WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: The WikiLeaks Story

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from my Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. It is time for

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>another classic episode of tech Stuff. This one originally published

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on June two thousand thirteen, that would have been my birthday.

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>This is called the Wiki Leaks story, and obviously it's

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>another one of those topics where I could do a

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>full update, probably a full redo of this episode, but

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's always interesting to go back and listen to how

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the show has evolved over the years. So let's listen

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Wiki Leaks story. Also, real quick, before we

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>get into this, I do want to give a brief

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>trigger warning. It's it's a light trigger warning. Really. UM.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Julianna sound being UM, one of the so called founders

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of Wiki Leaks, has been brought up on some rape

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>charges and so there will be a non graphic discussion

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of that later on in the podcast. UM. If that

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of thing that you would rather avoid hearing,

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than perhaps you would like to uh skip the rest

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of this episode now. Spoiler alert, both Lauren and myself

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and and with our particular political views. Feel that no

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>one in this story really comes out being a complete hero.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's just it's humans being humans, which means

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it's complex. It's complex and gets kind of messy. Yeah,

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna get messy. But before we get messy,

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>let's just clear things up a little bit, let's talk

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about what wiki leaks is. Now. First of all, the

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>name wiki gives you this sense that it has this

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of collaborative, open structure that allows people to come

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>in and add things and tweak things. Not so much.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>They trined that early on in the timeline of wiki leaks,

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but eventually moved away from it. The name has stuck, however, right,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think that I think that really what they

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do was um it was used, was used

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that that easy reading format of wikis without you know,

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they decided to really close down the part

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>where hey, anyone can edit it, because that's bad times

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>right right when you're talking about what it is WikiLeaks

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do and uh and be yes, the

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>sourcing of information in order to remain um anonymous and pertinent. Yeah, yeah,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>these are all things that make it. You know, if

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you were to just open it up for what wiki

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>leaks does, it would just be a mess very quickly.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It also has created a lot of confusion among people

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>who are just casually following this or have just heard

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, who think that wiki leaks has some sort

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of connection to Wikipedia, which it does not know. The

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia and wiki leaks are not at all related. So

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what is wiki leaks. Well, it's a not for profit organization,

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and the purpose of wiki leaks is to publish information

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that would normally not be available to the public. Right.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:58.639
<v Speaker 1>Normally normally be stuff that's either been classified or Yeah,

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>it could be trade secret stuff, it could be a

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>corporate uh, communications that normally would not be available to

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone outside a certain group of people within that corporation. Really,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's any information that would be of public interest but

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is not publicly available. And in fact, WikiLeaks go so

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>far as to say that the organization does not want

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>anything that's been published elsewhere. That's not the purpose for WikiLeaks.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>They also make pains to say that they do not

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>solicit any kind of information or files. They accept it,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but they don't solicit, which is an important distinction they

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>have to make so that they yeah, because otherwise they

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>could start getting charges about being a spy or or

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to bribe officials or people and who have access

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to to classified information to then share it. If they

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>merely accepted donations of information, that absolves them of of

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>some of that responsible kind of technically, yeah, and just

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>at least prints a better picture of them, right as

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>far as it makes it more difficult to make a

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>case against them, doesn't necessarily mean that a case would

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not be made against them and it wouldn't be successful.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, we're kind of getting ahead of ourselves now. Um.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>According to Columbia University's Journalism School, I read this, there

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was a very long article about wiki leaks and its

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>association with the Guardian newspaper was a newspaper in the UK,

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>and uh. In fact, there was quite a strong relationship

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>between the two for a while until an event that

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>we will discuss later. Yeah, yeah, that will come important later.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But according to that particular article, it said that Julian Assange,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>who is often referred to as a founder, founder or

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or at the very least the spokesperson for wiki leaks,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he's certainly the most identifiable personality associated with figurehead. If

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>if nothing else. Yeah. Yeah, and that gets complicated too,

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and we'll explain that in a bit. But according to

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this article, he registered the domain name back in However,

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>every other source I could find, two thousand six was

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the earliest that it was actually um registered. This is

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>another part that makes talking about wiki leaks challenging in

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of misinformation about the site itself,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not just about all the shenanigans that went on both

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>within wiki Leaks and surrounding Wiki Leaks, but just when

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it really got started. Right, And part of the problem

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>we should mention now is that a lot of the

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>information out there about wiki leaks comes from either Juliana

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Sounds himself or other other personalities that have been involved

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with the organization and have left it violently and bitterly. Yeah,

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and so so all of all of this is uh

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily it's difficult to track down the exact truth. Yeah,

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of subjectivity here. I mean, everyone involved

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>has their own agenda and uh, and that doesn't it

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily align with the organization stated mission, right right,

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is this is what makes this complicated. Now,

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>what is that stated mission? Well, the whole idea here

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>is that what Wiki leaks is trying to do is

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>make available information that the public that that that you know,

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the organization feels the public should have access to but

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would not because of the secrecy of either governmental

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or corporate organizations or even just other organizations in general,

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and that it's an attempt to make these organizations more transparent. Right.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>They cite the Universal Declaration of Human Rights UM, in

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>particular Article nineteen UM, which which just says that that

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone has the right to freedom, freedom of opinion and

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>expression right and that they should be able to pursue

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>information regardless of frontiers, which is kind of like saying,

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, a person in in say China, who otherwise

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>might not have access to certain information completely has the

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>universal right to that, even if the Chinese government says

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't. So in other words, it's kind of this

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>idea that everyone has this right regardless of what your

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>government says. Well, this is the United Nations that has

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and it's not like

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this is somehow legally binding for all right, Right, it's

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a very nice idea. Yeah, it's it's an ideal, Right,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much legal wording. It's it's saying ideally,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>we would say all people have the right to these expectations,

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and one of them would be this right to freedom

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of expression. Now, depending on where you are in the world,

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>your right to freedom of expression maybe fairly generous or

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it might be really restrictive. In the United States, we

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like to think that we have the freedom of speech,

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are certain limitations. I mean, obviously, if you

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are using that freedom of speech to inflict harm upon

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>someone and it is completely unjustified, and you know, you

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>could be taken to court for things things like library um.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the whole there's the whole argument about you

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>can't yell fire in a crowded theater because it could

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>cause people You're you're right, or freedom of expression does

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not override someone else's right to safety safety right, or

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at least the expectation of safety. Um. And so there

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of complications here. But even in the

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>United States, you know, it's fairly wide open. People will

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>argue as to how wide open it is because of

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>their own personal views. If you go to someplace like

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom, there rights of free speech are are

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>more narrow. There are very specific laws that prevent newspapers,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, from violating secrecy agreements. So something like The

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Guardian had to make some really tough decisions when they

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 1>got information from Wiki leaks onto whether or not to

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>publish it, because it could result in some junctions from

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the government, So that gets really complex as well. Anyway,

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Wiki Leaks essentially says, we don't subscribe to any of

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>these regional concepts. We subscribe to this universal concept and

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what it's all about. And so they try to

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 1>provide the material that journalists can use to tell the

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>stories that otherwise would be untold. Right. Um Assassa said

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in in one interview with Time that this organization practices

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>civil obedience. It tries to make the world more civil

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and act against abusive organizations that are pushing it in

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the opposite direction. So it's kind of funny to call

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>it civil obedience considering that, uh, you know that they

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are directly disobeying. Yes, they're being disobedient by by very nature.

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's all an argument about who has the

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>power and responsibility. If you have a lot of you know,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>as as Uncle Ben would say, with great power comes

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>great responsibility. That's that's one of those little cliche sayings,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but there is truth to that. It's very true that

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>if you are a governmental agency or a corporation that

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of power, then there is a certain

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>expectation that you will use that power in a responsible

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 1>way and not do it in such a way that

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you are going to violate people's rights, right. You know.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, frequently information is withheld by by governments,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in particular because because of of of measures of national security,

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>because they're trying to protect you know, either their their

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>military interests or their scientific interests, or or you know,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the people and the research that go into making that

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>country a safe place to be, right. So there is

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a very delicate balance here, right. I mean, you could

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>argue that there are there's certain information that's out there

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's good that it's secret because that means that

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the people who are doing valuable work, and it may

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be valuable work that in no way is violent towards

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>any other person. It may be completely humanitarian work that

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>their lives could be in jeopardy if the information were

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>made public, and that is something that you know needs

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to be taken into consideration. Now, the what wicked Leaks

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>would say is, on the other hand, you also have

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>these instances where UH agencies or the military or a

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>corporation are behaving in an unethical or corrupt or illegal manner,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and without this information becoming public, they can never be

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.719
<v Speaker 1>held accountable for that. And so if they you know,

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>this transparency gives accountability to those agencies. And in fact,

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they go so far as to say it's the media's

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>role to to reveal this kind of information to the public,

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to to make the public informed enough to be good citizens, right,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>because this is that that big relationship. You know, we

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>often think of the government as being this kind of

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>separate entity that is UH in some cases we think

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of as sort of that big brother Orwellian idea of

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>this this other that dictates what we do. But in reality,

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>at least in in you can argue to watch it, right.

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're definitely fringe theories about how much your

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>your average citizen does or doesn't have power over over

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>these these things. But but but saying that, you know,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 1>if we take democracy in the United States for what

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to be, if we assume that that in

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fact is the case, then what Wiki Leak's role is

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to tell the public, Hey, this is what your officials

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are up to, and if you don't approve of that,

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>you need to be aware of it so that you

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>can the next time voting comes around, behave in a

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>way that that allows you to get the right people

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>in charge, assuming of course, that the right people are

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.599
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are running for office. That's that's a

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>different political discussion. That's the whole other, whole other canne worms. Honestly,

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm probably coming across is really cynical. I'm actually

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not that cynical. I'm just aware of a lot of cynicism.

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's one of those things where you kind of

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>dance around it. Anyway. Well, yeah, and you know, the

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is that I read one thing about how the

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>US Information Security Oversight Office reported that um, the number

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of new secrets designated as such by the government rose

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>from nine and so so partially what this has to

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>do with is the way that governments are processing information

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>and um and releasing it to the public right and

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair, I mean, the Albama administration in

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States specifically said that one of its cornerstones

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>was going to be transparency, and so in a way

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you can think of the media in general and wiki

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>leaks in particular in this case, trying to hold them

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>accountable for that claim saying you said you're going to

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>be transparent. Here are all these things that have not

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>been reported? What is your stance on this? Absolutely? And

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, you know, I can't disagree with that motivation.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's very important. I think that any

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>nation where you have a free pet press, that presses

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>job to keep an eye and make sure that things

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>are not being uh, that people are not behaving in

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>an unethical manner or taking advantage of a situation, and

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>if they are, that that's reported. I think that's very important.

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>It's a key role in journalism, and it's something that

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>some people would say has really been slipping from journalism

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of decades. Again, I'm not a journalists,

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not going to comment on that. Well, that's

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that's another you know, there's also a lot of ideas

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>about out there about how entertainment based the journalism industry

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is these days. Yes, yeah, the whole idea of of

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the the commercialization of journalism. Uh well, anyway, Wiki leaks

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:44.119
<v Speaker 1>does have some policies that try to guide the organization

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and how it behaves. One of those is that that

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>they do sometimes delay or remove some details in stories

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to protect people from immediate harm, especially either

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>current victims of of harm somewhere or the whistleblowers who

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>are hoarding this information right. And then on top of that,

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they also try to make sure that every single leaked

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>report that they receive, which by the way, they they've

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>set up an electronic dropbox, that's their preferred method of

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>receiving information is electronically, and that this dropbox is encrypted

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>so that again in theory, you wouldn't be able to

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>trace the origin of that other than being able to

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>see that this is original source material, but it's not

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>tied to any particular person. So the electronic dropbox is

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a secure way of getting files two

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks, and they have said that they would also

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>receive files or documents in other forms, like including through

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the mail, but they preferred not to because that kind

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of stuff can be intercepted and securities and questions, and

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>also also if they have a physical mailing address, that

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it more difficult for them to uh avoid entanglements,

0:15:56.640 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, So anyway, they they do refer to their

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>electronic drop boxes being the preferred method, and they say

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that everything they get they use traditional investigative journalism techniques

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as more modern technology based methods to verify

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that that information is in fact, accurate and true, and

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that it really is from a verifiable source, right, that

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the documents are actually from wherever the person the anonymous

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>source says they're from. So if an anonymous source drops

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>off a enormous file that is supposed to contain all

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>these documents from the Department of Justice in the United States,

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, they would go through and try to verify

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that those were in fact d o J documents and

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>not just someone using some logos or whatever to fabricate something. Right.

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>This is through a largely volunteer based system they've they've

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>reported and again you know, these numbers are kind of

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>wibbly wobbly, but um they reported having up to eight

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred volunteer members, mostly mostly journalists, I think, helping helping

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>them out with stuff like this, right, and some of

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>those volunteers have a lot of stuff to say about

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks, but again we'll cover that probably in the

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>second half. I think of this of this episode, so

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>they their policies to verify everything to keep it secure,

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and then once they verified it, the next step is

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>deciding on when to publish this information. And wiki leaks

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>has done uh well, They've done their own journalism. They've

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>had their own journalists right stories that were based off

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of the documents that they had found. That I think

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier that that part of what wiki leaks

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>holds very DearS that they want to publish original material.

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to republish anything, and and that's and

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>so yes, so um so actually doing writing an investigation,

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a big part of that. They also will partner

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>with existing media outlets, although there's been sort of a

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>contentious relationship between wiki leaks and several high profile newspapers

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>UH in multiple nation and part of that I think

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the sana's personal handling of situations.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, they they their goal is to have stories

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>written about the information they have, because it's kind of

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you were to walk into a laboratory that's

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>doing scientific experiments and you see the experiment going on,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but you can't really necessarily make any meaningful conclusion based

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>on that. You need to have the report written up

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>where you can see what the actual methodology was, what

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the results were, and what the conclusions are. That's what

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is digestible to the average person. Same thing with these

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks reports. It's usually the raw material is something

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that they hand over to journalists and the journalists and

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>up rutting the stories, and then the raw material is

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>published along with the story, so that way complete transparency

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're really going for, right that way, so that

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you can check their sources exactly exactly. Like if if

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Lauren reads the story and then you know, she reads

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>onejournalists perspective on that story and they're the way that

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>they have taken this information and then communicated it, she

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can then go to the the source material, read the

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>source material and see if her own interpretation of that

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>source material is aligned with what the journalists said. Because remember,

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>no matter what, we're all humans, so we all view

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>things through our own kind of lens in the world,

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and we try and be as you know, a journalists

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>tried to be as objective as possible, at least most

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>people journalists try. That's the hypothetical ideal. Yeah, So, but

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, there's no way to ever truly

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>attain that sure, and and and in some of these

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>cases they the Assange and and other folks at Wiki

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>leaks have admitted to wanting to market some of these

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>bigger releases, uh, to to really get things into the

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>public eye. Right, I don't I haven't personally read any

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>any ill intent to change details, but it just to

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>bring the most important details to the forefront, because they

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are a political organization, right and when you look at it,

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're you're talking about sometimes they're getting files that are enormous.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about pages and pages and pages of documentation.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like like over over three hundred thousand documents and

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ago that that's you know, obviously way too much for

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone to just wade through beginning to end and find

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the nuggets that are meaningful, because a lot of this

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff has information that's not really um, you know, important

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>in the grand scheme of things. It might have been

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>important for a very specific purpose, but you know, beyond that,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter so much. So well, we'll mention

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a few examples of stuff like that a little bit later. Yeah,

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So they you know, this is this is their basic

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>purpose and their basic approach. To go into more detail,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to kind of look at the timeline and

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>discuss what had happened throughout the history of wiki leaks,

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>which course is still in existence today. I don't mean

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that history is over, but it is. It

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is a continuing story. But um, but most of the

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>most of the action within wiki leaks was going on

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>around Yeah, that's when the big, big stuff was going on,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>although it's played a part in other stories since then,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>and of course before then too. Hey, guys, Jonathan from here,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take a quick break to thank our sponsor. Alright,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>so we've had an overview of what wiki leaks is,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what its purposes, what you know, role it's it's ideally

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>would fill within the world of journalism and transparency and accountability.

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about the timeline. So it

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>was around two thousand six that Wiki leaks began to coalesce,

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was officially launched in two thousand seven, right

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>either December two thousand six or early two thousand seven. Yeah,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's right around the anyway. The first publications were coming

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>out in in December of two thousand and six. But

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>most folks just say that are The official launch where

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had a thing was in early two thousand seven, right,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>And and I did want to mention that this is

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>coming on the heels of in two thousand five, the

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>commission that had been investigating the nine eleven terrorists attacks

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States had found that that poor

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>information sharing was a huge failure of the government in

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the lead up to the attacks, of of

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of preventing this sort of thing from happening, and and

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>that that had led to internally a lot of reorganization

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of how information is shared in between different departments department. Yeah,

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this this is something that we see in all levels

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of organization where you have multiple departments and then the

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>communication between departments, sometimes the communication within a department tends

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to get bogged down by red tape. And uh, you know,

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you see this all the time. Like if you ever

0:22:55.720 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>read any stories about uh police investigation that spanned multiple jurisdictions,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that's always part of the story is how complicated it

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was to get the cooperation of one police office versus another.

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And if their federal investigators, then that adds another layer

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of complexity. And it was it wasn't until around that

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>time that um, I think that a lot of agencies

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>had been kind of resisting going digital just because of

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the ease of flow of information, which isn't really considered

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a good thing when you're trying to keep things secret.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Um And but but it was after after two five

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>after that report from that commission, that things started going

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>going online. And the first story that wiki leaks partnered

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with The Guardian on was for around August thirty one,

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven. It was a story about the alleged

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>corruption of Daniel arap Moi, the former president of Kenya,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and it was a leaked report. The Kenyan government had

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>elected to keep this report secret, and UH, someone leaked

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the information to wiki leaks. Wiki leaks then approached the Guardian,

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Guardian was very cautious about this kind of relationship.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>It was one of those things where they saw the

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>value in what WikiLeaks was doing. WikiLeaks was setting itself

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>up to be a completely independent safe house of information

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>leaked information. UH. The idea being that of course anyone

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>who would submit to it would remain anonymous, WikiLeaks would

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not point the finger at anybody, and that that information

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>could then get to some sort of outlet that could

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>communicate it to the wider world. So this was the

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>first attempt of The Guardian and WikiLeaks to work together.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>From the story I read from Columbia University, it really

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>did sound like Julian Assange was a big part of

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>this early early on, and that that was both a

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>good thing in the early days and turned into a

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>complicated thing as time went on. Um from what I understand,

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he can he can have an effect on people, uh

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>and make them feel like they're not really being listened to.

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>He's frequently described as being a very um dynamic personality.

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a very generous way of putting it. Uh. Yeah,

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>people who have taught to him have had some pretty

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>contentious things to say about him. I've never met the man,

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so I know nothing about him personally, nor have I

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>had any interactions with him. But just going from what

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>other people said, it seems like he seems he seems

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>very intense. Yeah, he can be a handful, yes, um uh.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 1>This The Wiki Leaks would later be presented with an

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>award from Musty International um On behalf of the Kenyan

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 1>folks who leaked this information. Um uh. Now that's one

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>of the awards that Wiki Leaks has won Wiki leaks

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know it's it is very controversial, but

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there are organizations that have recognized its role in UH

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>in uncovering corruption and even going so far as to

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>UH giving enough information so that authorities could end up

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>pursuing and correcting problems UM or that people could end

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>up going out and voting what would what some would

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>call a corrupt administration out of power. This is, of course,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, on a global scale, not not limited to

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.919
<v Speaker 1>just one country. In February of two eight, a wiki

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>leaks report along with The Guardian, exposed a Swiss bank

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>called Julius Bear for money laundering UH and UH that

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>ended up getting Wiki leaks hit with one of their

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>first major lawsuits, which is not something unusual for the organization.

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>They've been hit with many of them. Right. Also in

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, they posted a bunch of scientologies secret

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>membership manuals. Yeah. Uh. And it's funny because there's there

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are some stories that talk about how wiki leaks expected

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>certain things to get a lot more attention than what

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they what it actually did, and that these manuals were

0:26:58.080 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the things they thought that a

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 1>lot more attention would be devoted to the scientology manuals

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>than what actually happened. And that's another reason why wiki

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>leaks was looking to partner with various newspapers around the world,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>because they were discovering that trying to direct people to

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks to find out about the information was tricky.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyone who makes a website learns pretty quickly it's hard

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to get folks to go to your website. It is

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>folks need to want to go to your website, you

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>can't really make them go. So uh, you know, if

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>WikiLeaks was going to fulfill its mission and being this

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this uh depository of secret information that could then be

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>used by journalists, they determined that they had to reach

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>out to more journalists to make that happen. Um. The

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>next thing I have is November two thousand nine. Do

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you have anything before that? Okay? That's when they published

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive list of text pager messages that were sent

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>during September eleventh, two thousand one, which of course was

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the date of the terrorist attacks that that that ended

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>thousands of lives here in the United States. UM. And

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they were criticized for this because a lot of those

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>text messages were just simple messages from between family members

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or co workers to let people know that they were

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, that they had um managed to to stay

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:21.439
<v Speaker 1>clear of the impact zones and that sort of thing,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and that there was a real question of is this

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>actually newsworthy? Is this is this valuable information to publish?

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Is this are is this getting a little too voyeuristic

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>into the personal tragedies that happened during this day and

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and and there was a little bit of a question, um.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And this ties back into the scientology bit of whether

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks was was publishing things to get attention and

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be sensational um rather than mission right. Yeah, and

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's played wiki leaks throughout its history as well.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Like the again, the goal that it states seems very

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>noble and a journalistic sense, but the behavior of at

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>least some of the people in wiki leaks may have

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>been so is aligned quite with that. It seems it

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>seemed like you said, a little more sensationalists. And that

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>might not have ever been the intent of the people

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>in wiki leaks. It just maybe the impression that everyone

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>got from the way it was handled. Now, getting back

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in one last little thing about these these text pager messages, Um,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was that Wiki Leaks said their response to the criticism

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of is this actually newsworthy? Their response was, this helps

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>create a more complete picture of what happened on that day.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not I mean, yeah, it's more complete. I

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 1>just don't know that it's more relevant. Sure, sure I could.

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I could. I could argue that one. You know that

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that that could easily be argued either way. Yeah, but um,

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:53.479
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I did want to mention also in two

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, UM, that was the year that President Obama

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>signed the executive order requiring a whole bunch of people

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>who hold classified status here in the States um to

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>receive extra training on what actually needs classification and UM

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and also forced people who who are creating these classified

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>documents to identify themselves on those documents. And again this

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is that this is that effort for official transparency to say,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's not just blanket whitewash everything is classified,

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>because that just all that really does is engender a

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>spirit of distrust in the government to say, like, what,

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>why are they hiding this? What else do they have

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to hide? And uh, And of course I mean this

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is an ongoing story, stuff that we're finding out about now.

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>About things like clandestine surveillance, which are these are stories

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that are breaking as we are recording this podcast in

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>early June two thousand thirteen. They are all these stories

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about the n s A and surveillance and cell phones

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. And some might even argue that

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that happened with wiki leaks are what kind

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of led to those policies, which is the antithesis of

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>what they were supposed to be doing. I think that

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of that actually from from I

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of governments have kind of cracked down

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on openness in response to this sort of thing. Yeah

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's you know, and some might argue they're cracking

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>down on one side while really doubling down on the

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 1>shady stuff on the other side. So it's almost like

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Wilkie defense. Hey it's Chewbacca. So um yeah, I mean,

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>these is complicated issue. April that's when Assane goes to

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the National Press Club in d C and shows a

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>video of a two thousand seven incident. Now, this is

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the the most probably the most notorious wiki leaks really, yeah,

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's been a lot of high profile ones,

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>but this one is like the defining one, I think,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is one that showed an incident in two

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven in which UH two US Apache helicopter pilots

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>allegedly executed UH innocent people on the ground in Iraq,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>including to Reuter's correspondence. The whole thing was caught on video,

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and Assange called it collateral murder. That's what he named

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the video. And again that seems very sensationalist. Now, at

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the same time, the video itself really did portray a

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>horrific act. Yeah, and and I mean, and there's and

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>there's full audio in it, so there's this very chillingly

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>calm discussion of everything that they're doing and um and

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, it's it's you. You can you can see.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I think at least eighteen people are killed during the

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>course of the video, and two of them were Reuters reporters,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>right right. This had been a project that had been

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.719
<v Speaker 1>going on since March of and had been they had

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>received these files and UH kind of went into a

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>frenzy of work in Iceland putting them together. It was

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>called Project B And and they knew that it was big. Yeah,

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they knew it was big. And and again Assange was

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a way to get more visibility for

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks. So part of that sensationalism was in fact

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>intended because it was meant to to get as much

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>press as possible. But also, I mean it was an

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely pressworthy release. Yes, I mean you know you can't. Yeah,

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it was, I mean, I I was a legitimate It

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>was a completely legitimate story. It was something that needed

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to be broken because it was you know, people needed

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to be held accountable. Although it should be said that

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the military never did charge those helicopter pilots with anything

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>illegal or the official statement was essentially that the people

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>were in an area where there was a suspected um

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>uh ambush that was going to attack US forces and

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that the helicopter pilots acted responsibly. That's the official response.

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, definitely was newsworthy. Uh. Again, it was the

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>handling of it that I think was sensational, not the

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>material itself, but that was again completely valid. Uh. On

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the pen I gone arrested US Army Private Bradley Manning

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on charges of downloading and then leaking thousands of classified

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>US documents, including this video, and uh, that's sort of

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>been the the video and and the handling of Bradley

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Manning and and Bradley Manning's case have been this sort

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of defining element to what Wiki Leaks is and the

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:28.479
<v Speaker 1>way that it's portrayed in general. I mean, this story

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is still ongoing to this day. Right. I believe that

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the trial for Manning is going on right now as

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this podcast. Yes, it is, although it apparently

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going much more quickly than what they had originally planned.

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>They thought it was going to take it was gonna

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>be a three month trial, but apparently there moving through

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>witnesses much more quickly than they had previously thought. And uh,

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and there were thousands of documents involved in this, not

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>just the video, right right. Uh. Wiki Leaks ended up

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>publishing over two fifty documents for Manning. He had downloaded

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>all of these diplomatic cables while he was at an

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Iraq Army outpost between November two thousand nine. In April,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>um reportedly having burned them to a c d R

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>labeled Lady Gaga and told told a Hacker friend that

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he had them to Hacker turned him in, And apparently

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that hacker has since felt a great deal of conflict

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about that act. Uh. The charge, the main charge against

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Manning is that he knowingly gave intelligence to the

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>enemy through indirect means. And uh because before he was

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>arrested and put on you know, put on trial, he

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>had obviously leaked these documents to wiki leaks, right, and

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 1>so the in the trial I can say this because

0:35:45.000 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this was reported very recently as of the recording of

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Uh. The defense called the senior intelligence or

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:56.400
<v Speaker 1>one senior intelligence analyst from Manning's unit. Her name is

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Casey Fulton, and Fulton said that the unit received no

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>specific warning about sites visited by al Qaeda. She did

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>say that al Qaeda would visit sites like Facebook or

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Google or even Google Maps to gather information, but she

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>did not mention Wiki leaks among them. And the defenses

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:16.480
<v Speaker 1>case is saying that uh, that there this information went

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>directly to write well, that the al Qaeda was not

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>using wiki leaks specifically together information that that was not

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Manning's intent. And in fact, the judge in the case

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>has said that the prosecution has to show that Manning

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>had actual knowledge that he was actually giving intelligence to

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the enemy through a third party and intermediary or in

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>some other indirect way. And that the soldier must have

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>had quote a general evil intent unquote and to have

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>known he was dealing directly or indirectly with an enemy

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of the United States in order for this particular charge

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to hold. Now keep in mind this one charge out

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of all the trial. So but it sounds to me

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's a it's a really tough case to make,

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, to prove the intent parts specifically, but improving

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>intent is one of those things that's uh, basically impossible.

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So but doesn't mean that people don't do it or

0:37:13.840 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>don't don't achieve it now to say they also point

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>out that this is a military trial. It's different from

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>other trials in the United States. Typically in the United

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>States you have a trial with in front of a

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>jury of your peers. But in this case, it is

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a judge that is overseeing the case and her word

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is final at least unless you go through an appeals process.

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But and you do not have exactly the same the

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.320
<v Speaker 1>same rights to see what is a normal citizen in

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a court of law. So getting back to two wiki

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>leaks back in UH July twenty, two thousand and ten,

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so so Bradley Manning had been arrested By this point,

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>three news organizations released separate accounts of the war logs

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>gathered from Wiki Leaks regarding the war in Afghanistan. And

0:37:55.280 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in August, UH, that's when another big introversial event in

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the history of Wiki leaks in general and Julian Assange

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in particular happens. Uh. Two former employees of Wiki leaks

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>filed rape charges against Julian Assange, and Assange has essentially

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>spent the rest of his life from that point evading

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 1>any extradition to Sweden to stand trial for this. All right, right,

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>these charges were brought up in Sweden. UM. The the

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 1>two women who have brought up the charges, their names

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>have not been revealed to the press. UM and UH.

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>In Sweden there are laws about using using condoms. If

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.320
<v Speaker 1>partner tells you to use one and you do not,

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>then you can be brought up on what is called

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a rape charge and and the technical definition I shall

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>leave up to other political parties. Yeah, hey guys, it's Jonathan.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I gotta run out and take a quick Wiki leaks,

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna take a break. At any rate, he

0:38:58.640 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>has been fighting x tradition since then, and at this

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>point he has actually um been a granted asylum from

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>by Ecuador. Ecuador has granted asansing. I'll tell them more

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about that when we get a little further down. But yeah,

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that whole the whole drama is a story in of itself.

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>But because again it's so hard to get to the

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>truth of the matter, there's just we actually talked about

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>doing an episode just about Julia Sange, but instead of

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>about wiki leaks. But the more we looked into it,

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>the more we realize that this there's no way to

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>verify half the information that's out there, right, you know,

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as as I said at the beginning of the episode,

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>all of the information about Juliana Sang comes from either

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a Sange himself m or from very close personal ex

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.760
<v Speaker 1>compatriots who are pretty angry at him, right, So there

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of biases, and neither of those sources

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>are really necessarily reliable. So the July you had the

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>uh the Afghanistan reports released. Now that was one third

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>of three big blocks of information that we're going to

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>be released that year. The other two were about the

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Iraqi War, which that information came out in October, and

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>then there was a huge block of classified US diplomatic

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>cables and a cable is essentially a message. So these

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>were all these thousands and thousands of diplomatic messages that

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 1>came out in November. That was the trifecta of big,

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:36.359
<v Speaker 1>big bombshell releases that came out in twenty that really

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>established what wiki leaks was all about. I think I

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>think there's in November were the ones are specifically from Manning. Yeah. Yeah,

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And then in September twenty a little bit earlier, that's

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>when Daniel dom Scheidberg left Wiki leaks, right, that's when

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>he walked. He had joined in two thousand eight and

0:40:52.760 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 1>had become sort of a Songe's right hand man. Yeah,

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of. He was specifically a spokesperson four

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks in your up, mainly in Germany, and he

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>had a major falling out with a Sange to the

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>point where it went from he and Assange sharing the

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 1>same ideals to both of them demonizing one another whenever

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they had the opportunity to speak to the media. And

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>they were roommates somewhere in between there. So this is

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like talking about that band you used to love and

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>then they broke up, and now no one has anything

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>good to say about each other. Multiplied by about a

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>billion right later later on, he would publish a book

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>called Inside WikiLeaks, My Time with Julian Assange at the

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 1>World's Most Dangerous Website. Yeah, he was not particularly complementary

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of Osange in that book or in any of his interviews.

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>He left to try and his goal was to found

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a competing leak side. He felt that wiki leaks had

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>lost sight of its ideals, that it was not following,

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it was not behaving in a way that again was

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 1>aligned with its ideals. Perhaps he felt that it was

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>more sensationalized, the kind of way that we've been talking about.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>How you know, that's always been my person anal impression,

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.839
<v Speaker 1>but again that's a personal impression. Um. So he wanted

0:42:04.880 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to found a company called open leaks that would be

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially a competitor to wiki leaks. Uh, and he wanted

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it to be more transparent than wiki leaks was. So

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't want to have these kind of deals with

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>various news organizations where it was almost exclusive, like a

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>partnership saying hey, I'm going to give you this information

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and then you can run it and you know, we'll

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll have this buddy buddy relationship. Just link back to

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>my site. Make sure you do that. If you link

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.719
<v Speaker 1>back to my site, we're all good. He didn't want

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to do any of that, but eventually he ended up

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>changing his tune for open leaks because it just didn't

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>go well. Part of it was that when he left,

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the things he did was he copied about

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty five hundred files and then deleted them from wiki

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>leaks's database, and he left with those files. Depending upon

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>whom you ask, he was either trying to partially sabotage

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:05.879
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks and establish open leaks by getting a jump

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>start with these files, or from his point of view,

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he felt that what wiki leaks was doing was irresponsible

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and endangering the information that was within these thirty files,

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and he was only copying it so that that information

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 1>would remain safe until such time that he could return

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>those files to wiki leaks. This is why this gets

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>really complicated, because people get you know, they get a

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>little irritated at each other and they act out a bit.

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So um Anyway, open leaks never really took off. It

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>ended up sort of transforming into more of a site

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that's designed to teach other people how to set up

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>sites that that can accept and publish leaked material, so

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>it really did change quite a bit. So then we

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>had October and November where those other big releases came out.

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:56.359
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eleven, that's when Wiki leaks was hit

0:43:56.520 --> 0:44:00.280
<v Speaker 1>by a pretty hard blow, and it didn't have anything

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to do with a lawsuit. This was a blockade, a

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:10.720
<v Speaker 1>financial blockade. This was when several major financial companies, banks

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and credit card companies all decided to end any transfer

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>of funds towards WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks existed solely upon uh submissions

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>of of monetary donations to the site. You know, people

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>were donating money in order for WikiLeaks to keep going.

0:44:29.640 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>This was essentially all those methods of transmission, saying we

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>are no longer allowing payments to go to WikiLeaks, so

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>even if you want to donate, there was no route

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>for you to go right. And it actually got to

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a point where Assange said that Wiki leaks had burned

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>through of its assets UH and and that it wasn't

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.439
<v Speaker 1>able to really regenerate them in any meaningful way because

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this blockade was preventing payments to go to Wiki leaks. Absolutely.

0:44:57.600 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 1>And this was also going on at the same time

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that um Or or a little bit before this, UH

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:07.920
<v Speaker 1>servers had started withdrawing their services from Wiki leaks. Amazon

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>dumped them, every DNS had terminated their service, right it

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>got to a point where you know, you could still

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>get there. It was you know, they would have work

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>around so that people could still get to UH, to

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>wiki leaks, but it was a lot of that that

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>support was going away, and you know, there were theories

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on all sides of this as well, saying there was

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a conspiracy that these companies had been pressured by various

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>governments around the world to end any support so that

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>way Wiki leaks would essentially kind of starved to death,

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that no one would be able to get there, that

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it would no one would be able to financially support it,

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and that it would have just go away and then hey,

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>no more problems with all this leaked information because no

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>one has any place for this leaked information to go.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>So UH. Whether or not that's true, or if it

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>was just the company saying, you know, this is something

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that is going to cause us problems and we just

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be a part of it, and they

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>were independently coming to that decision, I don't know. I

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 1>guess if there was a leak about it, we'd find

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:12.399
<v Speaker 1>out this was This was also around the same time

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that that they had published in September of two, two

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven, they had published over two cables that did

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>not contain read actions, which means that that the sources

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of this information and in some places victims names and etcetera,

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>had not been blacked out. Yeah. In other words, there

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>were names of individuals within these cables that someone who

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>is reading over this could then target, either politically or

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:45.000
<v Speaker 1>literally target these these folks that are mentioned in these cables,

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and so there were there's a lot of criticism leveled

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>against Wiki leaks and against Assange, saying that it was

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>being irresponsible and endangering people's lives. Assange has not been

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 1>the most um compassionate person in regards to this. He's

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>often said that, uh, his goal is to save innocent lives,

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but if it endangers a few people because of the

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>information that's revealed in these in these cables, then that's

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's acceptable. I'm paraphrasing. That's not exactly what

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, but it's it's more or less the message

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that has been given collateral murder. Yeah, it's yeah, that's

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that the Lauren seems to feel that

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>this might be a little touch hypocritical, considering the uh,

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the criticisms that WikiLeaks has levied against, you know, governments

0:47:30.200 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and corporations, that WikiLeaks itself seems to be engaging in

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of cavalier behavior towards people's safety. And

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, it is absolutely not a parallel to

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:44.640
<v Speaker 1>compare um, uh putting putting a source in hypothetical danger

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of persecution versus an Apache pilot killing a child in

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a car. That's that's different. Yeah, that's the obviously very

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>different things. But it does seem to suggest that there's

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of hypocrisy going on. I don't disagree

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with Lauren, is what I'm saying. UM. But but but

0:48:01.200 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that's but that is that is my personal opinion and

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and I apologize a little bit for injecting it. Um.

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>This this move did did create a great rift between

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Wiki Leaks and UM. Several of those newspapers or or

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>reporting organizations that we had been talking about them being

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in cahoots with earlier, The Guardian, the New York Times, UM,

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of papers around the world. Der Spiegel was

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>another one. Yeah, it was actually uh and the way

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that Assange was handling the relationship between Wiki Leaks and

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>these news organizations was starting to cheesse them off. Like

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the Guardian had certain expectations, the New York Times had

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>certain expectations UH, and the Guardian had felt that the

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.280
<v Speaker 1>New York Times was going to be able to report

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 1>on certain things which the Guardian actually wanted to have happened,

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>because again the Guardians in the UK and the secrecy

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>laws are such that there were there were these partnerships

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>between the Guardian and New York Times where New York

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Times could publish some stuff that would possibly get the

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Guardian into trouble but would still benefit the Guardian in

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>some way. So it was this this kind of weird

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.279
<v Speaker 1>relationship that was going on. But then a sane got

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>essentially got ticked off at the New York Times for

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the way that the New York Times handled its information.

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Because one thing that the New York Times would do

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>is approached the government and say, hey, we receive these

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 1>cables and we plan on running with the story, but

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>we're letting you know ahead of time, whereas in the

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>UK that's generally not done. Generally in the UK they

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>run the story, so that put pressure on the Guardian

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and also put pressure on a Sane And then as

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Sane was apparently very much upset about this and wanted

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to sever the relationship with The New York Times, but

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians still wanted this relationship with the New York Times.

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 1>If this is starting to sound like the relationships in

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>middle school drama club, that's kind of what it comes

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>out to being, except the stakes are obviously way higher. Absolutely,

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh yeah, they the newspapers five five global newspapers

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>bound up putting out a joint statement that said, um,

0:49:57.960 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>we deplored the decision of Wiki Leaks to pub which

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the unredacted State Department cables, which may put sources at risk.

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>The decision to publish by Julian Assange was his and

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>his alone, right, yeah, because they all had the policy

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:14.279
<v Speaker 1>of actually going through and very carefully uh redacting any

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>identifiable information to protect sources and to protect people who

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 1>could potentially become a victim of some agency. And uh

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know that was an important part of their process,

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you had people entire departments in

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>charge of reviewing every single cable to make certain that

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff they published was going to be safe,

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and so for this move to happen on wiki leaks

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and meant that a lot of that work was just nullified.

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And obviously that is a good reason to become upset. Well,

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 1>once you get into about May two thousand twelve, so

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Assange had been fighting extradition attempts and he had been

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>living in London while Sweden authorities were trying to extradite

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:00.640
<v Speaker 1>into Sweden. He had he had spent about a week

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:05.359
<v Speaker 1>in jail in December on those um extradition charges. Yeah,

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and he had for being released on bail, been in

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and out of court trying to appeal extradition. And by

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:16.319
<v Speaker 1>made two thousand twelve, the British Supreme Court, it had

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:18.359
<v Speaker 1>gone all the way up to the British Supreme Court

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:21.800
<v Speaker 1>said no, we're not going to prevent your extradition. You

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to go to Sweden to stand trial.

0:51:24.520 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That's when a sane then started to appeal to Ecuador

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the embassy in the UK and actually saying will you

0:51:31.200 --> 0:51:35.000
<v Speaker 1>grant me asylum? And it was at a point where

0:51:35.080 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he was in the he was staying in the embassy.

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 1>He had not officially been granted asylum by Ecuador, and

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 1>then there was going to be apparently a raid on

0:51:44.640 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ecuador embassy in order to get a Sange out,

0:51:47.960 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's when Ecuador said, we're giving you asylum. So

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it's almost when it's possible that that that raid was

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the precipitated Yeah, that was exactly the moment where the

0:51:57.880 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Ecuador said, you know, we weren't going to but now

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>we totally are because now it's political. So it's still

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:08.760
<v Speaker 1>very complicated issue, um and you know, guilt or innocence aside.

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's one of those stories that is really complicated

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and tough to to kind of unwind and follow. So anyway,

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Wiki leaks is still still a thing still around. It's

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 1>still you know, accepts leaked information. Uh. It has uncovered

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:28.719
<v Speaker 1>lots of stories, not just with governments, but like we said,

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with corporations, some of which have caused newspapers to get

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>into trouble for running the stories. Things like you know,

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 1>major corporations that may have fallen short on promises for

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:42.560
<v Speaker 1>doing things like cleaning up a gasoline spill. There was

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a specific example of that, um and it continues to

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:51.320
<v Speaker 1>fulfill that role. Some argue that it's even possible that

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole Assange story could just be a smoke and

0:52:56.160 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>mirrors for Wiki Leaks to continue doing what it does

0:52:58.680 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 1>without having to worry about some focus because there's this

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>fall guy. Right. Yeah, You've got this very flashbank kind

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of person over here who's going like, look at me,

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>extradition charges. Yeah, and then they can continue doing their

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>their political political work. Right. So, uh, I doubt that

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>anything is that planned out because life is just complicated

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and messy and it's tough to ever have a plan that,

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like James bond Isshue be very impressed. But but you

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:32.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's possible. You know, if they did do that,

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>then it's it's the stuff of movie legend. Speaking of

0:53:36.120 --> 0:53:39.000
<v Speaker 1>movie legends, there is a film being made well there

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>there there are two films that have been um in

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>production recently. One is a documentary that was just released

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I believe Alex Gibney's We Steal Secrets, right, and that

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one focused both on a sang and on Manning correct

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh and sort of it was supposed to be

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in all awards and all kind of portrayal. And some

0:54:02.960 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 1>people say that his portrayal of Assange does give sort

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of a warts and all approach. In fact, I think

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, Assange definitely did not make that relationship a

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:17.960
<v Speaker 1>sweet one because apparently he demanded outright that if Gimney

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:19.759
<v Speaker 1>where to talk to Assange, you would cost him a

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:23.719
<v Speaker 1>million bucks, and the documentary filmmaker, that's probably not the

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 1>best way to win that person over to your side. No, Yeah,

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Assange has come out very vocally against this documentary, which

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is funny because people other people have also on both sides,

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 1>have come down upon this documentary right and and some

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>some people are proponents of it. One uh former Wiki

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Leaks employee in particular, James ball Um reported reported it

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>being a very accurate portrayal, like to the point that

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it was deja bou seeing the film. Now, there are

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 1>some who say that Manning's portrayal was overly sympathetic. That

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they do, you know, it's hard to say that that

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>it's unjustified, because you're talking about one person who may

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very well have been acting in what he thought was

0:55:10.920 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>the right way to to expose what he saw as

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>unethical behavior. And there's no you know, there's no official

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:21.560
<v Speaker 1>way of doing it and any hope of it being addressed.

0:55:21.920 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And so he went outside the system in order to

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>try and have this done. That's that's kind of the

0:55:26.760 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>story that's being told. There are other people who say

0:55:29.120 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 1>it's more complicated than that, and that you know, it

0:55:31.400 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't truly altruistic motivations that had him do what he did.

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>But again, that's a really complicated story. When you're doing

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 1>a documentary film, you have to simplify things so that

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you can and be so two hours long. And note

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the criticisms I saw was that

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it made uh Manning out to be more sympathetic than

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>than the person felt that he should be. Uh. I

0:55:56.680 --> 0:55:59.919
<v Speaker 1>think it's really hard to say that you can't feel

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sympathy for someone who's being held for a military trial

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't have the same same protections as a criminal

0:56:07.560 --> 0:56:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or civil case would in a normal court of law.

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, again, I don't know, so we don't

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.400
<v Speaker 1>know the guy, don't know all the details. So uh,

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that will play out and the judge will

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 1>come to a decision. So the other one is, um,

0:56:24.960 --> 0:56:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fictional film, or I mean fictional, it's

0:56:27.520 --> 0:56:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a biopic maybe Barnaby cumberbund In it a cumber Batch

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:40.880
<v Speaker 1>right right, I'm sorry, John Harrison. Is that John Harrison? Um?

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>This This film is called The Fifth Est State. It's

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>being directed by Bill Condon, UM, and it is slated

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to be released on October eleven. UM and uh. Cumber

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Batch has said that Assange directly asked him to not

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>do the film, UM, calling it a massive propaganda attack. Yeah,

0:57:00.680 --> 0:57:03.120
<v Speaker 1>then maybe it is. I haven't seen it. I don't know.

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to wait here. But if you want to

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 1>see some really cool pictures of Benedict Comberbatch looking intense

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.720
<v Speaker 1>with bleach bleach hair, um, those are on the internet.

0:57:16.240 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up this episode, this classic episode of

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, the Wiki leaks story. Like I said, we

0:57:21.520 --> 0:57:24.440
<v Speaker 1>probably need to go back and revisit this one. A

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 1>lot has happened with Wiki leaks, a lot of ups

0:57:26.960 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and downs with that story. So I'll probably do a

0:57:29.960 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>follow up, maybe a full redo. We'll see. But if

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you guys have suggestions for topics I should cover on

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, reach out to me on Facebook or Twitter.

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The handle it both is tech stuff hs W and

0:57:40.680 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.840
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio visit the I heart Radio app, Apple podcasts,

0:57:55.680 --> 0:58:00.080
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows e