WEBVTT - Thanksgiving Leftovers

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>advice Now League dot com. Here's your host. Welcome you

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>a Thanksgiving weekend edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. My co

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:33.279
<v Speaker 1>hosts this weekend are Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson, and

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we're both ten pounds heavier. Yeah, baby, that means you're

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>doing it right, unless it's ten pounds of pumpkin pie. Because,

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as I like to mention pretty much annually to our listeners, yeah,

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not eating pumpkin. You're eating squash of canned pumpkin

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is Dickinson squash. You are eating a cold squash pie.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, not cool Pickinson squash, which that's the

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>worst kind of squash exactly unless you're a big Iron

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Maiden fan. It is the worst of all possible squashes.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I like it. No, it's squashed. I don't like mountain dew,

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but you're not drinking fresh dew off of a mountain.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a great point. That's that's irrefutable launching

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>right there. Can't top that plenty to get you over

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the course of the show, we will go through our

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>three tough questions. We'll give you nine players upon whom

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you can take a chance. Premature speculation coming at the

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, and of course we will break

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>down every matchup fantasy style like we always do, and

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 1>we begin with the Chicago Bears facing the Jets. Matt,

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not yet sure if Justin Fields is gonna go,

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but let's assume he does. With the bad shoulder, gotta

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>believe we're gonna get less rushing Justin Fields if he

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>does play. Yeah, I was gonna mention that he was

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>limited in practice all week with a left shoulder injury.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>That's his non throwing shoulder. Uh. I imagine the Bears

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>still do suit him up and have him play, but

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think they take away a few rushing attempts

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and a few hits off of fields due to the injury,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>still giving him a solid be The Jets did allow

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen to go for eighty six and two scores

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on the ground just two games ago, and man, if

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're scared to take rushing away from fields,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they probably shouldn't play fields at all. Right, Well, I

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>think from the Bears perspective, you're talking fantasy. No from

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Bears. I think they want him to to

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to develop as a past Okay, so there we go.

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>I think they would like to see what he can do.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Simeon the gross backup. By the way, I hope

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Fields played in the Spike game. The Jets took Zach

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Wilson picks before justin Fields spite games science had that

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>one in the holster for I just know him. Alan

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Forever had memorized all this spite practically. Um. David Montgomery

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>returned to bell cow status last week with Khalil Herbert

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on I R twenty touches last week, including all of

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the RB targets. The Jets are good run defense, but

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they have allowed a fair amount of success to running

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>backs in the passing game. They ranked ninth most in

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>receptions and receiving yards allowed to the position. So Montgomery

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. I think he gets a lot of

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>work in this game. Darnell Mooney has been better, but

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>only in the fact that he scored in two of

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. He's top sixty yards only once

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in the last five games, though, He's just way too inconsistent.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The Jets are top four and receptions and yards allowed

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to the wide receiver position. For that reason, Mooney and

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Chase Claypool both on the bench and Cole commet he's

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a complete dart throw. Last week he sunk you with

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a three for thirty five against Atlanta. In the prior

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>three weeks he had five touchdowns, though, but he didn't

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>score once in weeks one through seven. So which cole

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>commit is it? It's probably the bad one this week.

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>The Jets have not allowed a tight end touchdown all year,

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're pretty dependent on that stat for commit to

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>be startable. So I'll give him the lowest possible C

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>grade in the tight end waste comme. Yeah, I was

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>just saying, really really low, low sestosterone grade. Alright, Mike

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>White is your new starter for the Jets. Zack Wilson

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was dropped below Joe Flacco to third on the depth chart.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Will probably be inactive this week. I think he will

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>be inactive the rest of the year. I'm not sure

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>about that. I think they might just want to give

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>him a couple of weeks off to clear his head here,

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe get right. Uh many of you remember Mike

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>White from his four hundred five yard three touchdown outburst

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in his second career game last year against the Bengals.

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>His other two and a half games in the league

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>were pretty brutal though. Uh and he offers absolutely zero

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>running ability. He does not run. He has a stand

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>in the pocket and chuck the ball passer. And the

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Bears are a pretty good past defense. They have like

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the league's worst defense against running quarterbacks, which

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's a it's a little bit of a

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>head scratcher here that Zack Wilson, who is a little

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>mobile isn't at least active in this game for that

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. But oh well, uh so it's because

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he's bad. Okay, sure he has bad. I keep White

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Twa and Dak are the only quarterbacks

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 1>to throw for multiple scores on the Bear since Week two,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and with that, I'm leaving the rest of the receivers

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>on the bench as well, including Garrett Wilson, a Jets

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, has not scored a touchdown since Week four,

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>which is why Zach Wilson isn't starting anymore. Uh. The

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>last Jet to mention is Michael Carter. He gets a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>C grade here. Carter snap percent percentage still hovering around fifty,

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>with James Robinson and Ty Johnson splitting the remainder of

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the snaps. The Jets are a good matchup for Carter

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>to get something going this week. Their bottom five in

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards and touchdowns allowed to opposing backs this year,

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and they have allowed of rushing score to a running

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>back in six of the last seven games. So Carter

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>gets the c I think Carter had like fifteen catches

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and that Mike White game. Ye, Mike White is a

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>dump off pass or big time that could absolutely help

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>him here. Tampa Bay takes like Cleveland Brian for the

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay offense outside of Leonard for Nett, who is

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>now the backup. Really that this is as healthy as

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this offense has been all year A most all the receivers,

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the starting receivers are all healthy. Brady's healthy and Rashad

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>White healthy. So I've got a little optimism here for

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Bucks going up against a Cleveland defense

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that's been pretty bad lately. Yeah, Bucks coming off there

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>by too, So a lot of start starting grades here,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>We'll start running back. I'm giving Rashad White b even

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>if for Net goes for nets kind of if he

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with this hip injury, he's been practicing in a limited fashion,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's White show at this point. Feels like

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so I got for net on the bench and Rashad

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>White with a B, whether for Net plays or not.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Over the Browns last three games, opposing backs are averaging

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards per game, and on the season, Cleveland has

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>surrendered the most total touchdowns to the position. Brown's also

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>allowing more than five catches per game to running back.

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>So I might be talking to myself into an A

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>here for I think I just did and changing it

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>all right from B to and A. I wish I

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>could have done that on many report cards as a kid,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but I could not. Anyway, over to the wide receiver side,

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna give a seed to Mike Evans, who

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>hasn't scored a touchdown since Week four. But the Browns

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have surrendered six wide receiver touchdowns over the last five games,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>so Evans has a shot to snap his scoreless street here.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>That said, he should see plenty of coverage from Denzil

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a Ward, who has looked great over the last two

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>weeks since returning from injuries. Surrendering just five catches for

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty scoreless yards in his last two games, and those

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>came against Miami and Buffalo elite pass offenses. So just

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to see for Evans, but a B for Chris Godwin,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>who plays around his snaps from the slot, which means

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll see a lot of cornerback A J. Green, and

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean the wide receiver, but he might be

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a better court cornerback then A J. Green the cornerback,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but a J. Green the cornerback. Here was first start

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of the season last week due to the loss of

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg Newsome, who who will be out again this week.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Green only played twenty two snaps in coverage, but he

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was targeted four times and gave up three catches for

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty one yards and a touchdown. So throw it his

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>way and Chris Godwin should be uh in line for

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a big day. Julio Jones, who looked great in that

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Germany game. I got bench here. I'll switch it to

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a C. It's not the greatest matchup, but I just

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to see him do it one more

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>time before I trust him to put in my starting

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>line up. The Browns are allowing less than eleven catches

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>per game to wide receivers as a whole, which is

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>not a lot. I like Godwin and Evans more. But

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a pinch, I'll give Julio the Sea,

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but I will not give a C to k dot

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And or Cameron Bred. They're back to splitting time, so

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>they're both on the bench and to be for Tom Brady.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have allowed multiple touchdown passes and two of

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>their last three games. Josh Allen should have had multiple touchdowns.

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Last week, Stephon Diggs dropped one, and I just think

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that the trio of Tampa based wide receivers and child

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>White can do enough damage through the air to make

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Brady a QB one this week, so he gets to

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the Sea. Over the Cleveland side. Nick Chubb gets a B.

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, the Bucks are coming off their by

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>so they'll be well rested and over the Over their

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>last two games, they're allowing turned very good on against

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the running, allowing just forty three rushing yards per game

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to imposing backs and no touchdowns. And that includes holding

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth Walker to just seventeen rushing yards on ten carries

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in their last game. So just a B for Chubb.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh b inn for Kareem Hunt, barely rosterable at this point,

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't topped I agree, I think he's certainly a

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>drop candidate. Hasn't top fifty rushing yards since Week two,

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't caught a touchdown since week one, hasn't topped

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty receiving yards all season, and over his last two

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>games he has total just fourteen touches. So easy bench

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for Hunt. He's really just an insurance policy in case

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>anything happens at job. He was always like a flex

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>worthy player, but now he's pretty much as a handcuff

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>chubbed books. Fine knock on wood, he'll stay healthy. So yeah,

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>if you gotta drop Hunt, I don't blame you. Definitely

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>don't drop a Marie Cooper. You actually want to start

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>him again with a B. He's played great at home

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and in Detroit at a neutral site, but this is

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a home game, and although it isn't the best matchup

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on paper, the Bucks have surrendered three wide receiver touchdowns

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>over their last two. So I like Cooper here and

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna continue to like Donovan People's jones. He gets

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>to see finally hit paydirt last week, and uh, dudes

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just been consistent over the last two months. Uh DPJ

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>has notched at least fifty receiving yards in seven straight

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>games and the top seventy yards and five of those

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>seven games. So keep rolling them out. There is a

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three and I he seems like a pretty

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>safe play, David and Joeku somewhat safe. He gets to see.

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks have allowed at least six catches to opposing

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and two of the last three games, and

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll take that production in the tight end waste land.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And lastly, Jacoby Brissette and what could be his last

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>start of the season because DeShawn Watson's eligible today. Previously

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>claimed that they were gonna make the switch no matter

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>what as soon as Watson was available, and I guess

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>his contract would suggest that that will be the case.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Per Sette played really well last week. I think he's

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>overall QB one. If not, he was the top three

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and he's gonna want to go out in a

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>blaze of glory. I'm giving him a see here. The

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Bucks have surrendered multiple touchdown PA passes in three of

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>their last four games, and they also on the sixth

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>highest opponent passing play percentage on the road, Superset will

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have his chance to air it out. You can say

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go on a blaze of glory and then

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>give him a cee. Well starting to go. See that's

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the Jacobe prisets like blaze of glory. Startable,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's it. Baltimore takes on Jacksonville. Let's go through. Uh,

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>let's really just a handful of lukewarm starters for a

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore offense that has struggled a lot. Mark Andrews is

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>not in question, obviously after returning in full strength last week,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Jaguars prior to last week's by got blown

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>apart by you know, the Kansas City tight Ends, which granted,

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know they're really good. Uh, still a grade for

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews. But where things get a lot dice here

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is for Lamar Jackson since week three, and it was

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. It was September, it was warm outside,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the trees hadn't changed yet, Tom Brady was still married.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>He scored seven touchdowns total rushing and receiving. He's typically

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson's typically being outscored by whichever other quarterback you

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>have on your roster still HiT's Jacksonville Giras have allowed

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the most broken tackles, which could bode well for Jackson

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, and it's a bit of a plus

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>matchup for him through the air as well. Posing quarterbacks

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are averaging two D fifty eight passing yards and one

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half touchdowns per game against Jacksonville. I would

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>take one and a half touchdowns at this point for

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. You can't start any of his wide receivers

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>since Bateman has gone down. These receivers as a group

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>are averaging sixty eight yards per game among all of them.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a disaster, and we're not chasing DeMarcus Robinson's random

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>explosion last week. They're all on the bench B grade

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar Jackson. If I didn't give him an actual

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>letter grade, I'm going be here just because of the

0:12:55.720 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>rushing upside that he's got. Then over to Gus Edwards

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if he plays and when we don't know for sure

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>if he's going to or not startable as a touchdown

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>option against the team allowing a rushing touchdown per game

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>since Week four. And reminder, last time Gus Edwards played

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in his only other full game the immediately game sixteen

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>carries and two and he scored two rushing touchdowns, so

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they won't hesitate to give him the ball to stripe

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>again here as well, Kenyan Drake comes into the C grade.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>He's had at least ten touches in each of the

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>last five games while averaging seventy two total yards and

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>almost a score per game. Um. But the catch here again,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>if Gus Edwards plays, then he's not getting those touchdowns.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Those will probably go to Edwards. The Jaguars allowed the

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>tenth most total yards per game to opposing running backs,

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're particularly vulnerable through the air. But Drake does

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>not catch, so that does not help him, and that's

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>why he has a C grade along with Gus Edwards

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>C grade. All right, let's go to Jacksonville. You got

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>a handful of starters here. Tricky game for Travis E.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:56.359
<v Speaker 1>T N. In the two games since Baltimore acquired linebacker

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>ro Kwan Smith, they're giving up third scoreless rushing yards

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:06.199
<v Speaker 1>per game. That's it. That includes, by the way, in

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:11.079
<v Speaker 1>those two games they faced Alvin Kamara and Donta Foreman.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are two pretty good backs. Both. Well, we'll actually

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>talk more about one of those players in great detail

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later in the show. Um, they do

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>remain vulnerable through the air. They're seeing the sixth most

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>receptions of fifth most receiving yards, and Travis E. T

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>N can catch a bit, but they don't use him

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that much as much as you think they would. He's

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>averaging three targets per game. He's hauled in three receptions

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in half of his games this season. So I just

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a lot coming here. You need a

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>touchdown really for Travis e t N, which he might get,

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I've got a C grade on him

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and not a bench grade altogether. In a brutally tough

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>matchup they could work in. They claimed Darryl Henderson to

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they've they've Alrea will not be a factor this week.

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to say Christian Kirk gets a B grade

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>as my highest graded Jaguar this week. Unlikely. He's been

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>an unlikely top ten wide receiver so far this season,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but consistently helpful. Kirk has averaged sixty eight yards. He's

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>reached pay dirt four times in his last five games.

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>His primary defender in the slot is rookie cornerback de

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Marian Williams. He has the third lowest Pro Football Focus

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>grade among all cornerbacks. It's a glorious matchup for Christian Kirk,

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>who comes in with a B grade. Here. The rest

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Jacksonville receivers, including the Jacksonville Joneses, our benchable.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We are not keeping up with the Joneses. They've They're

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>barely rostered anywhere anyway. It's a brutal matchup which you

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>do not like. And since week for only one receiver

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>has top seventy six yards against Baltimore. How about we

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>call them Jacksonsville Jacks Jacksons, maybe Jacksons jack I don't know.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a stretch. I'll be honest. Trevor Lawrence

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is a c gre He's been a viable Fantasy star,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>but I do not like this matchup. Baltimore has only

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>surrendered multiple touchdowns twice all season. They've been dominant over

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the last month, allowing just to score since weeks six.

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So Trevor Lawrence with a tricky matchup in just the

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sea grade in this game when we come back, take

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Nine players upon whom you can

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>take a chance. These are guys not normally in your

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup. Many of these players are available off the

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire. We will tell you who they are when

0:16:30.280 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we return to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back. Take your

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>chance at me nine players you would not normally start.

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Many of these guys available on the waiver wire. Let's

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>begin at the quarterback position, at Matt Harrison. I'll use

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan, who has looked all right since re taking

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>over the starting job with new coach Jeff Saturday. We're

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>quick to forget that Ryan has three games of over

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.719
<v Speaker 1>three fifty passing yards this season, and he's thrown every

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>single one of the Colts passing scores this year. Uh,

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers have allowed the fourth most passing yards and

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the third most passing scores, and out of the ten

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks they faced, eight of them have had at least

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty yards or multiple touchdowns. All right, Matt

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan in the house. Let's go to your quarterback, Brian.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I got Ryan Tannehill at home against the Bengals. Over

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, the Titans that faced the number

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>one in number five pass defenses and the Broncos and

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, and Tannehill has average passing game with four

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes over those two games, not too shabby. Now

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>draws the Bengals, who just let Kenny Pickett throw for

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>two sixty and a touchdown, which should have been too Yeah, yeah,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I really should have to bring that up again because

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it costs me like two grand and daily if George

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Pickens holds onto that ball. So I'm gonna turn off

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>my mic and cry now. H Taylor Heineke is no

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>need to cry here. He has been named the full

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>time starter for Washington. He's looked good on paper. What

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>does not look good? Atlanta UM They look like an

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>improved secondary, but in the last month they have faced

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the modest passing of p J Walker, Justin Fields, p J. Walker,

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and Justin Herbert without his whiteouts. Prior to those games,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are getting destroyed by quarterbacks three or eighteen

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 1>yards and almost two touchdowns per game. Heineke probably does

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not bring three eighteen and two to the table. It's

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>not his kind of upside. In fact, he hasn't scored

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in back to back games, but a solid game probably

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>coming here running from the outside. Terry McLaurin has got

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>very nice matchups. We'll talk more about him later, or so,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just if only for Terry mclaurin's upside, we can start

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Heineke this week. Terry, Let's go to the running

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>back position. Raheem most Stirt is a must start this

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>year or this week. Yes, most are to said single

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>digit carries in both games since Jeff Wilson came to town.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But also yes, the Texans are that bad where eight

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>or nine carries for most are it might be enough.

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>They're basically bottom three in every category against running backs,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>but the most notable one should be they've allowed the

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>most running back combo yards in the league this year

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>at a hundred and eighty four per game. It's insane,

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and the third most total touchdowns to running backs at

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>fourteen through ten games. So most are it's got a

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>decent chance at eighty and a score here in a

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>backup role. Here, in a backup role, Brian, you're running back,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me. Player uh Deonta foreman of

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers at home against the Broncos. He falls back

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>into take on range sadly after his gud game last week,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>but he could bounce back against the Broncos defense has

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>softened against the run. Over their last four games, opposing

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>backs are averaging rushing yards per game on nearly five

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry against Denver, and you know the Panthers

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>will want to lean on the run game with Sam

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Donald starting at quarterbacks. So I'm going back to the

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>well with foreman all right, might take a chance of

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>me running back him? Probably Littavius Murray, last man standing

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>again the Denver back. Is it the dawning of the

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>age of Lottavius again again? He could be Mike Boone,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>by the way, as a reminder, still on the injured reserve.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a good take a chance. I mean, our pre's

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>been sure speculation. We might talk about him more later.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>His only competition for touches for Latavius Murray's Marlon Mack,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>who has already been cut twice this year. Murray could

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>be looking at a lot of volume against the Panther's

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>team allowing the sixth most rushing yards the fifth most

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game to opposing running backs. And despite Denver's

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>offensive woes, Murray's been solid. He's scored in three or

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 1>five games. He's averaged sixty ish total yards in the

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 1>other two games. He's been a solid contributor anyway. Now

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get the aster majority of the work. Let's

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>go to the wide receiver position. Well, I'm gonna go

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>with the tight end position. I'm going really, really, really

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>deep into the tight end waste land chargers, backup tight ends.

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Tray McKitty, you're not going Donald Palm, No, he's not.

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I rude. Oh that's pretty good. Yeah, I was gonna

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>see if we had a meal. I think I think

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we have a horse nee. Yeah, I've got anyway, that's

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that's technically a mongoose, but you know they got four legs.

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everett does look like he'll play this weekend. He's

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a good start too, but it's a groin injury for Everett.

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Those tend to recur a little bit. Donald Palm on

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I r so here, McKitty kitty, Uh, McKitty saw six

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>targets in Week ten against the forty. Niners dominated the

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>snap count last week and Everett's absence, and this week

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.239
<v Speaker 1>he gets the Cardinals, who are the worst tight end

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>defense in the league. They have allowed the most receptions,

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>yards and touchdowns to tight ends this year, which is

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>why they are the worst. Let's go to Brian your

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of me receiver. I got Mac Hollands

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Raids at at Seattle. Over Seattle's last two games,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>opposing wide receivers are averaging fifteen catches and a hundred

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and fifty plus yards per and they've total three touchdowns.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are good numbers for the opposition, and you have

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to expect that Davante Adams will command lots of double

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>coverage from the Seahawks. So I think Mac will find

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some space in this one. And most importantly, there is

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a spike game angle here and draft. The Seahawks selected

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Amara Darbo exactly twelve picks before mac hollins, and he's

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna rub it in their face on Sunday. When was

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mccollins drafted like the six early fourth mccollins literally has

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a most of them three times. Paris Campbell has surged

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to life with Matt Ryan under center, and Campbell's last

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>four games with Ryan he scored three in time. In

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 1>those four games, He's averaging seven catches for sixty eight

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>yards and Matt Ryan's starts impressive. There is no reason

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to believe the Steelers will slow down Paris Campbell's momentum

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>running from the slot. He's gonna face Arthur Malllett, one

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of the league's shakiest slock corners. Male I got roasted

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>for eighty one yards in a score last week and

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>he owns up PF ranking as the one hundred six cornerback.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's an excellent opportunity for Paris Campbell. Just so you

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>guys know, when you're doing scientific spike game research, you

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have to break the draft into tears and you look

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>at like, I'm not gonna Let's say Matt Collins. You know,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson was draft and it was different drafts. You

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm saying. It's a spike game. You'll do

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>anything to find his spike games. Uh, Matt, let's go

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>to Houston taking on Miami. We have already touched. Uh

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>did we touch on this game? Yeah, well a little bit.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But let's start with Houston, who has another new quarterback.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's Kyle Allen, who seems primed to get the start.

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills. He'd be close to take a chance on

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>me player this week because Miami tends to get into

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>track meets with opposing teams. However, the Dolphins have been

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty decent against backup level quarterbacks in the last six weeks,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wilson, Jacoby Brissette, and Kenny Pickett have all been

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>held under to sixty yards and limited to one or

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>zero touchdowns. Alan has two starts in the last three years,

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and the best game of those was for the Washington

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>football team, where he threw for two eight and two

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>against the then horrible Giants. Everything else was bad. I'm

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>keeping him on the bench. Uh. Nico Collins and Brandon Cooks,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll give them both SEA grades just because it's probably

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a game script situation here. Collins

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>has led Cooks in targets and catch totals in each

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the last two games that both have played, and

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in the last three games, four different wide receivers have

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>topped ten PPR points against the Dolphins, So both startable here.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about Nico Collins later in the show. Sure,

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Damian Pierce just a B grade here. It was It's

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>closer to a CEE than an A. By the way,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins have been great against the run. They're allowing

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the fourth fewest combo yards per game to opposing runners.

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>The bright spot is the Dolphins are allowing just over

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a tight end or sorry a touchdown per game to

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>opposing runners, and Pierce gets almost all the work, so

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he should be able to claw his way to like

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>eight yards in a score here also a bit of

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a homecoming game. Oh yeah, there we go, right he

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>mostart might take a chance on me runner and for

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>similar points already made. Jeff Wilson gets an A grade

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in this one. Yes, I love Jeff. I think I

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>have Jeff Wilson number three running back. I mean it's Houston,

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's okay. Hey, can we consider an art Vark

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for Jeff Wilson. No, that's silly, he's not that he's

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>there's most starts still there, I got I got art

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Varks later in the show for so many uh um,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>all right back to uh the Dolphins. Despite no one

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>passing on the Texans and it's so easy to run

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>against them, I'll still give Tyrek and a grade and

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle a B. Davante Adams A J Brown, Darius

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Slayton each put up quality Fantasy days against the Texans

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last month, and the talent of Hill and

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Waddle just should be able to do the same even

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with limited touches. Mike Kasiki is totally touchdown dependent, and

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say that this is a favorable touchdown matchup

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as the Texans have only allowed four scores the position

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in ten games. So I'll keep him on the bench.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>If I like Hill and Waddle, I gotta like Tah

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>enough to give him a B grade. He has three

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes in three straight games. I think he can

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>do enough to cobble together a fourth straight multi touchdown

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>game here. So TA is good to go alright TOA

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is good to go TOA is going to end up

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>finishing the season as your yardage leader even with his

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>missed games. That is very possible. Yeah, Patrick Mahomes might

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>have something to say about that. That's that's gonna be

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the tricky That's gonna be the tricky one. But I'm

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>team two on this one, in particular. When we come

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>back Denver takes on Carolina, we'll tell you if any

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>we already told you one Denver player we like, we'll

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tell if there's any others that we like in this

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>really ugly matchup. D J Moore startable yes, no drop

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:22.120
<v Speaker 1>herble yes no. Plenty To get to four segment number

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>three of Fantasy Football Weekly coming up in moments. It's

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Charchy and Guillotine at Least dot com,

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison's Shock Fantasy Brian Johnson Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You can follow us on Twitter at Paul Charchy and

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at Explosive Output and at b t x J, respectively.

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Denver takes on Carolina. This is the crappiest matchup of

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. Brian. Yeah, what's the opposite of a barn burner,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>barn raiser? It's the Amish barn raising and day. That's

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the opposite right there. I would probably rather watch the

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Amish raiser bar in this football game over under in

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this game is six. Start with Latavius Murray. He was

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>charges take a chance on me running back, basically the

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>only running back active for the Broncos. So yeah, I

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. Start Um Courtland Sutton and Jerry Judy. I'll

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>give them both the seed. Judy, keep your eye on him.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He might not play, but if he suits up, I'll

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>give him the See here, the Panthers secondary has struggled

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>without starting corner Dante Jackson. Loss. Yeah, they allowed to

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns. The Falcons in Week ten. Last week

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to Marcus Robinson had nine catches for a dy yards

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>against them. So Sutton end or Judy can get something

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>done here. But I only think it'll be one of them.

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>It's because J. C. Horns on the other side, right,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's awesome. And we'll talk about their quarterback in

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a minute to uh in not a very nice way.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait for that anyway. Let's talk about the

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end quick. Greg Dalson she gets to see has

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a decent matchup this week, as the Panthers are allowing

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>five catches in fifty yards per game to tight ends,

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and over their last five games, Carolina has yielded nine

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>targets to the position, So I like doll sits here

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>nine times nine times. Lastly, though Russell Wilson, he is

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, has thrown for zero or one touchdown

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in every game but one, so he now needs five

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdown pass I didn't do this reach research. I wish

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I could attribute this. I don't know who initially came

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>up with this, but he needs five touchdown passes to

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>equal the number of toilets he has in his house,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>which is reportedly twelve twelve. He's got twelve toilets. He

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>started the season with twelve, and they're speculating that he

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>has not added anymore toilets to his house nor subtracted

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>anymore any toilets from his house. So they've got that

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>at twelve. But if what if you put in like

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a yurnal or something, well, I don't think you were

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>count I don't mean. I think a guy that sits

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>down to pe every time, so I think in his house.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Russell, you're just too easy to pick on anyway.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Over to the Panther's side, Uh don'te Foreman was my

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna give Russell a grade? Uh? Bench toilet toy?

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll put him on the throne. He can pick one

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of his toilet. He can sit on the bench, or

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>he can sit on the toilet on the throne, is

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>what I hear you say. All right, let's ride to

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the other side. Over to the Panthers. Dante Foreman was

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>my take a chance on me running back. Denver's d

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>softened as of late, so I like him in this

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>matchup to bounce back. I do not like Tchuba Hubbard.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>He use on the bench. Since his return in week ten,

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Cuba has nine carries for fourteen scoreless yards in a

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>very bad fumble. So I don't see him doing much here.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see Terrace Marshall or d J. Moore doing

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>much either. They're on the bench with Sam Donald as quarterback,

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Broncos are only allowing eleven catches one yards

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>per game to wide receivers. They've surrendered just five touchdowns

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to the position. Granted, four of those five touchdowns have

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>come over the last two weeks. Nick Westbrook, A Keene

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and Davante Adams both top the hundred yards and scored

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 1>toys against Denver over the last two weeks. But again,

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald, as you're starting cornerback quarterback, I can't go

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>there with more or Marshall, and I'm certainly not gonna

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>start Tommy Tremble or Sam Donald, of course certainly not.

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's just can we agree just drop d J. Moore.

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think about good. It's gonna did a long

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>time ago. I mean, yes, and I missed the one

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>good game he had, right, it is about one good game.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna feel so good. I mean, do they play

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic again? At least want to have him for the

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic game? No, they played it twice twice three weeks.

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It's over. It's over when you hit the drop button

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and confirm to just unshackle yourself from d J. You're

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>talking redraft only the of course I wouldn't drop him

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty. They have to do that with Kyle Pitts

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, too, did you I did

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>got ahead of you. You You dropped him in Dynasty. No,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta takes on Washington and we've got exactly one starter

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's we're back to this. It's Drake London. London

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>is you have to see more than forty receiving yards

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>since week three, but the Commanders have allowed the most

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns over the past five weeks. In London's

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>got that big frame, well suited friend zone news. His

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>most common individual matchup is against cornerback Ben st Juice,

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a neutral matchup, and he's given up a lot of touchdowns.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So on the hope that if you think Marcus Mariota

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is good for one touchdown, one touchdown pass, Drake London's

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>got to be the guy. No, Kyle Pitts, We've already

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>covered that. Moments ago. I can see Pitts just standing

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on the sideline and Mariotta throw us at him and

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>he's like, oh, now you do, Now you throw He's

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna he's gonna catch three balls on the sideline an

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>out out more fantasy points that he's had in nice.

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>He was having a good game last week before he

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>got hurt. That's that's all you've got left, don't you.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Before his season ending injury, he was doing well. You

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>had a few good games. Let's talk about your bench players,

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>including Marcus Mariotta. You already know the Falcons rarely passed.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They thirty one and passing plays per game thirty one

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and passing percentage. How funny would it be for Kyle

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Pitts owners if Mariotta throws like fifty passes in this

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>game and all to the tight end. Right, Well, he's

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver. So with Pitts gone, it removes on

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of Mariota's few aerial weapons. London is gonna need to

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>single handedly power the passing offense, something he's not proven

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he's able to do. You're really you're starting Mariota with

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the hope of rushing. Washington has allowed quarterback rushing touchdowns

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and back to back games, so you could throw a

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could throw a dart market Mariota, but

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got a bench good on him, and I don't

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>recommend it. All the running backs, Patterson, Algier, Huntley Williams.

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>What a what a mess for fantasy owners. It's a

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>matchup that features the league's ugliest running back by committee

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>with the league's best run defense. So they're all on

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Commanders have held their last six opponents under

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>one rushing yards, and on the season, only one runners

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>top seventy six yards against Washington. Only two backs have

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>scored rushing touchdowns against Washington since the opener. A brutal matchup.

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're all on the bench. Let's go to Washington

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>side of this, or we do have more we have

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>more optimism for their players. Taylor Heineke was might take

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me quarterback Terry McLaurin, I mentioned, and

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was tign about Taylor, Heineke was saying, Terry mccluy,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>nice matchup a grade Terry McLaurin. Sence, Heineke took over McLaren,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>averaging a robust nine targets and eighty five yards per game.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>McLaren can dominate an Atlanta secondary that's allowed the most

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>receptions and the most yards to wide receivers, along with

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the third most touchdowns. Cornerback A J. Terrell is allowed

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the most coverage touchdowns of any player in the league

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and an astoundingly high one D thirty one passer rating

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on passes thrown into his coverage. Terry McLaurin a grade

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel, though on the bench. He was getting a

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of you so with Carson Wentz, but very little

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with Heineke, averaging just two catches per game over the

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>last month. We're gonna keep him on the bench. The

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs Robinson and Gibson both gets C grades in

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 1>this one. For Robinson, over the last three games only

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Chicago is run the ball at a higher percentage than Washington,

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>which gives Robinson ample opportunity to get basically stuff that

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage because that's what he does. He

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>ranks fifty first out of fifty three running backs in

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>yards before contact. He has not averaged more than three

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>point nine yards per carrying any game this year. Atlanta

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>has however, seen a running back score against them in

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>five consecutive games. And that's the only reason I have

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a starting grade on Brian Robinson is the expectation that

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>he could get a touchdown in this game on a

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>short run. Antonio Gibson factors into the C grade. I

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>went back and forth with him on a C grade

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>versus bench if you factor in the receptions, Gibson is

0:35:52.920 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>getting as many touches as Robinson lately, and he's doing

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>more with them. Both Gibson and Robinson got carries inside

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the five yard line last weeks, so you've got the

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>hope for a touchdown for Gibson as well. And I

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before Atlanta is giving up running back touchdowns. The

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons aren't giving up a lot of running back reception.

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think Gibson helps you out a lot

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>from a PPR standpoint, but hopefully in totality can cobble

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>together a good game. Let's work in another matchup, Matt

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans taking on San Francisco. Alvin Camara has let's

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>just say it, he's been bad. We're gonna talk more

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>about him next segment. What do you think about this

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>matchup with San Francisco. I was gonna call him topsy turvy,

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but a hundred and fifty eight yards and three scores

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders now four weeks ago. Since then, he's

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>averaged sixty five total yards and had zero scores in

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the next three games. Now. He did that facing two

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 1>top ten run defenses there, and he gets another one

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this week in San Francisco. The Niners have allowed the

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>fewest rushing yards this season. They've only allowed five total

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to the position all year. He also hasn't practiced

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>this week due to an illness. I gonna give Kamara

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a C grade, but he's more of a flex consideration

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.359
<v Speaker 1>than a solid starter at running back, and I'd rather

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>have him on the bench if I have any better options.

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>This week. Andy Dalton has been Andy Dalton, and uh

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's about as good as you can say for the

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Saints starting quarterback. Solid but not spectacular, multiple touchdowns in

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>three or five games. Problem is, the Niners have allowed

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>two total touchdown passes in the last three games, and

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to get healthy at the right time, so

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Dalton is probably not start worthy. In a week with

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty two teams playing, Chris O Lave gets the best

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup of the wide receivers against Diamador Lenore, who's allowing

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of one oh one in his coverage.

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a B O. Lave managed a hundred

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>yards in a score last week, and despite Juwan Johnson

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 1>scoring five touchdowns in his last five games, he Taysom Hill,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry, and the rest of the Saints passing game

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench. It's just not a very favorable

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>match up against the Niners. Over on the San Francis

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>go side, Christian McCaffrey, he gets an A grade. The

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Saints have allowed the eighth most rushing yards this year,

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and McCaffrey has scored a touchdown in three straight games

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>against New Orleans. Now, granted those were all with Carolina,

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but here we go. Deebo Samuel still nursing a hamstring injury.

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He's been limited in practice all week. He only played

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in fifty eight percent of the snaps last week, mostly

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>because the game script didn't really need him in there.

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Against the Cardinals, he'll probably play, but if the Niners

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are able to get up early, they might just ease

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>off Debo in the second half altogether. So just a

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Debo, and it's a very contrarian angle.

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that if they were up by that

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>much hasn't Debo already helped your team a lot, not

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>necessarily because Brandon I Yuke has been great, Christian McCaffrey

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. George Kittles had a great couple of games.

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there's just other weapons there and

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Debo just might be the odd man out. They might

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>want to treat him with kid gloves, get him ready

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 1>for the playoff run. Brandon I Yuk I am giving

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>an eight grade to five scores in his past five

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of games. Eighty yards are a score in five straight games. Uh.

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>The Saints have been better against wide receivers lately, but

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>they've played the Ravens without Bateman, the Rams without Cup,

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Steelers wide receiver groups in the last three weeks.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>The Saints are allowing the ninth most yards in the

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>eleventh most touchdowns per game, so it's a good matchup

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for wide receivers. George Kittle gets a C because the

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Saints are actually the best tight end defense in the

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.879
<v Speaker 1>league and it's not very close. They've only allowed one

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>tight end score this year, and the best tight end

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>day that anyone has had against the Saints was last week.

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>It was Tyler Higbee who was the only guy on

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the Rams roster. I'm pretty sure he had four catches

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 1>for forty five yards. That was the best day. Now

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Kittle is the best tight end they've faced, and he's

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just coming off eighty four yards and two scores. So

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:49.240
<v Speaker 1>he's still startable here. But the matchups pretty tough. Jimmy

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>G gets a C grade. It's the middle of the

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.959
<v Speaker 1>PAC matchup for him. The Saints do not intercept the ball.

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>That's good for Jimmy G. They've only got two on

0:39:56.480 --> 0:40:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the season, and Garoppolos coming off multiple touchdown game in

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>five of his last six, so I like him with

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. Kind of closer to a bee than

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a bench. Though that sounds like a C grade to me,

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it does a lot like a secret. I know. I'm

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just giving you know, some context and layering to where

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>my C grade stands. All right, understood, I've got a

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of questions for you guys. From the Thursday Thanksgiving games,

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Ramondre Stevenson looked very good. But now Damien Harris, we

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know the full status of his injury situation. Harris

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>actually started that game. We we we loved Romandi Stevenson

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>when when Damian Harris was out like you know he was.

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>He was getting a grades most weeks when Harris was out.

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Then Harris came back. Uh in the last couple of games,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>he got a bunch of work. In fact, he was,

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned, starter on Thursday. But now it looks

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like he might be out again for a while. Where

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is Ramondre Stevenson rest of season? Because I think I

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>think he's an RB one automatic start the rest of

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, inside the top ten easily. I saw among

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>all running backs he's fourth in target percentage only behind

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:11.279
<v Speaker 1>like McCaffrey, Kamara and Ekeler and then they're there's Stevenson

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and they they're they're more of a run first team.

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>We didn't really see that on Thursday night, but they

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>were throwing to Stevenson a ton, So yeah, I mean

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 1>ten targets on Thursday. Harris is a fine player, went healthy,

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's getting to the point where it's like you

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>just gotta play Stevenson. He's like too good. He's just

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 1>too good. Yeah, I agree with everything you said. I

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>think Stevenson's probably six seven right in there at that

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>range for running backs you'd want the rest of the year,

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.279
<v Speaker 1>right there talk to me about I'm on Ross St. Brown,

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:41.719
<v Speaker 1>who's replicating last year's end of season tear right now

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>with another big game on Thursday night, and it looks like,

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>much like last year, this offense is going to go

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>through him. He's kind of a beast. Remember when Jared

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Goff had Cooper Cup and just kept feeding Cooper Cup

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the ball? I do. I think him on Ross St.

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Brown his his new Cooper Cup. I think that this

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>ey's the limit for him right here, and he could

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be And I think that I was saying in the break,

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's my number one wide receiver as we

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>head into draft season next year. So you're right now,

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'm looking at the Monross st. Brown. I

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>think he's my number one wide receiver going into it

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>for Justin Jefferson. Yeah, I think that he just gets

0:42:19.160 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>so much target share in Detroit. I think it's gonna

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be fun watching him. There's one

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>potential speed bump rest of the season and next year,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's Jamison Williams. That's true, but that's gonna help

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the whole offense too, so it might be great. Yeah,

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's gonna it's gonna hurt him more

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:36.359
<v Speaker 1>than it's gonna help him. But and and they might

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have a new quarterback in town next year to that

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is possible. Dalton Schultz two touchdown game, looks healthy, looks

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like a totally different player that we saw in the

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>first half of the season. Now with the dearth of

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>tight ends out there, where do you believe he ranks

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a tight ends off top of the head? I mean

0:42:55.600 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>he's behind Kelsey of course, with Mark Andrews, and that's

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>about it until Alice Goddard comes back hopefully. Yeah, he's

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>definitely a top five I think rest of the way,

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't name anybody out of the other than those two. Well,

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and really the things weren't working out because Doc was

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.479
<v Speaker 1>out or Dalton was out for those first first few

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>games there. And now that they're both back and healthy,

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>he's he's being targeted in the red zone like just

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>all the time. You can throw Kiddle in that mix too,

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, behind Kelsey obviously, but yeah, he's right up there.

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>What do you do if you're playing against any of

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the three guys that we just broke down Stevenson amand

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Ross st Brown or Um Justin Jefferson. Well, if you're behind,

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 1>point of if you're behind by a lot heading into

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, how does it change your draft? How does

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it change your lineup strategy for the weekend. I mean,

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 1>we kind of cover this every time a huge go

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.439
<v Speaker 1>off game happens on a Thursday night. But you get

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a little more risky with your with your decisions, not

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the safety. You go for the guy who

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>can get you a hundred and fifty yards and scores,

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.440
<v Speaker 1>but also might get you thirty and nothing, righte most

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in a very juicy matchup as an auto starter, and

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>then try and pair a quarterback with the pass catcher,

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>stack them up, hope hopefully the quarterback goes off to

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to your guys. That's right. I think that's Those are

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>the two I think the two most straightforward strategies. If

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>you're already down by thirty and get away from a

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback if the other team as a receiver for the

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback redvice first, you can't you can't afford to do

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that if you're Yeah, because then they both they both

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>go together. Yeah. Absolutely, it makes a ton of sense

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 1>as well. Our number two of Fantasy Football Weekly coming

0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up momentarily If you want all of the player ratings,

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you can get them at Guillotine leagues dot com for free.

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.840
<v Speaker 1>All the positions broken down and explained at no cost.

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot Com our number two coming up in moments.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>It's our number two Fantasy football weekly. This is a

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>segment we like to call three tough questions. We encourage

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you to play along and see if you can go

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>three and oh. Tough question number one. Should we drop

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four Net from our rosters? We begin with Matt Harrison.

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. He's still getting double digit touches

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and basically every game, and he's getting run in the

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 1>red zone, which is most important. Uh. The interesting was

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the snap count two carries last week for the Bucks.

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>For Net was only on the field for twenty two snaps.

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.719
<v Speaker 1>That was only of the share, but he touched the

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>ball fifteen times and twenty two snaps. That's a pretty

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>heavy workload for only twenty two snaps. Uh. They have

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>some plays that they want to run with four NET.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what that means. They have some things that they're like,

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a for Net play. This isn't a Rashod

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>White play, but good on ra shod White to really

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 1>take over the backfield and have the past protection lockdown.

0:45:56.760 --> 0:45:58.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that rookies need to do, and he's

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>really done that. So I don't think it's ready to

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:02.719
<v Speaker 1>drop for Net time the right. So you say no

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on dropping four net, Brian Johnson, Are we dropping Leonard

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>four net? H screw it? I'll say yes. Basically, he

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>needs something to happen to Chad White to be a well,

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you need to get healthy first and foremost. He's got

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this hip issue. Um to Concerner, he's gonna go on

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I R or anything like that. But he's been losing

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>snaps a week over week to Shad White, who both

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Bucks backs aren't really doing anything on the ground. But

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>White's been a little better. He's a better pass catcher

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and his snap percentage has been going up. So of

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>course there's a lot of stipulations like weeks eye, YadA, YadA, YadA,

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but blanket statement, yes, drop Leonard for Nett, I originally

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>authored this question to say, sabotage drop Leonard four Nette.

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't even know if this is the sabotage

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>criteria because I don't know that anybody's gonna be like

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four net. I'm not gonna pick him up and

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.919
<v Speaker 1>put him in my lineup. I don't think anybody's gonna

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.399
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody's that done. Nobody's gonna drop like all

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>their fab on Leonard four net. For no, they're not.

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>He is a backup running back on an offense that

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>ranks twenty seventh in points, dead last in rushing yards,

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>dead last in rushing touchdowns, and dead last in yards

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>per carry. And he's the backup behind that team. Shod

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>White hasn't looked a lot better. Granted a little better,

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot better. But if you're the Bucks, you

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what you've got in Leonard four net and

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not working. So I think we've got a long

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 1>runway on Rashad White to see if it turns out

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he can develop and to provide Tampa with some upside

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that four net clearly isn't providing. And four net is

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>just he's just a name on the on the back

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.319
<v Speaker 1>of a jersey that you recognize at this point. But so,

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks are the worst offering rushing offense in the NFL.

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:50.319
<v Speaker 1>The second worst rushing offense is the Rams. Would you

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>roster the Rams backup running back Kyren Williams right now

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in the hopes that he becomes the number one. Look

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at their playoff run. You want both Cam Akers and

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Kirraen Williams both stashed deep on your bench for that

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>playoff run because if one figures it out, that's fun.

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna drop Leonard four Nett and you go pick

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>up Kiren william There you go. You are so inclined tough.

0:48:12.760 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Question number two, what is the appropriate level of concern

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar Jackson? Is it none, some or a bowl

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>loosening level of existential dread? Brian, I'm not blowed on

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>l Jack's just yet, but I am somewhat concerned. As

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier in the show, Jackson total twelve touchdowns

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>from week one through Week three. Since then, he has

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>total just seven, which is a Yeah, You've been better

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>off benching Jackson in most cases, but I like you

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this week against Jacksonville. Denver is tough in Week thirteen,

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or should be tough, but that's a home game at

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>least for the Ravens. But Jackson will see Pittsburgh twice

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way in weeks fourteen, in weeks

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and in weeks seventeen and picked Pittsburgh has been the

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 1>fifth easiest team UH for quarterbacks to face. So I'm

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>somewhat concerned, but I'm not blowed on l Jacks. Matt,

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 1>What is the appropriate level of concern for Lamar Jackson?

0:49:09.080 --> 0:49:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it none, some, or blowed? I don't think I've

0:49:14.480 --> 0:49:18.879
<v Speaker 1>ever answered blowed and one of these questions not maybe

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just I'm just calm, I'm cool. I have no concern

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on Lamar Jackson. By the way. He's still doing enough

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on the ground to keep you and float afloat. And

0:49:28.239 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why you drafted Lamar for the rushing numbers, and

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the passing is really gravy for Lamar. He's ran for

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at least fifty eight yards or a rushing score in

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.800
<v Speaker 1>eight of his last nine games. That that's six points

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>right off the top. They're just on the running at least.

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.719
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have concern about Lamar Jackson. This is

0:49:45.760 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>who he is. You get the passing scores when Mark

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Andrews gets going and gets hot, then he gets the

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 1>spike week games. But he's getting you, you know, fifty

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 1>points in a standard league every week. The correct answer

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is some for Lamar Jackson some level of concern. Since

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Week four, he's quarterback twenty in scoring twenty, averaging one

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:10.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy five passing yards and zero point eight passing

0:50:10.160 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game. Sure does the rushing help the sixty

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>yards he's averaging sixty yards per game? Well, okay, that's

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>six fantasy points. But the problem is the passing is

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 1>giving you not giving you any other points to go

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>with it, or very few other points to go with it.

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.919
<v Speaker 1>He's only scored one rushing touchdown in the last seven games,

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and when Gus Edwards returns, Edwards is going to vacuum

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>up all the short rushing scores for Shot Bateman. Done

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for the year. He's got the worst set of receivers

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and the schedule it's so so. A

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of positive matchups left Pittsburgh in Atlanta, the rest

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of its neutral are bad. There's not much to like

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>with Lamar Jackson. Appropriate level of concern is some tough

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>question number three? What is the appropriate level of concern

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for Alvin Kamara? Is it none, some, or a bowel

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>loosening level of existential dread. I definitely have some concern here.

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention some of the stats in the matchup. Well,

0:51:04.440 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I did already, but he's just not faring well against

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>good run defenses. Against San Francisco this week in Tampa

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:13.240
<v Speaker 1>next week, there are both borderline bench grades for Camara.

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Then he has a Week fourteen buy, so it's tough

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to start him for three straight weeks. But after that

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy playoffs look better. Atlanta in week fifteen and

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland in week sixteen are both very positive matchups, and

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:29.719
<v Speaker 1>he exploded against a similarly bad defense the Raiders in

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the recent past. So it's a two pronged answer to

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this charch um. If you're dependent on Camara to get

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you into the Fantasy playoffs right now, it's it's full

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>blowed because he's not going to get you there. Well,

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's we're still like four weeks out of the

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy three weeks for away from the Fantasy playoffs, you've

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 1>got three weeks left. Most people still need wins. If

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you if you're solid and you're you're gonna be in,

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know you're gonna be in, then it's just some.

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you need him to get in, was he

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>answered some or is it blow slowed? You're okay? You

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>can't you care if you can't give two answers. Brian

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate level of concern for Alvin Kamara none, Some

0:52:16.560 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>or blowed based on where he was going in drafts

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in late summer, which was basically before Nick Chubb and

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:25.959
<v Speaker 1>some other big names. I'm I'm blowed on Camara. All

0:52:25.960 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of his touchdowns came in one game. I was against

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders a few weeks ago, and Matt mentioned the schedule.

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:34.839
<v Speaker 1>It's not as good as he thinks it is, at

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:38.680
<v Speaker 1>least in my opinion. San Francisco, Tampa Bay, Atlanta, Cleveland,

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and Philly. Yes, Atlanta is the good matchup, but that's

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the only home game during that stretch. The rest is

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on the road on grass or turf, but not the

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fast turf. And really the home game against Atlanta, it's

0:52:51.880 --> 0:52:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta plays an Adul. That's the one away game you

0:52:53.880 --> 0:53:00.160
<v Speaker 1>would rather have have based on that schedule. So it's

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Week sixteen. I don't know, I don't I don't love it.

0:53:03.880 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not a stopper, but I'll be at blow. He's

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>been he's been bad. I don't even think this was

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think this was close. If you took

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 1>his name Remember I said earlier that letter for nets

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just a name, you know, on the back of a jersey.

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>If you took that name off his box score, you

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't even consider starting Alvin Kamara. Most weeks he's giving

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you nothing, and he's getting worse. Over his last four games,

0:53:28.160 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>averaging three point four yards per carry. He hasn't even

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:34.360
<v Speaker 1>topped sixty three rushing yards in any game he has.

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I think, to my eyes, one and a half good

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.680
<v Speaker 1>matchups left. You guys just talked about these, and he's

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 1>basically unstartable. The next three weeks, Matt touched on this

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco Tampa by the Saints. Battered offensive line ranks

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, So that doesn't seem to be something where

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you can go, well, that line is gonna just suddenly

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 1>start dominating in open holes. Not gonna happen. If you

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:57.280
<v Speaker 1>don't already have a massive case of blowed you should

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:04.360
<v Speaker 1>now with Alvin Camaron, it's working a matchup Cincinnati takes

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on Tennessee. Brian, You've seen the Cincinnati offense look better lately,

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but no Joe Mixon in this game. Fascinated to think

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>what find out what you think about somaj P Ryan's

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 1>matchup without Joe Mixon coming off a two touchdown game.

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was a three touchdown was the three

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:27.919
<v Speaker 1>r three receiving touchdowns susdown game? Multiple touchdown game. Their

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 1>bases are covered. But yeah, it's you're excited if you

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:33.080
<v Speaker 1>got p Ryan on roster, but you want to pump

0:54:33.120 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the brakes this week just a little bit. I'm just

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 1>giving him a c here, even with Joe Mixon ruled out.

0:54:37.320 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned charge, the Titans are a tough draw

0:54:39.840 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 1>off running backs. They're allowing just a hundred and five

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:45.560
<v Speaker 1>combo yards and zero point two touchdowns per game to

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the position. That means they've given up two total touchdowns

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to running backs this season. The last running back to

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>rushed for a touchdown against Tennessee was se Kwon Barkley

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in Week one. Wow. So it's a brutal matchup, but

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you obviously have to start p Ryan, who will see

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>the Lion's share of work out of since his backfield.

0:55:03.440 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I should I should have said the Bengals share of

0:55:05.640 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 1>working There we go. Yeah, Hey, the Titans have given

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>up the most receptions to opposing backs though, and that's

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:13.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of p Ryan's bread and butter. That's how he

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 1>scored all of his touchdowns last week. Fair point, You're

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:19.280
<v Speaker 1>certainly gonna start him, but you don't expect three receiving touchdowns.

0:55:19.280 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But if that okay, I don't expect now what. We

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:27.680
<v Speaker 1>don't really know what to expect from Jamaar Chase. He's

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:31.560
<v Speaker 1>been practicing all week. On Friday, he was seen running

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:35.799
<v Speaker 1>red zone routes. You like to hear that, um, but

0:55:36.040 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's his status is still up in the air. It

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like he'll be a game time decision to to

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:42.879
<v Speaker 1>return from that hip injury. If he goes, I'll give

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:45.399
<v Speaker 1>him a C. The Titans are top five and the

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 1>most catches and touchdowns surrendered to wide receivers UH this season.

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>These teams met in the divisual round Divisional round of

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs last year. If you recall, Chase had five

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 1>catches for a hundred nine yards in that game. So

0:55:56.480 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>if he if he returns, I give him the SEA

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.320
<v Speaker 1>now over the other two wide receivers. Of course, Chase's

0:56:01.320 --> 0:56:03.560
<v Speaker 1>status will affect both of these grades. If he comes

0:56:03.600 --> 0:56:06.239
<v Speaker 1>back Jamar Chase, I'll give t Higgins a B. If

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Chase does not return, I'll give Higgins the A with

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Chase sidelined, Higgins saw target totals of six, eight, and thirteen,

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so he didn't really see a huge spike and looks

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:18.280
<v Speaker 1>with Chase on the sideline. UM. But Chase's return probably

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>helps Higgins more than it hurts. But I just mentioned

0:56:21.600 --> 0:56:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Titans are top five in the most of everything

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>surrender to wide receivers, So Higgins is a strong play. Uh.

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 1>He had seven catches for for ninety six yards in

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that playoff game with the Titans last year. Now over

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to Tyler Boyd. I got him on the bench if

0:56:35.719 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if Jamaar Chase comes back. In the games without Chase,

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Boyd is in the three games without Chase, Boyd is

0:56:40.520 --> 0:56:43.359
<v Speaker 1>total just ten catches for yards. And now we all

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:45.479
<v Speaker 1>thought that we all thought of those extra those extra

0:56:45.520 --> 0:56:47.839
<v Speaker 1>targets would largely go to Tyler Boyd and it hasn't

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:49.720
<v Speaker 1>worked out that way at all. Yeah, he did score

0:56:49.719 --> 0:56:52.799
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown during that three game span. Um. Again, it's

0:56:52.840 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a great matchup on paper. So if Chase is out,

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Boyd the sea. But if Chase comes back,

0:56:57.080 --> 0:56:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I got Boyd on the bench. And each of the

0:56:59.320 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>last two games of the titans last two games, though,

0:57:02.160 --> 0:57:04.960
<v Speaker 1>three different wide receivers totaled at least fifty yards, so

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that would if you're in a it's a tough one

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:12.399
<v Speaker 1>with Boyd. Uh, definitely a start. If Chase sits, I'm

0:57:12.400 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm holding with the bench grade if Chase comes

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:16.920
<v Speaker 1>back for Boyd. He only had two catches for seventeen

0:57:17.000 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 1>yards in that playoff game against the Titans last year,

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and over to the tight end for the Bengals Hayden Hurst.

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have a single game this season with over

0:57:26.280 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty receiving yards, and he hasn't found the end zone

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>since Week five. Also, the Titans have allowed just two

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 1>receptions to tight ends and each of their past two games,

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and the aven't allowed a tight end touchdown since Week four.

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:39.480
<v Speaker 1>So I got Hurst on the bench even in the

0:57:39.520 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>tight end wasteland, but it's certainly not benching Joe Burrow.

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Regardless of Jamaar Chase returning or not. Tennessee owns the

0:57:46.800 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>highest opponent passing play percentage in the league, and as

0:57:50.160 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a result, they have surrendered these second most passing yards

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and passing touchdowns to quarterbacks despite already having their by

0:57:57.000 --> 0:57:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Burrow did not throw a touchdown in that playoff game.

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned a few times, but he did have eight yards.

0:58:02.120 --> 0:58:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So I've got an A on Joe Burrow over the

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Titan side, easy A for Derrick Henry. Since Week eight,

0:58:08.800 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Henry has five rushing touchdowns. He's averaged a rushing touchdown

0:58:13.160 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 1>per every nineteen carries during that span, which is very good.

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>During that same span, the Bengals have allowed a rushing

0:58:19.600 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per every fourteen carries. So that math is adding

0:58:24.800 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>up to uh, it's a very good chance Derrick Henry

0:58:27.240 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>scores at least one touchdown in this game. He had

0:58:30.040 --> 0:58:32.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty carries for sixty two yards and a touchdown against

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals in that Divisional round game, and he had

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a metal plate sticking out of his foot for that one.

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So I like Henry and this one he gets literally

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 1>sticking out of his foot, probably pretty close. He probably

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:48.200
<v Speaker 1>need another surgery. It was fresh steel, very fresh steel.

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Over to the wide receivers trail on Burks. I'm gonna

0:58:53.440 --> 0:58:55.560
<v Speaker 1>give him a B. Last week. Yeah, he led the

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Titans and targets, receptions and yards. Posting the first game

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of his career year. It won't be his last. It

0:59:02.160 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 1>might not happen this week, as the Bengals will allowed

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>just two receivers to go for a hundred plus yards,

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but they have surrendered a wide receiver touchdown in five

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>straight games, So if a wide receiver is gonna score

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown for the Titans, that's gonna be trail on.

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Burke's I got Robert Woods on the bench finally had

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a decent showing last week. But the Bengals are only

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:21.680
<v Speaker 1>allowing ten catches per game to wide receivers, and if

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start a Titans receiver, it's Burke's. I

0:59:25.000 --> 0:59:27.160
<v Speaker 1>will give Austin Hooper a C grade coming off this

0:59:27.240 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 1>big game. The Bengals are allowing five catches for fifty

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>yards per game uh two tight ends, and last week

0:59:32.240 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they yielded fifteen targets to Pittsburgh's tight end, so Hooper

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:39.640
<v Speaker 1>should see some opportunities here. End and Ryan Tannhill I

0:59:39.680 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>like his matchup this week. US might take a chance

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 1>let me quarterback. Yeah, well done, Rams take on Kansas City.

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 1>We come back find out if for the first time

0:59:47.880 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>in I don't know, maybe the history of this show,

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:54.200
<v Speaker 1>are there no Rams to start find out? When we

0:59:54.240 --> 1:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, Yah, Welcome back Fantasy

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, Poltiarchi, Matt Harrison, Brian Johnson with you Rams

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>take on the Kansas City Chiefs. As I mentioned going

1:00:40.760 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>into our break, the Rams do not have anybody to start.

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>There's an official is easy. He's on the bench. Game.

1:00:49.080 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is on the bench. Bryce Perkins is your starting quarterback,

1:00:53.600 --> 1:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>backed up by Case Cookus, Coocus, Case Cookers, Tase Cookus

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe very well making an appearance in this game because

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Perkins is playing behind an offensive line that is

1:01:05.600 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>starting their ninth, tenth and eleventh string offensive lineman. He

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>could we could actually we could see Bryce Perkins get

1:01:12.080 --> 1:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>beaten into the ground and get Case Cookus into the game.

1:01:15.360 --> 1:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Bryce Perkins had a sneaky thirty nine rushing yards

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>last week. That that's that's that's the upside. There so

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>no starters on this Rams team, and I was trying

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the last time that maybe we had

1:01:28.440 --> 1:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a matchup in the history of the show which there

1:01:30.720 --> 1:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>were no starters. In twenty eleven, the Rams were a

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to win operation. Steven Jackson was there and he had

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he put up a yard season, so I gotta believe

1:01:43.240 --> 1:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty much a starter every week he was okay,

1:01:45.960 --> 1:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's possible. If not, then it's possible. The history,

1:01:49.640 --> 1:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenty whatever eight year history of the show, we've

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>never said bench all Rams. Well, it had to be

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty Kurt Warner for sure. That's old old St. Louis Rams.

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe that's it. I don't know, I don't think.

1:02:03.400 --> 1:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if I have to go into

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>any detail on any of this stuff. But you know

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we had Allen Robinson was unstartable when he had Matthew

1:02:09.840 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Stafford as his quarterback, and Cam Akers is dead last

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and rushing efficiency and yards, Tyler Higby is the closest

1:02:16.680 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Ram to a starting grade, and Perkins through to him

1:02:19.760 --> 1:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>three times last week. He's not healthy, and the Chiefs

1:02:22.840 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>are a good tight end defense. There's nobody to start

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>all the Rams on the bench. I will demand a

1:02:29.360 --> 1:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>peacock from my Allen Robinson take on last week. Though

1:02:33.080 --> 1:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>not a good game, I will yield to your demand.

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Let's go to the Kansas City side every week.

1:02:39.040 --> 1:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Travis Kelsey obvious a's and especially coming off

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the performance from last week, Holy cow, Judus miss Schuster

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>expected to play in this game. Yeah, they took him

1:02:47.200 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>off the injury report just recently. I like it. The

1:02:49.680 --> 1:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>fantasy funds he was at that game too, the fantasy actual,

1:02:56.480 --> 1:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the real fun. Henry Winkler himself. He seems like he'd

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>be one of the great actors to hang out with.

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>He seems like a cool guy. Absolutely, well, he was

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>literally the coolest guy ever in hindsight. Wasn't he kind

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of a d bag? Though? No? No, no, everybody says

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he's the nicest guy in Hollywood. No, I'm talking just

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Fonzie character like he was. I don't know,

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want. I mean he lived in the Cunningham's garage.

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>He did not need to live there. In the three

1:03:24.600 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>games prior to Juju's injury, he was averaging a hundred

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>eight yards per game and reached pay dirt twice. He

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>will face the hollow shell of the cornerback once known

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>as Jalen Ramsey. Ramsey's allowing a career worst one hundred

1:03:39.760 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>seventeen passer rating in his coverage and he's given up

1:03:42.800 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>at least seventy one receiving yards in three straight games.

1:03:47.160 --> 1:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>When Juju lines up in the slot, he'll face Troy Hill,

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>who's giving up a passer rating of a hundred and three.

1:03:52.160 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So no what, no matter where Juju is, he's got

1:03:55.280 --> 1:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a strong individual matchup B grade. Juju Smith Schuster Ka

1:04:00.320 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Darius Tony not expected to play in this game, and

1:04:02.680 --> 1:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll keep him on the bench in MVS. I'm a

1:04:05.120 --> 1:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>little bitter because he flopped badly last week and I

1:04:08.480 --> 1:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>was really excited. That's the fantasy mongoose right there. He

1:04:12.040 --> 1:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>eats the peacock. That's what we mongoose, the natural. How

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>about you just eat some crow church, Yeah, maybe it's oh,

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Thank you very much. I gave you.

1:04:22.720 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I gave you a C grade and MVS last week

1:04:25.240 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and he was terrible. So he's lost all I've lost

1:04:27.840 --> 1:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>all faith. He's off. Half of his last six games

1:04:30.240 --> 1:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have been zero or one catch. That is way too

1:04:32.600 --> 1:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>much risk for me. Let's go to the running backs.

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Isaiah Pacheco hundred seven yards last week, the most by

1:04:41.760 --> 1:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a Kansas City running back in how long do you

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think Kareem Hunt was there? Maybe forty two games? Since

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>some running backs at a hundred seven yards for Kansas City.

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards a layer now on I R. So the

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>ground game is totally his tough matchup against a Rams

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>team allowing the seventh fewest rushing yards and the seventh

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>fewest touchdowns per game. No back has hit one hundred

1:05:05.960 --> 1:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards. Uh at well rush no back is at

1:05:09.800 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred rushing yards against the Rams. The last three

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>leadbacks to face the Rams ran for nineteen yards, sixty

1:05:16.960 --> 1:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, and forty two yards and three yards per carry.

1:05:19.600 --> 1:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>There's still a great Rams defense, but the Rams evens

1:05:22.000 --> 1:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be on the field a lot because their

1:05:24.680 --> 1:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>offense is gonna be three and out constantly. So Potako

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade here. I can I flirted with

1:05:29.840 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a B grade, but I can't quite get myself to

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>go there against the Rams. Jerick McKinnon, if you're in

1:05:34.240 --> 1:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a spot, consider him here. He's gonna get some extra

1:05:36.520 --> 1:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>work and could be a contributor via the air. In

1:05:39.480 --> 1:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks nine and ten he caught six passes. Alvin Kamara

1:05:43.360 --> 1:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>posted forty seven air yards against the Rams last week.

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if we can get forty seven are

1:05:47.720 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>yards out of Jerick McKinnon and probably equals a C grade.

1:05:52.480 --> 1:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Our next matchup is the Chargers taking on the Arizona Cardinals.

1:05:57.680 --> 1:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Chargers side of this. You already gave us the backup

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ight end. Yeah, Trey McKinney, you know, line up all

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of your animal sounds for this one charge because this

1:06:06.080 --> 1:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>is like a fantasy zoo. We're plugging in all the chargers.

1:06:09.600 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that, plug in the chargers. Austin Ekeler, he's

1:06:13.080 --> 1:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>an art vark, just an air bear. He's a bear

1:06:16.440 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and also an art charger grades for both of them. Wow,

1:06:21.920 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that's like a fight right there. Keenan Allen got in

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a full practice this week. He's an A after playing

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the snaps Lady's at the zoo. Uh.

1:06:33.040 --> 1:06:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams did not practice yet this week. I don't

1:06:35.480 --> 1:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>think he plays. But Josh Palmer is gonna play and

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he gets an A grade. And Gerald Everett he's even

1:06:40.520 --> 1:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a solid B grade here. And here's why the Cardinals

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are a bottom ten defense in the following categories, passing

1:06:47.440 --> 1:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>completions and yards allowed, passing touchdowns, rushing yards to opposing quarterbacks,

1:06:52.920 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>receptions to wide receivers, running backyards per carry, running back receiving,

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and combo yards allowed, seaving touchdowns to opposing running backs.

1:07:02.240 --> 1:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And they already highlighted that the worst tight end defense

1:07:04.920 --> 1:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in the league, which is why Trey McKitty kitty was

1:07:08.400 --> 1:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on the receiver. All of the

1:07:10.480 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>above stats work in favor of the Chargers. Start them

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>all on the cardinal side, it's a bit more thorny. Uh.

1:07:16.360 --> 1:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray was a full participant in practice this week,

1:07:19.080 --> 1:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so it looks like he'll return after missing two weeks

1:07:21.800 --> 1:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>with a hamstring injury. See, this is the thing that

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>worries me is if if I'm not gonna get rushing

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out of Kyler Murray, I'm really not that interested in

1:07:28.960 --> 1:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>what his arm is gonna give. So the Chargers have

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not given up a ton through the air to the

1:07:32.600 --> 1:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>posing quarterbacks. It's not a particularly good matchup, and they

1:07:35.960 --> 1:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>have allowed multiple passing scores and six of two six

1:07:39.160 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of the last ten quarterbacks they've faced. I'll give Kyler

1:07:42.120 --> 1:07:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here, but this is about the time

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year every year where Kyler is made up

1:07:47.840 --> 1:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and Kyler fades into nothingness, he stops running. The hamstring

1:07:52.320 --> 1:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>injuced injury certainly plays into that, and I'm a little

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>nervous that with the weirdness on the sideline with him

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and Cliff Kingsbury. If they don't go right in the

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>first half, he could just get flat out benched for

1:08:03.360 --> 1:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Colt McCoy in this McCoy is healthy enough to go,

1:08:05.800 --> 1:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a possibility. There was I forget which which

1:08:09.280 --> 1:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>channel did the Cardinals game last week? It was ESPN.

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's rare that your ESPN pregame devotes like a whole

1:08:19.000 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>segment to how the team is happier with Colt McCoy's

1:08:21.920 --> 1:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for quarterback and how he's galvanized the locker room and

1:08:24.920 --> 1:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the players all love him, and it was all of

1:08:27.040 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these back it's handed. Yeah, it's all it was. So

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>don't get a lot of that. I don't think Kyler

1:08:33.439 --> 1:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and Cliff are both in Arizona next year. Arizona is

1:08:38.080 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>carrying on hard knocks right now. This in season hard

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>knocks the Canras out of here. Keep in mind, nobody's

1:08:44.200 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick up Kyler's contract. No, nobody wants that deal.

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Cliff Kingsbury's house, I feel like you

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>get an STD from ringing the doorbell that wow, this

1:08:56.400 --> 1:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>guy things are happening. He gives off five just like

1:09:01.640 --> 1:09:05.799
<v Speaker 1>so bring some Claros wipes to the ring doorbell. Portrait

1:09:05.800 --> 1:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of like a lion wearing a crown. He just like

1:09:10.000 --> 1:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>he's so gone. Um sorry, I understand Marks Brown is

1:09:15.400 --> 1:09:18.439
<v Speaker 1>possible to play, but media reports say if he does play,

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>he'll be on a snap count. Yeah, they have him

1:09:20.760 --> 1:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on a pitch count from what for what we see.

1:09:22.920 --> 1:09:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But Ron Dale Moore doesn't look like he's going to

1:09:25.400 --> 1:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>go with a groin injury. Greg Dortch looks like he'll

1:09:28.040 --> 1:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>miss this week with a thumb injury. And of course

1:09:29.800 --> 1:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Zach Ertz is on I R. So it's all DeAndre Hopkins.

1:09:32.960 --> 1:09:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him an A grade here. Uh, he's gonna

1:09:35.479 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be targeted copiously in this game. How many times is

1:09:39.000 --> 1:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins catching a ball per game? Right now? Church? Um?

1:09:44.960 --> 1:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's correct, Charch, good job. It is nine times

1:09:48.760 --> 1:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>per game. And the Charger secondary is allowing almost a

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>passing score per game to opposing wide receivers. So Hopkins

1:09:55.400 --> 1:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>gets an A. There's another tray mix tend to say

1:09:59.320 --> 1:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>how many? How many Trey gonna have? Trey McBride is

1:10:02.760 --> 1:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>not startable, but I like Trey McKitty. I thought he

1:10:06.200 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>would be startable due to the dearth of other available options. Yeah,

1:10:09.960 --> 1:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I just don't try Tyler that much, but I'm I'm

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:16.639
<v Speaker 1>giving James Conner a B grade here. He scored thrice

1:10:16.800 --> 1:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks. Faces a Chargers defense that

1:10:20.040 --> 1:10:22.479
<v Speaker 1>has been straight up bad against the run. They have

1:10:22.520 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>allowed five point seven yards per carry this year, which

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>lends to the averages of one hundred sixty one combo

1:10:29.240 --> 1:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>yards and one point three touchdowns per game allowed to

1:10:32.240 --> 1:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>opposing backs. I don't think Kyante Ingram steals enough work

1:10:36.320 --> 1:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>from Connor to make a dent here, so Connor should

1:10:38.920 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>get to a hundred yards at least in this one.

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Probably a coin flips chance at a score. Alright, let's

1:10:44.600 --> 1:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>see if we can sneak in one more matchup, and

1:10:46.280 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping it doesn't take long, at least not on

1:10:48.080 --> 1:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the Las Vegas side. Brian, Las Vegas is at Seattle

1:10:51.400 --> 1:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>for this game. There has been a very inconsistent Las

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Vegas offense. It has well outside of Josh Jacobs and

1:10:58.160 --> 1:11:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, so I'm giving a grade to both. Will

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>start with Jacob's real quick Seahawks allowing nearly a hundred

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty compo yards per game to opposing running backs. That's

1:11:05.800 --> 1:11:08.879
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most. Jacobs is also top nine and targets

1:11:08.880 --> 1:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and receptions among all running backs. He hasn't been much

1:11:11.040 --> 1:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of a pass catcher in the past, so and a

1:11:12.960 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for Jacobs and easy for Davante Adams. Last three games

1:11:16.439 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 1>one and two and two, he's on absolute fire. UH

1:11:21.560 --> 1:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers are averaging fifteen catches and a hundred fifty

1:11:24.000 --> 1:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>plus yards per game, and they've totaled three touchdowns against

1:11:26.800 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's against Seattle over their last two. That's why mac

1:11:30.200 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>hollins might take a chance on a wide receiver. I

1:11:32.360 --> 1:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>like him this week. I also like Foster, not Morow.

1:11:38.640 --> 1:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't sound like it's spelled. That's his problem, not ours.

1:11:42.880 --> 1:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>That's well, it's kind of it is our problem, isn't it. Anyway,

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>he gets to see opposing tight ends are averaging five

1:11:48.360 --> 1:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>catches seventy four yards per game against Seattle. Yes, those

1:11:52.080 --> 1:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>numbers are a little skewed by t. J. Hockenson's blow

1:11:54.600 --> 1:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>up game against them in Week four, you have like

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eighty yards. But still, since then, Seattle has

1:11:59.640 --> 1:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed a tight end to top fifty yards or score

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in five of six games. So Morrow is

1:12:06.600 --> 1:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>startable in the waste land. UH Dereck by Derek B.

1:12:13.040 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Derek c as in Car gets a B. Car in

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the later Raiders are left for dead after getting blanked

1:12:18.680 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>by the Saints, But over the last three weeks he's

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>been killing it. Yes, thanks in most part to Davante Adams.

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>But the Seattle is the middle of the road matchup.

1:12:25.680 --> 1:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But they are allowing two fifty and one and a

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:30.599
<v Speaker 1>half passing touchdowns per game. Should be a safe floor

1:12:30.680 --> 1:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for Car here. You're going to give him a B

1:12:32.680 --> 1:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>over to the Seattle side, Ken Walker easy A. Over

1:12:35.560 --> 1:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>their last four games, the Raiders have surrendered seven touchdowns

1:12:38.840 --> 1:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and to one yard rushing performances to opposing backs. Vegas

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>has also allowed the fourth most catches to the position,

1:12:45.479 --> 1:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which also bodes well for Walker, who has totaled nine

1:12:47.880 --> 1:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>catches over his last two games. DK Metcalf Tyler Lockett

1:12:52.640 --> 1:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>can give both of them a B over the last

1:12:54.920 --> 1:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>three games, Metcalf has scored in two of three and

1:12:57.800 --> 1:13:00.839
<v Speaker 1>Lockett has scored in every one. The Raiders are allowing

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>thirteen catches, five yards and nearly a touchdown per game

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to opposing wide receivers. So I love Metcalfine Lockett. This week,

1:13:08.360 --> 1:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Noah Fanton will death Slack. They're both

1:13:11.439 --> 1:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. They continue to split time and neither

1:13:14.000 --> 1:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have scored since week four. And lastly, a B for

1:13:17.760 --> 1:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Gino Smith. Gino has scored multiple touchdowns and eight of

1:13:22.439 --> 1:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>his ten games played, and since Week four, he's also

1:13:25.439 --> 1:13:28.519
<v Speaker 1>averaged nearly thirty rushing yards per game, which pretty much

1:13:28.840 --> 1:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>equates to a bonus touchdown past He's been great. I was,

1:13:33.120 --> 1:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I was trying ye go about that. Yeah, well, the

1:13:38.000 --> 1:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>frequency is I don't know the frequency of touchdown, but

1:13:42.800 --> 1:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is a frequency good like good frequency? We assume high

1:13:47.800 --> 1:13:51.639
<v Speaker 1>octane frequency. I don't know. I don't know if that's

1:13:51.640 --> 1:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Is it? You know what is a thing?

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Premature speculation. We're gonna give you three guys to pick

1:13:56.280 --> 1:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>up this week that everybody else is gonna be trying

1:13:58.160 --> 1:14:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to pick up next week. But those players are already

1:14:01.720 --> 1:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>on your tape. Stay tuned Premature speculation and our final

1:14:05.560 --> 1:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sets of matchups coming up in the final segment of

1:14:08.120 --> 1:14:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. It's a final segment of Fantasy Football Weekly.

1:14:22.840 --> 1:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchy and Matt Harrison, Brian Johnson with you. This

1:14:26.240 --> 1:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is a segment we like to call premature speculation. Blamo Blamo.

1:14:35.520 --> 1:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Three players that you'll want to pick up this week

1:14:37.880 --> 1:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that everybody else will be trying to pick up next week.

1:14:40.560 --> 1:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We begin with Matt Harrison, who is your premature speculation.

1:14:43.720 --> 1:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't necessarily think people are going to try

1:14:45.920 --> 1:14:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to pick him up this week, but I want to

1:14:47.439 --> 1:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>put on your radar for your playoff matchups to pick

1:14:51.280 --> 1:14:55.759
<v Speaker 1>up Tyler Conklin, the tight end for the Jets. Three

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>absolute cake matchups for Conklin and the fantasy playoffs to

1:14:59.840 --> 1:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>try right, Jacksonville and Seattle. And if you go to

1:15:03.080 --> 1:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Week eighteen for some crazy reason in your fantasy playoffs,

1:15:06.160 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 1>they get Miami in that week and that's also a

1:15:08.520 --> 1:15:12.559
<v Speaker 1>good tight end matchup. So top ten matchups for Tyler

1:15:12.600 --> 1:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Conklin in your fantasy playoffs. I do not like, Just

1:15:14.760 --> 1:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I do not like playing in Week

1:15:16.439 --> 1:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen for anything. I know you just to be just

1:15:19.320 --> 1:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that you've never played in Week

1:15:21.320 --> 1:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>eight teen ever, never, Brian, your premature speculation player, you

1:15:26.280 --> 1:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't played in the one year history of the weekend. Yeah,

1:15:29.400 --> 1:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that was was going for that. I know him in

1:15:31.479 --> 1:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Week seven. Yeah, that's that's always been dumb um. I

1:15:34.640 --> 1:15:36.559
<v Speaker 1>don't like my guy as much as Matt likes his.

1:15:36.640 --> 1:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But I got Bears rookie running back Treston Ebner, and

1:15:40.160 --> 1:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the angle here is he's probably gonna become a warm

1:15:44.000 --> 1:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>body that sees double digit touches down the stretch. You

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>think you might rest Montgomery. The Bears are from Montgomery.

1:15:52.240 --> 1:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a contract here from Montgomery, so they could run

1:15:54.240 --> 1:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>them into the ground. But what's the point there, three

1:15:57.200 --> 1:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and eight. It's so they're probably gonna resign montgo. I

1:16:01.200 --> 1:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>know they're gonna want to see what they have in Edner.

1:16:02.960 --> 1:16:05.519
<v Speaker 1>I just think they'll give him some extended books. So

1:16:05.560 --> 1:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just a running back stash if you're desperate down

1:16:08.840 --> 1:16:11.599
<v Speaker 1>the stretch. Trust and Ebner is out there and he's free.

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And we're really running out of guys at this point

1:16:14.080 --> 1:16:16.639
<v Speaker 1>in the season segment of the show. But so trusting

1:16:16.680 --> 1:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Ebner is my guy. UH one guy that we never

1:16:18.920 --> 1:16:20.479
<v Speaker 1>run out of. Because I don't think any show talks

1:16:20.479 --> 1:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about Nico Collins as much as this one does. But

1:16:24.200 --> 1:16:26.839
<v Speaker 1>roster for Nico Collins emerging is the go to receiver

1:16:26.920 --> 1:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Texans UH ten targets and seven targets the

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:33.439
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks. Over the last month, He's averaging four

1:16:33.520 --> 1:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>catches for fifty five yards. That isn't all all bad.

1:16:36.120 --> 1:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>He scored two weeks ago. And the fantasy playoff run

1:16:39.120 --> 1:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for Nico Collins Chiefs, Titans, Jaguars that those are pretty good.

1:16:44.560 --> 1:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this passing offense gets a boost. Davis Mills, who

1:16:47.200 --> 1:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I admit I was. I was very optimistic about Mills

1:16:49.840 --> 1:16:52.439
<v Speaker 1>heading into this season to be better than last year,

1:16:52.560 --> 1:16:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and you was wrong. I was wrong. He's worse than

1:16:55.520 --> 1:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>he was last year. They've benched him. Maybe Allen is

1:16:58.600 --> 1:17:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the is part of the answer year. I was Nico

1:17:02.960 --> 1:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is one of my preseason sleepers, but I failed to

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>mention you want just want to wait until November. And

1:17:10.080 --> 1:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're Houston, Brandon Cooks is gonna be gone this offseason, right,

1:17:13.080 --> 1:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so you may as well develop your in house next

1:17:15.920 --> 1:17:19.519
<v Speaker 1>year's number one receiver, Nico Collins in these last handful

1:17:19.560 --> 1:17:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of games that don't mean anything to you. So, Nico Collins,

1:17:24.080 --> 1:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>let's go to our final two sets of matchups. The

1:17:26.240 --> 1:17:29.680
<v Speaker 1>first one Sunday Night football, green Bay taking on Philadelphia.

1:17:29.840 --> 1:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>On the green Bay side, Let's begin with the mere

1:17:32.439 --> 1:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>curial Aaron Rodgers. You think Rogers has been as inconsistent

1:17:37.800 --> 1:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>as the team has been because usually as the quarterback goes,

1:17:40.360 --> 1:17:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the teams goes. But he's actually been a very reliable

1:17:42.760 --> 1:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy asset, scoring in every game this year since the opener,

1:17:46.240 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and he has thrown multiple touchdowns in eight of ten games.

1:17:50.840 --> 1:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But the Eagles are an elite past defense and maybe

1:17:53.800 --> 1:17:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the best. They've shut out three of the past four

1:17:56.920 --> 1:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>opposing quarterbacks, and on the season, they're giving up zero

1:18:01.080 --> 1:18:04.599
<v Speaker 1>point nine touchdown passes per game. That is not good.

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And I do not like Rogers receivers matchups, and we'll

1:18:07.160 --> 1:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about those right now, beginning with and if I

1:18:09.680 --> 1:18:11.559
<v Speaker 1>didn't say it, I don't think I did C grade

1:18:11.600 --> 1:18:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers just the C grade and Christian Watson five

1:18:15.720 --> 1:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the last two games, and all five of

1:18:18.120 --> 1:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron rodgers last touchdowns have gone to him. But he

1:18:21.040 --> 1:18:24.559
<v Speaker 1>runs overwhelmingly from the outside, and there he's running right

1:18:24.560 --> 1:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>into the teeth of philly Secondary elite cornerbacks Darius Slay

1:18:28.880 --> 1:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and James Bradberry. Philadelphia has allowed the fifth fewest receiving

1:18:32.760 --> 1:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>yards and the sixth fewest touchdowns to receivers behind the

1:18:35.960 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 1>elite play of cornerbacks Darius Slay, and James Bradberry. Neither

1:18:40.560 --> 1:18:43.479
<v Speaker 1>cornerback is allowed more than one touchdown, neither has allowed

1:18:43.520 --> 1:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>more than fifty of the targets, and their coverage should

1:18:46.040 --> 1:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>be caught. So I'm given Christian Watson a C grade

1:18:49.680 --> 1:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>mostly on the momentum of his past couple of games,

1:18:52.400 --> 1:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but this is a very tough match up here. Randall

1:18:55.280 --> 1:18:58.519
<v Speaker 1>Cobb is my favorite of the receiver matchups. In his

1:18:58.560 --> 1:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>first game back last week, caught all six of his

1:19:01.240 --> 1:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>targets for seventy three yards and he led the team

1:19:03.800 --> 1:19:06.559
<v Speaker 1>in both categories. And because he runs from the slot,

1:19:07.160 --> 1:19:12.519
<v Speaker 1>Cobb avoid Slay and Bradberry, and the normal starting slot

1:19:12.520 --> 1:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>cornerback of Matos is on I R. So this is

1:19:15.200 --> 1:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a premo spot for Randall Cob with a B grade.

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:20.599
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we've seen this movie before and Randall

1:19:20.640 --> 1:19:23.559
<v Speaker 1>Cobb comes out with one catch on three targets for

1:19:23.600 --> 1:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>twelve yards. Absolutely possible, but on paper anyway, he's got

1:19:27.680 --> 1:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the most favorable matchup by a mile of anybody among

1:19:31.000 --> 1:19:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the pack of receivers. How old did you guess Randall

1:19:33.560 --> 1:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Cob ist one? I was thinking older, like four. He

1:19:42.800 --> 1:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>started young. He's got an eighth of a tank left

1:19:44.840 --> 1:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and eighth of a tank. Might the gaslights on, but

1:19:48.200 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you can still get somewhere. Let's go to the running backs.

1:19:50.240 --> 1:19:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones B grade. The Eagles have have a struggling

1:19:53.439 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>run defense and a great past defense. So if you're

1:19:56.080 --> 1:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna win against the Eagles, screen Bay has to run

1:19:58.720 --> 1:20:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Here. In games where Jones has gotten fifteen

1:20:02.560 --> 1:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or more carries, which I think he's gonna get in

1:20:04.080 --> 1:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this game, he's averaged over one hundred thirty rushing yards

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the game. Since Elephantine defensive tackle Jordan Davis went

1:20:11.840 --> 1:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on injured reserved, Philadelphia has given up an average of

1:20:13.960 --> 1:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred twenty five rushing yards per game. So that

1:20:16.479 --> 1:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>puts Aaron Jones really on pace for between a hundred

1:20:18.920 --> 1:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five and a hundred thirty rushing yards. We'll call

1:20:21.160 --> 1:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it a hundred and twenty seven and a half. The

1:20:23.800 --> 1:20:26.559
<v Speaker 1>addition of Linval Joseph and and Dominican su are not

1:20:26.680 --> 1:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>likely to help. Those are aged veterans, and I do

1:20:29.120 --> 1:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not think that's going to change the equation here. A J.

1:20:31.720 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Dillon's on the bench. He has not scored since the opener.

1:20:34.560 --> 1:20:37.479
<v Speaker 1>He's being dramatically outplayed by Aaron Jones. And he does

1:20:37.520 --> 1:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>not catch a j Dillon hasn't topped eleven yards as

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a receiver in any game since the opener. He and

1:20:44.520 --> 1:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt has been absolutely worthless. They have they're going

1:20:48.320 --> 1:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to be this big helper. I thought Dylan was gonna

1:20:50.720 --> 1:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>be That was another preseason I was not like that

1:20:59.800 --> 1:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>was we're with you. I thought he was gonna be

1:21:02.000 --> 1:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>just a helper if nothing else, nothing. It was the

1:21:04.520 --> 1:21:07.599
<v Speaker 1>nothing part of nothing else. Let's go to Philadelphia. Jalen

1:21:07.680 --> 1:21:11.519
<v Speaker 1>Hurts obviously great, although let me say this, he doesn't

1:21:11.560 --> 1:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>look the same without Dallas Goddard. I mean, it's starting

1:21:13.800 --> 1:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to really think Dallas Goddard is the was the engine

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that made that passing offense go, because it's been inconsistent

1:21:19.760 --> 1:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>since then. After allowing just four passing touchdowns in the

1:21:24.680 --> 1:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>first six games of the year, the Packers have really

1:21:27.160 --> 1:21:30.920
<v Speaker 1>regressed on past defense, allowing eleven touchdowns in the past

1:21:30.960 --> 1:21:34.599
<v Speaker 1>five games. Last week, and Brian alluded to this earlier.

1:21:34.640 --> 1:21:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Conscious passer Ryan Tannehill posted three three yards against Green

1:21:38.680 --> 1:21:40.519
<v Speaker 1>Bay that was the most they had given up in

1:21:40.560 --> 1:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a year. The two mobile quarterbacks to face the Packers,

1:21:44.520 --> 1:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen, Daniel Jones, seven and forty nine rushing yards,

1:21:48.840 --> 1:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think we will get at least to that

1:21:50.520 --> 1:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>number for Jalen Hurts here, so I still have an

1:21:52.200 --> 1:21:55.519
<v Speaker 1>A grade on him um, but again that passing offense

1:21:55.560 --> 1:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>has not looked the same without Dallas Goddard Among the receivers.

1:21:59.360 --> 1:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to A. J. Brown be great on him.

1:22:01.000 --> 1:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay has allowed the fourth most yards and receptions

1:22:03.560 --> 1:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to receivers since Eric Stokes went down to Week nine,

1:22:06.840 --> 1:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and the funny thing is Stokes wasn't any good, but

1:22:09.120 --> 1:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>since he's left their way worse without him, Ground leads

1:22:12.840 --> 1:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the NFL and yards per route run against man coverage. Meanwhile,

1:22:16.240 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>J R. Alexander's allowing the six most yards per reception

1:22:19.200 --> 1:22:22.519
<v Speaker 1>while in man coverage. I like that individual matchup the

1:22:22.560 --> 1:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers secondary, though still good. Brown isn't automatic, but it

1:22:26.400 --> 1:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is a more promising situation than it felt a couple

1:22:28.960 --> 1:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago against green Bay. B grade on A. J. Brown.

1:22:33.600 --> 1:22:37.839
<v Speaker 1>DeVonta Smith has been the primary beneficiary of Dallas Goddard

1:22:37.920 --> 1:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>going out his He's led the Eagles and receptions, yards

1:22:41.160 --> 1:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and targets since that time since the Stokes injuries. I

1:22:44.240 --> 1:22:47.559
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Packers cornerback Rasul Douglas tends to stay on the

1:22:47.600 --> 1:22:51.559
<v Speaker 1>opposing number two receiver and in that span he has

1:22:51.760 --> 1:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>given up on the targets in his coverage. So I

1:22:55.120 --> 1:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>gotta be grade on DeVonta Smith as well. And then

1:22:58.479 --> 1:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the only other uh filled off your player you care

1:23:00.760 --> 1:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>about is Miles Sanders. I think the bounce back game

1:23:03.800 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is coming after a couple of dud games. For eight

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>consecutive games, Green Bay has seen a running back top

1:23:10.400 --> 1:23:13.599
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven yards on the ground against them. They ranked

1:23:13.640 --> 1:23:16.799
<v Speaker 1>thirty and rushing yards allowed on the season. Miles Sanders

1:23:16.800 --> 1:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>has been held to one scoreless yards over the last

1:23:19.640 --> 1:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>two games. Prior to that, though averaging eighty seven yards

1:23:23.080 --> 1:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and a touchdown in the previous five. I think he

1:23:25.080 --> 1:23:27.160
<v Speaker 1>gets back to that. I think he's sitting around ninety

1:23:27.200 --> 1:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown in this one. Weirdly, Miles Sanders,

1:23:30.200 --> 1:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>who can catch total non factor in the receiving as

1:23:33.680 --> 1:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>one catch in the last month. That is it. Our

1:23:37.400 --> 1:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>final matchup of this show is Pittsburgh taking on Indianapolis

1:23:41.960 --> 1:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night. Naji Harris Matt has been a resurgent

1:23:46.760 --> 1:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of weeks. Well, yeah, that's because

1:23:49.840 --> 1:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Warren is out with a hamstring and help. I

1:23:53.320 --> 1:23:55.599
<v Speaker 1>don't think he goes this week, so it's all Harris

1:23:55.600 --> 1:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>alone again, probably a bell cow against the Colts defense

1:23:59.120 --> 1:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that is seeing the second most touches allowed to running

1:24:02.040 --> 1:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>backs on the year at twenty nine point two per game,

1:24:05.400 --> 1:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like twenty five touches for nag Harris

1:24:08.479 --> 1:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>might be in the cards. He's no worse than a

1:24:11.040 --> 1:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>solid B if that's the case. Considering that the Colts

1:24:13.320 --> 1:24:15.559
<v Speaker 1>are middle of the pack against the run, it's a

1:24:15.600 --> 1:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>bit tougher. In the passing game for the Steelers. Kenny

1:24:18.000 --> 1:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Pickett has looked respectable but not spectacular in any game.

1:24:21.800 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>His two sixty five last week was his career high,

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't thrown for more than one touchdown pass

1:24:26.880 --> 1:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in any game this year. That's really killing his receivers

1:24:29.840 --> 1:24:33.759
<v Speaker 1>more than anything. Deonte Johnson hasn't scored all year. George

1:24:33.760 --> 1:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Pickens has managed to run and catch a touchdown in

1:24:36.640 --> 1:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks, but the Colts are top four

1:24:39.400 --> 1:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in receiving yards and touchdowns allowed to wide receivers, so

1:24:42.920 --> 1:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm trending toward benching Pickett, Pickens, and Deonta All in

1:24:46.880 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>this one. Yeah, I don't blame you. You can is

1:24:49.520 --> 1:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest busts of the year. Yeah. Absolutely,

1:24:52.360 --> 1:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you can throw a dart at Pat fryar Muth though

1:24:55.160 --> 1:25:00.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets a C grade here. Uh pick wow? Did

1:25:00.120 --> 1:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>you always get hit by the dark you? Yes, you are.

1:25:04.760 --> 1:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Pick It targeted him twelve times last week and he

1:25:07.640 --> 1:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>caught eight of them for seventy nine yards. And the

1:25:09.840 --> 1:25:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Colts defense will be they're weaker against the tight end

1:25:12.640 --> 1:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>than they are against wide receivers. They've allowed the twelveth

1:25:15.080 --> 1:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the most receiving yards and basically a tight end score

1:25:17.840 --> 1:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>every other game this year. Deante Johnson is ninth among

1:25:21.080 --> 1:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and targets and he has zero touchdowns. It's

1:25:24.000 --> 1:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not amazing that that's impressive. I'm not gonna lie. On

1:25:29.840 --> 1:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the indie side, I mentioned Matt Ryan was might take

1:25:32.120 --> 1:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me quarterback, although he will see t J.

1:25:35.080 --> 1:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Watt coming against him this week in his first game

1:25:38.000 --> 1:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>back from I R. Paris Campbell, Alec Pierce, and Michael

1:25:41.400 --> 1:25:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Pittman basically split snaps and targets almost evenly last week

1:25:45.600 --> 1:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>against Philly, all of which was on the field for

1:25:47.840 --> 1:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>at least of the snaps. I'll give a nod to

1:25:50.880 --> 1:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Pittman and seized both Pierce and Paris Campbell, who was

1:25:54.200 --> 1:25:56.759
<v Speaker 1>also take take a chance on me worthy from charge.

1:25:57.280 --> 1:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Pittman has the most yardage potential here, and he is

1:26:00.280 --> 1:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>a Steelers defense that that's allowing two two receiving yards

1:26:03.479 --> 1:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing wide receivers, second highest mark in

1:26:06.400 --> 1:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the league. They're also allowing touchdowns to white outs at

1:26:08.880 --> 1:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>an amazing clip. They've given up fourteen this year. It's

1:26:12.080 --> 1:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>also second most in the league. Don't mess with the

1:26:14.880 --> 1:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Colts tight ends. Mo Ali Cox is getting most of

1:26:17.880 --> 1:26:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the work, but it's not a good tight end matchup.

1:26:19.760 --> 1:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>And finally, Jonathan Taylor, he's an A grade. This is

1:26:23.280 --> 1:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not the run stuffing Steelers from the past. And since

1:26:26.080 --> 1:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Saturday took over as head coach, they're feeding Taylor

1:26:29.560 --> 1:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's Thanksgiving and it's bread and butter right here.

1:26:32.320 --> 1:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two carries in both games, a couple of receptions

1:26:35.280 --> 1:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>in each game. Better yet, he scored in both games

1:26:37.960 --> 1:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>since Saturday took over. So you're gonna start Saturday's favorite

1:26:42.360 --> 1:26:45.559
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor on Sun Sunday. Absolutely, We're going to you

1:26:45.560 --> 1:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>know where's as as We're talking about the Steelers struggling offense.

1:26:50.640 --> 1:26:53.519
<v Speaker 1>This is a bad season for them. Everybody talks about

1:26:53.520 --> 1:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Belichick without Brady and how he's effectively a five hundred

1:26:58.160 --> 1:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>coach since Brady left. Comlin might be starting to get

1:27:01.240 --> 1:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>some of this scrutiny, right since Ben left? What has Tomlin?

1:27:05.000 --> 1:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You know that it's not yet. Well know, he was

1:27:07.360 --> 1:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>working with the shell of Ben Roethlisberger for the last

1:27:10.040 --> 1:27:12.599
<v Speaker 1>couple of years too, and it hasn't looked as great.

1:27:12.720 --> 1:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>But uh yeah, that's you know, that might be a

1:27:15.760 --> 1:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>developing story. I never thought Ben was all that great.

1:27:18.320 --> 1:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>He had it prime Antonio super Bowls. He had a

1:27:21.520 --> 1:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>prime Santonio homes Seahawks super Bowl. He was awful and

1:27:25.640 --> 1:27:31.959
<v Speaker 1>that was rig Ben. You go back, it was Seahawks

1:27:31.960 --> 1:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>fans will agree with me on that. But anyway, yeah,

1:27:35.479 --> 1:27:38.479
<v Speaker 1>specifically for you, although Matt you can chime in. I

1:27:38.520 --> 1:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about there was a kicker Jinks on on Thursday.

1:27:42.120 --> 1:27:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Can can you jinks your you know, and fantasy players

1:27:45.520 --> 1:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>never want to talk about, like say, right now, I'm

1:27:47.880 --> 1:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna win the championship, right, Nobody wants to jinx themselves.

1:27:51.200 --> 1:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Can you jinks? A best ball team? Yeah, I think

1:27:56.840 --> 1:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because you can make you can't change anything. I think

1:27:59.000 --> 1:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I've jinx like three hundred of mine. But you need

1:28:04.000 --> 1:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you need is one at the end of the day.

1:28:05.680 --> 1:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>But you can't make any moves, you can't trade, you

1:28:08.960 --> 1:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>can't screw up anything anymore. I've played a lot of

1:28:12.200 --> 1:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Best Ball past summer, and I've been gone through every roster,

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:18.599
<v Speaker 1>But just to go through one and find a complete

1:28:18.640 --> 1:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>roster with no like season ending injuries is like the

1:28:21.200 --> 1:28:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Holy Grail. I think it's it's been brutal. This has

1:28:24.600 --> 1:28:28.559
<v Speaker 1>been so you say, yes, you can jinks. I can speak,

1:28:28.600 --> 1:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and I can speak into reality. My team losing, my

1:28:33.240 --> 1:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>best ball team losing. Yeah, I try to reverse jinks.

1:28:36.880 --> 1:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't work as much. But uh yeah, I think

1:28:39.320 --> 1:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the jink's only really exists in fantasy football. In this

1:28:41.760 --> 1:28:44.479
<v Speaker 1>fantasy realm sounds like a bunch of high jinks. Here,

1:28:44.600 --> 1:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>kicker jinks is what you say. No, I don't know.

1:28:46.760 --> 1:28:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I've I've got a best ball team that I'm watching

1:28:49.040 --> 1:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>very closely that has a chance to do something special.

1:28:52.439 --> 1:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But then I feel like I can't say anything about it. Well,

1:28:54.360 --> 1:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if you know how to reverse the kicker jinks, uh

1:28:56.840 --> 1:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>call up Greg Joseph, you needs it to help me.

1:28:58.640 --> 1:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>He does need some help on It's the anti kicker

1:29:01.120 --> 1:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Jinks for sure. Thank you for listening to everybody. If

1:29:04.080 --> 1:29:05.599
<v Speaker 1>you've missed any part of the show and you're listening

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:07.639
<v Speaker 1>over the air, no that. Fantasy Football Weekly is also

1:29:07.680 --> 1:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a podcast that we is available everywhere where you get podcasts,

1:29:11.479 --> 1:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and if you're listening to podcast you may be able

1:29:13.400 --> 1:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear this show over the air as well on

1:29:15.160 --> 1:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>your favorite sports talk radio station. We look forward to

1:29:17.880 --> 1:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing you then and we will talk to you next week,

1:29:20.439 --> 1:29:23.799
<v Speaker 1>hopefully after a big fat w in the win column,

1:29:24.080 --> 1:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or if you're in a guillotine league, hopefully you're still

1:29:26.240 --> 1:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>alive and we'll give you some fresh advice for next week.

1:29:29.400 --> 1:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Best of luck, everybody, talk to you then, Bye bye.

1:29:33.040 --> 1:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I Heart Radio.

1:29:36.320 --> 1:29:38.439
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit the i

1:29:38.600 --> 1:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

1:29:41.760 --> 1:29:42.639
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.