WEBVTT - Nuggets best team in NBA, Thunder title defense, Timberwolves leap | Northwest Division Predictions

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All right, welcome to Hoops tonight. You're at

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the volume heavy Friday, everybody hopefull you guys are having

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a great end of your week. We are continuing our

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>season preview series today with the Northwest Division, so that's

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Nuggets, the Oklahoma City Thunder, the Minnesota Timberwolves,

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the Portland Trailblazers, and the Utah Jazz. We're gonna be

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>touching on all five of those teams today. You guys

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are the Joe before we get started. To subscribe to

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Hoops and I YouTube channel so you don't miss

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>any more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter, Underscore JCNLTC.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>You guysn't misshow announcement, so forget about a podcast fore

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you get your podcast on our Hoops Tonight.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>It's also super helpful if you leave a rating in

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a review on that front. Jackson's doing incredible work on

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 1>our social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you guys follow us over there. The last

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one at least. If you guys want to get mailbag

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>questions into our mail bags, drop them in the full

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>episodes on YouTube in the comments and we'll get to

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>them regularly throughout the season. Our next mail bag will

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>be the week after we finish this season preview series.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk some basketball. So we're starting with

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Nuggets today. A little quick recap of their offseason.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>They lost Vlaco Konsar, They lost DeAndre Jordan, Michael Porter, Junior,

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Dario Sarich, and Russell Westbrook. They added Cam Johnson, Tim Hardaway, Junior,

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Brown, Jonas Valenschiunis, and essentially adding Deron Holmes who's

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>coming back from an achilles tear, a guy who was

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>drafted in the first round last year but got hurt

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in training camp, I believe, or either right before training camp,

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna be coming back this season. Then another

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>guy they added this summer that I'm gonna have my

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>eye on is Kessler Edwards. I'll have to compete for

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a roster spot. But his per thirty six numbers were

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty impressive last season. In addition to being a big,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>physical perimeter athlete, he averaged ten points and seven rebounds

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>per thirty six minutes with a two point five to

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one and assist to turnover ratio. Shot fifty percent from

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the field forty one percent from three ninety two percent

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>from the line, so fifty to forty ninety A good

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>playmaker relative to most role players in that type of slot.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Two point three stocks per thirty six minutes. Another guy

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that I think has a decent chance to impress in Nuggets'

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>training camp, So no way to look at this as

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>anything other than a massive influx of talent. I have

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>issues with the guy like Jonas Valancunis in a starting role,

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's unquestionably a substantial upgrade from DeAndre Jordan as

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a backup center. Cam Johnson is a better player than MPJ,

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but I also think he's a better fit than MPJ

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in this phase of the Nuggets contention window, which will

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>dive deeper into here in a minute. It won't be

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>hard for Deron Holmes to be better than Dario Sarach was,

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the combination of Bruce Brown and

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Tim Hardaway Junior is a big step up from Russell

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook coming off. So this is quite simply the best

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>roster that Nikola Joka just had to work with in

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>his entire NBA career, and it's a big part of

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>why I'm so high on the Nuggets coming into this

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>particular season. Let's start with the Cam Johnson fit. We've

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about this plenty over the summer, but i'll go

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>over quickly again here. I think Cam represents an upgrade

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>over MPG in two clear areas that I think will

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>help the Nuggets on both ends of the floor. First

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that he's just a much better ball

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>handler than Michael Porter Junior. The lack of reliable ball

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>handling outside of guys like Jamal Murray and a little

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of Aaron Gordon was a big part of why

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Denver had to take high risk options like Russell Westbrook

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or leaning a lot on a young Julian Strawther. Now

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Mike Coel Porter Junior could scale up his offense a bit,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as we've talked about over the years, especially versus lower

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>level competition, but mostly in handoffs, and again that had

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>some limitations as you went against the higher level teams

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in the league. I think Cam Johnson is just a

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>much better ball handler than Mike. He should be able

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to actually run action both with Jokic and without Jokich

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>on the floor. I also like this in the context

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of Tim Hardaway Junior, who should be able to come

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in and run many of those same dribble handoff actions

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that Michael Porter Junior ran with nikolea Jokic. In short,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>the team has substantially more offensive firepower. Now, if you,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as a Nuggets fan, are worried about the catch and

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>shoot side of the catch and shoot side of things, yes,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Michael Porter Junior was taller. I'd argue at like pure

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>stand still shooting because of his height and the slight

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>increase in percentage, he's a little better than Cam Johnson there,

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't really manifest much in the percentages. Cam

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>was forty percent on catch and shoot threes last year,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>so was Michael Porter Junior. Cam was forty four percent

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>on unguarded catch and shoot threes. Michael Porter Junior was

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>forty five percent. So not much of a statistical difference there,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>even though we can admit that Michael Porter Junior is

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>probably a little better just because of his size and

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that specific side of things. The second piece here is

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the defensive end of the floor. In last year's version

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the team, Christian Brown was their primary point of

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>attack defender, and then if they ran into a situation

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>where they needed to guard another perimeter player that would

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>handle the ball, or if it was a bigger forward

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that was handling the ball, they would have to deploy

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Gordon there. They had no choice because Michael Porter

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Junior is not a good perimeter defender. When Michael Porter

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Junior is locked in, he can be a solid weak

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 1>side defender. He could protect the rim a little bit.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>He's a solid defensive rebounder, but he can't guard on

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the perimeter. I'm not saying that needing to deploy Aaron

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Gordon on the perimeter is the reason he got hurt,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but at this phase in his career, with the mileage

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that Aaron has on his body, I'd prefer to not

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>ask him to do that as much. Certain matchups like Lebron,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>James Kawhi Leonard, some guys that might be too strong

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for Cam. Sure, but I think Cam is a perfectly

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fine option to be your secondary point of attack defender

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>behind Christian Brown. That should allow you to keep Aaron

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Gordon in helpside more, keep him rotating at the rim,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>keep him there for defensive rebounding. Aaron Gordon had a

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a drop off in his rebounding last year.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't just injuries. A lot of it has to do

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with how often he had to be deployed on the perimeter.

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I just think that that's a better all around foundation

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for Denver's defense in general. I just think Km's a

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>better player than Michael Porter Junior, but he also is

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a better option on both sides of the floor for

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this phase of where Denver is in their title contention

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>with Jonis Valentcunis. The big thing I'm looking for is

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>scheme consistency. In years past, Denver would go small when

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Yokich was off the floor much of the time. They

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>tried centers, obviously with to no avail, but they would

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly go small and they do more switching on defense,

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Gordon and Jamal Murray would mostly go matchup hunting,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, it just didn't work in the large sample.

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.280
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really have any other option though, and that's

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>really the big difference here. They didn't have any options

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that they could go to other than that going small, switching,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>attempting to pick teams apart through matchup hunting with Gordon

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and with Murray. Having yonas will allow them to play

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a very similar style on both ends of the floor.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.239
<v Speaker 1>To the way they played with Nikolea Jokic right dribil

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Handoff's two man game with Jamal Murray. Yonis can pick

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and pop a little bit. Yonis can play out of

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the post, especially against favorable matchups. No, he can't do

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff as well as Jokic can, That's

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not what I'm trying to say. But against inferior NBA

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>talent that's coming off the bench for teams, he can

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>be reasonably effective there, and it allows you to continue

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to run the same things that you're running. Even on defense.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You can continue to run your higher drop coverage, perhaps

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with a guy like Deron Holmes operating on the back

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>line behind Yonas when he has to come up to

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the level. It's not necessarily about winning those minutes with

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Nikole Jokic off the floor. It's just about not hemorrhaging

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>points the way they had been last year. Once again,

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Denver lost ten points per one hundred possession when yokich

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>was off the floor. That's just that's gonna make it

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>really difficult to win basketball games in the playoffs. In

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eighty three possessions with Yokich off, they

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>lost by thirty one point one points per one hundred possessions.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>That is devastating to you, to your chances. Despite this,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they pushed OKC to seven and might have won if

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Gordon didn't get hurt. To be clear, it's not

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>just about Yonas either. I want to be clear as

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you kind of look down the roster. To me, it's

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about everything. It's about having Bruce Brown, it's about having

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Tim Hardaway Junior. It's about having Yonas Valanciunas. It's about

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>having options. I once had someone tell me money doesn't

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>give you happiness, but it gives you options. And I

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>felt that personally last week when we were moving up

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>here to Denver. We were doing our last phase of

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our move. It was a three phase move, and we

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>got a trailer and we were driving it up through

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>up Interseate twenty five and we hit Albuquerque and rush

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>hour traffic in the morning, and literally I blew a

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>tire on my truck and I was able to get

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a tow truck and I was able to get a

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of tires and get back on the road. I

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>remember when I was much younger, my wife and I

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>were moving from Charlotte to Tucson, and we had all

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of our stuff loaded up in two cars, and we

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>had our dogs with us, and it was a twenty

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>eight hour drive, and we were so broke. We literally

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't afford a hotel, like literally because of the dogs

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that if you wanted to get a place

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that would allow dogs or that would charge a dog fee,

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be like three or four hundred

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>bucks for us to spend the night. We couldn't afford it.

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we pushed through the night and it was

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>terrifying and I probably shouldn't have done it, and we

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>damn near got ourselves killed driving through West Texas in

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the night, as I'm damn near falling

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>asleep on the road. I didn't have options then, whereas

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>something far worse happened driving up pulling a trailer, But

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I had options. I was able to get a tow truck.

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I was able to get the tires. I was able

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to get us back on the road. In the past

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Nuggets, when they would be watching the wheels

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>come off, quite literally, David Adelman would look at the

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the bench and he wouldn't have those options, right,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't have this player that can go out there

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and patch the holes that could make things work in

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>those units when Yokic was off the floor. This is

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>what I mean when I say going beyond just yonis

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>so for instance, like one of the things that Mike

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Malone would also do over the years is he'd be like, well,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to stagger the starters more in with

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the bench unit and just have Yokic carrier. Inferior units

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have much more flexibility to do that now because I

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:08.559
<v Speaker 1>know that Bruce Brown and Tim Hardaway Junior can score

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>with Nikola Jokic. I know that those guys Bruce Brown

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>can run regular pick and roll and inverted pick and

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>roll slipping out of it with Jokic, Tim Hardaway Junior

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>can run many of the same dribble handoff actions that

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Nikola Jokic ran with Michael Porter Junior. They have the

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>options now to put more of their talent. They could

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>run Cam Johnson, Jamal Murray, and Aaron Gordon with Jonas Valanciunis,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>or in a bench group with Gordon at center and

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>have more talent on the floor during those units wellout

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>having to wear everybody out in the past, they have

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to push minutes to do that. In general, this depth,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it gives them options. It gives them the ability to

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>commit more to the defensive end throughout the entirety of

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the regular season because of the just the ability to

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>keep everybody's minutes down and ask people to do more

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>game to game, they have so much more in the

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>way of options. He's looking at his hand of cards

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and he has like three or four different ways that

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he can try to attack the situation. That did not

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>used to be the case. And again, it's not about

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>winning necessarily those minutes, but maybe losing the Yokichov minutes

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 1>by one or two points per one hundred possessions instead

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of by ten to fifteen points. That could massively improve

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>their chances both night tonight in the regular season and

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>when they get to the playoffs. As for the defensive

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the floor, I thought last year was a

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>good example of them straight up switching, like flipping the

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>switch right. It's a concept that's very dangerous. It's a

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>concept that has burned veteran teams over the years, but

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it has worked a few times in NBA history, and

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it usually is teams that have won championships in the past.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, the Nuggets did not lose because of

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>their defense. They guarded Oklahoma City about as well as

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they possibly could have a combination of having some high

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>end defensive personnel like Aaron Gordon and Christian Brown, they're

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>weaker defenders. Nicole Jokic and Jamal Murray both have very

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>high IQs, which allows them to scale up in those

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>situations just by being in the right spots as part

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>of the game plan. And credit to David Adelman. I

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>thought he did an excellent job of keeping Oklahoma City

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>off balance by constantly mixing up coverages and using a

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of zone. But they were a brutal regular season defense.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>This year, I expect them to be closer to that

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fifteen range. One because of depth. Like we

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned, more good players means less of a necessity

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to conserve energy night to night throughout the season because

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>you can keep people's minutes down, you know you got

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>enough good players to do it. And then two belief.

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this team's going to go into training camp

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>feeling like they have the opportunity of a lifetime to

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hoist the trophy again this year. That should lead to

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>more buy in throughout the season. I think this is

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the best team in the league. I think Jokic is

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a substantially better player than Shake Gildas Alexander. I think

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this roster is tailor made to his strengths. I think

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>if they can stay healthy, if they can get anything

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>close to the Jamal Murray they had in twenty twenty three,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna win the trophy. They have their vulnerabilities,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>especially against the second tier teams in the West, like

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota has given issues because of their center rotation, the

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Lakers because of Luka Doncicz Luca can cause some problems

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for their pick and roll defense. But I still think

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they're better than both of those teams, and I think

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>they match up really well with Oklahoma City, so they're

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>might pick to win the title this year. We'll get

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>into the actual contender rankings the week after we finish

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>our season previews. Today's show is brought to you by

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. We are still

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a month away from basketball tip off, but with hard

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet, the action never stops. The WNBA Finals start

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. If you haven't placed your first bet, now

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is the perfect time. Bet five dollars and if it wins,

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't just get your payout, you also cash in

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty bonus bets on top. If you

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to wait, you need more hoops in your life.

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>NBA futures are already live on hard Rock Bet. You

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>can bet the Finals, MVP, Rookie of the Year, six Man,

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more. Open up the app to see

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>everything that's live and lock in today's odds if you

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>like what you see. And on Wednesday, if you're already

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>betting on the hard Rock Bet sportsbook app, you know

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what that means, It's the last day to use your

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>legendary rewards drops. Open up the app today you could

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>have a bonus bet or who knows what's in there?

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>More drops every Thursday. The rewards and promos are NonStop.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Download the hard rock Bet app today and make your

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>first deposit, payble and bonus bets not a cash offer

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida and Florida offered

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>by Seminal hard Rock Digital, LLC in all other states.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>eight eight Admit it. In Indiana. If you or someone

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia. Moving on to Oklahoma City Thunder. So, to

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>be clear, right off the top, I'm picking Denver to

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>win the title. But this isn't like a Denver with

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City way down here. The gap is very small

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to me. If anything, I'd say they're on the same tier.

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I just would pick Denver to beat Oklahoma City in

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a series quick off season recap, they're basically the same team,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>plus nikoloatopicch is coming back from an injury that caused

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>him to miss all of last year. I actually think

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Topics could end up having like a decent sized role

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>on this team, because, as Indiana kind of exposed last year,

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they do have a little bit of a ball handling deficit,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think they could use someone to help them

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>run their offense. For stretches help with some advantage creation,

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>especially when Shay is off the floor, so I wouldn't

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if he plays quite a bit this year.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>The story of the Thunder is going to be internal

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>improvement in this season. It's been an arms race in

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the Western Conference all summer. The Nuggets added a bunch

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of talent. We just covered that. The Lakers are getting

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a better version of Luca and a massive upgrade at center.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>The Rockets. Obviously they lose Fred van Vliet, but if

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they can pull off a trade for a guard, they'll

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be a top tier contender. The Clippers added a bunch

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of depth. We covered that the other day. The Warriors,

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>if they get Horford, will be better. We covered that

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the other day the MAVs will be a pain in

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the ass after being out of the equation last year.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>The Spurs will likely join the mix in the Thunder. Rightfully,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>for the record, they stood pat so if they're going

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>to keep up, they need internal improvements. Last year's Thunder

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>would lose to this year's Nuggets in my opinion. I mean, hell,

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>last year's Thunder damn near lost to last year's Nuggets, right,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So what does that internal improvement look like for Oklahoma

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>City to maintain the gap between them and the rest

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the league as they get better around them. First

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, Shay's game management. She had a remarkable regular

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>season statistically, but his efficiency plummeted in the postseason, and

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought his inconsistent game management was a big part

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of how they had such an up and down postseason run.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Some nights he'd come out and do a great job

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of setting up his teammates and looking for advantages, picking

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>his spots as a score and keeping everybody in rhythm.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>And another Knights, he'd come out gunning, and he'd take

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the team out of rhythm. The stats here, we're insane.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>When the Thunder won in the postseason, they had a

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>one to twenty offensive rating. When they lost in the postseason,

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they had a one to ozh three offensive rating out

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of the sixteen playoff teams. If you took all their

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>offensive ratings just in losses, that ranked eleventh out of

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen teams. In short, their offense was awesome when

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>they won and legitimately terrible when they lost. Now two

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Shay's credit. Every time the shit hit the fan and

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the Thunder found themselves in like a must win situation.

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought he managed those games extremely well and he

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>got the job done. That's the beauty of everything that

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>happened with the Thunder last year. In many ways, they

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>showed the warts of their youth and won anyway. And

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what's scary about the potential future. Outside of Game

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>four of the finals, Game four of the Finals was

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the one time I thought Shay kind of had a

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>bad floor game in a big spot, but even then,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>he came alive down the stretch in the final minutes,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>made the big plays, got the win that they needed.

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>But this year, at all likelihood, the margin for air

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>will be smaller. The top six teams in the West

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are just better than they were last year, so Shay

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>becoming a more consistent game manager would go a long

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>way towards them helping avoid an upset. Ja Dubb's overall

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>development Jada was incredible in this playoff run, and for

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that reason he ended up cracking my top twenty players

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in our player rankings this year, but he was inconsistent

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as many young players are. Like when Jay

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Dubbs scored at least eighteen points, the Thunder went fourteen

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and two, when he failed to score eighteen points the

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>thunder went too five. The biggest piece was mostly his

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>three point shooting. He was five for thirty four from

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>three in those seven games where he failed to get

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen points. He did really it seemed like right

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the Nugget series it like clicked

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for him. You could tell he like realized that no

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>one can stop him from getting to the rim. It

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>felt like one of the big aha moments for him

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in his career. He's just starting to realize that he's

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the most gifted basket attackers in the NBA.

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We went over some of the stats in our player

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>rankings video that showed he's already one of the most

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>gifted drivers of the basketball in the entire league. But

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if you can balance that out with the reliable three

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>point shot, that's where he's going to become a very

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>dependable night to night player. And again, when I'm talking

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>about this and I'm about to talk about chet in

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a second, I'm not trying to be super critical of

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>these guys. I'm pointing this stuff out as a as

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a reason to get excited these guys. How many teams.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't how any fans around the league are looking

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>at their team and they're like, we kind of are

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what we are. We just have to hope we have

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>enough pieces. Like Oklahoma City can sit there and go like,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much better we're going to get

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, but these guys are going to be better.

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's very possible that even just over the course of

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the season, like sometimes guys take leaps in big spots,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>like you could have Chet figure it out and it

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>could all click in a big Western Conference finals series.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>That's a potential that this team has that many teams

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>around the league don't have. With Chet, it's his offensive development.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I thought Chet was phenomenal on defense in the entire

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>playoff run. His combination of rim protection and his ability

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to switch out onto guards was a huge part of

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>how Oklahoma City reached the level they reached defensively on

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>their way to get the trophy. But obviously on offense

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it was an adventure. Right. He had six twenty point games,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but he had four single digit games, and similarly to

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Jay Dubb, it was tied to the team's success when

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Chet scored at least thirteen points. The Thunder were thirteen

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and three. When he failed to score thirteen points, they

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>were three and four. Obviously, a big part of that

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>offensive rating we talked about in losses showed up in

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>a variety of areas. He was forty six percent on

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>layups in the playoff run. Obviously a player of his size,

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he just needs to get better at finishing around the

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>rim through contact. He took twenty six off the dribble

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>jump shots and only made six of them, so he

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>either needs to massively improve there or kind of trim

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that fan out of his game. We'll see, it'll probably

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of both. He shot thirty two

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>percent on catch and shoot jumpers, including thirty two percent

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>when he was unguarded, so he's got to be able

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to knock down open shots. And again, these are not criticisms.

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.959
<v Speaker 1>You literally just won the title and Chet is twenty

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>three years old. He's going to get way better, and

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>when he does, he's gonna be one of the best

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>players in the league. Like I genuinely believe Chet has

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>like Anthony Davis level two way potential. That's what he's

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>capable of getting to. He's obviously years from that, but

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he has that capability and how far he gets in

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that direction this season is going to be a big

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>part of whether or not they can stif arm the

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>rest of the Western Conference. And again, like whether it's

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Chet or it's Jadub, or it's Shay or it's guys

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>like case on Wallace, or whether or not Nicoleo Topitch

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>ends up succeeding in a decent sized role, that will

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be the difference in whether or not that can stiff

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>arm these teams or not. The West is an absolute beast.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>The top six teams are insane. I found the stat

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the other day and I found it very interesting. The

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>big reason Oklahoma City got to sixty eight wins wasn't

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that they outclassed the West. They only won three more

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>games against the West than the Los Angeles Lakers did.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Led by old man Lebron James, they went twenty nine

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to one against the East. That game where Oklahoma City

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>barely lost in Cleveland, that was their only loss against

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>an Eastern Conference team all season. This is not an

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>unbeatable team. As I said, I have them right there

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>with Denver as the best team in the league. And again,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all of those teams below, whether it be Houston or

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers or Minnesota. Minnesota Anthony Edwards got his ass

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>kicked last year. You don't think he's coming back with

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of an attitude, a little bit

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more of an effort to improve in the areas where

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Shay kicked his ass. We're going to talk about it

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in a second. The Clippers are a threat, Golden State's

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>a threat. These are all upset threats, right, and then

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Denver's right there with them. This is not going to

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>be easy for Oklahoma City to repeat. They're going to

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>need that internal improvement. But to make it very clear,

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>if they do get substantial leaps out of Shae, out

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of j Dub, out of Chet, they'll kick everyone's ass

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>and they'll hoist the trophy again as the first repeat

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>champion since twenty eighteen. Moving on to the Minnesota Timberwolves,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>relatively on event for off season. They lost to kill.

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Walker is really good player that I like, but

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a big loss for sure, Luca Garza and Josh Minatt.

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>They added Joan Bearinger in the draft is like a

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>super raw French big and some end of the bench guys.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more likely that we just see more

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of like Terrence Shannon and Jalen Clark rather than a

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>guy like Johnny Juzeng, for example. But we'll see the

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Timberwolves painful. As a Lakers fan reminded me last year

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that they are one of the best playoff teams in

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the NBA, regardless of how they look on any given

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.719
<v Speaker 1>night in the regular season. They're just sodamn big and

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>sodamn strong and sodamn physical and athletic and sodamn competitive

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>that they can just physically overwhelm you over the course

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of a series. But in each of the last two years,

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>they've run into a combination of three things, an elite

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>defense that can protect the rim, and a superior superstar

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>on the other team that could pick apart Minnesota's defense,

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and in both cases, their impressive playoff runs came to

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>screeching halts. Now, on the defensive end, there's only so

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>much you can do with the supreme superstars of the NBA.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>But I do think it's worth talking about the game planning,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like I do think Chris Finch was foolish for having

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Jaden McDaniels pick up Shakeous Alexander that far away from

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the basket. That was foolish, but I don't necessarily think

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>it changes the outcome of the series. It's just like

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the things it's worth mentioning for. As good

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>as Minnesota's defense was, both Oklahoma City and Dallas lit

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>them up, so game planning obviously is going to be

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>part of it as well, getting the most out of

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.880
<v Speaker 1>your defensive talent. But the biggest issue was their offense.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota logged a one oh four offensive rating in the

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>four losses versus Oklahoma City. That's just not going to

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>get it done. It starts with Ant. He's got to

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>become a more resilient, less variance dependent score. I talked

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton after the Western Conference Finals about how Shay

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>badly outclassed Ant as a mid to short range score,

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was literally the difference in the series.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Shay outscored Ant one fifty seven to one fifteen in

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that series. If your superstar gets outplayed to that extent,

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's almost impossible to overcome. Now, what I said at

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the time was that Ant needed to build out reliable

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>short range scoring, the ability to use his size and

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>strength to get closer to the against the elite perimeter

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>defenders of the league. But also to have a shot

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>that he can shoot over the rim protector so he

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to contend with those guys at the rim.

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So I was relieved when Shaan Sharani had reported last

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>week that Ant had spent all summer working on his

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>post game and his mid to short range scoring. That

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>means Ant is paying attention to what happened. It means

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he went back and watched the tape. He went back

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and looked at the numbers, and he saw where the

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 1>area of opportunity was. We shared these stats during our

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>player ranking series, but I want to share him again.

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Ant posted up twenty seven times in the twenty twenty

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>four playoff run and got one point one nine points

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>per possession. That's awesome. He posted up just seven times

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>total in the twenty twenty five playoff run. It was

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 1>a thing that really worked for him and he like

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>straight up abandoned it. There's a lot of talk about

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Ant's playmaking, and it's certainly something you want to see

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>him to continue to incrementally improve on over the years.

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's averaging six assists per game on a two

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>to one assist to turnover ratio over the last two

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>playoff runs like he's getting better. He'll continue to get

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>better there, but his supreme gift is scoring the basketball,

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and right now he's struggling to do that against the

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>absolute best defenses in the league. That's where he needs

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to become more reliable. That heavy shift towards three point

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>shooting and helped him in true shooting percentage in the

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>regular season. It helped him hit higher scoring volume. I'm

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not saying he needs to stop taking threes, but he

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>was six for thirty one from three again in the

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>four losses against Oklahoma City. Because that's something that can

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>happen when you rely on heavy, high volume three point shooting.

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Building out a reliable short range scoring game. It will

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>help him go bucket for bucket with guys like Shay

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and the best greats in the NBA. I thought the

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Julius Randall experiment went about as well as it could

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have gone given the clunky fit. He shot better from

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>three than you would think, like he was forty percent

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>over his last twenty one regular season games and then

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine percent in the playoffs. He also provided like

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a face up and low post creation element to kind

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of get the defense into rotation. I hated his game two.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 1>In Game four against Oklahoma City, it felt like he

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>was like openly pouting on the floor. But I'm trying

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to cut him at least a little bit of slack,

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>just simply because Oklahoma City embarrassed a lot of guys

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with their defense in that playoff run. In general, I

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>think he fits the identity of the team really well.

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>He's a big, physical ass kicking forward that can really

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>leverage that physicality in the postseason. He had twenty seven

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>offensive rebounds in the playoffs, and he was a pretty

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>efficient twenty four points per game before the Minnesota series.

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that trade and that experiment worked out

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about as well as it possibly could have given the

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>way it looked at the time of the trade. Those

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>two guys ultimately control this team's destiny. The defense is

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the defense. They definitely need more from Chris Finch and

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>game planning, like we talked about to prevent your defense

0:29:54.800 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>from just completely falling apart against Luca and SGA. More

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>mixing up of coverages, including some zone, more willingness to

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>adjust when things aren't working. I don't think the Nikil

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Walker loss greatly affects their fortunes like he wasn't

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in their best five. He's very good. I like Alexander Walker.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted him on the Lakers this summer, but like

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not in their best five. And I do think

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season, guys like Terrence Shannon and Jalen

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Clark can be productive enough to prevent much of a

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>drop off there, and one of those guys, one of

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>those two dudes will end up popping just enough to

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to give you a shift or two per

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>game when they get to the postseason. They also match

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>up really well with Denver, which I think is a

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>strong foundation for a case that Minnesota could win the conference.

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>They just need to be able to score the ball

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>when they face an elite defense that can protect the rim.

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, what I'm saying is they've got to be

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>able to handle Oklahoma City if they can get there,

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to depend on Julius Randall avoiding those

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>disaster games than the Edwards becoming a better and more

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>reliable score hopefully built around the idea of short to

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>mid range scoring as well as the incremental improvements as

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a playmaker. The pathways there for Minnesota, like it's easy

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to see Minnesota gets on the opposite side of the

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>bracket from Oklahoma City and Denver, and Denver upsets Oklahoma City.

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You get Minnesota Denver in the conference finals, repeat of

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened two years ago. All of a sudden, you're

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in the finals and you're probably favored when you get there,

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>but again that's not guaranteed. There's a chance. There's a

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>good chance you run into Oklahoma City somewhere along the way,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>especially if they end up with the one and two seed.

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So at that point you're going to have to solve

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that puzzle when you get there. Right, We're going to

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>go more quickly through these last two Portland Trailblazers off

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>season recap. They lost dere And and Andrey Simons. They added

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Drew Holliday and Damian Lillard, who's going to miss all

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and Young Hansen, who was their first

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>round pick at number sixteen. Kind of an interesting pick.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Most draft boards graded him as a second rounder. My

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>guy Sam Vessini, who is the person I trust the

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>most with the draft, he had him at forty eight.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>The Blazers also had just drafted Donovan Klingen, so I

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>guess they're looking at this as like a center by

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>committee thing. I was looking at some quotes and apparently

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at as like Donovan Klingon is your big,

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>physical ass kicking center, and then Yang Hansen is basically

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like your finesse you know, offensive skill oriented center. The

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Blazers have some really interesting young talent. Shade and Sharp

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>had a bunch of really big scoring games down the

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>stretch of the season. Although that was a lot of

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>like high usage chucking. Denny Avdya really popped at the

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. In his final thirteen games. This

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is crazy. Denny Avdia averaged twenty seven points, eleven rebounds,

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and six assists, and he won his minutes. And he

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>did it on fifty two percent from the field, forty

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>six percent from three, and eighty two percent from the line.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And the big thing is, like, again, you see a

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of noise at the end of the year, especially

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>with teams that don't really have anything to play for.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>They put the ball in the hands of a bunch

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of random do dudes, and sometimes they can put up

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>numbers like I like Shaden Sharp, but I don't expect

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Shadon Sharp to be a guy that's gonna average twenty

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>six points a game like he did down the stretch

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Right Like to me, like the major

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on ball stuff isn't really coming forward for me as

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>something that I think he's ready for just yet. But

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>like the Denny Ovdyus stuff, I view that as real.

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe not to the extent is of him

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>like averaging twenty seven points per game for a whole season,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>but especially with the Scoot Henderson injury, who apparently tore

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>his hamstring the other day. I wouldn't be surprised if

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>they start with Denny as like their primary shot creators

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>start the year. And I wouldn't be surprised if we're

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty games into the season and Denny's averaging like twenty

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.479
<v Speaker 1>five points, ten rebounds, five assists on sixty percent through shooting.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>He's just he's a really gifted offensive player. He shot

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>pull up threes insanely well. He's got forty one percent

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on seventy pull up threes with Portland. He showed that

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in ball screens when guys would go under. He showed

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it in ISO out of dribble combinations on like step

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>backs and things like that. He's got like real downhill

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>burst you'll see it in ISOs where he'll just catch

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and he'll get a big on a switch and he'll

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>just hit the gas going to the right and he'll

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>dust somebody off the dribble. He'll in a ball screen

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.279
<v Speaker 1>if the BIG's not up at the level, he'll get

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>downhill into the lane, driving clothes out, so he'll hit

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a really hard like left handed or like a jab

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>step to the left and then drive to the right

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where he gets really good first step quickness. He's got

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.399
<v Speaker 1>some bullyball to his game where he'll just power through guys.

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 1>He'll drop that right shoulder and just go through guys

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the basket. He's got like really

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>nice change of pace on his drives, like in ball screens,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he'll put the defender in jail and trap him on

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the backside and hit a little floater or like a

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>step through something like that. He'll like burst downhill and

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>then slow way down with slow down steps. His bigs

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 1>jump around him, and then he'll find a little angle

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>he'll euro or he'll slide through some weird gap where

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it'll look like he's driving towards the left and then

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>somehow finish on the right as he swalloms through the

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>lane like it's honestly a little Luca Lights. Sometimes he's

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got pump fakes and like up and unders and

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>step throughs where he'll get to little short floaters and

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>short jump shots. Honestly, I think it's a really impressive

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>move from this Portland front office to find an underappreciated

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>talent in this league. And to be clear, I wasn't

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 1>watching the Wizards a ton back then. I wasn't aware

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>of this upside myself. But he has my attention now

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's really really good. As I was

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>digging into the Portland tape this morning, you know, you're

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a lot of noise, like we talked about,

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>but in that noise, you're gonna see things that you

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think are real, And Denny Avdia being like potentially a

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>legitimate like shot creator in this league is something that

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I think is real and I'm really really excited to

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>watch him this year. Tamani Kamara and Drew Holliday will

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>make a formidable pairing of defensive weapons, and they have

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a strong defensive center rotation with Donovan Klingen and Rob Williams.

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:59.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't have their clear foundational superstar yet and I'm

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not sure if Scoot hender will ever be that, but

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>they do have some really strong foundational pieces. I think

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the main goals for this season are find out if

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Denny is good enough to be a championship number two,

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>give him the ball a ton, and then see what

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the upside is trending towards with guys like Scoot Henderson,

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.959
<v Speaker 1>if he can be healthy and shade and sharp right.

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>If they're not, then it's time for you to start

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:26.959
<v Speaker 1>planning how to get that foundational superstar again. The thought

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 1>process is, you need a number one, you need a

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>number two, and you need complimentary role players. And you

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know what complimentary role players you need until you

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>know what your number one and your number two are.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think getting Denny and like seeing that upside

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see. It's got to you know, it's one

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>thing to do it for twenty games or whatever. At

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the season, you got to you gotta

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to do it. Over the course of

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a season. There's gonna be attempts to figure him out

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in scouting, and teams will figure out ways to guard

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>him better than they did. There was a lot of

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>like going underpicks on Denny. There are certain teams that

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>chase him over, Like I watched the game with the

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>Knicks where they chased him over the entire game, and

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where he showed a lot of that like putting

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the defender in jail type of stuff. But then there

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are other games where dudes are dying on picks and

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, if you're going to hit pull up

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>threes at forty percent, they're gonna start chasing you over

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the top. Right, We're going to see the league try

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to figure Denny out and then we will find out

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>if Denny is worth building around as that like secondary

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>star on a real team with real chances. But Portland's

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be a really fun league pass team this year.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised if they got up around thirty

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to thirty five wins. But we will see. Lastly, today

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Utah Jazz. They lost Jordan Clarkson, John Collins, Colin Sexton,

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Johnny Juzang, Jaden Springer, and they added Mobamba, a bunch

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of vets that they'll probably trade or buy out at

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>some point, like Kyle Anderson. Kevin loved George's Kniang and

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>use Nurkic. A couple of really interesting draft picks, like

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Ace Bailey out of Rutgers, who's the He's like a

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>tough shot maker that can't make tough shots yet and

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unrealized defensive upside, so, in other words,

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like a big upside pick. So well if he can

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>reach that upside. And then Walter Clayton Junior is the

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>guard out of Florida who made a name for himself

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in the NCAA Tournament in a deep run. I don't

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have a ton to say about the Jazz. They don't

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like they've made any progress towards their big picture plans.

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They clearly don't have their franchise superstar yet. I mean,

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Ace Bailey has that upside, I suppose, but that's a

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>long shot. It's certainly like a half decade away. And

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I like Lori Markinen is a potential number two for

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the right superstar. We're going to talk about him in

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the context of the Detroit Pistons in the video coming

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.839
<v Speaker 1>up on Monday, but he's twenty eight years old now,

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not sure how he fits Utah's timeline unless

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you have a plan to bring in a superstar that's older. Right.

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I continue to see reports coming out of Utah that

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>they have no intention of trading him, which makes no

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. Like, I get that he's a great

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>guy and a great player, and you like having him

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in the organization, but he's a great vehicle with which

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to give your team more opportunities to find the foundational superstar,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>which you don't have yet. There's no young player on

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>this roster below the age of twenty five that has

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:02.080
<v Speaker 1>real big picture upside other than Ace Bailey, who you

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just brought in and we've never seen play in the

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>pros and in college was a mess. Right, So I

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.359
<v Speaker 1>guess this year there's some interesting stuff, right, Like we'll

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>see if the Jazz trade Lori to a contender. We'll

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>see if Ace Bailey pops it all. But I'm kind

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>of unfamiliar with where Utah is trying to get at

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this point in time. All Right, guys, It's all I

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have for today is always to sincerely appreciate you guys

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for supporting us and supporting the show. We'll be back

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, going back out yeast. I believe the Central Division,

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>if I remember correctly, so I will see you guys.

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Then