1
00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:06,760
Speaker 1: Reality with the King is hosted by me, Carlos King.

2
00:00:07,080 --> 00:00:10,239
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer who have produced some of your

3
00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:13,520
Speaker 1: favorite shows from the Real Housewives in Atlanta, New Jersey

4
00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:17,360
Speaker 1: and my own creation, The Love and Marriage Franchise and

5
00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:23,040
Speaker 1: Bell Collective. Every episode we recap reality television from the

6
00:00:23,079 --> 00:00:27,680
Speaker 1: Real Housewives Franchise to The Bachelor or Selling Sunset. In

7
00:00:27,720 --> 00:00:31,680
Speaker 1: addition to celebrity guests, whether in the unscripted space or

8
00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:37,080
Speaker 1: scripted as well, we have so.

9
00:00:37,120 --> 00:00:41,559
Speaker 2: Much to talk about greeting and salutation, honey, that's what

10
00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:49,280
Speaker 2: we're doing. So on Tonight's Live, I've listened and I'll responded,

11
00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:54,880
Speaker 2: and you guys wanted me to bring back my amazing

12
00:00:54,960 --> 00:00:58,480
Speaker 2: friend and amazing co host f M. K. Williams to

13
00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:02,160
Speaker 2: talk about the Candy and Todd divorce proceedings. So on

14
00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:08,520
Speaker 2: this one, what we're gonna do is utilize Ebony's amazing

15
00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:12,280
Speaker 2: intelligence when it comes to the law and being a

16
00:01:12,319 --> 00:01:16,280
Speaker 2: celebrity and how those two things sort of intersect when

17
00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:19,480
Speaker 2: it comes to what happens with the celebrity divorce, the

18
00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:24,119
Speaker 2: money desk at stake, children being involved, minor children at

19
00:01:24,160 --> 00:01:30,400
Speaker 2: that in addition to recent information about particular allegations of

20
00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:33,440
Speaker 2: possible cheating. So, Ebony, are you ready to break this

21
00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:34,520
Speaker 2: all down?

22
00:01:35,640 --> 00:01:41,120
Speaker 3: I am if I have shot approval from the rain Drops, shit,

23
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:44,200
Speaker 3: I mean, well damn.

24
00:01:48,280 --> 00:01:51,120
Speaker 2: Well. Look, you know the range are very opinionated. So

25
00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:55,240
Speaker 2: just to catch you all up to speed, what's going on?

26
00:01:55,480 --> 00:01:59,520
Speaker 2: And look, this has been a situation that a lot

27
00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:02,440
Speaker 2: of did not see coming. So I want to make

28
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:08,040
Speaker 2: sure to recapture you guys exactly what is happening. So

29
00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:13,480
Speaker 2: rain Drops, as you all know, Candy Burristucker has decided

30
00:02:13,720 --> 00:02:19,119
Speaker 2: to file for divorce on November twenty first. She has

31
00:02:19,200 --> 00:02:22,920
Speaker 2: called it quiz after eleven years of marriage. She said

32
00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:25,440
Speaker 2: in a statement that after deep thought a lot of prayer,

33
00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:32,680
Speaker 2: she's made the decision to move forward with advores. Okay,

34
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:38,680
Speaker 2: she cited that the marriage was irretrivially broken and that

35
00:02:38,919 --> 00:02:43,280
Speaker 2: she was seeking for joint cust study. So before we

36
00:02:43,360 --> 00:02:48,200
Speaker 2: get into Ta's response, which truly did break the Internet ebony,

37
00:02:48,639 --> 00:02:55,399
Speaker 2: some of divorces, especially celebrities, we always hear the reconcilable differences,

38
00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:58,040
Speaker 2: which is pretty much like the safest thing to say

39
00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:02,560
Speaker 2: about like two parties. We decided to different matters to

40
00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:08,079
Speaker 2: say that it was irvally broken explain to us exactly

41
00:03:08,440 --> 00:03:14,120
Speaker 2: what that particular statement means and why or why not

42
00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:17,720
Speaker 2: is that important when it comes to this divorce.

43
00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:22,920
Speaker 3: Well, the only real legal significance of that language, Carlos,

44
00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:26,280
Speaker 3: and it's a good, it's a good point of clarification

45
00:03:27,160 --> 00:03:30,120
Speaker 3: is that because, like you said, irreconcilable differences is a

46
00:03:30,200 --> 00:03:32,840
Speaker 3: catch all, you know, it's it's a standard catch all

47
00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 3: that almost everybody uses in their uh no fault state divorces,

48
00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:45,320
Speaker 3: which Georgia is. But that beyond you know, what do

49
00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:49,680
Speaker 3: you call it? Reconciliation piece just kind of goes to

50
00:03:50,480 --> 00:03:53,760
Speaker 3: tap the judge or the try or effect on the

51
00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:57,240
Speaker 3: shoulder and let them know basically, we're not particularly interested

52
00:03:57,400 --> 00:04:02,640
Speaker 3: in counts or mediation tactics that would put us on

53
00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:06,560
Speaker 3: a path for reconciliation. It's basically because sometimes when you

54
00:04:06,600 --> 00:04:09,280
Speaker 3: initially find you do an initial first filing of divorce,

55
00:04:09,680 --> 00:04:12,560
Speaker 3: you might have a judge push you in that direction,

56
00:04:12,800 --> 00:04:16,280
Speaker 3: especially when there are minor children involved, as is the

57
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,040
Speaker 3: case with Candy and Todd. They've got a six year

58
00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:22,480
Speaker 3: old daughter Blaze, nine year old son Ace and so

59
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:25,640
Speaker 3: and especially I'm going to bring up some components rain drops,

60
00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:28,119
Speaker 3: So follow me here when you're in the Bible Belt,

61
00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:29,960
Speaker 3: they are in the state of Georgia. And I say

62
00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:33,040
Speaker 3: this as a proud Southern girl myself, who practice family

63
00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:36,360
Speaker 3: law in the state of North Carolina, you're gonna sometimes

64
00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,640
Speaker 3: run into a judge, and the judges, y'all, have a

65
00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:43,600
Speaker 3: tremendous amount of discretion in family law cases. So that's

66
00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:46,640
Speaker 3: one thing to note. This is not a prosecutor and

67
00:04:46,680 --> 00:04:50,080
Speaker 3: a defense This is a judge and only a judge

68
00:04:50,080 --> 00:04:52,839
Speaker 3: that we'll hear from both Candy's lawyers and Todd's lawyers

69
00:04:53,040 --> 00:04:56,320
Speaker 3: and decide all the elements of this case, from custody

70
00:04:56,640 --> 00:05:00,120
Speaker 3: to the enforcement of the prenup, which we will get to,

71
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:02,719
Speaker 3: to all the elements. And so when you're in this

72
00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:06,440
Speaker 3: type of jurisdiction, the South, the Bible Belt, where the

73
00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:11,680
Speaker 3: culture of the region, y'all, and that mandates a presumption

74
00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:17,560
Speaker 3: of family, a presumption especially in the political climate that

75
00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:19,440
Speaker 3: we're in. I don't have to name it, y'all can

76
00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:23,520
Speaker 3: put it together, okay, where there's such a energy and

77
00:05:23,720 --> 00:05:29,400
Speaker 3: propensity around traditional family values and family staying together and

78
00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:34,840
Speaker 3: nuclear family situations. So the inclusion by Candy's attorney and

79
00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:40,320
Speaker 3: their legal team of that sentence essentially beyond reasonable chances

80
00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:43,400
Speaker 3: of reconciliation is to say, hey, you're honor In case

81
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:45,560
Speaker 3: you're thinking about trying to put us on track for

82
00:05:45,640 --> 00:05:50,560
Speaker 3: some type of preliminary reconciliation counseling, we can skip it.

83
00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:51,800
Speaker 3: That's what that says to me.

84
00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:57,080
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah, So one of the things that occur after that,

85
00:05:57,240 --> 00:06:02,080
Speaker 2: because again the worse filings for me, and again I'm

86
00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:06,040
Speaker 2: not a lawyer, I'm just a general public citizen. One

87
00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:10,520
Speaker 2: thing that I thought was okay, it was a kind

88
00:06:10,760 --> 00:06:17,600
Speaker 2: way of saying, this relationship cannot be you know, retrieved

89
00:06:17,640 --> 00:06:21,279
Speaker 2: outside of getting back together. We do have minor children together.

90
00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:26,040
Speaker 2: We are going to try to have a joint custody.

91
00:06:26,440 --> 00:06:30,520
Speaker 2: She did say that. She also said that look, they

92
00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:33,280
Speaker 2: have businesses together, and that any depth that they have

93
00:06:33,440 --> 00:06:36,520
Speaker 2: to be split and anything else should be split. Everything

94
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:39,960
Speaker 2: seemed to be fair and everybody said, okay, that's fine.

95
00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:43,440
Speaker 2: Then a few days later after that, on December second,

96
00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:47,440
Speaker 2: I'm sorry an December second, what happened On December first,

97
00:06:48,480 --> 00:06:56,159
Speaker 2: Tom Tucker's attorney, Randy Kessler, responded to Candy's filing, and

98
00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:00,520
Speaker 2: this is where things were said, ebony that run the

99
00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:04,200
Speaker 2: general public, the wrong way, not all of a sudden,

100
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:08,600
Speaker 2: but I wanted to get your thoughts on it. In

101
00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:13,440
Speaker 2: the In the document, it did state that Todd would

102
00:07:13,760 --> 00:07:17,160
Speaker 2: like to have in the unlike in the hopefully unlikely

103
00:07:17,240 --> 00:07:21,600
Speaker 2: event that they are unable to reach a custody deal,

104
00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:29,760
Speaker 2: he will be seeking primary physical custody, joint legal custody,

105
00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:37,800
Speaker 2: and final decision making authority. The document stated that Candy

106
00:07:38,240 --> 00:07:44,000
Speaker 2: having substantial time and meaningful access to the children. He's

107
00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:48,360
Speaker 2: praising her as a mother, But he also did say

108
00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:53,880
Speaker 2: that because she travels a lot, he wants to be

109
00:07:53,920 --> 00:07:57,440
Speaker 2: able to be the primary parent if they're unable to

110
00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:02,000
Speaker 2: reach a deal. You being a love yourself, you being

111
00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:06,680
Speaker 2: a working mom, yourself, you're actually on set today, yep.

112
00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:11,200
Speaker 3: Out of state, by the way, out of state, on

113
00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:13,680
Speaker 3: set out on the other side of the country. So

114
00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:18,560
Speaker 3: I'm actually very similarly positioned to where Miss Candy Burgers

115
00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:21,480
Speaker 3: is in terms of this type of situation. So let's

116
00:08:21,480 --> 00:08:23,160
Speaker 3: start in the back, carlost let me do some issue

117
00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:26,840
Speaker 3: spotting here, old school style. Everything you read, and I'm

118
00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:30,200
Speaker 3: so glad you read it in its totality around uh

119
00:08:30,560 --> 00:08:34,480
Speaker 3: Todd's request on the custody piece. The initial request this

120
00:08:34,520 --> 00:08:37,480
Speaker 3: is around a potential child support claim. Okay, so let's

121
00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:41,720
Speaker 3: let's reverse engineering. This is setting up a potential claim

122
00:08:41,800 --> 00:08:44,920
Speaker 3: from Todd and his legal team to seek child support.

123
00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:48,920
Speaker 3: I want everybody to immediately put spousal support on a

124
00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:53,360
Speaker 3: selparate chef, a separate shelf. Spousal support and child support

125
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:56,800
Speaker 3: have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Okay. Spousal

126
00:08:56,800 --> 00:09:01,440
Speaker 3: support may or may not even be at play, depending

127
00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:04,000
Speaker 3: on whether or not the judge decides to uphold the

128
00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:09,200
Speaker 3: existing prenuptial agreement. But child support is something that you

129
00:09:09,320 --> 00:09:14,120
Speaker 3: actually cannot bypass in a pre nup, Okay, because it's

130
00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:17,880
Speaker 3: not about you or you spouse or spouse. It's about

131
00:09:17,880 --> 00:09:23,240
Speaker 3: who the child. So excuse me. With that framework, With

132
00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:26,120
Speaker 3: this being all about a potential child support claim, that

133
00:09:26,200 --> 00:09:30,240
Speaker 3: would be why Todd, through his attorney Randy Kessler, would

134
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:34,240
Speaker 3: be seeking primary physical custody, because if you don't have

135
00:09:34,400 --> 00:09:38,840
Speaker 3: primary physical custody, there is little to no claim around

136
00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:42,080
Speaker 3: why you should be compensated from the other parent, because

137
00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:44,319
Speaker 3: the judge will typically look at that as if it's

138
00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:47,920
Speaker 3: split physical custody. They will look at y'all as equals

139
00:09:48,080 --> 00:09:51,080
Speaker 3: who are more or less equally positioned to care for

140
00:09:51,160 --> 00:09:54,120
Speaker 3: the children through your own resources with the time you

141
00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,560
Speaker 3: each equally have the children. But if you're saying no, no, no, no,

142
00:09:58,120 --> 00:10:00,520
Speaker 3: I am the the children are with me most of

143
00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:04,040
Speaker 3: the time, subject to visitation from the other spouse, then

144
00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:07,560
Speaker 3: the financial presumption shifts. Carlos, see how that goes. And

145
00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,320
Speaker 3: now the expectation is I need to be paid from

146
00:10:10,360 --> 00:10:16,479
Speaker 3: the other's spouse compensated for taking on more fiscal responsibility

147
00:10:16,520 --> 00:10:18,960
Speaker 3: because the children are with me more so I'm feeding them,

148
00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:22,199
Speaker 3: I'm clothing them, I'm housing them, I'm paying for their extracurriculars,

149
00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:24,920
Speaker 3: and I need to be paid child support to make

150
00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:29,160
Speaker 3: that equitable. That's so, that's that's connecting the dots as

151
00:10:29,200 --> 00:10:33,480
Speaker 3: to why he's starting from a physical custody demand and

152
00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:39,040
Speaker 3: then the legal joint custody that standard because uh, there

153
00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:42,840
Speaker 3: is no fiscal component to legal custody, because legal custody

154
00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:47,280
Speaker 3: is not about where the physicality of the children. It's

155
00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:49,720
Speaker 3: only about the decision making. So this is where they

156
00:10:49,800 --> 00:10:52,720
Speaker 3: go to school, if they have health insurance, what kind

157
00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:57,040
Speaker 3: testing the things of this in terms of like whatever

158
00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:00,160
Speaker 3: whatever assessments the children might need as they continue you

159
00:11:00,200 --> 00:11:03,199
Speaker 3: to grow and develop but then I think it's interesting.

160
00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:06,600
Speaker 3: Something I don't see often, Carlos, is this final request

161
00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:11,320
Speaker 3: potentially of final decision making. Because the whole point of

162
00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:14,520
Speaker 3: joint legal custody is to say that we are joint

163
00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:19,000
Speaker 3: in assessing what I just ran down, schooling, healthcare, the

164
00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,319
Speaker 3: major decisions that affect the child's life. But he's saying

165
00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:25,079
Speaker 3: that I actually want final decision making potentially, and that's

166
00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:28,199
Speaker 3: a bit unusual. So but the first thing you said

167
00:11:28,280 --> 00:11:32,079
Speaker 3: is important. We only get to me having physical primary custody,

168
00:11:32,480 --> 00:11:36,680
Speaker 3: joint decision making, legal custody and final decision if and

169
00:11:36,800 --> 00:11:40,680
Speaker 3: only if we can't get to a custody agreement. So

170
00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:42,920
Speaker 3: that's gonna be the first step, Carlos. They're gonna sit

171
00:11:43,000 --> 00:11:46,319
Speaker 3: down with maybe a mediator, an arbitrator, or even the

172
00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:47,960
Speaker 3: judge and try to see if they can come up

173
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:53,160
Speaker 3: with what we tend to call a consent decree, which

174
00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:56,840
Speaker 3: means we both consent mutually agree that this is going

175
00:11:56,880 --> 00:11:58,559
Speaker 3: to be the custody arrangement. So that's going to be

176
00:11:58,600 --> 00:11:59,360
Speaker 3: the first attempt.

177
00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:05,960
Speaker 2: Todd, on his social media has had this sort of

178
00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:09,319
Speaker 2: like social media series, nothing I would call a websode,

179
00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:13,199
Speaker 2: but he has been promoting that he does a lot

180
00:12:13,200 --> 00:12:17,800
Speaker 2: of daddy daycare, and he's been doing this for you know,

181
00:12:17,840 --> 00:12:22,640
Speaker 2: in recent months. Do you think that was a part

182
00:12:22,679 --> 00:12:27,720
Speaker 2: of strategy to show that he is the prime he

183
00:12:27,880 --> 00:12:31,040
Speaker 2: is being theen based on what he's showing me as

184
00:12:31,160 --> 00:12:33,120
Speaker 2: the primary care came, I don't have to.

185
00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:36,840
Speaker 3: I don't have to think it. Well, I was gonna say,

186
00:12:36,840 --> 00:12:38,520
Speaker 3: I don't have to think it, Carlos. I know it.

187
00:12:38,600 --> 00:12:40,920
Speaker 3: I know it, and it's not necessarily that's not a deed,

188
00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:44,000
Speaker 3: that's not nefarious, that's just quite obvious. Quite frankly, when

189
00:12:44,040 --> 00:12:47,120
Speaker 3: you see people start to show up in a public setting,

190
00:12:47,120 --> 00:12:49,079
Speaker 3: which social media is as public as it kind of

191
00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:54,320
Speaker 3: gets right because it's real time visibility, establishing a narrative

192
00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:56,960
Speaker 3: which may very well be true, may not be true,

193
00:12:57,040 --> 00:13:00,160
Speaker 3: maybe a little true or and untrue, who knows, right,

194
00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:05,360
Speaker 3: but they're establishing a narrative that sements them in a

195
00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:10,560
Speaker 3: particular position. So he's saying publicly, hey, public and potential

196
00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:14,360
Speaker 3: judge and whoever's assessing this, I need you to know

197
00:13:14,640 --> 00:13:18,120
Speaker 3: that it is me that is primarily at home doing

198
00:13:18,160 --> 00:13:21,920
Speaker 3: the daily caretaking of the children. I'm running the bathwater,

199
00:13:22,360 --> 00:13:25,960
Speaker 3: I'm preparing the meals. I'm preparing any medicines they may take.

200
00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:30,199
Speaker 3: I'm the one doing story time because why my wife,

201
00:13:30,520 --> 00:13:35,240
Speaker 3: per his claim, is out of town, out of the country,

202
00:13:35,600 --> 00:13:40,400
Speaker 3: promoting Broadway shows, doing press for her incredible you know,

203
00:13:40,880 --> 00:13:43,680
Speaker 3: works and projects and movies and films and all the

204
00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:46,600
Speaker 3: amazing things she's doing. So while she is away, kind

205
00:13:46,600 --> 00:13:51,040
Speaker 3: of well, what's it getting the bacon. I'm playing daddy

206
00:13:51,080 --> 00:13:54,079
Speaker 3: daycare at home, frying up the bacon, and I am

207
00:13:54,120 --> 00:13:57,400
Speaker 3: holding down the home front. That is clearly Carlos what

208
00:13:57,559 --> 00:14:00,920
Speaker 3: he has been trying to establish for the past several months,

209
00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:05,480
Speaker 3: which bolsters his argument his legal claim that that's why

210
00:14:05,840 --> 00:14:09,600
Speaker 3: I should be designated the primary physical custodian, because, like

211
00:14:09,640 --> 00:14:11,920
Speaker 3: you were saying, and you know, using me as an

212
00:14:11,920 --> 00:14:14,400
Speaker 3: example of what it looks like to be the working

213
00:14:14,520 --> 00:14:17,040
Speaker 3: mom who's going to get the bacon. I'm out in

214
00:14:17,160 --> 00:14:19,360
Speaker 3: La getting the bacon. I'm on set getting the bacon.

215
00:14:19,440 --> 00:14:22,240
Speaker 3: Somebody's got to get the bacon. But also somebody has

216
00:14:22,280 --> 00:14:25,000
Speaker 3: to be home to fry the bacon because the children

217
00:14:25,040 --> 00:14:28,040
Speaker 3: can't eat un fried bacon, you know, using this analogy,

218
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:32,480
Speaker 3: so I would tell you, cybar, this this is sidebar.

219
00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:35,120
Speaker 3: This is part of the reason that I used a

220
00:14:35,160 --> 00:14:40,800
Speaker 3: donor true tide of my personal story time part Yeah.

221
00:14:40,920 --> 00:14:42,720
Speaker 3: Part of the reason that I decided to be a

222
00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:46,400
Speaker 3: single mom by choice, Carlos King and use a donor

223
00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:51,000
Speaker 3: and not have a father for liberty, not use a friend,

224
00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:55,280
Speaker 3: not have a cold parenting situation, is because I knew

225
00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:59,800
Speaker 3: my circumstances professionally would put me in Candy's exact situation,

226
00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:03,160
Speaker 3: and that I would very possibly end up paying child

227
00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:05,880
Speaker 3: support for my own daughter. Oh apps, some motherfucking lute

228
00:15:05,920 --> 00:15:09,240
Speaker 3: excuse me, I would easily be in a position to

229
00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:12,320
Speaker 3: have to go in front of a judge looking just

230
00:15:12,480 --> 00:15:16,160
Speaker 3: like this and plead my own case from my own

231
00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:20,480
Speaker 3: daughter that I carried in birth, to say, despite my

232
00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:24,960
Speaker 3: travel schedule, my work schedule, my sometimes lack of real

233
00:15:25,000 --> 00:15:28,640
Speaker 3: time availability, I assure you I can make sure all

234
00:15:28,640 --> 00:15:30,760
Speaker 3: of her needs are met. Because that opens the door,

235
00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:35,000
Speaker 3: Carlows for exactly this where a father, despite the relationship

236
00:15:35,040 --> 00:15:38,040
Speaker 3: between me and the father, despite what we even previously

237
00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:41,560
Speaker 3: agreed to, could then say, your honor, look at her.

238
00:15:41,640 --> 00:15:45,040
Speaker 3: She's outside. She might be outside for very wonderful, noble reasons,

239
00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:49,600
Speaker 3: but she's away from home and children need, you know, mom,

240
00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:52,400
Speaker 3: to be home. Mom's not available to be home, and

241
00:15:52,440 --> 00:15:57,240
Speaker 3: so she has she has put her custody rights at

242
00:15:57,320 --> 00:16:00,680
Speaker 3: risk from a legal standpoint, and I'm here to step

243
00:16:00,720 --> 00:16:03,160
Speaker 3: into the to the to the to the pocket. I'm

244
00:16:03,160 --> 00:16:05,560
Speaker 3: here to step into the role and play the primary

245
00:16:06,560 --> 00:16:09,920
Speaker 3: custodian for my children. And that's a real risk, Carlos,

246
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:11,800
Speaker 3: and it is one of the reasons I'm telling you

247
00:16:12,040 --> 00:16:15,960
Speaker 3: that women with high power careers that demand travel or

248
00:16:16,040 --> 00:16:19,920
Speaker 3: time away. My daughter is being very well taken care

249
00:16:19,920 --> 00:16:22,000
Speaker 3: of right now, rain Drops in Carlos. I assure you,

250
00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:26,360
Speaker 3: I'm getting hourly updates from her nanny, who has been

251
00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:28,600
Speaker 3: with her since she was four months old. She's in

252
00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:32,200
Speaker 3: a lovely, you know, preschool that she's been so she's good.

253
00:16:32,640 --> 00:16:35,160
Speaker 3: But if I had to argue this to a judge,

254
00:16:37,360 --> 00:16:39,560
Speaker 3: it could go either way, and I wasn't willing to

255
00:16:39,640 --> 00:16:42,800
Speaker 3: risk it going either way. So that's a personal decision.

256
00:16:42,880 --> 00:16:45,200
Speaker 3: Every woman gets to make that decision for herself. But

257
00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:49,120
Speaker 3: I hope that helps understand rain Drops why somebody would

258
00:16:49,120 --> 00:16:52,040
Speaker 3: do what I did, And more and more women are

259
00:16:52,080 --> 00:16:54,040
Speaker 3: electing to do it because we don't want to be

260
00:16:54,080 --> 00:16:56,880
Speaker 3: in court having to potentially fight for custody of our

261
00:16:56,880 --> 00:16:59,960
Speaker 3: own children simply because we chose or needed to go

262
00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:00,480
Speaker 3: to work.

263
00:17:01,960 --> 00:17:06,639
Speaker 2: Wow. Wow, well, listen, you are preaching to the choir

264
00:17:06,840 --> 00:17:09,680
Speaker 2: of the women who are working mothers. Who's working women

265
00:17:09,760 --> 00:17:12,320
Speaker 2: in the group chat? With that being said, I want

266
00:17:12,359 --> 00:17:14,560
Speaker 2: to ask you this because this was brought up recently

267
00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:17,840
Speaker 2: and I never thought about it until one of my

268
00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:23,800
Speaker 2: brain drops brought it to my attention. Does that hurt

269
00:17:23,840 --> 00:17:27,080
Speaker 2: a woman in this case? So, let's sen if Candy

270
00:17:27,160 --> 00:17:37,560
Speaker 2: had Blaze via surrogacy, right, yes? Does that will that hurt?

271
00:17:39,040 --> 00:17:43,159
Speaker 2: Let me remind could Todd and his attorney used that

272
00:17:43,840 --> 00:17:47,879
Speaker 2: as a way to establish her busy schedule and the

273
00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:51,240
Speaker 2: reason why it is in the best interest for the

274
00:17:51,280 --> 00:17:54,240
Speaker 2: primary custody to be in the hands of the father

275
00:17:54,800 --> 00:17:59,080
Speaker 2: because of something like that. Is that something that could

276
00:17:59,160 --> 00:18:01,160
Speaker 2: be used? Has it ever? Did?

277
00:18:01,240 --> 00:18:03,560
Speaker 3: I don't think so. I don't think so. I appreciate

278
00:18:03,600 --> 00:18:06,400
Speaker 3: the curiosity. I see where it could come from from

279
00:18:06,440 --> 00:18:09,680
Speaker 3: a curiosity standpoint, but I don't believe so. I didn't

280
00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:11,800
Speaker 3: follow that storyline, Cluk, I was watching this shor at

281
00:18:11,840 --> 00:18:16,160
Speaker 3: the time. But from what I know period of sarrogacy, Carlos,

282
00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:21,800
Speaker 3: it is almost always used for medical necessity, Candy, like myself,

283
00:18:21,960 --> 00:18:25,680
Speaker 3: is now very much so considered advanced maternal age. Candy

284
00:18:26,119 --> 00:18:29,080
Speaker 3: at that point had already birth Riley. Also at that

285
00:18:29,160 --> 00:18:33,160
Speaker 3: point Ace and Ace she was older as well, so

286
00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:36,159
Speaker 3: I could see we're medically speaking, she would have a

287
00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:41,439
Speaker 3: very sound argument to say that Blaze was brought to

288
00:18:41,640 --> 00:18:48,720
Speaker 3: the world lovingly and beautifully sarrogacy because not of professional obligations,

289
00:18:48,960 --> 00:18:50,760
Speaker 3: you know. And she couldn't carry the baby because it

290
00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:53,680
Speaker 3: was inconvenient, but due to medical reasons, so that would

291
00:18:53,720 --> 00:18:55,920
Speaker 3: not I don't see any argument, Carlos where that would

292
00:18:55,960 --> 00:18:56,919
Speaker 3: legally work against her.

293
00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:01,920
Speaker 2: This is reality. He with the King, and I'm Carlos King.

294
00:19:02,400 --> 00:19:07,200
Speaker 2: Let's get back into the show. Okay, So rain Drop,

295
00:19:07,280 --> 00:19:09,000
Speaker 2: I'll hope that answered your question. I want to make

296
00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:10,800
Speaker 2: sure to ask that, so thank you rain Dad for

297
00:19:10,960 --> 00:19:14,840
Speaker 2: asking that question. I want to move into the financing.

298
00:19:15,040 --> 00:19:17,520
Speaker 3: Can I just add something real quick because it doesn't

299
00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:20,240
Speaker 3: necessarily the Candy, but it could apply to other women

300
00:19:20,240 --> 00:19:24,120
Speaker 3: in these situations. Let's say Candy had used an egg donor, right,

301
00:19:24,400 --> 00:19:27,000
Speaker 3: So let's say Candy was so was the legal mother

302
00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:30,160
Speaker 3: of one of her children, but not the biological mother.

303
00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:32,439
Speaker 3: I want to be clear, rain Drops, that does not

304
00:19:32,600 --> 00:19:38,159
Speaker 3: jeopardize her custody. The law does not afford a biological

305
00:19:38,240 --> 00:19:42,280
Speaker 3: parent more legal rights than a legal parent. I think

306
00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:43,600
Speaker 3: that's very important to clarify.

307
00:19:43,960 --> 00:19:48,119
Speaker 2: Okay, and I'm clarified that. And and Ebony, I'm not

308
00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:51,840
Speaker 2: sure if you heard of this story that happened to

309
00:19:51,920 --> 00:19:53,000
Speaker 2: Sherry Shepherd.

310
00:19:54,359 --> 00:19:57,640
Speaker 3: Oh, yes, Sherry has told me that story herself at

311
00:19:57,640 --> 00:19:58,240
Speaker 3: her own mouth.

312
00:19:58,480 --> 00:20:02,880
Speaker 2: Yes, are you at liberty if you wanted to, because

313
00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:05,240
Speaker 2: because what you said made me think about that. Because

314
00:20:05,400 --> 00:20:09,639
Speaker 2: rain Drops, listen, Sherry Shepherd used a dinner egg, which

315
00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:14,120
Speaker 2: was her ex husband Lamar Sally's firm, to have herself

316
00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:17,840
Speaker 2: through a surrogate mother. The egg donor was selected by

317
00:20:17,880 --> 00:20:21,080
Speaker 2: the agency after you know, they signed an agreement with

318
00:20:21,119 --> 00:20:25,080
Speaker 2: the agency to be the legal parents. However, rain Drops, it.

319
00:20:25,119 --> 00:20:29,080
Speaker 4: Led to a legal battle during the divorce, with a

320
00:20:29,200 --> 00:20:34,480
Speaker 4: court ultimately ruling that Sherry was the legal mother of

321
00:20:34,600 --> 00:20:37,879
Speaker 4: the child and have to pay.

322
00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:44,720
Speaker 3: Child support. Sure did, Sure did? Sure did? So that's important.

323
00:20:44,720 --> 00:20:48,120
Speaker 3: So anybody hearing this this thinking you're mitigating your financial

324
00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:52,400
Speaker 3: responsibility by putting some biological distance between you and the child,

325
00:20:52,400 --> 00:20:56,880
Speaker 3: you are not. The court said, motion denied, go ahead, Carlos.

326
00:20:57,160 --> 00:20:59,440
Speaker 2: All right, so I want to get into the financial

327
00:20:59,640 --> 00:20:59,960
Speaker 2: so good.

328
00:21:00,359 --> 00:21:02,920
Speaker 3: This is so many issues, so many issues.

329
00:21:03,720 --> 00:21:07,640
Speaker 2: As my team all week, I said, I am attending

330
00:21:07,840 --> 00:21:12,040
Speaker 2: the University of Kay Williams because you.

331
00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:16,159
Speaker 5: Know, I'm obsessed with you and your brilliant and just

332
00:21:16,280 --> 00:21:20,800
Speaker 5: everything that I'm learning from you courtesy of this and listen,

333
00:21:21,680 --> 00:21:23,560
Speaker 5: I have so much of my play.

334
00:21:23,560 --> 00:21:25,080
Speaker 2: But I do want to go to law school now.

335
00:21:26,280 --> 00:21:30,479
Speaker 2: And also just so you know, a lot of frame drops,

336
00:21:30,480 --> 00:21:33,879
Speaker 2: courtesy of just watching you for years and also watching

337
00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:37,719
Speaker 2: this you are. You are influencing and inspiring a lot

338
00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:39,040
Speaker 2: of people at the law school. So I want you

339
00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:41,520
Speaker 2: to know that, and I so love that you.

340
00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:44,680
Speaker 3: Just so y'all know, rain drops. Of the entire legal profession,

341
00:21:44,800 --> 00:21:47,439
Speaker 3: only five percent count on one hand, one two, four

342
00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:51,199
Speaker 3: or five percent are Black attorneys. There are less than

343
00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:53,600
Speaker 3: for men and women black men and women. There are

344
00:21:53,680 --> 00:21:56,480
Speaker 3: less than sixty seven thousand Black attorneys in the United

345
00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:00,119
Speaker 3: States of America. We are underrepresented in this profession and

346
00:22:00,119 --> 00:22:03,439
Speaker 3: it affects us in every way from child support to

347
00:22:03,880 --> 00:22:08,240
Speaker 3: a criminal court to real estate property court. When you

348
00:22:08,280 --> 00:22:11,320
Speaker 3: get people's deeds stolen from underneath them, we need us

349
00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:14,160
Speaker 3: so Carlos all jokes aside, brother, I will literally write

350
00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:16,479
Speaker 3: your personal recommendation letters to law school. And I am

351
00:22:16,560 --> 00:22:19,639
Speaker 3: hand to God, very dead serious, very soon.

352
00:22:19,720 --> 00:22:22,080
Speaker 2: Thank you for that. And you know me, I take listen,

353
00:22:22,160 --> 00:22:24,439
Speaker 2: she knows it could be worked together. Everything I do

354
00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:27,520
Speaker 2: I take seriously, and I'm always preparing myself. So when

355
00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:31,000
Speaker 2: the time is right, I will let you know. Okay,

356
00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:34,240
Speaker 2: so rain drops. As we all know, Candy and Todd

357
00:22:34,240 --> 00:22:40,280
Speaker 2: got married April fourth, twenty fourteen. Todd, in the court document,

358
00:22:40,400 --> 00:22:43,840
Speaker 2: has stated that although he admits that he did sign

359
00:22:43,840 --> 00:22:48,320
Speaker 2: a prenuptial agreement, he is suggesting, though, that he was

360
00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:52,760
Speaker 2: pressured into signing it without his lawyers around.

361
00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:58,520
Speaker 6: Todd's lawyer said that he was presented without having council present.

362
00:22:58,560 --> 00:23:07,120
Speaker 2: Even though Candy then counsel that communicated previously with Todd's

363
00:23:07,200 --> 00:23:12,280
Speaker 2: counsel regarding a potential prenuptial agreement. What do don't want

364
00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:14,320
Speaker 2: to Rang Josh to know, because I know they're dealing

365
00:23:14,320 --> 00:23:16,800
Speaker 2: with business. What that means Range John's and I want

366
00:23:16,800 --> 00:23:19,720
Speaker 2: ethnic to school us on this when they say that

367
00:23:21,040 --> 00:23:28,760
Speaker 2: Candy's lawyers independently spoke to Todd without his lawyer's president.

368
00:23:29,320 --> 00:23:32,280
Speaker 2: The reason why that could be deemed I'm not going

369
00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:33,960
Speaker 2: to well, I'll just say the word is correct me

370
00:23:33,960 --> 00:23:36,359
Speaker 2: if I'm wrong. The reason why that may be deemed

371
00:23:36,440 --> 00:23:41,119
Speaker 2: unethical is because the moment, the moment two parties, So

372
00:23:41,160 --> 00:23:43,840
Speaker 2: in this case, Candy and Todd, Candy a Todd having

373
00:23:43,880 --> 00:23:47,480
Speaker 2: separate lawyers, the moment the lawyers are engaged talking to

374
00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:50,760
Speaker 2: each other. As a lawyer, you're not allowed.

375
00:23:50,359 --> 00:23:55,760
Speaker 6: To speak to the other council's client without them being president.

376
00:23:55,880 --> 00:23:56,520
Speaker 2: Is that correct?

377
00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:01,400
Speaker 3: That correct? Yes? Yeah, Okay, I mean that's that's that's

378
00:24:01,720 --> 00:24:03,880
Speaker 3: like a one on one type of way you get

379
00:24:03,920 --> 00:24:09,679
Speaker 3: sationed by the Bar association, is speaking to another attorney's

380
00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:13,439
Speaker 3: client without representation present. And just the reason for that,

381
00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:17,080
Speaker 3: rain Drops, is because there's a certain power dynamic at

382
00:24:17,080 --> 00:24:21,080
Speaker 3: play and certain presumptions of understandings that we have with

383
00:24:21,240 --> 00:24:26,000
Speaker 3: each other amongst each other as attorneys. Okay that lay

384
00:24:26,040 --> 00:24:29,679
Speaker 3: people could be brilliant, could be fortune five hundred CEOs,

385
00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:33,399
Speaker 3: could be multi muntime billion millionaire, celebrity whatever. It's not

386
00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:37,280
Speaker 3: undermining to say they are incompetent. It's just to say,

387
00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,119
Speaker 3: and they can actually catch this tea colors, they can

388
00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:42,800
Speaker 3: actually be attorneys. It can actually be it can actually

389
00:24:42,800 --> 00:24:45,040
Speaker 3: be an attorney. But if they are not the attorney

390
00:24:45,200 --> 00:24:48,520
Speaker 3: representing the legal interests of that person, in that case,

391
00:24:49,000 --> 00:24:53,600
Speaker 3: they are not permitted to speak to the council period.

392
00:24:54,520 --> 00:24:57,080
Speaker 2: Yes, And what we saw on the Wedding special was

393
00:24:57,880 --> 00:25:02,000
Speaker 2: Candy did call her lawyer. Tom was president. Todd tried

394
00:25:02,040 --> 00:25:04,720
Speaker 2: to call his lawyer. He didn't answer, but we did

395
00:25:04,760 --> 00:25:07,960
Speaker 2: see on camera that Candy's lawyer on speaker was talking

396
00:25:08,000 --> 00:25:10,679
Speaker 2: with Todd. And what would happened on the wedding.

397
00:25:11,680 --> 00:25:14,000
Speaker 3: Can we ask the flag that when Todd tried to

398
00:25:14,200 --> 00:25:17,679
Speaker 3: then later in that same scene call his lawyer, Randy

399
00:25:18,119 --> 00:25:20,440
Speaker 3: and tried to do the same thing, like, hey, Randy,

400
00:25:20,640 --> 00:25:24,200
Speaker 3: Candy's right here with me. Can you talk to us

401
00:25:24,400 --> 00:25:26,840
Speaker 3: and basically calm her down and let her know it's

402
00:25:26,880 --> 00:25:30,119
Speaker 3: gonna be all right. Randy Kessler said, what I think

403
00:25:30,160 --> 00:25:33,320
Speaker 3: not I will not be speaking to miss Burris without

404
00:25:33,359 --> 00:25:35,959
Speaker 3: her council present. But what I can do for you,

405
00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:38,920
Speaker 3: Todd is get on the phone and call Candy's attorney

406
00:25:39,359 --> 00:25:41,119
Speaker 3: and we could talk lawyer to lawyers. So that's the

407
00:25:41,200 --> 00:25:43,240
Speaker 3: easy way to think about it, rain drops. Lawyers should

408
00:25:43,240 --> 00:25:47,159
Speaker 3: be talking lawyers to lawyers, and the party should be

409
00:25:47,160 --> 00:25:49,960
Speaker 3: talking to each other, but we will not have a dynamic.

410
00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:54,879
Speaker 3: A triangulation is the word where me and my lawyer

411
00:25:54,960 --> 00:25:57,679
Speaker 3: are sitting on the phone with my future husband without

412
00:25:57,680 --> 00:26:00,640
Speaker 3: his lawyer present. Because that in and of itself can

413
00:26:00,680 --> 00:26:05,240
Speaker 3: be construed as a form of duress, a form of

414
00:26:05,440 --> 00:26:10,960
Speaker 3: compounding pressure and obligation that does not afford equal representation.

415
00:26:12,520 --> 00:26:17,159
Speaker 2: So, with all of that being said, Todd attorney in

416
00:26:17,200 --> 00:26:22,080
Speaker 2: this document, okay, is the reason why he is questioning

417
00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:27,280
Speaker 2: the prenuptial agreement because of the fact that he did

418
00:26:27,440 --> 00:26:35,040
Speaker 2: find the document without an attorney. His attorney president. One

419
00:26:35,080 --> 00:26:39,159
Speaker 2: thing that the attorney is saying, ebony is the fact

420
00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:42,920
Speaker 2: that I'm gonna read a verbatim so one of his

421
00:26:43,040 --> 00:26:56,160
Speaker 2: quote things right now, give me one second, okay. Tucker's

422
00:26:56,240 --> 00:27:03,680
Speaker 2: counterclaim for divorce also demanded a division of all marital

423
00:27:03,720 --> 00:27:13,040
Speaker 2: assets both real and personal, tangible and intangible between the parties.

424
00:27:13,480 --> 00:27:14,200
Speaker 2: What does that mean?

425
00:27:16,640 --> 00:27:19,840
Speaker 3: I'm so sorry, production was in my ear. Read that

426
00:27:19,920 --> 00:27:23,159
Speaker 3: last line again, thank you, okay, just the last the

427
00:27:23,240 --> 00:27:23,960
Speaker 3: last two lines.

428
00:27:24,800 --> 00:27:29,600
Speaker 2: Okay. A division of all marital assets both real and personal,

429
00:27:29,840 --> 00:27:32,880
Speaker 2: tangible and intangible between the parties.

430
00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:37,320
Speaker 3: Well, that's just going to probably mean to cover all bases, right,

431
00:27:37,359 --> 00:27:40,639
Speaker 3: because we know George is a community property state, and

432
00:27:40,680 --> 00:27:43,879
Speaker 3: he's just saying, hey, listen, we want all we know

433
00:27:43,920 --> 00:27:46,520
Speaker 3: what real property and assets are. That's the houses and

434
00:27:46,560 --> 00:27:49,080
Speaker 3: the cars and things like that, clothing, jewelry, things like

435
00:27:49,119 --> 00:27:51,720
Speaker 3: that that were purchased during the marital time which eleven years.

436
00:27:52,400 --> 00:27:54,560
Speaker 3: But the intangible stuff that could be things like stop

437
00:27:54,600 --> 00:27:57,880
Speaker 3: that appreciate it maybe right, or if either of them

438
00:27:57,960 --> 00:28:00,560
Speaker 3: or both of them have any pension funds. So basically,

439
00:28:00,720 --> 00:28:03,919
Speaker 3: you know accounts that things that are not liquid, assets

440
00:28:04,240 --> 00:28:06,840
Speaker 3: that are not liquid, so whatever you know that could

441
00:28:06,840 --> 00:28:10,320
Speaker 3: be any any account, money market accounts, things of that nature.

442
00:28:13,000 --> 00:28:14,840
Speaker 2: One thing that I want to get into is the

443
00:28:14,880 --> 00:28:19,400
Speaker 2: fact that people assume Evny like, hey, they signed a prenup,

444
00:28:20,040 --> 00:28:23,360
Speaker 2: they got on the boards, everything should be good. It's

445
00:28:23,400 --> 00:28:26,919
Speaker 2: a legal document. Tell me why that's not always the case.

446
00:28:27,080 --> 00:28:32,120
Speaker 2: They weren't married for ten plus years. Somebody did say

447
00:28:32,119 --> 00:28:35,119
Speaker 2: in the chat that is it true that in ten

448
00:28:35,240 --> 00:28:39,000
Speaker 2: years in the state of Georgia that you may be

449
00:28:39,240 --> 00:28:43,560
Speaker 2: able to renegotiate your prenup just based on all of

450
00:28:43,600 --> 00:28:47,080
Speaker 2: the activities that may have occurred in the ten years.

451
00:28:47,280 --> 00:28:49,440
Speaker 2: And one thing that I do want to say, Mayor

452
00:28:49,520 --> 00:28:54,960
Speaker 2: J Blige ex husband can Do did sign a prenup. However,

453
00:28:55,280 --> 00:28:56,280
Speaker 2: she still had to pay.

454
00:28:56,160 --> 00:29:00,920
Speaker 3: Home as Justin Ross affection affectionately called him ken don't

455
00:29:04,320 --> 00:29:09,240
Speaker 3: shout out to the lovely Dustin Ross. So a few things.

456
00:29:09,840 --> 00:29:14,000
Speaker 3: This ten year mark, let's clear some things up. Ten

457
00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:18,160
Speaker 3: years in some states is hugely significant, like the state

458
00:29:18,200 --> 00:29:21,320
Speaker 3: I'm in right now, California. In California, we saw this

459
00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:26,160
Speaker 3: with Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman in California. Legally speaking,

460
00:29:27,960 --> 00:29:29,600
Speaker 3: it's for real, for real, for real once you get

461
00:29:29,640 --> 00:29:32,960
Speaker 3: to ten years, meaning it now becomes very difficult to

462
00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:35,400
Speaker 3: not cash the other party out once you hit the

463
00:29:35,440 --> 00:29:38,000
Speaker 3: ten year mark. Now, let's go to Georgia where this

464
00:29:38,040 --> 00:29:41,480
Speaker 3: is happening. They don't have that severe of a statute

465
00:29:41,560 --> 00:29:45,000
Speaker 3: where everything kind of changes it ten years, but certainly

466
00:29:45,040 --> 00:29:47,640
Speaker 3: a few things do happen at ten years. Now, no

467
00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:50,080
Speaker 3: sitting judge is going to presume that this was just

468
00:29:50,120 --> 00:29:52,840
Speaker 3: for play play. If somebody sayed ten years, even if

469
00:29:52,840 --> 00:29:55,960
Speaker 3: they were a gold digger, they were committed, so we're

470
00:29:55,960 --> 00:29:58,960
Speaker 3: gonna treat them more seriously. That's a real thing. Also

471
00:30:00,080 --> 00:30:02,920
Speaker 3: point in the marriage, but certainly it's more likely after

472
00:30:02,960 --> 00:30:06,800
Speaker 3: the ten year mark things could be renegotiated. We even

473
00:30:06,840 --> 00:30:09,719
Speaker 3: heard Ashley Darby discuss this on Real Housewives of Potomac

474
00:30:09,760 --> 00:30:13,320
Speaker 3: when she was still married to Michael Darby that once

475
00:30:13,360 --> 00:30:16,720
Speaker 3: they got to ten years, it essentially is thrown out,

476
00:30:17,080 --> 00:30:20,000
Speaker 3: you know, this notion of we need to be real

477
00:30:20,080 --> 00:30:22,520
Speaker 3: careful of how we divvy things up once you get

478
00:30:22,520 --> 00:30:26,240
Speaker 3: to ten years. Again, the presumption is that everybody was

479
00:30:26,280 --> 00:30:29,120
Speaker 3: operating in good faith and that this is more treated

480
00:30:29,160 --> 00:30:31,800
Speaker 3: as a community of sorts and that's how it's gonna

481
00:30:31,840 --> 00:30:34,640
Speaker 3: be handled. So that's the significance of the ten year piece,

482
00:30:34,800 --> 00:30:39,200
Speaker 3: just so everybody's clear on that. It doesn't seismically change

483
00:30:39,840 --> 00:30:44,000
Speaker 3: what's going on here, but it says that nobody the

484
00:30:44,080 --> 00:30:46,680
Speaker 3: judge is not gonna look at Todd or whoever the

485
00:30:46,720 --> 00:30:49,960
Speaker 3: other person is and say you just married them just

486
00:30:50,040 --> 00:30:52,720
Speaker 3: for money, because most people that just married for money

487
00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:54,920
Speaker 3: are in and out in a year two or three,

488
00:30:55,360 --> 00:30:56,080
Speaker 3: not eleven.

489
00:30:58,120 --> 00:31:00,880
Speaker 2: And just so we know for the record, Candy is

490
00:31:00,920 --> 00:31:05,000
Speaker 2: the one that actually filed for the divorce. Todd did it.

491
00:31:05,280 --> 00:31:07,480
Speaker 2: So I just wanted to make sure that fact was

492
00:31:07,520 --> 00:31:10,680
Speaker 2: also presented because people are saying that all of this

493
00:31:10,800 --> 00:31:13,920
Speaker 2: happened because you know Todd wanted to, you know, get

494
00:31:13,960 --> 00:31:15,240
Speaker 2: the money. It's pretty much well.

495
00:31:15,240 --> 00:31:20,960
Speaker 3: Cash out, yeah, cash out. Well, we had to add

496
00:31:21,000 --> 00:31:22,960
Speaker 3: this to Carlos because I think you're right. First of all,

497
00:31:22,960 --> 00:31:25,920
Speaker 3: you're exactly right. I think people look at he signed

498
00:31:25,960 --> 00:31:30,640
Speaker 3: the document. It's legally binding, case closed. While that's not

499
00:31:30,640 --> 00:31:32,719
Speaker 3: the now, it is important that he signed the document.

500
00:31:32,760 --> 00:31:35,480
Speaker 3: I do want to be clear, it's not a nothing sandwich, okay,

501
00:31:35,720 --> 00:31:37,960
Speaker 3: because he signed the document. And there's also a part

502
00:31:38,000 --> 00:31:40,240
Speaker 3: in the wedding special or maybe it's an episode of

503
00:31:40,240 --> 00:31:44,080
Speaker 3: the next season where he says on camera, against my

504
00:31:44,360 --> 00:31:51,160
Speaker 3: attorney's advice, against my attorney's advice, I signed the document

505
00:31:51,880 --> 00:31:54,880
Speaker 3: because no piece of paper I'm paraphrasing now, but no

506
00:31:54,920 --> 00:31:56,120
Speaker 3: piece of paper is going to get in the way

507
00:31:56,160 --> 00:31:58,960
Speaker 3: of me and Candy being together. That's not gonna be

508
00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:04,840
Speaker 3: a good fact for Todd Tucker. However, it's not. But

509
00:32:04,880 --> 00:32:06,520
Speaker 3: it's not going to be a good fact for him, Carlos.

510
00:32:06,680 --> 00:32:10,560
Speaker 3: But it's not controlling enough to undermine his entire claim.

511
00:32:10,680 --> 00:32:12,440
Speaker 3: And part of the reason why is what I'm about

512
00:32:12,440 --> 00:32:15,520
Speaker 3: to tell you and point out now, both of their

513
00:32:15,560 --> 00:32:18,600
Speaker 3: lawyers are going to make arguments around whether or not

514
00:32:18,840 --> 00:32:21,880
Speaker 3: his signing of the prenup was what we call truly voluntary?

515
00:32:22,400 --> 00:32:24,640
Speaker 3: Was it truly voluntary? And when he says what I

516
00:32:24,720 --> 00:32:27,200
Speaker 3: just said, he said, against my attorney's advice, I signed

517
00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:30,080
Speaker 3: it anyway. That goes to it being voluntary.

518
00:32:30,200 --> 00:32:30,360
Speaker 2: Right.

519
00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:33,840
Speaker 3: But you know what doesn't bode well for Candy's side

520
00:32:33,880 --> 00:32:37,880
Speaker 3: of this argument and it being truly voluntary the time frame,

521
00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:43,719
Speaker 3: the fact that these two were twenty four hours before

522
00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:49,040
Speaker 3: their wedding, still going back and forth around the document

523
00:32:49,080 --> 00:32:54,080
Speaker 3: itself clauses what this means interpretation Already, that's a flag

524
00:32:54,160 --> 00:32:58,800
Speaker 3: to any judge Carlos, because ideally, for a prenup to

525
00:32:58,880 --> 00:33:02,920
Speaker 3: be deemed kind of best practices, this should have been

526
00:33:02,960 --> 00:33:06,000
Speaker 3: done months ago, months ago, this should have been in

527
00:33:06,040 --> 00:33:08,800
Speaker 3: the can. This is what this really is supposed to

528
00:33:08,800 --> 00:33:12,400
Speaker 3: look like in best practices is we set a wedding date,

529
00:33:14,200 --> 00:33:18,040
Speaker 3: and we each give our lawyers the document. Your lawyer

530
00:33:18,120 --> 00:33:20,720
Speaker 3: drafts it, they send it to my lawyer. We spend

531
00:33:20,760 --> 00:33:23,720
Speaker 3: at least, on average, with this kind of money involved,

532
00:33:24,480 --> 00:33:28,720
Speaker 3: a month to three months negotiating back and forth. What's fair?

533
00:33:28,760 --> 00:33:30,760
Speaker 3: Would I like what you like? Cut this out? Or

534
00:33:30,840 --> 00:33:32,800
Speaker 3: draft this? Da da da da da da. Then we

535
00:33:32,840 --> 00:33:36,920
Speaker 3: agree on the document I sign, you sign, it's notarized,

536
00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:41,160
Speaker 3: it's in the can at least a month, if not

537
00:33:41,480 --> 00:33:44,680
Speaker 3: three or four months ahead of the wedding date. When

538
00:33:44,760 --> 00:33:47,920
Speaker 3: you are just the nature of the pressure cooker of

539
00:33:49,240 --> 00:33:53,480
Speaker 3: vows start in twenty four hours now, that could easily

540
00:33:53,520 --> 00:33:56,960
Speaker 3: be construed as duress in its own form? Is that

541
00:33:57,040 --> 00:34:01,120
Speaker 3: making sense? Just the nature of the timeline can can

542
00:34:00,960 --> 00:34:04,760
Speaker 3: can be construed as an aspect of duress? Why? And

543
00:34:04,800 --> 00:34:06,880
Speaker 3: I don't know that that that this is on candy,

544
00:34:06,920 --> 00:34:08,960
Speaker 3: So I'm not saying that rain drops. But what I'm

545
00:34:09,000 --> 00:34:11,840
Speaker 3: saying is that's going to be investigated by the judge,

546
00:34:12,120 --> 00:34:15,440
Speaker 3: Miss Burris and your counsel. When did you deliver the

547
00:34:15,480 --> 00:34:18,759
Speaker 3: initial draft to mister Tatar and how long did his

548
00:34:18,800 --> 00:34:20,839
Speaker 3: counsel have to review it? And when did they get

549
00:34:20,880 --> 00:34:24,200
Speaker 3: the revisions? And how long did you to see did

550
00:34:24,239 --> 00:34:28,799
Speaker 3: you allow adequate reasonable time of review, consideration, and negotiation

551
00:34:28,880 --> 00:34:31,520
Speaker 3: and execution of the document, because if the court deems

552
00:34:31,520 --> 00:34:33,719
Speaker 3: you did not, and that you kind of tried to

553
00:34:33,960 --> 00:34:36,879
Speaker 3: run the clock out so that you were you felt

554
00:34:36,960 --> 00:34:39,360
Speaker 3: like your decision is marry the love of my life

555
00:34:39,800 --> 00:34:43,279
Speaker 3: or signed the document ill advised that that wouldn't vote

556
00:34:43,320 --> 00:34:44,320
Speaker 3: well for Miss Boris.

557
00:34:47,920 --> 00:34:49,920
Speaker 2: I have to ask the question because it's in the

558
00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:53,799
Speaker 2: comments and I want to get your expert opinion. A

559
00:34:53,840 --> 00:34:58,160
Speaker 2: lot of people are saying that with Todd because Okay,

560
00:34:58,880 --> 00:35:03,279
Speaker 2: Candy tops a claim Todd's response and said that they

561
00:35:03,280 --> 00:35:06,360
Speaker 2: will use the Bravo footage of the wedding series to

562
00:35:06,400 --> 00:35:09,120
Speaker 2: show that he did sign it. Now, with that being said,

563
00:35:10,239 --> 00:35:13,160
Speaker 2: the fact of the matter is Todd did sign it

564
00:35:13,840 --> 00:35:17,120
Speaker 2: the morning of his wedding. He did not have a

565
00:35:17,200 --> 00:35:21,239
Speaker 2: lawyer present. Yes, the Bravo cameras were there, But the

566
00:35:21,320 --> 00:35:28,520
Speaker 2: question does remain do you think that Todd was smart

567
00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:31,879
Speaker 2: enough to know that at the end of the day, Godfribis,

568
00:35:31,880 --> 00:35:36,200
Speaker 2: something may go awry. I do have this to protect myself.

569
00:35:37,120 --> 00:35:40,600
Speaker 7: The footage to protect himself, The footage of the fact

570
00:35:40,640 --> 00:35:45,680
Speaker 7: that he is signing the morning and everything and everything

571
00:35:45,719 --> 00:35:48,720
Speaker 7: that led to it, him having issues with Mama Joyce,

572
00:35:49,200 --> 00:35:52,040
Speaker 7: his his his mother makes you rest in peace, and

573
00:35:52,080 --> 00:35:55,440
Speaker 7: Mama Joys almost getting the physical altercation the day.

574
00:35:55,360 --> 00:35:59,279
Speaker 2: Before the wedding. He's being you know him and came

575
00:35:59,360 --> 00:36:02,000
Speaker 2: again to an ur I'm gonna tell.

576
00:36:01,840 --> 00:36:03,719
Speaker 3: You something else. I'm gonna tell you something else that

577
00:36:03,760 --> 00:36:06,840
Speaker 3: would work in his favor. Again, not controlling, but just

578
00:36:06,920 --> 00:36:10,120
Speaker 3: something in his bucket. There was a couple of times

579
00:36:10,160 --> 00:36:13,719
Speaker 3: that morning or the day before rather where Candy was

580
00:36:13,719 --> 00:36:15,600
Speaker 3: saying things like, what do you need to talk to

581
00:36:15,640 --> 00:36:18,480
Speaker 3: your lawyer for? Talk to him for what? This is open?

582
00:36:18,520 --> 00:36:21,080
Speaker 3: You know, this is this is simple. You're making something

583
00:36:21,080 --> 00:36:25,360
Speaker 3: out of nothing. That kind of language not ideal for

584
00:36:25,840 --> 00:36:30,000
Speaker 3: showing voluntariness, because what ideally would have been said is like,

585
00:36:30,320 --> 00:36:33,560
Speaker 3: of course, baby, call your counsel, call him a million times,

586
00:36:33,640 --> 00:36:35,960
Speaker 3: go over in a thousand times. I want you to

587
00:36:36,000 --> 00:36:40,160
Speaker 3: be completely comfortable with all the terms and conditions in

588
00:36:40,200 --> 00:36:43,239
Speaker 3: the document before we walk down this aisle. That's what

589
00:36:43,280 --> 00:36:47,120
Speaker 3: a judge is ideally looking for, not anything that looks

590
00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:50,799
Speaker 3: to try to circumvent the conversation with counsel because it's

591
00:36:50,840 --> 00:36:51,440
Speaker 3: very important.

592
00:36:52,200 --> 00:36:55,200
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, okay, a few more minutes. Get back to worry.

593
00:36:55,239 --> 00:36:57,160
Speaker 2: I want to I want to get into this so

594
00:36:57,200 --> 00:37:00,400
Speaker 2: that so rand on us all the legalities that we know.

595
00:37:00,600 --> 00:37:05,080
Speaker 8: As of today, December fourth, at the December fourth, sixty

596
00:37:05,120 --> 00:37:10,120
Speaker 8: seven pm Eastern Tod's attorney, Brandy Kesseler has not counter

597
00:37:10,320 --> 00:37:12,640
Speaker 8: claimed to Candy's response.

598
00:37:13,080 --> 00:37:20,319
Speaker 9: Now yesterday, Ebanie the very credible People magazine revealed that

599
00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:26,920
Speaker 9: a source said that Candy Birds discovered that Todd Tucker

600
00:37:27,640 --> 00:37:31,360
Speaker 9: was talking to other women behind her back.

601
00:37:31,800 --> 00:37:36,400
Speaker 2: That same day. Yesterday, Candy revealed on her Instagram a

602
00:37:36,600 --> 00:37:39,799
Speaker 2: post where she said how she has been dealing with

603
00:37:39,840 --> 00:37:43,200
Speaker 2: this for months and that sometime we have to check

604
00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:46,960
Speaker 2: on your strong friend. She had a photo slide of

605
00:37:47,000 --> 00:37:50,120
Speaker 2: her smiling and said that she was hurting and it

606
00:37:50,160 --> 00:37:55,960
Speaker 2: was in pain emotionally behind these photos. Today Today today

607
00:37:56,640 --> 00:38:01,360
Speaker 2: Tod posted a photo of him in a scenery background,

608
00:38:01,800 --> 00:38:04,799
Speaker 2: saying how he's with somebody, a friend of his, and

609
00:38:04,840 --> 00:38:09,880
Speaker 2: he's this journey has been difficult for How are the

610
00:38:10,000 --> 00:38:13,600
Speaker 2: interesting time? It's the timing. Do you think these two

611
00:38:13,640 --> 00:38:19,680
Speaker 2: people are using the media to influence the public perception?

612
00:38:21,080 --> 00:38:27,040
Speaker 2: Did Todd cheeto Candy? I'm emotionally distressed too, not just her.

613
00:38:28,160 --> 00:38:30,520
Speaker 2: Is that a factor in this that that that could

614
00:38:30,640 --> 00:38:32,320
Speaker 2: help the case legally?

615
00:38:33,640 --> 00:38:36,239
Speaker 3: I think they're doing what people in their position kind

616
00:38:36,239 --> 00:38:38,759
Speaker 3: of have to do right now, Carlos, which is do

617
00:38:38,880 --> 00:38:45,520
Speaker 3: two things at once. They're letting their lawyers, their actual lawyers, UH,

618
00:38:45,640 --> 00:38:49,440
Speaker 3: navigate this very real issue of divorce and custody and

619
00:38:49,480 --> 00:38:52,640
Speaker 3: all these things in the court of law, and because

620
00:38:52,640 --> 00:38:55,879
Speaker 3: of just how hugely public Candy and now Todd are,

621
00:38:57,239 --> 00:38:59,239
Speaker 3: they are working the court of public opinion at the

622
00:38:59,239 --> 00:39:01,680
Speaker 3: same time. Because if they were to do the thing

623
00:39:01,719 --> 00:39:04,120
Speaker 3: that we used to be told and advised to do

624
00:39:04,280 --> 00:39:06,880
Speaker 3: in this business, which is let it play out in

625
00:39:06,960 --> 00:39:10,160
Speaker 3: court and the public opinion piece will take care of itself,

626
00:39:10,520 --> 00:39:14,960
Speaker 3: we're seeing now that that no longer is effective. Those

627
00:39:15,000 --> 00:39:17,040
Speaker 3: are no longer the times we're living in, Carlos King.

628
00:39:17,440 --> 00:39:20,360
Speaker 3: So they are doing what public figures of their magnitude

629
00:39:20,440 --> 00:39:23,960
Speaker 3: must do. Actually, I would say, which is get in

630
00:39:24,000 --> 00:39:27,560
Speaker 3: front of some of this public narrative immediately and as

631
00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:31,920
Speaker 3: soon as possible. So Candy probably or her team probably

632
00:39:32,080 --> 00:39:35,360
Speaker 3: I think correctly assumed that if there starts to be

633
00:39:35,400 --> 00:39:39,160
Speaker 3: an argument around infidelity or bad actions on the part

634
00:39:39,200 --> 00:39:41,759
Speaker 3: of Todd Tucker, his legal team would then go to

635
00:39:41,800 --> 00:39:45,560
Speaker 3: her Instagram and pull all of these beautiful, gorgeous photos

636
00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:49,840
Speaker 3: of Candy Burris in July, of Candy Burris in March,

637
00:39:50,200 --> 00:39:53,319
Speaker 3: of Candy Burros in September, and say, for a woman

638
00:39:53,400 --> 00:39:55,400
Speaker 3: who was going through all that you just told this

639
00:39:55,480 --> 00:39:59,400
Speaker 3: court you're going through, I certainly can't tell this to me.

640
00:40:00,800 --> 00:40:02,600
Speaker 3: I'm just telling you how it go down in the

641
00:40:02,640 --> 00:40:04,440
Speaker 3: war room. Baby. I'm telling you how to go down

642
00:40:04,480 --> 00:40:06,239
Speaker 3: the war room. I'm telling you how to go down

643
00:40:06,280 --> 00:40:10,400
Speaker 3: in the depositions because I've sat in them. I have

644
00:40:10,480 --> 00:40:13,200
Speaker 3: done the questioning. Well, ma'am, you just told me that

645
00:40:13,280 --> 00:40:15,160
Speaker 3: your husband was cheating on you with your best friend,

646
00:40:15,200 --> 00:40:16,640
Speaker 3: and this and that and you going through it and

647
00:40:16,680 --> 00:40:20,320
Speaker 3: you got postpartum? Was this you having postpartum in Malibu?

648
00:40:21,840 --> 00:40:24,080
Speaker 3: Was this you have? This is how it go down, baby.

649
00:40:24,360 --> 00:40:26,040
Speaker 3: So this is Candy and her team saying, oh no,

650
00:40:26,080 --> 00:40:28,280
Speaker 3: we're not gonna allow for that. We're gonna we're gonna

651
00:40:28,360 --> 00:40:31,440
Speaker 3: we're going to get in front of that narrative and

652
00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:35,680
Speaker 3: we're gonna say, despite what it looks like, despite all

653
00:40:35,800 --> 00:40:38,600
Speaker 3: the you know, what's an eighteen hundred hark, I mean,

654
00:40:38,600 --> 00:40:41,920
Speaker 3: her stylist. But but but but you know, behind the

655
00:40:43,960 --> 00:40:51,160
Speaker 3: oh my god, god, dang here everything okay, back to

656
00:40:51,200 --> 00:40:54,200
Speaker 3: the business. Said hey, I'm sorry, I was literally gaged

657
00:40:54,760 --> 00:40:58,120
Speaker 3: despite all of that stunning, gorgeousness that you see on

658
00:40:58,160 --> 00:41:04,399
Speaker 3: your screens. My heart breaking. I was absolutely devastated. I'm

659
00:41:04,440 --> 00:41:07,919
Speaker 3: literally going through and then now, twenty four hours later,

660
00:41:08,000 --> 00:41:09,799
Speaker 3: we're not gonna let that go un answered, if we're

661
00:41:09,800 --> 00:41:12,239
Speaker 3: Todd Tucker and his team right, because certainly we're not

662
00:41:12,239 --> 00:41:16,400
Speaker 3: gonna let the opposing council or you know, opposing party

663
00:41:16,480 --> 00:41:18,880
Speaker 3: at this point which they are adversaries, Ladies and gentlemen.

664
00:41:18,880 --> 00:41:21,279
Speaker 3: Don't be confused, not saying they hate each other, not

665
00:41:21,320 --> 00:41:23,480
Speaker 3: even saying they don't still love each other. But when

666
00:41:23,520 --> 00:41:25,719
Speaker 3: it comes to what this is, in this point in time,

667
00:41:26,040 --> 00:41:29,640
Speaker 3: they are adversarial to one another, you better fucking believe it. Okay,

668
00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:32,879
Speaker 3: So he's not gonna allow his now adversary to take

669
00:41:32,920 --> 00:41:36,160
Speaker 3: that argument and run with it unanswered. So now we

670
00:41:36,239 --> 00:41:39,400
Speaker 3: too have to make our case that despite what it

671
00:41:39,480 --> 00:41:42,239
Speaker 3: looked like and the holding hands and the red carpets,

672
00:41:42,719 --> 00:41:46,040
Speaker 3: I too was struggling, I too was going through. So

673
00:41:46,120 --> 00:41:50,880
Speaker 3: we'll see something else I want to put out a

674
00:41:50,880 --> 00:41:53,960
Speaker 3: far go, Carlos. What we don't know is whether or

675
00:41:54,000 --> 00:41:57,480
Speaker 3: not this this prenuptial agreement had something called a bad

676
00:41:57,520 --> 00:42:01,000
Speaker 3: boy clause. Okay, This said is that a part of

677
00:42:02,320 --> 00:42:08,200
Speaker 3: the divvying of the assets and lat is predicated on behavior. Now,

678
00:42:08,600 --> 00:42:11,600
Speaker 3: these aren't very common because they're very hard to enforce

679
00:42:11,680 --> 00:42:19,360
Speaker 3: and very hard to prove, but it is.

680
00:42:16,040 --> 00:42:16,239
Speaker 8: It is.

681
00:42:16,920 --> 00:42:19,520
Speaker 3: It is something that we see. Sometimes it's rumored that

682
00:42:19,600 --> 00:42:24,120
Speaker 3: Jessica Bill and Justin Timberlake have such a clause that says,

683
00:42:24,239 --> 00:42:27,480
Speaker 3: in addition to the basic consideration who has what, who

684
00:42:27,520 --> 00:42:29,560
Speaker 3: made what, who brought what to the table, and when

685
00:42:29,600 --> 00:42:31,840
Speaker 3: they bought it, and da da dah, we're also gonna

686
00:42:31,840 --> 00:42:36,399
Speaker 3: consider before we make the division of assets and liabilities,

687
00:42:36,840 --> 00:42:41,600
Speaker 3: take into account whether one or either party committed infidelity,

688
00:42:41,760 --> 00:42:46,400
Speaker 3: was a bad actor. If indeed, fidelity is even you know,

689
00:42:46,440 --> 00:42:50,520
Speaker 3: a consideration in the marriage. So we don't know, and

690
00:42:50,560 --> 00:42:52,759
Speaker 3: I have no reason to know because I wouldn't know,

691
00:42:52,920 --> 00:42:55,560
Speaker 3: right we haven't seen the documents yet. But I just

692
00:42:55,560 --> 00:42:58,040
Speaker 3: want rain drops to put that on the radar that

693
00:42:58,200 --> 00:43:00,960
Speaker 3: if indeed there was a bad boy cl laws that says,

694
00:43:01,560 --> 00:43:04,680
Speaker 3: all of this looks different if mister Tucker is proven

695
00:43:04,719 --> 00:43:07,760
Speaker 3: to be out of fidelity, or maybe if Miss Burgess

696
00:43:07,840 --> 00:43:10,080
Speaker 3: is proven to be. And sometimes they go one way,

697
00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:12,920
Speaker 3: so don't assume that what's good for the goose is

698
00:43:12,920 --> 00:43:15,319
Speaker 3: good for the other. I've seen bad boy clauses that

699
00:43:15,400 --> 00:43:19,240
Speaker 3: only apply to the husbands. I've seen bad woman clauses

700
00:43:19,280 --> 00:43:22,160
Speaker 3: that only apply to the wife because it's understood that

701
00:43:22,200 --> 00:43:24,880
Speaker 3: the husband, because he's bringing the whole bag. Can do

702
00:43:24,960 --> 00:43:27,279
Speaker 3: whatever he want to do. But you bitch, you better

703
00:43:27,280 --> 00:43:30,160
Speaker 3: not think about it. I've seen it, so I'm just

704
00:43:30,200 --> 00:43:30,640
Speaker 3: telling you.

705
00:43:30,560 --> 00:43:31,040
Speaker 2: What it is.

706
00:43:31,160 --> 00:43:33,960
Speaker 3: Okay, Okay, So go ahead, go.

707
00:43:33,960 --> 00:43:38,319
Speaker 2: Ahead, question questions. With that being said, With that being said,

708
00:43:38,320 --> 00:43:41,680
Speaker 2: With that being said, Candy and Todd have been very

709
00:43:41,800 --> 00:43:45,759
Speaker 2: public and open about inviting women in their bedroom. It's

710
00:43:45,800 --> 00:43:48,680
Speaker 2: been something that they've been very open about. They this

711
00:43:48,800 --> 00:43:51,279
Speaker 2: is not a secret. They have three songs. They've been

712
00:43:51,560 --> 00:43:56,919
Speaker 2: very open about it. They had that understanding. If there

713
00:43:57,040 --> 00:44:00,080
Speaker 2: is a bad boy cloth or bad woman claw in

714
00:44:00,120 --> 00:44:04,239
Speaker 2: the in the in the prenuptial agreement, is it plausible

715
00:44:04,360 --> 00:44:08,320
Speaker 2: to say if Todd decided to be with a woman

716
00:44:08,480 --> 00:44:13,239
Speaker 2: independently of Candy, although Candy has allowed women to enter

717
00:44:13,280 --> 00:44:21,319
Speaker 2: their bedroom together, is that considered cheating because he does

718
00:44:21,440 --> 00:44:26,040
Speaker 2: have a free pass to sleep with other women based

719
00:44:26,120 --> 00:44:30,560
Speaker 2: on from my understanding watching the show, if she was around,

720
00:44:30,600 --> 00:44:33,759
Speaker 2: but is that considered cheating? And and and we have

721
00:44:33,880 --> 00:44:38,040
Speaker 2: seen videos of them on Instagram. They been on boats

722
00:44:38,200 --> 00:44:41,120
Speaker 2: with with with a third you know, with with another

723
00:44:41,160 --> 00:44:44,640
Speaker 2: woman and seems to be having a good, golly time.

724
00:44:46,080 --> 00:44:49,839
Speaker 3: So this is the height of judges discretion. Carlos and

725
00:44:49,880 --> 00:44:51,920
Speaker 3: this is where you know. One thing we say in

726
00:44:51,960 --> 00:44:54,120
Speaker 3: the law, and I've heard this since my first day

727
00:44:54,120 --> 00:44:58,680
Speaker 3: of law school, is the law always lagged behind society, right,

728
00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:01,520
Speaker 3: So what we know are these notions of whether it's

729
00:45:01,560 --> 00:45:05,640
Speaker 3: threesomes or more broader polyamory. They've always existed. No one's

730
00:45:05,719 --> 00:45:10,000
Speaker 3: naive to it, but the visibility and maybe the frequency

731
00:45:10,760 --> 00:45:14,960
Speaker 3: is peaking. It's climaxing right part in the pun Okay,

732
00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:19,000
Speaker 3: So because of that, I could see this is gonna

733
00:45:19,040 --> 00:45:21,799
Speaker 3: be what judge do you get on what day? And

734
00:45:21,800 --> 00:45:24,239
Speaker 3: what are their personal kind of values around this sort

735
00:45:24,280 --> 00:45:25,840
Speaker 3: of thing. You can end up in front of a

736
00:45:25,920 --> 00:45:28,440
Speaker 3: judge that's very kind of old school and traditional. It

737
00:45:28,480 --> 00:45:32,360
Speaker 3: feels like my grandma, don't start nothing you can't finish, okay,

738
00:45:32,400 --> 00:45:36,040
Speaker 3: May she rest in peace. So, hey, young lady, you allowed,

739
00:45:36,280 --> 00:45:39,200
Speaker 3: you know, you broke the seal so to speak, you know,

740
00:45:39,320 --> 00:45:41,480
Speaker 3: and once you break the seal and allow one woman

741
00:45:41,520 --> 00:45:47,719
Speaker 3: into your bed, you are tacitly inviting unlimited women at

742
00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:50,560
Speaker 3: unlimited times. And it will only be a fool that

743
00:45:50,600 --> 00:45:53,040
Speaker 3: thinks she can control the nature of it once we've

744
00:45:53,480 --> 00:45:58,399
Speaker 3: allowed permissible third party participation. That's one perspective you could

745
00:45:58,440 --> 00:46:02,200
Speaker 3: get a more of all. We'll say judge man or

746
00:46:02,280 --> 00:46:05,400
Speaker 3: woman of any age by the way, that says, hey, no,

747
00:46:06,080 --> 00:46:10,160
Speaker 3: it don't go like that. The couple must be in

748
00:46:10,280 --> 00:46:13,360
Speaker 3: complete agreement at all times on what the rules and

749
00:46:13,400 --> 00:46:16,520
Speaker 3: participation look like. So if it's if she's known, if

750
00:46:16,600 --> 00:46:20,800
Speaker 3: Ms Buris knows and she's you know, volunteering, and she's willing,

751
00:46:21,200 --> 00:46:25,520
Speaker 3: then it's permissible. But any activity outside of her knowledge,

752
00:46:25,920 --> 00:46:29,080
Speaker 3: outside of her permissiveness this court is gonna deem to

753
00:46:29,120 --> 00:46:33,400
Speaker 3: be out of fidelity of the agreed upon relationship. So

754
00:46:33,440 --> 00:46:35,840
Speaker 3: that's that's gonna ultimately be the height of a judge's

755
00:46:35,840 --> 00:46:37,040
Speaker 3: discretion point.

756
00:46:37,320 --> 00:46:39,640
Speaker 2: Okay, and my last question for you is this. You

757
00:46:40,560 --> 00:46:44,879
Speaker 2: were very honest about, you know, not dating a bus driver,

758
00:46:45,560 --> 00:46:50,200
Speaker 2: right and then girl.

759
00:46:53,640 --> 00:46:55,400
Speaker 3: And it absolutely not.

760
00:46:56,080 --> 00:46:59,280
Speaker 2: Yes, it lifted, it was split. A lot of people

761
00:46:59,280 --> 00:47:02,279
Speaker 2: are decide, a lot of people are not on your side. Yes,

762
00:47:02,360 --> 00:47:05,000
Speaker 2: that's how the conversation. The last question for edby k

763
00:47:05,200 --> 00:47:07,959
Speaker 2: Williams at least up tonight because she will be back.

764
00:47:08,800 --> 00:47:09,200
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.

765
00:47:10,120 --> 00:47:12,640
Speaker 2: You are a woman of means, you are a highly

766
00:47:12,760 --> 00:47:18,040
Speaker 2: educated woman, and you are a celebrity. You, like I said,

767
00:47:18,040 --> 00:47:21,560
Speaker 2: have been litten about not dating the bus driver based

768
00:47:21,600 --> 00:47:24,960
Speaker 2: on the fact that they're you know, the the financial

769
00:47:25,080 --> 00:47:29,680
Speaker 2: difference between Candy and Todd entering the relationship, and now

770
00:47:29,719 --> 00:47:35,839
Speaker 2: he's asking for you know, possible child support. Alumny, are

771
00:47:35,880 --> 00:47:40,759
Speaker 2: these the reasons why you felt so strongly about not

772
00:47:40,920 --> 00:47:43,239
Speaker 2: dating a bus driver to prevent yourself from being in

773
00:47:43,239 --> 00:47:43,800
Speaker 2: the situation?

774
00:47:44,960 --> 00:47:47,200
Speaker 3: But of course that's an easy answer, no shame. In

775
00:47:47,239 --> 00:47:50,080
Speaker 3: my game, rain Drops, this is very much a part,

776
00:47:50,360 --> 00:47:54,000
Speaker 3: not exclusively, but a very real part of why I

777
00:47:54,239 --> 00:47:58,120
Speaker 3: personally this is a me decision, each woman, each man,

778
00:47:58,200 --> 00:48:00,440
Speaker 3: each person gets to make this decision for themselve. But

779
00:48:00,560 --> 00:48:03,600
Speaker 3: for me, this would not be a risk I would

780
00:48:03,640 --> 00:48:06,640
Speaker 3: be willing to take. And that's based on a few things, right, Raindrops,

781
00:48:06,760 --> 00:48:10,080
Speaker 3: It's based off my personal value system. I'm very old school.

782
00:48:10,440 --> 00:48:14,439
Speaker 3: I'm very much of the traditional mindset that I think

783
00:48:14,600 --> 00:48:17,160
Speaker 3: men in this nation we live in a patriarchy, and

784
00:48:17,200 --> 00:48:21,000
Speaker 3: I believe that men, despite challenges that they also go through,

785
00:48:21,239 --> 00:48:25,720
Speaker 3: I think they are put in best position to climb

786
00:48:25,800 --> 00:48:29,400
Speaker 3: the capitalism ladder of this nation based off of male

787
00:48:29,880 --> 00:48:35,520
Speaker 3: patriarchal systems. So what do I look like tethering myself

788
00:48:35,680 --> 00:48:38,920
Speaker 3: legally for sure to a man that I'm out earning

789
00:48:39,000 --> 00:48:40,960
Speaker 3: when the whole system is designed for you to out

790
00:48:40,960 --> 00:48:43,040
Speaker 3: earn me. So I got a problem with that, and

791
00:48:43,040 --> 00:48:45,920
Speaker 3: I have no problem saying that, put it on a

792
00:48:45,920 --> 00:48:48,920
Speaker 3: T shirt. That's fine, fine, totally fine with it. But

793
00:48:48,960 --> 00:48:51,919
Speaker 3: in addition to that, because I have practiced family law,

794
00:48:52,520 --> 00:48:54,640
Speaker 3: I know what it's like to see sherry share. And

795
00:48:54,640 --> 00:48:57,440
Speaker 3: I also have relationships with women who have paid child

796
00:48:57,480 --> 00:49:00,439
Speaker 3: support for their own children. I have relationships with women

797
00:49:00,480 --> 00:49:04,960
Speaker 3: who have paid spousal support to men for years, to

798
00:49:05,120 --> 00:49:08,320
Speaker 3: multiple men. Some of these women and they're not all famous.

799
00:49:08,560 --> 00:49:12,279
Speaker 3: Some of them are accountants, some of them are CEOs,

800
00:49:12,680 --> 00:49:16,880
Speaker 3: some of them are you know, working healthcare positions, you know,

801
00:49:16,960 --> 00:49:19,120
Speaker 3: And that's again, not a risk I am personally willing

802
00:49:19,160 --> 00:49:21,240
Speaker 3: to take. So I want to be clear before anybody

803
00:49:21,320 --> 00:49:24,600
Speaker 3: thinks anything funny style, I am not calling Todd Tucker

804
00:49:24,600 --> 00:49:27,600
Speaker 3: a bus driver at all. I believe that Todd was

805
00:49:27,640 --> 00:49:30,720
Speaker 3: a working individual, that he bought many things to the table,

806
00:49:30,800 --> 00:49:33,920
Speaker 3: and Candy made sure we knew that. But the discrepancy

807
00:49:34,080 --> 00:49:39,720
Speaker 3: is undisputed. The financial discrepancy between herself and Todd remained severe.

808
00:49:40,280 --> 00:49:42,839
Speaker 3: And when there is a severe discrepancy from the man,

809
00:49:43,000 --> 00:49:48,200
Speaker 3: the woman whoever it is this risk of money grab

810
00:49:48,360 --> 00:49:51,720
Speaker 3: accusations is going to always be at play.

811
00:49:52,760 --> 00:49:54,759
Speaker 2: Ebony, I know you got to run. Thank you so much,

812
00:49:54,840 --> 00:49:58,359
Speaker 2: my love for breaking this down for you are listen,

813
00:49:58,480 --> 00:49:59,440
Speaker 2: she knows this already.

814
00:49:59,520 --> 00:50:04,440
Speaker 6: You will have been heavy requested your arms were president, and.

815
00:50:04,640 --> 00:50:06,520
Speaker 2: I know you're busy on the West coast, but I

816
00:50:06,560 --> 00:50:08,480
Speaker 2: want to say thank you so much for taking time out.

817
00:50:08,520 --> 00:50:11,720
Speaker 3: I love you, and I.

818
00:50:10,960 --> 00:50:12,440
Speaker 2: Get my best a Liberty and I will see you

819
00:50:12,480 --> 00:50:12,799
Speaker 2: some of my.

820
00:50:12,760 --> 00:50:15,880
Speaker 3: Live I will love you. Rain Drops y'alls by Sweetie

821
00:50:15,880 --> 00:50:16,480
Speaker 3: Bye Carlos.

822
00:50:16,560 --> 00:50:23,080
Speaker 2: Okay, all right, so rain drops, you have it here.

823
00:50:24,080 --> 00:50:28,399
Speaker 6: Ebony broke it down. Ebony broke it down. Ebney broke

824
00:50:28,440 --> 00:50:30,240
Speaker 6: it down. Ebony broke it down.

825
00:50:30,600 --> 00:50:33,000
Speaker 2: I want to read the super chat really fast before

826
00:50:33,040 --> 00:50:35,280
Speaker 2: I have to run myself job to get my food.

827
00:50:39,120 --> 00:50:41,239
Speaker 2: I gotta eat tu seven o'clock job.

828
00:50:42,080 --> 00:50:45,560
Speaker 6: Sweet talks the Mama Joyce's behavior along with the pressure

829
00:50:45,640 --> 00:50:47,680
Speaker 6: of being filmed at to the duress.

830
00:50:48,000 --> 00:50:51,279
Speaker 2: I mean, look, I think what we're seeing now is

831
00:50:53,440 --> 00:50:57,360
Speaker 2: I thought Candy's filing for divorce was very straight and narrow.

832
00:51:00,200 --> 00:51:04,719
Speaker 2: It wasn't anything that I thought was relacious. Then Todd responded,

833
00:51:04,920 --> 00:51:07,680
Speaker 2: and Todd, I think what Todd asked for.

834
00:51:10,120 --> 00:51:13,440
Speaker 6: If they're unable to agree to joint to the custody

835
00:51:13,480 --> 00:51:14,440
Speaker 6: of the kids, then.

836
00:51:14,400 --> 00:51:16,759
Speaker 2: You know people want X, Y and Z. I think

837
00:51:16,800 --> 00:51:19,279
Speaker 2: that's when people started parkling, like what's going on? And

838
00:51:19,320 --> 00:51:22,880
Speaker 2: then when he challenged the prenup, challenging, challenging, excuse me

839
00:51:22,880 --> 00:51:25,520
Speaker 2: the prenup, I think the audience was like, oh, this

840
00:51:25,640 --> 00:51:29,080
Speaker 2: is about to get a little messy. So to answer

841
00:51:29,160 --> 00:51:31,920
Speaker 2: your question, sweet Tea talks, I don't know. I think

842
00:51:32,600 --> 00:51:35,399
Speaker 2: I think more is going to come out. And one

843
00:51:35,440 --> 00:51:38,759
Speaker 2: thing I will say about being in the media is

844
00:51:38,840 --> 00:51:43,839
Speaker 2: this okay, And and hear me, Lillington brain drops when

845
00:51:43,880 --> 00:51:50,120
Speaker 2: you see things like bread crumbs being dropped, something big

846
00:51:50,160 --> 00:51:54,120
Speaker 2: is about to happen when you see like little bread crumbs.

847
00:51:54,160 --> 00:51:59,000
Speaker 2: And People Magazine is very different than I don't want

848
00:51:59,000 --> 00:52:01,200
Speaker 2: to I want to mention outlet because I'm not trying

849
00:52:01,239 --> 00:52:03,920
Speaker 2: to like say one is high to the other. But

850
00:52:04,000 --> 00:52:08,520
Speaker 2: what I will say is People Magazine in order for

851
00:52:08,600 --> 00:52:10,920
Speaker 2: them to publish a story, and I know this for

852
00:52:11,040 --> 00:52:16,600
Speaker 2: a fact, I am a journalist. Hey, porscha, People Magazine

853
00:52:16,719 --> 00:52:21,839
Speaker 2: is the most credible entertainment magazine in the world. In

854
00:52:21,960 --> 00:52:25,719
Speaker 2: order for them to publish anything from a source, they

855
00:52:25,800 --> 00:52:29,759
Speaker 2: need more than two sources. And that's just the fact,

856
00:52:31,200 --> 00:52:34,799
Speaker 2: me sweating job, that's a fact. You need more than

857
00:52:34,840 --> 00:52:38,080
Speaker 2: two sources for People Magazine to publish anything. They're not

858
00:52:38,120 --> 00:52:44,560
Speaker 2: gonna take a phone call from Edna because she heard

859
00:52:45,560 --> 00:52:51,520
Speaker 2: on the streets. M okay at First Avenue or you

860
00:52:51,600 --> 00:52:56,239
Speaker 2: know she read on the YouTube streets. Child, what, No,

861
00:52:56,760 --> 00:52:59,200
Speaker 2: they're not going to which I think a lot of

862
00:52:59,200 --> 00:53:01,640
Speaker 2: people should not do. But I digress.

863
00:53:02,560 --> 00:53:07,080
Speaker 6: Stop reporting on things that isn't substantial anyway. They're not

864
00:53:07,200 --> 00:53:11,080
Speaker 6: going to report on anything unless they get multiple sources.

865
00:53:11,760 --> 00:53:13,840
Speaker 6: So what happened yesterday?

866
00:53:13,920 --> 00:53:22,680
Speaker 2: I was like, People Magazine, my people, So that happened?

867
00:53:22,719 --> 00:53:30,760
Speaker 2: And then I know you got look, wait a minute, Carlos.

868
00:53:30,840 --> 00:53:34,239
Speaker 2: Miss Edna's reliable too, Yes, child, But I'm just saying

869
00:53:34,320 --> 00:53:36,800
Speaker 2: not when it comes to sources that People Magazine is

870
00:53:36,800 --> 00:53:39,880
Speaker 2: gonna take without talking to miss Edna in addition to

871
00:53:39,960 --> 00:53:43,759
Speaker 2: two more people. Child, That's all I'm saying. Okay, So

872
00:53:43,800 --> 00:53:46,560
Speaker 2: when I saw that, I was like, oh, these are breadcrumbs,

873
00:53:46,920 --> 00:53:50,080
Speaker 2: cause that's how the video works. It is with this child. Okay,

874
00:53:52,719 --> 00:53:54,960
Speaker 2: Oh I missed this. This This is a question for

875
00:53:55,000 --> 00:53:59,120
Speaker 2: Ebony when Leina and c Hey, Carlos and Ebony. If

876
00:53:59,480 --> 00:54:03,799
Speaker 2: toad Chie could he still get alamoney love y'all, I'll

877
00:54:03,800 --> 00:54:09,160
Speaker 2: bring you know what I want to do. Actually, I won't.

878
00:54:09,239 --> 00:54:16,280
Speaker 6: Me and Ebony to come back and then maybe bring

879
00:54:16,320 --> 00:54:21,040
Speaker 6: on a Georgia divorce lawyer to talk.

880
00:54:20,880 --> 00:54:25,400
Speaker 2: To ebd and I because I like that. Because the

881
00:54:25,440 --> 00:54:27,880
Speaker 2: thing is this, Everything is contingent on the state. When

882
00:54:27,920 --> 00:54:31,160
Speaker 2: you get married. State laws are different. As you all though.

883
00:54:34,520 --> 00:54:38,000
Speaker 2: That's that, all right. Last question from page four one

884
00:54:38,040 --> 00:54:41,360
Speaker 2: two eight Carlos as a producer for Candy's wedding special,

885
00:54:41,719 --> 00:54:44,239
Speaker 2: how did you feel about Candy gimming Todd the pre

886
00:54:44,440 --> 00:54:47,720
Speaker 2: nup forty eight hours forty eight hours before the wedding.

887
00:54:48,280 --> 00:54:51,239
Speaker 2: I saw that the comment. First of all, I have

888
00:54:51,360 --> 00:54:55,960
Speaker 2: no feelings in terms of I follow me as a producer,

889
00:54:56,239 --> 00:54:59,279
Speaker 2: I follow the reality. I don't I don't invoke my

890
00:54:59,480 --> 00:55:02,800
Speaker 2: personal opinion based on the reality of the people were filming.

891
00:55:02,880 --> 00:55:06,680
Speaker 2: So I wastly busy following it in real time. I

892
00:55:06,719 --> 00:55:08,479
Speaker 2: did see the comments built A lot of you guys

893
00:55:08,480 --> 00:55:11,319
Speaker 2: are saying that she gave him the prenup forty eight

894
00:55:11,320 --> 00:55:15,520
Speaker 2: hours before they got married. I don't. I don't know

895
00:55:15,560 --> 00:55:20,839
Speaker 2: if that is true, I have to I have to

896
00:55:20,840 --> 00:55:25,400
Speaker 2: go back and watch the season. Based on my memory,

897
00:55:25,520 --> 00:55:29,839
Speaker 2: I think he had it. I don't listen, I would,

898
00:55:29,960 --> 00:55:34,120
Speaker 2: I don't think. Listen. I don't think Todd had a

899
00:55:35,040 --> 00:55:38,440
Speaker 2: first draft of the prenup forty eight hours before they

900
00:55:38,480 --> 00:55:41,120
Speaker 2: were married. I don't think that's the case. I think

901
00:55:41,160 --> 00:55:46,320
Speaker 2: what may have been the case is maybe the final

902
00:55:46,400 --> 00:55:49,719
Speaker 2: draft on Candy's part was sent to him forty eight hours.

903
00:55:49,840 --> 00:55:52,880
Speaker 2: But I don't think he received a first draft forty

904
00:55:53,000 --> 00:56:02,680
Speaker 2: eight hours. So you know, but who, okay who? We

905
00:56:02,800 --> 00:56:07,240
Speaker 2: watched the wedding special here, Okay, the diva just me said.

906
00:56:07,640 --> 00:56:09,280
Speaker 2: I heard he got it three weeks before.

907
00:56:12,440 --> 00:56:21,960
Speaker 6: Okay, I'm what I'm gonna do is look at the

908
00:56:21,960 --> 00:56:24,360
Speaker 6: the wedding special again, because I don't remember.

909
00:56:24,920 --> 00:56:29,560
Speaker 2: I don't remember, but I do not. I'm ninety nine

910
00:56:29,560 --> 00:56:33,160
Speaker 2: percent sure he did not receive a first draft forty

911
00:56:33,160 --> 00:56:36,759
Speaker 2: eight hours. I don't think so at all. I don't

912
00:56:36,760 --> 00:56:41,279
Speaker 2: think that. But he did receive the final document the

913
00:56:41,320 --> 00:56:42,360
Speaker 2: morning of the wedding.

914
00:56:42,080 --> 00:56:45,000
Speaker 6: Because we were there filming it. So all right, ray listen,

915
00:56:45,040 --> 00:56:47,640
Speaker 6: I'll hope you guys enjoyed this episode. We will be

916
00:56:47,680 --> 00:56:51,960
Speaker 6: back more and when more information occurs, and thank you

917
00:56:52,040 --> 00:56:53,600
Speaker 6: guys so much, and I'm dropping.

918
00:56:54,680 --> 00:57:00,480
Speaker 2: I'm driving another episode tomorrow. Okay, so make sure you

919
00:57:00,480 --> 00:57:03,720
Speaker 2: guys go on Patreon, Patreon, doctor Hevle and I. Every

920
00:57:03,760 --> 00:57:08,080
Speaker 2: week we are recapping Maritime Medicine. Sign on to Patreon

921
00:57:08,480 --> 00:57:12,799
Speaker 2: to watch Heaveley and I recap Mariton Medicine, and sign

922
00:57:12,880 --> 00:57:16,560
Speaker 2: out to Patreon to see Marlo Hampton and we do

923
00:57:16,680 --> 00:57:21,840
Speaker 2: our fashion recaps. Okay, all right, that's patreon dot com

924
00:57:21,880 --> 00:57:25,360
Speaker 2: slash b Carlos King. All right, love you guys so much.

925
00:57:25,960 --> 00:57:28,479
Speaker 2: I'll see y'all late time.

926
00:57:32,080 --> 00:57:36,600
Speaker 1: Reality with the King is executive produced by me Carlos King,

927
00:57:37,000 --> 00:57:40,960
Speaker 1: produced by Lizzie Nimitz, and a partnership.

928
00:57:40,360 --> 00:57:42,480
Speaker 2: With the Lack Effect Network.

929
00:57:42,800 --> 00:57:45,520
Speaker 1: You can also find us on my YouTube channel at

930
00:57:45,560 --> 00:57:48,480
Speaker 1: be Carlos King Underscore