WEBVTT - Razor’s Edge

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Winkler Dawson. I'm a journalist who's spent the

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years writing about true crime.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Hols, a retired cold case investigator who's

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 2>worked some of America's most complicated cases and solve them.

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Each week, I present Paul with one of history's most

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling true crimes.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 2>And I weigh in using modern forensic techniques to bring

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>new insights to old mysteries.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Together, using our individual expertise, we're examining historical true crime

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>cases through a twenty first century lens.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Some are solved and some are cold, very cold.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>This is buried bones.

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Ay, Kate, how are you?

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well, Paul, how are you?

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm doing good. I got my hot toddy here

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>and I'm ready for this next case.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>What's in a hot is that whiskey? Is that just

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>hot whiskey that you mic awave? Is that what a

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hot toddy is? See how naive I am? Listeners? I

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh well, I kind of fibbed a little bit. It's

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 2>a little room temperature, but yeah, it's a little whiskey.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's all it is. It's warm whiskey is that

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a hot.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Toddy by my definition. Yes, I mean, this is.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Not what I thought we were going to talk about today.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But they used to use whiskey for everything, didn't they.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever read in history everything that whiskey had

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>been used for, I mean, for like knocking out little

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>babies so they'd stop crying, to anesthegia, to everything you

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>could think of.

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Sure, yeah, I knew about the anisc You know, if

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 2>they had to amputate the poor victim had to have

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of whiskey inside and then have to bite

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 2>down on the leather strap to prevent biting his tongue. God,

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>what a horrific time, I know.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you imagine? I mean, I just and you know,

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in one of the other episodes, we talked about women

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>who died in childbirth and how a lot of the

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>times it's because the doctors weren't washing their hands and

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they were getting in bacterial infection. I mean, how awful.

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, thank god we live in modern medical times. Yeah.

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>What I was going to tell you when when you

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the hot toddie was it reminded me of American Sherlock.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>You know my book. We were talking about Oscar Heinrich,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the forensic scientist at the center of my book. So

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>he got his start working at a pharmacy. When his

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>dad died, he had to quit high school and he

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>started working in a pharmacy. And he said that it

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>was the best thing that ever happened to him because

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of like a school on handwriting analysis

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>because he could never interpret.

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>The doctor's script.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>What the doctors yeah, So he said, there's that, and

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>then of course there's all kinds of chemistry and kind

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of toxicology. He said it was most valuable for human

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>behavior because there would be drug addicts who would come

0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in and he said he would just watch them and

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>how they were trying to con the pharmacists into giving

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>them drugs that didn't belong to them. But one thing

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that I noted. I had not known this was that

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>during Prohibition, the pharmacies really started ticking up on medicinal alcohol. So,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you needed to treat something. Oscar learned

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>how to make medicinal whiskey at his pharmacy, and I

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know this little fact. But it became such a

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>big business that Walgreens. I'm looking at my book now,

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Walllgreens expanded from twenty stores in the United States to

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>more than five hundred stores, basically based on medicinal whisky

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that was the only legal way to get it.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I get it, I understand.

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And then we went back to your hot toddy, which

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>is I can't take cold whiskey, let alone hot whiskey.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>No. I know, I've tried to get you to imbibe,

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>but unfortunately you just seem to want to stick with

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 2>your cider.

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I do. I know. I love cider. Right now, I

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have tea. But you know, like I said, if I

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>had any alcohol during our show, I would be in

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the fetal position in sleeping on the floor of myself

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>about thirty minutes.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, I need it just to kind of soothe

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 2>the nerves because I still get a little anxious before

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you and I start our episodes. No you don't, yeah

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Why because you're scared you're going to say the wrong thing,

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or that I'm going to outsmart you see, I can't

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>even get that out without loud. I'll smart you. Well,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you. You'll need some whiskey for this one.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a story that's set during I mean Prohibition

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty one. Love it great time period to talk about.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>We're in Portland, Oregon. Portland is one of my most

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite cities. And you said you've been there a couple

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>of times.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I was there twice. The first time I went to

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Portland was actually before a Golden State Killer, you know,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 2>doing a kind of an early form of the genealogy process,

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and found somebody that was up there in the Portland

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 2>area that I thought possibly was related to who I

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 2>was looking for, And turns out he was about nine

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 2>hundred years ago, so that didn't help. Wait what, No,

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>We collected DNA from this old man in a convalescent home,

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>thinking that possibly, you know, a Golden State Killer was

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 2>maybe a son or a cousin, and he just was

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 2>so distantly related that it was far beyond, you know,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 2>the genealogy paper trail that we need to be able

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to use. And then the second time I went to

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Portland was during my book tour. But that's when I

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>had the hosts of Small Town Dixon interviewed me on stage.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's nice.

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So that was Yardley, Dan and Dave. And this

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 2>was the first time that Dan and Dave revealed their

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>identities to the world because they had been active law enforcement.

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>They had always kept their identities hidden, and so they

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 2>what do you want to say, stepped out of the

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 2>closet at that Portland event.

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That's good. So you have good memories of Portland.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely well, this is not a.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Good memory story, I'll tell you that. But I do

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like going to places and time periods that I'm fond of,

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and I love Portland and I love nineteen twenty one,

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty one for me from American Sherlock is Fatty

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Arbuckle case, which was really interesting, you know, very classic

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>old case. And so I remember a lot of sort

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood scandals that's not this. This is a little

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of a mystery. And you know, we're we're really

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going to dig into a lot of questions that I

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>feel like I haven't had answered by you yet. So

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and get into it. Let's set the scene.

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>This is July eleventh, nineteen twenty one. Instead of introducing

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>you first of all, I guess to say the main players.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start with the action here. There is

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:48.119
<v Speaker 1>a neighbor named Robert Green. It's about midnight. He's getting

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>ready to go to sleep, which would have been about

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>three hours after I normally go to sleep. I go

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to sleep at like nine pm. So midnight Robert Green

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>says it's time to go to bed. He hears screaming

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>from his neighbors. And the neighbors are a family called

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the Age's, and they live across the street on North

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Druid Avenue. And the family is interesting, I would say,

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>relatively young couple. That's Harry, he's twenty nine, Louise is

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty six, and they have two young children, a three

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>year old who's a girl and a six year old

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>who's a boy. Robert here's screaming. He sees Louise, who's

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the wife, running over to his house. She's in a

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>nightgown and she's saying someone is killing Harry, so someone's

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>killing her husband. Robert then sees Harry, the husband, staggering

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to the door holding his neck before he collapses to

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the ground. So Robert runs across the street with Louise

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and they go to help Harry, who's now lying on

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the floor in the house. His throat has been cut,

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and when Robert looks down at Harry, he's awake and

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>his lips are still moving, but he can't talk, So

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that's My first question is does that mean his larynx

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>was cut? Because I'm going to tell you this. Normally

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of hide this information, but a pathologist will

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually say that whoever did cut his throat, unless it

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was Harry, he had missed his jugular vein. So why

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>would he not be able to talk?

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you know, when you start talking about

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>a cut throat, it is entirely possible that the trachia

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>could be transacted. Trachia is in the center of the neck.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Now you're they're talking about jugular veins. Yes, those often

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>are are cut, but it's also the deeper carotids, you know,

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 2>where when those are cut, obviously, death ensues very very quickly.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, right now, I would only speculate as to

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 2>well why he couldn't talk without more descriptors of what

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 2>the pathologists found. But yes, if your throat is cut

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and your trachya is transsected, or the larynx has somehow

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>been affected, that could prevent you from talking. And there's

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 2>no stab wounds to his chest or anything like that.

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just all through the neck, right.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yep, you got it. So Robert is traumatized. The neighbor

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he leaves Louise and Harry on the ground and he

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>runs to the neighbors. Not everybody has a phone in

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this neighborhood, so he goes to the neighbors whom he

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>knows does have a phone. They call the police. The

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>little boy who's six wakes up and you know, he

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is on the porch when he sees his father die,

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>which is terrible. So there is now a confusing crime scene.

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>And this will come up very quickly for question number two.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>For me.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of neighbors wind up gathering on the porch.

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a commotion. Of course, there's already Louise had been

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>screaming to begin with. There's Harry, the neighbor who's dead

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on the porch, and they are already going through the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>house before the cops even get there. So of course

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>what I write down on my notes is a contaminated

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>crime scene. But before I ask you about that, I

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>wondered when it became a thing to really secure a

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>crime scene in history. So listen to this. This is

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an article written by Livia Gershaan and she says that

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the first practical guide to investigating a crime scene was

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>written by Austrian jurist Hans Gross in eighteen ninety three

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and translated into English in nineteen oh six. So what

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Gross said was there were instructions to an investigative officer

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>who would lead the effort. They would secure the perimeter,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>protect the scene from contamination, including from the officer himself.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, he said, you will have as an officer,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the impulse to immediately touch any object of apparent significance.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You have to fight that impulse essentially. So they have

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>been talking about securing crime scenes for you know, decades,

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering about that. I mean, I have

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>written so much about this time period, neighbors just walking

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all over the place, and how it must have been

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>awful to get a conviction if you have a good

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>devinse attorney saying, how do we even know that these

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>are this person's fingerprints or you know anything?

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Right? Well, and that's, you know, fundamentally why crime scenes

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>have to be secured as soon as you possibly can.

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Of course, life preserving measures take precedence, and so whether

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 2>it be you know, patrol officers arriving first, securing the house,

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 2>making sure there isn't a thread inside the house, rendering

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 2>first aid, e MTS coming. You know, there's a lot

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 2>of chaos if there is going to be any type

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 2>of medical attention going on. But once that step, if

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>that step is needed, once that step is done, then

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 2>absolutely freezing the scene and preventing unnecessary entry into the

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 2>scene is critical because a lot of evidence is very fragile.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned fingerprints. You know, you could have let's say,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 2>the killer's fingerprint on a doorknob, and now a patrol

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 2>officer trying to secure the house grabs that doorknob to

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>open up the door and eliminates the fingerprint and shoe impressions,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, tracking blood you know, all over the place

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 2>as you walk through the house. That now confuses the

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 2>blood patterns inside the crime scene, and on and on

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 2>and on. So you know, in this particular case, obviously

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>it is a very contaminated crime scene. Maybe so it

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>just depends on, you know, where the actual violence occurred

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>in the house, did the people go in to that

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>location or not. And then Harry's body, his clothing is

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 2>also part of the crime scene and has critical forms

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of evidence that can be interpreted.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>When police are reporting or CSI whoever it is, and

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>everybody is securing a crime scene and collecting evidence and

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>all of that. Is there some sort of systematic way

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that all officers across the nation are taught, Like, is

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>there a standard that says this is how many officers

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we need with the yellow, this is what you should

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do next, this is what you should do next, or

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>does everybody just do whatever they want to do and

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>depending on their jurisdiction, you.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 2>Know, I would say that there's in essence best practices.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Every crime scene is different. Now you can kind of

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 2>group crime scenes into kind of clusters as to the circumstances.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>You have an outdoor scene versus an indoor scene as

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the first obvious thing, and then how you deal with

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>an outdoor scene versus an indoor scene, you know, you

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 2>take certain steps as a result, depending on the circumstances,

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>there may be additional measures that have to be taken

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>to protect the scene, and sometimes you don't have to

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 2>take as many measures, you know, and that's really upon

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the expertise of the people that are arriving on scene,

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, whether it be the patrol officers or the

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 2>CSIS or the forensic scientists. You know. I know, like

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 2>by the time I got out to my crime scenes,

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I was a you know, reputy share of krimlist. That

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>crime scene became mine. And I've seen in other jurisdictions

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 2>that the investigators control the crime scene and oftentimes they

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>don't have the wherewithal about the physical evidence because they've

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>never done the work themselves, and then they often inject

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 2>certain biases into how that crime scene is processed, you know.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>And so I really like the model of having that

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>independent CSI that once they're there, they are controlling how

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the processing of that scene, the documentation of scene, who

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>goes in and out of that scene, because they're sort

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 2>of like this independent physical evidence investigator that should be

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 2>paired with, you know, the actual investigators as sort of

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>a check and balance.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, there doesn't seem to be anybody in control of

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this particular crime scene of Harry's death, So that's unfortunate

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>for us. As we know, the forensics available in nineteen

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one were pretty limited. Yes, there are microscopes. Yes,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they can look at hair and kind of determine what's

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>animal hair, what's human hair. No blood typing yet, and

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint analysis is a thing ish, I mean, not great yet,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's pretty sketchy. We're in the middle of the

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>third degree era of policing, so finding out who did

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this would be tough. I have a photo of the

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>exterior of the house and a map of the interior.

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm going to show it to you

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just yet. Just know that I have it. So Harry

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is now dead. It is confirmed he has been cut

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>across his throat, and the pathologist will have a little

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more information. But let me set the scene inside

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the house so that we can start to figure out

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what the police are trying to figure out. What is

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the motivation to kill this man when his wife is

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>also right there and there are these two little kids.

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So he is dead by the time the police get there,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and the scene seems very confusing. It seems apparent to

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the police from all of the blood in the bed,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in Harry's bed, that Harry was first attacked when he

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was lying in bed, he was lying next to his wife.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>It's midnight, they're sleep. It looks to investigators like whoever

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>attacked him had stood behind the head of the bed

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and mend over him. Now, I'm not sure how that

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>came they came to that conclusion. Can you think about

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>would that be the spray or would what do you

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>think that would be for them to determine that?

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Well that I guess I'm puzzled because typically nowadays, the

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 2>head of the bed is pushed up against the wall,

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and so this bed is potentially out in the middle

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of the floor or somehow positioned where they the offender

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>could have accessed Harry from behind the headboard. Is that

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 2>how you're interpreting that?

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe that's my cue to go ahead and show you.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Let me share. I don't see. This is how I

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>find stuff out. Let me share What I would say

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is a very crude drawing, but I know you find

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>these helpful. So this here in the lower left hand

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>corner is the map of the room. So if you

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>see the little dashes from bed, I think that means

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>his pillow is in the center of the room and

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>their feet are toward the wall, unless you interpret that differently,

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and then I think the dashes are there showing you

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Harry's root to get on the front porch where he

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately died.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess I haven't seen a bed positioned like that.

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 2>But you know, this is a what I would call

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 2>it bird's eye view, sort of a crime scene sketch.

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Showing the inner layout of the house, you know, with

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the various bedrooms, their relationship to the living room, dining room,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 2>as well as the door that Harry went out to

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 2>get out onto the porch, the bed that I'm I'm

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 2>assuming Harry originated from where there's all this blood. It

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 2>does look like they've somewhat drawn in the pillows to

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the part of the bed that is actually sticking out

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>into the floor. And so I think I agree with

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>you is that, yes, the foot of the bed is

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 2>actually what's pushed up against the wall. In terms of

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 2>their positioning of Harry, this is where it's critical to

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 2>understand what the pathologists found. It sounds like Harry's throat

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 2>is cut while he's laying there, possibly while he's asleep.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'd be looking for the possibility of defensive

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 2>injuries on his hands, indicating that he was, you know,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>conscious and aware that he was being attacked. But if

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't have those defensive injuries, then I think it's

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>possible that he was asleep when his throat is cut. Now,

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you called a spray when your throat

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 2>is cut, and if it's cut deeply enough to where

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 2>it breaches the carotid arteries. While your your heart is

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 2>still pumping, you can get what is called an arterial spurt,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and that's a pretty significant blood pattern if it's present

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 2>and you have an artery that's been breached. If the

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.959
<v Speaker 2>carotids were not cut as a result of this neck wound,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>then in essence, what you're going to have is more

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>passive bleeding. And it sounds like the or I think,

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>if I remember correctly, you said the pathologist said his

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 2>jugular veins weren't cut. Correct. This is interesting because typically

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 2>with with you know, when you have a throat that

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>is cut, the knife wound is going directly across the

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>front of the neck, and you know, the jugulars are

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>fairly superficial, and so if the jugulars are not cut,

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>then it sounds like this incision is pretty focused in

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 2>the front of his neck, which might indicate that his

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>trachey or larynx was damaged as a result of this. However,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 2>if there's bleeding after that neck wound, now like when

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>he stands up, he's breathing, or even with these laying down,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 2>he could potentially be breathing in this blood. This blood

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>is getting into his trachea, potentially his oral cavity, and

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 2>if he is gasping, you know, trying to breathe, you

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 2>get potentially these expiratory patterns of blood that come out

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of the mouth, and so that can look like blood

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:25.239
<v Speaker 2>spatter and that can often be misinterpreted as to what

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 2>caused that type of pattern. So blood patterns, when you

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 2>do blood pattern analysis, you always want to know what

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.719
<v Speaker 2>the autopsy results are first so you can correlate the

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 2>injuries with the patterns at the scene.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, one thing to note about this is this is

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a small house. So look, it looks like it's only

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>two bedrooms. You walk through the front porch where Harry died,

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's a living room in a dining room, and

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>then it looks like the master is on the left

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>where he sleeps with Louise, and there's the kitchen, and

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>then there appears to me to only be one other bedroom,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>which is I'm assuming we're the boy and the girl

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are sleeping with just the kitchen separating them, and then

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got a back porch and then a back one

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>bathroom it looks like for the house. So just noting

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to end up coming back to this sketch,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and I do want to show you here's the photo

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 1>of the house. It's just a very small, modest house,

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>but I thought you might be interested in access. Like

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about the deep back top floor where

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they are. I mean, this is pretty exposed and it's

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>right on a big street.

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, at least per this sketch, it looks like there's

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>just one door into this small house, single story house.

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 2>There are multiple windows. I can't see all the windows

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>around the house, but in the sketch I can see

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 2>the location of the windows. I mean, those could potentially

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 2>be points of entry for an offender if an offender

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>actually got inside this house, you know, And I think

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>we'll have further discussions on that. And then it looks

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 2>like he came out that front door and collapsed right

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 2>on that porch.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 1>So setting the rest of the scene here, so we

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>know that the police think that the origin where this

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>happened was Harry was in bed. All the blood is there.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>He holds his neck, he kind of crawls, slash staggers

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>out onto the front porch and he dies. So they

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>go and they look and they say this place is

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>a mess. In the bedroom Harry's pant pockets are turned

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>inside out and they were just you know, wherever he

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>left them last the drawers and the bureau opened Louise's

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>purses on the floor. It's open. Now, why we have

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to go back. So this is obviously looking like a burglary.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Why we have to go back? Something weird. There is

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.439
<v Speaker 1>a pile of jewelry and some silverware found on the

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>ground outside the house, underneath a dining room window, So

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll go back to the photo that I showed you.

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But the dining room window is locked from the inside,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>so no one went out through it, or at least

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>it's locked by the time the police get there. And

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the jewelry, the police say, looks like it was placed.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like it was flung. It was almost

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like it was stacked outside and it was dropped from

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a few feet up. So they thought that this was curious.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And the dining room is on the opposite side of

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>the house of the bedroom. So let me show you

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about, because they're starting to try to

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>figure out as this staged burglary or something you know,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>bigger happening here. When you see this sketch down here,

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>and it says Jay, that's where the jewelry was. So

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you see the bedrooms kind of in the upper left

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>hand corner. Whoever did this had to go through the

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>bedroom into the living room, hang a left at the

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>dining room, and then I don't know, this stuff ends

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>up out of this window right here, so it's curious.

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that window is locked from the inside. So

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 2>if this jewelry was dropped out of this window, then

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 2>that person closed the window and locked it. Early on

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 2>in my career, I processed a fair number of burglary scenes.

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>That's how I really learned sort of the fundamentals of

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>crime scene investigation. Burglars don't do this. So you know,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 2>when a burglar enters into a house and is gathering

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 2>up items of value, there's usually a container that they use,

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 2>whether it's something that they've brought themselves or something from

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>inside the house. A common container that burglars use are

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 2>pellow cases, you know, So any jurisdiction has these pellow

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 2>case burglars. You know, so they don't have any burglary

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 2>tools on their person as they're walking through the neighborhood,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 2>but they can get inside the house and now they

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 2>can start gathering up items and sometimes a significant number

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 2>of items that they can place into a pellow case

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 2>or the homeowner's backpack or you know, whatever container that

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 2>they can find. You know. So for a burglar to

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>take these items of jewelry and toss them out the

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>window and then lock the window, that isn't right, you know.

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's a red flag to my mind. But I'm

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of curious to see what else, what other details

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you provide.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go back to the scene. So the police

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are automatically just like you. This is a big red

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>flag for them, especially just the locked window, the way

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>that this is piled up neatly. They said that maybe

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the killer robbed the house of jewelry and silverware, put

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it out the window and it landed weirdly. I don't

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.880
<v Speaker 1>know about that, then locked the window and then went

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>back to the bedroom to look for cash. And then

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Harry woke up and saw the person but didn't make

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it out of bed. Because I guess this is a

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>burglar who came armed with a knife or a razor

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>or something. The police are saying this is a thing.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't really think that's what happened. They feel like

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this is you know something that pretty clearly was focused

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>on Harry and murder and not on jewelry and money.

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So when they make a discovery in the street twenty

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>five feet away from the front door, police find a

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>straight razor with a black handle and it has blood

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>on it. This is not belong to Harry, so they

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>think maybe this is the murder weapon. But this is

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>not Harry's straight razor. First of all, when they say

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>straight razor, I'm assuming it's the kind of razor, the

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>old school razor that men used to shave with.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that right?

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you would think?

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 2>That's how I'm interpreting it. And that's what barbers use today.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So you go get a shave at of barber they

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 2>use a straight razor.

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>That would terrify Have you done that? That would scare

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>me to death? That would somebody come at me with

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>one of those with a handle on a razor? I

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:51.359
<v Speaker 1>guess you're used to it.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I actually have, Yeah, and it is you know, you

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 2>sit there and you think this person with a single

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>stroke could end my life.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, little sweeny tadd action happening. Well, that's what they have.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>They have this straight razor. They assume this is what

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the murder weapon is. It's got some blood on it.

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, this has all become a mystery. Louise

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is hysterical, and the neighbors, everybody's trying to console her,

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and the police are investigating, and they don't think it's

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a burglary. So now we have to learn a little

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about the couple. This is not straightforward the way

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we think it could go. There's some complications here. And

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say I usually say this at the top

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of the episode, but I want to say it now.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>This is something he said, she said, This is what

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this story is about, he said, she said. And I

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>don't even have that many of those. So it's interesting

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to see how people perceive the main players in a

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>murder case, especially in the nineteen twenty one, which is still,

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a conservative We're not in the roaring twenties,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>yet it's still a very conservative country. Many people think

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>women should be wearing corsets still, so you know, this

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>case kind of brings up some different things as far

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>as our culture. Let me tell you about these folks.

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So they moved from the Ozarks region of Missouri Beautiful

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to Portland. They had known each other their whole lives.

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>They grew up on farms next to each other, which

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is sweet. They got married when Louise was seventeen and

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Harry was twenty. And then, you know, Harry wanted to

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 1>work in a World War One shipyard, so they moved

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to Portland. And since moving to Portland, they had very

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>robust social lives. They were members of a church, They

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of social clubs that they were active in.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Louise played trombone in a local band and took private lessons.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>We have not had a trombone player involved in any

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of our cases yet. I thought that was interesting.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's surprising for a female trombone player from

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 2>this era. You know, I'm not sure I've seen that,

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, watching old historic you know, like the jazz

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>musicians from that timeframe. So interesting.

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me tell you what Louise said to investigators.

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Now that we know about Harry and Louise. She said

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>her kids are asleep. That the night that Harry died,

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they had both gone to bed about ten o'clock and

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>she had fallen asleep pretty quickly. She assumed Harry had.

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>She was woken up two hours later by his moaning,

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So she climbs over him, runs to the front door,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>which this is not a big place, as we talked

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>about before, it was you know, a few steps. Basically,

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>she saw someone running through that front door at the

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>same time, wearing a long overcoat. You know. One note

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I would say, as my first instinct I guess was

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>why did she not stay there and tend to him.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>She was not covered in blood, so that's not what

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>she did. She wanted to run out and get help.

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there a wrong reaction to have in that situation?

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>You're either you know, trying to help your husband but

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody who knows help needs to be called because

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a phone, or you're trying to you know,

0:29:59.680 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get help and you're leaving your husband there bleeding out.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it really comes down to what is

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 2>her perception at the time. Right now, I'm just hearing

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that she's hearing her husband moaning, you know, is this

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 2>akin to he's having a bad dream, you know, or

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 2>does she see something that causes her to you know,

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>climb over him and run out. We can never say

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>that there's the perfect way somebody should respond, you know,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>when there is a crime that has occurred. You know,

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 2>we've seen that over and over again. Some people, you know,

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>their loved ones have been killed, and they respond a

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 2>certain way, and other people respond a different way. And

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.959
<v Speaker 2>of course, you know, you pay attention to the response,

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's not a reliable predictor as to whether or

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 2>not somebody was involved in the crime because they didn't

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>respond the way that you think they should have. So

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:59.959
<v Speaker 2>in Luis situation, it's you know, I guess I'm just

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of confused. Harry's moaning and now she's running out

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>of the house. She must have, you know, taken in

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 2>more information or sent something more than just hearing him moaning.

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yep, she must have. I mean, I think the big

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>deal to me is she didn't have any blood on her.

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I didn't think that she wouldn't

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>at least touch him if there was that much blood.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>And she's lying next to him, but they report that

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't have any blood on her, and she says,

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't clean up anything. I just knew something was

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong with him and ran and then she saw this

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>person leaving in a long overcoat.

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Right now, I do want to address that though, when

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>people see a very bloody crime scene, and it sounds

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.320
<v Speaker 2>like the bed has a fair amount of blood in it.

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 2>A lot of that blood possibly was deposited after Louise

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 2>left the bed. So that's you know, because you have

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to think about the dynamics. If Harry's laying there, his

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 2>throat is cut, yes, he's going out, there's going to

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 2>be some external bleeding, gets up and she gets out.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 2>There's not a lot of blood that has saturated the

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 2>sheets or the mattress or the pillow whatever this, you know,

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>the circumstances are. And then as Harry lays there for

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>a period of time, now you get more blood being deposited.

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 2>But then also fabric causes blood to spread even further

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 2>even if there's not more blood being deposited. So when

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 2>you now go into and take a look at this bed,

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 2>it looks like half the bed is covered in blood.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 2>It was like, well, it's actually wasn't like that when

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Louise was in the bed.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense. If things happen the way that Louise

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>said they happen, I would say the police are very

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>suspicious of Louise because there's nobody who else is there around.

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, if they're thinking this is not

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a burglary. Somebody's targeting Harry. They're looking at her first.

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that's the right thing. I'm saying that's

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now.

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Sure, now, I think, you know, going back to you

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 2>know what was observed in the room where his hands have,

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 2>pockets turned out, drawers have been pulled out, You've got

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 2>money and jewelry that has been deposited outside. This all

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 2>must have occurred before Louise got up and got out

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of that bed. So now that's part of the assessment

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of Louise and how and why is somebody doing this

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>while she's asleep next to Harry? And then why does

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 2>that offender only attack Harry when Louise was laying right

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 2>next to him asleep. So there are there again, there's

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>some red flags here. So I want to know more.

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we go back to the theory that

0:33:39.680 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you say all the time, which is you eliminate the threat.

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Louise isn't a threat, right, I mean, Harry is the

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>threat with Louise. He can probably intimidate her and he

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>can do whatever you take, whatever he wants.

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, you eliminate the threat, but you're also eliminating

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 2>the witnesses. So if you're taking the step to kill Harry, yes,

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>you kill him first, but then you would also eliminate

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Louise and this offender. At least per Louise's statement, it's

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 2>not like she's in the bed and seeing somebody standing

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 2>over her in the bed like he was about to,

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, take further action against her. It almost sounds

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 2>like she wakes up, Harry's throat has been cut and

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the offender is running out of the house, you know,

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 2>So that seems more of Harry is targeted, you know,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's that's odd that the offender has taken the

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 2>time before killing Harry to go through the drawers and

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 2>go through his pockets and put the jewelry outside. Something

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 2>is not adding up here.

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, the police agree. A physician who works for the

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>corner will later say that he believes it looked like

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Harry's windpipe had been severed, and he's calling bs on

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Louisa's story. He's saying Harry would not be moaning or

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not enough to wake her up. Yeah, now what do

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Remember Robert, the neighbors said Harry's

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>mouth was moved, but no words were coming out.

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, And that that adds up the trachia, the windpipe,

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, being transsected. Absolutely, if you can't get you know,

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>air up through your vocal cords, you can't utter a sound,

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 2>but you still are able to mouth. You know, you know,

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 2>you don't have all these nerves that have been severed.

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, you still have you know, motor control over

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 2>the innervations and the muscles that are in your face.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it comes down to what exactly is

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 2>this moaning sound with this doctor saying his trachya is transsected,

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 2>his windpipe is transsected. He's not vocalizing anything, but there

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 2>is going to possibly be air passing it in and

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 2>out of this wound? Is she hearing that?

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>She can't even identify it. She just assumed it was

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>something woke her up, sounds of pain. So the police say, okay,

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us about the suspect that you saw running out

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the front door when you were running to go get

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>help from your neighbor. So the only description she was

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:08.879
<v Speaker 1>really able to give, because his back was to her

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and he was wearing a long overcoat, was that he

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>was short and squat. The issue is the next day

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>she says he was tall and lanky. So I'm going

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to go back to what you've said before, which is,

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, inconsistencies can be alarming. At the same time,

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>witnesses stink sometimes they can't remember anything. And my description

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of short and squatty as a woman might be different

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:34.280
<v Speaker 1>than your description of one.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Well for sure. And she's also seeing this individual in

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 2>what sounds like like a trench.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Coat in the middle of the night.

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in the dark, you know, And so this is

0:36:47.360 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 2>where you know. Of course, if she's being interviewed and

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.399
<v Speaker 2>he's short and squatty and then the next day he's

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 2>now tall and lanky, then the follow up is, well,

0:36:56.080 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 2>why are you changing your description? And if she's saying,

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, I started thinking about it, and I remember

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 2>I can remember him, you know, running past let's say,

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the living room sofa, and now as I think about,

0:37:08.960 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, how tall he is relative to the sofa,

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 2>he was taller than what I initially thought. Is Is

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>there a really good reason for her to change so

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 2>dramatically in this physical description.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's see. There is a corner's inquest held

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>three days after Harry is killed. Of course, the police

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are still interviewing everyone in his life, including Louise. Still

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the corner is a guy named doctor Earle Smith. I mean,

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the jury agrees that Harry was killed by a sharp object.

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>There's now an interesting debate on whether or not the

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 1>corner looked at Harry's neck wound and can say it

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was this razor. He's not sure it was the razor.

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Multiple doctors who examined the body agree that this looked

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more like a large knife. And here

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in lies my question to you. This is their description

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and the reason why they think it was a knife

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and not this bloody razor, this straight edge with a

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 1>handle that was found twenty five feet away. They said

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the cut had been deeper in the middle than on

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:13.919
<v Speaker 1>the ends, and that hairy skin had been damaged by

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what looked like the hilt of a knife. So, I mean,

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it matters in a way. Can they really

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>tell that based on a neck wound.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Which one is describing the neck wood? Is this the pathologist.

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like four of them, and they're all kind of

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.240
<v Speaker 1>having the same agreement that it's deeper in the middle

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>than on the ends, and it looks like kind of

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a jagged cut.

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so yes, you know, they can make assessments. They

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 2>can even determine a pathologist can determine is it a

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 2>single edge or a double edged knife, you know. But

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of course assessing the wound in terms of the depth

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 2>of the wound, with it being deeper in the middle

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 2>than on the sides, well, that helps explain why the

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 2>juggler veins the carotids aren't cut because those are on

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the side of your windpipe of the trachia. So this

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 2>knife wound sounds more like it has more of a

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 2>stabbing motion to the center of his neck than like

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 2>an ear to ear type of incision that we often

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 2>see with throats that have been cut. Now you can

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 2>stab the knife in but also do an incisive movement

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and then pull it out, and that would explain almost

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 2>it would almost look like a V shaped neck wound

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 2>from the skin surface of the skin into the neck structures.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's now he's got his trachia transected. He can't

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 2>talk yet his jugulars are intact, as crowdits must be

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 2>intact unless the knife went underneath the jugular on one

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 2>side and possibly severed acrot it. I mean, there's got

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 2>to be. I imagine some significant bleeding going on. If harryus

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 2>is getting up and walking out of the house and

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 2>collapsing due to loss of blood or potentially do sort

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>of almost like an asphyxia because his lungs are filling

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 2>up with blood. But either way, he's got a significant

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>bleeding injury inside his neck. But it's not like both

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 2>carotids are completely cut, you know, like if we have

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 2>a homicidal throat slashing, you know, this can often be

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 2>near decapitation and that person dies within a matter of

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 2>seconds because the brain absolutely has no blood pumping up

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 2>into it. The carotids are completely transsected, and all the

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 2>bleeding is going there's no blood pressure up to the brain.

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 2>That type of neck wound, it's close to instantaneous death.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 2>We don't see that with Harry. So Harry is getting

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 2>enough oxygen up to his brain to be able to

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 2>get up and walk out of the house before collapsing.

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 2>So the description of these medical experts of the neck

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 2>wound it makes sense to me. But there is is

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 2>going to be something happening in terms of significant bleeding

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and right now, yeah I'm not hearing Oh yeah, the

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 2>jugglers were cut or the crowd as were cut. There

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 2>are other blood vessels in the neck that this knife

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 2>probably transacted and that's the source of the blood.

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>So do you agree with them based on their description

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that this is more likely to be a large knife

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of a straight edge, which is consistent all the

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 1>way across based on what they're saying, because it makes

0:41:26.520 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a difference, Paul, I'll tell you that.

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, in terms of the size of the knife,

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:34.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, I right now I don't have any information

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that would be informative as to the size of a knife. However,

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, envisioning the typical straight edge, where you know,

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 2>the front, the top of the blade is blunt, and

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 2>then you have the working edge of the blade along

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, just the single edge, and then you have

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 2>that handle, I could envision a way that that blade

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 2>could have been used to inflict a similar looking neck wound.

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 2>They're observing the hilt of a knife handle in the neck. Well,

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 2>necks aren't very big, you know, So if this knife

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 2>is going all the way up to the length of

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 2>it's played to where now you have this part of

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the handle contacting the skin, that doesn't sound like a

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 2>very long knife to me. At all, you know, we're

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 2>talking a few inches. I'm not sure what they mean

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 2>by a large knife. Are we talking about like a

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 2>chef's knife. No, because in order to get that hilt

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 2>to contact the skin, for them to see that that

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 2>knife has gone completely through the neck and into the bed,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, so they would be seeing that complete, you know,

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:45.240
<v Speaker 2>through and through type of injury.

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's continue on because there's a lot more ahead here.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So the newspapers, of course, are yellow journalism. They're reporting

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this all over the place. It's a really big story,

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, people are fascinated with the idea that

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 1>police think this woman might be responsible for murdering her husband,

0:43:04.760 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and public opinion starts to shift against her. She is arrested,

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>but as a this is an interesting phrase. Is this

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a real thing? Witness under arrest, but she's not charged?

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So what is that nowadays? What would we call.

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 2>That a false imprisonment?

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess person of interest who's been collected by the way,

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Here in the United States, you have to have probable

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 2>cause in order to deny somebody their freedom, you know,

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 2>that's a constitutional right that we have. And so now

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to say that she's a witness under arrest that you know,

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 2>at least the way that I'm interpreting that where Okay,

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a they don't have a sufficient probable cause,

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 2>but they think she's the one responsible. She's a suspect.

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 2>That's how I would describe her. She most certainly is

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a suspect. But you still need to cross that probable

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 2>cause threshold in order to deny somebody their right to freedom.

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 2>And it doesn't sound like they've got that with what

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:10.400
<v Speaker 2>you've told me.

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Yet, I agree, And she is doing the right things.

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 1>She's clamming up. She's not talking to anybody about her attorney,

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>which just drives the press crazy and the police, but

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>especially the press, and you know, they start describing her

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>as a caged tigriss gross because she had reddish hair,

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and they start to sexualize her very much. I would say,

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 1>speaking along those lines, the police are saying and the

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor are saying, Okay, what's our motive here? And I

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>will tell you they don't have a great motive. So

0:44:40.560 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the neighbors are saying, they seem like a good couple.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we never know. She is taking trombone lessons

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>from a handsome man his name is J. H. Klecker.

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He is leazy. I will tell you that. And the

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>police say that they think that these two people were

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>having an affair and that she wanted things to get

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>more serious, and you know, the way to convince Glecker

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that she's serious is to kill her husband. They also

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think maybe they were in on it together, and this

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is where we come up with sort of desperate police

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to find a motive. And at the same time

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that he said, she said, so I can tell you

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>more about Klecker the trombone teacher, or what the police

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>are thinking, I will tell you they never do a

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>good job settling on. Did Luis do this to draw

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>her boyfriend in or did they do it together so

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>they could be together. There is zero evidence for either

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>one of these theories.

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 2>No, but you know, at least during the investigative stage,

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 2>this is I would say a decent theory from the information.

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 2>This crime scene does have an element of staging that

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 2>is a parent you know, Tupac is obviously turned out

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 2>of Harry's pants, drawers being pulled out, the money and

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 2>jewelry being weirdly positioned outside. You know, considering Harry is

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 2>in essence executed. You know, that's where I'm seeing contradiction.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing staging. And anytime you see staging, that suggests

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 2>that the person responsible, in their mind thinks that they

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.440
<v Speaker 2>are likely going to be considered a suspect. And so

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 2>that would be Louise, and that would be somebody she

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 2>is an intimate relationship with, which is this JH trombone player. Now,

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 2>whether or not Louise acted alone in order to make

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 2>herself free to be able to continue on a relationship

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 2>with JH, or she convinced Jah to come over and

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 2>make this look like a burglary, but kill Harry so

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 2>those so Louise and JH could have a future together.

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Either scenario, I mean those are real. You know, either

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 2>one has had and time and time again throughout history.

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:06.920
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I think during the investigator stage that

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 2>is a decent theory. But now you have to prove

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that you know? And and is JH? You know the

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:17.439
<v Speaker 2>man in the overcoat and Louise is lying about well

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a stranger versus why I knew exactly who it was?

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.440
<v Speaker 2>And what is Jh's description? Is he short in squat

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 2>or is he tall and lanky? You know, is there

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 2>a reason where she goes, Oh, maybe I described him

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 2>too accurately the first time. So now I'm going to

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 2>go the opposite way and say he's the opposite You know,

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:37.399
<v Speaker 2>the strange man in the overcoat is a taller guy.

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And I think he's a medium guy. He's

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 1>not short and squat, he's not super tall. He's in

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the medium range. Number one, Get that out of the way.

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Number two. Here's the problem with Clecker, I think is

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that Louise said, I am not sleeping with this guy.

0:47:54.040 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I am not having an affair with this guy. Klecker says,

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if she killed her husban or not.

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>We were not having an active affair. We had some intimate,

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate intimate moments. I had a girlfriend who was in

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>San Diego who is supposed to be moving up to Portland.

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>He says, basically, this hot woman, Louise, who was married,

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.320
<v Speaker 1>was hot for me, and a couple of things happened.

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>That was not a big deal. I wasn't interested in her.

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea if she wanted anything deeper with me.

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>She didn't profess her love for me. I don't know

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if she killed her husband he had no proof, and

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Louise says, this guy's nuts. I did not sleep with

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this guy at all. But the police are using Clecker's

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.680
<v Speaker 1>story to really kind of bolster their idea of why

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:45.359
<v Speaker 1>would a woman who is a homemaker, whose husband makes

0:48:45.400 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a good living, who seems to have a good marriage,

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>why would she in nineteen twenty one kill the golden

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>goose and go with this trombone guy who doesn't have

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a steady job. He brags about sleeping with her or

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 1>fooling around with her. I think that there is a

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a disbelief of why this would happen.

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's zero proof. I mean, Louise denies sleeping with

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy, and he can't come up with anything. There's

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>no witnesses who saw them out. I mean, there's just nothing.

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say one more thing, Paul, because I know

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you probably want to say something. Here. His family, Harry's family,

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and Louise's family all come from Missouri. No one believes

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this story. Everybody is behind her, including Harry's brother. They've

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:32.359
<v Speaker 1>known her the whole life. I mean, they live next

0:49:32.400 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>door to each other on this farm, and everyone says

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this is nuts. She did not do this at all,

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>and she wasn't sleeping with.

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 2>This guy, you know, the police saying that why would

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Louise do this? Yes, it appears that her life with

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Harry at the relationship with Harry at least on the

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:53.239
<v Speaker 2>surface is good. On the outward appearances of things is good.

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 2>But we've seen time and time again that it's what

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 2>the person is feeling on the inside. I right now

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 2>cannot just say, oh, no, you know, Louise is not involved.

0:50:05.600 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like Louise very much could still be involved in this,

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 2>even though everybody, including her friends and Harry's family are

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, saying no, there's no way she would have

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 2>done this. You know, right now, I've got a stage

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 2>crime scene and one of the individuals that has the

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 2>access to Harry as he's laying in bed is Louise.

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 2>So she's still in my mind a suspect. The relationship

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 2>with this J. H. Klecker, you know, that has to

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 2>be drilled down on because now it's not to eliminate

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 2>other possibilities, but it doesn't seem like this is where

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you have a random stranger who's broken into this house

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and was trying to commit a burglary and then decided

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to just you know, cut into Harry's throat. That's not

0:50:55.600 --> 0:51:01.240
<v Speaker 2>how these crimes occur. The staging really suggests that it's Louise,

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 2>this Clecker, or somebody else that's close to this family

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:11.440
<v Speaker 2>circle that is committing this crime. And at least right now,

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 2>the two potential suspects, or that what I would say,

0:51:13.960 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 2>The two suspects are Louise and or jh. There may

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 2>be somebody else that comes along, but right now they're

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 2>the suspects and Harry's homicide.

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let's continue on Louise and Harry's families. As

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, all think this is crazy. This is not

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Harry and Louise had a great marriage. Because

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole family is in from out of town, the

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:41.480
<v Speaker 1>trial is pushed up from September to July, so this

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.879
<v Speaker 1>is less than two months after Harry is murdered. And

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution, Boy, I was shocked when I read this.

0:51:48.200 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at the death penalty for a woman.

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So now we've moved from Louise being a witness under

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:58.239
<v Speaker 2>arrest to Louise being charged for Harry's murder.

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, and it is totally based on clicker what he

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tells the police, and he again is not saying she

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:06.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't confess to me. I don't think she did. You know,

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>he's not saying anything except yeah, we had some inappropriate

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 1>relationship stuff. But that was it, I mean, he was

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That was the extent of it, and they ran with this.

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no other evidence. The police said, that's why we're

0:52:19.120 --> 0:52:20.959
<v Speaker 1>arresting hers because of what this guy said.

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 2>It's flimsy, very flimsy. He's offering very interesting information for sure,

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:33.240
<v Speaker 2>as a witness, but you need to corroborate that somehow,

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 2>some way, you know, And of course in this day

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 2>and age, we would be looking for physical evidence, you know,

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 2>such as you know, like this straight edge razor, is

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:46.359
<v Speaker 2>that Harry's blood on it? And if it is, that

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 2>likely is the murder weapon whose DNA is also on

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 2>this razor, you know, on the handle. I know they

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 2>don't have that technology today, but you know this Trombone

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 2>instructor saying, well, we had sort of inappropriate thing. She

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 2>was kind of coming on to me, and Louise is

0:53:04.000 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 2>completely denying it. You know, It's like, God, that's not

0:53:07.160 --> 0:53:09.319
<v Speaker 2>enough to push this up to where, oh yeah, I'm

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 2>confident that Louise is Harry's killer. Yeah, you know, she's

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 2>still a suspect, and potentially a strong suspect. You know,

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:19.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe there is some motive there, but I'm unconvinced right now.

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, let's talk about flimsy. One of the neighbors.

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 1>The prosecutor loves this. One of the neighbors who came

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to the house before the police showed up, one of

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:33.920
<v Speaker 1>those contaminators I call them, said that Louise's side of

0:53:33.960 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the bed did not look like it had been slept in,

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Like the pillow was too fluffy. You know, I don't

0:53:42.280 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>know how I feel about that, and I know you're

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the things you'll say is like, I don't

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>know if that makes a difference. Number One. To me,

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.279
<v Speaker 1>it's what's more important is that there's no blood on her.

0:53:50.680 --> 0:53:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That seems a little bit more important than whether the

0:53:53.000 --> 0:53:56.200
<v Speaker 1>pillow was fluffy. And it's a neighbor, a layperson who's

0:53:56.200 --> 0:53:58.359
<v Speaker 1>determining that to begin with, what do you think?

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, it's an observation, but it's sort of

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 2>like I would need to, you know, see the photos

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 2>of that to verify. Is there something that seems to

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 2>be inconsistent with Louise having slept on that side of

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the bed that night. But that's very subjective. Now, the

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 2>blood on Louise or the lack of blood on Louise.

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 2>That's where I need to see the photos of the bed.

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, I need to know the extent of the

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:25.720
<v Speaker 2>blood patterns. I need to know better, you know, the

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the the blood patterns on Harry, in

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:32.399
<v Speaker 2>order to assess whether or not somebody could have been

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 2>on Louise's side of the bed and gotten up and

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 2>left without getting any blood on them. And you know,

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.320
<v Speaker 2>part of that assessment is also, as I explained earlier,

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 2>well how much blood was there when Louise would have

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 2>been in the bed versus how much blood is being

0:54:49.040 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 2>seen at the time that these contaminators are walking into

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the bedroom.

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and I'm not sure this occurs to

0:54:56.880 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the police. I mean, they really focus in on who

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely suspect and they can't get around Louise.

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Now I will say, I mean Klecker. I don't know

0:55:05.560 --> 0:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about him. I don't know who to

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:12.359
<v Speaker 1>believe her or him, but I'm sure he is whiplashed

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:15.640
<v Speaker 1>by what the prosecutor does. Klecker is the prosecutor star

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:18.879
<v Speaker 1>witnessing this, and the prosecutor cannot seem to decide whether

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or not Clecker and Louise did this together or it

0:55:21.200 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>was Louise alone. So you've got this trombone teacher sitting

0:55:25.400 --> 0:55:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on the stand testifying for the district attorney, and the

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 1>district attorney is in some ways accusing him of doing this.

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>They cannot settle on anything, I will say this, so

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:38.880
<v Speaker 1>things get a little complicated. You have not I'm surprised

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you haven't asked this yet. Did Harry have any money

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 1>or did Harry have a life insurance policy? I'm sure

0:55:43.400 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you were going to get to that though, right Well.

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>After looking at the house, I'm pretty confident that there

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 2>wasn't a ton of money in this family, you know,

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 2>most certainly it's all relative, you know, it's what is?

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 2>What is something? I mean, I've seen a woman killed

0:55:58.600 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 2>for five dollars, Yeah, you know, so it's all relative.

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't, you know, even form the thought of the

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:10.400
<v Speaker 2>possibility of life insurance. I should have, but I didn't.

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, good, I'm glad I caught you in something

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I did not smart you. So they find out that

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Harry did have a life insurance, a modest one, although

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I mean it's all relative. Forty five hundred

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:26.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a life insurance policy today that would have

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 1>been about eighty thousand, which doesn't seem like it's a

0:56:29.360 --> 0:56:33.320
<v Speaker 1>lot to many people. And as you pointed out, modest neighborhood,

0:56:33.320 --> 0:56:37.800
<v Speaker 1>modest family. Sure, so there's that. Okay. The biggest weird

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens in this case is this Klecker is

0:56:41.480 --> 0:56:44.839
<v Speaker 1>on the stand and the prosecution sits down and there's

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 1>cross examination. Okay, Now Louise's defense attorney produces something and

0:56:50.520 --> 0:56:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a piece of evidence that shocks the whole courthouse, Okay,

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>including Klecker. And the reason that he's able to do this,

0:56:57.800 --> 0:56:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you what it is in a second,

0:56:59.400 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is that there is no discovery in nineteen twenty one.

0:57:02.200 --> 0:57:05.440
<v Speaker 1>There are no discovery rules. Will you quickly and swiftly

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 1>explain the concept behind discovery rules and why they're important,

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and how this lawyer can really throw a gotcha at

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Klecker on the stand, you know, in.

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:18.600
<v Speaker 2>A nutshell, and this isn't going to be you know,

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 2>the real legal description. So any prosecutors out there listening

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:28.320
<v Speaker 2>to me, don't don't cringe too hard. But fundamentally that

0:57:28.360 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutors have to turn over everything that they have

0:57:32.160 --> 0:57:36.920
<v Speaker 2>in their case to the defendant's attorneys. This is the discovery.

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Now there are select items that can be withheld, but

0:57:41.560 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that's very limited. And fundamentally this process is that if

0:57:48.320 --> 0:57:54.320
<v Speaker 2>the people who are prosecuting the defendant have information half

0:57:54.360 --> 0:57:58.920
<v Speaker 2>evidence that is potentially exculpatory, you know, that's what the

0:57:58.920 --> 0:58:03.640
<v Speaker 2>defense attorneys are looking for. And that way, the discovery

0:58:03.680 --> 0:58:07.880
<v Speaker 2>process guarantees that the defendant is able to mount the

0:58:07.920 --> 0:58:13.240
<v Speaker 2>most rigorous defense possible with all the evidence and all

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the information that the investigating agency in the prosecutor's office

0:58:18.520 --> 0:58:23.880
<v Speaker 2>has compiled. And this is now where there's a case

0:58:23.920 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 2>decision of Brady v. Maryland, which really cements the obligation

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:35.400
<v Speaker 2>of the prosecutor to the point of potentially being personally

0:58:35.520 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 2>liable if it is found that they've withheld potential exculpatory

0:58:40.800 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 2>information from the defense. So like when I was working

0:58:44.280 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 2>for the DA's office, one of the most impressive things

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that I saw was how rigorous the prosecutors from my

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:56.560
<v Speaker 2>office were at ensuring that the defense got everything that

0:58:56.600 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 2>they could possibly get there's always going to be some

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 2>some things that are contentious in this adversarial system as

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to whether or not it was actually turned over under

0:59:07.120 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 2>discovery or not. Now, in this scenario, it sounds like

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Louise's attorney is producing evidence. Now the defense doesn't have

0:59:17.240 --> 0:59:21.560
<v Speaker 2>the same discovery obligation, you know. So this is where

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:26.000
<v Speaker 2>if the defense discovered evidence, and sometimes you know, defense

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:30.080
<v Speaker 2>attorneys hire their own investigators, et cetera, then that is

0:59:30.120 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 2>something that they could potentially produce if there is sufficient

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:39.680
<v Speaker 2>relevance to defending you know, the defendant. Sometimes the defense

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 2>will do let's say, scientific testing on the people's evidence,

0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 2>evidence collected by you know, the investigating agency. Well there,

0:59:48.040 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 2>now there's a little bit more of okay, you need

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 2>to inform the prosecutors in terms of what you know

0:59:55.040 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 2>you've done with with our evidence, you know, with the

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:02.600
<v Speaker 2>people's evidence. But under this scenario, it doesn't sound like

1:00:03.240 --> 1:00:08.320
<v Speaker 2>the situation would require the defense attorney to have divulged

1:00:08.360 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>anything up front under any type of discovery process. And

1:00:12.280 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I may be completely wrong, but that's my understanding, yep.

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And you're right. I mean that's what leads to this

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what I can only describe as a Perry Mason moment

1:00:23.160 --> 1:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the courtroom. So let me know you what happens.

1:00:26.440 --> 1:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Louise's lawyer reaches down looking at Cleicker into a bag

1:00:31.480 --> 1:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and he produces an overcoat, and we remember the notorious

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:39.240
<v Speaker 1>overcoat that the suspect, Louise says, was wearing as he

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>was running out the door after murdering her husband. It

1:00:42.880 --> 1:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is bloodstained. There's a hunting knife in one pocket. There

1:00:47.680 --> 1:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is trombone. I really want to get through this without laughing.

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>There is sheet music.

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>In the other pocket for trombone.

1:00:55.480 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, try, yes, it would be not great if it

1:00:57.760 --> 1:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>were clarinet, but yes, for a trombone. So there's trombone,

1:01:02.320 --> 1:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sheet music. There's a knife in the other pocket. And

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>then it's blood soaked, they say, with human blood. So

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I have never gotten I have looked everywhere. I've never

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>gotten a satisfactory answer about whose blood this could have been.

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the defense attorney is proclaiming that this is

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Clecker's coat, that you know, he's the one who murdered Harry,

1:01:23.960 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and then he discarded this, so then I have more information,

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but I want to get your reaction first. I don't

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>know whose blood this is. They say it's human. I

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>am dubious that this would be human blood. I mean,

1:01:36.920 --> 1:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>unless we really believe that this is the overcoat of

1:01:40.440 --> 1:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the person who murdered Harry.

1:01:42.760 --> 1:01:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know this right off the bat, there's issues.

1:01:47.600 --> 1:01:51.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, of course today need to see is that

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Harry's blood on the coat. But going back to nineteen

1:01:55.440 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty one, you know, this is where if Harry is

1:01:59.240 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>in essence, is his the front of his throat, his

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:06.320
<v Speaker 2>windpipe is being transsected, and the offender immediately runs off.

1:02:06.640 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>It's entirely possible that offender has zero of Harry's blood

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:15.680
<v Speaker 2>on him or her And that's where evaluating the blood

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>patterns at the scene and Harry's injuries, all of that

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:20.360
<v Speaker 2>has to come into play as to whether or not

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the blood patterns on this overcoat are even consistent with

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>the crime scene. You know, so, I mean this could

1:02:29.520 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 2>very well just be mocked up evidence. At this point.

1:02:32.920 --> 1:02:35.800
<v Speaker 2>There was absolutely no chain of custody. It's not being documented.

1:02:35.840 --> 1:02:38.360
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't sound like as to where it was collected from,

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, who's had possession of it, documenting that the knife,

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:46.080
<v Speaker 2>the trombone music, you know, the blood was all there

1:02:46.160 --> 1:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>when that overcoat was first found. So, you know, I'm

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>very skeptical about this evidence at least right now. You know,

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:57.320
<v Speaker 2>it just seems like this seems too I'm going to

1:02:57.400 --> 1:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>use the term staged again. I mean, come on, trombone

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>music inside the pocket.

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen to this. Louise's dad is the one who

1:03:06.160 --> 1:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>found it. You didn't even take a sip of your drink,

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you put it right back down.

1:03:11.360 --> 1:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well yeah, but is the dad trying to put

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the suspicion on J. H. Klecker? You know, my daughter's innocent.

1:03:18.640 --> 1:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>He's the killer. You know, this is where and there's

1:03:22.680 --> 1:03:26.360
<v Speaker 2>questions about the veracity of the evidence right off the bat,

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's where, you know, definitely investigation into this evidence,

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 2>forensic testing into this evidence has to be done in

1:03:33.920 --> 1:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>order to even determine does it have relevance to this case.

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think one of the things is

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that he found it. He said he found it in

1:03:41.960 --> 1:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood, rolled up under a fern plant. And you know,

1:03:46.920 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the issues that the police say is that.

1:03:50.200 --> 1:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And then he turned it over to the defense attorney.

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>The police say, listen, how long do you think this

1:03:55.360 --> 1:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>has been here? And of course the dad's like, well,

1:03:56.960 --> 1:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously the killer deposited it there and hid it there

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>after the killing, which was four weeks earlier. It had

1:04:02.680 --> 1:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>rained numerous times and there was no sign of rain

1:04:05.560 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>water washing out this blood. And the sheet music was

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>yeah perfect. I mean, I'm surprised they didn't ask Klecker

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to perform whatever the song was that was in his

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>pocket at the time.

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, the complexity is this is now being

1:04:20.560 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 2>produced by the defense in court, so there isn't an

1:04:23.600 --> 1:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to really scrutinize this evidence. And this is where

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the prosecutor I think, would be very much

1:04:32.840 --> 1:04:35.720
<v Speaker 2>in the right to be able to object to relevancy. Yeah,

1:04:35.800 --> 1:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, without you know, further scrutiny of that evidence,

1:04:40.000 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 2>not just the dad getting on the stand and saying

1:04:43.560 --> 1:04:45.959
<v Speaker 2>I found it here. There needs to be a deep

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:48.720
<v Speaker 2>dive into this evidence. Do you determine whether or not

1:04:49.200 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, it is what the defense claims it is.

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, none of that happens. I mean, they can't

1:04:55.480 --> 1:04:57.480
<v Speaker 1>get it thrown out. The jury has heard it, the

1:04:57.560 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>judge is allowing it to be heard. This is the

1:04:59.880 --> 1:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>life asked major murder trial in Oregon to have an

1:05:02.040 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>all male jury. They deliberate for thirty minutes, that's it,

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>half an hour, and they come back with a verdict.

1:05:10.080 --> 1:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Her life is on the line. This is a capital case.

1:05:14.160 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, Paul Holes, they came up with

1:05:17.440 --> 1:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>guilty or not guilty?

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's what I think they should have come up with,

1:05:22.280 --> 1:05:27.840
<v Speaker 2>based on the case against Louise. But my fear is

1:05:27.840 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>is that with such a short deliberation, all male jury,

1:05:32.720 --> 1:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>this Perry Mason moment with the overcoat, I have a

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:38.280
<v Speaker 2>feeling that they convicted Louise.

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>No, they acquitted her. Oh wow, I think that there

1:05:43.720 --> 1:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>was enough. There was you know, witnesses who were saying, well,

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the coat could have been there, and they were him

1:05:48.200 --> 1:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and Haun. I don't think anybody liked Klecker because he

1:05:50.600 --> 1:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>came off as leezy. And I still think in nineteen

1:05:54.080 --> 1:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, there was absolutely the belief that a woman

1:05:56.600 --> 1:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have done this. She didn't testify, and that was

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that they never found out or never convicted anybody of

1:06:04.880 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>murdering Harry and Louise and the two kids, the boy

1:06:08.240 --> 1:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and the girl leave town and she dies in nineteen

1:06:10.960 --> 1:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty six at the age of ninety one.

1:06:13.320 --> 1:06:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh Wow.

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's the end of that story. I mean,

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you think.

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a problem with Louise being acquitted, though

1:06:21.840 --> 1:06:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm still think that she is potentially Harry's killer. Yeah,

1:06:27.400 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I think the prosecution jumped the gun on charging her,

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't build up a good enough case. Nor am I

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:38.960
<v Speaker 2>convinced about this J. H. Klecker not having any involvement.

1:06:39.360 --> 1:06:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I think this investigation got up to a point where

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>two suspects were developed and they could have acted independently

1:06:45.840 --> 1:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>or they could have acted in concert, and they didn't

1:06:50.480 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>do enough to incriminate or exonerate either one of these suspects.

1:06:57.640 --> 1:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Further investigation was needed before the before or anybody was charged.

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>And you know, now, unfortunately, you know it's over one

1:07:04.320 --> 1:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred years later. You know, Harry's death is there is

1:07:08.720 --> 1:07:10.000
<v Speaker 2>no justice, there's no answer.

1:07:10.280 --> 1:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, two kids with no dad. Yeah, boy, what a story.

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it was it really did come

1:07:17.120 --> 1:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>down to that he said, she said, and planted evidence,

1:07:20.560 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>weird evidence, sleazy trombone teachers. I just think this was

1:07:27.240 --> 1:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a complicated case.

1:07:29.280 --> 1:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I know the way that I would be

1:07:32.200 --> 1:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>looking at this case if I was with the investigating

1:07:35.480 --> 1:07:38.200
<v Speaker 2>agency is okay, one of the suspects has been acquitted,

1:07:38.680 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>can't go after Louise anymore due to double jeopardy. However,

1:07:42.760 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>j Je Klecker is still in play, and that now

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>let's really try to determine was he involved or not,

1:07:51.200 --> 1:07:56.320
<v Speaker 2>And there could be all sorts of investigative tactics used

1:07:56.640 --> 1:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in order to try to you know, wean that out,

1:08:00.080 --> 1:08:06.000
<v Speaker 2>including potentially gaining cooperation from Louise because she now could

1:08:06.040 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 2>turn stace witness and said, yeah, I hired Klecker to

1:08:09.400 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>kill my husband, but you can't do anything about it

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>because I've been acquitted, you know, But she could say

1:08:16.200 --> 1:08:18.559
<v Speaker 2>he's he was the man in the overcoat. You know,

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 2>there's all sorts of things that could have happened if

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>they decided to pursue the case. But you know, I've

1:08:23.880 --> 1:08:27.640
<v Speaker 2>seen sort of the philosophy with prosecutors is that, well,

1:08:27.680 --> 1:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>we knew we had the right person, they just got acquitted,

1:08:31.120 --> 1:08:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and therefore we're not going to pursue the case any furthers.

1:08:34.320 --> 1:08:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I've got a woman in the early seventies dumped, had

1:08:38.320 --> 1:08:42.720
<v Speaker 2>been raped seemen evidence. Vaginally they charged a guy and

1:08:42.760 --> 1:08:46.639
<v Speaker 2>he was acquitted of her murder. You know, many decades before,

1:08:47.120 --> 1:08:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, well, I'm convinced that he is

1:08:49.560 --> 1:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>her killer, where's the DNA? And the prosecutor was like,

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>what doesn't matter. It's like, it's an unsolved case. If

1:08:56.240 --> 1:08:59.200
<v Speaker 2>it's an acquittal, it's an unsolved case. We now have

1:08:59.280 --> 1:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the technology, you know, prove whether or not the person

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>acquitted was the actual killer, or maybe we would actually

1:09:06.040 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 2>find the real killer and be able to arrest and

1:09:08.240 --> 1:09:12.240
<v Speaker 2>charge that person, you know. So it sounds like in

1:09:12.360 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Harry's homicide. You know, once Louise is acquitted, then you know,

1:09:17.080 --> 1:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the investigating agency in the prosecutor's office just drop pursuing

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:23.559
<v Speaker 2>it because they were convinced that Louise was Harry's killer.

1:09:24.000 --> 1:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>They put all their eggs in one basket, and then

1:09:25.960 --> 1:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>that basket got acquitted in left Town. So there you go. Well,

1:09:30.640 --> 1:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>next week we will not have this type of case.

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to stay away from both straight razors, which

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>scare me, and also having knives, and we'll be going

1:09:40.720 --> 1:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>for a different weapon. I can tell you that already.

1:09:42.920 --> 1:09:45.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, as always, I'm looking forward to it.

1:09:45.479 --> 1:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>All right, see you next week.

1:09:46.680 --> 1:09:47.519
<v Speaker 2>All right, Thanks Kith.

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>This has been an exactly right production.

1:09:54.439 --> 1:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>For our sources and show notes go to exactly Rightmedia

1:09:57.439 --> 1:09:59.799
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash Buried Bones Sources.

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Alexis Emirosi.

1:10:02.720 --> 1:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Research by Maren mcclashan, Ali Elkin, and Kate Winkler Dawson.

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Our mixing engineer is Ben Tolliday.

1:10:09.800 --> 1:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Our theme song is by Tom Bryfogel.

1:10:12.320 --> 1:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Our artwork is by Vanessa Lilac.

1:10:14.600 --> 1:10:18.719
<v Speaker 2>Executive produced by Karen Kilgarriff, Georgia hard Stark, and Danielle Kramer.

1:10:19.000 --> 1:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You can follow Buried Bones on Instagram and Facebook at

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Barry Bones Pod.

1:10:24.120 --> 1:10:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Kate's most recent book, All That Is Wicked, a Gilded

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Age story of murder and the race to decote the

1:10:28.680 --> 1:10:30.920
<v Speaker 2>criminal mind, is available now, and

1:10:31.040 --> 1:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul's best selling memoir Unmasked, My life Solving America's Cold

1:10:35.360 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Cases is also available now