WEBVTT - Fed Rate Hike and FPV Ventures

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. The

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>FED raises interest rates by seventy basis points, the biggest

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>increase since stocks rally. What this could signal about a

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 1>possible recession plus new funds still launching even in a downturn.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to the heavy hitters behind the four fifty

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>million dollar fund, including a top Morgan Stanley alone and

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk getting even more political as he reveals who

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he's backing from president in this as he prepares to

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>address Twitter and boys at an all hands meeting, divided

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on whether he'll save the company or destroy it. We'll

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>get to all of that in a moment, but first

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this day, we'll go down in history. The FED raising

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rates by seventy five basis points, the most in

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>almost thirty years. Stocks jumped after a FED chair j

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Pal gave his view on the path four and in

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the fight against stubbornly high inflation are at ludlow. Here

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with more on the market moves and tech especially at Yeah,

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the FED really intensifying its efforts to cool prices. Let's

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the main takeaways from this historic day. Is

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis points hike, taking the federal funds rate

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to one point five percent to one point seven five percent.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>The FED forecasting of the interest rates could rise to

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>three point four percent by December of this year three

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent by the end of next year. They

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the committee saying it's strongly committed to return the inflation

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.279
<v Speaker 1>to its two percent objective. Inflation of two percent seems

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a long way from where we are the inflation developments

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of recent weeks. That hot print last week warranted the

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>bigger height today wanting to power and there's no sign

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>though in the economy of a broader slowdown in terms

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of how the markets reacted. Green on the screen, interesting

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>because there's no one main takeaway. You look at the

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>SMP five one and a half percent, and as that

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred tech heavy index up two and a half percent,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a pull back in yield, a drop in the dollar

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Moving the dollar, the Bloomberg Dollar Index down

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>nine tenths of one percent, biggest drop since May. At

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one point down one percent is biggest drop since the

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>November election. No one takeaway the market looking at Pal's words,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>listening thinking what the path ahead is, and you get

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to listen as well. Here's j P Now, do not

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>expect moves of this size to be common from the

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>perspective of today. Either a fifty basis point or a

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis point increase seems most likely at our

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>next meeting. Look, you don't want to put too much

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>stock in an intra day move. This is the nas

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>That one hundred though, and after j power uttered those

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>words around the size of potential increases at an extra

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ly meeting going forward, you see what that has That

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred does the market giving relief rally, almost saying okay,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we understand where we stand. Now. This is very interesting,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot going on. It's all in the data,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's always in the data. The federals are going

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep an all on inflation and make decisions meeting

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>by meeting. All right, well, thanks for showing us that data, ed,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I want to get a look now at

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>crypto bitcoin following at one point to just above twenty dollars,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>then pairing its losses, Blue Merctionale Bossi breaks it all down,

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and the bad news for crypto seems to keep coming

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>shinale from all directions. Well, what's interesting, Emily is that

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>even though you saw risk assets rise today in markets,

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you did not see Bitcoin rise. You did see a

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>parents gains in relation to some of the movies you

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>saw by the said, but when we're talking about digital

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>money here, we are still seeing a decline, although it's slowing. Remember,

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>market watchers are watching for the levels that they saw

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at the peak of the last cycle. So if it

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>drops the low not just twenty k, but we're looking

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>at nineteen five hundred eleven. Is that worry area that

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you started dipping into a bitcoin and we're not quite

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there yet. Let's flip up the board and got atherorium

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, and how it's doing. Interestingly, you saw that

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>nearly one percent decline bitcoin over twenty four hours. Ethereum

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>dropped less in that time frame. You only saw a

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>drop about seven tenths of one percent, a little less

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>than that. Actually interesting land Now, if you look at

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 1>c r yp go, if you have a terminal, you

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of all coins rising. What else you

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>see rising was coin based. Today you saw coin based

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>rise more than six percent, about six point six percent

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>or so. Interestingly, that comes as we've reported about the

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>shock that so many coin based employees have been feeling

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>with the discipline they're taking, the job cuts that are

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>happening now across the industry and a coin base. Coin

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Base employees describe this to Bloomberg as impersonal and surprising.

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>So I want to pull up a tweet. Actually, what

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a strange week it's been. You pull up a tweet

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>here from Brian Armstrong just a couple of days ago.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Remember this was responding to the idea on a y

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Combinator post saying that coin based employees had elected to

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>out the executives here, and he had responded saying that

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have no confidence in executive company, why are

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you working there? Quit and find a company to work

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>out that you believe in. And remember this post was

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on June tenth, just days before a lot of these

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 1>job cut plans were put in place. All right, indeed,

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting, sweet storm, they're from Brian Armstrong, But also

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you think about the human faces behind these layoffs. Shanali,

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 1>thank you. We'll get to you later for a deeper

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>dive in our crypto report. I do want to get

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>back to the market's response to the Fed's decision to

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>raise rates by seventy five basis points. Victoria Green, chief

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>investment officer for G Squared, joins us. Now, So, Victoria,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the fact of the market

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>rally today after this historic rate hike and all of

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the turmoil we've seen over the last couple of days.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they were happy it wasn't a hundred basis points,

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's a relief that Powell's doing something. But I

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>think we're all gonna wake up tomorrow and realize nothing changed.

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>The feeder stillhawkers. Rates are coming up, and the only

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>way they tame inflation is by nipping unemploy him it.

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And so they're really to sacrifice the very low unemployment.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>They feel like they have wiggle room in the employement

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>market and they've got its human inflation. And we look

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at this and say, the economy is still going to

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>slow down. And I know we're talking about what kind

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of landing will have if it's crash and burn or

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing, and I think it's in a new

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or impossible situation. There's a lot of factors he doesn't control.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But I have to take heart with what the CEOs

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>are saying and what J. Powell himself said, which is

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we can basically have unemployment come up. We have wiggle

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>room and still historically low. We can see that come

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>up because we have the tame inflation. So when you

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>say it's out of our control, what what do you

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>think the scenario we're gonna be looking at over the

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>next six months to a year is gonna be? Is

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 1>this a recession? Is this a recession with a capital

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>R or a small R? I think we like to

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>call it bagel. Right, let's go go back to the

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>old West Wing day since we're reliving the nineties right now. Um,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I think it's gonna be a recession. I

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's gonna be a two thousand and eight redo.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're gonna have a lot of people

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>looking around and seeing pressures unemployment. There's already seeing pressures

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer, the consumers changing their buying pattern. The

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>U S economy lives and breeze and and will die

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>if the consumer slows down because you need the spending.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And look at what tal Walmart and Target and all

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the retailers are saying there is already a change in

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>consumption patterns. We're not seeing the electronics in the home

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>goods move. They're focused on buying food and gas and

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>paying rent. And when that happens and we still see

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>upward inflationary pressure, I mean, I don't think June's number

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna look a whole lot better than than Maze

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at gas prices and rent prices,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you really haven't seen the roll over. So as we

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>keep climbing this mountain and we have these pressures build

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and build and build, I think you know, kind of

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing you guys at the San Francisco people, you know,

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have an earthquake in a while, you

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of get a little worried when the next one

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>comes is gonna be the big one. And so we

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>want to see some of these pressures come off the economy,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's near impossible when you have the rent prices,

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>housing prices, food prices, and gas prices where they are.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>What does this mean for big tech companies that have

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>been riding high now for years, If they're not gonna die,

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they did need to read price a little bit lower.

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Um the problem is earnings growth looks a little susceptible, right,

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's the one question we have with the market

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. I see this more as a very short

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>relief rally and a further leg down because where is

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>our earnings growth going to come from? You're willing to

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>pay a thirty forty plus multiple if you have confidence

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna grow their earnings and you have a

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>future trajectory. And I think right now everybody's putting pause.

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>You're even seeing layoffs come from these tech companies, and

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Microsoft coming out warning about their earnings growth

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of doing walking that back a little bit. Um.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>You have to wonder how much should I really be

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 1>paying for the stock right now? If they're not growing

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>their earnings at the trajectory originally thought they were, how

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>much should I pay for them? So I think big

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>tech still gonna be under pressure, and the pressures are different.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The pressure that Netflix is facing is increased competition, and

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing that bifurcation across streaming. That's a little bit

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>different than say the pressure that the Amazon's facing, which

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they're facing issues with that now they've got too much

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>uh labor and they have too much storage space, and

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they're working on all these price pressures with fuel and

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>delivery costs, so it's not uniform across the board. UM.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And also what these tech companies deliver, how essential are they?

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh and are they discretionary or are they something that

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>people are willing to have to continue to use if

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the world slows down. Netflix is one that may still

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be at risk, even though it's priced more like a

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>value stuff now, because if your pocketbooks hurting, you may

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>start looking at cutting streaming and they're one of those

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>right now that is facing the wrath of cord cutters.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But these big tech companies aren't falling just a bit.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>They're not just under a little bit of pressure. I

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>mean they've already dropped significantly. We spoke to Cisco CEO

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Robbins yesterday UM, which reminded us that Cisco shares

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>peaked in the dot com boom, then plunged and still

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>still have not recovered. There. You're looking at a at

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a twenty plus year chart. Which of the big tech

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>giants do you think could end up being the Ciscos

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of today? I mean, I hate, I hate to be

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a negative l A and root against me used against them.

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But again I'll point to Netflix. I think Netflix is

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>facing such a changed landscape from where it was five

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>years ago, ten years ago, even two years ago. If

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>you think about the number of streaming services that have

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>popped up in the competition now that they face uh,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and they may have more backlash as well. They're trying

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to cut down on the password sharing, and they're facing

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the wrath of people that that don't like that this

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>is now less friendly company. Uh, We're seen as a

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>less friendly company to deal with. I think they could

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>be at risk for for one that's lost. And then

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you can look at some of the pandemic darlings, you know,

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>your zooms of the world, which did fantastic, But at

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the same point, you've got teams and everybody else has

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to tele conference a little bit better.

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>So when I look at who's gonna be kind of

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a potential tech bubble dud, I think it's those that

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>face competition and can't innovate. Interesting, how do you do

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the crypto meltdown? You know, what is? What is? How

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>does crypto survive this? Uh? Krypto needs to figure out

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>what it is? You know, we were told it was

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the heads against central bank spending and inflation, and I'm

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure we can decide it's not that um. It's

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly got to get through this regulation hurdle. I think

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>as it discovers what it really is because right now

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's trading and correlated like a growth or a tech stock,

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>right uh. And because it's it's not really providing any

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>diversification benefits or buffer, and it's definitely not providing an

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation offset. I think the blockchain and technology itself is

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>very very important. I think this will turn out to

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>be the start of a fintech revolution. I think you're

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>still in the very very early innings of it, and

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>people need to figure out how they're actually gonna use it,

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>how they're gonna integrate it in their lives, and how

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it's regulated in tax. And I think the regulated in

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>tax question, we might see some of that come out

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. But that's actually gonna also make it where

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>where you may see some bigger players come into the

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>market because they feel a little bit more comfortable they're

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have a blow up. You know, you look

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at some of the recent crypto blow ups and it

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>has put a little bit of a check on people

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>that this is not a safe, secure investment. There is

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a risk of a hunt to percent loss. And while

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the technology is a fantastic technology, and I think blockchain

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is a very innovative, we have to figure out how

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to use it. I'm you know, I'm not going around

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>buying my Starbucks with bitcoint on my app. It's too volatile.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's really not necessarily cash substitute. So what

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>will it be? I think this year we're going to

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>really figure out what is bitcoint as an investment. Is

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a digital gold We'll see. Victoria Green, chief investment officer

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>for g Squared love the metaphors. Thank you for joining

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>us on this week's Bloomberg Studio. At one point on

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>my exclusive conversation with Amazon CEO Andy Jassy about how

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the company is handling inflation, global supply chain shortages and

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>customers that are getting squeezed by higher prices of everything

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from gas to groceries. We spoke at our Bloomberg Technology Summit.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Take a listen for investors of financially, I'd say it's mixed. You.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we have some businesses are growing really strongly.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>If you look at aws, you know in grew thirty

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>seven year every year. You know, it's not a seventy

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollar revenue run right business, which pretty unusual growth.

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And we grew with fifty percent year every year in

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>our advertising business. You know, it's the thirty two billion

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar revenue run right business. So some business has grown

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>really strongly, and you know, we've continued to grow in

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>our retail business despite pretty crazy comparables during But I

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think the real challenge for us there is on the

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>cost side. And there have been several things that have

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>happened um, some of which are more controllable than others,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think the part that's less controllable is

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>really around inflation. And I think we thought that inflation

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would start to attenuate in two and with war in Ukraine,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it just went the other way and has significantly accelerated.

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So the cost of trucking and line hall and ocean

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and air and fuel has just substantially gone up, and

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that will attenuate at some point. No one

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>knows how long that will take. I think the more

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>controllable areas for US are really around fulfillment center capacity

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and productivity. It was taking about twenty four months to

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>build new filment centers during the pandemic, and so we

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>had to make decisions, you know, in mid two thousand

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty in early one, on how much demand we're going

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to plan for, and so you know, we we end

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>up with more capacity and we need right now. And

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a number of things that we're working on. We

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>when we've stopped building on properties where we don't need

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it yet, and we've let a number of leases laps

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and not a small number, you know, of both those things.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>We've had a lot of occasions in our history where

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we've worked on productivity and made improvements, and we have

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of clearly defined niches and I'm confident we'renna

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>get back to the right level of profitability. You are

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 1>going to sub lease thirty million square feet of space?

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Is there a mistake in the execution there because of

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the OVERBA Again, because you have to make these decisions

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>two years in advance, and again, if you put yourself

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty where we were growing thirty nine percent

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>year over year on a two billion dollar revenue run rate,

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to know what's the right amount to

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>build and you have to make a decision. And we

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>made the decision to air on the side of our

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers and sellers. Ela Must just came out saying he

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>has a super bad feeling about the economy, Tesla laying

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>off ten percent of his staff. Jamie Diamond says he's

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>preparing for an economic hurricane. The World Bank just slashed

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>its forecast for global growth. How do you feel about

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the economic climate? Well, I wasn't planning on giving any

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>guidance to please, but super bad or super super bad,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, there's some things that relates to Amazon

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that are useful to remember, you know. I think the

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>first pieces Remember the five of the of the worldwide

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>retail market segment share is offline. And if you believe

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that that equation is going to flip at some point,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which we do, I think it will. Who will flip

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time. If you look at

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>different town turns, um you know, should we have one

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at some point? We've been through a few obviously in

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty five years that I've been at Amazon. Customers

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>change their habits, and so, you know, I also think

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there's those two reasons. Those two factors give me some

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>optimism that even if we have a downturn, that we

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>have the potential to still grow. We have a roadmap

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, probably three to five years long, and

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to invent. We're going to continue

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to be insurgent, and we have a lot of work

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to do to get to where we think we ultimately

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>can get for customers. You can catch my entire exclusive

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>interview with Andy Jase Wednesday, nine d pm Eastern on

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Studio one point. Well, it is the end of

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet Explore. Microsoft has officially retired it's once dominant browser,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and while Internet Explorer has less than one percent of

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>worldwide market share according to stat Counter, it is still

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>causing some panic among businesses and governments. Japan in particular

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>might be the hardest it. A survey earlier this year

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 1>found that of companies still use Internet Explorer coming up

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as the market scrapple with intensifying inflation, employees are facing

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the brunt of it as more and more companies look

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to layoffs to help save some cash. We'll have more

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on that next well. As they watched the FED issue

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it's biggest rate increase for all in an effort to

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>restrain rampant inflation, it might be too late for the

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of employees facing layoffs in a slowing economy.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>In the last month, we've watched companies across different sectors

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>announced layoffs crypto, fintech, even real estate. Tuesday, both Compass

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and Redfinn announced they were cutting more than nine jobs

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>combine for more not only these layoffs, but the broader

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>real estate market during this downturn. I'm joined by bloom

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Brigs Patrick Clark, who covers all of this for us.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Was it surprising to see these kind of layoffs in

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the real estate tech business given just how um much

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market was booming. I don't really well.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think in January it might have been surprising. By

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, March or April, as maury trade started going

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>higher and sales started slowing, less surprising. And by the

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>time these companies reported earnings I think in May, you

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>know it, it almost felt inevitable that, um that they

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>were going to need to downsize. I mean, Compass in

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Redfin somewhat different businesses, but um you know, one one

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 1>employees agents as independent contractors. That's Compass, and all their

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>employees are either you know, developers making software for the

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>agents or you know, various types of support staff readfin

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>actually employees UM its own agents, and there's a different

0:18:56.359 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>compensation structure and so forth. But um, the at a

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>point when there are a lot fewer home sales and

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>this um a lot less commission revenue coming into the brokerage,

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>it feels inevitable that they're going to have to cut staff.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a number of companies, tech companies announcing layoffs.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood, coin Base, UM, you know read it just

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>announced more layoffs today. But what are these real estate

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>technology companies in particular them announcing layoffs. What does it

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have to say about the housing market. Yeah, there's just um,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the housing market is slow and and and and

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't know exactly how long it's going to take.

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Red Fan CEO Glenn Coleman said in the memo announcing

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the layoffs on Tuesday that sales were volume was sevent

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>lower in May first company and that it would be

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>year likely be years and not months um before you know,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>before the situation resolved itself. So you know, given um,

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.680
<v Speaker 1>given that it's it's it's these companies have a long

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>road ahead. You know, they enjoyed during COVID. Uh probably

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the best possible conditions for themselves. And that's not just

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>red vanden Compass, but also Zelo or open Door, you know,

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>any number of others. Many of these companies couldn't make

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>money in the best housing market pretty much ever, so um,

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be in for you know, a pretty

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.479
<v Speaker 1>new scenario now interesting, And I wonder about commercial real

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>estate as well. We just heard from Amazon CEO Andy

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Jazzy talking about letting leases run out, Amazon subleasing thirty

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>million square feet of its own space. Is this something

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see a lot of companies grapple with

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what to do with real estate that they picked up

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps not because in the pandemics some folks pulled

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>back on real estate. So far, it seems like there's

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>demand for the industrial real estate that you know that

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that at Amazon either owns or leases the you know. Um.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Just recently there was a big merger announced in the

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>industrial warehouse in the industrial real estate space. UM company

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>called Prologists, which is a big landlord to Amazon bought

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a company called Duke Realty, which is I think even

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>more exposed to Amazon leases. So, you know, the if

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon pulls back a little, I think there's the assumption

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in the commercial real estate world that there's still a bigger,

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>broader shift to e commerce and there's other places to

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>fill warehouse demand. All right, bloombergs Patrick Clark, who covers

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the real estate market for US. Patrick, thank you for

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>your insights. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I Emily Chang

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Fifty million dollars just defying the gloomy

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>morale among private tech investors. How much was raised in

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>venture capital for FPV the debut fund from Felice's Ventures

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and Morgan Stanley alums Wesley Chan and Pegg at Ibraheimni,

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>which will emphasize early stage deals where they say they

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>have experience. They're both joining me now for more. But

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:18.400
<v Speaker 1>first I want to ask you both about the markets

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 1>and the tumult that we are seeing today. Um Pega,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you rose to the top of the ranks at Morgan

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Stanley and Cisco UM in earlier days. What do you

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>make of what's happening right now? What kind of macro

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>environment are we headed for? I mean, it's um no

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>surprise we've you know, interest rates are like gravity, and

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>when they're really low, we have a lot of high valuation.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>When it rises, gravity goes up at things fall, and

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>UM we're seeing that now. Look, the FED announced seventy

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>five basis points somewhat expected UM in the last twenty

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>four hours. And what it means is cost of capital

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>is expensive and it just got more expensive faster. So

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>it does mean to move away from alternative assets classes

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like VC. So for for us, look, Wesley and I

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>are so excited to have UM closed the fund during

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>this environment to make sure we have dry powder for

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>really mission driven founders who are going to continue to

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be born in these environments. And regardless of capital getting

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. UM. You know, it's not lost on us.

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Both Westie and I have gone through two downturns UM,

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's companies. In these downturns, some of the best

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>enduring companies have been born. You look at Google, you

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>look at Airbnb, you look at Uber, you look at

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a Lassie, and these were all companies born and you know,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>more expensive capital environments, and those founders, those mission driven

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>founders are going to continue to be coming around, and

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 1>we're making sure we're going to have capital to support

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>those in back the truck up when we find them.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Wesley as someone who's gone through a couple of these.

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 1>How bad do you think this recession is gonna be?

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna look more like two thousand eight or

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand or something else? You probably look probably looked

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>more like two And you know you're gonna see a

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies who can't raise capital sort of close shop.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see some layoffs because of that, which is unfortunate.

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, people keep forgetting about the upside, which

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is that companies like Google, Nuber, and Airbnb got formed

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in these crucible moments. You know, I started my career

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at Google uh in early two thousand one, and back

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>then there was no other company really hiring. You know,

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Google came out of that moment where they were able

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to hire employees for relatively low costs. There were moments

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>where we were buying our office furniture off of these

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>auctions where we were getting discounts of up to eight

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 1>percent off stuff. Um. You know, every engineer from top

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>schools wanted to come and work for Google. So in

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>these moments of what seems like crisis, there's massive upside

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for the companies that are run by these mission driven

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>founders that we back. You know, I firsthand witnessed it

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at at Google from the fourteen years I was there

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and got the c Google build what is one of

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the world's most world changing companies from those early days.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that you mentioned Google because peg I used

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to work at Cisco, where the stock still isn't back

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>to what it was in the dot com bust. So

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>which companies in tech are going to be the Cisco's

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 1>of today and which startups you know, in what areas

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think you're gonna see that kind of disruption

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to find you know, who's gonna be the Google? Yeah? Um, look,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think when we were early stage funds, so we're

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>really focused on you know, mission driven founders who are

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>building long have hundred year plans and long lasting businesses.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>So those founders think about the cost of capital not

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>being cheap, which means they care about, you know, unit economics.

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>They care about being able to grow um even given

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>more expensive capital. And you look at companies like a Cisco,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've been because they weren't growing as fast.

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>They've they've you know, they've been focused on growth margin

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna have to have a shift when capital

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is not as cheap. You know, it's not growth at

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all costs, and you have to shift more towards making

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>sure you you can survive um these higher costs environments

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and you have well capitalized to do that. And there's

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>amazing growth companies that are doing that. Now. You look

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>at Canada, you look at Guild, you look at those

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>They well capitalized, They're going to be able to endure this,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and they have great, you know, hundred year missions ahead

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of them. So I think it's really about time horizons

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that there's going to be some bumps in

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the you know, short term, and making sure you're set

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>up for really passing this in a time and actually

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>taking off during these times. You mentioned Canava and Guild,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>other companies you're in, flex Sport, plaid Um Wesley, What

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>do you tell What advice are you giving to founders

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in this downturn? My former colleague Eric Newcomer in his

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>blog said that some founders are complaining that a lot

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of the advice they're getting from VC sound a lot

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>more like marketing speak, you know, cut to the chase. Yeah,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw that too. I agree. I completely agree with Eric.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, the advice advice I give this simple take

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it. Never let a great disaster go to waste.

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 1>This is this is a you know, Bill Campbell was

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a person I had the privilege of working with when

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I was at Google. He was a trollneller, coach, chronical

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>netbook and he would come up to Larry and study

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time. It's like, look, this economy is crashing,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>things are not going well. Don't let a good disaster

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>go to waste. Take advantage of it. Sees the moment.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the advice that we give to these founders.

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, they they've been behaved. We back mission driven founders.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>They behave as if every dollars or last either the

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>folks that fund the company on their credit card before

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a single investor believes in them early on, and they'll

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>continue funding on the credit card if nobody believes in

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>them later on. And so when when when you're doing well,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're when you're very careful capital, when you are

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a large horde of cash and you're profitable,

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a fantastic opportunity for you to seize the moment,

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hire all the top talent for half the prices they

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>would uh in a in a in an economy where

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it's booming, and then go and like build product in

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>businesses that people want and that do well in the recession.

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, like having witnessed at First and at

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Google is nothing short of incredible the outcome of what

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>happens when you see the moment. So this isn't about

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>let's lay off a bunch of people, let's preserve cash.

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>This is about leaning in. And you know we're partners

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to help fund these mission driven founders do it when

0:27:57.840 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the moment is right. That's why we have four h

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars help them out today. Are you guys

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be leaning into crypto or not? Pega. Eric also

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote that some vcs are quietly telling him they never

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>believed in crypto anyway. Well, I mean this is a

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>good one. Look I'll say it. Wesley was I think

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>in November when he was on stage where um he

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>um it was crypto was that as high and he

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>actually called it? So, Look, we haven't been involved in UM.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not investing in this fund out for those types

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of businesses we um. We pick really resalient, long term businesses,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and we have to understand the underlying value and so

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>um leslie, you want to take it? You called it

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on stage. I think you called the key and you

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>called the leslie. Okay, I pique Wesley. Where's the d Yes, yes,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>although there still to come. I mean, you know, at

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, Bill Gates called it the

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>greater fulls theory, right, you know, there's got to be.

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a business models that's sometimes predicated and finding a

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>greater full to pay up for your for your for

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>your for your investment in crypto. And so when all

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the fulls are out, you know, there's somebody left to

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>buy up your investment, it goes to zero. So we've

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>avoided it. We've never done any crypto investments. It's something

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that we we people made fun of us for avoiding

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>it and saying that we were, you know, when we

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>were the guys not getting rich off of it. And

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, today it's crashing like crazy. It's not lost

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on me that today's headline was that bitcoin almost dropped

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>below twenty uh and was back, you know, and it's

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>all time low, and you know, we're announcing a four

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollar fund to investment resilient founders that don't

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>do crypto businesses. So it's one of those things where

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of our LPs are sophisticated, blue

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>chip charities and foundations. They run children's hospitals. One of

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>our LPs is a foundation that you know, provides underprivileged

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>kids access to the performing arts. And last one want

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to do is take their money and put it in

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the business where you know, it's funded by greater fools.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we we want to preserve their capital

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and find great businesses like Canava and Fox Sports that

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>do things that add value to the world and add

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>value to their customers. And you know, over the long

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>time Horizon, as Pega mentioned, they tend to do really well. Peg.

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I know you closed this fun just in the last

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. What was it like closing in a downturn?

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you have any moments of pan where you thought, oh, gosh,

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, you know, we're able to do this.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to say, um, yes, in the last few weeks,

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was really early on we started this fund,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in February. We were fortunate and humbled

0:30:13.040 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>by the reception we got, but there was a moment

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Wesley and I decided to launch it, and um, Russia

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>decided to start the war against Ukraine and we're like,

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>what's happening and is this the right time? And and

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we were really lucky raised this in a short amount

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, so really we closed it a few weeks ago,

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but um, most of the commitments happened very early on.

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And UM, we're excited to have this dry powder to

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>really be able to fund these mission driven founders because

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna need capital and we're gonna be here for them.

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we're excited to watch where and how

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you put your cash to work. SPV Ventures co founders

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and managing partners Pegga Abrahemi and Wesley Champ, thank you both.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And it's time now for our crypto report. With the

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>bear market for bitcoin entering its deepest, darkest phase, according

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to some observers, was even long term holders who toughed

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it out until now coming under extreme pressure. Galaxy Digital

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>chief like nov Grats, has two thirds of crypto hedge funds,

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>could fail if the market keeps tumbling. Our crypto Contributionally

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Bossa here to talk more about those concerns. Shanali take

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it away, Emily, Seriously, we had talked about tokens and

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>projects facing pressure in the last couple of weeks, but

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking about the investors themselves. One company that

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>people are very worried about is Three Arrows Capital, after

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a very vague tweet went out from a founder saying

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that they are in the process of communicating with relevant

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 1>parties and fully committed to working this out. What does

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that mean at the end of the day, and what

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>is the future for a company like Three Arrows and

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are they the only ones? Remember Three Arrows was very

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>exposed to Luna, which had apsed earlier this year. They

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had invested a prior to that collapse. But remember it's

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not just the collapse of Luna. There's a broader decline

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and crypto assets that have been very severe, a lot

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of deleveraging, and the question is how far will that

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>wash out go, especially if some of these funds start

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to liquidate many of the assets that they hold. A

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>very cryptic tweet indeed, Tonaleo, Okay, stick with us. I

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about all this and more with our

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>next guest. Coin Shares Chief strategy officer, Melton demiraz Meldon.

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us, so I know you

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.479
<v Speaker 1>were listening into our segment earlier where our guest Wesley

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Chance and he called the top and that the bottom

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is even farther down from where we are. Now, what's

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>your reaction to that? Look, hey, Emily has snolly great

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to see you both. Wish it was under better circumstances.

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's been calling bitcoin tops since the beginning of of bitcoin.

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been in this industry professionally for seven years. One

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>trend that's not going away as we continue to see

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>higher highs as well as higher lows. Even at current

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>prices around twenty thousand, we are still above previous all

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>time highs. In the last cycle, we tend to see

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine draw douns. This is a volatile, highly cyclical asset,

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but the secular trend is here to stay. At coin shares,

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>we continue to invest in great technology businesses that are

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>changing the world for the better, that are generating fantastic

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>returns for investors. So look, I think it's a matter

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of time. Last year crypto commanded five percent of all

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>venture dollars. This year we're looking at around the same,

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>if not slightly higher. So I think crypto is here

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to stay. But you know what, the proof is in

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the return, So we'll see what the future brings. You know,

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are looking at that dollar number,

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know others are saying the right number to

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>look at is nineteen eleven dollars, the high that bitcoin

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>hit during the last bull cycle. Is that the right

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>number to watch for? And if we get below that,

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>which we're very very close to, how bad a sign

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is it. So look, I'm not tether to specific number,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>not to use the phrase tether which might raise some

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>alarm bells. Today I had to work in a little

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>cryptopun um. I'm not so concerned about that previous all

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>time high number. What we're looking for is we're looking

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>at key liquidation levels. So we're seeing a lot of

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>people just given the structure of debt in the crypto market,

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to overclateralize, and given these markets trade seven

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>three sixty five, you can get liquidated in an instant.

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>There is no grace period, there's no two week margin

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>call like Archegos had when when they were insolvent. And

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>so what we're looking at is key liquidation levels. And

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 1>then the other key numbers to look at is again

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that drawed down from peak to trough. So the last

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>cycle we saw an eighty five percent draw down from

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>peak to trough. This cycle, the high was around sixty

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand, so an eighty to nine draw down would

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>put us between seven and fourteen thousand. So right now

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we're at about a seventy percent draw down. We could

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 1>go a bit lower, but we're seeing strong support around

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>this twenty k number, and we're seeing liquidations slowed and

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>for spots selling has slowed as well. You know, speaking

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of for selling this idea of three arrows and worries

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>about other funds in the industry, the problem about funds

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>facing trouble is more liquidation. So the question I have

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>for you too is how systemic can this get? How

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>can some issues be get more issues here to kind

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of create some of those drawdowns that you're talking about. Yeah,

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think Sonale that's exactly the challenge here. Um.

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the great issues in in crypto is there

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>tends to be an asset liability mismatch that happens whatever

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>there is a drop in price, Um, there's more collateral

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be posted to keep some of the

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>leverage in the system. And again, positions tend to be

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>over clatteralized and can be called and even forced liquidated

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>at any point in time. So we kind of sees

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 1>this vicious cycle where your liabilities decrease in duration, so

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you may have received as a long term liability becomes

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a short term one. You need cash. And then what

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>we have on the flip side, if you're investing in

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>venture and some of these long term locked up investments,

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 1>your assets are more long term assets. You don't have

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>as much short term cash, or those short term salable

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>assets you have have declined forty fifty in some cases

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or in the case of Luna a d percent in value,

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So you have this mismatch that gets exacerbated by the

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that there is no duration on debt in crypto yet.

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And so again this tends to lead to this recursive

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pattern where margin calls lead to people's spots selling, which

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>leads to falling prices more margin calls. So what we

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>need to see is for this forced spots selling to

0:36:39.280 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>stop before we find some stability here. This is a

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty pivotal moment. It's been a very steep draw down.

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>As you had mentioned, what's the wake up call here?

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>What are the things that people are flocking to that

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are that are longer term projects in nature that are

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe safer to make it through this crash. Look for

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>us a coin shares, we manage billions of dollars in

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>assets we trade in markets. Risk management is the number

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>one principle. The fundamentals of finance don't go away just

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>because we're in a new asset class. So managing your liabilities,

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>managing your assets, managing duration really important. Risk management is

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>something we tend to forget about because you don't need

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it as much when number go up. But now that

0:37:24.520 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the numbers going down, I think we're seeing who hasn't

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>been managing risk. And so number one will always be

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 1>for trading of of any type, markets of any type,

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 1>just being really cognizant of the inherent risk you're taking

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in your business model with your positions, making sure you

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>manage that risk. The added wrinkle of crypto is there

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is this really interesting structural change in the market because

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>all these assets are on chain trading three sixty five

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>with instant settlement. It adds a lot of pressure to

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 1>markets and times of volatility. And then the second component

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of a new ring goal is there's obviously

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>technical risk in a lot of these defy our entream

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>protocols where all of a sudden, instead of interacting with

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lawyers and bankers, you're interacting with smart contracts. New Frontier

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>allow to figure out a lot of folks building solutions

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in the space that don't require token. At coin Shares,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we're continuing to invest. We're continuing to collaborate with great

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>partners for building excellent solutions to manage risk, to manage margin,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>and to manage some of these new technical risks in

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>new and innovative ways. So excited to continue doing that?

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Bowl or Bear Market? Are you continuing to hire because

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we're obviously looking at these eight percent layoffs. At coin Base,

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Chong Pung Jao, the CEO of finance, had tongue in

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>cheek tweet saying it wasn't easy saying no to Super

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Bowl ad stadium naming rights, large sponsored deals, but we

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>did and today we're hiring for two thousand open positions.

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So a quen share. If we are not firing, we

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have slowed down our pace of hiring. Think one of

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the important things to keep in mind. I think coin

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Base actually from a risk management perspective and a balance

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sheet management perspectives being very prudent. On average coin bases

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>generating about one point six million dollars of revenue per

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>employee prior to these cuts. With revenues going down, they

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously want to preserve profitability. That's in metric. We look

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at it at coin shares as well. I don't think

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen anywhere close to the bottom of cuts. We're

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see more cuts in the publicly

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>listed companies as well as the privately listed companies. And

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the other thing we will see is a

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies are relying on unspacs and pipes and

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all of these deals to try to go public and

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>get some liquidity. I think we're going to see a

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on that going into Q three and

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Q four as well, which is going to change the

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>hiring environment significantly. All right, Corn Shairs Chief strategy Officer

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Melton Demerez appreciated taking the time to join us. Shonale

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as always thank you. Coming up. Will Elon Musk still

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>need his Twitter center. His deal with Twitter actually goes

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>through plus who. Musk says he's leaning towards supporting for

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>presidential election. That's next. This is Bloomberg and it's that

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 1>time for more news from the world of Elon Musk,

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the world's richest man, appealed the federal court ruling that

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>upheld the SEC's requirement for him to have a Twitter sitter,

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>which is ironic given he is about to buy Twitter.

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>At what happened. So in April US your judge said

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to have your Twitter sitter. This was a

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>deal you made with the SEC, and just because you

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:49.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't like it when you made it in two thousand eighteen,

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you have to stick to it. You can't have remorse

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. And just because you are going to own Twitter,

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you still have to And so now legal team is

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>appealing this and they're saying that agreeming itself breaches his

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech, but also the SEC is harassing him.

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see where it goes. It's more litigation from US.

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Interesting and he is also using Twitter to share where

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>he's leaning right, So he said, it's a series of

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>tweets about three am in the morning New York time,

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>midnight San Francisco time. He did support Andrew Yang in

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>presidential election. He's now leaning to Rhonda Santists, and he

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.839
<v Speaker 1>thinks Rhonda Santists who's the governor of Florida you see

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on your screen. Can win. That's kind of the inference

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>we're getting his words. He thinks he can win. That's

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>where he's being his support. And de Santis is actually

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>speaking today, had some thoughts about Musque's support. Yes, so

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>matter of factly, they asked him what do you think

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of this? And Rhonda Santist, the governor of Florida, said

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that he welcomes the support quote support from African Americans.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Elon Musk is a white South African man,

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and in two thousand eighteen, when Rhonda Santis was elected

0:41:56.480 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>governor of Florida, he did receive voting support from black Americans.

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.880
<v Speaker 1>So those were his words today. It is what it is,

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, This is just the way he's leaning. Though,

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of the fact that he in

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:15.840
<v Speaker 1>President Biden, who who should be natural allies just continue

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to spark. Yes, Elon Must has been changing his politics

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>over a number of weeks, right, he says the Democrats

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Party of division and hate and basically pulled

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the support. The friction at the White House and the

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>administration Biden is Elon Must has called him out for

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>not supporting Tesla specifically, you know he's called Joe Biden

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>or accuse him of leading the Russian Revolution in EVS,

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but not talking about Tesla. All right, we will see

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 1>how that plays out on Twitter. I assume yes, thank you.

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, we're watching that all hands meeting.

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Elon must gonna be speaking to um all of the

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>employees at Twitter Thursday morning. We'll have full coverage of that.

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>And that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We're back here tomorrow with a number of great guests,

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:58.000
<v Speaker 1>including T Mobile CEO Mike Seaver, Coin Bases, Mark Lamb,

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and Jen hyman A Rent the Runway. I'm Emily Chang.

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Blowberg