WEBVTT - A Criminal Without A Crime?

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Sorry to spoil the surprise, but if you're getting gift

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>from me this Christmas, you're getting coffee from my favorite

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.560
<v Speaker 1>coffee company, Black Rifle Coffee. Every morning when I go

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>into the hill, I have a steamy, hot, delicious cup

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of Black Rifle, just black. And that's also how I

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>drink it. And the name of the coffee. By the way,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>it is delicious. Okay. The aromas, the different taste profiles

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that come through are incredible. Oh and by the way,

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a company run by and four veterans, including

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>veterans of the United States Special Forces. These guys are amazing.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Black Rifles Coffee Club makes things so easy. Just pick

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>your blending amount you want and they'll ship the coffee

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>right to your door. Check this out for yourself. They

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>offer three, six and twelve month prepaid and pay as

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you go subscriptions. The best tasting, most energizing coffee imaginable,

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 1>and they help veteran first responder causes. Black Rifle Coffee

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is the gift that keeps on giving. Visit Black Riflecoffee

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off your order.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck for fifteen percent off.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the Freedom Hunch, an epic throwdown in

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>the Oval Office with President Trump, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Schumer over the wall and the possible shutdown. Looks like

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe Republicans are growing a bit of a backbone here.

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got that and much more coming up on The

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the mission or mission is to decode what really matters

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, American, You're a great American. Again,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, you want to say,

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I want to say. We have a lot

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of disagreements here. The Washington Post today gave you a

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of pinocchios because they say you constantly misstake

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>how much of the wall is built and how much

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is there. But that's not the point here. We have

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a disagreement about the wall, Washington, whether it's effective or

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or not on board of security, but on the wall.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>We do not want to shut down the government. You

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have called twenty times to shut down the government. Who

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>say I want to shut down the government, We don't.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>We want to come to an agreement. If we can't

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>come to an agreement. We have solutions that will pass

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the House and send it right now, and we'll not

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>shut down the government. And that's what we're urging you

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to do. Not threatened to shut down the government because

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you let me just finish, because you can't pitch it down.

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>You give me say something, mister President, you just say

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>my way, or will shut down the government. We have

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a proposal that Democrats and Republicans will support to do

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a cr that will not shut down the government. We

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>urge you to take it. If it's not good border security,

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I will very welcome to the Buck Saxon Show. Oh man,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it was good stuff today of the Oval Office. This

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is the Trump that we signed up for. This is

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump that I want to see, the Trump that

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>makes the case in front of the American people and

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>holds the Libs feet to the fire so to speak,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean makes them make the case publicly. And you

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>could tell Pelosi and Schumer, oh, they wanted no part

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of what President Trump was bringing today because they know

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is better at this than they are. You know,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>without a completely in the tank for her press corps,

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi is exposed. She knows that, you know, Pelosi never

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>asked to take tough questions from anybody. Pelosi doesn't have

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to really explain herself in any meaningful way. She just

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>just treated like the queen all the time. And you know,

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer same thing, treated like the King of the Democrats.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And Trump was just saying, look, you know, I'm sorry,

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we gotta have a wall here. I mean this, This

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>whole debate, this whole discussion over a wall and whether

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we should have one or not, gets gets compleatly lost

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with the pensial efforts of the media to obscure what's

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>really going on. And the dumbest talking point that I've

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>heard on almost any subject is walls don't work. Of course,

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>walls work. Walls work in the San Diego sector of

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>the border. Walls have worked for as long as human

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.679
<v Speaker 1>beings have been building things. A wall is a barrier.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>To say that a wall does not work is like

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>saying a lock does not work. How many of you

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have a lock on your door, on your front door,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe on more than just that, maybe you're you know,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>all over your house, But how many of you have

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a lock. If I came to you and I said,

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a lock on your front door is stupid. I could

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>get into your house. I could break through your window.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do you lock your front door? Would you say, yeah,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you're right, no more locks. No if I said locks

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 1>don't work, because I could just you know, pick the lock,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>or I could kick the door, and you say locks

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>don't work. No. Charity is never about what's perfect. Security

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is about trying to lessen the chance of something bad happened,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or a lessen an occasion from arising the idea that

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a wall is supposed to stop everybody. No one says that,

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but let's just make it a little bit harder than Hey,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I got to the border, I'm gonna walk across now.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>People say, well, buck, there's border patrol. Okay, fine, Yeah,

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that's why it's not just a wall. I appreciate when

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they say that, because they're really making the argument for me. Yes,

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we do have border patrol. We do have either some

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>surveillance capability, and there are efforts to police and patrol

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the border of effectively, although they're not enough. A wall

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>makes those efforts more successful, makes it harder for people

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to just continue to come into the country. And either

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are just they are absolutely making it up

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as they go along on this thing. They're saying they'll

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>give one point five billion. That's what they always get

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>for board and security, ay, a pace for some things

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>here and there, pays for some government employees and some

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>other things, you know. And the Republican plan it's like, look,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>give us five billion and we'll get started building this wall.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's now or never for a wall, folks.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you remember Trump at all these different rallies.

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You remember what he was saying. He was you know,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the proposal was not I'll get you give me sixty

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>senators and I'll get a wall. You know, the president

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we can go into a government shutdown, they can decide

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>not to immediately fund all aspects of eighty five percent

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the government gets fund. I mean, that's there's so much

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>propaganda around this. It's not even a government shutdown. It's

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a partial government furlough. And it's really just a fragment

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the government. So this is not catastrophic. But you know,

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes the point the Republicans they've got the lame ducks.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.719
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't they're looking at trying to get something done here.

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know that that Democrats the way they the

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>way they fight this. You know, the way the way

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they're presenting this is that they say, uh, that that

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to spend the money, and that it

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work, and all these things are just are just nonsense.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Five billion dollars, that's what they think is is so

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>unexactly five billion dollars. I mean, when you look at

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>how much money we've been spending overseas in recent years

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for things that do not benefit the American people nearly

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as actual border security would, you're telling we're

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna have five billion dollars for this. It is nonsense.

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But they know this is just about the politics. This

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>is about who is going to as it always is

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>with the shutdowns, who is going to get the blame,

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and Pelosi, Pelosi and Shuber wanting to be very clear

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're, you know, they're going to blame the president

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for this shutdown. Play seventeen. The bottom line is simple.

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The President made clear that he wants a shutdown his position.

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>If he sticks to his position for a five billion

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars wall, he will get no wall, and he will

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>get a shutdown. Let's see, Chucky, Let's see what he's got.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Here's Pelosi. By the way, on. She calls it in

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>this clip the Trump shutdown, which I think is just

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, because she does. I think she still stings that.

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Remember Trump said the Schumer shutdown, and that kind of

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>stuck people. Remember, oh, yeah, the Schumer shutdown. When when

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Schumer's going to shut down the government and then he

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>backed off of it, right or he backed off after

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the short shutdown? Play clip at twelve. Some wall has

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>been reinforced by our military. Military has done a fantastic job.

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So the wall would get built. But we may not.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>We may not have an agreement today. We probably won't,

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but we have an agreement on other things that are

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>really good. Nancy, would you like to say something, well,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>thank you, mister President's the opportunity to meet with you

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so that we can work together in a bipartisan way

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to meet the needs of the American people. I think

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>American people recognize that we must keep government open, that

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown is not worth anything, and that you should

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>not have a Trump shutdown. You have the Trump Trump down.

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You have a White House, you have the Senate, you

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.959
<v Speaker 1>have the House of Representatives, you have the vote. You

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>should pass it. Trump. You could tell he got a

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>little exasperate or there too, where Nancy says that Trump shutdown,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He's like, you gotta be you gotta be kidding me. Really,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But now Trump has said that if there is a shutdown,

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I think he just doesn't like that she's taken his

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>taking his style there a little bit because he got

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the whole Schumer shutdown thing going. But Trump is saying, yeah,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he's down to do this. In fact, he's saying,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>just straight up, I'm gonna do this. I'm gonna shut

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>down the government if you do not give me the

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>wall play eleven. Oh we don't have eleven. Oh we

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>already played it. Yeah, Well, he says, I'm proud to

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>shut down the government for border security, Chuck. People in

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>this country don't want criminals and people that have lots

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of problems and drugs pouring into our country. Trump has

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>drawn a line of the sand here. He's either doing

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it or he's not doing it, and I don't know

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>how he backs off it. At this point, they're either

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>giving him the money or he's gonna have to shut

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>down the government. You know, the Democrats are fundamentally unserious

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about this, and that's why I like this approach. I

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>want this out there. I want them to have to

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>explain themselves because otherwise what happens is, you know, they

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>all do this behind closed doors thing. They all have

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>this discussion that we don't get to see, we don't

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 1>know what's happening, and then no one gets any blame.

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And when there's no blame because you don't know who's

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>responsible for what, there can't be any accountability. And if

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>there's no accountability within the slimy politicians get away with

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>saying whatever they want, and when it comes time for reelection,

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, they'll just they'll change it up and start saying, oh,

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I was a stalwart on the boarder. I

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was never gonna get know. They just make it up

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as they go along. It's just all a big bachanall

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of self interest on Capitol Hell for the most part anyway.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's what's really going on. So I would like

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this to be out there for us to see. I

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>want Trump to be making this case in front of

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the American people. You know who doesn't want it, Nancy

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi to play fourteen. They're here to have a conversation

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.599
<v Speaker 1>careful way. So I don't think we should have the

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>debate and trying to press on this. But the fact

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is the Senate of the House, Republicans could bring up

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>this bill if they had the vote immediately and set

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the tone for what you want. If we thought we

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>were going to get it passed in the Senate, Nancy,

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we would do it immediately, would get it passed very easily.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>In the House, we would, Nancy, I'd have it passed

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in two seconds. It doesn't matter though, because we can't

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 1>get a pass in the center because we need ten

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat volks. Let us have our conversation now. Depressing you know,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't make any sense. I don't understand what

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>what what Nancy Pelosi even things she's saying here. There's

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some problem with as Trump says, transparency, with with finding

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>out you know, why are Democrats so opposed to this?

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>There's the Secure Fence Act was voted on big bipartisan

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>majorities two thousand and six. Has really that much changed.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>This just used to be an area where the country

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was at least our elected leadership was pretending to be

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in wide agreement. But then Republicans, a lot of them

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>sold out the donor class, a lot of them became

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of infected with this uh you know, ultra free market,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>free movement of people, libertarian, you know, mumbo jumbo, and

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they started believing this stuff. They started believing, you know, hey,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter the more of the merrier. You know,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't really need a secure border. We don't need

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>any border. Really. There are someone who say they're on

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>the right who believe this. And then for the Democrats,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>they just realize, oh, this is this is ball game

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>for us. This means everything else that they want will

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be made possible through continued illegal immigration and through the

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>amnesty of the illegal aliens already of the country. And

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>they know that they only have to win this fight

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll win all the others. That's why this

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is so important to them, and that's why they're willing

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to make arguments. They aren't even really arguments. It's just

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, whining and accusations and oh it's

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>so racist and xenophobic, and this is what they say.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I have to deal with watching different pundits go on TV.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this part of my job is knowing what

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>all these clowns are saying all the time. And I heard,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>at least I've heard at least three people in the

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days say some variation of you know,

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>experts agree that a wall won't work. And I sit

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>here and I say to myself, well, I've been told

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>by the head of Border Patrol, by senior ice officials,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>by former border patrol officials, of course a wall will work.

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So who are these wall experts who don't actually work

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in border security and don't know what they're talking You know,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>where is the where is the expert consensus so to speak,

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that we shouldn't have a wall. It just appears in

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>media reports. You know, they ask somebody from like the

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Center for Migrant Rights AKA, like you know,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a George Soros. I don't think that's probably a real place.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just I tried to make that up off

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>top of my head. But you know, some George Soros

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>funded outfit somewhere that's saying, yay, you know it just

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all the experts agree a wall doesn't work. That's just

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this is buffoonish. He's buffoonish. If you're if you're trying

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to get you know, from point A to point B

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's a ten foot wall with patrol on one

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>side of it, are you more or less likely to

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get from A to B. It's all about the numbers,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all about the percentages. And the Liberals know this. They

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>know this, but they're being so they're being so dishonest

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on it. Here here's where I am on this, though

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I got more on this. This is really important. I

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you. I had been very cynical as you

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to the show, no cynical about whether Republicans will

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>hold the line on this one. And Trump hasn't done

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it yet, but he said we're gonna get a wall,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and he after today's performance, I don't understand. I don't

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>even know how it's possible that the president of the

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>United States could walk away from this issue and not

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>fight it, fight it out to the to the max.

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just just absolutely all in on this issue

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and then make Democrats defend the fact that you know

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that they were the ones that refused to budge on this.

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>They refused to allow there to be this spending. And look,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just the fact that we need a supermajority

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Senator else they won't let anything get through

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on the on this budgetary matter. They won't let anything

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>happen and I would note that there's nothing constitutional about this.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>There's there's nothing written that says you need sixty senators

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do anything worthwhile in the Senate.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>This is this is all these different career as politicians

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in Capitol Hill. They set the system up so they

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>can evade accountability. They set the system up so they

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>can all tell their constituents their state or their district, oh, sure,

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I really want to do this thing for you. But

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>then when push comes to shove, they don't get caught

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>holding the bag because they don't want to do that thing,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>but they don't want to come out and say it.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We need to push. Now is the time Trump can

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>win this fight and change the whole conversation going into

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty. He can change it now, and he cannot.

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>He cannot sell out his base on this one. We

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>will remember remember I as a Trump voter. I will

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>remember he said they got to give him the money

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>or we're going into a shut Look, if the shutdown happens,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>then it's a huge disaster for Republicans and they get

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, then we'll have a talk. But they

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>got to at least have the fight or else or else.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.239
<v Speaker 1>The world's kind of words coming to us from them,

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>from the president of this issue just have no meaning anymore.

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we got more coming, team. I'll be right back.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>His presentation to the press today. So when I said

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>let's have this conversation, they said, oh, you want to

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>keep it from the public. No, we don't want to

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>contradict the president again and again in front of the public.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But if that's what he wants, and that's what we

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do. I mean, what he was saying was

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just not factual. You get a little bit of crazy

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Nancy here saying the reason she doesn't want the discussion

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about the shutdown and immigration, all that stuff that happened,

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the reason she doesn't want that to be out in

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the open is for the president's own good Oh yeah,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that's right. She cares so much about making sure that

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>President Trump doesn't look bad. That's why she doesn't want to.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Nancy Pelosi can even keep a straight face?

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Well she while she says this stuff. Do you think

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi is even able to make the case with

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>any seriousness that she is in fact it has the

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>best has the best interests of the president at a heart. Here,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody really believes. I don't think Nancy

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi believes that. I really don't. I think that if

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you were to spend just a couple of seconds thinking

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>about it, you're like, yeah, buy that Nancy. Thanks though,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>So it's a nice idea, But no, no, she doesn't

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>want this to be something that the American people get

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to see for themselves. She does not want people to

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be in a position to evaluate the arguments of both sides,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because what is the Democrat argument here? Really, we won't

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>spend money to build a wall. I mean, they'll think

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of the things that the federal government does, spend all

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>kinds of money on your money, by the way, and

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>your children, really your grandchildren's money. This would this would

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>be low. Even if the wall didn't work nearly as

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>well as I and many others like me think it will.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>If it had one tenth of the effect, it would

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>be not even close to the most wasteful expenditures the

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>government's made in the last five years, and not even close.

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember the Obama administration. Administration spent a trillion dollars

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on stimulus. Anybody remember anything we got from the stimulus

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>prob A trillion dollars anything that was worthwhile. I don't

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>even think the Obama administration remembers anything that was worthwhile

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>this presentation to the press today. So when I said

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>let's have this conversation, they said, oh, you want to

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>keep it from the public. No, we don't want to

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>contradict the president again and again in front of the public.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>But if that's what he wants, and that's what we

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>had to do. I mean, what he was saying was

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>just not Actually, you got a little bit of crazy

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Nancy here saying the reason she doesn't want the discussion

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>about the shutdown and immigration, all that stuff that happened,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the reason she doesn't want that to be out in

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the open is for the president's own good Oh yeah,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>that's right. She cares so much about making sure that

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>President Trump doesn't look bad. That's why she doesn't want to.

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Nancy Pelosi can even keep a straight

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>face while she while she says this stuff. Do you

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think Nancy Pelosi is even able to make the case

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with any seriousness that she is in fact it has

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the best has the best interests of the president at

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>heart here. I don't think anybody really believes I don't

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think Nancy Pelosi believes that. I really don't. I think

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you were to spend just a couple of

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>seconds thinking about it, you're like, yeah, buy that Nancy.

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks though, So it's a nice idea, But no, no,

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't want this to be something that the American

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>people get to see for themselves. She does not want

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>people to be in a position to evaluate the arguments

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of both sides, because what is the Democrat argument here? Really,

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we won't spend money to build a wall. I mean,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll think of the things that the federal government does,

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>spend all kinds of money on your money, by the way,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and your children, really, your grandchildren's money. Would this would

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>be low Even if the wall didn't work nearly as

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>well as I and many others like me think it will,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>if it had one tenth of the effect, it would

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>be not even close to the most wasteful expenditures the

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>government's made in the last five years, not even close.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember the Obama inistration administration spent a trillion dollars

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on stimulus. Anybody remember anything we got from the stimulus

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars, anything that was worthwhile. I don't even

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>think the Obama administration remembers anything that was worthwhile. The

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>last time, Chuck, you shut it no, no, no, and

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>then you won't wait any time quickly. And I don't

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>want to do what you did twenty times have called for.

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I will shut down the government if I don't get

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>my wool, none of us. If you want to know

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>something you said you want to put that on, set it,

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll take it. Okay, good, you know what, I'll say, yes,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>if we don't get what we want one way or

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the other, whether it's through you, through military, through anything

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you want to call, I will shut down the government

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>absolute enough, and I am proud and I'll disagree. I

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>am proud to shut down the government for border security, Chuck,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because the people of this country don't want criminals and

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>people that have lots of problems and drugs pouring into

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>our country. So I will take the mental I will

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be the one to shut it down. I'm not going

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to blame you for it. The last time you shut

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it down, it didn't work. I will take the mantle

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of shutting down and I'm going to shut it down

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for border But we believe you shouldn't shut it down.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, everybody boo oom, Mike drop courtesy

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of El Presidente himself, mister Donald Trump, we got somebody

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>who can show additional lights on this throwdown in the

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Oval Office today, Our main man, Sagar and Jetty is

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>back in the house. He is the White House correspondent

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Daily Caller. He is there when all this wonderful, incredible,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 1>jaw dropping stuff goes on in the Oval Office and

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the West Wing. You name. It's good to have you back, Hey,

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me Buck, So were you in the

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>room for this throwdown? This was quite a scene. Now,

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the way it works is only a select group of reporters,

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>whoever is assigned to that day. You don't know what's

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.359
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. They're the ones that get to go,

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but we get to watch them all kind of come

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>back in to our workspace. And there was just like

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a feeling of absolute disbelief. Nobody ever gets to see

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this type of thing play out in front of the cameras.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's actually pretty amazing. You know. People were saying,

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, I can't believe that the president do

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this in front of TV. I mean, this is how

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>it usually works, right, But instead of reading about it

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in Tomorrow's Washington Post, with you know, people saying, oh, well,

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it was a heated Oval Office meeting, we just got

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to see it all for ourselves, which was great. Yeah.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand this argument. I mean the fact that

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi made it, I think is in a sense it's great.

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You know that she's saying, we don't want to have

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a debate in front of the press. Why not, You're

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>about to be speaking for the House. He's the president.

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we hear what you think on this? Why

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>does it have to be behind closed doors and then

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>filtered through you know, CNN, MSNBC in the New York Times?

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Correct Buck, I mean you and as the President said

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it pretty exactly right. I think where he said it's

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>called transparency. Nancy, I mean, if you really can't, if

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't debate these things in front of the press,

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are people particularly afraid of here? She

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>actually said afterwards that the reason that she didn't want

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the press to be in there, it's because she felt

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>bad correcting the president's facts and his misstatements. It was

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty striking. It was pretty striking to see how how

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 1>how much they kind of uh were a big cowed

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>by the President whenever he went after them in front

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of the in the Oval. Well, I also think that

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>those are those are two politicians who, in particular are

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just not used to it. I mean they're not used

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to hostile treatment from the press for sure. I mean

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the press is always coddling and trying to take care

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of them and make sure that they look they look

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>as good as possible. And I think the president. I

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>watched the thing and I thought, wow, the Democrats really

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>don't I mean, Nancy Pelosi kept harping on how you

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>know he doesn't have the votes in the House. It's like, well, Nancy,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>why is that your argument for why this can't get done?

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's see if he has the votes in

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.239
<v Speaker 1>the House. You're right, And actually the House top has

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>already come out and said, sure, we'll put a vote

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 1>on the floor right now. If the president's argument on

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>this is we have to negotiate with the Democrats because

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>things gott again in order to get past the billerbuster

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>proof majority, and there was just a major disconnect there.

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>There's there's arguments that you know, Chuck shoot was saying, well,

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the President says everything on the border is fine, So

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>why don't we just keep Why don't we just keep

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the current levels of funding for border security where they are,

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, particularly interesting given how many legal

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>limurants that we're apprehending at the border. We're at a

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>record number for November twenty eighteen, and we just went

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>through this whole caravan or are going through this whole

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>caravan crisis. Yeah, you know. I also want to ask

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>you about the situation of the Chief of Staff. I

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like I feel like the media is always more

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 1>interested in this than the American people are. I don't

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>really care all that much the Chief of Staff is,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but there is a lot of skull duggery around this now,

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and there are people saying, oh, you know, nick Ers

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't take the job. Why wouldn't he take the job?

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe the guy wants to write a novel.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Who the heck knows I would. What can you tell

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>us about where this stands and just your general sense

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of the White House right now on the morale inside. Yeah,

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>sure so, I mean, yes, the Chief and the President

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>have clashed in the past. They are leaving, as you said.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not myself also a great fan of Palace injury.

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But what I can tell you is that there are

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>a couple of candidates that people are looking at, and

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the President wants to make a change, to move towards

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:18.239
<v Speaker 1>are to move towards dealing with the Democrats, knowing that

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to have them in power in the House

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives, so he wants somebody who's more politically inclined

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and has a little bit more politically political experience. So

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to the people that are really at the top of

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>his list is Mark Meadows. I know that Chris Christie

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is also being considered. His name is being tossed around there,

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and he's also looking at people like Ambassador Leightheiser is

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>a US trade representative at Steven Mnuchin and the few others.

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But really the President has made a final decision and

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>John Kelly is sticking around in his job until January second,

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:51.239
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, so he's got a little bit

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of time. Did you see that Piers Morgan has thrown

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 1>his hat in the ring for Chief of Staff of

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States right White House? I know, I thought

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I was hilarious. Is the column title? One? Mister President,

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you've already hired the hired me once again we are

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>compelling preach. I gotta tell you if I'm if I'm

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Alma Rosa, I view this as my opportunity to get

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>back on the reality show. You know, this is the

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>episode where they bring back somebody that got voted off

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the island. If I'm Alma Rosa, I say that I

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>want to make amends and then I want to come

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>back and I'll be the best chief of staff ever

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>because even if the President doesn't take it seriously, and

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who knows, with this president, like maybe he would embrace

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>her with open arms. I have no idea it would

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>get her. It would get her in the news for

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a day or two. It would be kind of funny

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for us all to think about. But oh I would

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>love it. Would the dark horse chief of staff candidate

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to start pushing is Alma Rosa next

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>time or next time I have a chance. And I

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta ask you this. The different folks that you talk

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to you in around the White House, we're hearing so

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much this week. I mean, they make it sound the

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>media narrative yesterday was overwhelmingly animo. Now Trump's gonna get

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>thrown in the slammer. Do you get that h or

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're gonna bring charges against them whatever. Do

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you get the sense that the people are really worried?

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, you can kind of pick that up. No,

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they're no, they're they're so desensitized to this at the

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>moment to all of this talk. I mean, how many

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>times do we have to hear it's Muller time, or

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it's this time, or it's that time, and you know,

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump is really in danger this at this point. Yes,

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the President does spend a certain amount of

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>his time thinking about any sense of certain aunt, certain

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of time tweeting about it. But there's no sense

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>within the White House that an impending shoe is dropping,

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's not. You know, you see kind of like

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a frothing at the mouth and in a lot of

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the people who are in our media whenever anything happens

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the Muller case. And that's just not

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that's just not how it's received within the inside. There's

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>just so much else that's going on there. Do you

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>have it, By the way, do you have any kind

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of any prediction about about who's going to get the

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>big job within the White House or are you totally agnostic.

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't. I don't think the president one

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>knows right now, I don't. I mean, what happens if

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he taps you on the shoulder when you're walking past

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the oval and he's like, hey, Sager, I like your work.

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You should talk you snap too, and you say, yes, sir,

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>there you go. That is the right answer, Sager. When

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the when the commander in chief says, you know, jump,

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you say how high? Uh? Sager and Jetty everybody. You'll

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>see him on Fox News, You'll see him at the

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Daily Caller where he's the White House correspondence. Soager Man

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>always you to talk to you, see you soon. Hey,

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me, Buz. All right, team, we'll be

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>back in a moment. If you've looked at snippy dot

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>com in the past and left, look again. Thousands of

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>my listeners have joined snippy dot com and are expressing

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their opinions and stirring up lively conversations. Snippy's an unbiased

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>social media platform. It's all about conversation and community. And

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the guy who was the head of Google

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was down there today where any of you convinced by

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that testimony that Google's not engaged in left wing bias

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the search engine has a huge impact on what

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you see when you see it all right. Snippy dot

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>com is the beginning of the conservative revolution in social media,

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>where we don't have to worry about what the left

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>wingers in Silicon Valley want us to see. Snippy dot

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>com it's totally free to join. It's open to everyone.

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So join us at snippy dot com and let your

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>opinion matter. No shadow banning and no suppression of conservative

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>thought ever. Now, with an updated user interface and exciting

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>new features, also available in the Apple App Store and

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>now available for Android, Snippy is your new alternative social media.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a very real prospect that on the day Donald

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump leaves office, the Justice Department may indict him. That

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he may be the first president in quite some time

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to face the real prospect of jail time. Trump knows

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's facing some pretty strong criminal liability when he

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>leaves office one way or another. And you know, even

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're sitting President Camp indicted, he's got to know

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>his future looks like it's behind bars unless he cuts

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of deal with the prosecutors. That's right, my friends,

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>The left can't beat Trump and politics so they're trying

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to beat him with the law by destroying the law

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in the process, by weaponizing it, by bastardizing it, polluting it.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And these are people that are being treated as as

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>some kind of expert panel here. I mean, you got

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Adam Schiff and George and Georgetown law professor saying that

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the Trump is going to go to prison. You know,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>all we've seen so far from the prosecution and the

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>special counsel and the people have gone down are the

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>most heavy handed, one sided prosecutorial tactics imaginable. And what

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you've really been treated to, unfortunately, is a front seat view,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a front seat to the most politicized and disgraceful series

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of investigatory tactics and prosecutions imaginable. Really, I mean, this

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff is all so clearly based in Trump derangement syndrome.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And you get this when you look back at what

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they've been saying, oh along here, I mean, you know,

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they keep telling us that there's going to be collusion,

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be collusion, and then when we have a

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>new revelation, it's never collusion somehow, it's always something else.

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It's always you know, oh, well, this guy didn't base taxes,

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or this guy did this thing, or this guy did

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that thing. And I'm telling you, if you're a prominent

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>especially with international business ties, you're a prominent person in business,

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and they start doing things like going through all your

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.719
<v Speaker 1>communications and all of your taxes, and if you were

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>tied to a political campaign, all your communications with that campaign,

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and they were trying to find something to prosecute you for,

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I assure you they could do it. They could do it. Now,

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind, in the case of Trump, they haven't

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>been able to even say what the charge is yet.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>They're just telling you that he's a criminal all the

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>time because they know that ultimately this is a This

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is a political investigation, not really a criminal investigation. But

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>calling someone a criminal repeatedly these has political consequences. So

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>it's useful for them, even though in a sense it

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>undermines the very argument. Can we just hear what Trump did?

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 1>It's criminal? Notice how they'll go to this Cohen plea

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.279
<v Speaker 1>deal and I know we're getting the Cohen. We're gonna

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 1>find out how long he goes to prison. This week.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna get like four or five years in federal prison.

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:36.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty long time but no notice how when

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they discuss this, they say, oh, well, Cohen already pleaded

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to this, so it's on record, right, There are two

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>important parts that Cohen pleaded to this payoff for Stormy Daniels,

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Clifford. You know, I guess former porn star. I

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think she still does it, but I don't know

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>former porn star Stephanie Clifford Stormy Daniels or is it

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.919
<v Speaker 1>also the other one mcdougaut, And I can't remember which

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>one they're talking about with the specific pal, but it

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>was one of these women that Trump paid off. Yeah,

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>they got Cohen to say that he was a part

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of this and that Trump directed him to do it.

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>He has nothing to lose by saying that. And there's

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>no way that Trump can prove his innocence on it,

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.279
<v Speaker 1>because remember, he's trying to prove that he didn't tell

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>him something, not that he did tell him something. So

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:28.439
<v Speaker 1>how do you do that, Because even if you have

0:35:28.520 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a record of the discussions, even if you have a

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>record of all the actual transactions and emails around this

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>whole payoff situation, all that you need is Michael Cohen

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and said, yeah, well, you know, I was walking into

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom and he saw him in a way and

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, hey, you pay off that lady with the money,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not gonna pay you because I want to

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>violate FCC regulations or FEC regulations, whatever sounds the scene.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's all he has to do. You can't

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 1>can't prove that Trump didn't say that, so that this

0:35:57.760 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm saying, is that doesn't prove anything that

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>has said this. And the President is right insofar as

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not even a criminal act. It's not even a

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>crime to have paid this woman off because it's something

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that any person under those circumstances might do and could

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>legally do. You know, the very simple concept here is,

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, is a haircut a campaign expense? Well, you

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 1>could say, Buck, if you don't get a haircut, the

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>swoop is going to be out of control. And President

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Buck is not going to happen if he's got a

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>crazy swoop. He's got to have a tame swoop. And

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, yes, you're correct. There are benefits that

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you could say come from the personal grooming of a haircut.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you get a haircut every month and you

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>keep getting a haircut, during the campaign. You know, guess what,

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not a campaign expenditure. And if somebody is saying

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go public with a story about how you

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>had an affair years ago and you pay them off,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>guess what, it's not qualified as an expenditure that has

0:36:59.280 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to be listed. And now people can say, yes it is, Well,

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>guess what this would this need to be litigated and adjudicated.

0:37:06.040 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>This has to go through the courts. We don't take

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this as a as a fate at home police here.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't take this as something that's already been decided,

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that's already done. Why would we do that. But the

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>way they've structured this look at I was really thinking

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of this today. It reminds me a bit of how

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they came after Kavanaugh. I really mean this. You'll notice

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>how Kavanaugh, especially the initial allegation, it was all set

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:38.280
<v Speaker 1>up in a way that it was non falsifiable, and

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they got her on They wanted her on

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the record in front of Congress, you know, without members

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 1>of Congress harshly cross examining her, without really testing around

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in the facts. They just wanted to get her on

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the record and get her out of there. And it

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was all just a takedown effort. Right. Well, what they've

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>done with Cohen is get him on the record. Trump

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>has no official means of responding in court because it's

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 1>just a plea deal that somebody else did. Right, There's

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>no there's no challenge that Trump can level against this.

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But it then creates a document, a federal court document

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that has you know, Trump implicated in a crime that

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is only a crime because they had Cohen on all

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>these other things that he didn't challenge this. We did.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this by the way, we saw this with

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>John Edwards, where there was you know, they and look

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they took him to court over this and the payoff

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the mistress. And guess what, Jerry said, No, it's not

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a crime. John Edwards did not go to jail, and

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>his thing was way more sortid and messed up than

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>situation we're talking about here. Because whether you believe him

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>or not, the President says he didn't even have the affair.

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I will just say that that strikes me his although

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, although look this president, I think we all

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>can agree is if we're being honest, he's got more

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>than just you know the everyman. I for the ladies.

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely uh, you know, he's he's he's a playboy,

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no question about that. But why does a Stephanie

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>keep getting your name, you know whatever, Stormy Daniels, that's

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the way everyone knows her. Why does the Stormy Daniels

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>just have complete proof of some of their liaisons together? Why,

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the in the era of text messages

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and email and and you know, she doesn't have any

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, there's no actual proof that

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>she has produced of this affair other than they Oh

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a photo of them at events. Again, I'm sure

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>they knew each other. And look, maybe the president, you know,

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>even got a you know, got a little kind of

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a little fresh with her at some point before he

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was the president. But did this affair really happen? I think,

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably, but you know, it's not proven, and

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't he says no. So you know, you have

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to Nick dwaland account as well. But the real as

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you hear is just that they're running around calling the

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 1>president a criminal. And that's the whole point of this.

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 1>He's a criminal, he's a crimin. He's a racist, he's

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a racist. They just repeat these things these slanders against

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the president of the United States because they know that

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just the mere repetition does damage. Just saying this stuff

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>over and over again brings people to the conclusion that, oh, gosh,

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>there must be something wrong with this president. There must

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be And when I see people, not you, not me,

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>but remember, they're trying to win over a certain portion

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of the electorate. They're trying to get those undecideds and

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know they're trying to get. It's all about

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>suppressing the base and encouraging those in the middle, and

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>encouraging your own base. And they think that by calling

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the president a criminal, they can accomplish that. By the way,

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you got of another. I mean, I had a guy

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on Rising earlier this week who, as I mentioned you,

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>he had worked with Colomby as a former US attorney,

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, it's just it was just crazy to

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was sitting there. I was like, I

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what to say to this guy. He's like,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>here's here's what I think happened, and went on this long,

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>long tirade about how you know Russia collusion worked, and

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, you can't, none of this has any proof.

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You're just coming up with this whole theory. There's proof

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for not a single thing that he said, but he

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 1>had this really elaborate theory about you know, they one

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of the emails at a certain time released and so

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this is just this is creative writing. That's what I

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>said the guy, this is a creative writing exercise. You

0:41:28.080 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>used to be a prosecutor, I said. He Actually, I

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't say this something. This just came out. I don't

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>like to, you know, get saucy with my guests when

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they leave. But I kind of just muttered to myself

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and the mic was still on, and apparently he heard it,

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, that guy was a federal prosecutor.

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That's terrifying. So yeah, I mean it is terrifying that

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I think somebody who is so hyper parted. Look look

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at James Coleby, Look at the people who are making

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>these decisions. We're supposed to believe that they're just on

0:41:56.520 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the straight and narrow and honest, nonpartisan observers of truth,

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>defenders of democracy. Come on, here's another former Obama administration

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>US attorney on what should happen to Trump pay for

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a play for It could be that President Trump procured

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the presidency by fraud. When immigrants procure their citizenship by fraud,

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we strip them of their citizenship. When a president procures

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>his presidency by fraud, should we consider doing the same.

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>That's what this whole charade is about. They want payback

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>for Hillary. They want payback for all the all the

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>self righteous, self indulgent lib boomers. Sorry, but lib boomers

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are the worst. At least, millennials don't have life experience

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that they should be able to fall back on. All

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>these lib boomers, all of Hillary's contemporaries, and all these

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>people that were ready for Hillary, and the women watching

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in the pink hats and all this stuff. They have

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>not forgotten the hurt feelings, the tears, the deep sense

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of falling into the abyss after Hillary to not win

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen election, and it's not enough for them.

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not satisfied with merely winning the next election. They

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>want to erase Trump's victory and rewrite, in Soviet style

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the history books that Hillary really won. They essentially

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>want to strip Trump of the title. They don't want

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 1>there to just be another title about. They want to

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>strip Trump of the title and retroactively give it to

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Hillary and then gives, you know, and then have somebody

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:48.680
<v Speaker 1>else run against the President Pence in twenty twenty. That's

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>what That's the only acceptable outcome to them. These people

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are hyperpartisans, they are loons. They're destroying any faith in

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the political process. They're destroying faith in the law too,

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:02.840
<v Speaker 1>which is even more dangerous in many ways. I have

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:04.759
<v Speaker 1>more on this and a bunch of other stories. Two

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.759
<v Speaker 1>teams stare it there introducing a new conservative alternative to

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>liberal based email services, ipatriots dot Us. Ipatriots dot us

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is a new email service where privacy and protection are

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in your hands. My friends. Ipatriots is secure and includes

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more of what you want with all out all the

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>ads and the spam. Plus you get thirty gigs of

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>cloud storage, larger attachment sizes, and so much more. Ipatriots

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>dot us has premium anti virus, anti spam and encryption. Okay,

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you need to check this out of yourself. Ipatriot dot

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>us is compatible with most mobile devices iPhone, iPad, at, Android,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Windows Mobile, BlackBerry. It works on any Windows or Mac computer.

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Show your a patriot. Go to ipatriots dot us now,

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 1>choose your membership program and input your desired Ipatriots email address.

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.320
<v Speaker 1>During checkout, enter promo code buck for ten percent savings

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>during your first year of membership. Again, enter promo code

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>buck for ten percent off during your first year of

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:08.479
<v Speaker 1>membership at ipatriots dot us. Go check it out. Now,

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>this is a man who came in and said, I'm

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger than the House. I'm bigger than the intelligence community.

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm bigger than checks and balances, I'm biger than the

0:45:14.280 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>judicial community. I'm bigger than the free press. And he's

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:18.879
<v Speaker 1>going to pay for that the rest of his life.

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the American people would support impeachment. Donald Trump

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>will be must be impeached. Donald Trump is a criminal enterprise.

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>It certainly looks like they are the kind of offenses

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that would call for impeachment hearings. You have this memorable

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>phrase of individual number one. You know it's going to

0:45:39.680 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>go down, I think in the history books, along with

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some of those memorable Watergate phrases. When the evidence becomes

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so clear to likely have a criminal sitting in the

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Oval office, what is the Congress left to do at

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that point? A criminal for whom they cannot even identify

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a single crime, nor provide one piece of evidence that

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the crime that they cannot identify was committed by him.

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Stalinist tactics. That is what they are doing.

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That is what they are engaged in. It's a disgrace,

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know what happened. The old school

0:46:20.880 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 1>civil liberties guys. They're just not around the acluse a joke,

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>a cluse, Southern Property Law Center. They're just extensions of

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>media matters now, I mean, they are left wing loon factories.

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But the Dirsh doesn't even like Trump. I asked him once,

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, do you ever speak the President? The Durst

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>looked like he was gonna spit in my face. He

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was not happy with me for asking that question. Okay,

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the Drsh on the payments, the storm of Daniels said,

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a play five. It is absolutely textbook extortion,

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and there ought to be a prosecution of any person,

0:46:53.160 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>man or woman who approaches any candidate or anybody else

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and says, unless you pay me money, I'm going to

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>reveal a sex act that occurred. That is absolute classic extortion.

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's shocking that the Special Council looking into this,

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who has a broad mandate, he described it very broadly,

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't looking into the extortion to these payments had to

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be reported. They had to be reported after the election.

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>The reporting time was after the election, so it couldn't

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have impacted the election. So the absurd notion that he

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>won the presidency by fraud and should be stripped of

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the pregnancy reflects incredible ignorance about the timing here and

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 1>how these statutes operate. This is a guy who's just

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking about the law, and look, I'm on some huge

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dursh Fano. We got into a throwdown once on CNN

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>about gun control. I like the Durst. When he's right

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's on the law and on criminal justice, he's

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at least knowledgeable and honest about the law. There's so

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>few voices these days. I mean, people just don't throw

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>all of their principles out there, through all of their expertise,

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on a bonfire in order to tell the Libs and

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the left and the media what they want to hear

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>on this stuff, which is the Trump is a criminal.

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>How is it someone explaining that Stormy Daniels did not

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 1>commit extortion. I've been wondering about this, and I didn't

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.120
<v Speaker 1>go to law school, but it seems like extortion to me,

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you know. David Letterman for those of you were David

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Letterman fans, which if you were, we got to have

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a talk. But you know, David Letterman was having an affairs.

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>All came out, you know, with a much much younger woman,

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. I mean, you know, these people, a

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:37.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of these big celebrity types are pretty disgusting. But

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>he's got this affair with a younger woman and he

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the husband finds out and the husband, I forget the

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>specifics of it, but the husband basically says, you know,

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got this screenplay. I want you to buy it

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for me for ten million dollars, which nobody gets a screenplay.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.800
<v Speaker 1>This is absurd, right, ten million dollars and it's about

0:48:57.920 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a famous comedian on Late I TV. He's having a

0:48:59.920 --> 0:49:03.879
<v Speaker 1>fair with one of his staffers. That guy, by the way,

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>went to prison, prison for years. How is that different

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 1>from what Stormy Daniels and Avanadi Because she hired a

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>lawyer to create this this this veneer, this facade of

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a legal proceeding, and Stormy Daniels is treated with with

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>all this you know respect by the media. I mean,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>let me just say that, to have intimate relations with

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>somebody and then use that and look, there's a whole

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>we're assuming that Trump had the relations and you know,

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole bunch of steps that we're going but

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to have it's in relation to somebody and then use

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that for personal financial gain and the threat of ruining somebody,

0:49:43.719 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is It is disgusting. It's a disgusting

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 1>thing to do to anybody. It's a it's a horror.

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a horrifyingly you know, I imagine

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 1>if of a man, you know, taped a woman in

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a sex act and then threatened, threatened

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:03.839
<v Speaker 1>to release it unless she gave him money, that guy

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.160
<v Speaker 1>would go to prison, and rightfully so and he should.

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Right But Stormy Daniel says, I'll tell everybody about our

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>sexual affair unless you pay me X dollars. How is

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that not criminal? And as Dershwood, he's a criminal defense

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>attorney for decade, He's saying, look, it's a crime. Have

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>they even looked into this? Have they even looked into

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>who leaked Flynn's phone conversation with ambassador kids are the act?

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing the only crimes they care about involve Trump

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>associates and ways of trying to make it seem like

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump had something to do with them. Those the only

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:38.280
<v Speaker 1>crimes they care about. These people are destroying the criminal

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>justice system. If we had any sense of equal justice,

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>everything called me's done would, in fact, from the standpoint

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of Mueller, would have called me right now lined up

0:50:50.280 --> 0:50:52.720
<v Speaker 1>for a whole series of felony charges. But it tells

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>you what a one sided political witch hunt Mueller's engaged in,

0:50:57.760 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that all of these things go on and somehow it

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:05.399
<v Speaker 1>never quite becomes important. But going after General Flynn after

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 1>his thirty five years of risking his life for America,

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that's okay, even though nothing Flynn has been accused of

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>is comparable to what coming now has admitted. Any great

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>minds think alike Newt and Buck linked up on this one.

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean producer Mike always, you know, producer Mike knows

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>where my head's out on this stuff, and he's like, hey,

0:51:26.760 --> 0:51:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I think I heard somebody I got a clip. But yeah,

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the notion of equal justice is just it's

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a farce. With this whole Muller probe, It's ridiculous. How

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is it possible that given all the people they're interviewing,

0:51:40.800 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff, that not a single Democrat of any

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>kind yet has been has been prosecuted. You know, a Podesta,

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know the Podesta group, you know, and nothing, none

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of the anti Trump leaks, felony leaks, you know, they're

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not getting prosecuted. And these people aren't gett prosecutor. It's

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's only people that are tied to Trump that have

0:52:05.680 --> 0:52:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the the doj I of Surron looking right at them

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:13.759
<v Speaker 1>all the time. And you know, there's there's just no

0:52:13.840 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>effort to look at what was going on here to

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>get this whole thing going. I mean, the dj fought

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to prevent disclosure of the fact that the DNC funded

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the dossier which they used to do the fis of

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>warrants and get this whole FBI investigation going. I there

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>should be such embarrassment from the so called elites in

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:39.439
<v Speaker 1>charge of stuff. There should be such a sense of

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>letting the American people down and our outrage. It would

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be righteous if directed in the right directions. But it's not.

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We're being told all the time that the real enemy

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>is you know, General Flynn for lying, I mean, I

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>had I had to correct. I mentioned that easy federal

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:00.760
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor guy who was on rising. He said General Flynn

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:03.919
<v Speaker 1>having this, you know, conversation, Like, dude, that the conversation

0:53:04.080 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was completely fine. There's nothing wrong with the conversation you

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>have with Kiselak, And if you wanted to talk about sanctions,

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that's fine too. A man, I'm you know, it really

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just troubles me because what you see is the other

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the other side, the other side has such a will

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to power, has such a desire for crushing their ideological

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>enemies that they they're just utterly ruthless. And you know, conservatives,

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:35.719
<v Speaker 1>we walk around a lot and we're kind of play this,

0:53:35.800 --> 0:53:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, who can be who's the purest and the best,

0:53:38.280 --> 0:53:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and who can recite the most of the Constitution from

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.520
<v Speaker 1>memory all the time, and don't always think about, you know,

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>who's going to win this brawl that's happening here. And

0:53:45.560 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we're we're you know, people are getting taken off the

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.759
<v Speaker 1>battlefield by the other side. I mean, we're taking losses here.

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 1>They're going after Trump, they're going after his people. And

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this is not a this is not a fair game

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they're playing. And by the way, speaking of not a

0:54:02.160 --> 0:54:05.319
<v Speaker 1>fair game, I mean there's there's comey out there. I

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I've taken from this whole debacle of

0:54:09.120 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the post Trump hysteria that left is engaged is I'm

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>glad people will never think of these government bureaucracy directors

0:54:19.280 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in quite the same way, because you know, when I

0:54:22.200 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was in the CIA, it was still very much the

0:54:24.680 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>case that we assume enough you were the if you

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:30.839
<v Speaker 1>were the FBI director, the CIA director, you know, you

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>were thought of as somebody of real gravitas, and you

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>were a defender of national security. You are a nonpartisan,

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 1>you are a professional. Whether whether this was warranted or not,

0:54:41.800 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that was really the perception on the outside, and I

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>always knew on the inside that that wasn't really the case,

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:51.239
<v Speaker 1>certainly at the AGE, certainly at the CIA. I mean,

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>son looks some directors are more politically minded than others.

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But you know, but even more than that, these people

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:00.719
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily in pressI if some of them are

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 1>very impressive, some of them are very unimpressive. It depends

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>on who we're talking about. And the fact that Komey

0:55:07.880 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was the FBI director. I mean, this guy I would

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>not trust to teach my kid third grade social studies.

0:55:15.400 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's just not somebody who I would want

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone emulating or taking advice from I mean, he is

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 1>so just smart me. I remember, this is a guy

0:55:25.360 --> 0:55:28.520
<v Speaker 1>who sat across from people for decades and you know,

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was he was the deciding voice in a lot of

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:34.400
<v Speaker 1>instances of memory. He was a US attorney in New

0:55:34.480 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>York State. He was the one that wanted to go

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:39.799
<v Speaker 1>after Martha Stewart. It was Komy. He was the one

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that was like, yeah, she's got to go to prison.

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:43.839
<v Speaker 1>She didn't inside her trade, she didn't do anything wrong,

0:55:44.360 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 1>but she lied about getting a phone call because she

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was scared, and they decided to send it to prison

0:55:49.120 --> 0:55:51.600
<v Speaker 1>for it. And Nikomi was the one pushing for that. So,

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't don't let this whole COOMEI the seven

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:58.359
<v Speaker 1>foot tall boy scout thing fool you. He is very

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and first of all, I think he's very oviously, very ambitious,

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is why he wanted to stay on his FBI director.

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think he you know, Coomy's got a senate runner, Yeah,

0:56:06.080 --> 0:56:09.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe even something bigger in his sights. Don't think he doesn't.

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This guy's a megalomaniac pretending to be this humble public servant.

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:18.359
<v Speaker 1>He's scary. But here's what Nude. Nude has been very

0:56:18.360 --> 0:56:21.359
<v Speaker 1>good on this stuff. Play nine. If Comey had been

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a witness being interviewed by Mueller and he'd had two

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:29.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty five I can't remembers, I suspect they

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:32.600
<v Speaker 1>would keep him in there for a thousand hours until

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:37.839
<v Speaker 1>he finally remembered. This is nonsense. Any person with a

0:56:37.880 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>reasonable sense of judgment knows that they were breaking the

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:46.720
<v Speaker 1>law for the purpose of trying to defeat Donald Trump,

0:56:47.239 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and then when the Trump won anyway, they went on

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:55.320
<v Speaker 1>breaking the law, including illegally leaking things. As a historian,

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to explain how unique it is to have

0:57:00.080 --> 0:57:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation this deeply engaged,

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this dishonest, this patently fraudulent. I mean, nobody believes he

0:57:11.080 --> 0:57:14.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't know two hundred and forty five times. And I

0:57:14.800 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>think that it is a really sad commentary on how

0:57:18.920 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>sick the system has gotten. Yep, everything, my friends, when

0:57:26.240 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to government power, prosecutorial power, law enforcement, police power,

0:57:31.840 --> 0:57:36.760
<v Speaker 1>everything rests on some sense of good faith and judgment.

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's here's an example of what I mean. A prosecutor

0:57:42.920 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 1>can decline charges whenever he or she wants so. In

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a sense prosecutors could I mean, yes, prosecutors can be removed.

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand that, but you know, there's nothing to stop

0:57:54.960 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>them from just saying, all right, you know we are

0:57:56.720 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not going to charge this person just because we really

0:57:58.400 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. They can do it prosecutor. Prosecutors have

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous man discretion police when they show up but

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they see a crime. I mean, police can say yeah,

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I didn't see you know, I don't think

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we need to make this arrest. They might face consequences

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to that later on, but that's always in the discretion.

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So when people discard all good faith in roles where

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they have government power, the system starts to break down.

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's what has happened in an effort to destroy Trump.

0:58:26.200 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 1>People know they do not act in good faith. The FBI,

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the CIA, there was no good faith in their actions

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>with regard to Trump. This was about pursuing an ideological vendetta,

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and they managed so far to largely get away with it.

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Not entirely. There have been some they've taken some losses

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:46.439
<v Speaker 1>on this by Peter King says the same thing about

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Comey's memory, which I read this transco over the weekend Yeah,

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Apparently all you have to do is just say yeah,

0:58:50.800 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember it. If for Komey, that'll fly, that's

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just fine. Play eight. To me, it's hard to believe

0:58:56.080 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that Jim Comey I would have forgotten all those different details.

0:59:00.160 --> 0:59:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Intelligence Committee. Jim called me, testified before

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 1>us any number of times. I never recall him not

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>being able to answer a question. Yeah, Komey was very

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.240
<v Speaker 1>shaky on the details on the facts and figures when

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it came time to speak for that on the record

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 1>session with members of Congress last week. Very shaky indeed,

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm jaking on things that are I mean, he

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:27.240
<v Speaker 1>should be embarrassed by them, except he knows the answers.

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He just wasn't giving the answers because he didn't want to,

0:59:30.480 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and because he knows that no one's going to press

0:59:32.280 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 1>charges against the former FBI director who's trying to take

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump down for just saying I don't know. As far

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as I recall, that's all I remember. I'm his first

0:59:40.880 --> 0:59:44.760
<v Speaker 1>dispense with a completely illegitimate issue, which is the fantasy

0:59:45.120 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 1>dreamed up by some conservatives that Google and other online

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>platforms have an anti conservative bias, as I've said repeatedly,

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:57.040
<v Speaker 1>no credible evidence supports this right wing conspiracy theory. I

0:59:57.120 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>have little doubt that my Republican colleagues will spend much

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of that time. There is anything a laundry list of

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>anecdotes and that of context statements made by Google employees

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as supposed evidence of anti conservative bias, but none of

1:00:09.040 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that will actually make it true. Democrats really don't want

1:00:16.320 --> 1:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>people to catch on to just how biased these social

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>media platforms are. There are many reasons for this, but

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got a sense of it. Today you have the

1:00:26.920 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Google, one of the most powerful cash flow

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>positive wealthy corporations in the world, which, by the way,

1:00:36.920 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is working to create a special censorship friendly Internet for China.

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So you've got Google employees. You don't want to work

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on anything that has a US military application to it,

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't have any part of that. They're

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not a bunch of war mongers here for the American

1:00:55.000 --> 1:00:57.920
<v Speaker 1>war machine, but they will work on making sure that

1:00:58.360 --> 1:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>people in China are remain enslaved by the state, at

1:01:03.320 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>least mentally and intellectually not able to enjoy freedom. Google

1:01:09.920 --> 1:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently is cool with that. There's a lot of money

1:01:12.160 --> 1:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be made in China, I understand, but you have

1:01:15.160 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>this hearing that on Capitol Hill. I mean, there were

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>there were some of the interesting stuff that you'd expect

1:01:19.080 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>where you have members of Congress who kind of sound

1:01:24.160 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>like for those of us who are roughly my age

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even ten or fifteen years old than me,

1:01:28.280 --> 1:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, when one of the one of our grandparents

1:01:30.400 --> 1:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>back in the nineties should be like, hey do I

1:01:32.560 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>work to VHSH machine? Hey, hey, do I get the

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>VCR to rewind? You know? And it was always like

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the VCR was this really difficult thing that we had

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to help them struggle through, although I will admit that

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>there were many times where I could not figure out

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>how to get the time, how to get the clock

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to change on the VCR. But you had people today

1:01:55.360 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>who were talking about technology, and these are the individuals

1:01:58.240 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>who write our laws when it comes to technology, right,

1:02:00.680 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these are the people that we are counting on to

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>know something about this. And sure enough, they sound like

1:02:12.320 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people that couldn't even be bothered to

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>read through the executive summaries that their taxpayer funded congressional

1:02:20.200 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>staffs put together for them. But anyway, he had Sundar Peach,

1:02:25.480 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I who is the CEO of Google. Remember Google is

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>owned by Alphabet now, so here about Alphabet the company

1:02:33.360 --> 1:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. But you know, there was a big story.

1:02:36.480 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got this guy who's sang, for example,

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that conservatives are gonna that was you know, Nadler, who

1:02:41.720 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>says all kinds of annoying stuff. But they're gonna say that,

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, conservatives wine about this. It's not true. Conservatives

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't being shout out in Meanwhile, I think it was

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday that Gavin McGinnis is a guy that I

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>did Red Eye with a bunch of times back in

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the day. And look, I'm not going to pretend that

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Gavin is not a provocateur. He certainly is. He's a

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>guy who likes to likes to get people a little

1:03:07.320 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>fired up. He understands the effect that he has sometimes

1:03:10.240 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>on conversation. And look, he's actually he's a good writer,

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and he's smart, and he's he's always been very nice

1:03:19.040 --> 1:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to me when I've seen him, and I know he

1:03:21.320 --> 1:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>has this this affiliation of this group which I don't

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>know that much about the background of it, to be fair,

1:03:26.160 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they called the Proud Boys, who turns out are not

1:03:29.040 --> 1:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>considered an extremist group by the FBI. That was fake news,

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean they're not acting like a bunch

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of jerks. Again, I don't know much about them. I

1:03:37.240 --> 1:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't even know there were a thing until a few

1:03:38.760 --> 1:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>months ago, and they formed I believe in support of

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Gavin McGinnis's ideas. Gavin McGinnis has distanced himself from the

1:03:46.520 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Proud Boys. You know, I don't. I don't have time

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to follow up on all. You know, go deep into

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>all these things all the time. My point, you're just

1:03:54.360 --> 1:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>being Gavin McGinnis. Yes, he's controversial. He is somebody who

1:03:59.200 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>says things that up. That's the left, and whether you

1:04:01.640 --> 1:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like him or not, it should be concerning that he

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>gets demonetized because what they're doing is, you know, they

1:04:08.600 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>started out with Alex Jones, who very few people I

1:04:12.440 --> 1:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>know are willing to defend publicly, and now they've got

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Gavin McInnis, who you know, more people. Look my old

1:04:19.040 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>boss Glenn who is a big free speech proponent, Glenn

1:04:22.280 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>beck As. I understand that Glenn has come out and

1:04:24.760 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>said that this is this is really troubling that, you know,

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Gavin one got fired as part of the new merger

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>between Blaze TV or the Blaze Media and CRTV. And

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>also now Gavin's kicked off of YouTube and he's been

1:04:40.800 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been banned from numerous platforms. And you know, people

1:04:44.760 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>would say, oh, block this is one case, but yeah,

1:04:46.360 --> 1:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>where's the equivalent case on the left? Where do we

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>have a case of a really prominent democrat who or

1:04:56.600 --> 1:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not even that promise, just you know, somebody who's a

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>public figure, that's a Democrat who lost their platform, who

1:05:02.200 --> 1:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was demonetized or completely booted off of a major social

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>media platform. You know, one of the great examples of

1:05:08.520 --> 1:05:12.959
<v Speaker 1>this is look at Lewis Farrakon still on Twitter. Someone

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>explained to me, how is it conceivable what Lewis Farrakon

1:05:16.200 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>should still be on Twitter? But you can't have you know,

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't have Prager University stay on YouTube without getting

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>videos blocked. You can't have prag your university on Facebook

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>without getting videos blocked. I need someone to make these

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>make these consistently anti conservative tendencies appear like they're not

1:05:41.600 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow intentional. I mean, I've seen it myself with some

1:05:46.560 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of the way that they treat any organization that is

1:05:50.840 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>supportive of guns or gun rights. You know, that's all

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden very that that becomes very very testy,

1:05:57.840 --> 1:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>very difficult that oh, you know, gun rights, how could

1:05:59.840 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>some buddy, Um. You know, the truth is that there's

1:06:04.960 --> 1:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a bias because there's tremendous social pressure on these different

1:06:11.040 --> 1:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>people like preach I I mean these different social media

1:06:16.040 --> 1:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, important guys who yes, they want these really

1:06:21.040 --> 1:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>successful companies, but they're so rich and so powerful as

1:06:23.360 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>companies that they think that they're a little bit untouchable,

1:06:26.120 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>meaning that no, you know, nobody can you know, those

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>different ways of saying someone's untouchable, right, but meaning that

1:06:30.800 --> 1:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody can stop them from what they're doing. Really, and

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they get social pressure. I mean people from within their

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>social circle are always telling them, you know, you gotta stop.

1:06:41.880 --> 1:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>There's such there's so much hate. We can't allow hate speech.

1:06:45.480 --> 1:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And then you find out, well where are you drawn

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the line on hate speech? And and you know, this

1:06:50.720 --> 1:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is where there's also this this legal issue that you know,

1:06:54.480 --> 1:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>because you get other people that say, oh, it's a

1:06:56.000 --> 1:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>First Amendment, they can they can do whatever they want. Well,

1:06:58.320 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. Government regulates each in a lot of

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>different ways. The government's not supposed to regulate content of speech,

1:07:04.120 --> 1:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that content of speech can't get

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you in trouble in some way. Obviously, you know. I means,

1:07:10.840 --> 1:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as James Comey said recently, any conversation could be illegal theoretically.

1:07:15.080 --> 1:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And this platform versus publisher distinction meanings that they either

1:07:19.800 --> 1:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>act as a neutral party in this and they don't

1:07:22.320 --> 1:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>police content, or if they are policing content, they're publishers,

1:07:25.760 --> 1:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and that means they're responsible for whatever goes up on

1:07:27.880 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>their platforms. Big problem. So you gotta keep watching what

1:07:32.600 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>goes on with these execs that go down on Capitol Hill,

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and we gotta keep the pressure on here to stop

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the social media bias. Omaha Steaks is America's original butcher

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen seventeen. Right now, Omaha Stakes is giving an

1:07:45.600 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing limited time offer to my listeners. When you go

1:07:48.560 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to Omaha Steaks dot com and entercode buck into search bar,

1:07:51.840 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll get seventy four percent off Omaha Steaks Family Gift Package.

1:07:56.040 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It's originally one hundred and ninety five dollars, now only

1:07:58.760 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>forty nine nine. Order now and you'll get four handcut

1:08:02.640 --> 1:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>top sirloins, two savory premium pork chops, four chicken fried steaks,

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>four Omaha Steaks Burgers, four snappy Coobasa sausages, all beef meatballs,

1:08:10.960 --> 1:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>four perfectly brown potatoes O Greta, four made from scratch

1:08:14.360 --> 1:08:18.639
<v Speaker 1>caramel apple Tartlet's plus get four more burgers free. Omaha

1:08:18.640 --> 1:08:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Steakes is a fifth generation family owned company with over

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years of experience. Again, get this limited time

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>package for only forty nine ninety nine. When you go

1:08:27.160 --> 1:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to Omaha Steaks dot com, type Buck in the search

1:08:30.360 --> 1:08:32.639
<v Speaker 1>bar and add the family Gift Package to your card.

1:08:32.800 --> 1:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Go to Omaha Steaks dot com type Buck in the

1:08:35.560 --> 1:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>search bar to send the Omaha Steaks Family Gift Package today.

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>In a secret recording case, a federal judge has ruled

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in favor of James O'Keefe and Project Very Toss. This

1:08:47.240 --> 1:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is a case with big First Amendment implications. It is

1:08:50.600 --> 1:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a win for free speech. It is a win for

1:08:52.760 --> 1:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>government transparency. Why haven't you heard much about it yet?

1:08:55.720 --> 1:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it leading some major news broadcasts. Oh, that's

1:08:59.160 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>right because it involved a conservative investigative journalist and his outfit,

1:09:03.320 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and we know the left can't have that. James o'keith, however,

1:09:07.000 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is with us now to explain just what's going on.

1:09:09.200 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>He's the founder of Project Veritas. James, thanks for joining us.

1:09:14.160 --> 1:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Great to be with you. Thank you all right, can

1:09:16.040 --> 1:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you just give us a little bit of a backstore

1:09:17.400 --> 1:09:19.639
<v Speaker 1>here on this case. It has to do with your

1:09:19.760 --> 1:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>right as a citizen and as a journalist to surreptitiously

1:09:24.360 --> 1:09:28.599
<v Speaker 1>tape government officials. Right, tell us what's going on here. Well,

1:09:28.600 --> 1:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this was a situation where there's twelve states in the

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>United States that prohibit two party consent or prohibit recording

1:09:35.439 --> 1:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>people without their permission. One of those states is Massachusetts.

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>That means that if you're recording someone, you need their

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>permission to record them. Well, federal judge ruled yesterday this

1:09:44.800 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is pretty historic, the court said, And we sued the

1:09:47.960 --> 1:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>state of Massachusetts in federal cord taken us two years.

1:09:52.280 --> 1:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But the judge ruled that's secretly recording government officials and

1:09:56.000 --> 1:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>police officers is a quote, basic vital and wealth sta

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>most liberty safeguarded by the First Amendment unquote. And there's

1:10:04.400 --> 1:10:07.519
<v Speaker 1>a forty four page order that this judge had issued.

1:10:07.800 --> 1:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>And remember this was not The New York Times. It

1:10:09.960 --> 1:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the Washington Post. It was Project and Veritas that

1:10:13.120 --> 1:10:17.519
<v Speaker 1>fought the law. And we have overturned a state law

1:10:17.640 --> 1:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>prohibiting recording people public officials without their permission. Pretty historic stuff.

1:10:23.640 --> 1:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just just so everyone's clear the the position then,

1:10:26.840 --> 1:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and you said, there are a number of states where

1:10:28.439 --> 1:10:30.479
<v Speaker 1>this is the case, but the position of the state

1:10:30.479 --> 1:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of Massachusetts had been that. Let's say, James, you know,

1:10:33.760 --> 1:10:37.599
<v Speaker 1>I was visiting the O'Keefe residence and things got things

1:10:37.600 --> 1:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>got a little rowdy, and we're having a party. The

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:41.599
<v Speaker 1>police show up, and you know, all of a sudden,

1:10:41.600 --> 1:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you think the police are engaging in uh, you know,

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>abusive behavior, and you pull out your phone to you know,

1:10:49.000 --> 1:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in this in this analogy or in this storyline. I'm

1:10:52.000 --> 1:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm getting beat up by the cops. You

1:10:53.439 --> 1:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pull out your phone, you record this. They could stop

1:10:56.200 --> 1:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that and arrest you previously under Massachusetts law. Yes, there

1:11:00.360 --> 1:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>about eleven I believe eleven previous felony complaints or issues

1:11:06.080 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>brought by the state in the last in recent time,

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>so you could go to jail. I mean, this is

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:15.479
<v Speaker 1>we you know, Project gretas listeners are. I'm sure you're

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>aware of what we do. I mean, we're constantly in

1:11:18.000 --> 1:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>court facing people who try to shut us down, silence

1:11:21.920 --> 1:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>us with using law fair using the state as a weapon,

1:11:25.040 --> 1:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>using these lawsuits as a weapons. This is a very

1:11:28.360 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 1>this is a very significant case because it's never before,

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as far as I know, has a judge ever said

1:11:34.960 --> 1:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that recording someone is a fundamental First Amendment right now.

1:11:38.920 --> 1:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Other other courts have said that sort of hidden camera technology,

1:11:42.760 --> 1:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're in the room with someone, you

1:11:44.240 --> 1:11:46.519
<v Speaker 1>always have to be next to them when you're recording them,

1:11:46.600 --> 1:11:48.479
<v Speaker 1>but you could always write down what they say, and

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you could always you know, they say the hidden cameras

1:11:50.920 --> 1:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the extension of a pencil or it's the same thing

1:11:53.760 --> 1:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>as remembering what they say. So this judgment is I

1:11:57.360 --> 1:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>think it allows us to go to some of these

1:11:59.040 --> 1:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>other states like any California, Pennsylvania, which make it a

1:12:03.320 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>crime to record people in thirty eight states, in the

1:12:06.439 --> 1:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>District of Columbius Legal and New York it's legal, but

1:12:09.000 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these other places it isn't. So this

1:12:11.160 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty huge, huge victory for the First Amendment.

1:12:13.960 --> 1:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And to your point, you would think that these journalists

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>would be shouting from the rooftops about how great this is.

1:12:19.240 --> 1:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're a little contemptuous of the fact

1:12:21.680 --> 1:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that I James o'keeith, was the one to achieve this judgment.

1:12:25.920 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Is there are there any of the major networks that

1:12:28.520 --> 1:12:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have reached out on this one specifically James. I mean,

1:12:30.800 --> 1:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>our people are are people from any part of the

1:12:35.160 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>of the media spectrum saying hey, you had a boy, No,

1:12:38.680 --> 1:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>because their hatred for me and Project burtas outweighs whatever

1:12:43.240 --> 1:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>marginal appreciation they have for the First Amendment. Well, what

1:12:48.000 --> 1:12:50.519
<v Speaker 1>did you? Uh? What was what was the organization? Again?

1:12:50.560 --> 1:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>That was the Center for Medical Progress? Isn't that right?

1:12:54.040 --> 1:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>That was exposing planned parenthood and they were sued. Weren't

1:12:59.200 --> 1:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>they under our some version of surreptitious taping and you know, illegal,

1:13:04.080 --> 1:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to go after them in California. I mean,

1:13:05.880 --> 1:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm forgetting the details, but I am feeling you're familiar

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with them. Well, it was David Delight and a friend

1:13:10.960 --> 1:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of mine. I didn't I've been working with Lylan David

1:13:15.040 --> 1:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for some time. That particular investigation. David did California's the

1:13:19.040 --> 1:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>penal Code, which is Statute six thirty two California Penal

1:13:23.439 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Code prohibits. It's a misdemeanor to record people without their permission, right,

1:13:28.720 --> 1:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we would make the argument, and I've

1:13:31.040 --> 1:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>made it before in federal court in California, that the

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>recording government officials and people who receive taxpayer dollars, vice

1:13:39.040 --> 1:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>presidents of planned parenthood is a fundamental constitutional right as

1:13:43.160 --> 1:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>long as you're with the person. It's not like we're

1:13:45.760 --> 1:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>bugging people's homes. We're not filling them in their bedrooms.

1:13:49.240 --> 1:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>We're filling people doing public duties in public. And it's

1:13:54.400 --> 1:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a really you know, I think that people think that

1:13:56.960 --> 1:13:59.799
<v Speaker 1>hidden cameras it's unethical. I mean, it's not an invastion

1:13:59.840 --> 1:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of privacy. We're not invading these people's privacy. We're simply

1:14:03.360 --> 1:14:06.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to report on what people say and do in public,

1:14:07.240 --> 1:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who are public figures. And that's what the federal judge

1:14:11.439 --> 1:14:16.559
<v Speaker 1>in Massachusetts said. He said, the fundamental rights to record someone.

1:14:16.600 --> 1:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why, by the way, Buck, it's so

1:14:18.960 --> 1:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>fundamental is because the people that I'm dealing with a

1:14:22.720 --> 1:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so much venality in their behavior that the types

1:14:25.920 --> 1:14:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of people who would say I never said that if

1:14:28.479 --> 1:14:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I just wrote down what they said, they would call

1:14:30.520 --> 1:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>me a liar. So it's doubly important that we have

1:14:33.760 --> 1:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the right to capture what people tell us in these investigations.

1:14:38.600 --> 1:14:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise we're giving the culprits a way out. We're allowing

1:14:41.680 --> 1:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>them to say I never said that, when indeed they did.

1:14:44.800 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is not about journalism. Ethics are privacy Because

1:14:48.640 --> 1:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the media loved it. When that guy Sterling who owned

1:14:51.160 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the basketball team, remember him, the guy in California was

1:14:54.280 --> 1:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>recorded on his bed by his lover, No one cared

1:14:58.160 --> 1:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about privacy, even though was recorded on a bedroom they

1:15:01.720 --> 1:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>were laying in bed together. So this is not about

1:15:04.479 --> 1:15:07.439
<v Speaker 1>ethics or privacy. But this is really about is it's

1:15:07.479 --> 1:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>about power. People don't want these people recorded. They don't

1:15:11.280 --> 1:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>want the government corruption exposed. That's what this is, in

1:15:14.040 --> 1:15:17.519
<v Speaker 1>the final analysis, really about. And just just one more

1:15:17.560 --> 1:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for you, James. The Time magazine cover going to journalists,

1:15:21.960 --> 1:15:24.519
<v Speaker 1>what was your what was your take on this? Oh?

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the person of Yeah. I mean, it's just

1:15:28.479 --> 1:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>at this point it's become a mockery. It's become a sham.

1:15:31.800 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I think the only people that take it

1:15:33.400 --> 1:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>seriously are journalists themselves. Journalists are so full of hubrious

1:15:37.000 --> 1:15:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they're so they have no introspection. They're so it's gone

1:15:40.760 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so to their heads. And I know this because I'm

1:15:43.200 --> 1:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm fighting in the trenches every day doing my work,

1:15:45.400 --> 1:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>getting attacked and maligned by them. I just think that

1:15:48.120 --> 1:15:50.719
<v Speaker 1>they live in their own little bubble and and they're

1:15:50.800 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they're holding onto whatever last legacy they have. Time Magazine

1:15:55.320 --> 1:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is a shell of its former self and it's become

1:15:57.840 --> 1:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a mockery. But they all talk to each other on

1:16:00.040 --> 1:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter with their blue check marks, and they make them

1:16:02.280 --> 1:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>feel good about themselves. But I think it's it's it's stupid.

1:16:05.040 --> 1:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's kind of irrelevant. And the only

1:16:07.680 --> 1:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>people who care our journalists. I know you can't tell

1:16:10.320 --> 1:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>us what at least ahead of time, but can you

1:16:13.600 --> 1:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>give us a time frame or when is the next

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>project very toss bombshell going to drop? Well, we had

1:16:20.040 --> 1:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a huge fall as you you know, we did seven

1:16:23.840 --> 1:16:26.679
<v Speaker 1>or eight different states and senators lying in deep state.

1:16:27.000 --> 1:16:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I think a big theme right now is Silicon Valley

1:16:29.439 --> 1:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>with Google and Facebook and Twitter. We did a Twitter

1:16:32.200 --> 1:16:35.759
<v Speaker 1>expose a year ago showing them engineers admitting to shadow banning.

1:16:36.080 --> 1:16:38.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be a big theme over

1:16:38.640 --> 1:16:41.599
<v Speaker 1>the next you know mcch happening today with the Google

1:16:41.720 --> 1:16:45.559
<v Speaker 1>CEO being being cross examined in Congress. So that's one

1:16:45.640 --> 1:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>major theme. I can't even talk about it. What I

1:16:48.320 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>can do on your show here is if you, if

1:16:50.560 --> 1:16:53.479
<v Speaker 1>you see something, say something. If you're an insider, let's

1:16:53.479 --> 1:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>pull a reverse George Orwell on these guys and let's

1:16:56.360 --> 1:16:58.559
<v Speaker 1>let's let's have them fear us. And if you're and

1:16:58.560 --> 1:17:00.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that you need to go public, but

1:17:00.600 --> 1:17:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, send us a message of Project veritas dot com,

1:17:03.479 --> 1:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>go to our website. I'll meet we could confidentially become

1:17:06.280 --> 1:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a source for us, because that's how we produce a

1:17:08.680 --> 1:17:10.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of these stories, as we have insiders come to

1:17:10.600 --> 1:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>us with information and we corroborate it. So I would

1:17:13.000 --> 1:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>say Silicon Valley is a big one coming up. Absolutely,

1:17:15.800 --> 1:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>It's one that I try to cover a lot here

1:17:17.240 --> 1:17:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on the show because this is this is the new

1:17:20.160 --> 1:17:22.519
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media dominance, and people need to understand that it

1:17:22.560 --> 1:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>comes from Silicon Valley, not from the news networks. James o'keith,

1:17:25.960 --> 1:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>everybody project very tassed. You can get a project verytass

1:17:28.720 --> 1:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. As he mentioned, James, I appreciate your work

1:17:31.400 --> 1:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and your time. Man, thanks for calling in. Thank you.

1:17:35.880 --> 1:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, team, we have more coming up here. I'm

1:17:38.920 --> 1:17:42.519
<v Speaker 1>going to talk to you about Netflix shows in just

1:17:42.720 --> 1:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But now you've probably heard of snippy

1:17:46.040 --> 1:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com. It's a new social media site. Well, if

1:17:48.320 --> 1:17:50.519
<v Speaker 1>you've looked at snippy dot com and left, you need

1:17:50.520 --> 1:17:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to look again. Thousands of my listeners have joined snippy

1:17:53.680 --> 1:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com and they're expressing their opinions and stirring up

1:17:56.360 --> 1:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lively conversations. Snipy is an unbiased social media plat form.

1:18:00.240 --> 1:18:03.559
<v Speaker 1>It's all about conversation and community, and Snippy not only

1:18:03.640 --> 1:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>encourages freedom of expression, it guarantees its users the ability

1:18:07.200 --> 1:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to discuss topics freely without suppression from administrators. Snippy dot

1:18:12.160 --> 1:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>com is a place where everyone is free to express

1:18:14.000 --> 1:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>their thoughts and share their opinions. It is totally free

1:18:17.280 --> 1:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to join and open to everyone. So join us at

1:18:20.960 --> 1:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>snippy dot com and let your opinion matter. No shadow

1:18:25.040 --> 1:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>banning and no suppression of conservative thought ever. All right,

1:18:29.200 --> 1:18:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you need to check this out. They've got every you

1:18:30.640 --> 1:18:33.519
<v Speaker 1>can need, politics, sports, current events, fashion, food, whatever you

1:18:33.560 --> 1:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about. And now snappy dot com has

1:18:35.920 --> 1:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>an updated user interface and exciting new features, also available

1:18:39.920 --> 1:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Apple App Store and now available for Android.

1:18:42.840 --> 1:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Snippy is your new alternative social media. There's a petition

1:18:46.920 --> 1:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on campus to remove the name of Clarence Thomas Spring

1:18:50.439 --> 1:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Courts Justice from a building here. What's your thought on

1:18:53.320 --> 1:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the petition? I honestly think he should be removed. We

1:18:56.800 --> 1:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>should probably just take his name off the building. It's

1:18:59.200 --> 1:19:01.439
<v Speaker 1>not that big of a deal. I agree that should

1:19:01.439 --> 1:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>get removed. What's your thought on the petition? I agree,

1:19:06.040 --> 1:19:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he represents the student body. I would

1:19:08.960 --> 1:19:11.759
<v Speaker 1>sign it. Um. I think I'll probably sign the petition.

1:19:11.840 --> 1:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And is there anything that you would point to as

1:19:13.880 --> 1:19:19.479
<v Speaker 1>something that he's done that would warrant that? Oh? No, Um,

1:19:19.479 --> 1:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>do you mind if I get back to you. Is

1:19:21.000 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there anything that comes to mind that he's done that

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you would point to as something that you think disqualifies him.

1:19:27.400 --> 1:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I've done most much research on this.

1:19:29.479 --> 1:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I just saw a Facebook petition about it, and that's

1:19:33.160 --> 1:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of the extent of it. He is a historical figure, though,

1:19:39.120 --> 1:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so is Hitler. Okay, is there anything that Justice Thomas

1:19:42.880 --> 1:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>has done that you would point to and say that's

1:19:44.400 --> 1:19:46.719
<v Speaker 1>why we shouldn't have him I mean not in particular.

1:19:47.200 --> 1:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, I guess just well, I don't know what

1:19:52.240 --> 1:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>he did. I mean, I don't really know anything about him.

1:19:56.720 --> 1:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know that. Yes, that look, this is

1:20:00.840 --> 1:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>such a liberal community, and um to degrade that in

1:20:05.880 --> 1:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>any way is not really the scat way for things

1:20:10.280 --> 1:20:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and isn't the liberal viewpoint though, like open mindedness and tolerance. Guess,

1:20:15.760 --> 1:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's this way to twist the concept

1:20:19.520 --> 1:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of liberalism. So all right, that's that's all from Campus Reform.

1:20:26.120 --> 1:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>That's Cabot Phillips, the interviewer doing campus reform does. Will

1:20:29.680 --> 1:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>just point out how wacko looney tunes like the various

1:20:36.040 --> 1:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>college campuses across the country are when it comes to

1:20:39.200 --> 1:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>professor's student body, all these different people, and how they

1:20:43.280 --> 1:20:46.360
<v Speaker 1>have taken this incredibly left wing point of view that

1:20:46.479 --> 1:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was from the Savannah College of Art and Design. That's

1:20:50.160 --> 1:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what scatt is. I gotta say, I'm a big

1:20:52.040 --> 1:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Savannah fan. You know, Nine Line Apparel and and Black

1:20:57.160 --> 1:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Rifle Coffee both have stores in Savannah. So I've been

1:21:00.439 --> 1:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>down there to visit and hang out with all those guys.

1:21:02.360 --> 1:21:05.719
<v Speaker 1>And Savannah's a great, great town to see for a weekend.

1:21:05.960 --> 1:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoy it anyway back to campus or form

1:21:09.400 --> 1:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing here. I understand that there's a part

1:21:12.080 --> 1:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of me that always feels this way too. And they

1:21:14.040 --> 1:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>used to do these segments on on my favorite cable

1:21:17.840 --> 1:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>news channel where they would ask people on the beach,

1:21:20.479 --> 1:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know who's like the first president that I'll go, oh, dude,

1:21:24.160 --> 1:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>like auto knows like Abraham Lincoln the first president. And

1:21:28.320 --> 1:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>we're all like, oh, you're such an iom. You know.

1:21:30.439 --> 1:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the whole that's the whole stick, you know,

1:21:34.240 --> 1:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>go around and ask people. You know, so, what do

1:21:35.920 --> 1:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we celebrated on the fourth of July? Are we celebrating

1:21:38.240 --> 1:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>how we should be thankful for things? To be like? Yeah,

1:21:41.320 --> 1:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>for the July is about giving thanks man, like, I'm

1:21:44.280 --> 1:21:46.599
<v Speaker 1>thankful for being out here on the beach. Would zinc

1:21:46.680 --> 1:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>oxide on my nose? Uh? You know. So there's a

1:21:50.840 --> 1:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>limited there's a limited utility. It's one way to put

1:21:53.800 --> 1:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it for those kinds of segments as a means of

1:21:56.560 --> 1:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>illuminating anything worthwhile other than just for our own amusement.

1:21:59.200 --> 1:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the com many shows do this too.

1:22:01.000 --> 1:22:02.559
<v Speaker 1>They do the man on the street stuff and they

1:22:02.600 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ask questions. And one of the one of the most

1:22:05.080 --> 1:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>common bits is when they'll ask people to weigh in

1:22:08.600 --> 1:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on an event that hasn't happened yet or hasn't happened

1:22:11.000 --> 1:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>at all, but they know what they're supposed to say.

1:22:14.280 --> 1:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is a kind of variation on that in

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense, because you can tell from from these different students,

1:22:22.560 --> 1:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>many of them. You would think that students in college

1:22:25.640 --> 1:22:28.679
<v Speaker 1>would probably have some grasp of who is sitting Supreme

1:22:28.680 --> 1:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Court justices. But I've heard the statistics. I can't cite

1:22:33.960 --> 1:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>them from memory of how many people in this country

1:22:36.000 --> 1:22:39.639
<v Speaker 1>can actually name all nine Supreme Court justices without looking

1:22:39.680 --> 1:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it up. And it's a very very small number, you know,

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a less than one percent kind of number.

1:22:47.680 --> 1:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But that said, Clarence Thomas is very well known, and

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he's somebody that they're saying that they should remove his

1:22:54.120 --> 1:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>name from a building, or that he shouldn't have his

1:22:57.520 --> 1:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>name on a building, and they don't know why I

1:23:00.360 --> 1:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And so the the initial level of reaction you get

1:23:03.280 --> 1:23:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to this this kind of a man on the street,

1:23:06.080 --> 1:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>of a man on the street sounds sounds so gender normative.

1:23:10.439 --> 1:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The man on the street interview is these kids don't

1:23:13.800 --> 1:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>know anything and they're just a bunch of liberals living

1:23:16.680 --> 1:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in a cocoon. And then that's all, sure, that's all

1:23:19.240 --> 1:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>fine and true due to an extent. But what's what

1:23:22.080 --> 1:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I find really interested is how conservatism needs to understand

1:23:28.600 --> 1:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that for liberals, it's enough just that they have the

1:23:33.479 --> 1:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>impulse to say and feel the way the left wants

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>them to. Liberals don't really care. And you know, so

1:23:41.680 --> 1:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a little bit of a counterintuitive taker,

1:23:43.880 --> 1:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>but liberals don't really care when you walk around the

1:23:46.080 --> 1:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>campus and people say, oh, I don't like Clarence Thomas. Why,

1:23:49.960 --> 1:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>oh I don't know, I don't even know who he is.

1:23:51.479 --> 1:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I just well, all liberals care about is do they

1:23:53.880 --> 1:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>know they're not supposed to like him? And do they

1:23:57.080 --> 1:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>know that they should oppose him and everything that he

1:23:59.240 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>stands for every facet of their lives. So if it

1:24:03.640 --> 1:24:06.519
<v Speaker 1>if the outcome is what the left wants, they don't

1:24:06.520 --> 1:24:10.479
<v Speaker 1>care about the process. If the process is knowledge or

1:24:10.520 --> 1:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's related to having knowledge, here that's really irrelevant

1:24:14.840 --> 1:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to the left. In fact, I think the left prefers

1:24:17.240 --> 1:24:20.519
<v Speaker 1>that they see on campuses young people who will who

1:24:20.520 --> 1:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>are already able to vote and who will soon be

1:24:22.760 --> 1:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>out in their adult lives as yeah, working in companies

1:24:28.720 --> 1:24:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and working you know, at businesses and stuff, but also

1:24:32.439 --> 1:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as activists, and if they're really far left, as MSNBC

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>anchors and so, you know, they just want the end

1:24:40.240 --> 1:24:43.519
<v Speaker 1>product to be that you you know what the the

1:24:43.720 --> 1:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>cultural expectation of you is as a liberal. You know,

1:24:50.000 --> 1:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so when when I ask and another great example this

1:24:53.320 --> 1:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is climate change. When I ask somebody do you believe

1:24:56.000 --> 1:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in climate change? It is really a cultural signaling. If

1:25:00.320 --> 1:25:02.599
<v Speaker 1>I ask somebody that, as a liberal, I'm expecting them

1:25:02.640 --> 1:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to just say yes and leave it there. And then

1:25:05.880 --> 1:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like they've gotten the other part of

1:25:08.160 --> 1:25:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a secret handshake, right Clarence Thomas another one, you know,

1:25:12.000 --> 1:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>do you believe in? Do you believe there should be

1:25:15.320 --> 1:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>dark money in politics? Nobody knows what does that even mean?

1:25:18.600 --> 1:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>People to talk about it, don't know what it means.

1:25:20.280 --> 1:25:22.479
<v Speaker 1>But you know, then they'll say, oh no, well, well,

1:25:22.600 --> 1:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>as a liberally, I don't want you know, do you

1:25:24.320 --> 1:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>want do you want to get the money out of politics?

1:25:26.600 --> 1:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>There's a phrase you'll hear Liberals say it's an idiotic phrase,

1:25:29.800 --> 1:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but they'll say it all the time, and they just know, well,

1:25:32.840 --> 1:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>as a liberal, I'm supposed to, you know, like a

1:25:35.439 --> 1:25:38.599
<v Speaker 1>hamster hitting a pedal to get the treat I'm supposed

1:25:38.680 --> 1:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>to do this, I'm supposed to say this, And that

1:25:42.880 --> 1:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is the approach on a lot of these issues. And

1:25:45.160 --> 1:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>because they've created the social currency on pretty much all

1:25:51.120 --> 1:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>college campuses. I mean, I know there's a few conservative

1:25:54.160 --> 1:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>campuses across the country and people I have friends who

1:25:56.880 --> 1:26:01.479
<v Speaker 1>have attended them, and I know they exist, but ninety

1:26:01.560 --> 1:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent of college campuses are overwhelmingly, i mean just

1:26:05.960 --> 1:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>liberal dominated enclaves. And so you know, when when you

1:26:10.760 --> 1:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the when you look at what's happening on

1:26:12.920 --> 1:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>these campuses and the way kids respond to a question

1:26:15.000 --> 1:26:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like what do you think of Clarence Thomas, and they

1:26:17.200 --> 1:26:20.599
<v Speaker 1>all say, or overwhelmingly they'll say, you know, he's bad.

1:26:20.680 --> 1:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We shouldn't have him here because we're tolerant. That's all

1:26:23.720 --> 1:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the left wants. They view that as victory. They don't

1:26:26.800 --> 1:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't care that people can get to the why,

1:26:28.760 --> 1:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>because if they can get to the why on that issue,

1:26:31.360 --> 1:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they can get to the why on other issues. So

1:26:35.880 --> 1:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that we have a problem here. We are losing,

1:26:39.920 --> 1:26:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We are losing people in this ongoing battle for having

1:26:45.360 --> 1:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>people think about there, especially you know, young people, college kids,

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have them think about why they hold the ideas they do.

1:26:51.120 --> 1:26:53.839
<v Speaker 1>The left just wants to process them in an almost

1:26:54.000 --> 1:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>machine like way to respond to certain things the way

1:26:57.720 --> 1:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the left tells them to. I believe in climate I

1:27:00.400 --> 1:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>don't like conservatives. I don't like Justice Thomas. I don't

1:27:03.720 --> 1:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like Justice Scalia or his legacy. You know, you get

1:27:06.160 --> 1:27:08.519
<v Speaker 1>on the whole list. Think of all the issues that

1:27:08.600 --> 1:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the left can encapsulate down to a very very small phrase, slogan,

1:27:14.720 --> 1:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>even a couple of words. That's what they're doing. They're

1:27:18.240 --> 1:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to mobilize people for their own cause, and the

1:27:20.920 --> 1:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>way they get them to do it is by perpetuating

1:27:24.800 --> 1:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the perception that by holding these beliefs, you're one of

1:27:28.000 --> 1:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the good people, the cool people, the smart people. So yeah,

1:27:31.360 --> 1:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I get it. We can make fun of these kids

1:27:32.840 --> 1:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on campuses and they don't know anything in hahaha, But

1:27:35.840 --> 1:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>these know nothings are going to be voters soon. They're

1:27:39.200 --> 1:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be people that are supporting the left irrespective

1:27:43.320 --> 1:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of their lack of knowledge. So we have to combat

1:27:45.840 --> 1:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this by making people more knowledgeable on campuses some very

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>important news that I wanted to share with you all

1:27:54.439 --> 1:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the official statistics. I shouldn't do that because now you're

1:27:57.840 --> 1:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>actually expecting something important. This isn't portant at all, some

1:28:01.040 --> 1:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>official statistics when it comes to Netflix shows, as in

1:28:05.360 --> 1:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what are the top shows on Netflix? See one thing

1:28:08.120 --> 1:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I do like about the digital era we are in now,

1:28:11.400 --> 1:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>apart from all the big brother surveillance and the tech

1:28:15.240 --> 1:28:20.519
<v Speaker 1>platforms acting like left wing propaganda platforms, and you know,

1:28:20.720 --> 1:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>apart from all that, at least there's real there's real numbers,

1:28:24.280 --> 1:28:26.920
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you know, you know who's downloading, you know

1:28:26.960 --> 1:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>who's watching, and you don't have to play this guessing

1:28:29.960 --> 1:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>game anymore. I'm amazed at how shall we say, easy,

1:28:37.000 --> 1:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>too easy to fudge. The numbers are for traditional TV,

1:28:40.960 --> 1:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, for radio, for different media platforms out there,

1:28:46.320 --> 1:28:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there are a lot of people

1:28:47.479 --> 1:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>played a lot of games over the years. But with

1:28:49.840 --> 1:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>digital stuff, you can know. And so that's why you

1:28:52.120 --> 1:28:57.960
<v Speaker 1>got the top ten Netflix series by stream as of November,

1:28:58.000 --> 1:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of November twenty eighteen, and this is remarkable. Uh, Brandon,

1:29:03.520 --> 1:29:06.839
<v Speaker 1>what do you think is the number one most streamed

1:29:06.920 --> 1:29:10.519
<v Speaker 1>show on Netflix? Here's a hint. It is not a

1:29:10.600 --> 1:29:13.559
<v Speaker 1>new show or even a recent show. I feel like

1:29:13.600 --> 1:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw the article or do you want me to

1:29:15.160 --> 1:29:17.759
<v Speaker 1>lie to you? And then damn it, man, you've already

1:29:17.760 --> 1:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>seen this one. Where's producer Mike. I think he's going

1:29:21.160 --> 1:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>through his Friends DVDs because he doesn't have it on

1:29:23.880 --> 1:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Netflix by right as a Friends? Oh no, you're wrong,

1:29:27.840 --> 1:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh because I read the article about them spending one

1:29:30.320 --> 1:29:34.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars. Are high falutin fancy, man, you call

1:29:34.600 --> 1:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>me right now. You're you're actually you're you're very close. Uh?

1:29:39.040 --> 1:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Friends is number three? All right? I think it's I

1:29:41.880 --> 1:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's remarkable that even that Netflix is spending billions

1:29:46.040 --> 1:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of dollars on content, billions of dollars. A show about

1:29:50.520 --> 1:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>people in their twenties dating and not doing a lot

1:29:53.960 --> 1:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of work and hang out in a coffee shop from

1:29:56.360 --> 1:30:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the nineties is the number three most stream show on Netflix.

1:30:02.720 --> 1:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But You're Okay the number one show, though, is also

1:30:05.680 --> 1:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite as old as Friends, it is not

1:30:08.120 --> 1:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on air. What is the most stream show on Netflix? Dj? Brandon?

1:30:13.240 --> 1:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it like breaking bad or something that's not a bad? Guess,

1:30:17.160 --> 1:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta gave you credit for you know least least

1:30:19.120 --> 1:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>making it making a go of it. It's the Office

1:30:21.680 --> 1:30:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the most, which I like. I completely respect this decision

1:30:25.800 --> 1:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that the public has made, I think because the thing

1:30:28.160 --> 1:30:31.479
<v Speaker 1>what the Office is that it's in short chunks. The writing,

1:30:31.600 --> 1:30:34.599
<v Speaker 1>especially for the first five or six seasons, the writing

1:30:34.720 --> 1:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is just hilarious and brilliant and you can watch You

1:30:38.760 --> 1:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>know the problem I have with movies now, I don't

1:30:40.920 --> 1:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>know if you're the same thing. I never have over

1:30:44.280 --> 1:30:46.599
<v Speaker 1>two hours to sit in one place and watch something,

1:30:46.960 --> 1:30:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and I don't like watching a movie and not finishing it.

1:30:49.920 --> 1:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just much more likely to watch a show.

1:30:52.120 --> 1:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, before I go to sleep. But I'm

1:30:53.840 --> 1:30:56.439
<v Speaker 1>done with all my work. Do I have thirty minutes

1:30:56.479 --> 1:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch an episode of the Office or any show

1:30:59.040 --> 1:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for that matter that I want? Yeah? I do. So

1:31:01.280 --> 1:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>That's why I think the on demand and streaming habits

1:31:05.160 --> 1:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of people are changing to accommodate that. I mean, dude, Brendan,

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>what was the last the last time you watched a

1:31:11.800 --> 1:31:14.559
<v Speaker 1>full two hour length movie that you had never seen before?

1:31:15.560 --> 1:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I think yesterday. We've been We've discussed before. I'm a

1:31:20.400 --> 1:31:22.719
<v Speaker 1>horror weirdo, so I watched a lot of horror stuff.

1:31:22.800 --> 1:31:24.559
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I mean, I've never seen Lord

1:31:24.560 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Rings, but see you don't You wouldn't rather

1:31:26.320 --> 1:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>watch American horror story in thirty second chunks than watch

1:31:28.880 --> 1:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a full two hour long movie. Yeah, no, I would.

1:31:31.439 --> 1:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I know it's commitment and I'm not going to say

1:31:33.880 --> 1:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I always sit down and to do it. I'm usually

1:31:36.040 --> 1:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe doing something. Are you a fan of the Strain?

1:31:38.560 --> 1:31:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of horror, I actually like that on Hulu even

1:31:40.920 --> 1:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>though there was there was some there was some, you know,

1:31:44.320 --> 1:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>criticisms of it that I would offer. But did you

1:31:46.240 --> 1:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like the Strain? Haven't seen it yet? But you should

1:31:48.320 --> 1:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>watch Into the Dark. It's a new monthly series on

1:31:52.000 --> 1:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Hulu that's every month is a different horror about the holiday,

1:31:56.280 --> 1:32:00.439
<v Speaker 1>like Thanksgiving, Halloween, Christmas. And it's good. Yeah, only three

1:32:00.439 --> 1:32:03.519
<v Speaker 1>episodes in only an hour, I guess only now, Okay,

1:32:03.600 --> 1:32:05.559
<v Speaker 1>I'll check it out. So the Office Spell the Way

1:32:05.560 --> 1:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix number one most stream show. The Chilling Adventures

1:32:08.920 --> 1:32:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of Sabrina is number two. I don't even know what

1:32:12.560 --> 1:32:17.439
<v Speaker 1>that means or is. It's a more adult version of

1:32:17.479 --> 1:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Sabrina the Teenage which based on the comics. However, and

1:32:20.040 --> 1:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I will say this to you buck, Are you serious? Yeah?

1:32:21.960 --> 1:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And I watched it because again, horror, even if it's

1:32:23.960 --> 1:32:27.759
<v Speaker 1>four kids, they push real left on that show about

1:32:27.800 --> 1:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>certain topics even though it's about you know, which horror

1:32:30.960 --> 1:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>has to be commie now. I mean, you know they

1:32:33.040 --> 1:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>can't Ark and Harror story the same thing. Yeah. I

1:32:35.960 --> 1:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>saw that. There's a whole abortion storyline the first season

1:32:39.280 --> 1:32:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing. Grey's Anatomy is number four. House

1:32:43.479 --> 1:32:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of Cards number five, the British The Great British Baking

1:32:47.120 --> 1:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Shows number six, Who Knew? Marvel's Daredevil number seven, and

1:32:51.280 --> 1:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Narcos number eight. I think Narcos should be way. I

1:32:55.000 --> 1:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think Narcos is one of the best shows ever. I

1:32:56.880 --> 1:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>put in the top ten, and they just canceled Daredevil,

1:32:59.280 --> 1:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which I'm upset about. I'm upset about that too. I

1:33:01.520 --> 1:33:03.439
<v Speaker 1>actually like Dared a lot. And The Haunting of Hillhouse

1:33:03.520 --> 1:33:05.679
<v Speaker 1>is number nine, which I find bizarre because I don't

1:33:05.680 --> 1:33:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good shown. It's just me. It was, man, Yeah,

1:33:08.200 --> 1:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it was kind of man. I'm glad it. See you've

1:33:10.000 --> 1:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>got the horror expert here, DJ Brandon. He knows it

1:33:13.000 --> 1:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really that good, So folks, I hope I saved

1:33:15.080 --> 1:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you some time. The Office and Friends are worth having

1:33:17.760 --> 1:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on in the background, but Narcos and Daredevil you have

1:33:20.960 --> 1:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>not seen them. Highly recommend roll calls up next. The

1:33:25.120 --> 1:33:34.719
<v Speaker 1>show ain't over yet, folks. It's time for roll call, indeed,

1:33:34.800 --> 1:33:38.479
<v Speaker 1>roll call from the Swamp. It is time to get

1:33:38.520 --> 1:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>into all of the latest insights, thoughts, quips, analytic additions,

1:33:44.439 --> 1:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>keeping me honest, all that good stuff that comes to

1:33:47.439 --> 1:33:50.519
<v Speaker 1>us courtesy of roll call. And man, it's just so nice.

1:33:50.680 --> 1:33:52.759
<v Speaker 1>This was the first morning in a week I've woken

1:33:52.840 --> 1:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>up and not felt like I had some weird foreign

1:33:57.120 --> 1:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>objects stuck in the glands around my throat. So you know,

1:34:01.439 --> 1:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>life is good. Life is good. The Holidays coming up.

1:34:04.400 --> 1:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a good week on Radio two, folks,

1:34:07.240 --> 1:34:10.599
<v Speaker 1>John writes Buck the Christmas tree was chosen based on

1:34:10.640 --> 1:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the size of the chimney. After it dried out, it

1:34:14.080 --> 1:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>was removed from the home trunk first. To clean the

1:34:17.360 --> 1:34:21.559
<v Speaker 1>chimney with its dead branches, you dropped a chain tied

1:34:21.600 --> 1:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to a rope. Just so you know, John, I have

1:34:26.280 --> 1:34:31.519
<v Speaker 1>never heard this before, and my thought was that, based

1:34:31.560 --> 1:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on what I had been told before and what I've read,

1:34:35.880 --> 1:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Christmas tree is a tradition that we borrowed

1:34:39.320 --> 1:34:43.639
<v Speaker 1>from pagan rituals in Europe, where there would be either

1:34:43.720 --> 1:34:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a burning of what a coniferous tree, the fir tree

1:34:48.600 --> 1:34:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Christmas tree actually is. So I've never heard

1:34:51.320 --> 1:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>this theory before that that's used to clean the chimney.

1:34:54.000 --> 1:34:56.559
<v Speaker 1>But it is definitely interesting to me that that is

1:34:56.560 --> 1:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a theory that you have raised. So I'll I'll take

1:35:00.880 --> 1:35:03.679
<v Speaker 1>your word for it, pending further review. Sounds a little

1:35:03.680 --> 1:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>weird to me, but interesting for sure. Mike. Right, Hey, Buck,

1:35:08.000 --> 1:35:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the Stormy Daniels payoff. What about the

1:35:11.400 --> 1:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>seventeen million dollars Congress has paid out for sexual conduct payoffs. Well,

1:35:16.360 --> 1:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, Mike, what we have here with the Cohen

1:35:19.320 --> 1:35:23.559
<v Speaker 1>payoff situation is, once again we're being told, as we've

1:35:23.560 --> 1:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>been told all along in the Russia Collusion Special Council probe, right,

1:35:29.040 --> 1:35:33.559
<v Speaker 1>the investigating of the investigation of Donald Trump, which is

1:35:33.560 --> 1:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>what this is. This is the investigation of Donald Trump

1:35:37.439 --> 1:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>by his political enemies. That's what's going on. And the

1:35:40.600 --> 1:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>people who have been telling us that this is all

1:35:43.439 --> 1:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>about getting to the truth, getting to justice are also

1:35:46.840 --> 1:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are now telling us that we need

1:35:49.160 --> 1:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand that the crimes that are being uncovered don't

1:35:54.080 --> 1:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>deal with bad conduct or even necessarily criminal conduct. The

1:35:59.080 --> 1:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>crimes are in the process of how non criminal conduct

1:36:03.040 --> 1:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is hand. Let me give it a little bit of

1:36:05.160 --> 1:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a deeper details here on this one. For example, lying

1:36:09.840 --> 1:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>is the most obvious case we have where they're lying

1:36:13.600 --> 1:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>not about conduct that was criminal, to protect themselves. But

1:36:17.479 --> 1:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we are supposed to believe that it's just a coincidence

1:36:20.400 --> 1:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that these individuals who are put through the hellish, emotionally

1:36:24.840 --> 1:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and financially draining experience of having to face the special counsel,

1:36:29.240 --> 1:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're lying for no apparent reason. They're just lying

1:36:33.080 --> 1:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're liars and lying is bad. And so that

1:36:36.120 --> 1:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>process crime gets wedged into all of this, and we

1:36:40.080 --> 1:36:44.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have much further in terms of explanation. Okay, so

1:36:44.200 --> 1:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that's one part of this. And then on the Stormy

1:36:48.360 --> 1:36:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Daniel's payoff, we're supposed to be so outraged because this payoff,

1:36:53.280 --> 1:36:57.760
<v Speaker 1>which was a completely legal payoff to make, was not

1:36:58.000 --> 1:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>reported to election authorities properly. Well, I gotta tell you something.

1:37:03.520 --> 1:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>The notion that election authorities are somehow these virtuous and

1:37:11.400 --> 1:37:15.280
<v Speaker 1>why institutions, these these bodies that look at our election

1:37:15.720 --> 1:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, this is crazy. What I mean

1:37:19.400 --> 1:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is that they can change the election law with a

1:37:22.120 --> 1:37:24.280
<v Speaker 1>simple Act of Congress whenever they feel like, any time

1:37:24.280 --> 1:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they feel like, because there's no underlying moral distinction that's

1:37:28.920 --> 1:37:31.439
<v Speaker 1>being made here, right, they're not saying this is the

1:37:31.600 --> 1:37:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this is the mallem in say versus maem mallem prohibitum

1:37:35.760 --> 1:37:38.639
<v Speaker 1>distinction them we talk about here on the show. Mallem

1:37:38.880 --> 1:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in say is don't kill people. You don't need the

1:37:41.400 --> 1:37:43.479
<v Speaker 1>law to tell you don't kill people. And even if

1:37:43.479 --> 1:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know there was a law that says don't

1:37:45.360 --> 1:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>kill people, I could morally and with clarity, reason you

1:37:50.320 --> 1:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>through why you don't just kill people? Or don't steal?

1:37:53.760 --> 1:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Why should you not steal? We could? Why should you

1:37:56.680 --> 1:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>have to only be able to give, you know, twenty

1:38:00.120 --> 1:38:03.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred dollars to a political candidate because Congress says,

1:38:03.960 --> 1:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's malim prohibitim. There's an arbitrariness to it and

1:38:08.040 --> 1:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a lack of moral foundation in the rule that we

1:38:11.200 --> 1:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>are essentially trusting in this case the system and the

1:38:15.479 --> 1:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>elites who run it to make good decisions about where

1:38:18.960 --> 1:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they're drawing the lines. But on election stuff, this is

1:38:22.080 --> 1:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about as hazy and gray area and overly complicated as

1:38:27.920 --> 1:38:30.760
<v Speaker 1>any area of law can get. And it's really just

1:38:31.479 --> 1:38:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to believe it's bad because they say so.

1:38:34.800 --> 1:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, what you have not seen in the investigation

1:38:38.080 --> 1:38:41.519
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump and his associates is any talk of

1:38:41.680 --> 1:38:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or I shouldn't say any talk any proof of There's

1:38:43.800 --> 1:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of talk of it of what would be a

1:38:45.840 --> 1:38:49.519
<v Speaker 1>crime that is truly appalling, a crime for which anybody

1:38:49.520 --> 1:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>would demand there is punishment and that that's what justice requires.

1:38:55.000 --> 1:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You know. There's nothing about about stealing from people, about

1:38:59.240 --> 1:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>attacking people, about hurting people, about you know, it's always

1:39:02.720 --> 1:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about how if you know Trump didn't report

1:39:06.320 --> 1:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>this properly, or you know, maybe he's hiding his taxes.

1:39:09.680 --> 1:39:13.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's paperwork crimes. They're going after Trump on

1:39:13.080 --> 1:39:16.439
<v Speaker 1>paperwork crimes primarily. And you know people would say, oh,

1:39:16.439 --> 1:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>buck well, paperwork crime could be stealing somebody's house. Yeah,

1:39:19.040 --> 1:39:21.360
<v Speaker 1>but I mean the crime is just the paperwork's not

1:39:21.439 --> 1:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>done properly. Where the crime is that the testimony was

1:39:24.640 --> 1:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not given accurately. But there's no underlying crimes. And I

1:39:29.040 --> 1:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>know this is getting kind of philosophical about what does

1:39:32.200 --> 1:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the law really prohibit? In what is the law? But

1:39:34.200 --> 1:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where we are now because as we

1:39:36.840 --> 1:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>saw with Hillary, and it's not a what about is

1:39:38.720 --> 1:39:42.519
<v Speaker 1>if it's true she broke laws, but they told us

1:39:42.560 --> 1:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that was okay. They found they found a rationalization for

1:39:46.280 --> 1:39:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Hillary breaking the laws okay. And with Trump they're trying

1:39:52.280 --> 1:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to find a rationalization for how he did break the laws.

1:39:56.560 --> 1:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're seeing play out in real time, and

1:39:58.320 --> 1:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that's why people like me, I'm so little f that

1:40:01.080 --> 1:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>this has been a fair process and will continue to

1:40:04.280 --> 1:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>be and I'm sure it will continue to be an

1:40:06.520 --> 1:40:10.240
<v Speaker 1>unfair process. Rito Rites, welcome back. Glad your voice box

1:40:10.320 --> 1:40:14.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't crap out. You're absolutely right, sank Toakomy is exactly

1:40:14.600 --> 1:40:18.439
<v Speaker 1>the term for his insufferable self. Does he truly think

1:40:18.479 --> 1:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what he did? Or is he delusional?

1:40:21.680 --> 1:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter, it's maddening. Merry Christmas. All my people are

1:40:25.080 --> 1:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>getting black Rifle coffee. We'll really thank you so much,

1:40:28.080 --> 1:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and remember Black Riflecoffee dot com. Slash Buck make sure

1:40:31.000 --> 1:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's where you go so that they know that

1:40:33.640 --> 1:40:35.599
<v Speaker 1>you're part of Team Buck and the show gets credit,

1:40:36.800 --> 1:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but you know you'll get a good discount. And I

1:40:39.000 --> 1:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>really do. I have coffee around stacked up next to

1:40:42.120 --> 1:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>my desk, and I think Black Rifle does a great job.

1:40:45.960 --> 1:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And the guys who run the company or they're just

1:40:48.160 --> 1:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they're they're great dudes and dudets, they're ladies worked there

1:40:51.120 --> 1:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>two So definitely check it out. And as for Sanktakomy, Yeah,

1:40:55.560 --> 1:40:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Sanctakomey is somebody who should give us all a little

1:40:59.280 --> 1:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of Paul when we think about how the government functions,

1:41:03.680 --> 1:41:06.559
<v Speaker 1>who's in charge of it. And this is why this

1:41:06.560 --> 1:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>takes us really the roots of our conservatism. In many ways,

1:41:09.600 --> 1:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we understand that individuals, that human beings, are driven by

1:41:14.560 --> 1:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of emotions and feelings and beliefs and

1:41:19.360 --> 1:41:23.599
<v Speaker 1>self interest. And so that's why we have limitations on

1:41:23.720 --> 1:41:26.559
<v Speaker 1>government authority. That's why we want checks and balances. That's

1:41:26.560 --> 1:41:32.280
<v Speaker 1>why we have so many clearly spelled out processes in

1:41:32.400 --> 1:41:35.840
<v Speaker 1>place that are meant to protect you, the individual. It's

1:41:35.880 --> 1:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not really about protecting the Government's about protecting you the individual,

1:41:39.280 --> 1:41:43.439
<v Speaker 1>from the government, because historically we know that tyranny comes

1:41:43.479 --> 1:41:46.479
<v Speaker 1>from governments that are unrestrained and that are not rooted

1:41:46.920 --> 1:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in a respect for and a protection of natural law,

1:41:51.800 --> 1:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so philosophical there too. Dale. Hey, Buck, glad your voice

1:41:58.200 --> 1:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is back at I'm currently reading The Charm School by

1:42:01.080 --> 1:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Demill, which is a Cold War era novel that

1:42:05.040 --> 1:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>takes place in the Soviet Union, involves army intelligence and

1:42:08.520 --> 1:42:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the CIA. I know this as well before your time

1:42:11.160 --> 1:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the agency, but I was curious if you've previously read

1:42:13.160 --> 1:42:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the book and your thoughts aren't I if so, Shields

1:42:17.000 --> 1:42:20.679
<v Speaker 1>High Dale, Dale, I've never read any of Demill's books.

1:42:20.880 --> 1:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you that, I gotta be honest, never

1:42:22.920 --> 1:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>read anything Demill is written, so I really can't. I

1:42:26.040 --> 1:42:28.240
<v Speaker 1>just know the name, but I really can't speak at

1:42:28.240 --> 1:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>all to his writing in general or in specific terms,

1:42:32.920 --> 1:42:36.479
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure it's great. I haven't read that much

1:42:36.479 --> 1:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the way of espionage thrillers. I tended to read

1:42:39.240 --> 1:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more books about the history of intelligence and intelligence agencies,

1:42:42.880 --> 1:42:45.479
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not really your go to for espionage thriller

1:42:46.000 --> 1:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>book recommendations. Richard writes, Buck, could you ask this snippy

1:42:52.840 --> 1:42:56.879
<v Speaker 1>dot com people to simplify their site? Seems like advanced

1:42:56.880 --> 1:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>trigonometry trying to post and like and add followers. Richard

1:43:01.600 --> 1:43:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I will pass along your comment to the folks that

1:43:04.280 --> 1:43:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I know to deal with customer service there, and just

1:43:06.840 --> 1:43:09.599
<v Speaker 1>understand that it's a new it's a new social media site,

1:43:10.000 --> 1:43:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and that means that they're gonna look, they're gonna be

1:43:12.360 --> 1:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>working out some things as they go, but unlike a

1:43:15.680 --> 1:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the other sites out there, they're not engaged

1:43:19.040 --> 1:43:21.479
<v Speaker 1>in the shenanigans. And look, it's important that we as

1:43:21.520 --> 1:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>conservatives send a message to these social media really monopolies,

1:43:26.600 --> 1:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these social media juggernauts and let them know

1:43:31.120 --> 1:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that there will be consequences for their continued clear politicization,

1:43:36.800 --> 1:43:41.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's what they're doing. They are politicizing social media

1:43:41.320 --> 1:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in general. I mean they're politicizing the social media platforms

1:43:45.439 --> 1:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>in a way that are meant to help the left.

1:43:48.479 --> 1:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's what's going on. That's what we're

1:43:51.400 --> 1:43:54.559
<v Speaker 1>seeing happening, and I just think we should all be

1:43:54.840 --> 1:44:00.519
<v Speaker 1>very very clear about that. We have next up here

1:44:02.120 --> 1:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>rights Tia. Tia says, Hey, again, I've never seen Titanic.

1:44:08.680 --> 1:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I've watched a documentary about the Titanic and that had

1:44:11.200 --> 1:44:14.280
<v Speaker 1>me sobbing. I didn't dare watch the movie. Well, I

1:44:14.320 --> 1:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>guess you're one of the very very few is not

1:44:16.240 --> 1:44:20.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing Titanic. But you're not missing much because I'm pretty

1:44:20.240 --> 1:44:22.840
<v Speaker 1>sure you know how it ends. All right, team, we

1:44:22.960 --> 1:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>got a fantastic show already in the works for you tomorrow.

1:44:26.120 --> 1:44:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Please do tell some folks about this podcast. Remember, if

1:44:28.520 --> 1:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you're ever out out of radio station range, you can,

1:44:32.640 --> 1:44:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or you just don't have the time to listen live,

1:44:34.400 --> 1:44:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you can listen to this pot and listen to the

1:44:36.080 --> 1:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>show in full on podcasts absolutely anytime you want. Just

1:44:40.200 --> 1:44:43.439
<v Speaker 1>go on iTunes, you go on the iHeart app and

1:44:43.560 --> 1:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to the Buck Saxon Show at your leisure on demand.

1:44:48.040 --> 1:44:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a great way to do it. And with that

1:44:50.840 --> 1:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>until tomorrow, Shields High Oma Stakes are fantastic and right

1:44:57.040 --> 1:44:59.920
<v Speaker 1>now Omaha Stakes is giving an amazing limited time off

1:45:00.040 --> 1:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to my listeners. When you get to Omaha Steaks dot

1:45:02.439 --> 1:45:04.880
<v Speaker 1>com and enter promo code Buck into the search bar,

1:45:04.960 --> 1:45:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you will get seventy four percent off Omaha Steaks Family

1:45:08.320 --> 1:45:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Gift Package originally one hundred and ninety five dollars, now

1:45:11.439 --> 1:45:14.479
<v Speaker 1>only forty nine ninety nine. Order now and you'll get

1:45:14.520 --> 1:45:18.519
<v Speaker 1>four can cut age to Tendators, Top Surloins, two Savory

1:45:18.520 --> 1:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Premium Port jobs, four Chicken fried stakes, four Omaha Steaks burgers,

1:45:22.120 --> 1:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>four snappy Cobasta sausages, all beef meatballs, and four perfectly

1:45:25.760 --> 1:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>brown potatoes. Oh Granta, Plus, you'll get four more burgers

1:45:29.680 --> 1:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>free and four perfectly brown potatoes. Oh grattaw you throw

1:45:32.720 --> 1:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that all the mix. It's delicious. Omah Steaks is a

1:45:35.360 --> 1:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>fifth generation family owned company with over one hundred years

1:45:38.120 --> 1:45:41.919
<v Speaker 1>of experience delivering perfectly aged beef handcut by master Butcher's

1:45:41.920 --> 1:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>in Omaha. Omaha Steaks dot com tight buck in the

1:45:45.400 --> 1:45:47.800
<v Speaker 1>search bar and add the family Gift Package to your card.

1:45:48.000 --> 1:45:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Omaha Steakes dot com tight buck in the search bar

1:45:51.439 --> 1:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to send the Omaha Steaks Family Gift Package today