WEBVTT - Short Stuff: Ellen Richards

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, Hi there, How they're welcome to short Stuff,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the shorter stuffed version of stuff you should know, starring Chuck,

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Jerry and me Josh. This is short stuff on short

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff I do, which is why I despise it. Oh

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you doing well? I am doing well. I love talking science.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I also love talking history, and I really love talking

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>hissed sigh as it's called. And I love talking about

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>um undersung women in history and science. For sure. Chuck

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 1>kicks all those boxes. And what's sad is you could

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have just said women in science because almost across the board, um,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>women in science are are undersong or completely unsung. What

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>about Mary Curie? I mean she's such an outlier, Yeah,

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because like that's the first name that pops into your

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>head for a reason, right, and it's like, oh, well,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>she must have been the only woman scientists in the

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in the world. No, that's not the case. Supposedly, there

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is a longstanding tradition in science of the men in

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>science taking credit for the work of the women. Whether

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's something is like outright fraudulent, is like just basically

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>taking someone's work and not giving them credit because you

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>can get away with it because you're a man and

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the other person was a woman or just not giving

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>due credit. And over time, with history favoring men, typically

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at least Western history, Um, the original person who laid

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the foundation for the woman, um will just kind of

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>be lost to time. And this is what's called something

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>something called the Matilda effect. Yeah, and this is very

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>evident in science. There's a couple of sort of horrifying

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>UM statistics that they found here. One is that there

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was a science of big journal that changed their review process,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, reviewing things. Are we going to publish it?

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Are we not? And they switched there's to leave out

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the names of the author, so you don't even know

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>who it is, male or female. And just doing that, uh,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the acceptance rate for women's reports rose almost eight percent.

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>And Uh. Then a study in two thousand thirteen showed

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that the abstracts you know when you google online and

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you read like the abstract of a science science paper,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like sort of like a summary. I guess, Um,

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they were seen as uh being of a higher quality

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>if the author was male and wrote about things stereotypically

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you would think of as male subjects like physics or

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>math or something. Yeah, and this is in two tho. Right,

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>so it's clearly still going on. And like I said, also,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a long standing tradition. And um, it was kind

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of given this name, the Matilda effect, back in by

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>end a storian of science from Cornell named Margaret Rossiter,

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and she named it Matilda Effect after a woman named

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Matilda Jostle Engage who was an abolitionist and suffragists. And

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>she had written an essay in eightee called Women as

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>an Inventor, which is basically like it is straight up

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>b s the way that women scientists are just being

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>completely left out of history. She had a lot of

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>foresight at the time, um, and and called this out

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't really get anywhere with it, but at

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>least documented it as far back as before the turn

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the last century that this was a problem in

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>an issue. And so this this um, this a hundred

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>years later, Margaret Rossiter kind of came up with this

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thing called the Matilda effect. And there's a lot a

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of instances in history. It's not sporadic, it's not

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of scatter shot like, there are a

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of instances in history of women not getting due

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>credit for the work that they did. That um established

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a field that created multiple fields UM or that their

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>their work grew to be misunderstood and almost kind of scorned.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And that last one in particular, is very much embodied

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>by a woman named Ellen Henrietta Swallow Richards. That's right. Uh.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>She was a woman who UM. She was the first

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>woman accepted into a school of science, which at the time,

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the m I T. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was male only,

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and they said, we'll do a little test and see

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>if this lady can handle m I T. And she

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>was like great, I handled it. UM. She was one

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first female chemists in the US. UM. She well,

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>her her largest contribution. I guess what she's remembered most

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 1>for is her contribution to domestic science a k a. Homeck,

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>which just saying that some people still might dismiss that

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>as a soft science or non science, but it's not

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>true because that encompasses everything from hygienic standards in the

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>home to um the you know, the clothes we wear

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>being safe and the food we eat being healthy. And

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>before she came along, not a lot of people were

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>doing this, and it took her going to Vassar College, UM,

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>which is it still an all female college, Vassar I

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>think actually is yeah? Is it? Uh? She got a

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>degree in chemistry in eighteen seventy and then that's when

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>m I. T said let me just see if she

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>can handle this, and she got a Bachelor of Science

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and chemistry from there in eighteen seventy three, and then

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>immediately started working like studying pollution and sanitary chemistry and

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>things like that, which not a lot of people were

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>doing it at the time. No, she was almost the first,

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>if not the first person to say, Okay, we're all

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>like eating food and drinking water and um. Has anybody

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>stopped and asked, like, is the food we're eating in

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the water we're drinking healthy and impure? Is that toxic? H?

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the relation to um pollution? What's the relation to

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>indus tree? Um? She started asking questions and then in

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>addition to asking questions, you started doing research and study.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And she came up with this field called o ecology

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>o e k ology, and it was the basis for

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>what we recognized now as ecology or the study of

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the environment UM. And she was the first one to

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to to think about this back in I believe the

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>eighteen seventies UM and it went along for five years

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and m I T by this time she was a

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>um UH an instructor at m I T. And m

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I T said, this sounds crack pot and whack stopped

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. We we They literally forbade her to

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>talk about oh ecology for a year and so her

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>her this discipline that she launched lasted for all of

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>five years and just kind of frustrated by that, she

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>turned her attention instead to home economics, which was basically

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>taking this idea rather than studying like the water in

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the air and all of that, studying the um the

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>results of the water in the air, like the food

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we put in, and like the surroundings we live in

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>UM and how they impact our health and how they

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>can be made better. All Right, we're gonna take a

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>break and we're gonna come back and talk a little

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more about She about how she managed to bring

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>science into the household right after this. Alright, so bringing

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>science into the home environment was very different on the

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>household level. To do that at the time, it was

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it was an unusual thing that she knew was important.

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>It was a big passion of hers. Uh. She also

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, homeck also is cooking and cleaning and sewing

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and and things like that. And it's not like she

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>issued those things, but she was like, you know, women

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>are already in the home doing these things, so why

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 1>don't I bring some science to it and talk about

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 1>having sanitary conditions and organizing the household and raising a

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>healthy family with science based techniques. Because, like I said,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it was at the time, and this is in the

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, late I guess, uh, late nineteenth century, right

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>when she started out right at the turn. Yeah yeah,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so uh. I mean she has gotten some pushback over

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the years from feminists, but I think they got it wrong,

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, man, from what I saw it, they got

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it really wrong. Any And like, if you criticize um

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Richards as anti feminists by creating home MEC, it

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like you just haven't really dug in very deeply

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to researcher, because she was a proto feminist to the

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>first degree. Yeah, Like it would have been really easy

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time to say, as a as a progressive

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of to say, well, you know, women ditch the household

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and get out there and try and take the man's job.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But she she knew the reality of things. I think

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and she wanted to uplift UH, what women were doing

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>in the household instead of saying, no, ditch all that

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and leave it behind to go take a quote unquote

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>man's job, Like what you're doing is important, and I

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>want to uplift that and bring science to it. Well.

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And not only did did was it important? She also

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>realized that that was the reality of the situation, right

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>like you, I think something like nineties seven percent of

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>women at the time UM didn't go to college. They

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just they they got married and they became homemakers. So

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what she had to work with. So she was

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to UM, like you said, uplift women in that sense,

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily because you know she was. She was saying,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a woman's lot. It was, this is what

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're working with, so I'm going to try to make

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it better. She also very strongly advocated for women to

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>be college educated. She thought that that should just be

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>standard practice UM. And she actually set up a lab,

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a woman's lab at m I T to teach chemistry

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to UM young women who were coming into college UM.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>And the lab was only open for a few years

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>because from her efforts, m I T started to accept

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>women into the general the general population. It wasn't like

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a special track any longer. But she set up a

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>lab to teach women chemistry and she did it free.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>She didn't get any money from it. She and she

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>taught chemistry for years for for no charge, so that

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>these um young women could learn chemistry. Yeah. And you know,

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 1>despite all this, she's um, I don't know about forgotten,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>but largely forgotten in history, especially in science as a

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>real pioneer, uh and validating the home economic movement and

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>bringing women into more traditionally male fields of science. And

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't get nearly enough recognition. So uh no, especially also,

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean like she was she was a pioneer the

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 1>concept in the study of water quality and like that's

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that's huge she was. She had a really deep and

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>broad scientific career, so I know, she definitely doesn't get

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>her to you. Yeah, like today she would be on

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the front lines in Flint, Michigan, in in newspapers and

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>on TV shows, but back then she was discounted because

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it was kitchen stuff. Yep. So hats off to Ellen

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Richards for being just a total top notch scientist. Absolutely,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, if you want to know more about her.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Go check out this article on how stuff Works. How

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about that agreed? Uh, well, that's short stuff. Send us

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>an email if you like, send it off to Stuff

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Podcast at how stuff works dot com.