WEBVTT - We Testified for Impeachment and It Made No Difference

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:22.236
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.276 --> 0:00:25.476
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:26.036 --> 0:00:29.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. If you're joining us for the first time, welcome.

0:00:30.116 --> 0:00:32.436
<v Speaker 1>If you've missed any of our earlier episodes, which used

0:00:32.476 --> 0:00:34.836
<v Speaker 1>to be behind a paywall, you can now get them

0:00:34.876 --> 0:00:38.836
<v Speaker 1>for free exactly where you found this one. A bit

0:00:38.836 --> 0:00:42.396
<v Speaker 1>about me. I teach constitutional law at Harvard. I love

0:00:42.436 --> 0:00:46.476
<v Speaker 1>a well tailored suit, and I had a pretty eventful

0:00:46.556 --> 0:00:49.796
<v Speaker 1>winter break. Do you swear or affirm, under penalty of

0:00:49.836 --> 0:00:53.316
<v Speaker 1>perjury that the testimony you're about to give is true

0:00:53.316 --> 0:00:56.156
<v Speaker 1>and correct to the best of your knowledge, information, and belief.

0:00:56.556 --> 0:00:59.396
<v Speaker 1>So help you God. This past December, I was an

0:00:59.396 --> 0:01:02.556
<v Speaker 1>expert witness called by the Democrats to testify at the

0:01:02.596 --> 0:01:06.756
<v Speaker 1>impeachment inquiry and the House of Representatives into President Donald Trump.

0:01:07.356 --> 0:01:10.236
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, it was extremely nerve racking.

0:01:10.676 --> 0:01:12.916
<v Speaker 1>My job is to study and to teach the Constitution

0:01:13.036 --> 0:01:16.556
<v Speaker 1>from its origins until the president. I'm here today to

0:01:16.676 --> 0:01:21.356
<v Speaker 1>describe three things. Why the framers of our Constitution included

0:01:21.396 --> 0:01:24.796
<v Speaker 1>a provision for the impeachment of the president. What that

0:01:24.876 --> 0:01:28.876
<v Speaker 1>provision providing for impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors means,

0:01:29.476 --> 0:01:32.676
<v Speaker 1>and last, how it applies to the question before you

0:01:32.756 --> 0:01:35.956
<v Speaker 1>and for the American people, whether President Trump has committed

0:01:35.996 --> 0:01:40.196
<v Speaker 1>impeachable offenses under the Constitution. The other expert witnesses called

0:01:40.236 --> 0:01:43.636
<v Speaker 1>by the Democrats were Pamela Carlin, a law professor at Stanford.

0:01:43.996 --> 0:01:48.516
<v Speaker 1>When President Trump invited, indeed demanded, foreign involvement in our

0:01:48.596 --> 0:01:52.156
<v Speaker 1>upcoming election, he struck at the very heart of what

0:01:52.356 --> 0:01:55.796
<v Speaker 1>makes this a republic to which we pledge allegiance. And

0:01:55.956 --> 0:01:58.716
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gerhart, a law professor at the University of North

0:01:58.716 --> 0:02:02.316
<v Speaker 1>Carolina at Chapel Hill. If what we're talking about is

0:02:02.396 --> 0:02:06.956
<v Speaker 1>not impeachable, then nothing is impeachable. I recently got the

0:02:07.036 --> 0:02:09.996
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk to Michael Gerhart about that day and

0:02:10.196 --> 0:02:14.076
<v Speaker 1>all that has happened since I was, unfortunately recovering from

0:02:14.076 --> 0:02:17.956
<v Speaker 1>a slight cold. Michael, thank you so much for joining me.

0:02:18.356 --> 0:02:20.876
<v Speaker 1>We've spoken on the phone, but we actually haven't seen

0:02:20.956 --> 0:02:25.276
<v Speaker 1>each other since December fourth, when we both had the

0:02:25.356 --> 0:02:30.596
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and maybe dubious honor of testifying at the House

0:02:30.676 --> 0:02:34.476
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committees hearing on impeachment. How you've been doing since then?

0:02:35.436 --> 0:02:39.236
<v Speaker 1>It's been busy teaching classes, and also trying to be

0:02:39.316 --> 0:02:41.956
<v Speaker 1>part of the national conversation on a very important subject.

0:02:42.676 --> 0:02:44.076
<v Speaker 1>What I would love for us to do in this

0:02:44.116 --> 0:02:48.876
<v Speaker 1>conversation is open up for listeners some of the backstory

0:02:48.956 --> 0:02:52.196
<v Speaker 1>and the back scenes of what we experienced that day,

0:02:52.716 --> 0:02:55.756
<v Speaker 1>how we prepared for it, and also the sort of

0:02:55.796 --> 0:02:59.836
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture of consequences of what's been going on. So

0:02:59.956 --> 0:03:02.196
<v Speaker 1>maybe the way to start is I had never done

0:03:02.236 --> 0:03:04.396
<v Speaker 1>this before, so it was all a surprise to me.

0:03:04.836 --> 0:03:08.756
<v Speaker 1>But you had done this before twenty years previously, when

0:03:08.796 --> 0:03:10.876
<v Speaker 1>they were a group of law professors, I think twenty

0:03:10.876 --> 0:03:14.116
<v Speaker 1>one in total, who testified about Bill Clinton's impeachment to

0:03:14.156 --> 0:03:16.836
<v Speaker 1>the House Judiciary Committee. And not only were you one

0:03:16.876 --> 0:03:19.356
<v Speaker 1>of them, but you were also the only one who

0:03:19.396 --> 0:03:22.396
<v Speaker 1>was jointly put forward by the Republicans and the Democrats.

0:03:22.796 --> 0:03:25.356
<v Speaker 1>So take us back, if you will, twenty years and

0:03:25.436 --> 0:03:27.476
<v Speaker 1>tell us how that happened. You know, nowadays it's almost

0:03:27.516 --> 0:03:30.036
<v Speaker 1>inconceivable to imagine there being somebody who was acceptable to

0:03:30.076 --> 0:03:32.156
<v Speaker 1>both sides. Well, twenty years seems a long time ago.

0:03:32.196 --> 0:03:35.356
<v Speaker 1>It's going to seem even longer when we put together

0:03:35.436 --> 0:03:38.596
<v Speaker 1>what was happening back then, it'll seem completely alien to us.

0:03:39.396 --> 0:03:42.476
<v Speaker 1>So I had spent a fair bit of my academic

0:03:42.516 --> 0:03:46.236
<v Speaker 1>career studying and writing about impeachment, also testifying and consulting

0:03:46.236 --> 0:03:48.796
<v Speaker 1>with members of Congress. That was all known by the

0:03:48.836 --> 0:03:51.676
<v Speaker 1>time we got to nineteen ninety eight, And there was

0:03:51.676 --> 0:03:53.916
<v Speaker 1>a special moment for me in nineteen ninety eight when

0:03:54.156 --> 0:03:57.516
<v Speaker 1>Jim Leech or Republican David Skaggs Democrat called me up

0:03:57.516 --> 0:03:58.836
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and said, would you come talk to

0:03:58.916 --> 0:04:01.836
<v Speaker 1>us in Washington? Generally, if members of Congress want to

0:04:01.876 --> 0:04:04.236
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about something, I think that's a great honor.

0:04:04.356 --> 0:04:07.356
<v Speaker 1>Night went and they said to me, well, what we'd

0:04:07.356 --> 0:04:08.996
<v Speaker 1>like you to do after you talk to us right

0:04:09.196 --> 0:04:11.836
<v Speaker 1>now is go speak to the entire House of Representatives.

0:04:12.436 --> 0:04:15.716
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that coming into that moment, and they

0:04:15.756 --> 0:04:18.316
<v Speaker 1>had arranged like they wanted to speak to the House

0:04:18.396 --> 0:04:22.556
<v Speaker 1>right then, Yes, right then. Um, so I thought, well,

0:04:22.716 --> 0:04:24.076
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a good test whether or

0:04:24.076 --> 0:04:26.836
<v Speaker 1>not I know the subject matter. And so then we

0:04:26.876 --> 0:04:29.756
<v Speaker 1>walked over to the House and I had to get

0:04:29.756 --> 0:04:32.236
<v Speaker 1>special permission to walk onto the floor of the House

0:04:32.916 --> 0:04:35.876
<v Speaker 1>and then behind closed doors with no staff, no press

0:04:35.956 --> 0:04:37.836
<v Speaker 1>or anything. I then talked to the entire House of

0:04:37.916 --> 0:04:41.396
<v Speaker 1>Representatives about impeachment. It's been about two hours doing it.

0:04:41.716 --> 0:04:45.956
<v Speaker 1>No no cameras, nothing, nothing, just nothing. It was all

0:04:46.076 --> 0:04:47.556
<v Speaker 1>Is there a written record of your coup? Don't think

0:04:47.556 --> 0:04:49.756
<v Speaker 1>there's a written record. I think it was also amazing.

0:04:49.756 --> 0:04:52.076
<v Speaker 1>You had a confidential conversation with four hundred and thirty

0:04:52.076 --> 0:04:54.596
<v Speaker 1>five people. Hard to the biggest lecture of my life

0:04:54.676 --> 0:04:56.596
<v Speaker 1>or one of the biggest lectures, but it was. I

0:04:56.916 --> 0:04:58.836
<v Speaker 1>tried to design more as a conversation, and it was

0:04:58.836 --> 0:05:03.036
<v Speaker 1>a very congenial, collegial conversation. At the end of it,

0:05:03.116 --> 0:05:05.956
<v Speaker 1>Charles Kennedy, Republican, Bobby Scott, a Democrat who happened to

0:05:05.996 --> 0:05:08.676
<v Speaker 1>be my representative, came up to me and said, well,

0:05:08.716 --> 0:05:10.516
<v Speaker 1>if you have have a hearing on this, would you come,

0:05:10.836 --> 0:05:13.556
<v Speaker 1>And I said, well, think sure, I'd be honored. And

0:05:13.596 --> 0:05:16.996
<v Speaker 1>then that hearing to which you just alluded happened a

0:05:16.996 --> 0:05:19.076
<v Speaker 1>few weeks later, where I was then brought in by

0:05:19.076 --> 0:05:23.076
<v Speaker 1>both the Republicans and Democrats to testifize one of the experts,

0:05:23.276 --> 0:05:26.876
<v Speaker 1>one of the many experts, including Alan Dershowitz, on the

0:05:26.956 --> 0:05:30.796
<v Speaker 1>question of whether or not President Clinton's alleged misconduct rose

0:05:30.836 --> 0:05:33.316
<v Speaker 1>to the level of being an impeachable offense and what

0:05:33.356 --> 0:05:38.916
<v Speaker 1>did you say. What I talked about was basically the

0:05:38.996 --> 0:05:40.996
<v Speaker 1>law of impeachment. I tried to kind of lay out

0:05:41.036 --> 0:05:43.516
<v Speaker 1>the things we knew that I thought were clear, and

0:05:43.556 --> 0:05:46.396
<v Speaker 1>then kind of talked about some things that maybe unsettled,

0:05:47.116 --> 0:05:48.836
<v Speaker 1>and said, here's what we know about them. Here are

0:05:48.836 --> 0:05:51.796
<v Speaker 1>the arguments on both sides, and kind of walked everybody

0:05:51.796 --> 0:05:54.076
<v Speaker 1>through that and then got questions. But there was no

0:05:54.156 --> 0:05:56.476
<v Speaker 1>personal attack. It was always very much you know, in

0:05:56.476 --> 0:05:58.676
<v Speaker 1>this footnote you said this, but now today you're saying

0:05:58.716 --> 0:06:01.516
<v Speaker 1>that fair I can try and answer that. Did they

0:06:01.516 --> 0:06:03.156
<v Speaker 1>actually give you a chance to answer it? I say

0:06:03.196 --> 0:06:05.436
<v Speaker 1>that in light of our experiences this time around. They

0:06:05.476 --> 0:06:07.316
<v Speaker 1>asked a question and then they actually let you answer it.

0:06:07.316 --> 0:06:08.596
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, as you said, it sounds like

0:06:08.596 --> 0:06:11.196
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Age, that's right. Yeah, So when we had

0:06:11.236 --> 0:06:15.036
<v Speaker 1>our hearing, there was no chance to answer it, or

0:06:15.076 --> 0:06:16.796
<v Speaker 1>at least we were given maybe a second and then

0:06:16.836 --> 0:06:18.836
<v Speaker 1>that was about it. But yes, they would then give

0:06:18.876 --> 0:06:22.596
<v Speaker 1>me a chance to answer it, and they appeared to

0:06:22.636 --> 0:06:25.116
<v Speaker 1>be listening, and it was really more of a conversation

0:06:26.036 --> 0:06:29.236
<v Speaker 1>than twenty years later it would be. It's sort of

0:06:29.236 --> 0:06:31.396
<v Speaker 1>fascinating on many levels, but one of the reasons it's

0:06:31.396 --> 0:06:35.356
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating is that most people at the time identified

0:06:35.436 --> 0:06:38.116
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment of Bill Clinton, that moment as a high

0:06:38.156 --> 0:06:41.516
<v Speaker 1>point in partisanship, the most partisan moment that people could

0:06:41.516 --> 0:06:43.996
<v Speaker 1>remember in the United States and more than a century.

0:06:44.436 --> 0:06:46.756
<v Speaker 1>And I think that was actually a fair assessment in

0:06:46.876 --> 0:06:50.116
<v Speaker 1>historical terms. And now twenty years later, it sounds almost

0:06:50.116 --> 0:06:54.916
<v Speaker 1>like a model of bipartisan cordiality and collegiality, even if

0:06:54.956 --> 0:06:58.596
<v Speaker 1>they voted along party lines. Let me ask you a question, Michael, So,

0:06:58.796 --> 0:07:00.916
<v Speaker 1>the reason you found yourself in that extraordinary position in

0:07:00.916 --> 0:07:04.756
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton impeachment is that you were and remain the

0:07:05.036 --> 0:07:07.796
<v Speaker 1>leading expert law professor on the subject of impeachment. Your

0:07:08.196 --> 0:07:10.916
<v Speaker 1>Guide to the Impeachment Process book, you know, has come

0:07:10.916 --> 0:07:13.836
<v Speaker 1>out and I think three editions. Now, why in the world,

0:07:13.916 --> 0:07:16.676
<v Speaker 1>as a young law professor did you get interested in

0:07:16.716 --> 0:07:19.836
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment as the topic? It was not a hot topic,

0:07:20.316 --> 0:07:22.236
<v Speaker 1>you know when they lated eighties, when you must have

0:07:22.276 --> 0:07:23.956
<v Speaker 1>started diving into it, or the middle ladies, when you

0:07:23.996 --> 0:07:27.636
<v Speaker 1>started diving into it. Why did you choose the subject? Well,

0:07:27.676 --> 0:07:31.076
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. I grew up Jewish and Alabama

0:07:31.116 --> 0:07:34.276
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen sixties that that a lot comes with that.

0:07:34.276 --> 0:07:39.076
<v Speaker 1>That's a big sentence where in Alabama mobile Okay, got it,

0:07:39.436 --> 0:07:43.316
<v Speaker 1>And so I was my entire childhood was sort of

0:07:43.316 --> 0:07:46.036
<v Speaker 1>shaped and defined by the Civil Rights movement. At the

0:07:46.036 --> 0:07:48.796
<v Speaker 1>tail end of that civil rights movement was of course Watergate.

0:07:49.356 --> 0:07:53.716
<v Speaker 1>So like many people of my generation, I watched Watergate.

0:07:53.756 --> 0:07:56.836
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of thought it was an incredible moment

0:07:56.876 --> 0:07:59.716
<v Speaker 1>to see the Congress sort of investigating the president and

0:07:59.716 --> 0:08:03.236
<v Speaker 1>eventually the president resigned, and that that stuck with me.

0:08:03.276 --> 0:08:05.676
<v Speaker 1>That was something that I felt the Civil Rights movement

0:08:05.676 --> 0:08:07.796
<v Speaker 1>and the Watergate had in common a respect for the

0:08:07.876 --> 0:08:10.716
<v Speaker 1>rule of law. I had in common the idea that

0:08:10.756 --> 0:08:12.676
<v Speaker 1>law could bring order to chaos, and so that was

0:08:12.796 --> 0:08:15.276
<v Speaker 1>very appealing to me. I had an interest in the

0:08:15.356 --> 0:08:17.916
<v Speaker 1>law as a result. And I think one thing that's

0:08:17.916 --> 0:08:20.596
<v Speaker 1>common about impeachment and importance for me is there not

0:08:20.636 --> 0:08:22.796
<v Speaker 1>just academic areas of interest. There are areas where I

0:08:22.836 --> 0:08:25.236
<v Speaker 1>feel like, as a lawyer and law professor, I have

0:08:25.276 --> 0:08:28.396
<v Speaker 1>a duty to try to speak truth to power and

0:08:28.436 --> 0:08:30.716
<v Speaker 1>to be a part of the process which enriches my

0:08:30.796 --> 0:08:32.396
<v Speaker 1>understanding and that I hope I can bring that to

0:08:32.436 --> 0:08:36.196
<v Speaker 1>my students. So let's fast forward then to now. So

0:08:36.276 --> 0:08:38.636
<v Speaker 1>When I got the call in November saying, you know,

0:08:39.276 --> 0:08:42.796
<v Speaker 1>might you be open to testifying? I took a long,

0:08:42.876 --> 0:08:45.716
<v Speaker 1>deep breath, I said yes. And the next thing I

0:08:45.716 --> 0:08:47.196
<v Speaker 1>did as soon as I got off the phone is

0:08:47.236 --> 0:08:53.596
<v Speaker 1>I dove into the books and I massively read every

0:08:53.716 --> 0:08:57.276
<v Speaker 1>letter that I could find on impeachment. And I was

0:08:57.596 --> 0:09:01.396
<v Speaker 1>the whole time struck by just how much ground I

0:09:01.436 --> 0:09:04.756
<v Speaker 1>had to cover. Because although I teach constitutional law like

0:09:04.836 --> 0:09:09.316
<v Speaker 1>you do, I added a constitutional law casebook, impeachment appears

0:09:09.356 --> 0:09:14.116
<v Speaker 1>on like one page of a twenty five hundred page casebook. Now,

0:09:14.276 --> 0:09:16.836
<v Speaker 1>you must have been in a completely different situation because

0:09:16.996 --> 0:09:19.756
<v Speaker 1>you literally wrote the book. Well, I should say you're

0:09:19.756 --> 0:09:22.396
<v Speaker 1>a wonderfully quick study, and of course you've mastered it

0:09:22.516 --> 0:09:25.876
<v Speaker 1>very well. Um, I don't know how. I don't know

0:09:25.876 --> 0:09:28.316
<v Speaker 1>how quick it was, but it was hard. Now, well,

0:09:28.476 --> 0:09:32.996
<v Speaker 1>in constutional time, it was quick, Yeah, exactly. I got

0:09:32.996 --> 0:09:35.516
<v Speaker 1>the call. Actually, I think my call came the morning

0:09:35.516 --> 0:09:38.796
<v Speaker 1>of Thanksgiving. Um, you know, I knew this hearing was

0:09:38.836 --> 0:09:42.076
<v Speaker 1>coming up. I didn't have any I just I knew

0:09:42.076 --> 0:09:43.556
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be important hearing, But I didn't

0:09:43.596 --> 0:09:47.036
<v Speaker 1>necessarily know or think that I would be any part

0:09:47.036 --> 0:09:49.076
<v Speaker 1>of it. I still would be I would care about

0:09:49.116 --> 0:09:51.916
<v Speaker 1>it deeply, so I was following it. But then I

0:09:51.956 --> 0:09:54.476
<v Speaker 1>did get a call Thursday morning saying, Okay, would you

0:09:54.516 --> 0:09:58.636
<v Speaker 1>be willing to come testify? And then once I realized, okay,

0:09:58.676 --> 0:10:00.996
<v Speaker 1>I am going to do this, UM, I did a

0:10:01.036 --> 0:10:03.316
<v Speaker 1>little bit of study, but a lot of what I

0:10:03.436 --> 0:10:05.236
<v Speaker 1>tried to do was sort of sit back and think

0:10:05.276 --> 0:10:09.836
<v Speaker 1>about what's important for people to know and tried to

0:10:09.876 --> 0:10:12.116
<v Speaker 1>pull together what I thought would be a very helpful

0:10:12.236 --> 0:10:17.596
<v Speaker 1>narrative on how impeachment applies to the current situation. And

0:10:17.636 --> 0:10:20.716
<v Speaker 1>so that became my focus. And one thing the course

0:10:20.756 --> 0:10:24.236
<v Speaker 1>that stood out for me was how one of the

0:10:24.276 --> 0:10:28.236
<v Speaker 1>critical things we see even now it was apparent back then,

0:10:28.596 --> 0:10:31.036
<v Speaker 1>but we hear this and everything the president's lawyer is saying.

0:10:31.236 --> 0:10:32.956
<v Speaker 1>I think we see this and everything the president does,

0:10:33.316 --> 0:10:36.036
<v Speaker 1>and that is that all of that has in common

0:10:36.196 --> 0:10:40.636
<v Speaker 1>the effort to make the president a monarch, perhaps even

0:10:40.756 --> 0:10:42.716
<v Speaker 1>one could go so far as to say a tyrant,

0:10:43.396 --> 0:10:46.316
<v Speaker 1>and that is not consistent with our Constitution in any way,

0:10:46.316 --> 0:10:49.756
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. So having come to that conclusion, which

0:10:49.796 --> 0:10:51.836
<v Speaker 1>I don't think was a hard one to reach, I

0:10:51.956 --> 0:10:54.556
<v Speaker 1>then sort of built a case around did you sense

0:10:54.596 --> 0:10:56.236
<v Speaker 1>before going in, Did you know this was going to

0:10:56.276 --> 0:10:59.236
<v Speaker 1>be the kind of partisan battle royale that it sort

0:10:59.236 --> 0:11:02.676
<v Speaker 1>of turned into. And were you comfortable inwardly with the

0:11:02.756 --> 0:11:05.476
<v Speaker 1>idea that you were going to be able to say, look,

0:11:06.116 --> 0:11:08.276
<v Speaker 1>according to the facts as they've been released in the

0:11:08.316 --> 0:11:11.356
<v Speaker 1>House or discover in the House, if they're true, then

0:11:11.716 --> 0:11:14.356
<v Speaker 1>the president deserves to be impeached under the Constitution, which

0:11:14.396 --> 0:11:16.436
<v Speaker 1>is obviously what we both did say. But were you

0:11:16.676 --> 0:11:19.236
<v Speaker 1>did you have any trepidation about that? Well, it's a

0:11:19.236 --> 0:11:23.676
<v Speaker 1>good question I had already once I realized I guess

0:11:23.676 --> 0:11:26.436
<v Speaker 1>I was going to be there. One of the other

0:11:26.876 --> 0:11:29.996
<v Speaker 1>first things that occurs to me is to understand the venue,

0:11:30.556 --> 0:11:33.596
<v Speaker 1>to understand the forum. And I was fairly fortunate in

0:11:33.596 --> 0:11:36.036
<v Speaker 1>that I already testified in front of the Judiciary Committee

0:11:36.036 --> 0:11:39.116
<v Speaker 1>on July twelfth basically about the Mother Report. So at

0:11:39.116 --> 0:11:42.356
<v Speaker 1>that hearing in July twelfth, people came at after me

0:11:42.476 --> 0:11:47.436
<v Speaker 1>rather personally, and I somehow survived, And I knew that

0:11:47.636 --> 0:11:49.796
<v Speaker 1>this other hearing was going to be even more vicious.

0:11:50.396 --> 0:11:55.116
<v Speaker 1>So my instinct was in that circumstance to dial it down,

0:11:55.876 --> 0:11:58.596
<v Speaker 1>not to kind of meet them at the same level

0:11:58.676 --> 0:12:02.796
<v Speaker 1>of yelling and screaming and personal attacks, but to try

0:12:02.836 --> 0:12:07.036
<v Speaker 1>and sort of lower the temperature and make sure that

0:12:07.076 --> 0:12:08.916
<v Speaker 1>whatever I was saying, and of course you were doing

0:12:08.956 --> 0:12:11.196
<v Speaker 1>this as well, but to make sure everything I was

0:12:11.236 --> 0:12:14.716
<v Speaker 1>saying was firmly grounded in the law. So if you

0:12:14.876 --> 0:12:16.836
<v Speaker 1>if you know what you're saying is firmly grounded in

0:12:16.956 --> 0:12:19.396
<v Speaker 1>law and it's backed up, you can have a lot

0:12:19.396 --> 0:12:22.636
<v Speaker 1>of confidence when people come at you and attack you

0:12:22.876 --> 0:12:25.356
<v Speaker 1>because you know the facts and you know the law,

0:12:25.796 --> 0:12:29.076
<v Speaker 1>and you can then move forward on that basis. If

0:12:29.116 --> 0:12:30.756
<v Speaker 1>you don't have those things on your side, I think,

0:12:30.796 --> 0:12:33.556
<v Speaker 1>like the White House laws currently, you make things up.

0:12:33.796 --> 0:12:36.316
<v Speaker 1>You know, you engage in a lot of inconsistent statements.

0:12:37.236 --> 0:12:40.076
<v Speaker 1>But I felt the law was on our side. Let's

0:12:40.076 --> 0:12:43.036
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about style in the presentation, because

0:12:43.036 --> 0:12:47.036
<v Speaker 1>as you said, you were extremely calm throughout. I would

0:12:47.036 --> 0:12:48.556
<v Speaker 1>say you were the calmest of the three of us,

0:12:48.596 --> 0:12:52.276
<v Speaker 1>you and me and Pam Carlin. Was that fully your plan?

0:12:52.396 --> 0:12:54.636
<v Speaker 1>Because I have to say, as I walked into that

0:12:54.716 --> 0:12:56.796
<v Speaker 1>room with all of the cameras, I mean, I knew

0:12:56.796 --> 0:12:58.196
<v Speaker 1>the cameras would be there. I knew it would be

0:12:58.236 --> 0:13:01.716
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by you know, photographers. I knew they would melt

0:13:01.756 --> 0:13:03.876
<v Speaker 1>away like a magic curtain, and behind them would be

0:13:03.916 --> 0:13:06.796
<v Speaker 1>a whole walls worth of Judiciary Committee members. So I

0:13:06.876 --> 0:13:09.516
<v Speaker 1>knew it in theory, but I kept on thinking of

0:13:09.556 --> 0:13:13.596
<v Speaker 1>that expression of Mike Tyson's where he said everyone has

0:13:13.596 --> 0:13:16.516
<v Speaker 1>a plan until they get punched in the face. And

0:13:16.676 --> 0:13:18.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's sort of what it felt like to me.

0:13:18.436 --> 0:13:21.836
<v Speaker 1>I walked in there with a plan, and I then

0:13:21.996 --> 0:13:24.396
<v Speaker 1>felt just by the reality of it, it was like

0:13:24.476 --> 0:13:26.756
<v Speaker 1>a punch in the face. And then I'm more or

0:13:26.836 --> 0:13:30.236
<v Speaker 1>less adapted on the fly, and I think I changed

0:13:30.756 --> 0:13:34.196
<v Speaker 1>the tone of my presentation and the tone of my

0:13:34.276 --> 0:13:39.516
<v Speaker 1>answers based on the energy in the room. And I

0:13:39.556 --> 0:13:44.476
<v Speaker 1>think I had the inward experience of feeling, Okay, you're

0:13:44.516 --> 0:13:47.756
<v Speaker 1>about to open your mouth and say in substance that

0:13:47.836 --> 0:13:50.356
<v Speaker 1>the presence of the United States is guilty of high

0:13:50.396 --> 0:13:54.516
<v Speaker 1>crimes and misdemeanors. And logically speaking, although it's the choice

0:13:54.556 --> 0:13:57.636
<v Speaker 1>of the House ought to be impeached, that's really a

0:13:57.636 --> 0:14:02.476
<v Speaker 1>big deal. And it's not a time for half measures.

0:14:02.516 --> 0:14:05.196
<v Speaker 1>It's not a time to say it as a on

0:14:05.236 --> 0:14:06.996
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, or on the other hand, I think

0:14:07.036 --> 0:14:09.756
<v Speaker 1>if I thought to myself, if I don't say it, definitively,

0:14:10.316 --> 0:14:13.436
<v Speaker 1>clearly and bluntly, and again and again and again, the

0:14:13.516 --> 0:14:15.756
<v Speaker 1>message really might not get through. And I don't think

0:14:15.836 --> 0:14:19.196
<v Speaker 1>I really got that until I was sitting in the chair.

0:14:20.156 --> 0:14:22.196
<v Speaker 1>Were you able to more or less? Was the strategy

0:14:22.196 --> 0:14:24.676
<v Speaker 1>that you followed, the kind of the calm, rational one.

0:14:25.756 --> 0:14:27.716
<v Speaker 1>Was that a strategy that that was the one you

0:14:27.756 --> 0:14:33.956
<v Speaker 1>had going in. I'm not sure I had a well

0:14:34.036 --> 0:14:37.196
<v Speaker 1>defined strategy going in other than kind of what I've said,

0:14:37.276 --> 0:14:40.636
<v Speaker 1>other than I guess what is my typical temperament and disposition.

0:14:41.796 --> 0:14:46.156
<v Speaker 1>And so what I felt at the time was I've

0:14:46.196 --> 0:14:49.196
<v Speaker 1>got to get a feel for this room so very

0:14:49.236 --> 0:14:53.196
<v Speaker 1>much like what you were saying, and that would help

0:14:53.316 --> 0:14:56.516
<v Speaker 1>you know you know this very well. I think one

0:14:56.756 --> 0:14:59.596
<v Speaker 1>problem for a lot of lawyers, particularly young lawyers, is

0:14:59.756 --> 0:15:03.116
<v Speaker 1>they don't think about the forum. They don't think about

0:15:03.196 --> 0:15:05.716
<v Speaker 1>the venue. They would argue the same way in a

0:15:05.876 --> 0:15:08.636
<v Speaker 1>trial quarter as they would in congress or somewhere else.

0:15:09.556 --> 0:15:11.796
<v Speaker 1>That's not a good move. You've got to be aware

0:15:11.796 --> 0:15:14.476
<v Speaker 1>of who's listening, and you've got to be aware of

0:15:14.476 --> 0:15:17.796
<v Speaker 1>your audience. And so part of what I was I

0:15:17.836 --> 0:15:19.276
<v Speaker 1>felt I had to do was, Okay, I got to

0:15:19.316 --> 0:15:21.916
<v Speaker 1>get a feel for that so many respects. The hardest

0:15:21.996 --> 0:15:25.516
<v Speaker 1>moment is that first minute. Thank you, mister Chairman, ranking member,

0:15:25.596 --> 0:15:28.636
<v Speaker 1>or other distinguished members of the committee. It's an honor

0:15:28.636 --> 0:15:31.756
<v Speaker 1>and a privilege to join the other distinguished witnesses to

0:15:31.796 --> 0:15:35.476
<v Speaker 1>discuss a matter of grave concern to our country and

0:15:35.516 --> 0:15:39.996
<v Speaker 1>to our constitution. Because this House, the People's House, has

0:15:39.996 --> 0:15:43.196
<v Speaker 1>the sole power of impeachment. There is no better forum

0:15:43.596 --> 0:15:46.796
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the constitutional standard for impeachment and whether that

0:15:46.916 --> 0:15:49.156
<v Speaker 1>standard has been met in the case of the current

0:15:49.196 --> 0:15:52.636
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States. Where you're finding your voice

0:15:52.676 --> 0:15:54.556
<v Speaker 1>and where you're trying to figure out what's the right tone.

0:15:55.196 --> 0:15:56.956
<v Speaker 1>How do I play this room, so to speak. I

0:15:56.956 --> 0:15:59.356
<v Speaker 1>don't want to diminish it by saying that, but I

0:15:59.436 --> 0:16:03.156
<v Speaker 1>have to perform in these conditions, not academic conditions or

0:16:03.236 --> 0:16:07.436
<v Speaker 1>something else. And so I once I got that feel,

0:16:07.476 --> 0:16:10.116
<v Speaker 1>and I did have the benefit of following both you

0:16:10.156 --> 0:16:13.316
<v Speaker 1>and Pam, so I was able to kind of studying

0:16:13.516 --> 0:16:15.516
<v Speaker 1>and not just hear what y'all were saying, but also

0:16:15.996 --> 0:16:19.636
<v Speaker 1>study the circumstances, which in some respects made me calmer

0:16:20.236 --> 0:16:23.316
<v Speaker 1>because I felt I had a better grasp on the conditions.

0:16:23.356 --> 0:16:26.356
<v Speaker 1>And then I kind of tailored my remarks. Accordingly, that's

0:16:26.356 --> 0:16:29.476
<v Speaker 1>a great observation and it helps me to explain something

0:16:29.476 --> 0:16:32.356
<v Speaker 1>that I was feeling before I started speaking, which was

0:16:32.476 --> 0:16:35.116
<v Speaker 1>since I was the first witness, I had no idea

0:16:35.196 --> 0:16:36.636
<v Speaker 1>what the tone in the room was. I mean, the

0:16:36.676 --> 0:16:39.436
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Gerald, now they're set to start speaking. Professor Feldon,

0:16:39.556 --> 0:16:43.756
<v Speaker 1>you may begin, and immediately the ranking Republican Doug cons

0:16:43.836 --> 0:16:46.396
<v Speaker 1>interrupted me. Mister chairman before we get the chairman and

0:16:46.436 --> 0:16:49.436
<v Speaker 1>members of the committee, mister Chairman have emotion. So that

0:16:49.556 --> 0:16:52.956
<v Speaker 1>was already, you know, weird, and I wasn't clear on

0:16:52.956 --> 0:16:54.916
<v Speaker 1>whether I should continue speaking or stop speaking, so I

0:16:54.996 --> 0:16:57.876
<v Speaker 1>sort of stopped and then I started again. Mister Chairman

0:16:57.916 --> 0:17:00.036
<v Speaker 1>and members of the committee, thank you very much for

0:17:00.076 --> 0:17:05.476
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to appear. And in my head, the blood

0:17:05.516 --> 0:17:08.476
<v Speaker 1>was rushing and my heart was pounding, and I was

0:17:08.516 --> 0:17:12.716
<v Speaker 1>just thinking to myself, I really don't want to sound nervous,

0:17:13.156 --> 0:17:16.356
<v Speaker 1>and actually, at the end of my prepared statement, I

0:17:16.476 --> 0:17:19.076
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself, well, Noah, you must have sounded very,

0:17:19.196 --> 0:17:22.396
<v Speaker 1>very nervous. On the basis of the testimony and the

0:17:22.436 --> 0:17:27.156
<v Speaker 1>evidence before the House, President Trump has committed impeachable high

0:17:27.196 --> 0:17:32.116
<v Speaker 1>crimes and misdemeanors by corruptly abusing the office of the presidency.

0:17:32.396 --> 0:17:34.436
<v Speaker 1>And it was only when I went back and watched

0:17:34.476 --> 0:17:38.516
<v Speaker 1>myself on videotape that I realized that. Luckily, by trying

0:17:38.516 --> 0:17:41.996
<v Speaker 1>to be forceful, I think I suppressed the shakiness in

0:17:42.036 --> 0:17:44.996
<v Speaker 1>my voice and the you know, and the pounding heart,

0:17:44.996 --> 0:17:47.156
<v Speaker 1>and I think maybe I almost had to be forceful

0:17:47.276 --> 0:17:50.116
<v Speaker 1>in order to mask the fact that, you know, there

0:17:50.156 --> 0:17:52.356
<v Speaker 1>was something nerve wracking about being the first one. I

0:17:52.396 --> 0:17:54.076
<v Speaker 1>felt like I was speaking into the void. And I

0:17:54.116 --> 0:17:56.276
<v Speaker 1>don't think I really understood why that was so painful,

0:17:56.556 --> 0:17:58.276
<v Speaker 1>or not painful it is the wrong word, but why

0:17:58.276 --> 0:18:00.996
<v Speaker 1>it was so challenging until you just talked about getting

0:18:00.996 --> 0:18:02.196
<v Speaker 1>the feel of the room. It's hard to get the

0:18:02.196 --> 0:18:03.556
<v Speaker 1>feel of the room when you're supposed to be the

0:18:03.596 --> 0:18:07.956
<v Speaker 1>first person to talk. So that brings us to the

0:18:07.996 --> 0:18:10.996
<v Speaker 1>public's reaction, which we didn't know when we were in

0:18:11.036 --> 0:18:14.676
<v Speaker 1>the room, thank goodness, but which we discovered pretty clearly

0:18:14.716 --> 0:18:18.196
<v Speaker 1>when we came out and turned on our phones. I mean,

0:18:18.236 --> 0:18:21.516
<v Speaker 1>for me, a really dramatic moment was when we left

0:18:21.556 --> 0:18:23.756
<v Speaker 1>at the very end of the day, this long, grueling day,

0:18:23.836 --> 0:18:26.436
<v Speaker 1>nine plus hours. I think we were in there and

0:18:26.796 --> 0:18:29.596
<v Speaker 1>someone from the Sergeant at Arms Office of the House

0:18:29.676 --> 0:18:33.396
<v Speaker 1>was there to meet us in the witness room and said, Pam,

0:18:33.436 --> 0:18:34.916
<v Speaker 1>you know, I hate to tell you this, but you're

0:18:34.956 --> 0:18:39.436
<v Speaker 1>getting death threats. And you know, that was pretty shocking moment,

0:18:39.876 --> 0:18:42.756
<v Speaker 1>certainly for me to hear, and I imagine for Pam

0:18:42.756 --> 0:18:45.356
<v Speaker 1>as well, and it didn't really let up. Now. I

0:18:45.396 --> 0:18:49.276
<v Speaker 1>think Pam unquestionably got the worst of it. I think

0:18:49.276 --> 0:18:52.116
<v Speaker 1>a large part of that is good old fashioned misogyny.

0:18:52.156 --> 0:18:54.556
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, a woman taking on the president

0:18:54.596 --> 0:18:56.156
<v Speaker 1>of the the United States is going to just get more

0:18:56.676 --> 0:19:01.836
<v Speaker 1>and deeper negativity than men are. She also got, as

0:19:01.956 --> 0:19:04.476
<v Speaker 1>I got, and as you got, a huge amount of

0:19:04.476 --> 0:19:07.916
<v Speaker 1>negative commentary. I should say, I think I got about

0:19:07.956 --> 0:19:10.196
<v Speaker 1>as much positive as negative. You know, huge numbers of

0:19:10.196 --> 0:19:12.996
<v Speaker 1>people's coming out of the woodwork. You know, I knew

0:19:12.996 --> 0:19:14.636
<v Speaker 1>you in summer camp. Thank you for your service to

0:19:14.676 --> 0:19:17.796
<v Speaker 1>the country. Strangers writing that, lots of very uplifting stuff,

0:19:18.116 --> 0:19:21.956
<v Speaker 1>but also a really strong thread of pretty vicious negativity.

0:19:22.396 --> 0:19:24.716
<v Speaker 1>And at least in my instance, and we should talk

0:19:24.756 --> 0:19:27.236
<v Speaker 1>about whether you had this experience too, A lot of

0:19:27.276 --> 0:19:29.276
<v Speaker 1>it was anti semitic. A lot of the negative stuff

0:19:29.276 --> 0:19:33.636
<v Speaker 1>was anti semitic. I'm wondering first of all, was that

0:19:33.836 --> 0:19:35.636
<v Speaker 1>was that your experience? And then we should talk about

0:19:35.716 --> 0:19:42.156
<v Speaker 1>how it felt that was mostly my experience. I mean,

0:19:42.156 --> 0:19:44.836
<v Speaker 1>I guess the first thing I should mention is for me,

0:19:45.156 --> 0:19:50.116
<v Speaker 1>the hate mail hugely outnumbered anything else it was. It

0:19:50.196 --> 0:19:52.276
<v Speaker 1>may have been not just ten to one, it could

0:19:52.276 --> 0:19:53.916
<v Speaker 1>be more. I think it's more like one hundred and one.

0:19:55.316 --> 0:19:57.756
<v Speaker 1>I expected some of that. I don't know that I

0:19:57.796 --> 0:20:00.996
<v Speaker 1>could expected, you know, the volume of it, and it

0:20:01.036 --> 0:20:03.236
<v Speaker 1>was exactly the kind of vituol you described. It was

0:20:03.396 --> 0:20:08.916
<v Speaker 1>very hateful, lots cursing, lots of profanity, and lots of

0:20:09.156 --> 0:20:12.076
<v Speaker 1>declarations that you know you don't know X and you

0:20:12.076 --> 0:20:15.716
<v Speaker 1>know you should be fired. And and yes, a lot

0:20:15.796 --> 0:20:20.276
<v Speaker 1>of it was anti Semitic, and so that that was

0:20:20.356 --> 0:20:23.196
<v Speaker 1>like a tidal way. And I got some very nice

0:20:23.636 --> 0:20:27.436
<v Speaker 1>emails and even letters. And one thing that's very striking

0:20:27.476 --> 0:20:30.556
<v Speaker 1>and actually very meaningful for me is that I heard

0:20:30.556 --> 0:20:33.036
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of people that I grew up within

0:20:33.116 --> 0:20:36.676
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago in Alabama, and they were very nice,

0:20:37.716 --> 0:20:41.956
<v Speaker 1>remarkably kind, and very thoughtful, and that was I don't

0:20:41.996 --> 0:20:44.596
<v Speaker 1>know that I expected. It was very nice. I think

0:20:44.676 --> 0:20:48.556
<v Speaker 1>the level of anti semitism was more extreme this time

0:20:48.556 --> 0:20:51.196
<v Speaker 1>than I've ever experienced it in this setting. I mean,

0:20:51.236 --> 0:20:53.316
<v Speaker 1>obviously when I grew up, I experienced it a great deal.

0:20:53.436 --> 0:20:55.636
<v Speaker 1>Well you say something about that, you say, you say obviously,

0:20:55.716 --> 0:20:58.556
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of people, especially you know,

0:20:58.636 --> 0:21:01.836
<v Speaker 1>let's say our kids age, don't really know what it

0:21:01.876 --> 0:21:04.756
<v Speaker 1>would have been like to be a Jewish kid in Mobile,

0:21:04.876 --> 0:21:08.236
<v Speaker 1>Alabama when you were growing up in the sixties and

0:21:08.396 --> 0:21:12.476
<v Speaker 1>early SEVENTIESE what what was that like? I mean, how

0:21:12.476 --> 0:21:15.156
<v Speaker 1>how did you experience anti Semitism as a kid? Was

0:21:15.196 --> 0:21:17.916
<v Speaker 1>it was it comments? Was it people picking fights with you?

0:21:18.236 --> 0:21:20.196
<v Speaker 1>How did it? How did it work? Yes? It was

0:21:20.236 --> 0:21:22.276
<v Speaker 1>comments and it was fights. I got beaten up a

0:21:22.276 --> 0:21:25.076
<v Speaker 1>fair bit. And you're a big guy, and you were

0:21:25.076 --> 0:21:26.836
<v Speaker 1>a serious athlete, right, I mean, weren't you? Well I was.

0:21:27.156 --> 0:21:29.076
<v Speaker 1>I read somewhere you were the number two tennis player

0:21:29.076 --> 0:21:30.836
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Alabama, So you were you were

0:21:30.876 --> 0:21:33.276
<v Speaker 1>a jock, and they were still coming after you. Yeah.

0:21:33.316 --> 0:21:35.196
<v Speaker 1>Well you can imagine that you, as tennis player in

0:21:35.196 --> 0:21:39.636
<v Speaker 1>football country was not exactly you know, a model citizen.

0:21:40.076 --> 0:21:44.276
<v Speaker 1>Um and so um it manifested itself in all sorts

0:21:44.316 --> 0:21:48.756
<v Speaker 1>of different ways. Yes, people in school would say nasty things,

0:21:49.196 --> 0:21:51.556
<v Speaker 1>and certainly, both in school and out of school, I

0:21:51.556 --> 0:21:56.916
<v Speaker 1>would get beaten up somewhat regularly, um and um. And

0:21:57.156 --> 0:21:59.716
<v Speaker 1>although I was a competitive tennis player back at this

0:21:59.756 --> 0:22:02.836
<v Speaker 1>period of time, I could not play in any country

0:22:02.836 --> 0:22:06.316
<v Speaker 1>clubs because all the country clubs barre Jewish members. And

0:22:06.356 --> 0:22:08.836
<v Speaker 1>so whenever there was a tennis tournament in a country

0:22:08.876 --> 0:22:10.476
<v Speaker 1>club in those days, there were a lot of tennis

0:22:10.516 --> 0:22:13.116
<v Speaker 1>tournaments in country clubs, I could not play, Wow, because

0:22:13.116 --> 0:22:14.516
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just that. So it wasn't just that you

0:22:14.556 --> 0:22:17.716
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be a member. It was more like a segregation model. Yeah,

0:22:17.756 --> 0:22:21.116
<v Speaker 1>literally could not go into the club. That's play Becauespecially

0:22:21.156 --> 0:22:23.036
<v Speaker 1>there must have been other kids playing who weren't members,

0:22:23.196 --> 0:22:28.516
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't Jewish, that's correct. Wow. And so I

0:22:28.516 --> 0:22:30.276
<v Speaker 1>could play in public courts, but I couldn't play in

0:22:30.316 --> 0:22:33.556
<v Speaker 1>private courts basically. And did that do you think affect

0:22:33.556 --> 0:22:36.116
<v Speaker 1>you when you started getting you know, one hundred to

0:22:36.156 --> 0:22:37.996
<v Speaker 1>one ratio of of hate mail with a lot of

0:22:37.996 --> 0:22:41.276
<v Speaker 1>any Semitism? I mean, did was it upsetting? I don't.

0:22:41.396 --> 0:22:44.156
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the word would be. It's disturbing,

0:22:44.236 --> 0:22:48.196
<v Speaker 1>I don't, Yeah, Um, I think it's it's really sad

0:22:48.556 --> 0:22:51.156
<v Speaker 1>um and I think it was upset more from my

0:22:51.236 --> 0:22:53.836
<v Speaker 1>family because their threats made against my family as well.

0:22:54.396 --> 0:22:57.476
<v Speaker 1>So we had to get campus police UM and the

0:22:57.516 --> 0:22:59.956
<v Speaker 1>local police in Chapel Hill to kind of monitor our home,

0:22:59.996 --> 0:23:03.716
<v Speaker 1>and they're still coming by occasionally, goodness, check on our home. Upsetting.

0:23:04.036 --> 0:23:07.916
<v Speaker 1>The law school has essentially raised my information and you know,

0:23:07.916 --> 0:23:10.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I didn't ask for this, but the law

0:23:10.276 --> 0:23:12.556
<v Speaker 1>school decided maybe the best response was less pretend like

0:23:12.596 --> 0:23:16.916
<v Speaker 1>he's not here, so they took all indications of my office,

0:23:17.036 --> 0:23:22.556
<v Speaker 1>my phone, my email, everything's gone. So it's a weird feeling.

0:23:23.396 --> 0:23:26.876
<v Speaker 1>It's it's ironic. You're you're the most famous professor and

0:23:26.996 --> 0:23:29.876
<v Speaker 1>there's no information about you on the website except that

0:23:29.876 --> 0:23:32.396
<v Speaker 1>you are their most famous professor. Yeah. Well yeah, and

0:23:32.556 --> 0:23:36.276
<v Speaker 1>somehow disappeared. Yeah wow. And and maybe some of this

0:23:36.436 --> 0:23:37.836
<v Speaker 1>has to do with a little bit of being the

0:23:37.876 --> 0:23:39.996
<v Speaker 1>south of the Chapel Hills. It's one of the great

0:23:39.996 --> 0:23:42.116
<v Speaker 1>college towns. It's not an anti Semitic in any way

0:23:42.116 --> 0:23:46.116
<v Speaker 1>shape course, of course, And so I think that it's um.

0:23:46.796 --> 0:23:48.996
<v Speaker 1>So some of it did feel from your arn and

0:23:49.156 --> 0:23:51.116
<v Speaker 1>maybe that just provoked to me a feeling of great

0:23:51.156 --> 0:23:53.436
<v Speaker 1>sadness that after so many years, you know, I've come

0:23:53.476 --> 0:23:56.356
<v Speaker 1>full circle. You know, I think you know what you're saying.

0:23:56.516 --> 0:23:58.676
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I feel deep sympathy for you. I

0:23:59.356 --> 0:24:02.436
<v Speaker 1>it's a reminder to me that you know, we've all

0:24:02.556 --> 0:24:04.916
<v Speaker 1>we've we both have the white man privilege, which is

0:24:04.916 --> 0:24:07.316
<v Speaker 1>a good privilege to have in life. But there's an

0:24:07.356 --> 0:24:10.476
<v Speaker 1>extra privilege that I have of being in the Northeast

0:24:10.956 --> 0:24:15.516
<v Speaker 1>and from a generation that didn't really experience any over

0:24:15.796 --> 0:24:19.156
<v Speaker 1>anti semitism. You know, no getting beaten up, you know,

0:24:19.236 --> 0:24:21.716
<v Speaker 1>certainly no inability to you know, play in a in

0:24:21.756 --> 0:24:24.996
<v Speaker 1>a club. You mentioned your family. One of the pleasures

0:24:24.996 --> 0:24:27.636
<v Speaker 1>for me of the whole long day was getting to

0:24:27.636 --> 0:24:29.236
<v Speaker 1>spend a little bit of time in the witness room

0:24:29.276 --> 0:24:31.676
<v Speaker 1>with your son Noah, who came and sat behind you

0:24:31.756 --> 0:24:36.236
<v Speaker 1>during the entire hearing. What was his takeaway from the

0:24:36.596 --> 0:24:39.756
<v Speaker 1>from the whole day? And he seems incredibly smart, incredibly focused,

0:24:40.036 --> 0:24:41.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, knew all the details. Half the time. I

0:24:41.796 --> 0:24:43.476
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself, maybe he should be up there testifying

0:24:43.516 --> 0:24:46.836
<v Speaker 1>inside of me. Um, what what was it? What was

0:24:46.916 --> 0:24:49.916
<v Speaker 1>his ultimate takeaway from the whole day? Well, that's very sweet,

0:24:49.956 --> 0:24:51.916
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for saying that, and he said he

0:24:51.956 --> 0:24:54.356
<v Speaker 1>saw you later in the airport as well, So yeah,

0:24:54.356 --> 0:24:56.756
<v Speaker 1>we did see each other in the air I really

0:24:57.116 --> 0:24:59.036
<v Speaker 1>then I was drinking a very large Manhattan and I

0:24:59.076 --> 0:25:00.676
<v Speaker 1>would have invited him to join me, but he was not.

0:25:00.756 --> 0:25:03.796
<v Speaker 1>He was not of itch, that's right. But but thank

0:25:03.876 --> 0:25:07.196
<v Speaker 1>you for for all that. Um. This is my seventeen

0:25:07.276 --> 0:25:09.516
<v Speaker 1>year old son. He's very interested in politics. It's very

0:25:09.516 --> 0:25:13.996
<v Speaker 1>interested in the Constitution. But um and also, by the way,

0:25:14.116 --> 0:25:19.716
<v Speaker 1>incredibly proud of his Jewish identity, and so he I

0:25:19.756 --> 0:25:22.516
<v Speaker 1>think had asked me at some point, maybe way back

0:25:22.516 --> 0:25:24.756
<v Speaker 1>in the summer, he said, well, Dad, if you end

0:25:24.836 --> 0:25:27.076
<v Speaker 1>up he's hurt in our household. That I testified the

0:25:27.076 --> 0:25:28.676
<v Speaker 1>Clining hearing. So at one point he said, you know, Dad,

0:25:28.676 --> 0:25:30.836
<v Speaker 1>if you get invited, would you take me? And I

0:25:30.876 --> 0:25:33.916
<v Speaker 1>said sure, what Dad? Would you know? You say sure?

0:25:34.436 --> 0:25:36.636
<v Speaker 1>And then the day came and the first thing he said,

0:25:36.796 --> 0:25:38.836
<v Speaker 1>after I you know, I mentioned that this had keim.

0:25:39.076 --> 0:25:41.156
<v Speaker 1>He said, well, you promised, you promised to take me,

0:25:42.436 --> 0:25:45.116
<v Speaker 1>So I did, and he paid very close attention. He

0:25:45.196 --> 0:25:49.556
<v Speaker 1>was very incredibly sensitive to everything going on in the room,

0:25:49.796 --> 0:25:52.876
<v Speaker 1>but also very aware. And if you see the videos

0:25:53.316 --> 0:25:56.196
<v Speaker 1>of me testifying, you'll see him looking around the room

0:25:56.236 --> 0:25:59.036
<v Speaker 1>a lot behind me, so he was absorbing it, and

0:25:59.116 --> 0:26:03.076
<v Speaker 1>I think he was really struck by the really harsh partisanship.

0:26:03.636 --> 0:26:06.516
<v Speaker 1>The tone just stunned him. The fact that people could

0:26:06.516 --> 0:26:09.756
<v Speaker 1>talk that meanly to other people. You know, there is

0:26:10.156 --> 0:26:12.036
<v Speaker 1>we've kind of touched on this a little bit. If

0:26:12.076 --> 0:26:15.756
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned about equality, and we all are, it's remarkable

0:26:15.756 --> 0:26:17.556
<v Speaker 1>when you're in a room like that and you have

0:26:17.636 --> 0:26:20.996
<v Speaker 1>members of the House of Representatives yelling and screaming down

0:26:21.036 --> 0:26:24.196
<v Speaker 1>at you, and here's the thing you cannot yell and

0:26:24.236 --> 0:26:28.556
<v Speaker 1>scream back. True. That is the essence of inequality, I think,

0:26:28.556 --> 0:26:31.076
<v Speaker 1>where they are using their position in a way to

0:26:31.076 --> 0:26:33.476
<v Speaker 1>demean you. And my son really picked up on that.

0:26:33.556 --> 0:26:36.436
<v Speaker 1>He thought it was just I can't even put in

0:26:36.476 --> 0:26:40.996
<v Speaker 1>your superlatives here. He was just absolutely outraged by that.

0:26:40.996 --> 0:26:44.116
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. Yeah, I'm glad you made that point, Michaelin.

0:26:44.156 --> 0:26:46.676
<v Speaker 1>It brings me to my last question, and that has

0:26:46.716 --> 0:26:49.596
<v Speaker 1>to do with how you think about our roles as

0:26:49.636 --> 0:26:52.956
<v Speaker 1>law professors. Here. I have to say a couple of

0:26:52.996 --> 0:26:56.556
<v Speaker 1>my most cynical friends, one of whom is actually a

0:26:56.916 --> 0:27:01.236
<v Speaker 1>Trump person, you know, said to me privately, you know

0:27:01.276 --> 0:27:04.636
<v Speaker 1>what were you doing out there sounding like you can

0:27:04.716 --> 0:27:07.636
<v Speaker 1>speak on behalf of the constitution. In fact, someone said

0:27:07.636 --> 0:27:10.316
<v Speaker 1>to me, you sound like a rabbi and synagogue trying to,

0:27:10.516 --> 0:27:13.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, say what the toura means. And you know,

0:27:13.116 --> 0:27:17.396
<v Speaker 1>my answer was, Okay, I'll take that analogy because part

0:27:17.396 --> 0:27:19.516
<v Speaker 1>of my job as a law professor is to teach

0:27:19.516 --> 0:27:21.196
<v Speaker 1>students and to teach them that there are two sides

0:27:21.196 --> 0:27:23.996
<v Speaker 1>to every question. But that doesn't mean I can't believe

0:27:24.076 --> 0:27:27.516
<v Speaker 1>that one of the answers is true. And in this instance,

0:27:27.636 --> 0:27:29.596
<v Speaker 1>I felt like my job as a law professor was

0:27:29.636 --> 0:27:32.316
<v Speaker 1>actually to stand up and say not on the one hand.

0:27:32.356 --> 0:27:34.756
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, but actually, this is what the

0:27:34.796 --> 0:27:38.116
<v Speaker 1>constitution means. This isn't a hard case. The frameworks were

0:27:38.156 --> 0:27:41.316
<v Speaker 1>really clear. They specifically talked about these issues. It's not like,

0:27:41.356 --> 0:27:43.236
<v Speaker 1>what did the founding fathers think about smartphones when they

0:27:43.276 --> 0:27:45.356
<v Speaker 1>never heard of a smartphone? This is what did they

0:27:45.356 --> 0:27:47.636
<v Speaker 1>think about the distortion or presidential election? Well, as a

0:27:47.636 --> 0:27:49.476
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, they talked about it. What did they

0:27:49.476 --> 0:27:51.396
<v Speaker 1>think about, you know, bribery, As a matter of fact,

0:27:51.396 --> 0:27:53.356
<v Speaker 1>they talked about it. So I was sort of willing

0:27:53.436 --> 0:27:56.316
<v Speaker 1>to embrace the idea that sometimes our job is to

0:27:56.396 --> 0:27:59.596
<v Speaker 1>be kind of secular priests of the constitutional faith, you know,

0:27:59.636 --> 0:28:01.956
<v Speaker 1>to stand up and speak on behalf of the constitution.

0:28:02.716 --> 0:28:04.636
<v Speaker 1>You know, some of our colleagues think we shouldn't do that.

0:28:05.516 --> 0:28:08.036
<v Speaker 1>Do you share some instinct that you know that is

0:28:08.076 --> 0:28:11.956
<v Speaker 1>actually our role in those circumstances? Yes, I do share that.

0:28:12.836 --> 0:28:14.836
<v Speaker 1>So there are two points, and I think that's really

0:28:14.916 --> 0:28:18.316
<v Speaker 1>the first point. Another way to put it is that

0:28:18.396 --> 0:28:22.716
<v Speaker 1>I actually do believe in expertise, and I believe in facts,

0:28:22.956 --> 0:28:25.476
<v Speaker 1>and I think that somebody who spends a lot of

0:28:25.476 --> 0:28:28.916
<v Speaker 1>time studying something and has thought about it and analyzed

0:28:28.956 --> 0:28:30.636
<v Speaker 1>it and read about it and sort of come up with,

0:28:31.316 --> 0:28:36.196
<v Speaker 1>let's say, supportable insights and useful sort of thoughts about it,

0:28:36.996 --> 0:28:40.036
<v Speaker 1>ought to share that expertise. So that's the first reason.

0:28:40.556 --> 0:28:42.356
<v Speaker 1>But the second is I tell this to my class

0:28:42.396 --> 0:28:43.916
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I feel, to some extent this

0:28:43.996 --> 0:28:46.436
<v Speaker 1>is our duty as well. One of the first things

0:28:46.436 --> 0:28:48.636
<v Speaker 1>I always say, although fewer and fewer students are aware

0:28:48.676 --> 0:28:52.076
<v Speaker 1>of this story, the great story about the Emperor's new clothes,

0:28:52.796 --> 0:28:56.196
<v Speaker 1>and how what a lawyer has to do I think

0:28:56.476 --> 0:28:59.916
<v Speaker 1>is have the courage to be able to say I

0:28:59.956 --> 0:29:03.116
<v Speaker 1>don't think he has any clothes on. This comes back

0:29:03.156 --> 0:29:06.996
<v Speaker 1>from my background and growing up in Alabama. Somebody has

0:29:07.036 --> 0:29:08.876
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say, this is what a lawyer

0:29:09.236 --> 0:29:12.476
<v Speaker 1>most useful function is. I think, hold on, now, that's

0:29:12.476 --> 0:29:15.316
<v Speaker 1>a violation of the law. There's something bigger than us

0:29:15.356 --> 0:29:18.116
<v Speaker 1>here and we have to recognize that. And that bigger

0:29:18.156 --> 0:29:21.116
<v Speaker 1>thing is the Constitution. And if I think it's being breached,

0:29:21.716 --> 0:29:23.956
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thoughtful and I'm doing this in good faith,

0:29:23.996 --> 0:29:27.836
<v Speaker 1>I think I have a duty to express that. Michael,

0:29:27.876 --> 0:29:30.636
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being a model to me of what

0:29:30.716 --> 0:29:33.076
<v Speaker 1>it is to be an expert, what it is to

0:29:33.236 --> 0:29:36.996
<v Speaker 1>believe that there is truth about the Constitution, and what

0:29:37.036 --> 0:29:39.476
<v Speaker 1>it is to go out there and tell people what

0:29:39.636 --> 0:29:41.956
<v Speaker 1>that truth is. Really. Thank you so much. Thank you

0:29:42.076 --> 0:29:43.956
<v Speaker 1>such a great role model, and thanks thanks for this

0:29:44.076 --> 0:29:46.436
<v Speaker 1>great conversation. It's great to talk to you. Thank you. Noah.

0:30:00.356 --> 0:30:03.556
<v Speaker 1>Since Michael and I spoke, the impeachment trial has ground

0:30:03.636 --> 0:30:08.036
<v Speaker 1>to a premature halt. As of this moment, it seems

0:30:08.156 --> 0:30:10.876
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly likely that by the end of the day, the

0:30:11.036 --> 0:30:14.356
<v Speaker 1>Senate of the United States is going to vote on

0:30:14.356 --> 0:30:17.476
<v Speaker 1>whether to remove the president, and almost certainly it will

0:30:17.556 --> 0:30:20.036
<v Speaker 1>vote not to remove him, and that it's going to

0:30:20.116 --> 0:30:25.076
<v Speaker 1>do so without ever hearing any witnesses at all. That

0:30:25.116 --> 0:30:29.156
<v Speaker 1>reason is a really fundamental question was the trial legitimate

0:30:29.316 --> 0:30:32.316
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. This is going to be a

0:30:32.356 --> 0:30:36.316
<v Speaker 1>difficult and controversial issue that Democrats and Republicans are going

0:30:36.356 --> 0:30:39.596
<v Speaker 1>to continue to fight about for quite some time. You

0:30:39.596 --> 0:30:42.196
<v Speaker 1>can expect Democrats to point out that never in the

0:30:42.276 --> 0:30:44.836
<v Speaker 1>history of the United States Senate has there ever been

0:30:44.876 --> 0:30:48.836
<v Speaker 1>an impeachment trial without witnesses before. You can also expect

0:30:48.916 --> 0:30:52.076
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to say that the basic definition of a trial

0:30:52.516 --> 0:30:56.396
<v Speaker 1>requires looking at some sort of evidence, whether it's witnesses

0:30:56.516 --> 0:30:59.956
<v Speaker 1>or documents or something, and that therefore this really didn't

0:30:59.956 --> 0:31:02.316
<v Speaker 1>count as a trial, and that the Senate in some

0:31:02.436 --> 0:31:07.796
<v Speaker 1>sense failed to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities. On the Republican side,

0:31:07.836 --> 0:31:09.996
<v Speaker 1>you can expect people to say, not only now, but

0:31:10.116 --> 0:31:12.956
<v Speaker 1>well into the future, that the Senate just didn't have

0:31:13.076 --> 0:31:15.476
<v Speaker 1>to consider anything more than the evidence that had been

0:31:15.476 --> 0:31:18.716
<v Speaker 1>brought by the House. Some Republicans will say, as some

0:31:18.796 --> 0:31:21.396
<v Speaker 1>are saying right now, that even if all of the

0:31:21.476 --> 0:31:24.396
<v Speaker 1>charges against Donald Trump were true, they didn't rise to

0:31:24.436 --> 0:31:28.076
<v Speaker 1>the level of an impeachable offense. Others will take the

0:31:28.116 --> 0:31:31.516
<v Speaker 1>position that even if Trump did all of the things

0:31:31.556 --> 0:31:34.236
<v Speaker 1>he was accused of doing. There was just nothing wrong

0:31:34.236 --> 0:31:37.556
<v Speaker 1>with it at all. The judgment of history on this

0:31:37.636 --> 0:31:42.036
<v Speaker 1>question is likely to remain mixed for some time, but

0:31:42.076 --> 0:31:45.356
<v Speaker 1>that's not the most important point. The most important point

0:31:45.396 --> 0:31:47.276
<v Speaker 1>is that future Senates are going to look back on

0:31:47.316 --> 0:31:49.836
<v Speaker 1>what this Senate did and treat it as at least

0:31:49.916 --> 0:31:54.516
<v Speaker 1>a somewhat convincing precedent for how they should act. It

0:31:54.556 --> 0:31:56.996
<v Speaker 1>will no longer be possible to say that at every

0:31:57.076 --> 0:32:00.476
<v Speaker 1>single impeachment trial since the beginning of the Republic there

0:32:00.516 --> 0:32:03.636
<v Speaker 1>have always been witnesses, because now there will have been

0:32:03.676 --> 0:32:07.276
<v Speaker 1>a trial with no witnesses at all. I should add

0:32:07.516 --> 0:32:11.276
<v Speaker 1>that we did not get here overnight. Over time, the

0:32:11.356 --> 0:32:14.556
<v Speaker 1>Senate has increasingly been willing to listen to witnesses who

0:32:14.636 --> 0:32:17.156
<v Speaker 1>were not appearing directly in front of it, but who

0:32:17.196 --> 0:32:20.956
<v Speaker 1>gave depositions behind closed doors which could then be watched

0:32:21.036 --> 0:32:25.356
<v Speaker 1>indirectly as excerpts by the senators. On the surface, that

0:32:25.476 --> 0:32:27.516
<v Speaker 1>might not sound like it was such a deviation from

0:32:27.516 --> 0:32:30.196
<v Speaker 1>the tradition of hearing witnesses directly, and maybe it didn't

0:32:30.196 --> 0:32:33.356
<v Speaker 1>seem so at the time, but in retrospect, it's really

0:32:33.396 --> 0:32:37.476
<v Speaker 1>clear that not hearing directly for witnesses was one step

0:32:37.596 --> 0:32:40.316
<v Speaker 1>along the way to a Senate that felt it did

0:32:40.316 --> 0:32:43.716
<v Speaker 1>not need to hear witnesses at all. We even heard

0:32:43.716 --> 0:32:46.836
<v Speaker 1>in this trial Republicans saying the rather shocking proposition that

0:32:46.876 --> 0:32:49.196
<v Speaker 1>it was the job of the House of Representatives together

0:32:49.316 --> 0:32:52.196
<v Speaker 1>all of the evidence, as though it weren't also the

0:32:52.316 --> 0:32:54.556
<v Speaker 1>job of those who were running the trial to hear

0:32:54.596 --> 0:32:58.396
<v Speaker 1>that evidence for themselves, as they had always done previously.

0:32:58.956 --> 0:33:02.276
<v Speaker 1>The thing about impeachment is that precedent changes very slowly.

0:33:02.396 --> 0:33:06.116
<v Speaker 1>Because we don't have very many impeachments to judge from.

0:33:07.236 --> 0:33:09.916
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's inevitably the case now that we

0:33:09.956 --> 0:33:12.836
<v Speaker 1>will come to see this trial as having been whether

0:33:12.916 --> 0:33:17.116
<v Speaker 1>legitimate or not, one option available to the Senate. If

0:33:17.156 --> 0:33:20.796
<v Speaker 1>we have a democratic president and a democratically controlled Senate,

0:33:21.036 --> 0:33:24.516
<v Speaker 1>you will hear Democrats, not Republicans, saying, you know what,

0:33:24.556 --> 0:33:27.516
<v Speaker 1>we don't absolutely need to have witnesses, because after all,

0:33:27.636 --> 0:33:31.556
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have them the last time. In the long run,

0:33:31.756 --> 0:33:35.996
<v Speaker 1>then we won't be debating the legitimacy of the trial

0:33:36.636 --> 0:33:40.036
<v Speaker 1>or the fairness of the procedures. We'll just be debating

0:33:40.076 --> 0:33:44.876
<v Speaker 1>whether to follow those procedures again the next time. After all,

0:33:45.196 --> 0:33:48.956
<v Speaker 1>it's within the constitutional power of the Senate to decide

0:33:49.036 --> 0:33:52.836
<v Speaker 1>if the trial that it conducted counted as a trial

0:33:52.996 --> 0:33:55.156
<v Speaker 1>or not. And if you leave it to somebody to

0:33:55.156 --> 0:33:57.236
<v Speaker 1>be the judge in his own cause, you can be

0:33:57.236 --> 0:34:07.796
<v Speaker 1>pretty confident that he'll find himself not guilty. Now it's

0:34:07.836 --> 0:34:11.036
<v Speaker 1>time for a segment I'll be doing every week called Playback.

0:34:11.556 --> 0:34:14.276
<v Speaker 1>I'll choose a moment in the news, play it back

0:34:14.316 --> 0:34:17.076
<v Speaker 1>to you, and then I'll try to make some sense

0:34:17.076 --> 0:34:21.076
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Here's this week's major market alert. Stocks

0:34:21.116 --> 0:34:24.596
<v Speaker 1>plunging is the spread of coronavirus rattles investors, But now

0:34:24.636 --> 0:34:27.396
<v Speaker 1>the SMB and AZDAC all posted their biggest losses of

0:34:27.436 --> 0:34:31.196
<v Speaker 1>the year by far. That's a clip from CNBC's Brian

0:34:31.316 --> 0:34:35.116
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan about the impact that the coronavirus has been having

0:34:35.196 --> 0:34:39.076
<v Speaker 1>on the markets, and where something affects the markets, before

0:34:39.116 --> 0:34:43.316
<v Speaker 1>too long, it's going to start affecting the real economy too.

0:34:44.676 --> 0:34:47.476
<v Speaker 1>How worried should we really be about the effect that

0:34:47.516 --> 0:34:51.836
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus might have on the global exchange of trade,

0:34:52.316 --> 0:34:56.916
<v Speaker 1>which is so significantly affected by China. The answer to

0:34:56.956 --> 0:35:00.476
<v Speaker 1>that question is one of the classic instances of questions

0:35:00.476 --> 0:35:04.596
<v Speaker 1>that have to be answered by virtue of uncertainty. It's

0:35:04.676 --> 0:35:07.796
<v Speaker 1>uncertain because all we have to go on is the

0:35:07.836 --> 0:35:11.156
<v Speaker 1>experience of happened when China was struck by the Stars

0:35:11.236 --> 0:35:15.596
<v Speaker 1>virus nearly twenty years ago, and that experience is very

0:35:15.676 --> 0:35:18.396
<v Speaker 1>far from exact when it's compared to what we're dealing

0:35:18.436 --> 0:35:21.996
<v Speaker 1>with now. First of all, those are two different viruses,

0:35:22.076 --> 0:35:25.476
<v Speaker 1>and they might spread through the population in significantly different ways.

0:35:26.316 --> 0:35:29.116
<v Speaker 1>Second of all, China's role in the international economy has

0:35:29.156 --> 0:35:33.756
<v Speaker 1>expanded drastically since the last time, So all anyone can

0:35:33.796 --> 0:35:37.676
<v Speaker 1>do is make a little bet about what the probabilities

0:35:37.836 --> 0:35:41.316
<v Speaker 1>are that, in fact, we're going to be profoundly affected

0:35:41.516 --> 0:35:45.076
<v Speaker 1>globally by a process in which China might become largely

0:35:45.156 --> 0:35:47.956
<v Speaker 1>cut off from many of the supply chains in which

0:35:47.956 --> 0:35:53.516
<v Speaker 1>it's presently centrally engaged. The markets are simply one measure

0:35:53.916 --> 0:35:59.196
<v Speaker 1>of one collective group of people, acting individually, not coordinating

0:35:59.236 --> 0:36:03.276
<v Speaker 1>with each other, making bets and gambles on the probability

0:36:03.276 --> 0:36:06.036
<v Speaker 1>that this will happen, and the market is gambling from

0:36:06.076 --> 0:36:11.036
<v Speaker 1>a standpoint of very significant ignorance. Now it may seem

0:36:11.116 --> 0:36:15.236
<v Speaker 1>monstrous to try to make economic money making predictions and

0:36:15.356 --> 0:36:17.596
<v Speaker 1>bets that are intended to pay off for the people

0:36:17.676 --> 0:36:21.356
<v Speaker 1>making those bets on the basis of disease. But that's

0:36:21.396 --> 0:36:24.796
<v Speaker 1>just business as usual for economic markets, which after all,

0:36:24.876 --> 0:36:28.236
<v Speaker 1>have as their purpose trying to make a buck on

0:36:28.276 --> 0:36:33.076
<v Speaker 1>the vicissitudes of human affairs. The markets as of this

0:36:33.156 --> 0:36:37.436
<v Speaker 1>moment seem to think that the dangers of the coronavirus

0:36:37.476 --> 0:36:44.196
<v Speaker 1>profoundly disrupting the global economy are relatively small. Among the epidemiologists,

0:36:44.196 --> 0:36:47.316
<v Speaker 1>the prevailing view seems to be that the coronavirus is

0:36:47.396 --> 0:36:52.436
<v Speaker 1>not one of those viruses that's susceptible to extraordinarily rapid spreading,

0:36:52.716 --> 0:36:56.396
<v Speaker 1>infecting everybody who comes into any form of contact with

0:36:56.436 --> 0:37:01.516
<v Speaker 1>those who have the disease. But notice that the epidemiologists

0:37:01.756 --> 0:37:05.916
<v Speaker 1>are themselves little different from the people making bets in

0:37:05.956 --> 0:37:10.596
<v Speaker 1>the markets. That is, they're just engaged expressing a statistical

0:37:10.636 --> 0:37:14.396
<v Speaker 1>probability of what they think will happen, based on imperfect

0:37:14.436 --> 0:37:19.476
<v Speaker 1>models and highly dissimilar past events. So what we're dealing

0:37:19.476 --> 0:37:23.836
<v Speaker 1>with really is a set of statistical predictions by epidemiologists,

0:37:24.076 --> 0:37:26.876
<v Speaker 1>and then a set of statistical predictions by people in

0:37:26.916 --> 0:37:30.876
<v Speaker 1>the market who are betting on the bets of those epidemiologists.

0:37:30.876 --> 0:37:35.836
<v Speaker 1>In their first place it's probabilities on probabilities. All this

0:37:35.956 --> 0:37:38.996
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of a famous line by the Supreme Court

0:37:39.036 --> 0:37:42.396
<v Speaker 1>Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior. He was talking about the

0:37:42.436 --> 0:37:45.116
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech and the American system of government, and

0:37:45.236 --> 0:37:48.716
<v Speaker 1>he said that the American system of government is at

0:37:48.716 --> 0:37:52.916
<v Speaker 1>any rate an experiment, as all life is an experiment.

0:37:53.636 --> 0:37:55.316
<v Speaker 1>What Holmes meant when he said all life is an

0:37:55.316 --> 0:37:58.636
<v Speaker 1>experiment is that every day, and in almost every way,

0:37:58.956 --> 0:38:03.556
<v Speaker 1>we are betting our future on probabilities, hundreds or thousands

0:38:03.556 --> 0:38:07.916
<v Speaker 1>of probabilities of events taking place according to our expectations.

0:38:08.596 --> 0:38:11.556
<v Speaker 1>We do our best, not because that's so great, not

0:38:11.676 --> 0:38:14.716
<v Speaker 1>because it's good enough, but because it's our only option.

0:38:17.476 --> 0:38:20.516
<v Speaker 1>Deep background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our

0:38:20.556 --> 0:38:23.876
<v Speaker 1>producer is Lydia gene Kott, with studio recording by Joseph

0:38:23.876 --> 0:38:27.956
<v Speaker 1>Fridman and mastering by Jason Gambrel and Jason Roskowski. Our

0:38:27.996 --> 0:38:31.396
<v Speaker 1>showrunner is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme music is composed by

0:38:31.476 --> 0:38:35.396
<v Speaker 1>Luis Garat Special thanks to the Pushkin Brass Malcolm Gladwell,

0:38:35.556 --> 0:38:39.236
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Lobel. I'm Noah Feldman. You can

0:38:39.236 --> 0:38:42.996
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Noah R. Feldman. This is

0:38:43.036 --> 0:38:43.876
<v Speaker 1>deep background