1 00:00:01,440 --> 00:00:04,479 Speaker 1: The Action Network podcast podcasts. 2 00:00:05,720 --> 00:00:08,840 Speaker 2: If you are even remotely a savage, you'll run these 3 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 2: people over for a second spot. Hello, Welcome the Action 4 00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:31,640 Speaker 2: Network podcast UFC Betting Preview. I'm Sean Zerilla, joined today 5 00:00:31,640 --> 00:00:34,440 Speaker 2: by Billy Word to help you break down this weekend's 6 00:00:34,600 --> 00:00:37,560 Speaker 2: UFC card, giving you some of our best bets, favorite underdogs, 7 00:00:37,880 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 2: top props, and more. If you'd like to tail some 8 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 2: of the bets that we discussed today, make sure to 9 00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:45,040 Speaker 2: find the quick slip link in the podcast at video 10 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:48,560 Speaker 2: description or go to Action network dot com Slash bet 11 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:52,200 Speaker 2: Now twelve fight card in Seattle. Prelim start at six pm, 12 00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 2: Main card at nine pm. The main event Henry Sehudo 13 00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 2: about a plus three twenty underdog against song Ya Dong 14 00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:01,520 Speaker 2: minus two seventy five sorry, plus two twenty for Henry 15 00:01:01,520 --> 00:01:04,040 Speaker 2: s Hudo minus two seventy five for Songy Doong. Fight 16 00:01:04,040 --> 00:01:06,600 Speaker 2: about minus one sixty five to go to a decision 17 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:09,880 Speaker 2: about sixty two percent applied plus one thirty to end 18 00:01:09,880 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 2: inside the distance. Billy and I aligned on the same 19 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 2: side of the fight, betting it slightly differently, however, do 20 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:18,880 Speaker 2: you want to note though the age gap differential between 21 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:21,640 Speaker 2: these two Songy Doong eleven years younger, and when there's 22 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:24,760 Speaker 2: at least a decade of age between UFC opponents, the 23 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:27,640 Speaker 2: younger fighter has tended to beat the market, winning about 24 00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 2: twelve percent more often the betting market expects seventy one 25 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:34,320 Speaker 2: percent win rate versus about average odds of fifty nine 26 00:01:34,319 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 2: percent minus one forty five in that range. Songs also 27 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:40,440 Speaker 2: the bigger band forges Holler three and treat advantage to Hudo. 28 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:43,959 Speaker 2: A former fly weight, has mentioned potentially going back down 29 00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 2: to one twenty five if he wins this fight, potentially 30 00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:49,800 Speaker 2: trying to get his hands back on a UFC title 31 00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:51,520 Speaker 2: in a division that is a little bit weaker, a 32 00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:55,920 Speaker 2: little bit more shallow. Now, this is a different matchup 33 00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:58,480 Speaker 2: forsu Hudo than the guys he's faced in recent fights. 34 00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:03,000 Speaker 2: He had very tough wrestling style matchups, grappling style fights 35 00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:06,920 Speaker 2: with Marab Devas Hiley current champion with al Jamaine Sterling who, 36 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:09,760 Speaker 2: by the numbers, so Hudo all grappled for portions of 37 00:02:09,760 --> 00:02:12,040 Speaker 2: that fight. He had more control time, he landed multiple 38 00:02:12,040 --> 00:02:14,679 Speaker 2: takedowns in that fight. Al Jo had takedowns of his own, 39 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:16,480 Speaker 2: but so Who too had five minutes to control. 40 00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:17,239 Speaker 1: Aljo had four. 41 00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:21,000 Speaker 2: That fight was a split on the scorecards. But what 42 00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:24,320 Speaker 2: I do think is the difficulty for Suhudo in terms 43 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:27,959 Speaker 2: of winning this fight consistently is the damage optics. Earlier 44 00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:31,000 Speaker 2: in his career much more capable of winning a fight 45 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 2: with control time. Now later in his career, Lesson Cardio 46 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:36,799 Speaker 2: not gonna be able to shoot takedowns, you know, more 47 00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 2: than two takedowns around across a twenty five minute fight, 48 00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:42,800 Speaker 2: which is roughly what he's average throughout his career. 49 00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:43,960 Speaker 1: But he's not gonna be able to. 50 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 2: Go in there with a a rob style game plan 51 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,440 Speaker 2: shoot thirty takedowns. He's probably not going to be able 52 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:52,000 Speaker 2: to control Song for more than half around at a time. 53 00:02:52,120 --> 00:02:54,880 Speaker 2: Song is very strong, his get ups aren't super technical, 54 00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,040 Speaker 2: but he's able to explode back to his feet used 55 00:02:57,040 --> 00:03:00,560 Speaker 2: that athleticism, and then on the feet, Song is the 56 00:03:00,639 --> 00:03:05,480 Speaker 2: much more dangerous and efficient striker. Sahuda does the ability 57 00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:07,280 Speaker 2: to damage him to slow him down with leg kicks, 58 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:10,240 Speaker 2: but Song is going to land the more impactful punches 59 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:12,600 Speaker 2: in the pocket and have much better damage optics. So 60 00:03:12,639 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 2: I think there is a chance to Hudo could win 61 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,320 Speaker 2: minutes of the round with top control, and then they 62 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 2: return to their feet, and Song steals the fight back 63 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 2: or steals the roundback with superior damage on the feet. 64 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:25,560 Speaker 1: But overall, I do. 65 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:28,560 Speaker 2: Think Suhudo has the type of style to give Song trouble. 66 00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:33,160 Speaker 2: Songs lesser skill or his weakest area is his grappling defense. 67 00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 2: He's been taken down held down in the past, and 68 00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:38,839 Speaker 2: Sahudo's arguably the best wrestler that he's ever faced. I'm 69 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,200 Speaker 2: just concerned about the age Song in his physical prime, 70 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:44,440 Speaker 2: Shuto nearing the end of his career in his late thirties. 71 00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:47,600 Speaker 2: But if there's somebody who's athleticism is going to carry, 72 00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:51,000 Speaker 2: it's a world class athlete like triple C former Olympic 73 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:54,280 Speaker 2: gold medalist in wrestling, two time UFC champion in multiple 74 00:03:54,280 --> 00:03:57,400 Speaker 2: weight divisions. I'm betting Sahudo by decision of plus three ninety. 75 00:03:57,560 --> 00:03:59,600 Speaker 2: I made that line closer to plus three twenty five 76 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 2: plus three to fifty or better. I don't give him 77 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,760 Speaker 2: much finishing upside in the fight. I think Song is 78 00:04:05,800 --> 00:04:08,400 Speaker 2: the favorite because he is much more knockout upside, much 79 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:12,200 Speaker 2: more finishing upside, in addition to the damage optics on 80 00:04:12,360 --> 00:04:14,720 Speaker 2: the feat. Billy, You're just gonna take the straight money 81 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:18,000 Speaker 2: line stab at plus two twenty five. Tell me what 82 00:04:18,040 --> 00:04:19,960 Speaker 2: I missed in terms of my breakdown on this matchup. 83 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 1: I don't think you missed anything. I took this one 84 00:04:23,160 --> 00:04:25,000 Speaker 1: pretty early in the week. I thought the line would 85 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:27,160 Speaker 1: come back in a little bit more than it did. 86 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:30,599 Speaker 1: You know, before those method of victory props were off. 87 00:04:31,000 --> 00:04:33,479 Speaker 1: The only thing stylistically I would add is the way 88 00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:36,240 Speaker 1: that Song likes to get up and escape. He likes 89 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 1: to turn his back, go to his turtle and stand up. 90 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:41,479 Speaker 1: He's been trying with Team Alpamel. They all do that. 91 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:44,960 Speaker 1: That works really really well against guys whose grappling foundation 92 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: is like judo or sambo, because I want to jump 93 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,640 Speaker 1: on your back and get submissions rather than break you 94 00:04:49,720 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 1: back down. Wrestling is all about breaking someone back down 95 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 1: from that position. I mean, that's referee's position. That's how 96 00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:58,160 Speaker 1: everything but the first round starts in wrestling. Most of 97 00:04:58,200 --> 00:05:01,159 Speaker 1: the time, that is a really tough spot or tough 98 00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:03,120 Speaker 1: way to get back up against a guy like Suhudo 99 00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:05,440 Speaker 1: who is going to flatten you back out, make you 100 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:08,160 Speaker 1: do it over and over again. So I like that 101 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,200 Speaker 1: stylistically for Suhudo. But as you touched on like he 102 00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:14,240 Speaker 1: came back and fought two of the toughest grapplers in 103 00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:17,719 Speaker 1: the UFC, much less in these divisions. The age is 104 00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:20,040 Speaker 1: mitigated a little bit by coming back up to one 105 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:22,360 Speaker 1: thirty five instead of one twenty five. You know, you're 106 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:24,320 Speaker 1: a year or two younger as a bantamweight than you 107 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 1: would be as a flyweight. Still don't love that. I 108 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:30,120 Speaker 1: actually wish the Comaane was five rounds and this one 109 00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: was three rounds. I'd feel much better about betting on 110 00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:36,479 Speaker 1: both sides, honestly, but that's not what we have. I 111 00:05:36,520 --> 00:05:38,440 Speaker 1: am worried about down the stretch. I don't think he 112 00:05:38,480 --> 00:05:41,600 Speaker 1: gets hurt here sahudo. That is, he's been extremely durable, 113 00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:44,560 Speaker 1: he's got slick boxing, he's hard to touch. But yeah, 114 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:47,720 Speaker 1: you're right about the damage optics this and there's many 115 00:05:47,720 --> 00:05:49,880 Speaker 1: of these on this card. It would be a great 116 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:52,719 Speaker 1: point sped bet on the underdog, but the line is 117 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:55,640 Speaker 1: just so far apart is even money at DraftKings, and 118 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:57,760 Speaker 1: I'd rather just take a half unit on his money 119 00:05:57,800 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 1: line at plus two twenty five and take a bigger 120 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:03,000 Speaker 1: waying because we're not getting really a great price on 121 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:06,040 Speaker 1: the points bread. Because the books correctly realized that this 122 00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:07,080 Speaker 1: should be a close fight. 123 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:09,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, plus five and a half can't really do much 124 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:12,040 Speaker 2: with that, as the underdog would much rather lay that 125 00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:14,800 Speaker 2: with the favorite, And again Song does have more finishing 126 00:06:14,839 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 2: upside and more damage optics. You know, you look back 127 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:19,200 Speaker 2: at how the Aljro fight scored a lot of people. 128 00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:21,680 Speaker 2: It'll ended up being a split decision, but more people 129 00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:24,080 Speaker 2: scored it forty nine to forty six for al Jo 130 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:27,120 Speaker 2: than had it forty eight forty seven for Suhudo. And 131 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:28,880 Speaker 2: in that case, I think I would want to lay 132 00:06:29,040 --> 00:06:31,280 Speaker 2: the five and a half with Song as opposed to 133 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 2: taking the five and a half with Suhudo. I think 134 00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:36,799 Speaker 2: Suhudo by decision the best way to go about playing it, 135 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:40,279 Speaker 2: maybe even Sahudo in the decision only market, though I 136 00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:43,080 Speaker 2: projected that at plus one eighty and that's exactly where 137 00:06:43,120 --> 00:06:46,480 Speaker 2: DraftKings is too, literally to the number we were on 138 00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,440 Speaker 2: the mark in the decision only market, so no value 139 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:51,479 Speaker 2: there decision only, even though I thought that might be 140 00:06:51,520 --> 00:06:54,160 Speaker 2: a way to consider playing it, just Suhudo by decision 141 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:57,160 Speaker 2: For me, Billy going with Suhudo on the money line. 142 00:06:57,200 --> 00:06:59,240 Speaker 2: We'll see if it ends up floating up a little 143 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:02,000 Speaker 2: bit more, maybe some Chinese money coming into the market, 144 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:06,400 Speaker 2: the offshru markets, or just people betting the age differential. 145 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 2: As we get closer to fight time, our fight of 146 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 2: the night. Several fights on this card that I'm really 147 00:07:11,520 --> 00:07:15,000 Speaker 2: interested in. We have a rematch here from LFA between 148 00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:18,360 Speaker 2: Brendan Allen at plus two seventy and Anthony Fluffy Hernandez 149 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:21,920 Speaker 2: at minus three twenty that fight. That first fight occurred 150 00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:26,200 Speaker 2: in twenty seventeen. Alan opened minus two sixty five for 151 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:30,600 Speaker 2: that fight, closed minus one eighty five. Hernandez opened minus 152 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:33,960 Speaker 2: one ninety eight for the rematch of DraftKings minus two sixty. Elsewhere, 153 00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,000 Speaker 2: he's been bet up well over minus three hundred billion. 154 00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 2: I agree on one aspect in particular this fight, which 155 00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 2: is Alexander Hernandez is a great live bet after five 156 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 2: minutes after round one, Billy, I'm gonna let you take 157 00:07:46,960 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 2: it away though, because you have a breakdown for this 158 00:07:48,600 --> 00:07:51,600 Speaker 2: fight on Action Network dot Com. How are you betting 159 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 2: it pre fight while waiting for the Hernettaz live bet. 160 00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:58,239 Speaker 1: Yeah, pre fight. I'm coming in with a Brandan Allen ticket. 161 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:01,920 Speaker 1: We see Anthony Hernandez get hurt early in what feels 162 00:08:01,960 --> 00:08:03,800 Speaker 1: like all of his fights. It's not all of his fights, 163 00:08:03,840 --> 00:08:06,640 Speaker 1: but it's often and we've also seen Brendan Allen be 164 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:09,720 Speaker 1: much better earlier in fights than late. And what I 165 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:12,480 Speaker 1: realized watching tape he did the same thing seven or 166 00:08:12,480 --> 00:08:15,000 Speaker 1: eight years ago against Fluffy Hernandez that he did against 167 00:08:15,040 --> 00:08:17,840 Speaker 1: Naserdine Imeobov in his last fight, which is he'll get 168 00:08:17,840 --> 00:08:20,800 Speaker 1: an early takedown but get so greedy, for lack of 169 00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:23,640 Speaker 1: a better term, hunting subs, he doesn't hurt his opponent, 170 00:08:23,720 --> 00:08:25,960 Speaker 1: and then if he doesn't get the submission, he kind 171 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:27,640 Speaker 1: of walks away with nothing to show for it. Maybe 172 00:08:27,640 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 1: you win the round because he kept attacking stuff, but 173 00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 1: now you're tired. The other guy kind of just sat 174 00:08:32,160 --> 00:08:35,360 Speaker 1: there defending and you didn't do any damage, you didn't 175 00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:38,080 Speaker 1: weaken him for later rounds. I feel like that's pretty 176 00:08:38,120 --> 00:08:40,680 Speaker 1: likely to happen again here, just because we've seen seven 177 00:08:40,760 --> 00:08:43,559 Speaker 1: or eight years of Brendan Allen doing that against guys 178 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 1: he can submit great, go tap him out, make it quick, 179 00:08:46,840 --> 00:08:48,720 Speaker 1: get done with it. If you're not going to find 180 00:08:48,760 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 1: that sub and it's going to go longer into the fight, 181 00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:54,360 Speaker 1: you put yourself in a pretty bad position. I think 182 00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 1: if we were doing a one round grappling match, I 183 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 1: think Brendan Allen is actually the better grappler here. I 184 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:01,280 Speaker 1: know everybody loves Anthony Hernandez. He's a lot of fun. 185 00:09:02,040 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 1: He's kind of like the morob of middleweight. He shot 186 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:07,080 Speaker 1: twenty nine takedown attempts in his last fight. You do 187 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:10,320 Speaker 1: not see that amongst bigger fighters. But just in terms 188 00:09:10,360 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 1: of like at their peak, we're both fresh. We're only 189 00:09:12,520 --> 00:09:14,319 Speaker 1: gonna do this for a few minutes. I think Brendan 190 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:17,200 Speaker 1: Allen's actually better, might even be the slightly better striker. 191 00:09:18,000 --> 00:09:20,760 Speaker 1: I just expect him to exhaust himself going for stuff 192 00:09:20,840 --> 00:09:23,000 Speaker 1: in the first half or so of this fight. So 193 00:09:23,440 --> 00:09:26,120 Speaker 1: Brendan Allen pre fight. You could even go Brendan Allen 194 00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:27,880 Speaker 1: round one and then try to come back live if 195 00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:30,400 Speaker 1: you wanted to really stretch it out. Took that at 196 00:09:30,400 --> 00:09:33,240 Speaker 1: plus two seventy after the first round. We should be 197 00:09:33,240 --> 00:09:36,079 Speaker 1: in a spot though, where you can kind of arbitrage 198 00:09:36,120 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 1: it and make money either way, assuming that line comes 199 00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 1: back in on Fluffy Hernandez. That's why I don't like 200 00:09:41,040 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 1: the round one because you can't really set up that 201 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:45,960 Speaker 1: payout either way. Guys are fresh at the start of round. 202 00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:48,040 Speaker 1: Maybe he comes out swinging real hard, in round two 203 00:09:48,160 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 1: or three. Don't think that's the likeliest, but it makes 204 00:09:51,080 --> 00:09:53,440 Speaker 1: that a little bit tighter needle to threads. So I 205 00:09:53,520 --> 00:09:56,160 Speaker 1: like Brendan Allen prefight. I'm totally with you. You're gonna 206 00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:59,559 Speaker 1: give away, you know, and Hernandez late as well, which 207 00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:02,199 Speaker 1: exactly how I'm seeing it. I just like trying to 208 00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:04,280 Speaker 1: build that portfolio where I get paid out either way. 209 00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:07,439 Speaker 2: Yeah, same day parlay Hernandez in the over one and 210 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:11,640 Speaker 2: a half rounds at minus one p fifty five. I 211 00:10:11,679 --> 00:10:14,320 Speaker 2: think that's most of his wing condition in this fight. 212 00:10:14,400 --> 00:10:16,760 Speaker 2: As you mentioned, he does tend to get hurt pretty 213 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:18,960 Speaker 2: frequently early. He's vulnerable to the body. 214 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: It'sack. 215 00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,280 Speaker 2: Kevin Hollan put him away with body shots very quickly. 216 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,080 Speaker 2: Alan is vulnerable to the head. But I don't think 217 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:29,160 Speaker 2: Fluffy has the punching power to necessarily put Alan down 218 00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:31,959 Speaker 2: at striking range. So I give Alan the striking advantage. 219 00:10:32,320 --> 00:10:36,320 Speaker 2: I'd give Alan the early wrestling advantage, but as you said, 220 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:39,800 Speaker 2: he is probably the better submission grappler, but he makes 221 00:10:39,800 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 2: so many more mistakes in terms of the grappling. Fluffy 222 00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 2: much calmer. He saw the way he defended against Hudolpha 223 00:10:46,120 --> 00:10:48,520 Speaker 2: Viira bite at his time until he was able to 224 00:10:48,520 --> 00:10:52,080 Speaker 2: get on top and submit Viira. Hernandez is just much 225 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:55,240 Speaker 2: more composed, and that doesn't really align with the chaotic 226 00:10:55,280 --> 00:10:58,400 Speaker 2: fighting style that he's trying to implement. He's, you know, 227 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:03,120 Speaker 2: relentlessly attacking your legs and going for one takedown after another. 228 00:11:03,520 --> 00:11:06,200 Speaker 2: But then once he gets to those grappling positions, he's 229 00:11:06,240 --> 00:11:09,760 Speaker 2: actually not prone to making mistakes. He's very comment progressing 230 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:13,440 Speaker 2: from one position to the next and prioritizing position over submission, 231 00:11:13,440 --> 00:11:17,880 Speaker 2: whereas Allan always prioritizes submission over position and ends up 232 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:20,760 Speaker 2: losing said position against guys like Fluffy who are able 233 00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:23,520 Speaker 2: to defend him. So, yes, I agree with you, Billy. 234 00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 2: I think Alan, like he did in the first fight, 235 00:11:26,080 --> 00:11:28,720 Speaker 2: probably lands the first takedown and is the first guy 236 00:11:29,160 --> 00:11:32,920 Speaker 2: to get top position. But I prefer Hernandez in the scrambling, 237 00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:35,640 Speaker 2: and I prefer Hernandez the longer the fight goes. I 238 00:11:35,640 --> 00:11:38,320 Speaker 2: think he is better Cardio. I think his pressure, his 239 00:11:38,440 --> 00:11:42,359 Speaker 2: tenacity all elite. A bit of an awkward fighter to handicap, 240 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:44,439 Speaker 2: because you know, if you think about a fight playing 241 00:11:44,440 --> 00:11:47,840 Speaker 2: out normally at range, or two fighters wrestling in a 242 00:11:47,880 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 2: normal fashion, or you know, a normal MMA fight playing out. 243 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 2: Fluffy's skills don't really measure up to Alan's or even 244 00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:58,160 Speaker 2: a lot of guys in the division, but the way 245 00:11:58,200 --> 00:12:00,600 Speaker 2: he fights, the way he sticks on you, it's almost 246 00:12:00,640 --> 00:12:02,560 Speaker 2: the I think of the Chill Sun unquote. I can't 247 00:12:02,600 --> 00:12:05,000 Speaker 2: let you get closed. You can't let Fluffy get closed, 248 00:12:05,000 --> 00:12:08,600 Speaker 2: because once he initiates the process of getting the hands 249 00:12:08,600 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 2: on you and starting the takedowns, he puts you through 250 00:12:10,559 --> 00:12:12,840 Speaker 2: the washing machine. I talked about this before the Roman 251 00:12:12,880 --> 00:12:15,440 Speaker 2: kapol Off fight. Kopo Off heard him early in round one, 252 00:12:15,679 --> 00:12:18,320 Speaker 2: but the moment Fluffy got his hands on him, the 253 00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:20,000 Speaker 2: moment he got him in his grasp, the fight was 254 00:12:20,040 --> 00:12:23,439 Speaker 2: basically over. It's literally like putting guys through a washing machine. 255 00:12:23,559 --> 00:12:26,360 Speaker 2: He just it's rinses and repeats, and it's again and 256 00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 2: again and again until you're exhausted. So Fluffy live after 257 00:12:29,720 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 2: round one probably going to be the best price on 258 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:34,079 Speaker 2: the favorite. I think we get a competitive round one. 259 00:12:34,120 --> 00:12:37,200 Speaker 2: I think Allen I'd say is fifty to fifty. 260 00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:37,600 Speaker 1: To win round one. 261 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:40,000 Speaker 2: If not favored to win round one, maybe even sixty 262 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:43,360 Speaker 2: forty Allen, and then I'd probably go sixty forty Hernandez 263 00:12:43,440 --> 00:12:46,560 Speaker 2: round two, maybe eighty twenty or ninety ten. Round three's 264 00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:49,280 Speaker 2: this fight progresses, so Hernandez live after round one, same 265 00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:51,960 Speaker 2: game parlay Hernandez in the over one and a half, 266 00:12:52,160 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 2: could even do Hernandez round three or decision at minus 267 00:12:55,440 --> 00:12:58,520 Speaker 2: one thirty and then Hernandez decision is about plus one 268 00:12:58,600 --> 00:13:01,800 Speaker 2: ten plus one fifteen. I think all fine ways to play. 269 00:13:01,800 --> 00:13:05,400 Speaker 2: The favorite likely prefer the same game parlay at minus 270 00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:07,760 Speaker 2: one fifty five. Rely any props you like on this 271 00:13:07,880 --> 00:13:11,079 Speaker 2: fight aside from the live angle on Hernandez after the 272 00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:12,880 Speaker 2: pre fight on Alan, Yeah. 273 00:13:12,720 --> 00:13:15,720 Speaker 1: I mean the prop would be Allen round one, or 274 00:13:15,880 --> 00:13:19,800 Speaker 1: you could alternatively Hernandez round three or by decision slightly 275 00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:21,440 Speaker 1: better price than what you got. That's kind of just 276 00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:24,320 Speaker 1: a play with the timing however you want, with however 277 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:27,040 Speaker 1: you have available. But yeah, I mean he has a 278 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:29,160 Speaker 1: shot at finishing it in round one, either on the feet, 279 00:13:29,320 --> 00:13:33,360 Speaker 1: like we could see Andre Petrowski Versudolfo Vieira Part two 280 00:13:33,440 --> 00:13:37,200 Speaker 1: this weekend with kind of just a kickboxing match, and 281 00:13:37,320 --> 00:13:40,040 Speaker 1: just like Petrowski over Vieira, I think the underdog here 282 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:43,040 Speaker 1: is the better striker. Hopefully we'd see a finish and 283 00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:45,640 Speaker 1: not what we saw last week, which wasn't a great fight, 284 00:13:45,679 --> 00:13:47,400 Speaker 1: but we both got paid, so I'm happy with it. 285 00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:50,640 Speaker 1: The only thing I would add you mentioned Alan making mistakes. 286 00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:53,800 Speaker 1: It's frustrating because it's not even technical mistakes. It's not 287 00:13:53,920 --> 00:13:56,720 Speaker 1: like he didn't pass guard appropriately in this way like 288 00:13:56,760 --> 00:14:00,560 Speaker 1: his jiu jitsu is borderline perfect. It's like strategic, like 289 00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:03,840 Speaker 1: it's just not understanding what you should be trying to accomplish. 290 00:14:04,160 --> 00:14:06,840 Speaker 1: And you look at all the fluffy submissions. That front 291 00:14:06,880 --> 00:14:09,400 Speaker 1: headlock position. He doesn't have to give up anything to 292 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:11,839 Speaker 1: set that up, right, he sets it up. If it's 293 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:14,040 Speaker 1: not there, move on. You're still in a great spot 294 00:14:14,280 --> 00:14:16,680 Speaker 1: or arm triangle. He's had an arm triangle. Tap. You 295 00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:19,080 Speaker 1: can sit in top position hold that arm triangle. If 296 00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:20,800 Speaker 1: you get it, great, If not, you can still beat 297 00:14:20,800 --> 00:14:24,480 Speaker 1: the guy up versus Brendon Allen always trying to jump 298 00:14:24,560 --> 00:14:25,760 Speaker 1: on your back and if you don't get that and 299 00:14:25,800 --> 00:14:27,720 Speaker 1: you get dumped over the top, yeah, do the whole 300 00:14:27,760 --> 00:14:30,840 Speaker 1: thing all over again. So that's the thing that's interesting 301 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:33,360 Speaker 1: to me. Wouldn't shock me if he even did find 302 00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:35,600 Speaker 1: that submission in the first round, So if I was 303 00:14:35,600 --> 00:14:37,720 Speaker 1: going to prop it, it'd probably be Allen round one. 304 00:14:38,080 --> 00:14:39,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, Allan round one, you get as high as sixteen 305 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:43,120 Speaker 2: to one, So definitely an interesting poke there. I think 306 00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:45,440 Speaker 2: his best path to victory here is just to separate 307 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 2: and strike. And I know there will be a point 308 00:14:47,080 --> 00:14:51,080 Speaker 2: in this fight where he's winning striking at distance and 309 00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:53,880 Speaker 2: Hernandez hasn't pressured or he you know, he hasn't pressured 310 00:14:53,920 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 2: in a minute, and Allen's going to be the one 311 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:57,280 Speaker 2: who initiates the grap like and then Hernandez is going 312 00:14:57,320 --> 00:14:58,880 Speaker 2: to get on top again. That seems to happen in 313 00:14:58,920 --> 00:15:01,720 Speaker 2: every Brendon Allen fight where he's winning one aspect of 314 00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:03,960 Speaker 2: the fight and then he's like, well, I'm well rounded, 315 00:15:04,000 --> 00:15:06,000 Speaker 2: I should change it up and go for the other, 316 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:08,360 Speaker 2: and then he ends up losing in the other aspect 317 00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 2: of the fight. So yeah, Brenon Allen just prone to 318 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:14,280 Speaker 2: in fight mistakes, prone to not taking the path of 319 00:15:14,360 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 2: lyrics to resistance or capitalizing in the area where he 320 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:20,360 Speaker 2: has the advantage over his opponent. I do think he'll 321 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:23,520 Speaker 2: end up making mistake, Fluffy will capitalize, and Fluffy will 322 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:27,640 Speaker 2: take over down the stretch. Moving on our favorite underdogs 323 00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:29,800 Speaker 2: on this card, quite a number of underdogs we like 324 00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:32,120 Speaker 2: just give about one. Obviously in the comin event Billy 325 00:15:32,160 --> 00:15:35,240 Speaker 2: did with Brendon Allen, I've got one of my best bets. 326 00:15:35,360 --> 00:15:37,560 Speaker 2: Billy kind of has one in his best bets. He's 327 00:15:37,600 --> 00:15:39,680 Speaker 2: betting an underdog, but doing it in a different fashion, 328 00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:43,560 Speaker 2: and I've got three highlighted under our favorite underdog section. 329 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:45,480 Speaker 2: Billy's also betting one of these in the prop market 330 00:15:45,560 --> 00:15:48,280 Speaker 2: as well, So quite a bit of agreement on some 331 00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:50,400 Speaker 2: of these dogs. I'm gonna start and throw to you, 332 00:15:50,520 --> 00:15:53,280 Speaker 2: Billy first, on one that was in your luck rankings 333 00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:57,120 Speaker 2: earlier this week. Halfie Elser Carria at plus two sixty 334 00:15:57,160 --> 00:15:59,280 Speaker 2: five is what you got on Monday. I took plus 335 00:15:59,680 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 2: two thirty last night. What's your price target on Sirkaria 336 00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:05,000 Speaker 2: and w are you betting this matchup? 337 00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:07,480 Speaker 1: Yeah? I think i'd take it down to about plus 338 00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:09,720 Speaker 1: two hundred. It's a tricky one. We don't know a 339 00:16:09,760 --> 00:16:12,760 Speaker 1: ton about Circaria. He got starched by Ebo Aslan in 340 00:16:12,840 --> 00:16:15,360 Speaker 1: his debut. It was a weird situation though he was 341 00:16:15,400 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: supposed to fight on the Contender Series. They had at 342 00:16:17,720 --> 00:16:20,360 Speaker 1: different points three different opponents for him on the Contender 343 00:16:20,400 --> 00:16:23,920 Speaker 1: Series before he got called up. So like I'm gonna 344 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:26,160 Speaker 1: give him a pass on that, just because he was 345 00:16:26,200 --> 00:16:29,080 Speaker 1: preparing for all kinds of different people. Who knows part 346 00:16:29,080 --> 00:16:31,600 Speaker 1: of that ten and zero. I think nine finishes most 347 00:16:31,640 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 1: of them in the first round. In Bukowskis, who he's fighting, 348 00:16:35,160 --> 00:16:37,280 Speaker 1: is a guy who can kind of get overwhelmed by 349 00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:39,960 Speaker 1: like big pressure athletes, you know. Jimmy Krut knocked him 350 00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:42,200 Speaker 1: out in the first round. Khilil Roundtree knocked him out 351 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:44,080 Speaker 1: in the second round. Petrino got him in the second 352 00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:47,760 Speaker 1: round in an extended fight. I think Bruskowskis might be 353 00:16:47,800 --> 00:16:50,560 Speaker 1: the more skilled fighter from what I've seen from Sir Korea, 354 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,960 Speaker 1: though he's just gonna swarm early do some damage. I 355 00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:55,760 Speaker 1: think if I was betting it now, that's why I 356 00:16:55,760 --> 00:16:58,080 Speaker 1: had a hard time with your question, I might take 357 00:16:58,160 --> 00:17:01,200 Speaker 1: inside the distance or part laid with under two rounds 358 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:03,240 Speaker 1: or under one and a half, some version of that, 359 00:17:03,560 --> 00:17:06,159 Speaker 1: had I not got the better line. But there's just 360 00:17:06,280 --> 00:17:08,720 Speaker 1: enough unknowns about how this is going to go that 361 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:11,320 Speaker 1: getting if we're flipping a coin because we don't know 362 00:17:11,359 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: what's going on, better than two to one on one 363 00:17:13,640 --> 00:17:15,480 Speaker 1: side obviously makes a lot more sense than the other. 364 00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think that that Ko one loss, first loss 365 00:17:19,080 --> 00:17:22,080 Speaker 2: of his UFC career. First, you know, the UFC moment 366 00:17:22,160 --> 00:17:25,280 Speaker 2: he had is giving us value and potentially two fights 367 00:17:25,320 --> 00:17:28,359 Speaker 2: on this card, both the Circaria fight against Pukowskis and 368 00:17:28,359 --> 00:17:31,520 Speaker 2: then also the Ebo Aslon fight, which we'll discuss later. 369 00:17:31,560 --> 00:17:35,800 Speaker 2: Sirkaria closed minus one twenty against Ebo Aslon after opening 370 00:17:35,840 --> 00:17:39,000 Speaker 2: at plus one fifty, so the market moved him to favorite, 371 00:17:39,480 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 2: and then he died on the first exchange. And I 372 00:17:41,640 --> 00:17:45,439 Speaker 2: do think first exchange ko's first round KOs are not 373 00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:49,560 Speaker 2: very repeatable outcomes. They're random, they're high variants. I think 374 00:17:49,600 --> 00:17:53,040 Speaker 2: people take away much more from them than they actually 375 00:17:53,119 --> 00:17:55,280 Speaker 2: tell you. And in the case of a fighter like 376 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:58,040 Speaker 2: Ebo Aslon who will get to you later, or Nikolai 377 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 2: Vertikov who will get to you later, there are guys 378 00:18:00,040 --> 00:18:03,240 Speaker 2: who fall into this round one finisher archetype who as 379 00:18:03,240 --> 00:18:05,960 Speaker 2: their fights extend, you don't really know what they have 380 00:18:06,040 --> 00:18:10,000 Speaker 2: to offer. And Sirkaria actually fits into that category as well. 381 00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 2: But I think that unpredictability at plus two thirty is 382 00:18:14,520 --> 00:18:17,480 Speaker 2: worth betting into, not betting into it at minus one twenty, 383 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:20,920 Speaker 2: knowing that Bukowskis is likely the better point fighter likely 384 00:18:20,960 --> 00:18:23,919 Speaker 2: to sustain better across a fifteen minute fight, But Sir 385 00:18:24,000 --> 00:18:27,960 Speaker 2: Karia is probably the more dangerous guy we know. Bukowskis 386 00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:30,879 Speaker 2: has a potentially compromised shin has been put away in 387 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:33,760 Speaker 2: the past, seemingly gets hurt in every fight, So Sirkaria 388 00:18:33,840 --> 00:18:37,800 Speaker 2: pre fight, you may be able to come back live Bukowskis. 389 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 2: The other way I was thinking about betting this though, 390 00:18:39,560 --> 00:18:41,399 Speaker 2: was the ghost to decision at two to one. I 391 00:18:41,400 --> 00:18:45,000 Speaker 2: think I Bukowskis wins this. He probably wins by decision. 392 00:18:45,040 --> 00:18:48,720 Speaker 2: I wouldn't necessarily mind having Sir Carria plus two thirty 393 00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:50,760 Speaker 2: on the money line and then having a two to 394 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:54,199 Speaker 2: one bet on the fight to reach a decision, and 395 00:18:54,240 --> 00:18:57,440 Speaker 2: then hopefully cashing either of those tickets. May not even 396 00:18:57,480 --> 00:18:59,639 Speaker 2: stake them. The same may put a slightly smaller bet 397 00:19:00,119 --> 00:19:02,760 Speaker 2: on the GTD prop as opposed to this er Carrier 398 00:19:02,840 --> 00:19:06,080 Speaker 2: money line. But do you think there's potentially a value 399 00:19:06,119 --> 00:19:07,879 Speaker 2: on ser Carrier based on where he was lying in 400 00:19:07,920 --> 00:19:11,560 Speaker 2: his last fight, getting what I view as an equal 401 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:15,000 Speaker 2: or lesser opponent this time out, more time to prepare, 402 00:19:16,520 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 2: and a significant marketing adjustment relative to where he was previously. 403 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:24,359 Speaker 2: The one dog we do not have necessarily an alignment 404 00:19:24,400 --> 00:19:26,159 Speaker 2: on the I'm curious Mobilly thinks about this fight Eric 405 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:29,160 Speaker 2: mcconaco at about plus two forty. I grabbed them last 406 00:19:29,200 --> 00:19:32,680 Speaker 2: night versus Nurse Sultan Ruzaboyev. I talked about guys with 407 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:37,159 Speaker 2: that round one finisher archetype. Ruzaboyev absolutely fits into that category. 408 00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:40,399 Speaker 2: He's very big. Mconago though his last fight came at 409 00:19:40,480 --> 00:19:42,639 Speaker 2: light heavyweight, he won that he is more of a 410 00:19:42,720 --> 00:19:45,040 Speaker 2: natural middleweight. He is the smaller man, but I do 411 00:19:45,080 --> 00:19:48,680 Speaker 2: think he's capable of handling Ruzboya's power, and I give 412 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:52,000 Speaker 2: him the grappling upside and the durability or the cardio 413 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:54,679 Speaker 2: advantage down the stretch of this fight. I want two 414 00:19:54,720 --> 00:19:57,119 Speaker 2: to want or better at Eric mcconaco. I also like 415 00:19:57,200 --> 00:20:01,520 Speaker 2: him by decision at plus fifty, and I think live 416 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:04,159 Speaker 2: after round one could be a solid entry point as well. 417 00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:07,480 Speaker 2: Mcconico make his the ucadview, But MMA LAB trained. Those 418 00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 2: guys always come in with a very high four not 419 00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:13,359 Speaker 2: all of them necessarily championship caliber, but basically all of 420 00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:15,720 Speaker 2: them that we see come into the UFC are very 421 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:19,399 Speaker 2: very well rounded fighters with decent skill sets who end 422 00:20:19,480 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 2: up sticking around for at least a few fights Billy 423 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:24,480 Speaker 2: before I move on to the third dog. Any thoughts 424 00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:26,080 Speaker 2: on the mcconicos boy fight. 425 00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:28,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, I haven't watched a ton of tape on it. 426 00:20:28,880 --> 00:20:31,400 Speaker 1: It's hard to find anything on mcconico, which is kind 427 00:20:31,400 --> 00:20:34,040 Speaker 1: of why I mostly stayed away from this one. Don't 428 00:20:34,119 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 1: love a thirty four year old UFC debutant, even though 429 00:20:36,840 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 1: we're both betting on a different thirty four year old 430 00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:43,159 Speaker 1: UFC debutant on this card. The only pushback I give 431 00:20:43,200 --> 00:20:45,640 Speaker 1: you is, I'm not sure that mcconico has the grappling edge, 432 00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:48,280 Speaker 1: at least without seeing him. Who's a boy of trains 433 00:20:48,320 --> 00:20:51,280 Speaker 1: with Petrowsky and Pat Sabattini and Jeremiah Wells and all 434 00:20:51,320 --> 00:20:53,439 Speaker 1: those guys in Philly, and a lot of his wins 435 00:20:53,440 --> 00:20:55,679 Speaker 1: before the UFC were submissions. He just came in here 436 00:20:55,680 --> 00:20:57,359 Speaker 1: and knocked people out. So I think we might have 437 00:20:57,400 --> 00:21:00,000 Speaker 1: a little bit of a skewed he. Mcconico might be 438 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:02,840 Speaker 1: the better grappler, just without actually seeing him do it. 439 00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:06,199 Speaker 1: I don't feel confident in that assertion makes total sense, though. 440 00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:08,639 Speaker 1: I mean, riz aboyev if he gets extended historically not 441 00:21:08,720 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 1: been great. Maybe that'll be better for him at middleweight. 442 00:21:11,600 --> 00:21:13,960 Speaker 1: He was. He's certainly big enough to fight middleweight, so 443 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,119 Speaker 1: maybe less of a weight cut helps. I don't know, 444 00:21:16,280 --> 00:21:18,639 Speaker 1: not a lot of strong thoughts. Just I like to 445 00:21:18,640 --> 00:21:20,320 Speaker 1: watch a lot of tape. I have a hard time 446 00:21:20,720 --> 00:21:23,240 Speaker 1: betting on a guy who whose fights seemed to have 447 00:21:23,359 --> 00:21:26,399 Speaker 1: existed only in his mind or in the minds of 448 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:28,919 Speaker 1: people that saw him that time. Like, I don't know 449 00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:31,200 Speaker 1: how we didn't record this stuff, but there we are. 450 00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:33,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, he's an internet fighter. I guess that's what we 451 00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:36,520 Speaker 2: could call him. He's a tapology fighter because his fights 452 00:21:36,560 --> 00:21:39,720 Speaker 2: only exist within the universe of Tapology and shirt Dogs 453 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:43,240 Speaker 2: databases did have a win on tough Enough last time out. 454 00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:44,800 Speaker 2: He was he was supposed to be the main event. 455 00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:47,720 Speaker 2: I believe we're tough Enough again this weekend, and the 456 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:49,800 Speaker 2: UC called him up for this Jerusi boy fight, but 457 00:21:49,880 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 2: Ruza Boyev wasn't booked against anybody. This fight seemingly just 458 00:21:52,840 --> 00:21:56,280 Speaker 2: made out of thin air. I'm not really sure where 459 00:21:56,320 --> 00:21:59,360 Speaker 2: it came from. But moving on to earthan under dog 460 00:21:59,400 --> 00:22:04,040 Speaker 2: Julius Walker against Alonzo Menifield. Walker, a former college basketball player, 461 00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:07,679 Speaker 2: not necessarily the best base for MMA, but he is 462 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:10,520 Speaker 2: twelve years younger. Here he's the bigger athlete forage color, 463 00:22:10,680 --> 00:22:13,480 Speaker 2: two inch reach advantage, and Menfield is coming off of 464 00:22:13,560 --> 00:22:17,560 Speaker 2: consecutive knockout losses. He's old, he's in his late thirties, 465 00:22:17,640 --> 00:22:21,919 Speaker 2: he's slowing athletically, and he hasn't catoed an opponent himself 466 00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:25,639 Speaker 2: in over three years. Walker does have the grappling upside. 467 00:22:25,640 --> 00:22:27,439 Speaker 2: He's more of a jiu jitsu guy. I think if 468 00:22:27,440 --> 00:22:30,000 Speaker 2: he gets on top he can finish this fight via submission. 469 00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:32,440 Speaker 2: He can finish it with ground and pound from top position. 470 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:34,399 Speaker 2: But on the feet, I do think he's going to 471 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:35,680 Speaker 2: be vulnerable, especially early. 472 00:22:35,720 --> 00:22:35,920 Speaker 1: Again. 473 00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:39,879 Speaker 2: Menfield another guy who fits in that round one finisher category, 474 00:22:40,280 --> 00:22:43,959 Speaker 2: but then after round one, Menifield typically finds himself fading, 475 00:22:44,040 --> 00:22:48,120 Speaker 2: struggling to maintain that striking output across a fifteen minute fight, 476 00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:50,680 Speaker 2: struggling to get guys back down to the ground later 477 00:22:50,720 --> 00:22:53,200 Speaker 2: on in fights, says of a juda background, decent takedowns, 478 00:22:53,640 --> 00:22:56,920 Speaker 2: but I think defensively, as he gets tired, Walker is 479 00:22:56,960 --> 00:22:59,720 Speaker 2: going to wash Manfield in the grappling like plus two 480 00:22:59,760 --> 00:23:04,080 Speaker 2: hundred better pre fight and then live after round one, Billy, 481 00:23:04,119 --> 00:23:06,480 Speaker 2: you're gonna go ahead and take Walker inside the distance 482 00:23:06,880 --> 00:23:09,240 Speaker 2: at plus two seventy five, very close to being a 483 00:23:09,240 --> 00:23:11,280 Speaker 2: bet for me, manned up on my round robin tickets. 484 00:23:11,320 --> 00:23:14,120 Speaker 1: Why do you like this one? I mean he's finished 485 00:23:14,160 --> 00:23:16,080 Speaker 1: every fight he's been in in six and a half 486 00:23:16,080 --> 00:23:19,399 Speaker 1: minutes or less, only once seen a second round. And 487 00:23:19,480 --> 00:23:22,959 Speaker 1: it's not even just that. It's that, like you pointed out, 488 00:23:23,000 --> 00:23:25,119 Speaker 1: with Manifield getting knocked out in the first couple of 489 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:29,280 Speaker 1: first round his last couple of fights, if somebody is 490 00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:31,800 Speaker 1: knocked out within a minute, it's probably Alonzo Minifield. That's 491 00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:34,480 Speaker 1: just likelier to happen. The way I see Minifield winning 492 00:23:34,480 --> 00:23:36,840 Speaker 1: here is just kind of tackling him, holding them up 493 00:23:36,840 --> 00:23:39,879 Speaker 1: against the fence, making it a slow, boring fight. And 494 00:23:39,960 --> 00:23:41,480 Speaker 1: if we see that kind of fight, I don't think 495 00:23:41,560 --> 00:23:43,719 Speaker 1: Julius Walker wins it. This is a big step up 496 00:23:43,720 --> 00:23:47,200 Speaker 1: for him. I will note he fought a Ultimate Fighter 497 00:23:47,280 --> 00:23:50,280 Speaker 1: veteran in his last fight, finished it in under two minutes, 498 00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:53,000 Speaker 1: and then before that fought a UFC veteran. Although Bevan 499 00:23:53,080 --> 00:23:55,000 Speaker 1: Lewis is seven and five and went like one in 500 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:58,480 Speaker 1: four in the UFC, so that almost counts. So he's 501 00:23:58,520 --> 00:24:02,000 Speaker 1: got a pretty tough resume all things considered on his 502 00:24:02,040 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 1: way into the UFC. I just don't know what's gonna 503 00:24:06,240 --> 00:24:08,040 Speaker 1: happen to him if he hits a guy and they 504 00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:09,760 Speaker 1: don't die. You know, like for a lot of times, 505 00:24:09,760 --> 00:24:12,320 Speaker 1: when you're fighting these people who are just athletically way 506 00:24:12,320 --> 00:24:14,679 Speaker 1: better than you, put them away. You go home, you 507 00:24:14,720 --> 00:24:17,280 Speaker 1: cast your check, everything's happy, and the next thing you know, 508 00:24:17,320 --> 00:24:19,320 Speaker 1: you're in a fight against a guy who's still there 509 00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:22,399 Speaker 1: without a lot of experience being in those situations. So 510 00:24:22,960 --> 00:24:25,680 Speaker 1: I wish the price was farther away from his money 511 00:24:25,720 --> 00:24:27,520 Speaker 1: line because it almost makes it feel not worth it. 512 00:24:27,800 --> 00:24:30,760 Speaker 1: I just don't see a decision coming from Julius Walker here. 513 00:24:31,520 --> 00:24:34,520 Speaker 1: Another thing I will know Minafield, former CFL football player, 514 00:24:34,600 --> 00:24:37,040 Speaker 1: so we can settle the age old debate. What is 515 00:24:37,080 --> 00:24:42,160 Speaker 1: the better background for MMA is at lower level pro 516 00:24:42,200 --> 00:24:45,040 Speaker 1: football or Division two basketball. So we'll finally get to 517 00:24:45,040 --> 00:24:46,720 Speaker 1: settle that one this weekend, which will be good. 518 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:51,359 Speaker 2: Shouldas Walker also coming down from light or from heavyweight. 519 00:24:51,400 --> 00:24:54,160 Speaker 2: I believe right he passed couple fights at light heavyweight. 520 00:24:54,280 --> 00:24:56,120 Speaker 2: I think he competed at heavyweight earlier in his career. 521 00:24:56,160 --> 00:24:59,280 Speaker 2: He's a big dude, and he's got room to add 522 00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:01,720 Speaker 2: onto this frame. He's only been training MMA for a 523 00:25:01,720 --> 00:25:03,480 Speaker 2: few years. He's twenty five years old. He was playing 524 00:25:03,480 --> 00:25:07,239 Speaker 2: college basketball till he was twenty two. So this is 525 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:10,440 Speaker 2: the type of guy whose skill set should level up 526 00:25:10,840 --> 00:25:14,600 Speaker 2: relatively quickly relative to other people his age. You know, 527 00:25:14,640 --> 00:25:17,440 Speaker 2: he's barely been training. You're going to see huge leaps 528 00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:20,680 Speaker 2: from him from one fight to the next. His last fight, 529 00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:22,719 Speaker 2: I want to pull it up. 530 00:25:22,760 --> 00:25:26,320 Speaker 1: It was in one was booked at heavyweight that he 531 00:25:26,359 --> 00:25:28,960 Speaker 1: was supposed to have and then they came this, So 532 00:25:29,119 --> 00:25:30,480 Speaker 1: I'm guessing he was going to show up at like 533 00:25:30,560 --> 00:25:33,040 Speaker 1: two twenty five or whatever. So not a true true heavyweight. 534 00:25:33,119 --> 00:25:36,600 Speaker 2: But yeah, it's a big guy, so we'll see, you know. 535 00:25:37,480 --> 00:25:40,280 Speaker 2: The biggest concern, like, I'm assuming he'll have the cardio 536 00:25:40,280 --> 00:25:43,040 Speaker 2: advantage because he's the younger man. But as you pointed out, 537 00:25:43,080 --> 00:25:45,320 Speaker 2: he's basically finished every fight in the first round and 538 00:25:45,359 --> 00:25:49,400 Speaker 2: a half Metafield tends to slow down after round one. 539 00:25:49,560 --> 00:25:53,199 Speaker 2: Walker may two, especially if he was previously you know, 540 00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:55,400 Speaker 2: maybe taking a fight up at heavyweight now cutting back 541 00:25:55,600 --> 00:25:57,840 Speaker 2: to two of five. So I do worry about the 542 00:25:57,880 --> 00:26:01,159 Speaker 2: cardio dynamic here and Walker not having the ability. This 543 00:26:01,240 --> 00:26:03,119 Speaker 2: is a saying later in the fight. But the age 544 00:26:03,160 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 2: advantage is the thing I'm leaning on here. Twelve years younger. 545 00:26:07,720 --> 00:26:09,440 Speaker 2: As I pointed out earlier, when there's at least a 546 00:26:09,480 --> 00:26:13,399 Speaker 2: decade of UFC or decade of age between UFC combatants, 547 00:26:13,400 --> 00:26:16,520 Speaker 2: the younger fighter wins about twelve percent more often than 548 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:19,240 Speaker 2: the betting market expects. They just tend to be underrated. 549 00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:22,320 Speaker 2: The older fighters have bore of a fan base, more familiarity, 550 00:26:22,400 --> 00:26:25,880 Speaker 2: more tape on them. People are dislikelier to bet things 551 00:26:25,920 --> 00:26:28,440 Speaker 2: that they're more familiar with against the unknown. I think 552 00:26:28,480 --> 00:26:32,560 Speaker 2: the unknown worth leaning into here at plus money two 553 00:26:32,600 --> 00:26:34,280 Speaker 2: to one plus two ten on walkers what I took 554 00:26:34,400 --> 00:26:38,560 Speaker 2: last night. Move on are top props. I've got a 555 00:26:38,560 --> 00:26:40,359 Speaker 2: fun one here. I'm going to go a Gene Silva 556 00:26:40,400 --> 00:26:42,520 Speaker 2: by submission a plus seven to fifty. I also bet 557 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:45,600 Speaker 2: him inside the distance at about minus one thirty five 558 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:49,560 Speaker 2: at ESPN. ESPN lets you place fighters to win inside 559 00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:50,639 Speaker 2: the distance, but you have to do it as the 560 00:26:50,640 --> 00:26:52,440 Speaker 2: same game parlay. You have to hit the fighter money 561 00:26:52,440 --> 00:26:54,480 Speaker 2: line and then the ends inside of the distance, no 562 00:26:55,280 --> 00:26:58,320 Speaker 2: oftentimes of that book. Betting those sgps, you actually get 563 00:26:58,320 --> 00:27:00,520 Speaker 2: a better price than you do on their inside the 564 00:27:00,520 --> 00:27:04,160 Speaker 2: distance odds elsewhere DraftKings FanDuel at MGM. So always take 565 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:07,359 Speaker 2: a look and see what other options books let you 566 00:27:07,400 --> 00:27:09,520 Speaker 2: put together in terms of the same game parlay market. 567 00:27:09,560 --> 00:27:12,080 Speaker 2: That is how you bet inside the distance at that 568 00:27:12,119 --> 00:27:14,120 Speaker 2: particular book, and I got a number that is about 569 00:27:14,119 --> 00:27:16,720 Speaker 2: eighteen cents better than as they it'll get anywhere else. 570 00:27:16,960 --> 00:27:19,000 Speaker 2: But I do like Silva to win this by submission 571 00:27:19,280 --> 00:27:21,560 Speaker 2: at plus seven fifty. I think he's a big grappling 572 00:27:21,600 --> 00:27:26,720 Speaker 2: advantage here over Melsic Pagnasari and fighting nerds trained. We 573 00:27:26,920 --> 00:27:30,040 Speaker 2: often see the fighting nerds guys pursue the path of 574 00:27:30,160 --> 00:27:32,440 Speaker 2: least resistance against their opponents. They do tend to have 575 00:27:32,840 --> 00:27:37,800 Speaker 2: pretty good fight IQ. That said, Silva is I don't 576 00:27:37,800 --> 00:27:39,840 Speaker 2: know the best way to put this. There's a few 577 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:43,240 Speaker 2: guys on that team who don't seem like they're mentally 578 00:27:43,280 --> 00:27:45,679 Speaker 2: all there and they just want to throw down inside 579 00:27:45,720 --> 00:27:47,960 Speaker 2: the cage, and Jean Silva is somebody I would put 580 00:27:47,960 --> 00:27:51,760 Speaker 2: in that category. Mauricio Hoofi probably in that category as well. 581 00:27:52,240 --> 00:27:55,280 Speaker 2: So even though he has the grappling advantage, even though 582 00:27:55,280 --> 00:27:57,760 Speaker 2: I think he can finish this fight via submission, there's 583 00:27:57,800 --> 00:28:00,760 Speaker 2: a very strong chance that Jean Silva to strike it 584 00:28:00,800 --> 00:28:04,960 Speaker 2: out for fifteen minutes and probably doesn't cover his minus 585 00:28:04,960 --> 00:28:08,160 Speaker 2: five hundred et cetera price tag. So as a result, 586 00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:10,600 Speaker 2: I think Melsick the money line sader passed. I think 587 00:28:10,640 --> 00:28:13,359 Speaker 2: Melzik a good chance of winning round one on the feet. 588 00:28:13,359 --> 00:28:18,160 Speaker 2: He's got a really nasty bodykick. Gene maintains a really high, tight, tight, 589 00:28:18,280 --> 00:28:21,480 Speaker 2: high guard, so he's gonna leave himself open to those bodykicks. 590 00:28:21,480 --> 00:28:24,800 Speaker 2: Probably probably not going to get knocked out with a 591 00:28:24,840 --> 00:28:27,640 Speaker 2: head strike, but if this fight does hit the ground, 592 00:28:27,720 --> 00:28:30,399 Speaker 2: I think Gene Silva can wrap up a guillotine and 593 00:28:30,440 --> 00:28:33,480 Speaker 2: finish this one pretty quickly. I also like him live 594 00:28:33,600 --> 00:28:35,439 Speaker 2: after round one if he is striking it out. If 595 00:28:35,520 --> 00:28:37,640 Speaker 2: Meltick does win that first round, if you can get 596 00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:40,640 Speaker 2: minus two hundred on Gene Silva live after round one 597 00:28:40,720 --> 00:28:43,200 Speaker 2: before he's even attempted to grapple, I think that might 598 00:28:43,240 --> 00:28:46,160 Speaker 2: be a solid spot to bet into as well. Billy, 599 00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 2: any thoughts on the Silva versus Meltick fight, and then 600 00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:52,800 Speaker 2: any other top props you want to give out aside 601 00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:54,240 Speaker 2: from the walker inside the distance play. 602 00:28:55,160 --> 00:28:57,760 Speaker 1: I absolutely love the Gene Silva submission. It makes all 603 00:28:57,800 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 1: the sense in the world. Melsick's only austin the UFC 604 00:29:00,720 --> 00:29:02,800 Speaker 1: was a submission. He has been either taken down or 605 00:29:02,840 --> 00:29:07,600 Speaker 1: submitted in four or five promotional appearances. He's a former kickboxer. 606 00:29:07,800 --> 00:29:09,800 Speaker 1: Like everything is pointing that way. I get what you 607 00:29:09,840 --> 00:29:12,880 Speaker 1: mean on the mindset, but like worst case scenario with that, 608 00:29:12,920 --> 00:29:14,440 Speaker 1: you can still hope for a club in sub you know, 609 00:29:14,440 --> 00:29:16,440 Speaker 1: maybe Gene Silva heards Sam and he turns his back 610 00:29:16,440 --> 00:29:19,000 Speaker 1: when he falls down, and we get a cheeky submission 611 00:29:19,040 --> 00:29:21,560 Speaker 1: even though he won with his striking, So that one 612 00:29:21,560 --> 00:29:24,040 Speaker 1: makes it ton of sense. I like you, was a 613 00:29:24,040 --> 00:29:25,760 Speaker 1: little bit worried about his money line in case it 614 00:29:25,800 --> 00:29:28,640 Speaker 1: turns into a kickboxing match, So that submission prop is 615 00:29:28,880 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 1: I think the perfect way to handle this one. 616 00:29:31,000 --> 00:29:33,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, even you know the durability thing for Melsick, like 617 00:29:33,320 --> 00:29:35,479 Speaker 2: the inside of the distance part on Silva, I project 618 00:29:35,560 --> 00:29:37,959 Speaker 2: value on the under ins inside the distance here. I 619 00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:41,320 Speaker 2: wanted to have something tied to this fight finishing by 620 00:29:41,400 --> 00:29:43,920 Speaker 2: Ko or Silva winning via Ko. I didn't want to 621 00:29:43,960 --> 00:29:45,800 Speaker 2: lay the minus one to eighty though on the fight 622 00:29:45,840 --> 00:29:48,120 Speaker 2: to end in ICD or maybe even a little bit 623 00:29:48,120 --> 00:29:48,720 Speaker 2: steeper than that. 624 00:29:48,800 --> 00:29:50,360 Speaker 1: So getting that off. 625 00:29:50,120 --> 00:29:51,800 Speaker 2: Market price, I guess I would call it on silver 626 00:29:51,800 --> 00:29:54,760 Speaker 2: inside the distance. I think worth betting minus one fifty 627 00:29:54,800 --> 00:29:57,479 Speaker 2: five north of minus one fifty silver inside the distance. 628 00:29:57,560 --> 00:30:00,360 Speaker 2: Not really as interested Silvia submission the best way to 629 00:30:00,360 --> 00:30:02,400 Speaker 2: play this fight. You could also make it a small sprinkle. 630 00:30:02,400 --> 00:30:05,280 Speaker 2: If he never decides to grapple, you won't be particularly 631 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 2: mad about it because he didn't risk a ton on 632 00:30:08,120 --> 00:30:10,880 Speaker 2: the lost. Let's move on our best bets for this card. 633 00:30:11,120 --> 00:30:12,800 Speaker 2: As I said, you're going to take another shot on 634 00:30:12,880 --> 00:30:15,080 Speaker 2: another underdog, but you're gonna do so on the point spread. 635 00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:18,920 Speaker 2: Ricky Simone plus three and a half points at minus 636 00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:20,840 Speaker 2: one forty in a three round fight, just needed to 637 00:30:20,840 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 2: win one round on each scorecards. Tell me why you 638 00:30:24,160 --> 00:30:25,000 Speaker 2: like him? 639 00:30:25,360 --> 00:30:27,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, I was really hoping we'd get a better price 640 00:30:27,320 --> 00:30:28,960 Speaker 1: on this because his money line is as high as 641 00:30:29,040 --> 00:30:32,280 Speaker 1: plus two ten at ESPN. Even so, this one's really 642 00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:34,840 Speaker 1: hard to pass up. Very good grappler, you know, just 643 00:30:34,920 --> 00:30:38,920 Speaker 1: attempts a ton of takedowns. Javid Baschrot usually will grapple 644 00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:41,720 Speaker 1: with you, like even if he's not initiating that, he'll 645 00:30:41,800 --> 00:30:44,960 Speaker 1: usually jump into it. And if you look at Ricky 646 00:30:45,000 --> 00:30:47,680 Speaker 1: Simone's last three fights, he got knocked out in the 647 00:30:47,680 --> 00:30:49,320 Speaker 1: fifth round, best song, you dong, but it won some 648 00:30:49,400 --> 00:30:52,240 Speaker 1: rounds before that, and at least one judge gave him around, 649 00:30:52,280 --> 00:30:54,760 Speaker 1: and both of his last two losses against people who 650 00:30:54,800 --> 00:30:59,240 Speaker 1: are probably tougher to grapple than Javid Baschrot Baschat doesn't 651 00:30:59,240 --> 00:31:02,080 Speaker 1: finish anyone, just kind of out there point fighting, mixing 652 00:31:02,120 --> 00:31:05,040 Speaker 1: in some takedowns. The odds of him stealing a round 653 00:31:05,120 --> 00:31:07,160 Speaker 1: here in a fight that's very likely to go to 654 00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:10,680 Speaker 1: decision is pretty high. So what I did? I put 655 00:31:10,800 --> 00:31:13,680 Speaker 1: point seven units to win, half a unit on Ricky 656 00:31:13,720 --> 00:31:16,480 Speaker 1: simone minus one p forty on the point spread, and 657 00:31:16,560 --> 00:31:19,240 Speaker 1: then point three units on his money line. That way, 658 00:31:19,320 --> 00:31:21,800 Speaker 1: even if he covers the point spread, slight profit, big 659 00:31:21,880 --> 00:31:24,960 Speaker 1: profit if he wins outright. I think he's undervalued just 660 00:31:25,040 --> 00:31:28,080 Speaker 1: as a money line play here for the stylistic matchup, 661 00:31:28,560 --> 00:31:31,160 Speaker 1: but I would prefer the point spread. I'd really prefer 662 00:31:31,240 --> 00:31:33,320 Speaker 1: the point spread at plus money or whatever, but we're 663 00:31:33,360 --> 00:31:34,480 Speaker 1: not getting that this time around. 664 00:31:35,160 --> 00:31:36,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, I show value on the fight to go to 665 00:31:36,600 --> 00:31:38,479 Speaker 2: decision now it is minus three to fifty. I think 666 00:31:38,520 --> 00:31:40,880 Speaker 2: you can use it as a parlay piece. I also 667 00:31:41,000 --> 00:31:44,160 Speaker 2: like simone by decision at three to one. That might 668 00:31:44,200 --> 00:31:46,200 Speaker 2: be a round robin piece for me, A couple of 669 00:31:46,280 --> 00:31:49,720 Speaker 2: other fights that I view very similarly on this card 670 00:31:50,320 --> 00:31:52,840 Speaker 2: that when I modeled them out, seem to have a 671 00:31:52,960 --> 00:31:56,080 Speaker 2: lot of public action pointing to the underdog, and as 672 00:31:56,120 --> 00:31:59,720 Speaker 2: a result, I'm not on the underdog. The Andre Philly 673 00:32:00,120 --> 00:32:03,240 Speaker 2: Melki Costa fight, and then also the Rob Font John 674 00:32:03,280 --> 00:32:05,680 Speaker 2: Mattsimoto fight. I like both of those fights to go. 675 00:32:05,680 --> 00:32:06,320 Speaker 1: To a decision. 676 00:32:06,800 --> 00:32:11,040 Speaker 2: I lean to both underdogs as value to win by decision. 677 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:13,320 Speaker 2: I don't necessarily know if I like any of these 678 00:32:13,360 --> 00:32:15,880 Speaker 2: three underdogs to ultimately win the decision, but those are 679 00:32:15,960 --> 00:32:19,000 Speaker 2: the value plays for me. Simon by decision, Philly by decision, 680 00:32:19,280 --> 00:32:21,760 Speaker 2: Font by decision, all three of those fights to go 681 00:32:21,880 --> 00:32:25,280 Speaker 2: to a decision, the Philly fight, the Font fight Billy 682 00:32:25,560 --> 00:32:27,160 Speaker 2: before we get out of here, before I give out 683 00:32:27,440 --> 00:32:29,760 Speaker 2: my best bets an he takes on those fights because 684 00:32:30,720 --> 00:32:33,200 Speaker 2: I think the underdogs are going to be very popular 685 00:32:33,280 --> 00:32:35,480 Speaker 2: in both of those matchups, and I think ultimately both 686 00:32:35,520 --> 00:32:36,920 Speaker 2: may end up looking like value draps. 687 00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:39,440 Speaker 1: Yeah. I actually had in my notes, like before the 688 00:32:39,520 --> 00:32:41,480 Speaker 1: market came up, that I was really interested in Rob 689 00:32:41,560 --> 00:32:44,920 Speaker 1: Font plus three and a half for almost exact same 690 00:32:44,960 --> 00:32:47,000 Speaker 1: reasons to talk about it was reackuy Simon, but the 691 00:32:47,080 --> 00:32:49,960 Speaker 1: price adjustment is insane. He's minus one ninety five and 692 00:32:50,040 --> 00:32:52,080 Speaker 1: plus three and a half, which I just can't take. 693 00:32:52,160 --> 00:32:55,120 Speaker 1: Like that's too far for a point spread beat and 694 00:32:56,040 --> 00:32:58,120 Speaker 1: Andre Peeley. Yeah, this one's moved around a lot. I 695 00:32:58,160 --> 00:33:00,960 Speaker 1: took Andre Peelly early in the week, hoping the line 696 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:02,640 Speaker 1: would move en off that I could arbit out on 697 00:33:02,720 --> 00:33:04,600 Speaker 1: the other side. But now I'm kind of left holding 698 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:06,880 Speaker 1: my Andre Peely bag. I'm fine with that. I think 699 00:33:06,920 --> 00:33:10,200 Speaker 1: he probably should win. Malchie Costas look really good when 700 00:33:10,240 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 1: they give him bad opponents, but doesn't seem like mid 701 00:33:14,520 --> 00:33:16,600 Speaker 1: UFC level. He seems like he's kind of holding the 702 00:33:16,640 --> 00:33:19,280 Speaker 1: door between low and mid level, where we know Andre 703 00:33:19,360 --> 00:33:21,360 Speaker 1: Pheley at this point he's dangerous. He can beat anyone. 704 00:33:21,440 --> 00:33:24,080 Speaker 1: So I like the feely side a little bit. I 705 00:33:24,200 --> 00:33:26,880 Speaker 1: wish I'd been able to time the market movement a 706 00:33:26,920 --> 00:33:29,600 Speaker 1: little bit better. And yeah, I'm with you if I 707 00:33:29,760 --> 00:33:31,440 Speaker 1: like the points bread. I guess it makes sense that 708 00:33:31,560 --> 00:33:34,800 Speaker 1: also that guy by decision logically is a solid bed 709 00:33:34,800 --> 00:33:35,840 Speaker 1: if you want something risk here. 710 00:33:36,920 --> 00:33:40,840 Speaker 2: Six year age gap between font or between pheely and 711 00:33:42,520 --> 00:33:45,440 Speaker 2: and Malkie, I believe. And then yeah, six year age gap, 712 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:49,640 Speaker 2: but much more significant twelve years between Font and Matsumoto. 713 00:33:50,520 --> 00:33:53,280 Speaker 2: Just worth noting the age angles I discussed earlier with 714 00:33:53,440 --> 00:33:56,640 Speaker 2: everybody seemingly in the public projections that I'm you know, 715 00:33:57,160 --> 00:34:01,280 Speaker 2: accumulating data from seeming to be on Font and Feeley. 716 00:34:01,400 --> 00:34:03,560 Speaker 2: I'm passing on both of those fights, lean to either 717 00:34:03,640 --> 00:34:07,160 Speaker 2: fighter either underdog, to win by decision, probably saving both 718 00:34:07,880 --> 00:34:10,920 Speaker 2: for round robin tickets. If at all, couple bets I 719 00:34:11,080 --> 00:34:12,560 Speaker 2: want to give out before we get out of here, 720 00:34:12,800 --> 00:34:15,759 Speaker 2: technically best bets, I would file these under best of 721 00:34:15,800 --> 00:34:19,279 Speaker 2: the rest or as equivalent to anything else I've given 722 00:34:19,320 --> 00:34:21,759 Speaker 2: out on this card, but probably you know the top 723 00:34:21,840 --> 00:34:25,279 Speaker 2: two bets if I had to choose them amongst one, 724 00:34:25,280 --> 00:34:28,400 Speaker 2: I'm betting this weekend my two favorite bets Austin Vanderford 725 00:34:28,840 --> 00:34:30,920 Speaker 2: currently can get him about minus one ten. I took 726 00:34:30,960 --> 00:34:33,600 Speaker 2: minus one oh three. He opened at plus money. This 727 00:34:33,800 --> 00:34:36,920 Speaker 2: is a very late booking, to the point where props 728 00:34:36,960 --> 00:34:39,800 Speaker 2: aren't even up yet for this fight, but his opponent 729 00:34:40,160 --> 00:34:42,799 Speaker 2: was actually moved off of a booking from last week 730 00:34:43,280 --> 00:34:45,040 Speaker 2: back to this week. He pulled out of that fight 731 00:34:45,239 --> 00:34:48,279 Speaker 2: moved back to this week. Nikola I Verretnikov and Verretnikov 732 00:34:48,360 --> 00:34:50,560 Speaker 2: is really bad once you put him on bottom. Vanderford 733 00:34:50,719 --> 00:34:56,240 Speaker 2: is a decent wrestler. He's ania national champion. I don't 734 00:34:56,360 --> 00:34:58,880 Speaker 2: like his striking defense. I think Nikola I can absolutely 735 00:34:58,960 --> 00:35:02,280 Speaker 2: hurt him, finish him on the but once Vanderford starts 736 00:35:02,400 --> 00:35:04,440 Speaker 2: landing takedowns, I think he's going to take over. At 737 00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:06,480 Speaker 2: the momentum of this fight. Should be able to press 738 00:35:06,520 --> 00:35:08,520 Speaker 2: him up against the cage, should be able to control 739 00:35:08,560 --> 00:35:11,719 Speaker 2: from top position, and then Vanderford live after round one. 740 00:35:11,800 --> 00:35:14,440 Speaker 2: The longer this fight goes, the better I think it 741 00:35:14,520 --> 00:35:17,360 Speaker 2: plays out for him. Also, coming down from middleweight to 742 00:35:17,480 --> 00:35:20,279 Speaker 2: wealterweight for this fight, essentially spent most of his career 743 00:35:20,560 --> 00:35:23,680 Speaker 2: at middleweight, had some good wins over in Bell Tour 744 00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:27,239 Speaker 2: out of age particularly well. I do think he's a 745 00:35:27,320 --> 00:35:30,200 Speaker 2: pretty good wrestler, and I think getting essentially what was 746 00:35:30,320 --> 00:35:32,239 Speaker 2: you know, the grappling upside, all the grappling upside of 747 00:35:32,280 --> 00:35:34,480 Speaker 2: plus money now getting it at a picker price, I 748 00:35:34,520 --> 00:35:36,960 Speaker 2: think Vanderford clear side. I would bet him up to 749 00:35:37,000 --> 00:35:39,640 Speaker 2: about minus one twenty, project him closer minus one thirty, 750 00:35:40,600 --> 00:35:43,680 Speaker 2: and then Eon Kotzalava at plus one p fifty two 751 00:35:43,719 --> 00:35:47,080 Speaker 2: against Ebo Aslon I mentioned that as on Ko one 752 00:35:47,120 --> 00:35:50,640 Speaker 2: against her carrier earlier. I think that's provided value both 753 00:35:50,719 --> 00:35:54,960 Speaker 2: on both against Aslon and oncer Carria. Those KOs are 754 00:35:55,040 --> 00:35:57,160 Speaker 2: just not repeatable and eventually you are going to run 755 00:35:57,200 --> 00:35:59,200 Speaker 2: into guys as you move up the ladder of the 756 00:35:59,320 --> 00:36:02,840 Speaker 2: UFC ranking who can take those punches, and Ebo Aslon, 757 00:36:03,280 --> 00:36:05,720 Speaker 2: once he goes against the guy who can take those punches, 758 00:36:06,120 --> 00:36:07,759 Speaker 2: his game is gonna fall apart in the second and 759 00:36:07,840 --> 00:36:10,640 Speaker 2: third round. He can't grapple, he doesn't have good cardio, 760 00:36:11,080 --> 00:36:13,080 Speaker 2: he has good power, He's the bigger man two inch taller, 761 00:36:13,160 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 2: too inch reach advantage. But if Kutalaba survives that first round, 762 00:36:17,440 --> 00:36:19,560 Speaker 2: I think he takes over with the grappling. I think 763 00:36:19,640 --> 00:36:21,759 Speaker 2: he actually has the better cardio of the two, which 764 00:36:21,800 --> 00:36:24,600 Speaker 2: is very rare for an Ian Kutzalaba fight. He faded 765 00:36:24,600 --> 00:36:26,760 Speaker 2: in the third round of his last fight. It actually 766 00:36:26,800 --> 00:36:29,160 Speaker 2: the first time we've seen him fight more measured, more 767 00:36:29,239 --> 00:36:32,239 Speaker 2: conservatively ended up winning a decision. Really like to see 768 00:36:32,480 --> 00:36:35,640 Speaker 2: the development and improvement in his skill set and in 769 00:36:35,719 --> 00:36:38,839 Speaker 2: his mindset in terms of approaching these fights, and it's 770 00:36:38,880 --> 00:36:41,400 Speaker 2: a fight where he may have a rare cardio advantage 771 00:36:41,440 --> 00:36:44,319 Speaker 2: over his opponents, so Ian Kutzalaba want plus one forty 772 00:36:44,400 --> 00:36:47,880 Speaker 2: five or better, may consider him live after round one 773 00:36:47,920 --> 00:36:50,399 Speaker 2: as well, considering or once I can see how both 774 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:52,239 Speaker 2: guys look near the end of the round, how they 775 00:36:52,280 --> 00:36:55,360 Speaker 2: look on the tools. But Billy any thoughts on Koutolaba 776 00:36:55,360 --> 00:36:57,880 Speaker 2: a plus one fifty two. I know you liked Vanderford 777 00:36:57,960 --> 00:37:00,239 Speaker 2: and not sure what price target you like up to. 778 00:37:01,320 --> 00:37:04,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm with you on Vanderford. Retnikoff got taken down 779 00:37:04,880 --> 00:37:07,920 Speaker 1: four times by Michael Morales on the Contender series, and 780 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:09,920 Speaker 1: Michael Morales is like a pure striker. He strikes with 781 00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:13,400 Speaker 1: everybody else, So that tells you both. I mean how 782 00:37:13,480 --> 00:37:15,680 Speaker 1: much he motivates opponents to want to take him down, 783 00:37:15,719 --> 00:37:18,879 Speaker 1: but also how relatively easy it is. I actually took 784 00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:21,000 Speaker 1: the ebo os on side. I got him at minus 785 00:37:21,040 --> 00:37:24,239 Speaker 1: one fifty earlier in the week. Would absolutely not take 786 00:37:24,440 --> 00:37:26,680 Speaker 1: minus one eighty or minus one ninety on that now. 787 00:37:27,080 --> 00:37:29,000 Speaker 1: If it moves even more, I might just arm out 788 00:37:29,040 --> 00:37:31,640 Speaker 1: and take a little profit either way. To me, it 789 00:37:31,680 --> 00:37:34,160 Speaker 1: feels like a pretty pure striker versus grappler match. Not 790 00:37:34,320 --> 00:37:37,279 Speaker 1: that Ewon can't strike, but he's at such a power 791 00:37:37,360 --> 00:37:40,759 Speaker 1: disadvantage and his chin seems to be rapidly leaving him 792 00:37:40,800 --> 00:37:43,080 Speaker 1: even though he's only thirty one, So those two things 793 00:37:43,160 --> 00:37:47,359 Speaker 1: make it hard. And then I was saying Ebo has 794 00:37:47,560 --> 00:37:50,440 Speaker 1: defended every takedown he's faced in the UFC so far, 795 00:37:50,680 --> 00:37:53,319 Speaker 1: but like they all came from Antonterkli, so we don't. 796 00:37:53,800 --> 00:37:55,960 Speaker 1: It's more of a question mark, i'd say, than a weakness. 797 00:37:56,239 --> 00:37:58,719 Speaker 1: Might be a weakness we might see this time. But yeah, 798 00:37:58,760 --> 00:38:02,160 Speaker 1: fairly binary fight that one for DFS. Either Eon gets 799 00:38:02,239 --> 00:38:04,760 Speaker 1: takedowns and finishes it pretty fast or he gets knocked 800 00:38:04,760 --> 00:38:07,560 Speaker 1: out right away. But yeah, the price is at now 801 00:38:07,800 --> 00:38:10,360 Speaker 1: I'm with you. I think that's the better side, and 802 00:38:10,640 --> 00:38:12,759 Speaker 1: maybe we'll see if I can get both sides and 803 00:38:12,840 --> 00:38:14,000 Speaker 1: just lock into profit either way. 804 00:38:14,360 --> 00:38:16,480 Speaker 2: A lot of fights heavily used to go to a decision, 805 00:38:16,560 --> 00:38:17,960 Speaker 2: or at least that I expect to go to a 806 00:38:18,000 --> 00:38:20,000 Speaker 2: decision on this card. That's a great shout out on 807 00:38:20,040 --> 00:38:23,000 Speaker 2: the kudulaba As on fight for DFS purposes, I would 808 00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:25,800 Speaker 2: assume the Walker Menfield fight would probably be good for 809 00:38:25,880 --> 00:38:26,960 Speaker 2: you for DFS purposes. 810 00:38:27,000 --> 00:38:28,400 Speaker 1: Any other ones that you're going to be targeting for 811 00:38:28,520 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 1: DFS this weekend, Alan Hernandez seems like another good one. 812 00:38:32,160 --> 00:38:35,240 Speaker 1: Because if I think it's either Alan Early or Anthony 813 00:38:35,280 --> 00:38:38,440 Speaker 1: Hernandez doing a morob impression, kind of either way, the 814 00:38:38,480 --> 00:38:40,600 Speaker 1: winner gets a big score there. Main event's kind of 815 00:38:40,640 --> 00:38:43,560 Speaker 1: fun too, Honestly, similar logic in the main event because 816 00:38:43,600 --> 00:38:46,520 Speaker 1: song quick knockout or a lot of damage, or Henry 817 00:38:46,520 --> 00:38:49,120 Speaker 1: Sujudo just lands twenty six takedowns that he holds for 818 00:38:49,239 --> 00:38:51,759 Speaker 1: four seconds each. Either way, we're good with that. So yeah, 819 00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:53,879 Speaker 1: those are kind of like the four where I want 820 00:38:53,960 --> 00:38:56,040 Speaker 1: exposure to. Kind of a tough week when we're down 821 00:38:56,080 --> 00:38:57,920 Speaker 1: to twelve fights, there's a lot hard to make a 822 00:38:57,960 --> 00:38:59,600 Speaker 1: unique lineup, so you gotta get a little bit off 823 00:38:59,640 --> 00:39:02,480 Speaker 1: the board. I would even consider stack. I would even 824 00:39:02,520 --> 00:39:05,400 Speaker 1: consider stacking the main event because there's a case that 825 00:39:05,440 --> 00:39:07,640 Speaker 1: Sahudo gets takedowns for three or four rounds and gets 826 00:39:07,680 --> 00:39:09,520 Speaker 1: knocked out late. Both guys end up with a good 827 00:39:09,560 --> 00:39:11,759 Speaker 1: score even in a loss. So kind of where I'm 828 00:39:11,760 --> 00:39:12,319 Speaker 1: at right now. 829 00:39:12,640 --> 00:39:15,880 Speaker 2: No great points, I considering I had those three fights 830 00:39:15,960 --> 00:39:18,520 Speaker 2: all over like minus three hundred, you know, projected to 831 00:39:18,600 --> 00:39:22,040 Speaker 2: reach a decision. Yeah, again, the font Mattsimoto, Simone bach Rot, 832 00:39:22,640 --> 00:39:26,440 Speaker 2: and Philly Costa, I'm probably not going to pick any 833 00:39:26,440 --> 00:39:29,200 Speaker 2: of those six fighters in DFS lineups, maybe maybe one 834 00:39:29,239 --> 00:39:32,480 Speaker 2: of them like skipping three of those fights. Now I'm 835 00:39:32,480 --> 00:39:35,040 Speaker 2: down to nine, so let's find fights focused on. So yeah, 836 00:39:35,040 --> 00:39:37,520 Speaker 2: I appreciate you going a little bit more into the 837 00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:39,920 Speaker 2: DFS angles for this weekend, but that'll do it for 838 00:39:39,960 --> 00:39:42,080 Speaker 2: a USC betting preview. You can find more USC betting 839 00:39:42,120 --> 00:39:45,560 Speaker 2: content for both Billy and myself on Action network dot 840 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:47,400 Speaker 2: com and in the Action Network app. And you remember 841 00:39:47,400 --> 00:39:50,600 Speaker 2: if you instantly tail some of the bets we discussed 842 00:39:50,640 --> 00:39:53,279 Speaker 2: on today's show, look for the quick slip link in 843 00:39:53,360 --> 00:39:56,440 Speaker 2: the podcast and the video descriptions, or visit Action network 844 00:39:56,480 --> 00:39:59,680 Speaker 2: dot com slash bat now. Don't forget to download the 845 00:39:59,719 --> 00:40:01,600 Speaker 2: free award winning Action over Gap and sign up for 846 00:40:01,680 --> 00:40:05,560 Speaker 2: Action Pro for immediate access to expert picks, analysis, and 847 00:40:05,640 --> 00:40:08,480 Speaker 2: quicker bet notifications. Best of luck with all your best 848 00:40:08,520 --> 00:40:10,640 Speaker 2: this weekend, and enjoy the violence. Thank you for listening. 849 00:40:10,800 --> 00:40:21,640 Speaker 1: See you next time. Action Network reminds you please gamble responsibly. 850 00:40:22,120 --> 00:40:24,880 Speaker 2: If you or someone you care about has a gambling problem, 851 00:40:25,239 --> 00:40:27,839 Speaker 2: help is available twenty four to seven at one eight 852 00:40:27,920 --> 00:40:28,680 Speaker 2: hundred Gambler