WEBVTT - Episode 6 - The Trial

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>BBC SDS. Hey, it's Maggie. Just a quick heads up

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>before we begin. This episode does contain some pretty detailed

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of violence and deals with adult themes. Tell me

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about Houston. I've never been there. What's

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it like.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Liston is the most diverse town in the state of Texas,

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>very very ethnic friendly, lots of culture, lots of restaurants.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It might not sound like it, but I've been desperate

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk to this guy ever since I started working

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>on this story.

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a nice little part of Southeast Texas that nobody

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>considers to be Texas.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>He has a unique insight.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>We like to go out and test different restaurants.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes we have Thai food and sometimes you know the

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 2>stake how is to serve excellent food.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And his opinion really counts.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 2>There's plenty of tex Mex and there's even variations of

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 2>tex Mex. So you can go in one restaurant, I

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>have a text Mex and then something next week will

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit different. I think they have the

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>most cultural influence, but although the country is getting more

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 2>and more culturally influenced by Hispanic America, so that's always good.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Totally, I'm with you. It has taken me hours and

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>hours of searching online and dozens of phone calls to

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>find Air and Day. Tell me why we are talking

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to you today.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 3>You want to know my take on the Sandra Melgar

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>murder trail.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you still think about the case?

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Yeah, will never leave.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Me, Arin Day. He was one of the jurors in

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the state of Texas versus Sandra Gene Melgar.

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>It's part of my life, part of my history.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I got called into something I didn't want, but I

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>was asked to do it.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I did it because that's of my civil responsibility.

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Starting at the beginning, I'd love to talk a little

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>bit about the jury selection process.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. In the Boorda for dire.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Which again I'm sure Aaron and I are pronouncing one

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent correctly, is when perspective jurors are assessed on

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>whether they can be truly impartial or not.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I remember this as far as the prosecutor's first words.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 2>She said, welcome, ladies and gentlemen to Ordai. I have

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 2>one question I want you to think about. Can you

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 2>convict a person of murder with no motive? I answer

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that question, yeah, I think you know. If there's evidence,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>we should be able to convict. If we can't and

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>the evidence isn't prevalent enough, then we won't convict us.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>What our legal system is all about?

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And what did you think of that question?

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>When she asked, uh, you know it was really unusual

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 4>that well, I knew it would be an unusual trial.

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>A woman found tied up and trapped in a closet,

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:11.279
<v Speaker 1>her hands tied, the door jammed shut from the outside,

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>on trial for stabbing her husband to death without a motive.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm Maggie Robinson Katz and from BBC's Studios and iHeart podcasts.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Hands Tied, episode six the trial.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 5>When Santa Malgar walked into the courtroom, she was walking

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 5>with a cane and I was struck by how petite

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 5>she is and her delicate features.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>That's Amanda Orr, a journalist covering the case for Reuters.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 5>She had a shock of whitish gray hair that was

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 5>about shoulder length. She was wearing glasses, and she didn't

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 5>seem like a big, hulking woman that would have been

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 5>physically capable of overcoming a grown man.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Amanda joins her fellow spectators, the media, law students and

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>your casual gawkers all cramped onto the uncomfortable wooden benches

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the show to start.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 5>Murder trials are some of the greatest dramas any human

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 5>can witness. It's really a fascinating thing to behold. The

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 5>greatest lawyers know that winning a jury over is about

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 5>presenting the facts in a way that engages them, and

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 5>so attorneys are tasked with the job of being storytellers.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Whoever tells the best story wins. One of those storytellers

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is the silver haired defense attorney Max Seacrest. He's also

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>joined by his niece and protege, Allison Seacrest. Max dressed

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in a dark zomber suit and wears round towardous shell glasses,

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>while Alison sports an understated linen suit pearls her long

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>hair pulled back. Telling another story is prosecutor Colleen Barnett,

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a confident woman with a shoulder length blonde bob and

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a sharp suit. We tried to get Colleen for this podcast,

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't get a response. So what comes next

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>are her words taken from the court transcript, spoken by

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>an actor.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 6>You're going to hear testimony that Heimi's brother knocked on

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 6>the front door and didn't get an answer.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>This is Colleen's opening statement.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 6>You're going to hear testimony that when he went into

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 6>the house, he found his brother's body in his brother's closet,

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 6>brutally stabbed to death, multiple stab wounds on his chest

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 6>and his neck. He went into another part of the

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 6>house where he found Sandramelgar in her closet with her

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 6>hands tied behind her back and her ankles wrapped. She

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 6>was in her closet in the bathroom, and there was

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 6>a chair on the outside of the bathroom door, wedged

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 6>up against the door. The police were called immediately.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Colleen tells the jury how she thinks Jim died.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 6>We're going to show you that what we believe happened

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 6>is that she enticed Timie into some type of maybe

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 6>some sexual liaison or something that she was going to do,

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 6>made him sit in the chair.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Then Sandy stabbed him to death. She says. She warns

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the jury not to believe the story. The defense is

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>going to tell that there was a burglar there.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 6>What we're going to be able to show you is

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 6>that there was no way for any.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Burglar to enter that house.

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 7>There was no.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 6>Reason for anybody to have anything to do against timing.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 6>He was a loved person at his work and in

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 6>the neighborhood. There was no vendetta from anybody.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Colleen thinks Sandy could have made it to look like

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a breaken to cover her tracks. She tells the jury

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to not trust Sandy about her health, about her relationship

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with Jim, and about her version of events the night

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Jim died and.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 6>I didn't hear anything because the jacuzzi was going, and

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 6>that's broken, by the way, and I can't turn it

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 6>off if I wanted to, because it's broken, and the

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 6>noise was so loud from the jacuzzie that I couldn't

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 6>hear my husband getting stabbed, couldn't hear it.

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So if this were a courtroom TV drama, we could

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe see Colleen make her way to the jury, looking

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>each of them intently in the eye. Maybe she'd rest

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>her hand on the wooden divider separating the jury from

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the court. Because this is her moment,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the crescendo of her opening argument.

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 6>We believe that we're going to be able to prove

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 6>this case to you beyond a reasonable doubt. Don't know

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 6>that I have motive here, but There's no other way,

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 6>any other thing could have happened other than she just

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 6>brutally murdered her husband.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Again, continuing my imagined version of what she did, Colleen pauses,

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>ensuring that the jury heard those last words, that she

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Sandy brutally murdered her husband.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>She thanks the jury and takes her seat. But even

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if they accept that Sandy enticed her husband into a

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>sexual liaison before murdering him, how is that possible? When

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Sandy was found trapped in a closet, her hands and

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>feet tied. A video is played in court. The shaky

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>hand held camera hands across the disheveled bedroom belonging to

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Jim and Sandy Melgar. This is the video the police

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>took the night of Jim's murder, capturing the scene of

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>the crime. The room is a mess, the bedsheets, rumpled

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>clothes everywhere. The camera moves into the bathroom, where we

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>see the remnants of their celebratory evening drinks set on

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the edge of the chacuzzi, a tub of cream with

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a strawberry perched on top. Then we see a gloved

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>hand pull a white satin chair in front of the

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>closet door.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 6>The Sheriff's Department did a video showing you can be

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 6>on the inside of the bathroom and pull the rug

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 6>so the chair wedges up against the door. They can

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 6>show you that that can happen, that she could have

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 6>done that, and that is what she did.

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>To Colleen. This video is proof that Sandy could have

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 1>shut herself in the closet, put the chair on a

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>piece of fabric, making sure that half of it was

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>outside and the other half inside. Sandy could have cracked

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the door slightly, just enough to place her hand on

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the top of the chair, making sure it hooks underneath

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the door handle, close the door, then crouched down and

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>pulled the part of the chair that is inside of

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the closet towards her, causing the chair to be set

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in place, locking herself in.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 4>This theory clicked for juror aar and A and they

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 4>showed how you can pull that chair with a rug

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 4>underneath it to make it look like the door was

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 4>actually blocked so.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 2>A person couldn't get out.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 3>So that was like, oh, okay, that.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Makes sense, But how could she have done all of

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>that when she was found with her hands tied behind

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>her back. Well, Colleen has an answer for that too,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Sandy tied herself up. Colleen stands before the jury and

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>takes out a piece of fabric, its ends tied together.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>She methodically loops it around one of her wrists and

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a figure eight pattern. Then, with both hands behind her back,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>she twists the material around the other wrist, holding her

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>forearms parallel with each other, each hand gripping the opposite elbow.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>The binding looks tied around her wrists, but Colleen shows

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>she can easily slip her hands free, so Sandy could

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have tied her own hands behind her back.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution was able to demonstrate to the jury that

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>you can bind your hands behind your back and make

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 2>it look convincingly real and not have anybody.

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Actually tie you up.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 2>So that was the big thing for me, is well, okay, yeah,

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess you can bind yourself.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 7>The only problem was that wasn't the way that Sandy

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 7>was tied up. That was not at all consistent with

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.719
<v Speaker 7>the testimony of the only two witnesses who saw her

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 7>tied up.

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>To Mac Sandy's defense attorney, Colleen's demo doesn't match with

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what actually happened.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 7>She wasn't tied at the risk, she was tied with

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 7>her arms behind her back. The ligatures ran from her

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 7>wrist up basically to below her elbow. And when you

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 7>look at the crime scene unit photographs of Sandy's arms,

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 7>guess what? She has red marks consistent with that on

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 7>her arms.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>So, if you remember, Sandy was cut free by her

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>brother in law, herman, and his wife before the police arrived.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Herman gives evidence in court to say her arms were

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>bound so tightly behind her back that he couldn't untie

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the knots and needed scissors to cut her free. While

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron may be convinced of Colleen's arguments, there's another question

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>that looms across the entire trial.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 2>How can this poor little sick lady commit murder? That's

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 2>what I saw Sandra. I was surprised by the picture

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>she portrayed of her physical being.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And can you say a little bit more about that?

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 2>What is that she walked with her kine when she

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 2>walked into the courtroom. I needily questioned that she couldn't

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>have done it because she looked so frail and unhealthy

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the way she presented herself.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor, Colleen Barnett, argues that it didn't matter how

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>strong or how frail Sandy might have been, because she

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>believes Sandy planned the whole thing and took Jim completely

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>by surprise.

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 6>So she gets Himie to sit down in the chair

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 6>and maybe she's massaging his neck or whatever, I don't

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 6>know what, and then she pulls it out and then

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 6>while he isn't looking, she makes a strike straight up

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 6>all the way to his neck. That's what the first

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 6>strike is. Jimie of course, gets up to try to

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 6>defend himself, turns around and that's when she gets him

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 6>on the thumb and that's when the blood starts spurting

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 6>out onto the chair. This was the first strike, and

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 6>then she had him. There was no place for him

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 6>to go. As you saw, there's only two feet wide

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 6>and not that deep. He was just stabbed to death.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 6>She had the knife.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Colleen points out that jim wasn't a big guy. At

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>five foot seven, he was a bit taller than Sandy,

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but she's heavier than his one hundred and twenty five pounds,

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and the stab wounds weren't particularly deep, three inches at most,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>which gets Duror Air and Day thinking.

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 2>It made sense that she didn't have to be superwoman,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 2>strong or any of those other things you would think

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a murderer would have to do to murder somebody.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But there's also the matter of Sandy's health. She's had

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>her hips replaced, has epilepsy, and loopis an Ever since

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>her police interview, she has pointed to her health as

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a possible explanation for not knowing what happened at the

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>night Jim was killed. Sandy suspects she a seizure and

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>blacked out. I want to go into that. Colleen has

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>her medical records from Sandy's primary care doctor and asks

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a witness to read them to the court.

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Under seizure disorder.

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>What does it say that she was stable? Reads the witness.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Sandy's medical records show that, despite fairly regular checkups, she

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hasn't reported having a single seizure in the four years

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>before Jim's murder. According to Colleen, yes, Sandy had a

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>condition that could cause seizures, but it was stable, controlled

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>by medication.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 8>Sandy hadn't felt good, she had been resting a lot.

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 8>She had been experiencing auras, which are many seizures.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Defense attorney Allison Seacrest argues that those medical records don't

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>tell the full story or reflects Sandy's health in the

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>months before Jim's death.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 2>If she's using her illnesses and she's saying she can

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>veniently had a seizure and then a blackout for twelve

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>hours when her drugs were supposedly controlling these things, and

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>she was not complaining to her doctors, maybe she did blackout,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 2>but I can't find any evidence that.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 3>She did.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Over ten days. Colleen tears into Sandy's claim of innocence.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Colleen tells the court that she was unhappy, plotted the

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>whole thing and locked herself in the closet and tied

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 1>her own hands. The only thing that is missing is

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>why why would Sandy do this? When I've ordired you, guys.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 6>One of the things that I was a little worried

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 6>about was motive, because I showed you the things we

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 6>have to prove, and we've proven all of them. We've

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 6>proven all of them, but motive is not one of them.

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 6>And one of the things that I worried about being

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 6>able to establish that.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>She offers the jury a theory or two. The first

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is the classic Jim had life insurance policies worth some

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.120
<v Speaker 1>half a million dollars.

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 6>She'd be getting a lot of money.

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>The second is religion. Colleen argues that as a devout

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Jehovah's witness, Sandy couldn't divorce Jim without being ostracized.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 6>But if I kill him and nobody finds out, I'm

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 6>not ostracized and nobody finds out and I still get

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 6>the money.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine Colleen locking eyes with the jury, ensuring

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that her last words are heard clearly.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 6>There's zero evidence, zero evidence, zero evidence that somebody else

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 6>did this, no evidence that anybody else did this. She's guilty,

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 6>ladies and gentlemen, She's guilty. Please find her so, thank you.

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Now it's the defense's turn to take the stage to

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>try and convince the jury that the prosecution has got

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it all wrong and Sandy is innocent. When it's the

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>defense's turn to address the jury and defend Sandy, Maxiecrest

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>makes a big decision. He doesn't call Sandy to the stand. Instead,

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>he relies on a very simple but powerful argument.

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 7>It's the worst investigated case I've ever seen.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>He says. The only reason Sandy is on trial is

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>because the police fail to do their job properly.

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 7>They had an agenda, they weren't objective, and they jumped

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 7>to conclusions, and they were sloppy. They assumed. It's the

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 7>old rubric that if two people are married and one

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.120
<v Speaker 7>of them's dan thee, the other one must have done it.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 7>And that pretty much what propelled the entire investigation from

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 7>the get go.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>He claims, potentially crucial evidence slipped through the cracks.

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 7>There's actually a bloody thumb print on a safe in

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 7>the closet where Jimi was found.

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Mac tells the jury that this is the bloody smear

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>that Liz noticed when she was packing up her old house.

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>When she's called as a witness, Liz tells the court

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>she sent a photo of the bloody mark to the

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 1>police and they told her it had already been processed.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 7>And guess what, they didn't bother to analyze it. In fact,

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 7>one of the detectives said that it had been analyzed,

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 7>when in fact it never had been.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>The crime scene investigator tells the court that his team

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>had spotted the blood, but they didn't swab it for

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>DNA or toss the safe for prints. When asked on

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the stand, why, he says, because we assumed it was

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Sandy's blood.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 7>So I mean, again, this is indicative of what we're

0:20:59.119 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 7>dealing with.

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 1>According to Mac and his fellow defense attorney, Alison Seacrest,

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the police cherry picked evidence that suited their case and

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ignored anything that didn't, like the fact that forensic analysis

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Melgar's phones and computers and a keyword search

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>for rope not stab, crime scene and murder revealed nothing.

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And according to friends, family, and neighbors, the Melgars had

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a healthy relationship.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 8>There was no evidence of any kind of infidelity or

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 8>animosity between the pair. Sandra and Jim had a really

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 8>loving relationship.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the lack of physical evidence linking Sandy to

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the murder.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 7>Jim died in a brutal savage attack at least fifty

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 7>one sharp force and blunt force injuries, thirty one what

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 7>we call sharp force trauma. He had all the hallmarks

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 7>of someone who'd been eating to death. What's startling is

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 7>when you examine Sandy's hands, there was no trauma to

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:14.959
<v Speaker 7>her hands. It's very very common in stabbing cases that

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 7>if I'm holding a knife and I start to stab you,

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 7>and I stab you and I stab you, it's going

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 7>to produce a lot of blood. And it's very typical

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 7>that that blood will cause your hand to slip, and

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 7>the assailant will likely cut his or her own hand by,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 7>you know, repeatedly wielding a bloody instrument. In Sandy's case,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 7>the inside of her hands no cuts at all, and amazingly,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 7>she had ten beautiful fingernails, no brakes, no chips, no cracks,

0:22:54.560 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 7>and yet she supposedly brutally worked him over, including hitting

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 7>him with her fist.

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Jim's autopsy report details fractures to a skull, bruises on

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>his head, shoulders, torso, arms, and legs, and notes that

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>there was internal bleeding linked to some of those bruises.

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 7>Because of the fifty one plus blunt and sharp force injuries,

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:26.400
<v Speaker 7>it was agreed to by all sides that the assailant

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 7>would be covered in blood. There was no blood found

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 7>on Sandy at all. There was no blood found on

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 7>any of Sandy's clothing at all all. The examination of

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 7>her fingernails and the DNA under her fingernails no blood.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>At all, and there was no evidence of a cleanup

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to the defense. This proof Sandy didn't kill Jim, and

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 1>make some question why the police so quickly discounted the

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>theory of a robbery gone wrong. They seem to believe

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>that there was no obvious signs of a break in,

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>no windows broken, no doors knocked in, so no robbery.

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 8>I think she was the only suspect because these officers

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 8>rushed to judgment and made up their mind that because

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 8>there was no forced entry into the house that it

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 8>had to have been Sandy.

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But there is one key sign the police may have overlooked.

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 8>Sandy told the detectives in her interrogation that the garage

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 8>door could have been left open.

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 7>The garage was open when the family arrived and was

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 7>able to enter the house through the unlocked interior door.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 7>So that's how Hermann got into the house, and we believe,

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 7>of course, that's how the intruders got into the house.

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Did Duror Aaron Day Though this argument doesn't add up.

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>My thought process was, yes, the garage door may have

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 2>been open, but if you go to somebody's house to

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 2>rob them, why would you murder one and leave another

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 2>one tied up in a closet. It just didn't make

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>sense that the defense said this was a robbery gone

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 2>bad and person got killed.

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 9>It's Sunday, December twenty third, twenty twelve. This is Sean CARIZL.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 9>Harris kind of Shaff's office, Homicide sixty Henry forty two.

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 9>The current time is nine forty two pm. Okay, ma'am,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 9>can you identify.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Yourself for me?

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 10>Sandra Milber.

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>One part of the story that I can't quite shake

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is Sandy's interview with the police the night she was found.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.360
<v Speaker 1>If you remember, she's distressed, can't remember details.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 7>We went up to eat.

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, where's on the we at.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 10>Mexican restaurant?

0:25:58.800 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 9>Products pros.

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what time was that?

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 7>I wasn't.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Cucos cucos?

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 10>Uh, I'm listening about eight. I mean, I'm just guessing.

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>How will this tape play in court to the prosecution.

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Sandy's behavior proves she's dodgy, She's evasive, unclear, she seems numb, detached,

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and when she cries, they don't see tears.

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Are you governing something else?

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 7>Why would you take a pograph?

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 9>Because I'm so stressed right now I can't even think straight.

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 7>It's not a good reason.

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, I just don't want to use against me, That's

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 9>all I'll take it.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 7>But not just.

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm stressed, And I mean.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 10>I just beyond beyond that she.

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Was making them because she would answer questions. You know,

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>she would avoid eye contact, she would avoid and she

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 2>would mumble, and she wasn't shedding tears and emotion.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>But the defense call an expert witness, a former police

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>investigator who's reviewed the interview. He tells the court he

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't see any sign that Sandy was trying to mislead

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the officers or that they ever considered she was traumatized

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>in the victim of a serious crime, the ars screaming.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 10>I didn't hear when he was in pain. We know

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 10>that he suffered a lot. I need you to help me.

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.639
<v Speaker 10>I need you to help me. I need you to

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 10>help me on this. Help me, Sandra, help me.

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 9>Tell me, cousin Deny Scott, he went to a lot

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 9>of pain.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 10>Help me.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 9>I didn't hear anything stopping.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 3>How need help and.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 7>I need help help me.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 10>That's it, that's it.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 7>I need a lawyer.

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 9>I'm not talking anymore because you guys are just trying

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 9>to torture me.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 7>Here. We wanted the jury to hear her suggesting that

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 7>maybe she ought to get a lawyer, because obviously the

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 7>tenor of the questioning was absolutely unfair.

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 3>So you said, I want to stop ze lair.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 2>They should have stopped, So that'sn't really where I blame

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 2>the investigators interrogators.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Immediately after that police interview, Detective Carousel contacts the District

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Attorney's office to try and charge Sandy. However, the DEA refuses,

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>saying they need more evidence.

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Here's a guy that even before they know the analysis

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 7>of what the DNA may show, hours before the crime

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 7>scene people had left, it's saying he's trying to get

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 7>murder charges filed.

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Mac wants the jury to see this as yet another

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>example of a biased and narrow approach by the police,

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but Detective Sean Carosel says he was just keeping the

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>DA informed.

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 2>No wonder why they were suspicious at the onset, and

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.959
<v Speaker 2>that's why I give the police credit for being suspicious

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>that they had their murderer and they didn't need to

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>do more investigations.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Mac then reveals his trump card. Detective Sean Carousel has

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>been fired. Two of Sean Carousel's former colleagues tell the

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>court that his work on a previous case was sloppy

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and that he's not truthful. For journalists Amanda or listening

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to this in court, it's a slam dunk.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 5>The fact that the lead detective had been fired and

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 5>the fact that there were testimonies that the lead detective

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 5>had been untruthful in other investigations would have been enough

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 5>for me as a juror to say that everything about

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 5>this investigation is called into question.

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>But she's not on the jury. Aaron is, and he's

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>more well forgiving.

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, nobody's perfect, Maggie.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The jury aren't told the full story about why Sean

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Carousel was fired, only that there was an issue over

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a search warrant. But the truth is he forged a

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 1>search warrant in another case and lied about it. We

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>reached out to Sean Carasel for the story, but he

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't respond to our questions.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Closing arguments have just wrapped up in the case against

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 2>a woman accused of murdering her husband and then trying

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 2>to cover it up.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 5>I told Colleen Barnett that she did the best she could.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 8>Sandy couldn't have done it, and the evidence is so clear.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>The members of the media watching end court didn't seem

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>so sure.

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 8>Yes, Bill Well, the prosecutor arguing very strongly that Sandra

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 8>Melgar did murder her husband.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's up to the jury. Sandra Melgar's fate lies

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in their hands.

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I tried to keep it help in mind.

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I want to believe somebody is innocent until the stake

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>can prove them guilty. And then we all went back

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 2>in the room kind of like, uh, okay, where do

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 2>we start.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Hands Tied, a new eight part

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>true crime series from BBC Studios and iHeart Podcasts. New

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>episodes will be released weekly, so subscribe or follow on

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts so

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't miss out. If you like the show, please

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>help us by spreading the word or giving us a

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>five star review. I'm Maggie Robinson Katz and the producer

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is Maggie Latham. Sound design and mix is by Tom Brignell.

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Our script consultant is Emma Weatherall production support is from

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Dan Martini, Elena Boutang and Mabel Finnegan Wright, and our

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>production executive is Laura Jordan Rawl. The series was developed

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>by Anya Saunders and Emma Shaw at iHeart. The Managing

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Executive Producer is Christina Everett, and for BBC Studios, the

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Executive producer is Joe Kent. James Cook is the Creative

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Director A Factual for BBC Studios Audio and the Director

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of Audio at BBC Studios is Richard Knight.