WEBVTT - Traders Ready for CPI and Apple Partners with OpenAI

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene along

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 2>with Paul Sweeney. Join us each day for insight from

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 2>can also watch the show live on YouTube.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Visit the Bloomberg.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>from seven to ten am Eastern from our global headquarters

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>in New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always I'm Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 3>This is a joy.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 2>He is definitive in the world. A use of gold.

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>James Steele joins now from HSBC. Really honored to have

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>you in our studios. If we were to walk near

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 2>our offices by the Ritz Carlton in Dubai, where Jumana

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Bertecci holds court, but if we go down by the

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>canal in the old historic souks, where all of the

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Indian Ocean, all of Eurasia buys gold, what would be

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the mood in the souks of Dubai.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, first of all, thank you for having me, Tom

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 4>it's a real pleasure, I think, one of restraint. And

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 4>now that we've seen such a big price rises, what

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 4>has resonated through the physical side of things, And that's

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 4>not hedge funds, that's not asset managers, portfolio managers. That's

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 4>the people on the ground, rich and poor, buying gold.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 4>There's been a pullback. Bar demand is down. Physical coin

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 4>demand is down. We know that because the premiums have

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 4>come in. All the major mints are reporting somewhat lower demand,

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 4>with exception of the Royal Mint, which has been a

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 4>function of the election. So there's a trigger day demand

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>for and coins, which we tend to see. If it

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 4>ever looks in a democracy that the center left are

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 4>going to win, there tends to be an increase in

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 4>gold demand. But other than that, there's been there's been

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 4>a pullback.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I got to ask the question of the day.

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Is Fort Knox still like Goldfinger? Is Fort Knox still

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>where we keep all our gold?

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 4>This is where we keep our gold in the United States,

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>And it has, to my knowledge, about thirty thousand highly

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 4>trained troops guarding it.

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>So it's like Goldfinger still.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 4>It is it is there, and and it's it's it's

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:35.959
<v Speaker 4>the country's gold.

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Like is a bar of gold set at Fort Knox

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>for like sixty years or dare I say they've.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Been it's been there, it's been.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 4>It's been there a long time.

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>And Fort Knox is not at costco, Yes, exactly.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 4>The the you know, gold goes where the money goes.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 4>And in the inter war and post war period it

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 4>came to the United States out of Europe. In the seventies,

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 4>it went from the Advanced countries to the Middle East

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 4>with oil, and now it's going to Asia. So and

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>this is true for the last two thousand years, gold

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 4>has followed where the money goes.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, talk to us about China. Can you tell us

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 5>just give us a sense of demand for gold in China.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what I've heard.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know anything about the gold business, but they

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 5>say China. What's China mean for a gold demand? Who's

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 5>buying gold?

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 4>I think you have to break it down into two components.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 4>One is central bank demand, the demand from the People's

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Bank of China, which, like all central bank demand, not

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>just theirs, is somewhat opaque and we never get timely

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 4>information generally speaking.

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 3>And also.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 4>The demand outside of the People's Bank Now the demand

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 4>outside of the People's Bank has been very good, but

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 4>it's not necessarily because there's such devotees of gold. The

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 4>property market is down, the equity markets are down, and

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 4>most people in China don't quite have the same suite

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 4>of investments, even at the most sophisticated end, at the

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 4>professional investor end that we do, or British or American

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 4>hedge funds have, et cetera, et cetera. So when both

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 4>those things are down, gold is a winner by default,

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 4>and that's what we've seen. I don't necessarily think it's

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 4>because of a mad love affair with gold, and I

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 4>suspect that when or if I suppose when, is more

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the question. The property market stabilizes, the equity markets they're stabilized,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 4>will get gold underfunded. Now the central bank buying is

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 4>very different, and that's government buying.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 4>They reported you might as well noticed the pullback in

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 4>gold a few days ago. Last week, well, they reported

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 4>unchanged gold reserves for the previous month. That did not

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 4>mean that they've stopped buying. It just meant that they

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 4>didn't buy that month. That was misinterpreted, I think by

0:05:01.839 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 4>the market, and we got a very abrupt decline of

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>seventy seven seventy nine dollars that day, But it wasn't

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 4>a policy statement. They just said our gold reserves at

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>the end of May were the same as they were

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 4>at the end of April, and they had been accumulating

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>gold every month for the previous eighteen months.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 3>So how about silver.

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:24.239
<v Speaker 5>Do we think about silver different because that's up twenty

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 5>four percent this year? Is that just rising tides? Looking

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 5>all boats for silvers or special you do.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Tend to get a gold silver ratio that people will trade.

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 4>And I remember in the old days down at the

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 4>World Trade Center when I worked on the comes, when

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 4>it was called that, I would see people look over

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 4>at the silver booth and then back back to the

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 4>gold and they would trade. That's exactly how it used

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 4>to work. So the silver market's considerably less voluminous than

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 4>the gold market, and so when you get a big

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>moving gold, you generally get silver lifted. Now, the big

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 4>difference between the two is that over fifty percent something

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 4>like we estimate about fifty seven fifty eight percent of

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 4>silver demand is not for bars or jewelry or coins

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 4>the way it is for gold.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Industrial.

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>It's industrial exactly, and everything Now, even though we forecast

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 4>rather sluggish industrial production growth this year, everything you need

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 4>silverflo is growing at an above rate. So we think

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 4>the silver demand industrial demand is moving at twice the

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>rate of underlying industrial growth.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>There is a book that is like James Steele wrote

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 2>the screenplay. It is William Silber Definitive of nineteen fourteen,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 2>when we took the gold standard from Britain. He literally

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>describes the boat coming across the ocean where McAdoo said,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 2>it's our time and we became dominant. There's a content,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 2>there's a fear out there James Steele, that someday there's

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be a boat to China where they steal

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 2>the gold standard from us. They deal they steal dollars,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>sovereigntry from us.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>How do you respond to it, Well, I think there's

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 4>enough room for everybody. The United States is an enormously

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 4>large economy. But I think what you're touching on is

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 4>maybe this issue of dollar d dollarization, and that's been

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 4>ascribed to some of the reasons that central banks, not

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 4>just China, have been buying gold. No, we don't believe

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 4>that there's going to be any loss of sovereignty for

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 4>the US dollar as far as the world's reserve currency

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 4>goes for the next ten twenty years, as far as

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 4>you can see for reasons that would take an entire program,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 4>you and I could talk about it. But that's not

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 4>to say that every single central bank in the world

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 4>wants as many dollars as they do have. They may

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 4>want to reduce their reserves by say sixty five percent

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 4>to sixty two So what do you do with that

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 4>three percent? Well, there's they're very limited as to what

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 4>they can buy, both in fixed income and for currencies,

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 4>and there may be a reason that they wouldn't want

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 4>to buy the euro or the yen, and gold provides

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 4>a perfect sweet spot of getting out of the dollar

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 4>without going into something else.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, this is where I wanted to go. It's like

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>you read my script.

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Gartman, very different from James Steele, has nailed gold up.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>But he's also nailed it gold up in Japanese yen.

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 2>And it's shocking what Gartman predicts if Japan doesn't get

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 2>their act together and you don't see strong ye and

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you see continued week yen. Is there a linkage between

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>James Steele's world of gold and currency that signals a

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>huge opportunity in Europe.

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you know much of that is the

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 4>currency play as well. Yes, and exactly, And you take.

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 3>It over to Jeremiah. I mean you guys are on

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>speaking terms, right.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 4>I haven't spoken in a while, but we have done.

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 4>I think I can't remember when.

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.199
<v Speaker 2>Talks daylight Steve Major, but Derren Myer, forget it.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 4>But they're they're both. They are both brilliant analysts. Say,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 4>I want to go on record as saying, but and

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 4>that's what we've seen. That's one of the reasons that

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 4>the physical demand for gold has weakened. If not only

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 4>has gold gone up, but in Roupeat terms, for example,

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 4>it's enormously expensive. So so yes, gold would be high

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.319
<v Speaker 4>in Japanese terms if the end we're to weaken. But

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>but that's almost I don't want to quite say sophistry,

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 4>but it's getting on.

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 3>For we could say sophistry and survants. I don't know

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>how to spell it.

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 6>Exactly.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Jim gl c O the Global Commodities Monitor, that's all

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 5>I know about your business, commodities business. What's the trade

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 5>that people want to talk to you most about these days?

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, trying to figure out a gold. One of the

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 4>one of the interesting things is that I've just come

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 4>back from Europe, and both in Europe and North America,

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 4>the previous rallies have had a clear smoking gun. This

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 4>one hasn't so much right, And that's what makes it

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 4>so interesting because it's a couple of things. There's geopolitics

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 4>going on as well. And one of the thing I

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 4>just want to mention, and why it's so influential, is

0:10:13.200 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>that you can come to me and you can say, Jim,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 4>what happens to gold? Usually when the FED cuts by

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 4>fifty base points or when it increases but or when

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the dollar goes up this much or down this much.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 4>But Gaza is different from Ukraine, It's different from the

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 4>South China Sea, its different from the Taiwan Straits, and

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 4>so every geopolitical event may have a different impact on gold.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>You can't muddel it.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Forty seconds left here, I'm asking for a friend. What's

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 2>the markup on gold? It a fancy store in fifty

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>seventh Street, like Tiffany.

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 3>It's very very high. Thank you. It's good to know that.

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you say a double hundreds of percent plural?

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, you're paying, but you're paying for the artistry, and

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 4>you're paying for the for the workmanship.

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 3>You're not paying for the blue book, paying.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 4>For the you're paying for that too.

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, and.

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 4>That's it's it's it's well worth it. It hasn't dimmed

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 4>they demand at the high end. But it's one of

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 4>the reasons the gold price doesn't doesn't change. And so

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 4>whereas in Asia you'll see that the markup is very

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 4>low and the price is changed rapidly in the shops.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. This has been a pleasure. Please come in again.

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, Tom, Thank you for having me.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 2>James Steele with a question the definitive guy on fundamental

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Gold around this world from the Canal of Dubai to

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Asia to Fort Knax. I saw a Goldfinger like a

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>while back. What a great movie. Still, I've never.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Been anybody I try to play a concert, you.

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Know, I was, I was going to say, but I

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 4>thought it would be a party political broadcast. Our vault

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 4>is the second biggest vault in the American continent after

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Fort Knox.

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow, excuse me? Can I pray tell? Can I ask?

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Where is the HSBC vault?

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, four fifty two Fifth Avenue. I could have taken

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 4>you into it a couple of years.

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Ours taken notes. Thank you James always.

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Great, James till thank you so much, huge, huge, huge

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 2>comments for James steal As there should be Virginia Mesanu

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>joins us now, yes, global cio equity at Alian's what

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 2>we really want to hear from her about this turmoil, Virginy.

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 2>What happened is Charles de Gaulle's fifth Republic? Where did

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the middle go that Charles de gaud built out of

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 2>World War Two?

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, I you know, it's it's really interesting and the

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 7>results of the European elections were really shocking in a way,

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 7>although not unexpected that I would say, you know, the

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 7>quantum of that shift is really important. It's a bit

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 7>of a uniform trend. You have Poland, Holland, France, Germany, Sweden,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 7>they've all moved towards more the far right. And of

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 7>course the action that President Macrostecon calling for a snap

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 7>election yesterday is is really important. Right, It's a bit

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 7>but I think, yeah, he's got some good rationale for

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:33.719
<v Speaker 7>doing it, but it's going to be really interesting.

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Visionie.

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 2>I think of a list of surveillance guests, including Madame Leguard,

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>who have a transatlantic perspective. You're on that short list.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Can the tensions, the political tensions of Europe carry over

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 2>into America, in particularly to November of this year's election.

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think they are definitely linked in the sense

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 7>that if you look at President Macon, he's done quite

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 7>well on the economic front, the defense front, if you want,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 7>the diplomacy front. But some of the concerns that I've

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 7>led the French electorate to move to the right, where

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 7>domestic issues, issues of security, fear of the war, terrorist attacks,

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 7>a lot of attacks on kids at school for example,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 7>immigration integration, you know, all those issues are important. And

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 7>of course the far right party is more in support

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 7>as Madame Lupinne and Bardella have made it public, more

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 7>in support of Trump. And also there's definitely some links there, Paul,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 3>We need to clear this up.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I've had a lot of criticism about the use by

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg a far right.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 3>We are not editorializing their folks.

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 2>The parties are actually there's three, and they're actually called

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>far right. When we say far right, that's the identifiable

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>name of three of the fraction parties of the more

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.239
<v Speaker 2>conservative wing of French politics.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 5>VI Jinnie talk to us about when we think about

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 5>over the last twenty four hours of the European Union

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 5>and in France with the snap elections, how much of

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 5>that is economics, how much are people concerned about their

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 5>economic outlook, inflation and so on.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 7>Part of it is inflation, but I really think it's

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 7>all about security, immigration and in a way a vote

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 7>against green Green scene as a cost. It is really

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 7>interesting if you see one of the biggest loser, of

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 7>course is the Green Party. So I think that combined

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 7>with the rising popularity of mister Bardella, the twenty eight

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 7>year old, that if in fact there's a majority in

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 7>the next elections for Madame Lupinn, he could become a

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 7>very important part of the political life. And of course

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 7>he's very untested. The President Macon had promoted Monsieur Taala

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 7>as a younger if you want, politician, although older than Bordella,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 7>and in the recent debates around the key topics around

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 7>electrification et cetera, it was very clear that mister Baldella

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 7>was not really prepared for such a mandate. And I

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 7>think that's the point that McCoy is trying to make.

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 7>Bring them in and see how they will or will

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 7>not be able to do as a big part of

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 7>the government and hopefully influence in his mind the next

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 7>elections in a couple of years in twenty seven.

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 5>All right, So, Reginia, given all that backdrop here that

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 5>we've seen over the last again couple of days coming

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 5>out of Europe at alliance, how do you think about just,

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 5>you know, allocating capital across the globe. I mean, how

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 5>do you think that Europe versus the US versus is

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 5>friends on sales.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Friends on sales.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 6>That's simple.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 7>You might be able to buy it a bit cheaper.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, in general, the European markets are quite cheap.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 7>Of course, what you have supporting the markets is also

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 7>the rate cuts taking place ahead of the FED. And

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 7>of course what are the next ones? When are the

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 7>next one? Is the big questions. You also have some

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 7>interesting themes around electrification, around industrials and and and the

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 7>energy transition. So we have not only the climate transition

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.479
<v Speaker 7>but also the energy transition given what's happening with Russia,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 7>and that is an important part of investment that I

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 7>think is interesting for global investors.

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>This has been very valuable Virginie Messina, who thank you

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>so much with allions as we are audible towards the turmoil,

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the political.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Turmoil in France. How do you go summer claudiate USC?

0:17:57.320 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 6>I got to show up for class to do that.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Will running us now with parchment from USA and distinguished

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 2>at that as Lauren Goodwin, she strategius in New.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>York life as well.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 2>What was it like grinding and getting a deserved summicum

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>laudie at USC? Were you the only one in class

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 2>five days a week?

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, they just hold class on the lawn, right, you.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Have to have economics on the law.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Really a whiteboard that rolls on wheels. I still have

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one in my office. Actually it's a signature tree.

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 3>They literally would.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Roll the whiteboard out onto the lawn nose.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>But I did take a skateboarder class.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 5>You did take a skateboard to class.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I took a snowshovel and I'm lucky I got home. Lauren,

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 2>thanks for being with She worked for venerable firm. We've

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 2>done too much of the parlor game today. On the FED,

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 2>where's this fed going to be in a year or

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in six months?

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 3>Do they have a plan or are they literally making

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 3>it up? Report the report?

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're trying really hard to walk this

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>tightrope between really where they sit right now, which is

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that the data are slowing. They believe they're restrictive, but

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they want to make sure that that doesn't turn into

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>a policy mistake of being restrictive for too long. I

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>think that the challenge that they face on the six

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to twelve month time horizon is that we're in a

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>very capital intensive phase of economic activity. That's related to

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, it's related to electrification and infrastructure. This is

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a policy environment but also a corporate spending environment that's

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>constructive for economic activity, and that's going to be one.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>We're getting inflation closer to two percent. Allowing them to

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>pull rates back to two and a half percent is

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>just going to take time.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 5>So there's a lot of folks out there in academia

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 5>and in practice in the marketplace that are saying the

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 5>FED is missing the boat already. They need to be

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 5>cutting rates.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 5>What do you say to those folks?

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I tend to agree on the idea of the PI

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that the time may be now for the pivot, and

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>that's because we are seeing not the aggregate economy, but

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>areas of interest rate sensitive sectors, areas of lower income consumers,

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>businesses that use banks or floating rate credit to borrow.

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's been the case that that turning point has

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been taking place over the past couple of years. And

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so if we are looking to soft land the economy,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the evidence is in that inflation is moving

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 1>reliably downward. That's something that's that's that's been clear to

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>me over the last six months, and so I do

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>think that if the FED we're looking to extend the

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>cycle soon would.

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Be the time bring your economics over to investment a

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 2>bond portfolio, in equity portfolio, do you need to set

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 2>your actuarial assumption higher because of higher for longer or

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 2>because of a new reset in our start?

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe that you do. Our star I believe has

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>moved a bit higher as a result of this capital

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>intensive stage of economic growth that we're in. And it's

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an environment where even in a traditional investor portfolio, you

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>investors may be missing the point in the transition point

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so what an actual assumption If you're popping six

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 2>percent and you're telling me I have to go to

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>seven percent, that means I have to put more funding

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>into my institutional or retail retirement account.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yes, that's right.

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 3>This is a big deal.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 5>I know.

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is the government's way behind on this.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 2>There should be increased levels in four oh one ki R. Yeah,

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and pension and profit share.

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 5>On the sweeney offsprings are all maxing album the full

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 5>one kg and guarantee you that, Lauren, I love your

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 5>notes here. You give us some high conviction ideas here.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 5>You say that equity valuations are high. A lot of

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.239
<v Speaker 5>folks believe that. All right, what do I deal? I'm

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 5>not going to sell? Well, what do I do here?

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 5>If I feel like equity valuations are high? What are

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 5>my alternatives?

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think that you have to stay invested, and

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>so what I'm about to say is not sell off

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>all your equity and put it into somewhere else. But

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that we've seen considerable gains, and the

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>average investor, if they had a sixty forty portfolio a

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>year ago or two years ago, they don't have that now.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And so if the question is where do I put

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>new money or where do I put those gains? I

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>think that given where we are in the cycle and

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the strength that we've seen in the credit market, we've

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>got an environment where those equity market gains may be

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>better activated in fixed income and specifically in high yield. Okay,

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a sector that, while of course risks arising for

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the market as a whole, you have an interesting high coupon.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>We're also seeing investors start to diversify their US equity

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>into international equity and move their cash into short duration

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>fixed income to try to lock in the higher rates

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that we have. You think the FED cuts in September

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>or December or even January, the next couple of months

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are historically the time to get in to capture those

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>higher yields before the market starts to react.

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:52.399
<v Speaker 5>You know, we've been talking Tom and I have been

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 5>this morning about Apple and AI. How do you guys

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 5>think about AI? Is that's something you invest You just

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 5>own and say, okay, I've got my AI trader. How

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 5>do you guys think about that?

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is something over the past year that

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>we've taken a deep dive on, not just in the

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>investment arm of our company, but also in the corporate

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>insurance company, working together to understand what these trends might

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>look like. There's a couple of ways to think about it.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>I think First, the areas of the market, the Magnificent

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>seven that have already seen gains from AI. It's going

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.959
<v Speaker 1>to be very difficult to displace these companies. That's because

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the cost the barriers to entry of this foundational layer

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of technology are just very high. They're doing good work

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 1>that people want, but it takes a lot of power

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and infrastructure to do those things. So we think there's

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a physical layer of artificial intelligence that can be invested

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>in via equity, bonds, real estate, and in the future

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be regulation and ethics that shape corporate

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>use cases. We're not there yet.

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't want you to get in trouble with the

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 2>general counsul of New York Life, but CIRE is not

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>getting fun. I mean, just in the last month thirty days,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 2>it's really deteriorated. What's the fear level there?

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, the fear level I would say is aware

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>but not fearful, if that makes sense. So a couple

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of things. First, when we look at a global real

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>estate portfolio, we believe the bottom is in and other

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, including in Asia and in Europe

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 1>where office space is being used more. In the US,

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>there's still price discovery happening. That's a lot of the

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>newsflow that we see. There's a lot of what we're

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the news over the past couple of couple

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of weeks. But when we think about,

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do you do now? It is very

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>likely that we're going to continue to see valuations written down,

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>much in the way that's happened in brick and mortar

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>retail over the last decade. I think that these write

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>downs continue over the next several years. But commercial real

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>estate is diversified differently from office I think regional banks

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>are less allocated to real estate than is typically appreciated,

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and so this is a painful piece for investors in

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio. Across the board. It's going to take time

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>to play out. But the systemic risk, all investors have

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>their eye on that, So I'm not as concerned.

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Lauren, thank you so much.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 8>Lauren goodred with us in New York Life.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 3>This is a surprise.

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let me describe it for you as a best

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I can Apple one ninety six comes down, one ninety three,

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>doom and gloom, and then everybody read Gene Munster, Paul,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and we got a moonshot on opening trading right up

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 2>buttressed against one ninety eight. That's Apple up five dollars

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 2>off the gloom of yesterday afternoon.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, stock an early trading tom up two point four

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 5>per hundred ninety eight dollars. It gives you a market

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 5>cap three point zero three trillion dollars. Stocks up about

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 5>twenty percent year to date.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 2>What a joy to speak to Mark German of Bloomberg

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 2>News yesterday. Definitive on Apple. Let's listen.

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 9>You saw nothing today that's better than the competition. You

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 9>saw nothing today that's different from the competition except marketing

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 9>and a focus on privacy. Right, So that's the difference here.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 9>They're not the first, but they're also not the best,

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 9>and they're not the most advanced. They're here extremely late,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 9>and they showed up to the party without a gift.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 2>It showed up to the party, and we saw it.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday's full disclosure. I turned it off after sixteen minutes

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 2>because I knew Genemunster would tell us what the hell

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 2>happened yesterday deep water asset managements at Gene Monster.

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Jane, I saw your Twitter feed.

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 2>It's simple. The market listened to Gene Munster. Why is

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Apple up five dollars off the gloom of five pm yesterday.

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 10>The reasons it up is because that even though these

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 10>features are features that we have seen that those that

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 10>have been following AI for the past year have seen

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 10>from other companies, the reason why this dock goes up

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 10>is these features are now going to be brought to

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 10>Apple users for the first time. They are transformative, and

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 10>Apple is going to require you to upgrade your hardware

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 10>to get access to these and so about eighty five

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 10>percent of the Apple hardware is going to be needed

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 10>to upgrade. And at the most basic level is that

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 10>these features are going to be something that I believe

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 10>consumers are going to want.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 2>When will the cell side modify their what ifs, their

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>margins ratios, their free cash flow guesstimates? Does that happen now?

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Does it happen ninety days from now? Does it happen

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six.

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 10>I think what you'll see is maybe twenty percent of

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 10>the analysts are generally on board with this is going

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 10>to have a nice lift over the next one to

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 10>three years, and so you'll see some of those changes

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 10>probably before they report the June quarter. So call it

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 10>in the next month or so, and then you'll see

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 10>the next phase, call it thirty percent will come in

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 10>after the next iPhones come out, which will be middle

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 10>of September, and then the laggards, the fifty percent, will

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 10>probably come in early, probably when they report their December

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 10>quarter of twenty twenty four, so that will be early

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 10>in twenty five. But I think that the trajectory of

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 10>this is you want to own stocks ahead of positive

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 10>earnings revisions, and I think over the next six to

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 10>nine months we're going to see those. And just to

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 10>kind of put a final thought on what the magnitude

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 10>of those revisions are, is that we're talking about growth

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 10>going from call it two percent in calendar twenty four

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 10>to around ten percent in calendar twenty five and maybe

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 10>twelve percent in calendar twenty six. So it's a nice

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 10>move higher. It's a far cry from what we've seen

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 10>from some of these other aipower companies in terms of

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:50.959
<v Speaker 10>their growth rates, but it is for Apple, up twelve percent,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 10>up ten percent is much better than the down two

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 10>that they have reported on average per quarter for the

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 10>last year and a half.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Paul Apple off the April gloom, that's where I sold

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>everything up percent.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 5>Now zero perfect timing. Again, Hey Geene, I'm out here

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 5>sporting an iPhone eleven? Is this changed to a Is

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 5>that going to prompt me to get back into the

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Apple Store and upgrade in September?

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 6>I think it will.

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 10>And again, I think that this is the fundamental piece

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 10>that a lot of those who just analyze this so

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 10>closely are focused on the trees versus the forest. Is

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 10>that I think that people like you are going to

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 10>see these features and want to get upgraded. And maybe

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 10>in your case, you're probably due for an upgrade either way.

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 10>But I think in the case of many people who

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 10>are three years out, I think that they're going to

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 10>see these features and undoubtedly want them. This is the

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 10>biggest change in Apple since the iPhone came out, and

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 10>that's a bold statement, but just to put some perspective

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 10>on it. Over the past, call it fifteen or so

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 10>years since the iPhone came out, what we have seen

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 10>is that, you know, we've had things like Vision Pro,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 10>We've had services like Apple TV Plus, we've had the iPad,

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 10>we've had the App Store. Those have been kind of

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 10>the cornerstone announcements. But what this fundamentally does is change

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.959
<v Speaker 10>the way that we interact with these devices. It's going

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 10>to add more value and Paul, I think that that

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 10>is going to be a major catalyst for upgrades here.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 5>So it's interesting, Gene. I'm certainly ready for it. You're right,

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 5>I need to get out there and upgrade. But so,

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 5>how do you think Apple is really approaching AI? Gene?

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Is this kind of like the first salvo in what

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 5>will be a kind of a multiple product or multiple

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 5>software kind of approach to really capturing AI in some

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 5>of the use cases?

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 6>It is, This is definitely the first step.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 10>And I think what we've seen is this distinction between

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 10>small versus large models, and so from a consumer perspective,

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 10>you don't need to worry about that, no need to

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 10>think about what the distinction is. But Apple is really

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 10>tackling the small models first. That's going to be that's

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:05.959
<v Speaker 10>going to be the parts of it that are going

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 10>to do things related to our photos and our messages.

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.960
<v Speaker 10>All that data is going to be kept encrypted in

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 10>private on your device, but the things that you can

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 10>do with that is relatively limited. To put in a

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 10>perspective that we measure the intelligence on these models in

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 10>terms of parameters in the case of these models. These

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 10>are three billion parameter models. That's a three billion parameter

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 10>model GPT four. They haven't disclosed what that is, but

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 10>it's probably around a trillion, and so this is an

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 10>order of magnitude different. They need to get more to

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 10>answer question Paul, in the next three to five years,

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 10>to get more into those large language models to really

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 10>have control of their AI future.

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Jane Eric Schmidt didn't walk out on stage yesterday. Is

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 2>there any continuing dialogue with Google to me the bombshell,

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 2>even with a litigation various and sundry governments going after them.

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I guess they got a linkage of Apple

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>and Microsoft's open AI, but am I going to get

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 2>a relationship between Apple and Google?

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 10>So that's going to have This is going to have

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 10>some formative impact. And just to quickly recap as Google

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 10>pays Apple somewhere between thirteen and fifteen billion dollars a

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:18.479
<v Speaker 10>year to have Google as the default in your Safari browser,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 10>so it's a big number.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 6>Google has a product that.

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 10>Competes with Opening Eyes GPT that they didn't get the business,

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 10>so they're probably frustrated with that, but that's beyond the point.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 10>What the point is is that Google makes their decisions

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 10>based on data, and if it continues to be profitable

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 10>for them to pay Apple thirteen plus.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 6>Billion dollars a year, they'll do that.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 10>But one aspect here, as Apple integrates GPT into their experience,

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 10>people will Google search less, and so I suspect that

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 10>the value of the deal with Google will diminish over

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 10>time because it's simply there's just going to be more

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 10>usage that's going to be shifting towards GPT.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 6>Apple did say.

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 10>They will eventually allow you to plug M and I

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 10>into some of their base applications, so we'll see how

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 10>that plays out longer term.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I got another hour of questions Geene monster, thank you

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 2>so much, and I should find out mister Munster deep

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 2>water just tireless out on LinkedIn and Twitter.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Just I mean, he was the informative voice yesterday.

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely everybody else is doing their thing and Gene's d vailue.

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you know, Gene put in context a while

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 5>ago to talk about it, AI. I mean he puts

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 5>it right up there with electricity as to the impact

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 5>upon you know, yes, I feel in consumers, and he

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 5>puts the Internet at like forty just to give you

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 5>a sense of scale and magnitude of how Gene views

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 5>AI and its impact on technology.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, bringing you the best

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 2>in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. You can also

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 2>watch the show live on YouTube.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:54.959
<v Speaker 3>Visit the Bloomberg.

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Podcast channel on YouTube to see the show weekday mornings

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 2>from seven to ten Eastern from our global headquarters in

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 2>New York City. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and always on Bloomberg Radio,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business app.