WEBVTT - Fund Manager Says There’s an Easy Way to Make 3% More

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, John, Hi will now John, inflation right, A lot

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of people have been expecting CPI in the UK to

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>fall and fall quite significantly. The whole transient argument is back.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, energy prices are falling. Fuel prices are falling.

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Oil prices are falling, and so what we're going to

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>see is lower inflation numbers coming through and we kind

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>of have it. It's we need tiny bit. But today's

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers came in significantly higher than people expected.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, we now have had CPI above ten percent for

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>months and months and months. It will take and it

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to be falling back. You've written about this, right,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>what's your explanation? You know what mine is anyway.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean it's just that inflation keeps coming in

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 3>higher than the Bank of England can those wishful thinking

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and makes it makes it harm. I mean in April

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 3>we will see a sharp fall and that will go

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>below double digital. It's because effective atithmetically it simply cannot

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>The rate it sign now, but it'll probably fall is

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>something like seven and a half or eight percent, and

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>you know that will sound like a law, but it's

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.119
<v Speaker 3>still higher than the Bank I'd hoped it would be,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 3>you know, as recently as fair Beauty and it's saying but.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>It's worth reminding everybody that the Bank of England target

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is two percent and an inflation is currently five times

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England target. I mean this represents a

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>policy fail failure of such stunning scale. I'm amazed for

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.320
<v Speaker 1>not talking about it every single day. We talk a

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>lot about the inflation numbers, but how often do you

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>hear someone on the radio in the morning saying, wow,

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>five times the Bank of England target. Can we get

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>someone from the Bank of England on to explain it?

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>That's like getting someone from one of the top managers

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the NHS on to explain the mess up at

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the NHS, right, We never hear from them.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's true, and utiliarly talks about it during the

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 3>press conferences after the interest rate meetings either. I mean,

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 3>I think that's interesting in itself because there is that

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 3>sense or that understanding that an awful lot of this

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 3>stuff is beyond the control of central banks. So the

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 3>fact that you set a two percent target doesn't mean

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>that you're going to get two percent. And it's almost

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>everyone takes that. Yeah, I mean everyone seems to take

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 3>that for granted, to the point where you're not actually

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>holding the central bank governor accountable for something that in

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 3>theory he's accountable for. And I mean even has to

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 3>write those stupid little letters to the Chancellor, you know,

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 3>every couple of months saying, oh, you know, I'm sorry

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 3>that inflation is you know, below one percent or above

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 3>three percent. Here's why, it's basically not my fault.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So what's the point What is the point of the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Bank of England, What is the point of any central banks?

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You've literally just talked from out of a job? Well,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean they have one job.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't really think that central banks are necessarily a

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>good thing in the first place. I don't know what

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the mechanism is that you would replace them with. But

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 3>you know they're already basically chasing the market the whole

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 3>time anyway.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it just tells us that we're not quite

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>as close to peak rates as we would have expected. Now, listen,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's one number that really really stands out in these

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers that we've had this week, and that is

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>food inflation over nineteen percent, an absolutely extraordinary level of inflation.

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:51.119
<v Speaker 1>And also, I think we can be pretty certain that

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>farmers are not seeing in nineteen percent rise in the

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>prices that they're getting. So this is part of this

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>new dynamic that we're beginning here a lot about greed inflation,

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>where companies are taking the opportunity of crisis and disaster

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to effectively profit here. You know, they did it during

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic the beginning, at the beginning of the war,

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and they are still doing it. They're shoveling up their

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>profit margins to increasing their supernomal levels to take advantage

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of this slightly chaotic period in time. And that seems

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>like something that surely can't continue. And if it does continue,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there would surely be political pressure on the corporate world

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to just stop.

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you would think particularly food inflation, because food

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 3>inflation is extremely visible. You know, I don't know why

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>anyone regardless of you know, can I wealthy or not wealthy,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 3>who doesn't look at the shopping bell at the moment

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 3>and say, hold dn a minute. You know last week

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 3>that was you know, about ten percent less than it

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>is today. So yeah, not that's especially given that you

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>know the government has this they dam having the inflationary

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 3>by end of the year. There's quite be some political

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 3>pressure to be out as long as they can find

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>a smoking gun for this stuff.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, this is the sort of time when

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you would expect margins to be falling. You'd be looking

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at the cost pressures, you'd be looking at the pressure

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>on consumers at the same time, and you'd be saying,

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly when you expect the profit cycle to

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>turn and margins to be lower, instead of which they're

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>going up and up again.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean that's interesting. I mean I know that.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean one reason I think that might be the

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>case is simply because I think the consumers are probably

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 3>in better shape than we are given the impression that

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>they are. And so that's one reason why this perhaps

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 3>let's push back against these higher prices. Are you a

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 3>cost respect.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Hang on, are you a cost of living crisis denial? John?

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, I know as much denying that there's a

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 3>course of living crisis, But yes, I'm denying the people

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 3>are in the sort of unable to spend. I mean,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 3>everyone's get jobs, and there are some people are getting

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 3>a certain amount of extra wages, and so far, to

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 3>be fair, they still seem to be able to pay

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 3>their mortgages and things like that as well. I mean,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 3>it's still a lot of fixtrates to come off this year.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Something's got to explain how these companies I mean, I mean,

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 3>the supermarket sector in the UK, like the banking sector,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 3>is pretty competitive, and so if if they're managing to

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 3>push through super super normal profit margin prices, then that

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>means that somebody must be sucking it up somewhere, and

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 3>if the consumer is sucking up, it implies that they

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 3>have enough money to do so. Now I'm not I mean,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I I don't like the idea that people are getting,

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 3>you know, profiteered from due to this kind of confusion,

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 3>and I think that if that's happening, then you know,

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 3>we need to look at it. You know, it's not

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a it's something the politicians should take a week look

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 3>at the fact that it's.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Even about some price control place controls.

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 3>That's a great idea. Always words, let me.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Tell you, Let me tell you about rent controls, which

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we now have in Scotland is an Atholte classic of

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the price control genre. And when they first introduced rent

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>controls for Scotland last year, I think all of those

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>were some vague knowledge of economic history, etc. Again, you know,

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>there's been tried a lot of times before in it

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>never ever ever works. Because if if the market is

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>telling you via high prices that you have maybe too

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>much demand or not enough supply or both, you want

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to policy that either reduces demand or increases supply, right,

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and rent controls do exactly the opposite. Make stuff cheaper,

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you increase demand, reduce the return to suppliers, and you

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>reduce supply. So you know, that seems obvious and it's

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>borne out by many, many case studies. So the Scottish

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>did it anyway, I guess.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 3>What what's harming?

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, do you know what, sten This is the one

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>time it worked because Scotland is special. Now no, it's

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not working for started suppliers, suppliers falling land laws are

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>pulling out, the build to rent suppliers who were just

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning to get reasonably big in Scotland are pulling out

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>or delaying things. Talking about there was a reporter from

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the British Building Federation in which many of the big

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>providers noted that they found Scotland an unattractive place to

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think about investing because of the political risk. And then

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>here's a really interesting little dynamic. You can actually see

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to rents, and despite the fact that they

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>have been frozen, they're still going up because every time

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a property comes to the market again, there's a new

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>roopdris between tenants. The landlords put up the rent as

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>much as they possibly can because they know that their

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>future potential to put at rents is limited. So you'll

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>see in cities Glasgow, Edinburgh, et cetera, rent's going out

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to fifteen percent. And of course when we get

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to the beginning available when you can put your rent

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>up by three percent, everybody will put their rents up

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>by three percent, So the cab becomes a target. Anyway,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I only tell you about it because absolutely standard stuff

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and mostly mostly the results of policies aren't one hundred

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>percent predictable because there are various sort of external forces

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and things can things can turn out differently, but not

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>rent controls. Not rent controls. We have so much evidence.

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean, that's I think that's really interesting because

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 3>for two reasons, like one, actually in areas that aren't

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 3>rent controlled, like you know the rest of the UK,

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 3>it's basically the same dynamic. The landlords aren't generally putting

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 3>rents up for certain tenants because they're just glad they've

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>got a certain tenant and one particularly who's low hassle,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 3>and that's a big deal. You don't really want to

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 3>kick people over a few percent. But as soon as

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 3>people leave, you know, yeah, rents are getting jacked up

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 3>by double digit rates. So the same thing is happening,

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.239
<v Speaker 3>only you don't need to have imposed any event controls.

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>And then the thing about the three percent, it's like,

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 3>as you say, it turns from being a cap and

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 3>a target and everyone can raise it at the same

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 3>time because they all know what the target is. And

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 3>so effectively you've kind of created a massive monopoly market

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 3>because now everyone knows that there's not going to be

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 3>anyone undercutting them because everyone's going to raise their rates

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 3>by three percent exactly at the same time. So the

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 3>tenants are a captive market. So I just I just

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 3>wish people would think about the consequences of the policies

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 3>beyond doing something that sounds good.

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>It's so.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Frustrating.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>It's frustrating, But you know what, here's a prediction for you.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>We have decades of history showing as that rent controls

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>don't work and effect have negative effects. We have a

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>live example, a live case that you can watch in

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>real time in Scotland. You can see it failing. You

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>can read the failure and the numbers. But I bet

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that the calls for rent controls in the rest of

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the UK and around the world will continue. I know

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Sidik can in London has been calling for them.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>You will see more calls for them and you will

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>probably get rent controls in more major cities in the

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>UK because we are so back to the seventies.

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean Sidik's been calling for them since

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 3>before Scotland even introduced their stuff. So yeah, I mean

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 3>he's not going to change, you mean, I mean, yeah,

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>you're good.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but do you know what that tells you landlords?

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And there's messages here, messages I'm going to write about this.

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I in the middle of writing about this,

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>there are messages from Scotland for the rest of the UK.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>All these property bubbles are high price of housing. It

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>makes you want to do something, don't do this. And

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>then there's a message for landlords the government shouldn't do this,

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but it probably will take action.

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, do you do sort of sitting in

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and think, well, look, if I'm a landlord just now

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>and I own a properly then on the one hand, yeah,

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'm going to face a bit of political hassle.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, I'm going to have a semi

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of protected market, and much the same way that

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, Facebook and all the rest of them call

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 3>for regulations whenever they if they're in the dominant position.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 3>So I know, I mean, you know, rent controls are

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 3>in a funny kind of way. They do give you

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 3>that if you know you're going to get a nice

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 3>predictable three percent uplift every single year, and then an

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 3>extra you know, twenty twenty percent every time somebody moves out.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Do you know, maybe it's not such a bad Do

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 3>you know what this has to be?

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>In I can introduce you quite a few people in

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Edinburgh who may want to sell you a too big

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>or that well told.

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks good, thank you.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Marin Talks Money, the podcasting which people who

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>now the market's explain the markets. I'm meren Sunset Web.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>This week's special treat a conversation with Simon Edelson, manager

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Artemist Global Select Fund and co manager of

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the Midwind Investment Trust. Actually, before we get any further Samon,

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>do you know I call it the Midwind Investment Trust,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes I'm tended to call it the Midwind Investment Trust.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the actual real answer, because I hear both all

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, the last time I was in Dundee, which is

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 4>where Midwind Street is, the locals call it Midwind, So

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm sticking with that.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>You're sticking with that, Okay, brilliant. And one of the

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>things that I want to mention before we get started

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is that you have a fabulous where record of spending

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>long periods in the top quartile, etc. So that you've

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>had a very successful career and now you're leaving it.

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>You're retiring at the end of the year and handing

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>all this over, and we'll talk about the person you're

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>handing it over to briefly at the end, so everyone

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>knows whether they should sell immediately or hang onto the

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>long term. But we'll come to that towards the end

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>because Fus, obviously we want to talk about you, so

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us.

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 5>You're welcome to light to be here.

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Good now, I have just been looking, which I didn't

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>mean to, actually, I was just googling the performance of

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>the Midwind Investment Trust so I can see whether it

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>be polite or route to you at the beginning of this,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and I found an interview that we did a couple

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, twenty nineteen, and it was very prescient,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>very prescient, all about you had recently been on stage

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>with the managers of Scottish Mortgage, and you had been

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked a little bit about that because I had

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>also recently interviewed the managers of Scottish Mortgage, and we

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about the importance of growth and how amazing it

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is to be invested in exciting companies which are disruptive

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and growing at speed and doing brilliant things that will

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>lead the world forward, but also about how important it

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is to make sure that you buy those stocks at

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the right price. And you had, I think at the time,

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just sold out of Amazon and a few of those

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar names, and obviously Scottish Mortgage was hanging

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>onto those and you were right.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, yes, we did think that valuations would come under

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 4>pressure a couple of years ago, and so we sold

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 4>a few of our technology shares, which we've made a

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 4>huge amount of money in over the years but we

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 4>just felt that there come points in markets where everyone's

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 4>in the same place, everyone's in the same stocks, everyone's

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 4>pointed in the same direction. Now this doesn't mean these

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 4>companies aren't good. I mean most of them have actually

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>performed very well over the last few years, but the

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 4>share prices have gone down because they were priced to perfection,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 4>and they were priced to perfection also against very very

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 4>artificially low interest rates.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 5>So we'd had very low interest rates before.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 4>The pandemic as a result of the financial crisis at

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 4>the end of the two thousands.

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 5>And then those interest rates kept even lower.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 4>So a lot of what's happened over the last couple

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 4>of years has just been interest rates getting where they

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 4>normally are, inflation getting where it normally is, but quite

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 4>a big all off in the share price of these companies,

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 4>despite those companies still being pretty good businesses.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting, isn't it that over this lengthy period of

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>falling interest rates and brilliantly performing equity markets, large groups

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of people came to believe that their good performance was

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a result of brilliant stock picking and skill, when in

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>fact it was to a large degree a function of that.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>We could come on to central banks in a minute

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>actually talking about this kind of thing, whereas in fact

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it was a function of more global global economic dynamics

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and movements.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm afraid that that's always right. My old boss, Neil's Taup,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 4>who started farm management in nineteen forty six, and I've

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 4>met him when he was about seventy, and one of

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 4>the things he said to me, which always seemed to

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>be a joke but now seems to be less of

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 4>a joke, is that as people get wealthier, it turns

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 4>out that they think that they're cleverer than they were.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, of course, the trouble is that some of

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 4>them were just luck and some of the times we

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 4>live in are easy times to make money. I'm afraid

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 4>the last ten years was an easy time to make

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 4>money until two years ago, and the period we're in

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 4>now is probably going to be a bit more tricky.

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Ask for a bit more certainly, a bit more valuation discipline,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 4>because suddenly we have the option of leaving money in

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 4>the bank. I mean, you'll lose purchasing power if you

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 4>leave money in the bank, but.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 5>At least you get more than nothing.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you saw, I'm sure about the new Apple bank

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>account will not quite bank account, but deposit to arrangement

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>where you can get four point Indeed, now, why would

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you not do that? And also why would you not?

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Why would you not on your investment account? And of

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>course I've done this myself because I had a reasonable

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of cash in my investment accounts, which Harger's landsdown,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>except for we're making a large amount of money from

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>you by paying me no interest at all. And now

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I've moved a doll landed guilts. So you know, as

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>presumably everybody has, and that has consequences, doesn't it.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, well, of course this sort of movement is

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 4>what caused an American bank to fall over, quite a

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 4>small American bank, but all the same, bank failures don't

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 4>come along all that often, and when they do come along,

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 4>one ought to pay attention to them. So this American

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 4>bank called Silicon Valley Bank. He got a couple of

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 4>things wrong, including having a city name, But the main

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 4>thing was the main thing was that the people who

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 4>left the deposits there were all quite switched on and

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 4>all quite plugged in, and so it only took them

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 4>a very short period of time to move their.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 5>Money out of that bank.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 4>Into money market funds and the equivalent of US treasuries

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 4>where they have better security and a high yield. I mean,

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 4>what's not to like. A friend of mine was heady

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 4>skiing in Canada and saw some of the largest depositors

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 4>doing it, moving this money on their iPhones that Friday night.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, we live in a world where the

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 4>frigidities in the system that rudely exposed from time to time,

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 4>and everyone says, well.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 5>Similar things won't happen around the rest of the world.

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 4>And certainly, you know, the credit suitel issues are more

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 4>down bad management than deposits moving around. But if you're

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 4>moving your deposits, and I have to say, I've been

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 4>moving my deposits as well, and I move and I

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 4>check my interest s right on the small cash balances

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 4>we have on the funds to make sure that you're

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 4>getting at least at least three and a half percent

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 4>in the UK at the moment, and I'm afraid most

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 4>people aren't. So that's tip number one, but it is

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 4>it check your deposit account.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 5>I could see that one.

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>That is possibly the most important. I mean, I know

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to say, piles more interesting things as we

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>go on over the next half an hour. But I

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have to say I believe that this is the most

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>important financial advice you can give anyone in the UK

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. If you look at your deposit account,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I bet you will find that you're still making one percent,

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent, possibly significantly less, and you

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>can move that money and make a risk free two

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>or three percent points more in a matter of minutes.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Well I don't know how many minutes it takes to

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>open and your bank account these days, but not very

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>many minutes. And you could do that even as I

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>say in your investment catch, just by buying short, short

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>dated guilts. So if you haven't done that, you're literally

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>throwing money away. You're giving it to the big financial

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>institutions who you will always tell me that you hate

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>every time I talk to the little to hate their bank. Well,

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you can take your revenge now, This

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is the time to take your revenge on the retail

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>banks that you just like so much. Go for it,

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. They may all go bust as a result,

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know whatever, do it anyway, Do it anyway, right, Simon,

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's stick with interest rates and inflation, because this is

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the key dynamic in markets.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>You said a few minutes ago that we're getting to

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the point where interest rates are normalizing and inflation rates

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>are normalizing. They're coming back to where they should be.

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Now that I agree with you. But if you move

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates from the lowest they've been ever back to

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>normal levels, if we think of four to five percent

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as being normal levels, and you do that faster than

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in restrates have ever risen for forty years, you've got

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to break stuff. And everyone is now talking about what breaks,

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>how it breaks, and how long this can go on for.

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and I would be very nervous about that. You

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 4>don't tend to find the unexploded bombs all that quickly.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 4>People like to hide them for a long time. So long,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 4>long periods of low interest rates tend to lead to

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 4>a number of companies which would normally have gone bus

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 4>not going bust. In fact, the furlough loans from our government,

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 4>who might remember, were specifically designed to stop people going

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 4>bus during lockdown and did a very good job.

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 5>But it means.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 4>That the normal failure on average of businesses around the

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 4>world hasn't happened. Where do you want to be careful

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 4>at a time like this, The classic places to be

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 4>careful are real estate investment. Now the real estate shairs

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>in the market have actually fallen so far that I

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>don't think stock markets being silly about this. I mean,

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 4>shares in stocks like land securities are half what they

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 4>were before the pandemic, and actually they haven't borrowed as

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 4>much money as they used to. So that's probably an

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 4>area where people know to worry, and it's right to worry.

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Private individuals, i'm sure will know some young families who've

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 4>recently taken out of mortgage for their first home who

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 4>didn't expect mortgage rates to go up this far, So

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 4>it'll also have an effect, i'm afraid on a few

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 4>unlucky people who weren't expecting mortgage rates to go up,

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 4>and it will squeeze consumer spending later this year, so

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 4>one needs to keep an eye on that. But the

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 4>part of the market which I think is debt funded

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 4>and isn't understood is being debt funded is what I

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 4>call immature technology and immature biotech. So we know that

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 4>the last cycle was built up out of people getting

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 4>very excited about technology stocks and a lot of them

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 4>doing very very well, but they themselves got used.

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 5>To free cash.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 4>They got used to being able to hire very large workforces,

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 4>pay them in shares, and expect to build their business

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 4>and come to the market fairly early to pay everyone off.

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 4>And all of those gates of clothes. The banks aren't

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.479
<v Speaker 4>able to lend them any money, even if they've got

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 4>a good app or a good new drug in development,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 4>and the stock market won't allow them to ipo that early.

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 4>So I'm afraid that there's probably going to be quite

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 4>a lot of quite good businesses out there which just

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 4>going to find their timing very unfortunate. And this is

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 4>in a part of the market most people at the

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 4>moment think is really safe. They think technology is not

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>debt funded. Well, we saw from Silicon Value pank it

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 4>is debt funded. You know, everything has to be paid for.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 4>It's just it's not in loans against real estate, which

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 4>was the classic problem from previous cycles.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>What about the wall of money we keep hearing about

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in the private equity world that is just sitting there

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to pick up all these companies and help them out.

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well it might be a bit stretched, because.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 4>I know that you see an interview every now and

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 4>the chairman of the Midwine Board Professor Russell Napier, who

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 4>now tis no tis from telling anyone who listened, including me,

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 4>that the total amount of debt in the system is

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 4>so much higher than it ever has been. And what

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 4>I find interesting about his point here is that the

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 4>large public companies that I invest in, the Googles of

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 4>this world, the Thermo Fishers of this world, the Seamens,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 4>even these companies actually have got much less debt than

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 4>they've had for most of my career, which is quite

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 4>a long one. So it's not public companies who borrowed

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the debts seems to be in private equity.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 4>And so although the private equity people you know, are

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 4>still around and looking to pick up anything from a

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 4>full seller, and you see the odd bid out there,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 4>one suspects that the total amount that the adjustment that

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 4>they're going to have to face from a zero interest

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.719
<v Speaker 4>rate world to a three and a half percent interest

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 4>rate world could be quite tricky and.

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 5>It's very opaque.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 4>So I suspect that when the unexploded bombs go off,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 4>some of them will be in the private equity world.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 4>But trying to find out where is almost impossible because

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 4>they don't unlike public equity people, they don't have to

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 4>give out that much information.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Mmm. And that is why, of course, too many of

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the private equity trusted RAINI on such what been great discounts,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't it because no one quite trusts what's going on

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>under the bonnet.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 4>And also they will have a lot of these early

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 4>stage growth companies.

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's lots of different sorts of private equity.

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 4>Some take private very old companies like Cabre's, and some

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 4>of them just start up small bar tech and small tech.

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 4>But again, I remember in two thousand and two thousand

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 4>and three, right at the end of the TMT bubble,

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 4>the big quota stops went down first. But even in

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.480
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and three, it was the unquoted s which

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 4>were still being written down, and they had to be

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 4>written down to zero most of the time.

0:25:58.080 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No one wants to write the stuff in their

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>actually portfolio down do this, so the longer they can

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>hold it off, the better.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>And the rules this is where it all gets quite difficult.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 4>But the rules on how you write it down are

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 4>quite hard to apply. Whereas in public markets you just

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 4>look at the share price, the market makes forces you

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 4>to face reality early.

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, let's talk about the listed market then, and

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>when we did that into you. I was talking about

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>earlier in twenty nineteen, one of our big topics of

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation with valuations and how it was very, very hard

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to find any particular sector or geographical market where you

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>could invest and do so at at a price that

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>made long term sense. I think at the time you

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>were still relatively interested in the Japanese market, which was

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>looking relatively cheap. Still is And how has that changed

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years. When you look around, do

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you see more or possibly less that looks reasonable value.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 4>I'd say that valuations are not particularly cheap. I would

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 4>say they're okay. I mean the global equity universe that

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 4>I look is dominated by America and the standard and

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 4>pauses on seventeen times earnings in a yield of one point.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 5>Seven percent for next year.

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 4>So with that hurdle that you can get three and

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 4>a half percent in the bank, going off and buying

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 4>a load of BAC is not the easiest thing to do.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 4>You've got to have a reason to do it. On

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 4>the other hand, three and a half percent in the

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 4>bank is probably going to lose you a bit of

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 4>purchasing power if inflation stays where it is now. The

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 4>good news on inflation, there are two bits to inflation.

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 4>One bit is the cost of living, you know, prices,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 4>and the good news on that is that the oil

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 4>price is a lot lower now than it was a

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>year ago. So we live in a world of eighty

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 4>five dollars brent one hundred and twenty three dollars a

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 4>year ago when Putin went into Ukraine, So we probably

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 4>won't see so much inflation in goods prices this over

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 4>the middle part of this year, over the summer, which

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 4>is good news. On the other hand, wage inflation is

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 4>still holding pretty high and that will feed inflation in

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 4>other areas. So the inflatory pressures are less than they were,

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 4>but they're still high and they still make a difference

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 4>to which stock you want to be in.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 4>So do we think valuations are cheap? We think that

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 4>they're okay. Do we think the world is a safer

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 4>place to go into, Yes, because inflation might have shot

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 4>out even further last year, and it seems now to

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 4>be sort of leveling out a bit but very persistent.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 4>So we're not going to expect interest rates to go

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 4>down anytime soon. So what does that mean in terms

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 4>of stocks and shares? Where you've got you've got to

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 4>buy stocks that are growing, and you've got to buy

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 4>stocks that aren't going to where you're not going to

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 4>give up most of your gains to wage inflation. And

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 4>you've got to buy stocks which don't spend too much

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 4>time talking to their bankers. Now, fortunately there are quite

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of stocks like that, and those stocks are

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 4>generally a little bit more expensive the index, but you

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 4>get a lot more back for the fact that they're

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 4>growing very fast.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's just go back one step, because we keep talking

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>about value evaluations. Let just want to ask briefly, what

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about value, what do you mean? What

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>represents value to you?

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 4>So the two things that I keep an eye on

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 4>are how much free cash flow you get per share

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 4>after all costs, including stop based compensation, which is a big,

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 4>big factor.

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 5>In American companies.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Ignoring stock based comp is one of the biggest errors,

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 4>I think in the last couple of years, because a

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of technology companies have just been paying their staff

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 4>in shares, and when your share price goes down, all

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 4>these people look at their share options and they say,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I haven't got any money, and they're highly paid computer programmers,

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 4>and they're very mobile. So suddenly that stop based compensation,

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 4>which hasn't been a cash deduction from earnings, hasn't been

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 4>a scene as a cost of the business for shareholders. Suddenly,

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 4>if you want to keep your programmers, you've got to

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 4>start paying them some cash. So this happened again in

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and three. So you can suddenly find if

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 4>you don't adjust these earnings figures properly, you can find

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 4>a sudden, very sharp increase in the costs, very sharp

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 4>decrease in what's left over for shareholders. And in the

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 4>case of big companies like Facebook or or Amazon, Amazon

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 4>has I think one point five million employees, many of

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 4>whom are not on high wages, most of whom work

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:26.959
<v Speaker 4>at work in the warehouses.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 5>But they're still facing at a lot of cost inflation.

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 4>And people people in the technology sector are not used

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 4>to modeling for cost inflation. It's not what they're interested in.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 4>So you've got to keep an eye up for that

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 4>sort of thing. I should just add something you mentioned

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 4>by Keyness on Japan. I should mention Japan was dreadful

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 4>last year. I know, so I took my profits, we

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 4>took our profits in the fund in some of these

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 4>technology shares, and we wanted to get better value for money.

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 4>And the other side of the valuation inequities that we

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 4>love is how much book value you get per share,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 4>because if the earnings of a company disappoint, you've still

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 4>got the sort of intrinsic value of the business. So

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 4>we think it's worth trying to work out what would

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.719
<v Speaker 4>this business be worth even in really bad economic conditions.

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 4>And Japanese companies you get a lot of company for

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 4>your money, You get a lot of plant, you get

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of market share. They don't always make a

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of money, but they do dominate certain industries around

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 4>the world, so you have that resilience.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Unfortunately, the end went.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Down a lot last year, and that meant that our

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Japanese investments didn't perform very well. But I am much

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 4>more positive about Asia in general this year, and I

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 4>think one of the things which could be really really

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.719
<v Speaker 4>positive for investors, on top of inflation being under control,

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 4>is just that Asia was still locked down until the

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 4>end of last year, particularly China obviously with the extended

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 4>COVID measures and China coming out of lockdown. Japan coming

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 4>out of lockdown late could be one of the more

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 4>exciting global trends on consumption and industrial demand over the

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 4>next twelve months.

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so Asia is a big theme for you. Yeah,

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>how are you playing that theme?

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 5>So we have double the index waiting in Japan.

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 4>So we have about eleven or twelve percent of the

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 4>midwide pork value in Japanese equities. There are three groups

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 4>of them. We own Japanese banks. Japanese banks would love

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 4>it if inflation persisted because at the moment, interest rates

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 4>in Japan are zero more or less, and so banks

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>prefer to lend it a bit more than zero. So

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 4>if they're ever allowed to lend it a bit more

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 4>than zero, they'll make a lot more money than they

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 4>make at the moment. And then we also own some

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 4>companies in Japan which trade at a discount book value

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 4>and which are under pressure to reorganize themselves, basically to

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.239
<v Speaker 4>sell some of the cross shareholdings that they've had and

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 4>buy back shares, and that would lead to very sharp

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 4>increases in the share prices.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And I to interrupt you to ask you what would

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>make that happen, because we have been telling that story

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for fifteen years, maybe longer, maybe twenty years. We've been

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>telling that story and Ryan Cross shareholding blah blah blah

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. Yeah, and sometimes it happens, but it hasn't

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.239
<v Speaker 1>happened in the volume that maybe you and I might

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have expected. So what's going to make it happen now?

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 4>So the good news here is that for the first

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 4>time in history, yes, the new chairman of the Tokyo

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Stock Exchange has told them all to do this in public, okay,

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 4>And that's what makes a difference. So if you look

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 4>up the nicky newspaper headlines for last week, the new

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 4>chairman of the Tokyo Stock Exchanger sent out a letter

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 4>to over a thousand companies that trade below book value,

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 4>and they've said, all of you should make a public

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 4>announcement of how you're going to reorganize yourself so that

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 4>you don't trade blow book value in future.

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 5>Now you can refuse, you can lose face, which is

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 5>not big into bad.

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.479
<v Speaker 4>But the pressure on them has never been greater, and

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 4>this is quite a big change. The other thing I'd

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 4>say is there were a number of activist investors who

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 4>forced this change last year, and they weren't pushed away

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 4>or frowned on. You know, the establishment in Japan can

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 4>see that they need to make some changes. Whereas there

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 4>was a wave of this around the time Arbey came

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 4>in in twenty twelve, twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, a few

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 4>raiders turned up from America, particularly in private equity, and

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 4>tried to do this, and they were pretty much told

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 4>to go away. And you know, the establishment just said,

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 4>we don't want to, we don't want Japanese business run

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 4>in these dreadful American ways.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 5>And they had some points, you know, because they don't

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 5>you know.

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 4>They're not going to approve of takeovers to lay off

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 4>workers or anything like that. But the pressure at the

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 4>moment is just to improve governance, just to improved shareholder value.

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 5>And the number of stocks you.

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Can buy on that is smaller than it was because

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 4>some of them have already worked. So we've got a

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 4>few of those.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us an example of definitely stockholder's trading

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 1>below book? Very we like examples?

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yes, Well, there's a company called top Hand, which

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 4>used to be called top Hand Printing, and it owns

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 4>lots of lots of controlling stakes in.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 5>Very very good subsidiary companies.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 4>But if it just sold those stakes and used its cash,

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 4>it could cancel half its shares and you'd end up

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 4>with the same business for half the number of shares,

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 4>so the share price would double. It's quite simple, and

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the board has always known this, but they found life

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 4>very comfortable having a wildly over capitalized, very rich business

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 4>which which you know, chugs along. So it's the interesting

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:52.840
<v Speaker 4>thing here is that there were there are two printing

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 4>businesses in Japan. The other one is called Di Nipon Printing,

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 4>and the other one's already done this over the last

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 4>six months and it shares are rap I think, so

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 4>all that they've got to do is not be the

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 4>only one left who hasn't done the right thing.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's and it's core business is solid. So if it

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>sells off all these subsidiary steaks.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, and you don't want to buy something where the

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 4>core business isn't solid. Yeah, it's it's a solid, low

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 4>growth business.

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But I thought you only approved of high growth businesses.

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Literally just told us a matter of three minutes ago.

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 4>No, what I said to you was that I approve

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 4>of high growth businesses if you can find cheap ones, right,

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 4>but during a period of higher inflation, you need a

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 4>balance sportfodio which has some more modest grown companies on

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 4>very low, very very low ratings like this, and also

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 4>balanced with some higher growth businesses which are still not

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 4>bite your hand off cheap. I mean, I'm not going

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 4>to tell you that the well known growth businesses in

0:36:58.280 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 4>the world.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 5>To bite your hand off cheap. I don't think they are.

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 4>So you need some balance in the portfolio. I think

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 4>that that's key now that interest rates are higher.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So if we're looking for cheap and relatively low growth,

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>what about the UK?

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, interestingly so on my list of average multiples of

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 4>stock markets, which is not a good way of doing valuation,

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 4>as you know, because each stock market the average multiple

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 4>is more about the mix than about the stocks in it.

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, so the S and P index in America,

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 4>as I said, is seventeen times earnings, Japan fifteen times earnings.

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Japan used to be more expensive even on just earnings multiple,

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 4>so it's no longer as expensive as it was. And

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 4>then yes, bottom of the class come the UK ten

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 4>times earnings and Hong Kong, which has got problems on.

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Nine times earnings.

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 4>And the reason for that in the UK, as you know,

0:37:57.000 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 4>is the biggest stocks in our index are banks and

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 4>oil companies, mining companies, and they all tend to trade

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>on very low earnings multiples because the earnings go down

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 4>from time to time.

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 5>So when the oil price goes down, you.

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Know, anyone who buys BP on six times earnings needs

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.439
<v Speaker 4>to check whether that's six times earnings when the oil

0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 4>price is very high, because then when the earnings oil

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 4>price goes down, of course it won't be on six

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 4>times earnings.

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 5>It'll be on twelve times earnings.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 4>So you know, so these pee things move around in

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 4>cycnical sectors. And the trouble with the Hong Kong market

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 4>and the UK market is they've got very large, very good,

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 4>but very cyclical stocks in it, so the comparisons are

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 4>not entirely fair. All the same, I have more UK

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 4>stocks now than I've had for years, I have less

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Americans waiting than I've had for years, and I have

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:49.879
<v Speaker 4>more European waiting.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 5>That I have for years.

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:54.720
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I don't think America is full of cheap shares,

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 4>and that's quite a big change from the way in

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 4>which on my way of doing valuation is the way

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 4>in which the market looked between twenty ten and i'd

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 4>say twenty twenty, most of the time we could find

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 4>American businesses which were not a.

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 5>Lot more expensive than the rest of the world.

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we can't, Okay, so let's go back to talking

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about some of the big themes that you're thinking about

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. So we've talked a bit about Asia

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>as a theme, and that's partly on valuation grounds and

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>partly on growth grounds.

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, China reopening will be the really big economic news

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:30.959
<v Speaker 4>this year.

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But you're not actively invested in Chinese stocks themselves.

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 5>You don't need to be.

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 4>So the way we we invest in China were actually

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 4>considerably more exposed to the Chinese economy than the index.

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 4>But we do it through investments in other parts of

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 4>the world, most particularly in luxury goods companies which quoted

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 4>in Europe. So the big biggest holdings in the founder

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 4>companies like Louis v Wuito, which managed to sell yet again,

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 4>managed to tell well, I think twenty percent more handbags

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 4>last year than the year before, and they managed double

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 4>digits the year before the year before that.

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it's an astonishing The.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Mystery is how many hands how many handbags do you have?

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Simon, Yeah, I'm probably I'm probably not the target audience, Marrin,

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 4>So I think you could probably help me on this one.

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I have quite a lot of airbags, but none very none,

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 1>very expensive. I just don't think I can bring myself

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to pay that kind of money for a handbag. Well,

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's an endless mystery to me, the whole thing.

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a mystery to me. But I'm very happy shareholder.

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:38.400
<v Speaker 4>We've owned these shares. This has been the biggest holding

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 4>of the fund since we launched the unit Trust twelve

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 4>years ago. It's the biggest profit we've made over that period.

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 4>So luxury goods sales are one of the classic ways

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 4>of getting exposure to China. We've just bought some shares

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 4>an estate Lorder, which again the Chinese by a lot

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 4>of cosmetics from estay Lord in particular, more than from.

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Loreal w Why why why why why Stayloaders. There are

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>so many amazing Asian makeup and skincare brands. The Koreans

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>are brilliant at their stuff. Why a Staylorder? Are you

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the wrong person to ask? Can't you?

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm possibly.

0:41:21.320 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 1>All you know is that they do not why they.

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 4>I look at the data and I noticed how fast

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:32.439
<v Speaker 4>the sales stopped, I mean literally stopped overnight when zero

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 4>COVID policy was brought in. And it's particularly these are

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 4>sales inland, so it's it's not actually just Chinese people

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 4>traveling to the rest of the world.

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 5>When they go.

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Down to Hainan Island, they buy a lot down there,

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 4>and they buy very high end stuff, and no doubt

0:41:49.239 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 4>they find that the estate order cosmetics particularly work for

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 4>them just as much as they particularly like Hermes and

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Louis Wheat are handbags, and they don't you know, they

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 4>won't pay up so much for other brands.

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 5>So I just trust the data.

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know how they say you'd only invest in

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>things you understand Simon.

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well that would leave me with a very narrow portfolio.

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>What other ways if have you got to get into

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>investing in China without actually investing in China, without taking

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the political risk which comes with being in China itself.

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, the other interesting area has been a lot of

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 4>European companies, major German companies are very successful in China.

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 4>They're more successful in their investments in China, i'd say

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 4>in proportion than some of them have been in America.

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 4>And in the autumn last year, when everyone thought the

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 4>world was going to come to an end and we're

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 4>going to run out of gas and we'd have to turn.

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 5>The lights off.

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 4>In Europe, a lot of these European fantastic European market leaders,

0:42:56.080 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 4>world leaders, we're trading on the lust ratings i've ever

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 4>seen them on. So we bought shares in companies like

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Schneider and Seamens, which will benefit from American growth more

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 4>than Chinese growth, but all the same, they've all got

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 4>good Chinese businesses inside them. And then on top of that,

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 4>American healthcare companies, particularly diagnostic companies, make a decent amount

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 4>of money setting high tech equipment to China. Now, of course,

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 4>in the middle of all this, we've got to be

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:28.919
<v Speaker 4>very careful that you don't invest in a business which

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 4>could get caught between this increasing trade spat between America

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 4>and China. But at the moment there's no sign that

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese. The Chinese may want to argue about semiconductors,

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.439
<v Speaker 4>and I understand their point of view here because they're

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 4>sort of being locked out, but that doesn't mean to

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 4>say they're going to stop buying American diagnostic equipment or

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 4>insulin made by Novo Nordisk. I mean they're still open

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 4>to trade with the world, particularly in areas where you

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 4>know your company makes stuff that they want. Making sure

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 4>that you're investing mainly in businesses have got a really

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 4>powerful market position like that is important quite outside the

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 4>Chinese environment. This is about in a difficult world which

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 4>will no doubt face some more problems in future.

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>What about India. Indian population overtaking the Chinese population, and

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>for years we've been talking about India as about to

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:22.479
<v Speaker 1>break through, about to be that, you know, the fastest growing,

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:25.480
<v Speaker 1>greatest economy ever except and quite happened. But it feels

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like with everyone wanting possibly to shift some of their

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>investments from China towards other developing countries that now might

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.240
<v Speaker 1>be India's time invested there.

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 5>We're not.

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 4>We do have licenses to invest there, and we've missed out.

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it was the best performing emerging market last year,

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 4>so I can't claim it's been a good idea.

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 5>There are two troubles I've had with India.

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:50.959
<v Speaker 4>Firstly, I find all of the best companies I find

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 4>very very expensive. Indeed, there's a very large domestic investing public,

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.040
<v Speaker 4>and so that public can't take their money out of

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 4>India easily and invested around the rest of the world.

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 4>So that's probably one of the reasons why the shares

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 4>tend to look expensive. And then secondly, if India does

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 4>open up to trade more, it could always they'll always

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 4>be losers as well as winners. And so you know,

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 4>everyone in the world keeps knocking on India's door saying,

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 4>would you like to join this trade agreement that trade agreement?

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Trade with us more?

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 4>But they've generally got a domestic industry that they know

0:45:26.800 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 4>might be quite fragile if it was opened up, and

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 4>you don't want to be invested in them.

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, not India, then other Asian economies that are interesting.

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 5>I think one thing.

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm very underweight emerging markets at the moment,

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 4>and I think it's important I just go back to

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 4>what I said earlier about the total weight of debt

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 4>in the world.

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Being very very high.

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Although I think that this is a perfect good time

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 4>to invest in equities and to invest in very strong equities,

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't see any point in taking any risks you

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:03.799
<v Speaker 4>don't have to take because the trouble is, we've got

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 4>this background of massive amounts of debt, massive amounts of

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 4>government debt. We haven't got markets where central banks are

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 4>supporting the market anymore because they're trying to stop doing

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 4>this bond buying that they've been doing for fifteen years.

0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 4>In some cases, like in Japan, they're running out of

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 4>bonds to buy, so they have to stop at some point.

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 5>So the shock.

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Absorbers in the system have gone away. And although at

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:30.000
<v Speaker 4>the moment I can see quite a rosy scenario for

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:33.160
<v Speaker 4>this year, the trouble is if anything bad did happen,

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 4>and always something happens that you can't expect. Saint Putin

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 4>got much rougher and in Ukraine and wasn't prepared to

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 4>let this warfizzle out, or say that the next attempt

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 4>by Opek to cut oil production really did take the

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.359
<v Speaker 4>oil price up again. Markets would fall quite sharply and

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 4>companies were find it quite difficult. So my policy at

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 4>the moment is safety first, and I'm afraid that that

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 4>just you know, if you can find a developed market

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 4>company on a sensible rating which will which will grow

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 4>nicely for you over the years, why go any further.

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I think that's a good way of looking at though.

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say that your professor Napier is very keen

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on Asian equities at the moment, so maybe we'll come

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:19.840
<v Speaker 1>back to that with him another time. Now, there are

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 1>few more things that I want to I want to

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>ask you, But the first one is about he wrote.

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:27.240
<v Speaker 4>He wrote, he wrote the book about the shape gradation

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 4>crisis and made me read it.

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He did it. We all read it, and extremely good.

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It is too highly recommended, by the way listeners have had.

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Anything written by Red Napier is highly recommended. I wanted

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about ESG. Now, we've talked about ESG

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the past and ESG overlays on portfolios, et cetera,

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. But the last couple of years, and the

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>last year in particular, have shown us many of the

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses of the approach that lots of fund managers have

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>taken to ESG, and things that were not considered to

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be ESG friendly only eighteen months ago are now considered

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to be very very ESG friendly. I give you defense, etc.

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>And you can even now and I do make an

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>excellent argument for fossil fuels being ESG friendly. Well, I mean,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>if you would take the S seriously and you'd like

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>people's living standards to be maintained, then obviously you should

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>consider the fossil fuel industry as part of that. Anyway,

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 1>moving on from that, because I hate mail by the

0:48:21.880 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>way to usual address, Simon. Have you changed your approach

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to ESG over the last couple of years or do

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you think that there are changes that people should be

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 1>taking into account.

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:36.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm delighted to say we haven't changed our approach at all,

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:42.479
<v Speaker 4>because it was perfect. Because we've thought about these things

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:48.320
<v Speaker 4>quite seriously, and we've seen the ESG agenda go from

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 4>not taking it seriously to coming up with a sort

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 4>of prescription based, bizarre, totally impractical tick list and now

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 4>perhaps in ways back to where we started.

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 5>So the ESG score on our funds when all.

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 4>This first started about five years ago, came through and

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:11.760
<v Speaker 4>it turned out that we were top decile.

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 5>I think, amongst all funds, and we.

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Just said, oh, that's interesting. We've never looked at it

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 4>that way. But of course, we don't invest in bad

0:49:19.239 --> 0:49:23.879
<v Speaker 4>businesses that pollute the planet because they're bad, and why

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 4>would we. And then amazingly as you say, a couple

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 4>of years ago, our ratings started going down because we

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:35.759
<v Speaker 4>own things like copper mines that you need in order

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 4>to do the energy transition.

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 5>You can't do it without copper. It's quite simple.

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 4>And yes, we own a gas company now in the

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Investment Trust, because the Western world needs secure sources of

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.440
<v Speaker 4>gas so it doesn't rely on Russia. And you know,

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 4>getting hydrocarbon prices up for poor people is not an

0:49:56.640 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 4>acceptable policy. It doesn't mean to say that and that

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.800
<v Speaker 4>zero is undoable. It's just you've got to be practical

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 4>about how long it's going to take, how much it's

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 4>going to cost, and make sure that voters go with you.

0:50:10.000 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 5>And so we think we've run a balance approach here.

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 5>We have a large.

0:50:13.880 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 4>Amount of the fund invested in energy transition companies that

0:50:18.120 --> 0:50:19.640
<v Speaker 4>will help energy transition.

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 5>We have a particular holding that I'm very proud of,

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 5>which is.

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Well plea hopeful for let's put it this way, which

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:30.359
<v Speaker 4>is Panasonic. Yes, again a Japanese company, but it's one

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 4>of Tesla's biggest battery makers, and it's never managed to

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:36.800
<v Speaker 4>make much money out of this. But you can imagine

0:50:36.840 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 4>with this massive bill that Biden's passed in America to

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 4>encourage energy transition in general and more use of electric vehicles.

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Panasonic's got two of the biggest battery plants in America,

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 4>one of them joint venture with Tesla. They're going to

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 4>be paid for making a lot more batteries and they're

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:54.359
<v Speaker 4>going to be a lot more profitable for it. And

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:56.920
<v Speaker 4>it trades on twelve times earnings. You know, you get

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.439
<v Speaker 4>a lot of company for your money. And of course

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:03.160
<v Speaker 4>the America American investors have looked through Wall Street for

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:06.719
<v Speaker 4>companies that will benefit from the Inflation Reduction Act, but

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 4>most of them don't, you know, they have never looked

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 4>at Panasonic. It's in Japan, you know, So you missed

0:51:11.760 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 4>this out. And then we balance it with companies like

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 4>First Soda, which is the biggest soda panel industrial soda

0:51:18.719 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 4>panel maker in America, which is a very expensive stock.

0:51:22.160 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 4>It's probably the most expensive stock in the portfolio. But again,

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 4>going back to what I was saying, energy transition will happen.

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 4>I think people are getting closer to being realistic about

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:35.799
<v Speaker 4>the cost and the time scales. The time scales may

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:38.759
<v Speaker 4>not be what the scientists want, but they have to

0:51:38.760 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 4>be what the politics. I'm afraid and the business reality

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 4>will allow.

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, it also has to be a balance between the

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>short term, the medium term, and the long term. You know,

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we can't plunge everybody into poverty in the shortened medium

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>term for a constantly shifting long term target. As I say, hey,

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:58.480
<v Speaker 1>mail to the normal address, can I ask you, simon,

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>have you got any investments tall in the upgrading of

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:05.560
<v Speaker 1>electricity grids of the national grade for example? I mean,

0:52:05.760 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm currently obsessed with the fact that our national grid

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:10.879
<v Speaker 1>was put up, you know, one hundred of years ago

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with the idea of taking empower from a set number

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of large power stations, and now finds itself taking in

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:20.280
<v Speaker 1>power from tens of thousands of different smaller energy producers,

0:52:20.360 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be they off sure wind farms or you know, your

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>second cousin's solar panel on their roof, et cetera. And

0:52:25.640 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>it makes it an incredibly fragile thing, which is also

0:52:29.800 --> 0:52:32.240
<v Speaker 1>someone's pointing out to me the other day, the global

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>national electricity grid is the largest thing that humankind has

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:40.120
<v Speaker 1>ever created, the biggest thing ever ever, and yet in

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 1>most developed countries it's also horribly, horribly out of date

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and in no way whatsoever fit for purpose. So this

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to me to be one of the greatest investment

0:52:48.160 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there is participating in the upgrade of this global

0:52:53.880 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out of date network. Anything in that I.

0:52:56.200 --> 0:52:58.239
<v Speaker 4>Couldn't agree with you more, I love that couldn't agree

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 4>with you more so. Semensddly Enough, which I've mentioned already,

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 4>is one of the biggest. It's one of the first

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 4>companies you'll ring up if you want your grid mended

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:10.280
<v Speaker 4>an updated, and it's about a third of the businesses

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 4>GID into that. And secondly, if you have lots of

0:53:14.160 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 4>little wind farms around a grid and they produce wind

0:53:17.600 --> 0:53:19.359
<v Speaker 4>in the middle of the night when nobody needs it,

0:53:19.440 --> 0:53:23.400
<v Speaker 4>what do you need to store the electricity batteries? Thus

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 4>Panasonic again, so that's the combination you really need. In

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.799
<v Speaker 4>the investment trust, we also have a holding in a

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:36.880
<v Speaker 4>UK battery company called Gore Street, which is a investment

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 4>trust which just owns battery storage in the UK and

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 4>pays a six and a bit percent yield every year

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 4>for helping manage the British grid to and it's also

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 4>been investing. It's brought some battery storage plants in America,

0:53:50.480 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 4>in Texas actually, and also in Germany because again going

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 4>back to the engineering reality of this, as you say,

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 4>people have talked about grid grid improvements for at least

0:54:03.880 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 4>twenty years, but it actually seems to be happening now.

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, it has to happen now, I mean, it has

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It's the core part of the energy transition.

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Without full on grid upgrade, yep, everything else is pointless.

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I couldn't agree more so.

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean we have a nice exposure of that,

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.360
<v Speaker 4>and that covers that, you know, that covers two of

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.919
<v Speaker 4>the really big areas we've talked about. Emerging market consumers.

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 4>We invest in We invest in energy transition. We invest

0:54:32.440 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 4>in automation that I've talked to you about before, which

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, just inflation of course, particularly wage inflation, pushes

0:54:40.040 --> 0:54:43.960
<v Speaker 4>people to invest more in robotics and plant automation, but

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 4>also automations coming into other industries like agriculture, even surgery.

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Robots are getting cleverer, smarter. And then the other big

0:54:53.120 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 4>area we invest in this healthcare because I'm afraid the

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 4>healthcare costs of the world are going to carry on

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:00.560
<v Speaker 4>being one of the main drivers of econ mis tax

0:55:00.560 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 4>spending policy, certainly for the next twenty five years. And

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:10.840
<v Speaker 4>then a funny sort of way, the pandemic actually was

0:55:10.880 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 4>a period which wasn't very stressful for the health service.

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 4>This may covers a shop for people, but of course

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 4>most of us didn't go anywhere near a hospital for

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 4>two years.

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:22.640
<v Speaker 1>No. I did actually go near a couple of hospitals,

0:55:22.680 --> 0:55:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's absolutely amazing how little was going on, absolutely nothing, nothing.

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, we were told stairway, We did stairway,

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:34.960
<v Speaker 4>and we saved a few people's lives, you know, the

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:35.719
<v Speaker 4>people who had to go.

0:55:36.239 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 5>Unfortunately, of course they did a very good job of saving.

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.720
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, we're back now to the normal dynamic which

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 4>fed spending in this area, or demand in this area

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:52.319
<v Speaker 4>of an aging population which expects top class treatment, and

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:54.880
<v Speaker 4>there are lots of very high quality companies one can

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 4>invest in.

0:55:55.440 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, Simon, I don't think there's an old person

0:55:57.360 --> 0:56:00.360
<v Speaker 1>left in the UK who expects top quality treatment, Like

0:56:00.480 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>top quality treatment, what do you think they actually expect? Yeah, exactly.

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. I feel that people do expect it,

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:12.440
<v Speaker 5>and then.

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Well then they've got a world of disappointment ahead, haven't they.

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that I don't know.

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean it's a different subject, but just on the

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 4>investment side, the great thing is that there's a such a.

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:29.280
<v Speaker 5>Long list of really high quality companies.

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 4>But in healthcare, I tend to avoid the drug companies

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:39.799
<v Speaker 4>because the drug companies businesses inventing cures for things that

0:56:39.840 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 4>there aren't good cures for at the moment, which are

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:45.319
<v Speaker 4>often very rare diseases and where you need to spend

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:47.319
<v Speaker 4>a very large amount of money on a very small

0:56:47.400 --> 0:56:50.399
<v Speaker 4>number of patients to cure them. And I just think

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:54.280
<v Speaker 4>that the system won't be spending money on that because

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 4>the money will be needed for old fashioned care, proven technology,

0:56:59.400 --> 0:57:02.839
<v Speaker 4>old fashioned technology, a lot more diagnostics, a lot more

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 4>medical equipment, hits and knees, you know, hearing aids, hips

0:57:06.600 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 4>and knees.

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I need knees. Someone give them your knees. Now, listen,

0:57:09.400 --> 0:57:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what's your top healthcare holding?

0:57:11.880 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 4>So I think the best one for me on this

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, anyway, is the one I've probably mentioned

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 4>today anyway. It's Sonova, which is one of the world's

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:24.160
<v Speaker 4>biggest hearing aid companies, and the world of people who

0:57:24.200 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 4>need hearing aids because they're feeling a bit stressed on

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 4>the on their personal account because the cost of living.

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 4>None of them upgraded, they're hearing it. Few of them

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:38.360
<v Speaker 4>upgraded their hearing aids last year, and they're all coming

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 4>back to do it this year because everyone feels a

0:57:40.280 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 4>bit more confident and people are going out more and

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:45.040
<v Speaker 4>the hearing aids keep getting better.

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:47.320
<v Speaker 5>These are the teeny little digital.

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Ones which need tuning up to your ear, but which

0:57:49.960 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, are a massive improvement on the old hearing aids,

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 4>which were basically just loud speakers stuck in ero and

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 4>these these shares. You know, there are three or four

0:57:59.720 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 4>company is in the world that make the really good

0:58:01.640 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 4>hearing aids, the many European companies, many most of them

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:10.440
<v Speaker 4>are based in the Benilux. And yeah, I mean that

0:58:10.520 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 4>the trend at the moment seems to be that people.

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Are going back to getting their hearing sorted.

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 4>And that's before you get all the people who've been

0:58:18.280 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 4>on the tube with their EarPods in for the last

0:58:20.920 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty years.

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Is that music?

0:58:22.960 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to product the demand for hearing is?

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Apple is going to release a hearing

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>aid product?

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:30.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think.

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I mean it absolutely standard brilliant corporate policy

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to create a need for a product and then build

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the product something to work. You heard it here.

0:58:40.680 --> 0:58:43.880
<v Speaker 4>First they they are to get a hearing aid that

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 4>can yeah, that can bluetooth.

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:48.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. Perhaps hearing aids can't.

0:58:47.920 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Bluetooth into your iPhone. I have no idea why not.

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 4>But if they don't, now it probably won't be them.

0:58:53.960 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 4>It'll be you know, snover who will make a hearing

0:58:56.320 --> 0:59:00.720
<v Speaker 4>aid which has good bluetooth and whilst the other thing

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:01.800
<v Speaker 4>noise cancelation.

0:59:01.920 --> 0:59:04.240
<v Speaker 5>That'll be the thing. The noise cancelation is actually part

0:59:04.280 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 5>of how hearing his work. Yes, sorry, go into this.

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're going another tangent, tangent alert, tangent. Look, we've

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:14.400
<v Speaker 1>got calling into this. I always say post didn't be

0:59:14.440 --> 0:59:16.600
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty five minutes or people get terribly bored.

0:59:16.720 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But you've been a bit longer than that, and I

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>know they won't. We got bored for a second. So

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:24.240
<v Speaker 1>last question, Oh god, I said we were going to

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about the person taking over from you, the trust,

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what, We're not going to do that. They're

0:59:27.680 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have to read about that on the internet

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at a later date. But here you are, you heading

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:34.880
<v Speaker 1>off into retirement. You can dig into that portfolio of

0:59:34.960 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 1>yours at midwind and you can take one stock with you.

0:59:37.520 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Which one would it be? Oh?

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 5>I think, I think.

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:44.200
<v Speaker 4>I think the best company for the future that I've

0:59:44.200 --> 0:59:47.960
<v Speaker 4>got in the fund is Thermo Fisher, world's leading scientific

0:59:48.000 --> 0:59:50.840
<v Speaker 4>equipment makers. One of the cleverest companies I've ever met,

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 4>one of the best managed.

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Not cheap, but who cares?

0:59:54.240 --> 0:59:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Simon, not cheap? Is that the right way to win?

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>It'll do. Thank you so much joining us today, and

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I hope that we will talk again before you slide off.

1:00:04.000 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Actually maybe a little short interview at the end of

1:00:06.600 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the year, but thank you for joining us.

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:09.360
<v Speaker 5>You're welcome.

1:00:15.400 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to this week's Marin Talks Money. We

1:00:17.800 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>will be back next week. In the meantime, if you

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>like our show, do please rate, review, and subscribe wherever

1:00:23.480 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your podcast. And I repeat the bit

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>if you like our show. If you don't like our show,

1:00:28.400 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>please do not mention it to anybody. This episode was

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>hosted by me Maren Sumset Web. It was produced by

1:00:35.080 --> 1:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Saasadi and Mohammad Faruk. Additional editing by Blake Maples. Special

1:00:39.560 --> 1:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Simon Edleston and to John Steppek. And finally,

1:00:42.840 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>do not forget to sign up to John's daily newsletter,

1:00:45.960 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Money Distilled. The link is in this show notes. Do

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sign up. You definitely won't regret it.