Speaker 1: You are entering the Freedom Hunch, the most expensive Senate
Speaker 1: race and perhaps most consequential in decades currently under way.
Speaker 1: LAC is a massive COVID spike dictator Cuomo wants to
Speaker 1: be able to imprison anyone anti terrorizes Josh Holly's family
Speaker 1: and is Kamala plagiarizing stories from MLK, buck Sextons, coding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence? Make
Speaker 1: no mistake, America, You're a great American again. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts again can speak
Speaker 1: to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that.
Speaker 1: Sometimes the damage they do will be permanent and will
Speaker 1: be irreversible. Can't let it happen. Nothing and no one
Speaker 1: will be able to stop them. These Senate seats are
Speaker 1: truly the last line of defense. Now I must preface
Speaker 1: that the same because they'll say he just conceded. No. No.
Speaker 1: So we have quite an important race today determining control
Speaker 1: of the United States senators. You know, Republicans already have
Speaker 1: fifty seats, Democrats have forty eight seats. There are two
Speaker 1: Senate seats in play because there was no one who
Speaker 1: got more than fifty percent in the election. So that
Speaker 1: forces a runoff, and now we have this battle between
Speaker 1: these candidates playing out with the whole country watching very
Speaker 1: closely because so much is at stake. You got us
Speaker 1: off hoping to defeat per Due, you have war knock
Speaker 1: up against Kelly Leffler, and many people now sitting around
Speaker 1: wondering what would happen. I mean, the President even understands
Speaker 1: the stakes here. What would happen if the Democrats had uncontroled, well,
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say uncontested, but majority control. Hopefully we'll contest
Speaker 1: it no matter what majority control in the House, the Senate,
Speaker 1: and of course having the presidency as well. What are
Speaker 1: the kinds of things that they would do? Often we
Speaker 1: talk about politics in more general terms, perhaps even we
Speaker 1: focus in on things that are more theoretically impactful, that
Speaker 1: are more a question of what is best, what is right,
Speaker 1: but not necessarily what will affect you the control of
Speaker 1: the Senate, especially when you take into account the very
Speaker 1: high likelihood that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, the ninety
Speaker 1: nine point nine percent likelihood that they're going to be
Speaker 1: the president and Vice president of the United States in
Speaker 1: just a matter of weeks. Here the Senate is as
Speaker 1: the president, as our current president. Trump pointed out the
Speaker 1: last line of defense, and if you have Harris and Biden, Gosh,
Speaker 1: I didn't mean to say it in that order, but
Speaker 1: seems right, doesn't it. Increasingly this will look like a
Speaker 1: Harris presidency with this guy named Joe Biden who's hanging
Speaker 1: out in the Oval office but not really calling the shots.
Speaker 1: That's my prediction. But if they don't have the Senate,
Speaker 1: they're not able to do the same kind of long
Speaker 1: term damage, and they're much less likely to be able
Speaker 1: to do damage that will affect you. Here's what they're
Speaker 1: not telling you. Here's what you're not hearing about what
Speaker 1: this will influence. If we have Democrats in control of
Speaker 1: the House, the Senate, and the White House, you will
Speaker 1: see a major increase in taxes. You will see an
Speaker 1: effort to try and come up with a public option,
Speaker 1: which will expand the one thing. Do you know what
Speaker 1: drives most states into the red unions? You know what
Speaker 1: the single biggest budget item is that pushes states into
Speaker 1: debt and then causes more borrowing. And then there's interest payments,
Speaker 1: which means, guess what more tax on all of you.
Speaker 1: It is Medicaid. It is the government's idea of providing
Speaker 1: healthcare for people at a certain income level. That's the
Speaker 1: single biggest driver of state debt. Do you think that
Speaker 1: a public option is going to be a plan that
Speaker 1: people will want to be on. The only way that
Speaker 1: happens is if they're getting a much better deal. They're
Speaker 1: getting much more out of it than they pay into it,
Speaker 1: and that's going to drive up the cost of healthcare
Speaker 1: for everyone else, because you're going to be subsidizing that
Speaker 1: public option, just like your taxes currently pay for Medicaid.
Speaker 1: So that's one thing they'll definitely do that. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's a given. There'll be environmental policies, There'll be an
Speaker 1: increase in the corporate tax rate to whatever it will be,
Speaker 1: twenty eight percent or thirty percenter, who knows, Which means
Speaker 1: that you'll see a decline in the stock market, You'll
Speaker 1: see decline in your four oh one ks. Hiring will
Speaker 1: go down just at a point when we could see
Speaker 1: a major economic recovery. And we can tell, based on
Speaker 1: what's already happened this year under Trump, that there is
Speaker 1: a lot of cash on the sidelines. There are a
Speaker 1: lot of people just waiting, just waiting for that green
Speaker 1: light for the economy to open back up again post COVID,
Speaker 1: and there'll be a flurry, a frenzy of productive wealth
Speaker 1: creation for Americans all across the country. That can happen.
Speaker 1: But if you have these Democrats able to do whatever
Speaker 1: they want without Republicans having a majority in any and
Speaker 1: any aspect of the rulemaking and implementing part of the government,
Speaker 1: right if they have the White House and the Congress
Speaker 1: all locked up, they're going to do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: So those are things that will absolutely happen, and then
Speaker 1: we get into the what could happen? Then we get
Speaker 1: into the what if things get really bad? And for
Speaker 1: that I would just bring you to the long term
Speaker 1: structural changes that Democrats can go for right away. They
Speaker 1: are already talking about and they're still doing it going
Speaker 1: right into an election. Here they're talking about statehood for
Speaker 1: DC and Puerto Rico, which would add four United States senators,
Speaker 1: which means they're going to have a Senate majority for
Speaker 1: the next let's say decade or two. And that's really
Speaker 1: just baked into the cake. That's all done. If they
Speaker 1: do that, they're going to try to pack the courts
Speaker 1: they will I shouldn't say try. They will pack the
Speaker 1: courts with activists. They'll pack the courts with people who
Speaker 1: think that you should say amen and a women you
Speaker 1: know it. They'll pack the courts with social justice warriors,
Speaker 1: with those who are so brainwashed by wokeness and political
Speaker 1: correctness that the law will not matter because they see
Speaker 1: a greater justice in diversity and inclusion efforts than anything
Speaker 1: actually written in statute or the constitution. They'll have judges
Speaker 1: that reject science while claiming to embrace it on issues
Speaker 1: of the right to life in the womb. They'll put
Speaker 1: judges forward that will make sure that your liberty is
Speaker 1: only at the whim of the state. There's no freedom,
Speaker 1: there's no protection that you have When some Democrat demogogue
Speaker 1: comes along and says, oh, but this is really important,
Speaker 1: Oh but COVID means that the constitution no longer counts.
Speaker 1: The left is all on board with an ideology of
Speaker 1: the eradication of your rights when they think it's convenient,
Speaker 1: when they think it's necessary. There is no right that
Speaker 1: you have that the state cannot violate, including just the
Speaker 1: right to a fair trial, the right to not be
Speaker 1: detained for no reason, the most basic kinds of justice
Speaker 1: are under assault in the COVID era. You have things
Speaker 1: like the bill in New York State, But they'll be
Speaker 1: able to detain you because you're considered a public health risk.
Speaker 1: Who determines whether you're a public health risk? The people
Speaker 1: in charge? How do you even get to fight that?
Speaker 1: You don't? They can just take you. Now. Whatever happened
Speaker 1: to habeas corpus, whatever happened to due process? Democrats are
Speaker 1: abandoning all this. But we're not paying attention to that
Speaker 1: as a country, are we. No, No, We're supposed to
Speaker 1: focus on Trump's phone call in Georgia. Oh my gosh.
Speaker 1: Impeach him again, Peach him for what exactly. The President
Speaker 1: believes that the election was stolen from him. He thinks
Speaker 1: that Raffensburger is an incompetent buffoon, and he is, so
Speaker 1: he doesn't trust Raffensburger's word when he says, oh no,
Speaker 1: you have the wrong numbers. And once again they're telling
Speaker 1: us the president, because of what he said on a
Speaker 1: phone call, should be impeached, and I suppose removed, because
Speaker 1: it's never enough for them. It wouldn't be enough even
Speaker 1: if Trump were removed from office at this very late
Speaker 1: stage and then prosecuted. They would still feel like Trump
Speaker 1: got off easy. And this is what we are up
Speaker 1: against with these Democrats. And that's why I want to
Speaker 1: tell you. In the same way that Trump turned around
Speaker 1: the idea of fake news on the Lib media. One
Speaker 1: of the great things about trumps um has been his willingness,
Speaker 1: his ability, his tenacity in fighting back against the fake
Speaker 1: news media. He turned the term around on them, and
Speaker 1: they absolutely hated it because remember in the early days,
Speaker 1: they were saying that fake news was the only reason
Speaker 1: people wanted to vote for Donald Trump. It's because Trump
Speaker 1: voters were such easily fooled imbeciles that they could see
Speaker 1: things on the Internet that weren't true and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna vote for Trump. That was what fake news
Speaker 1: was supposed to be. Then Trump said, no, you the
Speaker 1: mainstream media, you are the fake news. You lie, you
Speaker 1: lie about things and pretend that you were the truth tellers,
Speaker 1: which makes it even worse. And they hated that. They
Speaker 1: hated it because he turned it around. Well, I say
Speaker 1: that we borrow from them once again. It is time
Speaker 1: for the hashtag resistance and this will drive them mad.
Speaker 1: Remember this in the beginning the very earliest days of
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency, they said that they were going to resist,
Speaker 1: and they were explicit comparisons between the French larisistance fighting
Speaker 1: against occupied Nazi rule. That was what they were trying.
Speaker 1: They're trying to create this comparison between them and the
Speaker 1: fighters of fascism. Well, this time around, when we know
Speaker 1: who the true fascist impulse comes from, where we know
Speaker 1: who the real authoritarians are, the Democrat Party and the left,
Speaker 1: I say we take a page from their playbook. We
Speaker 1: resist at every stage. The Senate would give us a
Speaker 1: very powerful tool in that process. But also Trump appointed
Speaker 1: judges should hold to the law because by doing that
Speaker 1: they'll be sufficiently problematic for the authoritarian left, and so
Speaker 1: therefore that will become another avenue of resistance. We resist,
Speaker 1: and this Georgia Senate battle today is an important piece
Speaker 1: in all of that. If we have a Senate majority,
Speaker 1: we're able to stifle stimy, hobble the agenda of Biden,
Speaker 1: Harris and the left wing Libs, we can effectively make
Speaker 1: them inept more so than they would already be. That's
Speaker 1: what's at stake today. I certainly hope that anybody listening
Speaker 1: to this in Georgia, and I know there are many
Speaker 1: of you. I certainly hope that people listening to this
Speaker 1: who are legally able to and still can vote, And
Speaker 1: we're expecting massive turnout today from Republicans. Early voting tends
Speaker 1: to go the Democrats way, but this time around, I'm
Speaker 1: hoping Republicans show just what turnout on election day really means.
Speaker 1: The stakes are indeed very high. They're high for you.
Speaker 1: The Georgia Senate seats in play right now will determine
Speaker 1: how much money you have in your bank account. At
Speaker 1: some level a year from now, it will determine what
Speaker 1: kind of healthcare options you have, what kind of environmental
Speaker 1: regulations you live under, and perhaps whether or not you
Speaker 1: can even have the option of voting for a Republican
Speaker 1: party that has a realistic shot of taking back power
Speaker 1: at the national level. Those are the kind of things
Speaker 1: that are on the ballot. As they say, the radicalism
Speaker 1: of the left needs to be defeated, and at a minimum,
Speaker 1: at a minimum, we need to have tools like a
Speaker 1: Senate majority and an emboldened Republican base that's willing to
Speaker 1: continue this fight no matter what happens in the Trump reelection.
Speaker 1: Recount battle. Those are the stakes, friends, That's what we're
Speaker 1: up to today. Will continue to look very closely at
Speaker 1: all aspects of this fight. You're in the Freedom This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Tomorrow, each of
Speaker 1: you is going to vote in one of the most
Speaker 1: important runoff elections of the history of our country. Runner. Frankly,
Speaker 1: forget about runoff. One of the most important elections. Really,
Speaker 1: it's really not runoff. It's elections because it's a big
Speaker 1: Our country is depending on you. The whole world is
Speaker 1: watching the people of Georgia tomorrow, and you've got to
Speaker 1: swamp them because everything's so crooked around I mean and
Speaker 1: not here they were saying, oh, he's complaining about Georgia. No, No,
Speaker 1: I'm complaining about eight different states, and I think we're
Speaker 1: gonna win them all. He says he's gonna win them all.
Speaker 1: But let's focus on what he's saying first here about
Speaker 1: the Senate race. It is absolutely critical for the reason
Speaker 1: we're outlining it, and with Ausof and Warnock, you do
Speaker 1: have a quite a duo of Democrats who are really
Speaker 1: representative of the ideological trajectory of that party right now,
Speaker 1: I mean, asof, I mean this is a guy who
Speaker 1: what is well, why should John Ausoff be a United
Speaker 1: States Senator? What exactly has he done? He's done a
Speaker 1: little bit of staff work for somebody else in the House,
Speaker 1: and he's rich because of who dad is. Well, that's
Speaker 1: not particularly impressive, but the left loves this guy. So
Speaker 1: that tells you a lot, doesn't it. And then you
Speaker 1: have mister Raphael Warnock, the Reverend Raphael Warnock, who is
Speaker 1: a doctrinaire leftist who says what he needs to say
Speaker 1: in order to appeal to his favored constituencies. And what
Speaker 1: would he do, Well, they'll do whatever the Democrat left
Speaker 1: wants them to. It's not even really clear in any
Speaker 1: way what they would push for on their own. They're
Speaker 1: going to be functionaries largely if they win in the
Speaker 1: Democrat machine. But that's all they have to be. They
Speaker 1: just have to go along with it. And there's the
Speaker 1: Republican candidates in this case, who are, let's just be honest,
Speaker 1: not particularly strong. They're good enough, they're far better than
Speaker 1: these Democrats. And good heavens, please don't let me giving
Speaker 1: you a little bit of honesty here dissuade any of
Speaker 1: you in Georgia from going out there and casting your
Speaker 1: vote for these two candidates. But Leffler has done okay,
Speaker 1: and Purdue is also okay. You know, you really look
Speaker 1: at it and say, okay, well, but they're Republicans and
Speaker 1: they will at least support policies that will be better
Speaker 1: off for the rest of us, whether Democrats realize it
Speaker 1: or not. But Trump is clearly upset as well at
Speaker 1: what's going on in the state of Georgia. And this
Speaker 1: is a big problem. This is Georgia, friends, this is
Speaker 1: not some place that we thought we'd be having these
Speaker 1: kinds of troubles. So Democrats, there's the immediate power issue
Speaker 1: here of control of the Senate and also Trump continuing
Speaker 1: to contest the outcome in Georgia. But then there's the
Speaker 1: what does this place look like? What does the state
Speaker 1: of Georgia look like in two years? What does it
Speaker 1: look like in four years? This is a in the
Speaker 1: center of the South trending blue state, and we have
Speaker 1: to look at why that is and what's going on.
Speaker 1: And you have to think that the GOP state apparatus
Speaker 1: is not doing a particularly impressive job at all. And
Speaker 1: Governor Camp in particular, who just barely beat Stacy. Remember
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrahams, the fake governor of Georgia. Just Camp barely
Speaker 1: beat her. Trump is unhappy with Camp to the point
Speaker 1: where he's already threatening to campaign against him. Play fifteen.
Speaker 1: I'll be hearing about a year and a half campaigning
Speaker 1: against your governor. I guarantee that I shouldn't say this.
Speaker 1: I shouldn't say this because I just don't want you
Speaker 1: to tell anybody outside of this room other than the
Speaker 1: minions of Papa now. But you know, I endorsed him.
Speaker 1: He was in last place, and I endorsed him. He
Speaker 1: went to first place very like immediately, and then he
Speaker 1: won the primary. And then I gave him a couple
Speaker 1: of rallies, which I don't like doing for other people.
Speaker 1: I was telling you I hadn't do rallies for other people,
Speaker 1: do them for me, right. The president has had the
Speaker 1: incredible ability to pass his support to other people. You know, Obama,
Speaker 1: as popular as he was among Democrats, his popularity did
Speaker 1: not translate to others. When Trump shows up and says
Speaker 1: this is my guy or gal, it tends to really
Speaker 1: move the needle in impressive ways. And that may continue on.
Speaker 1: We'll see. We'll have to look and watch for what
Speaker 1: the president's next moves will be. He very clearly has
Speaker 1: no interest in going quietly into the night. We know
Speaker 1: that much. And he's saying that he's continuing to contest
Speaker 1: this election. But right now we gotta spend the next
Speaker 1: the next you know, let's see twelve hours, friends, All
Speaker 1: that really matters. All that really matters for the for
Speaker 1: the rest of today going into tonight, Uh, just slay
Speaker 1: the rest of today. Forget about the twelve hours, is
Speaker 1: that we get this Georgia election done and we get
Speaker 1: these two Senate seats. Everybody out there, Team buck Georgia.
Speaker 1: Go vote, Tell your friends to vote, stay in line.
Speaker 1: Once you're in line, it's all on you, my friends.
Speaker 1: God's speed. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. What has gone wrong with
Speaker 1: the rollout of the vaccine that we've seen phone lines jammed,
Speaker 1: websites crash, a lot of demand. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: at the end of the day, we excuse me, excuse
Speaker 1: me if I could finish. My queen just said, what
Speaker 1: has gone wrong? So I'm answering the question if I
Speaker 1: could complete the question, though, So you're gonna give a speech,
Speaker 1: are you gonna answer? Ask a question? Repect? You asked
Speaker 1: a question. I'm going to show you're you're you're given
Speaker 1: a speech. You asked a question. I am trying to
Speaker 1: ask you that you're gonna ask commedy questions. You get three?
Speaker 1: They only got one question? Why do you get three? Well,
Speaker 1: I'll du respect, Governor, I'm just asking if I could
Speaker 1: finish my question. You didn't you finish the question. I
Speaker 1: did not. My full question is what went wrong with
Speaker 1: the rollout of the vaccine When we've seen phone lines
Speaker 1: jammed website so you're repeating your question to complete it
Speaker 1: for you, Governor. We've seen websites crash and also senior
Speaker 1: citizens waiting overnight for the vaccine. Where was that at
Speaker 1: We've seen it in Duval, Broward, Orange and Lee County.
Speaker 1: Why was like in Lee? Why did that happen? Did
Speaker 1: you investigate why? That's my question to you, Governor. You're
Speaker 1: the governor of the state. I'm not the governor of
Speaker 1: the state, okay, But you didn't investigate why that like
Speaker 1: in Lee County? Why was there a big line? Did
Speaker 1: you did you investigate why could you tell us, because
Speaker 1: we distributed vaccine to hospitals and the hospital said, first come,
Speaker 1: first serve, if you show up, we'll do it, So
Speaker 1: they didn't use a registration system. There wasn't anything that
Speaker 1: was done, and there's a lot of demand for it,
Speaker 1: so people are going to want to go ahead. There
Speaker 1: was no plan then from the state to make sure
Speaker 1: that senior citizens didn't wait outside overnight. So the state
Speaker 1: is not dictating the hospitals. How we're not dictating the
Speaker 1: Carlos Mogoya how he runs his operations here. That would
Speaker 1: be a total disaster. These guys are much more competent
Speaker 1: to be able to deliver healthcare services than a state
Speaker 1: government could ever be. Knockout from raw descentis against it
Speaker 1: a CNN fake news journo. I've never seen that one before,
Speaker 1: but there she was. I like this. Republicans have to
Speaker 1: do this. When you're up against the ninety five percent
Speaker 1: Democrat media, when you're up against a news a news
Speaker 1: apparatus that will do everything in its power to help
Speaker 1: one side and to crush you, to attack you all
Speaker 1: the time, you've got to take every opportunity to point
Speaker 1: out the bias, because otherwise they get what they want
Speaker 1: and they win. So you've got to say, hold on
Speaker 1: a second, why, why is the premise of your question
Speaker 1: based in the failures of the state, And you want
Speaker 1: to do some long rambling speech. Look, she wanted her
Speaker 1: MSNBC moment, Well, she got her Fox News moment. Perhaps
Speaker 1: she wanted to be able to attack Ronda Santis, who
Speaker 1: has been the best governor of a large, populous state
Speaker 1: in the country at handling COVID. All right, people vote
Speaker 1: with their feet. The numbers don't lie when you see
Speaker 1: the top places where Americans are moving and this is
Speaker 1: from there's a U haul in the big moving company.
Speaker 1: They put out their data. There's other moving companies have
Speaker 1: done the same. Where is everybody going? Right now? All right,
Speaker 1: we've been in a crisis. States are doing different things,
Speaker 1: and this is the way it's supposed to be. Right.
Speaker 1: States are able to pursue their own pathways to deal
Speaker 1: with a crisis like this. And where where are people
Speaker 1: fleeing and where are people showing up? Well, they're leaving
Speaker 1: in precedented numbers, at least in modern history, New York, California,
Speaker 1: New Jersey. They're leaving big blue enclaves. Right, the heart
Speaker 1: of the Democrat financial you know, money and political power, infrastructure.
Speaker 1: They're saying, this is just crazy. Where are they going? Florida, Tennessee,
Speaker 1: South Carolina, North Carolina either somewhat read or very red
Speaker 1: states but also states that have low or no income tax,
Speaker 1: states that have been more open during the COVID pandemic.
Speaker 1: Rhonda Santis has been basically running one big move here.
Speaker 1: It's better ad during all of this. And to our
Speaker 1: our listeners in the Miami area and in the Tampa area,
Speaker 1: we got to WFLA and w IOD. To our listeners
Speaker 1: down in the Florida area, we would just say congratulations
Speaker 1: for already being down there, right. Good job, a good job.
Speaker 1: So I've just got to tell you, I'm I'm amazed
Speaker 1: that the broader perception hasn't shifted faster here. You see,
Speaker 1: everyone's going to places that are doing a better job
Speaker 1: with this, and they're fleeing the places that the media pretends.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom and Governor and Governor Cuomo Governor's Newsom and
Speaker 1: Cuomo are a disaster, an absolute disaster, and all the
Speaker 1: data shows it. You've got twenty two thousand dead in
Speaker 1: Florida from COVID with two million more in population, you've
Speaker 1: got over thirty thousand and now I think it's like
Speaker 1: thirty three or thirty four thousand dead in New York.
Speaker 1: That's a lot more. That's a much bigger death toll.
Speaker 1: And Florida has an even higher percentage of seniors. Remember
Speaker 1: that the biggest vulnerability group is senior citizens. You'd think
Speaker 1: that Florida would have been hit worse than anybody by this,
Speaker 1: but no. And in terms of in terms of death
Speaker 1: per capita, there essentially in the middle of the pack.
Speaker 1: But understand this, they're in the middle of the pack
Speaker 1: for a state that has a lot of pretty dense cities,
Speaker 1: and also for a state that hasn't been closed down.
Speaker 1: The closed down states should be They should be able
Speaker 1: to point the lockdown states should be able to point
Speaker 1: at more open states and say, oh, my gosh, look
Speaker 1: at what a terrible job you've done. Look at how
Speaker 1: much better off we are. Not going to do that
Speaker 1: in California right now. California is having its worst ever
Speaker 1: period of COVID cases. Los Angeles hospitals, according to Daily Mail,
Speaker 1: have suffered a one thousand percent spike in admissions because
Speaker 1: of COVID and ambulances have been told to stop transporting
Speaker 1: patients with little chance of survival. Now, Los Angeles was
Speaker 1: held up as a model for all of us, and
Speaker 1: I think we need to remember this. Los Angeles and California.
Speaker 1: They were see, we wear masks, unlike you, dumb Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: which is even true, people all across the country wearing masks.
Speaker 1: But they had this belief that the only people that
Speaker 1: don't wear masks are Trump supporters, and therefore they were
Speaker 1: really they're really horrible about this too. You know, it
Speaker 1: was our It was our fault when anyone on the
Speaker 1: right got sick, it was it was our problem that
Speaker 1: we had created. Well, what's the situation Los Angeles? Why
Speaker 1: Why is COVID so out of control there and has
Speaker 1: a relatively moderate climate, I mean it's not quite Florida,
Speaker 1: but pretty close to it. Why is it so much
Speaker 1: worse off? The people that told you they knew what
Speaker 1: to do and their policies would work were wrong. They
Speaker 1: were wrong. They could deny this as much as they want.
Speaker 1: They can pretend it's not true. They were wrong. Didn't work.
Speaker 1: They can say it's because we didn't do a good
Speaker 1: enough job. They can have all the excuses they want.
Speaker 1: But at the end of the day, you know, if
Speaker 1: this is a war, their battle plan did not succeed.
Speaker 1: All right, the generals need to get fired. That's what's
Speaker 1: happening in California. Meanwhile, in Florida, yes, it's not perfect. Obviously,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people who are getting sick
Speaker 1: and a lot of people who are dying in Florida
Speaker 1: from COVID. But that's happening everywhere. But Florida is still open,
Speaker 1: and Ron de Santis isn't going to sit there and
Speaker 1: have a CNN reporter do a speech in the you know,
Speaker 1: do a speech under the guise of a question to
Speaker 1: basically be why you're doing such a bad job at
Speaker 1: the vaccine role out. Have you seen such an aggressive
Speaker 1: question posed by any CNN journalist to Governor Cuomo ever,
Speaker 1: particularly about his disastrous COVID response. No, of course not,
Speaker 1: because this is all important to the overall narrative. There's
Speaker 1: a broad narrative here of who is better at handling
Speaker 1: this public health challenge, the same way that we would
Speaker 1: have this on issues of national security. Do you trust
Speaker 1: Democrats or Republicans more national security? For a long time,
Speaker 1: it was a huge clear favorite of Republicans, and then
Speaker 1: that balanced out a little bit after some of the
Speaker 1: Mid East wars, but I think it would still be
Speaker 1: able to have to check the most recent polls. Republicans
Speaker 1: tend to have an advantage there well on who do
Speaker 1: you trust to do a better job in a pandemic.
Speaker 1: They've blamed Trump for all this, but really you have
Speaker 1: to look at this on a state by state level,
Speaker 1: and Republican states are doing better in their fight against COVID,
Speaker 1: then Democrat then large Democrats states are And now I
Speaker 1: know one of the highest deaths per capita states, for example,
Speaker 1: is Massachusetts, where you have a technically Republican governor, but
Speaker 1: it's a Democrat state. It's overwhelmingly Democrat voters, and the
Speaker 1: and the politicians that have power there are you know,
Speaker 1: and it's this guy is not like some Trump supporting
Speaker 1: Republican either. He's kind of a fakey Republican, you know.
Speaker 1: But you look at the places that have had the
Speaker 1: worst results, New York, Michigan, New Jersey, Massachusetts, now California,
Speaker 1: really bad results from this, and the media can allow
Speaker 1: this to be a widespread recognition. They can allow people
Speaker 1: to figure out hold on a second, I thought Democrats
Speaker 1: were the science people and they wear masks, so it's
Speaker 1: all so much better. Why is it so much worse
Speaker 1: in their states? They probably argue about population density, which
Speaker 1: is that is a reasonable point to make, but that
Speaker 1: doesn't explain the full disparity. Look at Texas, look at Florida.
Speaker 1: Where would you have rather been during this during this pandemic?
Speaker 1: And it's states that are more read. Even with large cities,
Speaker 1: even with huge populations, you'd rather be in a state
Speaker 1: that's more read. And then you also have the growth
Speaker 1: of the tyranny mindset among Democrats. Do do you know
Speaker 1: that in New York right now, there's there's a bill
Speaker 1: that has been in circulation that would allow Governor Cromo
Speaker 1: to just detain people who are believe to be a
Speaker 1: public health risk. Let me get into this because these details,
Speaker 1: this is chilling. And if they can do it in
Speaker 1: New York, trust me, they're going to want to do
Speaker 1: it in California. There are other places they'll try this
Speaker 1: as well. And if you think the federal government under
Speaker 1: a Bide administration is going to try to step in
Speaker 1: and protect your basic constitutional rights, you're in for a surprise.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom hud This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. I think one of the biggest things I learned,
Speaker 1: and I say this as a neurosurgeon, you know, someone
Speaker 1: who operates on people who are in the worst of
Speaker 1: situations often, is that is that science cannot rescue us
Speaker 1: from ourselves. We can have these incredible breakthroughs, and we
Speaker 1: will in vaccines and therapeutics and new forms of testing.
Speaker 1: I mean, it is really just remarkable to see, and
Speaker 1: I think we will be a different world as a
Speaker 1: result of the medical innovation that we have this year.
Speaker 1: But if we don't lean into the basic health practices,
Speaker 1: they make such a big difference. I mean, even now,
Speaker 1: one hundred years after the Great Pandemic of nineteen eighteen,
Speaker 1: the same things made the biggest difference. Wearing masks, keeping distance,
Speaker 1: washing hands. We can talk about mr Anda, vaccines and
Speaker 1: all those things, but washing hands and wearing a mask
Speaker 1: makes as big a difference. It doesn't sound as neat
Speaker 1: or as fancy, but it can make such a huge impact.
Speaker 1: And it's something I will now always remind my patients of.
Speaker 1: I want you to be very clever. This here you
Speaker 1: have the CNN's favorite on air doctor doctor Gupta telling
Speaker 1: you that washing hands and wearing masks is as important
Speaker 1: as a vaccine. Does anybody really believe that? I know
Speaker 1: there are people who have been brainwashing blue, but think
Speaker 1: about that for a second. The vaccine is ninety percent effective,
Speaker 1: So how are we supposed to take this hand washing
Speaker 1: and mask wearing is ninety five percent effective? Well, then
Speaker 1: explain California to me. Doc. Oh, this was all so obvious.
Speaker 1: It was so obvious that at the very beginning of this,
Speaker 1: all the so called experts were telling us they know
Speaker 1: the history, they know about the pandemic of nineteen eighteen.
Speaker 1: At the beginning, there's saying, no, I don't wear masks.
Speaker 1: That's that's how obvious this was in medicine, right. But
Speaker 1: there they just doesn't matter. They just keep saying it.
Speaker 1: What are they going to do admit that they've been
Speaker 1: wrong this whole time about really important stuff. No, they're
Speaker 1: never gonna do that. So they tell you that we
Speaker 1: can't save us from ourselves. You didn't do a good
Speaker 1: enough job. That's that's the takeaway. You're supposed to have. Yeah,
Speaker 1: masks and hand washing really show me that show me
Speaker 1: the hand washing as a means of stopping COVID data.
Speaker 1: I'm just here. Show me that data. Prove that one
Speaker 1: to me. Stop telling me. Prove it to me. Oh
Speaker 1: but you know, we did their study where people said
Speaker 1: they thought they wash more hands, and because they wash
Speaker 1: more hands, maybe they thought, no, no, I want proof,
Speaker 1: like I'm going to j something in my arm that's
Speaker 1: going to save my life kind of proof. Not Oh,
Speaker 1: I think if you wash your hands, maybe theoretically it
Speaker 1: could help prevent some tiny percentage of spread, which, when
Speaker 1: played out hundreds of millions of times over the course
Speaker 1: of a month, may result in you know how many
Speaker 1: fewer cases a handful? Who knows this is what they're saying.
Speaker 1: That's right. It was all about masks, you see the
Speaker 1: whole time. That's all we needed. Oh wow, okay, So
Speaker 1: somehow mask compliance goes up dramatically ninety seven percent in
Speaker 1: a lot of these states, and yet we're having the
Speaker 1: worst outbreaks we've ever had, worse than when nobody was
Speaker 1: wearing masks. Really or very few people explain that to me.
Speaker 1: Make that make sense. Oh, and they come up with
Speaker 1: all these and then their explorations, you say, well, that
Speaker 1: doesn't make any sense. That's not true. And then you say,
Speaker 1: shut up science, that's what they do. Well, that's all happening.
Speaker 1: You have things like New York Bill A four six See. Now,
Speaker 1: I know for those of you are listening in other
Speaker 1: states all across the country, you're probably thinking, well, this
Speaker 1: isn't my problem. Remember I told you the stuff you're
Speaker 1: seeing in New York, the crazy lockdowns, the nonsense that
Speaker 1: we're all being put through New York City, that is
Speaker 1: now replicated in many other Democrats cities and states across
Speaker 1: the country. So get ready for stuff like this New
Speaker 1: York Bill A four sixteen. It would give the governor
Speaker 1: the ability to imprison or deport anyone he says is
Speaker 1: a public health threat. But not only is this now
Speaker 1: this is detaining people without without trial. Now I know
Speaker 1: they're gonna say, oh, but it's but you know, it's
Speaker 1: like quarantine. Yeah, taking quarantine powers for sick people for things.
Speaker 1: You know, for if somebody has smallpox or somebody has
Speaker 1: a bowla that's one thing. But this is quarantine powers
Speaker 1: for well, we think there's the possibility you may be
Speaker 1: sick with COVID even though you feel fine and the
Speaker 1: tests are too sensitive, but we can still lock you up.
Speaker 1: This is from the bill. This is from the text
Speaker 1: of the bill. Quote upon determining, by clear and convincing
Speaker 1: evidence of the health of others may be endangered by
Speaker 1: a case contact or carrier, or suspected case contact or
Speaker 1: carrier of a contagious disease that, in the opinion of
Speaker 1: the Governor, may pose an imminent and significant threat to
Speaker 1: the public public health, resulting in high mortality. The Governor
Speaker 1: or his or her delegee, including local Health Department commissioners,
Speaker 1: may order the removal and or detention of such a
Speaker 1: person or group of persons by issuing a single order.
Speaker 1: That's right, the governor or any health department official or
Speaker 1: anyone else that he designates can lock you up, can
Speaker 1: detain you because they you are a health threat. Oh
Speaker 1: but this won't be abused, right, this won't be used
Speaker 1: to get compliance. Really, speak out against lockdowns. Refuse to
Speaker 1: wear your mask. You gotta get locked up. You're a
Speaker 1: threat to public health. Don't you see how this is
Speaker 1: playing out. Don't you see the threat to your freedom
Speaker 1: and to your liberty from this. It's not just in
Speaker 1: New York. This is the Democrat mentality nationwide. It's not
Speaker 1: a question whether they want to do this, it's do
Speaker 1: they have the power to implement this kind of authoritarian
Speaker 1: insanity because they want to. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Let's check in with our friend John Cardillo. He is
Speaker 1: a former NYPD officer, now a Florida residence, which comes
Speaker 1: into much of our discussion these days, and also a
Speaker 1: TV host, radio host and commentator on right, my friend,
Speaker 1: mister Cardelo, good to see you again. Ready to see
Speaker 1: you buck. How's everything going? I'm good man. You know
Speaker 1: you you are one of the original voices, kind of
Speaker 1: the with the siren call of make your way down
Speaker 1: to Florida. It's nice here. I've already lost I've lost
Speaker 1: two of my brothers. I think they're never coming back.
Speaker 1: They're now flirt of Florida guys. They love the flip flops,
Speaker 1: the beautiful weather, the right of center politics. I know
Speaker 1: there's still some big blue areas, but they're they're having
Speaker 1: a good time. Um, what was what was just your
Speaker 1: your your thought when you saw Governor Desantists dealing with
Speaker 1: that CNN reporter, which you know, she's doing the classic
Speaker 1: CNN thing, Let me just explain, let me do an
Speaker 1: editorial of your failure, and then just sort of drop
Speaker 1: that in front of you and let you sit there
Speaker 1: and fumble around with it. The way that desantists handled
Speaker 1: that question, given his record this year in governing, makes
Speaker 1: me think maybe this guy's got even bigger plants. You know,
Speaker 1: Buck I have. I was critical around the Santis early
Speaker 1: on this year when COVID first became a thing right,
Speaker 1: and I have never been happier to be dead wrong
Speaker 1: about a politician, especially a Republican conservative. I treat him
Speaker 1: today after watching and he took down rows of Flora's
Speaker 1: from CNN for that moronic question. Basically, she was trying
Speaker 1: to set him up, saying, well, why is it that
Speaker 1: hospitals in Lee County, Florida, that's the Fort Myers area,
Speaker 1: have these crazy crowds outside? Why is there no system
Speaker 1: in place? And she had started to ask the question
Speaker 1: and then wanted to pontificate, like these left wing reporters do.
Speaker 1: I'm throwing this out there for the viewers reference point,
Speaker 1: and the Santis just cut her off. He said, First
Speaker 1: of all, he said, look, basically said, you're testifying, you're
Speaker 1: not asking a question, You're asking three questions in one.
Speaker 1: Everybody else got one. But what I loved was his answer.
Speaker 1: He said, the state doesn't dictate how hospitals administer the vaccine.
Speaker 1: The state's going to get the vaccine at the hospital.
Speaker 1: And then he specifically pointed out a healthcare executive. He
Speaker 1: was at Jackson Health which was a big facility down
Speaker 1: to Miami, and he pointed the guy out, mentioned his
Speaker 1: name and said, they know how to do what they
Speaker 1: do hospitalization and healthcare far better than the state does.
Speaker 1: That the state does it, it's a disaster. And as
Speaker 1: answer in Lee County was that the hospital in Lee
Speaker 1: County at Fort Myers Area Hospital said first come, first serve,
Speaker 1: we've got the vaccine. It was great demand and people
Speaker 1: crowded it. Well, she tried to blame it on him,
Speaker 1: and he said, hey, look we're not going to tell
Speaker 1: the state is not going to tell hospitals how to
Speaker 1: administer healthcare. I think Ron de Santis there should be
Speaker 1: mandatory training with Ron da Santis on how to handle
Speaker 1: hostile leftist media for Republican politicians. At this point, he's
Speaker 1: doing a great job yeah. And I also have noticed
Speaker 1: that a game that the the LIB media likes to play,
Speaker 1: where if you if you let the decision making, if
Speaker 1: you put the decision making in the hands of the experts,
Speaker 1: and it's it's you know, there's there are problems, it's
Speaker 1: not rough you have you know, you've abdicated leadership. What's
Speaker 1: wrong with you? But if you decide that you, as
Speaker 1: the you know, executive branch official at the state level
Speaker 1: or even at the federal level, are going to make
Speaker 1: the final call, it's why are you listening to the experts? Right?
Speaker 1: You can't win either way. It's a lose lose for
Speaker 1: the look they CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. Ideologically, they cannot bring themselves to admit that
Speaker 1: the private sector and the free market exists. Let alone
Speaker 1: does things right, let alone has the right to do things.
Speaker 1: So to them, it is it is utterly perplexing. They're
Speaker 1: befuddled when a politician points to a business executive and says, hey,
Speaker 1: that guy knows how to do his job far better
Speaker 1: than we in government do. If if if we in government did,
Speaker 1: it's a disaster. That's horrific. That's horrific. That's like the
Speaker 1: torture of puppies to the mainstream media. I mean, they
Speaker 1: can't think of a more terrifying concept than giving the
Speaker 1: private sector the freedom to operate. We're speaking of John Cardilla,
Speaker 1: former NYPD and a conservative commentator. John. By the time
Speaker 1: people hear this, they may have a little bit more
Speaker 1: info than we do on on Georgia. But but just
Speaker 1: going into this big day to day what are your thoughts,
Speaker 1: how are you feeling about this? Obviously big stakes, you know,
Speaker 1: big stakes. I'm just shocked. I am absolutely shocked at
Speaker 1: the Trafalgar Pole. Now, Trafalgar Associate has been one of
Speaker 1: the better polling firms. Robert Gahley who runs it, a
Speaker 1: good guy, very reputable guy, one of the few traditional
Speaker 1: pollsters I'll actually give credence to. It is absolutely mind
Speaker 1: blowing to me. Buck that Raphael Warnock, with his history
Speaker 1: of racist statements, anti Semitic statements, blocking a child abuse
Speaker 1: investigation at his camp, to which the Georgia bure of
Speaker 1: Investigation Investigators, one of the most professional law enforcement agences
Speaker 1: in this country, said they've never seen obstruction like that
Speaker 1: to his wife's allegations about abuse. That this guy is
Speaker 1: polling a point ahead of the Republican that John Assafa
Speaker 1: a Hollywood transplant into Georgia. So I don't know if
Speaker 1: it says that the Republican part has dropped the ball
Speaker 1: on grass roots. I don't know if it says they
Speaker 1: didn't spend enough money, or if fraud is just that rampant,
Speaker 1: and people like Stacy Abrahams have done a good job
Speaker 1: combining that fraud withoutreach, especially in minority communities. But I'll
Speaker 1: tell you one thing, it shouldn't be the Republicans in Georgiana.
Speaker 1: You should be up by six seven, eight points. And
Speaker 1: we need to do a really, really thorough post mortem
Speaker 1: on how the Republican Party, from the GOP to the
Speaker 1: National Republican Senatorial Committee, these fundraising entities have operated throughout
Speaker 1: this election cycle. I think it's abysmal that where we are,
Speaker 1: and I'm concerned that we might lose the Senate. We
Speaker 1: might wake up tomorrow to Leader Schumer. But even more
Speaker 1: concerning buck last point on this, why are we now
Speaker 1: being told yet again that we might not have the
Speaker 1: results of this elections tonite, that it might take weeks.
Speaker 1: What is this new precedent where we can't count an
Speaker 1: election on election day, and you've got the Georgian Secretary
Speaker 1: of State, Ravensburger, acting very pale, acting questionably. He was
Speaker 1: interviewed by Martha McCallum on Fox, and his answers seemed
Speaker 1: like it was a was a grudge match against him
Speaker 1: and David Purdue. Something really isn't right in Georgia. And
Speaker 1: I believe that this is going to be Brian Kemp
Speaker 1: and Raffinsburger's last term in politics. I don't think either
Speaker 1: one of them survives a primary in twenty two And
Speaker 1: what do you think about the President's continued what do
Speaker 1: we call it now? I mean he's he's not conceding,
Speaker 1: he said last night at the rally. We've got Senator
Speaker 1: Ted Cruz along with I believe ten oh, no more
Speaker 1: than ten now because Lefler said that she would also
Speaker 1: you know, if she is able to, she would also
Speaker 1: stand with the president of this one or she will,
Speaker 1: I mean she's already said that she'll do that, because
Speaker 1: I guess it'll happen this week. So what exactly what
Speaker 1: do you think happens as a result of this demand
Speaker 1: for the ten days of further investigation into the presidential election,
Speaker 1: of vote situation in Georgia. I think I hope something
Speaker 1: will happen. I don't think anything's gonna happen. Look, the
Speaker 1: Democrats have the majority, right so back in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: I think it was six or seven Democratic senators objected
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump's selection. Donald Trump was inaugurated on January twentieth.
Speaker 1: I don't you know barring I mean, I mean the Hiroshima,
Speaker 1: the the you know, the fat Man and little Boy
Speaker 1: nuke level of evidence that would be required to overturn
Speaker 1: this barring that coming to light today in tomorrow, that
Speaker 1: would force our entire judicial system, DOJ, the courts, Congress
Speaker 1: into action. I don't see anything changing the outcome, And unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I think we're gonna endure a Joe Biden presidency for
Speaker 1: a little while, then a Kamala Harris presidency until twenty
Speaker 1: twenty four. Because if they had, if this smoking gun
Speaker 1: evidence existed, if this nuke level evidence existed, I it
Speaker 1: would have been presented already. DC leaks like a sieve.
Speaker 1: You and I are in this business. We know how
Speaker 1: that goes. It wouldn't have been under wrapped. I think
Speaker 1: the awareness is great. I love that A few million
Speaker 1: people are showing up in DC tomorrow. I think we
Speaker 1: could shine a bright ladd an election fraud. We can
Speaker 1: make some changes in the party, more America First people.
Speaker 1: But I just don't see the results of this election changing.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm disappointed because I really do believe and I
Speaker 1: know you do too. And we've talked off a lot
Speaker 1: about this extensively, that there were there were intentional distortions
Speaker 1: and essentially subversions of the electoral process by Democrats in
Speaker 1: this election year, so that it would be very easy
Speaker 1: to commit fraud and also, and this is the critical point,
Speaker 1: very hard to prove it. That said, I also think
Speaker 1: that you know, they needed, we needed a clear, bright
Speaker 1: red line caught fraud moments in this to blow the
Speaker 1: whole thing open. And I'm not even willing to It's
Speaker 1: not that I don't think that happened, John, but the
Speaker 1: inability to find that, and I know it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's a short period of time everything else. You just
Speaker 1: it's not what you know, it's what you can prove.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah, Look, I mean you and I have
Speaker 1: agreed on this for months. We spoke about it, We
Speaker 1: saw it the last week at dinner, we spoke about this.
Speaker 1: The problem is that I'm going to place blame right here,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to name names. The Republican National Committee
Speaker 1: and GOP Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel. They sat on hundreds
Speaker 1: of billions of dollars for two years. They were warned
Speaker 1: about voter fraud. Memos were generated with them a year
Speaker 1: ago when the election was really in full swing. They
Speaker 1: did nothing. They did nothing until the President deployed lawyers
Speaker 1: on election night, not even election night. The next morning
Speaker 1: at about five AM, is when he really weaponized and actionized,
Speaker 1: ready Giuliani to put a legal team in place. The
Speaker 1: RNC could have had a preemptive legal strategy. They could
Speaker 1: have had mathematicians, statisticians, litigators, election law experts, constitutional scholars.
Speaker 1: They should have had all that in place for the
Speaker 1: last year. They were worn for two years. They saw Russia,
Speaker 1: they saw the nonsense, the impeachment sham. They did nothing.
Speaker 1: They raised about a quarter billion dollars for this legal
Speaker 1: effort to fight election froud. They spent about four million
Speaker 1: of it. Where is that the rest of that quarter billion?
Speaker 1: So I squarely put this on the shoulders of the
Speaker 1: r NC. They should have been in front of this.
Speaker 1: They should have been proactive and they handed they handed
Speaker 1: the White House of Joe Biden. Because I'm with you,
Speaker 1: there was glaring, rampant electoral front. But we had to
Speaker 1: prove it. You know, we had we had, we had
Speaker 1: these meetings and hearings and and you know, we're sitting
Speaker 1: here and saying okay, and and ultimately it just feels
Speaker 1: like yet another There was the the miss you know,
Speaker 1: there was the the width at bat, so to speak,
Speaker 1: leading up to election day, and then afterwards. Maybe it
Speaker 1: was asking too much because of all the stuff that
Speaker 1: happened before, but they had to get it together. It
Speaker 1: just feels like they weren't able to pull that off.
Speaker 1: And I just want to ask you this. You know,
Speaker 1: Buck filings, court filings take a while the other side
Speaker 1: can run the clock. It was ludicrous to start this
Speaker 1: effort after election day, given us two months to do.
Speaker 1: It should have been a year. Down there, Georgia was
Speaker 1: filing lawsuits in Georgia a month ago for this special election.
Speaker 1: Before the special election. They weren't waiting till the morning
Speaker 1: in January sixth. The Democrats, John, do you think that
Speaker 1: there's a hope or what do you what do you
Speaker 1: want the Republican machinery of And I'm just gonna say it,
Speaker 1: I think we should take the term resistance back from
Speaker 1: them now, you know, we should use it and turn
Speaker 1: it around in their face and say, Okay, now we're
Speaker 1: the hashtag resistance and we'll see how much we have
Speaker 1: to do with that, depending on what the final outcome
Speaker 1: here is on the Senate side. But well, do you
Speaker 1: think that they can put more America first, more more
Speaker 1: MAGA type people in roles at the r n C,
Speaker 1: or is the old GOP? Is this like the Empire
Speaker 1: strikes back? What's going to happen? It's a great question.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'll tell you I've been very vocal about it.
Speaker 1: I'm working over time to try to help gut that
Speaker 1: place that that's a swamp of swamps. I think one
Speaker 1: of the things that needs to happen under the president,
Speaker 1: like she's a fan of yours. We know that he
Speaker 1: said so publicly. If the President does happen to see this,
Speaker 1: I'll say, mister President, rescind your endorsement of Ronna Romney McDaniel,
Speaker 1: cut the rc RNC leadership on your way out the door,
Speaker 1: and understand it's your party. We make it in your
Speaker 1: America first image. Take that party over out the door.
Speaker 1: That's the only way he needs to rescind. One of
Speaker 1: the biggest mistakes Donald Trump made was endorsing Ronna McDaniel
Speaker 1: for another term as RNC chairwoman. She is not an ally,
Speaker 1: she's done nothing. In fact, she and her ilk they
Speaker 1: despise America First. But I will tell you this, Buck,
Speaker 1: I've had a lot of meetings you and I've spoken
Speaker 1: about the solf line with very high net worth former
Speaker 1: RNC megadonors who will never give the RNC another penny.
Speaker 1: They'd rather donate directly to candidates or to entities that
Speaker 1: will be a thorn America First, entities that'll be a
Speaker 1: thorn in in the side of the RNC. John Cardillo,
Speaker 1: everybody follow him on social on Twitter if you're not already,
Speaker 1: and keep an eye off for some things he's got
Speaker 1: coming this year. John, my friend, good to have you, always,
Speaker 1: great to see about. Thanks you're in the freedom. If
Speaker 1: this is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, I didn't know
Speaker 1: it was being recorded. I just was at my home
Speaker 1: with my wife that I had an on speaker from
Speaker 1: but I didn't record anything in my house, but I
Speaker 1: was making notes. But also then on Sunday morning, he
Speaker 1: put out a Twitter. I thought we had a private conversation,
Speaker 1: just not left unsaid it was private, but I saw
Speaker 1: it was man demand, just having a conversation, and you know,
Speaker 1: and so with the President United States. But then he
Speaker 1: goes out on Twitter the next morning it says stuff
Speaker 1: that's not true. First of all him, he releases that
Speaker 1: we did have a conversation, so I didn't see what
Speaker 1: the issue was. And obviously we did have a conversation.
Speaker 1: The whole world knows. He's got eighty million Twitter followers,
Speaker 1: he does, indeed, But who then recorded the conversation Georgia's
Speaker 1: Secretary of State Rappings Burger. Who who was the person beyond?
Speaker 1: Who was the person behind this? Can't we get an
Speaker 1: answer to that? Can't? Can't you tell us? And why
Speaker 1: aren't you more disconcerted if you really want us to
Speaker 1: believe you didn't know what was being recorded, that's somebody
Speaker 1: else recorded a call you have with the President of
Speaker 1: the United States and release it. I mean, come on, folks, right,
Speaker 1: this is this is honestly as as we sit here,
Speaker 1: we're thinking about the future of Georgia. That someone like
Speaker 1: this guy could be in such a prominent role in
Speaker 1: that state government. You're seeing now, you know, it's not
Speaker 1: just it's not just about the presidency. It's not just
Speaker 1: about the Congress. There's there are state level politicians who
Speaker 1: can play a national level role. And if there are
Speaker 1: a bunch of bozo's, you got a problem. Ravensburger also
Speaker 1: claiming that if Trump hadn't said something that was not true,
Speaker 1: he would have stayed silent. Play play five. If the
Speaker 1: President hadn't tweeted and tweeted something that was false, would
Speaker 1: we have ever heard that call recording? No, it was
Speaker 1: a private conversation as far as I was concerned, and
Speaker 1: he broke privacy when he put out a tweet. But
Speaker 1: then his tweet was false. Was there any agreement that
Speaker 1: this call was not going to be recorded or would
Speaker 1: be kept confidential. No, there was no agreement, and we
Speaker 1: didn't know what the purpose of the call really was.
Speaker 1: We assumed it was about the November election, a really Wednesday.
Speaker 1: The President Trump wouldn't have tweeted out anything and would
Speaker 1: have stayed silent. We would have stayed silent as well,
Speaker 1: and that would have just been a conversation between him
Speaker 1: and I man to man, and that would have been
Speaker 1: just fine with us. But he's the one that couldn't.
Speaker 1: You had to put it out on Twitter. And so
Speaker 1: if you're going to put out stuff that we don't
Speaker 1: believe it's true, then we will respond in kind. I
Speaker 1: don't know about this one, Raefernsburger. I don't think that
Speaker 1: was a very good move. But I also would note
Speaker 1: that there's a story out there that Trump had to
Speaker 1: call eighteen times because the interns. I feel like this
Speaker 1: this was one of these stories I read. I thought
Speaker 1: there's no way that really happens, right, but apparently, I mean,
Speaker 1: I like, I don't know, I wasn't there. Trump was
Speaker 1: treated as a prank caller. This, according to Daily Mail,
Speaker 1: eighteen times by Brad Raffensberger's interns before he finally got
Speaker 1: through to demand the Georgia's Secretary of State find eleven thousand,
Speaker 1: seven hundred and eighty votes. Eighteen me forget about the
Speaker 1: votes that we already know that there was, Oh this treason?
Speaker 1: How can he do this? Eighteen times he had to call? Really,
Speaker 1: I mean, who wouldn't really recognize I know there's some
Speaker 1: good impersonators out there, probably the best impersonators, the very best.
Speaker 1: But I know there's some people who were really talented
Speaker 1: at doing the Trump voice and all that. You wouldn't
Speaker 1: know if the President had called. I mean, even for
Speaker 1: an intern, you couldn't figure that one out. Can you
Speaker 1: imagine having to call somebody you're the President of United States,
Speaker 1: You have to call back eighteen times. Chief of Staff
Speaker 1: Mark Meadows is the one who had to get on
Speaker 1: the phone to actually make it happen. The Press Office
Speaker 1: interns really didn't believe that it was Trump. So if
Speaker 1: you're wondering about the competency of this guy in his operation,
Speaker 1: I think that's a pretty good indicator of what we're
Speaker 1: dealing with here. This is somebody. The Georgia Secretary of
Speaker 1: State is a Republican. Unfortunately, the Georgian Secretary of State
Speaker 1: is such a buffoon that when the President of the
Speaker 1: United States wants to speak to him, it requires eighteen
Speaker 1: separate phone calls just to get through. This is who
Speaker 1: we're counting on to figure out what really happened in
Speaker 1: the election. Not good. Thanks for listening to the Bush Past.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts. The iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. You know, I know
Speaker 1: we all, we all got our doubts about the last election.
Speaker 1: And I want to assure you I share the concerns
Speaker 1: of millions of Americans about voting aularity And I promise
Speaker 1: you come this Wednesday, we'll have our day in Congress.
Speaker 1: We'll hear the objections, We'll hear the evidence. We're gonna
Speaker 1: hear those objections and hear the evidence. And that's a
Speaker 1: good thing people should know, and which should be all.
Speaker 1: We should air all this out and there should be
Speaker 1: no problem with this. The people who are telling you
Speaker 1: that this is some kind of a constitutional travesty have
Speaker 1: neither read nor care about the Constitution, So don't listen
Speaker 1: to them. Their opinion on this should be irrelevant to you.
Speaker 1: This is completely within established order. There's nothing about this
Speaker 1: that should be upsetting. It's not martial law, it's not
Speaker 1: destroying our democracy. It's telling people what we've found so
Speaker 1: far and raising questions that have either been unanswered or
Speaker 1: only partially answered about something that's really important. You'll notice
Speaker 1: that this is all very plausible. You know, we're not
Speaker 1: talking about and when I say this is plausible, not
Speaker 1: everything that's being said about the election is, but what
Speaker 1: you're going to hear from people like Ted Cruz, which
Speaker 1: you're going to hear from other senators who are going
Speaker 1: to stand alongside him and raise their objections. They'll bring
Speaker 1: up the very real election fraud concerns and questions, and
Speaker 1: hopefully we'll stay away from the release the crack in
Speaker 1: international conspiracy of CIA Ninja's craziness that's been out there, because,
Speaker 1: as I've been telling you, that's been really useful for
Speaker 1: undermining the very real election fraud questions. Right. The crazy
Speaker 1: town stuff makes it harder for the rest of us
Speaker 1: to push and communicate to the public, to push for
Speaker 1: answers and communicate to the public about what really happened
Speaker 1: that is concerning. I still have not heard a single person,
Speaker 1: for example, just in the state of Georgia, I haven't
Speaker 1: heard a single person come up with a plausible explanation
Speaker 1: for how it is a hundred times it was a
Speaker 1: hundred times less likely for a mail in ballot to
Speaker 1: be the disqualified because of legal reasons disqualified this time
Speaker 1: compared to the last time. Yeah, a hundred times less.
Speaker 1: That seems like a noteworthy thing, isn't it. You have
Speaker 1: far more people doing the mail in process, but far
Speaker 1: fewer rejections of those votes. That's I just want to
Speaker 1: know how that happened, you know, I want to know
Speaker 1: how my friend Sean Parnell says that there were more
Speaker 1: votes cast than eligible voters in the state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: Is that or is that not what occurred? Sean is
Speaker 1: a straight up squared away guy, and he's an honorable guy,
Speaker 1: and I trust him and he's my friend and you
Speaker 1: all know that. And he's telling me that something doesn't
Speaker 1: smell right. I believe Sean, and he says something doesn't
Speaker 1: smell right, but he can't get answers. Every time he
Speaker 1: tries to get a court they go sorry, elections over,
Speaker 1: shut up, go away. Those are real questions, those are
Speaker 1: real problems. But you notice the Democrats, they just are
Speaker 1: going to use the power they have in the media
Speaker 1: to try to silence and try to try to just
Speaker 1: move on down the road with all of this. And
Speaker 1: they're also making these outlandish claims about how illegal the
Speaker 1: president's phone called Rappensburger was. I mean, here's here's here's
Speaker 1: Bernie thun We haven't heard from Bernie Thunders in a while.
Speaker 1: It's been a bit of time. Before you know, he's
Speaker 1: out there doing the usual thing. Here he is play nine.
Speaker 1: It is unprecedented. It is the most consequential attack on
Speaker 1: American democracy in the history of our country. And I
Speaker 1: think your previous panelist was right. This is what mafia does.
Speaker 1: And what Trump was essentially saying to Rappensburg, the secretary
Speaker 1: of a state in Georgia, is hey, get me twelve
Speaker 1: thousand votes so I can win. And if not, by
Speaker 1: the way, you know, there may be criminal action against
Speaker 1: you and your attorney. This is beyond outrageous. This is
Speaker 1: not only impeachable, it is certainly a criminal offense. When
Speaker 1: you run for office, you can't threaten public officials about
Speaker 1: manipulating the vote for you to win. That is not
Speaker 1: what democracy is about. There's no threat burn come on,
Speaker 1: man and the Bernie the Bernie Fendes legal school. It's
Speaker 1: a criminal offense. What's the crime? Exactly? Everything that Trump
Speaker 1: is saying is premised upon his belief that there was
Speaker 1: fraud and his belief that there are people who are
Speaker 1: standing in the way of finding out about that fraud.
Speaker 1: And if he's right, and he's right, so what exactly
Speaker 1: is Bernie's contention with all this, What exactly is he's
Speaker 1: trying to say, it's, well, it's just trash Trump. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's that's clear. I do believe it. They recognize that
Speaker 1: they will have their hands full with Trump, even post
Speaker 1: term one. I think we have prefurt a Trump term
Speaker 1: one now pretty openly. And maybe you say that's too early,
Speaker 1: but what I mean is that there may still be
Speaker 1: a Trump term two. Yes, could still happen, probably Donald,
Speaker 1: but maybe another Trump. You never know. That's also a possibility. Personally,
Speaker 1: I think Eric Trump is a super nice guy and
Speaker 1: if he had political aspirations it would be very very interesting.
Speaker 1: He doesn't get talked about as much as some of
Speaker 1: the other Trump kids. But Eric Trump everyone, I'll tell
Speaker 1: you that, and I'm not I'm not disparaging any of
Speaker 1: the other Trump's. What I'm saying everybody who knows Eric
Speaker 1: Trump always has the same reaction. Just a good guy.
Speaker 1: And I think that's the base. You know, that's my baseline.
Speaker 1: I want to know that of its someone a good
Speaker 1: guy or gal? Are they a good person? Start with
Speaker 1: that and they a good person. I always hear that
Speaker 1: about er I know him a little bit. I don't
Speaker 1: know him well. I actually knew him when he was
Speaker 1: a little kid, but he was so young he probably
Speaker 1: barely even remembers me. But he's he's always been thought
Speaker 1: of as a good dude. Kylee mckinnety, White House Press Secretary.
Speaker 1: She gave a full throated defense of what the president's
Speaker 1: phone call was all about. Let's get into some of the
Speaker 1: the at play six and let me be clear the
Speaker 1: claims the President was making he walked through on that
Speaker 1: phone call. If you read the transcript of various tranches
Speaker 1: of ballots, that he has used publically identified data from
Speaker 1: the US Postal Service, from the Georgia's Secretary of States
Speaker 1: office to call these ballots into question. This is publicly
Speaker 1: available information. Based on this public data, it raised questions
Speaker 1: on about twenty four thousand ballots by a conservative estimate.
Speaker 1: And now you have the Georgia Secretary of States saying
Speaker 1: we have our own secret numbers, but we won't show
Speaker 1: them to you even if you sign a confidentiality agreement.
Speaker 1: That should tell you all you need to know. From
Speaker 1: the same person who's leaking audio his conversation with the
Speaker 1: President of the United States and his attorneys he should
Speaker 1: not be trusted. We should shine daylight on these numbers.
Speaker 1: That's all the President was asking for throughout the entirety
Speaker 1: of the conversation. And it's interesting you won't reveal his numbers.
Speaker 1: The same guy who secretly recorded the President of the
Speaker 1: United States and released it to the public won't release
Speaker 1: his numbers. And beyond that, I think we have to
Speaker 1: ask does this guy even want And I put aside
Speaker 1: whether that means he would do anything on this, but
Speaker 1: just do you think that Ravensburger wants Trump to win?
Speaker 1: I think the answer is very clearly, and I mean
Speaker 1: before this whole phone call thing. No, Now, there are
Speaker 1: a lot of establishment GOP types who want Trump gone.
Speaker 1: They want the Trump approach to be forgotten. They want
Speaker 1: the whole Trump world. They want MAGA to fade into irrelevance.
Speaker 1: They wanted to be this kind of outburst that lasted
Speaker 1: four years. That what was that again? What was this
Speaker 1: MAGA thing that they used to talk about. That is
Speaker 1: the hope of many people in the GOP and the
Speaker 1: GOP establishment, including people who had done nothing really before that,
Speaker 1: but lose to Democrats, The GOP losers, the people that
Speaker 1: just gets gets you know, smacked around by the Obama
Speaker 1: administration and by all the people around Obama, all the
Speaker 1: victories that they had. They want to come around now
Speaker 1: and tell everybody how we win when we all remember
Speaker 1: what exactly was the what was a record of establishment
Speaker 1: gp beform is going to say this, Remember, George Bush
Speaker 1: led to eight years of Obama. George Bush made some
Speaker 1: good decisions, And again I would say, I think he
Speaker 1: was a good and well intentioned man, but I think
Speaker 1: he was over his head sometimes. I think that's fair.
Speaker 1: I think that he wasn't the leader we needed always
Speaker 1: in the moment at a point of particular danger for
Speaker 1: the country, and a lot of what happened, especially toward
Speaker 1: the end, with the fallout of the economy and everything else,
Speaker 1: would just led directly to a new emboldened left wing
Speaker 1: Democrat party that Obama took control of for eight years.
Speaker 1: To the establishment GPS record for the last twenty years
Speaker 1: is a problem. And I know they'd say, oh, but
Speaker 1: look at what we did in the state houses, in
Speaker 1: the state races and everything. Okay, who's been winning at
Speaker 1: the national level on major issues that endure beyond any
Speaker 1: one politician or administration. Who's been winning not just at
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, but also on federal legislation and issues
Speaker 1: like Obama Care. All right, we go through the list.
Speaker 1: What's the huge conservative victory? And I'm just gonna say it,
Speaker 1: even with Trump, what is the big legislative victory from
Speaker 1: the four years of Trump's time in office? You'll notice
Speaker 1: a bit of silence because tax cuts are good, but
Speaker 1: tax cuts are always temporary. What was the big legislative victory?
Speaker 1: Regulation cuts are good, regulation cuts her temporary. This is
Speaker 1: the system we have. We have to understand how it
Speaker 1: actually functions, so Keyley saying, But back to that Keyley
Speaker 1: saying that there was there's nothing untoward, not surprising at all.
Speaker 1: Mean she is. I mean she may be the most
Speaker 1: ferocious defender of the president. I mean maybe you know
Speaker 1: Donald Trump Junior, but you know that's his that's his dad.
Speaker 1: I don't know if we could find a more ferocious
Speaker 1: defender of President Trump than Kelly mckinnetty. She she's like
Speaker 1: the walks into the bar and says, I'll take any
Speaker 1: man in the house, you know, rolls up her sleeves,
Speaker 1: ready to fight. Here. She is on the numbers. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: not not the numbers on the objection that should that
Speaker 1: will be raised tomorrow by some senators if there's a
Speaker 1: constitutional mechanism in place, the Twelfth Amendment and a statute
Speaker 1: pursu into that in the mid eighteen hundreds that says
Speaker 1: this is where you can object in Congress. This is
Speaker 1: constitutionally statutorially prescribed. Democrats have raised objections before, and Republicans
Speaker 1: crow a backbone and fight, just like Senator Holly, just
Speaker 1: like Senator Cruz, because if we don't fight for integrity now,
Speaker 1: it's not just tomorrow's race that can be affected, but
Speaker 1: every Senate race thereafter and presidential race thereafter. So fighting
Speaker 1: for the truth is something we'll never apologize for. Why
Speaker 1: we fight, It's about what's right. And she understands that
Speaker 1: the president understands that millions and tens of millions of
Speaker 1: his supporters understand that this is the process. They can
Speaker 1: keep saying this is a threat to demand OCOU, they
Speaker 1: can keep saying this is a you know, destructive and
Speaker 1: evil and horrible. Oh, it's the process that we have
Speaker 1: and we are abiding by it. We're not lying, we're
Speaker 1: not fabricating evidence so that the FBI can turn on people.
Speaker 1: We're not coming up with nonsense here and using the
Speaker 1: DOJ as a weapon for political purposes. That's what democrats do.
Speaker 1: We are abiding by the process, by the letter and
Speaker 1: spirit of the law, and raising questions and objections to
Speaker 1: what happened here. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast mentioned Josh Holly before,
Speaker 1: and I wanted to bring this to your attention. He's
Speaker 1: he's an a rising star in the GOP. There's no
Speaker 1: question about that. The guy is, you know, he's articulate,
Speaker 1: it's pretty young, telegenic, smart, really understands how to connect.
Speaker 1: Seems like he's got some real political skills. It's early
Speaker 1: in his career, but I think he's got some very
Speaker 1: big I think he's got a big future. I think
Speaker 1: that he's somebody that we'll be thinking about a lot
Speaker 1: more in the future. And he's a US already, a
Speaker 1: US senator. But here he is telling everybody, and you
Speaker 1: need to hear this because the mainstream media is not
Speaker 1: going to cover this, and you should know about it. Tonight,
Speaker 1: this is from his Twitter account. Tonight. This is last
Speaker 1: night in Missouri. While I'm sorry, tonight, while I was
Speaker 1: in Missouri, Antifa scumbags came to our place in DC
Speaker 1: and threatened my wife and newborn daughter, who can't travel.
Speaker 1: They scream threats, vandalized, and tried to pound open our door.
Speaker 1: Let me be clear, my family and I will not
Speaker 1: be intimidated by left wing violence. What kind of lunatics
Speaker 1: would do this? Right? What kind of maniacs would be
Speaker 1: pounding on the door and screaming threats and insanity at
Speaker 1: a woman and a newborn infant baby because they disagree
Speaker 1: with the politics of somebody that they're they're married to.
Speaker 1: Harassing his wife and child is absolutely disgusting. Will the
Speaker 1: left call this out at all? Will the left any
Speaker 1: about this? No? In fact, and this is what's this
Speaker 1: is what's truly just disgusting. In fact, what you'll what
Speaker 1: you'll find is that Josh Holly has had to blast
Speaker 1: The Washington Post because he says they printed quote outright
Speaker 1: lies and falsely painted Antifa violence outside his home as
Speaker 1: a peaceful vigil. I mean, unbelievable. The Washington Post reported,
Speaker 1: quote activists staged a peaceful vigil on this sidewalk in
Speaker 1: a northern Virginia sawberb The Washington Post. The liberal paper
Speaker 1: then said Holly had a different description for the scene
Speaker 1: outside his family's home. The Post story was headlined with
Speaker 1: Senator Josh Holly says Antifa scumbags terrorized his family's Virginia home.
Speaker 1: Protesters said they had a peaceful vigil dismissed, of course,
Speaker 1: the any wrongdoing on the part of this group. There
Speaker 1: is a fifty minute video shared by the group that
Speaker 1: shows protesters writing in chalk on the sidewalk, channing through
Speaker 1: a megaphone, and at one point leaving a copy of
Speaker 1: the Constitution on Holly's doorstep, and Holly responded to this,
Speaker 1: that's the Washingt Post description. This morning, Washington Post printed
Speaker 1: outright lies from the Antifa group, who now described themselves
Speaker 1: as sweet angels bs. You screamed through bullhorns, shouted down
Speaker 1: my wife when she asked you to leave, vandalized property,
Speaker 1: pounded on our door, and terrorized neighbors. So the Post
Speaker 1: will will lie to defend Antifa. That's where we're up
Speaker 1: against here, though. Those are the kinds of things you
Speaker 1: should expect. It's been happening already, but you should expect
Speaker 1: a lot more of it over the next four years.
Speaker 1: They don't even have an impulse to be decent when
Speaker 1: it comes to an entirely you know, a woman who's
Speaker 1: got nothing to do with any of that. She's not
Speaker 1: a politician, she's not she's just at home with her
Speaker 1: infant baby or an infant is a baby, but she's
Speaker 1: at home with her infant. And can you imagine. I mean,
Speaker 1: if my girlfriend and perhaps you know, if if my
Speaker 1: wife down the line were to be threatened in that
Speaker 1: way by people who disagree with me, I would be
Speaker 1: honestly overcome with rage. And it's a good thing that well,
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say I would understand any any male,
Speaker 1: any red blooded American in that situation feeling like they
Speaker 1: would have to really let these Antifa scumbags know what
Speaker 1: they think of them up close and personal in their faces.
Speaker 1: And then some I'll just leave it at that, but
Speaker 1: the post will to say, oh, now it's a peaceful visual.
Speaker 1: First of all, showing up it at elected officials homes
Speaker 1: at night or at any time for that matter, to
Speaker 1: a scream and yell and shout at them is disgusting.
Speaker 1: Forget forget about whether they think, oh, we repeat, that's
Speaker 1: all crap. Anyway, it's disgusting. It's something that losers do.
Speaker 1: It should not be done. It shouldn't be a part
Speaker 1: of this country. It shouldn't be a part of our
Speaker 1: democracy or a republic or whatever. But the left likes
Speaker 1: it because you know what, Ultimately they like intimidation. Whatever
Speaker 1: they need to feel good about themselves is okay. That's
Speaker 1: how the left approaches everything. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: bus ss and Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: CNN is boring, CNN is dishonest, but occasionally occasionally you're like, oh,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, Actually, I'm glad I'm watching this.
Speaker 1: I never actually watch it live, but I look at
Speaker 1: this a worthwhile CNN moment. This one is fun because
Speaker 1: they created a circular firing squad of three of the dumbest,
Speaker 1: fakest Republicans imaginable. Some are just more fake than dumb.
Speaker 1: I mean, like the Mooch is not a dumb guy,
Speaker 1: but he's he's just a phony. And then there's Anna Navarro,
Speaker 1: who is both a phony and very dumb. And then
Speaker 1: there's Ted Cruz's former spokesperson or something who, yeah, her
Speaker 1: job is to like on CNN and just be like,
Speaker 1: I hate Donald Trump because he's terrible. Uh yeah, that
Speaker 1: must be really fun. That's really that's really helping the
Speaker 1: conservative movement, that's really doing great things. I just want
Speaker 1: to play this for you. This is this is a
Speaker 1: lot of fun. This is on Don Lemon Show, speaking
Speaker 1: of not particularly savvy uh and this is how this right.
Speaker 1: I just want you to enjoy this. Now the best
Speaker 1: thing I've seen or heard of from CNN in quite
Speaker 1: some time. Play a producer, Mark but the trigger if
Speaker 1: they you know, you know, damn well, Anthony, you're too
Speaker 1: smart for that. Okay, Well he worked for Trump, so
Speaker 1: I don't know. I didn't Anthony, Take Cruise, you work
Speaker 1: for Take Cruise, a full on trader. I mean, what
Speaker 1: are you talking about? You don't have any standing to
Speaker 1: say that. Excuse me. Excuse me, Anthony and praising Donald
Speaker 1: Trump to the hilt. When I worked for Ted Cruise.
Speaker 1: You want to go there he took you didn't work
Speaker 1: for him? Excuse me? What was that? You really work
Speaker 1: history when you were Donald Trump's communications person, willingly don't
Speaker 1: don't be don't be a hypocrite on now National TV.
Speaker 1: I've owned the mistake of Donald Trump not to be
Speaker 1: a hypocrite on national TV. But Anthony, you were Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's mouthpiece, and everybody knew what kind of person he
Speaker 1: was then as he shown himself to be. Now, so
Speaker 1: seventy four million people voted for him, Amanda, all right,
Speaker 1: I gotta go, guys, this is the country you're living in.
Speaker 1: Seventy four million people voted for him. Understanding those voters
Speaker 1: chase their will. Okay, thank you all, goodbye. It's like great,
Speaker 1: oh man, I love watching watching fake Republicans fight is
Speaker 1: really entertaining. Thank you see an end for that one.
Speaker 1: It's like I was like, I was like working just
Speaker 1: for tech Grid. How dare you? Mooch is like, come on,
Speaker 1: come on, don't be apocrid old TV. Come on you
Speaker 1: see hey, oh man, could you imagine going from being
Speaker 1: the the biggest Trump booster to being an all out
Speaker 1: anti Trump critic solely because of your own professional prospects,
Speaker 1: because you had the really good wisdom and judgment that
Speaker 1: the mooch had to call up a lib reporter and
Speaker 1: go on an obscene, profanity lace tirade about just all
Speaker 1: kinds of craziness. Didn't even ask for it to be
Speaker 1: off the record, not that that would have even really
Speaker 1: made it better, and that's what happened. That's what happened.
Speaker 1: But now he's missed, mister principal, I've I've owned it. No,
Speaker 1: you're not owning a mistake. When saying that benefits you
Speaker 1: in everywhere, that's not owning a mistake, right, that's just
Speaker 1: saying what you got to in the moment in order
Speaker 1: to get ahead based on your own reality. Hi, Hi,
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, it's just it's amazing the stuff
Speaker 1: that you see on some of these cable news shows.
Speaker 1: The craziness. Now, oh oh oh, speaking of crazy and
Speaker 1: bad cable news, Mika Brzinsky, there's this there's this group
Speaker 1: of people that are media executives at places like NBC,
Speaker 1: for example, NBC, ABC, CBS, and they're they're really obsessed
Speaker 1: with a kind of establishment elitism, such that if you
Speaker 1: have the right last name, they think that people should
Speaker 1: listen to you. They think that your opinions are worthwhile,
Speaker 1: and that what you're saying is is important, no matter
Speaker 1: what the actual actual analysis of such statements would lead
Speaker 1: a normal person to believe. Mika Prischinsky, I have never
Speaker 1: met a person I don't really mean this in media.
Speaker 1: And I've been in media now for ten years almost,
Speaker 1: I guess it'll be I started in Yeah, It'll be
Speaker 1: ten years in June that I've been in the media business.
Speaker 1: And I've never met a person who thought that Mika
Speaker 1: Prisinsky was interesting or good at her job. And yet
Speaker 1: she has a show and she's paid seven figures to
Speaker 1: do it, I don't know, you know, two million, four millions,
Speaker 1: something like that. And he does it with Joe Scarborough,
Speaker 1: who's another guy who's just a delusional wind bag. And
Speaker 1: they think that their job is to say that other
Speaker 1: people are delusional. Here, here is Mica play one. The
Speaker 1: president's working outside the norms. And I'm telling you, the
Speaker 1: guy thinks Mike Pence is going to have like a
Speaker 1: special secret envelope with his name in it. He's delusional.
Speaker 1: It's all gonna be okay, Mika. It's all gonna be
Speaker 1: there's not gonna be martial law, there's not gonna be
Speaker 1: a crack in. It's all gonna be okay. This is
Speaker 1: all within the process. It is all within the Constitution
Speaker 1: and the rule of law. Nothing has been done that
Speaker 1: breaks or violates any of that. On the Republican side,
Speaker 1: of course, the big question remains on the Democrat side.
Speaker 1: What has been done at this state, what has been
Speaker 1: done in the election, and what may have occurred as well.
Speaker 1: We'll see what are really the chance is that there
Speaker 1: won't be outstanding questions no matter what the end result
Speaker 1: is in Georgia for these Senate races. Put aside the
Speaker 1: president for a second. What do you think the chances
Speaker 1: are there aren't going to be some pretty intense battles
Speaker 1: over that. I've got to say, I'm of the belief
Speaker 1: that Georgia is going to be a place where we
Speaker 1: have to look even more into this because they've they've expanded, Yes,
Speaker 1: Republican Secretary of State Ravensburger has allowed for the expansion
Speaker 1: of some of these different mechanisms of voting that are
Speaker 1: more open to more likely to be nodes of fraud.
Speaker 1: Drop boxes, for example, put in more drop boxes. Gotta
Speaker 1: have more drop boxes everywhere? Why? Why are you doing that?
Speaker 1: Drop Boxes are not a secure way to run an
Speaker 1: election at all, especially the way Georgia set it up
Speaker 1: very rapidly in just the recent months. He's expanded all
Speaker 1: of that. That doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
Speaker 1: Does it. Why haven't we been able to get the
Speaker 1: full transparency that we need already on this It's not
Speaker 1: going to all of a sudden change. It's not gonna
Speaker 1: feel all warm and fuzzy when we ask questions about
Speaker 1: this Georgia Senate election, knowing that we weren't even able
Speaker 1: to get the full scope of questions answered about the
Speaker 1: Donald Trump presidential election. But they're just sticking to the
Speaker 1: script here speaking about MSNBC before. Here's this guy, Mike Barnacle,
Speaker 1: and I did what is he a post writer or something?
Speaker 1: Must be something like that. Mike Barnacle, Well, let's put
Speaker 1: a krusty, old angry fellow on TV right Trump here
Speaker 1: he is on the on the damage done to the country,
Speaker 1: play too City. In the United States, senators led by
Speaker 1: Josh Holly and Ted Cruz are in the middle of
Speaker 1: an engagement of an active sedition and Gene Robinson. I
Speaker 1: understand that Georgia is important. I understand inland if the
Speaker 1: Democrats ever won both seats, that the landscape in Washington
Speaker 1: and the country would literally change overnight. But I'm sitting
Speaker 1: here for the past few days thinking about the incalculable
Speaker 1: damage that one man Donald Trump has done to this
Speaker 1: country and to our political system. And I'm wondering if
Speaker 1: you like me. Have fought back to Adam shift summation
Speaker 1: during the impeachment proceedings when he talked about why Donald
Speaker 1: Trump had to be impeached, and he raised the question
Speaker 1: of the Republicans wondering, you know, how much damage could
Speaker 1: he do? And Shift ended his summation by saying a lot.
Speaker 1: And in my mind, marketing back to those words, then
Speaker 1: to today and what is playing out right in front
Speaker 1: of the world, I don't think a lot really handles
Speaker 1: the scope of the damage that Donald Trump has done.
Speaker 1: What is the damage? Somebody, somebody want to try to
Speaker 1: answer that one? For me? What is the damage? And
Speaker 1: let's just let's just take them at their word for
Speaker 1: a second and assume that they actually believe the nonsense
Speaker 1: that they're spewing. Here, what's the big problem, somebody, What
Speaker 1: do he do by saying that he thinks that there
Speaker 1: was cheating Democrat. Let's let's never allow them to forget
Speaker 1: Democrats came up with a crazy conspiracy theory and manufactured
Speaker 1: evidence at the highest level of the federal bureaucracy, including
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, the FBI using the Fies Accords.
Speaker 1: They manufactured evidence to create a fake, a fake conspiracy
Speaker 1: between Trump and Russia to steal the election. And they
Speaker 1: this was the primary method of their opposition to Trump
Speaker 1: for the first three years of his presidency. In the
Speaker 1: fourth year, I think it transitioned a bit to you know,
Speaker 1: COVID and the impeachment before that, and remember that too,
Speaker 1: they pushed for that, just sham that laughable, absurd, disgusting
Speaker 1: impeachment of the president on what was in fact, especially
Speaker 1: now that we know additional information about what was really
Speaker 1: going on with Undrew Biden. One hundred percent fine phone call.
Speaker 1: They impeach the president over that. You want to talk
Speaker 1: about doing damage to our democracy. They got a special
Speaker 1: counsel based on a lie. Russia clusion was a lie.
Speaker 1: These people were lying about it. The media apparatus of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party was engaged in a wholesale fraud for
Speaker 1: three years against Trump. And now we're supposed to be
Speaker 1: so worried because of the sanctity of our democracies under
Speaker 1: assault because Trump thinks that Democrats cheap. Democrats always cheated
Speaker 1: in elections, just a question of how much. As always,
Speaker 1: this is their thing. That's why I notice they never
Speaker 1: accused Republicans of cheating in elections by ballot stuffing or
Speaker 1: by having fake voters or whatever. That's that's Democrats thing.
Speaker 1: So that's why they had to come up with Russia collusion. Oh,
Speaker 1: a foreign power working with Trump to steal the election.
Speaker 1: This is simply absurd. But but you notice that the
Speaker 1: speech that you heard there on air before that, that
Speaker 1: moronic monologue from Barnacle over at the over at MSNBC
Speaker 1: about the damage Trump, what is the damage exactly? And
Speaker 1: the moment they start to blabber about sanctity of our
Speaker 1: democracy and a process of institutions and say, what was
Speaker 1: Russia collusion exactly? I mean, how do you guys think
Speaker 1: you're in any position whatsoever a lecture anyone on democratic
Speaker 1: norms or any of this stuff. Given the just the
Speaker 1: the absurdity and the insanity of Russia collusion. I just
Speaker 1: want to know what exactly is there? What exactly is
Speaker 1: the point that one would have one would be able
Speaker 1: to make about this. I'm oh, but uh, when you're
Speaker 1: looking for really stupid political analysis, can you do any
Speaker 1: better than Joy Bayha thirteen? I thought get the straight
Speaker 1: tracket get the strait jacket. He's he's gone. This guy's gone.
Speaker 1: He's on his knees begging with his Raspenburger whatever his
Speaker 1: name is, Higer, what is it Raspenburger. It's a hard one,
Speaker 1: rapp And I give him, I give him credit, I
Speaker 1: give I give props to Raspenburger. He's he's did a
Speaker 1: good dress. He will not bend over, he will not
Speaker 1: bend over for this guy. But you know what, I'm
Speaker 1: wondering if we have the twenty fifth Amendment, because you
Speaker 1: know this, if you don't use it with them, when
Speaker 1: are they going to use it when one flew over
Speaker 1: the cuckoo's nest? I mean, when are they going to
Speaker 1: use it? If they didn't impeach him before, and I
Speaker 1: guess they could still impeach him. And I understand that
Speaker 1: if they impeach him again, he can't run for president again.
Speaker 1: That would be a mitzvah, an unfunny, semi literate comedian,
Speaker 1: My friends, is who we are supposed to be taking
Speaker 1: political analysis from. According to the Left, if you watch
Speaker 1: that show, the view, I mean, really, the View is
Speaker 1: an abomination of political ignorance. But you know, people watch it.
Speaker 1: People watch it and they listen to these individuals, which
Speaker 1: is in and of itself appalling, but they do the
Speaker 1: twenty fifth Amendment. They're going to remove the president. At
Speaker 1: this we're a few weeks away from what it's going
Speaker 1: to be, the Joe Biden inauguration. I know it hurts
Speaker 1: me to say it, but that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: We're a few weeks away from it. So what's what's Yeah, Oh,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have the objection, which is good, We're gonna
Speaker 1: hear it and everything else. But they don't have the votes.
Speaker 1: They don't have the votes to stop the certification. So
Speaker 1: they will certify, and we will be dealing with this
Speaker 1: new reality, which will include imbeciles at MSNBC and ABC
Speaker 1: in these other places just pretending that the last four
Speaker 1: years didn't even happen. As you know it, they're going
Speaker 1: to engage in a wholesale, large scale rewriting of history
Speaker 1: to favor Democrats. Speaking of democrats, Kamala Harris got a
Speaker 1: little authenticity, a little a little honesty problem here. Let's
Speaker 1: get into that. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Kamala Harris, somebody who
Speaker 1: advanced herself politically through an elicits personal romantic relationship with
Speaker 1: a married man you know, much much much older than her,
Speaker 1: but you know it worked. Media doesn't talk about it,
Speaker 1: but it's true. We all know about this. He was
Speaker 1: Willie Brown was the guy and Kamala Harris was his
Speaker 1: What do what do the mistress? A girlfriend? I mean
Speaker 1: he was married. But anyway, Kamala Harris not a particularly
Speaker 1: impressive politician, but managed to play the system the right
Speaker 1: way become a senator in California. You know, she checks
Speaker 1: off some of the right boxes, and now she's gonna
Speaker 1: be vice president. She's not very interesting when she talks
Speaker 1: about stuff, so she's gonna have a hard time unless
Speaker 1: she does a bit of creative writing of her history.
Speaker 1: And that's what I think we see here. In an
Speaker 1: Ell magazine interview, Harris talked about her parents' involvement in
Speaker 1: the nineteen sixty civil rights movement. Here's the quote. Senator
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris started her life's work young. She laughs from
Speaker 1: her gut the way you would with family, as she
Speaker 1: remembers being wheeled through in Oakland, California Civil Rights March
Speaker 1: and a stroller with no straps with her parents and
Speaker 1: her uncle. At some point she fell from the stroller,
Speaker 1: and the adults, caught up in the rapture of protests,
Speaker 1: just kept on marching. By the time they noticed little
Speaker 1: Kamala was gone and doubled back, she was understandably upset.
Speaker 1: My mother tells the story about how I'm fussing, Harris
Speaker 1: told the magazine, and she's like, baby, what do you want?
Speaker 1: What do you need? And I just looked at her
Speaker 1: and I said, freedom. Now, that's fw That's how it's written. Freedom.
Speaker 1: It's supposed to be a cute, heartwarming story about how
Speaker 1: Kamala has always been dedicated is but someone's pointed out that.
Speaker 1: In nineteen sixty five, Martin Luther King Junior did an
Speaker 1: interview in Playboy magazine where he said the following quote.
Speaker 1: I will never forget a moment in Birmingham when a
Speaker 1: white policeman accosted a little girl seven or eight years
Speaker 1: old who was walking in a demonstration with her mother.
Speaker 1: What do you want, the policeman asked, gruffly, and the
Speaker 1: little girl looked at him straight in the eye and answered,
Speaker 1: feed him feed o m. She couldn't even pronounce it,
Speaker 1: but she knew it was beautiful. Many times when I've
Speaker 1: been in sorely trying situations, the memory of that little
Speaker 1: one has come into my mind and has buoyed me.
Speaker 1: We think that's a coincidence. Or did Kamala take this
Speaker 1: story and redo it a little bit to apply to herself?
Speaker 1: You all, I mean, you all know the answer. But
Speaker 1: do you think the media cares. They're engaged in the
Speaker 1: creative writing to make Kamala seemed like some great historic
Speaker 1: figure themselves. They are the scribes of the rewriting of
Speaker 1: Kamala's pass. They are the people that are directly involved
Speaker 1: and engaged in that kind of history, you know, historical revision.
Speaker 1: So get ready for a lot more of that. Because
Speaker 1: the thing about kamalas she was rejected by the Democrat electorate,
Speaker 1: you couldn't really get much at all going for in
Speaker 1: the presidential election. The Democrat based didn't really like her
Speaker 1: all that much. That's obvious from the votes. But now
Speaker 1: the system of the left requires that there is love
Speaker 1: for Kamala, so they will have to lie to get there.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Show past. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcast Liberty, Truth and great Hair. Feel
Speaker 1: those funky beats. It's time for roll Call. Roll call, everybody,
Speaker 1: get the call of the role going Facebook, dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck sexon please check in on bucksexon dot com.
Speaker 1: You can always listen to the podcast there if you
Speaker 1: want on demand, so easy if you're not a big
Speaker 1: podcast platform person, He's just gonna bucksex and dot com.
Speaker 1: You can also listen to the iHeartRadio app. Please tell
Speaker 1: somebody it's a new year, new podcast, new radio shows.
Speaker 1: For folks out there, and anyone you know who likes politics,
Speaker 1: you tell them about the Buck Sexton Show because it
Speaker 1: is awesome. It is fantastic, if I if I may
Speaker 1: say so, and so with that we will get into
Speaker 1: all the ladies and grades. But first I do have
Speaker 1: something for producer Mark. I think producer Mark, this is
Speaker 1: very important. Are you there, my friend? Of course? Where
Speaker 1: else would I be just making sure? So I was
Speaker 1: yesterday after a very very long day of like NonStop
Speaker 1: radio and TV and content creation because I'm a I'm
Speaker 1: like a machine that just does this all day long,
Speaker 1: and I was all I wanted to do was go
Speaker 1: into that watching something that's brain off mode, and for me,
Speaker 1: a great way to do that, A great way to
Speaker 1: go brain off mode is The Office on Netflix. Oh
Speaker 1: you finally realize it's not there, didn't you. I was
Speaker 1: about to throw my controller at the wall. I was
Speaker 1: looking at us like, what do you what do you mean?
Speaker 1: I can't watch the all? What do you mean? I was?
Speaker 1: I was like, I was indignant about this, Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: because if you want to spend like twenty five minutes
Speaker 1: just amused, entertained and not having to think and just
Speaker 1: sort of just brain off mode, you know, because I've
Speaker 1: already I've seen every episode of the Office. I don't
Speaker 1: even know how many times. It's boring, but I just
Speaker 1: kind of it's almost like a background show. But I'm
Speaker 1: not doing anything else while it's on, you know, And
Speaker 1: and it's gone, Prucer Mark, What have they done? How
Speaker 1: did they take this from me? Well, NBC still have
Speaker 1: the rights to it and the contract with Netflix and
Speaker 1: did December thirty first. So now it is on Peacock.
Speaker 1: The heck is Peacock. It's NBC's to streaming service. But
Speaker 1: this one's free. It's just add supported unless you pay
Speaker 1: for the non ad supported version. Ah so now I
Speaker 1: gotta watch commercials to watch the Office, and I gotta
Speaker 1: support NBC in the process too. It doesn't really bother
Speaker 1: me the com because I have Hulu with ads, it
Speaker 1: doesn't bother me. Does Hulu have any great original, new
Speaker 1: recent programming that I should be aware of? I feel
Speaker 1: like Netflix comes out with all this new stuff all
Speaker 1: the time, but I don't really see much of the
Speaker 1: Hulu stuff. They definitely have it, I'm just not as
Speaker 1: familiar with it. I usually want to use Hulu for
Speaker 1: like TV shows that are currently on. Yeah, so here's
Speaker 1: my I had The Office and Friends were my brain
Speaker 1: off in the background shows, and now they're both gone.
Speaker 1: What what where can I watch seinfeldt Seinfeld's on Hulu? Ah? Okay?
Speaker 1: That is? They also have a bunch of other good sitcoms,
Speaker 1: like what like They've got Superstore. I don't know if
Speaker 1: that's the Superstore. You probably like it's like The Office
Speaker 1: but in a Walmart. Oh yeah, I will check that out.
Speaker 1: And Brooklyn nine nine is the other one I would
Speaker 1: recommend you. Is that with Andy Samberg? Yes, that one
Speaker 1: is one of the funniest shows I've ever seen. Honestly,
Speaker 1: I will check out so I'll check out superstore and
Speaker 1: and I may watch the snow Princess likes. Or told
Speaker 1: me that the show about the Creek that we can't
Speaker 1: say on radio Yes is good too, So well, I
Speaker 1: mean it won like every Emmy last year, so it's
Speaker 1: gotta be good. So I gotta check that one out,
Speaker 1: all right, roll call, which I know it's time to
Speaker 1: hear from the folks from my beloved team. Oh no, forget.
Speaker 1: You can become a Facebook supporter if you want a
Speaker 1: little extra Team Buck access. We're gonna have videos going
Speaker 1: up there that won't be anywhere else, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: be doing some Facebook meet up kind of stuff and
Speaker 1: it's gonna be fun. So you can be a Facebook supporters.
Speaker 1: Go to Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton. Alrighty, with that,
Speaker 1: we go to our roll call. We get senday Hey
Speaker 1: Buck and producer Mark. I'm baffled as to what the
Speaker 1: endgame is for Blue state governors shutting down small business.
Speaker 1: It can't just be so these people will be dependent
Speaker 1: on government for survival. Less people working equals less tax dollars.
Speaker 1: The government can afford to take care of all the
Speaker 1: people it's putting out of work. I'm just not understanding
Speaker 1: the logic. All right, Sandy, very interesting, worthwhile question. Let
Speaker 1: me try to address this one. There are a couple
Speaker 1: of different ways we go with this. First of all,
Speaker 1: never assume the Democrats have a plan that is is
Speaker 1: sane and reasonable. Always leave open the possibility that they're
Speaker 1: a little crazy. I always leave them for crazy, as
Speaker 1: I'm fond of saying, you know, you don't know. And
Speaker 1: at a time of mass hysteria like this, there's certainly
Speaker 1: plenty of reason to believe that there are democrats. There
Speaker 1: will be Democrats out there who are incapable of seeing
Speaker 1: the kind of obvious reality of the downside of their policies.
Speaker 1: All right, So that's one part of this. But here's another.
Speaker 1: Let me put out a theory for you. It's in fact,
Speaker 1: a theory based on a theory modern monetary theory MMT.
Speaker 1: What we see happening right now is a reordering of
Speaker 1: our expectations of government and society such that we are
Speaker 1: sending out you know, right now, we've got Republicans, We've
Speaker 1: got Trump saying let's send out two thousand dollar checks.
Speaker 1: Now that's for an extreme, that's for an emergency. But
Speaker 1: remember an emergency for the left is always also you
Speaker 1: as an opportunity for government and what we think of
Speaker 1: as you and I would say, well, yeah, two thousand
Speaker 1: dollars check and let's get it to people. Well, the
Speaker 1: left seasons and says, okay, you write that check, but
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people that have a lot
Speaker 1: of problems. Why not give them two thousand dollars check
Speaker 1: every month for all eternity. Everybody who you know make
Speaker 1: below a certain amount of money, let's say, and he said, oh, wait,
Speaker 1: wait a second, Oh do you mean a you mean
Speaker 1: a minimum basic income? Right? You mean a universal basic income?
Speaker 1: You be I Oh okay, Well, when you have YOUBI,
Speaker 1: people start to say, well, it's very expensive. And then
Speaker 1: you get to MMT modern monetary theory, and the left,
Speaker 1: Okasio Cortez, Bernie Sanders, they believe in this stuff. MMT
Speaker 1: means that you can spend as much money as you want.
Speaker 1: MMT means that whatever whatever debt you want to run
Speaker 1: up is fine because it's money that goes back to us.
Speaker 1: So who cares. Spend whatever you have to spend, and
Speaker 1: then just deal with inflation as it comes along. That's
Speaker 1: that's the very basic version of MMT. And for those
Speaker 1: of us who would say, well, that's crazy, you're going
Speaker 1: to debase the currency, I'd say, yeah, look at bitcoin,
Speaker 1: look at gold. Look what's going on here? Is it
Speaker 1: that those things are gaining value or is it really
Speaker 1: more that the dollar is losing value right now because
Speaker 1: everyone realizes you're putting more and more dollars, more and
Speaker 1: more money in circulation, digital currency mostly, but still it's
Speaker 1: out there. It's perception, it's value. So this is my
Speaker 1: long winded way of answer your question because I found
Speaker 1: this very interesting, Sandy, is that there is a belief
Speaker 1: among the left that is maybe a little bit crazy,
Speaker 1: but also rooted an MMT theory that yes, we'll have
Speaker 1: all these businesses go under, and yes there'll be far
Speaker 1: more people dependent on the government, but we've already established
Speaker 1: all we have to do is write them a check.
Speaker 1: Everyone starts getting more and more checks. And you would say,
Speaker 1: I'm sure, Sandy, will hold on, who's who's supporting the
Speaker 1: value behind those deposits of currency, which is effectively what
Speaker 1: you're talking about. Who's where is the actual value creation
Speaker 1: to maintain the purchasing power of those dollars when you're
Speaker 1: just putting more and more and more in them in
Speaker 1: circulation as effectively a massive welfare program. They don't have
Speaker 1: an answer to that. You know what their answer is,
Speaker 1: don't be mean? Why don't you care more about people?
Speaker 1: Why don't why don't you want to do more to
Speaker 1: help people? So that's what we're up against. Aaron, I
Speaker 1: like you a whold bar, A bar at a very
Speaker 1: high regard, and do believe he saved the president. However,
Speaker 1: he is losing my support lately. Why would he come
Speaker 1: out and tell everyone he will not assign a special
Speaker 1: counsel to the Hunter bid investigation? Aaron, fairpoint, thank you
Speaker 1: for writing in and bringing this up. Attorney General Bar.
Speaker 1: Attorney General Bar is no longer the Attorney general, so
Speaker 1: let's start where that he resigned. But former A. G. Barrum,
Speaker 1: Yes he was a He was brilliant and praiseworthy on
Speaker 1: the Muller probe, and I think that we all need
Speaker 1: to under we all should remember that why would he
Speaker 1: not assign a special counsel to the Hunter Biden investigation.
Speaker 1: I don't have a good answer for you. He said
Speaker 1: he didn't see a need for it. Look, it's it's
Speaker 1: very possible that Hunter Biden was while peddling influence, not
Speaker 1: necessarily running a foul of criminal statues. I know people
Speaker 1: don't want to hear that, but that is possible that
Speaker 1: he you know, if he uh declared all the money
Speaker 1: he was getting from Burisma in Ukraine, for example, and
Speaker 1: pay taxes on it. You know what they got maniford
Speaker 1: On for example, wasn't who I know I know now
Speaker 1: has been pardoned. Well they got manifoord On. Wasn't Russia
Speaker 1: collusion and it wasn't it was I was getting paid
Speaker 1: a lot of money. Wasn't panningy taxes on it? That's
Speaker 1: what they nailed man afford On. If Hunter Biden actually
Speaker 1: declared the money that he was making from these influence
Speaker 1: peddling schemes, pay taxes on it, you know. I know
Speaker 1: they said there's a money laundering probe, but maybe maybe
Speaker 1: he was smart enough to Actually I'm not saying he did.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying it's possible, and Barr would know more
Speaker 1: about the state of that investigation, So that's that's a possibility.
Speaker 1: I don't have a good answer for you, though, I
Speaker 1: wish I could tell you. Oh, here's why he wouldn't
Speaker 1: declare special counsel because to me, the Hunter Biden situation
Speaker 1: almost cries out for a special counsel. To me, the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden situation, when you have an incoming president whose
Speaker 1: son is under federal federal investigation, of course, there's a
Speaker 1: conflict of interest within the normal operations of the executive
Speaker 1: branch at the DOJ. So wouldn't you want to have
Speaker 1: a special counsel looking into that? Isn't that if there
Speaker 1: was ever an for a special counsel, wouldn't be Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe maybe I'll get to ask Attorney
Speaker 1: General Bar that at some point. I'm sorry, former Attorney
Speaker 1: General Bar, but that's the best answer I can give
Speaker 1: you right now on that. And we'll get more role
Speaker 1: call coming up here. You're in the Freedom Hud. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right back into
Speaker 1: roll call. Here we get Paul. I remember if you
Speaker 1: want to write the role call team Buck and ihremedia
Speaker 1: dot com or Facebook dot com Slashbuck Sexton. Paul, how
Speaker 1: can we mobilize? I'm talking to people locally in New Jersey,
Speaker 1: but I've never organized on a large scale. It's time
Speaker 1: to come together, Paul. Well, one way is by writing
Speaker 1: into a show like this and having other people in
Speaker 1: team buck you know here that you want to mobilize,
Speaker 1: and then it's you can create a site. You can
Speaker 1: create a digital gathering point, you can share information there,
Speaker 1: and then you can if you want to be part
Speaker 1: of the rally. I know there's a huge rally and
Speaker 1: I meant to speak about the earlier, a huge rally
Speaker 1: planned in DC tomorrow, and I'm sure there will also
Speaker 1: be counter protesters and a kind of counter or rally
Speaker 1: or whatever going on, and that will involve antifa, lunatics
Speaker 1: and left wing people who are who are violent and destructive,
Speaker 1: and the media will cover for them because that's what
Speaker 1: they do, because they're dishonest and disgraceful. But yeah, Paul,
Speaker 1: that's this is This is a good start. But I
Speaker 1: would say find like minded people online, find people who
Speaker 1: you listen to the show for example, gather together with
Speaker 1: them and come up with what your plan of action
Speaker 1: may be. I mean, if it's just getting the word
Speaker 1: out and demonstrations and showing through peaceful protest your point
Speaker 1: of view and showing the American people will not be
Speaker 1: or at least the Republicans and conservative conservatives will not
Speaker 1: be silenced. That's one thing, but there's also the more
Speaker 1: traditional grassroots fundraising organizing, and these are areas the Democrats
Speaker 1: do very well, and unfortunately they organizing and the getting
Speaker 1: together and the community activism. There's a whole culture among
Speaker 1: the Democrats of doing that. We saw that with the
Speaker 1: Tea Party, and let me just tell you right now,
Speaker 1: we need that mentality to come back. What we're going
Speaker 1: to need here is Tea Party two point zero. Now
Speaker 1: I'm not sure Tea Party is the best branding, for
Speaker 1: the best name for anything like that, but that spirit
Speaker 1: of people gathering at their community level, people coming together
Speaker 1: and coming up with a plan of action to mobilize
Speaker 1: and then to take that to action at the ballot box,
Speaker 1: which we saw remember the twenty ten huge repudiation of
Speaker 1: the Obama agenda. Thank you to the Tea Party in
Speaker 1: twenty ten and what happened with the House and the Congress.
Speaker 1: So I would point all that out, I would look
Speaker 1: at all that Matt Hey bucking producer Mark, been listening
Speaker 1: to your show for a long time, have always enjoyed it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for all the hard work put in. It
Speaker 1: really shows. Thank you, Matt, I will say I love
Speaker 1: this show, but man, it is it is a lot
Speaker 1: of work doing this show and doing the TV show
Speaker 1: and the website and writing and American Consequences that I
Speaker 1: contribute to magazine, American Consequences, all the things that I'm
Speaker 1: doing all the time. It's it's a lot. It's a lot.
Speaker 1: And I still need Producer Mark to tell me you
Speaker 1: have a meeting at three, you have to show up
Speaker 1: on time for radio tomorrow at at at X time.
Speaker 1: You gotta do this that. It's a lot of things.
Speaker 1: It's a lot of things. But Producer Mark, we're somehow,
Speaker 1: We're somehow We've kept the train on the tracks. Dude. Yeah, somehow,
Speaker 1: some way, we get the show to our listeners every day,
Speaker 1: and we appreciate them for listening. We do. And Matt
Speaker 1: also says, my question is why can't Trump impound all
Speaker 1: the voting machines and check how many votes were cast illegally.
Speaker 1: Isn't this a federal election after all? PS. I hope
Speaker 1: you and this no princess had a nice vacation in Florida.
Speaker 1: You deserve it, Thank you, Matt. We did. We had
Speaker 1: a great vacation in Florida, great week down there. Look,
Speaker 1: I think I'm gonna move to Florida. I'm just gonna
Speaker 1: say it. I think I'm gonna move to Florid, probably
Speaker 1: with it, probably within two to three years. That's my
Speaker 1: time horizon. But I think moving to Florida is very
Speaker 1: likely for me. I think that I need at least
Speaker 1: I know it's not a red state. It's not like
Speaker 1: moving to Wyoming or something where you know it's a
Speaker 1: red state. But there's so many don't I don't want
Speaker 1: to do another free infomercial for Florida. I feel like
Speaker 1: I've been doing that too much lately. You know, w
Speaker 1: io D and WFLA listeners will like, good job Buck,
Speaker 1: But yeah, I know. I think I'm gonna be joining
Speaker 1: you all down there if I moved to Florida. The
Speaker 1: producer mark am I allowed to say, y'all. Is that
Speaker 1: considered Southern for the purposes of being a y'all user? Well,
Speaker 1: it depends on what part of Florida you're in. Perfect
Speaker 1: I think you're totally correcting this perfect answer. I think
Speaker 1: if I moved to Pensacola, I can say y'all, But
Speaker 1: if I moved to Miami, I have to say, um,
Speaker 1: you know yellow, No, you don't change anything because that
Speaker 1: area of Florida has based bally the sixth Borough of
Speaker 1: New York. Yeah, without the crazy policies. Nancy, next up,
Speaker 1: I've been listening to since the Real News days, also
Speaker 1: whenever Glenn Beck had you on his show Prior to that.
Speaker 1: I've been a listener to Glens for many years. I
Speaker 1: obviously loved listening to you, so I still listen to
Speaker 1: all three hours of your radio show. Always thought you're
Speaker 1: very sharp, knowledgeable and entertaining. I love the impressions you
Speaker 1: do and Commy Bear and your other fun characters. I
Speaker 1: enjoy your banner with producer Mark, and you're the end
Speaker 1: of the show each day too, and these days especially,
Speaker 1: I really appreciate the insight you're able to provide in
Speaker 1: this crazy world. I listen to your show on the
Speaker 1: iHeart app usually in the evenings. Happy belated birthday, love
Speaker 1: your show and Shields High Well, Nancy. Thank you for
Speaker 1: the belated birthday present here by writing in this very
Speaker 1: supportive and kind note, it really means a lot, and
Speaker 1: it really is just Mark and I putting this together
Speaker 1: every day and blasting out the show all across the
Speaker 1: country and all over the internet. And the fact that
Speaker 1: folks like you get something out of it, enjoy it,
Speaker 1: and know that you can come here and you know
Speaker 1: what you're getting every day. You know what you're a
Speaker 1: part of, you know what being a member of the
Speaker 1: team is. That is deeply meaningful. Were very appreciative everybody.
Speaker 1: It's going to be a big day tomorrow because we're
Speaker 1: gonna have a lot to talk about from everything that's
Speaker 1: happened today, So get ready for it. Shields high