WEBVTT - Sharon French Discusses Smart Beta ETFs

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Sharon French and she is the head

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 1>of Beta Solutions at Appenheimer Funds. She has a storied career,

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>stopping at such places as JP Morrigan, Chase, Alliance, Bernstein,

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and black Rock, amongst others. She has been an instrumental

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>person in the development and growth of the E t

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>F sector as well as a very active participant in

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the E s G, Environmental, Social and Governance UH sector

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of investing. She is consistently named one of the most

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>influential people in finance. Most recently Cranes had their list

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of forty women, but find a list of a hundred

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>most influential women in markets, investing, finance, and Sharon is

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>invariably on that list. You will find this to be

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>an absolutely fascinating conversation. So, with no further ado, my

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Sharon French of Oppenheimer Funds. This is Masters

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry Ridholts.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>special guest this week is Sharon French. She is the

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:30.639
<v Speaker 1>head of Beta Solutions at Oppenheimer Funds, where she also

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>implements the firm's E s G efforts, as well as

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>overseas a number of UH Smart Beta et F products

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and solutions. She has previously worked at such storied firms

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>as Black Rock Alliance, Bernstein Chase, JP Morrigan Chase. She's

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a graduate of Wharton School of Business and serves on

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the board of Women in ETFs. Sharon French, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Barry. I'm glad to be here. We've been

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about doing this now for a long time. I'm

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>glad we finally got you in the studios to have

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. Let's talk a little bit about your career.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You began back at JP Morgan Chase when they were

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>really a much smaller shop. Weren't they, Yes, Yes, down

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on Water Street, one Water Street, right across in the

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Staten Island Ferry. What was yeah? What were they like

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>then and what was your role with them? Sure? So

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I graduated with a management degree concentration and finance. I

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>went into a sort of global training program with them. Certainly,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know much smaller at the time, you know, still

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>very regionally based. Um. You know, the the project that

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>I was working on is really how to define profitability

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for their different product lines. Um. But I got a

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>chance very early in my career to travel abroad too.

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I lived in Paris, I lived in London, and lived

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in Milan, Madrid, Frankfurt, doing cost studies with country managers

0:02:57.240 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and then making a recommendation to you know, either d

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>market a product or or you know, sort of focus

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>in a particular area. And so I was definitely over

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>my skis. Looking back, I don't know that I knew

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>really what I was doing, but I certainly learned a lot. Well,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this is was just right out of grad school. They

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>start sending you this was right out of undergrad. Yes,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>right out of undergrad So I was young. Yeah, yeah,

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 1>but you have to work really hard the first year

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and then you know sort of um, you know, compete

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to go overseas. So thankfully, you know, I've never been

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.839
<v Speaker 1>showed a hard work and so they you know, gave

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>me the opportunity and I jumped at it. So you

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>go from Chase to Wharton, where do you go? So

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>my undergrads from University of Delaware Wharton is my um

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>my certified Investment Management Analyst designation, that's right. And so

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>where did you go from from upen? Uh so? So

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>then I just went straight into Chase, right, So I

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>started my career in global banking, then moved into brokerage,

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>then sset manager. Yeah so alright, so then you go

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from how how do you end up in black Rock

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the entire build out of

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ice Share. Yeah, yeah, that was fun. That was right

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>after Larry Fink bought b G. I so right, I

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>think that deal closed December two thousand nine. And look,

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I certainly have an appreciation, a broad appreciation

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for financial services in general, because my journey and career

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>progression was, like I said, global banking, wealth management, brokerage platforms.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Really sure, some Leman brothers up through what is now

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>called Morgan Stanley UM, and then I went into asset management,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>always on the active or fundamental active side, right, which

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is what people like you and I grew up with

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the mutual fund. But what really drove me crazy at

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Alliance Bernstein was that we would go into an institutional presentation. Right,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so you've got the committee there, you've got the chief

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>investment officer and would be trying to sell whatever strategy,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and invariably, probably fifty percent of the time, we would

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>lose to b G I Northern Trust State Street because

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of a passive mandate. And you know what I was

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to articulate to the chief investment officer is that

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the real prudent way to run the pension fund, as

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>an example, is to figure out how to combine intelligent

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>alpha with efficient beta so that there's really room for

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>both of us. So what again, intellectually stuck in my

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>brain is I cannot really as a practitioner talk about

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the indexed enhanced index or beta side of the business.

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I got a call from a recruiter, James Beck,

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wonderful recruiter here in New York City, and they had

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>a position at I Shares And I loved Alliance Bernstein

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Loos Andrews, especially as a leader. Was was just a legend.

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They had such a fabulous research group, especially in the

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>nineties right into the tie absolutely and Bernstein plus Alliance

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like boom right. It was just a

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fabulous combination. So I never thought I would leave, but

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this I had this nagging thing in my brain intellectually

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as a professional that I needed to satisfy. I needed

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to be able to talk about both sides of the

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>investment management industry again as as a professional. So that's

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>really why I went, and I gotta tell you, And

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of course I got you know, I got grilled, and

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody said to me, oh, you're going to the dark side,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I suppose I did, But I did it,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, deliberately. Well, by dark side you mean more

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>efficient and lower cost or dark side just the company

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 1>dark side anything passive right from fundamental active into the

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>dark side of indexing. If you were, you were dead

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>right when you say they're not mutually exclusive, they're complementary.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't understand why people, I guess when you're

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>losing business and we've seen the flows have just been

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>when you started at I Shares, did you ever imagine

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard would be five trillion, black Rock would be six trillion,

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and a decade of flows would shift from active to

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>passes the way we've seen. No, I really didn't, And

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and look, you and I both know that. I think

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight really propelled that forward dramatically. But

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>but when I joined I shares Vanguard and State three.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We're certainly a of I shares in terms of the

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>league tables, but I shows came on strong. And one

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of the big strategic moves that I Share has made,

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is right when Mark Weedman took over in

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eleven, maybe nine months after, is they

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were losing the core positions to Vanguard,

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>right they were, they were being relegated to the satellites,

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and so they came out with the core series right

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of replicating Vanguard's core products at a lower phase,

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and that was a big game change. I mean, certainly

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>us m V, which rivalist SPLV and had a better construction,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>took a lot of assets in low vall. So they

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, they really made a lot of good strategic moves.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated by Larry Fink in two thousand and nine,

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>when everybody is still stinging from the g f C

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>from the financial crisis, says, no, No, now is the

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>time when we're going to make a giant purchase and

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>totally reformulate the firm. That is one of the great

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>all time pivots in history. And if you recall the

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>time everyone thought, oh, my gosh, he's totally overpaying b

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody's laughing. He's laughing all his way to the bank.

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And now they are literally the biggest shop in the world. So,

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so you were there at a time when the growth

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>was really rampant. What was that experience like? So here's

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>how I described in many of us who have been

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at I Shares and have since left and gone on

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to really wonderful things. It's like going to boot camp

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Special Forces. I knew you were going to

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>use that metaphor because I've attended a number of conferences

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>where you and I have both spoken, and that crew

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of E T F people all seem to have gone

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>through the same baptism of fire. It's absolutely fair. Again,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if you have anybody else in your show who's who

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was there for a period of time and left, we

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all say wonderfully positive things about the experience. And I

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>mean that so genuinely, because every single day you are

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>walking into battle, the bar is set so high for

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>everything that you have to achieve, and Refin's expectations are real.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>They they they are quite lofty for everybody, and so

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you really sharpen your skill set that when

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you get out. You get out like you are a

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Green Beret or a Navy seal or recall it what

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you will, right, So therefore you are very hirable. People

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>love to take people from black Rock now difficult culture

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>because of that. Um. But you know, I absolutely look

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>back at that time in my life as a wonderful experience.

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>That's shaped a lot of who I am today. And

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the proof is how successful they've become. Whatever they're doing,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be working. Yeah, I'm very hults. You're

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>listening to Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Sharon French. She is the head of

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Beta Solutions at Oppenheimer Funds, where she oversees smart beta

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>products as well as E s G efforts. Um, before

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we move on to what you're currently doing in Oppenheimer,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I have one last black Rock quest Shin. So you

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>were head of private Clients and Institutions at Black Rock.

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>What did that work entail on a day to day basis?

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>What were you basically in branding and marketing or were

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you front line dealing with c I O S and

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>investment committee front line? Good question? Um? Uh yeah, so

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.839
<v Speaker 1>it so institutional, which was also a responsibility of mine

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>out of lines Bernstein so institutional and private banks. So

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we certainly dealt with JP Morgan private bank

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, and a lot of the others Wills, Fargo, etcetera,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know them well, UM and so it was it

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>was really a strong product development client fit role at

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that time that the the I shares you know, product

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>lineup if you will, was growing pretty dramatically, but it

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was very closely connected and linked to certain channels. So

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the channel that I fail exactly now they're they're pure

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>beta you know index stuff, you know, the um some

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>institutional kinds for using as trading vehicles, but they certainly

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.839
<v Speaker 1>were looking to get away from that specifically within smart

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>beta first trust was coming up very fast in the

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>in the sort of rear view mirror at the time UM,

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so we had to sort of pivot and balance between

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>our our pure beta market cap strategies, which is really

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>where they started into how do we tilt a particular

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>product more fundamentally, and a lot of the feedback that

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we were getting for that product development was driven exactly

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>from some of the private banks that we worked with

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in some of the larger institutions quite interesting. So let's

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about beta solutions, which is kind of a mouthful

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to instead of just saying beta. So let me just

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>start with the obvious question, what's the difference between Beta

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>solutions and basic index? And yeah, well so, and there's

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a reason why it's called that. So, yeah, right when

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I was hired to Oppenheimer Funds, it was a very

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>deliberate decision Artstime as the CEO, to really, you know,

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>commit and go full force into the E T F

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>business utilizing smart Beta, taking a pass on market cap

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.559
<v Speaker 1>because there's certainly big players who you know, corner that market.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Hard hard to add value there if you're smaller or

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>even a mid sized player, that right, That's right, And

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>so he sort of wanted to call the unit. So

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a this is a sort of a a independently run,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>if you will, operating unit within Oppenheimer Funds, which gives

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>us the space and the focus and the commitment to

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of build our business alongside of our active business.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But he wanted to call it smart Beta, and I said,

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, is that really what we're trying to do,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't we Aren't we trying to take a beta concept

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and wrap it in whatever it makes sense to wrap

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it in, whether it's an et F fund, a separate

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>account and use it. So shouldn't this be called beta solutions?

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Because if we are pigeonholing ourselves just into smart beta.

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for the longest time people really know

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what smart data was. It had all kinds of names, strategic, beta, alternative, veta,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>de menal, indexing exactly, probably the most descriptive. Are you

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on the side of the fence that thinks the phrase

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>smart data is a marketing term? I am on that

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the film. You're you're not a fan of that.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people just cringe every time

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>here because if you think about it, if beta is

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just what the market's giving you, what is how you

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>modifying that with smart? I like alternatively weighted right, because

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I think of I think of buying the market right,

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>which is market cap and certainly favors certain stocks or sectors,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>which you know, there's always been concentration risk in that approach.

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Some people still want it, which is fine, but there's

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>better ways and different choices on how to drive that

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>risk return profile through alternatively waiting the index. And I

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>really do believe that I remember way back when. I

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think it was Guggenheim who had the equal weighted that's

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was suddenly like, wow, so you don't have

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the market cap weighted. It was never giants, although it

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly has grown, but it was always home. You mean,

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a different way to do this. It's kind of

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>surprising that the smart beta move hadn't begun earlier because

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>people were clearly thinking about ways to look at indexing

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't just cap weight That's right. And what I'm

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>really encouraged by Barry is that if you look at

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>flows in teen versus eighteen, smart beta, of the total

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pie of et F flows was about twelve pen it was.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>That's giant. It seems to have plateaus somewhat now, right

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>or is it still growing? It's still growing. Yeah, it's

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>still growing some of the well, you know, I mean

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>this year, I mean, I haven't seen April numbers yet,

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's haund pretty healthy growth this year, you

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>know that. And I know that it's over whether it

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>will double. I mean, it's it doubled. From whether it

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>will double, that's that's a bit of a stretch. But

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the point of the matter is we knew we would

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>get smart beta market share from three places. The first

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is underperforming active and you know sort of morning star

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>one and two star rated funds. We certainly saw it there. Um,

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the just the sheer growth of smart Beta trying to

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>get our unfair share of that. And that's the growth

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about from eighteen doubling and then passive. So

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>as people got more educated about the merits of alternatively

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>weighted some of the you know, uh, sort of traditional

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>passive buyers started to move towards and understand what they

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>were getting by paying in some cases twenty basis points

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>more to get a smart beta product. They started to

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>move parts of their portfolio to smart beta from having

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it be all passive. So there were three pillars by

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>which we gathered market share, and we're about five billion

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>today and from our our start with it's about so

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty happy with. So let's since you brought that up,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what Oppenheimer's portfolio options look like. So

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you have the alternative way thing you're saying billion, what

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>are the other et F offerings they have in either

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the beta or the non beta opportunities? Sure? Sure, So

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we have twenty equity strategies. UM starting out with revenue

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>weighted revenue weighted, so that's a traditional smart beta fundamental.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>It is absolutely yeah, and that is due to a

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>small acquisition we made back at the end of of

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue shares. UM really kept five of those products and

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>then built that suite out and then we started to

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>move into factors and we've got a really nice partnership

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>with Fitsie Russell. We introduced Dynamic multi factor, which we're

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>super proud of. We were one of the first us

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in PIMCO. So this is an active no, it's it

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>well interesting we have it's sort of an active overlay.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's a macro signal coming from our global multi

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Asset group which takes UM sort of leading economic indicators

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as well as the sort of the momentum signals from

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the market and tells us monthly whether we're either in

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a recovery, an expansion, a contraction or a slowdown. And

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>then we take the five factors and we wait them

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>depending upon which market regime we're in, and so based

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>on that you will alter within the e t F

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the waiting of the So it is rules based, but

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it is informed by this active signal and it has

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>done phenomenal. We launched it in November. It's at the

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>top of the category. So this is kind of an

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>interesting space because people have been talking about making its

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>ironic how beta has driven so much of e t

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>f s, but we're talking about making e t fs

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>more dynamic and more active based on a variety of

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>other inputs. So this one is rules based, driven by

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>a series of economic inputs. Any other dynamic or active

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>ETFs current or on the rise well, interestingly, so we

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>did file with the SEC for a senior loan product.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got a very very well recognized and successful senior

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>loan FRANX fixed income right, so so we were making

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>our foray into the fixed income marketplace. We also filed

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for short duration uh e t F some liquidity enhanced

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>ETFs and all these are not to a specific index.

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>The role dynamic and can change. Well, these are actually active.

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So what we're doing is filing active fixed income ETFs

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with some of our key teams and Oppenhammer funds. And

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 1>had we not been bought by Investco, because those products

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are just sitting on the shelf, those approvals by the

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>SECO sitting on the shelf, we would have launched fixed

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.679
<v Speaker 1>income active UM just sort of you know, build out

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the asset allocation sure and all the academic research says

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that while active may not necessarily create a lot of

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>value in the equity side, it really can create value

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.679
<v Speaker 1>unfixed income. It does absolutely, and I think you know,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>firms who are thinking about that should really look at

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of what are some of their core competencies on

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the fixed income side. Certainly we've seen you know, Gunlock

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and Gross do well with the products when they came out,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're sort of leading the fixed don't come active

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>ETF space, But we really believe that that there's something

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in that for investors. I think the jury is still

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>out on the equity side. I mean we saw the

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>big you know, Presidian approval that was a big development

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. I'm not familiar with that ETF.

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>What was the um. The company is Prosidian, and they

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have been working with the SEC to try to get

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>an approval for a non transparent solution. Quite quite interesting.

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm very ritults. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My special guest today is Sharon French. She

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is the head of Beta Solutions, for Oppenheimer Funds. She

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>also covers environmental, social and governance efforts at the firm.

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>She is a graduate of the Wharton School of Business

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and sits on the board of Women in ETFs. So,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about what's going on, um with women

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in the E t F space. Tell us a little

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bit about Women in E t F the board that

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>you're on, uh, and what is that group about and

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what are they looking to accomplish. Yeah, I would love

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that. Thank you for the question. So

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm co president with Jillian del Signore JP Morgan of

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Women in E t F. So I have been a

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>global governance committee and board members since the beginning. Um,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>how long has this been around? For just over five years?

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>We just hit our five year anniversary in January. That's decent,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know these days, five years just for something to

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 1>survive and grow is not a bit. And I have

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell you we are growing so fast. We're global. Um.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're in a May as well as Asia, pack

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and Canada. Um, We've got ten chapters, were just about

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to hit five thousand members globally. That's fantastic. And this Verry,

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this hit at the heart of what I really think

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is needed within the e t F industry. There are

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>women of Wall Street, there are women in hedge funds. UM.

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But this was really something that we heard a lot,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>as we believe, but within financial services there are a

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of women gravitate to the e t F ecosystem,

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>whether you're an AUTHORIIC participant. We have really drilled down

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>with some theories on this, but we would love to

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>get a research partner to prove it. Well, let me

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>man explain this to you, okay please, But UM, we

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's innovation. We think women are very drawn to

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>innovation and UM evolution. Um, there's a lot of women

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in supporting the e t F industry on the legal side.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot on the trading side, especially authorized participants

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and market makers. You and I know many of them. Um.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of women leading e t F businesses. Uh.

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of women in e t F distribution.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Again like my co president Jillian del Signore over at

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan. UM, there are also you know heads of products.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, uh, they're the head of uh the e

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>t F business at JP Morgan. Also used to be

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the head of product both at I Shares and and

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan. So so there is just a huge concentration

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of women within the E T F industry that we

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>felt a need to get connected. So our mission is

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to connect, support and inspire UM. So it's really having

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the more senior executives within ETFs mentor and

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 1>sponsor and connect the women who are joining us who

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are just starting out in the industry UM. And we

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have events all over the world and by the way,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we do encourage men. Uh they're a well over ten

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of our membership as men. We're hoping to get

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it up to because we are trying to continue to

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>push forward the agenda of gender equality and the diversity

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of thought. And so one of our big things that

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we do every International Women's Day is ring the bell

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at every stock exchange around the world with the Sustainable

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Stock Exchange in the u N And that's a fabulous, fabulous,

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>high profile way to promote gender equality within the ecosystem.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's our five year anniversaries, so we're gonna be

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>doing events both in UH Hong Kong, San Francisco, Chicago,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>New York, and Toronto. So it's funny you mentioned five years.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 1>July will be five years that this show has been around,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And when I was first beginning and was able to

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>wrestle up a female guest, one of the questions was

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>always something corny, like, so what's it like being a

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gallon of man's industry? And I'm being a little sarcastic,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thrilled that I get to ask a question.

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about how you're driving the growth of

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>E t F. You can see just over the past

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>five years how much things have have changed. It's really

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so different. And I'm curious. Do you think it's the

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that the E t F space was so new

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you did not have that sclerotic old boys network cemented

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in place. It was easier to um breakthrough into that

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>space without the usual obstacle. I think that's very valid.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a very big part of it. I mean, look,

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I've been around for over thirty years,

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>so I did grow up in the environment exactly um,

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know you sort of because of of that,

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, for me personally, I've sort of become teflon

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>coded because you needed to be. But you you know,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>now it's much more supportive. I mean, the industry has changed.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I do have to say glacially it is better today,

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but I would have preferred it to be in leaps

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and strides. But um, but but whether it's you know,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>women on Wall Street, the Financial Women's Association, hundred women's

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in Hedge Funds, women in ETFs, I mean there's now

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>organizations that have a genuine interest in continuing to promote women. UM,

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>give them the tools and resources in order to to

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>advocate for themselves, negotiate for a job or a better raise. Um.

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a speakers Bureau, So we have a lot

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of people in media like you tell us about the

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>speakers because um, I introduced them to one of the

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>women who worked for me who actually speaks all around

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the world then is highly sought after speaker, Blair Ducasney.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>She started working with the Speakers Group who put together

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes Yes, so thank you and look, we're we're sort

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of spoon feeding the media who are are are having

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a hard time finding female speakers. So Elizabeth Kashner at

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>fact Set and Linda Jang with she has her own firm, Purview,

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about it and that's what we

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.239
<v Speaker 1>do women as we just get it done. So they

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>came together and they reached out to everybody, and you

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have to you have to apply, and you have to

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be qualified in certain topics and media trained in order

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to be part of our speakers. Beer, I think we're

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>up to Linda last set on our Lastkoll, I think

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>we're up to forty, you know, professionals who are you know,

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>very well experienced in certain key segments of the market.

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.119
<v Speaker 1>So we're taking this list and we're giving it to

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>people like you. We're giving it to inside ets, We're

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>giving it to Tom i'd a e t of trends.

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>We're giving it to whoever needs female speakers to try

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to get a more diversity of thought and equal representation

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in the media. I won't I won't mention the group,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>but there was an article not too long ago about

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a conference and the photo is the panel on diversity

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's six white dudes, and it's pretty Hey, listen,

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys, really you gotta make a little bit more

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of an effort. Then, look, I found six white guys.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's have a that that one I know exactly

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>which one you're talking about. That won't happen again, But again,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we did you guys tag them and say, oh, absolutely idiots,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>absolutely didn't. It's kind of embarrassing. It is. It's embarrassing

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 1>on diversity. I might be exaggerating slightly, but the photo

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw it was like, what, Yes, No, that's gotta

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>be the you know, how to raise money for a

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund or something else, male dominated type of a panel.

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>That was pretty hilarious. Yeah, and so sometimes you just

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>need to take action. That's what we did. We have

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the list of forty women and growing, so depending upon

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the topic, we certainly will have three to five women

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to choose from. That. That makes a whole lot of sense.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry Hults. You're listening to Master's in Business on

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest this week is Sharon French.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>She runs the Beta Solutions group at Oppenheimer Funds. Let's

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about environmental, social, and governance investing.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>What I keep hearing is we're on the leading edge

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of a thirty plus trillion dollar generational wealth transfer um.

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Millennials and women are the people most interested in investing

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in the environment and social based clauses, and yet the

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>pickup has been so slow. What do you make of that? Yeah,

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the numbers in retail in

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the US, right, so you always have to peel the onion. Uh,

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the adoption has been slow within what I call the

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>sustainable investing universe to really understand why that is. And

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this is the first really trend if

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it a trend um where the

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>growth outside the US is really driving it. So it's

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>typically there's big pension funds within the Nordics, within Europe

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>or a MIA um so institutionally in Amia driving a

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the adoption. There is a very high expectation

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in some cases of mandate that you have to have

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a very well thought out E s G process within

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio management structure. Is it a specific percentage or

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is it just it's it's most of the market institutional

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>outside the U S. Yes, of the eight trillion or

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's in that market today, most of his institutional

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>outside the U S. So, as you know, most of

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the growth is driven by the US, and the adoption

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>happens usually in a Midia first and Asian Europe, Middle

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 1>East and UM Africa. So Europe pension funds specifically driving

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>deeper in the Nordics is what's driving the overall global

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>growth of stainable investing in the US, there has been

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a legacy understanding that we're trying to unwind with s

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>RI I. So SRI I socially responsible in exactly, but

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it's been sort of the days of Calvert where it

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is exclusionary investing, the broad index, they screen out whatever

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it happens, that's exactly right, and therefore they when you

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>carve out big segments of the market, in many cases,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>not all, but many cases, it impacts performance. So it

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>has sort of has this negative um inertia attached to

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it that has really evolved. So that's one end of

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, that's right. The middle part is E s

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 1>G investing or e s G integration, and what that

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is is looking at the environmental, social, and governance factors

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that impacts a corporation using that within a portfolio manage

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>management process. So they really called the intangibles, typically look

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>at the tangible balance sheet right financial metrics. Adding to that,

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the intangibles really tells you and gives you a full

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>picture of how the firm is run. Um also exposes

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you to some potential areas of vulnerability or risk. So

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>E s G integration within a portfolio management process is

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a great risk management tool. I've heard a number of people,

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that some of the events we both attended

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>together talk about E s g as being misunderstood, that

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really a fundamental screening method to look for risk

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and control for it for And the perfect example was

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies that have no diversity, no women

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.239
<v Speaker 1>on their boards, very little women management. Oh and they

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>managed to get caught in the me too UM debacle

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>self self inflicted wounds. What a coincidental correlation or apparently

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not right? That that's a fundamental screen isn't it? That

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely right? The other sort of common ones are

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Volkswagen example with its emissions issues scandal

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely could have been uncovered if you start to

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>really dig deeper into some of their governance practices. Um

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in some cases with some of the oil companies that

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have been notable to oil spills. So you know that

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>really all of them though, can you screen for preventing oils?

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You can screen for practices, right, so some have more

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>robust practices than others. Right, So would would you exclude

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a company from your portfolio or would you overweight another

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that you feel is more robust and and more tightly controlled,

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the and then the the further on

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum is impact investing. So impact investing is taking

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a particular cause that you believe in rainforest in Sudan,

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>carbon emissions, very sort of narrowly focused, and and waiting

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio towards that or buying just that. So you know,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of private equity money is directed towards impact investing.

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>So so again if you look at the spectrum, you

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have s R I and exclusionary on one side, which

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>again has been sort of fallen out of favor. Is

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that well, I mean, I think there's just a better

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding that people believe that there's a better way to

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do it right. So and then there's the s G integration,

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which was where a lot of the people in US

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 1>retail are focused, including us. And then there's impact investing,

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 1>which we actually have a company that we bought that

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>does custom municipal portfolios and we allow them to do

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>an impact overlay on that custom income fixed income. Really yes,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 1>so you can actually get green bonds. You can quite

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>quite intriguing. So so what do you think is going

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to be required for e s G to take off

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or or we contextualizing it's the wrong way and it's

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just going to be something that's implemented into the risk

0:32:56.120 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>screening approach. Yeah, I actually think it's both, So let's

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>take the latter first. I believe that the asset management

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>industry will just become E s G. Just just integrate it,

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like you're no longer an Internet company everybody uses. Then yes,

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there will. There will no longer be E s G

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or non e s G because millennials and women demographically

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>are driving the desire and the requirement to incorporate E

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>s G screening within their portfolios is a big, big driver.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>The other is data democratization. Most companies now well there's

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a variety of different data providers that now collect that

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>information from companies. So now most of the sp are

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>reporting to data providers on those three measures. Their environmental practices,

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.360
<v Speaker 1>there's social practices, and their governance practices. So we now

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have access to all kinds of data to be able

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to screen on those dimensions. Now, don't you run into

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of issue we get with hedge funds

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.719
<v Speaker 1>reporting performance? Well, if it's good your report and if

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:01.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not so good, Oh, we're not going to make

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that filing this quae. Well, so here's the issue this

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is this is going to impede the group. So again

0:34:05.800 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I think to your latter question, we're gonna asset management.

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't say exactly when. I think it will be

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between five to ten years from now. And then

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you think that's a gradual Just one day we'll turn

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>around and say, oh we're all s G. Yes, I do,

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I do. And there's a variety of people who agree

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with that premise. The issues today are there's no uniformity, right,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a variety of different approaches. Even the data provider,

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they go at collecting the data and reporting the data

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in a variety of different ways to lack of uniformity

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and data. The second is benchmarking, right, we always want

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to try to especially on the active management side, we

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>always want to find a benchmark. So people are struggling

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with how to benchmark E s G strategies and you know, uh,

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>consulting organizations like a mercer who does due diligence on

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>these strategies, they're they're struggling to answer that question, which

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a traditional method of you know, rating

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a particular strategy. So I think it's those two things

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that are slowing down the growth. But once we you know,

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>come closer to solving those two, I think the growth

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>will start to be you know, sort of more profound

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in US retail. So so that's the second part of

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the question, which is will there still be E s

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>G focus funds and and who are going to be

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the purchases of these? Yeah, I think there will be. Well.

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, institutions within the US certainly are following

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Europe and so look, I mean I have to say,

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the last six months to a year,

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 1>most of the r fps we get request for information

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 1>into a new strategy for institutional clients. They all have

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>E s G questions in there, and the portfolio management

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>has to be able to describe specifically their E s

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>G process. And uh so institutions are moving first within

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the the US, and you know retail will follow closer

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>behind once we figure out these issues that I talked about,

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>which is uniformity and benchmarking. What do you think about

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the dedicated E s G E T F that have

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>come out? Paul Jones has one full Just what are

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones that you guys so we have s g

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>L and s GF and that's where we're taking our

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.239
<v Speaker 1>revenue weated strategy L and F. What's the difference. That's

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some foreign and domestic local local, that's right. I think

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 1>D was taken when we went to look for a ticker.

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So my by the way, my theory is you you

0:36:25.680 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>not only need a good investment idea, but a good

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>ticker is just crucial. Absolutely right. It seems like that

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>makes a giant difference. It does make a giant difference.

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>It cuts through all the clutter. Look and a lot

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of this is coming through the clutter. There's a lot

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of players who have gotten so E s c F

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is foreign s g L and they're they're broad based.

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot out there that are more narrowly based,

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>again specifically as we talked about before, based upon you know,

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 1>climate change, um, climate risk, carbon emissions, things of that nature.

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>We want to be more broad based. So this is

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue weighted s G strategies. But there are many and

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 1>there are many mutual funds. We have a mutual fund

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>where we partner with pick t A and it's a

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Geo environmental h an E s G shop in Europe.

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Is very their subadvisor to us and we like them

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot actually. Um. And so there are strategies that

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>are coming out in separate account, mutual fund any TF

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>fashion that I think are a good start. Um. You know. Again,

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the institutional clients are looking for more of the separate account,

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in some cases mutual funds. M. They're not buying the

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>E s G E T f s quite yet. There

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 1>are people like the UN partnering with firms and developing

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 1>some of their E s G strategies. And there's big

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>pensions like CalPERS who partnered with State Street on she

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they seated she to the tune of Calipers or Calisters

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it was Kelpers. So who did Calists? M sure I

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of remember them being involved our counts now I

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>know Calipers seated two d and fifty billion. Yeah, it was.

0:37:58.120 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a big chunk of whatever it was. It

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is a big jump of change um or million, excuse me,

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was definitely a which is still not

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ann So so our mutual friend Dave Nodding is a

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:19.800
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of direct index. I'm slowly warming up to

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the concept and where I see it having so much

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>potential is exactly what you just described the s M

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as for individuals that want to have an overlay of this.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you see that space development? Yeah? Yeah, so

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I I actually agree with Dave. Um, you know, getting

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>instead of buying the index, sort of buying the the

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, underlying holdings of the index. That creates a

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>great opportunity for tax efficiency, tax harvesting, customization. Uh. There

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>are some firms out there, they are very good at it.

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Parametric has been around for a while, Imperio, Uh, there

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:01.399
<v Speaker 1>are others um and so you know, look, people are

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for more of those things UM, and you have

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>more flexibility in getting access to that through direct indexation.

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>It is a little bit more uh efficient from a

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.280
<v Speaker 1>cost perspective, You're not because you're not paying an index

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>provider three to five basis points. So the the index

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>landscape is changing as well as fees are getting driven

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>down there as well, people are doing self indexing, their

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>self indexing providers out there who are calculation agents, and

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>so the world of indexation as it existed ten years

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>ago is also changing because of self indexing and direct indexation.

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Dave. I think it's going to grow

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 1>quite quite fascinating. So before we began we were talking

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>about music because you happen to see my picture, tweeted

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of Eagles guitarist Don Felder. I have to tell you

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that was a ridiculous amount of fun. I'm sure it was.

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm jealous is my thing. Everyone who knows me knows

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that music is my thing. Me too. I don't know

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 1>how far apart in age we are. We'll talk about

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that later. You're deceptively um, You're like, you're hard to

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pin an age on. Okay, like thirty nine is safe.

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. Um, I said you start, well that

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:21.120
<v Speaker 1>would You said you've been in the business thirty years,

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and I said you started it at age nine. So

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's how I came to that. Um. But I'm a

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>class I listened to a lot of stuff from jazz

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to classical but really uh and a lot of punk

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and reggae. But I'm really a classic rock guy. What

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what's your musical over classic rock? Okay, you know classic

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>rewind or classic tracks on? On? Yeah, exactly. So you're

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not a coffeehouse sort of No, Actually, it depends on

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the mood. I like coffee house as well. Thank you

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for bringing that up. Well, if you're a jack Johnson fan.

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a great sort of a great sort of channel. Um,

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so I've had I don't know how this has worked out.

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been a dumb accident. But I've had a series

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of guitarists. So it's been Don Felder and Steve Miller.

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Steve Miller is, Lawrence Juber and John Pizzarelli. So those

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>are the four guitarists I've had. And I should reach

0:41:16.800 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>out to Jack Johnson because I love his ry. He's

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a great Uh, so these things come up. Trucks, can

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>we talk about derren so your southern sort of roots?

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>So look, I mean I also love southern rock. But

0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 1>my two so, I think Derek Trucks is one of

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>the most gifted guitarist and you know he's so that's

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>your pick for greatest guitarists? No, he actually he's not.

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He's he's sort of next generation. My pick, but my

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>two picks, which I can't decide on, is uh, Carlos Santana.

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I love Santana. He's technically a brilliant guitarist and a

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.919
<v Speaker 1>very good songwriter. I don't know if many people would

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>put him up as in the top five because it's

0:41:55.520 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 1>usually the hyper technical guys like Joe Satriani or go

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>down to Montrose or and of course you know we

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>could talk about Clapton or June. Well, so that's my second.

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.719
<v Speaker 1>So my second is Clapton. I would probably to your point,

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably edge Clapton over cent Town a little bit.

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But I gotta tell you, Derek Trucks is you know,

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.880
<v Speaker 1>he's he's gonna think gonna arrival everybody. He's just a

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit younger. I asked, Um, By the way, if

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you like that sort of swampy southern are you familiar

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>with UM? J. J. Gray and the Mofro No? Oh,

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.799
<v Speaker 1>so that's it. Then you have to check out. It's swampy,

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>bluesy southern roots rocking. They have a number of great albums,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 1>but you can never go wrong with that first album

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is J. J. Gray in the mo They're just um

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a Southern version of Remember the album

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Thick Freakness by Um. I'm ding a blank on the

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>band's name, but that Um Black Keys guy, that's the

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 1>first album. And I and I so, I asked Henley,

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>let me we can talk about music for hours, but

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>let me wrap this up. I asked Henley, who do

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you think, um, what sort of guitarists do you like?

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Who do you really appreciate? And he said, I love

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the Triple Threats. I love people who are great songwriters,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>ken sing and a really good performers. And I knew

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly where he was going to go with that. I

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>thought he was going to say clapped in, but um,

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 1>he kind of surprised me and said, well, this generation,

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.439
<v Speaker 1>it's John Mayer is that Triple Threat? And I said

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's because that's he's this generation the class. So who

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>else do you again? So I don't forget I put

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Derek right up there. Yeah, but you know, and again

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big Alllin Brothers fan, you know, I mean

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that story, you know, has been a bit of a

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:53.240
<v Speaker 1>sad story. But of course Dwayne Allman taught Don Felder

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:56.279
<v Speaker 1>to play slide guitar house and they're all from the

0:43:56.440 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>music scene from Gainesville. Was crazy, was him, and I

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 1>think it was Stephen Stills and Tom Petty and it

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>was just like a like, wait, why are all those

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>people coming from Gainesville, Florida? And then Dwayne Alman on

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 1>top of that. So then of course, you know, Greg

0:44:12.480 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 1>just died, which was a very sad day for me.

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But so you know, Ada Peach was my favorite Almon

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Brothers album. I remember that was giant when I was

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in high school. Giant. That was who else you listen

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to today? Give me a newer you know today? I

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have to tell you I'm sort of evolving a little

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.359
<v Speaker 1>bit too, you know, sort of this newer country such

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>as so you know Dirk Spentley, Um, Zack Brown, Zack Brown.

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I know Dirk Spentley. I don't know that. Yeah, yeah,

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those guys got a little more of

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>an edge than tradition shoes radio. I mean, Kenny Chesney

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously is terrific. Um, so you know. I so I'm

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>really pushing myself to appreciate other genres. And I didn't

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like the old twangy country Chad Atkins sort of well

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a brilliant guitarist. But the I know exactly,

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I love My dog died, my my wife left me

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that so there's a really do you ever we were

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about X some satellite before. Do you have a

0:45:10.880 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>play with Pandora? Pandora that's my actually music of choice.

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I have so knows in my home, so do I

0:45:16.880 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and I go to Pandora. So what I love about

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Pandora is if you want to discover something new, Yeah,

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like you take those three newer country, create a channel,

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:29.880
<v Speaker 1>call it whatever you want new country, and seed it

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.399
<v Speaker 1>with five songs that you like. And it's really great

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for music discovery. I'm always hearing things. Wow, what's that?

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard that? So it's a fun thing to

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:42.359
<v Speaker 1>play with. Yeah, all right, back to back to ets. Sorry,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 1>sorry to drag you back to you said I could

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>talk music all day long. Same here. It's it's just fascinating.

0:45:49.000 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I um anything aside from country rock and classic rock.

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 1>You listen to jazz, you listen to reggae. I do.

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I listened to both, but I have to say my

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>my world is really dominated by the too today. Um.

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But I I used to listen to a lot more

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>classical um than I do today. I've always listened to jazz.

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Miles Davis is my hero. Really, Miles Davis is my hero,

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>for he's not. I always warn people who are like

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your your jazz head, what what should I listen to?

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Should I listen to? Miles Davis? Not the most accessible?

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I always say, start, start, slow, walk before you run,

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because who is your walk slow person. Jerry Mulligan. Um,

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like Coltrane, I I build a little further out halfway

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>between even thelonious monk um Um Paul Desmonds. Uh, you can't.

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That's really totally accessible, very easy for most people. If

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you if you listen to like Time Out or so there,

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to to ease into jazz. But if

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>you start with bitches Brew or you know, that's a

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:55.200
<v Speaker 1>tough It's like it's the equivalent of starting out in

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>rock music by listening to Frank's Appa. It's like Jethro Tull. Yeah,

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's call is. You know, you could listen you know,

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>aqualong or locomotive breath. Yeah, that's straightforward rock and roll.

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 1>But it's hard to find outside of Joe's garage. It's

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to find a Zappa song that you could just

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>slide right into and say, I'm interested in rock music.

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Play something for me because um, although since you mentioned

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorite guitarists, if you ever have a chance,

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>get the Zappa album, shut up and play your guitar.

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Y e er guitar. It's just three discs of him

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>doing leads and he's amazing. People don't realize what a

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>spectacular technical musician. You know, I didn't. And if I

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:44.239
<v Speaker 1>could just make one plug for for a female the

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>modern day Bonnie Rate is Derek Truck's wife, Susan Twadski

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a band two Trucks, you would not know the difference.

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think she's got more soul. Bonni Rate is a

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ton of soul. But if if you can believe Susan

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Tudeski even has more soul than body, right, so I

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>would I need to make my female plug before we

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>move on? All right? Last female guitarist um reference, Go

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube. I can't remember the girl's name, and I

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>say girl because she's like eleven. There is this girl

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube who just shreds. It's unbelievable. There's probably multiple

0:48:23.560 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>people in that age group who are just spectacular guitarists

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's mind blowing you. Just I'll send you some links.

0:48:32.840 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are just like what. Alright? So so

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 1>now now back to eat got drag herself away from music? Well,

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>because you know this is a conversation over a beer. Um.

0:48:44.560 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>The one question I forgot to ask you during the

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>broadcast portion that I meant to ask is you began

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>your career in nine seven, Right, what was stock market crash? Yeah?

0:48:57.239 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 1>What was that like? And by the way, there are

0:48:59.880 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a few people who I know of David Rosenberg is one,

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to remember who the other person was

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 1>who literally begin their career that fall and bang right

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:12.600
<v Speaker 1>into I started and I think at the end of

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>May or June. But it was that fall. Um, you

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:17.919
<v Speaker 1>certainly look, I mean it was. It was a great

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.839
<v Speaker 1>learning experience for me, right, I mean, I am I right.

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>It was a five points, it was you know, percentage wise,

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it was big and something like that. I think it

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 1>was six hundred and something points. It's easy enough. I

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know why five hundred six in my mind, but um,

0:49:33.960 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 1>which we call today a Tuesday, Yeah, right, exactly exactly.

0:49:37.719 --> 0:49:39.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why that's why I brought it up. It's it's

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of interesting to look back, and you know, it's

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a blip in today's world. But but look, so I

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really tied to the market at that time. Remember

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as a Chase Manhattan Bank, and I was doing all

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 1>these cost studies. I still was domestic at this time.

0:49:52.360 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't yet in Europe. By the way, you have

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>correct five eight points, Thank you. I I don't know

0:49:57.880 --> 0:49:59.239
<v Speaker 1>why that's stuck in my head, but you know I

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>was there, so you know these things are important. Um.

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And so it was a great learning experience for me.

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 1>I was still learning about the market, right and so

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>uh me and Chase Manhattan Bank, you know too, I

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 1>had some exposures. So they obviously took a hit but recovered.

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Don Boudreau was the the CEO or president

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Um. But so you know, there was

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot to learn in terms of the you know,

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>how the market factors into sort of the you know,

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the capital markets and what a driver they are and

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>why that happened and how to avoid it and how

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to put you know, stops in place by the New

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:38.200
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange. And so I was young and you

0:50:38.280 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 1>know what behind the ears as they say, And so

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I was just a great learning experience for me. Don Boudreau,

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>why is that name familiar? Is he still around and published?

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>He's been retired, So you you looked at it as

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a learning experience I did. I didn't have any personal exposure.

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I had no money, so you know it didn't affect me.

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Are the best crash exactly? Now? The next one I was,

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I was in grad school and I

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>watched it with such clinical, detached detachment. It was like, oh,

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be kind of interesting. Now. I was fascinated,

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thankfully was at a place where I

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:13.360
<v Speaker 1>could learn more about it. And that was really my

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>first like ouch when you when you when you um accidentally,

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, touch a burner on this story, it was

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:21.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a you know, learning about the capital

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>markets by being stung by it. But thankfully it didn't

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>affect yes, and so did two thousand. Obviously two thousand

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it was the worst, but that was the best one

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of all two left of market. Yeah, so two thousand

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and eight was fabulous learning experience. Can we describe it

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>as that because it was we'll take that off, Mike.

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.719
<v Speaker 1>I found that to be of all the market crashes

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I lived through, the one that was most fascinating. Yeah, No,

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it certainly was. There's millions of stories that have come

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>out of that. When it's really shaped, it's shaped, you know,

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole generation. Absolutely. You alluded to this earlier. Let

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>me circle back to that. My pet theory is all

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of the scandals, the animal scandal, the IP, all those

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:11.400
<v Speaker 1>things kind of led mom and pop to say, you know,

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this Wall Street thing is, you know, I'm just gonna

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 1>give the money to Vanguard and be done. I kind

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of felt like the cherry on that cake was the

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:24.560
<v Speaker 1>O eight oh nine crash. But you even took it further.

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>You said, this really drove people into passive explain absolutely absolutely, Um,

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of it is they sort of didn't

0:52:33.480 --> 0:52:35.279
<v Speaker 1>want to deal with it anymore. Just let me, let

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 1>me just give it to an index. Let me give

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my money to an index. They didn't trust the institutions

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that were running their money in a lot of cases,

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>especially the ones that got bailed out, that had to

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>imbat the thought process right exactly right, And so I

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>think it just shocked people. People woke up. I think

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>previous that they dabbled in et f s a post

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight, two thou nine, when when we

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 1>finally recovered, I think they made it a prominent part

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of their portfolio construction, and part of it I think

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>was a risk mitigation, at least from what they understood

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to be more of a risk mitigation because of you know,

0:53:09.320 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>let me look, at the time, I was at a

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>lines Bernstein uh Bernstein that part of a line Spernstein's

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>deep value and um, you know the Bernstein managers specifically

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:21.319
<v Speaker 1>and Loose Sanders as an investor himself, the CEO at

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the time, they rode financial services down all the way

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom because they were looking for that. You

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:29.920
<v Speaker 1>know what they talk about the sustainability of earnings with

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 1>growth companies, and they talk about the recoverability of earnings

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with with value companies, and so you know, fundamental active managers.

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time, we're just riding the wave

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:42.319
<v Speaker 1>to see if they can pick up some assets at

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the cheap. And that was a very, very tough ride

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of investors. So I think part of

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it was trust. I think a lot of it was

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>risk mitigation. Quite quite interesting. So again looking at the

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 1>lack of faith in the institutions, is that something that

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually comes back or is that a permanent scar and

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>people change their behavior for a generation. Yeah, yeah, No,

0:54:06.880 --> 0:54:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I think ten years later, I think it is bouncing back.

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think part of it is, you know, government

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>lead because of everything they've put in place in terms

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of safeguards, meaning the regulatory environment or the federal reserve environment.

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the regulatory environment in terms of the requirements

0:54:21.239 --> 0:54:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that they have. So they forced some of it. And

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think CEO s I mean, now, on the executive

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:29.800
<v Speaker 1>committees of organizations, whether it's a bank or asset managers,

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the chief risk officer reports to the CEO. And that

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a position that necessarily exists. It didn't didn't it

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't so and I agree with that, right, I mean,

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the general council reports the CEO. Why shouldn't the chief

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:45.480
<v Speaker 1>risk officers. It's we are stewards of our clients capitals,

0:54:45.520 --> 0:54:50.719
<v Speaker 1>we are fiduciaries. We need to take that particular function seriously.

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, whether it's it did the different

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:57.680
<v Speaker 1>government structures for running an etf business or fundamental active business.

0:54:57.719 --> 0:55:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I think whether it was regulatory pushed or forced upon,

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or firms just taking this more seriously and it becoming

0:55:06.040 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 1>a key role of the CEO. I think that certainly, Uh,

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>those institutions are starting to earn back trust ten years later.

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Do we do we run the risk when we elevate

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the chief risk officer to that c suite with the

0:55:22.080 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO's ear of stifling innovation or making companies risk averse?

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure no, And I think that's a great question, and

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to and we and we talk

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:32.319
<v Speaker 1>about this a lot at Oppenheimer Funds, and I think

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.640
<v Speaker 1>thankfully we've struck the balance because the portfolio management teams

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>UM on the fundamental active side are you know, there's

0:55:39.320 --> 0:55:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a push pole there, right. So

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:45.400
<v Speaker 1>our chief investment Officer, Christian MoManI Um, you know, he

0:55:46.040 --> 0:55:48.480
<v Speaker 1>works very very closely with our chief risk officer on

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>behalf of making sure that we don't do just that,

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that we give the prudent degree of freedom. Now, how

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:58.239
<v Speaker 1>do you define prudent degree of freedom? No leverage? That's

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>how I define it, Um, And you know, I mean, really,

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it's so much easier to get into trouble when you're running,

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for one, if you're putting out et fs that are

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>more interesting in in the way they're assembled and built

0:56:12.560 --> 0:56:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and they're not relying on a ton of leverage. There's

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.800
<v Speaker 1>really very modest risk there, right. The product works or

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It finds an audience or it doesn't. It

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 1>accumulates assets or it doesn't. But none of your e

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>t f s are ever going to blow up Oppenheim

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>or that we would never play. We would never I

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:31.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to play that game, but that that wasn't

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 1>our that was not our space, And I agree with you,

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's tough. I don't think investors understand it. I don't

0:56:35.680 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think they understand the impact of the leverage you're taking on.

0:56:39.040 --> 0:56:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It's easy. If you're fifty two one and you drop

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:45.200
<v Speaker 1>two per cent, you're gone, You're done, right, Like, wait,

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:48.000
<v Speaker 1>two percent drop wipes me out? Oh, I don't want leverage.

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a bad thing. And I think everybody that was

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the one big takeaway. I thought everybody learned from from

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. But you're saying risk is now thought

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of a little more differently at financial institutions. Absolutely, and

0:57:02.360 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>again part of it is because they knew they needed

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to to build back trust with clients. I mean again

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>back to our FPS. You know, in the very beginning

0:57:10.400 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of the RP, it asks about their risk management process,

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the firm overall from a centralized perspective, whether

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio management specifically, you've got to articulate your risk

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>management process. And we have that and we're running our

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:25.480
<v Speaker 1>rules based strategies. We have that in there as well, right,

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and index providers have that as well. So it's an

0:57:28.280 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 1>important part of the story. You know, again, we are

0:57:30.560 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 1>stewards of capital and we are fiduciaries and we need

0:57:32.960 --> 0:57:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to take that role seriously, not to say the least. Um.

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>The dominance in the E t F space by I

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:43.760
<v Speaker 1>almost want to say trilogy, but really it's Van Garden blocked.

0:57:44.360 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The Yeah, State Street is up there, but it the

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 1>two big ones are really um, well, the muscle in

0:57:51.560 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the space. How is it that this sector has evolved

0:57:55.320 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>where it's such a uneven distribution A winner take coal distribution.

0:58:02.480 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you know those three firms got started

0:58:05.920 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>way before everybody else, as you know, spise over years old, right,

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So I mean there there, there is, there is a

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a advantage absolutely, um. So part of it is that

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they certainly won over the early adopters of

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 1>E t F specifically UM, and they grew their passive

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>business for the first decade, so they just had a

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 1>giant head start and everybody else's playing catch up. I

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>mean there's well and then the players that got in

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the market after them. I have a belief set many

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of them that you know, we actually can evolve our

0:58:40.760 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental active franchise. We can do enhanced index, we can

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:48.600
<v Speaker 1>do active ETF. So they have sort of by passed

0:58:49.280 --> 0:58:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the passive to go to alternatively rated or active, something

0:58:52.840 --> 0:58:56.120
<v Speaker 1>more active, And so there's not a lot of unless

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you are putting out you know, these vehicles that are

0:58:58.840 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 1>for free that you used to allocate internally within your organization,

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:05.439
<v Speaker 1>whether you're using them to build model portfolios and charging

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>an overlafy. People aren't jumping on the passive bandwagon, by

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>which State Street vand guard Nice Year has got a

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>very strong early start too, so and most of the

0:59:15.680 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>pie of the flows every single year go to that.

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:20.959
<v Speaker 1>So there are people who are dabbling around the edges

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to UM try to offer a more sort of UM,

0:59:25.040 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, fully built out sweet to their clients, but

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody has the scale or can buy or build the

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>scare in a short period of time where they can

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:36.320
<v Speaker 1>even make a dent in the market share that that

0:59:36.480 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>those three organizations have. And I do believe a lot

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of it was the head start that they got. It

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Before I get to my favorite questions is

0:59:44.560 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions I wanted to ask you about.

0:59:46.880 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So you were at F squared UM when they ran

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:52.640
<v Speaker 1>into the little difficulties, What was your role and what

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was your reaction when you've heard about what was happening elsewhere. Yeah, so, uh,

0:59:57.560 --> 0:59:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a big segment of the market, as you

0:59:59.560 --> 1:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>recall at F strategis segment which is defined by you know,

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>model portfolios where at least fifty or more has to

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be with an ETFs. It grew to over a hundred

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>billion UM. Actually F Square was a big client of

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I Shares, so that's how I knew them. Um they

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>probably gave I Shares directed six st eight billion a year.

1:00:18.000 --> 1:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>That number might be slightly off, but anyway, so I

1:00:22.440 --> 1:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>they had outsourced everything and they wanted to build their

1:00:26.280 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>own discretionary business internally. So as hired as the president

1:00:29.400 --> 1:00:31.919
<v Speaker 1>of F Squared Capital, and I had to build our

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>our trading system higher head trader. UH put in place

1:00:36.160 --> 1:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio management system with the client service UM group

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>assemble a client service group sales to talk to Wells

1:00:44.120 --> 1:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Fargo's separate account platform business. So I built that lots

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of moving parts. Was really fun. We grewed almost thirty billion.

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>But the SEC came in in the summer of I

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>hope I get this right summer to do a routine

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>audit and had discovered that the track record we were marketing.

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>This is really important. The tracker we were marketing was

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>went back to two thousand one. The time period in

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>question was two thousand and eight, back to two thousand

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and one. In two thousand and eight, the CEO of

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>F squared bought a signal from a firm and was

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:21.919
<v Speaker 1>told that the signal was run against live client money.

1:01:22.400 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Therefore was a live signal two thousand and eight forward. Uh,

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that was now in the in the domain of F

1:01:29.440 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>squared and they ran that money at that signal against

1:01:33.200 --> 1:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>live client money and live client portfolios. It was Gibbs compliant.

1:01:36.560 --> 1:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>It was audited by a big accounting firm. So the

1:01:39.160 --> 1:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>SEC had no issue with the track record from two

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight forward. That was valid. It was all

1:01:43.960 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>based on the purchase and what was represented. That's there

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was the crux of the matter. So you know that

1:01:50.040 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was a disagreement. Yeah, so there was a disagreement. Certainly,

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of F squared continued to fight that that

1:01:55.480 --> 1:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it was misrepresented, but the SEC just with the SEC

1:01:58.760 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>did I mean, they get trade blotters and they get

1:02:00.640 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>everything they need to do to subpoena people and get

1:02:03.360 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to the heart of the matter, even if it is

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>represent if it's misrepresented to you and you go out

1:02:08.360 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and represented, that's what they're going to hang their hat on. So, hey,

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you relied on someone who lied to you, your bed right,

1:02:14.320 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>so you should have done deeper due diligence or whatever

1:02:16.600 --> 1:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the theory is. So unfortunately, you know, we I still

1:02:20.720 --> 1:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>believe to this day that what we were doing in

1:02:22.560 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the way in which we were doing it, which was

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the alpha sector of products, was a prudent way to

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>run a portfolio. Client certainly agreed with that as we

1:02:29.240 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>grew very quickly. However, um, once they slapped the fine

1:02:33.200 --> 1:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on and they got rid of our CEO and sort

1:02:35.240 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of abandoned from the industry and one of the board

1:02:37.120 --> 1:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>members came off of the board to be the introm CEO,

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we really needed to kind of wind the firm down.

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>There was too much damage done. I was going to say,

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>is that recoverable even if it's an innocent mistake? And

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any information whether it is or isn't,

1:02:50.600 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But when the SEC drops that sort of hammer, is

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>there anything that can be done to done to save

1:02:56.840 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a company of that point or is it just all

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>bets are off? Yeah? You know. Look, so to your point, Barry,

1:03:02.040 --> 1:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all two employees approximate to employees were completely innocent. Thankfully,

1:03:06.320 --> 1:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the industry recognized that and gave everybody a free option,

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and everybody has has gone on to be into really

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>great jobs at other firms. Um. But I think what

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>happened is the trust was just eroded, but from the clients.

1:03:19.600 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So clients were starting to pull money. Um, and it

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was it was too difficult to save. And so we

1:03:25.440 --> 1:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what we did is we hired a banker to do

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>an asset pursage agreement and so sell the remaining assets off.

1:03:31.200 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, we just it was it was

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>too difficult. So you know, look, I I what I

1:03:36.080 --> 1:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>learned through that process was I mean it was excruciating certainly,

1:03:40.720 --> 1:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>UM but um, you know, managing through crisis and trying

1:03:44.640 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to you know, keep everybody on the boat until such

1:03:47.000 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>time that you've got to get everybody safely off the boat. UM,

1:03:50.080 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and just being really open and honest with clients. I

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>mean clients would take me out to dinner and say

1:03:53.760 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>what really happened? And I had to say that I

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>actually have no idea. I mean I wasn't here I

1:03:57.960 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>joined in. Um. But again b B seek solace and

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>knowing that two thousand and eight forward, since F square,

1:04:07.280 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it has been running your money. It's been it's been

1:04:09.400 --> 1:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>done in in a in a prudent way. So it

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was tough. But that's an amazing story. Yeah, it's it's

1:04:15.000 --> 1:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly the most excruciating chapter of my career. It's for

1:04:20.080 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>two is that everybody below the CEO managed to continue

1:04:24.040 --> 1:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the career. Everybody's great without that being a black mark. No, no,

1:04:27.400 --> 1:04:29.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody understands it now. It was sort of isolated to

1:04:29.800 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the CEO. Amazing. So let's jump to our favorite questions.

1:04:34.320 --> 1:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>These are the things I asked all of our guests.

1:04:37.800 --> 1:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's start out with, what was the first car you

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:48.600
<v Speaker 1>ever owned? Your making Model seventy four Volkswagen super Beetle. Really,

1:04:48.720 --> 1:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I had a super Beetle. They were indestructible, are absolutely.

1:04:53.200 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I had three hundred thousand miles online. I had not

1:04:57.720 --> 1:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a beat seven the four By then they had breakes

1:05:02.000 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and radios and air conditioning. I didn't have any of that.

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Mine was light blue, which god, I had a light

1:05:07.360 --> 1:05:09.840
<v Speaker 1>blue one. Also I had a white Bug and then

1:05:10.560 --> 1:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a light blue super Beetle. The super Beetle for about

1:05:13.760 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>six months I was broken, did not have a battery,

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would start parked on a hill and just

1:05:19.360 --> 1:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>drop the clutch and that's how I would start the car.

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>It's um literally so so I had no heat, so

1:05:26.240 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that was tough. But they were pretty pretty indestructive, absolutely

1:05:30.720 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>until the floorboards rusted out and became like a flint stone. Right.

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I had one of those, absolutely, So tell us the

1:05:37.600 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>most important thing people don't know about? Sharon French. It

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>was funny what the word important? I mean, the most

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>important thing in my life, for sure is that I'm

1:05:46.600 --> 1:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a mom. And but I think most people know. Y, yes,

1:05:50.360 --> 1:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think most people know that. Um, what else is important?

1:05:54.640 --> 1:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean some things people don't know. I don't know

1:05:56.240 --> 1:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>how important is I have a titanium hip, so a

1:05:59.360 --> 1:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people called me the bionic woman. When you

1:06:01.440 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>go through airport security, does that set stuff? Yes, it does.

1:06:04.640 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I have to. I have to do the walk through

1:06:06.280 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>thing where you hold your arms machine. That is the

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>only non invasive imaging technology that has not been f

1:06:14.520 --> 1:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>d A approved. And you'll notice when they set the

1:06:17.000 --> 1:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>button they kind of lean back, lean away from it

1:06:19.600 --> 1:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because they know that stuff is going to kill them.

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm the beauty of t s A pre

1:06:26.200 --> 1:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or even better clear is that you don't have to

1:06:28.920 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do the naked machine, which does go. But because of

1:06:31.640 --> 1:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>my hip and I carry I carry a card to

1:06:33.520 --> 1:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>my and my wallet that shows the hip, I have

1:06:35.800 --> 1:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a striker hip, and my doctor's name and everything I've

1:06:37.880 --> 1:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>an addressed. Um. But I actually just thinking about it,

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and this could set up a whole, This could set

1:06:42.360 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>off a whole another series of questions. An important fact

1:06:45.000 --> 1:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>about me that nobody knows that I just found out,

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's a little bit of a family controversy. Family

1:06:50.160 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of origin, my my five brothers and sisters or six

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of us is I did twenty three and me and

1:06:56.160 --> 1:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>my whole life. I thought I was a pure bread

1:06:58.800 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Irish woman. Apparently not I am Oshgnazi Jew. Really, yes,

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fascinating, that's fascinating. So we had an unbelievable you know,

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>family conversation over Thanksgiving and made my mother Unfortunately my

1:07:14.560 --> 1:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>dad has passed, but we made my mother take the

1:07:16.960 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>test and she surprisingly is fifty percent, which means one

1:07:22.000 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of her parents has to be so you know, and

1:07:26.720 --> 1:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>which she doesn't. They're both deceased. But we think it's

1:07:29.920 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>my grandfather. But you know, somebody went astray or this

1:07:33.000 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is post World War two or maybe not. So they

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>were born in uh the after the war. People stopped,

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>some people stopped talking. They were born in nineteen oh.

1:07:45.600 --> 1:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>My grandparents were born in nineteen o five or six

1:07:48.800 --> 1:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>around there. So anyway, so that's an important fact that

1:07:51.440 --> 1:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, I didn't even know until recently. If you

1:07:53.720 --> 1:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>want to have some fun, google Oshkenazi Jewish nobel recipients.

1:07:58.640 --> 1:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's there's fastly disproportionate, and I don't know what that's about,

1:08:03.720 --> 1:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's kind of it's I just went to the

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Nobile Museum in Stockholm and the fall was it was fabulous. Second, yeah,

1:08:10.240 --> 1:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot um tell us about some of

1:08:12.480 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 1>your early mentors who helped shape your career. Yes, yes, so,

1:08:17.120 --> 1:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>um Bob Shulman, Robert Shulman. So he was an executive

1:08:23.120 --> 1:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>at E. F. Hutton Shearson Lehman Brothers. I think he

1:08:26.400 --> 1:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>left before the Smith Barney acquisition to become president and

1:08:30.000 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Tremont Advisors. Um. But he was a very

1:08:35.760 --> 1:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>very shrewd, tough boss. He had I had moved into

1:08:41.400 --> 1:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a number of different positions throughout my decade at that

1:08:44.080 --> 1:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>organization and really really tough and ran a number of

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>different business units, new product development. He actually was one

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the early executives who ran the Smith Barney Consulting

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Group UM, which was ultimately sold off to I think

1:08:58.800 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Bank of New York m Ellen UM. And he was

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>tough as nails and so the reason and we still

1:09:06.600 --> 1:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>meet for coffee and and uh lunch today he's retired, UM,

1:09:11.040 --> 1:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but he was. He was instrumental to me because he

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>was so tough. I didn't need coddling. I needed to

1:09:18.560 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>understand how to be better and do better and UM help.

1:09:22.520 --> 1:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>He gave me all kinds of runway. And so my

1:09:25.560 --> 1:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>reputation today is sort of somebody who can you know, fixer? Right,

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I was a question I didn't get to. Your reputation

1:09:33.200 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is something's messed up, Send share and she'll fix it. Yeah. Well,

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's fixing and growing or doing the

1:09:39.280 --> 1:09:42.519
<v Speaker 1>diagnostic in order to remove the obstacle for growth. I mean,

1:09:42.600 --> 1:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I I hope that at some point people see me

1:09:45.880 --> 1:09:49.679
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who drives profitable growth. But that was Bob,

1:09:50.000 --> 1:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and that was that is who gave me those early

1:09:53.800 --> 1:09:56.479
<v Speaker 1>you know sort of runways and taught me how to

1:09:56.840 --> 1:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>go at the heart of the issue, um and keep harder,

1:10:00.439 --> 1:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>keep running stronger. I mean, I certainly he wasn't a

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are afraid of him. UM So I

1:10:05.280 --> 1:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that he was the mentor in my life

1:10:07.120 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>who taught me how to socialize issues and how to

1:10:10.000 --> 1:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>get the right key stake overt holders involved and get

1:10:12.439 --> 1:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>their buy and that came later. Um. I had a

1:10:15.080 --> 1:10:18.519
<v Speaker 1>female mentor, Alliance Bernstein. I had a male mentor also

1:10:18.560 --> 1:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to Alliance Bernstein, and I think helped me along in

1:10:20.840 --> 1:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that regard as well. UM So, I'm a big believer

1:10:24.200 --> 1:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>in mentors. I'm a big believer in sponsorship. Um And

1:10:27.640 --> 1:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I have mentored a ton of mostly women in my career,

1:10:31.720 --> 1:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>which I continue to do and I really believe in

1:10:33.920 --> 1:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>because at this stage of my career very to me,

1:10:35.840 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it's all about paying it forward. I mean, I I

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot more to accomplish, but it's all

1:10:40.840 --> 1:10:45.479
<v Speaker 1>about inspiring the next generation, which I started a a

1:10:45.760 --> 1:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>unit called University Outreach within Women and e t f S,

1:10:48.800 --> 1:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>which is actually going to universities at the undergraduate level

1:10:52.840 --> 1:10:56.639
<v Speaker 1>and mentoring in them and raising their awareness around asset

1:10:56.720 --> 1:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>management and et F specifically because a lot of a

1:10:59.800 --> 1:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of women who are going into business, I have

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>nowhere to go from there, and business is hard for women.

1:11:05.320 --> 1:11:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Financial services is still pretty difficult. It's getting better, um,

1:11:08.760 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>but I I really want to inspire the next generation

1:11:11.520 --> 1:11:14.639
<v Speaker 1>at the undergraduate level and then mentor younger females who

1:11:14.760 --> 1:11:19.599
<v Speaker 1>are incredibly smart and promising within this industry. What about

1:11:19.680 --> 1:11:23.919
<v Speaker 1>investors who influenced the way you look at assets, markets

1:11:24.000 --> 1:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and investment. When I was young, it was Bill Sharp

1:11:26.200 --> 1:11:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and Harry mark o Witz right Modern Partio, Yes sixty two.

1:11:31.400 --> 1:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>So the only startup I did in my career was Empower.

1:11:33.920 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>That's when I left my wealth management brokerage experience in

1:11:39.320 --> 1:11:41.599
<v Speaker 1>New York and moved to San Francisco right after AO

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:45.599
<v Speaker 1>went public in remember that that really started the whole

1:11:45.600 --> 1:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet place. UM and so UM that startup experience was

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:54.479
<v Speaker 1>was really really strong, and we partnered with Harry Marko Witz.

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Our competition with financial engines who partnered with Bill Sharp. UM,

1:11:59.280 --> 1:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean more recently, um over the that was probably

1:12:03.360 --> 1:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>my second decade. My third decade was more FAMA and

1:12:06.240 --> 1:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>French at the University of Chicago and a lot of

1:12:08.720 --> 1:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>their factor work. I really do believe in the persistence

1:12:11.400 --> 1:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of factors is a more uh precise way to get

1:12:15.040 --> 1:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>at the key drivers of return. Right, Eugene Fama at Chicago,

1:12:19.360 --> 1:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Ken French at Dartmouth, Yes, exactly, a tough

1:12:22.400 --> 1:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>school and that's quite interesting. Um. Everybody's favorite question, what

1:12:28.920 --> 1:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are some of your favorite books, be they fiction, non fiction,

1:12:31.439 --> 1:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>investing related, or whatever. Yeah. So, I'm I really love

1:12:34.920 --> 1:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to learn about people. So I love reading biographies. Um

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I the one I just read was I

1:12:42.320 --> 1:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Love Capitalism by Ken Lango. It was fast. He's a

1:12:46.400 --> 1:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really interesting I'll be a krusty guy. I mean he's

1:12:49.520 --> 1:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a classic curmudgeon. Lely had the book read.

1:12:52.840 --> 1:12:57.879
<v Speaker 1>He was scrappy, scrappy. That's the better work to get crusty, scrappy, scrappy.

1:12:58.040 --> 1:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could not put it down. I read

1:12:59.920 --> 1:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it three days home. Depot is just amazing. I mean

1:13:02.960 --> 1:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he did so many other things deep absolutely, I mean

1:13:06.280 --> 1:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he put capital together on Wall Street, That's what he did.

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>He was scrappy, he was fearless. He was amazing. Um.

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, so, um, I just read Michelle Obama's book,

1:13:16.800 --> 1:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was great becoming also read that one

1:13:18.800 --> 1:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in three days. Um, Katherine Hepburn, Um, certainly Michael Bloomberg,

1:13:23.360 --> 1:13:29.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm a giant Katherine Hepburn fane biography, biography, biography, who

1:13:29.640 --> 1:13:33.479
<v Speaker 1>wrote that? And UM, oh gosh, you're testing me. I

1:13:33.640 --> 1:13:37.639
<v Speaker 1>just I just don't there's a dozen Katherine Hepburn biography. Yes, Um,

1:13:38.120 --> 1:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember. Barry I'm sorry, I don't remember. Emailed me.

1:13:41.240 --> 1:13:44.599
<v Speaker 1>I'll add it to the list. But even Anne Keller,

1:13:44.680 --> 1:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I mean, I you know, so

1:13:46.960 --> 1:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated by people. So my my my favorite books

1:13:51.400 --> 1:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are actually reading about you know, the bio biography channel

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:56.479
<v Speaker 1>I love to listen to. I mean, I certainly have

1:13:56.600 --> 1:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>read a lot about the Grateful Dead, going back to music,

1:13:59.080 --> 1:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jerry Goo see uh, Phil Collins, So I

1:14:03.200 --> 1:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I typically read not, that's a weird that's a weird

1:14:07.160 --> 1:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>juxtaposition the dead into Phil. Not exactly. I've got an neglectic,

1:14:12.880 --> 1:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, palette. Let's see, I go back to the

1:14:15.880 --> 1:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>established that of Genesis and Peter Gabriel, not that I

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>not that I mind super tramp Genesis, that whole that

1:14:23.400 --> 1:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was high school for me. That was my freshman year

1:14:25.200 --> 1:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in college. Breakfast alight. So you're older than me. A touch,

1:14:29.240 --> 1:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>just a touch, Um, So, what do you tell us

1:14:31.960 --> 1:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>about a time you failed and what you learned from

1:14:34.200 --> 1:14:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the experience? Are there any other books before we jumped

1:14:36.680 --> 1:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in down? That's that's good. I mean, certainly I read

1:14:38.960 --> 1:14:41.599
<v Speaker 1>other things other than just biographies. But I think that's

1:14:41.640 --> 1:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the thought I'd like to leave you with. Okay, So

1:14:44.160 --> 1:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>let's discuss the time you failed business or not and

1:14:47.240 --> 1:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what you learned from the experience. Gosh, okay. So it's

1:14:52.800 --> 1:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of business and personal at the same time. So

1:14:55.439 --> 1:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>during that period of time where I was in San

1:14:56.760 --> 1:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Francisco where I was working for Empower and we were

1:14:59.120 --> 1:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we were growing fast us again. Harvard Business Case Study

1:15:02.200 --> 1:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>loved it. We ended up selling the business to morning

1:15:03.960 --> 1:15:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Star ultimately in two thousand one. But um, I was

1:15:07.760 --> 1:15:10.519
<v Speaker 1>running global sales. I was one of uh. I was

1:15:10.760 --> 1:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was on the management team employed, you know,

1:15:13.360 --> 1:15:16.479
<v Speaker 1>fifth member of the management team. UM. And we had

1:15:16.520 --> 1:15:18.879
<v Speaker 1>built our business domestically and I was starting to establish

1:15:18.920 --> 1:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>our business globally. So we I set up I was

1:15:21.240 --> 1:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth from San Francisco to Tokyo and

1:15:23.360 --> 1:15:26.479
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco to London. Put up joint ventures in London

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to grow that and build a subsidiary bricks and mortar

1:15:29.040 --> 1:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in Um sorry, in Asia. We did joint ventures London.

1:15:33.000 --> 1:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We put up a subsidering we had We were a

1:15:36.080 --> 1:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>finalist for so Miszooho really came together in two thousand

1:15:40.880 --> 1:15:43.479
<v Speaker 1>one of his iby J Industrial Bank of Japan, day

1:15:43.600 --> 1:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Chicanga dk B and Fujibank. Those three individual banks came

1:15:47.160 --> 1:15:49.719
<v Speaker 1>together to form ben zoo Hoo. While they were forming,

1:15:50.320 --> 1:15:53.479
<v Speaker 1>they were looking for online investment advisory services. We were

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as one of many things on this platform they were building.

1:15:55.920 --> 1:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>We were a finalist. There was two of us at

1:15:58.080 --> 1:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that time. I was pregnant with my daughter, very pregnant, well,

1:16:01.920 --> 1:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>started out not so pregnant, but over the course of

1:16:03.880 --> 1:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>eight months, I and um I needed to and as

1:16:10.360 --> 1:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>if you understand the Japanese culture, they are very much

1:16:14.400 --> 1:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>into relationships, right, not that we are in the US,

1:16:17.800 --> 1:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but even more so, much deeper. So when you start

1:16:20.240 --> 1:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with them, you have to end with them or you

1:16:21.880 --> 1:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>might as well not compete. And so I was the

1:16:24.840 --> 1:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one who had to hot fly to Tokyo to do

1:16:27.160 --> 1:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this finalist presentation. And I was eight months right, so

1:16:30.960 --> 1:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>ps forged the doctor's note. Bad idea. UM. I remember

1:16:36.040 --> 1:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time my husband and my son was to saying,

1:16:39.360 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you go you don't get it, we

1:16:41.960 --> 1:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>will not be here when you get back. Do you

1:16:44.280 --> 1:16:46.439
<v Speaker 1>understand that when you fly to New York or London

1:16:46.560 --> 1:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or New York, you're flying over land, So if you

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>go into labor, you have to land the plane and

1:16:51.120 --> 1:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>you can land them. I can't land the plane when

1:16:52.720 --> 1:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you're over the that's right, So stupid me I went. Thankfully,

1:16:58.840 --> 1:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The story ends, well, we did win the business and

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't quinto labor. But I went into labor prematurely

1:17:05.880 --> 1:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>two weeks after I got back, and my daughter was fine,

1:17:09.080 --> 1:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>she was six pounds. My husband and little boy was

1:17:13.000 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>were still there, although he didn't talk to me for

1:17:15.040 --> 1:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the following month. But the lesson learned and very I

1:17:18.000 --> 1:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>said that I mentor people and women, and many of

1:17:21.200 --> 1:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the things I said them is look avoid the mistakes

1:17:23.280 --> 1:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I made. What was I thinking our number one priorities, ourselves,

1:17:27.720 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>our healths in our family. That was the stupidest thing

1:17:31.320 --> 1:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I ever did. I put my life at risk and

1:17:34.720 --> 1:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>my unborn child's life at risk. Wow, like stupid, that's

1:17:40.040 --> 1:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's pretty bad. That's a horrifying, horrifying story. Again,

1:17:44.120 --> 1:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it worked out, but still, what do you do for fun?

1:17:48.520 --> 1:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>What do I do for fund? Listen to music? Um? Look,

1:17:52.920 --> 1:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm very sporty, as you say so. I I used

1:17:56.640 --> 1:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to run, but now I have a new hip, so

1:17:57.800 --> 1:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that anymore. But I do yoga, I

1:18:01.000 --> 1:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>do you know, stand up paddle boarding, I ski, um,

1:18:04.520 --> 1:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I you know, snorkele, I, paraglide, I do anything. I

1:18:11.320 --> 1:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>don't say no to anything. I don't scuba dive. I've

1:18:14.280 --> 1:18:16.599
<v Speaker 1>got to get my over my fear of scuba diving.

1:18:17.400 --> 1:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm very sporty, so you know, I'll be on

1:18:19.880 --> 1:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a softball team or I'll you know, um, I'll always

1:18:24.280 --> 1:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>say yes if anybody wants my son just jump jumped

1:18:26.640 --> 1:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>out of a plane. I don't know if I'm going

1:18:27.960 --> 1:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to do that, but yeah, that's the risk reward on

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that one is not my my favorite. So our last

1:18:33.200 --> 1:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>questions because we have to wrap. Um, what sort of

1:18:35.840 --> 1:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>advice would you give any millennial who was thinking of

1:18:38.800 --> 1:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>going into a career in finance. Yeah, so, look, it's

1:18:41.960 --> 1:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting millennials. You and I grew up with the mutual

1:18:44.280 --> 1:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>fund in the eighties. Millennials are growing up with et

1:18:47.000 --> 1:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>f s right, and they're growing up with digital advice.

1:18:50.800 --> 1:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Um So. One of the things I like about that

1:18:53.320 --> 1:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is it's it's a lot of the burden of that

1:18:55.920 --> 1:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>falls on their shoulders in terms of how they learned

1:18:58.400 --> 1:19:02.519
<v Speaker 1>to um you know, think about portfolio construction. Um So,

1:19:02.880 --> 1:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think data and I mean, look, we're sitting at Bloomberg.

1:19:06.200 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 1>This is the epicenter of data and intelligence. I am

1:19:09.680 --> 1:19:13.519
<v Speaker 1>big into how the financial world meets the technology world.

1:19:13.680 --> 1:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>So I certainly my passion and my love deep down

1:19:16.520 --> 1:19:19.559
<v Speaker 1>as asset management, but I love the intersection of finance

1:19:19.600 --> 1:19:23.519
<v Speaker 1>and technology, So I certainly would um you know, advise

1:19:23.600 --> 1:19:26.439
<v Speaker 1>them in that direction. And our final question, what is

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it that you know about the world of investing today

1:19:28.520 --> 1:19:30.519
<v Speaker 1>that you wish you knew thirty years ago when you

1:19:30.600 --> 1:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>first started. I wish I understood risk a little bit more.

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, I sort of thought tree screwed to the

1:19:37.160 --> 1:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sky back then, and you know, I think I was

1:19:39.360 --> 1:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit idealistic at that time. So I'm I'm

1:19:42.479 --> 1:19:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I've I've been sobered and I've been burned. I mean,

1:19:44.600 --> 1:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been through three market corrections that are pretty significant

1:19:47.320 --> 1:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>eight seven, two thousand, two thousand one and two eight,

1:19:50.680 --> 1:19:52.599
<v Speaker 1>as well as market timing scandals and all the things

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. So you know, I'm I'm much more practical now,

1:19:56.040 --> 1:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>much more pragmatic, and uh, I wish I knew that

1:19:58.600 --> 1:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>back then. I think a lot of you, a younger

1:20:00.400 --> 1:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>generation of special millennials, are super idealistic. But having been

1:20:04.280 --> 1:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>through what I've been through throughout my career, you know,

1:20:06.960 --> 1:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I wish I learned more earlier on about you know,

1:20:10.400 --> 1:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>managing risk better. Really really interesting answer. We have been

1:20:14.280 --> 1:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Sharon French. She is the head of Beta

1:20:17.320 --> 1:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Solutions at Oppenheimer Funds. If you enjoy this conversation, well,

1:20:22.320 --> 1:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>be sure and check out Apple iTunes, uh and look

1:20:25.160 --> 1:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>upward down an inch where you can see any of

1:20:27.400 --> 1:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the other two hundred and fifty or so such conversations

1:20:31.040 --> 1:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had previously. Uh. You can find that at iTunes, Stitcher, overcast,

1:20:36.320 --> 1:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions

1:20:40.640 --> 1:20:44.519
<v Speaker 1>right to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

1:20:45.160 --> 1:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>crack staff that helps put together these conversations each week.

1:20:51.240 --> 1:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Medina Parwana is our audio engineer. Slash producer Atika val

1:20:56.840 --> 1:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Brun is our project director. Uh Michael Boyle is our booker.

1:21:02.240 --> 1:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is our head of research. I'm Parry Retolts.

1:21:06.320 --> 1:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.