WEBVTT - Fantasy Football Weekly Week 10 0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:05.040 Fan Forecast Life from the Exogen Temporal Scanner, Thermometer Weather Center. 0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:09.920 Right now, it's fourteen the common Man weekdays noon to 0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.080 three from the Cafe and Briant Heating and Cooling Studios 0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.080 on FM one point three kf X in Minneapoli. St 0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:24.599 Paul the Fan Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly on 0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:30.080 the Fan, presented by grain Belt Premium and Devani's your 0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:36.000 weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football speculation and advice. 0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:42.559 Fantasy Football Weekly is brought to you by fanball dot Com, 0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:49.320 town Hall Family, Greater Twin Cities, Honda Dealers, Show Sensors, Hudson, 0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:55.600 Ford and by Park Tavern now Wow along with fanball 0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:02.400 dot Com, Scott Fish, Matt Harrison, and Brian in Johnson Fans, 0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.039 it is week number ten. Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly 0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.640 on the Fan. I am Paul Charchy and my co 0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:16.280 host today or Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Good morning, guys. 0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.160 Is that a tribute to the long lost Christian Peterson 0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.040 right there? Sure? Yeah? We like that, Um, we don't 0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.040 like Christians just like Yeah, he apparently don't hasn't been 0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.000 on the show in two years now because he won't 0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.160 come on the show too good for us. That's you know, 0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:32.920 if you're gonna say you're too good for us, then yes, 0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.000 that was the case. Church. You'll appreciate this, and it 0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.440 was something that connects with our fantasy football almost daily podcast. 0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.240 We did an appliance draft at lunch the other day. 0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:42.959 Was Christian. I could just do it out of my 0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.240 kitchen because all I've done is buying new appliances for 0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.160 the last year. I can tell you which ones you 0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.440 do not want to fall into. I can I can 0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.320 rank them, um, and the one you really don't want 0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.480 to fall into, other than the burning oven, I think 0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:00.960 would probably be the dishwasher. Take it from me, um 0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:02.960 Plenty to get to over the course of the show 0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.840 is our usual stuff. But I've got two things that 0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.600 I want to talk about before we got dive into 0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.520 our matchups and are take a chance on me and 0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.959 everything else? Number One, the news in Baltimore that Joe 0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.720 Flacco may miss an extended period of time there. I'm 0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.480 by this week coming out of the by the presumption 0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:22.520 is that Lamar Jackson will be the starter, but we 0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.040 don't know for sure. There are some reports saying, you 0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.840 know that r G three is technically the number two 0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.760 quarterback I guess on the depth chart, but they because 0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.960 they like the running that Lamar Jackson can do and 0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.040 all the hybrid stuff they've been utilizing him and for 0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:40.079 gadget place. But that doesn't mean that if they need 0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:42.680 an every damn quarterback they'd go to Jackson. What are 0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.359 your thoughts on acquiring either of the Ravens quarterbacks? So 0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:49.960 what this says to me is that the Ravens aren't 0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.640 quite ready to move on from Joe Flacco yet. The 0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.880 only reason you do not start the Lamar Jackson era 0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.160 and and go with Bobby three sticks Robert Griffin. The 0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.919 third is you're not ready to move on from Joe 0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.559 Flacco because you can easily go back from Griffin to Flacco. 0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.600 But if Lamar Jackson comes in and has a couple 0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.400 of good games, there's no turning back. So I think 0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:17.160 that they still have some legitimate loyalty to Joe Flack, 0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.000 which he very If Lamar Jackson does get in there Cincinnati, Oakland, 0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.079 Atlanta to start out, That's why I'm picking up Lamar Jackson. 0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.240 You guys are putting us in fantasy terms. I mean, 0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.440 I say, you know, my immediate response on Twitter was 0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.799 go get Lamar jack He was picked up everywhere within 0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.200 five minutes of Yeah, you have to, because uh, you're 0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:41.440 gonna get from Lamar Jackson probably RB two running numbers 0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.160 like fifty yards rushing and a coin flips chance at 0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.720 at a at a touchdown, which is you know what 0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.760 you're getting when you're starting Keevin Coleman, right, and then 0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.240 all the passings just gravy. Basically, if he can throw 0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.040 for hundred ninety yards and a touchdown, that's just all 0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.400 bonus points. That's a that can be in sort of 0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.880 like Robert Griffin the third when he was before yeah, right, 0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.920 when he could actually run. So I'm I'm I'm actually 0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.520 pretty excited about Jackson. Um already had him, had had 0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:12.040 him statted from the beginning of the year in a 0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.040 couple of leagues. But there's a I highly recommend that 0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:16.919 people go out and get Lamar Jackson and see how 0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.000 this thing plays out. Robert Griffin and even if Robert 0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.920 Griffin were the game the first starter with Flacco out, 0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:28.080 does not mean Griffin will be the game too starter 0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.480 with with Flacco out. So let's get Lamar Jackson. Keep 0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.200 our fingers crossed that they go to the first round 0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:39.359 rookie next hypothetically, and this is the case for a 0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.480 lot of our listeners. You're down by fifty points after 0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:48.000 the crazy explosion of points that came on Thursday night. Guys, 0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.480 give some advice to those people that are already down 0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:54.160 by a wide margin. What do you do? Just hang 0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.960 it up, just talking out. Don't even try quit fantasy 0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:00.960 football altogether. I mean, yeah, it's just over. It's high risk, 0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.360 high reward guys. You you look at your wide receiver 0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.920 to wide receiver three and your flex plays, and you go, 0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.560 which guy has the crazy high upside but the crazy 0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.680 low floor, and and you try to just hit on 0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.640 a couple of those. It's it's got to be playing 0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:19.800 the same with the ones that were close. Like if 0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.840 you have two quarterbacks and one is fits and one 0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.120 is like Dalton has the higher upside. And I think 0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.880 throughout the show today, when we're going through the matchups, 0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.960 maybe we can use like some sort of sound or 0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.160 something like that to to signify some of these players 0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.560 that doesn't seem high upside while you're down by fifty. 0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.480 If you're down by fifty right now, that's that's how 0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.200 you're feeling Okay, the sad trombone play, We're gonna call it. 0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.520 We can do this. The vulture doesn't really make sense. 0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.600 We need that better, No, we really do. It'll come 0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.400 up with something. There's gonna be some amazing comebacks by 0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.440 teams though stories I think there will be. Yeah. The 0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.960 thing you're missing on is get try to hook up 0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:02.280 together quarterback wide receiver so that if your wide receiver 0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.080 goes off, he takes the quarterback with him, or vice versa. 0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.560 The quarterback goes off, he probably you know you've got 0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.400 something out of your out of your your receiver as well. Well, 0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.600 how about this too, If your quarterback is playing your 0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.520 opponent's wide receiver or vice versa, do you try to 0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.480 avoid those matchups? Well, yeah, I mean I think. Well 0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:21.799 let's so let's flip it over. Let's say you're protecting 0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.000 a fifty point lead, like because of a lot of 0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.919 our listeners are very savvy fantasy players, of course, so 0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.240 let's assume any of them are protecting a fifty point 0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.240 lead right now, flip it over for them and talk 0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.320 about what you do to make sure that you don't 0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.240 end up on the wrong side on Sunday. Well, super 0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.480 safe plays. If uh, if I'm the Drew Breese owner 0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.279 and my opponent's got Michael Thomas, I'm very happy having 0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.080 Drew Brees in my lineup because every Michael Thomas touchdown 0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.360 down to so that that's kind of how you play. 0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.240 You just you just go ultra safe and and you 0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.200 go for the guys that are lower. You look at 0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.800 receivers who catch a lot of passes and will give 0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.960 you your PPR points and not necessarily, say a Tyler 0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.680 Lockett who needs to turn three receptions into a touchdown. 0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.640 If Tyler Lockett doesn't give you the touchdown, you're stuck. 0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.840 You want Jarvis Landry's of the world. You do you 0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.640 want Jarvis Landry. You want your safe plays right down 0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.840 the middle of the fairway if you're up by fifty points. 0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.000 All right, let's dive into the matchups, beginning with probably 0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.920 the least interesting one of the entire day, Bills taking 0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.680 on Jets. We have two new quarterbacks at home in 0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.520 all probability for this game at the entire day, try 0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.280 the entire year. While that could be too um, I've 0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.240 got Buffalo on the bench. Okay, as a team, Yeah, 0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.240 the team is on the bench. The Bills have not 0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.640 thrown a touchdown pass in three weeks. They have three 0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.920 passing touchdowns on the season to sixteen interceptions. That's unbelievable. Also, 0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.640 the Bills running backs have not run for a touchdown 0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.920 since Week two. God, that's that's unreal. That's the worst 0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.840 offense maybe in the history of the league. It's it's 0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.080 gonna be in that conversation if they don't turn it around. 0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.440 And so let's flip it over to the Jet side. 0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.600 Isaiah Crowle and Elijah McGuire are my only starters on 0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.400 the Jets side, and they're barely starters like c minus starters. 0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.200 The Bills have allowed twelve touchdowns to running backs in 0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.120 nine games. That's the good part. The only problem is 0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:14.400 is now we're looking at a split timeshare backfield and 0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:18.240 only one back is top the century mark against them. 0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.080 I'm not excited about either, but either are available to 0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.360 be played. Uh. Josh McCown is starting for the Jets 0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.200 as quarterback. He's on the bench. The Bills are only 0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.000 allowing two or twenty five passing yards per game. That's 0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.080 tied for the third fewest in the NFL. Robby Anderson 0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.080 has an ankle injury, he may not go, and he 0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.440 was an account's favorite target last year. Quincy and None 0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:40.720 one Jermaine Curse are both on the bench as well, 0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.199 and none was pretty much moved to the outside now 0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.600 and Curses moved inside as the slot received around an 0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.040 almost full time basis. Yeah, but now with the change 0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.160 of quarterbacks, so you under Darnald it was just like, 0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.319 you know, we just fed the slot over and over 0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.080 and over again. But now we're at McCown, so you know, 0:08:56.160 --> 0:09:00.240 McCown was not as slot oriented in the past. Thing 0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.960 I'm worried about is ann one matches up with tred 0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.360 Davis White, who's a well above average cornerback in the NFL, 0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.160 so he's on the bench, and then Chris Herndon, who 0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.240 scored in three of his last four, but that was 0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.040 all with Donald. I don't know the relationship between McCown 0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:22.600 and Herndon. Thank you sage like wisdom from Scott Fish 0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.920 and the Bills are only allowing four receptions in forty 0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:26.839 one yards per game to opposing tight ends, so it's 0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.319 not something I want to chase after here with Herndon. Um, 0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.760 I think overall the Jets are better. Honestly, the way 0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.040 that Donald had played for the last month. The whole 0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.199 offense is a little bit better with Josh McCown, even 0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.360 on zero reps for this year. I think the over 0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.640 under in this game is thirty seven, and I think 0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:47.360 i'd take the under. Scott Seahawks taking on the Rams. 0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:51.800 This is a surprisingly good Seahawks defense, and um, does 0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.719 this present any problems for the Rams. I'm just to 0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.360 hear what you have to think. I don't know. The 0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.920 last game they played one kind of the shootout actually, UM, Seahawks. 0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:02.080 Obviously you can tell by the score. She has almost 0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:03.960 won that game. It was it was touch and go. Yeah, 0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.040 they really did, and they did it on the ground 0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.600 with thirty four touches to running back. Say, I wonder 0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.480 if that's a little bit of the blueprint to hold 0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.360 the Rams down. UM, let's start with a running game 0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.520 instead here we usually start with the passing. Let's start 0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.640 with the running game. Uh. Carson has been questionable a week. 0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.439 It's likely he's going to play. If he doesn't, Mike 0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.560 Davis is a huge must play. Mike Davis has has 0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.280 been the starter twice this year, and he was RB 0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.679 six and RB eleven in those two starts, so he's 0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.360 a definite start if if not, Carson gets a two 0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.000 to one advantage in touches. Usually, So I meet Carson 0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.000 a B grade and Davis a C grade because I 0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.040 although there's a scenario out there which is tricky where 0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:49.480 Carson's active, but maybe they don't use them or they 0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.520 give them much reduced role. It's very it's very difficult 0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:57.120 to project here. You guys remember Penny, Yeah, that was funny. No, no, 0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:58.840 I don't even know who you're talking. I think I 0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.959 think he plays a couple of shole team snaps every 0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.920 once in a while for a first rounder. Uh, kind 0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.239 of like Corderol Patterson for US for a while. Um 0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.360 Russell Wilson gave him a B grad's he's starting to 0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.160 heat up. He has seventy six rushing yards over the 0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.640 last three games. He only had forty two rushing yards 0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:17.920 in the first five games toital He's starting to add 0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:21.040 those rushing yards to his UH, to his uh, you know, 0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.560 inventory of points he's getting or whatever. It has potential 0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.080 for a good game script for for Wilson. I think 0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.800 it's possible they fall behind, very very possible they fall 0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.280 behind and have to keep catching up. So I have 0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.320 a B grade on Russell Wilson here. I give most 0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.920 of his receivers bs and seas as well. Baldwin looks 0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.520 like he's gonna play. I barely give him a B grade. 0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.440 He has seventy five plus yards in two of the 0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.040 last three. He's super inconsistent, but he's still the his 0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:53.240 Russell Wilson's number one guy. It's a unsteady, unsteady B grade. 0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.240 He gets the best cornerback the Rams half too, though, Nickel, 0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.320 Robie Coleman and not. So I like his one on 0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.120 one matchup the East out of the group. You're you 0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.640 like Baldwin more than Baldwin jumps around. He's like he's 0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.480 normally a slock guy. But it's only like so he 0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.520 does jump around. Uh lock it B grade. I almost 0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:17.240 considered an age just because Marcus Peters is game destroyed constantly. Um, 0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.079 Baldwin being in is is the scary thing because with 0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.880 Baldwin out, Uh, he topped fifty yards in every game 0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:25.800 and scored in two of them. With Baldwin in, he 0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.000 hasn't topped three catches yet this season. That once, Yeah, 0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:31.160 it's he's he's You've got to get the touchdown out 0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.080 to lock it, but it could happen in this game, 0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.719 and he's had six touchdowns in eight games, so it 0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.640 could definitely happen. I have a B grade, unlock it, 0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.000 a C grade on more barely it becomes very safe 0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.440 if Baldwin comes out. But he has five red zone 0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.120 targets in the last three weeks, scoring scoring in three 0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.800 of them, and Russell Wilson trusted him with the very 0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.000 last play the game last week, which tells tells me 0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.000 a lot about his trust and David Moore around the 0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.560 end zone. So C grade there, goff. Basically, I gave 0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.199 all a's to the Rams except for Cooks. I gave 0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.480 a B and I'll explain why a second, but Golf 0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.440 A grade. My only concern here is the Seahawks have 0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:08.959 not allowed its top twelve fantasy quarterback yet this season. 0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:10.920 It's shocking to me. Now they played a lot of 0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.800 garbage quarterbacks. That's exactly where I was gonna go, So 0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.560 I'm not gonna go over it. But yes, they played 0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.520 a lot of garbage, A lot of garbage quarterback. Um 0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.640 uh yeah, I lost my train of thought there, but 0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:27.200 I I really I stopped on your Yeah, exactly exactly. 0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:30.320 It's fine. Golf had five has five hundred yard games 0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.760 and five multi touchdown games, and see has a lot 0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.120 of back to back touch multi touchdown games to quarterbacks. 0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:36.800 I'm still gonna give him an a here, can I 0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:38.760 can I mention my my golf stat that I may 0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.600 have mentioned last week, But I just think it's so 0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.440 salient here, and it's playing itself about about Girly. When 0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:49.960 Girly only only scores one or zero rushing touchdowns, Jared 0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:55.160 Goff absolutely goes off. His average game when Gurley only 0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.560 has zero or one touchdowns is three fifty yards and 0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.760 three almost three and a half touchdowns per game. So 0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.760 if Gurly doesn't eat all the touchdowns, Golf gets them, 0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:06.760 so they're always going to score the points. So to me, 0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.040 it's always all about how good is Gurly going to be? 0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:15.240 Is the first question. Yeah, so, yeah, exactly, But I 0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.480 think Golf is startable either way. And he's a low 0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:20.960 a even in the for me in the in those 0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.480 other games, but he's made grade here. Wood's given a 0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.880 grade because he's the super consistent target leader. Five catches 0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:33.080 and seventy yards or more than those in eight straight games. Uh, 0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.880 Cooper Cup. I love Cup. I think this is a 0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.440 great spot for him. He gets justin Coleman, who plays 0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.000 off his slot receiver by six point eight yards. Why 0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.800 that's relevant is that when Russell Wilson targets Cooper Cup 0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.880 and there's more than five yards cushion, he has a 0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:52.560 near perfect passer rating. Uh and uh, it's just a 0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.920 smash spots here. Eight team catches, eight yards and three touchdowns. 0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.400 He just if they do that, if they did that 0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.600 to Cup, He's gonna hit Cup all day long. Cooks. 0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.720 I give the B grade here too. Uh. Cup and 0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.960 Woods have scored fourteen and a a half Fantasy points more 0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.560 than fourteen and a half Fantasy points all but one 0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.120 time combined. Cooks has done it four of eight wakes. 0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:15.760 He does it every other week, and this is an 0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.800 off week for him, so that's that's kind of random. 0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:20.960 But he can get the two for fifty two. He 0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.520 could explode. He's still gonna be He's still startable. But 0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.840 he's the one that I'm most concerned about. Interesting. Robert 0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:28.560 Woods is another one of these safe right down the 0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.520 middle wide receivers. Right, you want your seventy yards and 0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.120 your six receptions and Woods chips in another ten. Here's 0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.120 your guy to help protect your fifty point lead from 0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.920 Brandon Cook exactly. He's the guy you need for the 0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.520 McCaffrey deficit correct correct or the Bendom deficit or the 0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.680 Antonio Brown deficit. Yes, anyway, but by the way, a 0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:52.880 Cup is scored in four straight, five of six where 0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:54.960 he played the full game. How about that? Yeah, he 0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.560 quietly Cup his like up. He was a top five 0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:59.920 red zone guy last year and this year in games play, 0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:07.640 So going forward, Cooper Cup top ten receiver because nobody's 0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.200 thinking that. But I bet if we look at his 0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.720 full game averages, I bet he's a top ten receiver 0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.520 in fantasy. Yeah. I think it's pretty close. I bet 0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:16.640 it's close right there. I bet quietly Cooper Cup is 0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.640 right around a top ten wide receiverate twelve team league. 0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.920 He's probably a wide receiver one. When we come back, 0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.240 Lions take on the Bears. Will tell you if the 0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.080 Lions offense is going to get back on track after 0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:36.600 last week's to backle when we return, this is take 0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:42.080 a chance on me? Is how about that? All right? 0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:51.760 This is very wow. This is how you a woman's woman. 0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:59.880 Maybe this would be in the background of some Come 0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:05.639 of age teenage eighties film, right during some some scene 0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.320 in which Mike Lanthony Hall is half naked, come on 0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:19.359 tripping over his underwear. Somedays take a chance on me, right, Well, 0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.240 take a chance on me. Nine players not normally in 0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.560 your starting lineup. All three of my guys are waiver 0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.040 wire players, and I think most of these are our 0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.640 guys that are available on the waiver wire. They've all 0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.879 got good upside. You're down by a lot. Think about 0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:39.040 these guys beginning eat the quarterback position, Scott uh So, 0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.000 I'm going with Marcus Mariota. Mariota has just one game 0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.280 over two yards on the season and failed to even 0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.399 get a touch on four of seven. That's what worries 0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.440 That's what worries me, Okay, but he has a similar 0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.960 skill set to Trabinsky, who had who had three and 0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.880 thirty two and two and eight one in one rushing 0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:58.720 against them. I think there's a lot of garbage time 0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.200 here and the pets on the rutor allowing just over 0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.200 three hundred yards and two touchdowns per game. So I 0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.439 like that angler. I actually think it's passing hasn't been 0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.399 half bad. Matt your quarterback. First off, I have to 0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.399 read a text message from my wife Melissa, who says, nope, 0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:18.480 not how you Thank God, well done Melissa. Yes, my 0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.400 take a chance on me. Quarterback is Baker Mayfield, who's 0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.399 available and I think has some huge upside here. Uh. 0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.920 The Falcons have given up over three hundred yards passing 0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.240 to six of the eight quarterbacks they faced on the season, 0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.439 and three or more touchdown passes to five of those 0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:40.840 six quarterbacks. So five quarterbacks have topped three hundred and 0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.720 had at least three touchdowns. Amazing. That's nuts. Now, Baker 0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.680 hasn't topped the three hundred yard mark in the last 0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.280 four weeks, but he has thrown multiple touchdown passes in 0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.600 each of his last three. I like that streak to 0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.080 continue this week. I like him too. You know, Baker 0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.400 keeps having these easy matchups and he hasn't really exploited 0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.200 him yet. Maybe this is the one where it all 0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:02.280 comes together. Josh Rosen goes up against Kansas City and 0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.680 before last week's by he you may have not remembered, 0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.400 and I don't blame you. He's had his best game 0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.720 ever two hundred fifty two yards and two touchdowns for 0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.240 Josh Rosen, Larry Fitzgerald finally healthy for the first time 0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.400 since September, and David Johnson has an awesome matchup through 0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.879 the air. The Kansas City secondary playing better middle of 0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:25.040 the pack anyway, but every opposing quarterback except Case Keenum 0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:28.840 has scored against them, and the Cardinals sixteen point underdogs 0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.960 are likely to be playing from behind and throwing constantly 0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:36.000 in this game. I love David Johnson by himself might 0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.200 power Josh Rosen to a huge game through the air. 0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.120 Let's go to the running back position, Scott, I'm going 0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.480 way off for it here with a guy named Josh 0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.080 Adams for the Eagles. UH. Adams said. Adams lead the 0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.240 team and carries last week, you know, before the bye, 0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.560 and he has fifty of the team's running back to 0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.400 attempts inside the tent over the last two weeks. He's 0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.760 a bigger back. He average six point eight yards per 0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:01.680 carrying that game against Jacksonville, which is pretty good run defense. UH. 0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.119 Cowboys will be without Sean Lee and Sprawls. Darren Sprawls 0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.439 is already marked out. They know what they have in 0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.960 small Wood and Clement. I can see them giving Adams 0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.800 a legit shot here Okay, I've got Edo Smith of 0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.840 the Falcons going against Cleveland. He's due for about twelve 0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.040 ish touches in this game, splitting time with Tevin Coleman, 0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.359 but the matchup is just too juicy to pass on. 0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.920 The Browns are bottom ten and nearly every statistical category 0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.000 against opposing running backs. They're allowing an average of a 0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.639 hundred and seventy two total yards per game to the 0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.800 position that's tied, and they're tied for the most rushing 0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.760 touchdowns allowed. The Falcons rank number eight in the NFL 0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:43.000 in yards created before contact, So they're opening holes and 0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:47.639 they're getting Edo open along the way. All right, I've 0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:52.000 got Spencer wear against Arizona, and I I like this 0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.560 one as much as I liked Duke Johnson last week, which, 0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.520 by the way, I couldn't help but bring up, wait, 0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.520 it's not on here? Where is what happened? Did Tony 0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.359 take it with him? D I got two heavy carbons 0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:10.360 and I don't have a I don't have a peacock. 0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.280 But there it is. There's the peak. Where did the 0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:21.480 from the button bar? Oh? This is not cool. There 0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:27.040 it is there we go, thank you, uh Spencer? Where 0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:28.720 the Chiefs are gonna roll in this game. As I 0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.720 mentioned with Josh Rosen and backup runners, Spencer, where it's 0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.840 gonna get a lot of run in this game. Arizona 0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.760 sees the most rushing attempts by a mile, thirty four 0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:42.200