WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Fresh Data, Mobile World Congress, Baidu Earnings

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Break anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the program, a look at the US housing market ahead

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the big spring home buying season and some highly

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>anticipated data on inflation and economic growth. I'm Tom Busby

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>in New York.

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen carolind London, where we're looking ahead to AI's

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 2>starring role at this year's Mobile World's Congress in Barcelona.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Ran Curtis in Hong Kong. I'll take a

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>look at my news upcoming results, whether AI makes an intercot.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 4>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, The business

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 4>news you need to wrap up your week, Available on Apple, Spotify,

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 4>the Bloomberg Business Appen everywhere you get your podcasts.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby and we begin

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>today's program with home buyers, home sellers, home builders, and

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>home improf been chains for more on where we stand.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>We welcome Bloomberg Intelligence US home building analyst Drew Reading.

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 5>Drew, thanks for being here, Thanks for having me.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's start with the biggest roadblocks in the home

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>buying selling Everybody sky high home prices, a dearth of

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>homes on the marketplace, and mortgage rates, which just last

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>week rose back above seven percent for the first time

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>since early December. Drew, is there any relief in sight,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>any good news out of this.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 5>I think you hit the nail on the head with

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 5>the challenges facing the home buyer. I mean, we've had

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 5>home prices rise more than forty percent over the last

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 5>couple of years. We've had interest rates rise from three

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 5>percent now above seven percent. We have the worst affordability

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 5>on record if you look at monthly payments relative to income.

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 5>We've been describing the housing market as kind of a

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 5>tale of two markets. On one hand, you have the

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 5>resale market, who's battling not only the high rates, but

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 5>low inventory and homeowners who don't want to sell. On

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 5>the other hand, you have the new home market, where

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 5>builders have done extremely well. Sales actually grew in twenty

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty three, and that's because they've been bringing more supply

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 5>to the market. They've been pretty aggressive and adjusting base prices.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 5>So if you look at prices in the new home market,

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 5>they were actually down double digits in twenty twenty three,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 5>And most importantly, they've been offering financing incentives, so that's

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 5>been a big tool in their belt that the existing

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 5>home market really doesn't have to leverage. So a buyer

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 5>who's going out into the market now is looking at

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 5>something in the seven percent range. Builders are able to

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 5>offer lower rates somewhere in the five and a half

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 5>to six percent range, So that's been a huge differentiator

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:40.399
<v Speaker 5>for them.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, you follow the builders, so you know what they do,

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 1>where they do it, how they think. Home builder sentiment

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>actually was I think a six month high right now. However,

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>they also face a lot of challenges, don't they. Not

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>enough available land, not enough of skilled labor. I mean,

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 1>how are they still building these homes where people want

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy with the challenges that they face.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, builders have been facing these challenges for quite some

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 5>time now. You mentioned, you know, the lack of available labor,

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 5>particularly as volumes heat up, the lack of developed land,

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 5>which we think could become even more of a problem

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 5>for the industry. But the way I would look at

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 5>the new home market is, on one hand, you have

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 5>the large, well capitalized, pickly traded home builders, and on

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 5>the other hand you have smaller private peers. We think

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 5>that the large builders are going to continue to take

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 5>market share from those smaller private piers. And the main

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 5>reason is because a lot of the private builders are

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 5>reliant on regional bank financing in order to grow, whether

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 5>it's for land acquisition, land development, or construction loans. And

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 5>with not only the cost of those loans going higher,

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 5>but also the availability as the economy has weakened a

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 5>little bit, we're seeing their ability to access that growth

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 5>capital has come down. We think that the large builders

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 5>are stepping in to fill the void because they've got

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 5>strong balance sheets, they've got long land pipelines, and they're

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 5>able to self develop their land. So we think that,

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, as we move through twenty twenty four and

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 5>into twenty twenty five, they'll continue to be the beneficiaries.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Now I imagine also some of these builders, the ones benefiting

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>the most, are the ones building homes where people want

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to live. And that means the Sun Belt Florida, all

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the way across to Texas and the Southwest. Are there

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>other builders having success? You know, the Toll Brothers up

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the northeast. Are they building big houses, make mansions

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>or even mansions? Are are they all seeing you know,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the rising tide lift all boats in the housing market.

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a great question. And you know, when you

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 5>look big picture, the Sunbelt is really where you want

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 5>to be due to more favorable demographic patterns. That's where

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 5>the population shifting, that's where the job growth is. Affordability

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 5>is better, so you see some migration out of some

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 5>of the higher cost markets. What's interesting right now is

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 5>we are seeing pretty broad based rebound in the new

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 5>home market across the country. Some of the hardest hit

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 5>markets in the back half of twenty twenty two were

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 5>in the West, think California, the Pacific Northwest to Southwest,

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 5>but we're even seeing a strong rebound there. You mentioned

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 5>the Northeast, which is actually an interesting example because if

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 5>you look at sales paces that the builders have been

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 5>doing relative to twenty nineteen, the Northeast and the Midwest

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 5>have held up really well. And I think part of

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 5>that has to do with the fact that maybe these

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 5>are markets that didn't participate as much on the way up,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 5>so they weren't the boom markets, but they also didn't

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 5>follow as much on the way down. When things got

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 5>a little bit hairy. Theer in the back half of

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two and into twenty twenty three, So the

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 5>Northeast has done really well. We heard from Toll Brothers

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 5>recently they noticed strength across their entire footprint, across all

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 5>of their price points. So it's been a pretty broad

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 5>based rally.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah, everybody wins now. One thing you have been

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>reporting on though, is is more modest, moderately priced new homes,

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>more of them going up. What can you tell us

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>about that.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 5>There's been a decided shift over the last several years

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 5>from builders who wanted to engage more at the entry level.

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:16.600
<v Speaker 5>One of the reasons is because that's where a lot

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 5>of the demographic based demand is now and will be

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 5>in the coming years. The other reason that they're targeting

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 5>that market is for relative affordability. As I mentioned, affordability

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 5>is near the worst on records. So one way builders

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 5>are looking to address that is through doing smaller square

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 5>footage floor plans, which allows them to get the price down.

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 5>They're also doing projects with more density, so they could

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 5>spread more units over the same piece of land and

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 5>spread out costs that way and address affordability for the

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 5>buyer through density. So there's a couple of different ways

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 5>they're doing it. It's something that's been ongoing for a

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 5>couple of years, but it's starting to be emphasized a

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 5>little bit more. Now.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>One last question, Drew, and it's about last week we

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had home depot earnings. This week we have lows. Are

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we likely to see the same kind of not disappointing results,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>but clearly home improvement projects have slowed down.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, expectations coming into the print for lows are all

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 5>that high. As you mentioned, home Deep gives some rather

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 5>disappointing guidance I think on the outlook for twenty twenty four,

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 5>calling for the market to be down about one percent,

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 5>I expect to hear similar commentary from Loew's.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Bloomberg Intelligence US home building analyst Drew Redding,

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and up next, some closely watched economic data points out

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>this week what they could mean for the Fed's next

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>policy meeting just three weeks from now. And for more

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>we welcome Bloomberg International Economic and Policy correspondent Michael McKee. Well,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the Fed's preferred measure of inflation. This

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>is a mouthful. The personal consumption expenditure core price index

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for the month of January and the fourth quarter. That's

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggie this week. What are you expecting to see?

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, we get to the fourth quarter as part of

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 6>the GDP report. It's a revision, so that doesn't get

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 6>as much attention from the Fed because it's quarterly, it's

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 6>over a three month average. But the monthly number, which

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 6>represents the latest month that we have will be January,

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 6>and that's the one that the FED looks at because

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 6>it gives them the most complete picture they think of

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 6>where inflation is at the moment, and that's going to

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 6>be the key for them, where inflation is at the

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 6>moment in the PCE, because in the CPI, obviously it

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 6>was not good news for January. Now, the forecast for

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 6>the PCE is for a two point four percent year

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 6>over year increase, which is down from two point six

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 6>the year before, and a two point eight percent, down

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 6>from two point nine percent for the core. FED Vice

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 6>chair Phillip Jefferson spoke last week and said the FED

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 6>staff is basically predicting the same thing. So there are

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 6>people out there who think we might see an increase

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 6>in the PCE this month because of some unusual factors,

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 6>but the Fed seems sanguine going into the number.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, what are the factors that we see that could

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>make inflation even worse.

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, one of the questions is what's happening with energy

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 6>and with food because those went up in the CPI report,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 6>expected to but not by as much as they did.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 6>And then the ongoing question is always what's happening with housing?

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 6>The CPI showed unexpected strength in housing inflation when it's

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 6>supposed to be according to everybody who follows it going down.

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 6>It's less of a weight in the PCE, so it

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 6>may not make as much of a difference, but it

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 6>could affect that number as well. But the big one

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 6>in the PCE, this is what I call the Pogo problem.

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 6>We have met the enemy and he is us. Our

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 6>listeners are at fault because so much trading has gone

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 6>on in the markets, and obviously the markets have continued

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 6>to go up, so stock trading fees are a big

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 6>component of why the PCE has stayed high. And there

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 6>are some analysts who really follow this stuff closely who

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 6>think that's the number that's going to push PCE higher

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 6>and instead of lower.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to GDP because you talked about that.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to get a reading, a second reading on

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter GDP. What kind of growth overall growth are

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we expecting in the economy, and also what does that

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>mean for the full year?

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 6>Oh, if we only knew what it meant for the

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 6>full year. Three point three percent was the initial read,

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 6>and the economists we survey don't expect a change in that,

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.359
<v Speaker 6>just a little bit of a change in the composition,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>with more coming from business investment in inventories and a

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 6>little bit less from personal consumption consumer spending. But for

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 6>the year, the view has been that we are seeing

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 6>a slowing in the economy, and we have seen some

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 6>numbers that suggest that. But I go back to some

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 6>of the remarks from FED officials in this last week

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 6>where they warn that one of the dangers is that

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 6>consumer spending doesn't drop off that much, and that we

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 6>do see a stronger than expected economy through the year.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 6>That could put pressure on inflation, and that would have

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 6>an impact on if and when they start cutting interest rates.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 6>So it's something to keep in mind. It's really hard

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 6>to make a prediction because it's been so it's been

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 6>so weird coming out of the pandemic. Nobody expected the

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 6>kind of recovery that we've gotten, and it could keep going.

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's for sure. I mean, even with a slight

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>pullback in consumer spending, three point three percent growth in

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the final three months of the year is pretty strong.

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Good news in Washington, certainly for this administration as we

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>go into an election year.

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, they should be meeting to figure out how they're

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 6>going to sell all this to the American public because

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 6>obviously the political polls don't match what's happening with the

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 6>economy at this point. But overall, if the economy doesn't

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 6>go into recession and inflation does come down, then that

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 6>could be good news for Joe Biden. The saying is

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 6>always it's the economy stupid, and people have wondered if

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 6>that's going to be the case this year, and we'll see.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, a lot to look forward to, and our thanks

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg International Economic and Policy correspondent Michael McKee, coming

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>up on Bloomberg Day Break weekend to look ahead to

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Mobile World Congress that takes place in Spain this week.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Day Break weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby.

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 4>In New York.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Up later in our program a look at inflation in

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand and the next move from its bank, as

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 1>well as earnings from China's biggest tech giant, but first.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Mobile technology arguably one of the fastest growing sectors of

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the twenty first century and one investors think has boundless possibilities.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>In the coming days, everyone who is anyone in the

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>world of connectivity will convene under one roof at the

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>annual Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, trading ideas and discussing

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the future. But can telecom keep up with multiple high

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>paced advancements in the world of tech. For more, Let's

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak anchor Steven Carroll.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Tom The market frenzy about tech and artificial intelligence driven

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 2>gains seems to have reached fever pitch this earning season.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Telecommunications is one of the many industries that's racing to

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 2>adapt and harness its advantages. This year's Mobile World Congress

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>in Barcelona will see major tech companies, including the likes

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>of Meta, lining up to showcase their AI products to

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the sector. A recent survey of more than four hundred

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>telecoms industry professionals by AI chip giant Nvidia underlined this,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 2>over half of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that adopting

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 2>AI will be a source of competitive advantage. That's a

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>score that's up from just thirty nine percent in twenty

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. In Nvidia themselves are seeing blockbuster growth thanks

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 2>to the technology, and their latest results show no sign

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of that growth slowing down. The CEO of Futurum, Daniel Newman,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and bab o'donald, chief analyst at TECHnalysis, say the pressure

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 2>is on for Nvidia to continue these gains.

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 7>The only result that was going to be acceptable was

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 7>not only a beat, but a substantial beat and a

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 7>guidance upbeat because people are beginning to wonder, how many

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 7>consecutive quarters can this company continue to run with triple

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 7>digit revenue growth and high triple digit earnings growth. But

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 7>it seems each quarter they continue to surprise.

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 8>This is a company that continues to execute and completely

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 8>blow away everybody's most robust forecast. I mean, they raise

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 8>their own forecast, the street raises the forecast, and they

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 8>still beat them. It's kind of crazy. And of course

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 8>the big question has been how.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 7>Long can this continue?

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 8>How long can this go on. The competition has never

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 8>been more fierce than it is right now foreign Vidia,

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 8>but they have a huge headstart.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 7>Do you think there is sort of a consensus in

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 7>the industry to put some competitive pressure back on.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 8>In video, they've been innovating at a pace that nobody

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>else has been able to keep up.

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 2>With Daniel Newman from Futuram and Bob O'Donnell at tech Analysis,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 2>they're discussing the latest results from Nvidia with Bloomberg. Well,

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 2>perhaps some of those future gains could come from AI

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>collaborations with the telecoms industry. Those conversations will be happening

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 2>at Mobile World Congress in the coming days. Apart from

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 2>the latest tech, industry players will also be considering the

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>regulatory requirements that are facing some telecoms companies that aren't

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 2>applicable to their big tech cousins. Telecoms may just be

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning of its AI journey, but will it

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 2>be a dalliance or a long lasting partnership. While I've

0:15:56.960 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>been discussing all of this with our European telecoms and chips,

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Jillian Deutsch and I started by asking here how important

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Mobile World Congress is in setting the agenda for the sector.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, this is really the key event for the year,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 9>and I think it's gonna be fun to kind of

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 9>see not as European telcos which have lots of things

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 9>that they're pushing, for example, deregulation and lots of m

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 9>Andy talks across Europe, but also a lot of different

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 9>international telcos and also major US tech companies coming to

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 9>all descending on Barcelona to kind of really set the

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 9>agenda for tacos in tech the next year.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 2>So AI is one of the key themes at this

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>year's events, talk us through where Telecom's companies are with

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>them implementing that technology and where they found success with it.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean AI has definitely hit a taco sector

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 9>of course as well, and so I think we're going

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 9>to be seeing lots of announcements about, you know, different

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 9>offerings with different US tech giants for example, and how

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 9>they're integrating artificial intelligence into their offerings, you know. I mean,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 9>I just definitely think a lot of this is hype.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 9>I think anyone who founds tech is used to hypes

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 9>of course, and AI is obviously in the most recent ones.

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 9>But I do think there's a lot of really interesting

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 9>ways that companies are trying to integrate AI into their offerings,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 9>really kind of to improve the experience for consumers when

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 9>it comes to customer service also with businesses, and really

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 9>kind of creating you know, more streamlined offerings for their

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 9>for their clients. And so I think a lot of

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 9>this also will be kind of in with kind of

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 9>key announcements with big tech giants. So we already saw

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 9>now key is stock going up recently when they announced

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 9>a partnership with the Videos. Those kind of big names

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 9>obviously are really important to show that they are really

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 9>serious about AI and intergeting AI. But also I think

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 9>we'll see some interesting ones. You know, BT for example,

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 9>last year announced pretty massive job cuts fifty five thousand

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 9>people until twenty to thirty and that's not entirely but

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 9>at least in part because they're integrating AI, so it's

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 9>kind of helping them to trim from the fat in

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 9>the company. And so I think that's we might see

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 9>some more more kind of uses of AI in that sense.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So does it do we have the sense that European

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 2>companies are sufficiently investing in this given that so many

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 2>of the technology advancements are coming from US firms.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 9>That's a great question. I mean, celcos are It's funny,

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 9>they are really afraid of just becoming you know, a

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 9>pipe in the ground, right, And so it's kind of

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 9>sparked this kind of panic a lot of among a

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 9>lot of tech tech taco companies across Europe, and so

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 9>that has led to this massive push to keep innovating

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 9>and and there are a lot of questions about whether

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 9>or not they actually can outcompete you know, Silicon Valley

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 9>giants that have you know, massive market caps and have

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 9>all of that talents obviously you know, really harmonized or

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 9>centralized into one location and already in their companies, and

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 9>a lot of what these celcos are doing is to

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 9>really trying to compete with them. So you see a

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 9>lot of kind of IT solutions and cloud solutions and

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 9>networks and factories and these are all things that actually

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 9>put tuco's in direct competition with US tech giants. And

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a lot of skepticism that they can

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 9>really outcompete tech giants, but that is really a crucial

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:56.360
<v Speaker 9>crucial thing for tacos going forward, if they really want

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 9>to make sure they're not just you know a utility company.

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 2>So it is a question of cooperation as well as

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 2>some competition in these areas too.

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolute, I me, you know, we already do see

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 9>lots of tacos and tech giants working together. They have

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 9>for a long time when it comes to data centers

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 9>and other kinds of partnerships they've had, or even you know,

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 9>when you open up your you know, you turn on

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 9>your TV, you probably see YouTube or Netflix offerings, right,

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 9>So telcos really do rely on us tech giants as well.

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 9>It's kind of a fren of me love hate relationship

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 9>between the two, and I do think we see that

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 9>that kind of relationship really play out in Brussels, where

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 9>I'm based and covered tech regulation or have cover tech Regnation.

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 9>A lot of these techos argue that they're way more

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 9>over regulated than they're often American counterparts, and are really

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 9>pushing for tucos to help out with with helping tech giants.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me, helping telcos with these massive, expensive network infrastructure investments.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 9>And they say, you know a lot of these tech

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 9>giants get to piggyback off of the really expensive and

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 9>complicated work that they do.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a really just in conversation that I'm sure

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 2>will be featuring two at Mobile Work Congress. What you know,

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 2>the European Commission recently published a white paper on this

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 2>on reforms to the market. What were the problems that

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 2>that white paper identified.

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 9>I think it's really interesting because Taco's for the past

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 9>least couple of years, I've really been, like I said,

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 9>arguing that tech companies need to help with the bill

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 9>for infrastructure, and this argument was dubbed fair share Tech

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 9>companies need to pair their fair share for infrastructure. That

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 9>specific lobbing effort failed, but what they did do is

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 9>really put Taco's back at the top of regulator's agenda.

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 9>They've been really overlooked for the past five plus years.

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 9>So this white paper was really interesting because it actually

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 9>dives into the issues that Tacos have been complaining about

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 9>for years and acknowledge a lot of the issues that

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 9>they've been complaining about. You know, it's an incredibly fragmented

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 9>market with over fifty players in you across the EU,

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, compared to the United States where they're early

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 9>three maybe four kind of massive players. They do knowledge

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 9>that they're overregulated. There's too much bureaucracy to get permits

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 9>et cetera. But I think when it comes to the

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 9>actual solutions, I think most of the telcos I talk

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 9>to feel like the paper is kind of lacking. There's

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 9>some talk about, oh, we should harmonize spectrum policies atle

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 9>bit more across the European Union, and we need to

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 9>make it easier for companies to achieve scale by merging

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 9>across borders. But telco's for their main number one ask

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 9>really has been to merge in market, and there's very

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 9>little acknowledgement of that. And you know, and even when

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 9>when the Commission was unveiling this paper, you know, we

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 9>had Margaret Investigate, the competition chief for the European Commission, saying,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 9>you know, in market consolidation is not the answer. So

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 9>I think that was kind of met with a lot

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 9>of sadness among the telcos. But it also will have

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 9>a new commission coming in next year, and so it

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 9>really is a question of what is that next commission,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 9>who's in charge, what do they think is actually the solution?

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 9>Do they even do they take up telcos as a

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 9>topic end item?

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so an interesting time for those companies too. I

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>mean we're also in the midst of earning season of

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 2>course as well, what's sort of financial state are these

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 2>companies in.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 9>Not not a great one in them And there's obviously

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot of nuance between companies and different markets, but

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 9>these more broadly speaking, we definitely see declining revenues for

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 9>almost all of these tacos year on year, and I

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 9>think there's some really interesting trends that have come out

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 9>of that. So I think a good one to look

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 9>at is Votaphone, for example. You know, they're really a

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 9>key pan European toco. They're actually exiting a lot of markets.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 9>You know, they've sold off their operations in Spain, is

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 9>going to They're trying to exit Italy. There's a massive

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 9>merger in the UK, so I mean there's one, but

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 9>this is an example of the kind of massive M

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 9>and A talks we're seeing across Europe. And you know,

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 9>this is really so that companies can try to achieve

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 9>that scale that they say is necessary to actually make

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 9>the kind of big infrastructure investments that they need to

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 9>remain competitive. So every kind of company is trying to

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 9>scramble to find solutions in that sense. But we're also

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 9>seeing a lot of foreign investment more hedge funds coming in.

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 9>Whenever I talk to telco's and I ask, you know,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 9>where do you see this market in five years? Really

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 9>no one has a clear pick sure or what it's

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 9>going to look like, which is kind of frightening but

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 9>also quite exciting I think for companies. So it'll be

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 9>very interesting to see where that kind of talk is

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 9>at ahead of this at the conference.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Because one of the really big investments these companies have

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 2>been making has been in five G networks. Are those

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 2>investments paying off for these companies or when are they

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>expected to a great question.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think what the best way to look

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 9>at is to start with the Tulco infrastructure companies. So

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 9>this is no Ki and Erickson. They really hold this

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 9>kind of Nordic do compily very really interesting because they're

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 9>at the mercy of network operators and no Key in

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 9>their recent earnings was saying, look, you know, these companies

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 9>have to start investing in five G if they want

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 9>to really remain competitive with each other. And they say

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 9>that these investments will start soon, but they really don't

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 9>have a great idea of when that actually will happen.

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 9>And I think, you know, we do see inflation decreasing.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 9>Of course, energy costs are lower than they have been,

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.159
<v Speaker 9>so I think there's some optimism that maybe this is

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 9>the year where things start to turn around, but it's

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 9>not a very clear picture when this actually could turn around.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 9>I also not mention, you know, not just with five G,

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 9>which is obviously a massive focus for tacos, but there's

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 9>also a lot of talk about open ram, which is

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 9>basically a technology that allows network operators to pick and

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 9>choose parts from different suppliers. There's been a lot to

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 9>talk about open round for a long times when pushed

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:22.880
<v Speaker 9>by the US government, but it never really gained traction

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 9>until the end of last year when at and T

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 9>and that's some massive contract with Ericson to actually start

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 9>rolling this out in the US. We see Deutsche Telcom also

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 9>in Germany doing this with Nokia, and so I think

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 9>that's also giving companies some hope, and that might that

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 9>might also kind of help for Nokia and Erickson, and

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 9>that might kind of stimulate more and more network infrastructure investment.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 9>So maybe this is the year, but I'll be curious

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 9>to see if there's actually much optimism in Barcelona about it,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 9>or if this is just you know, another year. There's

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 9>some hope, but never actually any any reality.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks too, Bloomberg's European Telecoms and Chips reporter Gillian Deutsch. There,

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Carroll in London. You can catch us every

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>weekday morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak Europe. Begetting at six

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>am in London at one am on Wall Streets.

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Tom, Thank you, Steven, and coming up on Bloomberg day

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Break weekend, another closely watched central bank rate decision and

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 1>earnings from a Chinese tech giant. I'm Tom Busby, and

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. I'm Tom Busby in New York with

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>your global look ahead at the top stories for investors

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>in the coming week. For markets in the Asia Pacific region,

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 1>two things stand out in the week ahead, a rate

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>decision from New Zealand Central Bank and an earnings report

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>from online retail giant and search giant by Do for more.

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to Bloomberg's Doug Chrisner, co host of Daybreak Asia.

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 5>Tom.

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.479
<v Speaker 10>We begin with Kiwi inflation. We know higher prices have

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 10>been sticky in several economies, and New Zealand is no exception.

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 10>The question now is over the response on the part

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 10>of central bankers the Reserve Bank of New Zealand will

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 10>meet in the week ahead. Recently, the swaps market has

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 10>been pricing in a possible rate hike from the RBNZ

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 10>in the coming months. How real is that possibility though?

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 10>Let's bring in James McIntyre from Bloomberg Economics Asia. He

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 10>joins us from our studios in Sydney. James, always a pleasure,

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:22.719
<v Speaker 10>Thanks for joining us. I'm going to ask you that question.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 10>How real is the possibility that the RBNZ raises rates again?

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Great?

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 11>Look, thanks for having me, it's great to be here.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 11>And look, I think that I think it's not a

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 11>real possibility, but their threat is there. The RBNZ have

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 11>been quite hawkish still, even though they've done a lot

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 11>and they went earlier than everyone else, and also even

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 11>though they are getting things moving in the right direction,

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 11>whether it's the inflation story with the New Zealand, the

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 11>unemployment rate, labor capacity beginning to ease up, a lot

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 11>of that is moving in the right direction. But they've

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 11>stayed tremendously hawkish. There's a few reasons why, but I

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 11>think that they're more a threat than anything. It's likely

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 11>to become a reality over the next few months.

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 10>When you look at inflation expectations, though, can you give

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 10>me a sense of how that measure has been moving.

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, well, there is a there's a key measure of

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 11>inflation expectations two year ahead expectations from a survey the

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 11>RBNZ does, and those expectations actually dropped down to about

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 11>two and a half percent. Now one to three percent

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 11>is the rbnz's target band, and they want to hit

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 11>that midpoint of two. So two and a half percent

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 11>for inflation over the next two years is not quite

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 11>there yet. But more than a quarter of the participants

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 11>in that survey saw that headline inflation measure moving to

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 11>the midpoint of the rbnz's banned by the end of

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 11>this year. So things are moving in the right direction there.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 11>But I think that that might not actually necessarily be

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 11>the thing that the rbnz's super worried about at this point.

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 11>I think maybe that market pricing, which before traders had

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 11>begun to move to price in the chance of another hike,

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 11>that market pricing had seen those two year swaps. So

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 11>if we think about the to your inflation expectations from

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 11>economists to your swaps out there in markets, those had

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 11>been beginning to price in more and more of the

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 11>arbyens at easing, and that's something that we think that

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 11>they might have wanted to or that might be beginning

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 11>to start to try and talk against right now.

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 10>So from what I've read about the key we inflation,

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 10>the headn't line number is cooling a bit, but there

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 10>are elements that are proving to be sticky. Where do

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 10>we find those elements in the economy.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's in the non tradable side of the New

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 11>Zealand inflation basket. So we've had the tradable inflation falling,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 11>and that's especially things like the energy price decline and

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 11>the goods price deflation that we've been seeing coming from

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 11>all around the world, and those are the things that

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 11>are kind of actually not really within the ARBs control.

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 11>Those non tradable side of things. Services inflation in particular,

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 11>they're proving a little bit stickier, and in the fourth

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 11>quarter data that we had back at the end of

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 11>January on the twenty fourth, they were quite a bit

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 11>stronger than expected and not only by economists, but the

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 11>arbiens it's own exit dictations for those. So that's that's

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the services side within the economy, rents

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 11>being a bit of a challenge there and some of

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 11>the other services pricing that some of the domestic labor

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 11>costs might be a problem. For now we think that

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 11>that things are on track for those to EBB. But however,

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 11>the arben said, this is this dynamic that we're that

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 11>we've got with the hawkishness and some of that market pricing,

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 11>and even some of our economists peers thinking that the

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 11>Arbenz might want to actually do a little bit more

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 11>to take a little bit of extra insurance. So not

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 11>quite there yet on the non tradables front, which is

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 11>the part that from the domestic side and from the

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:42.239
<v Speaker 11>what the Arbenz can control where they've probably got their

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 11>their maximum point of nervousness.

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 5>Stay.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 10>When I think of higher prices in New Zealand, the

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 10>property market comes to mind when you look at how

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 10>home buyers have been behaving in an environment where rates

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 10>have been elevated, at least on the mortgage side. Has

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 10>there been a shift? Is are sales contracting a bit,

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 10>our prices coming down? What's the behavior of the housing market?

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 11>Pit, Yeah, we've had a bit of a turn in

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 11>the housing market. So we had been in a decline

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 11>as the housing market was responding to the rate hikes

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 11>thus far. But as the RBNZ has been on that pause,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 11>we have seen some life come back into the property market.

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 11>Now part of that has been the very very strong

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 11>demand for property that we've seen. So like Australia, New

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 11>Zealand has been recently experiencing a really massive rebound in

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 11>its migration. We're getting population growth in the high twos,

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 11>possibly getting towards three percent, and that's really showing up

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 11>across a whole range of parts of the economy. But

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 11>in the property sector it's showing up in extra demand

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 11>for rents, an inflation problem for the RBNZ. And on

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 11>the price side of the market, we're seeing a little

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 11>bit of a pickup and activity a little bit more

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 11>confidence than some of those prices starting to rise. So

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 11>that's again one of the sort of if you're on

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 11>the camp of cutting rates soon in New Zealand, you'd

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 11>be looking at where the economy is going in terms

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 11>of activity, consumer spending, the unemployment rate, and where the

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 11>inflation track is ultimately going. But if you were going

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 11>to be a little bit hawkish and sort of thinking

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 11>that the RBNZ could hike that property sector and the

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 11>little bit of a migration stirred revival there, along with

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 11>inflation on the non tradable side being a little bit

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 11>too high. They're the kind of factors that you're balancing there.

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 10>I'm sure it's going to be a very interesting conversation

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 10>around the table at the meeting of the Reserve Bank

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 10>of New Zealand in the week ahead. James, thank you

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 10>so much for helping us preview the meeting. James McIntyre

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 10>from Bloomberg Economics Asia. Up next we go to Hong

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 10>Kong and the other host of Daybreak Asia, Brian Curtis Doug.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 3>We'll be having a chat with Ernie bot in the

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 3>coming week as by Do reports its fourth quarter earnings.

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>The ernie chatbot has been generating considerable excitement for Baidou

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 3>as it looks to capitalize on AI. Erniebot is based

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 3>on Baidu's internally developed large language model, and like others,

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 3>it can generate tech images and videos. Bidou said at

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the end of December that the chatbot had attracted more

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 3>than one hundred million users. We thought it would be

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 3>a good time to take a look at how baid

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 3>and other companies in Asia are doing on the generative

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 3>AI front, where the buzz seems to be a little

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 3>bit less than what we're hearing in the United States.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And joining us now for a look at baido is

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Jumping Huang, who covers technology companies for Bloomberg News. Jumping

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 3>thanks very much for coming into our studios. So Bidu

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 3>is competing against ten Cent and Ali Baba and others

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 3>to commercialize this as far as we know, and I

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 3>know we won't know for sure until we get the

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 3>earnings in the coming week, but as far as we know,

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 3>how well is byd monetizing AI.

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 12>Right before we get deep into earning BA, I would

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 12>like to know that the fundamental business for Baidu is

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 12>to search advertisement and it's sort of using advertisement revenue

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 12>to fund its risky projects like Erniba. So for the

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 12>results we were seeing the coming week, it's essential to

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 12>see if it's ever a NewView is picking up again

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 12>during a very difficult time during China's economy.

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 5>But back on.

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 12>Learning, Yeah, it's sort of the leader, at least in

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 12>the Chinese internet sphere because it's the first to launch

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 12>the service to the public and it already started to

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 12>charge a monthly subscription fee for a premier tier of

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 12>the Arniba, which costs a dollar promounts. So monetization is

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 12>kicking off, yes, but we still have to wait and

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 12>see to see how big of an impact it will

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 12>have to byduce top line.

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, I know that China has enforced a law to

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 3>regulate this area. It's something that China perhaps is in

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>advance over other places like the United States and Europe

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and others. What do we know about how tough this

0:33:59.400 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 3>new law is.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so what China did is like for every generative

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 12>AI service to get online to be used for Chinese

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.840
<v Speaker 12>users and need to get the pre approval from China's

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 12>top internet regulator, the CAC, and back earlier last year,

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 12>the CAC issued its first batch of approvals to Chinese

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 12>tech giants, including Baidu. So we got like around that

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 12>doesn't like services that was greenlight by Beijing. And that's

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 12>also to say that also means that foreign services like

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 12>GPT and the ones from Google and Microsoft will likely

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 12>never be available within China's internet. So we're sort of

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:51.360
<v Speaker 12>like seeing yet another episode of the parannel universe of

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 12>the China Internet. Versus the global Internet.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 3>And how different is the approach of Chinese chatbot compared

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:03.759
<v Speaker 3>to those in the West, particularly in light of the

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 3>overhang of the legislation that's in place.

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 12>The Traine spot will like actually do a lot of

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 12>censorship to prevent some questionable answers from the bots. Whenever

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 12>you touch upon politics or human rights or actually if

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 12>you're trying to type the name of Chinese president, in

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 12>many of the Chinese spots, they won't even let you

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 12>to continue the conversation. So I think data is one thing.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 12>When we talk about whether it's like training data or

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 12>like the output data, it's sort of filtered and self censored.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 12>That could have a negative impact on the effectiveness of

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 12>the Chinese spots.

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 3>And we might think that the search leader in China

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 3>would have almost a step ahead or a leading start

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.560
<v Speaker 3>against other companies. But I understand that Chinese companies are

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of of well armed with ample CAPEX built into

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 3>the spending model for this year. Are we expecting to

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of money spent on this?

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, Actually, it's quite funny. The way it's calling China

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 12>is a wall of one hundred models, meaning like whether

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 12>it's like tech giants or startups there, they're trying to

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 12>build their own models instead of applications. Because in the West,

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 12>GPT is a clear winner, and in China, like not

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 12>everyone's buying by do well be the Chinese version of

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:36.240
<v Speaker 12>open Ai. Yet, so venture capitalists are trying to fund

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 12>a lot of like rival models and for robbing THEE

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 12>is trying to argue, hey, let's stop building model because

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 12>it's a waste of resources. Let's try build applications on

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 12>top of learning.

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.439
<v Speaker 3>And if we were to set aside generative intelligence and

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.760
<v Speaker 3>this push on developing a chatbot, how does Buyd's earnings

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 3>look otherwise?

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that goes back to my first point about advertising.

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 12>So in advertising, we know it is closely tracked with

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 12>China's macro economy, which is not in a good shape

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 12>because it's dealing with a couple of fundamental problems like deflation, use, unemployment,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 12>and a shrinking population. And for bay Do, it's the

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 12>bread and butter of its ad revenue comes from the

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 12>search revenue, and traditionally automobile makers and travel agencies will

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 12>be a big spender in search ads. It would be

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 12>great if the company provide us any breakdown or color

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 12>about who's spending more in terms of search ad and

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 12>who's spending less, so we will get a better idea

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:49.919
<v Speaker 12>of where the Chinese economy is going.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 3>Japping, thanks so much for joining us. Chapping Huang, who

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 3>covers technology companies for Bloomberg News. I'm Brian Curtis along

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 3>with Doug Christner. You can catch us every weekday here

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 3>for or Bloomberg day Break Asia, beginning at nine am

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 3>in Hong Kong and six pm on Wall Street.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Tom thank you, Brian, and that does it for this

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:11.720
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>morning at five am Wall Street time for the latest

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on the market's overseas and the news you need to

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>start your day. I'm Tom Busby. Stay with us. Top

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.