WEBVTT - Bankruptcy Is The Solution to Student Loan Crisis: Joe Nocera

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.239
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, A, market pros, and

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news. Find the

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts, and on Bloomberg dot com. It is time

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for a Bloomberg Opinion, and today we're going to look

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>at student debt. I think it's fair today that nobody

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>really wants to ever declare bankruptcy, but some people do

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have to declare bankruptcy. The one thing, though, that you

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>won't be able to discharge in bankruptcy is your student loans.

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>You'll carry them around for the rest of your life

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're not able to pay them off. Well, our

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>next guest says bankruptcy is a solution to the student

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>loan crisis. So to get what he means, let's bring

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>in Jon Oh Sarah Bloomberg Opinion columnist Joe. Obviously, you

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>know this idea that you can never discharge your student

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>loans even in bankruptcy is something to be reckoned with.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You can spend a fortune getting you know, in education,

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and then life can intervene. You can end up going bankrupt,

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>which you'll still have those student loans, you know, following

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you around for the rest of your life. How how

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>do we change that? How can that be changed? Good morning? So,

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's beyond the rest of your life,

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>because once you die, the federal government will come after

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>your state to get to get paid off of the

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>student land. Um. You know, this has been something that's

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>been going on for about forty years, starting in the

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 1>late sixties, and they made it, the Congress made it

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>more and more difficult, near impossible to discharge the student loans,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not only those that are granted by the federal government,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>which is about but also those that are granted in

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the private market though by banks and institutions at grant

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>student loans. Um. Uh. So it is a ownerous burden.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh The average student loan debt is about thirty dollars,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but there are plenty of people who have debts of

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand or a hundred and fifty thou dollars.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, in in the economy that we have

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>had for the last you know, fifteen or so years,

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe more, it's been so hard for for those people

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to get the kind of jobs that allow them to

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>make monthly payments and and and stay straight with their

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>student loans. So, Joe, I think as it relates to

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the student loan issue, that what we've heard the most

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>out of politicians is actually forgiving the debt. How would

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you compare and contrast I guess the pros and cons

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.639
<v Speaker 1>of forgiving the debt versus maybe allowing um a bor

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>or to go into bankruptcy? Right? Um, well, uh, I say,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>first of all, from a political point of view, forgiving

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>debt is going to be highly contentious. It's just gonna

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>be very controversial. There are gonna be lots and lots

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of people who say, you know, I had to pay

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>my loan, why does this freeloader get you know, get

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>his loan up and partially um uh, you know, wipe

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>wiped off the board. So so that's point one, it's

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a political it's a political problem. Point number two

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, the amounts that are being talked

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 1>about are being between loan forgiveness between ten thousand and

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars. So for some people that will wipe out

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>their loan. For many others, it won't, and they'll still

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of money to pay back, just not

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>as much as they had before. The thing about bankruptcy

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is number one, it would wipe out the entire loan.

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But number two, it comes at a price. Nobody, as

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as as you said at the beginning, nobody wants to

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>file for bankruptcy. You know, it hurts your credit and

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>makes it difficult to buy a house, and maybe it

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>sometimes makes it difficult to buy a car for five, six,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>seven years, and it takes a while to recover from.

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So when you file for bankruptcy, you pay a price.

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So that would help um subdue some of the objections

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>from those who think it's just a program for freeloaders.

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there I mean, is there any appetite for it

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to be done across the board? So I've definitely seen

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>people talk about maybe doing it for teachers if they

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>put in a certain amount of time of public schools,

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>or doing it for people who go work with the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Peace Corps for a while. But hows anybody has just

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.280
<v Speaker 1>suggested has it got anywhere in Congress? This idea that

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a certain amount of student loans we've

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:31.119
<v Speaker 1>paid off for every single student no matter what they study. Um,

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what you talked to. I mean, in

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, there is an

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of desire to get this done. In the

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the furthest right wing of

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party, there's no appetite for this whatsoever. And

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the reasons that I've been suggesting bankruptcy

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>as as a possible middle ground. Um. But let me

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>say something else about what you just said about teachers

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Um, there's a second aspect to this.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>If you file, if you bring back bankruptcy, it means

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that the lenders, the banks, the government are all going

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to have to be more careful about making loans. That's

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the big problems. They give the money to anybody,

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to care whether the person can pay

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it back or not, because they're gonna get reimbursed by

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the federal government. That's a huge problem. That's called moral hazard. Um.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, if they're more careful with their lending,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>that means that you know, working class and poor kids

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 1>are going to have a much harder time getting loans.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I proposed the second part of this,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 1>which is to make it much easier to get into

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>these income based repayment plans where you pay a percentage

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of your income for a certain number of years um

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>as your way of paying of paying back your loan.

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And if you have certain you could you could make

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it so that, you know, if you are in the

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Peace Corps, if you are a teacher, or if you

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>do work on an Indian reservation, or you know, any

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of those kind of things, that that the amount would

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>be reduced just because you're doing you know, what amounts

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>to public service. So I think between bankruptcy and income repayment, uh,

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much have the problem solved. Joe, what do

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we know about President elect Biden and his thoughts about

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this issue, because presumably this might be one of the

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>things he might want to tackle in this first one days.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I doubt he'll tackle it in this first one days

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's con contentious, but I do think he does

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>want to tackle it. He needs to give something to

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the progressives. Now what I've heard is that, um, what

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he's looking at. You know, Elizabeth Warren wants fifty uh

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>wiped away. He and he and she and she wants

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>him to do it through executive order. He would like

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to reduce it simply by ten thousand dollars, and he

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>wants to do it through legislation, so it wouldn't look like,

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, by sea I, it wouldn't look like he's

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to ram something down those throats. Um, whether he

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>could get a past legislation, well, a lot of that

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>depends on what happens in Georgia, you know, in early January.

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Um uh, And so we'll just shop to see about that. Yeah.

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, you know, it doesn't matter what kind

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of college you go to, you end up with these

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>crushing debts, and then you know, interest rates that are

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>insane for for a lot of young people out there

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that are just trying to give themselves an education. I

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>know that Joe Biden has definitely talked about pel grounds

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for everybody, but I mean, that's what the tip of

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the iceberg, right Jo, Yes, it is. And I would

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>say I'm also about the crushing debt. Don't forget you know,

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>kids who drop out of school because they can't keep paying,

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that they still have that debt. Kids who

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>go to for profit colleges that are turned out to

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be scammed, they still have that debt. So, I mean,

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a percentage of people for whom the

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>debt is great. They get through college, you know, they

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have a good life, they have you know, they did

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a good job. But there's a whole lot of other people,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>well that doesn't need can happen, and they're still stuck

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with the dad. Yeah, very big issue for a growing

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>number of people. Jonah Sarah, thanks so much for joining us.

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonah Sarah's a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. You can read

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>his work and all the work of Bloomberg Opinion at

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, slash Opinion or on the terminal O

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>P I N go. Well, we got another dose of

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>sobering jobless claims this morning, arguably once again raising the

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>incentive for the Fed remaining accommodative and for Congress to

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>move forward on a meaningful piece of fiscal stimulus. Let's

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get the latest economic outlook with Lindsay Pegsa, chief economist

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at Steeple Financial, joining us on the phone from Chicago. Lindsay,

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. You know, if

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we step back a little bit, we can certainly see

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>signs that the economy is through the worst of the

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>pandemic UH disruption, but there's still a lot of work

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to do. Given what we heard from FED Chairman Pal

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this week, given what we see on the on the

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>job was front of other eco economic data points, where

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think we are in the recovery? Well, I said,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think we've made it through the first the biggest barrier,

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest top as we saw the worst of the

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>pandemic in the second quarter. But that's not to say

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're not going to have more difficult times ahead,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because even if we do see the second round resurgeon

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>UH snuffed out at a relatively faster pace than the

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>first round. Remember, businesses and individuals are already beginning from

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>an extremely fragile position after months of hardship, so it's

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be increasingly difficult for them to continue to

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>weather a storm without some sort of additional artificial support

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from officials in Washington. So there really has to be

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>some increased pressure on our representatives on Capitol Hill to

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>really do their job and get some of those funds

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>out to hurting individuals and businesses really struggling at this point.

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>How concerned you think the FLMC is about the situation, Lindsay,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very concerned. I do think that FED

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>chairman struck a very delicate line. On the one hand,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to be optimistic about the improvement that

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we've seen thus far, particularly in the third quarter, with

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that stellar rise more than offsetting the decline in the

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>second quarter, at least in percentage terms. But he was

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>also very cautious to say it looks that the virus

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to dictate the path of the recovery. It's

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>still very uncertain, and while we're optimistic, a number of

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>things have to go right, A number of dominoes have

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to fall just perfectly in line in order to really

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>navigate ourselves out of this, this unprecedented situation. So I

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>do think the FED is increasingly concerned about being able

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to get the economy back on track, but more importantly,

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>back to a position of a longer run, sustainable improved trajectory.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not about just a one quarter bounds, but really

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>getting the economy back on a pathway towards potential GDP.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a nillion dollar fiscal stimus here, do that, lindsay,

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>or do we need even more than that? From your

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>perspective this, I do think it will help. I do

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think it will help stabilize the economy. But again, it

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>depends on the depth and duration of this second round resurgence.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>If we continue to see businesses shut down, workers sent

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>home well into the first quarter, billion is not going

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So it really depends on how quickly

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>we're able to control the virus and how how really

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lenient I would say, local officials are in terms of

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>allowing the private market to return to some semblance of

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>normal market activity. Remember, this isn't a market crisis, this

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>is a health crisis. So the best way to control this, uh,

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this unprecedented scenario is having a meaningful way of separating

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the healthy from the sick, something that we don't have

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point. What else can the FED do? At

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this point where you surprised at the fact that the

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>SCP skewed a little more positive, No, I wasn't. I

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily surprised by that. We did anticipate a little

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of an upward revision in terms of the Fed's

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 1>expectation for growth and unemployment because we have seen vast improvements,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, faster than expected improvement. As I mentioned in

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter, carrying forward through October and somewhat in November.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So it does make sense that the FET is reflecting

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that improved baseline scenario. But going forward, I do think

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that the FED has put so many tremendous proposals and

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>plans in place that at this point that there's very

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 1>little additional they can do to support the market or

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>support the economy. It really has to come from fiscal

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>policy support at this point, and the FED all but

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>handed that proverbial batime over to our officials in Washington, saying, look,

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we've done everything we can up to this point. Now

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it's up to you guys to again do your job

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and reach an agreement and get those much needed funds

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>out to those that are hurting the worst, including small

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses and individuals that have lost their job through no

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>faults of their own, but by the government's own design.

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>H lindsay, briefly, what's the steeple four Q GDP call

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and GDP call. I do think there's enough strength in

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>October and November to carry growth in positive territory in

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter. So I am looking for low single

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>digit growth around four or five percent for the fourth quarter,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>certainly a decline from that rebound that we saw on

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter, but still a very a very welcomed

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>improvement in terms of growth going forward, however, into the

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>first quarter. Right now, our baseline scenario is less than

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>one percent GDP, with a downside risk of the U

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>S economy falling back into negative territory if we do

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>see a continued drag out of this second round resurgence

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>without additional support from the federal government. Lindsay, you have

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to live there, but thank you so much for joining us,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, maybe speak to you again before the end

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year. If not, we'll talk to you in January.

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Lindsay, pe TV economists add Stephile Nicholas joining us

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there and pull. It's really just so fascinating to see

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the data come in and some of it poor, some

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of it okay. It really is so obviously a caeshaped recovery.

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It really is. And I think the concern here is

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is Lindsay suggested not getting a handle in the near

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>term on this pandemic. Another industry that's had a very

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>tough year is the home health business. Those going into

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>people's homes protecting the aging population. And so on. Charlie

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Young is the CEO of Synergy home Care, located in

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. It's one of the leading in home care

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>organizations that operates in three markets. Charlie, first of all,

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>before we get onto the vaccine vaccine rollout, tell us

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>how your business has been going and what changes you've

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>had to make thanks to the pandemic. Well, first of all, Fanny,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's great to be here. Thanks for having me. I'm

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>actually out in Arizona, so I missed that beautiful snowstorm

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that you are just that. Uh. The business of home

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>care has has seen quite a bit of demand, as

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine obviously. Uh, people are looking to make

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>sure that they are safe and one of the safest

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>places to be is at home. Like many industries, senior care,

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>home care, December this is prime time for us UM

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and the reason for that is generally this is when

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>families get together. This is when families gather usually for extended,

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>extended areod of time and adult children often times see

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that mom or dad or another senior love one of

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>theirs needs more care and more more help. Um. We're

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not having that this year. Um uh, So we're trying

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to help people understand how that they can support their

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>loved ones and look for the things that they need

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>uh to help them to continue to thrive at home,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>even though they might not be there in person. But

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to your to your point, the business has been been

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>doing quite well because the demand for home care during

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic is quite high. Charlie, your employees, they are

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just the definition of frontline workers. Here a couple of

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>points here how to how they've been faring Number one

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and number two. Um, presumably they will be one of

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the first to get the vaccine. What if we can

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about that? Yeah? Well, first of all,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. I mean, there's no more noble cause

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>than to be a caregiver who goes into another's home

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>UH to take care of them. Our mission at Synergy

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>own cares to help people thrive at home, and that's

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>what these people do every single day. UH. As you know,

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the response to the pandemic has been decentralized across the country,

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with states all having different approaches and oftentimes trickling down

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to local UH and county governmental decisions. So UM, you know,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is that our home care workers are

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>being treated as essential. Some places, but not in others.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Really encouraged. I did get a call from a franchise

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>e of ours in New Jersey this morning. They were

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>called by their county health department yesterday asking for a

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>list of their caregivers so that they could be put

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>on uh that priority list for the vaccine. And uh,

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I only uh wish it was that way all over

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>the country. So Charlie talked us about how franchise e

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that works. Are all of your home all of your

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>businesses in the various dates franchise run and uh and

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>how do they pay you a fee? And what do

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>you provide to them? Yeah? Absolutely so, uh, you know,

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we are a franchise business. We uh we really offer

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the promise to help care minded uh compassionate entrepreneurs build

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a robust business. We do that in four basic ways.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>We provide a home care platform everything that you need

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to run a home care business, from the initial training,

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the software and other tech backbone that you need, uh,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and then all the marketing that goes with it. We

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>provide all the local lead generation marketing, referral partnerships with

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>insurance and health organizations, and obviously a network of people

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>who have done this before. Uh, and so when you

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>have over three seventy markets around the country, there's a

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>robust group of people who have experience and can help there.

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>That's another area of our business has grown quite well

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic is the franchising side. We're selling home

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>care franchises. I think that's a function of two things.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>One is, you know, the the economic situation in the country.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Many people have been downsized and are out of work

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and are looking for a new chapter in their lives.

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>And then I think when you look at the the

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the upside for home care in the years to come

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>starts with demographics. Uh, it starts with a shift in

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>in in thinking about the whole healthcare continuum. It's a

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a business to be in and so we've done

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>well there over the last nine months as well. So

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it was I just curious, why would somebody need to

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>buy into a franchise if they want to, you know,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>be in the home care business. Can they not just

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>do it? You could? You could just do it. You

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>would be faced with a much steeper learning curve and

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>startup curve because when you when you join a synergy

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of home care franchise, you're gonna have all of your

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>systems in place from day one. So that is a

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>thought process as a business owner that you don't need

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to go through. You're going to have the software, software

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>platform for billing, for scheduling, for recruiting caregivers, all of

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. You're gonna have the marketing platform

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for lead generation. And because we have a national footprint,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we have uh, national partners who are bringing referral business

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to us. Uh you know, and so so it's a

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a it is a way to get up and

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>running and uh uh much more, much more efficiently. Yeah,

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. Interesting, Charlie, thanks so much for joining us.

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a really an interesting time for you and your business.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure, Charlie young Ief, executive officer for Synergy Home Care,

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously seeing increased demand during these pandemic times. Now, let's

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>bring in Bloomberg journalist to Molly Smith. A fantastic story

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Today and it relates to minority owned

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>underwriting firms and how they benefited from a new detention

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on social justice issues, particularly this summer after Floyd's killing.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But they say that actual institutional barriers are keeping them

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>from gaining a bigger share of the corporate debt market,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and it really is a phenomenal, molly great story. First

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of all, give us a rundown of some of the

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>firms that you're talking about. Sure, So when we talk

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>about diverse underwriters, these are banks that are owned by minorities, women,

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and veterans. So we talked to several of the prominent

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>African American owned banks like Luke Capital, playlog Van, We

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>talked to several veteran owned banks like Drexel Hamilton's Academy Securities,

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of these banks really trace their roots

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>back to UH the civil rights movement, and that's when

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them got started and in underwriting bonds

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>for America's local governments, and that's why they've done so

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>well in the municipal bond market, where where America's leadership

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at the local government level, excuse me, is tends to

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>be much more diverse in nature itself. You transition them

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to the corporate market, and America's companies are hardly as

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>diverse in nature at the leadership level than the cities are,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and it just hasn't been as integral and natural of

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>emission on the corporate market. So'm only I know historically

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the challenges for some of these minority on

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>banks as it relates to uh, the corporate market is

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of adequate capital and maybe even staffing and so on.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:51.479
<v Speaker 1>So what's the story there. The biggest obstacle that a

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the banks will point to is that they

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>are set up as solely investment banks, meaning that they

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have commercial banking abilities as well. And that's what

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>makes the biggest banks on wall streets such a formidable

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>force in this space, so that they are able to

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.479
<v Speaker 1>provide cheap loans to companies with the expectation of winning

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the more lucrative capital markets business in return. And when

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you're just an investment bank that's not in your wheelhouse,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't have, you know, provide these credit facilities to companies.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So the lend these diverse underwriters have had to be

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>much more creative and how they get into deals, and

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what key obstacle that they pointed to that's

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping them from moving forward. Yeah, I mean earlier this

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>year when by Lackman was ringing his back to sort

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>of the public attention, he pointed to the fact that

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>he used minority owned underwriters for setting up some of

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the deal, but if you looked at it, it was

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>actually you know, a small sliver of the deal, but

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they did have permanent capital was going to be you

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>know something, and he was trying to get other people

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 1>on Mole Street to do this as well. There was

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>no downside according to him. Why are they not doing it?

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>What is the big big setback? Are they afraid of

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>the big banks like David Morgan and Goldman's X I

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>don't I think that they're starting to come around to it,

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>because when the All State deal, at least in my

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>opinion and for definitely a lot of these banks too,

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was a really big turning point and showing that they

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that All State had borrowed one point two billion dollars.

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was last month, and this was the

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest deal ever managed solely by diverse firms. And all

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>State is a major US companies. Certainly they have banking

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>relationships with the biggest Wall Street banks and they actually

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>consulted with some of those banks before this bond sale,

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and all of them, including Brian moynihan from Bank of America,

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>said they thought this was a great idea and something

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that all states should definitely pave the way in doing so.

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there is more receptiveness to us. But certainly

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there is just that stigma. It's not, you know, a

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>start and set rule in any way, but companies just

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>naturally tend to look at their lending partners when looking

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>at capital markets like ativities. Is there any incentive for

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>companies to change I'm thinking about E s G investing,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is that maybe could be a criteria for certain investors

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, we want your advisors, whether it's your

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>legal advisors or your financial advisors, to be more diverse.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>Is that an angle perhaps, certainly, and that's something that uh,

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of companies they cannot fulfill D

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and I mandates through their capital markets group as well.

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think a lot of them are starting to

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>look at this in the new light. And certainly you're

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing as well with Goldman and NASDAC requiring companies to

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have diverse leadership in the at the board level, that

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's becoming much more significant that they're going to be

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>real consequences that if you could be delisted from an

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>exchange if you don't have if you're not inclusive in

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>your board representation, that's a really big deal. So I

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>think companies are really going to be waking up to

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this more. But certainly that is what these diverse banks

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>are looking for, that this isn't just a thing, it

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is a sustainable trend. You quote Eric van Standifer, who's

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the founder and chief executive author of Laylock, saying, they're

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>still giving us qualms and just giving us more crumbs.

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be so you know, at the margin,

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you know it needs to be a much more major

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of movement, doesn't it. That's exactly it, because these firms,

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why all State was so significant that they took

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on lead manager roles versus in the Google deal which

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.719
<v Speaker 1>he was talking about. Google brought on fifteen diverse co

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>managers for this deal. So that means that they've walked

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>away with just two hundred sixty thousand dollars in fees

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>each versus the three biggest underwriters got more than seven

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollars each. So it's just like, of course, you

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.239
<v Speaker 1>want to spread the wealth, so to speak, but when

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you include so many firms on one deal, it's just

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>being spread out among that many more people. Hey, Molly,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.159
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us and sharing this

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>story really well reported. Molly Smith, corporate finance reporter for

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Thanks for listening to Boomberg Markets podcast. You

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn, I'm on

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio