WEBVTT - #298 Guest Hosts David Rudolf & Sonya Pfeiffer with Michael Peterson

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jason Flahm. Through this podcast, I aim to highlight

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>how frequently our criminal legal system shatters the lives of

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>innocent people. Whether junk science is introduced to trial, police

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>or prosecutorial misconduct, or simply a misidentification. Each story is

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>devastating on its own, but when we zoom out and

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>take in the sheer breadth of the issue, we can

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>see a pattern forming across our entire system. Who better

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to take us on that journey than the brilliant journalists

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and writers who regularly cover these stories.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Kathleen Peterson was found by her husband, Michael Peterson, bleeding

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>and struggling to breathe at the bottom of a staircase.

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 2>It was the middle of the night on December ninth,

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and one. Michael called nine one one and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>held her as she lay downing. When emergency services arrived,

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>there was blood all over the walls, the floor, and

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>on Michael's clothing, which led Durham Police Detective Art Holland

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 2>to quickly assume this was a murder. Michael became a

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 2>suspect in Kathleen's death, and Durham Police pursued this theory

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 2>to the exclusion of all other evidence. After a highly

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>publicized trial, Peterson was convicted and sentenced to life in

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>prison without parole. His attorney, David Rudolph, was able to

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>overturn the conviction eight years later, and Michael was released.

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 2>After waiting for a new trial for five years and

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 2>after turning seventy years old, Michael was tired of fighting.

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>He decided to take an Alford plea, a plea where

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the defendant maintains his innocence but admits that the evidence

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>presented could result in a jury finding him guilty. This

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>is probably a case you've heard about and might already

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>have an opinion on. There is a popular Netflix documentary

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>called This Staircase, and this year HBO produced a mini

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 2>series of the same name. But despite all that coverage

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and drama, Michael Peterson has refused to speak to the

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>media about the case until recently, and that's why we

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>wanted to speak with him today to give him the

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to tell his side. It's an important story that

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 2>highlights so many of the problems with the American criminal

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>justice system. This is wrongful conviction. Good afternoon. I'm Sonja Pfeiffer.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm a criminal defense and civil rights attorney based in Toronto,

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Ontario and Charlotte, North Carolina, and co host of the

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 2>podcast Abuse of Power on Audible.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And I'm David Rudolph. I'm also the co host of

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Abusive Power with Sonia, who is my wife and law partner.

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, for those who don't know, we are married. And

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>we met while I was a television reporter in roleig

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Durham assigned to cover the Peterson case, and you were

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 2>representing Michael, and Michael is here with us today to

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 2>talk about this case that really changed all of our lives.

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Michael Peterson, I'm in Durham, North Carolina, almost seventy

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 4>nine years old, still a fellon, and still a writer.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's jump right in, Michael, because you mentioned two things

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 2>that I think people know about you already, That you're

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a writer and that, yes, you are a convicted felon.

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>But before we talk about how you moved to Durham

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>and then met Mary Kathleen, you had a whole other life.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't think a lot of people know about who

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Michael Peterson was before all of this. Can you talk

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about how you grew up.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>I was born in Tennessee. I think I stayed there

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe four weeks. My father is a military officer.

0:03:59.200 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>We moved.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think I stayed in a particular grade more

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 4>than one year. It was a very what can I say,

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 4>transient childhood, but very fulfilling, and I loved it. I

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't trade it for anything, because I lived in so

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 4>many different places.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 2>So you went to Duke for undergrad I mean I

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 2>have to ask tar heels or devils.

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh please, you do not want to profanity podcast here.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 2>So after university you enrolled in the military, and by

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>this point you had also married your first wife, Patty,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 2>and you and Patty also lived overseas. Tell me about

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 2>that part of your life.

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, she is military also, and god we lived Germany

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 4>with Japan, traveled everywhere together for many, many many We

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 4>were married twenty five years, and she unfortunately last year

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 4>a massive heart attack, very very very sad day.

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm sorry about that. I did hear about that,

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 2>and I know David spoke to you. But yeah, you

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and Patty have a special relationship. And then you and

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>Patty had two kids together. Tell me about your two.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 4>Sons, Clayton and Todd. They were both born in Germany.

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 2>So I want to talk about Germany because as we

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>continue talking today, that's going to resurface, as you know well,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to your trial. But in Germany, you

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 2>and Patty became parents a second time. Explained to our

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>listeners who George and Elizabeth Ratliffe are and how it

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>came to be that you and Patty were the guardians

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>of their daughters.

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 4>When we first met Liz, oh she was a teacher

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 4>and Patty was a teacher, and they became very very

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 4>close friends. And then we met George and he really

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 4>was a wonderful guy. George died in nineteen eighty three,

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 4>was on a mission, the invasion of Granada, and he died.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 4>And then Liz was left with two very small, very

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 4>small children, and she had a nobody knew at the time,

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 4>a serious medical condition. She was suffering from von Villebrunt's disease.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think that the stress of raising two small children,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 4>the loss of her husband, it was too much for

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 4>her and she died. And unknown to me, the military

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 4>flew up and said, did you know that George had

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 4>asked you to adopt his children or take care of

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 4>the children if anything had happened to him, And I said, no,

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 4>you talk to me about that. He said, well, it's

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 4>in the will and I said, oh, okay. So then

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 4>and Liz had the same will, and when she died

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 4>inteen on nineteen eighty seven, I became the defective guardians

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 4>of Margaret and Martha.

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 2>You and Patty were still together at the time, Is

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that right?

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes? Yes?

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 2>What was it like bringing those two young girls into

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 2>your family?

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 4>I think it was more of a strain on Patty,

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 4>and that's I think, really essentially what broke up our

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 4>marriage is that Patty, and I don't mean this in

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 4>any negative way whatsoever, she felt it would be better

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 4>if others raised Margaret and Martha one of their relatives,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 4>and so I said, no, I'll keep the children, and

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 4>so I raised them, and then I'd met Kathleen and

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 4>that became another journey.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Kathleen. How did you two.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Meet Kathleen was when we came back from Germany with

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 4>the two girls. They were four and five at the time,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 4>I think, and Kathleen and her husband Fred were living

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 4>down the block in another house, and we met at

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Margaret's fifth birthday party because Caitlin was the same age,

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>and we just became very close after that, more and

0:07:58.040 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 4>more close.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned Caitlyn. Caitlyn is Kathleen's daughter from her

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>first marriage, right, correct, And that's Caitlyn Atwater. And how

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>did your relationship with Kathleen develop?

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Uh, Well, it's one of these neighborhood stories. And we

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 4>just saw more of each other and realized that we

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 4>were very much suited for one another.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>And over time your relationship really became something quite special.

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, something that I think other people would say

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 2>they envied in a relationship. Would you agree with that?

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 4>Oh? I think so. I mean we had a great relationship.

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 4>She was Oh god, she was well sexual and funny

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 4>and smart. She was used to say that, for God's sake,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 4>don't tell anybody your college board scores. I don't want

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 4>anybody to know I'm living for someone so stupid. And

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 4>it was just fun. Every day with her was fun.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 2>So, David, I want switch and talk with you now

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and move to Kathleen's death. So it was called a crime,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 2>but let's start with the death on December ninth, two

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 2>thousand and one, when Kathleen was found by Michael and Michael,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I'll ask you about that in a little bit. But

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>December ninth, two thousand and one, Kathleen is found inside

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the home she shared with Michael and Forest Hills. Can

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>you talk about what was known at that time and

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>initially how the discovery of Kathleen's body was treated.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I think initially, at least in the press, it was

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 3>just treated as a prominent author's wife was found dead

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>in their home. And I don't think initially, at least

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 3>for the public, there was any connection to it being

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 3>a crime that changed relatively quickly.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 2>And David, I'm going to ask you to describe the

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>scene a little bit, because, as we'll talk about later,

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 2>what the scene looked like became a fact that really

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 2>influenced investigators. So could you describe that.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Sure, because it was a horrendous looking scene. You know

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>when you walked in and I did early on to

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 3>meet with Michael. We did not meet in a diner

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 3>eating a Pistromi sandwich, as the HBO series indicated. But

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 3>when I came in, you know, Michael showed me the

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 3>scene and there was blood all over the walls and

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>all over the floor, you know, dry blood, and you know,

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 3>the immediate reaction when you saw that was Wow, something

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>really terrible happened here. But you know what I didn't

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>realize when I first saw that, and obviously what the

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 3>police didn't realize when they first saw it, was that

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the scalp bleeds incredibly. It is the most vascuarized part

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 3>of a human body. And so when somebody is bleeding

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>out from deep wounds in their scalp, there is a

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 3>massive amount of blood. And the massive amount of blood

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>was not indicative of what caused the wounds. It was

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 3>just indicative of the fact that the wounds bled a lot,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>that she was conscious for some period of time, and

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 3>therefore there was blood all over. But when you first

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>looked at it, it looked like a crime scene. I

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 3>mean it did.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>And Michael, you were the first one to see that scene.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>What do you remember about walking upon that scene, that

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the blood seen? Kathleen there? What do you remember about that?

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 4>When I came into the we'd been at the pool

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 4>and then I came into the house. Uh, she had

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 4>a teleconference the next morning, So I stayed outside with

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 4>the dogs for a while and then came in and then

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 4>I went to go in the back staircase and there

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>she was lying there at the bottom of the stairs,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 4>and I you know, I saw the blood, but I

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 4>was not it didn't I didn't focus so much on

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 4>the blood as I focused on Kathleen lying on the ground.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 4>And that's when I called nine one one and infamous

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 4>and nine one one call, and you know, I said,

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 4>she fell down the stairs. And people asked me afterwards, well,

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 4>why do you think she fell down the stairs as well?

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 4>If you find somebody at the bottom of the stairs,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 4>or obvious thought is that she must have fallen. And

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 4>that's what I did think.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Was it surreal though, I mean to come upon that

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 2>after you had had this evening together by the pool,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean describe that.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 4>It was one of those what you know, what you know,

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 4>what's going on? What happened? Uh, there's she was talking

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 4>and alive, and then suddenly I walk in and she's

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 4>she was dying. She was still breathing faintly, faintly, and

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'd seen enough death in Vietnam to know

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 4>that she was dying, and so I, you know, I

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 4>put her down brand of the call nine one one,

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 4>ran to open the door for them and then was

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 4>holding her when empt came in. And surreal, well, just shocking,

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 4>I think is the better word.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 2>And so you just described you coming to Kathleen and

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>holding Kathleen and calling out on one so you yourself, of

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 2>course you're now covered in blood.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Right, yeah, I suppose. I mean again, the blood was

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>not a significant thing, you know, to me, that was it.

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what significant was that Kathleen was dying.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 2>David. Let's let's talk now about the investigation. Right, So

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 2>we sort of set that scene. Michael calls nine to

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 2>one one. Eight minutes later, paramedics show up. And then what.

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, after the paramedics showed up, First of all, there

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 3>was no protecting the scene. People were walking in and out.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 3>The police showed up, and Art Holland has said that

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 3>he walked into the scene and immediately came to the

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>conclusion that this was a crime. You know, he reacted

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 3>to the amount of blood at the scene, and so

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>we have a classic case of confirmation bias and tunnel vision.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 3>He immediately forms his conclusion that there's a murder here,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 3>that there's a crime here. Who's the only person in

0:14:55.120 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 3>the house. Well, it's Michael Peterson. You know. The the

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 3>assumption in these situations is that the spouse must be

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the perpetrator. And that's where they went. It was supposed

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 3>to be an investigation of what happened here, and instead

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 3>there was an assumption about what happened, and then the

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 3>focus became Michael is the perpetrator because there was no

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 3>one else to blame.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 2>And I want to break down for listeners what you

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>said about tunnel vision and confirmation bias, because those are

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>two different things, but they really work hand in hand. Right,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 2>So tunnel vision, that's what you're talking about. Art Holland

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 2>comes in, he sees blood. In his mind, he thinks

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a homicide, so now he is focused only

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>on that homicide. Everything else is blacked out, Like when

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you enter a tunnel confirmation bias is then processing all

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 2>of that information that you find through that lens, through

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 2>that tunnel vision lens. And that is the way the

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 2>investigation continued, not just with Art Holland, right, But then

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>they have a so called blood spout expert I hate

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to even use that word, in Dwayne Deever who also

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>shows up on the scene.

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, he shows up that very night, a little bit

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 3>later on, and he's infected by Art Holland's tunnel vision

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 3>and Art Holland's confirmation bias. So he's there not to

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 3>really explore what the blood spatter means, assuming that one

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 3>can even get any sort of information from that that's worthwhile.

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>He's there to again assist Art Holland in proving that

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>this was a murder and that Michael Peterson did it,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 3>and so he engages in what he calls pulling strings.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.479
<v Speaker 2>David, let me ask you to explain that pulling strings

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 2>and point of origin. I know it's very familiar to you,

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 2>but explain for our listeners what that means, what it

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is that Dwayne Deever was trying to eve.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.479
<v Speaker 3>When you have a massive blood spatter and you're trying

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>to determine from where that spatter originated, you can take

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 3>a look at the angles of the spatter on the

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 3>walls and work backwards from there with various spatter selections

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 3>and try to find what is called an area of origin.

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 3>And that's the best that you can do. The science

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely clear that yes, you can do that to

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.959
<v Speaker 3>find an area of origin, but you can't do that

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 3>to find a specific point of origin. The area of

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 3>origin is going to be like twelve by eighteen inches.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 3>And the problem was if he had done that properly,

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the area of origin would have been the walls and

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 3>the steps. Well, that wouldn't have helped our Holland's case

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 3>at all. So instead what he had to do is

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 3>find what he called points of origin, and that was

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the first step in essence framing Michael Peterson for this murder.

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 2>And when we talk about origin, a point of origin

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 2>or an area of origin, what you're talking about is impact.

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 2>If it were a fall, at what point on the

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 2>stair did her head hit at what place on the wall.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>That's what you're talking about.

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Right Exactly where did the blood start to flow.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned Art Holland coming back with a search warrant,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>that's another thing falling right into his tunnel vision. And

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>this is where he went out, and he got a

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 2>search warrant right away that evening, that very evening, right.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, within an hour, within less than an hour, that's

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 3>where he was headed.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about the injuries, David, because of course

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>there was an autopsy, and the autopsy found that this

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 2>was blunt force trauma.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Actually not the autopsy. Initially, what Deba Ratish found initially

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 3>was that the cause of death was a loss of

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 3>blood exanguination, and then we found out later from going

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>through the file, the chief medical examiner came in and

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 3>essentially told her, no, you need to put on the

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 3>autopsy that the cause of death was blunt force trauma.

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>That was not the cause of death. We all agree

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>that what caused Kathleen's death was the loss of blood.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 3>So why all of a sudden do we have blunt

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 3>force trauma as the cause of death. That is a

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 3>question that I don't think has ever been satisfactorily answered.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, and you know, you talk about tunnel vision, you

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 2>talk about it infecting other people. This is yet another example.

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>So initially Debora Ratic says cause of death is blood loss.

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Then she later changes it to blunt force trauma. But

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 2>there were problems with that being the cause of death,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>right because blunt force trauma usually has some well known

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:21.239
<v Speaker 2>associated conditions, right like subdural hematoma, edema. None of that

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 2>existed here.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Kathleen didn't have any of the injuries that are normally

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 3>associated with blunt force trauma. She had no injuries to

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 3>her brain, There was no subdual there were no contusions

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 3>to the brain, there were no fractures on her arms.

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 3>There was nothing that was consistent with blunt force trauma.

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 3>So when you look at that, you say to yourself, Okay,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 3>how is that possible? How is it possible that none

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.239
<v Speaker 3>of the things that I know as a lawyer are

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 3>normally associated with blunt force trauma are there? And so

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 3>I say, okay, well, let's take a look at all

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.959
<v Speaker 3>the autopsies going back ten years and see if we

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 3>can find even one other, even one other which had

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 3>none of those injuries. And so that's what we did,

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 3>and in fact, there was not a single other blunt

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>force trauma death that didn't have at least one and

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 3>often several of those kinds of injuries. Kathleen Peterson was

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the only case in the previous ten years where they

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 3>claimed blunt force trauma was the cause of death, but

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 3>there were none of those associated injuries.

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 2>And we'll talk about the trial in a little bit,

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 2>but back to the investigation. Michael, do you remember talking

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 2>to investigators that night on December ninth, two thousand and one, Oh, yes, I'd.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Be right away. You know. They came in and my

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 4>son Todd arrived with his girlfriend Nigman at a party

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 4>rated everybody, and it was Todd who instantly simply because

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 4>of that and also the way that they were just acting.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 4>He picked up right away. He said, Dad, they're trying

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 4>to get you. And that didn't make any sense to me.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Number One, I was in shock and tu but why?

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>So he called my brother who was an attorney in

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Reno and for which later was like, oh, we lawyered up.

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 4>But my brother Bill talked to Holland and said, do

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 4>not question Michael Peterson. I would have been happy to

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 4>answer anything. I had to cooperate it. That's the only

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 4>reason why not. And Holland kept trying to do that,

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 4>put his arm around me, and Todd said no, Dad, no, no,

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 4>don't talk. Not just snap me out of it. And

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 4>I realized, oh yeah, they really are definitely out to

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 4>get me.

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about your arrest now. Because it wasn't immediate.

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this was December ninth, two thousand and one,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 2>but sounds like you were well aware that eyes were

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>on you. Tell me about when you got arrested, what happened.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 4>David wanted me to go to Charlotte or at least

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 4>get out of Durham because he knew the arrest was coming.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 4>But all I could think was the ray Caruth case

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 4>in which she had fled. As a matter of fact,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 4>I said, no, if they're going to arrest me, they're

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 4>going to arrest me, I'll surrender if this is what

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 4>they want. So I made the decision that I would

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 4>go to the courthouse and surrender for that, and I

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 4>was put in jail for two weeks.

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 2>David, what do you remember about that, because by now

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you were hired, right, I was.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Hired relatively early on, before the case even went to

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>a grand jury. What I was originally talking to Michael

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 3>about was the fact that I was afraid that the

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 3>police are going to just swoop in before we had

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 3>a chance to arrange a surrender. Because surrenders get arranged.

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I was able to reach the district attorney's office. We

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>were able to arrange a time for Michael to show

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 3>up and surrender himself. And part the reason to do

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 3>that is because it helps to set up the bail situation,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.239
<v Speaker 3>and eventually we were able to get a judge to

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 3>set a bond for Michael that Michael could make, which

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 3>is an enormously helpful thing. If your client is in

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 3>it makes the case much more difficult to defend.

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 2>So December twentieth two thousand and one is when Michael

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>was charged with first degree murder and then released in January.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So now's January two thousand and two. The trial is

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 2>a little more than a year in two thousand and three, David,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 2>can you talk about the two theories at trial? What

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 2>was the state's case? What was your case?

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Our case was sort of set from the very beginning

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 3>when Michael said she's fallen down the stairs, because that

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 3>was the logical conclusion. Everything that Michael told me from

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>the first day that I met him always checked out.

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, I would go and talk with Michael

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and he says, well, you know, we were watching a movie,

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 3>America's Sweethearts, and we get the receipt from Blockbuster which

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 3>shows that he rented that movie that day. He says, well,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Todd and his friend the Doctor, stopped by the house

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 3>around ten o'clock on their way to a party. So

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 3>I called the doctor and she confirms everything was exactly normal.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 3>They were watching a movie. Everything was absolutely normal. Michael

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 3>was normal, Kathleen was normal. There was no tension, you know.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Michael tells me that he had a wonderful relationship with Kathleen.

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 3>We interview all of their friends. Every single one of

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 3>them confirms that. So literally every fact that Michael told

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 3>me I was able to confirm. So for me, that

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 3>was the end of the matter. It was okay, she

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 3>fell down the stairs. And for me it was then

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 3>a question of how do we explain all the blood

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 3>to a jury, because that was the big problem. The police,

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 3>of course, had their own theory, and that was that

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Michael somehow beat her to death, although they didn't have

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 3>a murder weapon for probably a year, so their theory

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 3>had had its problems. Of course, our problem was the

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 3>amount of blood and the spread of the blood over

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>the walls.

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about the States case. Let's first start

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>with Dwayne Defe because I think it's fair to say

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 2>that Deaver was the lynchpin for the state. Would you

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 2>agree with that.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 3>No doubt about it. I mean, Dever was the person

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 3>who he was the only person who could put a

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 3>weapon in Michael's hand as explaining the injuries and the blood.

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 3>That's what he was there for. And indeed he was

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.479
<v Speaker 3>the person who established that it was first degree because

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>his opinion was that there was some period of time

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 3>between the first blows and what he described as the

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 3>second blows, so that's where the state argued the premeditation occurred.

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>So Diver was responsible for the overall theory and for

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the specific theory regarding first degree. He was their case

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 3>to create what he called experiments, which weren't experiments at all.

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 3>They were attempts to recreate certain facts that he saw

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 3>in the scene in a way that would implicate Michael.

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 3>They were almost cartoonish when you first looked at them,

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 3>but they videotape these, and the police obviously relied on them.

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 3>The DA relied on them, and the DA showed them

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 3>a trial, which was sort of a surprise to me

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 3>because I found them to be almost laughable. But apparently

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 3>the jury didn't well.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 2>And when you say laughable, I mean, look, I know

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 2>this is not a laughing matter. But seriously, he had

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 2>like a foam skull, and he put a sponge on

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 2>top of the skull and climbed up a ladder and

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>put like the skull up top and then dropped it

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 2>after putting some red stuff on the sponge to see

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 2>what would happen.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Right exactly exactly. And of course that experiment didn't go

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>well for him because it didn't prove what he wanted

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 3>it to prove. His big success. His huge success was

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 3>quote proving that the blood spatter on the inside of

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Michael's shorts came from a blow to the head, and

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 3>he spent hours trying to create that situation, and when

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 3>he was finally able to after multiple attempts, you see

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 3>his assistant in the background doing a little victory dance,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>like she scored a touchdown in a football game. And

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>that was the tip off to me that this was

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 3>all about proving a certain thing, not about finding out

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 3>what happened.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 2>So we can call that junk science, no doubt.

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 2>There was also Deborah Ratish. We talked about what she

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 2>found in the autopsy, and you present entered her at

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 2>trial with volume upon volume upon volume of the autopsies

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>from blunt force trauma deaths over the previous ten years,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 2>none of which looked anything like Kathleen. So I think

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 2>those are sort of that let's call them the heavyweights,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 2>the state expert types. But there were other critical pieces

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 2>of evidence that came into the trial that were entirely unfair,

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 2>as later acknowledged by the judge. And let's start with Germany.

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 2>So Michael earlier, we talked about Elizabeth Ratliffe and George Ratliffe,

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and you mentioned that Elizabeth passed away. One thing I

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 2>have come to just get my hairs up about is

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 2>every time someone says Elizabeth Ratliffe was found at the

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 2>bottom of the staircase, the fact of the matter is

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that's not quite true. I was a reporter. I went

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 2>to Germany. I saw that condo or that little home.

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 2>You walk in the door, there's a little step up,

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and then there's a staircase. And she was found like

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 2>on that little step up. So she could have been

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>walking in the door and fall down. I mean, there

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 2>was there was no evidence that she fell down the stairs.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>But yet you did have this death in Germany, a

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 2>woman that you knew, whose children you were now raising,

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 2>and she was someone who I believe you were one

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 2>of the first people to see upon her death. Is

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 2>that right?

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 4>Her nanny was the first one. She had been going

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 4>for the weekend and came back to the house and

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 4>opened the door and found Liz there, and she immediately

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 4>ran over to our house. We lived one hundred and

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 4>two hundred yards away. I was a slave. Patty was

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 4>getting up because Patty and Liz were going to go

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 4>to school together and drive together. So Patty was you know,

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 4>woke me up and said something happened to Liz. So

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Patty ran over first, and then and I was maybe

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 4>three or four minutes later I came on the scene.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>And let's talk about the scene. The fact that there

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>was no blood, the fact that there was no evidence

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 2>of an intruder. This was not a scene at all

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>like the scene where Kathleen was found.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Fair oh, fair, right. And what had happened right away

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 4>was that Barbara, who was the nanny, called German nine

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.719
<v Speaker 4>to one one and the German police immediately came along

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 4>with a medical doctor, and the German doctor did a

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.239
<v Speaker 4>spinal tap and the German doctor said this woman had

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 4>a stroke, and then the body was brought to Frankfurt

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 4>General Medical the Center and thoughts apsy was done on Liz,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.479
<v Speaker 4>and the pathologist there said that she had had a stroke.

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 4>So at the time, and because Liz had been complaining

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>for days and even called her mother and said this,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm having the worst headaches I've had in my life.

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 4>So when it was said that she had a stroke,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 4>everyone accepted, well, of course she had a stroke, and

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 4>that's what I and everybody believed at the time.

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And the prosecution finds out about this. Now, first of all, David,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 2>you were aware of this when you started representing Michael.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 2>This didn't get thrown on you by either the media

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 2>or the prosecution. You were well aware of this when

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 2>before Michael's trout right.

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 3>You know it was it was always stroke. But Ron Jurrett,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 3>who was a former police officer, as soon as he

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>learned that her body had been found where it was,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 3>he said, the police are going to try to use this,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 3>The DA is going to try to use this, and

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 3>so literally, within the first few months of us being involved,

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Ron and I flew to Germany and we investigated it.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 3>We spoke with the prosecutor, we spoke with the doctor,

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we spoke with the Army CID agent, we got his report,

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 3>we looked through the German files. Everyone agreed.

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>So the first issue is that, yes, the state learned

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 2>about this. Yes, the state tried to get in, and

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 2>they did get it in at trial, and you were

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 2>therefore forced to Rebut all of this evidence, let's talk

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>about those witnesses that the state brought forth. First of all,

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 2>who were they and how were they treated by the

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 2>prosecution when they showed up in Durham, David Well.

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 3>They consisted, I believe, of three women, one of whom

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Barbara Magnino was the nanny who never ever raised anything

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 3>about Liz's death being suspicious, but now, of course, in retrospect,

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 3>given Kathleen's death, convinced that there must have been something

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 3>going on, and she now remembers all this blood all over.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 3>And then there was another witness, Mary Beth Burner I

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:18.320
<v Speaker 3>think was her name, and she came in. She'd initially

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 3>given a statement to Art Holland which didn't even mention

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Michael when she talked about the death of Liz, didn't

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 3>even mention him. Now she comes in and she's had

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 3>what she calls it flashbacks where she sees blood all

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 3>over and Michael's acting suspicious, and Michael calls it a

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 3>stroke before the doctor gets there, and all of this nonsense.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Interrupt for just one thing. On the witnesses those were

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 4>friends of mine and Patty's, and to this day I

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 4>do not understand why they did that. I mean, they

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 4>just totally made up that blood stuff. And it was

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 4>one of the more heartbreaking things to Patty that her

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 4>friends had said that out of nowhere, and this was

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty years later, and it was all false.

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 2>So in addition to the evidence the state brought in

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 2>about Elizabeth Ratliffe, including much of the false evidence, they

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 2>brought in another piece of the state's case that I

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 2>think was really prejudicial and has been acknowledged as such

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 2>was your bisexuality, Michael and these emails that were found.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>They said it countered your argument that he had a

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 2>perfect relationship with Kathleen, right, like that was the legal

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>basis for getting it in.

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 3>That was the legal basis for getting it in, according

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 3>to the judge. But by the time FREDA. Black got

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 3>up in her closing argument, it was nothing about that.

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 3>It was all about how you know, what Michael was

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 3>doing was pure te filth, and how he was a pervert,

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 3>and that was the argument. And that's really why they

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 3>put it in.

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, And that's what you do right when your other

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 2>evidence is weak. So let's talk about your case though,

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.959
<v Speaker 2>because you also put on a case. Just quickly run

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 2>through for me who you put on and why what

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 2>your goal was put it on a defense case?

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Sure, well, our defense was to counter the expert evidence,

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and so had we had two blood spatter crime seen

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 3>people Henry Lee and his associate who contradicted Dwayne Devers' testimony.

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 3>And we had a biomechanical expert who was an expert

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 3>in head injuries, and he testified about how this could

0:37:56.760 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 3>have happened. And indeed, we had an animation to show

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 3>how this could have happened, because it was difficult to

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>picture how the falls took place without having seen it,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 3>and so that's what we did, and I thought it

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 3>was a very persuasive animation to explain the injuries on

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:19.919
<v Speaker 3>Kathleen's head.

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 2>So again those injuries that was problematic for the state,

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 2>as well as the fact that they didn't have a

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 2>murder weapon until, as you put it, maybe a year later,

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 2>which they determined to be a blowpoke, which by the way,

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 2>they didn't even have to show the jury at the

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 2>beginning of the trial, right.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, they came in with the Candace's blowpoke and said, see,

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 3>this is what Michael had in his house. It's mysteriously

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 3>missing and it was always there before, according to Candace,

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.720
<v Speaker 3>and now it's missing, and this must be the murder

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 3>weapon because it's light and it's stiff, and it wouldn't

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 3>crack her skull or cause brain injuries, but it would

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 3>cause the kind of injuries to the scalp that she had.

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 3>That was Deborah Radish's testimony, which was completely false, as

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 3>we proved later on when we were able to actually

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 3>find the blowpoke in a corner where the police had

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 3>put it, not recognizing that it was even relevant.

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 2>At the time you mentioned Candace and Michael, you had

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Candace as well. Candace Zamparini was Kathleen's sister. She

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 2>became a very important person in this case in terms

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>of I would say a player for the prosecution. Would

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 2>that be a good way to characterize her? Yes, What

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 2>was your relationship with Candace before Michael?

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 4>There was a lot of jealousy between the sisters, and

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.399
<v Speaker 4>many times they came to visit us, and we grew

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.800
<v Speaker 4>up to visit. I can remember a couple of times

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 4>they would be fighting and her husband and I would

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 4>has sort of rolled her eyes saying, oh my god.

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 4>But it was a good relationship. And when Kathleen died,

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 4>she was right there. She took over everything, arranged funeral, cemetery,

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 4>plot everything, and then it became very bad because the

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 4>police convinced her that I had killed Kathleen, and I

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 4>understood that. Why then her sentiments changed and she really

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 4>hated me in the same sense if somebody had come

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 4>to me and said the police had said, oh, this

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 4>person kills your brother, well I would have hated that person,

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 4>no question about that.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Michael, you said, the police convinced Candace that you killed Kathleen,

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 2>But it was actually the prosecutors and not just Candace

0:40:56.280 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 2>but also Caitlin, Kathleen's daughter. What the prosecutors did was

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 2>flat out wrong. It was improper. I mean, the prosecution

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 2>essentially formed Team State of North Carolina using Kathleen's own kin.

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:15.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So initially Candae was very supportive of Michael, as

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 3>was Caitlyn. Both of them said to me, there's no

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 3>way that Michael would have done this, no way. Indeed,

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Caitlyn was the family spokesperson when Michael was first let

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 3>out of jail, and she said that to the media.

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So what change. What change was the police and prosecutors

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 3>brought them in, showed them the photographs, and had Deborah

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Ratish explained to them that these were clearly the result

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 3>of an attack, a homicidal attack, and that changed everything.

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's go back to the trial, the state puts

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.800
<v Speaker 2>on their case, you put on your case, they rebt

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 2>you rebut right, and then the jury goes out and

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 2>they deliberate for a week. So Michael, I want to

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about when the jury returned and what it was

0:42:15.120 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 2>like for you when you heard the verdict.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, again, it had been days and days that they

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 4>were out and we had to stay in the courtroom.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 4>So Margaret and Martha and Todd and Clayton, we were

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 4>all there together, and I don't think I'm going to

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 4>be convicted. I just don't think it's going to happen.

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 4>And of course the next day when they came in,

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 4>I stood up and they said guilty. It was shocked,

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 4>it really was. But you know, it's not the first

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:50.919
<v Speaker 4>shock I've had in my life. And I immediately thought

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 4>of my children, thought, oh, oh, oh god, what this

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 4>does to them after all that they've suffered and lost,

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 4>you know. So I turned to them and I said,

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 4>it's okay. Uh. It wasn't later when I was locked

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 4>up in a cell in the basement, Oh my god,

0:43:10.400 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 4>what happened.

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 4>I've lost my family, I've lost my everything, everything. And

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 4>then it really hit at the time it was like

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 4>just getting to blow guilty.

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 2>And let's talk about prison. I mean, you went from

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, that blow in the courtroom and the shock

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and trying to process with your family to then immediately

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 2>being taken to prison. What was that experience like?

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Prison was? I think for me a little different in

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the fact that I was really famous. Everybody had watched

0:43:56.640 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 4>this even in prison, they were watching court TV and

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the news, so everybody knew who I was when I

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 4>got there. And the fact that I was old sixty

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 4>eight or something.

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>Oh you were fifty eight. You were fifty eight, fifty.

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Eight fifty eight, where I felt like sixty eight. I

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 4>taught ged for a couple of years, earning a dollar

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 4>a day and got seventy five guys their GEDs. I

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 4>was doing everything I could stay busy and keep my

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 4>mind off the tragedy of losing, you know, my children

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 4>and everything. So again, life, you know, whether it's war

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 4>or anything, it it's pretty much what you make of it.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.239
<v Speaker 4>And I had decided right away, well, okay, this is it.

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 4>I'll just make the best of it, and so I did.

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:49.320
<v Speaker 2>And meantime, on the outside, there's the appeal process going on. David,

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 2>can you just briefly walk us through direct appeal post conviction.

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 2>What happened.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, on the direct appeal, we were pretty confident because

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 3>number one, they had introduced evidence pursuing to a search

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 3>warrant which was completely insufficient. FREDA. Black had made arguments

0:45:13.040 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 3>and closing that were completely improper. So we were optimistic

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 3>that the verdict was going to be reversed. And then

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 3>they decided, well, all of that was just harmless error

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 3>that wouldn't have affected the verdict. And then what happened

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 3>was that Dwayne Diaver was exposed as a fraud, not

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 3>in this case, but in the Greg Taylor case. And

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 3>once that happened, then I saw an avenue for a

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 3>post conviction petition that would succeed because Dwayne Diaver was

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 3>in fact the lynchpin of the case. And so that's

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 3>where we went.

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 2>And so when you say Dwayne Diver was exposed to

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 2>be a fraud, let's put a fine point on that, right.

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>It was more than being a fraud. I mean he

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 2>was not passing confirmatory reports on it was preliminary reports.

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 2>He was doing these made up experiments. I mean, explain

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 2>what you mean by that?

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I was being too kind, He was a liar,

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 3>He was someone who was hiding exculpatory evidence. He was,

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 3>in essence, setting up people by his lab results in

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 3>case after case after case, to the extent that the

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 3>State of North Carolina had to hire two former FBI

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 3>agents to come in and audit the lab, and as

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a result of that, they shut down the blood spatter

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 3>division of the lab because it was rife with inaccuracies.

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 3>And so once we had all of that, we were

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 3>able to go back. And you know, Michael had from

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 3>the start was in favor of the documentary being made

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 3>because he felt like it would level the playing field.

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't mean to speak for you, Michael, but you

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 3>know I think that was your thought, was that, hey,

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 3>having these award winning Academy Award winning documentarians there would

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 3>keep things a little bit more honest. We were able

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 3>to get all the clips from the French filmmakers of

0:47:28.640 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 3>divers testimony, and that had a very visceral effect, I

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 3>think on the judge, because it's one thing to read

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 3>it in the transcript, it's quite another thing to watch

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 3>this guy on the witness stand where you're the judge

0:47:43.760 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 3>and he's lying to you. And to the jury, and

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 3>that was extremely powerful. So I think in fact, Michael's

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:58.240
<v Speaker 3>instinct of having those filmmakers there is what ultimately enabled

0:47:58.320 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 3>us to get him.

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 2>At and ultimately what your emotion was. Your motion for

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:04.879
<v Speaker 2>a new trial was based on the fact that there

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 2>had been false and misleading testimony, a fabricated evidence, and

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Michael deserved a new.

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Trial, exactly, exactly right.

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 2>What's so interesting about that is a lot of times

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 2>in cases of wrongful convictions, we looked to the thing

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that made a difference, right, it was DNA testing. It

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 2>was a tape that turned up and someone saw the

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 2>real perpetrator or someone finally confessed. And here what I

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 2>hear both of you saying is it was the documentary.

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 2>So Hudson's ruling, Mike, what was that like? What was

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:41.640
<v Speaker 2>it like to hear him say you get a new trial?

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 2>What was that like?

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh, Jesus, it's like being resurrected almost. I'm not sure

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 4>how it Lazarus felt, but when you're gone and have

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 4>lost everything and suddenly someone returns your life to you

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:57.719
<v Speaker 4>and there were my children in court and it was there.

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, it was it was just it wasn't

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 4>ventication so much as it was just getting life back.

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 2>And at the time, I mean, everyone was ready to

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 2>dismiss the charges. I think, if I remember right, Judge

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Hudson was ready to do it. Frankly, I think the

0:49:15.880 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 2>DA was. But then in step Candae Zamporini and her sister.

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 2>What happened then, David.

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 3>Everyone was done with this case, you know, and everybody

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 3>realized that the trial hadn't been fair, that this Germany

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:35.240
<v Speaker 3>stuff should have never come in, that was a farce,

0:49:35.800 --> 0:49:40.080
<v Speaker 3>that the sexuality stuff should have never come in. They

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 3>now didn't have the blood spatter expert anymore. I mean,

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 3>how are they going to proceed? They had no evidence

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 3>at that point, so I think Judge Hudson fully expected

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 3>the prosecutor say we don't have enough to proceed. I

0:49:55.960 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 3>think the DA was hoping to say that. But Candace

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:06.759
<v Speaker 3>and Laurie, the two sisters, were adamant that they objected

0:50:06.800 --> 0:50:11.759
<v Speaker 3>to that. But the DA was not willing to do

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 3>the right thing over the objections of these two women.

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 3>And when you watch Candace's venom at the ultimate Alford

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Plea hearing, I guess you can sort of understand why,

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:32.400
<v Speaker 3>because she was beyond beyond the pale in how venomous

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 3>she was.

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 2>So after the new trial is granted, of course, the

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:41.240
<v Speaker 2>state appealed and lost their appeal, and oftentimes what happens

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 2>is then everything's dismissed. That didn't happen here. You mentioned

0:50:44.239 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 2>the Alford plea. Michael, talk to me a little bit

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 2>about why you were okay with an Alford plea and

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:53.799
<v Speaker 2>how it was explained to you.

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, when I got out of prison, I believe I

0:50:56.680 --> 0:50:59.720
<v Speaker 4>was sixty eight at the time, and I weren't ankle

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:03.920
<v Speaker 4>brace for god two years. So I lived with this

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 4>for the longest time. I'm getting older and older. So

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:10.919
<v Speaker 4>when it finally came when David worked out this offered plea,

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 4>and again I wasn't convinced that the jury would find

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 4>me not guilty. Again, I mean, you know burn once

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 4>you're a little leary. The second time I was with

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 4>my children, I had, you know, a life, I was

0:51:24.320 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 4>writing and everything was good. Did I want to risk that.

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:31.400
<v Speaker 4>I did not want to go through that for myself

0:51:32.280 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 4>or especially for my children, and then to bring my

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 4>grandchildren into help, we'd still be fighting this thing. So no,

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 4>just just ended.

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:43.160
<v Speaker 2>David, just for the listeners, just break down an Alford plea,

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Why it exists, What it means.

0:51:45.480 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, what it is is a way of resolving

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 3>a case without the defendant admitting to the essential facts.

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's essentially a mechanism where everybody can declare victory

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:08.280
<v Speaker 3>or defeat equally and the case just ends. And Michael

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 3>was adam in about two things. Number one was that

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 3>he would never say that he had killed Kathleen. Absolutely,

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 3>would never say anything close to that. And number two,

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:23.520
<v Speaker 3>he would not go back into incarceration even for ten minutes.

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:26.719
<v Speaker 3>In other words, he had to be released and the

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 3>case had to be over right then and there. He

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 3>wasn't going to go back to the jail to be processed.

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Those are my marching orders. And once the prosecution agreed

0:52:37.000 --> 0:52:40.800
<v Speaker 3>to both of those things, as I said to Michael, Okay,

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 3>so if we go back to trial and you're found

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 3>not guilty, is that going to change anybody's mind who's

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 3>already decided you're guilty. No. If you take an offered play,

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:55.120
<v Speaker 3>is that going to convince anybody who believes you're innocent

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that you're guilty. No. So there was no practical res

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 3>easy to go back to trial. Nothing would change at

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 3>that point, and as Michael said, he was older, he

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 3>had grandchildren, and it was time to put this to rest.

0:53:13.520 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 2>And so, Michael, what have you been doing with your

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:18.120
<v Speaker 2>life since finally putting this to rest?

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I've been writingta God on two four books, five books,

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, since then, since I got out, I've traveled

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:29.840
<v Speaker 4>and plan to do more of it and plan to

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 4>continue writing. I told my children over and over, hey,

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:38.839
<v Speaker 4>don't hate. That's just the most useless destructive emotion that

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 4>you can have. So just get over it and live

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 4>the life that you can now. I mean, you got today,

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 4>so uh, live today. And that's you know what I've

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:48.680
<v Speaker 4>been doing.

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:49.840
<v Speaker 2>What about?

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 2>A closing argument for listeners here, What do you want

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to say to folks, Michael about your experience about your case?

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Can they learn learn from it? What would you want

0:54:02.080 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 2>to leave people with?

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.359
<v Speaker 4>I think what what to me boils down to as

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:09.920
<v Speaker 4>a matter of having an open mind. You know, back

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 4>in the old days, you know, if the police had

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:17.920
<v Speaker 4>arrested somebody or shot somebody, well they were right, of course,

0:54:17.960 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 4>you know. We just believed that then. Uh, and I

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:24.680
<v Speaker 4>probably did myself, as you know, rich white guy, we

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 4>don't believe that anymore times have changed. What you believe

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:35.000
<v Speaker 4>isn't necessarily true. What you've been told isn't necessarily true.

0:54:35.440 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 4>You need to think. And people aren't really comfortable with that.

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:41.080
<v Speaker 4>They like the oh no, it's got to be this

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 4>way or that way, this Kirkergardian either or well, it

0:54:47.840 --> 0:54:52.120
<v Speaker 4>really isn't that. It's all sort of gray. So think

0:54:52.560 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 4>and keep an open mind.

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And David, what about you, you know, I mean, on

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 2>abuse of power are podcast, we talk about a lot

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 2>of the issues that were at play in this case,

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:09.399
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of misconduct, junkt science, tutle vision and confirmation bias,

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:15.200
<v Speaker 2>all of that in Michael's case, in this experience, what's

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the word? What's the thought? You want to leave with listeners.

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 3>What Michael's case illustrates is how fundamentally flawed the criminal

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:32.000
<v Speaker 3>justice system is and how someone like Michael, who never

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 3>had done anything criminal in his life could suddenly find

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:40.280
<v Speaker 3>himself convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:46.719
<v Speaker 3>in prison based on the testimony of Dwayne Deaver. Is

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:49.759
<v Speaker 3>a wake up call. And so what I've tried to

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 3>do since then is to broaden my message, you know,

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 3>not just to talk to juries in particular cases, but

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 3>through the podcast, through a book I've just written to

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 3>try to educate people about the flaws in the system.

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:13.600
<v Speaker 3>And as Michael said, you need to keep an open

0:56:13.680 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 3>mind because things are not always as they seem, and

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:25.760
<v Speaker 3>indeed there's lots and lots of gray in the world

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:30.160
<v Speaker 3>and in the criminal justice system.

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'm your guest host,

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Sonya Pfeiffer. I'd like to thank our executive producers Jason

0:56:38.800 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Flahm and Kevin Wardis. The senior producer for this episode

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 2>is Jackie Paully, and our producers are Lyla Robinson and

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Jeff Cliburn. Our editor is Roxandra Guidi. The music in

0:56:50.920 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 2>this production is by three time OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph.

0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:58.800
<v Speaker 2>You can find the podcast I make with David Abuse

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 2>of Power on Audible That's at Audible UK. Follow the

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 2>show on Twitter at Abuse of Power Pod. You can

0:57:06.719 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 2>follow me on Instagram at Sonya Pfeiffer and on Twitter

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:15.680
<v Speaker 2>at Feifer Sonia. David is on both platforms as David S. Rudolph.

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Be sure to follow us on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 2>on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction podcast and on Twitter at

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:28.040
<v Speaker 2>wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava for Good on

0:57:28.160 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 2>all three platforms. Wrongful Conviction is a production of Lava

0:57:32.720 --> 0:57:45.440
<v Speaker 2>for Good Podcasts in association with Signal Company Number one.

0:57:48.840 --> 0:57:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Next week, on the guest hosted episode of Wrongful Conviction,

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Pulitzer Prise finalist and co host of the podcast, ear

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Hustle Earle on Wood, my friend Earl on Woods is

0:57:58.040 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to an Axonery that he met while

0:58:01.400 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>still serving time at San Quentin. Prison Erlon will talk

0:58:05.200 --> 0:58:08.320
<v Speaker 1>with Karamut Conley about the wild twists and turns of

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the California justice system and their shared experience of life

0:58:11.880 --> 0:58:15.560
<v Speaker 1>behind bars. This is a must listen episode. Tune in

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:18.600
<v Speaker 1>next week. It's going to be Monday. In the Wrongful

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Conviction podcast feed,