WEBVTT - How NPR's Former CEO Left the Liberal Bubble and Learned to Love the Right

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Well,

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Republicans returning to Washington, they've got to decide whether they

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to set aside or support a bipartisan healthcare bill.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>It has gained some acceptance in Congress. Indeed, Senate Minority

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Leader Chuck Schumer said over the weekend that the bill include.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>The bill's support includes all of the forty eight Senate Democrats,

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as twelve publicly committed Republicans, enough to overcome

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>any filibuster. So is there a chance of some kind

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of bar bi partisan resolution here? To help us understand

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the divide that exists between Republicans and Democrats is Ken Stern.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>He is an author and the former chief executive of NPR,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and he's the author of the new book entitled Republican

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Like Me, How I Left the Liberal Bubble and learned

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to love the right, and he joins us in our studio,

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>can thank you for being here, thanks for having me

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on the show. Well, maybe as a jumping off point,

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 1>this idea that because we're waiting to hear what's gonna

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>happen with any kind of health care legislation, I wonder

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>if you could kind of take that and then explain

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>why you wrote this book and a little bit of

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>your experience learning about different perspectives when it comes to

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>such important issues like healthcare. Yeah, I think it's actually

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting example. So let me tell you why I

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>wrote the book, and then we'll tie it into healthcare.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So I wrote the book because I've become increasingly concerned

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>about the polarization. Um More and more we live in

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.559
<v Speaker 1>our own world. We don't um communicate with the other side,

0:01:55.960 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've continued to think a worse than were to

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the other side. And it actually has relatively little to

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do with issues issue polarization. How much we disagree hasn't

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really changed in this country over the last twenty five years.

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>How much we hate the other side has gone off

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the charts. Um So, so my book is really and

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's a reason for that. The reason has become

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>more divided geographically and demographically. We don't know the other side.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>When you don't know the other side, it becomes easy

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to demonize them. Um. So my book was about me

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>leaving my democratic m ward in washing d C. And

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>spending as much time as I could with Republicans where

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they work, where they pray, where they where they hunt. Uh.

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was an eye opening experience for me. And

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I learned along the way is

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>when it comes when you get polarized like this, it's

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>often not about substances, about whether you're winning or losing.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a lot of social science around it doesn't

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>actually matter that actually underlying merits doesn't matter. It's about

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>my side beating your side. And I think that's a

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>lot to do with politics and washing d C. Right now,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you can before we get into what you found as

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you to this trip across the country. I'm wondering whether

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you are saying that as the chief executive officer, the

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>former chief executive officer of NPR, you think that NPR

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and other media outlets do perpetuate these ideas well. I

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think so, So let's that's actually two different issues to

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about. There um. In the broader scheme of things,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>um um. I think what media, like all people do,

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they live in their own bubble. Uh, they're in a

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>place they they they tend to perpetuate themselves. They hire

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>people like themselves. Uh, they think like themselves. They have

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a confirmation bias always going on. And it's not a

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily intentional thing, but it's an important thing because it

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>terms what's important, who you talk to, what issues you cover.

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why a lot of the country

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>feels locked out of sort of what's called mainstream media. Um.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's a subtle thing that I think is hard

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to grapple with, but it's real. The issue I think

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we found more recently in the Trump era is that

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>media has discovered that conflict play. It's not actually not

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a really new concept. You know, if it bleeds, it leads.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the best thing that's happened to the

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Times is Trump's attack on the failing New

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>York Times. And the best thing that happens that Trump

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is the New York Times attacks on him. Um. And

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a win win for them and kind of

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>a lose lose for democracy and sort of civility. Well,

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go back to that, because that's those are not

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>things you can legislate. No, I think that's you know, Uh,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.799
<v Speaker 1>these are tough things. Um, where does it come from?

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Based on your trips and your meeting of people? How

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 1>did what do they say to you in order to

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>explain why they feel the way they do? So I think, Um,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a challenging question because I think people

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>uh in the flyover states. So let's just be Yeah,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I was suppose pick an example, maybe an anecdote or too. Yeah,

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in Kentucky when you go down and talk to people

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>who are seeing their coal mines closed. Um, you're in Appalachia,

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>which has been essentially an internal colony of the East

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>coast of the United States for a hundred years, where

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>coal mining provided a semblance of of middle class life.

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And they see the their economy going, they see their

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>hope going, they see opioid addiction on the rise, they

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>see um, their kids, um not having an opportunity. Uh,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>they get angry. They don't see those stories are told,

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>they hear things like climate changing. They just see sort

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of their outside clone. The colonial powers from Washington City,

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>New York California shutting them down and shutting them down

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>without really a concern about um their livelihood, and that

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>translates into anger, that translates in the rejection of science,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that translates into a whole, a whole gestalt of one

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>side against the other. And you know, you can argue

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the facts a lot, but the facts matter less than

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the feelings. Okay, So at a time when the facts

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>matter less than the feelings and you have these sort

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of increasingly ingrained winner and loser type of mentality that

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is not easy to resolve, even on the issues. As

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you point out, what's the path forward? I mean, I'm

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that if you were to sit down with one

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>person who thinks differently from you, who's from a state

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not in your bubble or in a world, you

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>could find commonality because we're human beings. But like from

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of social level, what's the way forward at

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a time when Donald Trump is having a Twitter war

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>right now with Bob Quirker, Republican Senator. I don't think

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there's any easy answers, and I will assure you my

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>book does not have any conclusions that solves the problem.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>But I think it starts first with um, something I

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>realize a long way, which is we're actually an exceeding

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in the era of high discourse and high anger, actually

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>an exceedingly moderate people actually talk to people and actually

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the data around the most polarizing issues of

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the day. People actually move towards the center on abortion,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>on healthcare, on guns. It's actually an extraordinary amount of commonality.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>And if you actually and actually sort of telling people

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>that and trying to translate that into the ideas like

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the other side, or actually, aren't the radicals the other sides?

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Are people telling us where the radical right? But here's

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the problem, because we were just talking about how blood cells,

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and so if you know, if if

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the conflict is what people want to read, how do

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you you know, tell them over and over again you're moderate,

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You're we're all moderate. We all just want to come ground.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what I just I think that that's the

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>problem is that you know, in a time when everyone's

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>looking for attention, you are seeing you know, increasingly inflammatory rhetoric. Yeah, um,

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's gotta be uh so before again,

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you I don't have the answers, um uh And

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you can cook kick me out of the studio for

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>being frustrating. Um. It's also the political parties are part

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of the problem. And I think one of the things

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you always hear people complain about the politicians

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Washington political parties. I'm from Washington. I've never really felt

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that until this trip, Uh, and understanding how the political

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>parties have actually found progress for themselves fundraising electioneering off

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of conflict UM. And the example I use is UM

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of odd when it's abortion. UM an area of conflict.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But the American opinion and abortion has not changed in

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. We've tracted since Roe v. Wade UM. And

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>yet both of the parties are are trumping in the

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>fact that they have the most extreme positions of that.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So thank you so much, Ken Stern. Fantastic to to

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hear what you have to say. Kencern, author and former

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of NPR, author of the new book

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Republican Like Me, How I Left the Liberal Bubble and

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>learned to love the right Well. The Chinese Communist Party

0:08:55.040 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>approved a revised charter enshrining President Jijin Ping's name under

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>its guiding principle. This was a departure from the prior

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to leaders of China which did not get their names

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>enshrined here. To explain why this is actually a very

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>big deal is John from Her, senior executive editor for Business,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Finance and Energy at Bloomberg News. Thank you so much

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. So this this is a big deal.

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Why this is a this is a huge deal. This

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most important political developments in China

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in decades. Essentially, this means that she and Pining, the

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>current president, will be in power and will extend his

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>influence over over Chinese politics, over the economy of the markets,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>potentially for decades to come. In theory, he was supposed

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to set down in five years time, but the fact

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that he is now elevated at the same level as

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Mout Tongue and Deng Xiaoping in the Chinese constitution means

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that he has the status that goes way beyond that

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of any other politician in China thought for the new

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>era of socialism with Chinese special characteristics. That's the phrase,

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>at least the translated phrase. Maybe you could explain what

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that means, and also in that context that the Communist Party,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the party in China sits above the government to a

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>certain extent. That's right. I mean, the key animating thought

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>for all Chinese leaders always is to is to preserve

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the legitimacy of the party. And it's just it's it's

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine this now, but you know, Chinese leaders

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have very long memories. They are obsessed with history, and

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they talk a lot about how if you look at

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Chinese history, there are regular sort of breaks, revolutions, disruptions

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like that are are are a pretty sort of constant

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>feature of Chinese history, and they're determined to do everything

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they can to make sure that the Party stays on

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>top of all of that. And I think, you know

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now in China, this is she and

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>ping himself talks about the third development of communism and

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the third step in communism, but I would say telling

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>established it during the revolution. D J. Ping Um sort

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of you know, created the second wave of of of

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the of an economic revolution, and now that he is

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>now leading China into a third period where he will

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>restore China as a great power, which is something he

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>spoke about a lot in his speech. So that's you know,

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you sort of have to parse the language of all

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>of these leaders, but that, I think is what the

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>key messages from this from this congress. But John, can

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you square the idea that the Communist Party is still

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at the top, ahead of the government at a time

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>when now j Ping himself, this charismatic leader, is leading

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the nation. He it seems like he's kind of on

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>top of the Communist Party. Now he's on top of both.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean he isn't He is the president if you

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>look at his title as the President of China. So

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>his title, actually, if you look at Chinese history, is

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the lesser titles. He's head of state, whereas

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the really important role is to run the party. So

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>he now runs both. He's head of the military as well,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>which is another really key When he controlled this is

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>where his power has come from. He controls the three

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>or four most important officers in both the party and

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the state himself. And he's also been pretty vocal about

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>wanting to be a global economic power and competing and

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>how does the concept of competing in a broad capitalistic

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>economy mesh with communist values. I think that that argument

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>in that debate was probably one one in lass in

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Beijing many many many years ago. Again, but the way

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese leaders look at it they're all about prosperity

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Chinese people. And as then, as Dan Dropping

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>himself once said, it doesn't matter if you have a

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>black cat or a white cat. The most important things

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that are catch as mice. The way the party leaders

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>will look at it doesn't matter what your ideology is,

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as you are you are raising the tide

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Chinese middle classes, and you are bringing everybody

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in China up to a certain level of prosperity and

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of undoing what they see as the great sort

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of economic um sort of backwards steps that China took

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth twente century. Doesn't matter how you get

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>their most important part is that all you bring as

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>much of society with you as possible. Very important thing

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to bear in mind as well. In the speech, which

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about more if you like, present, she

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>talked a lot about restoring or or addressing imbalances and

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>inequalities in Chinese society. Is not just about economic growth anymore.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>He's obsessed now with sort of fixing some of the inequalities,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of standards are living and also environmental

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>factors that have been a byproduct of China's economic miracle.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Over the last thirty or forty years. By all means,

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if you if you have other things in the speech

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that you want to highlight, I mean, I was going

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the vote in the Central Committee and

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>how an ally UH, an enforcer really of of j

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Pink's Andy corruption move, is not going to be part

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of this. Well, that's right. So Lankie Shan, there was

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of speculation that he would also he would

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>be restored to the to the Standing Committee. UM. That

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>would have been controversial because there's an unofficial rule in

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>China that once you're over sixty five you need to retire.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>He's now sixty seven. UM. So there was some speculation

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that maybe if she had put him, had kept him on,

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that he would have broken UH with that long standing tradition.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>He didn't do that. You could possibly arguing again, you know,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>China is a very opaque place and the governing structures

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>are very opaque. So a lot of this speculation, you

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>could argue that one Key Shan his job was done,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like what his job was to clamp down and corruption

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at the height at the top of the Chinese Party,

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and in a lot of ways it was one key

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Shan was she's battering round. He was his instrumental power.

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It was one key shan that basically put the fear

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of God into all of the top Chinese leaders, and

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that was what allowed she to exercise the power that's

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>taken them to the pinnacle of power. Now, thank you

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>very much for spending time with us. Has always looked

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>forward to future visits. So John freyher is senior editor

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>for Senior executivetor for Business, Finance and Energy for a

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Turn. Attention now to the world of food and

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>restaurants McDon donald, Hippotle, McDonald's today benefiting from what they

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>call their high low menu strategy. Here to tell us

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>more about it, Mike Halin, senior restaurant analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike,

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>good to have you. What is it? Tell people? What

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is this high low menu strategy and how's it working

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for McDonald's. UM. So, it's basically offering a lot of

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>value items, some lower end items. UM. Also, you know

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mike pick two which they do in different combinations.

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It might be two items for two dollars and fifty

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>cents or four items for four dollars, but offering value

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and as we know as the you know, largest chain

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in the world. They can source their product cheap, more

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>cheaply than everyone else, and offer lower price points their

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>customers and still allow their franchisees to make something off

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. And at the same time, on the high end,

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they're improving the quality of a lot of their items

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with the signature craft inline of chicken sandwiches and and burgers,

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and so that's also drawing um new customers or lapse

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 1>customers into the chain. Um. You know, it's what we

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>call a Barbell strategy kind of in in this fast

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>food industry. One day, Wendy's is another chain that's doing

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it pretty well, um and also benefiting from it. You know, Mike,

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to confess something. When I see you, I

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think he ate McMuffin this morning. He ate neg McMuffin

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this morning because we had a whole the gym. No no, no,

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>not because of that, Because months ago we were talking

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about how the breakfast menu was really bolstering their sales

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and getting them, getting them this momentum. But here we are,

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like this momentum is here to stay.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the egg McMuffin that we talked about,

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>which you which you liked? Yeah, which I liked. And

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, value was probably the first thing, and operations

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the stores, and then right after that was was

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the all day breakfast. But um, yeah, they they've attacked

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>their problems on a lot of different fronts, um. And

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know it's the culmination of all these things that's

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>leading to this very strow momentum. You know you you

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>know I have said it before. You know, you can't

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>turn around an aircraft carrier on a dime. Um, you know.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But they've been really aggressive and it's enabled them to

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to really turn things around a lot faster than anyone expected.

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>How is the the ongoing effort to sell off the

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>units to franchise, you know, franchisees and then just take

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a percentage of the of the money back. Yeah, they

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>hit their goal or a year ahead of schedule. So um,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've they've been um aggressive, They've they've been

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>um you know, whether it be operations or better food,

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or with the structure of the company and the refranchising. Um,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been able to hit their targets and and achieve

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>their goals faster than most expected. So then why are

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>are their shares only up one and a quarter percent today,

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>stocks up fift in the last year. Trees don't grow

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>out of the sky, you know. And I mean there's

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 1>just huge expectations baked in, right and and so the

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>sames Our sales were um that you know that the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>strong strange sames Our sales trans across the globe are

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>continuing um. But you know, revenue and EPs was kind

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of just in line. So you know, um, you know,

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>it's like like I said, stocks don't go off forever,

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, they have to take a breather

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at some point. You're not just the egg McMuffin at

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>a certain point just can't get any larger for you

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to have for breakfast. Just too much. You never know,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you never you know. In what you describe it, it

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>rings a bell for me. And it it says, you know,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>high price or higher price and customization and personalization that works, right,

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the high end of that high low menu, the low

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>end convenience and low cost that works. It's sort of

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're describing the retail industry as well. The high

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>end does well, the low end does well, in the

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>middle just struggles. Yeah, I think that's that's that's a

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>good point. I mean, and you don't really talk about

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the middle much because, um, you know,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>fast casual has kind of destroyed that, right, So like,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, just getting a decent meal for eight bucks,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know six bucks is you know, is that that

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come with table service? No, it's and it's been

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>stolen away by a lot of these fast casual names. So, um,

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's why we're doing deep value, and that's

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>why we're trying to improve the high end because we

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have that competition. You know, POSR has that competition from

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Task Causual only have to compete. So let's talk about

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle that's suffering. Chipotle, they were for earnings today

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>at four ten pm Wall Street time, and uh, you know,

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they've been really suffering with a series of illness scandals

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and others. What are we what are we looking for today?

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We you know, as always, we're looking at the pace

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of the same store sales in the traffic recovery, especially

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>since there was another neuro virus outbreak in July in

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a Virginia store. Uh that that's number one, two and three.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was a five fifty basic point impact

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>for the week following the outbreak. Across the chain. We

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>want to see how um that affects the entire quarter. Uh.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And number two would be restaurant margins because there's kind

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of some conflicting opinions about this. You know, we tend

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to think that there's still room for pretty significant restaurant

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>margin expansion. UM. Management was very slow to take labor

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the stores. Your sales drop, you have employees

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>just sitting around, you know, so they really needed to

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>take labor out of the stores, and they weren't aggressive

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. So we think we think there's some more

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>um low hanging fruit there. Others might disagree on the street, um,

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's the other thing that that uh, you know,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna look at. And of course Caso and

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the their impact that impact on same road, cheese on

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 1>it and Americans will just come funneling in the door. Yeah, clearly.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Halin, thank you so much for joining us. Mike

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Halin is seenior restaurant analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>here in our living three studios. Gold prices are down

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>today and they've been sort of on a choppy down

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>trajectory over the past week or so. And uh, here

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to explain what's driving that is, Mike Judas partner and

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Metals and Mining Analystic Vertical Church Partners based in Stanford, Connecticut. Mike,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to first just get your view on what

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the bigger driver of gold prices is right now. Is

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it the dollar which is starting to strengthen a little bit,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>or is it the sort of risk on environment which

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>makes people not go to sort of have in trades

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like gold. Lisa, Good morning, morning pimp. So I would

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>argue that I hate to split the baby here, but

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's probably about fifty fifty, maybe weighted more towards the

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar that I would say. Ever since early September when

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>gold peake fifty, Lisa, the dollars bounced about two or

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>three percent against trade weighted and we've seen gold prices

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>retreating kind of in this little a little little near

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>term downward range. But I think the dollar has been

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good explanation for it. And secondly, there's been

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>much more risk risk on, not only for the equity markets,

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>no need to explain that with some of the great

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>earnings of being produced this morning, but also when you

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>think about geo political tensions which have kind of up

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and pushed off for for a bit. Hey, Mike, I'm

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>just wondering if I can drag your attention out to

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia for a moment, because I want to get your

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about a mine out there. This is the world's

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>largest combination copper gold mine. This is the Grassburg mine,

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's owned or you know, it's currently owned I

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think fifty one by Freeport mcmaran and the subsidiary of THEIRS,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to do a deal with the Indonesian

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>government and that's proven a problematic. I just want you

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>to use that as an example to explain to people

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>what it's like to have to invest in a mind,

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>how long it takes to get your money out of

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground after you've spent it. That's a very good observation.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And just quickly on on this mine and Indonesia. Grassburg,

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>which is discovered back in the nineties sixties by Freeport

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>mcmaran and UM. It has been the an amazing asset

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and the largest copper gold deposit. As you mentioned, uh,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the government and right now currently Freeport owns stake in

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the assets, but the Indonesian government is now negotiating with

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>report to grab or to take a fifty stake and

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>buy at a market price to the asset from freeport.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Um that that's an issue that will work itself out.

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But what it does explain to what it just show

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for investors that where a lot of these base medals

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and and soft medals are located around the world are

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>areas where governments need the revenues, need the taxes, and

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>there are in areas that have are less developed. And

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the amount of capital that's required to develop a mind

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't even replace some like a freeport for for

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>anywhere more than several billion dollars. The time it would

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>take from the first negotiations of first drill hole to

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>when you're producing gold, silver, lead, copper out of the ground.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, at the best, if everything works out well,

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's uh six seven years and you're talking more like

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten years from a full mind life cycle.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>So it is a very dicey situation. And uh and

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult to you know, when you're looking longer term

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it where the new Mind's gonna be built. They're not

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna be built in politically safe places and morobably can

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>say US Canada, it will be some will be in

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>areas around the higher risk tolerance required. Yeah, and it's

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>definitely going to be interesting to see what the supplied

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>demand kind of dynamic right now, because a lot of

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>people have been talking about bitcoin is being sort of

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a century version of that's where I was going with it.

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So you know, people are saying, you know, we conbind

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>that while we wait, and people have been using that

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 1>as a proxy, and I'm wondering in some ways of

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>whether that reduces gold's appeal as a haven trade because

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>people are finding other havens that are decentralized and uncorrelated

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and makes it more of a currency and commodity play

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>than it has well. And also it becomes a situation sometimes,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I think where the marketing or the publicity around bitcoin

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>tries to appeal to the retail investor in a way

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that some gold advocates also try to appeal to those

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>potential investors by trying to paint paper currency and fiat

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>money as being something that will disappear within their lifetime

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>or indeed, you know what happens if the world ends,

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna need something other than money backed by a

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>government in order to buy and sell the things you need,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just to give you some sort of reference points. Gold

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>spot gold prices up about ten percent so far this year,

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so not terrible, right, exceeding bonds right, But a lot

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of this has been driven by the commodities rally, A

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of it has been driven by the weaker dollar.

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>There is an expectation that that weaker dollar will not continue,

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Doodas going forward for the rest of the this

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>year and perhaps the next six months out. What do

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you think will sort of be the main driver for prices?

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that if if the dollar sort of

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>stays where it is with respect to it's uh competing currencies,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>where the gold prices go. I think if dollars stays

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>where it is, I think gold probably creates bit higher. Um,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>there's still some speculation said and what not only what

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>they may do in December, but what a new Fed

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>governor Shairman of the said might do for for gold prices.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So there could be some near term volatility there. But

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>but those days where there's I think gold prices drift higher,

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not dramatically higher, as you know, as we can also

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>see when you think about gold as a safe haven,

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>if the equity markets were to correct, or if the

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bond market spikes a bit here to get some risk

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of trades off the table. What about investing in gold

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>stocks right now or even in mining shares? You know,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we at the cycle. I mean, I keep looking at Freeport.

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry of you know, keep banging the table on

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>this one. But you know it's fifteen dollars a share

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the stocks of what about thirteen so far? The thirteen

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>percent so far this year. It was led left for

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>dead year ago, right in January, year ago January, and

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you have made some pretty decent money since then. But

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it has not been a straight shot. No, it has,

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>and I think we are we are through the phase

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the early recovery cycle in mining, in the

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>commodities in general, in the mining stocks in particular, we've

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>had some tremendous moves off the bottom to from January

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>for two thousand and sixteen. I think report stock has

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>been held back by this Indonesian negotiation and the uncertainty

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>how it's willing to play out. Once that gets settled,

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's significant upside and Freeport share price because

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>copper prices, in our view um look to be very

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>supportive to move higher, not just on a near term

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>basis of meeting UM a long term basis, as demand

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>picks up and the supply issues that we talked about

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>tim starts to show up in more detail in two thousand, eighteen,

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and twenty. When you talk about the supply demand dynamic,

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is are we running out of supplies of the precious

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>metals right now? Is demand outstripping what's available? UM, We're

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not running out of supply. Supply is getting more difficult

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>to to extract. We had a capital spending decline and

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>deficit over the past five or six years of the

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>mining industry, and so that that is going to limit

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount of new supplies that come into the market.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>What's different about gold versus some other commodities like copper

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>letters is that you know, gold is still around above

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ground throughout the world. There's probably ten years worth of

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>annual demand in central bank vaults globally, and all the

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>goal that's ever been mine in the world is still

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>around technically somewhere. So it tries gold prices isn't as

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>much supply demand though it does help, but it's much

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>more sentiment and from a macro basis, also the inflationary

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>expectations and a dollar touch on copper lend and zinc

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and those medals. Um we anticipate demand's gonna supply, and

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna lead to tighter to higher deficits, higher prices,

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and eventually more investment. But that's gonna take some time

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to come, all right, Thanks very much, Mike Dodass. He

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is a partner Medals and Mining Analysts for Vertical Research,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking about gold and other medals, as well as that

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Grassberg mine that is owned by the company Freeport mcmaran.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>abramowits one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bluebirg Radio