have for you. No second lockdowns.
Speaker 1: We pushed through. We fight on. This is America. I'm
Speaker 1: not living in some totalitarian idiocracy where the protests are
Speaker 1: fine but the rest of life isn't. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Look, we haven't had a lot of good
Speaker 1: news to celebrate from the courts recently. That's putting it mildly.
Speaker 1: It has been a really rough patch for our constitutionalism
Speaker 1: and for people who think that the law is something
Speaker 1: that is written, that is intelligible, that is understandable by
Speaker 1: all people, based on what the words are, not based
Speaker 1: on what some people would like the words to have been,
Speaker 1: not the same thing. And so with that, I take
Speaker 1: you to the Supreme Court in a seven two decision.
Speaker 1: Now here's the thing. This is a victory, but it
Speaker 1: also goes to show you just how extreme the Democrat
Speaker 1: position and particularly the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which
Speaker 1: is just a bunch of left wing activist lunatics who
Speaker 1: are an appeals you know, or an appeals court, federal court.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a powerful body in the United
Speaker 1: States law and they're just unhinged, so unhinged that even
Speaker 1: some of the Libs on the Quarter or had to
Speaker 1: be like, Okay, you can't, you can't do this. You know,
Speaker 1: this is even beyond where we'll get there eventually. Don't worry,
Speaker 1: we're progresses, we're libs, But right now it's just too
Speaker 1: much to push for this. So the way that this
Speaker 1: is being framed, the way the media is reporting on this,
Speaker 1: is that a seven two ruling, this is NBC News,
Speaker 1: allows people to be deported without judicial review of their cases.
Speaker 1: Oh oh oh no, this seems so harsh. This seems
Speaker 1: like such a policy that's slapping the statue of liberty
Speaker 1: in the face. How could we have this? How could
Speaker 1: we do this? Well, it turns out when you look
Speaker 1: at the case, it's very clear why this is the
Speaker 1: ruling that has come down from the Supreme Court just
Speaker 1: earlier today. And remember seven too, so it's not a
Speaker 1: five four decision. This is a This is very clear
Speaker 1: it's just the extreme superlibs. I mean, Soda Mayor is
Speaker 1: effectively an activist of the left who was now sitting
Speaker 1: on the Supreme Court. You know, she is someone who
Speaker 1: anything that you would expect any of these HR directors
Speaker 1: that are constantly handing you pamphlets on diversity and inclusion.
Speaker 1: And you know, how dare you question anything I say.
Speaker 1: She's in line ideologically with that left wing activist Democrat movement.
Speaker 1: But here's the background of the case. You understand this.
Speaker 1: A guy named Vijaya Kumar Thorigi of Sri Lanka was
Speaker 1: detained by federal agents within twenty five miles of the
Speaker 1: US Mexico border, and he claimed because he was obviously
Speaker 1: told this by a lot of people before he got
Speaker 1: to the border, because the cartels number the cartels make
Speaker 1: a lot of money off the human smuggling operation. You know,
Speaker 1: you're you're not going to get close to the border
Speaker 1: unless the cartel and make a run for unless the
Speaker 1: cartel is getting paid off. They make big money from this.
Speaker 1: So it's a criminal enterprise. It's a criminal act ennit
Speaker 1: of the US illegally, and it's a criminal enterprise too
Speaker 1: that that benefits from it. Makes money off of the
Speaker 1: human smuggling aspect. So he claimed asylum because he said
Speaker 1: a group of men kidnapped and beat him in his
Speaker 1: home country and he faced harm because of that. And
Speaker 1: he says he thinks it's because he's a Tamil minority. Right,
Speaker 1: you have the Tamil and the Sinhalese in Sri Lanka
Speaker 1: and the Sinhalese of the majority, there's a Tamil minority.
Speaker 1: You've probably heard of the Tamil Tiger is a terrorist organization.
Speaker 1: So yeah, this is this is a guy claiming, well,
Speaker 1: I was beat up because I'm a Tamil, so now
Speaker 1: give me asylum. And they said, well, hold on, how
Speaker 1: do you know you're beat up because you were a Tamil. Oh,
Speaker 1: he doesn't know what's really his story as it's not
Speaker 1: really clear, so he just came up with this. Look,
Speaker 1: he couldn't claim he's not a Syrian refugee, right, so
Speaker 1: he has to try to tailor the story to where
Speaker 1: he's from. He couldn't claim MS thirteen back in Al Salvador,
Speaker 1: for example, was threatening him, so he came up with
Speaker 1: something else. Well, he managed to get in front of
Speaker 1: immigration officials and the immigration officials said that no, your story, sorry,
Speaker 1: you don't qualify for asylum, and they quickly deported him.
Speaker 1: This was uphell, this was fine. And then he tried
Speaker 1: to challenge and say, no, he should have the due
Speaker 1: process right as somebody captured illegally entering. As he's entering
Speaker 1: the United States, he should have due process rights to
Speaker 1: challenge in federal court. His to tension, I'm sorry, his
Speaker 1: expulsion and rather his removal from the United States. Now,
Speaker 1: just think about what that would mean. Any single person
Speaker 1: caught entering United States illegally would have the due process
Speaker 1: right too, and they're going to have a council provided
Speaker 1: for them. They're going to be able to go before
Speaker 1: a federal judge and challenge their their deportation. Every single
Speaker 1: person who's caught would therefore have to be kept in
Speaker 1: the United States. Believe they're going to show up to
Speaker 1: federal court, have a court appointed lawyer, and then get
Speaker 1: to go and argue why they should be allowed of
Speaker 1: the United States. This is all the federal courts would
Speaker 1: be doing this. He had. The due process in this
Speaker 1: case was given by the agents who caught you and said,
Speaker 1: what's your story? Not good enough for a credible fear test.
Speaker 1: You have to go. That is your due prod. You
Speaker 1: don't have more due process than that. That is your
Speaker 1: due process. Other people that you think we'll buck hold on.
Speaker 1: What about all these other migrants that have been coming A. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they were coached and passing their credible fear standard. This
Speaker 1: guy's story essentially fell apart, and it's clear that he
Speaker 1: just wanted to come into America and the immigration agents
Speaker 1: who caught him, know, Border patrol and Immigration to the
Speaker 1: customers enforcement were like, sorry, your story is not credible.
Speaker 1: You're going And he's saying no, no, no, I get
Speaker 1: to tell it to a judge. What you had had
Speaker 1: with other people was they did have what at least
Speaker 1: sounded and it's a very low bar, sounded like a
Speaker 1: credible fear standard. Oh. MS thirteen is going to kill
Speaker 1: me if I go home? Why you oh, because my
Speaker 1: neighborhood is overwhelm with MS thirteen. But people had this
Speaker 1: story that they would tell and they would then pass
Speaker 1: the credible fear and then they get into the immigration
Speaker 1: system with the court and they wouldn't show up to court,
Speaker 1: or if they did, they kept challenging it. But this
Speaker 1: is a very straightforward, very straightforward judgment here, which is
Speaker 1: that we can have enforcement of the border and you
Speaker 1: don't get to start just getting in. You're not a
Speaker 1: US citizen. You have no rights specifically to challenge this order.
Speaker 1: You're not here legally in any context. We're not going
Speaker 1: to start filling the court system with challenges and then
Speaker 1: appeals and then more challenges of people who are caught
Speaker 1: entering the border illegally. As they're entering, think about what
Speaker 1: this would mean. It's a great All you have to
Speaker 1: do is go up, get caught, and now you get
Speaker 1: to get your day in court in the United States.
Speaker 1: Where are you going to be waiting for that day
Speaker 1: in court in the United States? You get to stay,
Speaker 1: you get to say stay. Then the Ninth Circuit said
Speaker 1: that the the then this guy found look, they brought
Speaker 1: a habeas corpus challenge here, and they also found that
Speaker 1: they that they the Ninth Circuit of Appeals Court, the
Speaker 1: crazy Court, the Ninth Circuses people call it, also found
Speaker 1: that there was a it's really a due process violation.
Speaker 1: And he said, and this was Alido writing for the majority, quote.
Speaker 1: Habeas has traditionally been a means to secure release from
Speaker 1: unlawful detention, but responding invokes the writ to achieve an
Speaker 1: entirely different end, namely to obtain additional administrative review of
Speaker 1: his asylum claim and ultimately to obtain authorization to stay
Speaker 1: in this country. Aliens who have established connections in this
Speaker 1: country have a due process right, Alido said. But he
Speaker 1: wrote that thora CGM attempted to enter the country illegally
Speaker 1: and was apprehended, apprehended just twenty five yards from the border.
Speaker 1: He therefore has no entitlement to procedural rights other than
Speaker 1: those afforded by this statute. Amazing, isn't it. This is
Speaker 1: the ACLU, of course, which is a left roy organization
Speaker 1: not about liberty at all, but meant to destroy America.
Speaker 1: ACLU is upset about this. They said the rule quote
Speaker 1: fails to live up to the Constitution's bedrock principle that
Speaker 1: individuals deprived of their liberty have their day in court,
Speaker 1: and that this includes asylum seekers. No, their asylum claim
Speaker 1: was heard through the process and they did not pass
Speaker 1: the initial credible fear test. That's what the statute says.
Speaker 1: The statute doesn't say you get to show up and
Speaker 1: you get to just automatically go to court the law
Speaker 1: is supposed to have meaning. Soda Mayor and her descent,
Speaker 1: which was joined by Kagan, said the majority's decision handcuffs.
Speaker 1: This is all from CNBC. The judiciary's ability to perform
Speaker 1: it's constitutional duty to safeguard individual liberty and dismantles a
Speaker 1: critical component of the separation of powers. They're delusional. We
Speaker 1: have a law. The law says that this is how
Speaker 1: we secure our border. And if you are not a
Speaker 1: US citizen, you are not able. You are not able
Speaker 1: to just keep going through the legal process and get
Speaker 1: all the protections of and if you're not even in
Speaker 1: the country illegally at all, even as a as a visitors,
Speaker 1: as an alien who's here on a visa, you know,
Speaker 1: think about what anyway. It's but this, the fact that
Speaker 1: there are Democrats, activist democrats on the Supreme Court who
Speaker 1: can't even agree that this is a lawful usage of
Speaker 1: immigration powers by immigration authorities just goes to show you.
Speaker 1: I mean, they are completely it doesn't matter what the
Speaker 1: law says. They're activists who are trying to seek an outcome.
Speaker 1: Democrats do this all the time. The Ninth Circuit exactly
Speaker 1: the same thing, activist seeking an outcome, undermining law at
Speaker 1: its very essence. That's what they do. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. You know,
Speaker 1: we have a record this year on crime, a record
Speaker 1: positive rating on crime this year at the best. And
Speaker 1: you hear about certain places like Chicago, and you hear
Speaker 1: about what's going on in Detroit and other other cities.
Speaker 1: All Democrat run. Every one of them's Democrat run. Twenty
Speaker 1: out of twenty, twenty worst, the twenty most dangerous, our
Speaker 1: Democrat run. We have one city or two cities in particular,
Speaker 1: worse than Honduras, worse than Afghanistan, worse than Afghanistan. And
Speaker 1: these are cities within the United States, Democrat run, radical
Speaker 1: left run. You see what's going on in Seattle. You
Speaker 1: see what's going on in another place, the Seattle, of
Speaker 1: all places. Who would even think that's possible. Twenty out
Speaker 1: of twenty the Democrats one a weekend, very substantially our
Speaker 1: law enforcement and our police, and frankly, they want to
Speaker 1: defund largely, at least largely, there are some that want
Speaker 1: to defund and abolish our police. If you can believe that,
Speaker 1: and we're not letting that happens. Notice that the president.
Speaker 1: What he's saying here is absolutely true. Democrats are in
Speaker 1: control of all of these cities. We know that. And
Speaker 1: there's never any blowback against the Democratic Party for this.
Speaker 1: They're never help responsible. There's something that there's a dynamic
Speaker 1: that's going on here. And I know this dynamic because
Speaker 1: of what happens in New York City, what happens in Washington, DC.
Speaker 1: Cities that I've lived in and where I know people
Speaker 1: either I myself worked in the police and security realm
Speaker 1: or many many friends of mine in the case of DC,
Speaker 1: work in the police and security realm. You work for
Speaker 1: the cops. We're work cops, And here's what you have
Speaker 1: in Democrats cities. Because he's talking about all the violence,
Speaker 1: and you'd say, well, is that really true? In the answers, yes,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you look at per capita, what's going
Speaker 1: on in Chicago and what's going on in Baltimore, there
Speaker 1: is more violence than you have per capita than in
Speaker 1: even what we consider to be very dangerous countries. And
Speaker 1: you'd say, well, why isn't there more of an outcry
Speaker 1: about this? Well, here's the reality of Democrat cities in
Speaker 1: America when it comes to crime. And if there's an
Speaker 1: exception to this, I'd be curious to know what it is.
Speaker 1: Overwhelmingly even you can have a city that you can
Speaker 1: think of as pretty safe, but there are areas of
Speaker 1: the city where crime is concentrated in New York, which
Speaker 1: I know very well. I know the numbers, I know
Speaker 1: the neighborhoods and work for the NYPD. In New York,
Speaker 1: almost all of the violent crime and the shootings in particular,
Speaker 1: almost all of the murders, I should say, and the
Speaker 1: shootings in particular, are concentrated in There are five boroughs
Speaker 1: in New York City, and the violence is in a
Speaker 1: couple of parts of Brooklyn and the South Bronx. That's
Speaker 1: where you have seventy five percent plus of the homicides
Speaker 1: that occur. So it's in a very small, overall, very
Speaker 1: small part of the city. Now you would say, hold on,
Speaker 1: if you know where the violence is, why can't you
Speaker 1: stop it? Why can't you do more? Well, For one,
Speaker 1: there's always this deflection that happens from the elite rich,
Speaker 1: predominantly in New York white liberals, who say, oh no,
Speaker 1: what we have to do is not, you know, more
Speaker 1: aggressive policing to keep the you know, ninety nine percent,
Speaker 1: ninety nine point nine percent of these minority neighborhoods where
Speaker 1: there is all this violence, people are just good people
Speaker 1: trying to live their lives and not involved in this crime.
Speaker 1: Instead of focusing on how to protect the ninety nine
Speaker 1: percent plus all the violent neighborhoods who are trying to
Speaker 1: live their lives, raise their families, you know, go to
Speaker 1: go to work, do whatever they need to do. Is
Speaker 1: you know, productive citizens day to day. No, they focus on, oh,
Speaker 1: let's expand you know, let's expand the public school system
Speaker 1: with even more funds, and let's expand welfare programs. Let's
Speaker 1: do these things that do not work. This is the
Speaker 1: social worker idea that we've seen the Libs bringing up.
Speaker 1: But you see, there's another part of this that they'll
Speaker 1: never really you'll never really hear the media address. And
Speaker 1: there is a sense of guilt that the the elite
Speaker 1: liberal upper class in these cities has to exponge because
Speaker 1: you know, they have to find a way to expel
Speaker 1: this to get rid of this sense of guilt. Because
Speaker 1: they're mostly fine with day to day life in these cities.
Speaker 1: It is great they get to haul their liberal policies
Speaker 1: and liberal politics, and as long as the violence and
Speaker 1: the shootings and everything else are happening in what are
Speaker 1: in New York and DC overwhelmingly minority neighborhoods. I mean,
Speaker 1: DC is a largely by demographics separated city. There are
Speaker 1: parts of DC. You can look at this, there are maps.
Speaker 1: There's parts of DC that are overwhelmingly African American, and
Speaker 1: there are parts of DC. There's one part of DC,
Speaker 1: really northwest, that is overwhelmingly white. And all these white
Speaker 1: liberals in DC will tell you, oh, you know, we
Speaker 1: have great pologies and great ideas and everything, but they
Speaker 1: don't really spend much time thinking about because it does
Speaker 1: and affect them. You see the violence in minority, minority
Speaker 1: majority neighborhoods saying things true. Here in New York City
Speaker 1: you have all these white liberals and then they're not
Speaker 1: all white, they're from different races and backgrounds. But the
Speaker 1: rich liberals in Manhattan who live in multimillion dollars apartments
Speaker 1: and you know, ten million dollars town houses. You know,
Speaker 1: the Anderson Coopers and the Don Lemons and the Aaron
Speaker 1: Burnetts and these people at CNN. They pretend to care
Speaker 1: so much, but all the violence is concentrated in a
Speaker 1: few neighborhoods. What do they do? What do they want
Speaker 1: to happen with that? Oh no, let's just vote. Let's
Speaker 1: bash the cops because that's going to make things better
Speaker 1: in those neighborhoods. They every once in a while have
Speaker 1: to confront the guilt, the elite lives after confront the
Speaker 1: guilt that they have deep down from pretending so much
Speaker 1: to care about violence in minority neighborhoods and doing nothing
Speaker 1: about it. But instead of being proactive and taking real steps,
Speaker 1: you know what they do, Blame the cops, playing to
Speaker 1: the narrative, the victimology game. That's what they do. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Joining us now is my friend ned Ryan.
Speaker 1: He is the founder of American Majority Pack and is
Speaker 1: also a conservative commentator, writer, author, TV host. He is
Speaker 1: the man himself. Great to have you here, sir, Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: good to be with you, Buck. So you are somebody
Speaker 1: that the White House trusts is on board for the mission.
Speaker 1: You know. Trump today tweeted something out about someone saying
Speaker 1: something mean about him on Fox News. I gotta tell you, Ned,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm a little frustrated right now. I'm frustrated with Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm also frustrated with the Republican Party. I want to
Speaker 1: know how much of that you think, or how much
Speaker 1: of that you share you think is fair? And what
Speaker 1: we need to do to turn the political momentum right now?
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, where to start book? That's I mean, you
Speaker 1: got to unwrap, unwind a lot of things there in
Speaker 1: that question. I think we have every right to be
Speaker 1: disappointed with the Republican Party and what I call conservative ink.
Speaker 1: And I've been very outspoken obviously on TV with Tucker
Speaker 1: and in my outbedge the conservative ink, places like Heritage
Speaker 1: AEI all these people that have had literally billions, And
Speaker 1: I wrote this in one of my last pieces for
Speaker 1: American Greatness, where I write all my outbeds and pointed out,
Speaker 1: you know, Heritage is raised between twenty one and twenty
Speaker 1: eighteen one point two five billion. They're sitting on two
Speaker 1: hundred and sixty million investments, lands and property. You know,
Speaker 1: what are they really prepared to do to beat the left?
Speaker 1: What are you gonna do swat them away with your
Speaker 1: white papers and even worse than they're denigrating us and
Speaker 1: slandering us. I thought k Cole James piece at Fox
Speaker 1: News was insulting, to be quite honest, there were three
Speaker 1: or four lines in there. I thought, you know, are
Speaker 1: you an advocate of the sixteen nineteen project or actually
Speaker 1: about you know, preserving and conserving the constitutional republic American Republic.
Speaker 1: But I have to tell you too, and I've been
Speaker 1: very open and honest. You're right. I mean, I went
Speaker 1: out there and slugged away for the White House, especially
Speaker 1: on postal channels like MSNBC and CNN. You've done your
Speaker 1: part in that. I've done my part. You know, back
Speaker 1: in spring at twenty seventeen, these guys were convinced Russian
Speaker 1: collusion was real, and I laughed in their faces and said,
Speaker 1: it's a fairy tale. So I fought the fight. But
Speaker 1: I I've been into the White House multiple times now
Speaker 1: in the last six weeks, and I'm a grassroots guy.
Speaker 1: You know, people that know what American Majority does were
Speaker 1: grassroots organizers. We train people who run for state and
Speaker 1: local office. That's what I've been doing the last twelve
Speaker 1: years with American Majority. But it was something I was
Speaker 1: doing four years before that, so it was like sixteen
Speaker 1: years of experience. Right dad was in Congress. I've been
Speaker 1: around DC almost twenty years. Wrote at the previous administration
Speaker 1: in a White House, I went, is, listen, you've got
Speaker 1: real numbers. You've got real problems with your numbers down
Speaker 1: in Florida with absentee ballots, and this is something very specific.
Speaker 1: Ran a narrative showed them the numbers went in second
Speaker 1: week of May. When two weeks later and said, hey,
Speaker 1: here's I'm giving you a narrative here that you've got
Speaker 1: real problems that you do not address this. I see
Speaker 1: no elect poor old map that makes sense for you
Speaker 1: without Florida. And right now, let me share this buck.
Speaker 1: And I'm sorry for being so long winned in the
Speaker 1: sands of man. Let her rip, Let her rip. People understand.
Speaker 1: I've got to have people understand why I'm so concerned. Tradition,
Speaker 1: Traditionally in Florida elections, Republicans win the absentee mail in
Speaker 1: vote right, and we win it by tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of votes, all right, and we invest some time and
Speaker 1: effort into it to make sure that happens. Then in
Speaker 1: the early in person voting. Democrats typically win that and
Speaker 1: win it convincingly, so so much so that we're typically
Speaker 1: behind in the vote point into election day, and then
Speaker 1: we usually pull it out on election day. But the
Speaker 1: margins keep on getting slimmer and slimmer and slimmer because
Speaker 1: Democrats are waking up to how to do absentee ballots right.
Speaker 1: Politico reported yesterday that Democrats are beating Republicans by over
Speaker 1: three hundred thousand absentee ballot quest in Florida as of
Speaker 1: this moment, about seventeen weeks out from election day. If
Speaker 1: we do not win absentee ballot mail in voting in Florida,
Speaker 1: I see no way we can win Florida. And if
Speaker 1: we don't win Florida, I have a really hard time
Speaker 1: seeing how Trump wins. In November of twenty twenty. I
Speaker 1: have said it again and again and again, and I
Speaker 1: message to them yesterday and even send a tweet tagging
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and said it's about time for you to
Speaker 1: get a real campaign manager and drop the jumped up
Speaker 1: website designer. There's so much at state buck you and
Speaker 1: I know it. The American Republic is in great danger
Speaker 1: now if they seize control speaking to Ned Ryan, founder
Speaker 1: of American Majority, as he's been saying, he is an
Speaker 1: organizer who's trying to actually help Republicans put points on
Speaker 1: the board because that's what matters. And you know, Ned,
Speaker 1: to your point about Conservative inc. And you mentioned some
Speaker 1: very large think tanks. I look, I don't want to
Speaker 1: get you in any trouble, and I might even try
Speaker 1: to get any trouble for myself here, but I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna say that there are people in this conservative media
Speaker 1: sphere who by speaking out risk a lot. They you know,
Speaker 1: they haven't had decades of you know, good times, fat
Speaker 1: and happy from the conservative media world, and if they
Speaker 1: got canceled, or if they got fired, or if they
Speaker 1: lost their job, you know, it'd be tough for them
Speaker 1: to figure out what the next move is. There are
Speaker 1: also people who are fat and happy, have a big
Speaker 1: show or something who I look, you and I both
Speaker 1: through Tucker Show. I think Tucker has been the heart
Speaker 1: of sanity in this whole situation. And I won't name
Speaker 1: names because I don't want to. You know, everyone has
Speaker 1: their personal suffering, but there are some other shows where
Speaker 1: I feel like and other other entities and institutions and
Speaker 1: platforms where I feel like they're pulling punches and maybe
Speaker 1: maybe even part of the GOP, you know, surrender caucus,
Speaker 1: making some concessions and they could handle some heat, but
Speaker 1: they don't want it. And I think we're getting a
Speaker 1: point here. We're gonna have to start being honest about
Speaker 1: who really is willing to fight for this and who
Speaker 1: wants that third or fourth beach house. Well that buck,
Speaker 1: you make it a point. And I've been very blunt
Speaker 1: and honest about this. I don't mind getting in trouble.
Speaker 1: I'm already in trouble, you know when people I don't
Speaker 1: really care for their opinions, so I don't give a rip.
Speaker 1: You know the amazing thing about Tucker that's so revolutionary
Speaker 1: that people are just like, we love Tucker so much.
Speaker 1: He's just simply speaking the truth. He's not pulling punches.
Speaker 1: He's saying, here's the reality of what is. And I
Speaker 1: made this point on his show Friday Night. Actions authenticate beliefs,
Speaker 1: and we know the black lives matter what they believe. Right,
Speaker 1: they're a valid Marxist, they're not shy about it. They
Speaker 1: want to destroy the Western nuclear family. They're industriests, they're
Speaker 1: protesting the rioting, they're looting. Their actions validate their belief system.
Speaker 1: And on our side, we have a lot of Republicans
Speaker 1: and Conservatives that want to come to DC and be
Speaker 1: involved in this because they think it's a cool career
Speaker 1: to pick up a paycheck. You're never going to beat.
Speaker 1: And again the black marks, black Lives Matter, and these
Speaker 1: Marxists that are you know, Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
Speaker 1: Industry's writing for them. Religion is their politics is a religion, right.
Speaker 1: They are religious zealots. You're never going to beat religious
Speaker 1: zealots who want to destroy the American Republic With a
Speaker 1: bunch of careers who think it's a cool career and
Speaker 1: want to pick up a paycheck. That's what we have.
Speaker 1: And I have to say this, whatever people think the
Speaker 1: conservative movement is, I've come to the point I don't
Speaker 1: even know if it's a movement, right. I think it's
Speaker 1: conservative inc. I think it's a racket. It's devolved into
Speaker 1: a business. I'm convinced by their actions they believe in
Speaker 1: certain things like money and power. But you know, my
Speaker 1: next piece is coming out with American Greatness. I'm not
Speaker 1: really sure what they believe deep down inside, beyond the
Speaker 1: ephemeral pursuit of money and power, and when you lack
Speaker 1: the conviction to really fight for something, you'll vow the
Speaker 1: need of anything. Well, I have to say how many,
Speaker 1: how many conserve? And again I separate this out, and
Speaker 1: you know they're people, there are people who are intiputed,
Speaker 1: like they've got families defeat and they're you know, lower
Speaker 1: on the lower on the on the food chain, so
Speaker 1: to speak. And they you know, they haven't a massed
Speaker 1: a tremendous amount of wealth and influence. But when was
Speaker 1: the last time that you know that anybody. I mean,
Speaker 1: Tucker is getting boys, so he's a perfect Sam. Tucker's
Speaker 1: getting sponsors pulled from his show and he's not pulling back.
Speaker 1: We have all these other people that are, oh, I'm
Speaker 1: so tough, and you know, look at all my books
Speaker 1: or you know, whatever it is. You know, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: such a warrior for the cause. They're they're playing it's
Speaker 1: safe and they don't ever have to work again, and
Speaker 1: they care that they pretend to care so much about
Speaker 1: the republic. And I see here saying, what are you
Speaker 1: really what are you really willing to risk in this fight?
Speaker 1: You know, we talk about wartime conservatism. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: I've got people that have gone after me try to
Speaker 1: get me Benn pulled off air. I've got other Conservatives
Speaker 1: sometimes behind the scenes and try to get me pulled
Speaker 1: off the air. That's still a thing that happens, and
Speaker 1: I just feel like, you know, when are we going
Speaker 1: to realize that you got to you gotta find people
Speaker 1: that actually fight and not the people that are fighting
Speaker 1: for bigger bank accounts all the time. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: it is a business, but we also have to look
Speaker 1: at some people that I look, I think I think
Speaker 1: there's a lot of rich dead wood in the conservative
Speaker 1: ink movement right now. I'm just gonna say it, because
Speaker 1: we've been centivized and we've actually made people believe this
Speaker 1: is what you want to do, this is why you
Speaker 1: do this right, so you can get a big bank account,
Speaker 1: have multiple homes, you've got your luxury car whatever as
Speaker 1: your quote unquote fighting the good fight. And I have
Speaker 1: to tell you, Buck, one of the things that is
Speaker 1: really where people are being weighed in the balance and
Speaker 1: found wanting they are hollow men and women to be
Speaker 1: perfectly blind. But we've been centivized this in some ways
Speaker 1: because we've allowed people to win without winning, and by
Speaker 1: that I mean they've been allowed to win by you know,
Speaker 1: making a lot of money, bank accounts, houses, all these things.
Speaker 1: I think we need to redefind what winning actually looks
Speaker 1: like inside the Conservative movement. I'm a big believer with
Speaker 1: American Majority of politics is policy. We have to kind
Speaker 1: of have to completely restructure our incentives, what we're actually pursuing,
Speaker 1: what winning looks like. Buck. My next piece with American
Speaker 1: Greatness after this one's going to be what the New
Speaker 1: Right looks like. I think we have made massive mistakes
Speaker 1: by this overinvestment and intellectual ammunition and institution building. We
Speaker 1: need to start thinking about an insurgency fight. You know,
Speaker 1: I've written about the war of the flee, Euresco theory,
Speaker 1: all of these things, which I'll spell out in the
Speaker 1: next piece. Even more, we got to restructure this entire
Speaker 1: movement to understand we are at war. This is a
Speaker 1: war for the heart and soul of the American Republic,
Speaker 1: and we have to structure everything and how we're investing,
Speaker 1: our strategy and our tactics, what we're incentivizing people to do.
Speaker 1: At the same time, I mean, American Majority, in one aspect,
Speaker 1: we are building a farm team of conservative leaders. We
Speaker 1: need to start looking out there for young talent that
Speaker 1: we can develop who have the right convictions, who have
Speaker 1: the right goals in mind that you know. Listen, I
Speaker 1: truly believe. I want to say this so people understand
Speaker 1: and I qualify this. Good effective people deserve to make money.
Speaker 1: But it's good if absolutely that deserved to make money,
Speaker 1: not simply because you exist and are saying cute things
Speaker 1: in a book are on TV. Absolutely, I look, I agree, Ned,
Speaker 1: something we should be working on together going forward here, man,
Speaker 1: because you know, the one thing about about good people
Speaker 1: who are honorable and real is they like other good
Speaker 1: people who are honorable and real. So thank you as always, correct,
Speaker 1: Thank you as always for joining us on the show.
Speaker 1: American Majority, Ned, Ryan, go check out the work that
Speaker 1: he's doing. Also American Greatness for his latest written pieces.
Speaker 1: American Greatness does some really good editorial stuff. Thanks so much, Ned, Absolutely, Buck,
Speaker 1: you're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. I'm very happy about General Flynn. He was
Speaker 1: treated horribly. He was treated very very horribly by a
Speaker 1: group of very bad people. And I think you'll see
Speaker 1: some things are going to start to come out. But
Speaker 1: what happened to General Flynn should never happen again in
Speaker 1: our country. He was persecuted, and many other people were persecuted.
Speaker 1: They spied on a campaign, and they should never spy
Speaker 1: on a campaign. To put it mild, it never happened
Speaker 1: before in the history of our country. The Obama administration
Speaker 1: spied on a campaign. This is just the first one.
Speaker 1: He's been exonerated, and I want to congratulate him. He's
Speaker 1: been through a lot. He's been through a lot. He
Speaker 1: had great courage, great fortitude that they spied at a campaign.
Speaker 1: There's never been anything like that happened. If that were
Speaker 1: the other way around, people would be in jail for
Speaker 1: fifty years already. The President's right when he says that
Speaker 1: if it were the other way around, we'd have a
Speaker 1: very different outcome, that's for sure. You would have You
Speaker 1: would have Republicans in prison if they had done and
Speaker 1: I mean very senior, you know, you'd have the Komis,
Speaker 1: the Strucks, the Brennan's, if this were a Democrat administration,
Speaker 1: those people would be in prison. The charge them with conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Look at what Mueller does. Muller effectively made up new
Speaker 1: charges that nobody had what doesn't even mean conspiracy against
Speaker 1: the United States? What does that mean? I mean, man,
Speaker 1: whatever Mueller said, Remember they used that charge to pretend
Speaker 1: that there was any possibility they were really going to
Speaker 1: try to prosecute Russian Facebook bot creators. Oh yeah, yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: the Russians are just going to hand them over. What's
Speaker 1: amazing is that they actually called their bluff on that,
Speaker 1: and then they all, okay, they had to drop all
Speaker 1: those charges. I had a one or two public spats
Speaker 1: with a couple of well known conservative legal intellectuals who
Speaker 1: are saying, oh, this is an overcharging, this is absolutely
Speaker 1: necessary on some never Trumper types like no, this is
Speaker 1: a joke. They're not going to charge the Facebook bought
Speaker 1: creators with I mean, they're not going to bring them
Speaker 1: to trial for anything. This is nonsense. But Mueller came
Speaker 1: up with his team came up with conspiracy against the
Speaker 1: United States, which is really if you again the Soviet Union,
Speaker 1: think about how authoritarianism, how totalitarianism works, they could anytime
Speaker 1: they didn't have a charge it was counter revolutionary activity. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I don't like you. I don't like I don't like
Speaker 1: your attitude. You're we've picked you up. We've sent one
Speaker 1: of the souls of NEETs and called that the Black Marias,
Speaker 1: these black Soviet sedans that would come and pick you,
Speaker 1: pick people up in the middle of the night, you know,
Speaker 1: seize them from their homes in their bed with guns.
Speaker 1: You know, they have you sit there and they can't
Speaker 1: really figure out, well, what do you do that was
Speaker 1: wrong kind of revolutionary activity? What does the mother team do? Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're going to say that there was a conspiracy against
Speaker 1: the election of the United States or something like that,
Speaker 1: and we're a conspiracy against the United States very broad.
Speaker 1: Trust me. They would find a way to level that
Speaker 1: charge if it were Democrats in the White House against
Speaker 1: any of the Republicans involved in this attempt to destroy
Speaker 1: and ruin a presidential administration. They were you know, there's
Speaker 1: this charge that has also been used in the past
Speaker 1: by Democrats. Always they're the ones that you know, whether
Speaker 1: it's the Logan Act or Honest Services fraud. This was
Speaker 1: a Democrat headhunter. Federal prosecutors love this. They used it
Speaker 1: against Conrad Black for example. It was a Canadian conservative
Speaker 1: publishing magnate, and really sent him to prison for a
Speaker 1: long time unjustly. They had to overturn this. The Supreme
Speaker 1: Court had to overturn the Honest Services Fraud Statute, at
Speaker 1: least in part because it was so broad that they
Speaker 1: had no outer limit to it. But that's what democrats like,
Speaker 1: a statute that you can just make up as you
Speaker 1: go along. Okay, So what we see here is the
Speaker 1: President reminding everybody that if this were a different administration,
Speaker 1: a democrat, and the media would be that they would
Speaker 1: be all their all their hair would be on fire
Speaker 1: every day about oh my gosh, the republic is dead
Speaker 1: and look what they've done, and you have people in
Speaker 1: prison instead. They've dragged General Flynn through this nonsense for
Speaker 1: three years for what what was his crime? Really think
Speaker 1: about that, He's like, yeah, I don't know. I told
Speaker 1: him FBI had no had no business in the first
Speaker 1: place even sitting down to ask him about his phone call.
Speaker 1: They only use the leak, the illegal criminal leak of
Speaker 1: that phone call to the Washington Post as the pretext
Speaker 1: to interview him on it no business to even have
Speaker 1: the conversation. Right, There's something called the fruit of the
Speaker 1: poison tree doctrine in law, where if you get something
Speaker 1: through illegal means, that evidence gets tossed. There was no
Speaker 1: basis for the investigation of Flynn in the first place.
Speaker 1: And what is really the crime that he said he
Speaker 1: didn't talk about something that then they claimed that he did.
Speaker 1: And it's actually not clear because he talked about expulsions,
Speaker 1: not necessarily specifically about sanctions. It's a little bit of
Speaker 1: a gray zone. But they created this whole narrative that
Speaker 1: he's a criminal, He's a felon, ruined his life, bankrupt
Speaker 1: him millions of dollars. These Democrats are vicious totalitarians, don't
Speaker 1: forget it. That is their party. The same way that
Speaker 1: the Bolsheviks took over the Soviet Union or created the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union, and you know, took over Russia, ruined the place,
Speaker 1: ruined it, generations of people condemned to misery. It can
Speaker 1: happen here too. Democrats have gone that crazy. The only
Speaker 1: way that we can handle this is to win, to
Speaker 1: defeat them. And that's also the only way there will
Speaker 1: be any real justice for General Flynn, who has been
Speaker 1: sacrificed for the Trump administration. And it's time that we
Speaker 1: get this man his reputation back. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts,
Speaker 1: roll call time. That's right, that's when we get into it.
Speaker 1: But I also wanted to have an opportunity here to
Speaker 1: let producer Brandon say hi to all. You probably haven't
Speaker 1: heard from him in a while. He's filling in for
Speaker 1: producer Mark this week as Prucer Mark's working on his tan.
Speaker 1: Prucer Brandon, how you doing man? How are all of
Speaker 1: us doing? Kind of the loaded question? But now I'm
Speaker 1: doing it right? You Actually you checked in with me
Speaker 1: the Instagram as soon as the pandemic went down, which
Speaker 1: I appreciate. Yeah, I mean make sure my guys need
Speaker 1: to make sure my team is all right, you know,
Speaker 1: in case, you know, if producer Mark, you know, went
Speaker 1: down with a sniffle for a few days. We need
Speaker 1: to produce your brain. It's got to be ready to rock,
Speaker 1: I know. And now I have all this free equipment
Speaker 1: because I'm working working with you. But no, it's a
Speaker 1: it's been a right just hanging in my apartment in
Speaker 1: Queens for three months. Whatever it is right now? How
Speaker 1: is the friend How is the Appetite for Destruction podcast
Speaker 1: coming along? Close? Appetite for distortion distorage. Sorry, I actually
Speaker 1: thought of the the Actually that was the album, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's the play on words that I use. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: it's been cool. Actually you would find this interesting. I
Speaker 1: sent a request to email to interview doctor Fauci to
Speaker 1: talk about the future of concerts, and I actually heard
Speaker 1: back from his people, but I guess he's too busy,
Speaker 1: so they recommended the CDC, CDC press person or whatever.
Speaker 1: But it's been fun. I've been able to interview current
Speaker 1: members from Guns and Roses at home. But what if I, oh,
Speaker 1: we can keep going, I mean interrupt. You've interviewed Guns
Speaker 1: and Roses members, which ones not anyone that you probably
Speaker 1: would care about, like Slash or Axel, but their current
Speaker 1: drummer Frank Ferrar had a zoom interview with him a
Speaker 1: couple months ago. Matt Sorum, who you may remember from
Speaker 1: the November rain video the whole user illusion Era, got
Speaker 1: to interview him while at home, so it's a Thankfully
Speaker 1: I'm still able to keep myself sane while I'm you know,
Speaker 1: in quarantine good Man, good Man, what is your core?
Speaker 1: Like I really need as soon as we get into
Speaker 1: like the phase where I can go to the gym,
Speaker 1: I'm going to have to give away like the collection
Speaker 1: of ice cream pints that I have amassed over time
Speaker 1: in my freezer, which I'm also continuously updating, which is
Speaker 1: very bad news. That's why I feel like the stay
Speaker 1: Puff marshmallow Man these days. But what is your lockdown
Speaker 1: quarantine Fulty food pleasure. We've bought a lot of pretzels.
Speaker 1: A lot of pretzels, that's what we've been trying, like
Speaker 1: different varieties, whether it's I think the one that my
Speaker 1: girlfriend just bought, our little pretzel balls. We've gotten honey ones,
Speaker 1: We've got the rods. It's like every time we go
Speaker 1: it's like a different kind of pretzel. So so yeah,
Speaker 1: that's my my aunts. For whatever reason, I don't know
Speaker 1: why his producer Mark gonna let you go through the
Speaker 1: voicemail box for the show, which is eight four four
Speaker 1: nine two five eight four four nine hundred buck for
Speaker 1: everybody listening, or are you are you going to delve
Speaker 1: into the depths there? We'll see. I'll have to ask
Speaker 1: him because I don't know if the team Buck members
Speaker 1: that may remember, we were getting some good feedback on
Speaker 1: for me, and Mark was kind of scared that he's like,
Speaker 1: why do they like you better than me? So I
Speaker 1: don't know, maybe he's keeping the positive Brandon feedback away. Well.
Speaker 1: I also want to want to tell you that, if
Speaker 1: you want, I could call into your podcast and pretend
Speaker 1: to be doctor Fauci so that I could answer the
Speaker 1: questions about the concerts. You know, here's the thing, here's
Speaker 1: the thing, Producer Brandon. A concert a lot of people,
Speaker 1: you know, and when the people come together in a big,
Speaker 1: big blob of people, the mitigation is less and the
Speaker 1: virus has a chance to spread. So what I think
Speaker 1: we're gonna do is concerts where everybody kind of looks
Speaker 1: like a nerd because they're gonna have to have purell
Speaker 1: and a mask. And so you know, if you're there
Speaker 1: and you're there to hear def Leopard, you're gonna you're
Speaker 1: gonna have to have ear plugs because it's loud, a
Speaker 1: face mask for the virus, and hand sanitizer for the mitigation.
Speaker 1: I think, you know, actually it's good. I actually bought
Speaker 1: a guns of Roses face mask. I don't know what
Speaker 1: you think of me now, but I think you're a
Speaker 1: true fan. I think you're a true fan, and people
Speaker 1: respect that people respect that because you own it. Man,
Speaker 1: you don't. You're shy away from that. That stuff you
Speaker 1: don't shy away from out. We digged that about you,
Speaker 1: Producer Brandon, and we're glad you're okay, and it's nice.
Speaker 1: You got a girl. You got a girlfriend. And also
Speaker 1: something else. Got a couple of cats. From what I hear,
Speaker 1: I have three cats now. So I had one. They're
Speaker 1: all my girlfriend's family. We had one. I'm allergic to cats.
Speaker 1: I had to get since being in lockdown, I never
Speaker 1: thought about this. I can't leave, So I have now
Speaker 1: two air purifiers. We had to travel to Ohio to
Speaker 1: meet her sister halfway because she's from Chicago, to get
Speaker 1: these two other cats that were her dad's. So now
Speaker 1: I have three like elder statesman's cats running around and
Speaker 1: it's like tumbleweeds going across the floor. I've had, like
Speaker 1: I thought, I got COVID. Honestly, I had trouble breathing.
Speaker 1: It was really bad. So I'm gonna have to get
Speaker 1: the allergy shot once a week for the next six
Speaker 1: months as of next week. So that's my little my
Speaker 1: little story, being quarantined and and being on the verge
Speaker 1: of dying from a dude a cat dander. Man. You
Speaker 1: don't want to die during a pandemic, not from the pandemic,
Speaker 1: but from cat dander. That's a rough way. That's a
Speaker 1: bad storyline. It's so it's buck Honestly, it got really bad.
Speaker 1: I'm like, I might do I have COVID no, but
Speaker 1: I would go outside and breathe the fresh air. It
Speaker 1: would go away. It's the cats. If you just shaved
Speaker 1: them so they look like they look like a little
Speaker 1: you know, hell spawn, like with the pink skin and
Speaker 1: the scary face and the claws. You know what, if
Speaker 1: you shave all the hair, all the fur off. Maybe
Speaker 1: I should do that because part of it is my
Speaker 1: fault because I can't help it hug them and squeeze
Speaker 1: them and all that, so I kind of bring it upon.
Speaker 1: Are they nice cats? The original cat, the og he
Speaker 1: is temperamental. The other two are just like super nice.
Speaker 1: I had really only experienced up close and person with
Speaker 1: the cat was over a decade ago. I had a girlfriend.
Speaker 1: She was very beautiful, and she had a cat that
Speaker 1: was also very like a very elegant looking cat, and
Speaker 1: the cat would scratch me at random times like I
Speaker 1: would think the cat was fine, and the girlfriend was
Speaker 1: kind of like that too, although not scratching. I'm saying,
Speaker 1: you know, snippy would be a little unpredictable. And then
Speaker 1: I realized yeah, and then I whoops, And then I
Speaker 1: realized the cat. The cat was mirroring the owner. I
Speaker 1: think I think that was a real thing. I think
Speaker 1: it is because my girlfriend's kind of the same thing.
Speaker 1: You have to make sometimes you have to tell what
Speaker 1: if she's listening to this podcast, I don't want to
Speaker 1: get you. Dude, You're gonna be living on my couch
Speaker 1: for a few weeks if this keeps up, we gotta
Speaker 1: watch out for you here. Don't worry. Way, but this way,
Speaker 1: in the local in the local election, because she's still
Speaker 1: on the ballot, she voted for Elizabeth Warren listening. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: She's good. Otherwise, Well, the good news is I don't
Speaker 1: think we have to worry about her listening to this show.
Speaker 1: That that's my point. Yeah, all right, now into all
Speaker 1: of the actual role call team coming your way here.
Speaker 1: We have first up, and remember Facebook dot com slash
Speaker 1: buck sexon. Please if you don't follow me on Facebook,
Speaker 1: add me in. We post stories and I post just
Speaker 1: all kinds of stuff, occasionally to Lula photos because she's
Speaker 1: a cute, fat little piggy also known as a French bulldog.
Speaker 1: But we post also commentary clips from the show. Sometimes
Speaker 1: I'll tell people I'm gonna be on Fox or something
Speaker 1: on Facebook. And if you're on Twitter, which I know
Speaker 1: probably less than five percent of you are, please do
Speaker 1: follow me a buck Sexton. But if you want to
Speaker 1: email me, Teambuck at Iheartmedy dot com and on Instagram
Speaker 1: buck Sexton and you can send me. Look, we get
Speaker 1: a lot of direct messages on Instagram. I tried, were
Speaker 1: trying to go through them. The team goes through them.
Speaker 1: It's either me or Brandon or Mark or we got
Speaker 1: a web team now and everyone you know. They're going
Speaker 1: through the box to pick the best comments possible, the
Speaker 1: best notes possible for all of us. So we're working
Speaker 1: on it. We get a lot coming in, but please
Speaker 1: do send them. We will always get through or reading them.
Speaker 1: We just can't get all of them on the air,
Speaker 1: all right, probably because I talk too much. Anthony Shields. Hi, Buck,
Speaker 1: love your show and how you're speaking truth and rallying
Speaker 1: the patriots who love our country and the constitution Anthony
Speaker 1: short but sweet man. We love the roll call message.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for listening and supporting us. It
Speaker 1: means a lot. Bart. Hey, OK, I listen to your
Speaker 1: podcast daily. You and your crew do an awesome job.
Speaker 1: I'd like to say I'm quite conflicted on the entire
Speaker 1: police issue. I get treated pretty horribly by the police
Speaker 1: in the small town I live in, and although it
Speaker 1: was a combination of bad police and a terrible prosecutor,
Speaker 1: it left me here with a very bad experience and
Speaker 1: all honestly, I do feel for the police out there
Speaker 1: being treated like they are. It's totally unfair. But like
Speaker 1: I said, I'm conflicted. Keep up the good work, buddy,
Speaker 1: and always shields high. Bart. There are bad cops that exists,
Speaker 1: but let's remember there are bad everything's too. There are
Speaker 1: bad prosecutors, there are bad teachers, bad garbagemen, bad doctors.
Speaker 1: I mean, there's bad everything out there. Bad conservative radio
Speaker 1: hosts like there are bad people that exist in this world,
Speaker 1: and you've just you got to understand that you do
Speaker 1: your best and you're responsible for your actions and your family,
Speaker 1: your loved ones, and got to just keep pushing through.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you've had a bad experience with cops there
Speaker 1: I got. I remember I was stopped when I was
Speaker 1: about fourteen or fifteen, stopped, put up against the wall, frisked,
Speaker 1: and they made me show them my hands to look
Speaker 1: for paint for spray paint because they had had a
Speaker 1: report of youths in the area writing graffiti. And they
Speaker 1: just they just put me up against the wall, patted
Speaker 1: me down the whole thing, and like I did not.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I would not have thought that I
Speaker 1: was somebody that would have been writing graffiti. But the
Speaker 1: good news is, of course I was not. But I
Speaker 1: remember that they made they shine a flashlight on my
Speaker 1: fingertips and they were looking for flex of paint and
Speaker 1: if I had them, they were going to arrest me.
Speaker 1: And did they have probable cause? You know, I don't
Speaker 1: think so. But anyway, Look, it's not perfect, not perfect, Angela,
Speaker 1: Hi Buck, I'm enjoying the show as always. Yes, or
Speaker 1: you were talking about NASCAR and Bubba. Another thing that
Speaker 1: I think will come into play after this news episode.
Speaker 1: Bumps and ubs have always been a thing. Will drivers
Speaker 1: now be afraid to do this and treat Bubba as
Speaker 1: they would any other driver, or will they avoid any
Speaker 1: bumps with him in fear of being called racist for
Speaker 1: harassing him. Angela, I had to figure out what a bumping,
Speaker 1: what a bumping rub was or do I? No? I
Speaker 1: do just getting I think? Yeah, I mean, all right, anyway,
Speaker 1: in NASCAR what a bump and rub is and that's
Speaker 1: a good I don't know. I don't know how that
Speaker 1: works in the sport. I've never watched a full NASCAR race,
Speaker 1: so maybe interesting to check it out. At some point.
Speaker 1: I watched more Formula one stuff and I'm actually going
Speaker 1: to check out I think this Netflix documentary on Formula One.
Speaker 1: I hear it's very very good. But you know, Angela,
Speaker 1: could be you you know more about the sport than
Speaker 1: I do. I don't know if that's considered a grave affront,
Speaker 1: you know to bumping rubs, bumping rub somebody. I you know,
Speaker 1: usually like you want to buy somebody dinner, have a
Speaker 1: couple of drinks before you bump and rub. But yeah,
Speaker 1: you're in the freedom huh. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. All right, Now we have some more roll
Speaker 1: call to get to and let's do that together, shall we. Brandon,
Speaker 1: I heard you ask about a place where there are
Speaker 1: no left wing activists, and I can say with ninety
Speaker 1: six percent plus certainty that rural north Idaho lacks any
Speaker 1: left wing activists. In fact, our local city, Cordline, came
Speaker 1: out in force, armed and ready to defend from looting.
Speaker 1: I live in a small rural community of just a
Speaker 1: few hundred people an hour outside of Cordleine, Idaho and Spokane, Washington.
Speaker 1: We're right on the border. We are armed, polite, We
Speaker 1: help our neighbors, we wave and say hello. And they're
Speaker 1: not left wing activists. There is probably a libertu here,
Speaker 1: but they stay quiet. So life is great. Well, Brandon,
Speaker 1: sounds like things are pretty good out in Idaho, so
Speaker 1: thanks for writing in and giving us that option. I
Speaker 1: don't think producer Mark wants to move there Freedom Hut
Speaker 1: to Idaho, though, I don't think that's really going to
Speaker 1: be the way he wants to do it. Angela, Hi, Buck,
Speaker 1: I'm enjoying the show as always. Yesterday you were talking
Speaker 1: about NASCAR and Bubba, another thing that I think will
Speaker 1: come into play after this news episode. Oh sorry, we already.
Speaker 1: I just want to do the bumps and rubs again.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I just I got confused, Jay Buck,
Speaker 1: I flat out don't believe that cases are going up.
Speaker 1: Can we even trust the testing who dons the testing?
Speaker 1: The CDC not exactly a reliable source. We know that
Speaker 1: in the first wave a lot of cases we're presumed
Speaker 1: positive base merely on symptoms no actual test was taken.
Speaker 1: I think the same is happening again. The only numbers
Speaker 1: we should be concerned with our debts, which are going down.
Speaker 1: This is all just a part of left wing action
Speaker 1: against Trump, and we all know it shields high Jay.
Speaker 1: So let me see here. I don't think that that's
Speaker 1: likely going on. I think that there might. Look, there's
Speaker 1: always going to be some issues with you know, this
Speaker 1: is an imperfect system, and I'm sure there's some places
Speaker 1: that might be overreporting or underreporting with regard to testing,
Speaker 1: and there's some degree of testing that must there's i think,
Speaker 1: very high accuracy, but there are going to be some
Speaker 1: false false positives. I think the bigger issue is that
Speaker 1: as they ramp up testing, which we're told we absolutely
Speaker 1: have to to contain this, the greater number of confirmed
Speaker 1: cases overall becomes part of the narrative that we have
Speaker 1: to lock down again because there's more cases. But if
Speaker 1: we're doing more testing. Is the pandemic actually getting worse
Speaker 1: or we're just finding more of the cases that are
Speaker 1: out there. That's where this becomes a real debate and discussion.
Speaker 1: So yes, indeed, let's see here, Maureen hey Buck and
Speaker 1: producer Mark. I just heard soccer is dropping the playing
Speaker 1: of national anthem of the national anthem before games. The
Speaker 1: solution isn't to stop the anthem at sporting events or
Speaker 1: in letting players kneel in derision of our flag. No,
Speaker 1: the solution is to play the anthem before any players
Speaker 1: are out on the field or cord or whatever services
Speaker 1: being used for whatever sport, play the anthem, do the
Speaker 1: usual pregame festivities, but without any players. When finished, bring
Speaker 1: out the players. Love you in the show and the website.
Speaker 1: Thanks for all you do, Maureen, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for listening and for being a part of what we
Speaker 1: do here. As for playing the anthem without players, well,
Speaker 1: let's let's get into that show. We I think that
Speaker 1: what would happen if you did that. First of all,
Speaker 1: the players would complain. They would because they want this.
Speaker 1: The ones who want to make trouble here want the
Speaker 1: opportunity to do it during the anthem. So that's one
Speaker 1: part of it that I think would come up. And
Speaker 1: I think you would also then just have players who
Speaker 1: would take it upon themselves to do stuff right when
Speaker 1: they came out. You know, they would still find ways
Speaker 1: to cause to be disrespectful or to draw attention to themselves,
Speaker 1: because as we know, this is all about branding for
Speaker 1: the players. This is not really about changing society or
Speaker 1: making things better. So yes, indeed, trust me, they'd find
Speaker 1: a way now. Next up here, Graham, Hello Buck and
Speaker 1: producer Mark. I'm a forty six year old Rush baby
Speaker 1: and discovered your show late last year when I was
Speaker 1: looking for content. I really enjoy your insight and knowledge.
Speaker 1: It's a fantastic podcast, and I have been spreading the
Speaker 1: word Graham, thank you so much. That really helps. It
Speaker 1: really means a lot. I have a question regarding PBS
Speaker 1: and NPR. The other day you were talking about our
Speaker 1: needs for some billionaire conservative to buy some media company
Speaker 1: and convert it to an unsinkable aircraft carrier of free speech.
Speaker 1: I was wondering, why can't the Trump administration put their
Speaker 1: guy in charge of PBS and or NPR and start
Speaker 1: four seeing them at least to tell the truth These
Speaker 1: orcs have news editors, do they not? Thanks for being
Speaker 1: a voice of reason. Shields High, Well, thank you Graham
Speaker 1: for your support, and it's great to have somebody who
Speaker 1: understands fantastic radio Rush Limbaud to feel like this is
Speaker 1: also a very good show. And as for replacing MPR,
Speaker 1: not a bad idea, not a bad idea, but remember
Speaker 1: that the staff at NPR would be an open revolt
Speaker 1: and there would be you know, so I don't think
Speaker 1: they won't go along with it without making it impossible
Speaker 1: for just the director. And you're not going to replace
Speaker 1: the whole staff of it, and if you tried, the
Speaker 1: media would freak out. But it's an interesting thought. Let
Speaker 1: me let me give it some more thought. Actually, team
Speaker 1: thanks as always, check out bucksexon dot com when you can.
Speaker 1: Tomorrow we talk Shields High