WEBVTT - The Nature of Evil

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It's far easier to slander one's political adversaries and to

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>demand that responsible citizens forfeit their constitutional rights that it

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>is to examine the cultural sickness giving birth to unspeakable

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>acts of evil. It's far less comfortable to ask why

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>despair and isolation and violent hatred is so prevalent in America.

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>It requires a sick soul to drive a truck into

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a crowded sidewalk, to plan a bomb at a marathon,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>or to fly a plane into a building. It requires

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a sick soul to open fire in a movie theater,

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>or in a church or in a school. A speeding

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>automobile in the hands of a madman is deadly, as

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is a jet airplane. Tragedies like the events of this

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>week are a mirror forcing us to ask hard questions,

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>demanding that we see where our culture is failing, looking

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>at broken families, absent fathers, declining church attendant social media bullying,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>violent online content, desensitizing the act of murder in video games,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>chronic isolation, prescription drug and opioid abuse, and their collective

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>effects on the psyche of young Americans. Today's episode of

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Verdict with Ted Cruz is brought to you by ip Vanish.

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Did you know that browsing online using incognito mode doesn't

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>actually protect your privacy Without added security, you might as

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>well give all your private data way to hackers, advertisers,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>your Internet service provider, and who knows who else. Ip

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>vanish helps you securely and privately browse the Internet by

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>encrypting one hundred percent of your data. This means that

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>your private messages, passwords, emails, browsing history, and other information

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>will be completely protected from falling into the wrong hands.

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Ip vanish makes you virtually invisible online. It's that simple.

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Just for Verdict listeners, ip vanish is offering an insane

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent off their annual plan. That's like getting nine

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>months for free. You have to go directly to ip

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>vanished dot com slash cactus to get this seventy percent

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>off discount. Ip vanish is super easy to use. Just

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>tap one button and you're instantly protected. You won't even

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>know it's on. You can use ip vanish on your computers, tablets,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and phones, whether you're at home or in public. Don't

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>go online without using ip vanish. Don't forget Verdict listeners

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>get seventy percent off the ip Vanish annual plan. Just

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>go to ip vanished dot com slash cactus to claim

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.519
<v Speaker 1>your discount and secure your online life. That's iv a

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>nish dot com slash Cactus. This episode, A Verdict with

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruze is brought to you by Matt Walsh's new film,

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the New Daily Wire documentary What Is a Woman. I've

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for this film since the day Matt announced it,

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and it does not disappoint. Radical gender ideology is corrupting

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>our nation right now. It's seeping into our children's classrooms

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>as young as kindergarten and preschool. It's even poisoned corporate culture.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>We see Disney and their queerness agenda that they're inserting

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>into their children's programming. This has become a cultural phenomenon

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that is assaulting women, that is trying to erase biological women.

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And so Matt Walsh is fighting this fight. He goes

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>on a global on a world tour asking a very

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>simple question, what is a woman? And fortunately he took

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a film crew with him, so we all get to

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>come on this journey with him, and you will be

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>shocked to hear how many people can't answer what you

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>would think is a very simple question, or they have

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a very warped, twisted idea of what a woman is.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>The leftist in this film actually admit to Matt Walsh

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>what their ulterior motive is, what their underlying agenda is.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You will laugh, you will cry, you will scream, probably

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all at once. I highly recommend this film. It's available

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for Daily Wire subscribers only. Go to what is a

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>woman dot com? What is a woman dot com? And

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>join Matt on this cultural battle what is a woman

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>dot Com? This episode, A Verdict with Ted Cruz is

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by American Hartford Goal. Now, the new

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers are out, and I think we can all

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>agree they are incredibly depressing. The price of gas is

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>way up, the price of housing is up, the US

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>national debt is way way way up. And unfortunately, given

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the way that our current administration prints money and spends money,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>experts don't see this going away, this inflation going away

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon. So how do you protect your money, your savings,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>your retirement from inflation. Well, when times are turbulence, Americans

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>like you turn to physical gold and silver, and American

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Hartford Gold can show you how to hedge your hard

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>earned savings against inflation by diversifying a portion of your

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>portfolio into physical gold and silver. It's really easy to

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>get started. All it takes is a short phone call

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and they will have physical gold and silver delivered right

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to your door. Or if you prefer inside your four

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>oh one K or your IRA, they make it easy.

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>If you call them right now, then they will give

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you up to fifteen hundred dollars of free silver on

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>your first order. So don't wait, call them right now.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Call eight five five seven six eight one eight eight three.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Or if you prefer texting, you can text the word

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>cactus to six five five three two. Again, the phone

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>number is eight five five seven six eight one eight

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>eight three, or text the word cactus to six five

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>five three two. Welcome to Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles. We've just had the NRA convention. This was

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously very controversial, major calls from the left to regulate

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>guns and ban all sorts of guns. This after the

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>shooting in Uvaldi. I have to point out a lot

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of people dropped out of the NRA convention. Governor Abbott,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>dropped out Senator Corn and dropped out Congressman Dan Crenshaw

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped out, Dan Patrick, I think dropped out the Lieutenant

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>governor of Texas. A lot of people dropped out. Senator,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you did not. You showed up. You gave a robust

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>defense of the Second Amendment. I'm not saying it to

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>flatter you, and you know that I hate to compliment you.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You gave what I thought was a really, really powerful

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>and important speech. I thought it was important to be there.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I was disappointed to see so many others make the

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>decision not to be there, in part because the media

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>narrative that comes out of horrific crimes, horrific mass murders

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>within seconds, the media immediately wants to politicize them and

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>use them to advance their long standing political agenda that

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they had moments before the murder occurred. And in this instance,

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the media and the Democrats, they want to label anyone

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>who believes in the Second Amendment, anyone who defends the

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment as responsible for this horrific crime, and the

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>NRA in particular is probably their favorite boogeyman. Donald Trump

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>spoke as well. He and I spoke back to back,

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and I chatted with Trump right before he went on

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>stage and thanked him for coming, and you know, I said, look,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it was important that you came, It was important that

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you didn't back out. Thank you for being here, and

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>he of course agreed, and he had Let me just

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>say some choice words for some of the folks who

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>chose not to be there. Um, you know that they

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>were with classic Trump understatement, he expressed his views on

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that topic. Well, there's an irony here, which is why

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciated your speech. I've got to cut it

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>out with the compliments for you. You know, this is

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the last episode that we'll get back to criticism next time.

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But I really appreciated it because when whenever anyone brings

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>up cultural factors, something other than guns in any of

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>these tragedies, what the left says is, well, you're just

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>evading the question. You're just trying to distract from the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>real issue, which is guns. We've gone through all of

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>these statistics. I don't see any reason to rehash them now.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So all right, we've addressed the gun part. Why are

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you not allowing us to address the fatherlessness part? Why

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are you not allowing us to address the social isolation?

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Why are you not allowing us to address the decline

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in religion and faith in going to church are Why

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is that the part that we're not allowed to address.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me that that's far more the common

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>thread here even than the guns. You know. I will

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>say the speech that I gave was very different from

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the speech I'd planned to give. I've spoken a lot

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of n A conventions. I know how to give a

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, barn burner of a speech, and so I

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>decided instead to give what I hope was was a thoughtful,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>serious speech on the nature of evil. That that was

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire topic of my speech, both the nature of evil.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Why it is that we have mass murderers, We have

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>people who commit horrific crimes, whether it's shooting a school,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>or shooting a church, or shooting a movie theater, or

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or you have people that you know commit crimes driving

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a truck into a Christmas parade, murdering six people, or

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or setting off a bomb at the Boston Marathon. I mean,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing sick, homicidal people. Many of the times

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>they are young, disaffected men who are alienated, who are isolated,

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>who who are angry. The per capita rate of gun

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>ownership in nineteen seventy two was forty three percent in America,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the per capita rate of gun ownership in twenty twenty one,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>forty nine years later is forty two percent. It's identical.

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The same percentage of Americans owned firearms today as did

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago. So that hasn't changed. It's not like

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy people didn't have firearms. You had the

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>exact same percentage of Americans owning firearms. What's changed is

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the culture, the loss of faith, a loss of family.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the left, you know, when I

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>talked about, you know, homes without fathers in them, and

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so many of these mass murders are raised with absent fathers,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>often criminal fathers or abusive fathers, but absent fathers virtually

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all of them. Virtually every single one of these shootings

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>involves a father outside the home. You know, it was

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting seeing some of the reactions to the left because

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's almost pathological where they come back and attack me

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and said, well, Cruz is attacking single moms. No I'm not.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that kids do better with dads. Look, I've

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>got a family that has a lot of single moms

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in them. Single moms are heroic and extraordinary people. I

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just wish there didn't have to be so many single moms.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I wish moms had the help of a father who

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was a husband and a loving helpmate in raising children

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that are loved and appreciated and valued and not psychopathic monsters.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I always thought the gun control arguments were incoherent from

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the same people who tell us that the cops are

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>racist and they go around plucking off people, innocent people

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>because of their skin color. The cops are racist, the

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>cops are terrible, that's why they should have all the guns.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>That never made a lot of sense. But now, in

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the wake of the shooting in Texas, you're hearing many

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>people say that the police response was incompetent, that the

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 1>police response was cowardly. Again, I'm sure there will be

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>an investigation to go through what actually happened there. But

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>if that is the case, you're telling me that we

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>can't rely on the cops to protect ourselves. So isn't

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that an even more robust defense of self defense of

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the Second Amendment of our right to keep and bear

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>arms in America? The whole I'm just really glad that

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you stood up and you didn't let them bully you,

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and you didn't. You didn't cancel the speech because I

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's a message that people really needed to hear. Michael.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>The point you're making there also is an important one,

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which is if you look in the last couple of years,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen gone ownership going up, and one of the

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>major causes of that was in twenty twenty the Antifa

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and Black Lives Matter riots all across the country, where

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you had democratic politicians that refused to enforce the law,

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that ordered the police to stand down, that wouldn't protect

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>people's homes, that wouldn't protect people's businesses, that wouldn't stop looters,

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't stop fire bombs from being thrown, that allowed

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>lawless rioters to declare so called autonomous zones, the Chads

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and the chad for weeks on end. When you have

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat politicians who say we won't let the police protect you,

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising that people will make the decision, well, heck,

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to protect myself if there's gonna be a

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>mob in the street with violence as they're objective, especially

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>if the cops aren't there to protect me, That's that's

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>when I definitely need to keep my family safe. And

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>all the more irony that these same politicians who were

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>singing the praises of violent rioters and people committing assaults

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and fire bombings and even murders. You know, these Democrat

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>politicians Kamala Harris raised money to bail these violent rioters

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>out of jail, and now they're suddenly saying how morally

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>righteous they are because they're opposed to crime. Well, you

0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>don't get to have it both ways. You don't get

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate violent criminals and then say, oh, by the way,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys can't defend yourself when those violent criminals commit

0:13:55.240 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>horrific acts that unfortunately they're relentless anti police rhetoric helped

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>fuel and cause. Speaking of corruption in the criminal justice system,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I do have to get your take on something on

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a completely separate topic that just came out today though,

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>which is the case of Michael Sussman. Yeah, this Clinton

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>lawyer who lied to the FBI, who planted the whole

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Russia hoax, apparently at the direction of Hillary Clinton. We

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>saw the evidence, we saw the correspondence, and yet today

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the judge let the guy off the hook. I should

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>clarify too, it wasn't just the judge that led him

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>off the hook. It was it was the jury apparently down.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's not all the judge's fault. Well, and it's

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you know the facts of it. This lawyer worked for

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton's campaign's law firm, and he reached out to

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the FBI and said, hey, I've got information that that

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump is involved with the Alpha Bank in Russia and

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Trump campaign is colluding with Russia. And he goes

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>out his way to say, I'm not doing this on

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>behalf of any client. I'm not working for anyone. I'm

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>just being a good citizen. I'm just a good Samaritan.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I love America. Rah rah rah. So he reaches out

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to the top brass at the FBI under Obama and

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>meets with them and affirmatively represents him. Now, what he

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>told them was nonsense, and it was the beginning of

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole Russia hoax and all of that nonsense. But

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>his statement, I'm not doing it on behalf of any

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>client was a flat outlie. He was doing it on

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign in the DNC, and

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, being a lawyer, he built for it. So

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he literally sent the Hillary Clinton campaign a bill charging

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>his time for the time meeting with the FBI to

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tell them about the Russia hoax. When he told the FBI,

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't doing it on behalf of a client. Somehow,

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the client he was certainly was going to get paid

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>for it, because he is a lawyer. After all, If

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be implicated in a crime, don't you

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth taking that, You know, eighteen minutes on

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the arm. Do you really need to charge in the

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>six minute increments for when you're committing a crime? So

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I will confess, Michael. When I was practicing law, and

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I do not miss about private

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>practice is having to think of my day in six

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>minute increments. I would literally take a legal brief or

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a case with me when I went to the restroom,

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>because I'd stand at the urinal and be reading because

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted a bill for the time and it is

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I understand that sentiment. And by the way, there'd be

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>three other lawyers standing they're holding a brief reading at

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the urinal too, because none of us wanted to miss

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>billing the time. Two things on the suspend case. Number one,

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the judge severely limited what the prosecutors could introduce into evidence,

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So they severely limited the broader context of what the

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Clinton campaign was doing, pushing the Russia hoax and everything

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>they were doing in the press, that this was part

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of a long concerted scheme. The judge kept almost all

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of that out, and it was a very circumscribed, narrow

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>factual You said X was X true. Is how the

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>prosecutor had to present it to the jury. I think

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>there are real questions that should be asked why the

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>judge was keeping all that context out. What it did

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is it protected Hillary Clinton like crazy, Like all of

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the judge's orders basically kept the Hillary campaign directly from

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>being implicated and just had one rogue lawyer, well you're

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be in trouble. But then the jury, Look,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the jury is from the District of Columbia. District of

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Columbia votes you know, ninety plus Democrat. I have not

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>studied all of the factual evidence introduced in trial, but

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it certainly raises an eyebrow that this is a jury

0:17:55.640 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that in all likelihood voted for Hillary Clinton and hates

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. And we have seen in cases that are

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>brought in DC, we've seen them be political the other

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 1>way that they're quite happy to throw the book at

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>someone if they disagree with the politics of it. It

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly raises a real question in this case whether at

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>least some members of the jury didn't happen to just

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like the politics of the guy who was violating the law.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It just makes people think that there are two separate

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>justice systems. You know that we hear ad nauseum about

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a guy who cracks a corpse light in the Capitol rotunda.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>He's the worst terrorist insurrectionist in the history of our country.

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Throw him in isolated, an isolated sell and throw away

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the key. Meanwhile, you've got a guy who, at the

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>direction of the Democrat presidential nominee, is lying to the

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>FBI about a matter of what could potentially be national

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>security and then undermining trying to rig a presidential election,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>undermining the actual presidency. And the guy gets off the hook,

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and the campaign gets off the hook, and you think,

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>where's the justice. Well, and I'll tell you what is

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>really worrisome is I'm concerned that that Merrick Garland, the

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General, is going to use this verdict as an

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.959
<v Speaker 1>excuse to fire John Durham, like they want to end

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this investigation it's the one sort of lingering that they

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>want to sweep under the rug. What is coming, you know,

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>My next book that's coming out in Septeptember is called

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Justice Corrupted, How the Left politicized our Legal System, and

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it talks at great length about how Barack Obama now

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden are using the legal system to target their

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>political enemies. It talks about what you just said, the

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 1>differential treatment used to January sixth defendants compared to the

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>violent rioters and Antifa and Black Lives Matter riots. And

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been pressing this Justice Department for over a year

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on that and they just stonewall. They refuse to answer questions,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>They refuse even the barest oversight. And you're right, it

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>does suggest that there is a disparate, partisan, uneven enforcement

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of justice. Number one, But number two, I'm very concerned

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that Garland will use this as an excuse to say, Okay,

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Durham's done. And that would be terrible if that happens.

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that is a very real possibility, because

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>there is no doubt the Biden White House wants the

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Durham investigation over yesterday. I suppose my fear then, though, is,

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>let's say Durham gets to keep pursuing the investigation, do

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we have any hope for justice? I mean, we thought

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Durham had this guy. We thought Durham had the Clinton campaign,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>and so if he couldn't get suessman, is there is

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there any hope that we're ever going to see any

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>justice even if Durham does get to keep his job. Well,

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think there is power to sunlight

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and transparency and exposing the crimes. You know, if you

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>think about Crossfire, Hurricane and the absolutely legal abuses of

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>power carried out by the Obama Justice Department. They never

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>thought they'd get caught. They thought Hillary would win, in

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>which case it would all be buried, nothing would come

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>come to light. It's only the accident from their perspective

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that their candidate, who they were trying to do everything

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they could to ensure she won, lost that you suddenly

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>had the mechanism in place to provide at least some

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>modicum of sunlight. Well, there, shockingly is a little bit

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of justice coming out of a liberal institution in America.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get your thoughts on it. Have you

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>seen top Gun yet? I have? I saw it yesterday.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It is awesome, It is spectacular. Did you see the

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>back of the jacket. They put Taiwan back, They put

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan back, they put Japan back, and then this is

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>fantastic astic, all right. So, folks who don't know the

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>backstory of this, the Top Gun sequel was being made,

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they edited the back of mavericks jacket and the back

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of Maverick's jacket had the Taiwanese flag in the Japanese flag,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and they erased it. They took them out, and so

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>in the trailer that came out or I don't know,

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, the two flags were gone. And it

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 1>was obvious why they did so, which is that they

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>were worried about the Chinese censors, and the Chinese censors

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>don't refuse to acknowledge that Taiwan exists, and so Hollywood

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>was trying to sell the movie in China. It's a

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>big movie market. I actually introduced legislation to address Chinese

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>censorship of American movies, and it's legislation that's called the

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Script Act. And what the Script Act says is that

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of movies and Top Guns a great example,

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of movies use US government assets. So Top Gun,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>used FA teens, it used aircraft carriers, It used you know,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars of federal government assets to make the movie.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And that happens a lot anytime you're using military equipment,

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>anytime you're at the border patrol. There are lots of

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>times where you're using government assets to make a movie.

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And what the Script Act says is that no MovieMaker

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>could use federal government assets if they allow the Chinese

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Communist government to censor their movie. So it doesn't try

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to prevent If you want to let the Chinese censor you,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you can, but the federal government is not going to

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>subsidize your efforts to produce Chinese censored movies by allowing

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you access to federal government assets. I stood on the

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Senate floor and I lit into Hollywood over exactly this issue,

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>top Gun censoring, the jacket on the back of Mavericks jacket.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I said, look, you know, now, Maverick is afraid of

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communists. What the hell have we come to?

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And I gotta say, it was beautiful yesterday watching the movie.

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>He pulls on the jacket and there they were the

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Taiwanese flag and the Japanese flag. I don't ever say this,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>but but Paramount Pictures did the right thing. I don't

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>ever praise Hollywood, but they grew a backbone and they

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>stood up to the Chinese Communist and Amen, hallelujah. Top

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Gun Kill the Bad Guys. Awesome movie. Well, it might

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have been a little little bit of stick as well

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>as a little bit of carrot. You know, if you're

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 1>proposing legislation that says we're gonna make it much harder

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for you to make these movies, if you throw us

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in our allies under the bus. I don't want to

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>sound cynical here or jaded. Maybe that had something to

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>do with the decision. By the way, do you know

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>how they do the aerial scenes and Top Gun? So

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I watched a couple of days ago a thing on

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube where they were describing it. So they're in actual

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>f eighteens, and essentially when they're in the aerial seats,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the actors are in the second seat, so the front

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're two seats in an eighteen. The front

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>seat is the pilot. It is the actual presumably navy

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>pilot who's flying the jet and doing all the maneuvers,

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and in the second seat is the actor who's meant

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the pilot. But all of the like face

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.680
<v Speaker 1>being smushed back, those are real g forces. I mean

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>they're like they're going through all of that. And what's

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>fake is when they're moving the stick up and down

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and the controls, they don't actually have the controls. It's

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the real pilot doing it. But it is real that

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they're in the F eighteen and the footage is actual

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>fighter jets flying through the air, and it's really cool.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't doubt anything that Tom Cruise does in movies.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm expecting him to walk on Mars in the next

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Top Gun, so that'll be something to look forward to. Senator.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Before I let you go, I do have to get

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to speaking of Hollywood, some criticism that has come out

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from you. Verdict has been in the news everywhere I

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>get alerts for this show. The alerts have been blowing up.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>You got in big, big trouble, sir, because you made

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the audacious claim that you like hot women. You made

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the claims some women are beautiful. You didn't understand how

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy from SNL could pick up the hot chicks.

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So amid all of the barrage of criticism from the

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>liberal media here. Do you still stand by that outrageous

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>statement beautiful women are awesome? I will say I was

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>amused to see verdict became uh the subject of the view.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>They sat there and and and and you know, we're

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>blasting us for the for that segment, and in particular

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>so I, you know, I talked about, how did Pete

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Davidson get get uh, Kate Beckasdale? I get. I guess

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Beca's sale. There's no d in it, So I

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>mispronounced her name. Um. And they went on and and

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh. You know, the women on the view were

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>attacking me. I think they said I was creepy and

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gross or I don't know. It was some sort of

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of insults, which which I couldn't help but respond. Well,

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, from from such noted experts on sex appeal

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>as as as who Whoopee Goldberg and Anna Navarro, I'm

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 1>really glad to get their views. Um. All right, So

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, UM, we had my family in town because

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we were celebrating Caroline, my eighth grader, graduated eighth grade,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going into ninth grade, and so we were celebrating that.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.239
<v Speaker 1>But my dad was very unhappy about that segment, so

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't. My dad was in town this weekend. He

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was very unhappy and he was like, you really shouldn't

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>be talking about those things. You were talking about hot

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>vampire women. I don't think my dad's seen Underworld and

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and and he was like, why are you talking about

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>hot vampire women? And you know, my father and a

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Cuban accent, and he's a preacher, but he was he

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was dismayed. And I'm like, have you not watched Underworld?

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Because like, that's objective truth is a defense. I actually

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even really get the views criticism because you know,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you had, if you had said that

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>the women were not beautiful, they'd call you a misogynist

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and a terrible they'd find some way to hit you.

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Kind of damned if you do, and damned if you don't.

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>But are we at the point of society right now

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>where we're not even allowed to embrace objective standards? We're

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not even allowed to say that beautiful women are beautiful?

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>What what have we succumbed to? And by the way,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>my point was just there's a mismatch that Pete Davidson

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>seems to be batting out of his league. Look if

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>Tom Cruise, Tom Cruise dates hot women, of course, I

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>mean the guy's Tom free and cruise like that. You know,

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Brad Pitt, you know you understand, Michael, I will tell

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you my favorite toast God bless near sighted women. That's

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe that explains it. That might actually maybe Kim Kardashian

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of them, maybe they just need classes.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Before we go, I also have to get to some

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>mailbag center because we've got very very good questions, as

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we always do from our Verdict listeners. If you haven't

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribed yet, subscribe what are you waiting for? Go head

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on over to Apple podcast, Spotify, Stitcher. We will play YouTube.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You can enjoy the Verdict Plus community. Just click subscribe.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Leave a seventy five star review. This question does relate

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to gun control. This is from long Ethernet. Will the

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court strike down standard capacity firearm magazine bands so

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>greater than ten rounds? Say? From California and Washington. I

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>think there's certainly a possibility. There's ongoing litigation on that.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The tests that comes from the Heller case, which was

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the case Heller versus District of Columbia that first clearly

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>established and upheld the Second Amendment right to keep it

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>bare arms laid out a test about whether a weapon

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the same would apply to ammunition is in common

0:29:54.680 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>usage for self defense by American citizens. In that instance,

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>what the Court struck down in DC was a ban

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on handguns and on functioning long guns on rifles and shotguns,

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>both of which were required to be disassembled or have

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>trigger locks on them at all times. The argument with

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>regard to ammunition would be the same thing, that it

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is in common usage by individuals to defend their homes

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and defend their families that's being litigated. My recollection is

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the California ban had been struck down in

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>federal court, although I'm not following the litigation closely, so

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a fuzzy recollection that may or may not be

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>right whether the Court takes it. Typically, the court will

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>wait for what's called a circuit split to take a case.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>So the Supreme Court's general view on its docket is

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't engage an error correction. So even if

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a decision of the Court below that it thinks

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is wrong, its job is not to correct wrong decisions.

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Its job instead is to ensure uniformity of federal law,

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that the answer to a question of law a federal

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>law be the same in one part of the country

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as it is elsewhere, that there not be a patchwork

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>quilt of different legal standards. So for the court to

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>grant a case, there's got to be in almost all

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>circumstances what they call a circuit split, which is multiple

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>courts of appeals addressing the same legal question and coming

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to different outcomes. And if there's a circuit split, if

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it's significant and consequential, and if the case provides a

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>good vehicle to address it, then in those instances, the

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>court is likely to take it. Right now, there's a

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>pending Second Amendment case before the Supreme Court out of

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>New York dealing with New York's restrictions on carrying guns,

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's an argument about the right to keep in

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bear arms, and in particular the right to bear arms

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not just to have them in your home, but actually

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to carry them for self defense. That's going to be

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>expected to be one of the big blockbuster decisions in

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the next month on the extended magazine size. I don't

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>know if there's a circuit split right now. If there

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't my guess is the court would wait until a

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>circuit split developed. That makes sense. You had mentioned earlier

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation about why these shootings appear to be

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>more prominent now more prevalent. There's issues beyond the guns,

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>one of which is family breakdown. So we have a

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>question from Ben who asks would you support a Hungary

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>style family incentive program? So throughout the West, the birthrates

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>have plummeted. We're blow replacement now, families are falling apart,

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and Hungary has implemented programs to incentivize people to get married,

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to have families, to create kids, or tax incentives, furious

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>government subsidies, and it appears to have worked at least modestly,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 1>although I know a lot of conservatives recoil at the

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of government basically paying you to have kids. What's

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your take, Look, I think the objective is a good objective.

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I would be skeptical of that particular means for implementing it.

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I think when it comes to federal policy, we should

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>work to limit the harmful consequences. So there have long

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>been disincentives for marriages, what's called the marriage penalty, and

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I think our tax laws should not disincentivize marriage. There

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>are also work disincentives, so you look at how some

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of the welfare programs work, where people at certain income thresholds,

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>if they go get a job, they end up functionally

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>paying over one hundred percent in taxes because they lose

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>more government benefits than they earn in their job. Those

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>negative tax implications are really really problematic. So I think

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we should not be disincentivizing strong family units. UM. Look,

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>at some level, we do things like we have child

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>tax credits, which are designed to make it easier for

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>families to raise kids. I think those make sense and

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 1>an important part of the tax code. UM. You know.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I have also seen different proposals for things like a

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>universal savings account for each newborn child, that that that

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially the government would populate. You have a baby, and

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a savings account that is populated with a couple

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars that grows and gains in value during the

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>child's life. Some of those ideas I think are interesting.

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they're fully baked yet, but I

0:34:54.239 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're interesting ideas to to think about. UM. I

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think I would be hesitant to engage in the sort

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of micro social engineering. I don't know a lot of

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>details about the Hungary in a program, but just as

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you described it, I think there'd be a danger of

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>screwing things up. I think we ought to be doing

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>more to encourage strong families in churches and communities in

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. I don't know that we should be

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 1>in trusting Joe Biden and Kamala Harris with that, right,

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>there is also a middle ground where one could trust

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the laboratories of democracy. And you see, yeah, if some

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of program like this works in a state, if

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it does, great, you consider it at the federal level.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>And if it doesn't, well, you know, too bad for

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you Colorado or whatever state. Probably not Colorado would ride out,

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>but that yeah, it's a very it's a very measured

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>take on things. Finally, Senator, very important question from Chris,

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>blue or black? There's no way the I can really

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>even clarify this question without falling into all sorts of

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>political incorrectness from Monty Python. So I suppose we should

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>probably just leave it there. There is of course more

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to discuss for the verdict listeners, and that is on

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the cloak Room with Liz Wheeler. Liz, what will you

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>be talking about? Hi, Michael High, Senator. We're going to

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>build this week on last week's episode of Cloak Room,

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>where we talked about the police response or lack thereof,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in Uvaldi at the shooting at the elementary school. This week,

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about a legal principle underpinning the

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.359
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement response. It's called public duty doctrine, and it's

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>been held by the Supreme Court that police officers, law

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>enforcement officers actually have no legal duty to respond or

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to be dispatched or to aid in any situation, any circumstance,

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that they can't be held liable for that. And we're

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>going to talk a little bit about this legal principle

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of shocking, right It sounds very It

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds very shocking that police who we count on to

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.879
<v Speaker 1>respond in emergencies actually have no duty to respond. We're

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about how that applies here and how

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that can be addressed legally to prevent anything like this

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>from happening again in the future. You can join us

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Cloakroom on Verdict Plus. Go to Verdict with

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruise dot Com Slash Plus you can use my

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 1>promo code Cloakroom to get one month free on your

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>annual subscription. That's Verdict with Ted Cruise dot Com slash

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:27.919
<v Speaker 1>plus promo code Cloakroom excellent. There are so many opportunities

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe. If you haven't done it already, I implore you.

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I beseech you. Go to Apple Podcast, Spotify, Stitcher, YouTube,

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Google Play, MySpace, Aol, instant messenger, I don't know anywhere.

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe to Verdict. Senator, thank you as always. I'm Michael Knowles.

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Verdict with Ted Cruise. This episode of Verdict

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with Ted Cruise is being brought to you by Jobs,

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security Pack plans to

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party across the nation.