WEBVTT - Week 1 News and notes, Waiver Wire watch, Lev Bell issues, and more...

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app, and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guests dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do do do do? Didnt

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do Yo? This is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever here

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Readio Network alongside Frankie Stamford. I

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>am Greg Sussman. Fregg. What's going on? Man, Freggy? There

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is a ton going on. First of all, how was

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>your weekend? Um? Think it was good. I think it

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>was good. We did some venue shopping on Saturday. Ready, Yeah, there,

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you waste no time these places book up, I've been told. Yeah.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And then I spent the rest of the weekend at

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>my dad's relaxing. Oh at Rob Susman's Yes, where he

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>owns the beach. He does not own a beach. He

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>lives on a beach. He lives on a bay. Yes,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>sure it was great. It was it was nice, It

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 1>was very relaxed. Was great. Uh, now you know today

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I walked in, I was a bit more stressed, to

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you. Um, but I'm here. It's best friends. Yeah,

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we are best friends. But Frank, sometimes you stressed me

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit more. Me Yeah, what did I do?

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You didn't do anything this morning or even very helpful

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Actually, sometimes like sometimes you're just like the week,

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 1>this is not happening, and you get upset because there's

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of work to come, and it just

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it stresses me out more. All you've done today has

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>been extremely helpful. So thank you appreciated. How was your weekend?

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>It was good. Friday it was a roller coaster of

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a weekend, I'll put it that way. Friday I went

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.959
<v Speaker 1>to the Yankee game. That was a great time, probably

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the best game they played in a while. Was very

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. They ended up winning. It was great. Yes. Saturday, Um,

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was contracting hand, foot and mouth disease. Really, yes, yeah,

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it was terrible. Um, what made you believe that you

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>were contracting this. So my niece actually has it and

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we were walking two we were walking together and she

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>was in the carriage. And then Saturday night I had

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a fever. My throat hurt, like this is happening for sure.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I was getting ready to text you like, Greg, I'm

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be here this week. I have handfoot and

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>mouth disease, like I'm dying. I was freaking out. So

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>day I woke up, I was perfectly fine. So I

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know where I got a fever and uh and

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a sore throat from, but it went away, so that

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>was good. And then Sunday I had an NFFC draft

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and yesterday I went to the beach. It was it

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was very up and down weekend. It sounds like it

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was a good time, feeling well, there's one more thing

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>this morning, I'll might ride in. I mean, this is

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty much status quo for like writing the m T

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a subway system in New York City. Um, but somebody

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>put their arm up to grab the poll to like

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hold on. And I don't know if you remember the commercial,

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but there was a commercial with Michael Strahan. He made

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a put in golf and like put his arms up

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>celebrating and like the whole craft passed out. That was this,

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that was this greg And at some point in adulthood

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to realize that if you're a stinky person,

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like a genuinely stinky person, it happens like I'm sorry.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>If you are a stinky person, you should probably admit

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>these things, like there are things that we do that

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we admit. You know, people might not like it, like

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>do too too, it might get into some people's skin.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>We love it, No, we love it great, We love it.

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>We can acknowledge, we can acknowledge that, you know, some

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>people might get piste off by it. If you're a

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>stinky person at the time you hit adulthood, you should

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>know that, and you should put an extra deodora. So

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say not not put on deodora. That is

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of what you should do on a ninety

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>degree day in the New York City subway system, because

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that to get that off my chest. Do you feel

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>better a little bit? You look, you looked very refreshed.

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>To be honestly, do you feel great that? I don't

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>feel great. I woke up, I'm tired, and I went

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to sleep early last night. I don't understand the way

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that the world works. Greg, it's week one, it's week one,

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's week one. Can tell you about my issue? What's up?

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So I have an issue with RCN Cable, who obviously

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>has our our channel on their network on their provider.

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I should say I have the fantasy best Friends forever

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>every day on my DVR. Right, we know this because

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I have our CN. So our CN jacked up my

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>prices telling you after a year, so year two they

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>jack it up. So I have a way around this.

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I changed ownerships to my roommate. It happens to be

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>now my fiance, but whatever, it would be the same.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Referred to Judy as your roommate it because it doesn't

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>matter that it's my fiance. It matters that it's just

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>another person. Right, So if you change ownership, they treated

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>as a new client, which means you get that first

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>year deal again. So cable goes way down. I know

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't, you don't. We're talking about cable in the past.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So I still pay for cable and I literally saved

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>like fifty bucks a month by doing that. Great awesome,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So we did it on Friday after work. I went home.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I had a whole list of stuff I needed to

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do and that was on it. So I changed over

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.239
<v Speaker 1>our cable. So yesterday she turned on The Bachelom in Paradise.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I got to watch Better Call Saul in our in

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>our bedroom because you know whatever, she wants to watch

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bachelom. When the night fine whatever says, your cat's

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>been deactivated. You know, please call our CNN callar Cianna

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>explained exactly what happened. Please just reactivate my bedroom box.

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't do it. I don't know what do you

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>mean you couldn't do it? You you you did this?

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Why couldn't you just un can't do it? I don't

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. The earliest they can have somebody in

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>my apartment to manually do whatever they have to do Friday,

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so I go, I will not be paying for my

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>TV this week then, and it was a huge upper.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>They hung up on me one one time. I'm very upset,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>very angry at Arcin. Right now, you're an email Oh yeah,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>email writing Gregg salesman. I do have to you know,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody else, but it's side the point I enjoyed that

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not afraid to speak my mind. Yeah, like when

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you are wronged, and like whether it's a restaurant or

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like a waiter or something like that, you you're gonna

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>give him a piece of your mind, Gregg, shouldn't you.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm paying a service. My service should be provided correctly.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>If I was in a restaurant, I'm paying for a meal,

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I want it correctly. You know what I mean? I

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>want it hot? You know all right? People, Greg is

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>fired up on a Tuesday's Arc and Cable. I agree

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>with you that you should if you pay for something,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you should get what you pay for. I agree with

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you for that. Sometimes I just don't have it in

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes I mean, like most of the time, I'm

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>just not, like naturally not a confrontational person, so I

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't really go out of my way to

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like argue stuff, although there are times where I look

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>back in hind said, I'm like, you know, I should

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>have done that. I just don't have it in me.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you have it though, You have the trade, and

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you should boast that trade. You let football people here

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>only to ten minutes. Alright, let's get right, let's get

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>right into the football, because we are live this weekend.

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>The NFL will gets on this weekend two days away.

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night football were together. We are together watch together

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>one time. Very exciting al right around here too, which

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>is cool? Is it? I don't even know where it is.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that I just didn't know where. The new

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>location much closer to here, alright, So Thursday I feel

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>pole we're watching together. It's a falcon's in the Eagles.

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But before that, we're gonna treat this like a regular week.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We decided other than tomorrow, we're doing what we're doing.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Corey Favor basically, we're making our show to help his

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>show makes sense him. I would want to do that

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. I agree they need to help. But nevertheless,

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>today and the rest of the week, we're treating this

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like a normal week. So on Tuesdays we would do

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire, right like we would think of who is

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>available on the waiver wire for you to pick up

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>as you get ready for week one, because people are

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>having their week one waiver wires go through tomorrow, I

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>believe right like we're talking about flexikers through tomorrow. Is

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it not a lot of waivers? I know my Home

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>League waiver I opened it up. The fat process will

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>run tonight evernight, so ye do as well? Um, I

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think flex is like Wednesdays like eight pm. Oh, Wednesday

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>nights or Tuesday's at eight pm. I don't know. Check

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it out. Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's like it's either

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at night or during the day, like if you noon

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or a PM. It's not overnight. I have a lot

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of money on a FLEX that I've been a ready

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>dropping it all down. We'll see how it works at

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna talk about those waiver wire guys were also,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>of course on Tuesday's we'll get even talk about the

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 1>updated headlines each and every day. You'll you have the

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning quarterbacking essentially and then Tuesday practice. Practice usually

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>start Wednesday for players, but we'll get certain injury updates,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's how we're gonna begin today's show with those

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>injury updates, specifically with a guy that Frank believe couldn't

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy this year, and that was Jerick McKinnon. He

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't stay healthy through a practice. Unfortunately, of course,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Niers kick off on Sunday afternoon. Jerick McKinnon, on the

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>last rep of practice only fell to the ground as

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>his knee went the wrong way he tore out as

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>only as a c L but there's other stuff torn

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. Jerry McKinnon will now hope to

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be ready to go for next season. Jerry McKinnon out

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for the year for San Francisco just days before the

0:09:56.160 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>season began, which means the next man up is who

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brita, who Frank all along and said may have

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>more fantasy points in Jeri mckinnidams here now, um that

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Rita steps up, Alfred more steps up. These are the

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>two guys that you need to know. Which role would

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you rather own? Frank, Yeah, I think this is this

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is a tough call here, and I think there's gonna

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of splitting. And I will say this

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>just to start off, we're talking about Week one. I

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I want either one in my lineup

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in Week one because they're going up against the Minnesota Vikings.

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We know how great their run defense was last year.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>What do they do to that defense? They added Sheldon

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Richardson to clog up the middle even more so, I

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>expect this run defense to be very very strong once

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>again this year. So I don't want to start either one.

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>You definitely both guys need to be added. If I

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>had to choose one, I think ultimately Alfred Morris is

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the starter for this team. But I could

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>see no one series for this guy. One series for

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy. It could be a game to game, uh

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of You know what I said about the forty

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Niners all long is that I think it was gonna

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 1>be frustrating. You wouldn't know week in and week out

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>who it was gonna be. I still kind of feel

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that way. But with that being said, you know, Jerick

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>mc and it was a third, fourth round pick. Now

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 1>you're getting these guys off the waiver wire, Alfred Morris,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>even Kyle Uschek, who we think we need to talk

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>about this morning because there's a chance that he leads

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this team in receptions out out of the running back

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 1>position because Matt Breeda didn't catch the ball all that

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>much in college. On Alfred Morris, we know, you know,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>dating back to his days with Washington, just never has

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 1>been a big pass catcher. Greg I actually had a

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>stat of the day today. You didn't throw to it,

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but I will reveal it to you anyway, and involves

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris. His average season in the two years he

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>played under Kyle Shanahan as his O C in Washington.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Three hundred and five attempts, fourteen hundred and forty four

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards, ten touchdowns, ten receptions per year, seventy seven

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards per per year. He finished RB six in

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve RB eighteen, and that's an average finish of RB

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve overall. I think he's the guy. I still want

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>to own Matt Brida as well, just on that off

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>chance that he's the guy. But Alfred Morris knows this system,

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>He's familiar with Kyle Shanahan. Um this offensive line seems

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>to be improved. Alfred Morris impressing that final preseason game

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. UM, so I think earlier. I think the

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>easy answer is I think a lot of early downs

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and goal line work goes to Alfred Morris and then

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>like change of pace stuff maybe um like past catching.

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>It's either going to be Matt Brida or Kyle Uscheck.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to choose one, it will be

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Alfred more But I do think both guys should be owned. Greg. Yeah,

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and I've said it. This is the beginning of Art

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>mckinn argument we had last week, right, Like I want

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco running back. And I think it's it

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is clear now. Albreda was never exactly a pass catching

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>running back by any means um in in in college,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of fell into that role last year.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>He is theoretically the Vin Coleman in this offense. That

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>is his role. Alviren Morris, I believe, will be the

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Davante Freeman, the the gold line plunger, will be the

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>big back. He's going to get every opportunity to succeed. Now,

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>if I had to choose one, it's Alfred Morris. Now,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll see more of Kyle us Check. I think

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw it. We felt last year we see more

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of Kyle Ucheck. We didn't. That's why I'm not really

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>know the u Check bandwagon. Um, But I mean, Brita

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is it Tevin Coleman? Like if you were drafting today,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I would draft Brita Where you draft Kevin Coleman. I

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>think that's fair. If you're drafting today, where would you

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>draft Alfred Morris? So I moved both of these running

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>backs inside my top thirty five? Is that crazy? Do

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you draft? But like just inside? I mean look at

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>my rank because I don't pull this up, aliund. You know,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>if you put them inside the top thirty, then you

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>start to move them ahead of guys like harry On

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Johnson and Jamal Williams and that range. I don't feel

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>comfortable doing that. I have them, I have Alfred Morrison

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the same range as I do Adrian Peterson and Peyton

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Barber and Chris Carson and guys like that who are

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like the starters for their teams, but they're like questionable

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>starters for their teams. If that makes sense, great, Yeah,

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I think they are. As I look at my rankings,

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they're they're top thirty guys for sure. To both of them,

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they are. I don't think there's any doubt about that.

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>To be honest with you, I just think it could

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>be a somewhat frustrating situation. I'm literally up the amou

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>nanking staid have a draft to night, So I'm doing

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>this right now. Do you want to wait to talk

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about how much fab you want to spend on these guys?

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you know we're talking about do it? Do it

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>right now? With Alfred Morris mat Preader out there, how

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>much you're spending So basically, if if a top thirty

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>running back was out there, how much would you spend,

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if a if a Peyton Barber or a Chris

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Carson or Adrian Peterson or even guys who are ranked

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>just above that, how much would you spend for that

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>player to get him. I think Matt Brita is universally

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>owned already, he's owning seventy four percent of the leagues.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He might be out there, but Alfred Morris is only

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>owned in so he's still out there. And you know

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>about forty of leagues is according to CBS ownership. If

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you really want them, I could go as high as

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>but the number that stood out in my mind where

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna feel what I'm gonna feel comfortable spending on

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>him is probably not gonna get him. The number him

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in my mind also, and that is because it seems

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>similar number they're giving you the Adrian Peterson right like

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>that is some kind of the same spot with a

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>P and Alfred Morris. I have to ask you that

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not just similar because you have a big

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>back in a P and Alfred Morris passing down back

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Thompson and Matt Brida. Theoretically, now, if you

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have to choose one of these guys who would you

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>rather own that. I'm not Mad Brida, Alfred Morris, or

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson or Matt Braid. I'll throw all you've already

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>said Morris over Breda. So I still have Adrian Peterson

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>ranked the highest of this career. I think it's very close, though.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think again, like you said, there's a lot of similarities.

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But I like Washington's offensive line. I know they've been

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>banged up the past couple of years, but when healthy,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a very strong unit. I like the forty

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Niners as well. I just think I think roles are

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to find a little bit more so in Washington. I

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think the team trust Robert Kelly at all. I

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think they trust some j. P Ryn. I think

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Adrian Peterson early downs, Adrian Peterson in the red zone,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson's gonna get his you know, eight to twelve

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>touches as well, especially in the passing game. But I

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>think I trust Adrian Peterson a little bit more for consistency,

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>whereas with the forty Niners, I could see it being

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>one game, this guy, one game, this guy one series,

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy maybe a little bit more inconsistent, but it's close.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I love I love this. He's just like fat Robbi

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the starting running back on this. Yeah, and then I

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>eat my words. Yeah exactly. I think it's really really close.

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think both of them, that they're both available on

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire. I think you put the same amountain

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on it. Um, everybody knows when love with San Francisco

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>hand system and the offensive line there, I think it's

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>very very strong. Um. I think it's hard. I think

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really really hard. But I'll say this, I'm always

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>try to to recommend to people to be super aggressive

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>early when they do a fab. These are two spots

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>right now that a potential to be helping for sixteen weeks.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Not guys, you're not guys are speculating on later on.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you want to save that fab for what

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could come next. These two guys are here right now

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and they can be helpful all year long. A p

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll boost a little bit up. I think if you

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>really want Alfred Morris that eighteen to range a little bit,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and if you were a jerk McKinnon owner, you have

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to go over for Alfred Moores. Let's take a break here,

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>when don't we come back. We haven't touched on Levy

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on Bell at all, and and the holdout and him

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not being there because we didn't think it mattered. Well,

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we're five days away from the started off Steeler season

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>at least time to say it might matter. Leave on

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Bell and if we're worried about him when we come

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>back next. On the Fantasy Sports Rainio network from the

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL to the NBA, Daily Rodo dot Com is the

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:24.719
<v Speaker 1>place to win millions in daily fantasy. You can get

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the best DFS NFL coverage all season long for a

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>price of one, or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm.

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Put the Elite Package at month. If you use the

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n t s Y, you get ten

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>percent off your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com, pick your NFL Elite Package, enter promo code

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>f n t s Y, and you'll be on your

0:17:45.440 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 1>way to becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. Get your

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>season ticket to Fantasy glory right now. Ruto Experts exclusive

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Edge Fantasy Football package. It is not just the draft kid,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a full season package that takes you from draft

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>day to Championship week. It features in depth analysis from

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorite fantasy sports radio experts. Go to

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Ruto Experts dot com. Use a promo code Frankie Tank

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to get ten percent off the exclusive Edge Fantasy Football package.

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Set a side of the spot on the mantel for

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>thaten Championship trophy. Also remember that Fantasy Factors three million dollars.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>About every contest is now open. Sign up today for

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>chats at one million dollars. Go to Fantasy Factor dot com.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 1>That's Fantasy Factor dot com. Frank if you looked at

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Sura this week, I haven't. Do you use survivor fools?

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do the one on Fantasy Factor. I usually

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>jump in, probably like a few other random ones that

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I could just find on the internet. I paid for

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>one over the weekend for a hundred bucks or whatever.

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I never have one that I paid for it though, true,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but I do play for sure. I paid for one

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred bucks. Um, these are two thousand people in

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, so pretty nice. You're gonna change,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>um give me a quick look. Well, analyze is more.

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>This will also be a thing Durrett for us during

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the week where we kind of take a look at

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the um top games on the board and

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>where our heads are at. I guess my top game

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>right now would be Baltimore at home against Buffalo. Does

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that make sense? That makes sense. They're they're one of

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest favorites right now to their their minus seven

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half, the only one the biggest favorites. This week,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Saint set minus ten home in the Dome against Fitzpatrick

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 1>in the books. That's good too, though, Yeah, I mean

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>not it's a good one. But I think you'll be

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>able to find another game throughout the year that you'll

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like to use the Saints. I don't normally care about

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the next time they play Tampa. I don't normally care

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>about that so much. I just want to win now

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and just get out. I think, I lean. I feel

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>very good about Baltimore in Baltimore, like give me Peterman,

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I'll face Peterman. You know what I mean. There's

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing more Buffalo Bills than they just released a a

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Nate peter in hype up start like QB one starting

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>video on their on their Twitter. Did not hide me up. Sorry,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>oh you Buffalo Bills stands out there. Sorry Florio, Sorry Florio.

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>We didn't even text him. We should have been like

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>our condolences on season. Saw an interesting tweet to Um

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Leoni actually retreated and it was like, this

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is my nightmare, is that the Bills are just dreadful

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>this year. Right, they have a top three pick next year, Right,

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>have an opportunity to draft the next best quarterback, right,

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and they don't because they just drafted Josh Allen will

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be good? I mean maybe, yeah, there's certainly a chance,

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know who will need a quarterback, the Giants,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know they're gonna win ten games. According to

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ventum, the Giants. Giants are such a disaster this weekend, man,

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they were like an absolute disaster, like everything they did

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>cuts and stuff. Dude, they cut their backup quarterback for

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>no reason. They kept four quarterbacks on the rostera on Saturday,

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and they got David's web The guy has been number

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>two all all summer. Of course, David's Webb was the

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>reason we did They didn't draft Sham Donald joke and

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Pat Turmer came out and said he he's comfortable with

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Lolett as his QB two. Yeah, so I read

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that full quote before Rotal World had it. If you

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>were comfortable when you give him more reps as the

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>number two. I was wondering he didn't look great, didn't

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>look great in that final preseason game. Two or three

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>interceptions in that one half is not good in big trouble. Um, okay,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So fantasy owners number one and number two all off

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>season long, selectly lady on Bell, and I remember last year,

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I think this exact show. I was like, are we

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>concerned that Levyan Bell hasn't shown up yet? And everyone

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was like no. When he showed up the next day

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was no big deal. Yeah, he didn't get

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the full workload week one. By week two he had

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>like forty tounches. So it was fine, But I think

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>we have to bring up the question again. He did

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not report to camp on Labor Day. The first practice

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of the week will be tomorrow. Mike Tomas says he

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>has not been in touch with Levy on Bell. I

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's just posturing or whatnot. Um Kevin Culvert,

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the GM of Pittsburgh, is disappointed in Levy on Bell.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>This seems a little bit more contentious than it was

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. At this time, are we reading anything into this? No?

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a legitimate story. Um, and you know

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>we brought it up last week that Levion Bell we

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>cut from this team, and you laughed at us. Just probably,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there's more coming out today. I like you mentioned,

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin said he hasn't been in contact with Levian Bell.

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But this can literally changed on the drop of a dime,

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Like Levian Bell just shows up and then I think

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we're good. Like you said, he's not gonna have the

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>full workhorse in week one. I heard them talking about

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on Carton and Friends. Does he get twenty touches if

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he shows up now? Even if he shows up this week,

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd say probably not. I don't think he gets twenty touches.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>He didn't last year either, so he could get off

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to the slow start. But um, yeah, look, if you

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>own Levian Belle, you need to own James Conner. And

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>even if he's a free agent, if if your draft

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>passed already, you gotta find a way to get this guy. Um.

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>We actually I have a league where I drafted Levion

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Bell and I didn't get James Conner. What is you

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>already owned? So I don't really have a backup plan here?

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>What is your backup plan? But like, what is your

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>level of fear right now? Because Leon Belly Tuesday on

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a scale of one to ten. Yeah, as a Levian Bellinger,

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of scared really not owning James Conner. Um

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>put it out like a five guy. What if he

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't dhop tomorrow? What does that jump to? I think

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>like every day goes up one number, so like Friday

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's not there and I don't own James Connor,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, my panic level is the highest it could

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be because I don't have my first round pick who's

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>just supposed to be my work horse running back. If

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you were drafting tonight, Todd Gurley goes number one, who

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:33.959
<v Speaker 1>do you take number two? You don't take PPR, David Johnson,

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>anything else? All right? Then if you have number three,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? Whoever didn't go between David Johnson

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and Zek Elliott? So what would you do at number four?

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And then and then it take James Conner later on?

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Make sure like even if you have to pull him

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>off the board like five rounds early, don't care, ninth

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or tenth round. Take James Conner. The Someone tweeted me

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>last night and said he had the fourth overall pick

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and he took Antonio Brown and Levian Bell was there

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't like the way the team turned out.

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny because this whole conversation, maybe it's completely

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>moot by by tomorrow, by the time for an hour

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>from now, by the time that you guys are listening

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to this undemand right, like it's for sure, But I

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think you have James Conner is a guy that we

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>should be talking about for waivers as well, because he

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>only owning fort of leagues. So if you are, you

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>are not picking him up, even if I'm not a Levia.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>That was the question. Absolutely, what if something happens where

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell just doesn't show up. There was a year

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>where Vincent Jackson just held out for like half the season. Yeah,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's been no indications going to do that,

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't make sense why he would do that

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>because he's already indicated like, look, this is my last

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>year in Pittsburgh, I'm gonna leave. But what if he's

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>just like, screw the Steelers. You guys didn't want to

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>give me the long term contract. All I wondered, what's

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>financial security for everything I did for you guys? I'm

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not playing this year. It tell me to add James

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Conner just on the off chance that that happens. It

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 1>sounds like, um, it sounds like that's obviously not the

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>case of Vinca Jackson. This Khalil Mack would have been

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a Vinca Jackson potential guy, right, Like he didn't get

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the trade for Chicago, which will get you in a

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>moment um. But Lavia Bell, there's I agree with you.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>There is seems legitimate reason to be nervous. I was

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nervous last year for not there's just tea leaves that

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>are just like eating rappaport tweating, like here we go, Like,

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It was a little bit different this year. Yeah,

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean the fact that it's happening two years in

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a row. And I think last year someone asked me this,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>when did he report last year? And I'm pretty sure

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the Friday before Labor Day? Was I think

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what it was. I couldn't find out exactly, but

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>at this point last year he was in camp. He

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was there September one last year, So yeah, right today,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>September four, Labor Day last year wasn't September two. He

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>reported on Labor Day or the day before Labor Day.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Last year. He did not do that this time. I

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>think you have to be slight there. I think of

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>five is fair. And how much do you how much

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do you put on James Conner if you're the Levy

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on bellowner, if you're not the Levion bellowner, great question. Um,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm the Lady on Bell owner, if I'm the

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Leaving on Bill owner, I'm putting twelve on it. Yeah,

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going I'm going to highest fifteen. That's what I

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>was thinking. You don't want to have to blow it,

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but that ultimately that's your fault for not draft team.

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>You should have draft him. Every every time we said, look,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if you draft Levi on Bell, you also draft James Conner.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>If you draft Todd Girley, you also draft John Kelly,

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. If you draft David Johnson

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you get Chase Edmonds. So it's your

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>fault you have to spend your fab for for not

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>drafting James Conner. But if you didn't, you gotta go

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.959
<v Speaker 1>as highest fifteen percent if if you're not a Levi

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on bowner. Yeah, completely completely agree with that. Completely. That's

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>where we're at hopefully by the time tomorrow he's there though,

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm freaking out. Yeah, I get it, man, I

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I completely get it. I actually do have a draft

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to night. I'm very interested to see where leaving on

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Bell goes. I'd like, as you have video, i would

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>love the pick seven the first round, lavis there, seven out,

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously take him. It won't happen, um crazy apps never know.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm very interested to see though from my perspective, like

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>where do I take if James kind of sitting there,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>do I take him and then have ransom potentially or

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete waste to pack? How early? Yeah? How early?

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a pick that could be completely basic. By's

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the top forty running back running backs go and you

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>get into like that group that where they're just PPR

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like Theo Riddic, Geo Bernard guys like that, and like

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>backup running backs to actually have a role on their team,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like Doug Martin. Once you get outside the top forty,

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you can pull the trigger on James Conner

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and then, like you said, I mean the next couple

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of days. If I'm you, I'm just trying to trade

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>him to the Levy on Bellowner holding, Yeah, that ransom,

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like you said, eight four four eight four three six

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine's eight four four eight four three six

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 1>eight seven nine. We mentioned Nathan Peterman starting for the

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills against the Ravens. He's not the only backup

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>quarterback they'll start. Nick Foles officially named the starter for Philly,

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think we kind of saw this coming over

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the last month. Frank, Yeah, Carson Wentz, he's getting closer.

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised we see him in week two,

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe week three. Obviously after this game they have the

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ten days off, they'll play the following week. I believe

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>it would be Sunday, right. I don't know if they

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have like another primetime game after that, but I don't

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think they do, so he has that time to get ready. UM,

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>And we're getting a lot of questions about like Nelson

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Aglare Obviously should I start him. I've read something interesting

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about Aglare, UM is that obviously he played much better

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the slot last year. UM, and they have stats

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to justify it, Like his slot numbers versus outside receiver

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers are drastically different. He was much better in the

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>slot they're talking up the fact that this team can

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>run out zach Ertz and Dallas got her a lot

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night on this kind of go with like

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the duel tight end approach, whereas one of those guys

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>will fill in as the slot receiver, which pushes Nelson

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Aglar to the outside where he will potentially be faced

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>with Desmond trufefont Um. And he's just overall hasn't been

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>as successful as an outside receiver. So I think Nelson

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Aglars kind of a polarizing player for a week one

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>break Yeah, it's hard, It's it's hard. You know. Nick

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Foles is somebody that obviously the super he stepped up,

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and during that entire run he stepped up. But Nelson

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Aghaloor's entire resertain not even resurgence breakout really a better

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>word came. Of course. Of course it wins as the quarterback.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>The Eagles in general are banged up, Like, I like

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons in this game. What's this? What is this spread?

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now? The Eagles are still minus two and a half,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>They're still minuston half. I don't know, it's hard not

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to like the Falcons. Falcon's money line, right that's not crazy.

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I might throw something on the Falcons right

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>now are plus one fifteen. If you take the spread

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at plus two and a half, that's minus one fifteen.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>It's hard. You just take the money line at that

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>point and just yeah, try and count on the Falcons

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>winning this game. It's hard. Here has a chance they could,

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>gets a pretty good chance. It's hard. It's hard, like

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>an absolute dumpster fire. We saw the Super Bowl hangover

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>last year when the New England patients got trounced by

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs, like happened this year. To m

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the Falcons like things are good for them,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're prepared. Defense looks solid. We're expecting Steve sarkisian

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Is offense to take the step. Everyone's healthy. Julio Jones

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>came out yesterday. I mean, obviously this is I gues.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not coach talk, it's player talk. But he said

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the healthiest he felt in two thousand fifteen.

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>It's worthy Ullio Jones too. Everyone's everyone's health like the

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Falcons in this game. Love the Falcons in this game,

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so we're willed in this. I don't want to see him, Okay,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles, the starting quarterback this week for the Philadelphia Eagles.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of old guys, Antonio Gates back with the Chargers

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>very clearly did not want to be a training camp

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and now he's back. Was obviously interested to see what

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of shape Antonio Gates is in after an off

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>season where he thought he would be retiring. Um, but

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people have actually already asked about how

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>much fab do you spend on Antonio Gates, And to me,

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the answer is not much. I think he is a whatever,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 1>high end tight end two, especially in a standard league,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>streamer and touchdown dependent. Um. Yeah, you'll play him against

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>teams that have struggled against tight ends obviously, but I

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>still think this team is going to run a lot

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>through Keelan Cole in the red zone. I think we're

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a lot of Mike Williams, the draft pick

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>from last year who was you know, should have a

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a very serious role in the red zone this year.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And then they're gonna run the ball a lot. So

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure there's gonna be many targets to go

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>around for Antonio Gates. I think he's a solid tight

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>end too. If you wanted to pick him up for depth,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, three fab not much more than that. Okay,

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>so there you go. That's with Antonio Gates. I agree.

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Is there any negativity? Does this do anything negative to

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams right like he was supposed to be the

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>big red zone guy Antonio Gates is back? No, I

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think so, because I think all along we kind

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of expected Antonio Gates to be back, or at least

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we did on this show. Um and then

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I just I think Antonio Gates kind of takes the

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>back seat this year. I don't think that. I don't

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>think so. So you think this does affect Mike Wild

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Do I do? I think there's a you could say

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what you want about him taking a back seat. But

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Antonio Gates in this connection with Philip Rivers before,

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like it's been like this for a decade. Now, Antonio

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Gates immediately one more year older. I don't think it matters.

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Antonio Gates is literally only going to play

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone, Like you're not gonna see him

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on the field than outside of the twenties three sixteen

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>yards and three touchdowns last year, Greag What Hunter Henry

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>do though? The Hunter Henter is not there. Yeah, but

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why I think a lot of the

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry production that we expected, a lot of that

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:36.719
<v Speaker 1>goes Mike Williams way. So I don't know, I think,

0:32:36.760 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think. I think. I think Antonio Gates when it's

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all said and done the end of the season, he

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>could have like five yards and five touchdowns. That's fine.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think of a lot of what Hunter Henry

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>did last year, plus what the second wide receiver did

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:51.880
<v Speaker 1>last year, whether it was Tyrolle Williams, Travis Benjamin, I

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of that goes towards Mike Willams. By

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, every buddy Jimmy Sands or at Vandal Love

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is Tyroll Williams this week. Yeah, it gets the Chiefs defense,

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>who look absolutely brutal in the preseason. He's super, super cheap,

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>especially for DFS. I don't I'm not picking him up

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and starting him in season long. I think that's getting

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too cute. But in DFS for I mean,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what you expect likely a minimal price for Tyroll Williams.

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I could get behind that. As a GPP GPP play. Um,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm more likely to put Mike Williams in my lineup

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>in season long. If I were to put one, that

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But I've I've always been all the old

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Mike Williams hype training. I completely understand. It

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't shock me. Like Tyler Williams starts at this number

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>two wide receiver here, I think he's gonna start. I

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna start. But I think we see a

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of three wide receiver sets here, um and I

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>think as the season goes on, Mike Williams kind of

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>takes over as this team's wide receiver two eight four

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>four eight four three six seven. I a lot of

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>those calls. But get to you guys right after the break.

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I referred to the Climac trade. Earlier on in the show,

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Max traded to the Bears. I guess it was on

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Friday now at this point, right, I think Saturday morning.

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Saturday morning, it was two first rounders and a third

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for Mac and a second. Is that correct? I know

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>there was definitely two first round I believe it's two

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>first and a third for Mac and a second. If

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a Jets fan, are you said that the Jets

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>don't pull the trigger. Why are we talking about the

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Jets just saying this is nothing to do with the Jets.

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I know that does. They were kind of in the

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Clue Max sweeps. They were never giving this up. Agree

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>with you don't want them to give this up. I

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think it. And I so here here's the thing

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Bank team. Well, I think you're yere. I

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.960
<v Speaker 1>think you're year away from this for the Jets, because

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what the Bears did is exactly what the

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Jets should do a year from now. You have an

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>established young quarterback that makes nothing. This is the time

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>where you have to go for it. This is how

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks want a Super Bowl. Is how you

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>see that she one of the reasons she's got rid

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>of Alex Smith. You open up so much cap space

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and availability to your team when you don't have a

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>high price quarterback. You're seeing you with the Rams and

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Jarry Gopp how much how they're extending everybody, including Aaron Donald,

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who for a brief period time was the most highest

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>paid defensive player in history. Now it's Khalil Mack, and

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I give the Bears credits for opening up their checkbooks

0:34:58.360 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and opening up their team. Uh to Mac and doing

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they had to do to go and get

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Khalil mack Um. The Vida's gonna suck? Are the Raiders

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna suck? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, you're you're now green old

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>greening thing. No. I mean, I still like some of

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>their offensive pieces, like for fantasy, I like Marshall Lynch,

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I like a Marii Cooper, But overall their defense is

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not good. You just traded away one of the best

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>players in the league, and yeah, they were already not great, right,

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and then you trade away Khalil Max, So I think

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the defense is gonna be brutal. I still think the

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>offensive players could do enough to be fantasy viable, but

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we expected at him. Yeah. Drie Nelson, by the way,

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>do you while receiving more Davious Brant no longer on

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this team? Another head scratching move for John Gruden in

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bowl. Felli's older. I saw that. We'll be back

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with your calls and more. Waiver wire stop cut out next.

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>When you're hiring, you don't want to waste time sorting

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>through dozens of irrelevant resumes. You want an efficient way

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to get to a shortlist of qualifying candidates. That's why

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you need Indeed dot Com Post a job in minutes,

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>set up screener questions based on your job requirements, then

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>zero in unqualified candidates. Using an intuitive online dashboard, discovered

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>why three million businesses use indeed for hiring. Posed a

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>job today at Indeed dot com slash higher, search for

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Greatness Search Indeed. Taylor Rotor dot Com is putting more

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 1>than twenty five dollars on the line for subscribers this

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL season by entering paid conses on fandel and bringing

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you along for the three role have a chance to

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>win big this year. Alongside sportscrit CEO Jeremy Stein, we're

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the only men have won two separate million dollar prizes.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Each week was select lucky subscribers to sweat with us

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and split fifty percent of the profits. No problem that week,

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>All good. You need to toss back in it at

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the following week. Head on over to Daily Rotor dot

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>com slash Sweat and learn how to get into the

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>action in your share. It's what the five thousand dollars

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's Daily Rotor dot Com slash Sweat. Bet ds

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I is celebrating twenty years is the industry's biggest and

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>safest betting site. They have great customer service and fast,

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>easy payments of winning. You can play virtually every sport

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bet ds I with hundreds of wagering options, including liven

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>game wagering on all major sporting events, where you can

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>make your play at any time during the game. Bet

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ds I runs sign up and deposit promotions. You're round

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:22.759
<v Speaker 1>for a limited time using the promo code fan t

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>s Y. Bet d s I is offering up to

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>five dollar bonus on your first deposit. So use promo

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>code f and t s Y and try bet DSi

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com and that's bet d si dot com. The

0:37:32.920 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>promo code is f n t s Y. Head on

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>over and start winning today. Frankie, let's the phone lines

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>eight four four eight four three six seven nine eight

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six eight seven nine. And

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if I was a listener, viewer, watcher of this program,

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd be so annoyed at the host, meaning me, because

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I did some thing. Now two years in a row, no,

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>two years a round, they did it. Hit me. Last year,

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I drafted Alvin Kamara in an auction. All right, he's

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a good player, obviously now third string guy at the time.

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.839
<v Speaker 1>And you remember a handcuff that everybody was extremely high

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on last August. Mm hmm, no, coming the handcuff was

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Williams. People love that Jonathan Williams and Buffalo. So

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>I wound up cutting Alvin Kamara before this, long before

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the season started for Jonathan Williams. Of course, Jonathan Williams

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make the team and Alan Camara becomes Alan Camara.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>This year. I drafted mark Ingram in several places, as

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I wound up cutting someone for Jonathan Williams.

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I cut like Mike Wallace, so whatever, but

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I cut somebody a player that I drafted for Jonathan

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Williams because he was going to be the starter, and

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>he looked good in the preseason and everyone talked to

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 1>him up with New Orleans. Well, Jonathan Williams is once

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>again cut after the preseason, and I officially believe, much

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>like Jeff Janis, the fantasy community believes in this guy

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>more than any NFL coach or any NFL organization does.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>For whatever reason, I will no longer be drafting or

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>picking up Jonathan Williams anywhere, And as a mark Ingram owner,

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I sat here being like, what do I do now?

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Floria in our chat this weekend was talking up Boston Scott,

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and I honestly said, who the f is Boston Scott's

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy. He's gonna be the kick returner it

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like for New Orleans, and he was seemingly the

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>guy that took Jonathan Williams job that lasted one day

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 1>until the Saints went out and signed Mike Gillisly. If

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you're a mark Ingram owner, do you a pick up

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Boston Scott? Do you be pick up Mike Gillisly or

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>do you see pick up neither of them? If I'm

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>an Ingram war or inger own, If you're an Ingram

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>owner that theoretically backed up Ingram with Jonathan Williams, what

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do you do? Yeah, so we have this dilemma. We

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are we own mark Ingram in the GSC League as

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Team BFF. Also, Scott looked pretty good in the preseason.

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 1>He had twenty five rushes for a hundred and twenty

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>one yards, four eight yards per tempt uh and a touchdown.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>This team went out and signed Mike Gillisle to a

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 1>one year deal. I think he fits more of that

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram rolls more so than Boston Scott does. I

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody knows if I had to choose one

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and there's like no running backs on the waiver wire

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>at all, that it's just like Baron and you know,

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you just want to drop Jonathan Williams. I would pick

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>up Mike Gillis Lee, but I don't think that will

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>really know who that mark Ingram replacement is until after

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 1>week one. Yeah, so I think my answer to that

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>is also Gillisle, right like I'm the Gillisle is gonna

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be a guy. I think he is the short yardage back.

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you see a ton of camera. But and

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stick with me. I remember it was a couple of

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.799
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, Frank, that you were saying, maybe it wasn't

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>even you, but people were saying, what if Ingram doesn't

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>get his job back? What if there's this love eight

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>thing continues with Sean Payton and Jonathan Williams all of

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a sudden becomes the man Jonathan Williams isn't on the

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>team anymore, and maybe, sure, maybe Sean Payton will fall

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>in love with Micullously. But I think if you drafted

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram in that fifth or sixth round or wherever

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you have the draft him. I think you feel kind

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of comfortable right now that his role is pretty secure

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 1>when he comes back. Yeah, I think that makes sense.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Um it is. It is annoying that you only get

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Marking room one game for the first six weeks will

0:41:36.640 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 1>taste because he has the four game suspension and they

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 1>have a bye in week six. So so I used

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to be what I used to be like on that

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Also, like it bothers me you don't

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>have him for first four weeks. Realistic, you don't have

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>him for the first five of six weeks, and then

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you could be dead, and that's what I always said.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 1>But you're also like almost more equipped to handle that

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>because however you handled Marking over the first four weeks,

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you can handle that and we six. Also like you're

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 1>actually prepared for losing mark Ingram in week six rather

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>than having to figure it out almost maybe you all

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>have different players by them, but like we tend buy

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially you know, it's like nothing really changes. Ultimately, just

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:13.879
<v Speaker 1>go back to whatever you were doing in the first

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. Fine, all good, and then if the

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>entire shot round for weeks seven three year championship, you

0:42:19.120 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have Marketing Ram. I think there's gonna say for that. Yeah,

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>and he should be high end r B two once

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he returns. But I do agree with you. Look, Jonathan

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams was getting talked up as the guy all these

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy outlets we saw, we're talking him up once again,

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and it really came as a surprise that he got cut.

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's you know, Mike Gilliesle, Boston Scott,

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>those are the next man up. But I think, you know,

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Boston Scott is probably more of that special teams player.

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>We've already you know, referenced that and we've talked about that,

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:47.319
<v Speaker 1>so that will be his role on the team. There's

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly a chance that he does that he gets a

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>few carries. But I think Mike Gillesle is closer to

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram than Boston Scott is. So I would theoretically so,

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>but again I don't know anything at Boston Scott, so

0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I can be totally wrong with us more than the waiver.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>At a moment at eight four, four, four, three seven nine,

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 1>let's hit up Caesar in Arizona. It's up Casar, Hey,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what's up? What's going on? Dude? My question is about

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire. I wanted to pick up two of

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>these guys, DeVante Parker, Josh Dockson, Allison Crowder. So it's

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a great So you want two of those four. It's

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Johnama Allison, it's Jamison Crowder, it's Josh Dockson, and it's

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Parker. Four guys that we have seen on on

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.359
<v Speaker 1>waiver wires here at this time. I'm not four three

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of them we've seen a waiver wires pretty consistently. Jamison

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>crowd is easy pick up for me, like you grab him,

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no question about that. Now when it comes to

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the other three, I think it's interesting. Davante Parker is

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>always a name that's now there at the end of drafts, right,

0:43:44.520 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, man, at what point do I just

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:49.439
<v Speaker 1>do this? Josh Dockson, I haven't had any in clear

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:51.400
<v Speaker 1>feelings to be like, oh, let me do this. I

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>want nothing to do with Josh Doxon this year. And

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>then John will Allison's name I own everywhere. So my

0:43:56.440 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>answer would be Jamison Crowder and John Will Allison pretty easily. Yep.

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's my answer as well. Some people are still

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 1>hyping up Josh Dockson that it seems like standard league. Yeah,

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, So I mean, look, Josh Dockson, he is

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a standard play He's a guy that you expect to

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>score some touchdowns. But Ronaldo Allison, he's one injury away

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.359
<v Speaker 1>from being a top thirty wide receiver. He legitimately does

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have that upside. Josh Dockson, I don't know that he

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>fits the skill set of Alex Smith all that much.

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think the first three reason this offense on

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>nearly every player going to be prouder whoever's playing tight

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.520
<v Speaker 1>end for this team. And Chris Thompson as the receiving back.

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you want a lot of Chris stops, and

0:44:34.000 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to they paid Paul Richardson too. Yeah, So

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think there's a lot of targets that I

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>completely I'm not Josh Duson. Let's hit up heavy and

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Kentucky it's not heavy. What's up? What's going on? Hey?

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll just get a question. I got Matt Stafford and

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Grew Brees this week that Stafford or Drew Brees. It's

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Stafford on Monday night football against the Jets, and it's

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Breeze at home Sunday afternoon against Tamba. What do you think,

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank Yeah, I think there's a good question. I could

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>see the Jets and Lions game being closer. Obviously that

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned the Saints are the biggest spread on the

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:11.399
<v Speaker 1>board right now. Their minds tense, so there's a chance

0:45:11.440 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 1>that they just kind of like run the bucks into

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground and then just run the football. It's on.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But given the fact that they're in the Dome, I'll

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>still take Drew Brees, but I think it's pretty close.

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's close. Also, I have Breeze ranked um

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>HIRER to begin with, so I'll take Breese in general.

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's gonna match up Matthew Stafford against the Jets.

0:45:27.600 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because one of my leagues I'm a

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit desperates and it's one of my more inger leagues. Frankie,

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>um and thanks for the call, and I want um

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting theoretic asm now is that like ridiculous? And

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is it a full PPR? Now have pprs or what flexes?

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>What are my two flexes? Alright? Well, yeah, two flexes.

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I could see him being a second flex. Look, the

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Jets have never been great at covering. I think he's

0:45:53.000 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 1>arguably my first flex alright. Well, look, I don't think

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel great about it, obviously that's why you're asking me.

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>But the Jets have never been great at covering, receiving

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>running backs, pass catching running backs out of the backfield.

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So yes, they drafted, not drafted. They signed Avery Williamson

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>to help that Winebacker Corps to kind of help store

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.959
<v Speaker 1>up um covering running backs, but he did not practice today,

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.280
<v Speaker 1>so keep an eye on that. I think it's okay

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:21.360
<v Speaker 1>as a flex. You don't feel great, you don't love it,

0:46:21.400 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't hate it. I think it's all right. Yeah. Actually,

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and speaking of some of the notes from this weekend,

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wilkins, it certainly seems like it's going to be

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the starter for Indianapolis here this weekend. He was kind

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of put on ice during that fourth preseason game. Marlon

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Mack does not look like you're ready to go. Um.

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot about Christen Michael and Jordan Wilkins.

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Would you feel comfortable study any of those guys? Either

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of those guys are I think I think Jordan Wilkins

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>is in the flex discussion, but kind of similar to

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:50.279
<v Speaker 1>THEO Rick, I don't feel great about it. I think

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it's more like a wait and see approaching other options.

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I could start Michael Gallup, O don't like that, like

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that one like Star is not very good. Start Matthews

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:07.399
<v Speaker 1>and to see against my I like that too. Yeah,

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I like both of those options better than Wilkins Ridick Uh.

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I might keep Riddeck in there. Again with Wilkins, I'd

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>rather I'd rather take a wait and see approach. The

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 1>offensive line did not look good for run blocking in

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. I kind of want to see how the

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Colt's offense just comes out this weekend. I don't really

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:25.320
<v Speaker 1>want to start Joan Wilkins in the first week. You

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>start Dante Moncrief, it's Jones, or I would start Matthews

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>or Gallop over Wilkens. Or I could start my guy,

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:36.240
<v Speaker 1>your guy, Gnom Allison. Now I'm not doing that, idiot,

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I'll start with other Matthews we have. Matthews

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>is more of a question mark because you just didn't

0:47:43.040 --> 0:47:46.320
<v Speaker 1>see him all appreciate really what the deal is with

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Gallup I think my opinion, I think him and Herns

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>are cemented as the outside wide receivers from this team,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and Cole Beasley in the does it matter yes, I

0:47:57.480 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think. So okay, I don't think this team go

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 1>out and drafts Michael Gallup if they really loved Terrence Williams.

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>The same thing goes for Allan Herns. Why do they

0:48:06.719 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sign him if they like Terence Willips. Rince Williams is

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a bump command I believe me. I I know that.

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>But the Panthers secondary sucks, so I understand wanting to

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>get some exposure in that matchup. Alright, so it's other

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>so other Galliper Wilkins, you say for me? Yeah, I

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 1>guess it makes sense. Eight four four eight four three

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>six seven nine's eight four or four eight four three

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>six eight seven nine. Before we take any more calls,

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanna say about our YouTube audience, Rankie. We appreciate

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you watching. We we appreciate obvious support. UM. Tomorrow we

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 1>will combine with the Fantasy Football Frenzy for our last

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>draft of the season. It'll be a best ball draft

0:48:42.719 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and we're in it. A bunch of you guys are

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 1>in its way. Thank you, UM, and we'll see tomorrow. Friends,

0:48:46.920 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of course is next. If you're listening on YouTube, if

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you're listening on iTunes, on your podcast, you're listening live

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Know that we're going

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 1>with another five minutes or so. We're here for the

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>next five minutes of fantasy football frenzies. Next, subscribe to

0:48:59.600 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Podka ask give us a light rate US five stars,

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course leave a comment. Week one waiver Wire,

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned a bunch of them. We mentioned out for

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Morris and matth Brita and James Conner. I mentioned Rochard

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Matthews just a moment ago. He's available in over sixty

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh but CBS dot com leagues, are you buying Richard

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Matthews to a certain extent? I don't think he has

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the same role in this passing game as he has

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in years past. I think we're all kind of expecting

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis to take that next step. We were expecting

0:49:26.320 --> 0:49:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that last year too, So there's always a chance for

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Richard Matthews. He seems like the go to guy for

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Mariota alongside the Laney Walker. I'm not putting much down

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on him, but in a few leagues where he's available,

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I've put down three or four dollar bids out of

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars, just as you know, like a wide

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver six on my team like a third benchnch wide receiver. Yeah,

0:49:44.040 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you could do a lot worse

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>than him as your third bench wide receiver. I'm kind

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of interesting, like potentially in starting him this week against Miami,

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>because there is a connection with him in Mariota, and

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think as long as he's healthy, you know he's

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be out there, he'll he'll give you something. So

0:49:55.760 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like him. Also of note for Tennessee,

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Lanny Walker has stated he will play this week. He's

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>been out most of the training camp with a tell

0:50:01.960 --> 0:50:05.280
<v Speaker 1>andre I will say, I think Chardon macach is probably

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:08.439
<v Speaker 1>safer for week one, but Gallup is the upside playing

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:10.880
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, let's meat ball in San Francisco. What's up?

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Guys? Hey, I got a question. I'm sure

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you already touched on the whole Levy on Levy on

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Bell situation. But uh so, I've got him and Marshawn's starting.

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:24.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a twelve team week. The waiver wires a bearing,

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and on my bench, I kind of got guys are

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>either injured or kind of scrubbies. I've got Ronald Jones,

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Rashan Penny, uh John Kelly and who else do I have.

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that might be it right now. So I'm

0:50:41.480 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 1>just trying to think of who I could do in

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a flyer in a twelve team PPR league. We need

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to start one of these guys, are you saying, yeah,

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could pick someone up, but just about

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gone, gosh, um, yeah, I mean we don't even

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:01.320
<v Speaker 1>know what Hood Penny's role is going to be in

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>week one. Same thing could be said for Ronald Jones. Yeah,

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>if I if I had to choose one of them,

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it would probably be Ronald Jones, but I don't even

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:13.399
<v Speaker 1>know what he's gonna do in Week one. Might say

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Penny just coming back from the injury going up

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>against the Denver Broncos. Dude, do we know that Ronald

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Jones is ahead of because Rogers on the start, I

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even know that we could say that, I guess,

0:51:27.000 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 1>but we don't like any of these guys. If you could,

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if you could find out who's on your free agency

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and call back and let us know, or just tweet

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:35.800
<v Speaker 1>at me at roto underscore Frank and and let me

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>know who's on your waiver wire, because I think there

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 1>has to be somebody anybody where you can start over

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys, whether it's just like a PPR

0:51:42.239 --> 0:51:44.840
<v Speaker 1>pass catching bag, or take a shot on like a

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Hill. You know what I mean that we haven't

0:51:46.640 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned yet, Greg, Do you have any interest in Jeremy

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Hill as like a when you're three or four running

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>backs on your bench. I'm not doing Jeremy all day

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 1>until Week one where scores three toushdowns, and then I'll

0:51:56.920 --> 0:52:00.279
<v Speaker 1>worry abut Jeremy Huh. I think he's clearly behind every

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:02.399
<v Speaker 1>single runing back we've mentioned today as a waiver edge,

0:52:02.680 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 1>even behind the New Orleans Saints guys. But if you're

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>in a deeper league where maybe you own Burkehead or

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>you own Sony Michelle, I take a shot on Jeremy Hill.

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.719
<v Speaker 1>They chose to cut Mike Gillisle and keep Jeremy Um

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and they were they were talking about during the preseason

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>as but Jeremy Hill, Mike, like Mike Gillisy last year,

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe an acting on game day, he may be an

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:23.879
<v Speaker 1>active on Sunday. Yeah. I mean you'll know that early

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. If that's the case, drop him. This

0:52:27.480 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 1>is a deeper league. Throw it out there, Greg, see

0:52:29.920 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Yeah, Um, it's funny. Other players out there,

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 1>they know the Cartner friends this morning was John Ross

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that people like are excited because John Ross has the pedigree.

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>We still get a little bit about him throughout the summer.

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:44.439
<v Speaker 1>You just stashing John Ross just to see what you have? Yeah,

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>for sure, I think he is a deeper statue's behind.

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I almost consider him a rookie because he didn't do

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>anything last year. But I would I think he's behind

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:54.440
<v Speaker 1>some of those other names that we've talked about Gallup,

0:52:54.560 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>DJ Moore, Courtland Sutton. I think those guys have more

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of an immediate impact. But he's in that range and

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>he's like a stash wide receiver who has upside. So

0:53:03.880 --> 0:53:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I would rank him behind all those guys. I will

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>say this week one against the Colts, I would start

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>him over any of the players that b Ball just

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 1>asked us about. I agree, Yeah, take a shot, take

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a shot. There's a fifty touch. Start him over a

0:53:15.320 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>guy like Jordan Wilkins. No, I wouldn't do that. I

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't go that far, but I would start Gallop over

0:53:21.360 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 1>John Ross. Was a gallop over John Ross? Okay, Um,

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:25.799
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned off the air to me when I start

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bears defense this week, they're only fifty percent of

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the leagues. Of course, they just acquired to Cleil mac

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and frank you were read in the front seven. I

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>mean it's really really good. Would you start him this week?

0:53:35.400 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can against Green pay No. No.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is another wait and see approach, and

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it sucks because you want to own a defense with

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this much talent, and you can't really statch a defense

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because then owning two defenses is kind of wonky um.

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:49.359
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of town on the defensive. I'm

0:53:49.400 --> 0:53:51.399
<v Speaker 1>not starting the week one against the package. I can't

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. There you go, We're done. Coming next Fantasy

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Football Frenzy Jim Day Chris Ventuan of course a fantasy

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>executive Poory Parson for Frankie Standuple. My name is Greg Susman.

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching listening to the Fantasy

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:04.240
<v Speaker 1>best Friends Forever. We'll do it all again tomorrow, we hope.

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:05.759
<v Speaker 1>M