WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Tesla Earnings, Paris Olympics, U.S Election

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Break anchors all around the world. And ahead on the program,

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>we looked at the EV market and second quarter earnings

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>from Tesla. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Karlin Hepger here in London, where we're looking ahead

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Paris Olympics, that costs from the spectacle.

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong. We look ahead to

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the way Asian countries might be gaming, our differences in

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>policy between President Biden and former President Donald Trump.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 4>E Loove on three own New York, Bloomberg in ninety

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>nine to one, Washington, DC, Bloomberg one O six one, Boston,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg nine sixty, San Francisco, dav Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 4>XM one nineteen and around the world on Blue Bomberg

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 4>Radio dot com and via the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby. We begin today's

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 2>program with some highly anticipated economic data here in the US.

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Out this week, an initial look at second quarter GDP

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday and PC core inflation data on Friday. How

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 2>might those numbers impact the feds monetary and interest rate

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>policies moving forward?

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 2>For more, we turned to Stuart paul, Us, economist with

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Economics. Now, Stuart, let's start with that economic growth

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>number for the spring's second quarter, A pretty mild GDP

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>number one point three percent in the first quarter. What

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 2>are you expecting in the spring.

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 6>We're expecting a very modest uptick. Our base cases for

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 6>headline GDP growth to register a one point eight percent

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 6>annualized pace of growth. So we're slightly above the consensus,

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 6>which is at one point seven percent. And so there's

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 6>a very modest uptick in headline growth in the second quarter.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 6>And the real question is what's behind that acceleration and growth,

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 6>Because it's not personal spending. We expect personal spending growth

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 6>to essentially be constant at one and a half percent.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 6>What's really driving that headline growth number in the second

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 6>quarter is an accumulation of inventories. And inventories can rise

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 6>for two different reasons. Producers can be really optimistic about

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 6>the growth outlooks, so they start stocking shelves and anticipation

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 6>of future demand, or they could just misjudge growth accidentally

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 6>overproduce goods and they find themselves carrying this inventory that

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 6>they didn't intend to actually produce in the first place.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 6>And we think that it's more of the second. We

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 6>think that it's more a misjudging of the durability of

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 6>the American consumer in the present. So we think that

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 6>one of the key fundamental drivers of growth in the

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 6>second quarter is the sort of accidental accumulation of inventories.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 6>And so we're really thinking about growth in the first

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 6>half of twenty twenty four relative to growth in the

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 6>second half of twenty twenty three, and the pace of

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 6>growth when you look second half of twenty twenty three

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 6>and into the first half of twenty twenty four has

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 6>basically been cut in half. And a big part of

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 6>that is the cooling labor market. Consumers are becoming a

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 6>little bit more prudent, and as a consequence, firms find

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 6>themselves a little bit over stuffed with inventory. So as

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 6>we head into the second half of the year, we

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 6>expect production rolls to slow and we expect growth to

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 6>cool in the second half as well.

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we see a labor market cooling a little bit.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 2>We do see inflation cooling a little bit. But the

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 2>several months in a row of solid manufacturing data that

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 2>we have, the factory orders, durable goods orders, that's a

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 2>false flag.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 6>You're saying some of it is because of a backlog

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 6>in autos, right, the fleet is older, there's still a

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 6>turnover that needs to take place. There is real underproduction

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 6>of autos when there was a semiconductor shortage, so there's

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 6>still a little bit of a catch up there. Auto

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 6>sales in June will effect a little bit by a

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 6>cyber attack, so there's still going to be some chunkiness

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 6>to some of the data. There are still orders of

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 6>some other transportation goods like aircraft, so there is some

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 6>larger explanatory variables. They are separate apart from what we

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 6>would think of as typically affected by monetary policy, typically

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.239
<v Speaker 6>affected by the business cycle. There are some of these

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 6>lagging consequences of COVID that are still showing up in

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 6>the data and making the data a little bit chunky.

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, so will these build ups of inventories, whether

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 2>it's cars, whether it's clothing, whether it's housing, appliances. Is

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.239
<v Speaker 2>that a good thing for consumers in the months ahead,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean they're going to have to clear out these

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>storerooms and warehouses.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 6>We think that it can lead to some discounting of

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 6>consumer durable goods, and consumer durable goods are typically dragging

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 6>on inflation. We do see just through time, this was

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 6>true pre COVID as well, that consumer durable goods really

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 6>dragged on headline inflation. And for the inflation outlook, the

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 6>thing that's going to matter most is really inflation in

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 6>some select services categories, things like homeowner's insurance and auto insurance,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 6>where the price of autos rose a lot, so the

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 6>replacement cost of autos rose a lot, and so what

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 6>you should be paying in insurance premiums is now rising

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 6>a lot. So there's a little bit of this catch

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 6>up inflation that's taking place. That's booying inflation separate and

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 6>apart from the dynamic that's taking place in goods, where

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 6>we do expect to see some discounting because of that

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 6>accidental build up in inventories.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Well that would be nice to see. Well, let's stay

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.119
<v Speaker 2>on inflation, because we're going to turn to that PCE

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 2>price index for June the FEDS preferred measure of inflation.

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to continue to see evidence that inflation

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>is cooling? I mean, we're not getting worse, that's right.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 6>So CPI inflation and PPI inflation are both pretty good

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 6>for June. And when we map CPI and producer prices

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 6>PPI in to that core PCE space so that we

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 6>can get a good feel of the Fed's preferred measure,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 6>we estimate that annual core PCEE inflation is going to

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 6>register two and a half percent in June. That's down

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 6>from two point six percent in May. And if we

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 6>look on a monthly basis, we're expecting to see core

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 6>inflation of just zero point one percent. Now, that'll give

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 6>us the third month in a row where the monthly

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 6>pace of inflation is pretty consistent with the fed's two

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 6>percent inflation target, and that should give the FED some

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 6>confidence to cut rates this year. We think starting in

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 6>September and.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Three months in a row is exactly the kind of

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>consistency they were looking for. So we do have a

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>FED meeting later this month at the very end of July.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 2>It's the September one that is the focus for everybody,

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.599
<v Speaker 2>right that By then we will have data on jobs

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>and data of inflation for July and for August. Is

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that the one where we may really see the holy

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 2>grail everyone's been waiting for.

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 6>I think that's right. I think that September is going

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 6>to be the month where we finally get a cut.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 6>I think that the July meeting that's coming up is

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 6>actually going to be pretty the uneventful. We could get

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 6>some communications from the FED Chairman at the post meeting

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 6>press conference that sort of sets this stage for cuts

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 6>this year. Then all the FED officials go to Jackson

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 6>Hole for their annual symposium where they discuss a lot

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 6>of academic papers, and there is typically a pretty well

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 6>attended speech by the FED Chairman that always serves as

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 6>an opportunity for communications to set the stage for that

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 6>September cut that will then follow. And then we get

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 6>the September meeting, and I think that could be the one.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot to look forward to. Second quarter GDP out

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>this Thursday. The PCE price Index for June on Friday

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>are thanks to Stuart paul Us, economist with Bloomberg Economics. Well,

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 2>next we move to the auto space and ev Giant Tesla.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 2>The world's most valuable automaker report second quarter earnings on Tuesday,

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and for more. We're joined by Steve Mann, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Global Autos and Industrials research analysts. So, Steve, it's been

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of a challenging time for most ev makers, sales

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>still growing a lot more slowly, but Tesla, at least

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 2>on Wall Street, is on our role. What are you

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>expecting to see in Tesla's second quarter earnings on Tuesday.

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, their stock has been doing really, really well. You know,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 7>a lot of it is related to the robo taxi

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 7>that they have planning to announced in October. They were

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 7>originally saying August, now it's in October. But if you

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 7>look at the underlying business, the auto business, it's still challenging.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 7>You know, second quarter sales are down year every year.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 7>But we still think their earnings can actually beat consensus

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 7>by like twenty to twenty five cents, mainly on you know,

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 7>lower raw material costs on the battery side, as well

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 7>as you know, cyber truck production is ramping up. They

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, produce eleven thousand in the second quarter, up

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 7>from thirty five hundred in the first quarter. So overall

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 7>earnings in the first quarter should be better than what

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 7>people expect.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 2>So Tesla's delivery numbers rising from I would say a

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty tough first quarter when GM and FOD they're not

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 2>seeing the same kind of dem I mean, can you

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>compare the products or is Tesla that much more desirable

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the demand for those products so much better?

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, Tesla does have a cachet in the EV space,

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 7>but look, I think you know they're going to face challenges.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 7>GM and other companies like Stilentis. They're not waiting, they're

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 7>not holding back. Even though EV sales are slow in

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 7>the recent quarters, they're still investing a lot of money

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 7>in introducing new products. You know. For example, GM introduced

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 7>the new Blazer not too long ago, and then another one,

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 7>a more affordable one, the Chevrolet Equinox. And you're seeing

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 7>that across the board. A lot of the automakers are

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 7>introducing more affordable evs. And that's what I think the

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 7>industry needs to do, is to cater to the bigger masses,

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 7>the bigger audience in the auto market by introducing a lower,

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 7>more affordable EV.

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, nowhere is that more then in China and the

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>EV maker byd on track to overtake Tesla and sales

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 2>in that country this year, and it's just one of

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 2>many competitors. Some of their cars going for about thirteen

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand US dollars over there. How is Tesla competing against that?

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 7>That market is just crazy. I mean, the price war

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 7>is not only impacting the EV markets, impacting everyone including

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 7>internal combustion engine vehicle makers like BMW. It's a crazy

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 7>market over there. Tesla is actually doing fairly well over there.

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 7>They've actually held back on any price cuts, but they

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 7>are providing some better financing terms for some consumers. Sales

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 7>have actually, you know, fallen off a little bit, but

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 7>overall they're still producing a lot in their factories, shipping

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 7>them overseas in Europe. But overall, you know, Tesla, I

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 7>think it will bounce back, you know, once this price

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 7>for kind of subsides.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Now, let me circle back with you on the ROBOTAXI.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have been hearing about this autonomous cab

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>for six seven years, A delay, delay, delay. We are

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>going to expect to see it August eighth, Now it's October.

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 2>What do you think? What is the real reason or

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>as Kathy Woods of our management said, he wants to

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 2>wow us, and it's going to be even better than

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 2>we expected.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. I mean, if you look at their stock price,

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 7>we did some of the back of the anvelope calculation.

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 7>Most of the stock price is valuing Robotaxi and AI.

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 7>You know, Elon must have talked about robotaxi for a

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 7>long time, and I think this is an event that's

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 7>going to be mostly watched to see how they're going

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 7>to move AI, you know, into the cars. They're going

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 7>to probably announce or give some updates on the Optimus

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 7>humanoid robots. It's going to be a huge event for us.

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 7>You know, Robotaxi is only I think. I think one

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 7>component of what Elon Musk is trying to do. Rye

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 7>hailing is probably going to be a small part of

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 7>that business for them. There's a lot of opportunities for

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 7>robo taxi. You know, his mantra is really about driving sustainability,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 7>lower consumption or lower greenhouse gases. These Tesla vehicles, you know,

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 7>if you think about it, they're actually battery on wheels,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 7>so other than taking the passenger from zero point A

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 7>to point B on the rye hailing business, you know,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 7>I think what Kathy Wood and others are thinking about.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 7>Is these cars could be used for distributed power, offsetting

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 7>peak power in one region to the next.

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 2>Well a lot to look forward to Tesla's second quarter

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>earnings after Wall Street's closing bell on Tuesday, Our thanks

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to Steve Man Bloomberg Intelligence, Global Autos and Industrials research analysts,

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>coming up Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Can France win an

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Olympic gold in profitability? We look ahead to the twenty

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty four Summer Olympic Games in Paris. I'm Tom Busby

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend,

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 2>our global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 2>in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Up later in our program we'll look at how the

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 2>US presidential election in November may shape US China relations

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 2>going forward. But first, the French capital prepares to host

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the greatest show on Earth. But will it be worth it?

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 2>The Olympic Games famously expensive, very rarely profitable. Will Paris

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 2>be able to convert athletic prowess to economic gain? And

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>for more, Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Europe anchor Caroline hepgar Tom.

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Much like an Olympic marathon, the road to Paris twenty

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five four has already been filled with ups and downs.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>The journey has been punctuated by obstacles, from funding challenges

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to more recent political uncertainty and local dissatisfaction at the

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:18.359
<v Speaker 1>perceived inconveniences that the Games could bring. Central two discussions

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>has been the question about whether Paris's iconic river Senn

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>will be clean enough in time to welcome Olympic swimmers

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>onto its banks. Recently, the Paris mayor and Idalago took

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a dip in the river herself plus some journalists in

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>a bid to prove its cleanliness. France has earmarked one

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>point four billion euros that's about one and a half

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>billion US dollars for improving the water quality of the river,

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>amid lingering concerns that the overflows from the city's sewage

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>system bring waste water and bacteria into the Seine, making

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it unswimmable. President Immanue and macar is even committed to

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a swim in the river at SCE some point, although

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>given the country's current political situation, he may find it

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>difficult to find the time cleaning up the river and

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>reversing a centuries old ban on swimming in It has

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been a long and complicated project for French authorities, the

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>peculiarities of which I've been discussing with Bloomberg's investigations Reporter

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>gasper seabag.

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, the issue here is that when it rains a lot,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 8>the sewage system in Paris overflows and that brings wastewater

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 8>and bacteria into the Seine, which obviously isn't what you want.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>No indeed, and the weather has been particularly rainy across Europe,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>how has it been in Paris lately?

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 9>It's not being fantastic. I mean, June was pretty horrendous

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 9>and that obviously translated into the quality of the water

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 9>not being adequate. For basically most of the days of June.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 9>July has been much more positive and we've seen several

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 9>days in a row being at the right quality standards,

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 9>and in fact, the Sports Minister Amelie Udia Castella took

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 9>a dive into the seine to show that it was

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 9>it was okay for athletes.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 7>To go in.

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 2>So how have they done us.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 9>There's a huge variety of efforts that have been deployed

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 9>in Paris. It's it's taken several years. There's some which

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 9>really got the spotlight, like creating a huge water bisin

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 9>in the depth of Paris, which was you know, they

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 9>they excavated and they created this huge capacity to increase

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 9>the possibility to store those overflows from the sewage when

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 9>it rains. That I was talking about. But there were

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of smaller tasks, some quite For example, they

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 9>had to go knocking on doors to make sure that

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 9>households were connected to the sewage system because the reality,

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 9>the grim reality of all of this is that some

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 9>were just pumping their toilets directly into the sein. Again

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 9>not at all what you want to achieve. The result

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 9>of having athletes a jump into the sin and feeling

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 9>comfortable about it.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>So that was Gaspar Sibag speaking to me. But murky

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>rivers aren't the only problem facing the Paris Olympics. Organizers

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>also faced the challenge of extracting lasting value from these games,

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>economic gain being perhaps the most sought after prize ever

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>since the first Olympics was held over a century ago.

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>The Games have been known for dazzling sporting feats, but

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>also dizzying expense, particularly for opening ceremonies. Recently, the ballooning

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>cost of hosting the Games led residents in Austin, in

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Rome and in Oslo to reject efforts to bring the

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Olympics to their cities. As a result, the International Olympic

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Committee is hoping to reign in costs, starting with Paris.

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Well joining me for a discussion around this and how

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Paris is trying to do things differently and keep the

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>costs of the Games down is Bloomberg's Hugo Miller.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 5>Well. I sat down with Sebco for the Big Take

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 5>that we wrote on this topic recently, and what he

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 5>told me was something fascinating was that the architect of

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 5>the modern Games in Los Angeles in nineteen eighty four

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 5>said to him the most important thing you do, as

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 5>he was preparing to run the twenty twelve London Games,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 5>was learned to say no. And the trouble is that

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 5>the Olympics for too long have not been able to

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 5>say no. In other words, when in doubt, they've added

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 5>another ceremony, another event, just to kind of make the

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 5>whole spectacle that much more spectacular, and over the years

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 5>the Games have got bigger and more bloated. For the

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 5>better part of three decade.

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, and only one of the games is actually ever

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>managed to be profitable, and that was Los Angeles in

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty four. How did they manage to do it,

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>even though of course it's quite a long time ago.

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, that was the culmination of a bad decade for

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 5>the Olympic movement. You had in nineteen seventy two, the

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 5>tragedy of the murder the terrorists murder of eleven Israeli

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 5>athletes in seventy two, and in Montreal in seventy six,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 5>you had a massive cost overruns, which led taxpayers in

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Montreal to still be paying for the Olympics four decades later.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 5>And things got so bad that the citizens of Denver

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 5>actually said, after being awarded the Games, no thanks, we

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 5>don't want them. So basically, by the time you got

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 5>to nineteen eighty you had just two cities bidding for

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 5>the games, Los Angeles and Tehran. And as we know,

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 5>the history books tell us, Iran was rapidly overtaken by revolution.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 5>So you've had la alone. And what that allowed Peter Uberov,

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 5>this businessman who was fronting the games, to do is

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 5>to tell the IOC, you know what I'm going to

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 5>do these games the way I want to do them,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 5>and that means we're going to reuse student dorms for

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 5>the athletes, We're going to reuse existing stadia like the

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 5>Coliseum and the Rose Bowl, and we're not going to

0:20:21.160 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 5>build for the sake of building. And he was the

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 5>first and to date, as you say, the only person

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 5>to deliver the games on profit, on time.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, what about Paris? What is France doing to rain

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in the costs and try to bring it home profitably

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for them?

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Paris, even cynics would say, Paris so far looks like

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 5>it's learned the lessons from the past and taking a

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 5>queue from the IOC, is set to deliver a balanced

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 5>budget for its games. It's done so by keeping the

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 5>construction of new infrastructure to a minimum, primarily just to

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 5>revitalize the northern neighborhood of San Denis in Paris, but

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 5>really a focus on private sector involvement, to keep the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 5>operating budget down to four point seven billion dollars and

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 5>then to keep the surrounding infrastructure spending to another four

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 5>and a half billion, which, when you compare it to

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 5>the boondoggle that was such a in twenty fourteen or Beijing.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a fraction of those costs.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>So I feel so expensive. Why do cities? Why do

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>countries keep on bidding or wanting to take part? What

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>do they gain from it?

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 5>When it comes to democracies, Many of these democracies simply

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 5>say no, And we had taxpayer revolts in Stockholm, in Boston,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 5>in Rome, as we discussed. But I think there is

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 5>just this irresistible urge, particularly in emerging markets and authoritarian

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 5>countries that still seek kind of soft power to be

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 5>gained from host the Games. So that's why you saw

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 5>Puchin trying to kind of burnish Russia's legacy well after

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 5>the Cold War is over with the such a Games,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 5>and the Chinese Communist Party looking to do it not

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 5>once but twice with the Summer and Winter Games in Beijing.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 5>It seems like there's a certain sort of authoritarian swagger,

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 5>as we put it, that they feel comes from hosting

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 5>the Games that the Western democracies don't really feel anymore.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, maybe there are some benefits. For example,

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>if France manages to clean up I know that the

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>main river the send in Paris, for example, I mean

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that's expensive, but perhaps could be seen as quite.

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 10>Worthwhile indeed, and to listeners and readers, I have to

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 10>give a shout out to my colleage Jenny Cha who

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 10>did in deep job in the same as Paris Mayor

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 10>and Hidalgo yesterday to experience the send for herself going

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 10>to every.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Length as a Bloomberg report.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 5>I like it she did, and I think that that

0:22:54.800 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 5>is a sensible legacy that we should collectively sit dwellers

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 5>aimed for is that London could regenerate part of the

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 5>east end of the city twelve years ago, that Paris

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 5>can turn the sin into a swimmable asset. And these

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 5>are fantastic legacies, and these are what we should be

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 5>aiming for. What the IOC doesn't want to see anymore,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 5>and what I don't think any taxpayer should want to

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 5>see is instead where you see things like what happened

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 5>in Rio de Geneiro, where they built all this infrastructure

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 5>for sports that locals just didn't use and sat there

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 5>like white elephants within months of the game's ending.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, in London, interestingly, the eastern part of the city

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that was redeveloped is really being absorbed, has been absorbed

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>into the cattle, which is interesting, which brings me to

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 1>my last thought about long term economic and development gains.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Do those emerge, where have they emerged? Most will they

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>emerge from the Paris Games.

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 5>I think it remains to be seeing what the parish

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 5>organizers say is four billion dollars depending on your perspective,

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 5>as a lot or amount of money when you're talking

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 5>about public spending on infrastructure. But the aim is to

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 5>take a more depressed, or at least to put bluntly

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 5>poorer part of the city that hasn't necessarily benefited from

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 5>public spending and create things like swimming pool sports facilities

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 5>for local residents in the northern part of the city.

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 5>That hopefully will prove to be the case in the

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 5>years to come. But as we've seen over and over

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 5>and over again, there is a history of overrun and overspending.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 5>But hopeful in Paris is the exception to that unfortunate rule.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So that was Hugo Miller and of course not long

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:41.239
<v Speaker 1>to go now. Paris begins its Olympics extravaganza with an

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>opening ceremony along a six kilometer route taking in all

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Paris sites we expect, right along the River Sene.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>On the twenty sixth of July. I'm Caroline Hepger here

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>in London. You can catch us every weekday morning for

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak Europe, beginning at six am in London, that's

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>one am, Tom.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Caroline, And coming up on Bloomberg day Break

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 2>weekend to look at how the US presidential election may

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>shape relations between US and China. I'm Tom Busby on

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg. I'm Tom Busby in New York with

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 2>your global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>in the coming week. How will the US presidential election

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 2>shape the relationship between the US and China? For more,

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to Bloomberg Daybreak Asia co host Brian Curtis

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 2>in Hong Kong.

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Tom, the twenty twenty four US election will be critical

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 3>in setting the chorus for relations with China and indeed

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 3>all of Asia over the next four years. Broadly speaking,

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 3>both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump want

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>to be tough on China, and in fact both want

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>to step up the pressure and enact even tougher policies,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 3>but they will take different paths. Biden will be more ideological,

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Trump more transactional. Now, President Biden says the US would

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 3>force fully respond to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, while

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 3>former President Trump hinted to Bloomberg he'd want to see

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 3>the US get paid for it. Earlier, Bloomberg's Rome var

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Geese weighed in on Trump's comments.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 11>It's never been a question the United States would protect

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 11>Taiwan against Chinese aggression. But here he is saying what's

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 11>in it for us? And I think that's the common

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 11>thread throughout all of these policies and all of his statements.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 11>It's I'm not going to take anything for granted, and

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 11>I'm going to see what's best for me and what's

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 11>the best for the United States.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 3>That's Rome var Geese. We also heard from Bloomberg opinion

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 3>columnists menschene Pai.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 12>We should not worry very much about what Trump says.

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 12>He keeps saying one thing and then doing another, so

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 12>he's totally unpredictable, and I think most people do not

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 12>eve at the moment in what he says. So the

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 12>market is reacting.

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 3>Rationally well, particularly in an area like that. But I

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 3>think we can believe that he would like to slap

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 3>sixty percent tariffs on China.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 12>Oh yes, I think so. Trump has this of the

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 12>double sided feature to his policy. On the one hand,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 12>he's very tough on China in terms of trade, he

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 12>wants to cut China off from the US market. At

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 12>the same time, he does not care that much about

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 12>China's military might, especially where Taiwan is concerned. There are

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 12>inconsistencies in there, because in his heart, Trump really does

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 12>not want to see China strong and powerful, and if

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 12>you see Taiwan to China, then China will become even

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 12>more powerful than it is today. So at the end

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 12>of the day, I think Trump will probably be tougher

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 12>on China where Taiwan is concerned then what.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 3>He see Bloomberg opinion columnists mention pay for more on this,

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 3>We turn now to Bill Ferries, Bloomberg Senior Editor. So, Bill,

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 3>we wanted to talk a little bit about how countries

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 3>in Asia, and probably more with China, how they might

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:16.479
<v Speaker 3>be preparing for different outcomes from the US election. We

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 3>sometimes generalize in the differences between the two on policy,

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 3>saying that President Trump really focuses more on trade policy

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 3>and President Biden more on industrial policy. But when looking

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 3>at the differences, how do you think China is seeing it? Well?

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 13>I don't think From China's perspective, they see it as

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 13>a tough election for them either way, regardless of who

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 13>wins in November, there's not a lot of upside for them.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 13>I mean, as you suggested at the outset, being tough

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 13>on China is one of the very few things that

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 13>has bipartisan support in the United States at this point.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 13>So you know, China sees that as they'll have to

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 13>take their poison, whether it's a round of new tariffs

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 13>that a President Trump would or says he would enact,

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 13>versus a lot of the trade restrictions. We're already seeing

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 13>the Bided administration ramping up when it comes to high

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 13>technology semiconductor chips and things like that, including support for Taiwan.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.719
<v Speaker 13>So I think China knows there's still a lot that

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 13>could happen in the next several months before the election,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 13>and that regardless of who wins, it's going to be

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 13>a bumpy road for them for quite a while.

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because if you think about what you highlighted there,

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 3>President Biden using the foreign direct Product rule on chip

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>makers doing business in China, that's something that really in

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a sense is almost like the higher tariffs that President

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Trump would put on right.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 13>You know, it's a real point of leverage that the

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 13>US has with China. Listen, you know, we import a

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 13>lot of goods from China. We found out during the

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 13>pandemic that a lot of the just the basic medical

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 13>goods that we products that we needed to deal with

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.239
<v Speaker 13>the COVID nineteen outbreak were coming in from China. There

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 13>was a lot of reassessment of US vulnerabilities. The access

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 13>to the highest technology gear to make the top line

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 13>chips is something that the US has influence over. It's

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 13>something that China has spent tens of billions of dollars

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 13>trying to recreate and so far hasn't been able to.

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 13>So I think the US, really, regardless of who wins,

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 13>is going to continue to use that leverage over a

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 13>Beijing because it's one real strength that the US has

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 13>at this point.

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk a little bit about the different approach to

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 3>policy on Taiwan. How do you see the differences there?

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 13>You know, it's fascinating because if you remember back to

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 13>twenty sixteen, when President Trump was first elected, he actually

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 13>took a call from the then Taiwanese president and that

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 13>was seen as a huge breach of diplomatic protocol. It

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 13>never happened again. But you know, I think the latest

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 13>comments we have from the former President Trump in his

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 13>interview with Bloomberg suggests real questions about whether the US

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 13>would come militarily to Taiwan's aid. I think President Trump

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 13>always had a proclivity towards selling weapons to allies or anybody.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 13>He really talked about that a lot with countries like

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 13>Saudi Arabia and Japan. I think he would be willing

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 13>to continue and even ramp up weapons sales to Taiwan.

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 13>But the idea of sending American troops into harm's way

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 13>if China attacked, that's really been raised into question by

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 13>his latest comments. President Biden, on the other hand, kind

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 13>of broke with decades of a diplomatic protocol in his

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 13>own way when he said that, yes, the US would

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 13>have to come to Taiwan's aid if attacked. So there

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 13>is a big difference there. But I don't think anyone

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 13>really knows how strongly Trump would stick to those doubts

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 13>if he is elected and there was an attack.

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 3>So that really is a good example of the transactional

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 3>versus the ideological differences. President Biden feels very strongly about

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 3>protecting for reasons to go all the way back to

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>the Second World War and perhaps even further whereas President

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump you know, wants to get paid in the sense

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 3>of offering protections to Taiwan like an insurance policy, he

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 3>believes that as she could pay. If you're a foreign

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 3>leader in Asia, is it easier to deal with a

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 3>transactional person or an ideological person?

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 13>It depends on, like which issues I think you're trying

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 13>to get into. I think the Chinese, you know, a

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 13>lot of foreign leaders will remember Trump as being transactional.

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 13>They will also remember him as being quite unpredictable, and

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 13>so you can try to reach a deal. You can

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 13>think you have a deal, and then a week later

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 13>you can find out that that deal no longer stands.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 13>So that's something I think people will have memories for.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 13>On the other hand, if you're facing you know, someone

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 13>like Joe Biden and he's if you don't like the policy,

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 13>you're going to have a much harder time changing that

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 13>policy because I think, you know, Biden has more of

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 13>an ideological focus in terms of you know, when they

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 13>make decisions, they're making them kind of long term, and

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 13>they can be harder to undo.

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump is sending a message essentially that you can pay

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 3>to have policy changed. Now we know that there are

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 3>obviously lots of nuances in that for countries that are

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 3>looking at trade and for what might come from President

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump versus President Biden. Former President Trump has talked about

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 3>using tariffs even against allies. Do allies in Asia fear that?

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think allies in Asia are concerned. I think

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 13>allies in Europe are concerned, and they all saw some

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 13>of that in the previous administration. Yeah, I think he's

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 13>going to be looking for companies to grant concessions to

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 13>the US. He's going to be looking for companies to

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 13>build factories in the United States. That was something that

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 13>happened in his term. I think it's something that's happened

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 13>in Joe Biden's term as well. You know, you go

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 13>back to twenty twenty one when Biden took office, there

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 13>were a lot of expectations that he would ease some

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 13>of these tariffs on China, and that never happened. He

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 13>kept them in place and then move forward on other

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 13>high technology restrictions. So I think regardless of the country,

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 13>whether you're a close ally or arrival of the United States,

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 13>a President Trump would be very much looking to you

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 13>for transactional diplomacy, looking for deals that, in his mind,

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 13>would help the American consumer.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about a couple of other areas. So if

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 3>we think about President Trump, if he were to win

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 3>with Vladimir Putin and Shijen Ping, who becomes the third wheel.

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about it from the standpoint of would

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 3>President Trump be a third wheel with those two because

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 3>they've already declared this very strong relationship. But then I

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 3>was thinking, it's more interesting if you throw the three

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 3>in a hat and say, which are the two that

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 3>get the closest.

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 13>I mean, you've heard former President Trump saying that if

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 13>he is elected that he will help bring peace to

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 13>the Ukraine conflict even before he takes office, and you've

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 13>seen him draw a, you know, a very harsh line

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 13>on China. You know, he I think he showed a

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 13>lot of comfort in his first term and working with

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 13>leaders like Putin, like she, like the Saudi Crown Prince.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 13>He does seem to have a proclivity to work with

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 13>these very kind of strong man type leaders who are

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 13>able to make decisions and you know, very quickly in

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 13>their countries because they don't have to deal with some

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 13>of the mess of democracy. He took a harder line

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 13>in many cases against a lot of US allies. So

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 13>you know, whether he would try to strike deals with

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 13>Shi Jinping, I think is a very open question. I mean,

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 13>he started off his administration really trying to work with

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.320
<v Speaker 13>Shi Jinping, but by the end, when the COVID outbreak happened,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 13>I think the tone changed very quickly. So between those three,

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 13>He's certainly believes that he has influence with people like

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.839
<v Speaker 13>Putin and She, but to the degree he'll be able

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 13>to exercise that would A lot needs to happen for

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 13>that to take place.

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 3>A quick question on the dollar, Former President Trump seems

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to be pining for a weaker dollar, whereas President Biden

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 3>doesn't normally wade into those waters.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 13>Differences there, Yeah, I mean President Trump in his first

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 13>term was really like someone who, for the first time

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 13>in a generation, talked about the value of a weaker dollar.

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 13>He really saw that as a boon to American exports

0:36:37.160 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 13>and you know, a way to bolster the economy. Traditionally,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 13>of course, Treasury secretaries and White Houses have always pushed

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 13>a strong dollar policy. So you know, when you talk

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 13>to economists about the economic policies that President Trump would

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 13>bring about, they see it as very inflationary. He talks about,

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:00.919
<v Speaker 13>you know, extending his tax cuts, perhaps apps adding more

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 13>tax cuts, but not as much talk on cutting spending side.

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 13>So economists are looking at that as something that would

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 13>have the FED perhaps having to keep rates higher. For Logger,

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 13>that is essentially a stronger dollar policy if the rates

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 13>remain high and the rest of the world is looking

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 13>for cuts. So how he's going to square that circle

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:23.280
<v Speaker 13>is going to be a difficult one.

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Bill, thanks very much for playing ball with us. Bill Ferries,

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Senior Editor. I'm Brian Curtis in Hong Kong along

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 3>with Doug Krisner. You can catch us every weekday here

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at eight am in Hong

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Kong and eight pm on Wall Street.

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Tom thank you, Brian, and that does it for this

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 2>edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.280
<v Speaker 2>morning at five am Wall Street time for the latest

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 2>on markets overseas and the news you need to start

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 2>your day. I'm Tom Busby. Stay with us top stories

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 2>and global business headlines coming up right now,