WEBVTT - Surveillance: Stimulus Talks With Kudlow

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Ye. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast and I'm Tom

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Keene Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course,

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg audience worldwide on Bloomberg TV and Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We can get the White House reactions this and number.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm very pleased to say that joining us now is

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Larry Cudlow, National Economic Council Director. Larry, let's start right

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>there downside surprise on the payrolls report. People we speak

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to in the last hour, the last ninety minutes will

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>say the same thing. This makes it more likely to

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>get a deal down in d C. Does it make

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it a difference to you, Larry? Well, look, I just

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>want to say, I don't think this is such a

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bad jobs report. Okay, it may have come in a

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 1>wee bid under expectations, but I don't know what that means.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Six point seven percent unemployment rate is big news. The

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>CBO and others didn't expect single digits until early so

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we got the single digits the last couple of months.

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Six point seven and incidentally importantly to everybody, UH, if

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you look under the hood, the biggest drops in unemployment

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>were in the minority groups African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, and

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>let me adds not a minority group, it's a majority group.

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Another big drop in unemployment came from women. That is

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>not just people leaving the labor for us, I beg

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to differ. We also scored in the household survey. Private

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>jobs were up nearly five hundred thousand. That's a strong number.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's true we have ten million unemployed. I understand

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's still a lot of hardship left, no question. However,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>let's keep in mind that the peak of that number

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is twenty three million. And when we look at the

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>other statistics, and I'm sure you will want to know

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. Other statistics on retail sales and housing

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and capex UH are very strong. And Atlanta f GDP

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>now is looking for Q four. That's their number, not ours.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.359
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying I think the economy is very

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>much in a V shape percovery. The P M I

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>s were strong, the I S M s were strong.

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's put this in some perspective. The job numbers

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are not the only stat and six point seven cent

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>unemployment is awful good number. So Larry, you and I

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>could debate the state of the economy. I think what

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.679
<v Speaker 1>matters is how you read the economy, how the administration

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sees the economy, and what it means, how it put

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>together a policy package. So Larry, talk to me about it.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Where are you on stimulus talks right now? Well, I

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>think what we've got, um, senter McConnell's talking to House

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Speaker Pelosi. Our team is of course in touch part

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly with Senator McConnell and UH Republican House Leader Kevin McCarthy. UM,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>people are glad to see that the other team has

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>come down in its numbers. On the other hand, there

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>are still policy differences that remain. Um. I think Mitch

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>McConnell sounds to me I've known him quite some time,

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more optimistic. But I can't say one way

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>or other what the outcome is going to be. I

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to dare predict that. I will add this

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>point from our standpoint, and I think Santor McConell agrees

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>with this. We have for many many months. You and

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about it. Here, she'll argue for targeted assistance.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Targeted assistance in a few key areas. One is the

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>small businesses to resurrect the p p P. Two is

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>unemployment assistance, because we're going to continue, as you have noted,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we still have a lot of hardship in the unemployment area.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>That's tough stuff. Uh. School COVID related spending is good. Um,

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe certain industries have to be helped out. And I

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>will add to that. In terms of the figures that

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are flowing around, you've got roughly four hundred and fifty

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars available from unspent treasury funds and a hundred

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five billion dollars available from unspent PPP funds.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Now in round numbers, i'm gonna call that six hundred

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>billion plus or minus. It would be good to use

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that money, which has already been appropriated once, use it

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to redeploy it um and reappropriate it. And in a sense, uh,

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, the bookkeeping is okay, you're not really

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>adding above what the legislators suggested way back last winter

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit this summer. There's this a good

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>way to do that around six I'm not going to

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>get into a numbers game. That's up the Center McConnell,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Speaker Pelosi. I'm just saying, get into a numbers game

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. I'm just saying, there's a key targeted areas

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:11.559
<v Speaker 1>that could be funded by redeployed appropriations hundred and sixty billion.

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the State eight in the bipartisan plan. This has

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>been a story for the last several months. Let's just

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>get right down to it. That has been the red

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>line for Senate Republicans. State eight. Have we moved the

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>dial on that story, Larry, I don't know. Senator O'Connell

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>has indicated that he's not happy with that part of

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the bipartisan group or the Speaker Pelosi, he's not happy

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>with it. I'm going to leave that those are his decisions. Um,

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he's never been happy with a big bail out of

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>states and localities. A lot of these blue states are

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>poorly managed pension funds and so forth. COVID related funding

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is um very popular. That's different though, than a broad based,

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so huge omnibus appropriation to states and localities. I will

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>leave that to Center McConnell. But I'm just saying, um,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that's always been a difficult hurdle to get through. Well,

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you representing the administration this morning without lucky to have

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you with the President sign a bill that has a

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty billion dollars of state aided it. I

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to say that. You'll have to ask him.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I was with him last evening talking about the job

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 1>numbers and related matters. Um, the President is in favor

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of a new assistance package. Okay, he is in favor

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of that, but the details, the targeting that I discussed

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>earlier is absolutely crucial. And as you know, Jonathan, the

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>President has always opposed a large scale appropriation for state

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and local governments that he President Trump believes have been

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>mismanaged for many years. This idea that these states have

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>been mismanaged, Larry, is that what this all comes down

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to a political debate about what you guys see as

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the mismanagement of state finances at a time when we're

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in a pandemic. We're seeing more restrictions in California, New

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>York and by the way, in Republican states as well.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Is this what it's going to come down to, Larry.

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. I don't want to declare that

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to targeted assistance, particularly small

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>businesses unemployment assistance. These are temporary measures. UM and COVID

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>relations dealing matters can be each other. Larry. That doesn't

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sound the deal. That doesn't sound like a compromise, Jonathan.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to make a deal with you. I

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>hope you understand that. I don't expect to. I don't

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>expect to negotiate with me. But the two plans for

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just planet five hundreds of sixty, Larry, don't do that.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Come on, let's finish on a good note. We've had

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>We've done really well for three or four years. My

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>position not taught to each other like that. I'll give

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you the time, Jeff, just laying out the question. We've

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>got two plans and nine intered eight billion dollar proposal

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and a five billion dollar proposal in the biparlisan proposal

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is a hundred and sixty billion dollars of state eight Larry.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what it's going to come down. So we can

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>either make a deal in the middle or we can

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't sound like we can. Can you convince

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the audience otherwise? I can only give you the facts, Okay,

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>as I've laid them out, and as I've said, the

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>president's view, the majority leader's view, Mrs McConnell, my view

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>is certainly Steve Minution's view over a treasury as we

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>UH have targeted areas of assistance that we think would

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>strengthen the economy, and those include most particularly um p

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>PP for small businesses which are in need dealing with

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>COVID spikes that we expect even more in the Christmas

0:08:54.960 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>holiday season, and some unemployment assistance which also we would

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>like to have again to get us through UH the

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>COVID UH spikes and recovery elsewhere is pretty strong. Now

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>let me add this point. Help is on the way.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>The vaccines will be distributed. Early distribution in a week

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or two. Okay, I was at Vice President Pence's COVID

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>task Force a week or two. They are expecting, these

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are the experts UH at least twenty million by the

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>end of December, and at least another twenty million to

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>get the forty million by January, on their way to

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million in March. Now that becomes awfully important,

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not only for the health and safety of Americans, but

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>also it will help keep businesses open, which is our view,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we do not want businesses closed, and it will help

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>keep schools open, which is our view as President Trump's you,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we do not want school uh closed. So that is

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be an enormous boost. And we have to

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of lean through this period of the spiking COVID.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>We get that, that's what our experts are telling us.

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>But help is on the way. And um, we have

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>this massive program, Operation Warp Speed, which is panning out

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it's gonna be great boon for America. Is

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great boon for the American economy. So coming

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the stimulus package, I'm gonna say again we

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>see important targeted areas, most particularly I'll narrow it down

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to a couple, frankly, most particularly small businesses. The p

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>p P program, which probably saved fifty million jobs. In fact,

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the temporary lawyoups. Now roughly two thirds of them have

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gone back to work, which is terrific. Um. Secondly, some

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>unemployment assistance because as I've acknowledged, despite much better than

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>expected jobs numbers for the last seven months, there are

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>still hardships that we need to help out on that.

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say those are the two biggest and perhaps

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>COVID related assistance UM to schools. We want to keep

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the schools open. We want to keep the business open.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got a strong economy and retail sales and housing

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and capital goods and durable good sales. One of my

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>favorite best indicators I've seen. I get a lot of

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>material from the Wall Street friends. Uh Ed Hyman, one

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the top economists, has a Christmas Tree survey. Christmas.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>He's a wonderful guy as a brilliant guy. He has

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>his Christmas Tree survey. It's up twenty nine percent year

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>over year. That's a good holiday spirit number. That tells

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>me we are in fact in the v shape recovery. Larry,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I gave you three full minutes then, so you and

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I can finish on good terms. One final question, sir.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>We've gone back and forth together for three or four years,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>sometimes with a little bit of rough and tumble. We've

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>always got our points across. Let me give the opportunity

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to do one final thing for your success. What's advice?

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Full of them? I've never met him. Um, I'm not

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him policy advice because I fear we have

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>some significant disagreements. But we're in a honeymoon period of sorts. Look,

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>anyc director is a fabulous job. It's a great honor

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for me to have had that. It's a great honor

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>for me to serve our country as well as this president.

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>NBC is a very powerful UH Council. It gets involved

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in nearly every aspect of economic, life, of trade, life

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of national security matters. As sits on the National Security Council,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it is involved across the board almost every conceivable thing

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the NBC. It's a great job. I wish him luck,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I do. I pray for him. I do um he

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>better be ready to work hard hours. But I'm sure

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>he knows that he has served in government before. It's

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a terrific job, and I am blessed to have held

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that job for nearly three years. As I say, it's

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a high point in my professional career. And I've always

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thanked President Trump on that, and I thank everybody else

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for the opportunity to do this. I just loved the job,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and we thank you for your contribution to this program.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Larry Cudlo, Thank you, sir. I have a good Christmas

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and we don't catch up. Larry Cudlo. They're the National

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Economic Council directed from the market. You want to us now,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>pre A misraa TV Securities global head of Rates Strategy, Preyer,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the number in about one hour and twenty five minutes.

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter to you? It doesn't matter. I think

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been watching the momentum. Clearly that December number is

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>going to matter more because that's when the COVID restrictions

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>should show up in the data. But our economists do

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>have a much weaker number, and I think this market

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that's forward looking, that's pricing in the end of the

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the light at the end of the tunney,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>if the tunnel is long, and you know, scary because

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we're heading into a period of weaker economic growth. I

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think the market, that at least the rates market, is

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not pricing in much of that weakness. The tenure is

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>almost at one percent, so I think the market is

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>really pricing in this vaccine fuel recovery stimulus. Well, we

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>may have to deal with a lower growth environment and

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the FED doing more, so I think you actually do

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>get a reaction in the rates market if it's anything

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>less than four hundred, three hundred thousand, and our economists

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred thousand, So we're actually going into this

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>number long treasurees. Prea, I gotta make some money here.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The kids wanted a twenty Christmas tree, so you know,

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I get broke the bank yesterday. What I want to know, Prea,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is do I step in here and buy fixed income

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>by bonds, notes and bills because we've had a nice

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>move in yield and now is the opportunity to look

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for lower yields later. I think so yes. I don't

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>know if it's going to get you your your Christmas tree,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>but I think you have to buy a lot more

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>treasuries just because the the extent of rate move I'm

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for is like twenty base points. You know, do

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we get to seventy eight basis points on the tenure?

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So so there is a floor. We're just very low,

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, close to zero. But I do think we've

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>sold off in treasuries pricing in all the good news

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>out there. There is a key FED meeting coming up,

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and our views that they're going to make Quei state

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>contingent and they're going to extend the average maturity of

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>QUIE purchases. They just kind of have to do it,

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the markets forcing them to do it, and they've realized

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that they could be longer term scarring. We still have

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so much uncertainty about the vaccine, So I think rates

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>have sort of priced in too much of that good news,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't quite priced in that we have a

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>long way to go before that COVID recovery is is

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>upon us. Built a little bit on this idea that

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the market is forcing the FED to extend the duration

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of its purchases. I'm looking right now at a tenure

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>zero point nine two six percent, not exactly screaming we're

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>running away with higher yield that could potentially threaten financial conditions.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that they are forcing the Fed's hand?

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>And what does bond what do boundary able to do

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if they do not confirm the market's expectation. So I'm

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>going to say the FED is the only marginal buyer

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of treasuries right right now, particularly in the long end.

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, the front end is so anchored by the

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>FED because of their faith policy, because of just inflation

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>being low, that if investors want to be in treasuries,

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they want to be in that front end. Meanwhile, the

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>U S treasuries is showing a lot of long dated

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>paper and that's really only happened in the last few

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>months that they've you know, they've increased long end coupon

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sizes significantly. So the market right now is expecting the

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Fed to do something in December, which is why we're

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at one percent. If that meeting happens with nothing, I

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>think we're breaking through that one. You know, do are

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we the brink of a taper tantrum? And I think

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fed knows that, which is why we expect them

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to come in and sort of tell us that they're

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>going to keep conditions accommodative. It's a wife from your remit,

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to go there. Are we back to

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five and two thousands six of the silly

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>season of parsing out every hundreds of a basis point

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of investment grade, high yield leverage loan yield? I mean,

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are we back to the silliness of reaching out for yield? Yeah?

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you call it silliness, but we

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>are in a very serious reach for yield environment. And

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the question is that sometimes people don't understand the risk

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>they're taking, but they're forced into different alternative assets. Um, yes,

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're you know, I would suggest people should

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>do credit work because defaultress is miss priced in certain products.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But in the investment grade sector where you're not worried

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>about default risk and you're not worried about interest rates

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>going higher, I think like anything is fair game in

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of how do I get that extra yield. And

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing it in people selling volatility at historic laws.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>People are selling ball, They're taking spread risk, they're taking

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>effects risk. So I think if interest rates are not

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>going to give you that return, you're going to have

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to go into other products to get that written on.

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know that's the intended consequence of QUI. That's

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what the portfolio balance channel is. You take duration risk out,

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the central bank takes duration risk out and force investors

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>into the risk spectrum, and the hope is that that

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>translates somewhere into an economic recovery and then everything makes sense.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a big hope in there that you

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>don't see this disconnect between the economy and markets. We

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>all hope it makes sense. In the end, we spent

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>ten years debating whether it made sense. A decade ago prayer,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, TV Securities. I'm gonna put it on a

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>terminal at nine strength in Chinese Yuan, that just racing

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>since June, and we see that across the Pacific rim folding.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>All this in has been chatting in all of Morgan

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Stanley Economics. The leadership of Allen Zetner, their chief US economists,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>has been extraordinary to try to figure out the ebbs

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.479
<v Speaker 1>and flows of g d P and how it folds

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>into appending jobs report early in January of next year.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Msentner joins us this morning, Ellen, by great definition, today's

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>discussion today's jobs report really is a look back. What

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is the data you see now for the January report?

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>What does December look like? Yeah, So as we rolled forward,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we continue to see job growth slow here. Um.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we do still hang on to some net

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>job gains because the economy isn't shut down broadly as

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we did earlier this year. Um, but certainly the amount

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of folks coming back to the labor market and absolutely

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in that service side of the economy, Um, it just

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>has to slow further. I mean, it's going to be

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>a difficult winter. We know this, We're married to this idea.

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We're all disappointed in what the winter is going to

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>look like. But these peril reports are getting overshadowed by

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>positive news on the vaccine front and the fiscal headlines.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to see services dison, inflations stay where

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>it is with a slowdown in the service sector, or

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>do we get back to normal inflation dynamics between services

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and goods. Well, that's those. So those are the two

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest drivers of our inflation forecast for next year. I

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mean goods inflation has been driving the numbers this year

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>because the good side of the economy that has been

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>growing and driving output, that consumer demand for durable goods.

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>But next year, as we roll into next year and

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>activity starts to pick up, as we move further through

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>getting the vaccine rolled out and activity picking up, that

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>services side does come back. And that is the lion's

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>share of consumer demand. It's the lion share and what

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>drives the price indusease. So goods prices decelerating, but services

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>prices pick up. Services prices representing the bulk of the

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>price induseries means inflation will be higher next year. Ellen.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is saying that the economy will come back in

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and certainly that is in census, and it's easy to

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>see how that could be. The case, but the post

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pandemic economy will look quite different in terms of consolidation

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of companies being stronger and bigger at the top and

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the smaller companies that have gone out of business. What

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>does that mean longer term for the labor market. Yeah,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the small businesses are the driver of

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of job growth UM and part of the loss of

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>wage bargaining power over time has been the rise of

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>mega companies and company density uh. And so that is

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>something that when you add that to the other inequities

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>that have been exposed further exposed by COVID On the

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>household side, I think it's a heavy lift that the

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party is going to focus on in terms of

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that fiscal policy activism that overall tries to raise the

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>labor share of of profits UM and that is has

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>been part of our longer run thesis on wise inflation

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>over the long run would be structurally higher. I think

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the focus going forward, not just

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>household inequities, but inequities on the business side as well.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And we spend a lot of time on programs like

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 1>this beating up on the south side, I have to say,

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.639
<v Speaker 1>let's just take a moment to really talk about. One

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of the calls coming out of this crisis, and that

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>was from you and the team that this recovery would

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>be quick, This recovery would be sharp, it would look

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like a v And that was something we heard from

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:27.120
<v Speaker 1>politicians down in Washington. But many people just did not believe.

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>This has been so underappreciated in the same way the

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>equity market record highs are hated. And what did everyone

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>get wrong? What do we learn from the lesson and

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>how do we apply it for the months still to come. Well,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, from for me, there's a there's

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a story that's missing in that that V shape recovery. Um.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And to me, it's you know, when you open up

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>from nothing to something, it's a very big jumping activity. Uh.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And this was not a cyclical downturn. This is very

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>structural downturn. So the way the virus would play out away,

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccine development would play out the way the economy and

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>opens up. That's what's dictating that V shape in the economy.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Where I am still greatly disappointed and where I think

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of heavy lifting to do is

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly what share Pal and the feather looking at as well.

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at women's labor force participation rates, I'm looking

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>at the unemployment rate of minority communities, of the unemployment

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>rate of those that are concentrated in low wage paying

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>service sectors. That you're going to see longer term damage

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>from this, and so I do think that there is

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a great need and focus on further fiscal support so

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that these longer term unemployed folks don't leave the labor

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>market all together. Because if that's the case, then it

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter that we've got a V shape recovery. It's

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>going to matter that longer run potential growth has been advantage.

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is important, Adam. The big call from Marcin

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanley was this V shaped recovery at the headline level.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>The complication you're talking about is the disparency beneath. Have

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>we already done sufficient damage that it could take years,

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe even a decade to recover from what we've experienced

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that or can we actually do something about it? No?

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we can do something about it. I mean,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the the biggest way that that you can UH affect

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>help those underlying UH components of the labor market is

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 1>by running a tight labor market, meaning a hot economy,

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>very easy monetary policy, accommodation, targeted fiscal policies right up front,

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more as clearly needed. Uh, and we expect more to come. Um.

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But those kinds of things can get you as kind

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of a labor market, so as low of an unemployment

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>rate as possible, as quickly as possible, And we do

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>think by the end of with that kind of focus,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>we can push the unemployment rate down back down to

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>around four percent, so getting close to the Fed's goal

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of maximum employment. But without that, you know, I think

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the literature, there's a there's a broad body of literature

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that shows that if you have a sluggish recovery after

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a deep downturn, that you do see permanent scarring to

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy. So I can't stress enough that we need

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to be doing all of this upfront now in order

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to push the unemployment right down as quickly as possible

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and get those folks back reattached to the labor market

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and re employed. Ellen, given the high flying stocks, given

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that equity markets are at new highs again

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>and again, does that complicate the urgency to try to

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>get something done? As you say, on the fiscal side,

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 1>in other words, is the high the high valuation of

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>equities actually hampering the fundamental recovery of the economy. Uh. Well,

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the hampering the fundamental recovery, uh No, but hampering what

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>typically are drivers of Congress to act quickly. Yes. Uh.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's there's nothing like good old market

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>volatility and sell off and really bad data coming in

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>to get Congress to act quickly. Uh. And we've just

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>not been forced by that. We're trying to before looking

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>here and call for fiscal you know, further fiscal support

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>before we see broad swass of the labor market gets

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>sent back home if the the virus tightens its grip

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>over the winter, uh, and we see further shutdowns. Um.

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But certainly, you know, if we got that negative payroll's

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>print today, which we're not expecting. Um. But as John

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, there's a big spread and there are some

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>expectations for a negative number, certainly that would impress urgency

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>upon Congress to do something. I think the bizarre thing

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>out of today's payroll print print is if it is

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>a bad print, folks might take that as a good

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>thing because it might push Congress to act. Ellen. I

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>want you to help your colleague Mike's Mike Wilson. I

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>know he listens, he hangs on your every word. But

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I want you to play equity strategist right now because

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it is part of economics. Nance deck went a hundred off.

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>The financial crisis trend is out three standard deviations. It's

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>an exceptionally elegant chart and it shows the monetary and

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>fiscal of the nation, which is driven equities. There's no

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>question about that. Do you just assume a mean mean

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>reversion of equities within a five or ten year view?

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that just part of your playbook that you got

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to tell Mike Wilson about. Yeah, I don't think I

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>give him advice on where equities will be. And as

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when economists put on a strategist had it

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>can be pretty dangerous. Um. But he's gonna target on

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>SMP at the end of next year, and I think

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>where I think people are going to be surprised at

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>how much economic activity we pick back up over the

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>course of the year as we're rolling out the vaccine.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you from just a personal experience, as

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>soon as the efficacy rates of the vaccine began getting

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>reported that we're so positive. Um, you try to pick

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>any summer travel place and have it with a with

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a with a healthy cancelation policy. Uh. And the two

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of the top three places we wanted to go to

0:28:06.680 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>more already booked. People were booking that quickly. So I

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>think we will be surprised at how quickly activity comes back,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think investors are looking forward to that. That's

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 1>a very yesterday, Ellen, thank you, and thank you for

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal guidance through much of this year. Allen Setta of

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley, thank you very much. Were on policy is

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>John Farrell mentions a key topic with Mr Caudlow, Henrietta

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>tres joins us. Henrietta is the ink drying on a

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>stimulus bill right now? Are you that certain it can

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>get done? I've actually I felt pretty great about it. Honestly.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I know that's crazy talk after the last six months

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of inaction, but um, I don't think there's a question

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of whether or not we're going to get a bill anymore.

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's what is the size and scope going

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. So I am optimistic. I would say low

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and six that we get a bill done in the

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>next two weeks. Okay, I'm looking right now. The tenure

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Yield believes your message. Right now, Yields breaking out, as

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>John was pointing out earlier, almost now up to basis

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>points as people price in the greater likelihood of some

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of fiscal support package passed in Washington on the

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>heels of this labor market report. Do you believe that Henrietta,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that this was a bad enough report to push any

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of the laggards on the Capitol Hill into passing something.

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I had an interesting conversation with a

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>client yesterday who is still sort of looking at stimulus

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is unnecessary and saying, you know, the market clearly doesn't

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>need stimulus. And I think that's an outdated way of

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how DC considers economic policy. This is an

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>anomaly under the Trump administration that anyone cared about the

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>stock market in Washington, d C. It's about the fundamental data.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>It's about the jobs data, it's about the unemployment NUBER,

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it'spect GDP data. It's slow moving, but it's exactly that.

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of print that makes members in d C say,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>oh right, I mean us their stantial amount of unemployed,

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>were massive increase in COVID. We're going into the holidays,

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to be here for another month and

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a half something now. Package expect it will be somewhere

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the six billion dollar range. That includes three hundred

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars roughly in money that has already been allocated

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in previous iterations of stimulus, whether the Care's Act or

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the p p P program or the E s F

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>programs at the Fed and Treasury level. But there's gonna

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>be somewhere in the range of about three hundred billion

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in new funding that goes out just to extend

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic unemployment assistance. Where does McConnell stand, just Henriette,

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering the key sticking points we've been talking about

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>all morning and frankly for a couple of months now

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is the funding to state and local governments. What's sort

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of the tipping point for McConnell to get on board

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with this nine eight billion dollar bipartisan agreement or something

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that still includes some aid to state and local governments.

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>State and local is absolutely the sticking point, because you

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>still have this divide mentality amongst Midwestern senator in the

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>red blue state divide. But I think if you can

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>drill down and stop discussing just state and local broadly,

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>but get into schools need this aid, specifically buses, rail transit,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>um subways. These programs are going to lay off ten

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand workers. They're slashing um their provided provisions by in

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>d C, in New York, in Chicago, they are making

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise at the transit level. So I

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>think if you can start talking about transit funding and

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>specific segment, come on, Henrietta, Henrietta, I take issue with

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this after talking to Patrick Foyd, Washington hates transportation because

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>they're Democrats in big cities. Is that going to change

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>in the next forty eight hours? I think I think

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>there's enough of a push, honestly to get you a

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>small basket of funding for those sectors include air lines.

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, um, there's you know, a long way

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to go there. But I do think that fundamental unders

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and there is something that has shifted in the last

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. Yes, and it's a bit of disruption

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>on your line, but we'll stick with it because this

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>conversation is important. How important are the things that we're

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>discussing right now to the January five runoffs in Georgia.

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a really critical question. Obviously. Um, it's

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>important because you need to. It's enough funding to keep

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Democrats at home and not enough to alienate your Republican base.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So that package that I just walked through, roughly six

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars or so in spending, does just that.

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>It's no bail out. There's no three D six hundred

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars a week unemployment insurance booster at the federal level,

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>no direct payment to individuals, none of that, you know,

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>democratic socialist minded stuff that will get the Republican senators

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in trouble Senators per New and Laffler. But it is

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>also enough to provide aid to the Democrats or the

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>members of the Georgia community who needed the most, mostly

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in that unemployment insurance aid, to get them to potentially

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>stay home. This is going to be the largest turnout

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>runoff in the state of Georgia. Per the electoral officials expectations.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The margins are exceedingly tight. UM. The latest data shows

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that as Up is up fifty to produce forty eight,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>whereas Warnock is up fifty two too lawful forty five

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>UM in the polls and Georgia polls. For what it's worth,

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty accurate in November. So, um, there needs to

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>be a concerted effort to turn out the Republican base,

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>which means the stimulus needs to be relatively small, but

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be enough to keep the Democrats home

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, which creates some concern around whether President Trump

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>should or should not go to Georgia. UM or whether

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>or not they should or should not passed even a

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>minimal stimulus bill this cycle. I so I think they will.

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's threading the needle from McConnell's perspective, and

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what they'll get. This is not part of the

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation on Wall Street, Henrietta. It barely comes up. The

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>outlooks for one hardly even include January five. There is

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just an assumption that we have a divided government down

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. Do you think that's a mistake. Well,

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if we do see the Democrats pick up the next

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>two seats in Georgia, there will be the definition of

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>divided in the is not a function majority. Um, We're

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to watch the teams at risks for flipping sides.

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 1>That would be maybe Lisa Murkowski or Joe Mansion, a

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat out of West Virginia. Um, you're gonna look at

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a sixty vote threshold for any legislation, regardless of what

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 1>happens in Georgia. In my opinion, Um, that is what

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>President of Like Biden is signaling. He will make in

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>State of the Union address about his inaugural speech about

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and concentrate on exclusively the coronavirus, on the need for stimulus,

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and that will occupy all of the first quarter at

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>least until they get it. And then if there is

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a fifty seat Democratic uh you know, quote unquote majority,

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll try to pursue things like reconciliation instructions and get

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>more funding. But you're not gonna see any more legislation pass.

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So I encourage our clients to focus on things that

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>can change at the regulatory level. And then of course

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>trade policy US China, relations to US EU, relations to

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>US Japan. That's the focus for the future. It's a

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation for another time, Henriet said, we always enjoy catching

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>up with you. Thank you and read traice that Vati Potus,

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the director of Economic Policy, Thanks for listening to the

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple podcasts. SoundCloud,

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide.

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Bloomberg Radio