WEBVTT - Trump Admin Looks to Save Spirit Airlines

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>He's done on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>The White House is pretty busy these days, not only

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the Warren Iran, but they're also playing a

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 2>big role here in Spirit Airlines, embattled in its second

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>bankruptcy in about one year.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Who wants to own an airline?

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, maybe the US government is going to own a

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>stake in the airline.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in George Ferguson.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>He is our senior aviation aerospace defense analysts here at

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 4>George.

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>The reporting right now is the White House is close

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>to reaching a financial rescue package for Spirit, and we're

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 2>hearing that disagreement would offer up to five undred million

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars in financing an exchange for warrants to purchase stock.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Is this kind of out of the Great Financial Crisis

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>playbook of bailing out a company?

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 5>It sort of seems out of almost the pandemic playbook,

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 5>right and the pandemic. We decided we couldn't let any

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 5>airlines fail and so came in to support them. Not

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 5>sure why we need to do it here, you know,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 5>I think that the market has certainly recovered, the airline

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 5>markets recovered since then. I think that there's probably too

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 5>much capacity right now in the US market, and that's

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 5>that's why some airlines are having problems generating profits. Spear

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 5>at the tip of that spear having the most problems

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 5>generating profits, and so it seems to me that we

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 5>again need to cut down a capacity. So, you know,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 5>having some some airlines leave the business is probably the

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 5>sort of the right way to fix it. But I

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 5>guess the white House fields differently.

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 3>That's kind of where I want to go, George. I mean,

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>what's the what's the marketplace telling us here? It just

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>seems like, well, not one of these big three airlines.

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>It's just a tough business. I mean, is there a

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>market for some of these more regional, lower cost airlines.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 5>I think there is, right, but the market has definitely

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 5>turned I think against sort of most harshly against these

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 5>low cost carriers, right because I think, really, you know,

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 5>right now, the sort of the state of play in

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 5>the US airline businesses, you need a strong loyalty program,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 5>so you need to be able to put a credit

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 5>card in the hands of your loyal flyers. They're using

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 5>that credit card for dinners, groceries, everything else. You're selling

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 5>the credit card company miles, which is boosting your profits,

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 5>which you can use to support the flying business. And

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 5>then the big full service carriers, you know, they get

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 5>they also have the premium I think there's a lot

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 5>of premium travelers, a lot of baby boomers who've retired

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 5>business travelers who will pay more for the front of

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 5>the airplane and the back of the airplane seems very competitive.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 5>They're using those loyalty programs and that premium revenue to

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, subsidize the back of the airplane to a degree.

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 5>So again telling me that there's just too much basic

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 5>economy capacity, having Spirit leave the market would be one

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 5>way to get rid of some of that basic economy capacity.

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing airlines start to reduce capacity as well because

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 2>of the higher costs from fuel. Does that bring us back,

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 2>bring us more back into balance.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 5>It's a beginning for it's the beginning of that of

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 5>that process, absolutely right. And so Spirit had its problems

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 5>before the Iran wars. So again that's why I think

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 5>it's more a you know, the market really does have

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 5>too much capacity. I think now for however long we're

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 5>going to see these much higher fuel prices, the market

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 5>has even more excess capacity.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 5>So look, if we if we return to you know,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 5>two dollars a gallon jet fuel, I think a lot

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 5>of these airlines that are starting to take some capacity

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 5>out would take those park planes, put them back in service,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 5>and we'd be off to the races. But at these

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>higher fuel prices, the airlines have to push through price increases.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 5>And you know the economics of that is when something

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 5>costs more less is demanded and the airlines are seeing it,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 5>they can't get fares to rise enough to cover that

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 5>increased fuel price. With this levelcity capacity in the marketplace,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 5>and we saw United, we saw Delta, we saw Alaska,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 5>all announced cutting back at least growth plans. Nobody's cutting

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 5>in to you know, capacity levels that they flew last year.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Starting to cut growth plans more more probably has to happen.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Georgia United airlines at some numbers and they reduce their

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>for your guidance, now, this looks like an earning sestment

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 3>like I would put out between seven and eleven dollars

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 3>a share. You can drive a seven forty seven through that, George,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 3>does that just reflect the uncertainty they have and kind

0:04:58.760 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of their whole p and L.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it's a wide range. And you know,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 5>United has really gone to the less is more on

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>the guidance world. So every other airline will give us

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 5>a sense of what the cost available seat mile could be, right,

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 5>they'll talk to us about where operating margins could be.

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 5>United for the last I think it's about a year now,

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 5>they just throw an EPs at us, a wide EPs,

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 5>and they're like, yeah, you guys, go figure it out.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 5>So they're the poster child for less is more in

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 5>the guidance world. And yeah, that's what they gave us

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 5>this time too.

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of how they figured they're going to play

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 4>the game.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Boeing, which narratives cash burn in the

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>first quarter because of rising deliveries.

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>How did these summers look to you?

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean they looked as expected, all right, and

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 5>so look, you know, the progress towards the recovery at

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Boeing continues, lowering cash burns always great. The defense business

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 5>showed a profit, which was nice. Global Services continues to

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 5>ring the bell, you know, eighteen percent margins. We love

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 5>that business. It's a little bit of a black box.

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 5>You don't always know what's going on there, but I

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 5>hope it just keeps going. And the commercial airplane side,

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 5>Spirit Aerosystems got folded in at the end of the year,

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 5>and we would have expected a better result at a

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 5>commercial airplane until Spirit got rolled in. And so there's

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 5>some work to do down at Spirit. Bowing said, go figure.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 5>They were buying fuselages for more than Spirit can make

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 5>them for or less than Spirit can make our force.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.239
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Coarcklay and Android

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk a little tech here.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Why not? It's always in the news. Ed Ludlow, He's

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 3>in town, usually based there in Silicon Valley Peer three.

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 3>I think it is at Bludlow b Tech co host

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Joints us here in our studio, ed, do I need

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>to pay attention to this Anthropic Mythos model being accessed

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 3>by authorized users? I'm not a Mythos user, but how

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>should I think about it?

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 7>You should pay attention. How confused are you all this

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 7>by the ongoing story?

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought it would like people couldn't use it in

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the government, but the government is also coming out with

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 2>rules on how to use it.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 7>I really sympathize with everyone that's reading about this and

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 7>listening to us talk about it. It's so complicated, But okay.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 7>There is a community of people who are hang out

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 7>on discord, which is a platform for programmers, and one

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 7>of these people, a single individual, was a contractor who

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 7>had a contractor relationship with Anthropic and therefore had credentials

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 7>to access Mythos. Mythos is a general purpose AI model,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 7>but it's very good at detecting vulnerabilities in source.

0:07:58.360 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Code, so it's like a chat GPT.

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 7>It's the underlying model, but its primary competence is that

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 7>it can go through really big bodies of code. Take

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 7>for example, bank banks are built on lots of software,

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 7>and it can quickly go through that software code base

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 7>and say ah, I've found a flaw and I know

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 7>how it could be exploited, and if I wanted to,

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 7>I being the model, I could exploit it. So what

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 7>we know is that this contractor with some a merry

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 7>band of fellows and colleagues from this community got access

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 7>around April seventh. It was supposed to be a very

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 7>limited release to the biggest tech companies and banks, so

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 7>a group of maybe forty entities, so it was supposed

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 7>to be closed off. They did not use it for

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 7>anything malicious. Actually, the other thing the model is really

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 7>good at is making websites, so it's just very good

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 7>at generating software. The concern is they should not have

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 7>had access. They were unauthorized. How could that have possibly happened?

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 7>And this is good old fashioned kind of hacking. They

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 7>did use credentials, that's so important. I keep underscoring that

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 7>this person had access but shouldn't have used it.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe companies should hire full time staff rather than use

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 2>contractors who have no loyalty to the company.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Just the thought.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 7>But they also used logic and were like, where do

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 7>we think that the code for the model itself is hosted?

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 7>And they went through the internet slewth thing is the

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 7>word we've used in the story and found it, and

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 7>so it's completely bizarre. The net result is that Anthropic

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 7>has confirmed that this has happened, they didn't do anything

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 7>malicious with it, and that it was within the sort

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 7>of closed confines of this contractors. They could have, but

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 7>they could have. And so here's the hypothetical. What if

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 7>a bad actor, this could be a state level piece

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 7>of espionage, It could be a malicious group of hackers.

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 7>What if they got access through the same mechanisms and

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 7>did something actually bad with it.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's one thing to hack some code back

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 3>in the day. It's another thing to get access, as

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 3>you were saying, to this type of technology, which I

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 3>don't think we as users, certainly the regulators in Washington,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine know exactly how powerful this can be. Yeah,

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean you could paint some really dire scenarios.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 7>The reason I'm sympathetic with the audience is that we

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 7>use blanket terms like cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a good thing,

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, it's the defense against potential catch up, right,

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 7>and so like, let's make this really simple. It's a model.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 7>A user can say to the model, here is a

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 7>very big body of code, the code of a bank,

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 7>go through it and find vulnerabilities. Now, the Fed and

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 7>the Treasury want those banks to do this proactively so

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 7>they can find the flaws and patch them to d risk.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 4>So it's a race to see who can get to

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:47.959
<v Speaker 4>it first.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 7>But what if there were a bad actor? So this

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 7>is the hypothetical, and it is a hypothetical. There's no

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 7>evidence that there is yet a malicious actor out there

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:59.599
<v Speaker 7>that has access to this. It's so complicated. But the

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 7>into is that the model can go through lots of

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 7>code much more quickly, in more detail, and find things

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 7>that an army of humans cannot do at least as quickly.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:10.959
<v Speaker 7>That's the basics of what we're talking about.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us.

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>All right, here's a headline. When I read this morning,

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, are we back in the nineteen nineties, Deutsche

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Telecoms seeks to build number one carrier T Mobile deal.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is the stuff we were doing back

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>at Salomon Brothers and Credit Swiss, back in the day

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>when telecoms were just buying and selling each other left

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and right, and spending money which.

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 4>We as opposed to being a utility business.

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what we like to fund those people because they

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 3>are capital intensive.

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 4>So it's teching him. John Bler.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>He knows what's going on out there. He covers all

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 3>the telecoms for a Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, John, did this

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>surprise you this morning to see that Deutsche Telecom is

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 3>maybe thinking to buy the whole thing out there in

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 3>T Mobile.

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 8>I think the timing was a little surprising, Paul, I

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 8>didn't expect it, sort of out of the blue. It

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 8>came midday yesterday Bloomberg reported that taught the Deutsche Telecom

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 8>was considering this move, and as you said, it's kind

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 8>of back to the future with this mega merger. Here.

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Keep in mind, Deutsche Telecom is the parent of T Mobile.

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 8>They own fifty three percent of the company and have

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 8>for a while. They have fifty six percent I think

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 8>of the voting rights here, So what they're really after

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 8>is Europe is a much more mature market than the US,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 8>and so T Mobile has been a real profit engine

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 8>for them, and I think they're looking to sort of

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 8>boost their profits by bringing in T Mobile into the

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 8>fold as one hundred percent holding.

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Is this something that regulators in Germany and here in

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the US would be okay with?

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 8>That is the big question mark scorelet. It's going to

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 8>be really interesting to see how the current administration here

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 8>in the US reacts to it. I can't speak to Germany,

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 8>but I do believe here in the US they may

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 8>look at it and say, gee, do we really want

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 8>a foreign entity holding one hundred percent of T Mobile

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 8>which has US license spectrum licenses across a broad swath

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 8>at different frequencies, and it's you know, they would have

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 8>obviously control over the customer relationships, call it eighty five million,

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 8>I think at T Mobile. So I don't want to

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 8>second guess the administration and how they're going to react

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 8>to it, but my sense is there might be some

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 8>pushback there. The US may even seek some sort of

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 8>a deal with Deutsche Telecom to you know, favorable terms,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 8>if you want to think of it that way, to

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 8>clear the path for getting the deal done in.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 3>The Bloomberg News reporting today on this story. US congress

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 3>and Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Tuesday that the US government would look at the details

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>of any deal. Quote, A foreign company taking over TA

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Mobile will get our staff's attention end quote. He said,

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 3>So there's certainly gonna be something from the congressional side here.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Would do you think that would Deutsche Telecom's full ownership?

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Would that mean anything to Charlie Pellett, who's a Tea

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Mobile customer? And are you a T Mobile customer?

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 6>Scarlett?

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 3>And Scarlett's a T Mobile customer and.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 8>Scarlet, so I'm a Verizon customer, but I do have

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 8>a single line with T Mobile. It is a great network.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 8>I look at a combination in the scale that comes

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 8>with it, and I see potential for investing more heavily

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 8>in the network. I think they would have access to

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 8>greater source of funds, they would have greater leverage over

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 8>suppliers potentially, so they would get better deals on equipment,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 8>lowering their cost capital. So from that standpoint, Paul, I

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 8>think we could see real uplift in T mobiles network.

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 8>They've been investing in it over the years and have

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 8>done a very good job of building out five G

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 8>coveraging capacity, but that's an ongoing process, right, so you

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 8>would you know, you're constantly investing there, and you're constantly

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 8>seeking more funds to be able to do more on

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 8>that front, and I think a deal would favor that.

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 8>So Charlie can rest assured that his service would probably

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 8>get a lot better, not worse.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Than the I like hearing that, John.

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Where does that leave the number one player in the

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 2>telecom space here in the US, which is AT and T.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>It just reported earnings. Wireless service revenue did come up

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 2>short in the last quarter, it.

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 8>Did, Scarlet. I think investors should look beyond that. In

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 8>two Q we're going to see a price increase across

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 8>the base, which is going to lead to higher wireless

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 8>service revenue. The one thing that AT and T has done,

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 8>and I suspect for Rizing and T Mobile are doing

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 8>exactly the same, is they're relying more on subscriber growth

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 8>now to drive the revenue equation as opposed to driving

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 8>up rates. So again positive for consumers. We're going to

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 8>see fewer price increases, although, as I said just a

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 8>second ago, AT and T is implementing a price increase

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 8>on some of the older plans starting in two Q

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 8>so that'll help to lift that wireless service revenue, but

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 8>you don't have that dual engine of rate increases and

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 8>subscriber growth at work.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Earnings out again for a lot of companies this week.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 3>This is a big week. Philip Marsh International Alison better

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 3>than expected numbers. The stocks up about six point six

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>percent today, so a big move for that stock. It's

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 3>up about two percent year today. Let's break down the

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 3>numbers from Philip Marsh, Ken Sha Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Consumer

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Products Analyst joints us here Ken. What's driving Philip marsh

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 3>businesses these days?

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 6>Well? Philip Morris today a late any fears that some

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 6>competitive activity with their oral nicotine products into the US

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 6>is going to derail them hitting their numbers. They didn't.

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 6>They beat their numbers handily. Top line up nine percent

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 6>EPs up sixteen helped a bit by currency, but the

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 6>underlying business is healthy cigarettes. Unexpectedly, or I should say

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 6>as expected, volumes are down as the long term secular

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 6>decline continues, but pricing was up eight percent over the

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 6>year of a year smoke free products top line was

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 6>up strong. Gross margins are about seventy percent. And so

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 6>the big picture is that they're on plan with their

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 6>transformation to move away from legacy cigarettes to these smoke

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 6>free products which are on trend. And now that business

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 6>smoke free is a scale business, a sixteen billion dollar

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 6>business that's now being positioned I believe for separation at

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 6>some point soon.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh interesting, Yeah, I mean the kids. I hear zin

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 3>like in social media posts from from younger folks. I'm

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 3>not really sure because I think Zinfandel line, but that's

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 3>not it.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 4>No, this is Zyn not Zinfandel.

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So yeah, talk a little bit more about that

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>smoke free business and how a spinoff might be on

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the way.

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Why would Philip Worse want to do that?

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 6>So there's smoke free business I mentioned is powered most

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 6>by Icos. That's their heated tobacco device which uses its

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 6>Marlborough and other branded plugs, if you will, units that

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 6>you put into the device and it heats tobacco rather

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 6>than burn it like a combustible cigarette, and thereby is

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 6>smoke free and or less harmful alternative. The two other

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 6>legs of the stew of smoke free or it's evapor

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 6>product that's a closed system, meaning there's no plugs involved.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 6>It's just that once you use it, you're done. That's

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 6>called viv that's a more economical version, and that's catching

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 6>on well. And then you have the oral nicotine products

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 6>that I alluded to before, which they have a sixty

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 6>percent share in the US, a big share you know,

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 6>outside the US in selected markets. It's still prohibitive prohibited

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 6>in many European markets, but where it is legal, it's

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 6>doing well, and that rounds out their smoke free business.

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 6>It really is the fastest growing element to Filla Morris,

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 6>this smoke free The company is providing the disclosure that

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 6>analysts love. It's a double digit grower, it's got high margins,

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 6>it's on trend, and I think they're going to market

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 6>it that way probably, Like I said, I believe at

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 6>the end of the year as a really attractive spinoff.

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just looking at the PGeo function which gives

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 3>you the segment revenue, and smoke free is now forty

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 3>percent of total sales there. That is just external talk

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>to us about the competitive landscape for that smoke free products.

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 6>They Phillip Morris, to their credit, was really out in front,

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 6>well ahead of its competitors, namely British American Tobacco, Imperial Tobacco,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 6>Japan Tobacco, who have similar products a heated tobacco and

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 6>you know an e vapor E cigarette products. They are

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 6>way behind with Philip Moore to Philip Morris, so they

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 6>have like a seventy five percent share of where they're

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 6>where they compete with these products and the icos product.

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 6>So they're way ahead. You know, they're not immune to competition,

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 6>but they're so far ahead they're already coming out with

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 6>second and third generation products. Whether competition is trying to

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 6>catch up.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Do we see any impact from the war in Iran

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 2>on Philip Morris, whether it has to do with just

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.640
<v Speaker 2>costs overall or you know, transporting its products.

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.920
<v Speaker 6>They said there was a small impact, namely the duty

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.440
<v Speaker 6>free you know shops you see in airports with less travel,

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 6>they had a downturn there. They said they did site

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 6>some input costs, you know, distribute, They have some of

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 6>their own distribution costs, transportation, things like that. It's a

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 6>relatively small impact though, and you know, it's something worth

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 6>keeping an eye on. But I don't think anybody changed

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 6>their margin profile on the company just yet due to that.

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the.

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday ten am

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app,

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always on

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal