Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center.
Speaker 2: Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty arm Strong and Jetty and
Speaker 2: he Armstrong and Jetty.
Speaker 3: Protesters clashing with masked federal agents conducting immigration raids at
Speaker 3: a cannabis farm in Ventura County. The federal agents setting
Speaker 3: off smoke canisters and irritants to disperse them.
Speaker 2: Right now, they're.
Speaker 3: Popping off tear gas canisters and folks are just running
Speaker 3: like crazy and it's just chaos out here.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna have to get out of the way, folks.
Speaker 3: But another large scale immigration raid in nearby Santa Barbara
Speaker 3: County targeted a second cannabis farm owned by the same company. Online,
Speaker 3: there are calls for violence with a goal of trying
Speaker 3: to stop these.
Speaker 2: Raids always presented. So that's the ABC News version of
Speaker 2: this story. These are always presented from the standpoint of
Speaker 2: this is a horror that we're attempting to arrest people
Speaker 2: here illegally.
Speaker 1: Right, the bad guys are clearly ice in this story. Okay,
Speaker 1: we've got that. Now.
Speaker 2: Maybe you think it's too far, or you know, you
Speaker 2: don't like the visual or all that, but what are
Speaker 2: you supposed to do.
Speaker 1: It is interesting that it's ICE and not the DEA,
Speaker 1: given that it's an illegal pot farm. Well, but they
Speaker 1: are if they're illegals literally in the act of committing crimes.
Speaker 2: Yeah, well they're prosecuting the crime of being here illegally
Speaker 2: as opposed to being involved in the drug trade, I guess,
Speaker 2: or both. And as we mentioned earlier, and maybe this
Speaker 2: will come up in some of the clips, there were
Speaker 2: kids there working in the fields, quite a few of
Speaker 2: them quite young, with no parents around, so they were
Speaker 2: just there as child labor, working in cool that anyway,
Speaker 2: legal brown.
Speaker 1: Child labor, and progressives are saying, let them work them.
Speaker 2: Well in TIFA has figured out. This is banded together
Speaker 2: in TIFA from all around the country. We're going to
Speaker 2: fight Ice whenever they try to do these raids. And
Speaker 2: this particular story is long from over anyway. Here's the
Speaker 2: Fox version of that incident.
Speaker 4: The FBI is offering fifty grand to anyone who helps
Speaker 4: them identify and convict a protester who allegedly fired a
Speaker 4: gun at federal immigration officers. That moment was captured by
Speaker 4: local news cameras Federal immigration officers were carrying out a
Speaker 4: raid with a search warrant at a southern California marijuana facility.
Speaker 4: Hundreds of protesters swarmed that area, despite warnings from the
Speaker 4: US attorney, who told them not to interfere or they'd
Speaker 4: be charged with a federal offense. There were no reports
Speaker 4: of any injuries, but the video appears to show that
Speaker 4: man shooting a pistol at law enforcement agents.
Speaker 2: Did the ABC story include anything about that?
Speaker 1: Read my mind? Did I just space it off? Or
Speaker 1: did Aaron Katursky not mention that? Maybe in the clip
Speaker 1: we had he didn't mention it. I don't want to
Speaker 1: judge him, but seems like a pretty big deal.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I agreed. And as we keep saying, imagine if
Speaker 2: the politics were reversed, if this was a I don't know,
Speaker 2: a trans march or an abortion clinic or whatever, and
Speaker 2: right wingers and MAGA hats were squeezing off shots at cops,
Speaker 2: you don't think this would be like a giant, giant story.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it occurred to me. I actually just had to
Speaker 1: google an account of this so I would have it
Speaker 1: in front of me for the discussion, because in my
Speaker 1: usual combing through news sources, it had not been prominent
Speaker 1: at all.
Speaker 2: I know, I know, I've hardly come across this anywhere,
Speaker 2: or the clash the other day in LA with Karen
Speaker 2: Bass and the Ice agents. Anyway, Gavin Newsom, the governor,
Speaker 2: has gotten involved.
Speaker 4: California Governor Gavin Newsom tried to politicize the moment, posting
Speaker 4: kids running from teargas crying on the phone because their
Speaker 4: mother was just taken from the fields. Trump calls me newscum,
Speaker 4: but he's the real scum. The CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott
Speaker 4: replied to that, saying, here's some breaking news. Ten juveniles
Speaker 4: were found at this marijuana facility, all illegal aliens, eight
Speaker 4: of them unaccompanied. It's now under investigation for child labor violations.
Speaker 4: This is Newsom's California.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom stands up for brown child labor should be
Speaker 1: the headline.
Speaker 2: Way to go. Gave you way to read the room
Speaker 2: as usual. Yeah again, Ten juveniles found at the marijuana facility,
Speaker 2: all illegals, eight of them unaccompanied, so not exactly you know,
Speaker 2: being ripped out of their mom's hands. As and the.
Speaker 1: Bad guy here is Trump. According to Gavin Newsom, Katie.
Speaker 2: Yeah, just a couple of points.
Speaker 5: One, this was a licensed by the State of California
Speaker 5: grow house. So it wasn't an illegal growing operation. It's
Speaker 5: owned by an ex cop.
Speaker 2: Worth knowing.
Speaker 5: Yeah so, and it looks like one of the reasons
Speaker 5: that the protesters showed up in such numbers is because
Speaker 5: not it wasn't just Ice, the National Guard was associated
Speaker 5: with this rate as.
Speaker 2: Well, so to protect Ice.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, yeah, the whole the authorities, by protecting their
Speaker 1: own have caused the violence narrative.
Speaker 2: You hear that a lot from the left. So maybe
Speaker 2: I don't know if this makes me a hypocrite or
Speaker 2: I'm just trying to present all angles of the situation.
Speaker 2: But we do have the problem of we made every
Speaker 2: indication for several decades that you can come here and
Speaker 2: work in the fields, and have allowed that to go
Speaker 2: on for millions of people until three weeks ago. Yeah,
Speaker 2: until like three weeks ago, and now we're saying no more.
Speaker 1: Well, and we as a people, and and yes, we
Speaker 1: absolutely have been betrayed by our government. It's an enormous
Speaker 1: failure of democracy. But as a country, we have said yes,
Speaker 1: come in, Yes you can have a job.
Speaker 2: We will feed, clothe.
Speaker 1: Ediquate, educate and medicated, pay for every deal for you
Speaker 1: know your children.
Speaker 2: Pay for your transition in certain states, right right?
Speaker 1: And then one of the political parties, during a debate
Speaker 1: nine of ten said we should decriminalize coming across the
Speaker 1: border illegally completely. So, yeah, you cannot fault these people
Speaker 1: for being here and working. Now, can you go ahead? And,
Speaker 1: as Jack is advocated, start enforcing the damn law. If
Speaker 1: you don't like the law, don't shoot, don't organize Antifa
Speaker 1: chapters and shoot at the cops.
Speaker 2: Get Congress to do their damn jobs. Or and I
Speaker 2: think this phrase should be on every Republican's lips. Who
Speaker 2: I see on any talk show, what other laws are
Speaker 2: you okay with us? Ignoring should be the response.
Speaker 1: We talk a fair amount about lawlessness and the crumbling
Speaker 1: of society in a number of different ways. I think
Speaker 1: the utter unenforcement, the laughing at of all of our
Speaker 1: immigration laws for years and years has had to have
Speaker 1: contributed to that.
Speaker 2: How could it not? I mean, I don't know. I've
Speaker 2: got to follow the law.
Speaker 1: That the company down the road is profiting enormously ignoring
Speaker 1: the law, the coyotes are ignoring the law, the people
Speaker 1: coming across the border are ignoring the law. And then
Speaker 1: my tax dollars again, our feed and clothing, educating and
Speaker 1: medicating all these people who snuck.
Speaker 2: Across the border. Why am I following the law? I mean,
Speaker 2: I don't like this video with all the tear gas
Speaker 2: and the forty year old women running with children and
Speaker 2: everything like that. It's not a good look. I don't
Speaker 2: like it. I don't know what to do. Congress, do
Speaker 2: you know what to do? Yeah, Congress could get involved
Speaker 2: and either change the law or modify it, I guess
Speaker 2: a little bit. It doesn't have to be a complete
Speaker 2: change of all of a sudden, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2: Laws about that, Well, you've got to figure out the
Speaker 2: guest worker program or whatever. You could go after the employers,
Speaker 2: I guess, and then you don't have to show up
Speaker 2: with smoke bombs and chase people out of there. Just
Speaker 2: you know, go with the whole everify it and make
Speaker 2: make loud noises about we're going to ruin you as
Speaker 2: an employer if you keep hiring illegals? Could you do that?
Speaker 1: So? I want to make sure make sure this is accurate.
Speaker 1: This is astonishing. I'm looking at the La Times account
Speaker 1: of this. It's very, very long. They tell the story,
Speaker 1: the basics of the story. He did standoff, several arrests
Speaker 1: and injuries.
Speaker 2: How is this not more of a national story?
Speaker 1: Hang on a second, but and again I'm scanning the
Speaker 1: La Times real quickly. They make the They quote several
Speaker 1: people saying.
Speaker 2: That that.
Speaker 1: They are taking everyone. And the truth is, it's not
Speaker 1: right because these people come to work, struggle every day
Speaker 1: to earn for bread every day. It feels like they
Speaker 1: are against us. But there are no narcos here, no
Speaker 1: one is armed here, and they come fully armed, full
Speaker 1: of military personnel. The La Times doesn't mention the shooter,
Speaker 1: just doesn't mention.
Speaker 2: It that Antifa is there and somebody who squeeze off
Speaker 2: shots and.
Speaker 1: There's a fifty thousand dollars reward from the FBI. No,
Speaker 1: they couldn't squeeze that into the story unless it comes
Speaker 1: much much later. There's gonna be unfortunate violence one way
Speaker 1: or the other. Either ICE agents get hurt or killed.
Speaker 1: More of them, more of them. I've already been shot, right,
Speaker 1: more of them. But there's gonna be a big one,
Speaker 1: you know. There's gonna be like a Kent State sort
Speaker 1: of deal where you got a whole bunch of dead
Speaker 1: illegals or a whole bunch of dead ICE agents or both.
Speaker 1: And it's you know, it's not gonna be surprising when
Speaker 1: we end up there, But maybe then we'll.
Speaker 2: Start talking about it, figure something out for what it's worth.
Speaker 1: The Benjamin Haneil's song is the subject of an FBI
Speaker 1: manhunt for uh being involved in that, allegedly being involved
Speaker 1: in the ambush shooting again outside an ICE detention center
Speaker 1: in Texas. Thirty two year old Benjamin Hannil's song of
Speaker 1: Dallas wanted for attempted murder considered armed and dangerous.
Speaker 2: And you're okay with illegal children working in fields. My
Speaker 2: fifteen year old can't wait to get a job, but
Speaker 2: can't because he's not old enough. Almost everywhere, but illegals, Yeah,
Speaker 2: you can stand out in the hot sun and pick
Speaker 2: marijuana leaves. It's fine. You shouldn't have been born brown.
Speaker 2: That's what progressives say in effect with their policies, I guess,
Speaker 2: and once again Byron York writing in the Washington Examiner,
Speaker 2: is antifa more Antifa is more closely aligned than ever
Speaker 2: with the beliefs of progressive Democrats and perhaps those in
Speaker 2: the party's mainstream. I think that is absolutely true. It's
Speaker 2: not a stretch. No, so that's the politics. Is this
Speaker 2: going to be interesting anyway? You have any thoughts on it?
Speaker 2: Text line four one five two nine five kftcy.
Speaker 6: Today's pronoun of the day is puff puffy. Well, why
Speaker 6: might someone want to use pup puppy as pronouns? Well,
Speaker 6: this person can have a strong connection to puppies and
Speaker 6: identify with some of their qualities like loyalty, energy, or softness.
Speaker 6: It could also be a way to express a non
Speaker 6: human identity, So using pronouns like pup puppy can help
Speaker 6: a person.
Speaker 2: Describe that feeling.
Speaker 6: And please remember that this is a person's experience, and
Speaker 6: just because you don't know or you can't relate to
Speaker 6: this person's experience doesn't mean that it's wrong, doesn't mean
Speaker 6: that it's bad, and it does not mean that you
Speaker 6: have the right to bully that person. In fact, the
Speaker 6: best thing that we can do is to uplift each
Speaker 6: other and make each other feel seen and heard. Someone's
Speaker 6: just trying to live their own life. So you live
Speaker 6: your own life and you let them live their own life. Okay,
Speaker 6: pup doesn't know anyone an explanation. Pup gets to define
Speaker 6: puppyself or not. People keep asking, but Pup made it
Speaker 6: clear what Pup isn't up for discussion.
Speaker 2: So is that an act? Or is she sincere?
Speaker 1: She's a that's snow white lesbian who is a well
Speaker 1: known online presence.
Speaker 2: I believe she is sincere. Katie, I agree she is sincere.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's interesting if you did not hear last hour
Speaker 1: when we were talking about a fabulous piece of journalism
Speaker 1: about how easy it is to radicalize young.
Speaker 2: Women these days.
Speaker 1: Several things struck me from that discussion right there in
Speaker 1: that clip, and it's it's worth of mentioning.
Speaker 2: I read another piece to y'all ages ago.
Speaker 1: Why I won't use pronouns, you know, the chosen pronouns.
Speaker 1: It's because it's an innocent sounding, almost noble sounding. They
Speaker 1: appeal to your sense of politeness and kindness to accept
Speaker 1: the basic premise of radical gender theory, which is that
Speaker 1: you can decide what gender meaning sex you are and
Speaker 1: other people must respect it.
Speaker 2: Otherwise they are rude bigots. That's a tough one. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I was talking to a dude who was doing online
Speaker 2: dating app and said half the people women, Half the
Speaker 2: women had pronouns in there. They had their preferred pronouns
Speaker 2: in there, and like, do you assume they're of that
Speaker 2: bent to a point that you couldn't put up with it,
Speaker 2: or you think they're just trying to be what you
Speaker 2: were talking about, polite. They think that's what everybody's doing.
Speaker 1: Right, It's that assumed consensus that we also talk about it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that segment last hour.
Speaker 1: And the other aspect that jumped out to me was
Speaker 1: the idea idea of ideological purity, which was part of
Speaker 1: the discussion where you can't even object to something that
Speaker 1: laughable or you will be ejected from the group because
Speaker 1: you have to have ideological purity.
Speaker 2: You can't dissent with any of it. Puppy pronouns.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, And that in turn reminded me in a
Speaker 1: weird way of whether it's Vladimir Putin hurling adversaries to
Speaker 1: their deaths and then claiming, yeah, he fell out the window.
Speaker 1: You say, yes, sir, he fell out the window, or
Speaker 1: when Kim Jong un or Kim Il sung, one of
Speaker 1: the Kims, claimed to make eighteen consecutive holes in one
Speaker 1: in a round of golf. Seems unlikely, right, well, and
Speaker 1: you had to say, wow, that's a great round. Congratulations
Speaker 1: and swallow it. And if the radicals can make you
Speaker 1: submit to accept being the most ridiculous of their claims,
Speaker 1: they know they have you. If you say yes, okay,
Speaker 1: I'll say pups Pop wants pups self to go to
Speaker 1: the ice cream store. Don't hurt me, Please, don't hurt me.
Speaker 1: That's an act of submission. The date is July eleventh.
Speaker 1: Written numerically, it is seven eleven. There is a store
Speaker 1: called seven eleven, a convenience store that got that name
Speaker 1: because they used to open up at seven am and
Speaker 1: close at eleven and it seemed extraordinary at the time.
Speaker 1: They are now open twenty four hours, like almost all
Speaker 1: convenience stores, but they did not change their names. AnyWho
Speaker 1: their name.
Speaker 2: They're famous for their slurpees, and on seven eleven they
Speaker 2: have free slurpees. I guess I was just looking this up,
Speaker 2: and they do do. I'm sure there are caveats, gotta
Speaker 2: be limits or something like that. I haven't had a
Speaker 2: slurpe in a very long time. That's a good drink.
Speaker 2: I remember having a girlfriend many many years ago in
Speaker 2: college who really liked some flavor a slurpee with slow
Speaker 2: gin in it. For some reason, that was their drink,
Speaker 2: so I'd have to go to the seven Eleveen. Yeah,
Speaker 2: I haven't had one in many decades. Pretty good. I'm
Speaker 2: concerned I would find it too sweet. Hmmm. They have
Speaker 2: different flavors, mixing it with boozough. Pretty pretty good. Pretty
Speaker 2: good drink on a hot summer's day. Yeah, not again.
Speaker 2: Refreshing and helps you forget all your problems exactly. It
Speaker 2: makes other old people more interesting, makes other people more
Speaker 2: interesting and more attractive. Right if you can get all
Speaker 2: that bang for one for the buck of one slurpy, Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's a pretty good deal, you know. I hear you
Speaker 2: talking and cool you off on a hot summer's day, right, Absolutely,
Speaker 2: I love it. What are we doing next hour? Got
Speaker 2: all sorts of stuff to get to. I just don't
Speaker 2: know what order. Yeah. Oh.
Speaker 1: A giant quote unquote expose in the New York Times
Speaker 1: about how net and Yahoo's just continuing the war to
Speaker 1: hold onto.
Speaker 2: Power Iran or Israel released their report on how much
Speaker 2: damage our attack on Iran did with more specifics, which
Speaker 2: is kind of interesting. On where where the uranium? Uranium
Speaker 2: is so we can tell you about that. It's so
Speaker 2: an interesting conversation, among other things, on the waist. They here,
Speaker 2: armstrong and getty.
Speaker 7: They started throwing pepperballs, dear gas, smoke, everything.
Speaker 2: Just trying to disperse us because they're scared. They know
Speaker 2: that we're gonna push back against it. Are here united.
Speaker 3: We're not letting ICE agents in.
Speaker 2: We're not letting ICE agents. Oh we've been trying to
Speaker 2: blog in since we're not giving them.
Speaker 6: What they want.
Speaker 2: Okay, I can't get away from this story just because
Speaker 2: the coverage of it is so damned interesting. So you
Speaker 2: got Bill Millusion of Fox, who has been probably the
Speaker 2: best reporter on everything illegal immigration wise for a decade
Speaker 2: now here's responding to this House Rep. I don't remember
Speaker 2: whose name it was who said how many MS thirteen
Speaker 2: gang members are waking up at three am to pick strawberries?
Speaker 2: Suggest that you're not going after MS thirteen, you're just
Speaker 2: you know, ruining their lives at hardworking undocumented labors, even
Speaker 2: though you're illegally it's against the law, and you know,
Speaker 2: like we've said a million times, they're going to force
Speaker 2: alar not. But Bill Malusion went on to say, it's
Speaker 2: just actively dishonest to keep pushing this narrative when it's
Speaker 2: been widely reported since yesterday afternoon that it was a
Speaker 2: criminal warrant being served at a cannabis farm, not farm
Speaker 2: workers who feed America as has been reported a bunch
Speaker 2: of different places throughout the day. There's no food being
Speaker 2: grown there, no strawberries either, And they did have a
Speaker 2: warrant for a couple of criminals along with other illegals,
Speaker 2: and you had the whole child labor violations thing going on,
Speaker 2: right yeah. Add to that that ABC seven in Los Angeles,
Speaker 2: they had this footage from a helicopter. It looks like
Speaker 2: while this melee was going on and somebody was firing
Speaker 2: a gun at ice agents. And I mean it's clear
Speaker 2: in the video what's going on here. But ABC eyewitness
Speaker 2: Snooze said a protester called him a protester, not Antifa crazy,
Speaker 2: trying to kill federal agents for enforcing the law. Sunon right,
Speaker 2: no kidding. A protester was seen apparently firing some kind
Speaker 2: of a weapon at federal agents during the immigration raid
Speaker 2: at a farm. Calling it a farm is obviously misleading.
Speaker 2: I mean it is technically because they're growing a crop,
Speaker 2: but the crop is marijuana and that's not what people
Speaker 2: think about when there farm. If that makes any difference.
Speaker 2: It says, it's unknown if anyone's injured in the chaos.
Speaker 2: So it's just chaos. It's not a radical political group
Speaker 2: firing weapons at federal officers to stop them from enforcing
Speaker 2: a law. Just chaos. Yeah, it's just case and firing
Speaker 2: some kind of weapons. Guy Benson, who's often on Fox,
Speaker 2: said it's not a protester, and it's a gun. I mean,
Speaker 2: it's clearly a gun. I mean it's the camera is
Speaker 2: zoomed in enough. It's not in question whatsoever.
Speaker 1: What's going on there. And you know, I haven't scanned
Speaker 1: the whole thing because it's very, very long. But the
Speaker 1: La Times are article on this at the very very
Speaker 1: best buried.
Speaker 2: That that fact. I don't think they mentioned it at all.
Speaker 2: It's going to get away from that story. But Man
Speaker 2: and then Newsome weighing in and trying to make it
Speaker 2: seem like hard working undocumented pick and strawberries in all right.
Speaker 1: Okay, I stand correct. It's several paragraphs in. Here's the
Speaker 1: way the La Times phrases it. A spokesperson for the
Speaker 1: FBI said the agency was investigating a shooting that occurred
Speaker 1: during the operation in Camerio, so they did cover it.
Speaker 2: I apologize for saying they didn't. I skipped over it. Ah,
Speaker 2: that's not a lot of verbiage around that incident, though.
Speaker 1: It's kind of an afterthought. Yeah, and it's and they
Speaker 1: don't expand on it. It's two sentences.
Speaker 2: Well, how big a deal is it when right wingers
Speaker 2: fire a law enforcement to protect their issues. It's an
Speaker 2: enormous deal, of course, as it should be. Jos Joe
Speaker 2: Biden claims he ran for president because of a half
Speaker 2: a dozen numb nuts chanting something about they will not
Speaker 2: replace us. That's a long way from firing bullets at
Speaker 2: ICE agents over your political issue, right right, which is
Speaker 2: getting so little coverage anyway. A movie on Remember a
Speaker 2: couple of weeks ago when Trump bombed the crap out
Speaker 2: of Iran. Israel released their report on how much damage
Speaker 2: was done. Yesterday, there's Peter Doucy of Fox Zillia Mohoane.
Speaker 2: Today marks the final day of a historic visit.
Speaker 7: And Netanya, who is leaving his host with some bad news.
Speaker 7: According to a New York Times, Israel has concluded that
Speaker 7: some of Iran's underground stockpile of near bomb grade enriched
Speaker 7: uranium survived. American and Israeli attacks last month and maybe
Speaker 7: accessible to Iranian nuclear engineers, according to a senior Israeli official.
Speaker 2: That's interesting because I heard a completely different report on
Speaker 2: MSNBC where you would think you'd get the reverse of these,
Speaker 2: in which it said the report stated that the uranium
Speaker 2: still exists, but it's buried so far down underneath so
Speaker 2: much rock it will be inaccessible to Iranians without a
Speaker 2: major project that would be quite visible. I don't know
Speaker 2: why I got reverse messages on this.
Speaker 1: But I watched that report last night, and I'm pretty sure,
Speaker 1: like his next sentences. On the other hand, many authorities,
Speaker 1: as I believe it is totally inaccessible.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I wonder why I am Fox went with that
Speaker 2: and MSNBC went with theirs. But anyway, well they didn't though,
Speaker 2: that's my point, he said. Some people claim this. Other
Speaker 2: people are claiming that, yeah, it wouldn't be You'd have
Speaker 2: to move in all kinds of graters and bulldozers and
Speaker 2: all kinds of different things to get down there and
Speaker 2: be pretty visible from space. I don't understand the argument.
Speaker 2: I've heard this a couple of times today in light
Speaker 2: of this report that what the bombing did was cause
Speaker 2: Iran to back out of the agreement that allowed inspectors
Speaker 2: to get on the ground, and now we have no
Speaker 2: way of what. No, that is just dishonest.
Speaker 1: It is to say the EIA itself for the first
Speaker 1: time said before the bombings, they're totally out of compliance.
Speaker 2: They're not operating at all. Well and then yeah, they
Speaker 2: were screaming toward a bomb and no there they weren't
Speaker 2: allowing anybody to look before and they're not gonna allow
Speaker 2: anybody to look now. So that's a meaningless point that
Speaker 2: bothers me. Also, I heard one of my favorite pundits
Speaker 2: and a really smart guy is making the argument that
Speaker 2: this has set them back maybe six months, maybe six years.
Speaker 2: He said, but they're gonna still gonna try to get
Speaker 2: a bomb and we'll be doing this again. Okay, So
Speaker 2: what kind of critique is that? That's idiotic? I know, Wow,
Speaker 2: the marriage counseling worked and they're still together. But I
Speaker 2: don't think this is the last argument they're gonna have. Well,
Speaker 2: nobody ever claimed it could be. I mean, it's just what,
Speaker 2: what a bizarre argument? I know, I hope I don't
Speaker 2: do this, and I just like, don't notice that I
Speaker 2: do this. I don't want to make arguments that are
Speaker 2: that dumb, Like I'm so into one point of view
Speaker 2: that I stretch arguments that far. I mean, that makes
Speaker 2: no sense. Six years from now, he might be doing
Speaker 2: this again.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and what well, right, hold that guy for the
Speaker 1: murder of a straw man. Nobody has made the case
Speaker 1: that that bombing has denied Iran a nuclear weapon from
Speaker 1: now until the end of time. Right, And nobody has
Speaker 1: ever even hinted at that, because that would be idiotic.
Speaker 2: And they'll stop trying to get one, right, said nobody. Yeah,
Speaker 2: that's a good point. Wow, that is a strong man argument.
Speaker 2: All right, that's enough. Yeah, I just was struck, craw
Speaker 2: And again my craw is already inflamed this week. Good lord,
Speaker 2: that's got gotta be painful for you.
Speaker 1: Uh.
Speaker 2: Speaking of bb net and Yahoo, really.
Speaker 1: Interesting hatchet job top of the fold, front page, New
Speaker 1: York Times on old bb tell you about it. After
Speaker 1: a word from our friends at Trust and will do
Speaker 1: not do not subject your poor loved ones to the
Speaker 1: probate process. When you go get security and peace of
Speaker 1: mind by making an estate plan.
Speaker 2: Now, when you go, like for instance, your craw gets infected,
Speaker 2: turns into sepsis you die, good lord, do you have
Speaker 2: no that's disgusting. Do you have your finances in order?
Speaker 2: If you do not, you need a will and trust
Speaker 2: and you can do it online. Will give you the
Speaker 2: website and it starts at one hundred and ninety nine
Speaker 2: dollars and you start filling in the information step by
Speaker 2: step and they'll help you through it if you run
Speaker 2: into a problem through chat, phone or email. When they
Speaker 2: got the state laws fit for wherever you live. It's
Speaker 2: really quite the process.
Speaker 1: And you can have all of your important documents in
Speaker 1: one place with bank level encryption.
Speaker 2: This is such a good idea. You know you need
Speaker 2: to do it.
Speaker 1: Secure your assets, protect your loved ones with trust and
Speaker 1: will get twenty percent off your estate planned documents by
Speaker 1: visiting Trust and Will dot com slash armstrong. That's Trustendwill
Speaker 1: dot com slash armstrong.
Speaker 2: Oh my god, The Washington dot The Washington Post says
Speaker 2: Americans deserve a thorough investigation into Biden's health, so they've
Speaker 2: come around details to go.
Speaker 1: Yeah, my attitude has not changed on that. We had
Speaker 1: to throw investigation. The results were unmistakable. He was old
Speaker 1: and senile, and they were covering up for it with
Speaker 1: a complicity of the press.
Speaker 2: I know you've got the best argument now in that
Speaker 2: what could you possibly tell me right that would be
Speaker 2: interesting at this point?
Speaker 1: Or is poured in that Adolf Hitler sought to take
Speaker 1: over Europe and kill lots of Jews. No, we know,
Speaker 1: we know, and that is absolutely worthy of the Hitler Dang, Michael,
Speaker 1: come on, I know you're sick, but come on, that
Speaker 1: was a gratuitous mention of the Chancellor of Germany of
Speaker 1: the thirties and forties.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: So. Top of the fold, New York Times, Page one,
Speaker 1: How nittnyawho prolonged the war in Gaza to stay in power,
Speaker 1: secret meetings, altered records, ignored intelligence, the inside story of
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister's political calculations since October seventh. There are
Speaker 1: three guys who teamed up on this, Patrick Kingsley, Ronan
Speaker 1: Bergmann and Nathan Odenmeyer. I think it is an absolute
Speaker 1: master class in a hatchet job, hit piece and just
Speaker 1: practically ridiculously biased journalism. And I don't think for a
Speaker 1: second bb netanyaw who is a saint, no or anything
Speaker 1: like it. No, he's half a crook. He's enjoyed power
Speaker 1: for a very long time.
Speaker 2: Longest serving prime minister in Israel's history.
Speaker 1: Many many sins, many imperfections, many mistakes. I am not
Speaker 1: some sort of fanboy, but I'll just hit you with
Speaker 1: part of it. Six months into the war in the
Speaker 1: Gaza Strip, Benjamin netnw who is preparing to bring it
Speaker 1: to a halt. Negotiations were underway for an extended ceasefire
Speaker 1: with Hamas, and he was ready to agree to a compromise.
Speaker 1: He dispatched an envoy now at a meeting. He needed
Speaker 1: to get his cabinet on board, and he was going
Speaker 1: to hit him with the plan and blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: and one of the super conservative coalition members said, Hey,
Speaker 1: we're here in a rumor that there's a plan in
Speaker 1: the works that includes this, and that we cannot back that.
Speaker 1: In fact, you know, if you are thinking of going
Speaker 1: for that, you won't have a government anymore because we
Speaker 1: will leave the coalition.
Speaker 2: Blah blah blah.
Speaker 1: So the prime minister was forced to choose between the
Speaker 1: chance of a truce and his political survival, and Netnya,
Speaker 1: who opted for survival, so he didn't go for the
Speaker 1: ceasefire he could have easily had, just because he wanted
Speaker 1: to stay in power, says The New York Times.
Speaker 2: Well so, but reality was he couldn't have because that
Speaker 2: group was not going to go along with the ceasefire.
Speaker 1: So right, so the government would have fallen apart. So
Speaker 1: nobody would have agreed to the ceasefire first of all. Secondly,
Speaker 1: you can you can interpret and misintert virtually every sentence
Speaker 1: of the article.
Speaker 2: There was a ceasefire plan.
Speaker 1: That served Israel's interests that Hamas would have agreed to.
Speaker 2: Maybe, like every.
Speaker 1: Single sentence has a giant if in parentheses next to it,
Speaker 1: but they presented as clearly he could have had peace
Speaker 1: but chose to stay in power.
Speaker 2: Long Article two. It's just ridiculous. Our tennis players are
Speaker 2: given the world what for at Wimbledon. Happy to see
Speaker 2: at USA, USA America, among other things we can bring
Speaker 2: up to speed on stay here. So Michael wanted me
Speaker 2: to listen to a joke to see if I thought
Speaker 2: it was okay to play on the air, and we
Speaker 2: will play it on the air. It is a little edgy,
Speaker 2: a whole Barbie diabetes. Barbie is getting a lot of attention.
Speaker 2: A few more details after Greg Guttfeld to promote inclusion.
Speaker 2: Mattel has introduced its first Barbie with type one diabetes.
Speaker 2: I know, and they.
Speaker 1: Laughed at me when I tried to pitch aides ken.
Speaker 2: That's fine, what a joke to make. Yeah, but it's
Speaker 2: well I think in today's age you would they would
Speaker 2: probably have an aid skin. Who do they think.
Speaker 1: They're to promote inclusion? I assume that comes from some
Speaker 1: press releases.
Speaker 2: As you pointed out earlier, the type two diabetes cause
Speaker 2: cases the prime related. Well, so if you're going to
Speaker 2: get diabetes most of the time, it's type two, right,
Speaker 2: And then of that, because I know somebody with type
Speaker 2: two is skinny, so you don't have to be fat
Speaker 2: to get it apparently, Oh no.
Speaker 1: Indeed, yeah, In fact, I was regretting my choice of
Speaker 1: words saying obesity.
Speaker 2: It's a weight.
Speaker 1: Related Arguably, there are very very few skinny people with
Speaker 1: type two, but it happens.
Speaker 2: But why don't they have type two? See, that would
Speaker 2: make more sense, though, Barbie with type two, since I
Speaker 2: know several kids with that. I got no fn idea.
Speaker 1: I know.
Speaker 2: I'm just trying to figure out what the woke world
Speaker 2: thinks they're doing. Sure, sure, yeah, I get it. I
Speaker 2: just I can't imagine. And I'm looking here. It's the
Speaker 2: first time I'd looked up the pictures that have the
Speaker 2: her pink insulin pump and then the little pink thing
Speaker 2: that she wears on her arm to monitor and all
Speaker 2: that sort of stuff. And she's still very attractive. Okay.
Speaker 2: Is this going to make the world a better place
Speaker 2: in any way?
Speaker 1: Well? And I hope Barbie can manage her symptoms and
Speaker 1: keep her blood sugar at the proper levels and live
Speaker 1: a long, healthy line.
Speaker 2: This is one of my new questions I'm asking as
Speaker 2: a plastic doll. This is one of my questions asking
Speaker 2: for this sort of thing that I wish more people
Speaker 2: would answer, Like I was asking the question about that.
Speaker 2: I went to the American History Museum in New York
Speaker 2: that used to have Teddy Roosevelt on a horse out
Speaker 2: front on a statue and was famous in the movie.
Speaker 2: Every kid had seen it, but they took the horse
Speaker 2: down during the George Floyd Summer craziness because Teddy Roosevelt
Speaker 2: was on a horse and there was indians neck to him.
Speaker 2: My question was, was one person, and I mean one,
Speaker 2: can you find me the one person on earth whose
Speaker 2: life was made better by taking that horse statue down first,
Speaker 2: You and I'd be willing to include anybody in the
Speaker 2: next one hundred years, right, And I just wonder that
Speaker 2: with a lot of examples like that, is there a
Speaker 2: single person like when you announce at the beginning of
Speaker 2: your meeting, I just like to before we start here
Speaker 2: at the holiday inn, we're holding this real estate convention
Speaker 2: on the land once owned by the pocketas I mean,
Speaker 2: is there one human being on earth that you can
Speaker 2: explain to me how that made their lives better?
Speaker 5: One?
Speaker 2: Come up with one? And I don't think you can.
Speaker 2: So why are we doing.
Speaker 1: This crap meaningless virtue signaling slash shows of ideological purity.
Speaker 2: By the weak minded? Yeah, I don't know. So if
Speaker 2: there is a kid out there that has type one diabetes, see,
Speaker 2: I think you might be able to come up with
Speaker 2: one here wouldn't be very much. Might be able to
Speaker 2: come up with a little girl as type one diabetes
Speaker 2: and has to wear the monitor and she feels self
Speaker 2: conscious about it and now doesn't that which is nice? Yeah,
Speaker 2: I have nothing against that.
Speaker 1: I will reread this note from JT in livermore, WTF.
Speaker 1: I have no problem from a free market point of view.
Speaker 1: If they think they can sell motar dolls this way,
Speaker 1: more power to them.
Speaker 2: But what does it.
Speaker 1: Even mean to have a doll with a disease that
Speaker 1: can't be reflected in any way by the actual doll.
Speaker 1: I mean it would be like making a Barbie in
Speaker 1: declaring that she was born with only one kidney. One
Speaker 1: kidney Barbie. With respect to diabetes, she doesn't have any
Speaker 1: internal organs, let alone of pancreas, nor does she have
Speaker 1: an immune system.
Speaker 2: Thus she can't suffer from an autoimmune disease like diabetes anyway. Oh,
Speaker 2: you guys think low intelligence? Can He's a dullard. He's like,
Speaker 2: he's under ninety, probably barely employable.
Speaker 1: Yeah, well, speaking of dullards, you know that's unfair. Hakeem
Speaker 1: Jeffries is a very bright man. He is the already
Speaker 1: leader of the House of Representatives. He is also a
Speaker 1: serial face tune app abuser to make himself look slimmer,
Speaker 1: not just his face, but his whole body. A series
Speaker 1: of pictures have emerged, and you can tell because the
Speaker 1: background has symmetrical lines of one sort or another that
Speaker 1: get distorted by the filter. There are at least four
Speaker 1: pictures in recent days in which he has used a
Speaker 1: filter to make himself look thinner.
Speaker 2: Why is he doing that? I mean, I've seen him
Speaker 2: enough to know he's not a big.
Speaker 1: Fat guy, nice a little zofti, but you know he's
Speaker 1: got a desk job.
Speaker 2: Is a little picture. He looks like the average American man, right, Huh?
Speaker 2: Is his staff doing that? Or is he's not self
Speaker 2: conscious himself? Is he recently divorced?
Speaker 1: Because he's also dressing in a way that's like excessively
Speaker 1: young looking.
Speaker 2: That makes way more sense than anything else. Yeah, look
Speaker 2: into his personal life. Is he back on the.
Speaker 1: Market looking to legislat a little get together if you
Speaker 1: know what I mean, a little hot caucus?
Speaker 2: Huh wow, I'm gonna filibuster this or something too? Now
Speaker 2: that one. Now, if you miss an hour or a
Speaker 2: sign of the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand Armstrong
Speaker 2: and Getty