WEBVTT - Quack To The Future

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.319
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now,

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>along with the guys from fanball dot Com, here's the

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for a

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>playoff edition of America's longest running fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Paul Charchy, and my co host

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>today are Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. Hello, guys, what's up?

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>At what point do we apologize to Mitch Rubisky about

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>his Thursday night performance? Do we? We don't have to apologize. Yeah,

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>we didn't call bad. You're coming. It sounds like a

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>happy trombone ski right there. What I what I'm really

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>disappointed in is I've got this great, horrible trombone solo

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>and I've only been able to use it one time

0:00:54.920 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>because Mitch has been good. Come on, Mitch, I bring

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>back this version of Mitch Robisky. He's got the vikings

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:12.400
<v Speaker 1>coming up. That's gonna be uh um. I think he's

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>got chiefs and actors next week. Now we're here this year.

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>We are here this year at Yeah, we're kind of

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>always here. That's right, um, as always. We're gonna break

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>down every game, well not the Thursday game that already happened,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>but I got a good feeling Mitch Robisky is gonna

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have a good game. We're gonna give you letter grades

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on every player, will give you our rationale for every grade,

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>so you can decide whether or not you're on board

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with us. A few minutes from now, we're gonna give

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you nine guys upon whom you can take a chance.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Many are available on the waiver wire. A little later on,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll have three tough questions answered for you, and we'll

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>run through all of the matchups. Get you ready for

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. Guys, what I what I always love is Okay,

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the playoffs that means this really counts. I need

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you to give your very best possible. Yeah, we were

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>given the crap analysis are I feel like you were

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>trying the rest of the year. Yeah, but now I

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>really love getting that on Twitter. You really need this one.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>It's the playoffs. Gotta do better. Uh, let's jump. Let's

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>jump right into the matchups. Our first matchup is with

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Brian Cincinnati taking on Cleveland. Cincinnati is your adopted squad.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>For Joe Mixon, it's been He's slowly gotten better over

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the course of the year too. Now to this point

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got my highest ranking of the entire season in

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this matchup. What do you think about Joe Mixon this week? Yeah,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking of doing better, Joe Mixon has scored in four

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of his last six games, but not an ideal spot

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to stay hot this week. Over their last five games,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland is holding opposing backs under one Combo yards per

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>game and they've allowed just three total touchdowns over those

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>five games to running backs. But you have to play

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>mixing on volume. Malone's We'll give him a B here.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Also gonna give Tyler Boyd b borderline A slot. Receivers

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>James Washington and Alan Herns have scored against the Browns

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>over the last two weeks, and Tyler Boyd has scored

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in his last two games against the Browns. So boom,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>let's make it an A for my boy, Tyler Boyd,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>A J Green, John Ross, Auden Tate. Let's talk about

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>these guys. Green won't play John Ross might. I think

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to get at least sometime in this game.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Tate definitely will, But I'm not starting any of these guys.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>That Browns have allowed just one boundary receiver to score

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>over their last six games, and that was Courtland Sutton.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>The cordon or duo of Greedy Williams and Denzil Award

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 1>is legit. So they're all on the bench. Boyd is

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the only wide receiver I'm playing. Tyler Eifert two touchdowns

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the last time he faced the Browns on December eleven.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna gas. Okay, he's been that long

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>since he's seen the Browns. He's on the bench. He's

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>dead to us. Andy Dalton on you give him a

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>see multiple touchdown passes and six of his last seven

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>games against the Browns. If Marcus Mariotta, Jared Goff, Brandon Allen,

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>who's Jared Goff on the road? I believe Brandon Allen

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan Fitzpatrick can throw multiple touchdown passes against Cleveland

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this season. I think Dalton has a chance to over

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Cleveland side. Nick chob can give hi An a.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>The last running back to score through land or error

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>against the Browns was mark Ingram in Week ten, so

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they've been kind of tough against the run since then.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They've blanked the likes of Josh Jacobs, Benny Snell, and

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Levy on Bill. But opposing backs are still leading, are

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>still averaging a hundred combo yards per game, so Chubb

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>gets an A and Kareem Hunt will get a B.

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Opposing backs are averaging five plus catches against Cincinnati over

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks, and during that span Hunt has

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>caught thirteen passes while Nick Chubb has just four catches,

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>So easy hunt for B for hunch, maybe an A MPPR.

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Even I'm gonna haven't mentioned the wide receivers now, and

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the first one I'm gonna talk about his Jarvis Landry

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>while he's the leading receiver sixty five catches, nine nineteen yards,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns for Landry, seven eight oh five and two

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for Beckham. Brutal uh. Cincinnati is the only team in

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the NFL with an opponent passing play percentage under fifty

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>though that doesn't bode well for either of these guys

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>or the passing game. Landry has been red hot, garnering

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>ten plus targets and five of his last six. He's

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>moved around quite a bit, but should still run primarily

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out of from the slot world see Darky's Dennard who

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>has allowed just ten of eighteen passing for ninety yards

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>and no touchdown. So he's good. I think he's truly

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a slot corner and whenever they try to play him

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere it doesn't work out. But in the slot, den

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Art is very good. Agreed and uh so this is

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a better matchup for Odell Beckham um probably one of

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>the better matchups of the season four him. But again

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the volume is a concern, but opposing wide receivers are

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>averaging under seventeen targets per game against the Bengals, not

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volume, but Robby Anderson had seven catches

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred and one yards last week. Beckham can

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>do the same, one would think. David and Joku not

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>activated yet, so we're not going to talk about him much.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But he still has Arizona next week, so he's worth

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Mosterick and pick him up now for that Arizona matchup

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>next week. You know you got a figure for those

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that are still allowed to make waiver moves. He'll be

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a hot waiver wire guy next week. So if you

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted Joku for free, effectively, go pick him up now.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I should. I didn't mention though I gave a B

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to both Landry and Beckham and Baker. Mayfield also gets

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>a B two eighty four and three and two fifty

0:05:58.080 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and four in the two games. Again since the

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>last season. This is the first meeting, by the way,

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>very late for a divisional the first divisional matchup. But again,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>how much will the Browns need to pass in this one?

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals understandably limited Sam Donald the combo of Duck Hodges,

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph and Derek cart in recent weeks, but they're

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>still ranked thirty one against the past by football outsiders.

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Baker should do fine, but his ceilings a little caps here,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>just to be all right, Uh, Matt, let's move over

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco taking on the Saints, as are two

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>good defensive teams. And let's start with the forty Niners

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>side of this one where he mostarred splashed big time

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>last week. We're gonna talk about him in depth a

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>little later. What do you think of where he mostred

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>in the rest of the running game for the forty

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Niners in this matchup? So I was gonna say this

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is a really good reality game, but a pretty bad

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy game for the most part. Here Um, I got

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>all the running backs on the bench because it's Shannahannigans

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>all over again. Touch leaders in the backfield over the

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>last five weeks have been Brita, Brita, Coleman, Coleman, Mostart,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and now Jeff Wilson is back involved again to most

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.919
<v Speaker 1>Are huge day last week was the only back in

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that span the topped eighty rushing yards for the Niners.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>No back has topped eighty three yards in the Saints

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>all year, and they've only allowed one rushing score to

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>running back in the last seven games. So they're all

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Um, I don't really like much in

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the passing game either. I'm giving Jimmy Garoppolo a bench grade.

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Garoppolo has put up three big games this year. They

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>were two against the Cardinals and one against Cincinnati. In

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>his other nine games on the season, he's averaging two

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred six yards and one point one touchdowns per game.

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So unless you had the number one overall pick last

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>year or the number one overall pick this year, he's

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not doing We're very well against right, Yeah, so we

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>should call him Jimmy three pretty much three good games. Uh.

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The Saints have allowed multiple scores to each of the

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>last four quarterbacks they faced, and two of those four

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of top three yards. But I still don't think Jimmy

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>g is getting it done. George Kittle, I am giving

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. Two Kittles topped eighty five yards or

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>scored in five of his last seven and the Saints

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have given up four relevant fantasy days to tight ends

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in the last four weeks. So Kidles just an auto start.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Emmanuel Sanders gets to see Deebo Samuels on the bench.

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Sanders led the team in targets and catches last week,

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>but that was only six and four, respectively. He seems

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to be over the rib injury, but he's not over

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Marshawn Lattimore, who he should draw shadow coverage from this week.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>On the Saint side, Michael Thomas easy a. I am

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>giving an A grade to Alvin Kamara as well. And

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there's there's okay, I'm gonna I'm gonna get right into

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all the shade that needs to be thrown here alright. Um,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't topped a hundred rushing yards all year. He's

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>scored only twice, both in one game. Yes, on the

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>positive side, running back has topped eighty total yards on

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Niners, and six of the last seven weeks that'll

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 1>be Kamara, and Kamara has seen reception totals of eight, ten, nine,

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and four in the last four weeks. Those are huge

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>reception totals, and in PPR leagues, he's still just an

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>auto start. I think he's an a start. Nobody in

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the in the playoffs right now is thinking about benching

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Alvin m Nobody's got Alan Camara in the playoffs because

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>they're all out. Maybe, um, did you good job, Drew Brees.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm only giving a C grade two. Over the last

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven games, the Niners are only allowing a hundred and

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>forty three passing yards and under a touchdown per game

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to opposing quarterbacks. The only quarterbacks who have burned the

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Niners over the last two months were the mobile Lamar

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Jackson and the mobile Kyler Murray twice. Drew Brees mobility

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>might be improved if he played with one of those

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>hover around electric wheelchairs. I think that that might help him.

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook, also on the bench, the Niners have been

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>awesome against the tight end this year. Only two tight

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>ends of top thirty two yards against them all year,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've only allowed three scores to the position. Um,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.959
<v Speaker 1>why can't um? Why can't Drew Brees be on what

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was the palm? The mall cop? Paul Blart mark mall cop? Yes,

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>why can't he be on a segway? He could? I mean,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>are there specific rules in the NFL that state that

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't ride motorized vehicles? That's right? Show me in

0:09:57.440 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the in the rule book for the NFL where it

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>says just been a sega. It just has to match

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the uniform. That's all they care about. Yeah, my kids

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>are really good at those hoverboard things. Yeah, Breese might

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>might do well in those. I think I'd break my back.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Ravens taking on the Bills Another that we've You know,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we're starting out with a lot of low scoring, tough defense,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>really good reality games this week that aren't gonna lend

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you a lot of fantasy points. And this is Baltimore.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is a great reality game, and there aren't that

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>many fantasy points to be had. So we're gonna do

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>go through the charade with Lamar Jackson where I'm gonna

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you all the reasons he should have a bad game.

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Then you're gonna start him anyway, are we gonna do that.

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him an a grade anyway. We have

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the time for this. Here are the

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>reasons you should bench Lamar Jackson outright, and we'll never

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>bench Lamar Jackson outright. The Bills ranked fourth and passing

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>yards allowed, second in passing touchdowns allowed um. They are

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed the third fewest quarterback rushing yards, just eight rushing

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. Two of the past twenty seven quarterbacks

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of face Buffalo have scored a rushing touchdown. And I'm

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>giving him an a grade anyway, because the rules just

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>don't apply to Lamar Jackson right now. Uh, staying staying

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Ravens and maybe even the passing game. The

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>only the only member the passing game that you can

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>start here is Mark Andrews. It is a tough matchup

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>though The Bills have allowed the second fewest receptions, yards

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and touchdowns to tight end basically the top tight end defense,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and they basically are the top tight end defense. And

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Andrews only gets a be because he's been that good

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>no no tight end his top sixty yards against the Bills,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and only one tight end his top fifty yards, and

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that was John hu Smith. Who did it on one

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 1>flukey long catch. So it's a brutal matchup and Mark

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Andrews probably deserves more like a C grade here, but

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been so good for much of the year, I'm

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>giving him a B. Anyway, it sounds like you're gonna

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>play the players that got you there. Oh yeah, I

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>hate that. Then Marquis Hollywood Brown averaging a pedestrian thirty

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>six yards per game over the last six weeks. See,

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you need him to score, So Willie score? Answer no,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's gonna get shadowed by trade Abous White, who

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is not allowed to touch down all season, so he's

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>out to Where does that leave us? Mark Ingram? Over

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the last three games, the Bills are allowing fewer than

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen rushing attempts, the fewest for only fifty seven rushing yards,

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth fewest. Last week, it was only the second time

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>since Week four that mark Ingram did not have one

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards or a touchdown, and that was against a

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>tough forty Niners defense. This is also a tough draw here,

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but mark Ingram usually gets it done, so he gets

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Overall. It's it's tough if if Lamar

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Jackson is going to have a flop game. This is

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the one, but you're still starting. Let's go to the

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo side. We've only got a couple of starting grades here,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>beginning with a C grade on Josh Allen. Over the

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>past month, the Ravens are giving up ten and a

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>half points per game. That's it. Only Patrick Mahomes has

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>topped one touchdown against the Ravens, and while Josh allen

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing prowess is always a wild card, the Ravens have

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>stymied other good rushers this year, like Kyler Murray and

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson. The Ravens have allowed the third fewest quarterback

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards as well, So it's all it all, It's

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>all bad for Josh Allen. The only other starting grade

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got is Devin Singletary. The Ravens defense much more

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable on the ground than through the air. Aside from

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>shutting down Todd Gurley two weeks ago, the Ravens have

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed one hundred rushing yards or a touchdown to running

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>back in each of their last four games, and Devin

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Singletary averaging eighteen touches since he's supplanted Frank Gore. So

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, but just between all the usage and the

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>fact he can't pass on the Ravens, Singletary has got

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable chance at a good game here. We're not

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>going to start John Brown in a brutal match of revenge.

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>It is a revet. You're right, Revenge Stock. I forgot

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>about their revenge dock. Thank you. Revenge Duck is back um.

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Over the last two weeks, he's averaging just thirty three

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>yards on less than three catches per game. That's John Brown.

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But the important thing to know is since the Ravens

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>got Jimmy Smith back from injury and traded for Marcus

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Peters and have had those two in the same backfield,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>basically nobody passes for anything. And that's the case there. Yes,

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, just Lamar Jackson, you're toiling over starting him.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Most people who own him probably have a bye, which

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is the silver line, which is absolutely great because they

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>need that. By this week. They might like it's danger

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>takes it. It could be. I mean, I just I

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>really think if there's one game where Lamar Lamar Jackson

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>has the backgame is up and I'm stilliving him an

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a because he's just agreed, agreed. I'm just saying a

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of owners. Will they have a vibe most likely

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>everything charge available for you at fanball dot Com. By

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>going to fanball dot com slash chart, you get instant

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>access to my free weekly rankings, my free one dollar

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>weekly contest, super Flex salary cap contests, are podcasts, and

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>much more. Again fanball dot Com slash Chart. Coming up

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>next a segment we like to call take each hants

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on Me. Nine players who you would not normally start,

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>but you can this week find out who they are

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly Weekly Returns.

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's called take a chance on Me. Nine players not

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>normally in your starting lineup, many of whom are available

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire. My co host and I are

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>going to provide three quarterbacks, to running backs, and three

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>receivers we believe are unusually startable this week, beginning with

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson in the quarterback position. Who you got all right?

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>We heard the revenge duck. Now I need the duck duck.

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>The distinction very slept between those ducks, Devlin Duck Hodges

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>At Arizona, this is quite simple. Arizona has surrendered the

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns in the league with thirty one. They've

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>surrendered three plus passing yunds in five straight games. Duck

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>has turned the tables on the Hunters because he's got

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the gun. He's got a cannon, and the Cardinals have

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>allowed sixty pass plays of twenty plus yards. Zero Ducks

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>greater than Cardinals. I think if a real Duck and

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a real Cardinal got in a fight, oh, I take

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Duck, I take the Cardinal. They are mean. That

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is a mean, mean bird. You should see the blue

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>jays in my backyard. The Cardinal. Yeah, there mean to

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the jerks of the avion world, for sure, they are.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You want to want to hear about another jerk? Sam

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Donald was a jerk last week against Since he really was.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But he's the quarterback against the Dolphins, and that's basically it.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins have been the slump buster uh for every quarterback.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Multiple scores for each of the following fantasy studs, and

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I used that in print their quotation marks uh, Phil Rivers,

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Case Keenum Mason, Rudolph Baker, Mayfield, even let Carson Wentz

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>get back in the positive. Last week, Donald's coming off

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a bad game against the lowly Bengals and the prior

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>to games against Washington and Oakland. He was averaging over

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards and three scores per game. I think

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Donald's probably on that again this week three three calling

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it all right. I'm now I'm wondering what are slump

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>buster sound should be. I really hope Donald makes out

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all right this weekend. I think it's gonna Ryan Fitzpatrick

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>goes up against the Jets in that same game, and

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what this is, It's time for the revenge

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>duck as Rand Fitzpatrick takes on the Jets. He faced

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the Jets in week nine two eight yards and three

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns for Mighty Stu Beard. Volume will be Fitzpatrick's friend.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Since Week six, opponents are throwing thirty eight passes per

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>game against New York. They're a great run defense. At

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Miami can't run at all, and they are a terrible

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>past defense. And Stu Beard's the best thing going. When

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick throws thirty eight or more passes, he averages three

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one yards. Big game coming for Ryan Fitzpatrick. Let's go

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to the take a chance, I mean running backs, Brian.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying with the Steelers and going Jalen Samuel's at

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the same Arizona Cardinals of course, James Conner has been

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>ruled out. Yes, Benny Snill will start, but Samuels will

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>assume all of the third down work and could be

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in line for an expanded role if Pittsburgh somehow manages

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to fall behind, which isn't all that unrealistic. Um Arizona

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>has been been a good matchup for pass catching backs

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as of late, outside of the Rams runners, who are

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>rarely targeted. The Cardinals yielded catch totals of thirteen and

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve to the back fields of San Francisco and Tampa

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Bay in their last two games prior to the l

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>A game. And then there's more receiving angles here. Juju

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>looking kind of dicey. He's out, He's ruled out. Okay,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>my bad Vance McDonald's. Janlen Samuels might be a better

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>tight end than Vance McDonald is. And we all know

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>how tight ends do against the Arizona Cardinals. So changing

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Jylen Samuel's position, all right, don't get let Yahoo know,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>because they'll make anybody a tight end, or they did

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>last year. They've done it several times. Uh, Matt, you

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>take a chance to mere running back. I planted my

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>flag in one of the Buccaneers running backs, and so

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to decipher this one. So hear me out.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones is still the starter, but Peyton Barber shows

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.199
<v Speaker 1>up and kills you ever so often like he did

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.679
<v Speaker 1>last week. But the Bucks have essentially split the backfield

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>in games where it's close or where they're leading the

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>line in this game is Bucks by three show, which

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>should be one of those games. So what backs have

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>had the most success against against the Colts in recent weeks. Yes,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it's Derrick Henry, It's Carlos Hyde, alright, it's Leonard four

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>net bigger back, It's Trey Edmonds. All four of them

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have the same thing in common there two pounds or more.

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones is two hundred pounds. Peyton Barber. There we go.

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>If it's gonna be a close game, we're looking at

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys in the twelve to fifteen carry arrange.

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But Barber is gonna have the success. Okay, I like it,

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>calling you shot um. I tweeted this earlier. I think

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>last Sunday. There are approximately forty million Americans and Canadians

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>who play fantasy football. I'm glad you kept the Canadians

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in there. Well, they count a boot. They There isn't

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>one person who has successfully started either Peyton Barber in

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>all the right weeks and benched him in all the

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>right weeks, or Ronald Jones started him in all the

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>right weeks. Nobody's broken it down like I just did.

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Right there. No, that's gonna be the angle right there,

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance to be running back has not

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>scored a rushing touchdown in two years. That's Davanta Freeman.

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It's come to this. It was the the playoff game

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>before the Minneapolis miracle. I think you're right, Um. The

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Panthers are the opponent this week. They've allowed a rushing

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>score in eight straight games. They've given up nineteen running

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>back touchdowns this year. Caroline has given up at least

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>one hundred fifty two combo yards to their opponents in

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>five of the last six games. What was the one

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>game in the last six in which they did not

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>give up one hundred fifty two yards? It was the

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Falcons Brian Hill and Brian Hill. Watch Brian Hill get

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns. That I thought about that. I'm like, well,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I should just go Brian Hill right now. But Freeman

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>should get the majority of the work here is pedestrian.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>As he's been, he should get the majority of the

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>work in a great matchup, Let's go to the receivers.

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Who's he to take a chance of me? Receiver, Brian,

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm staying in the desert in Arizona, but I'm going

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>to the other sideline with Larry Fitzgerald. I can't move

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>using letterally Fitzgerald as it take a chance and receiver

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for a while. He has provided he say four as

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>of late with catch totals of eight, five and six.

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>But there is potential for a ceiling here, especially if

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is playing from behind slot wish. Slot wide receivers

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have faredwell against Pittsburgh in the last three Landry Jarvis

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Landry at six or seventy six, Tyler Boyd five for

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>one oh one in a touchdown, and then it was

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Landry uh again or it was going you know

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>back in time had four for forty three and one.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Even Miami's Alan Hearns and Albert Wilson both scored from

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the slot against Pittsburgh not long ago. So let's gool

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Larry fits all right, I got a double bonus. Take

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance to me, wide receiver, here. But first I

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gotta ask you a question. Which one of these names

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>does not belong here? Zach Pascal, Marcus Johnson, Donovan Reiners

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>or Ashton duel in Um. All of them don't belong

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Three of them are coldswide receivers that

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>received a target last week. The fourth is a kid

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>from my son's soccer team. Okay, great Pascal is the

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>obvious play with t Y Hilton officially out, but Marcus

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Johnson becomes interesting. He had six targets four receptions in

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty five yards last week, and this week he gets Tampa.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks have allowed the most receptions and yards to

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in the second most touchdowns in the league,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with nineteen on the season through twelve games. Marcus Johnson

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is even in play in a deep league. I think

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>we have to be very deep. But yes, bucket yours

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>secondary has been strangely competent the last couple of weeks,

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't trust it alright. Our final take a

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>chance of me player is a tight end. Not only

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is he a tight end, he is the tight end

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in that he has He's the highest scoring fantasy tight

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>end over the last six weeks. And he's available in

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>half of the league's That's Kyle Rudolph. Since Adam Feeland's injury,

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>he has scored six touchdowns in six games. When he

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 1>faced to troyd in Week seven, this week's opponent, five catches,

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight yards and a touchdown for Kyle Rudolph. Since

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that Rudolph touchdown in Week seven, the Lions have surrendered

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>four more tight end touchdowns, including touchdowns to the likes

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of Foster Moreau, Ben Bronicker and Jasper horse Stead. If

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>those guys can score on the Lions, why not Kyle

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Rudolph available in half of leagues? Those are solid NFC

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>North splits splits right there, Brown and Jesper what's his stead?

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Yesper Harstead. Um, let's go to work. In one or

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe even two matchups into this segment. Denver taking on

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Texans and Brian Drew Lock got his first

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>start last week, looked quasi competent. What do you think

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>about him this week against an inconsistent Houston Texans secondary. Well,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>first off, this is the battle of teams who paid

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Brock Oswiler to play football. That's a good point, but

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the Texans lost that one. By a wide margin by

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Start Cleveland. Like, huh picked up the tab because it's

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>been a while. The official name on this show is

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>brick Oss Wilder, so let's keep that straight my bed anyway. Uh,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Drew Lock. I got him on the bench,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>just rookie making his first road start. It's a it's

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's better than neutral matchup. But let's see what we

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>got here. Uh, let's go to his top receiver. Obviously,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Courton and Sutton can give him a B. He's an

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>automatic A with an a proven competent quarterback. Hopefully Drew

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Lock can prove to be that at some point. Because

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Courtlon Sutton is let. Houston has allowed the fifth most

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdowns on the season, but just two over

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the last four games. That's said, they haven't faced anyone

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>quite like Sutton, so a safe B for Courtland here.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get kind of cute with Tim Patrick,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but just again, with Drew Lock making his first start

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road, I'm gonna put him on the bench

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. As Noah Fant was out targeted by Jeff

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Human last week, and Fant can't block supposedly, and Drew

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Drew Locks probably need some blockers in this game, so

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:23.479
<v Speaker 1>he's on the bench. Houston has only allowed three tight

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>end touchdowns all season. By the way, air Ebron, Darren Waller,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews Fant isn't quite in that company just yet. Uh.

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay, though does get a starting grade with a B,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was actually out snapped by Royce Freeman last week, with

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay still had two x the touches, so I'm not

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>too worried about that. And the Texans have been getting

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 1>touched up by opposing backs recently over the last three weeks. Uh.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They're allowing a hundred and thirty plus combo yards in

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>every game to opposing running backs and six total touchdowns

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to the position during that span. So a safe B

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for Philip Lindsay here Over to the Houston side, and

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>uh to the running backs Carlos Hide and Duke Johnson,

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this situation got pretty messy last week. I'm gonna give

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>both a sea here. Duke outtouched Tide fourteen to eleven

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>total ninety yards in a touchdown. Hide had twenty two

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>meaningless scoreless yards. So gross Hide looks tired to me.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And then he does this a lot where he wears

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>down Duke looks like he's got the fresher legs right now. Yeah,

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:21.719
<v Speaker 1>I might change my mind when I'm done with this

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.880
<v Speaker 1>analysis here because outside of a monster game by Leo

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>four Nett in Week four against the Broncos, Denver had

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>been shutting down opposing running backs all season, but they've

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of packed it in the last couple of games.

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Last week Black Backs, that's the Chargers running backs total

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the hundred seventy seven yards and uh, I get it.

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And Buffalo Backs had a hundred seventy nine combo yards

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of the week before no touchdowns there. So I'm gonna

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>give both a sea here because Houston should dominate time

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of position. Um DeAndre Hopkins though another brutal draw after

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>getting Stephon Gilmore last week. Gets Chris Harris, but he's

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins. He can't go below a season on your bench.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>He still gotta start him. Well. Fuller going to give

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>him a sea borderline b Denver has allowed seven wide

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns over the last six games. Kind of shocking.

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Fuller should be free from Harris uh shadow coverage, but

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>per usual Fullers a boom or bust option. Uh, he

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>will see a lot of Isaac Yam. Yes, the corner

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>who has a career one of the six quarterback rating

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage. So a safe sea for will Fuller. Hey,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Will Fuller, how about holding on in the ball? Yeah,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>how about catching a pass? That would be nice, that

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would help as well. And Darren Fells he's on the

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bench three or less, three less targets and four straight games.

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>He's irrelevant yet again. And Deshaun Watson, you give him

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a b here. Denver has allowed multiple passing touchdowns and

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>three straight games. These these teams actually met in November

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of last year and Watson had two thirteen and two

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>passing and thirty eight rushing yards. Probably a safe floor

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for him here. That does sound about right. Um Matt

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis taking on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers already talked about

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>several players from this game. Marlon Mack is going to

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be back in this one. Now, what we're not clear

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>about is he's got the hand in We're not clear

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, just this mean he goes right back to

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>being a workhorse or are they going to keep rotating

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that I think that makes us a little bit murky.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a broken hand, so that the concern is

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ball security and pass catching both. Yeah, so um, we're

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>probably looking at Marlon Mack who gets maybe half the touches,

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna get Jordan Wilkins and Jonathan Williams.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilkins replaced Williams last week who was benched. So I

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 1>have all of these guys on the bench and this

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.919
<v Speaker 1>one um Tampa has allowed the fewest rushing yards in

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the league to the position and only five total touchdowns

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>on the season, and with how murky this backfield looks

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, they're all on the bench. Jacoby Bursett, I'm

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>giving a B grade to. The only quarterbacks that have

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not thrown multiple touchdown passes against the Bucks in the

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>last ten weeks are Matt Ryan, who was replaced by

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt shab because the Falcons were up by a ton

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Jags quarterbacks Gardner Minshew and Nick Foles last week.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And Minshew had one forty seven and one and a

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>half of play, so you know, play that out. He's

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>got about um. So Brissett's definitely in. Jack Doyle gets

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>an A grade to Only the Cardinals have allowed more

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to the tight end position, and we've seen this

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in the past. When one of those two tight ends

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>goes out, the other one takes all the numbers, and

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you combine those two tight ends into a super tight

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>end and they're good. By the way, t Y Hilton

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is out, Zach Pascal and Marcus Johnson where my code.

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Take a chance on me wide receivers. Pascal's probably like

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a solid A A minus is B plus ish grade.

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in on that. I picked him up. I'm starting

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>him in a playoff game, yes, right, Um, I talked

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about the running backs for the Bucks, and take a

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>chance on me. We don't need to. I don't think

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting Ronald Jones or Daria Ogun Boala. Peyton Barber

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>just kind of gets a see. Mike Evans and Chris

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Godwin each get A grades. Evans is third in the

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>league in targets inside the ten, but hasn't scored in

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>four straight so some positive regression is due. And from

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter, both DJ Chark and DeAndre Hopkins each scored

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>twice against the Colts in the last three weeks. Colts

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>slot corner Kenny Moore is out for this game, so

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Godwin will be running it back up and a made

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>up name from Charge Roland Milligan. Roland Milligan was burned

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>by former undrafted free agent and also made up name

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Cliff Raymond for a forty yard score last week. Jamis

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Winston gets a B grade, mostly because I like his

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver so much. But no quarterback has topped three

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>yards in the last six games against the Colts, and

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.479
<v Speaker 1>no quarterback has thrown for more than two touchdown passes

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>since Week three against this team. But I just gave

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a grades to the wide receiver, so I got to

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>give at least a B to Winston and a desperation

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>D grade to O. J. Howard if you've got no

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one else. Howard had five catches on six targets last week,

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>was on the field for seventy of the plays, and

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the Colts have allowed the ninth most receptions to the

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>tight end position, So if you're really, really in a pinch,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a deep play for sure. Did you know

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>fan ball has day fantasy auctions actions? Yes, you do.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You love auctioning in the preseason, You'll love auctioning for

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>this weekend's games. Fanball auctions are fast paced, their frantic.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>They're real time as you bid on four players simultaneously.

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Against your opponents. Go to fanball dot Com click on

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the auctions tab. Coming up next on Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we will break down more matchups, including the Detroit Lions

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Minnesota Vikings, David Blow making a second

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>ever start. What can you do with Marvin Jones and

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Golladay. We'll tell you when we come back to

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. You're listening to Fantasy Football Weekly. I

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>am Paul Giargie and my co host Matt Harrison and

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson from fanball dot Com. You can hear us

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>over the here on many stations around the country, and

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this show is also a podcast available every Friday and

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>all major podcasting platforms, including the number one destination for

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, the I Heart Radio app de Troy. It

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>takes on the Minnesota Vikings. This one's uh. This one's

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit thorny with a fair number of moving parts. Here.

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback for the Lions, as you probably saw on Thanksgiving,

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>David Blow. Now his wide receivers have strongly positive matchups,

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not ruling out a decent game from him,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>despite being a second start rookie going up against Mike Zimmer,

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't on the face of it sound very promising,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be surprised if Kenny Golladay and Marvin

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones at decent games here. So I've got I'm giving

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a C grade to David blow Zimmer has faced four

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>backup quarterbacks this year. None have topped one touchdown pass,

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but they've all beat him two of them. Two of

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>them have beaten the Vikings. Marvin Jones doesn't have any

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>history against the Vicings. Oh it certainly did not score

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>four times in the earlier matchup with the Vikings, and

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got I think he's got eight touchdowns

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in his last four against the Vikings. I believe yikes uh.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He will see both Trey Waynes and Xavier Rhodes. Marvin

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Jones will um and they're both strong matchups. Based on

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>his history this year, Jones we most more oftensee Xavier Rhodes, though,

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>who is allowed over one hundred yards in his coverage

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and back to back weeks and was benched for a

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>while last week. So Marvin Jones gets to be great.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>He was better when he was Xavier Rhodes and now

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that he's ex Xavier Rhoades, he used to be Xavier Roads.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>He's an ex Xavier Rhodes. You're right, he has an

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>ex Xavier h Kenny golladays for him also be great.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>His his rookie quarterback hit him for a seventy five

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>yard bomb in the second play of the game on Thanksgiving,

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>but he still hasn't had more than four catches in

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a game in a month, which makes him very boom

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or bust. Over the last four games, Minnesota has allowed

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred yards per game to opposing receivers, including

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>allowing four receivers to top the century mark. So Gala

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Day is still in play here and he could do

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>well again. I've got him with a B grade. Let's

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the running game where both Scarborough will get

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the start again and he's gotten nearly all the carries

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>since he took over three weeks ago, but he gives

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>you nothing through the air, So keep that in mind

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're a PPR league. I know the Vikings just

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:20.719
<v Speaker 1>got hammered by the Seahawks Runners, but that has been

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>an aberration. Minnesota hasn't allowed running back to top seventy

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>six yards in their five home games, and only Andy

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Janovic has scored a rushing touchdown in Minnesota this year.

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know who Andy Janovich is. A one

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>yard gold line plunge for Andy Janovich fullback Broncos. Let's

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>go to the Minnesota side where Kirk Cousins gets a

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>straight up A. Even without we believe Adam Theeland, who

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely to play, Cousins is thrown multiple touchdowns in

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>four straight games and seven of the past eight games,

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>most of them without Adam clan In that mix of

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.439
<v Speaker 1>games was his Week seven performance against Detroit, in which

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>he threw for three hundred thirty eight yards and four touchdowns.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Every opposing quarterback except Dwayne Haskins, who does not count

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>since Week seven, has blown up against the Lions, averaging

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>three seventeen yards and three and a half touchdown passes.

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a great opportunity for Kirk Cousins, and that means

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I must like his receivers, and I do. That includes

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph, who is might take a chance of a

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver as I mentioned earlier, and he gets a B grade.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Diggs gets a B grade. It's for Diggs. It's

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>been all or nothing in these games. Without feeling in

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>three of the past four games, Diggs has had fifty

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>yards or less receiving, and then in the other one

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he went four five catches, hundred twenty one yards and

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Fortunately, Diggs faces a familiar opponent in the Allions,

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>who he pasted for seven catches a hundred forty two

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>yards in the Week seven matchup. To try to struggle

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>in pass coverage over the last three games, giving up

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 1>two hundred thirty five yards per game to receivers, the

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>second most over the last three weeks out of any team.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>So I do think dig shakes free here. He will

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>get almost certainly shadow coverage from Darius Slay, But Darius

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Slay just isn't a shutdown cornerback anymore. He's good, but

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not a shut automatic, shutdown cornerback, and he's an

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>ex Darius Slay Exterius Slay. I like it um now

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to get really cute, and at this

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>stage of the year, you don't need to because you're

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>probably in the playoffs. But maybe the worst slot cornerback

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in the league is Justin Coleman, who has given up

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the most yards in coverage of any cornerback. He's their

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.359
<v Speaker 1>slock cornerback. You could try Olabes Johnson. I do think

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings that will move Steph Diggs into the slot

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to abuse Coleman with Digs in that matchup.

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running backs. Dalvin Cook one percent

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>will play. He's got the shoulder injury but isn't even

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on the injury report for the weekend. Cook smoked Detroit

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>in the week seven meeting for one d forty two

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>yards and two touchdowns. But since then they got Mike

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Daniels back, and since getting their defensive tackle back, they

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 1>have not allowed more than seventy five yards to a back.

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Cook has scored touchdowns in ten different games and Detroit

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is allowed five running back touchdowns in its last four weeks,

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>many of them by the air, and Cook has become

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the passing game. Now there's a

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>chance here that with the shoulder injury, Cook gets less work,

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and if he gets less work, that brings Alexander Madison

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation, I think he's startable with a C

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>grade here because we don't know for sure how much

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>work that Cook gets. And then also there's this the

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are thirteen point favorites. There's a chance they just

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>get up by a lot. Could be a blowout. It

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>could be a blowout. They could end up that. It

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>could end up just resting Cook at some point and

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it turns into a Madison game in the fourth quarter.

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So I do have a C grade at Alexander Madison.

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to our next matchup, that is Tennessee taking

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Oakland Raiders. Well, Derrick Henry is the easy

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>part of this equation, right. I think the real question

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is what does he leave? What? How many leftover points

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>are there for the passing game? Easy for Henry. I

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>just want to mention really quick, he's playing out his

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rookie con tracked right now. So talk about motivation going

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>into the fantasy play unrestricted free agent after this year. Yep,

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he's looking to get paid and he's doing a good

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:12.880
<v Speaker 1>job of that. Future Tampa Bay buccaneer possibly. Um. I

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>do not like a lot of the past catchers for

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. Shockingly, UM, let's start with A J. Brown

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and Corey Davis. Davis is on the bench. Uh. First off,

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 1>let me say opposing wide receivers are seeing less than

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>eight team targets per game against the Raiders. Those are

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not numbers for opposing receivers and in that, in that,

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and if you're the Tennessee Titans, why pass? Yeah,

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I mean you've got Derrick Henry an unhealthy

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>numbers are Davis's target total over the target totals over

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the last five games. It's gone from seven to six

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to five to three to two. Just drop him. He's worthless.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.279
<v Speaker 1>He's probably dropbab Dynasty leagues at this point. Yeah, I

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:47.759
<v Speaker 1>will give A J. Brown a celough despite the low

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>target total by opposing wide receivers. Oakland is one of

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>eight teams that have allowed more than two thousand yards

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and at least twelve touchdowns to wide receivers. This here,

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so see for A J. Brown the number one receiver

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>on that team. Adam Humphrey's not going to play. I

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>believe I wasn't really gonna mention him anyway. He's been

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a huge disappointment, huge John new Smith. I have him

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, even with Delaney Walker on I R.

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Firkser might actually be the tight end to start,

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>but you want to avoid this situation entirely. They're both

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. I will give Ryan Tannehill as see

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 1>um even though it should be a Monster Henry game.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Oakland has allowed multiple multiple touchdown passes and seven of

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>their last nine games. The only quarterbacks who failed to

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>do so where Ryan Finley and of course Patrick Mahomes.

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>He did total to touchdown, so he didn't run one

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in so see it for Tannehill. But Tannehill has had

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns and everyone his starts. Yeah, you know, the

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:37.760
<v Speaker 1>problem is he's doing it on eighteen passes, nineteen passes,

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty passes. The low volume just caps Tannehill's upside because

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 1>they just running Derrick Henry so well, and the low

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>volume and the writings on the wall for that in

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this matchup for sure, um over to the Raiders who

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are underdogs at home. By the way, Josh Jacobs, if

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna if you're gonna break the show every time

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and alert listeners every time the Raiders are home underdogs.

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't that. That wasn't the case, at least for

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks when people thought the Raiders were good. Right,

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they had met Trick, they were the sixth seed in

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and up until for a hot minute. But anyway,

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs has a shoulder injury. He is a game

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>time decision at this point in appeared it's a broken shoulder.

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It's fractured. So DeAndre Washington go out and scoop him up.

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna give Jacobs a B if he plays.

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give Washington a B. I suppose if Jacob sits.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Over the last four games, Tennessee has allowed a hundred

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and forty eight combo yards and one and a half

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game to running backs, and Jacobs does way

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>better at home. By the way, even though Oakland is

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a underdog. So just you got a monitor, Josh Jacobs,

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>he must handcuff DeAndre Washington must add Washington in all

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues at this point. Really, who has been added a

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>long time ago thanks to this show is Darren Waller.

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I should say drafted, not added. Waller is averaging over

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards per game over the last three weeks, and

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>during that same span, both Travis Kelsey and Jack Doyle

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>top seventy receiving yards and scored a touchdown against the Titans.

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Waller can do the same. Tyroll Williams, I was gonna

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bench him if it Dorry Jackson plays. But Dorri Jackson

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to miss this game. So despite not topping

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 1>six targets in six straight games, Tyroll Williams, I'll give

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 1>him a see, but you know what, he's really a

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>great boomer bus Are you like a high ceiling play

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>on fanball? In DFS, I would go out chase Tyroll

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Williams in a few lineups. But despite starting Tyroll Williams

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr bench, come on, come on, it just hasn't

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>come together. Car was eminently startable through the middle of

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the season and but just it's all, it's all feels

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's fallen apart and you need easier matchups At

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this stage, I think, yeah, there's um a couple of

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>wet time for one more matchup to work in Miami

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins taking on the New York Jets. Matt we already

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about this as a revenge game for Stu Beer.

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the other members of the

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>passing game and especially DeVante Parker. I think very highly

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>of DeVante Parker because as far as Fitzpatrick's targets go,

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Parker has seventy seven targets for Stu Beard this year.

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>No other wide receiver has more than thirty three, and

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>he's seen double digit targets in four straight. In fact,

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>since Preston Williams knee injury, Parker's top five in the

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>NFL and targets receiving yards and air yards. So over

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks. Uh, he gets the Jets defense

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's allowed eight wide receiver touchdowns and that's the second

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>most in the league over that span. A grade for Parker.

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Mike get Sicki gets a B grade. Gisicky has had

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 1>six or seven targets in each of the last five weeks.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>In each of the last five games, a tight end

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>has topped forty yards or scored versus the Jets. That

0:42:34.040 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>includes Gisicky's six in Week nine. Um, we're not starting

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the running game though Patrick Laird is on the bench.

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a fourth string running back going against a team

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't allowed a runner to top forty four yards

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>since Week eight, So we're not thinking about that in

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a playoff matchup. On the other side, the running back

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>situation is a little tricky because Levy on Bell is

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a game time decision with an illness. I bet he goes,

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but you plan for Bellow Powell in his absence because

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 1>if Bell doesn't go, Powell will be grade, but I

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>think I think Bells will be grade to um. The

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Fins have had the most rushing attempts against them this year,

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:12.359
<v Speaker 1>as opponents are averaging twenty seven rushing attempts per game.

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge number. Bell put up a hundred and

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty one total yards in the first meeting on twenty

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:19.279
<v Speaker 1>five touches. Sam Donald was might take a chance and

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback means I like his wide receiver's Jamison Crowder.

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving an A grade to Robby Anderson. I'm giving

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a b um. No team has allowed more touchdowns to

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position than the Dolphins twenty one so

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>far this year. The Dolphins have allowed nine touchdowns on

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 1>nine slot targets this year, and Crowder's running from the

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 1>slide um and I like Anderson because outside speedsters have

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>burned the Fins over the last few weeks. John Brown,

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>O'Dell and Alshon Jeffrey each had huge games against the Dolphins.

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 1>And then Ryan Griffin. I'm even given a B two.

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>He's had another seven targets last week. He faces a

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins team that's allowed the sixth most yards to the

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 1>tight end position, So Griffin is available in a pinch. Yeah,

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he is too, and I'm i gotta start

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with one of my playoff leagues. I'm starting Ryan Griffin.

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an opportunity here coming up. Next, we've

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>answered three tough questions. You get to play a lot,

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>try to go three and oh. We've crafted three absolute

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 1>mind benders for you to try to play along with.

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:19.839
<v Speaker 1>It won't be easy to try to go three and oh.

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Three tough questions on Fantasy Football Weekly. Next, it's Fantasy

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I am pul Charchie in my co host

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and for this segment, panel of experts are Brian Johnson

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and Matt Harrison. Let's uh dig into three tough questions, guys.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Traditionally we like to begin on a tough question. Number one.

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 1>In redraft leagues, should owner who are in the consolation

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bracket be allowed to make waiver wire moves? Brian, I'll

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>make this short and sweets. If there's anything on the

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>line that you can win, I don't care. If it's

0:45:11.120 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a red balloon, then the answer is yes. If there's

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a punishment for the last place team, then the answer

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is yes. But otherwise no, I get like, yes, everyone

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>should have a chance to play out the season. But

0:45:23.560 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>just play out the season with the players you got

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and let the big boys play for the prize. But

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>if there's anything on the line, yes, at all. But

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if there's not, no, just just sit it out and

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:34.359
<v Speaker 1>make best with what you got. So wait, but there

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.440
<v Speaker 1>is there's a consolation bracket, So there is a problem.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter if there's a consolation brackets. Elation bracket

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>is the questions and your answer is yeah, I'm gonna

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:45.920
<v Speaker 1>assume there's a prize at the end of this braacket.

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't have to be a monetary prize. Why I can't

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it just be I know I won. Well, that's worthless

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, that's worthless if there's no if there's nothing,

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>if there's no picks, if there's if there's no, it's

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna brag about winning the consolation brack it. Come on,

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>if that's if you're going to brag about that. But

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's a I brag about that before I brag

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about a red balloon. But you get the red balloon.

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I was I was gonna say penny instead of adonai. Okay, penny. No,

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.359
<v Speaker 1>So no is your answer. If there's no monetary value, No,

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so yes is the answer. If one one cent or

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>more of value, then yes yes. If there's not, then no, Yes, Matt,

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my answer is similar, but I'll try to do it

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>more eloquently. By default, that will happen. If there's a

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>prideful Toilet Bowl trophy or anything on the line, you

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>got to allow them to play, especially if it's a

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>dinostair keeper league. For sure, you need to allow people

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. If you believe the flip side, and

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you do not believe people should be able to pick

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up any players once they're out of the top bracket

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in your playoff league. There should not be a consolation

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 1>bracket in your playoff league at all. They should not

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be playing. You should just give him those weeks off

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and say, go play on fanball and play some dfs

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and win some money in the Crushed Church Championship. Um.

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's that's that's how I see it. Yeah,

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you you nailed the exact right. That is exactly the

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 1>right answer. If if I if you're trying to crown

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a champion and you don't want some two win owner

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>mucking up the waiver wire because he's trying to not

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>get that Toilet Bowl trophy that actually looks like the

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>toilet lid or whatever. They're trying to not get that

0:47:28.600 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 1>thing and they don't want to hold it for a

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 1>year or whatever, you know whatever that loser penalty is

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that they've got that. Don't have the consolation bracket at all.

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Don't have a loser penalty. But this question, there is

0:47:38.280 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a consolation bracket. What do you here there is? So

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the point is, if there is a consolation bracket, then

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people are playing for something. It doesn't have to be

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a money It can pride counts. They're spun up by

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>the fall. You know what we say. We always say

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>this in face football, it's not about the money. If

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I were to ask you, tell me about tell me

0:47:54.920 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>about your fantasy football championships. You'll go, oh, well, two

0:47:57.600 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand two, I had this team, and I went I

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>started this he's and nine and oh and then I

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>had this tough loss and I had marsh On Lynch

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and he powered me to blah blah blah. It's never well,

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I won four two bucks. It's not about the money

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that should be tell. The point being, if owners have

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:17.720
<v Speaker 1>something anything to play for, they get to make waiver

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 1>wire moves tough question number two. For the rest of

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the year, San Francisco running back where he most start

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 1>will be an RB one and r B two, A

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>flex or a bench player. Matt, you know this one

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>caused some severe damage to my pennial gland. Yeah, I did.

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I can see, I can see it leaking out right now.

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that helps me regulate my body's internal clock,

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>circadian rhythms, and it helps me secrete melatonin, and it

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>has some role in my sexual development, secreting two different ways. Yeah,

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's all bad. Um. Most it's of bench grade,

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>as is the whole Niners run game, because you can't

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out who the lead back is in any given week.

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned before in the matchup, three different runners

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>have led the team and touches in the last five weeks.

0:49:05.800 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Brita gets dinged up a lot, but he also placed

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>through it quite often. Tevin Coleman has been bad for

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks, but before that he was a

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty solid RB two. If you can tell me that

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:18.719
<v Speaker 1>both of those guys won't play at all for the

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year, I'd give most dire an r

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:25.399
<v Speaker 1>B two, But as is, he's a bench player. Bench Okay, Yeah,

0:49:25.440 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this week it's a brutal matchup at New Orleans Atlanta.

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Next week at home, that's a good matchup, and then

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the Rams in week sixteen. That's almost a blocker for

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>running backs. As Matt said, uh no, Loane running back

0:49:36.760 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>really has popped off as a bell cow all season.

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>On four occasions a San Francisco back has topped fifteen carries.

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman did it in weeks five, six, and seven,

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and then Rashima raheam moster did it last week when

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we had nineteen carries and Coleman only at five. If

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brita wasn't coming back, I might be changing my answer.

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, now Bree is gonna come back and muck

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this all up again. And Brita is the best running

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>back on the team skill wise in my opinion, and

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>when he's healthy, he will be the back. So I

0:50:00.680 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>got most of on the bench too, all right, So

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.479
<v Speaker 1>most of its averaging six yards per carry six back

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to back seven yard per carry games coming into this.

0:50:09.440 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>He just ravaged an excellent Baltimore defense. Tevin Coleman is

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not even a factor in this conversation anymore. If you've

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 1>been paying attention. You've noticed diminishing snap count in four

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>straight weeks and then ultimately benched in the second half

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of last week's game. Tevin Coleman is just not very good.

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>He's not even a factor. So then that only really

0:50:27.640 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>leaves us with Matt Brita to sweat. Now, Brita is

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:34.320
<v Speaker 1>good and maybe even the best back in the backfield,

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like Brian just said, but does it even matter because

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we all know what's gonna happen to Matt Breed to

0:50:38.000 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the moment he gets more than five or six touches

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in a game, he's dead. Most of the work is

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to wheheem Mostred by default pre dead. San Francisco,

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as a reminder, has the most rushing touchdowns in the league.

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They've got They lead the NFL in running back rushing

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 1>yards total yards by their running backs. It's San Francisco

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>as the lead back in a quality offense where he

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Mostred is going to be an RB two the rest

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of the way. Shanahanigans, man, oh yeah, it's I'm not

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.719
<v Speaker 1>saying there won't be your rotation. There will be some.

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Moster is the kind of player that you start and

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>lose a fantasy playoff week because of or win or

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or really really lose. Tough question number three, assuming Michael

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is sitting at top pretty much everybody's cheat sheets

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>at the wide receiver position next August. Who will be

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too? M Brian, who you got? I was

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so close to saying Mike Evans. He and Randy Moss

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the only two players in NFL history with a thousand

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:43.439
<v Speaker 1>yard seasons in the first six seasons in the NFL.

0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:46.840
<v Speaker 1>He's like a lock wide receiver ten guy. That being said,

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I want my first round wide receiver, in my top

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:51.959
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver to be the alpha receiver on that team.

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And Chris Godwin kind of MUCKs up that situation for

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, who doesn't have any competition at the wide

0:51:57.760 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver position on this the way, is this answer about

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>who it's honor? Who it is? I was saying almost

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 1>as Mike Evans, And now I'm gonna get to Davante

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Adams is my wide receiver to He has no Chris

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Godwin type threat on his team. Quite the opposite situation

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in Green Bay. And yeah, he only has three touchdowns

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on the year. They have come in the last two games.

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>He had sort of a slow start, but he had

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.879
<v Speaker 1>tough matchups at Chicago and he didn't score until Week ten. Well,

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 1>he missed five games as well. I'm gonna assume he's

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>healthy all of next season. He's seen double digit targets

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in every game since his return, at least six catches

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in every game, couple hundred yard games, and three touchdowns

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>over his last two He'll be just fine going to

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.760
<v Speaker 1>next year. Rogers has enough gas in the tank. Davante

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Adams is my number two wide receiver alright, Matt, I'm

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>going to bat for Amari Cooper again, who I predicted

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in our bold Predictions segment at the beginning of the

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>year would finish as the number one wide receiver overall.

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a kind of peacock. He's not going to finish

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:54.279
<v Speaker 1>number one overall. It's gonna be close, but he's he's

0:52:54.360 --> 0:52:59.560
<v Speaker 1>number He's not. He's number three in most formats right now. Um,

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the how Boys have to move on from Jason Garrett, right,

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I imagine they bring in an offensive mind to help

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>steer their young investments, as Dac and Cooper will both

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:10.759
<v Speaker 1>either sign big deals this offseason or get hit with

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the franchise and transition tags, Cooper's top ten and targets, yards, receptions,

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and receiving touchdowns. He's only twenty five years old. He's

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>playing for one of the most talented offensive collections in

0:53:22.719 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the league, with a good offensive line Zeke Dack and

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallup on the other side. Who's a beta receiver,

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not the alpha, but he's a good beta, right, he

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he doesn't have the Godwin problem. You're absolutely right

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:36.439
<v Speaker 1>about that. So I like I like Mary Cooper quite

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:38.279
<v Speaker 1>a bit. That is the correct answer. Mary Cooper is

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be the I think will be the consensus

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:43.919
<v Speaker 1>number two next week or next year. Remember, he's he's

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:45.959
<v Speaker 1>been this good this year playing on half a leg.

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>He's limping noticeably on every single play. That's been this

0:53:49.960 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>way since the preseason when he had the bad foot.

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And Cooper is not too old. I don't have to

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.400
<v Speaker 1>worry about the age drop off or the the or

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the can necessarily the camp hounding injuries of like a

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones and it's finishing his fifth year and he's

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy, isn't it. Yeah, he came out so early.

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Marie Cooper is going to be wide receiver number two

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:13.960
<v Speaker 1>next year. Nicely done. Man. When you lose Jason Garrett,

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:20.839
<v Speaker 1>you lose your precious garbage time though, so don't uh.

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's work in one more matchup, and I believe

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>we are on the Carolina Panthers taking on the Atlanta Falcons.

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>It's Carolina good run defense. Caroline is not a good

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>run defense. Christian McCaffrey's an obvious and this one, let's

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the passing game. Kyle Allen gets a C grade.

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the change it head coach really affects

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen much because Norv Turner and his son Scott

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Turner were responsible for developing Alan. They're still in the

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>sidelines and there they were the play callers before they're

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the play callers now. Alan played his worst

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:54.160
<v Speaker 1>game of the year against these same Falcons three weeks ago,

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>which does worry me. Frankly. The Falcon secondary improved dramatically

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 1>over their Week nine by when they used Raheem Morris

0:55:00.920 --> 0:55:04.320
<v Speaker 1>as their new secondary coach. Not only have they crushed

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen, but they stymy Drew Brees twice since then.

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So just to see grade on Kyle Allen here and

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.239
<v Speaker 1>it's in part because I still want to be able

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:16.719
<v Speaker 1>to use DJ Moore. Over the past five games, d

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 1>J Moore's average seven catches for a hundred three yards

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and has found paidired three times over those five games.

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta's defense has improved a lot, as I just mentioned,

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>But why Do's are still succeeding Over the last five games,

0:55:27.760 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta's allowed three one yard receivers and four receiver touchdowns,

0:55:31.880 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and receivers are still getting a little something done here.

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So I've got a a middling sea on Kyle Allen,

0:55:36.840 --> 0:55:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a straight up be on DJ Moore. Curtis samuel Is

0:55:40.200 --> 0:55:43.240
<v Speaker 1>on the bench is a low volume, touchdown dependent receiver

0:55:43.320 --> 0:55:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in a difficult, seemingly difficult matchup. Let's go to the

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta side. Hold on one minute. Yes, you're burying the lead.

0:55:49.719 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 1>Caroline is not going to get the ball in this

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 1>game because of all the onside kicks the Atlanta is

0:55:54.080 --> 0:55:57.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna just complete. They're never kicking off ever again, not

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have to There is that um I mentioned, And take

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.879
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me about how the Carolina the run

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>defense is just awful. Carolina Jacksonville are your two terrible

0:56:09.000 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 1>run defenses. DeVonta Freeman was might take a chance on

0:56:12.000 --> 0:56:16.879
<v Speaker 1>me running back. It's a lot thornier for the quarterbacks

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game. Let's talk about Matt Ryan. Normally,

0:56:19.440 --> 0:56:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I cautioned fantasy owners about relying on a quarterback against

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers because Carolina's got the worst run defense and in

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in league, so they don't even bother to throw. But

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons and DeVonta Freeman have been so inept that

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not a guarantee. He probably isn't gonna go like

0:56:34.080 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 1>full blown workhorse on this, so I still think Matt

0:56:36.719 --> 0:56:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan could end up with a decent game here. Um

0:56:40.480 --> 0:56:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan has scored at least one touchdown against Atlanta

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in eight straight matchups, and you'll likely score here too,

0:56:45.760 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>But I wouldn't be surprised we were just one touchdown

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 1>like he threw against Carolina three weeks ago. So I've

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 1>just got a C grade on Matt Ryan. Julio Jones.

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.399
<v Speaker 1>In his last nine meetings with the division riseing rival

0:56:58.600 --> 0:57:02.920
<v Speaker 1>rival Panthers, Jones has had at least sixty yards and

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or a touchdown, but he hasn't very been explosive games,

0:57:06.400 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and he always seems to draw Um Bradbury, which has

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.480
<v Speaker 1>been a tougher matchup for him. The Panthers defense has

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:14.239
<v Speaker 1>fallen a part of the last four weeks, allowing a

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy four passing yards per game to receivers, including

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:19.959
<v Speaker 1>one hundred yard performance in three of the last four.

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>If Julio Jones were healthy, I'd give him an A,

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but instead he just gets a B grade here. And

0:57:26.760 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that brings us to Calvin Ridley, who crushed Carolina for

0:57:29.320 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>eight catches, one forty three yards, and a touchdown three

0:57:32.080 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. Meanwhile, the Panthers secondary has been in a

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.080
<v Speaker 1>free fall over the last four weeks, as I mentioned,

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and well, you know, Julio goes so Ridley probably is

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 1>going to see cornerback Dante Jackson, who's just an above

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 1>average quarterback. But that was the same guy that he

0:57:45.640 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 1>beat for the for his big game three weeks ago.

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:51.439
<v Speaker 1>So Calvin Ridley a B grade. Austin Hooper is coming back,

0:57:51.640 --> 0:57:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll remind I'll remind listeners, Austin Hooper was the number

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>one scoring tight end when he suffered his knee injury.

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:02.480
<v Speaker 1>He was a top ten wide receiver time nine, So

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he goes right back into being viable. Here is a

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:08.160
<v Speaker 1>B grade assuming he's going to get a full complement

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of plays, which I think he will. He missed the

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 1>first meeting due to his knee injury, should return here.

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Caroline is allowing nearly sixty yards per game to tight

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:18.919
<v Speaker 1>ends over the last three weeks, and Fantasy relevant tight

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ends have fared well against the Panthers. Big games to

0:58:21.640 --> 0:58:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook, George Kittle, even Cameron Brat o J. Howard

0:58:25.160 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 1>combined for a good game. So we'll give it B

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:31.280
<v Speaker 1>grade to Austin Hooper. All right. Every week, did you

0:58:31.320 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 1>know you can play the Crush Charch Championship for free

0:58:33.640 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 1>at fanball dot com. When you assemble a better salary

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>cap team than mine, you get a shot at this

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 1>week's prize pool of one thousand dollars free to play

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one thousand dollar tournament. But more importantly, beating me is

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the only way you get an entry to our weeks

0:58:45.400 --> 0:58:48.400
<v Speaker 1>seventeen Championship, where you'll battle me for the ten thousand

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar prize pool. Again. Fanball dot com slash and chart

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:54.479
<v Speaker 1>is where you go for that. When we come back,

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers take on the Arizona Cardinals. Benny Snell

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:00.880
<v Speaker 1>looking to get the majority already of the carries for

0:59:00.920 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. Can you trust him in a playoff game?

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you when we come back to Fantasy Football

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Fantasy Football Weekly Returns Playoffs style. We're diving back

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 1>into the matchups, helping you win your playoff matchup. Some

0:59:30.040 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of you got a bye week and you're just coasting

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:33.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. You're just listening, going, ha, I don't have

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to sweat any of this stuff before we get into

0:59:36.920 --> 0:59:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that though. Did you know you can play super flex

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>salary cap at fanball dot com If you love starting

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:44.600
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks and or four tight ends four tight ends?

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Go to fanball dot Com Player salary Cap super Flex

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:51.680
<v Speaker 1>d f S. Let's dive back into the matchups. Pittsburgh

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Steelers taking on the Arizona Cardinals. Brian Benny Snell will

0:59:56.440 --> 1:00:00.680
<v Speaker 1>get the vast majority of carries against Arizona. What do

1:00:00.720 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you think of this opportunity for him? With James Conner out? Yeah,

1:00:04.360 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a very safe b for Benny Snell. Over their last

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>five games, Arizona has allowed a hundred seventy two combo

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>yards and one point two touchdowns per game to opposing

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>running backs. But the receiving yards from those combo yards

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>most should go to Jalen Samuels might take a chance

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of me running back, and you know what, he'll probably

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>see a few added targets because Juju Smith Schuster has

1:00:22.640 --> 1:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out, and you know Deante Johnson's I'll mention

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>James Washington in a minute. Outside of Juju and James Washington,

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sold on any Pittsburgh wide receiver, but James

1:00:32.560 --> 1:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Washington definitely get to be here. With Juju out, Washington

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>will man the slot where he will avoid Pat Pete.

1:00:38.640 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Peterson, who is still the best cornerback for what

1:00:41.000 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's worth, still a shell of his former self, but uh,

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's just an all around great matchup for wide receivers.

1:00:46.720 --> 1:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Though Arizona has surrendered the third most catches and third

1:00:50.280 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>most yards to the wide receiver wide receiver position on

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the season, and over the last four weeks, Arizona has

1:00:56.520 --> 1:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>surrendered the third most yards to wide receivers and the

1:00:59.160 --> 1:01:01.439
<v Speaker 1>only played three games over the last four week They've

1:01:01.480 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had their boy. So I will give Deonte Johnson a

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>dart throat see in this one, but he's more of

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a flyer in daily on fanball dot com. If he

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:11.320
<v Speaker 1>asked me, I wouldn't trust him and redraft Um. What

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you can trust is the opposing tight end against the

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Cardinals. Basically, any tight end that faces Arizona is

1:01:17.520 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an automatic a start. That said, Vance McDonald just gets

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a B four targets across Ducks two starts at quarterback.

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm a little worried about Vans McDonald, but he's

1:01:29.680 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a safe. He thinks Jalen Samuel's gonna steal all this

1:01:32.680 --> 1:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>touch And there's Nick Finnett, to who Pro Football Reference

1:01:38.760 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has him dubbed his baby gronk for some reason. They

1:01:40.800 --> 1:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>need to scrub that from their site. The Arizona has

1:01:43.200 --> 1:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>surrendered the second most catches and the most yards and

1:01:46.160 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the most touchdowns to tight end, So safe b for

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Vance McDonald. Duck Hodges might take a chance on the

1:01:50.720 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for very obvious reasons. Over to the Arizona side,

1:01:54.000 --> 1:01:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake the softest of seas for Kenyon here, nine

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>two combo yards is the high water or mark for

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>an opposing running back against the Steelers this year, who

1:02:03.480 --> 1:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have also just allowed to running back touchdowns over their

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>last nine games. Drake is strictly a volume play. We're

1:02:09.480 --> 1:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to talk about David Johnson, will briefly mentioned

1:02:12.200 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk another very soft Sea has been running the

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>majority of his routes from the right side, where he'll

1:02:17.680 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of the rejuvenated Joe Iron Hayden, who

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>was allowing just a catch rate in his coverage on

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the season. He's doing He's looking great. Larry Fitzgerald, though,

1:02:27.600 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was a much better matchup in the slot. Slot receivers

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>have been doing well. That's why he was might take

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me wide receiver. And lastly, Kyler Murray

1:02:34.320 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I got on the bench in one quarterback leagues. I

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>will start him in super flex though, but Murray's probably

1:02:40.040 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>still banged up in a very tough matchup. Pittsburgh ranks

1:02:42.960 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>fourth against the past by football Outsiders. They are third

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in sack rate, and let's just put it this way.

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers held la Mark Jackson to a hundred sixty

1:02:50.680 --> 1:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one passing yards and one passing touchdown. L Jackson did

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have seventy rushing yards, but it took him fourteen carries

1:02:56.720 --> 1:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to get there. Murray only has fifteen combined carries over

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>his last three games. So bench for Kyler Murray go

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with ste Beard or I think I think you can

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>find so I do I'd rather have done or a

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:10.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of other quarterbacks. And now you mentioned that the

1:03:10.920 --> 1:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Steelers defense being so good, and it it really is.

1:03:13.400 --> 1:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And for all the talk about Mike Tomlin is a

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Coach of the Year candidate, which is legitimate talk, most

1:03:18.280 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of it focuses on what how he's been able to

1:03:20.400 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>win despite his quarterback people are talking and running back.

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You lost Levi on bell To that was a season ago. Um,

1:03:27.240 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the more I think it's the defense, it's

1:03:30.000 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the defense. Well, now we're really going over the

1:03:32.920 --> 1:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>lost Franco Harris too, So it's the defense that I think.

1:03:37.000 --> 1:03:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Overcame Franco Harris and that was tough. It was a

1:03:40.600 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>tough loss. Jack Ham, Jack Lambert, Me and Joe Green.

1:03:44.080 --> 1:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Really very impressive work by Mike Domblin. Uh, the defense

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>has been very impressive. The Chargers take on the Jacksonville Jaguars,

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt and the Chargers running backs have a great opportunity

1:03:55.680 --> 1:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>against what is turning into one of the two worst

1:03:58.360 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>run defenses in the NFL and the jack Jaguars. Well, yes,

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Brian said before, it's uh lack versus the lack backs

1:04:05.040 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and its lack versus Jack and Jack Without Jack Jack,

1:04:09.600 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Myles Jack Jack is out, no Jack for Jack for

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the lack backs. Um. The Jags have allowed six point

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>one yards per carry over the last four games and

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>seven rushing touchdowns to the running backs in that span.

1:04:22.080 --> 1:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>They and and as I mentioned, they lost Miles Jack

1:04:24.400 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to i R this week. Eckler still deserves starts in

1:04:27.240 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues, as he's had thirteen touches in each of

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>his last two weeks and has had at least eighty

1:04:31.920 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>yards or a score in eleven of twelve games this year.

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen, I'm giving a B grade two hasn't top

1:04:38.720 --> 1:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy one yards since Week three, and that's bad, but

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he's had at least eleven targets and four of his

1:04:43.640 --> 1:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>last six games, and double digit targets is pretty bankable.

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And Jacksonville is just a middle of the pack past

1:04:49.120 --> 1:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>defense and their best corners are on the outside. Hunter

1:04:52.760 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Henry gets a B grade as well. Sixty nine nice

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>yards or scored in five of his last seven games,

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's slotted in most lineups. Don't worry about the

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>crappy game yet. Against the Broncos last week that was

1:05:03.280 --> 1:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that was nothing. Philip Rivers is on the bench, though

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the upside seems to be gone. Hasn't topped two touchdown

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>passes since Week one, only one yard game in his

1:05:11.920 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 1>last five. Similarly, the Jags haven't allowed a three hundred

1:05:14.880 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>yard passers since Week four and only two quarterbacks of

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>top two touchdown passes. The upside here is two fifty

1:05:20.800 --> 1:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and two and that's the upside. Do you buy into

1:05:23.000 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the Tyrod Taylor talk that that Rivers is at risk

1:05:27.160 --> 1:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of a potential in game benching. I think the organization

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>respects him too much um for them to bench him

1:05:33.600 --> 1:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>at all the season. The season's lost for the for

1:05:35.640 --> 1:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. I think that they let him play it

1:05:37.600 --> 1:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>out the rest of the year, and I think Philip

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Rivers retires at the end of the season, calling you

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>shot hip. Leonard Fournett gets a B grade, averaging over

1:05:45.320 --> 1:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>seven receptions per game in the last five weeks. What's

1:05:48.400 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>more shocking that Leonard four Nett has not missed any

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>time or even shown up on an injury report this year,

1:05:54.520 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>or that he's turned into a receiving superstar this year.

1:05:57.680 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>How about this, He trails only Christian mccau free and

1:06:00.360 --> 1:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>running back targets any trails only the off fore mentioned

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler and Christian McCaffrey in running back receptions unbelievable.

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>He's like Matt Qorte. Now, if he were scoring any touchdowns,

1:06:12.560 --> 1:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be a whole different deal. He'd be dominating

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>fantasy leagues. But he's not scoring. He's going to be

1:06:17.000 --> 1:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a super interesting guy to forecast next year. Um The

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Chargers have allowed the eighth most receptions and the sixth

1:06:24.240 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>most receiving touchdowns to opposing backs this season. That's why

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:29.439
<v Speaker 1>he's getting a B grade even though he's only scored

1:06:29.520 --> 1:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>three times this year. Gardner Minshew is on the bench,

1:06:32.240 --> 1:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know how I feel about Senior Stash, but

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>even I can't play him in this game. Over the

1:06:37.280 --> 1:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>last nine games, the Chargers are averaging only a hundred

1:06:40.080 --> 1:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and ninety four passing yards allowed per game and just

1:06:42.920 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>over one touchdown per game. That doesn't get better with

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a healthy Derwin James and Casey Hayward in the defensive backfield.

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why DJ Chark is only getting a C for me.

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>D D. Westbrooks getting kind of a desperation see chart.

1:06:55.680 --> 1:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Will probably match up with Hayward, who's only allowed two

1:06:58.760 --> 1:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>D fifty eight yards in coverage all year according to

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus, on only twenty catches. Chargers past defense

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good, but they're a bit susceptible to the

1:07:07.520 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>slot wide receivers, so Westbrook is in play. Slot corner

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Desmond King has allowed eight six of the passes thrown

1:07:13.760 --> 1:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage to be completed. That makes d D

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook sort of viable here, It is sort of viable.

1:07:19.520 --> 1:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the next year's ranking for Leonard four Net.

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me just tell you somebody that bugs me about

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy experts this last offseason for with four Net, all

1:07:30.760 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the fans, you guys like what, he's never healthy. I can't,

1:07:32.680 --> 1:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't put him in my top ten. He's never

1:07:34.280 --> 1:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy anymore. And you know it's he's he's just too

1:07:36.600 --> 1:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just too much risk. Now everybody's gonna overreact to that.

1:07:39.640 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Now this year, it's all gonna be Now won't even

1:07:42.280 --> 1:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>matter anymore. We won't even be talking about that storyline

1:07:44.720 --> 1:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that narratives will be dead one year later. Because so

1:07:47.760 --> 1:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>many people, even just just regular drafters, not even fantasy experts,

1:07:51.440 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>so many drafters. All they can do is replay last year.

1:07:57.000 --> 1:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just so, what's what's the amount of time that

1:08:00.360 --> 1:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you need in order to get a good sample size?

1:08:02.880 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it like three years? I don't Well, no,

1:08:05.480 --> 1:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>there is. How about this, there's no such things sample size?

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>How about that there's no viable sample size in the

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>NFL because by the time sounds like the title of

1:08:14.960 --> 1:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this podcast podcast, it could be by the time you've

1:08:19.880 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>established your true viable sample size, you're now aging out

1:08:24.400 --> 1:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to the point that you've become old and you're not

1:08:28.160 --> 1:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>as good and the sample size isn't true anymore. It

1:08:31.320 --> 1:08:34.759
<v Speaker 1>seems like we've breached the space time continuum. Here. Where's

1:08:34.800 --> 1:08:40.639
<v Speaker 1>our time machines effect? It's right here. And if you're

1:08:40.680 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>curious about what it would sound like if there was

1:08:43.080 --> 1:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a duck on the time machine, it would be like that.

1:08:49.240 --> 1:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't blame. At the same time, it's really weird.

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Two together, Quick to the future. Good job, Brian Redskins

1:08:56.920 --> 1:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>take on the Packers, be grades for the running back

1:09:00.000 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>acts for the Redskins. Adrian Peterson. Uh, you know, let's

1:09:03.040 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>start with Darius because I think that's the bigger story.

1:09:05.520 --> 1:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>He had the sixty yard run last week, scored a

1:09:07.720 --> 1:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of touchdowns, which is great and I think we

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>called that on the show if I may Peacock for

1:09:12.600 --> 1:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a moment. However, he did his damage last week on

1:09:16.840 --> 1:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen snaps. That's it. This is still Adrian Peterson's backfield,

1:09:21.760 --> 1:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>who is only one hundred forty two yards away for

1:09:24.720 --> 1:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>moving into fifth place all time in rushing yards. He

1:09:29.320 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>led the Redskins backs in plays and carries last week,

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>finished with ninety nine yards and a touchdown last week,

1:09:35.280 --> 1:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and he goes up against the Packers defense that ranks

1:09:37.320 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty five in rushing yards in yards per carry allowed.

1:09:41.920 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Three straight lead runners have topped one total yards against

1:09:46.280 --> 1:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, and Adrian Peterson still the lead runner there,

1:09:50.000 --> 1:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but Darius Guys also gets a be because he's been dynamic.

1:09:53.800 --> 1:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>The Packers have given up big games to multiple running

1:09:57.560 --> 1:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>backs several times this year, and there is still a

1:10:00.240 --> 1:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>scenario out there where Geist is the lead back that

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is the game that Bill Callahan changes everything

1:10:05.479 --> 1:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>up and they give the ball to Darius Guys. Now,

1:10:08.240 --> 1:10:10.599
<v Speaker 1>the hope is that the Green Bay Packers don't stake

1:10:10.640 --> 1:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a big lead and then the running game evaporates because

1:10:13.080 --> 1:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you get nothing out of the passing game. Needless to say,

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you're not starting any part of the Washington passing game

1:10:20.320 --> 1:10:23.479
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. They've been shut out. Dwayne Haskins have

1:10:23.520 --> 1:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>been shut out in every game but one, so we're

1:10:25.880 --> 1:10:27.479
<v Speaker 1>not touching any part of that. Let's go to the

1:10:27.520 --> 1:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay side of this equation, starting with Aaron Rodgers,

1:10:30.200 --> 1:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>who gets a B grade. Aaron Rodgers this year has

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>been a boom or bust fantasy quarterback. In his four

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>boom games, he ranks as quarterback number one. In his

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>other eight games, he ranks his quarterback thirty seven matt

1:10:45.080 --> 1:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>how many teams are in the NFL, not thirty seven two.

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:53.759
<v Speaker 1>So in his other eight games, Aaron Rodgers is worse

1:10:54.280 --> 1:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>than there are numbers of starting quarterbacks in the NFL,

1:10:57.360 --> 1:11:00.919
<v Speaker 1>like worse than Jeff Driskell. Yes, a him against Washington

1:11:01.040 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>feels feels like a boom, but it's actually potentially a

1:11:06.360 --> 1:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sneaky bust. Since early October, the average passing game against

1:11:10.960 --> 1:11:15.559
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins two hundred twenty seven yards and one point

1:11:15.560 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. Those are very modest numbers. Five of the

1:11:19.240 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>past seven quarterbacks to face the Redskins have thrown zero

1:11:22.960 --> 1:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>or one touchdown that's it. I love a sneaky bust B.

1:11:26.720 --> 1:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a sneaky bust B grade on Aaron Rodgers. Davante Adams, though,

1:11:31.400 --> 1:11:34.639
<v Speaker 1>gets an A. Over the last three games, Adams has

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>been able to weather the ups and downs of Aaron

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers to produce either one yards or a touchdown. And

1:11:39.439 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 1>over the last seven games, Washington secondary has allowed just

1:11:42.600 --> 1:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>one receiver to top just seventy six yards, which is

1:11:45.280 --> 1:11:48.519
<v Speaker 1>very impressive. However, they have given up multiple receiver scores

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in two of the past three games, and I think

1:11:49.960 --> 1:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Adams will find the end zone here. He's been very

1:11:52.240 --> 1:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>hot on the touchdown department in the last couple of games.

1:11:55.320 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of receivers, I've got a C grade on Alan Lazard,

1:11:58.000 --> 1:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>who runs half his plays on the easy side of

1:12:00.439 --> 1:12:03.479
<v Speaker 1>the field against rookie Jimmy Morland, who has taken over

1:12:03.479 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>for the sense bench to Josh and Norman. By the way,

1:12:06.280 --> 1:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dormans still making like nineteen million dollars this year, unbelievable.

1:12:12.080 --> 1:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>In his two games as a starter, Jimmy Moreland has

1:12:15.120 --> 1:12:18.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed nine of eleven passes to be completed, making Lazard

1:12:19.000 --> 1:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and all or nothing shot. If you need that kind

1:12:21.080 --> 1:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of player in your in your lineup, and let's go

1:12:23.880 --> 1:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to the running game where Aaron Jones has been a

1:12:27.000 --> 1:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>total disaster. So if you think back, like a month ago,

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he has that epic game against the Chiefs where he

1:12:34.840 --> 1:12:37.479
<v Speaker 1>ends up skilled with like a hundred receiving yards and

1:12:37.680 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>just mowing down Chiefs on the ground and through the air,

1:12:40.320 --> 1:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're like, finally they've learned how to use Aaron

1:12:43.439 --> 1:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones and unlock the talent of Aaron Jones. Since then,

1:12:46.800 --> 1:12:50.599
<v Speaker 1>total tail spin for Aaron Jones. Three of his last

1:12:50.600 --> 1:12:56.799
<v Speaker 1>four games have produced fewer than forty total yards. That's terrible.

1:12:56.840 --> 1:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And he has not scored in a month. He hasn't

1:12:59.280 --> 1:13:02.719
<v Speaker 1>carried the ball more than thirteen times in seven straight games.

1:13:03.920 --> 1:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And the Redskins are sneaky good against the run. They

1:13:06.360 --> 1:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just held Christian McCaffrey in check, they having allowed one

1:13:09.280 --> 1:13:12.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard rusher all season. I have a C grade

1:13:12.640 --> 1:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on Aaron Jones, and frankly it ought to be it

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>ought to be a bench But I just said, IM

1:13:17.080 --> 1:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>an inherent believer in jones talent and think he could

1:13:19.560 --> 1:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>emerge at any game. There's a bunch of people who

1:13:21.479 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 1>are very angry at their radio or podcast device right now, going, Oh,

1:13:25.520 --> 1:13:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Darren Jones is one of the guys who got

1:13:27.640 --> 1:13:29.599
<v Speaker 1>me here. I don't did he, but did he get

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you there? In the last month, he got you some

1:13:31.800 --> 1:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>wins early in the season, he did. There's gonna be

1:13:33.720 --> 1:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>better options for you to play than Aaron Jones. One

1:13:36.160 --> 1:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of them is on his own team. That's Jamal Williams,

1:13:38.400 --> 1:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>who was out gained Aaron Jones one hundred forty seven

1:13:42.120 --> 1:13:45.439
<v Speaker 1>to sixty nine in combo yards the last two weeks.

1:13:45.479 --> 1:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a doubling rough doubling of combo yards. He's

1:13:49.400 --> 1:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>also averaged five targets over the last seven games. The

1:13:52.160 --> 1:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Redskins have given up some big receiving days to runners

1:13:54.479 --> 1:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>including Dalvin Cook and Christian McCaffrey and Devin Singletary and

1:13:57.040 --> 1:14:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Bolden James White. Um So, I think we're I

1:14:00.600 --> 1:14:02.639
<v Speaker 1>think we're looking at a pretty good receiving game from

1:14:02.680 --> 1:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamal Williams, who gets a B grade here and a

1:14:05.120 --> 1:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>C grade in non PPR leagues. Jamal Williams is the

1:14:08.840 --> 1:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>second best receiver outright on that team outside Davante Adams.

1:14:13.040 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. It's to nobody else, it's not Gerontoo, Allison, Marquees,

1:14:19.000 --> 1:14:22.679
<v Speaker 1>Valdez scant Links, not him, Jimmy Graham. I don't know, God,

1:14:22.720 --> 1:14:24.559
<v Speaker 1>that guy disappeared, remember when he was wouldn't it be

1:14:24.600 --> 1:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>cool relevant like week one? I mean, not as Minnesota guys,

1:14:27.120 --> 1:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but wouldn't it be cool if the Packers signed Antonio

1:14:29.360 --> 1:14:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Brown right now? I don't think they can. I think

1:14:31.760 --> 1:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the you know, the guys who are not rostered.

1:14:35.040 --> 1:14:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Deadline is already passed. I don't get off the plane

1:14:37.840 --> 1:14:41.679
<v Speaker 1>and get right back on anyway, no kidding. Our final

1:14:41.760 --> 1:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>set of matchups are coming up next, including Seattle taking

1:14:45.200 --> 1:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>on the L. A. Rams. What do you do with

1:14:46.720 --> 1:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson and Rashad Penny? We'll tell you when we

1:14:49.240 --> 1:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back to Fantasy

1:15:14.360 --> 1:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Final set of matchups coming including the Sunday Night,

1:15:18.720 --> 1:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Monday Night games, and then Chiefs and the Patriots

1:15:21.760 --> 1:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>coming up. But let's begin with the Seattle Seahawks traveling

1:15:25.280 --> 1:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to the L. A. Rams Brian Last week on Monday Night,

1:15:29.360 --> 1:15:33.479
<v Speaker 1>we saw both Rashad Penny and Chris Carson carve up

1:15:33.520 --> 1:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a really good Vikings run defense. They face another good

1:15:37.320 --> 1:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>run defense here. What should our What should the people

1:15:40.240 --> 1:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle listening to us on kJ R think about

1:15:43.520 --> 1:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Penny and Chris Carson in this one? Before I

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>get to them real quick, these teams didn't meet already

1:15:48.360 --> 1:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in week five, so all reference to that points in

1:15:50.960 --> 1:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that game two meetings last year sixty seven and sixty

1:15:55.040 --> 1:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>four points these teams get together, so game stack, game

1:15:59.200 --> 1:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>stack might be right. So in the week five meeting, um,

1:16:02.520 --> 1:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Carson definitely led the way over a Shot Penny,

1:16:05.080 --> 1:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but they did combine for thirty six touches and a

1:16:07.120 --> 1:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty plus combo yards. But the Rams run

1:16:11.280 --> 1:16:13.519
<v Speaker 1>defense has showed up a lot, and as we all

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:16.759
<v Speaker 1>know now, it's essentially a fifty fifty time split between

1:16:16.800 --> 1:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Carson and Penny. And Carson supposedly let Penny score the

1:16:20.200 --> 1:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week. I don't know how much like like that.

1:16:23.120 --> 1:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like taking me out so ra shot can go. Yeah,

1:16:25.120 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there was there was some of that. It was Carson

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>subbed himself out. Okay. So over the last four weeks, though,

1:16:30.200 --> 1:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs are averaging thirty plus opportunities against the Rams.

1:16:34.200 --> 1:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>That's rushes and targets, but they're not doing anything with them.

1:16:37.320 --> 1:16:39.719
<v Speaker 1>During that same four game stretch, the Rams are allowing

1:16:40.120 --> 1:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>less than three and a half yards per carry and

1:16:42.120 --> 1:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine receiving yards per game to opposing running backs.

1:16:45.640 --> 1:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So I gotta see on both Carson and Penny, and

1:16:48.080 --> 1:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Carson had like three more three four more touches, and

1:16:50.320 --> 1:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Penny last week, I get him the slight edge if

1:16:52.200 --> 1:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I had to choose one, but it's not a good

1:16:54.160 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>look for either this week. What wasn't a good look

1:16:56.560 --> 1:16:59.599
<v Speaker 1>was Tyler Lockett last week, nowhere to go but up

1:16:59.720 --> 1:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>right after zero catches. I heard from a guy on

1:17:02.080 --> 1:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter in a guillotine league. He needed zero points seven

1:17:07.120 --> 1:17:10.559
<v Speaker 1>points from Tyler Lockett on Monday Night. One catch there's

1:17:10.560 --> 1:17:13.799
<v Speaker 1>actually he really needed was one catch for even negative

1:17:13.840 --> 1:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>three yards would have been a win. One catch for

1:17:15.800 --> 1:17:17.479
<v Speaker 1>negative three yards would have been a win for him.

1:17:17.479 --> 1:17:19.559
<v Speaker 1>And he's in a bad beat. That's a bad beats,

1:17:19.560 --> 1:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>a very bad beat. Actually, he could go nowhere sick

1:17:22.760 --> 1:17:25.719
<v Speaker 1>in that one. And he's been sick for three weeks

1:17:25.760 --> 1:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a shin injury. He's banged up. He actually had negative

1:17:29.240 --> 1:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>eight rushing yards in the first meeting. So if he

1:17:32.280 --> 1:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>he didn't catch and he passes, he would end up

1:17:35.320 --> 1:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>doing worse. But he had four catches for fifty one

1:17:38.200 --> 1:17:41.160
<v Speaker 1>yards any touchdown in the first meeting. Jalen Ramsey was

1:17:41.200 --> 1:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not on the Rams. Then Ramsey might shadow lock It

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in the slot, which would not bode well for lock It.

1:17:46.920 --> 1:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>They're saying there's a potential for that. Lockett has scored

1:17:49.720 --> 1:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in three straight games against the Rams. But just to

1:17:52.040 --> 1:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>see for him here, because I think Ramsey gives him

1:17:54.120 --> 1:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the shadow treatment, and Lockett's looking banged up. He's not

1:17:56.360 --> 1:17:58.360
<v Speaker 1>looking as good as he was earlier in the year.

1:17:58.720 --> 1:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So call him Decalf Metcalf. You know Decalf Metcalf is Well, yeah,

1:18:03.000 --> 1:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the bad version, the uncalfeated vision. Okay, that's also

1:18:06.320 --> 1:18:08.719
<v Speaker 1>a booger. Mcc was calling him on Monday Night Football.

1:18:08.760 --> 1:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But what is he trying to? Yeah, okay, I think so.

1:18:11.920 --> 1:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you never know, you never know. But anyway, um,

1:18:15.120 --> 1:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a be assuming that Ramsey shadows

1:18:19.400 --> 1:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>lock It. But if Ramsey shadows Metcalf, Metcalf's in trouble.

1:18:22.880 --> 1:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf has been a very reliable option as of late,

1:18:25.240 --> 1:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>averaging five catches, sixty yards and half a touchdown over

1:18:27.880 --> 1:18:30.799
<v Speaker 1>his last six games. But not an ideal spot outside

1:18:30.840 --> 1:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of the four wide receiver touchdown surrender to the Ravens

1:18:33.400 --> 1:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of an anomaly. The Ravens have conceded just one

1:18:35.880 --> 1:18:38.479
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdown over their last six games, and only

1:18:38.479 --> 1:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one opposing wide receiver has topped one hundred yards all year.

1:18:41.960 --> 1:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>That was Chris Godwin. So you know what I'm just

1:18:44.120 --> 1:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be for Decalf, dk Metcalf as well. Uh.

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He gets a c as long as as well as

1:18:50.000 --> 1:18:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett, and so does Jacob Hollister. The Rams have

1:18:52.520 --> 1:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not allowed tight end touchdown since Week seven, and since

1:18:55.080 --> 1:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>then only one tight end as topped forty five yards.

1:18:58.479 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>For what it's worth, will disially in. Luke Wilson combined

1:19:01.000 --> 1:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>for five catches for nine yards when these teams met

1:19:03.280 --> 1:19:06.360
<v Speaker 1>back in Week five, so it is worth a fair amount,

1:19:06.400 --> 1:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so Hauser probably c Plus, I know you won't let

1:19:08.680 --> 1:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>me do that, but I just did it. Uh. And

1:19:10.000 --> 1:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson in a to and four passing with thirty

1:19:13.680 --> 1:19:16.519
<v Speaker 1>two rushing yards in the first meeting, totaled seven passing

1:19:16.600 --> 1:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns against the Rams and two games last season. The

1:19:19.960 --> 1:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>main concern is Jalen Ramsey, of course, since his acquisition,

1:19:22.760 --> 1:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>non Lamar Jackson quarterbacks have averaged only two thirty yards

1:19:25.960 --> 1:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and one touchdown since the Ramsey trade. Wilson is probably

1:19:29.920 --> 1:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a little more Lamar than Non though, but a littlettle

1:19:33.240 --> 1:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more Lamar than none. Now over the Rams side and

1:19:35.920 --> 1:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley two rushing touchdowns in the first game kind

1:19:39.000 --> 1:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>of a shocker. Just fifty one yards on fifteen carries.

1:19:44.080 --> 1:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That would be believable. Sadly, in Curly's previous three games

1:19:47.360 --> 1:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle, though, dating back to last year, dominated eight

1:19:51.040 --> 1:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>total touchdowns. So he has ten touchdowns in his last

1:19:54.280 --> 1:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>four games against the Seahawks. But of course he was

1:19:56.280 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a different player back then. Malcolm Brown wasn't vulturing touchdowns.

1:20:00.280 --> 1:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle has the only allowed one running back touchdown over

1:20:03.080 --> 1:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>the last three games, and Nick Chubb is the only

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>loan running back who is able to top sixty nine

1:20:08.200 --> 1:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>yards rushing. That is not nice. So just a C

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>for Todd Gurley. I will give Cooper Cup a very

1:20:13.439 --> 1:20:15.960
<v Speaker 1>solid B. Nine catches, a hundred and seventeen yards and

1:20:16.000 --> 1:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown in the first game. Here is two games

1:20:18.240 --> 1:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle last year. He had six for nine and

1:20:20.760 --> 1:20:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one in the first meeting, but left with the concussion.

1:20:23.720 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Second game, he had five for thirty nine, tore his

1:20:26.360 --> 1:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>A c L mid game, so he was going off

1:20:28.680 --> 1:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in those games where he got hurt. So B for Cup,

1:20:31.280 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>B for Robert Woods. Uh just five for forty eight

1:20:34.280 --> 1:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first meeting, but as thirty eight targets over

1:20:36.080 --> 1:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>his last three games, he will see Shaquille Griffin a

1:20:38.400 --> 1:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot to Seattle's top corner. So soft be for Woods,

1:20:41.200 --> 1:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be inch on Brandon Cooks one nine in

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting, just four catches on six targets and

1:20:48.000 --> 1:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>two games since returning. Actually a plus match up against

1:20:50.880 --> 1:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Trey Flowers, who could be burned deep. But I don't

1:20:53.080 --> 1:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>trust Jared Goff's accuracy. Tyler Higbee Jerald Everett. There's two

1:20:56.920 --> 1:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>scenarios here. Everett plays, Everett sits. If every plays, I'll

1:21:00.439 --> 1:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>give him a see Ben Higby, Okay, if every six

1:21:05.200 --> 1:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Higby gets a B. Over the last two weeks, opposing

1:21:07.720 --> 1:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>tight ends are averaging thirteen catches ninety four yards of

1:21:10.080 --> 1:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>one whole touchdown against Seattle. When these teams met in

1:21:12.640 --> 1:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Week five, Higby and Gerald Edward combined for ten catches

1:21:15.240 --> 1:21:17.799
<v Speaker 1>a hundred eighty three yards. He's that was all general,

1:21:17.880 --> 1:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Gerald Everard. That was a huge Gerald Everard game. That's right,

1:21:21.040 --> 1:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you plays that really MUCKs the situation up. Though,

1:21:23.200 --> 1:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>then Jared Goff real quick a C three and one

1:21:25.760 --> 1:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>in the first game, top three hundred yards in both

1:21:27.720 --> 1:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>meetings last season. He's at home. I'll give him a

1:21:30.000 --> 1:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sea whatever. Alright, let's go to the Giants taking on

1:21:32.320 --> 1:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. Matt Eli Manning at the helm of the Giant. Yeah,

1:21:34.800 --> 1:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this one's Monday Night. He looks to get at least

1:21:36.800 --> 1:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>one more start in his long and storied career because

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones is in a walking boot this week and

1:21:40.920 --> 1:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he's unlikely to go. Before Ryan Fitzpatrick's explosion against the

1:21:44.760 --> 1:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Eagles last week, they had kind of figured out how

1:21:47.120 --> 1:21:49.559
<v Speaker 1>to play past defense, and the prior five weeks they

1:21:49.560 --> 1:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>had held opposing quarterbacks two d eighty nine yards per

1:21:52.160 --> 1:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>game in less than a touchdown. And it wasn't some

1:21:55.160 --> 1:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>bad quarterbacks, it was Doc. It was Josh Allen, Tom

1:21:58.080 --> 1:22:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Russell Wilson and that girl. Some good pastors there, yep.

1:22:01.080 --> 1:22:03.599
<v Speaker 1>So I'm still giving Eli a bench grade though, because

1:22:03.600 --> 1:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he's Eli Manning. Um Golden Tates supposedly on track to

1:22:06.840 --> 1:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>play on Monday Night Football, which just muddies the waters

1:22:10.360 --> 1:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>for Darius Slayton and Sterling Shepherd. They're all on the bench.

1:22:12.960 --> 1:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Davante Parker is the only wide receiver to top sixty

1:22:15.400 --> 1:22:17.479
<v Speaker 1>one yards in the last five games against the Eagles,

1:22:17.720 --> 1:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and Eli's yards per attempt is a terrible six point

1:22:20.320 --> 1:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>two yards and his passes of over twenty yards is

1:22:23.120 --> 1:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>only seven point nine percent, which is a full point

1:22:25.760 --> 1:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>worse than Marcus Mariota. For what it's worth, Shepherd was

1:22:28.760 --> 1:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Eli's favorite target in Week one six for forty two,

1:22:31.280 --> 1:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but that's probably the ceiling there. Evan Engram is trending

1:22:34.920 --> 1:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction to play. He's getting a B

1:22:37.120 --> 1:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>grade because the theme of this is Eli doesn't throw

1:22:39.800 --> 1:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a very fair down field, which bodes well for Ingraham,

1:22:42.439 --> 1:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>who saw twenty two targets in Eli's two starts that

1:22:45.400 --> 1:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>included eleven for one sixteen and one in Week one

1:22:49.120 --> 1:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>six for forty eight and Week two, so it's a

1:22:50.760 --> 1:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>decent floor. And Sea Kwan gets a B grade as well.

1:22:53.760 --> 1:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Um The Eagles have allowed the tenth most receptions to

1:22:56.280 --> 1:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the running back position and they haven't faced Sa Kwan

1:22:59.080 --> 1:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>or the Giants this year. But se Kwon did face

1:23:01.320 --> 1:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>them last year. He had one forty one and two

1:23:03.720 --> 1:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>scores in the first game to nine and a score

1:23:07.439 --> 1:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the second game. That's numbers seem unreal for the

1:23:10.280 --> 1:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>stake Kwon Barkley We've had this year. It does, but

1:23:13.200 --> 1:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he's still You're still firing up sa konof. But it's

1:23:16.360 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a tough it's a tough matchup for him that maybe

1:23:19.920 --> 1:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not as tough. I think it's tough. On the

1:23:22.400 --> 1:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>other side, Miles Sanders gets a B grade. Jordan Howard

1:23:25.439 --> 1:23:27.679
<v Speaker 1>still limited with the shoulder injury, and if he does

1:23:27.720 --> 1:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>suit up, I suppose that dropped Sanders to a C H.

1:23:30.760 --> 1:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>The Giants have given up three huge games to backs

1:23:33.240 --> 1:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, Dalvin Cook, Zeke Elliott and Chase Edmonds, but

1:23:36.439 --> 1:23:39.559
<v Speaker 1>have been pretty good mostly outside of that. Sanders had

1:23:39.600 --> 1:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a career high twenty two touches last week and top

1:23:41.840 --> 1:23:44.599
<v Speaker 1>tw hundred total yards and scored. J G. I doesn't

1:23:44.640 --> 1:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>scare anybody. He's not even in the in the in

1:23:46.640 --> 1:23:50.599
<v Speaker 1>the mentionable station, Carson Wentz, I'm giving a B grade.

1:23:50.640 --> 1:23:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Three of the last five quarterbacks to face the Giants

1:23:52.760 --> 1:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have thrown for at least three touchdown passes in the

1:23:55.000 --> 1:23:58.479
<v Speaker 1>other two were too bisky. And and Sam Donald each

1:23:58.520 --> 1:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>had over two thirty one sing score and both of

1:24:00.840 --> 1:24:03.479
<v Speaker 1>them added a rushing score. And Wentz is uh, he's

1:24:03.479 --> 1:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>got the ability to do a rushing score here. Uh,

1:24:06.680 --> 1:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a good matchup. I'm in on Wentz, I'm

1:24:08.400 --> 1:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in on Alshon Jeffrey two, He's an A grade. It

1:24:10.920 --> 1:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like Nelson Aguar may miss this game with a

1:24:13.080 --> 1:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>knee injury, which only frees up more targets for al Shan.

1:24:15.720 --> 1:24:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Last week he returned from an injury in a big way,

1:24:18.120 --> 1:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>sixteen targets, nine receptions, one seven and one. Finally, the

1:24:22.200 --> 1:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end, Zach Ertz gets an A. Dallas Goddard gets

1:24:25.000 --> 1:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a B. The Giants have been good against the tight

1:24:27.360 --> 1:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>end this year, but they faced no one at all.

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>The best tight end they faced all year is either

1:24:33.120 --> 1:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph or Jason Witten. They faced nobody. Arts is

1:24:37.439 --> 1:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>averaging ten and a half targets per game over the

1:24:39.360 --> 1:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>last four. Godard's averaging seven targets per game over the

1:24:41.880 --> 1:24:44.559
<v Speaker 1>last three. Fire them both up. Alright, deal, and our

1:24:44.600 --> 1:24:46.719
<v Speaker 1>final game is Kansas City taking on the New England

1:24:46.760 --> 1:24:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and For Patrick Mahomes, it's it was barely an

1:24:50.439 --> 1:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>A grade and it really vastly between A and B

1:24:52.240 --> 1:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time here. I gave him the A

1:24:54.200 --> 1:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's completely healed from his ankle and

1:24:56.240 --> 1:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>his knee injuries, and the mobility unlocks a lot of

1:24:58.439 --> 1:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>his passing upside. But it's still tons of caution here

1:25:01.720 --> 1:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots defense that is not locked down other

1:25:05.360 --> 1:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>quality passers like Ben Roethlisberger in Week one, Dak Prescott,

1:25:09.960 --> 1:25:13.599
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz, Lamar Jackson. Those guys passed for an average

1:25:13.600 --> 1:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred sixteen yards and zero point five touchdowns,

1:25:18.040 --> 1:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so there's no guarantees. But it's still Patrick Mahomes and

1:25:20.880 --> 1:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>nobody be surprised to do for three and three, including me,

1:25:23.240 --> 1:25:25.799
<v Speaker 1>so he still gets an A grade. Travis Kelsey obviously

1:25:25.800 --> 1:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a grade. Over half of the Patriots passing touchdowns allowed

1:25:29.160 --> 1:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have gone to tight ends. Travis Kelsey definitely in play

1:25:32.200 --> 1:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>here again. Tyreek Hill sums to a B because he's

1:25:35.720 --> 1:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna draw Stephan Gilmore, who is arguably the league's best

1:25:38.479 --> 1:25:43.559
<v Speaker 1>cornerback and frankly a defensive m VP candidate. For Stephan Gilmore,

1:25:43.720 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 1>is there a defensive end of here just defensive player

1:25:45.520 --> 1:25:47.519
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I think it's just defensive player of

1:25:47.560 --> 1:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the year. Gilmore almost always shadows and Tyreek Hills the

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>obvious guy to shadow here, so it's and he's averaging

1:25:53.880 --> 1:25:56.959
<v Speaker 1>a scoreless thirty four yards per game in his coverage,

1:25:57.080 --> 1:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's a brutal matchup for Tyreek Hill. Then we

1:26:00.439 --> 1:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>go to the running game. It's gonna be a two

1:26:03.200 --> 1:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>man backfield in Kansas City between Darwin Thompson and Leshawn McCoy.

1:26:07.160 --> 1:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>The two Williamses have been ruled out of this game.

1:26:09.600 --> 1:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Last week we got our first long look at Darwin

1:26:12.040 --> 1:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Thompson and to me, he passed the eye test and

1:26:14.400 --> 1:26:17.559
<v Speaker 1>looked far more electric than Leshawn McCoy. The Patriots, though,

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>are not an ideal matchup, but the run defense has

1:26:19.720 --> 1:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>been un characteristically wobbly of late. Over the last five games,

1:26:24.040 --> 1:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they have allowed one hundred thirty nine total yards per

1:26:28.120 --> 1:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing runners. So if we call that one

1:26:30.760 --> 1:26:34.759
<v Speaker 1>in thirty nine seventy for Darwin Thompson seventy for Lashawn McCoy,

1:26:34.760 --> 1:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>if it isn't even split, they both get basically see

1:26:37.920 --> 1:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>grades here. Somebody gets a touchdown out of this thing,

1:26:40.120 --> 1:26:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's not necessarily Leshawn McCoy, by the way, he

1:26:43.439 --> 1:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>has scored him back to back games, so he probably

1:26:45.760 --> 1:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>would get a goal line opportunity. But I'll mention the

1:26:48.320 --> 1:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Patriots have given up one rushing touchdown all years, so

1:26:50.760 --> 1:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there probably isn't a goal line opportunity to be had

1:26:53.160 --> 1:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>here at all. Can go more? A little more love?

1:26:55.400 --> 1:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Real quick? Yeah? How much more love do you need

1:26:57.439 --> 1:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>than its averaging a scoreless thirty four yards per game

1:27:00.160 --> 1:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage recent in the last month. About the

1:27:03.520 --> 1:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>last month, Odell Beckham, Mariti Cooper DeAndre Hopkins. If you

1:27:06.600 --> 1:27:12.559
<v Speaker 1>combined for ten catches Tyreek Hills an amazing player, you're

1:27:12.560 --> 1:27:14.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna you have to be careful here. All right, let's

1:27:14.800 --> 1:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>go to the New England side. We begin with the

1:27:17.439 --> 1:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>running game with Sony Walkman, Kansas City allowing the seventh

1:27:20.720 --> 1:27:23.559
<v Speaker 1>most carries for the second most yards and five point

1:27:23.600 --> 1:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>one yards per carry. Fire up, Sony Walkman. Put the batteries,

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the double A batteries and you're Sony Walkman. You are.

1:27:31.400 --> 1:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, back then it took like six

1:27:33.479 --> 1:27:36.519
<v Speaker 1>double A batteries to work your cassette player. I really

1:27:36.560 --> 1:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>liked the auto reverse on the Sony Walkman that would

1:27:39.479 --> 1:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>start playing the other side of the table flip. You

1:27:41.880 --> 1:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have to flip it right, it flipped itself. He

1:27:45.240 --> 1:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>crushed Kansas City in the two games last year as well.

1:27:47.760 --> 1:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>He gets a B grade. James White gets a B

1:27:50.080 --> 1:27:52.360
<v Speaker 1>grade because this is this is the fascinating thing about

1:27:52.439 --> 1:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>James White this year. In the games in which they're trailing,

1:27:57.360 --> 1:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been fantastic, So I think he's got an opportunity here.

1:28:00.400 --> 1:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>He averages a hundred thirty one yards and one and

1:28:02.160 --> 1:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a half touchdowns, and games that they're trailing, he gets

1:28:04.800 --> 1:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a B grade. Tom Brady has thrown zero or one

1:28:07.120 --> 1:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in five of seven games. Kansas City has allowed

1:28:10.080 --> 1:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>zero or one touchdown in eight of their games this year,

1:28:13.240 --> 1:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're just getting zero or one touchdown

1:28:15.240 --> 1:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>against a good, a good past defense from Tom Brady,

1:28:18.320 --> 1:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and he just gets a C grade. And the only

1:28:20.160 --> 1:28:23.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver you dare start is Julian Edelman, who's now commanded

1:28:23.800 --> 1:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>double digit targets in a career high seven straight games

1:28:26.840 --> 1:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and is averaging eighty three yards on eight catches per

1:28:29.840 --> 1:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>game with three scores in that span. He remains startable

1:28:33.200 --> 1:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>with a B grade. If you love this show, please

1:28:36.240 --> 1:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>go to fanball dot com slash chart and check out

1:28:38.120 --> 1:28:41.479
<v Speaker 1>my free player rankings, my free one dollar weekly contest,

1:28:41.520 --> 1:28:44.719
<v Speaker 1>are auctions and podcasts, and a lot more and many

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks to everybody who takes the time to rank and

1:28:46.760 --> 1:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>review the show on your podcasting platform of choice. Talk

1:28:50.280 --> 1:28:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to you for Round two of the playoffs next week, Everybody,

1:28:52.920 --> 1:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Bye Bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I

1:28:58.520 --> 1:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio. For more podcast us from my heart Radio,

1:29:01.000 --> 1:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

1:29:04.160 --> 1:29:05.639
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.