Speaker 1: Watch up and welcome back to another episode and No
Speaker 1: Sellers podcast with your host. Now, funk that with your
Speaker 1: low glasses, Malone. Quite don't understand how pussy inflation will matter.
Speaker 1: How how would explain to me how with pussy inflation
Speaker 1: have anything that comparable to actual inflation. It's illustrative. You
Speaker 1: had a policy change called the sexual Revolution, during which
Speaker 1: women flooded the market with casual pussy, thus driving down
Speaker 1: the price of pussy. You guys up to marry one
Speaker 1: of these women to get some puss. Now he's kind
Speaker 1: of gonna know one. Then they try to add some
Speaker 1: interest rates to bring the integrity of the value back
Speaker 1: by making you take them on stupid vacations or buy
Speaker 1: them over priced handbags or dinners to try to you know,
Speaker 1: had your guest inflation. Hey, you want to throw some
Speaker 1: points on the pussy, go ahead, because I'm good at default.
Speaker 1: Right out, you can. You can go ahead and fore
Speaker 1: clothes on the ship. I've already packed my bags. Why
Speaker 1: do I get what the funk you're saying? Because because
Speaker 1: it's fucking you're a smart guy. Love that again, because
Speaker 1: today you Professor Pete, because on no sentence, because you're
Speaker 1: about to teach a bunch of herm motherfucker's about inflation.
Speaker 1: So now compared to inflation as far as how pussy worked,
Speaker 1: you feel me for as far as males went, do
Speaker 1: that again? Run that whole thing again? All right, pussy
Speaker 1: it was like the currency for dating or for relationships
Speaker 1: or whatever for you know, since the dawn of man. Right,
Speaker 1: So that was that was that was the actual what
Speaker 1: do you call it? The uh? So pussy was was
Speaker 1: the currency for relationships in in humankind? How pussy is
Speaker 1: like gold? No, pussy is like cash? Sure? Like not
Speaker 1: quite because pussy was tied to the gold standard, which
Speaker 1: used to be a wedding band when we took them.
Speaker 1: So wouldn't that hold up? And I don't mean to
Speaker 1: cut you off, but I just want to make sure
Speaker 1: I meeting this right. So that makes sense? I got it?
Speaker 1: So I got I got to correction. Consistent pussy or
Speaker 1: the the ownership of such an investment is the ghost
Speaker 1: and and pussy itself is cash. Go ahead, and okay,
Speaker 1: got it? Yeah that's fair to say, right, because it's
Speaker 1: not marriage. Marriage is the consistency of pussy, the the
Speaker 1: allure of the availability all the time. Yeah, Marriage is
Speaker 1: the marriages. Is the job that's your occupation? Sure? Okay,
Speaker 1: so so running out now, now backing up, okay, so
Speaker 1: now pussy and compared to the American dollar, Yeah, when,
Speaker 1: interestingly enough, both came off the gold standard around the
Speaker 1: same time in the sixty seventies. Yeah, early seventies. So
Speaker 1: pussy predated real money. It always, it always predates the economy.
Speaker 1: So we don't when when the dollar was on the
Speaker 1: gold standard, we weren't running around trading gold because it
Speaker 1: was the gold standard. The currency is representative of a
Speaker 1: gold standard, which was actually, interestingly enough, put together by
Speaker 1: Sir Isaac Newton initially back in the early eighteenth century England.
Speaker 1: That's how England vaulted ahead of the Dutch and other
Speaker 1: European countries in global commerce and power so rapidly. So
Speaker 1: so instead of carrying around these gold bars, you would
Speaker 1: have these I O U s of this was the
Speaker 1: same value of the goal. You have somebody's holding the goal,
Speaker 1: so they had to run around carrying this heavy as ship.
Speaker 1: You had these simple promissory notes of this is somebody's
Speaker 1: amount of gold that I'm giving you on this piece
Speaker 1: of paper. So then that's so now back to the
Speaker 1: pussy comparison, because the pussy seems great. Okay, go ahead.
Speaker 1: So when you come off the gold standard, there's nothing
Speaker 1: buying your value to your note other than your own
Speaker 1: other other than basically confidence in you as an entity.
Speaker 1: And when women had the sexual revolution, you didn't have
Speaker 1: to marry a woman to get the pussy. You just
Speaker 1: had to show up. And so it flooded the market
Speaker 1: with casual pussy, thus driving down the value of the pussy,
Speaker 1: of of of an individual piece of pussy, was driving
Speaker 1: down the value of women. It drolled down to well,
Speaker 1: it depends on how you want to look at it.
Speaker 1: It does drive down both. It drove down the value
Speaker 1: of pussy because when pussy is so casual, it's not
Speaker 1: that big a deal, you know, sure, yeah, it's funny.
Speaker 1: I was arguing with the homies in the group chat,
Speaker 1: and they was trying to convince me that like pussy
Speaker 1: was special, and I'm like not, pussy used to be special,
Speaker 1: but now everybody getting pussy. You know, Downtown at the loft,
Speaker 1: I would walk through Scared Road just to clear my head,
Speaker 1: Like I was so close, so I would just watch
Speaker 1: just to get some pussy. No, I was walking through
Speaker 1: the scared road really just uh to clear my mind,
Speaker 1: like staying grounded and routing, you know, never letting the
Speaker 1: economics or success give me too far away from the corner.
Speaker 1: And what's what it's about. So people would being intense.
Speaker 1: It's homeless people getting pussy. So at that point I
Speaker 1: realized pussy wasn't special. Yeah, I mean just the fucking
Speaker 1: value portion of it. Everybody was getting some pussy. So okay,
Speaker 1: now back to the comparison. So the sexual revolution has
Speaker 1: now so much casual pussy because based before the Sexual Revolution,
Speaker 1: you had to damn to and marry a woman to
Speaker 1: get something. You had to earn a dollar. And the
Speaker 1: Sexual Revolution was like a gigantic stimulus bill and it
Speaker 1: flooded the market with random, inflated, valueless pussy. So you're
Speaker 1: calling the p p P the Pussy Protection Plan where
Speaker 1: it was just pussy everywhere for everybody. Yeah, and that's
Speaker 1: why the American dollars fucked up because of because there's
Speaker 1: just there's an excess of supply everybody. Any So niggas
Speaker 1: don't even got to be special me and don't gotta
Speaker 1: be special no more to get pussy. You don't gotta
Speaker 1: go do nothing. Pussy is just available. Doesn't look like
Speaker 1: most of the men getting put pussy these days were special.
Speaker 1: Probably not, it's not. And they don't have to do
Speaker 1: nothing special nothing. You just have to exist. So you said,
Speaker 1: that's how people. So that's what's sucking up the American dollar,
Speaker 1: the currency right now, because you didn't have to do
Speaker 1: anything to earn the dollar. It was exactly and and
Speaker 1: and it outpaced the supply of the of what you
Speaker 1: were trying to get. That's the real gist of it.
Speaker 1: It outpaced the supply of the goods you were using
Speaker 1: to purchase it with. You know, currency exists for really
Speaker 1: one reason because it's it's a medium for bartering. That
Speaker 1: way you can have an even trade. Otherwise it's like
Speaker 1: you got break pads, I got orange, Just they don't
Speaker 1: equate really easily. Someone's gonna walk out with either too
Speaker 1: many break pads or not enough orange, or someone's getting
Speaker 1: screwed in every single transaction. So you just or you
Speaker 1: might just not want orange. Just I got enough oranges,
Speaker 1: but I need break pads. All I got his oranges.
Speaker 1: That way you can guarantee a transactual happening. It will
Speaker 1: be as close to fair as possible, you know, so
Speaker 1: like now there there's like there's more casual pussy than
Speaker 1: there are you know, like real women out there, you know,
Speaker 1: like I don't need to fuck be have Ashley to
Speaker 1: get some pussy. I could try to get Ashley and
Speaker 1: fail and go get some pussy in an hour. That
Speaker 1: actually makes perfect sense. I actually fully understand it now,
Speaker 1: and and it what's interesting also is what we're seeing
Speaker 1: the feed is trying to buy money back by raising
Speaker 1: the interest rates, because interest is just sure, it's creeping now,
Speaker 1: it's it's it's coming up, and that's just wasted money.
Speaker 1: So this would be the equivalent if women was like,
Speaker 1: not only now do you have to marry me to
Speaker 1: get the pussy, but you have to marry me, Okay,
Speaker 1: what would be the comparison of what the fids are
Speaker 1: doing it. We're not trying to go back to the
Speaker 1: girl standard. We're just trying to rein in the madness
Speaker 1: a little bit. And that's all we're just trying to
Speaker 1: We just need to pull a little bit of integrity
Speaker 1: back into the value of our dollar. That's all women
Speaker 1: are attempting to do. You gotta take me to Mastro.
Speaker 1: So you gotta fly me to Cabo, you gotta buy
Speaker 1: me an air mes bag because we went out for
Speaker 1: an hour. You want to fund me. That's just that's
Speaker 1: just interest. That's just interest. That's just that's three a
Speaker 1: half points. So, first off, no sailings glass is low
Speaker 1: by man Peter Boss in the spot Professor Pete today
Speaker 1: because I feel like the community don't have enough conversations
Speaker 1: about inflation. So it's really important for us to address
Speaker 1: this and in a very communal way. And and and
Speaker 1: nobody is greater at this their Professor Pete. And nothing
Speaker 1: is more communal than the modern day. Yeah, but well
Speaker 1: we go, uh, we're gonna let Professor Pete break it
Speaker 1: down in the comparative ways of pussy and the value. Okay, So,
Speaker 1: so wouldn't the smartest thing for women to stand up
Speaker 1: and say, you know what, you have to marry us
Speaker 1: to get the pussy again. That would bring complete order
Speaker 1: back to the system, right, absolutely. Unfortunately, much like the
Speaker 1: US governor government, women do not want to abide by
Speaker 1: the constraints of their own aspirations for intel gritty. They
Speaker 1: don't want to pay the costs to be the boss,
Speaker 1: so to speak. They want to still frivolously live this
Speaker 1: irresponsible lifestyle, but try to have a way to not
Speaker 1: let the wheels totally fall off the vehicle. So they
Speaker 1: still want the freedom of fucking without the consequences of
Speaker 1: inflation exactly. But is that isn't that unrealistic at that point? Well,
Speaker 1: I say we crossed that bridge, and it most certainly is.
Speaker 1: It's it is an unsustainable monetary policy. I mean, we
Speaker 1: have had an unsustainable monetary policy in the States for
Speaker 1: a very long time. We had, you know, a huge
Speaker 1: wave of between technological development of a lot of goods,
Speaker 1: globalization and importing of goods and e commerce that enables
Speaker 1: you to like price compete somebody who had a small
Speaker 1: brick and order store three blocks from you versus like
Speaker 1: some guy who's gotta warehouse out and sue falls idol
Speaker 1: or whatever. Yes, anywhere it's flooded. It was it was
Speaker 1: able to keep pay stride for stride with ridiculous government spending.
Speaker 1: And people didn't really know that much other than to say,
Speaker 1: like a housing market going up and down, which kind
Speaker 1: of had its own factors. So hypothetically speaking, what would
Speaker 1: be the match, like, how would you match this? What
Speaker 1: would be the comparative. What would be the interest rate
Speaker 1: that the Fed would have to raise money. You know,
Speaker 1: money is expensive right now, so the interest rates that
Speaker 1: they have they have to go up on loaning it, right,
Speaker 1: So if you're some money for money is expensive, they're
Speaker 1: talking about the price to borrow money. So if women said,
Speaker 1: you know what, the only way we're gonna give me
Speaker 1: a pussy now, right is if they marry it's outside
Speaker 1: of the traditional prostitutes initially or the couple of fast girls.
Speaker 1: But let's say they say, you know what, the only
Speaker 1: way you're getting this pussy at this point, right is
Speaker 1: if you marry me. What does that interest rate look
Speaker 1: like in the housing market? Where would you have to
Speaker 1: raise loaning money too? To make that the equivalent of
Speaker 1: women actually having a full set of stern standards before
Speaker 1: to counter a casual pussy. Well, the two aren't exactly parallel.
Speaker 1: I mean, like saying we're gonna have a hard and
Speaker 1: fast marriage standard for pussy would be the equivalent of
Speaker 1: there being a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution saying
Speaker 1: that the government cannot run a boy, what what's the what?
Speaker 1: What a deficit? An annual deficit? They have to. They
Speaker 1: have to budget, you have to get rid of you
Speaker 1: have to balance out all your debt. You can't. You gotta, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you gotta come to zero every year. Holy shit. So
Speaker 1: so so that would be the equivalent of of that
Speaker 1: without being on a on a currency gold standard. Otherwise
Speaker 1: you have to have one of two things happened. You
Speaker 1: could have like zero economic growth, which is we're kind
Speaker 1: of a negative right now, and your and your interest
Speaker 1: trade would have to probably would have to like exceed inflation.
Speaker 1: So if inflation, you have to have an honest inflation
Speaker 1: to like the way they measured inflation back in eighty
Speaker 1: is not how they measure it today. So like the
Speaker 1: list of items that define inflation would have to be expanded.
Speaker 1: So it's way worse than we think it is. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's probably something like I mean, ship look, I mean this,
Speaker 1: look at stuff gases up double. Most grocery items are
Speaker 1: up like fift. I mean it's up a lot. You know,
Speaker 1: rent in the last couple of years has gone up
Speaker 1: like thirty at least, you know, so you have to
Speaker 1: you have to have your interest match your inflation or exceeded.
Speaker 1: And that was why I like like the carter administration
Speaker 1: stag inflation and the Carter administration, the Fed had interest race.
Speaker 1: I think my dad's student loan from college was like
Speaker 1: or something like that. Ch it's insane. Back when the
Speaker 1: houses they were around fifteen or sixteen percent, right, they
Speaker 1: have been more than that because they're gonna you know,
Speaker 1: you can't borrow money for less than the federal interest rate,
Speaker 1: so it was very high. That's white houses were very cheap. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: So we both agreed that the motto is unsustainable. We
Speaker 1: both agree with that, right, we both Uh. I want
Speaker 1: to tell you a story, right, and it's a weird
Speaker 1: story because it kind of talks about inflation um. And
Speaker 1: it's a biblical story. You ever heard the story Jesus
Speaker 1: and the Money Changers. I believe you talked about it
Speaker 1: that one time. So Jesus is like the one time
Speaker 1: Jesus loked up in the Bible. Like Jesus was a
Speaker 1: pretty like smooth character in the Bible. You mean, he's
Speaker 1: always cool, callous, even when he was about to kill
Speaker 1: him and knocking down chipping you feel me like he
Speaker 1: was cool and callous. But the one time Jesus acted
Speaker 1: a fool, And I think it's important, right, because I
Speaker 1: appreciate biblical ideas. You know, it's just a conversation of
Speaker 1: soul and spirit. You I mean, like I think that
Speaker 1: you should be outraged about. And I has been to
Speaker 1: wat since I read the story, but I think I
Speaker 1: got the jest of it. So to praise God right
Speaker 1: initially at these times and the story right, you will
Speaker 1: go to the church or the temple and you would
Speaker 1: deposit or or donate or putting the plate two shakeles
Speaker 1: to gold shakeles. I think the number was a gold
Speaker 1: checker or two goal checkers. And at that time, to
Speaker 1: make it work, praising God was the most desired thing
Speaker 1: to do, you know what I mean outside the traditional business,
Speaker 1: you know, so praising God. You know, people would trade
Speaker 1: gold checkles right for apple pies or a pair of shoes.
Speaker 1: So maybe two apple pies got you, uh, a goal
Speaker 1: check or two goal checkles. It's amazing where your financial
Speaker 1: priorities go when a certain financial priority isn't quite the
Speaker 1: state that it isn't you know, modern America, Well, what
Speaker 1: is it that they weren't paying for outright? And the
Speaker 1: way that we paid for it back in those days?
Speaker 1: Something I can't put my finger on it probably still
Speaker 1: pare for it did telling. They're just everybody so long
Speaker 1: story shut. Right, So, so you like an apple pie
Speaker 1: or two apple pies will get you a gold checker, right,
Speaker 1: it says one goal checker to praise God, two apple
Speaker 1: pies will get you a goal check or a pair
Speaker 1: of shoes will get you a gold checker. So a
Speaker 1: person that made apple pies were traded for a ghost checker,
Speaker 1: a person that made shoes were traded for a ghost
Speaker 1: check or a person that made pants a roofer, you know,
Speaker 1: different people, you know, right, they bartered all their services.
Speaker 1: That's how they live, right, like you said, the barter system.
Speaker 1: But then they got these goals checkers to praise God. Well,
Speaker 1: some group of people right based biblically decided, like you know,
Speaker 1: the desire to praise God is like astronomical, Right, So
Speaker 1: if we have possession of all the gold checkles, we
Speaker 1: could determine what people should have to pay to praise God.
Speaker 1: So that one apple pie turned into five apple pies
Speaker 1: to get one goal checko, right, that one pair of
Speaker 1: shoe turned into four pill throughs to praise God. Right,
Speaker 1: that all the roofers, you know, it turned into these
Speaker 1: crazy numbers just to praise God for and gold shekel
Speaker 1: and when they were taken, the called shack and assuming
Speaker 1: they would go put it in some sort of at
Speaker 1: the temple. Yeah, and the same guy who gave him
Speaker 1: the shackles walking around to the other side of the door,
Speaker 1: just taking the second right back. This problem. So they
Speaker 1: was like, this is the ship, this business model is
Speaker 1: the ship. So there's like, you know what, we need
Speaker 1: to have it set up at the temple m hm.
Speaker 1: And all of the people in the community started complaining
Speaker 1: the body and they told Jesus, and Jesus went down
Speaker 1: there and seeing what was going on, that they were
Speaker 1: doing this ship right, this ridiculous ship at the temple
Speaker 1: inside the household the lord bill for worship, and he
Speaker 1: got a broom and started whacking the ass upside the
Speaker 1: head and chasing them out of the temple with it,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people, well me priormarily, but other
Speaker 1: people I know believe that's that be came that the
Speaker 1: miise of Jesus Christ that day right there he was
Speaker 1: Finn hang on across. It wouldn't be uh terribly shocking,
Speaker 1: it would It would fall in line with history. Remember
Speaker 1: Abraham Lincoln people thought Abraham Lincoln got knocked off because
Speaker 1: of the slaves, right, But you know, like I know,
Speaker 1: when they was fighting that war, right, the Civil War,
Speaker 1: and he went to the FED to borrow money, right,
Speaker 1: he went to the Fair to borrow money. And the
Speaker 1: FAN was trying to you know, extend their charter of
Speaker 1: printing bills to the United States of America. Because most
Speaker 1: people don't realize this, but the FED, the Federal Reserve,
Speaker 1: and this country, as much as they see in the
Speaker 1: same are separate entity. They have selparate self interest. It
Speaker 1: sometimes can line up, but it's not the same entity.
Speaker 1: It's it's a different entity where they allow people from
Speaker 1: you know, the American government to be a part. But
Speaker 1: at that point you could corrupt him. So Abraham Lincoln
Speaker 1: went to borrow money to fight a war. I don't
Speaker 1: think most people understand this about how this works. So
Speaker 1: he goes to the Federal Reserve to to borrow money
Speaker 1: to buy supplies and everything he needs to fight the
Speaker 1: Civil War. And he goes and they're trying to charge
Speaker 1: him a ridiculous interest rate where they extend their charter too.
Speaker 1: I think it was like perpetuity, like permanent or a
Speaker 1: hundred years or some crazy number. And the money they
Speaker 1: wanted back for what he was trying to borrow wanted
Speaker 1: a crazy interest rate. So Lincoln got mad. He was like,
Speaker 1: fuck it. And one of his generals told him, like, man,
Speaker 1: you could print your all money and do the same thing.
Speaker 1: And he didn't see how that will work because they
Speaker 1: had been used on the federal reserve currency for so long.
Speaker 1: And he said, look, as long as you make it
Speaker 1: payable to taxes, right, as long as you make it
Speaker 1: payable to taxes, people to take it. And that's how
Speaker 1: we got the green back, the treasury note, the treasury
Speaker 1: not right, the green back. So now Lincoln wins his war.
Speaker 1: And you know what he's about to do now, because
Speaker 1: he got the attitude by how they were trying to
Speaker 1: do to fight the war. Next thing, you know, this
Speaker 1: motherfuck come up shot. Andrew Jackson came up shot. Mar
Speaker 1: Luther King was preaching all that ship the whole time,
Speaker 1: for years and years and years. Oh it's all good
Speaker 1: that we all egal, we all the same, We're good man.
Speaker 1: Nobody cared. Ain't even trip his last year or two
Speaker 1: of life. Them speeches started talking about coming for checks
Speaker 1: and y'all owe us and we're coming for our money.
Speaker 1: Shot Nigga's be getting shot fucking with that money, just
Speaker 1: like sucking with that pussy. Yeah. I mean, now like
Speaker 1: these you know, world banks and and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Like like I guess a little bit of trivia for
Speaker 1: for the audience. You know what the largest industry in
Speaker 1: the world is right now, it's um it's currency exchange.
Speaker 1: Between seven and eight trillion dollars a day uh in
Speaker 1: in currency trading happens, which is just like a miscarriage
Speaker 1: of value. And I think it's like some seventy times
Speaker 1: the total value of exchange of goods and services is
Speaker 1: just in currency exchange. And that's kind of like the
Speaker 1: death of of the you know, the system of money
Speaker 1: in general. Like you you know, you're using the thing
Speaker 1: you're supposed to it's supposed to be fixed to enable
Speaker 1: other trade, and you're trading that so you so now
Speaker 1: it's like you're you're trying to conduct normal commerce. You know.
Speaker 1: I I grow wheat, I sell wheat. I priced it
Speaker 1: to the market, and the medium of the market is
Speaker 1: going up and down because people are trading the markets
Speaker 1: medium against somebody else's markets medium and then you want
Speaker 1: to sell your wheat to Belgium, but Belgium's ship has
Speaker 1: been trading against ours, so it really convolutes the market.
Speaker 1: And and you can see the amount of potential loss
Speaker 1: value for goods and services, particularly internationally. Um, you know
Speaker 1: you you all in on this money ship peak, Professor Pete.
Speaker 1: I've always had an issue with America outsourcing everything. M
Speaker 1: Like that seems as if it's the most unpatriotic thing
Speaker 1: you could do. It seems like the most selfish thing
Speaker 1: you could do. Right. Um, so again I'm gonna compared
Speaker 1: to my neighborhood. Right, it was a time where we
Speaker 1: were all hustling, Right, we hustled in the hood like
Speaker 1: all my older homies created this this uh, what's the
Speaker 1: word I'm looking for? Almost like a like a like
Speaker 1: a flow of currency like that. The neighborhood came to
Speaker 1: super wealthy, you know, well for PCP. So the whole
Speaker 1: community of Los Angeles, everybody from different communities new to
Speaker 1: come to a hundred and seventeen street seven street watch
Speaker 1: right to buy the PCP. They had the highest quality,
Speaker 1: you feel me, and it was gonna always have it
Speaker 1: on deck. So everybody around Los angeles would come to
Speaker 1: my hood to buy PCP, right, And the rules were simple, right,
Speaker 1: because you had all of these older dudes built this economy. Right.
Speaker 1: The rules was, you know, one you know, buy from here,
Speaker 1: buy from here by from one of the homies, do
Speaker 1: not buy from out of the community. Right. And at
Speaker 1: that point it cost a little bit more money. Let's
Speaker 1: say a sixteen ounce of shine, right, which is a
Speaker 1: snample bottom, right, it might have in the community, right,
Speaker 1: and on the seven it might have cost you a
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, but you could actually buy it outside of
Speaker 1: the hood for five or six hundred dollars. So I remember,
Speaker 1: I would argue with my homies, who will want to
Speaker 1: go buy from somebody else because they are worried about
Speaker 1: the profit not to mention, right, So off an ounce
Speaker 1: of sharon when the when the stick is five dollars right.
Speaker 1: You know with a cigarette, a dip of a cigarette
Speaker 1: is only five dollars of PCP. Right, there was roughly
Speaker 1: sixty dips in the bottle, right, so you'll make three
Speaker 1: hundred dollars. Right, So even if you pay a thousand
Speaker 1: dollars for sixteen ounces of shuram of PCP, you still
Speaker 1: would make forty eight hundred dollars, and you was gonna
Speaker 1: run through that sixteen ounce stick for stick, maybe a
Speaker 1: couple of poores, you know, with somebody to buy poor,
Speaker 1: You're gonna run through that right in a week, everybody,
Speaker 1: because the whole Los Angeles County and beyond, you know,
Speaker 1: even people would come from the Inland Empire, Orange County,
Speaker 1: you know, the valley because they knew about our product.
Speaker 1: And so even if you paid a thousand dollars to
Speaker 1: an older homie from the hood, you know, you would
Speaker 1: still make forty hundred dollars, you know, so there was
Speaker 1: no need to go buy for five hundred dollars. You
Speaker 1: was only add an extra five hundred right on top
Speaker 1: of your profitness. So instead of I said, it's a
Speaker 1: thousand dollars, you gonna make four day hundreds. That's thirty
Speaker 1: eight hundred bucks. So instead of forty three, you made
Speaker 1: thirty eight. But I realized that was how the older
Speaker 1: homies kept making money. That's how the community kept the
Speaker 1: dollars within it. And I would argue with the homies
Speaker 1: that was my age or younger, because they would want
Speaker 1: to go out and buy from somebody else. And I
Speaker 1: was trying to tell them. Then I'm like, yo, that's
Speaker 1: not how economies work. You know, that's not how economies work.
Speaker 1: And we just had these bad debates, and and you know,
Speaker 1: I'm very stern, Like I think people feel like, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm a dictator, but only because I've studied enough history
Speaker 1: to know why it's the way it is, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, why it's the way it is. So
Speaker 1: I always respected my older homies for setting up an
Speaker 1: economy that allowed everybody to earn, you know, a great living.
Speaker 1: You know, really you could get rich. You can sit
Speaker 1: on a hundred and seventeen street and get rich. So
Speaker 1: I've always had a problem with America outsourcing all of
Speaker 1: the stuff to try to save a couple of dollars.
Speaker 1: But you're still do so many jobs. You now you
Speaker 1: have to sell everything at Walmart prices because don't nobody
Speaker 1: got no money versus when you were paying people in
Speaker 1: America to make the product, and people have money. So yeah,
Speaker 1: something that would have cost four dollars for China to
Speaker 1: use his slave labor to make it and sell it
Speaker 1: for four dollars, it would have cost us ten dollars.
Speaker 1: It had been a better quality one to somebody can
Speaker 1: actually afford to pay ten dollars. More people in the
Speaker 1: American economy can afford to pay ten dollars. So I
Speaker 1: never quite understood why would they outsource all of the opportunity.
Speaker 1: It could only be motivated by greet Yeah, I think
Speaker 1: it's a handful of things, because that's a very complicated question. Um.
Speaker 1: Like if you look at certain parts of the country,
Speaker 1: there are certain areas where there is exclusivity where it's
Speaker 1: just like this happens here, it can only happen here,
Speaker 1: and it's always gonna happen here, like like New York,
Speaker 1: New York Financial District or something like that. Or the
Speaker 1: Port of l A being that it's the largest port
Speaker 1: at the infrastructures there and anything coming in across the Pacific,
Speaker 1: it's going to be there, you know. Or the Central
Speaker 1: Valley for California, as far as being able to grow
Speaker 1: an abundance of that much fruit, you have that much
Speaker 1: soil quality, weather, water access, all that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: I could get to water access in a minute, um,
Speaker 1: because that's about to not be so good. But the issue,
Speaker 1: like you can outsource things and move on if you like.
Speaker 1: For California, Yeah, you could outsource a bunch of jobs
Speaker 1: out of California if you and enable if you don't
Speaker 1: have beer's entry for businesses to grow and replace those jobs.
Speaker 1: You need to essentially have an economy grow at about
Speaker 1: three percent annually to keep up with um population growth.
Speaker 1: You know, so if like right now, it's very difficult
Speaker 1: to build new housing in California, the price of housings
Speaker 1: way inflated, people priced out of being able to live
Speaker 1: in California in a lot of cases or there, all
Speaker 1: you can do is just not die outside. You have
Speaker 1: enough money to just die in your place because you
Speaker 1: have no money to even eat. That's okay. So you know,
Speaker 1: if if you create an environment that's very robustly fertile
Speaker 1: for innovation and growth and development, it doesn't matter that much. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: and it's all kind of does tie together. You have
Speaker 1: the government intervention in marketplaces, you know, has gotten way
Speaker 1: out of whack in the last years in the United States,
Speaker 1: when like some company a will go bribe a bunch
Speaker 1: of politicians to create a barrier of entry law and
Speaker 1: grandfather them around that law so that nobody else can
Speaker 1: invade their space. Also, you know, you come off the
Speaker 1: goal standard around the same time, within five years probably
Speaker 1: or less, of the United States becoming a bit of
Speaker 1: a welfare state. So if people are unemployed, doesn't matter what,
Speaker 1: borrow print whatever, more money and we'll we'll subsidize that problem.
Speaker 1: It's a problem for the people who went from having
Speaker 1: a job to having you know, welfare, but it's still
Speaker 1: you know, they're they're pissed. They're not that pissed. But
Speaker 1: if you had any integrity to the to the monetary policy,
Speaker 1: that kind of stuff wouldn't happen. You'd be forced to
Speaker 1: continue to actually drive drive business growth and drive the
Speaker 1: economic growth. And if when you can source things for cheaper,
Speaker 1: you know, you can do the layer on top of
Speaker 1: that more easily, in the layer on top of that
Speaker 1: more easily. Say, it is a globalization can cut both ways,
Speaker 1: depends on how you manage it, but it still just
Speaker 1: means it. The goal is to be profitable for few
Speaker 1: and leave the majority dependent. Depending that's kind of always
Speaker 1: going to be the case because it's it's the few
Speaker 1: who innovate, and it's the few who who really run things,
Speaker 1: and it's and it's the many who just support you know,
Speaker 1: mechanisms that that beat the competitive market and make and
Speaker 1: and make the mechanism viable. You know, so you start
Speaker 1: to use I know exactly what you mean. We're gonna
Speaker 1: keep this load if you go that fall, We'll keep
Speaker 1: this on the human on the regular plans here and that.
Speaker 1: And that's why I said, I think even that type
Speaker 1: of thought is just inhumane. Like the point God blesses
Speaker 1: people with innovation and innovative minds is to do right
Speaker 1: by human beings. Right. The first verb outside of being
Speaker 1: a single sale organism right is the past information. That's
Speaker 1: literally the only goal of it. That's the whole purpose
Speaker 1: of the right past information. And then the first act
Speaker 1: for every human being is being humane right, which is
Speaker 1: to care for the next person, to care for human beings.
Speaker 1: And I think we found some space to where people
Speaker 1: think caring for somebody is to give them the bare
Speaker 1: minimum of existence. Like you said, the ability to not
Speaker 1: die outside is some false sense of what caring is.
Speaker 1: I had ah. I was on i G Live and
Speaker 1: I was talking to my childhood French Sherry that staying Florida,
Speaker 1: and heard and a guy I know brother named Book
Speaker 1: that Bill Low riders in the high desert. Shout out
Speaker 1: to Book they were mad at me about something I
Speaker 1: was saying alive. Uh. The conversation started. We're talking about
Speaker 1: she was saying, compared to the South and the West,
Speaker 1: like and I'm like, well, we kind of, you know,
Speaker 1: brothers on the West protests a little different, like we
Speaker 1: we are angry group and we're just not gonna play.
Speaker 1: And I was like, the brothers in the South, you know,
Speaker 1: they're a little bit more passive about letting certain things
Speaker 1: go because historically that's been the history, and long story short,
Speaker 1: we end up in this place of protesting. And she
Speaker 1: was like, yeah, but it don't make sense when people
Speaker 1: tear down their own community. And I said, well, that's
Speaker 1: the difference with this new generation. This new generation ain't
Speaker 1: tearing down their own community. This new generation is tearing
Speaker 1: down ship in wealthy communities right there, going over there
Speaker 1: to the malls, if they looten, if they tripping, they
Speaker 1: going over their raising hill. And I was telling her,
Speaker 1: I respect that. I thought that was brilliant, Like that's
Speaker 1: that's who you want to listen to. You, you want
Speaker 1: the wealthy elite to listen to you. And they could
Speaker 1: turn off the TV. You know what I'm saying. If
Speaker 1: you're doing in the your community because that's the only
Speaker 1: way they're gonna see it. But if you take that
Speaker 1: ship to let's say, the Beverly Center, they're forced to
Speaker 1: contend with your attitude. So I respected, and then I
Speaker 1: was expressing it. I said, right now, like, if you look,
Speaker 1: it's a whole flush of robberies going on, right because
Speaker 1: now you know the money, the inflation is happening. There's
Speaker 1: the money is drawing up on the streets. You know,
Speaker 1: ain't no more street drugs doing good. It's all pharmaceutical drugs.
Speaker 1: So somebody else got control over it. So now you're
Speaker 1: seeing the streets kind of wolf out, you know, people
Speaker 1: like hold up, like this ain't right, and now I'm
Speaker 1: gonna do with it, take to make sure that I
Speaker 1: am living and eating and getting the most I can
Speaker 1: out of life. So now they're not robbing uncle. You
Speaker 1: know Auntie Shirley that stay three houses down for her
Speaker 1: life savings. On the same street, they're going to Beverly
Speaker 1: Hills catching people at these be Stro's wearing a million
Speaker 1: dollar watch, right and they're like, we're gonna rob this person.
Speaker 1: And um, I was saying, I was proud of that
Speaker 1: I'm like, you know, that's the point of because if
Speaker 1: you want the wealthy to hear your voice, you have
Speaker 1: to be in their face, like your problem has to
Speaker 1: become their problem right there. The problems need to mess
Speaker 1: That's how women's gain other human beings attention. And I
Speaker 1: was saying I was proud of that, and I respected
Speaker 1: it because if you're going to rob somebody, don't rob
Speaker 1: a motherfucker with something. Don't rob no motherfucker two doors
Speaker 1: down fro your house. So they ain't gotten nothing. And
Speaker 1: they both were upset, like classes, I can't believe you
Speaker 1: encouraging people to rob people. You know, obviously they're hearing,
Speaker 1: they're not listening, right, It's hearing is a bodily function.
Speaker 1: Listening is a skill, right, you have to practice and
Speaker 1: take notes and really focus. So I'm telling her, I'm like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I never said that, And they were so upset, and
Speaker 1: we got into this conversation. You know, the point of
Speaker 1: what I was saying is we got to this conversation
Speaker 1: of being humane. If you know there are people starving,
Speaker 1: why in the funk would you buy a million dollar watch?
Speaker 1: How as a human men being could you be that
Speaker 1: disconnected from the human experience to where it's like the
Speaker 1: smartest decision you would make as a human beings, let
Speaker 1: me buy this million dollar watch. And I's somebody starting now,
Speaker 1: I get it. The reality is it just you selfish
Speaker 1: and no matter, there's no other excuse, It never makes
Speaker 1: no other sense, it's no other way to put it.
Speaker 1: It's any humane. It literally is in humane by definition, right,
Speaker 1: But we've came to this conclusion where we live a
Speaker 1: life where it's like I don't care about what nobody
Speaker 1: else going through. That's on them. That's literally the mentality
Speaker 1: or it's the bare minimum efforts, or it's the efforts
Speaker 1: that make you feel good, not actually the real things
Speaker 1: you should be doing as a human being. And that's
Speaker 1: where it starts at for me, Like we're living in
Speaker 1: this weird space in America, right, like where you said, like, right,
Speaker 1: you have to be super innovative, right, you have to innovative.
Speaker 1: You have to constantly plan for the expansion of people
Speaker 1: coming in. And it's tough in California because it ain't
Speaker 1: just necessarily people being born. You know, you have people
Speaker 1: you know coming from different countries. You know, you're not
Speaker 1: counting everybody there, So it's always gonna be a tough
Speaker 1: out for this country. It's always gonna be a tough
Speaker 1: out for this country. And you and you can't go
Speaker 1: against America's initial value. And and that's the point. Maybe
Speaker 1: the actual values that the American forefathers set up were
Speaker 1: not sustainable values or didn't contemplate everything that could happen.
Speaker 1: Then what I'm saying, I think I think the idea
Speaker 1: is better than the actual execution, right, because the whole
Speaker 1: theory of America was like give me your poor, get
Speaker 1: you know, give us your poor, you know, your blah
Speaker 1: blah blah. That was the theory of the socialist France
Speaker 1: wrote on the statue that they mailed us. So that's
Speaker 1: not any American forefather concept. I wouldn't say so, I
Speaker 1: would say I would say America as a haven for
Speaker 1: the ambitious and and and for those who wanted to
Speaker 1: have an opportunity to be upwardly mobile. Europe is a
Speaker 1: haven for the complacent and for those who don't who
Speaker 1: wants security and basic stuff. So at this point, then
Speaker 1: so if you are over the tragedy or the economic
Speaker 1: department of America, how do you fix dictatorship? Let's go forward.
Speaker 1: Dictator mode. How do you fix what's wrong with the
Speaker 1: American dollar? I mean, we'll dictator mode right now. If
Speaker 1: you right now, if women, if if the women around
Speaker 1: the world came to Pete and say, hey, Pete, we
Speaker 1: are tired of twissy being undervalue. Pussy is at his lowes.
Speaker 1: Nobody cares that pussy is worth nothing no more. Pete,
Speaker 1: give us the decisions that make decisions for us to
Speaker 1: bring the value of pussy back up to its highest levels.
Speaker 1: What would be the things you would tell women in America? Well,
Speaker 1: I'll put it in the financial terms first and the
Speaker 1: women terms second. The challenge with correcting the dollar situation
Speaker 1: and in a bruised economy. I mean like we're we
Speaker 1: have negative growth of first quarter. It does not feel
Speaker 1: like we're rebounding in the quarter or two of this
Speaker 1: year by any stretch of the imagination. So we are
Speaker 1: in an in a yet to be announced recession actively
Speaker 1: right now. You can't was that as a great politician.
Speaker 1: They don't want to use that word. Oh no, no, no,
Speaker 1: they'll say anything. Never want to use the word session.
Speaker 1: They'll change every metric available. Um, I'm sure, go ahead, Okay,
Speaker 1: you do as dictator Pete Uh, this American economy. What
Speaker 1: are the things and I mean ruthless, ruthless because it's
Speaker 1: it's it's ruthlessly executed to put it in this day.
Speaker 1: So what needs to be done ruthlessly to get us
Speaker 1: back on track? I mean you you really need to accelerate,
Speaker 1: like right now. Two things have happened actively for sure,
Speaker 1: by the government. There has been restriction of supply and
Speaker 1: products in certain areas. Obviously that needs to be reversed
Speaker 1: immediately and aggressively. And you have that again. Run that
Speaker 1: by me again. There's certain restrictions to supply on the
Speaker 1: product side that have happened. What supplies are being restricted
Speaker 1: exactly a lot of Obviously the most glaring one is
Speaker 1: oil drilling, natural gas drilling. I mean, the energy sector
Speaker 1: has been hit, has been pushed down on by the
Speaker 1: body administration the day he got in office. He was
Speaker 1: signing executive orders changing that the day he got in office.
Speaker 1: But this is the debate of what's healthy for the earth.
Speaker 1: Even though if you think about it, it's almost ridiculous.
Speaker 1: What I guess it kind of makes sense. Their minds
Speaker 1: have to be like, Okay, we know this hurts the earth,
Speaker 1: right over, using it does. You don't say this hurts
Speaker 1: the earth. Let me go gravel to Iran, Saudi Arabia
Speaker 1: and Venezuela so that their old rusty ship can go
Speaker 1: do the same thing that our ship was gonna do,
Speaker 1: and then we can spend the same money shipping their
Speaker 1: oil all the way up here instead of not having
Speaker 1: to pay for that. So you're saying it's a it's a.
Speaker 1: It's one of those things I tell my homie Joey
Speaker 1: west Side, where instead of being a good person, you're
Speaker 1: trying to look like a good person because somebody's from
Speaker 1: the earth anyway. So even if you're not taking your
Speaker 1: little sector, if you ain't taking it from the arm,
Speaker 1: somebody else taking it from the shoulder. And there's no
Speaker 1: e p A standard out there. It's not like our
Speaker 1: standard for emissions or whatever is being applied in ri
Speaker 1: Odd or in Venezuela's you know, northern coast. It's not so.
Speaker 1: I mean, do you think Russia and Vaterate Putine are
Speaker 1: counting the carbon molecules coming out of their refineries and
Speaker 1: they're drilling apparatus, etcetera, etcetera. No, they're not. They're counting
Speaker 1: the dollars in this case, they're counting their rubles. So
Speaker 1: in other words, we're just trying to look good like
Speaker 1: we're not doing it, but yet we still have to
Speaker 1: buy it and consume it. And then on top of that,
Speaker 1: we're also paying ships to send it across the ocean
Speaker 1: risk its spilling, and all the gas is just used
Speaker 1: to burn it and put into the air just to
Speaker 1: bring it. It is available under the under this soil
Speaker 1: that we call it the states there, Yeah, okay, okay,
Speaker 1: so okay, So the first thing you said, we gotta
Speaker 1: stop poll and looking like we're good people and not
Speaker 1: over consuming the Earth's natural resources. We gotta deal with
Speaker 1: the fact we are m if we're and if and
Speaker 1: if we're gonna say, look, we don't live in a
Speaker 1: fantasy world where we're gonna solar and wind power generate
Speaker 1: the world's largest economy and every other developed economy in
Speaker 1: the world today. It's not gonna happen. It's probably never
Speaker 1: gonna happen, to be honest, but it's certainly not gonna happen. Now,
Speaker 1: we don't pursue nuclear energy at all for reasons unbeknownst
Speaker 1: to man. The same it's so there's no fear of
Speaker 1: health at that point of when you are drilling for
Speaker 1: you and the possible contaminations in the air, is that
Speaker 1: is that really a thing that they're avoiding or really
Speaker 1: doesn't not matter because you have the same gas stations
Speaker 1: and the oil is coming or I guess maybe it's
Speaker 1: only coming on the truck or they're keeping it specific.
Speaker 1: Like what is the lie that they are telling to
Speaker 1: make this work? We know a lot that they're telling.
Speaker 1: I mean, at this point, the lighter telling it's just
Speaker 1: we don't we don't believe in fossil fuels. We believe
Speaker 1: in green energy. So you're buying going fossil okay, got it?
Speaker 1: Come on this Okay? So you have immediately you've got
Speaker 1: to get back down to getting your own oil. You
Speaker 1: get it? How you live? Yeah, you gotta do that.
Speaker 1: We can't. Like California is gonna be shutting down the
Speaker 1: Diabolo Valley nuclear power plants soon. I mean, how hysterical
Speaker 1: is that California has not enough electricity as it is.
Speaker 1: It's one of the largest electrical power sources in the
Speaker 1: state of California. So they're gonna shut that down and
Speaker 1: then also mandated every car and like ten years be electric?
Speaker 1: How are you gonna power the cars? So they just
Speaker 1: don't think anything through it all, so you know, there's
Speaker 1: no reality mystic again, it's back to that pose and
Speaker 1: trying to look like a good person versus really injury
Speaker 1: what it would take to do it, or in your
Speaker 1: in your face to feel like this is a your
Speaker 1: plan that you need to put together for four years
Speaker 1: where you can even think about doing it. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: then there's there are so many holes in the green
Speaker 1: energy thing, like one of the biggest issues, like like
Speaker 1: rare earth minerals. They're called rare earth minerals for a reason.
Speaker 1: They're rare. I mean, it's a strain coming up with
Speaker 1: enough material to just create the power cells for electrical
Speaker 1: cars for the market demand to exists today. Multiply that
Speaker 1: market demand by twenty we're gonna come up with this stuff,
Speaker 1: you know, or we're gonna completely and totally redefine like
Speaker 1: like there's gonna be some aha moment like the silicon
Speaker 1: chip is gonna rehappen where there's gonna be like a
Speaker 1: new piece of material. They're gonna have a carbon based
Speaker 1: energy fuel cell or something like that. It's like not
Speaker 1: gonna that's so abstracted, far far way to to try
Speaker 1: to coordinate an entire economy around now when like that
Speaker 1: that technology not only does it not exist readily, it
Speaker 1: really really doesn't even exist theoretically. Okay. So that's two things, right.
Speaker 1: So one you have to stop posing and you have
Speaker 1: to continue with the fact you use too much oil
Speaker 1: to not actually dig on your own soil for it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and the concept that you're using to actually make it work,
Speaker 1: which is, oh, we're going to gonna go bring energy,
Speaker 1: you have to accept that that's a a very much
Speaker 1: a long term plan, very very long term. Okay, Okay,
Speaker 1: what's the next thing. What's the third thing? The next
Speaker 1: thing is, I mean, to be honest, the hard that's
Speaker 1: the hardest part. I mean that that's a hard part.
Speaker 1: The hardest, hardest part is you have to caught all
Speaker 1: the bullshit out of the budget, stop stop spending a
Speaker 1: bunch of money, and be able to raise interest rates
Speaker 1: some So what's what's the bush rand? Paul does a
Speaker 1: great job of it. I mean, there is, that's a
Speaker 1: ten hour show. I mean, give me two or three
Speaker 1: things as bullshit economically, we okay, the amount of money
Speaker 1: we spend on researching ship. Here. Here, here's a really
Speaker 1: big one actually for like like for welfare programs. Right.
Speaker 1: I've seen it several times from different sources like the
Speaker 1: United Way and Grant. They have people who volunteer and
Speaker 1: stuff like that. But I think if you give a
Speaker 1: dollar to the United Way, eight cents reach its destination.
Speaker 1: When the taxation pulls a dollar for a social program
Speaker 1: for people who need help with either medical or just
Speaker 1: cash whatever it is, thirty cents seventy cents on the
Speaker 1: dollar is just administer rate of cost. It costs me
Speaker 1: twice as much money to hand you a check as
Speaker 1: the value of the check because of how bloated the
Speaker 1: federal government is in the state government's underneath it, which
Speaker 1: is insane. I imagine I owe you a hundred dollars,
Speaker 1: Well you better give me two hundred dollars to go
Speaker 1: give that hundred dollars to him. It's not very efficient,
Speaker 1: so you feel the elite is hustling us as well
Speaker 1: as so it's not necessarily what you're saying is before
Speaker 1: you even get something like welfare is elite hustling at
Speaker 1: the highest level. For silly ship by far, I mean
Speaker 1: obviously the United States government doesn't in and of itself
Speaker 1: produce anything, right other than like I guess postal service
Speaker 1: would be like the closest thing. If you were to
Speaker 1: look at the fifteen wealthiest counties in America, I think
Speaker 1: eight of them surround Washington, d C. But not all
Speaker 1: in Silicon Valley, and they're like all in northern Virginia,
Speaker 1: And would it be eastern Maryland or whatever the hell.
Speaker 1: It's just it's just it's just siphoning money. Let me
Speaker 1: think about, like, we run a deficit of like a
Speaker 1: trillion dollars a year, so our budgets like five trillion
Speaker 1: or something like that are a revenue. What you mean
Speaker 1: when you say they run a deficit of a trillion
Speaker 1: dollars a year. That means every year America is balancing
Speaker 1: owen niggas a trillion dollars every year. Yeah, we spend
Speaker 1: more than we make by a trillion. Like that. The
Speaker 1: GDP for the United States is like twenty trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: You gotta see you're talking at seven. You gotta talk
Speaker 1: at one, Okay. The the entire like dollar exchange value
Speaker 1: of the US economy is like twenty trillion dollars in
Speaker 1: a year. The government taxes off probably about a quarter
Speaker 1: of that. I think it's about five trillion in tax
Speaker 1: revenue that we do a year, if memory serves, I
Speaker 1: haven't looked at this stuff in a while, and we
Speaker 1: overspend that by about a trillion. That's most of that's nothing.
Speaker 1: The majority of that is like medicare shit, you know,
Speaker 1: twenty one or two percent as military spending, which half
Speaker 1: of that goes to just paying people to live who
Speaker 1: are in the military. A lot of it goes to
Speaker 1: weapons research, and a lot of it goes to horseship
Speaker 1: as we saw in Afghanistan. So yeah, they just have
Speaker 1: to say, look, there's no there's not enough accountability. You're
Speaker 1: gonna get people who are married like like the same
Speaker 1: people who are married to this green energy agenda almost
Speaker 1: like religiously, like they're emotionally married to it. Don't even
Speaker 1: logically makes sense. Yeah, you have people who are going
Speaker 1: to like, like Joe Bien right now is objectively doing
Speaker 1: a terrible job, and he's like physically mentally incompetent, Like
Speaker 1: there's not a lot of wiggle room on that. Likes,
Speaker 1: it's not like I hate the guy, And I was
Speaker 1: saying that everybody knows it's obviously falling over the bike.
Speaker 1: He's got a thirty five approval rating. One one in
Speaker 1: three people in this country are like, no, he's great.
Speaker 1: But you gotta understand what policy really is, what politics
Speaker 1: really is. It's not about actually making things better. It's
Speaker 1: about making people feel better, exactly. That's a big problem.
Speaker 1: Ever anybody can feel better sucking up. It's a problem though, Well,
Speaker 1: you know what, let me slow down. For sure, that's
Speaker 1: a problem here. For sure, that's a problem right in America.
Speaker 1: And that's a problem. But you know what, that also
Speaker 1: is a problem when intelligence is dim. I mean, when
Speaker 1: tellect is being dim, all you care about is how
Speaker 1: you feel. You're not thinking about what's actually better. Like
Speaker 1: I go through that all the time. Like I had
Speaker 1: a conversation with somebody again, Like I'm said, I'm telling Sherry,
Speaker 1: I'm like, you know, they live in a space where
Speaker 1: they want people to be Like I'm like, poor people
Speaker 1: should actually rebel in this country, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: Because it is the responsibility of the wealthy to do
Speaker 1: right by other human beings. I mean, that's the responsibility
Speaker 1: of human beings. Being humane is to care for humans.
Speaker 1: And we just do our idea of caring is that
Speaker 1: like if we treated a woman the way the wealthy
Speaker 1: treat the poor people in this country, everybody would call
Speaker 1: it we go to jail for abuse. We go to abuse.
Speaker 1: So now back to women, let's go back to this.
Speaker 1: What would women need to do to hounder the inflation
Speaker 1: of vagina to put the true value in the wonderfulness
Speaker 1: that is vagina. What needs to happen on all levels,
Speaker 1: like get you know what you you don't always do
Speaker 1: right by them, but do right by them now as
Speaker 1: it's performing. I always do right back women because I'm
Speaker 1: the only one out here telling them the truth. And
Speaker 1: this is the truth too. It's they need to do
Speaker 1: two things. One they need to stop doing like I
Speaker 1: was saying earlier, using the metric of value as a
Speaker 1: means to like the metric of wealth as a way
Speaker 1: to gain wealth. So right now they're just they do
Speaker 1: a lot of currency trading. You know, they're trying to
Speaker 1: get something for cheap for the pussy all the time.
Speaker 1: They need to knock that ship off and they need
Speaker 1: to accelerate the supply of stuff that you would want
Speaker 1: to get for the pussy. Like right now, there there's
Speaker 1: no goods Like, Okay, so let's say, like, like what
Speaker 1: if you like a woman is basically saying to me,
Speaker 1: I'll give you the pussy if you take the rest
Speaker 1: of me. Pitch, what the fund is that? So you're
Speaker 1: saying pussy in its inception has no value. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying in this exception, it has no value evolutionarily, like
Speaker 1: we have a drive to like need to do that.
Speaker 1: You know, it's like hardwired in our DNA for I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously other human beings come out that portal. Yeah, so
Speaker 1: did the issue is they're they're they're convinced that's that's
Speaker 1: the most valuable part of them. I'm saying that. I'm
Speaker 1: saying right now, what's what's going on is women see
Speaker 1: all right, this is this is my valuable currency that
Speaker 1: I can use how I want to. Instead of using
Speaker 1: it to elevate my you know, my or the market's
Speaker 1: demand for me, I'm going to use it to get
Speaker 1: things out of the market. So it's now turned into
Speaker 1: four X trading instead of value measuring. So you're saying,
Speaker 1: instead of them people wanting to pussy, So then they
Speaker 1: raised them up higher on the platform for other people
Speaker 1: to see. They're exchangeon it for Birken bags cars, thinking
Speaker 1: that somebody sees these things and puts value on the pussy.
Speaker 1: It's like, oh, I get, I agree. I agree. Girls
Speaker 1: who think because they're walking around with a three thousand
Speaker 1: dollar burking bag and jumping out of c two forty
Speaker 1: bands feel like they're pussy is more valuable than the
Speaker 1: motherfucker has walked on the bus stop. But in reality,
Speaker 1: us as men, we don't see any difference. No, we don't.
Speaker 1: And because this in theory, it's not better. Oh no matter,
Speaker 1: it's like you get in the same way. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: just look at it all. That one's way more overpriced
Speaker 1: than that one. Good looking out for tuning into the
Speaker 1: No Sellers podcast. Please do us a favorite, subscribe, rate, comment,
Speaker 1: and share. This episode was recorded right here on the
Speaker 1: West coast of the USA and produced by my homeboy
Speaker 1: A King for the Black Effect Podcast Network. And I
Speaker 1: heard radio. Yeah,