WEBVTT - What the Nobels Tell Us About the World Right Now

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:30.564
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, a show about making

0:00:30.604 --> 0:00:34.724
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanakova and I'm Nate Silver. Today

0:00:34.764 --> 0:00:37.164
<v Speaker 1>on the show, Nate, we'll be talking about a topic

0:00:37.204 --> 0:00:41.404
<v Speaker 1>that I think is really exciting. Every single year, I'm

0:00:41.484 --> 0:00:46.604
<v Speaker 1>always eagerly awaiting the announcements of the Nobel Prizes, not

0:00:46.764 --> 0:00:50.324
<v Speaker 1>because I'm in any danger of winning one, but because

0:00:50.364 --> 0:00:53.124
<v Speaker 1>I think you can learn a lot from the people

0:00:53.164 --> 0:00:56.644
<v Speaker 1>who win the awards. So all of the Nobel Prizes

0:00:56.684 --> 0:01:00.724
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty five have been given out, and I'm excited,

0:01:00.804 --> 0:01:04.284
<v Speaker 1>probably more excited than you are in Nate to dive

0:01:04.524 --> 0:01:08.484
<v Speaker 1>into the recipients and some of the broader implications and

0:01:08.524 --> 0:01:10.844
<v Speaker 1>broader history of the Nobel Prize.

0:01:11.204 --> 0:01:14.764
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, look, I think you owe me not

0:01:14.764 --> 0:01:16.324
<v Speaker 2>to be too gender astorre. I think you owe me

0:01:16.364 --> 0:01:21.564
<v Speaker 2>as sports focused episodes and Maria. But yes, I do

0:01:21.644 --> 0:01:24.204
<v Speaker 2>have some thoughts, particularly on the economics Nobel Prize, where

0:01:24.204 --> 0:01:26.324
<v Speaker 2>I'm an admirer of one of the recipients.

0:01:32.124 --> 0:01:36.484
<v Speaker 1>So Nobel Prizes are something that I actually always follow avidly.

0:01:36.764 --> 0:01:39.324
<v Speaker 2>That makes one of us I think that.

0:01:39.244 --> 0:01:43.644
<v Speaker 1>They're fascinating, and I think so for several reasons. First,

0:01:43.764 --> 0:01:49.884
<v Speaker 1>like when we get the Nobel Prizes in you know, medicine, chemistry, physics,

0:01:49.924 --> 0:01:53.484
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff, I get to learn something about

0:01:53.484 --> 0:01:55.724
<v Speaker 1>the world because it's usually for shit that I had

0:01:55.764 --> 0:01:57.964
<v Speaker 1>no idea existed, and I'm like, oh my god, this

0:01:58.084 --> 0:02:00.924
<v Speaker 1>is so cool. Right, You've been doing all this amazing research,

0:02:00.964 --> 0:02:03.364
<v Speaker 1>and that's really interesting, and it's a way, you know,

0:02:03.444 --> 0:02:05.684
<v Speaker 1>of educating myself about things that I don't know about.

0:02:05.964 --> 0:02:10.044
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize in literature I'm always really excited about because

0:02:10.564 --> 0:02:13.004
<v Speaker 1>if it's someone who I know and love, I'm like, yes,

0:02:13.044 --> 0:02:15.284
<v Speaker 1>you know, finally they get recognition. And if it's someone

0:02:15.284 --> 0:02:18.444
<v Speaker 1>whose work I've never read, I'm like, wow, okay, you

0:02:18.444 --> 0:02:21.964
<v Speaker 1>know this is cool. Something else for me. Economics, I

0:02:21.964 --> 0:02:25.524
<v Speaker 1>also think is always just interesting to figure out, you know,

0:02:25.604 --> 0:02:28.284
<v Speaker 1>what is in vogue, so to speak, right, like, what

0:02:28.404 --> 0:02:31.564
<v Speaker 1>ideas are getting rewarded at what time for what reasons,

0:02:31.804 --> 0:02:34.204
<v Speaker 1>Because I do think that there is kind of a

0:02:34.244 --> 0:02:39.004
<v Speaker 1>backdrop for the choices of Nobel Prizes on any given year,

0:02:39.444 --> 0:02:42.604
<v Speaker 1>because they could be awarded at you know, this year

0:02:42.684 --> 0:02:46.164
<v Speaker 1>or next year or never, and when you make that choice,

0:02:46.164 --> 0:02:48.444
<v Speaker 1>you are saying something about I think that this idea

0:02:48.484 --> 0:02:51.404
<v Speaker 1>is very important right now, and the Peace Prize is

0:02:51.444 --> 0:02:54.924
<v Speaker 1>the one that often gets the most attention. You know,

0:02:55.244 --> 0:02:58.484
<v Speaker 1>since Donald Trump has been campaigning for it, it's certainly

0:02:58.484 --> 0:03:00.764
<v Speaker 1>been getting a lot of attention. And I actually think

0:03:00.804 --> 0:03:04.844
<v Speaker 1>that that is the for me, that's the most politicized

0:03:04.964 --> 0:03:08.484
<v Speaker 1>prize and the one that I think sometimes goes to

0:03:08.524 --> 0:03:11.444
<v Speaker 1>people who are depletely undeserving of it, and I'm like,

0:03:11.524 --> 0:03:13.324
<v Speaker 1>what the fuck, Like, you guys are just trying to

0:03:13.364 --> 0:03:17.164
<v Speaker 1>make a political statement. So the Nobel Peace Prize, I think,

0:03:17.604 --> 0:03:20.724
<v Speaker 1>is one that I most often disagree with. But the

0:03:20.764 --> 0:03:23.364
<v Speaker 1>other reason I love the Nobel Prizes is I really

0:03:23.404 --> 0:03:26.684
<v Speaker 1>love the Nobel Lectures. So I actually, especially in literature,

0:03:27.084 --> 0:03:31.564
<v Speaker 1>I love reading the lectures that people write and deliver

0:03:31.964 --> 0:03:33.844
<v Speaker 1>because there are so many. I mean, I think it's

0:03:33.884 --> 0:03:37.684
<v Speaker 1>some of the most interesting thinking and writing out there.

0:03:37.724 --> 0:03:41.964
<v Speaker 1>And I often quote from people's Nobel Prize speeches lectures

0:03:42.644 --> 0:03:45.364
<v Speaker 1>because I think that we have the chance to hear

0:03:45.364 --> 0:03:47.844
<v Speaker 1>from some of the greatest minds, some of the greatest writers,

0:03:47.884 --> 0:03:50.724
<v Speaker 1>some of the greatest thinkers in the world. So yes,

0:03:50.884 --> 0:03:53.404
<v Speaker 1>I love the Nobel Prizes. Clearly, Nate, you are not

0:03:53.844 --> 0:03:56.604
<v Speaker 1>a fan, though you are not someone who follows them

0:03:57.084 --> 0:03:57.764
<v Speaker 1>follows along.

0:03:58.484 --> 0:04:03.044
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm more concerned with the American League MVP Award,

0:04:03.204 --> 0:04:07.524
<v Speaker 2>among many other things. I guess I know somebody who's won.

0:04:08.124 --> 0:04:09.884
<v Speaker 2>Somebody call a friend is one of Nobel. You get

0:04:09.884 --> 0:04:13.324
<v Speaker 2>the call from like you know, some strange plus something

0:04:13.844 --> 0:04:16.844
<v Speaker 2>country code, European number, in the middle of the morning,

0:04:17.404 --> 0:04:20.124
<v Speaker 2>middle of the night. Right, very exciting. I would still

0:04:20.124 --> 0:04:22.764
<v Speaker 2>be up. We're working on some fucking model. I'll be like, hey, Nate,

0:04:23.404 --> 0:04:25.364
<v Speaker 2>you and Maria have finally won. I'd be like, I'm

0:04:25.364 --> 0:04:29.404
<v Speaker 2>Tired's call Maria. I'm tired and I'm busy, busy that

0:04:29.484 --> 0:04:31.324
<v Speaker 2>we can. You get money for the Nobel.

0:04:31.004 --> 0:04:32.884
<v Speaker 1>Prize, right, you get money for the Nobel Prize, different

0:04:32.924 --> 0:04:36.724
<v Speaker 1>amounts for different prizes. My favorite, by the way, speaking

0:04:36.844 --> 0:04:39.204
<v Speaker 1>of middle of the night, and I don't know if

0:04:39.204 --> 0:04:41.844
<v Speaker 1>you saw this night, I shared it because it to

0:04:41.924 --> 0:04:45.444
<v Speaker 1>me it actually says something pretty fundamental about the type

0:04:45.484 --> 0:04:50.324
<v Speaker 1>of thinking that is often required to win a Nobel Prize.

0:04:50.444 --> 0:04:54.804
<v Speaker 1>So one of the people who won, Fred Ramsdell, he

0:04:55.044 --> 0:04:59.404
<v Speaker 1>was unreachable when he won the Nobel Prize in medicine

0:04:59.844 --> 0:05:02.644
<v Speaker 1>and they could not get a hold of him, like

0:05:02.804 --> 0:05:04.724
<v Speaker 1>this is the first time actually in the history of

0:05:04.724 --> 0:05:08.604
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Prize that they literally could not contact a winner,

0:05:08.724 --> 0:05:11.604
<v Speaker 1>not even not immediately, but like for twenty four hours.

0:05:11.644 --> 0:05:14.244
<v Speaker 1>And he was hiking with his wife and off the grid,

0:05:15.084 --> 0:05:19.164
<v Speaker 1>living his best life, as his company said after they've

0:05:19.284 --> 0:05:23.084
<v Speaker 1>reached the company, and the company actually ended up putting

0:05:23.084 --> 0:05:25.804
<v Speaker 1>out a statement on his behalf. So he was just

0:05:26.004 --> 0:05:29.524
<v Speaker 1>completely off off the grid, hiking with his wife. This

0:05:29.604 --> 0:05:31.924
<v Speaker 1>is something that they do, This is something that they

0:05:31.964 --> 0:05:34.804
<v Speaker 1>love doing. They don't have reception, their phones are off.

0:05:35.164 --> 0:05:38.644
<v Speaker 1>His is actually the entire trip in airplane mode, and

0:05:38.684 --> 0:05:42.524
<v Speaker 1>he ended up finding out because his wife had hers

0:05:42.564 --> 0:05:45.284
<v Speaker 1>not in airplane mode, and so at some point they

0:05:45.324 --> 0:05:49.444
<v Speaker 1>came to a place where they had reception exactly exactly,

0:05:49.404 --> 0:05:51.924
<v Speaker 1>and she started screaming and he thought she saw a

0:05:51.964 --> 0:05:55.044
<v Speaker 1>grizzly bear. So he didn't have a heart attack. He

0:05:55.204 --> 0:05:58.124
<v Speaker 1>was fine, but he thought that actually she was in

0:05:58.204 --> 0:06:00.724
<v Speaker 1>danger and she's like, you won the Nobel Prize.

0:06:01.044 --> 0:06:02.564
<v Speaker 2>It would be ironic if you did have a heart attack.

0:06:02.844 --> 0:06:04.804
<v Speaker 2>That would be very ironic. Yav I always wonder about

0:06:04.804 --> 0:06:08.564
<v Speaker 2>the mechanics of like I guess I was last year

0:06:08.604 --> 0:06:11.844
<v Speaker 2>was nominated for a prize which is second only the

0:06:11.844 --> 0:06:14.364
<v Speaker 2>Nobel Prize. I was nominated for a Global Poker.

0:06:14.924 --> 0:06:18.164
<v Speaker 1>Or you know, some people would say it's actually more

0:06:18.204 --> 0:06:19.924
<v Speaker 1>prestigious than the Nobel Prize.

0:06:19.924 --> 0:06:22.604
<v Speaker 2>So you know, no, I mean it really is.

0:06:23.164 --> 0:06:25.684
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have won a Global poker okay, and

0:06:25.884 --> 0:06:26.404
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go.

0:06:26.524 --> 0:06:29.164
<v Speaker 2>They have a ceremony. I hadn't made enough to Vegas

0:06:29.164 --> 0:06:31.044
<v Speaker 2>for the year. Didn't go to the ceremony. I kind

0:06:31.044 --> 0:06:33.604
<v Speaker 2>of forget that, Like, if I was gonna win, I

0:06:33.604 --> 0:06:37.804
<v Speaker 2>didn't win, they would tip me off. Oh they don't.

0:06:37.804 --> 0:06:40.524
<v Speaker 1>They do not tip you off. So these are awards

0:06:40.564 --> 0:06:44.684
<v Speaker 1>that are given for various accomplishments in the poker world.

0:06:45.324 --> 0:06:47.964
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are for things like best tournament performance,

0:06:48.044 --> 0:06:51.044
<v Speaker 1>best breakout player, or something that I was nominated for

0:06:51.084 --> 0:06:54.044
<v Speaker 1>once and did not win. Nate, I was Breakout Player

0:06:54.044 --> 0:06:57.164
<v Speaker 1>of the Year and lost to This is very funny

0:06:57.844 --> 0:07:00.644
<v Speaker 1>ali am Siavich, who no longer plays poker because it

0:07:00.684 --> 0:07:05.124
<v Speaker 1>turned out that he was cheating. His breakout performance was

0:07:05.204 --> 0:07:08.524
<v Speaker 1>not quite as breakouting in the in the right ways.

0:07:08.964 --> 0:07:11.724
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's uh, that actually is quite funny.

0:07:11.724 --> 0:07:13.764
<v Speaker 1>But he won that year. But some of them are

0:07:13.804 --> 0:07:17.724
<v Speaker 1>for poker journalism and those those types of awards you

0:07:17.804 --> 0:07:20.764
<v Speaker 1>were nominated for On the Edge. I was nominated and

0:07:20.964 --> 0:07:26.444
<v Speaker 1>won for the Biggest so my yeah, my, My Global

0:07:26.484 --> 0:07:31.204
<v Speaker 1>Poker Award is for the biggest bluff and it's yeah,

0:07:31.244 --> 0:07:34.404
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fun ceremony, but no, you have no idea.

0:07:34.764 --> 0:07:37.284
<v Speaker 1>No one is tipped off, and so it's very funny

0:07:37.324 --> 0:07:41.004
<v Speaker 1>because there are people who have won and like when

0:07:41.084 --> 0:07:45.884
<v Speaker 1>I won, I wasn't at the ceremony and didn't get

0:07:45.884 --> 0:07:49.284
<v Speaker 1>my physical award for several years because I kept forgetting

0:07:49.324 --> 0:07:53.044
<v Speaker 1>to pick it up and to ask for it. So yeah,

0:07:53.084 --> 0:07:56.284
<v Speaker 1>they don't tip you off. And then Nobel prizes, So

0:07:56.404 --> 0:07:59.924
<v Speaker 1>this is something quite interesting. I love you know that

0:08:00.004 --> 0:08:01.564
<v Speaker 1>this guy was off the grid, and I think that

0:08:01.644 --> 0:08:05.644
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting to think about the importance of you know,

0:08:05.764 --> 0:08:08.644
<v Speaker 1>disconnecting and actually letting your brain think and being out

0:08:08.644 --> 0:08:11.484
<v Speaker 1>in nature. There's so many things about this that are

0:08:11.564 --> 0:08:14.124
<v Speaker 1>actually there's a ton of research on why this is

0:08:14.164 --> 0:08:17.804
<v Speaker 1>good for creativity, good thought, et cetera, et cetera. So

0:08:18.164 --> 0:08:22.564
<v Speaker 1>yay Fred Ramsdell and yay being so like basically so

0:08:22.564 --> 0:08:25.044
<v Speaker 1>secure in your profession that it's Nobel Week and you're like,

0:08:25.044 --> 0:08:26.924
<v Speaker 1>fuck it, I'm going off the grid. I don't care.

0:08:28.204 --> 0:08:30.844
<v Speaker 1>So it does say a lot about that. But Nate,

0:08:30.884 --> 0:08:33.724
<v Speaker 1>there's a really interesting component here about the being tipped off.

0:08:33.924 --> 0:08:38.044
<v Speaker 1>There were some controversies surrounding the Nobel Prizes in terms

0:08:38.124 --> 0:08:42.084
<v Speaker 1>of polymarket and prediction market betting, where it seemed like

0:08:42.484 --> 0:08:46.244
<v Speaker 1>there were tip offs before the announcements of certain prize winners,

0:08:46.324 --> 0:08:51.004
<v Speaker 1>most notably the Nobel Peace Prize, which went to Maria

0:08:51.084 --> 0:08:55.924
<v Speaker 1>Quorina Machado. And there was before the announcement, were you.

0:08:55.964 --> 0:08:57.884
<v Speaker 2>Just replaced the native Spanish speaker there?

0:08:59.684 --> 0:09:02.884
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, you know, I studied. I studied

0:09:02.884 --> 0:09:05.364
<v Speaker 1>Spanish for many years and lived in Spain. Nate, I

0:09:05.444 --> 0:09:06.724
<v Speaker 1>studied abroad in Spain.

0:09:08.724 --> 0:09:11.324
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, there was a big surge for her on

0:09:11.404 --> 0:09:14.844
<v Speaker 2>poly market and probably other prediction markets, like right before

0:09:14.884 --> 0:09:17.964
<v Speaker 2>she won. Right. The theory I've heard is that there

0:09:18.124 --> 0:09:21.764
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of maybe some meta data release that

0:09:21.804 --> 0:09:24.604
<v Speaker 2>you're preparing a bio, you're preparing like a big like

0:09:25.004 --> 0:09:27.884
<v Speaker 2>you know, look, I used to know how to find

0:09:28.244 --> 0:09:32.244
<v Speaker 2>poll releases before they were released by typing in certain

0:09:32.524 --> 0:09:35.284
<v Speaker 2>URLs and things like that. Right, So, like if you

0:09:35.324 --> 0:09:38.084
<v Speaker 2>have an incentive to make one hundreds of thousands of dollars

0:09:38.404 --> 0:09:40.724
<v Speaker 2>by getting the sodaity right, and looking for any clues

0:09:40.764 --> 0:09:43.364
<v Speaker 2>that you can. It doesn't necessarily have to be inside information.

0:09:43.684 --> 0:09:46.684
<v Speaker 2>There's a whole longer combinate conversation about like inside information

0:09:46.724 --> 0:09:49.124
<v Speaker 2>and prediction markets and non prediction markets too, that we

0:09:49.124 --> 0:09:52.044
<v Speaker 2>should maybe have for some for other period of time. Right.

0:09:53.844 --> 0:09:55.364
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the one thing where I think polllymarket did

0:09:55.364 --> 0:09:58.244
<v Speaker 2>a bad job was for the Pope. Right, that was

0:09:58.284 --> 0:10:00.644
<v Speaker 2>a case where shit didn't leak.

0:10:01.604 --> 0:10:04.524
<v Speaker 1>That's because there were line Nate, there were no pockets

0:10:04.564 --> 0:10:05.844
<v Speaker 1>of data or anything.

0:10:05.884 --> 0:10:09.724
<v Speaker 2>It was totally It's the exception that proves day of

0:10:09.724 --> 0:10:12.364
<v Speaker 2>the Internet in the Vatican that they probably have the Internet, right,

0:10:12.364 --> 0:10:19.004
<v Speaker 2>they need it for grinder. Sorry, nay, come on, when.

0:10:18.804 --> 0:10:22.524
<v Speaker 1>They're in conclave. They absolutely do not have access to

0:10:22.964 --> 0:10:27.684
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Nobody does. But they do have somebody who

0:10:27.764 --> 0:10:32.324
<v Speaker 1>can access everything externally in case of medical emergency, et cetera,

0:10:32.364 --> 0:10:35.404
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, as we talked about in our fascinating deep

0:10:35.444 --> 0:10:37.124
<v Speaker 1>dive into the Conclave.

0:10:38.204 --> 0:10:42.964
<v Speaker 2>Have you judged awards before? I have a park poker.

0:10:42.764 --> 0:10:47.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I have, indeed, And this is just to say

0:10:47.844 --> 0:10:49.844
<v Speaker 1>that the Nobel does try to keep it very close

0:10:50.084 --> 0:10:51.644
<v Speaker 1>to the best. Have you judged awards before?

0:10:53.164 --> 0:10:56.084
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I did. A rotating two years to the higher

0:10:56.124 --> 0:10:59.524
<v Speaker 2>journalists were people, you know, to judge the Pulitzers for

0:10:59.564 --> 0:11:02.124
<v Speaker 2>like a two year stint and then Yester's wait another

0:11:02.164 --> 0:11:04.764
<v Speaker 2>decade before they invite you back. But that was fascinating,

0:11:04.844 --> 0:11:06.724
<v Speaker 2>right You spend is it like two or three days

0:11:06.844 --> 0:11:11.604
<v Speaker 2>up at the Columbia campus, and like for the Pulitzers,

0:11:12.524 --> 0:11:17.604
<v Speaker 2>you were given like a gigantic stack of applications in

0:11:17.684 --> 0:11:20.284
<v Speaker 2>your category. Right, I love the spirit of it. It's

0:11:20.284 --> 0:11:22.564
<v Speaker 2>a fun day. You get to meet I guess I

0:11:22.604 --> 0:11:24.644
<v Speaker 2>call myself a journalist among other things. I get to

0:11:24.644 --> 0:11:29.204
<v Speaker 2>meet like real journalists and interesting people, right, and with

0:11:29.244 --> 0:11:32.604
<v Speaker 2>different perspectives. But you're like, you're going through this shit

0:11:33.364 --> 0:11:36.164
<v Speaker 2>very fast. I'm not sure if it like applies the

0:11:36.204 --> 0:11:40.044
<v Speaker 2>same way to the Nobel Prize. Right, you know, one

0:11:40.044 --> 0:11:42.884
<v Speaker 2>thing I would know in general, if you're applied for

0:11:42.924 --> 0:11:46.804
<v Speaker 2>an award that's like judged by some panel or committee,

0:11:46.924 --> 0:11:50.444
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like student applications to some elite institution, right,

0:11:50.524 --> 0:11:53.964
<v Speaker 2>Like half of it to two thirds to three quarters

0:11:54.964 --> 0:12:02.124
<v Speaker 2>can be dismissed out of hand pretty much, right. You know,

0:12:02.324 --> 0:12:05.364
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a journalist and I'm judging different stories, there

0:12:05.364 --> 0:12:08.484
<v Speaker 2>are some stories that are prize bait, right, where like

0:12:09.444 --> 0:12:12.444
<v Speaker 2>aimed in this way. It's feature style and blah blah,

0:12:12.444 --> 0:12:16.324
<v Speaker 2>but it's important here's some person who overcame hardships, or

0:12:16.364 --> 0:12:18.724
<v Speaker 2>here's a person who took on city hall, right, and

0:12:18.924 --> 0:12:23.804
<v Speaker 2>like sometimes it's good, but it's sometimes not necessarily all

0:12:23.804 --> 0:12:28.164
<v Speaker 2>that impactful, right, Yep, it's kind of a little bit

0:12:28.164 --> 0:12:30.964
<v Speaker 2>paint by numbers, And like when I'm on the committee,

0:12:31.004 --> 0:12:32.924
<v Speaker 2>I don't particularly care for that type of story, right,

0:12:32.964 --> 0:12:35.364
<v Speaker 2>I kind of care more about like what maye be

0:12:35.564 --> 0:12:38.924
<v Speaker 2>a big splash in the world this year, Right. I

0:12:38.924 --> 0:12:40.084
<v Speaker 2>guess when I was doing it, was it during the

0:12:40.124 --> 0:12:43.404
<v Speaker 2>first Trump term race before COVID. Right, there's a bunch

0:12:43.404 --> 0:12:45.244
<v Speaker 2>of me too stuff. There was a bunch of Trump

0:12:45.924 --> 0:12:49.524
<v Speaker 2>Russia stuff right by the way. You know, you have

0:12:49.644 --> 0:12:52.524
<v Speaker 2>your group that makes a recommendation that can be overridden

0:12:52.564 --> 0:12:55.644
<v Speaker 2>by like the board of the poetry Prizes, which you

0:12:55.684 --> 0:12:59.524
<v Speaker 2>know might sound like it's having a heavy hand on

0:12:59.564 --> 0:13:02.964
<v Speaker 2>the scale, but like, but they're inherently political kind of things.

0:13:02.964 --> 0:13:05.404
<v Speaker 2>I think the poltries do better than some jobs, but

0:13:05.564 --> 0:13:09.524
<v Speaker 2>like it it. You know, it probably helps to to

0:13:09.684 --> 0:13:11.444
<v Speaker 2>know people I suppose.

0:13:11.364 --> 0:13:15.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, absolutely, And that's why I said that, you know,

0:13:15.204 --> 0:13:16.924
<v Speaker 1>some of the I think some of the prizes are

0:13:17.004 --> 0:13:21.204
<v Speaker 1>much more political than others. And even it's interesting because

0:13:22.284 --> 0:13:26.604
<v Speaker 1>in the Nobel Peace Prizes, that's very you know, that's

0:13:26.684 --> 0:13:29.604
<v Speaker 1>just egregiously the case. And by the way, that's not

0:13:29.764 --> 0:13:33.324
<v Speaker 1>a knock on this year's winner, who I think is

0:13:33.364 --> 0:13:37.604
<v Speaker 1>incredibly deserving. I'm not trying to subtly suggest that this

0:13:37.724 --> 0:13:41.164
<v Speaker 1>year's winners should not have a should not have one.

0:13:41.324 --> 0:13:43.924
<v Speaker 1>I do want to very strongly suggest that there are

0:13:43.964 --> 0:13:46.604
<v Speaker 1>past winners who should not have one, but she is

0:13:46.644 --> 0:13:51.884
<v Speaker 1>not among them. But even you know, even Peace Prize aside,

0:13:52.804 --> 0:13:56.764
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the Nobels have become more than

0:13:57.044 --> 0:14:00.924
<v Speaker 1>just oh, we think that this is the person most

0:14:01.004 --> 0:14:05.004
<v Speaker 1>deserving of a prize for their literary output, for instance.

0:14:05.284 --> 0:14:08.484
<v Speaker 1>And I say become, but this has always been the

0:14:08.524 --> 0:14:13.284
<v Speaker 1>case to some extent, and where there are political considerations

0:14:13.324 --> 0:14:16.484
<v Speaker 1>of all sorts. So I think with the Nobel Prizes

0:14:16.524 --> 0:14:20.604
<v Speaker 1>in literature, just you know, in recent years, the committee

0:14:20.924 --> 0:14:23.164
<v Speaker 1>was accused of having you know, too many white men,

0:14:23.204 --> 0:14:26.244
<v Speaker 1>too many Europeans, Americans, et cetera. And they're like, okay,

0:14:26.644 --> 0:14:28.724
<v Speaker 1>so how much of that is because we just have

0:14:29.564 --> 0:14:33.604
<v Speaker 1>a committee who's reading habits are inherently biased because of

0:14:33.644 --> 0:14:36.044
<v Speaker 1>who they are, right, Like, they're not trying to be biased,

0:14:36.044 --> 0:14:38.844
<v Speaker 1>but they just are not aware of a lot of

0:14:39.284 --> 0:14:45.084
<v Speaker 1>other literature. That's you know, that's painting them in a

0:14:45.124 --> 0:14:49.524
<v Speaker 1>non aeroditelite saying, you know, you haven't made those sorts

0:14:49.564 --> 0:14:53.324
<v Speaker 1>of comparisons. But sometimes then it's kind of like, you know,

0:14:54.804 --> 0:14:58.124
<v Speaker 1>it's a really it gets into really murky ground where

0:14:58.284 --> 0:14:59.844
<v Speaker 1>we're like, well, are we trying to have like a

0:14:59.924 --> 0:15:03.804
<v Speaker 1>quotea sistem right for Nobel prizes in literature where we

0:15:03.884 --> 0:15:07.004
<v Speaker 1>don't have you know, enough women, We don't have enough

0:15:07.604 --> 0:15:10.444
<v Speaker 1>people from you know, non u et cetera, et cetera,

0:15:10.484 --> 0:15:14.404
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And I think that part of it is

0:15:14.604 --> 0:15:18.444
<v Speaker 1>just a lack of knowledge, a lack of exposure, a

0:15:18.564 --> 0:15:22.284
<v Speaker 1>lack of translation. Right, that's that's another important thing, Like

0:15:22.604 --> 0:15:24.644
<v Speaker 1>you need who sits on the committee? We don't know,

0:15:24.764 --> 0:15:27.484
<v Speaker 1>by the way, these are things that are very closely

0:15:28.204 --> 0:15:31.124
<v Speaker 1>guarded secrets. So like I do not you can't google

0:15:31.204 --> 0:15:34.724
<v Speaker 1>like who is the committee for the Nobel Prize in X?

0:15:35.204 --> 0:15:38.004
<v Speaker 2>Like have you sold a French edition of The Biggest FLA?

0:15:38.604 --> 0:15:39.044
<v Speaker 2>I have not.

0:15:39.324 --> 0:15:42.964
<v Speaker 1>Actually I have not sold French. I have not so

0:15:43.044 --> 0:15:46.004
<v Speaker 1>the French. I have not sold a single one of

0:15:46.004 --> 0:15:50.244
<v Speaker 1>my books in France ever. And my books this isn't

0:15:50.244 --> 0:15:53.084
<v Speaker 1>a brag, but like my books have been translated into

0:15:53.244 --> 0:15:56.484
<v Speaker 1>over twenty languages, right, like we sold rights all over

0:15:56.524 --> 0:15:59.604
<v Speaker 1>the world. France has never bought one of my books.

0:15:59.844 --> 0:16:02.004
<v Speaker 1>The first one. I was like, well, it's about Charlock Holmes.

0:16:02.004 --> 0:16:05.804
<v Speaker 1>It's very English, right, so maybe there's like an inherently

0:16:06.204 --> 0:16:09.364
<v Speaker 1>anti English bias, but yeah, no, the French do not

0:16:09.604 --> 0:16:11.644
<v Speaker 1>like buying American books, and.

0:16:12.164 --> 0:16:16.164
<v Speaker 2>I like France. I'm by the way, isn't the World

0:16:16.164 --> 0:16:18.764
<v Speaker 2>Bookage or the whatever European booked are back in Paris

0:16:18.844 --> 0:16:19.324
<v Speaker 2>next year.

0:16:19.684 --> 0:16:21.844
<v Speaker 1>Poker Stars is coming back to Paris in February with

0:16:21.924 --> 0:16:25.724
<v Speaker 1>the I will not leave until both of us have

0:16:25.804 --> 0:16:27.004
<v Speaker 1>sold our postil.

0:16:26.604 --> 0:16:30.044
<v Speaker 2>Both of us have books translated into French. I like wine,

0:16:30.204 --> 0:16:33.484
<v Speaker 2>I like coffee, I like lounging around, I like steak freez.

0:16:34.044 --> 0:16:36.284
<v Speaker 1>And there's so many amazing things about France. But yes,

0:16:36.324 --> 0:16:39.604
<v Speaker 1>they do not love our books, Nate, But you know

0:16:39.644 --> 0:16:42.644
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue, right, Translation is a problem. Like

0:16:42.764 --> 0:16:46.204
<v Speaker 1>the Winner this year, not all of his books have

0:16:46.244 --> 0:16:51.484
<v Speaker 1>been translated into English, and some have just been translated,

0:16:51.484 --> 0:16:55.204
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's Lasno krasno Hork. He is Hungarian,

0:16:55.524 --> 0:16:59.124
<v Speaker 1>and I loved that. His last book, which I have

0:16:59.284 --> 0:17:02.484
<v Speaker 1>not read, is four hundred pages and contains one period

0:17:03.564 --> 0:17:07.924
<v Speaker 1>in the entire book. So so that should be an interesting,

0:17:08.044 --> 0:17:08.804
<v Speaker 1>interesting read.

0:17:09.604 --> 0:17:12.764
<v Speaker 2>As a purveyor of run on sentences myself, I'm officially

0:17:12.764 --> 0:17:13.124
<v Speaker 2>a fan.

0:17:13.204 --> 0:17:15.764
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there you go, there you go. So you know,

0:17:16.044 --> 0:17:18.484
<v Speaker 1>but but you know, you get these you get these

0:17:18.724 --> 0:17:22.884
<v Speaker 1>winners who already are who already won the prize, right,

0:17:23.204 --> 0:17:26.644
<v Speaker 1>someone like this year's winner, And not all of his

0:17:26.644 --> 0:17:29.644
<v Speaker 1>books have been translated into English, and so I assume,

0:17:30.004 --> 0:17:33.484
<v Speaker 1>you know, other languages also suffer from that. Now, imagine

0:17:33.484 --> 0:17:36.404
<v Speaker 1>you're someone who hasn't like and he's someone who already

0:17:36.524 --> 0:17:39.364
<v Speaker 1>rose to that level of prominence. So there are issues

0:17:39.404 --> 0:17:42.164
<v Speaker 1>that end up, you know, making the prize a little

0:17:42.164 --> 0:17:46.164
<v Speaker 1>bit more politicized than one would think. And I said that,

0:17:46.564 --> 0:17:50.244
<v Speaker 1>you know, in recent memory, people have been pressuring the

0:17:50.244 --> 0:17:55.684
<v Speaker 1>committee saying, you know, you're you're representing too many similar voices.

0:17:56.164 --> 0:17:59.404
<v Speaker 1>And yet this has been an issue for a very

0:17:59.444 --> 0:18:02.764
<v Speaker 1>long time. So there have been two times that I

0:18:02.804 --> 0:18:06.044
<v Speaker 1>know of in history. Because deliberations are eventually made public.

0:18:06.564 --> 0:18:09.804
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember how many years after it's decades, but

0:18:10.804 --> 0:18:14.684
<v Speaker 1>you eventually, you eventually do know who was nominated and

0:18:14.764 --> 0:18:17.604
<v Speaker 1>like you do understand, you know why some people were

0:18:17.604 --> 0:18:21.364
<v Speaker 1>shot down, so I can. There are two instances in

0:18:21.484 --> 0:18:24.444
<v Speaker 1>history where I'm like, are you guys, are you kidding me?

0:18:24.844 --> 0:18:27.964
<v Speaker 1>And it shows different sources of biases. One, which I

0:18:27.964 --> 0:18:32.724
<v Speaker 1>think is the single most egregious one is w. H.

0:18:32.724 --> 0:18:35.804
<v Speaker 1>Auden did not get the Nobel Prize in literature. He

0:18:35.964 --> 0:18:39.804
<v Speaker 1>was gay. He was very openly gay. He was, you know,

0:18:40.044 --> 0:18:44.804
<v Speaker 1>very vocal about it. And this was not it's not

0:18:44.924 --> 0:18:47.684
<v Speaker 1>like it's there's a line that says we are not

0:18:47.804 --> 0:18:50.284
<v Speaker 1>giving him the prize because he's gay, But you can

0:18:50.364 --> 0:18:54.084
<v Speaker 1>read between the lines, and he did not get it

0:18:54.124 --> 0:18:57.364
<v Speaker 1>because of his sexual orientation. He's one of the greatest

0:18:57.404 --> 0:19:00.044
<v Speaker 1>poets writers of the twentieth century and the fact that

0:19:00.084 --> 0:19:02.244
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't given the Nobel Prize because of a sexual

0:19:02.484 --> 0:19:08.004
<v Speaker 1>orientation is horrible. Now, second one shows a very different

0:19:08.044 --> 0:19:11.684
<v Speaker 1>sort of bias. White streat Mail. This time Tolkien j R.

0:19:11.844 --> 0:19:15.364
<v Speaker 1>Tolkien did not win the Nobel Prize because people were

0:19:15.364 --> 0:19:18.884
<v Speaker 1>biased against the types of books that he wrote and said,

0:19:18.924 --> 0:19:22.204
<v Speaker 1>you know, oh you know, fantasy is not real literature.

0:19:22.884 --> 0:19:26.004
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to stand the test of time. But

0:19:26.124 --> 0:19:29.044
<v Speaker 1>the year that Tolkien was up, the person who won

0:19:29.124 --> 0:19:31.364
<v Speaker 1>that year, like I have no idea who the fuck

0:19:31.404 --> 0:19:35.164
<v Speaker 1>that is, and like no one remembers that name, and

0:19:35.404 --> 0:19:40.324
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows Tolkien's name, and like it's one of those

0:19:40.364 --> 0:19:43.084
<v Speaker 1>things where I'm like, wow, you guys are just there

0:19:43.084 --> 0:19:46.484
<v Speaker 1>have been closed minded biases around this prize for a

0:19:46.644 --> 0:19:50.404
<v Speaker 1>very very long time, basically since its inception. So instead

0:19:50.404 --> 0:19:53.164
<v Speaker 1>of saying, this is the prize for the you know,

0:19:53.284 --> 0:19:56.684
<v Speaker 1>single most deserving author, just like with all everything, I

0:19:56.684 --> 0:20:00.284
<v Speaker 1>think we need to caveat it. Right that has risen

0:20:00.324 --> 0:20:04.204
<v Speaker 1>to a certain level, whose works have been translated, and

0:20:04.244 --> 0:20:06.724
<v Speaker 1>we don't take issue with the type of writing you do,

0:20:07.244 --> 0:20:10.364
<v Speaker 1>the type of person you are, et ce cetera, et cetera.

0:20:11.404 --> 0:20:14.444
<v Speaker 1>So I think that that's something that's really important to

0:20:14.484 --> 0:20:18.484
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind. And you would think that the other prizes,

0:20:18.684 --> 0:20:23.284
<v Speaker 1>like you know, medicine, physics, economics, that they're a little

0:20:23.284 --> 0:20:28.324
<v Speaker 1>bit potentially, especially with something like physics more straightforward. And

0:20:28.444 --> 0:20:32.044
<v Speaker 1>I actually, just to be perfectly honest, I don't know literature.

0:20:32.084 --> 0:20:33.924
<v Speaker 1>I've done a lot of deep dives into the history

0:20:33.964 --> 0:20:36.284
<v Speaker 1>because it's something you know, it's my field. It's something

0:20:36.284 --> 0:20:39.924
<v Speaker 1>that I feel very passionately about. And I wouldn't be

0:20:39.964 --> 0:20:42.364
<v Speaker 1>surprised if I went down the line of you know,

0:20:42.404 --> 0:20:46.364
<v Speaker 1>physics and realized how much controversy there was there. I

0:20:46.364 --> 0:20:48.884
<v Speaker 1>do know that there is controversy and who exactly gets

0:20:49.004 --> 0:20:52.804
<v Speaker 1>prizes for discoveries right? Because sometimes if you know that

0:20:52.844 --> 0:20:55.484
<v Speaker 1>a certain discovery is going to win the prize in physics, medicine,

0:20:55.524 --> 0:20:58.044
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, how do you divide it? Right? How do

0:20:58.084 --> 0:21:00.804
<v Speaker 1>you actually decide who's going to get it? Who's going

0:21:00.844 --> 0:21:03.284
<v Speaker 1>to get credit for this? Does one person get it?

0:21:03.324 --> 0:21:05.284
<v Speaker 1>To two people get it? Do three people get it?

0:21:05.284 --> 0:21:08.244
<v Speaker 1>Because sometimes it is split. This year's prize in economics

0:21:08.244 --> 0:21:10.804
<v Speaker 1>will split three ways. One person got half the prize

0:21:10.804 --> 0:21:12.804
<v Speaker 1>and then two people had to split the other half.

0:21:13.164 --> 0:21:15.924
<v Speaker 1>So you have to make determinations like that all the time.

0:21:16.524 --> 0:21:18.644
<v Speaker 2>You have to be alive too, You have to be alive.

0:21:18.684 --> 0:21:20.804
<v Speaker 2>That's actually interesting, that is huge.

0:21:20.804 --> 0:21:24.044
<v Speaker 1>That's actually really important. So like when Daniel Konnoman won

0:21:24.644 --> 0:21:27.764
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Prize for his work with Tabarski, Tierski couldn't

0:21:27.764 --> 0:21:32.084
<v Speaker 1>win it, right, even though he did, he did half

0:21:32.124 --> 0:21:34.764
<v Speaker 1>the research. Right, he was half the team, but Conoman

0:21:34.884 --> 0:21:36.004
<v Speaker 1>was alive. Twarski was not.

0:21:37.044 --> 0:21:41.764
<v Speaker 2>My grandparents who are passed away, you know, they would says,

0:21:41.804 --> 0:21:44.844
<v Speaker 2>how do you guys stay married for for fifty years

0:21:44.884 --> 0:21:46.044
<v Speaker 2>or became sixty years eventually?

0:21:46.124 --> 0:21:46.244
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:21:46.324 --> 0:21:49.284
<v Speaker 2>My grandfather was always like, well, there are three key components, right,

0:21:50.124 --> 0:21:55.804
<v Speaker 2>get married young number one, stay together and don't die.

0:21:56.004 --> 0:22:00.484
<v Speaker 2>The don't die a part is really it's really quite

0:22:00.484 --> 0:22:08.044
<v Speaker 2>important for winning a Nobel On for other things.

0:22:08.884 --> 0:22:10.284
<v Speaker 1>And we'll be back right after this.

0:22:27.964 --> 0:22:29.324
<v Speaker 2>You want to talk a little b about the Economics

0:22:29.324 --> 0:22:30.884
<v Speaker 2>Prize of one thing that I kind of you know,

0:22:31.124 --> 0:22:33.004
<v Speaker 2>I don't know the other two I do know Joel,

0:22:33.404 --> 0:22:35.804
<v Speaker 2>I always thought it was mochr m ok y r.

0:22:35.964 --> 0:22:39.084
<v Speaker 1>I don't actually, yeah, I don't know how it's more okay.

0:22:39.284 --> 0:22:43.444
<v Speaker 2>He's Dutch, Israeli, American. You know a lot of different

0:22:43.524 --> 0:22:48.804
<v Speaker 2>ingredients here. But he does work on economic history in particular.

0:22:49.284 --> 0:22:53.164
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to do very basic stuff, right. If you know,

0:22:53.164 --> 0:22:57.644
<v Speaker 2>if you study economic history, then very stylized competition in

0:22:57.684 --> 0:23:01.204
<v Speaker 2>the facts. Right, you learn that progress is unusual, Right,

0:23:01.324 --> 0:23:06.244
<v Speaker 2>that like humanity has spent most of its existence barely

0:23:06.284 --> 0:23:11.364
<v Speaker 2>eking out a living where innovations are slow to come by,

0:23:11.484 --> 0:23:14.644
<v Speaker 2>there's wars, you might have empires, the empires die out

0:23:14.724 --> 0:23:18.844
<v Speaker 2>after some period of time. And then in the Industrial

0:23:18.884 --> 0:23:23.964
<v Speaker 2>Revolution we had this spark and things began to catalyze

0:23:23.964 --> 0:23:28.124
<v Speaker 2>and into revolution we've had We've had growth. Right at first,

0:23:28.124 --> 0:23:30.724
<v Speaker 2>the growth might be zero point five percent per year

0:23:30.764 --> 0:23:34.324
<v Speaker 2>on top of population growth, although population growth is also important,

0:23:34.324 --> 0:23:37.164
<v Speaker 2>and then it gets up to one percent, two percent, three percent,

0:23:37.484 --> 0:23:39.444
<v Speaker 2>it begins to compound, and so you know, I think

0:23:39.844 --> 0:23:44.444
<v Speaker 2>a history is like a vitally undercovered topic. I think one,

0:23:44.564 --> 0:23:49.044
<v Speaker 2>you know, the average liberal or conservative, this is where

0:23:49.084 --> 0:23:51.124
<v Speaker 2>I think both sides like are full of shit, right.

0:23:51.204 --> 0:23:53.604
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they understand that, like that progress is

0:23:53.644 --> 0:23:56.724
<v Speaker 2>not the default by any means for human history. Right.

0:23:56.844 --> 0:24:01.324
<v Speaker 2>In some ways, its a very pessimistic interpretation of human history, right,

0:24:01.404 --> 0:24:03.524
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, you know, now people who think

0:24:03.564 --> 0:24:05.644
<v Speaker 2>that we're on the verge of an ai singularity of saying, okay,

0:24:05.684 --> 0:24:08.004
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have like an in my book on the

0:24:08.084 --> 0:24:10.484
<v Speaker 2>Edge the Art ofversking everything from publishers ever worre no

0:24:10.564 --> 0:24:15.124
<v Speaker 2>I in my book, you know, I'm using the revolution

0:24:15.244 --> 0:24:17.924
<v Speaker 2>as a paradigm for like what might happen if you

0:24:17.924 --> 0:24:21.524
<v Speaker 2>had very rapid ai growth, right, and the revolution. Of course,

0:24:21.564 --> 0:24:24.004
<v Speaker 2>you had a lot of change of institutions. You have

0:24:24.124 --> 0:24:26.084
<v Speaker 2>the Enlightenment, you had the American Revolution, you had the

0:24:26.084 --> 0:24:32.204
<v Speaker 2>French Revolution. There is always some debate about what came first, Right,

0:24:32.564 --> 0:24:37.884
<v Speaker 2>did you have this technological shock and then institutions catered

0:24:37.924 --> 0:24:40.404
<v Speaker 2>to that. You know, that period of time, maybe things

0:24:40.404 --> 0:24:42.484
<v Speaker 2>that were more a liberal, right, like land didn't matter

0:24:42.524 --> 0:24:44.684
<v Speaker 2>as much now labor power data, and that changes the

0:24:44.724 --> 0:24:47.084
<v Speaker 2>way that all society relates to one of You also

0:24:47.084 --> 0:24:49.644
<v Speaker 2>have wealth that people are not just at subsistence. People

0:24:49.684 --> 0:24:51.404
<v Speaker 2>are not just presents anymore. Although it takes a long

0:24:51.444 --> 0:24:54.444
<v Speaker 2>time to expand that franchise and so forth, right and

0:24:54.484 --> 0:24:57.844
<v Speaker 2>so like, I was very glad to see economic history

0:24:58.404 --> 0:25:02.244
<v Speaker 2>get it to do. I think, you know, the critique

0:25:02.244 --> 0:25:04.964
<v Speaker 2>of economic historians that they're neither economists nor historians. Jill

0:25:05.044 --> 0:25:07.684
<v Speaker 2>Muker Again, I don't know, the two is excellent. I

0:25:07.684 --> 0:25:11.564
<v Speaker 2>think at both. And you know, considering the stakes of

0:25:11.644 --> 0:25:17.724
<v Speaker 2>like why does humanity, why do civilizations grow or stagnate

0:25:17.924 --> 0:25:20.804
<v Speaker 2>or die out, it seems like a very high stakes

0:25:20.884 --> 0:25:23.724
<v Speaker 2>question that most people don't know very much about. Yeah.

0:25:23.764 --> 0:25:27.804
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and I'm especially grateful in the present day and age,

0:25:27.804 --> 0:25:32.364
<v Speaker 1>where people seem to be devaluing the importance of history

0:25:32.644 --> 0:25:36.244
<v Speaker 1>and historians in general. I think it's it's very important

0:25:36.564 --> 0:25:40.284
<v Speaker 1>to to illustrate just how important economic I mean history

0:25:40.284 --> 0:25:43.684
<v Speaker 1>in general is, but economic history specifically. And the other

0:25:43.724 --> 0:25:46.964
<v Speaker 1>two winners, by the way, are Peter Howitt I think

0:25:47.004 --> 0:25:51.244
<v Speaker 1>I got that pronunciation correct, and Philippe Agill. And sorry

0:25:51.284 --> 0:25:55.764
<v Speaker 1>if I butchered that one, because you know, I have

0:25:55.924 --> 0:25:59.484
<v Speaker 1>not heard these names pronounced. I've only ever read them.

0:25:59.844 --> 0:26:03.564
<v Speaker 1>And they were awarded it for their work on creative destruction.

0:26:04.204 --> 0:26:07.684
<v Speaker 1>So the concept of creative destruction, so the process by

0:26:07.684 --> 0:26:13.164
<v Speaker 1>which something new, something innovative, will replace older technologies and businesses.

0:26:13.604 --> 0:26:16.604
<v Speaker 1>And that was originally to put a little more history here.

0:26:16.804 --> 0:26:21.644
<v Speaker 1>It was originally coined in a nineteen forty two book Capitalism, Socialism,

0:26:21.684 --> 0:26:27.124
<v Speaker 1>and Democracy by Joseph Schumpeter. Schumpeter, how do you pronounce it?

0:26:27.444 --> 0:26:29.964
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to pronounce any of these last names, Nate,

0:26:30.044 --> 0:26:33.564
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be riddled with riddled with a

0:26:33.684 --> 0:26:36.244
<v Speaker 1>mispronunciation episode.

0:26:36.764 --> 0:26:38.604
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's kind of become a little bit

0:26:38.604 --> 0:26:41.804
<v Speaker 2>of a buzzword in Silicon Valley where it can be.

0:26:42.564 --> 0:26:44.124
<v Speaker 2>You know, hey man, let's go to burning man do

0:26:44.164 --> 0:26:49.404
<v Speaker 2>some creative instruction kind of thing. But yeah, look, one

0:26:49.444 --> 0:26:53.684
<v Speaker 2>of the core basic foundations of both capitalism and democracy,

0:26:53.884 --> 0:26:57.684
<v Speaker 2>which is why they have some correlation often repaired together.

0:26:57.724 --> 0:27:02.004
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they both ideally should believe in competition, right.

0:27:02.044 --> 0:27:03.484
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is why I think people, you know,

0:27:03.684 --> 0:27:07.604
<v Speaker 2>and I'd put these both under liberalism. Like people are flawed.

0:27:07.724 --> 0:27:09.644
<v Speaker 2>It is hard to predict the future. It is hard

0:27:09.684 --> 0:27:11.364
<v Speaker 2>to know what's going to work, hard to no ideas

0:27:11.404 --> 0:27:14.684
<v Speaker 2>what find a market, right, and so and so you

0:27:14.724 --> 0:27:18.124
<v Speaker 2>want them to compete instead of to have central planning, right.

0:27:18.124 --> 0:27:20.444
<v Speaker 2>And this is more of a risky business kind of topic, right,

0:27:20.444 --> 0:27:22.404
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, a lot of it is the

0:27:22.524 --> 0:27:27.564
<v Speaker 2>value of of optionality. Right. You know, if I were

0:27:27.564 --> 0:27:30.604
<v Speaker 2>living in some small town and I could like commission

0:27:30.604 --> 0:27:33.884
<v Speaker 2>the perfect restaurant in my town, right, maybe I'm some patron, right,

0:27:34.044 --> 0:27:37.924
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather have like five in a food hall or something, right,

0:27:38.004 --> 0:27:41.084
<v Speaker 2>and then the best ones can can survive because there's

0:27:41.124 --> 0:27:45.124
<v Speaker 2>uncertainty because like you know, because it creates proper incentives.

0:27:45.204 --> 0:27:51.604
<v Speaker 2>And it also means that like that older institutions sometimes

0:27:51.644 --> 0:27:58.084
<v Speaker 2>have to be replaced and destroyed, right, I think ironically

0:27:58.084 --> 0:28:00.684
<v Speaker 2>and ironically, I guess ironically only because we're talking about Europe,

0:28:00.724 --> 0:28:03.164
<v Speaker 2>you know, but like small things like that, like making

0:28:03.164 --> 0:28:07.164
<v Speaker 2>it hard to fire unsuccessful employees or making it hard

0:28:07.204 --> 0:28:11.124
<v Speaker 2>to dislodge businesses, that having him with the government. But

0:28:11.244 --> 0:28:13.244
<v Speaker 2>like that's it's very it's very important. And you know,

0:28:13.244 --> 0:28:17.244
<v Speaker 2>the thing about economic history too, is like again for

0:28:17.364 --> 0:28:20.244
<v Speaker 2>our audience, it's kind of like a one oh one concept,

0:28:20.284 --> 0:28:24.684
<v Speaker 2>but the notion of like compounding growth when you're looking

0:28:24.804 --> 0:28:27.724
<v Speaker 2>taking the truly long term perspective. I probably said versions

0:28:27.724 --> 0:28:30.964
<v Speaker 2>of this before, but like you know, I am worried

0:28:31.484 --> 0:28:35.804
<v Speaker 2>in the Trump era about America like squandering its leadership

0:28:36.324 --> 0:28:39.964
<v Speaker 2>in various ways, including its economic leadership, and that having

0:28:40.164 --> 0:28:43.924
<v Speaker 2>compounding effects. Right, I mean, the US has like a

0:28:44.084 --> 0:28:47.764
<v Speaker 2>big lead over the rest of the world, and a

0:28:47.804 --> 0:28:50.204
<v Speaker 2>lot a lot of advantages, a lot of advantages, worlds

0:28:50.244 --> 0:28:55.804
<v Speaker 2>leading currency, world's largest or you know, most effective military, right,

0:28:58.284 --> 0:29:04.684
<v Speaker 2>world's most number of founders, I guess, effectively, right, you know,

0:29:04.724 --> 0:29:06.444
<v Speaker 2>we're in a very we even very America is a

0:29:06.444 --> 0:29:08.564
<v Speaker 2>beautiful country. You got lots of good land. Whoops, almos

0:29:08.604 --> 0:29:12.284
<v Speaker 2>knocked over a lamp, and like we're starting from a

0:29:12.364 --> 0:29:16.364
<v Speaker 2>very high point, and you know, fortunately every other country

0:29:16.444 --> 0:29:18.884
<v Speaker 2>is fucking up too, right, But like, but yeah, when

0:29:18.884 --> 0:29:20.484
<v Speaker 2>you go from like three percent to two percent to

0:29:20.524 --> 0:29:23.524
<v Speaker 2>one percent to negative one percent GDP growth per capita

0:29:23.884 --> 0:29:27.444
<v Speaker 2>over time, then you really notice that after a generation

0:29:27.844 --> 0:29:30.924
<v Speaker 2>and and you know, you kind of need more of

0:29:30.964 --> 0:29:33.844
<v Speaker 2>an economic history of perspective, comparative perspective at least to

0:29:34.444 --> 0:29:35.724
<v Speaker 2>understand the implications of that.

0:29:36.044 --> 0:29:40.844
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely, And mok here is someone who's definitely thought

0:29:40.884 --> 0:29:46.844
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the implications of creative destruction and kind

0:29:46.884 --> 0:29:50.324
<v Speaker 1>of how how you need to think about it in

0:29:50.444 --> 0:29:53.604
<v Speaker 1>order to enable long term growth, right and not just

0:29:53.764 --> 0:29:56.964
<v Speaker 1>like have this short like let's move fast and break

0:29:56.964 --> 0:30:01.484
<v Speaker 1>shit type of mentality, because one of the elements of

0:30:01.524 --> 0:30:06.364
<v Speaker 1>his work, of all three of their's work, is that

0:30:07.364 --> 0:30:12.484
<v Speaker 1>in order for the innovations to have lasting positive impact,

0:30:13.004 --> 0:30:18.044
<v Speaker 1>you need to actually support the individuals who were affected

0:30:18.164 --> 0:30:22.124
<v Speaker 1>by the changes and be able to protect the workers

0:30:22.964 --> 0:30:26.364
<v Speaker 1>and move them to kind of more productive other jobs.

0:30:26.644 --> 0:30:31.324
<v Speaker 1>So he's not saying that you need to protect specific jobs.

0:30:31.724 --> 0:30:34.324
<v Speaker 1>You know, jobs are going to get replaced, right, because

0:30:34.684 --> 0:30:37.924
<v Speaker 1>that's the nature of the way the world works, But

0:30:38.004 --> 0:30:42.164
<v Speaker 1>you do need to know how to actually protect productivity

0:30:42.204 --> 0:30:45.564
<v Speaker 1>and protect workers. And if you don't do that, right,

0:30:45.604 --> 0:30:47.764
<v Speaker 1>if you don't actually do everything together and have a

0:30:47.804 --> 0:30:51.044
<v Speaker 1>full vision for how this will work with long term

0:30:51.084 --> 0:30:55.564
<v Speaker 1>societal impact, you might be negatively surprised. So this is

0:30:55.884 --> 0:30:59.124
<v Speaker 1>I think something that a lot of people don't realize,

0:30:59.284 --> 0:31:01.324
<v Speaker 1>right when they're like, oh, well, we just need to innovate,

0:31:01.404 --> 0:31:04.524
<v Speaker 1>But they don't realize that they're actually ways of innovating

0:31:04.524 --> 0:31:10.844
<v Speaker 1>successfully that have long term positive economic implication and ways

0:31:10.844 --> 0:31:14.764
<v Speaker 1>of doing it in a much less successful way. And

0:31:14.924 --> 0:31:19.724
<v Speaker 1>people don't normally couple those things together necessarily. They're like, yeah,

0:31:19.764 --> 0:31:21.004
<v Speaker 1>the market will just figure it out.

0:31:22.044 --> 0:31:25.564
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And kind of when you look back at history

0:31:25.564 --> 0:31:28.204
<v Speaker 2>with a very long lens, right, you're like, oh, there

0:31:28.284 --> 0:31:33.164
<v Speaker 2>was political turmoil during this time, right, and you don't

0:31:33.204 --> 0:31:39.284
<v Speaker 2>live through that turmoil necessarily, right. Yeah. It's particularly interesting

0:31:39.284 --> 0:31:44.404
<v Speaker 2>in the case of AI where explicitly some of the

0:31:44.484 --> 0:31:48.004
<v Speaker 2>leaders in Silicon Valley are saying they're not saying we're

0:31:48.004 --> 0:31:51.764
<v Speaker 2>going to create millions of new high paying jobs, right,

0:31:52.604 --> 0:31:55.044
<v Speaker 2>some of them are saying, we're going to create a

0:31:55.084 --> 0:31:59.044
<v Speaker 2>life of leisure for people where you can create weird

0:31:59.124 --> 0:32:02.444
<v Speaker 2>Soora videos of furries having sex and I don't know

0:32:02.444 --> 0:32:06.004
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to do right in neglecting like the

0:32:06.164 --> 0:32:10.404
<v Speaker 2>dignity of work or the fact get like you know

0:32:10.444 --> 0:32:14.524
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna have like a political of people is a euphemism, right,

0:32:14.564 --> 0:32:17.204
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you kind of like take everyone's jobs,

0:32:17.204 --> 0:32:21.404
<v Speaker 2>you might have a revolution or something, right, and ignoring

0:32:21.484 --> 0:32:24.644
<v Speaker 2>kind of that history lesson, even though some people, you know,

0:32:25.004 --> 0:32:29.324
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Collison is the CEO of Stripe, and he and

0:32:29.404 --> 0:32:31.604
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Conwan economists have kind of like founded a field

0:32:31.644 --> 0:32:33.524
<v Speaker 2>called progress studies, which in this kind of the like

0:32:33.884 --> 0:32:38.724
<v Speaker 2>same vein potentially, but like the politics and the economics

0:32:39.124 --> 0:32:43.404
<v Speaker 2>are intertwined. I think probably there's too much of saying

0:32:43.524 --> 0:32:45.884
<v Speaker 2>we have to preserve these kind of coal miners jobs,

0:32:45.884 --> 0:32:49.004
<v Speaker 2>and you have like parochial interests and things like that.

0:32:49.044 --> 0:32:53.644
<v Speaker 2>But if you have very widespread destructions of existing institutions

0:32:54.204 --> 0:32:59.204
<v Speaker 2>and you don't have a good plan to create new institutions,

0:32:59.324 --> 0:33:02.484
<v Speaker 2>then that could get very messy. Potentially. I'm not sure

0:33:02.524 --> 0:33:05.764
<v Speaker 2>it's a good precedent. You know. Again, I worried about

0:33:05.764 --> 0:33:11.004
<v Speaker 2>the combination of rapid technological change with declining institutions, right,

0:33:11.124 --> 0:33:15.444
<v Speaker 2>and and the fact that the technologies involved in some

0:33:15.484 --> 0:33:20.044
<v Speaker 2>ways people checking out from civic life. I mean again,

0:33:20.124 --> 0:33:22.244
<v Speaker 2>after World War Two, we kind of had a new

0:33:22.404 --> 0:33:26.564
<v Speaker 2>world order somewhat literally. We also had the development of

0:33:26.604 --> 0:33:29.564
<v Speaker 2>the atomic bomb. It probably is another episode, right, but

0:33:29.564 --> 0:33:32.644
<v Speaker 2>you also did the development of the United Nations, which,

0:33:32.684 --> 0:33:35.084
<v Speaker 2>whatever you think of it, I get annoyed because it

0:33:35.084 --> 0:33:37.684
<v Speaker 2>makes it a fucking nightmare to commute to the East

0:33:37.684 --> 0:33:39.524
<v Speaker 2>Side for a couple of months every year when they

0:33:39.524 --> 0:33:40.244
<v Speaker 2>have a conference.

0:33:40.324 --> 0:33:40.484
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:33:40.564 --> 0:33:43.524
<v Speaker 2>Good, and by the way, the building is the building

0:33:43.604 --> 0:33:45.324
<v Speaker 2>is not super and I feel like that you went

0:33:45.364 --> 0:33:46.404
<v Speaker 2>you a fucking better building.

0:33:46.924 --> 0:33:49.604
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna do a total caveat on our Nobel

0:33:49.684 --> 0:33:54.644
<v Speaker 1>episode to just complain. So that was the United Nations

0:33:54.724 --> 0:33:58.164
<v Speaker 1>was meeting when we were trying to rent a car

0:33:58.364 --> 0:34:02.164
<v Speaker 1>and drive to Vermont and rented the car in Midtown

0:34:02.324 --> 0:34:05.564
<v Speaker 1>because I'm an idiot and forgot and had to wait

0:34:05.644 --> 0:34:08.924
<v Speaker 1>for an hour basically to leave the garage because the

0:34:08.964 --> 0:34:12.484
<v Speaker 1>block the car was on had dignitaries staying on it,

0:34:12.524 --> 0:34:15.204
<v Speaker 1>and then everything was blocked off. Anyway, it was just

0:34:15.244 --> 0:34:17.484
<v Speaker 1>such a nightmare and I was like, Okay, I'm just

0:34:17.524 --> 0:34:20.764
<v Speaker 1>never going to go to Midtown Manhattan when the UN

0:34:20.844 --> 0:34:25.764
<v Speaker 1>is meeting ever again. Anyway, that's a big caveat. But yes,

0:34:26.004 --> 0:34:28.844
<v Speaker 1>you can be annoyed by that. But your broader point

0:34:29.004 --> 0:34:31.564
<v Speaker 1>it is an incredibly important one, and I want to

0:34:31.604 --> 0:34:33.684
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we stay with it, which is that

0:34:34.084 --> 0:34:38.804
<v Speaker 1>the institutions that came out of it were actually incredibly important,

0:34:38.844 --> 0:34:42.164
<v Speaker 1>and that you need multiple prongs for stability, and that

0:34:42.204 --> 0:34:44.804
<v Speaker 1>you might have issues with a lot of the kind

0:34:44.844 --> 0:34:48.244
<v Speaker 1>of UN directions, you might have issues with the UN traffic,

0:34:48.644 --> 0:34:50.724
<v Speaker 1>you might have issues with more important things that the

0:34:50.804 --> 0:34:53.484
<v Speaker 1>UN does, But the fact that you do have this

0:34:53.964 --> 0:35:00.324
<v Speaker 1>societal structure is something that helped prevent innovation with negative

0:35:00.404 --> 0:35:03.044
<v Speaker 1>kind of with the negative social disruptions that might have

0:35:03.164 --> 0:35:07.444
<v Speaker 1>otherwise accompanied it, with the social displacements, with the revolutionary

0:35:07.604 --> 0:35:11.404
<v Speaker 1>forces that people tend to gloss over.

0:35:14.564 --> 0:35:29.124
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be right back after this break, Mariet, what

0:35:29.124 --> 0:35:32.284
<v Speaker 2>would you give yourself a Nobel Prize for nothing?

0:35:34.204 --> 0:35:37.564
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I deserve a Nobel prize, Nate. If

0:35:37.604 --> 0:35:39.684
<v Speaker 1>I were to give you a Nobel prize, Nate, I

0:35:39.724 --> 0:35:43.124
<v Speaker 1>would give you the prize in economics, and you would

0:35:43.124 --> 0:35:45.204
<v Speaker 1>get it for some of your statistical stuff. And I'm

0:35:45.204 --> 0:35:47.924
<v Speaker 1>sure that by the time you get your Nobel Prize,

0:35:48.764 --> 0:35:51.964
<v Speaker 1>you will have come up with some, you know, great

0:35:52.004 --> 0:35:57.764
<v Speaker 1>statistical innovations that help us forecast and project more accurately,

0:35:58.044 --> 0:36:02.044
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully, because we're friends, I'll be able to profit

0:36:02.084 --> 0:36:06.484
<v Speaker 1>off of that by placing very nice bets on prediction markets.

0:36:10.204 --> 0:36:11.964
<v Speaker 2>Because I would give you the prize in literature because

0:36:11.964 --> 0:36:13.004
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:36:12.324 --> 0:36:15.524
<v Speaker 1>I have written fiction, and I hope you're very good writer. Well,

0:36:15.524 --> 0:36:18.844
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that night, and yes, and I hope to

0:36:19.004 --> 0:36:22.804
<v Speaker 1>write more fiction in the future. So that is something

0:36:22.844 --> 0:36:24.844
<v Speaker 1>that I'm definitely I feel.

0:36:24.644 --> 0:36:26.804
<v Speaker 2>Like we're probably being in puckle world. We probably both

0:36:26.844 --> 0:36:30.324
<v Speaker 2>deserve the Noble Piece Prize for listening to bad beat

0:36:30.364 --> 0:36:31.244
<v Speaker 2>stories over the years.

0:36:31.284 --> 0:36:34.444
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we could collectively. I think we could collectively take

0:36:34.484 --> 0:36:38.204
<v Speaker 1>a Nobel Piece Prize for listening to bad beat stories

0:36:38.244 --> 0:36:41.604
<v Speaker 1>and not actually physically harming anyone who tells us a

0:36:41.644 --> 0:36:44.604
<v Speaker 1>bad beat story, even though sometimes I really really want tonight.

0:36:45.084 --> 0:36:48.804
<v Speaker 1>There are some people who you just when they're like Maria, hey,

0:36:48.804 --> 0:36:51.324
<v Speaker 1>do you want to grab dinner? I'm like, oh no, no, no,

0:36:51.324 --> 0:36:54.044
<v Speaker 1>no no. You probably know some of these people and

0:36:54.084 --> 0:36:56.484
<v Speaker 1>you just want to run away, and when you actually

0:36:56.524 --> 0:36:59.204
<v Speaker 1>are cornered and end up in a conversation with them

0:36:59.324 --> 0:37:01.684
<v Speaker 1>or at a dinner with them, and you smile and

0:37:01.724 --> 0:37:03.484
<v Speaker 1>nod through the whole thing. You do feel like a

0:37:03.564 --> 0:37:05.684
<v Speaker 1>mediator who's made world peace possible.

0:37:06.604 --> 0:37:09.124
<v Speaker 2>Can you believe that that flush came in on that river? Again?

0:37:09.804 --> 0:37:11.964
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe the idiot who stayed in the hand

0:37:12.044 --> 0:37:15.324
<v Speaker 1>until the river? The odds were so bad? How does

0:37:15.324 --> 0:37:17.564
<v Speaker 1>this fish ever make any money? By the way, Nate,

0:37:17.724 --> 0:37:19.844
<v Speaker 1>this is totally off Well, it's not off topic with

0:37:19.884 --> 0:37:22.364
<v Speaker 1>the poker bad beats, but have you noticed that there's

0:37:22.404 --> 0:37:24.324
<v Speaker 1>a certain type of person who whenever they tell you

0:37:24.604 --> 0:37:27.644
<v Speaker 1>hand histories, this usually goes hand in hand with bad

0:37:27.724 --> 0:37:30.484
<v Speaker 1>beats stories. It's always like the whale in the one

0:37:30.524 --> 0:37:32.884
<v Speaker 1>seat did this, and then the fish did this, and

0:37:32.924 --> 0:37:35.844
<v Speaker 1>then the idiot did this. It seems like every single

0:37:35.884 --> 0:37:39.564
<v Speaker 1>person at their table is a whale, a fish, an idiot,

0:37:39.604 --> 0:37:43.124
<v Speaker 1>a donk, a something bad and no one is actually

0:37:43.644 --> 0:37:46.164
<v Speaker 1>and from their descriptions, I'm like, wow, I want to

0:37:46.164 --> 0:37:48.844
<v Speaker 1>play in that tournament, you know, seems like seems like

0:37:48.884 --> 0:37:51.044
<v Speaker 1>a great field. No.

0:37:51.204 --> 0:37:53.084
<v Speaker 2>The way you can learn a lot from the causes

0:37:53.084 --> 0:37:55.764
<v Speaker 2>of death. I once called it in a poker tournament, right,

0:37:55.804 --> 0:37:57.484
<v Speaker 2>and once like created a texta one and they're like

0:37:58.524 --> 0:38:02.604
<v Speaker 2>thirteen ways to die, right, and how do you die?

0:38:02.924 --> 0:38:04.764
<v Speaker 2>You know, I go up, sometimes I go with a

0:38:04.764 --> 0:38:07.924
<v Speaker 2>bluff some times a life. If you're only losing poker

0:38:07.964 --> 0:38:10.804
<v Speaker 2>tournaments when you take a bad beat, it's often the

0:38:10.804 --> 0:38:13.964
<v Speaker 2>sign of people who are who are too nitty and

0:38:14.484 --> 0:38:17.684
<v Speaker 2>risk averse that you chip down, you chip down, chip down,

0:38:17.764 --> 0:38:20.244
<v Speaker 2>chip down right, because you're not taking any chances, and

0:38:20.244 --> 0:38:22.884
<v Speaker 2>then yeah, you'll lose it seventy thirty, or you lose

0:38:23.004 --> 0:38:25.284
<v Speaker 2>aces versus kings. Maybe if the kings against the aces

0:38:25.284 --> 0:38:27.484
<v Speaker 2>can't avoid that kind of thing, right, But like, you

0:38:27.524 --> 0:38:33.644
<v Speaker 2>know someone who is never busting out of a tournament

0:38:33.644 --> 0:38:37.164
<v Speaker 2>by saying, look, I made a big bluff here, it

0:38:37.164 --> 0:38:40.244
<v Speaker 2>didn't work. I made a big fold here, I got

0:38:40.244 --> 0:38:42.044
<v Speaker 2>shown the hand. It was wrong, and then I was

0:38:42.084 --> 0:38:44.324
<v Speaker 2>down low on chips. Right, I made a big call

0:38:44.404 --> 0:38:48.084
<v Speaker 2>and that was wrong. I tried to slow places. I

0:38:48.124 --> 0:38:49.204
<v Speaker 2>thought it was the right play, and you caught the

0:38:49.204 --> 0:38:50.964
<v Speaker 2>perfect card and I lost all my chip. Like, if

0:38:51.004 --> 0:38:54.644
<v Speaker 2>you're never like admitting to like making a bold poker play,

0:38:54.844 --> 0:38:58.764
<v Speaker 2>then then I kind of think you're probably an inferior player.

0:38:58.804 --> 0:39:01.044
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, yeah, what matters is all the decisions

0:39:01.044 --> 0:39:03.604
<v Speaker 1>that led up to that point not the actual bad

0:39:03.684 --> 0:39:06.964
<v Speaker 1>being at the end. I think that that's that's an

0:39:07.004 --> 0:39:10.324
<v Speaker 1>important thing to remember when you're a warding the Nobel

0:39:10.404 --> 0:39:14.444
<v Speaker 1>Prize in poker. Bad beat stories, Nobel Committee, these are

0:39:14.484 --> 0:39:17.804
<v Speaker 1>all things that we need to that we all need

0:39:17.844 --> 0:39:21.004
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind. Nate, you will have created a

0:39:21.044 --> 0:39:25.124
<v Speaker 1>statistical model that tells us how to avoid the people

0:39:25.124 --> 0:39:28.164
<v Speaker 1>who will tell us the bad beat stories. You'll you'll

0:39:28.204 --> 0:39:32.684
<v Speaker 1>get us maps of the Paris and Horseshoe ballrooms so

0:39:32.724 --> 0:39:35.244
<v Speaker 1>that we know the best routes to take to avoid

0:39:35.324 --> 0:39:39.044
<v Speaker 1>bad beat storytellers. And I will incorporate them into my

0:39:39.164 --> 0:39:42.924
<v Speaker 1>novel and we will we will bring this to the

0:39:42.964 --> 0:39:46.764
<v Speaker 1>Nobel's attention. But that was a I really enjoyed that.

0:39:47.284 --> 0:39:49.164
<v Speaker 1>And next year I hope, Nate, that you will be

0:39:49.204 --> 0:39:53.684
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more engaged in the Nobel Prize given

0:39:53.764 --> 0:39:56.484
<v Speaker 1>now that you understand why some of them can be

0:39:56.524 --> 0:39:59.804
<v Speaker 1>so interesting to follow, and now that you know some

0:39:59.884 --> 0:40:01.164
<v Speaker 1>of the controversy behind.

0:40:00.964 --> 0:40:03.004
<v Speaker 2>The scenes, you can bet on it.

0:40:03.084 --> 0:40:05.564
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we can bet on it all right. Next

0:40:05.604 --> 0:40:07.164
<v Speaker 1>year we can do Nobel brackets.

0:40:07.684 --> 0:40:10.804
<v Speaker 2>Nobel brackets. Yeah, Okay, Maria will have to be one

0:40:10.924 --> 0:40:14.164
<v Speaker 2>another's Nobel Prize for now, So Thank you listeners, and

0:40:14.164 --> 0:40:14.804
<v Speaker 2>we'll see you soon.

0:40:20.484 --> 0:40:22.284
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think of the show. Reach

0:40:22.324 --> 0:40:26.084
<v Speaker 1>out to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot Fm.

0:40:26.244 --> 0:40:29.324
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kanakova.

0:40:29.044 --> 0:40:31.804
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show was a cool

0:40:31.804 --> 0:40:35.764
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushing Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:40:35.804 --> 0:40:40.124
<v Speaker 2>by Isaac Carter. Our associate producer is Sonya gerwit Lydia,

0:40:40.244 --> 0:40:43.124
<v Speaker 2>Jean Kott and Daphne Chen are our editors, and our

0:40:43.164 --> 0:40:47.004
<v Speaker 2>executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Mixing by Sarah Bruger.

0:40:47.524 --> 0:40:49.764
<v Speaker 1>If you like the show, please rate and review us

0:40:49.804 --> 0:40:52.444
<v Speaker 1>so other people can find us too, But once again,

0:40:52.604 --> 0:40:54.404
<v Speaker 1>only if you like us. We don't want those bad

0:40:54.444 --> 0:40:56.604
<v Speaker 1>reviews out there. Thanks for tuning in.