1 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:12,680 Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, why do particle physicists obsessed so much about mass? 2 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:15,440 Speaker 2: Well, mass is one of the basic properties of a particle. 3 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:17,239 Speaker 2: It's like part of its identity. 4 00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:19,160 Speaker 1: Whoa is that? Healthy? 5 00:00:19,160 --> 00:00:19,440 Speaker 3: Though? 6 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:22,160 Speaker 1: You think your mass should define who you are? 7 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:25,200 Speaker 2: I don't think we have to worry too much about 8 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:26,800 Speaker 2: like particle mental health. 9 00:00:26,960 --> 00:00:29,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, but shouldn't they be defined by their magnetism or 10 00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:30,920 Speaker 1: how colorful they are? 11 00:00:31,080 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 2: Well, we're all made of particles, so I guess we 12 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:35,560 Speaker 2: can just decide for ourselves how to identify with them. 13 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: You are your particles, right, my particles are me? No, 14 00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:41,240 Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure it's the other way around. 15 00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 2: It depends if you believe in strong or weak emergence. 16 00:00:43,960 --> 00:01:02,120 Speaker 1: That is a massive detail, right there. I am Poor Hamm, 17 00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: a cartoonists and the author of Oliver's Great Think Universe. 18 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:08,400 Speaker 2: Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor 19 00:01:08,480 --> 00:01:11,399 Speaker 2: at UC Irvine, and I really wish there was more 20 00:01:11,480 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 2: we could know about each particle. 21 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:14,440 Speaker 1: What do you want to know? 22 00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:16,880 Speaker 2: I want to get to know them. You know, particles 23 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:19,040 Speaker 2: are kind of like black holes. There's a few things 24 00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:22,320 Speaker 2: you can measure about it, the spin, the mass, the charge, 25 00:01:22,319 --> 00:01:26,000 Speaker 2: et cetera. But otherwise they're all totally identical. It's not 26 00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:28,320 Speaker 2: like this particle is Bob and that one is Sam 27 00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:31,399 Speaker 2: and this one is Juanita. You know, all electrons are 28 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:31,840 Speaker 2: the same. 29 00:01:32,080 --> 00:01:35,280 Speaker 1: What if they don't want to be known? What if 30 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: they're private particles? 31 00:01:36,959 --> 00:01:38,320 Speaker 2: I see they're all spartacles. 32 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:38,680 Speaker 4: Huh. 33 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, they have secrets. They don't want the Walsh out 34 00:01:41,280 --> 00:01:41,960 Speaker 1: there on the internet. 35 00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:45,320 Speaker 2: Well, like I've said before, I don't think the universe 36 00:01:45,360 --> 00:01:48,640 Speaker 2: deserves any privacy. You know, we are curious creatures and 37 00:01:48,680 --> 00:01:52,080 Speaker 2: we're part of the universe, so knowing ourselves is sort 38 00:01:52,080 --> 00:01:53,320 Speaker 2: of like knowing the universe. 39 00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:57,200 Speaker 1: Are you saying. Physicists then are sort of like professional boxers. 40 00:01:58,680 --> 00:02:00,800 Speaker 2: I like to think of as more as the detectives 41 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:05,560 Speaker 2: maybe private snoops. Yeah, we are snoops for sure, and 42 00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:08,200 Speaker 2: we're out to solve the biggest mystery in the universe, 43 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:10,880 Speaker 2: which is like, how does this whole thing all work? 44 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:13,480 Speaker 1: Did you change your jaw title then to a particle 45 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:18,240 Speaker 1: snooper particle investigator? I'm a PI a PPI. I guess 46 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: I don't like having PP in my title. Yeah, PP's 47 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,799 Speaker 1: not good on many things. But yeah, anyways, welcome to 48 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 1: our podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production 49 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:29,760 Speaker 1: of iHeartRadio in which we. 50 00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:33,040 Speaker 2: Try to lift the level of discourse as best we can, 51 00:02:33,480 --> 00:02:37,560 Speaker 2: elevating your mind to the deepest, biggest, most ethereal questions 52 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:40,239 Speaker 2: in the universe. How does it all work, what's it 53 00:02:40,280 --> 00:02:42,560 Speaker 2: all made out of? What are the rules of the game, 54 00:02:43,000 --> 00:02:45,280 Speaker 2: and how is the game played in such a way 55 00:02:45,280 --> 00:02:50,280 Speaker 2: to give us this crazy, amazing, visceral conscious experience of 56 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:52,960 Speaker 2: such a real world, which in the end is made 57 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:56,440 Speaker 2: up of tiny, little, almost massless particles. 58 00:02:56,880 --> 00:02:59,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, because it is a pretty awesome experience to exist 59 00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:02,160 Speaker 1: in the universe and to look out there and appreciate 60 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:04,520 Speaker 1: all the wonders and amazing things that are happening out 61 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:07,400 Speaker 1: there in the universe that we can see and also 62 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 1: that we can't see. 63 00:03:08,440 --> 00:03:10,960 Speaker 2: And as we drill down into the nature of reality, 64 00:03:11,080 --> 00:03:14,800 Speaker 2: taking things apart into molecules and atoms and nuclei and 65 00:03:14,840 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 2: protons and neutrons, we like to give names to these things. 66 00:03:18,320 --> 00:03:20,560 Speaker 2: We say, oh, this kind of thing is an electron, 67 00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 2: and that kind of thing is a neutrino, and this 68 00:03:23,000 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 2: kind of thing as a quark. It's just part of 69 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:28,120 Speaker 2: who we are to want to attach labels to bits 70 00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:29,920 Speaker 2: and pieces of the universe. 71 00:03:30,120 --> 00:03:33,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's all part of humans quests to understand what's 72 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 1: going on out there, to get a handle on how 73 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:38,920 Speaker 1: things work and how to predict what's going to happen 74 00:03:38,960 --> 00:03:39,520 Speaker 1: in the future. 75 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 2: And as we look at these tiny little particles, we 76 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 2: want to describe them in ways that make sense to us. 77 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 2: You know, how much spin does it have? What can 78 00:03:47,200 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 2: it do? And maybe at the most fundamental level, part 79 00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:54,560 Speaker 2: of the identity of a particle is how much mass 80 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:55,440 Speaker 2: does it have? 81 00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:58,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, some particles have a little bit of mass, some 82 00:03:58,360 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 1: particles have a lot of and some particles have no mass. Right, 83 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,200 Speaker 1: some particles adheres to a very impressive diet. 84 00:04:06,200 --> 00:04:09,680 Speaker 2: Photons have no mass, while top quarks, the heaviest known 85 00:04:09,800 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 2: fundamental particle, have the mass of like one hundred and 86 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:17,159 Speaker 2: seventy five protons. So there really is an extraordinary range, 87 00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:20,600 Speaker 2: which is something that we don't understand at all. But 88 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,640 Speaker 2: mass is also part of how we tell which particle 89 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:27,359 Speaker 2: is which. I think about an electron and a muon. 90 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,279 Speaker 2: What are the differences there between the two? They're almost 91 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:34,880 Speaker 2: identical particles, except that muons have more mass than electrons do. 92 00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 2: And when we produce particles in our experiments. That's how 93 00:04:38,600 --> 00:04:41,480 Speaker 2: we tell what's what. We measure the masses of these 94 00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:43,680 Speaker 2: particles and we say, oh, this one's got to be 95 00:04:43,720 --> 00:04:47,000 Speaker 2: an electron because look at its mass. So it's not 96 00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:49,480 Speaker 2: just that we take the particles, we assign mass labels 97 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:51,880 Speaker 2: to them. We use the mass to tell us who 98 00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:52,280 Speaker 2: is who. 99 00:04:52,680 --> 00:04:54,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, and there are lots of particles out there. Some 100 00:04:54,839 --> 00:04:57,159 Speaker 1: of them are not shy at all about how much 101 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,040 Speaker 1: mass they have. Some of them are a little bit 102 00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 1: shy and don't necessarily want to reveal how much mass 103 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:03,279 Speaker 1: he has. 104 00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:06,880 Speaker 2: Some of the weirdest particles out there are neutrinos, these 105 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 2: ghostly little particles that are everywhere but very hard to spot. 106 00:05:11,279 --> 00:05:14,120 Speaker 2: And in the case of neutrinos, their identity is something 107 00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:17,560 Speaker 2: of a more complex story. They have sort of two 108 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:20,599 Speaker 2: different kinds of clothing they can wear, who they talk to, 109 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:24,440 Speaker 2: and how they move through the universe. And because their 110 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:26,640 Speaker 2: mass is so weird and so hard to nail down, 111 00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:29,200 Speaker 2: it's not something we actually know very well. 112 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:31,479 Speaker 1: It's all a big mystery. And so today on the 113 00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:40,680 Speaker 1: podcast we'll be asking the question how massive is a neutrino? 114 00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:43,960 Speaker 2: Or maybe we should have said, how massive isn't a neutrino? 115 00:05:44,240 --> 00:05:46,440 Speaker 1: Wait? What why shouldn't we have not said. 116 00:05:46,279 --> 00:05:52,880 Speaker 2: That because neutrinos have some masks, but they definitely aren't very. 117 00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 1: Massive, or how very little massive nutrina is? Is that 118 00:05:57,880 --> 00:05:58,240 Speaker 1: what I mean? 119 00:05:58,640 --> 00:05:59,960 Speaker 2: How dainty is a neutrino? 120 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:00,240 Speaker 5: Yeah? 121 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:02,880 Speaker 1: I thought you meant, like, how significant in nutrino is? 122 00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:06,320 Speaker 1: Like how massive it is it in a universal scale 123 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 1: of awesomeness? 124 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 2: Yeah. It actually turns out neutrinos are quite important and 125 00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:13,920 Speaker 2: play a big role in the physics of the universe 126 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:17,840 Speaker 2: despite being almost invisible. So from a consequential point of view, right, 127 00:06:17,960 --> 00:06:20,039 Speaker 2: neutrinos are massive. Dude. 128 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:22,880 Speaker 1: Well, I think what you're saying is that the mass 129 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:24,919 Speaker 1: of the neutrino is not known. We don't know how 130 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:25,760 Speaker 1: much mass it has. 131 00:06:25,880 --> 00:06:28,400 Speaker 2: We do not know how much mass the neutrino has. 132 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:30,839 Speaker 2: We've only known that it has mass for a couple 133 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:33,680 Speaker 2: of decades, which was a big shocker and sent quakes 134 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:37,440 Speaker 2: through the theoretical community when we figured that out, and 135 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:40,000 Speaker 2: it's still something that is very hard to pin down 136 00:06:40,040 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 2: and not something we know. 137 00:06:42,120 --> 00:06:45,920 Speaker 1: It was a massive shock weighed heavily on the minds 138 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:47,160 Speaker 1: of physicists for a long time. 139 00:06:47,640 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 2: They didn't take it lightly, that's for sure. 140 00:06:49,400 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 1: So yeah, this is an interesting question. How much maths 141 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:55,160 Speaker 1: does and theatrino have. Apparently it's kind of tricky to 142 00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:57,040 Speaker 1: find out. So as usually, we were wondering how many 143 00:06:57,080 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 1: people out there had thought about this question or have 144 00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:01,680 Speaker 1: an idea about the mass of a nutrino. 145 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 2: So thanks very much to everybody who answers these questions 146 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:06,880 Speaker 2: for this fun segment. If you'd like to hear your 147 00:07:06,960 --> 00:07:11,360 Speaker 2: voice speculating for everybody else's entertainment and education, please write 148 00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:14,240 Speaker 2: to us two questions at Danielandjorge dot com. 149 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 1: So think about it for a second. How massive do 150 00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:20,480 Speaker 1: you think a neutrino is? Here's what people have to say. 151 00:07:20,760 --> 00:07:22,920 Speaker 3: Not sure if the vibe was that there's more than 152 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 3: one type of neutrino. So maybe there's like some with 153 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:29,320 Speaker 3: more mass. But I thought that neutrinos were like massless 154 00:07:29,400 --> 00:07:31,680 Speaker 3: or like had negligible mass and so like they travel 155 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:32,480 Speaker 3: at the speed of light. 156 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 6: I think there's different types of neutrinos that are different sizes. 157 00:07:37,240 --> 00:07:40,520 Speaker 6: You talked about one of NASA finding another universe by 158 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:45,080 Speaker 6: seeing neutrinos pass through Earth. So there's some massive ones 159 00:07:45,120 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 6: but not so massive. How big maybe like fifty protons 160 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 6: big or something, if that even makes sense, And maybe 161 00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:55,120 Speaker 6: neutrinos are also dark matters what you also said in 162 00:07:55,120 --> 00:07:56,480 Speaker 6: one of your earlier podcasts. 163 00:07:56,480 --> 00:08:00,320 Speaker 2: I would think that a neutrino is real light because't 164 00:08:00,360 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 2: interact with other particles, but it may interact with the 165 00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:07,280 Speaker 2: Higgs field. So I actually have no idea. 166 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 7: Well neutrino so eno means very small in Italian or smaller, 167 00:08:12,720 --> 00:08:17,000 Speaker 7: so I would assume that the mass of a neutrino 168 00:08:17,200 --> 00:08:20,120 Speaker 7: is much much much smaller than that of a neutron, 169 00:08:21,160 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 7: and I'm tempted to say that. 170 00:08:25,320 --> 00:08:27,120 Speaker 5: Neutrinos are massless. 171 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 4: Maybe mass is just I think the amount of energy 172 00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:37,920 Speaker 4: that's required to move something, so gravitational mass is just 173 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:41,400 Speaker 4: a unique form of inertial mass, wherein it's the gravity 174 00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:44,080 Speaker 4: which is pulling you and that changes according to where 175 00:08:44,080 --> 00:08:48,880 Speaker 4: you are, whereas inertial mass is just independent of that. 176 00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 4: I guess I. 177 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:54,040 Speaker 5: Don't know how massive a neutrino is. I'm pretty sure 178 00:08:54,120 --> 00:08:56,560 Speaker 5: that I've heard that they have mass, and I think 179 00:08:56,600 --> 00:09:02,240 Speaker 5: it's extremely like neutrinos are very low mass, and it 180 00:09:02,280 --> 00:09:05,600 Speaker 5: would be great if they had the lowest amount of 181 00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:09,680 Speaker 5: mass allowed by quantum mechanics. That would be pretty. 182 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:12,560 Speaker 1: Neat, right. I think a lot of people seem to 183 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:13,920 Speaker 1: know it had very little mass. 184 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,520 Speaker 2: I really like the linguistic analysis, reverse engineering the name 185 00:09:17,720 --> 00:09:20,079 Speaker 2: particle to infer what its mass has to be. 186 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:22,040 Speaker 1: What do you mean it has neutral mass? 187 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:27,520 Speaker 2: Well, you know, neutrino means little neutral particle. That was 188 00:09:27,559 --> 00:09:29,600 Speaker 2: the name given to it before we even really knew 189 00:09:29,600 --> 00:09:32,080 Speaker 2: what it was, because that's all we knew about it, 190 00:09:32,120 --> 00:09:34,080 Speaker 2: that it could be very massive and that it was 191 00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:37,040 Speaker 2: electrically neutral. So in that sense, you might even be 192 00:09:37,160 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 2: tempted to say that it's a well named particle. 193 00:09:39,960 --> 00:09:41,200 Speaker 1: They were going to say it has the mass of 194 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:44,360 Speaker 1: a newt. But also you kind of have to know 195 00:09:44,480 --> 00:09:47,400 Speaker 1: Italian to know that the io ending, you know, know, 196 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 1: means small, don't you not everyone speaks Italian. 197 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,000 Speaker 2: That's true. I guess if it had been named by 198 00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 2: somebody who speaks Spanish, would be like nutrito. 199 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:57,960 Speaker 1: Yeah exactly. Or in English, I guess, how would you 200 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:00,360 Speaker 1: call it new trini neutral? 201 00:10:00,400 --> 00:10:02,240 Speaker 2: Do we have affectionate endings in English? 202 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:05,760 Speaker 1: Tiny neutron? There you go, like tiny tim? 203 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:08,120 Speaker 2: Or maybe we'd give it an ironic nickname you know, 204 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:09,040 Speaker 2: like big. 205 00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:13,480 Speaker 1: Neutron, Yeah, neutronizer or something, or how about just neutron. 206 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:16,840 Speaker 1: I mean that sounds pretty massive now in comparison to neutrino. 207 00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:21,080 Speaker 2: Neutron had already been discovered. Is the name of another particle? 208 00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:25,960 Speaker 1: Oh well, there you go, that one's misnaming them. All right, Well, 209 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:28,920 Speaker 1: let's dig into this mystery. What is the massive a neutrino? 210 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:31,240 Speaker 1: But I guess far as Daniel talk to us about 211 00:10:31,280 --> 00:10:33,000 Speaker 1: what a neutrino actually is. 212 00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:36,720 Speaker 2: Neutrino is a really fun particle because it's so weird 213 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:40,240 Speaker 2: and yet so fundamental and so important and at the 214 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:43,880 Speaker 2: same time not a part of the matter that's around us. 215 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:46,040 Speaker 2: You know, if you take a part the stuff that 216 00:10:46,080 --> 00:10:47,720 Speaker 2: you're made out of, and that I'm made out of, 217 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:50,000 Speaker 2: and that everything you've ever eaten is made out of, 218 00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 2: you discover that it's made of atoms, and those atoms 219 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:56,040 Speaker 2: are made of protons and neutrons and electrons. But the 220 00:10:56,040 --> 00:10:58,360 Speaker 2: protons and neutrons can be made out of quarks, up 221 00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:01,480 Speaker 2: quarks and down quarks. Specific that means that everything that 222 00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:04,080 Speaker 2: we know is made of two kinds of quarks, up 223 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:07,199 Speaker 2: quarks and down corks, as well as electrons. So really 224 00:11:07,280 --> 00:11:11,200 Speaker 2: just three particles explain all of the matter that we know, 225 00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 2: the stuff that the Earth is made out of, that 226 00:11:13,320 --> 00:11:15,440 Speaker 2: the Sun is made out of, that the visible matter 227 00:11:15,520 --> 00:11:17,720 Speaker 2: in the galaxy is made out of. Of course, put 228 00:11:17,800 --> 00:11:20,160 Speaker 2: dark matter aside because we don't know what that is 229 00:11:20,200 --> 00:11:22,839 Speaker 2: made out of. So those three particles sort of underlie 230 00:11:22,960 --> 00:11:26,280 Speaker 2: everything that exists. But there's another particle that's in the 231 00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:29,560 Speaker 2: same category as like one of the basic templates of 232 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 2: possible matter, and that's the neutrino. Because you notice that 233 00:11:33,320 --> 00:11:35,600 Speaker 2: the upcork and the down cork sort of have each other. 234 00:11:35,720 --> 00:11:38,480 Speaker 2: There's like a pair of quarks. You might wonder like, well, 235 00:11:38,559 --> 00:11:41,760 Speaker 2: who's the electrons partner, And the electron does have a partner, 236 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,240 Speaker 2: it's the new trino. So it sort of like completes 237 00:11:44,320 --> 00:11:48,160 Speaker 2: the quartette of the fundamental bits of matter, even though 238 00:11:48,200 --> 00:11:51,520 Speaker 2: the neutrino doesn't appear in the atom and isn't used 239 00:11:51,600 --> 00:11:54,120 Speaker 2: to make up your lunch or your dinner or anything 240 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:54,920 Speaker 2: you've ever eaten. 241 00:11:55,160 --> 00:11:57,440 Speaker 1: Hmmm, I guess maybe the first question I would have 242 00:11:57,640 --> 00:12:01,400 Speaker 1: is why not why they aren't neutrino's part of the 243 00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:03,600 Speaker 1: matter that we're made at it, or why don't we have, 244 00:12:03,640 --> 00:12:05,720 Speaker 1: you know, neutrino bits inside of us. 245 00:12:05,840 --> 00:12:07,959 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a great question. You know, the universe has 246 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:10,400 Speaker 2: these bits and pieces, and they have rules for how 247 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:13,720 Speaker 2: they can come together, and then you get complex structures 248 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:16,160 Speaker 2: emerging from that. You know, you have quarks bind together 249 00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:19,040 Speaker 2: to make protons and neutrons, which then bind with the 250 00:12:19,080 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 2: electron to make atoms, to make all sorts of other 251 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:24,520 Speaker 2: complex stuff. I scream and stars and black holes and 252 00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 2: all that stuff. And really it's the interaction. They're the 253 00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:32,520 Speaker 2: binding that's crucial. While quarks and electrons all have electric charges, 254 00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:35,640 Speaker 2: and quarks have strong charges, so they can use the 255 00:12:35,679 --> 00:12:39,960 Speaker 2: more powerful forces to build complex matter. Neutrinos are different 256 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:43,360 Speaker 2: from the other three kinds of basic fundamental bits of 257 00:12:43,480 --> 00:12:46,560 Speaker 2: stuff in that they only feel the weak force, so 258 00:12:46,600 --> 00:12:49,320 Speaker 2: they have no electric charge, they're neutral, and they also 259 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 2: have no color, so they don't feel the strong nuclear force, 260 00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:55,440 Speaker 2: which means they're only left to interact via gravity, which 261 00:12:55,480 --> 00:12:58,760 Speaker 2: is basically negligible for a particle and the weak force. 262 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:01,679 Speaker 2: So in order to bi old something out of neutrinos, 263 00:13:01,960 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 2: you'd have to have them bound together by the weak force, 264 00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 2: but the weak force is just too weak to do that. 265 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,000 Speaker 1: Interesting, What do you mean too weak? Like you can't 266 00:13:10,040 --> 00:13:12,720 Speaker 1: stick to nutriinas together with the weak force. 267 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 2: The weak force can be used to interact, but it's 268 00:13:15,400 --> 00:13:18,959 Speaker 2: really very, very shockingly weak. That's why, for example, if 269 00:13:18,960 --> 00:13:22,280 Speaker 2: you shoot a photon at the wall, it'll splat against 270 00:13:22,280 --> 00:13:24,920 Speaker 2: the wall and interact with all the electrons inside of it. 271 00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:27,640 Speaker 2: But if you shoot a neutrino against the same wall, 272 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 2: it will fly right through. It's not like it's finding 273 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 2: holes in the wall. It's not like the wall is 274 00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:35,480 Speaker 2: a screen or a mesh that it's slipping through. It 275 00:13:35,520 --> 00:13:38,480 Speaker 2: ignores all those particles because it doesn't interact with them. 276 00:13:38,840 --> 00:13:41,200 Speaker 2: So it's really all about the strength of the interactions. 277 00:13:41,600 --> 00:13:44,360 Speaker 2: And if you wanted to like bind two neutrinos together 278 00:13:44,559 --> 00:13:47,640 Speaker 2: into a more complex object, that have to be in 279 00:13:47,679 --> 00:13:50,160 Speaker 2: a bound state in order to be trapped together by 280 00:13:50,160 --> 00:13:52,120 Speaker 2: an interaction that's so weak, they would have to be 281 00:13:52,160 --> 00:13:54,480 Speaker 2: almost motionless. It wouldn't take very much energy to break 282 00:13:54,520 --> 00:13:57,560 Speaker 2: it apart, So you'd have to have very cold bits 283 00:13:57,640 --> 00:13:59,960 Speaker 2: fall together to make a bound state and then be 284 00:14:00,200 --> 00:14:02,480 Speaker 2: very easy to break it apart. So it's basically not 285 00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:06,120 Speaker 2: possible to build more complex structure using the weak force. 286 00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:09,880 Speaker 1: I think you're saying that you can, but maybe matter 287 00:14:09,920 --> 00:14:12,360 Speaker 1: would have to be super duper cold to put together 288 00:14:12,440 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: things with the weak force. 289 00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:15,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, matter would have to be super duper cold, and 290 00:14:15,559 --> 00:14:18,640 Speaker 2: they would have to not be other stronger forces disrupting it. 291 00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:22,040 Speaker 1: Right, I don't know how does the weak force work. 292 00:14:22,080 --> 00:14:24,120 Speaker 1: Does it repel or attract or both? Does it have 293 00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:26,200 Speaker 1: positive negative charges to it? 294 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 2: So the weak force is quite complicated. We talked once 295 00:14:28,640 --> 00:14:30,720 Speaker 2: about whether the weak force can attract or repel. It 296 00:14:30,760 --> 00:14:34,000 Speaker 2: actually can do both. There are two different charges for it. 297 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:37,760 Speaker 2: They're called isospin and weak hypercharge, and so it's a 298 00:14:37,760 --> 00:14:40,640 Speaker 2: complex combination of all these different numbers that tells you 299 00:14:40,680 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 2: what the weak force is going to do. But in short, 300 00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:45,200 Speaker 2: it can attract and it can repel. So it's very 301 00:14:45,200 --> 00:14:49,560 Speaker 2: similar to electromagnetism. Actually, electromagnetism and the weak force together 302 00:14:49,880 --> 00:14:53,560 Speaker 2: are part of a larger idea called electro week And 303 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:55,320 Speaker 2: the reason that one of them is more powerful than 304 00:14:55,320 --> 00:14:57,520 Speaker 2: the other has to do with the Higgs boson, which 305 00:14:57,600 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 2: breaks the symmetry between the two forces, leaving one of 306 00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:03,400 Speaker 2: them very powerful and one of them very very weak. 307 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:07,240 Speaker 1: So, like if I took two neutrinos, and I cooled 308 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:10,400 Speaker 1: them down out there in space and I stuck them together. 309 00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:12,400 Speaker 1: Would they stick together due to the weak force? 310 00:15:12,680 --> 00:15:14,880 Speaker 2: You could put two neutrinos into a bound state if 311 00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:16,800 Speaker 2: they were very, very cold, so they didn't have enough 312 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 2: kinetic energy to escape these bonds and there was nothing 313 00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:23,160 Speaker 2: else bothering them. Yes, you could. And you could even 314 00:15:23,160 --> 00:15:23,640 Speaker 2: add more. 315 00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:25,680 Speaker 1: Yeah, you could add more. Maybe can you build a 316 00:15:25,680 --> 00:15:27,960 Speaker 1: whole planet out of neutrinos? 317 00:15:28,480 --> 00:15:31,080 Speaker 2: You could build larger, more complex structures, but it would 318 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:34,080 Speaker 2: be very fragile, and it certainly wouldn't look like a planet, 319 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:36,520 Speaker 2: and the whole thing could probably pass through the Earth 320 00:15:36,560 --> 00:15:40,200 Speaker 2: without even noticing, because neutrinos, again don't interact with normal matter. 321 00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:43,280 Speaker 2: So even if you build more complex structures out of neutrinos, 322 00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:46,040 Speaker 2: it exists sort of in parallel to us, the same 323 00:15:46,040 --> 00:15:48,440 Speaker 2: way that like dark matter does. Dark matter is here, 324 00:15:48,560 --> 00:15:51,880 Speaker 2: dark matters everywhere. Dark matter might make complex structures that 325 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:54,640 Speaker 2: we can't see, but they passed right through us, and 326 00:15:54,680 --> 00:15:56,720 Speaker 2: we passed right through them because we don't have any 327 00:15:56,760 --> 00:15:59,920 Speaker 2: interactions with them, the same way a neutrino can pass 328 00:16:00,040 --> 00:16:03,680 Speaker 2: through like a light year thick wall of lead without 329 00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:06,960 Speaker 2: even interacting. And so a whole planet of neutrinos would 330 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,880 Speaker 2: do the same thing. Like, right now, there's one hundred 331 00:16:09,960 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 2: billion neutrinos passing through every square centimeter of the surface 332 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:17,160 Speaker 2: of the Earth every second, and yet we don't feel them. 333 00:16:17,240 --> 00:16:19,680 Speaker 2: So somebody could throw a planet of neutrinos at us 334 00:16:19,720 --> 00:16:21,000 Speaker 2: and we wouldn't even notice. 335 00:16:21,120 --> 00:16:23,680 Speaker 1: Would that neutrino planet break apart when it goes through 336 00:16:23,760 --> 00:16:25,240 Speaker 1: us or would it stay together? 337 00:16:25,560 --> 00:16:28,880 Speaker 2: A tiny fraction of those neutrinos would interact with us, 338 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:30,640 Speaker 2: so those a little bonds would break up, but most 339 00:16:30,640 --> 00:16:32,760 Speaker 2: of it would totally ignore us. Neutrinos have a very 340 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 2: very tiny probability of interacting with electrons or with quarks. 341 00:16:38,080 --> 00:16:40,760 Speaker 1: So and then when you say weak, do you mean 342 00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:44,200 Speaker 1: like low probability or just that the force is weak? 343 00:16:44,440 --> 00:16:48,440 Speaker 2: We mean low probability, not small momentum exchange, but low probability. 344 00:16:48,920 --> 00:16:51,280 Speaker 2: Like you shoot a neutrino at another particle, it's very 345 00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:54,520 Speaker 2: unlikely to interact. If it does interact, it can impart 346 00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:57,880 Speaker 2: significant momentum, it's just a low probability of it happening. 347 00:16:58,160 --> 00:17:01,000 Speaker 1: Oh, that's interesting. So it's really called the weak force 348 00:17:01,080 --> 00:17:04,320 Speaker 1: because of its weak probability, not because like you wouldn't 349 00:17:04,359 --> 00:17:04,840 Speaker 1: feel it. 350 00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:07,399 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. The very strength of the forces are more 351 00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 2: about the probability of that interaction, which, if you integrate 352 00:17:10,280 --> 00:17:13,439 Speaker 2: over all possibilities, does end up playing a role in 353 00:17:13,520 --> 00:17:16,679 Speaker 2: like its impact on the world, basically how massive is 354 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:17,400 Speaker 2: its impact. 355 00:17:17,600 --> 00:17:19,680 Speaker 1: So then maybe like a better name for the weak 356 00:17:19,760 --> 00:17:23,880 Speaker 1: force would have been improbable for us, the unlikely. 357 00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:26,520 Speaker 2: Force, the unlikely force that makes it sound like it's 358 00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:29,000 Speaker 2: going to go on a hero's journey and in the 359 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:31,360 Speaker 2: end it become the most powerful force in the universe. 360 00:17:31,440 --> 00:17:35,520 Speaker 1: That's right, the underdog for exactly What else do we 361 00:17:35,520 --> 00:17:36,400 Speaker 1: know about neutrinos. 362 00:17:36,440 --> 00:17:38,960 Speaker 2: We know that there are three kinds of neutrinos, the 363 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:42,000 Speaker 2: way that there's like three different kinds of electron. There's 364 00:17:42,040 --> 00:17:44,680 Speaker 2: the more massive version that's the muon and the even 365 00:17:44,720 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 2: more massive version that's the tau, So there's three different 366 00:17:47,920 --> 00:17:52,960 Speaker 2: flavorers of electron. There's also three different flavors of neutrino. 367 00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:56,199 Speaker 2: So there's a neutrino associated with the electron, the electro 368 00:17:56,280 --> 00:17:58,960 Speaker 2: and neutrino, and one associated with the muon and one 369 00:17:58,960 --> 00:17:59,879 Speaker 2: associated with the taw. 370 00:18:00,320 --> 00:18:02,080 Speaker 1: What do you mean associated? What does that mean? They 371 00:18:02,119 --> 00:18:02,960 Speaker 1: signed a contract? 372 00:18:03,040 --> 00:18:05,280 Speaker 2: Well, these guys interact via the weak force, and so 373 00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:07,480 Speaker 2: for example, if you want to make an electron, you 374 00:18:07,520 --> 00:18:10,320 Speaker 2: can make it from a w boson. A W boson 375 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:13,400 Speaker 2: can decate to an electron, but also decays to a neutrino. 376 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:15,320 Speaker 2: And when you create an electron, you also create an 377 00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 2: electron neutrino. You create a muon, then you also create 378 00:18:18,640 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 2: a muon neutrino. So when we say associated with, we 379 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:24,800 Speaker 2: mean like grouped together with by the weak force. It 380 00:18:24,840 --> 00:18:28,119 Speaker 2: groups these guys together. Remember that we count the number 381 00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:31,439 Speaker 2: of eleptons in the universe and that's conserved. So for example, 382 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:34,280 Speaker 2: you can't just like make more electrons. If you make 383 00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:37,480 Speaker 2: more electrons, you also have to make more anti electrons 384 00:18:37,720 --> 00:18:40,400 Speaker 2: to balance out the number of electrons in the universe. 385 00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:44,040 Speaker 2: But electron neutrinos fall into that category. So you can 386 00:18:44,040 --> 00:18:47,119 Speaker 2: make an electron and then you make an anti electron neutrino, 387 00:18:47,359 --> 00:18:49,360 Speaker 2: and the universe's books are all balanced. 388 00:18:49,520 --> 00:18:52,360 Speaker 1: Like an electron and a neutrino are sort of like twins, 389 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 1: like you can have you can make one without the other. 390 00:18:54,880 --> 00:18:57,080 Speaker 2: You can make an electron either with an anti electron 391 00:18:57,160 --> 00:19:00,760 Speaker 2: neutrino or with an anti electron, So like a boson 392 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:03,240 Speaker 2: will de kate to an electron and an anti electron 393 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:07,199 Speaker 2: neutrino together, or a z boson will dekate to an 394 00:19:07,240 --> 00:19:10,200 Speaker 2: electron and an anti electron. You can't just make an 395 00:19:10,200 --> 00:19:11,480 Speaker 2: electron by itself. 396 00:19:11,680 --> 00:19:14,960 Speaker 1: So there's it sounds like there are more electrons and 397 00:19:15,000 --> 00:19:18,440 Speaker 1: there are anti electrons and electron latrinos. 398 00:19:18,600 --> 00:19:21,600 Speaker 2: There's definitely more matter than antimatter. So yeah, they're more 399 00:19:21,640 --> 00:19:25,719 Speaker 2: electrons than anti electrons. But when it comes to the neutrinos, 400 00:19:25,720 --> 00:19:28,280 Speaker 2: like we have these pairings. So there's three different flavors 401 00:19:28,280 --> 00:19:31,640 Speaker 2: of neutrino, the muon, the electron, and the town neutrino. 402 00:19:31,760 --> 00:19:34,760 Speaker 2: Each one is connected to one of these leptons because 403 00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 2: the weak force likes to make those together. 404 00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 1: That's just something we've observed, right, Like we noticed that 405 00:19:40,560 --> 00:19:43,680 Speaker 1: the weak force, when it does things in the universe, 406 00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:46,679 Speaker 1: it creates these things in pairs. Like is there anything 407 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 1: else we know about them that associates them, Like do 408 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:51,520 Speaker 1: they have the same quantum varible about it? 409 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:53,720 Speaker 2: I like the way you say, that's just what we observed, 410 00:19:53,760 --> 00:19:56,639 Speaker 2: Like that's basically science, right. We observe the universe and 411 00:19:56,680 --> 00:19:58,640 Speaker 2: then we describe it, and then we try to boil 412 00:19:58,720 --> 00:20:00,919 Speaker 2: that description down to a couple a set of rules 413 00:20:00,960 --> 00:20:04,320 Speaker 2: as possible, and think about what that means. So, yeah, 414 00:20:04,320 --> 00:20:07,560 Speaker 2: that's just what we've observed. We've never seen this be violated. 415 00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:10,760 Speaker 2: So there's an asterisk there. We'll talk about neutrino oscillation 416 00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:13,080 Speaker 2: in a minute, but yeah, really that's the only difference 417 00:20:13,119 --> 00:20:15,280 Speaker 2: we know about it from these different kinds of neutrinos 418 00:20:15,280 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 2: that the weak force associates them with different leptons, with electron, 419 00:20:19,320 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 2: a muon, or a taw. The other question, of course, 420 00:20:21,880 --> 00:20:24,359 Speaker 2: is about their masses, like what are the masses of 421 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:27,639 Speaker 2: these particles. We know that for normal matter, all the 422 00:20:27,760 --> 00:20:30,719 Speaker 2: quarks and the electron, the masses tend to increase as 423 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:33,080 Speaker 2: you go to their copies, like the muon is heavier 424 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:36,240 Speaker 2: than the taw. The upcork has heavier versions the charm 425 00:20:36,280 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 2: and the top. The down cork has heavier versions the 426 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:41,640 Speaker 2: strange and the bottom. When it comes to the neutrinos, 427 00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:43,880 Speaker 2: we don't know so much about what their masses are 428 00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:45,800 Speaker 2: and how that's organized. 429 00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:48,479 Speaker 1: All right, it sounds like a good cue for us 430 00:20:48,480 --> 00:20:50,879 Speaker 1: to dig deeper into the mass of the neutrino and 431 00:20:50,880 --> 00:20:52,439 Speaker 1: talk about how we know it has mass and how 432 00:20:52,480 --> 00:20:54,639 Speaker 1: we measure that mass. So let's get into that, but 433 00:20:54,680 --> 00:21:09,440 Speaker 1: first let's take a quick break. All right, we're talking 434 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:13,360 Speaker 1: about the mass of a neutrino specifically, what is its mass? 435 00:21:13,760 --> 00:21:15,600 Speaker 1: Is it a lot, is it a little? And why 436 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:18,800 Speaker 1: is it the way it is? So we talked about 437 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:21,680 Speaker 1: what a neutrino is. They are ghostly particles that fly 438 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:25,199 Speaker 1: around the universe without really interacting with the rest of 439 00:21:25,240 --> 00:21:27,919 Speaker 1: the matter in the universe. Daniel a quick question. Do 440 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:29,080 Speaker 1: they interact with dark matter? 441 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:33,160 Speaker 2: Ooh, yeah, great question. We don't know. For a long 442 00:21:33,160 --> 00:21:36,399 Speaker 2: time we wondered if neutrinos were the dark matter, like 443 00:21:36,400 --> 00:21:38,800 Speaker 2: they kind of fit the bill because we can't really 444 00:21:38,840 --> 00:21:40,960 Speaker 2: see them and there's maybe a lot of them out there. 445 00:21:41,119 --> 00:21:44,040 Speaker 2: Turns out neutrinos can't be the dark matter because we 446 00:21:44,119 --> 00:21:47,320 Speaker 2: know the dark matter moves slowly, it's cold. We know 447 00:21:47,400 --> 00:21:50,080 Speaker 2: that from like how it's influenced the structure of the universe. 448 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:52,880 Speaker 2: If dark matter moved faster, things would be less lumpy, 449 00:21:53,080 --> 00:21:56,520 Speaker 2: and neutrinos move really really fast, So neutrinos are too 450 00:21:56,560 --> 00:21:59,600 Speaker 2: hot to be the dark matter. Do neutrinos interact with 451 00:21:59,680 --> 00:22:01,880 Speaker 2: dark man? We don't think so, because we don't think 452 00:22:01,920 --> 00:22:05,280 Speaker 2: that dark matter feels the weak force or the improbable force, 453 00:22:05,320 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 2: as you'd like to call it, because if it did, 454 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:08,919 Speaker 2: we would have seen it bump into some of our 455 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:12,520 Speaker 2: big underground detectors. So because dark matter probably doesn't feel 456 00:22:12,520 --> 00:22:15,119 Speaker 2: the weak force, it probably doesn't interact with neutrinos. 457 00:22:15,560 --> 00:22:17,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, I feel the same way. I think I'm too 458 00:22:17,119 --> 00:22:18,200 Speaker 1: hot to be dark matter. 459 00:22:19,760 --> 00:22:20,920 Speaker 2: I'm always telling people that. 460 00:22:22,680 --> 00:22:24,160 Speaker 1: And ironically, I'm also pretty cool. 461 00:22:24,560 --> 00:22:26,080 Speaker 2: You're a paradox of physics. 462 00:22:26,400 --> 00:22:29,440 Speaker 1: Yes, I'm an enigma wrapped in a cartoonist. But talking 463 00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:31,280 Speaker 1: about the mass of a nutrino, I guess the first 464 00:22:31,320 --> 00:22:33,320 Speaker 1: question is like, first of all, how do you know 465 00:22:33,359 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: it has mass? Like, there are particles out there without mass, Right, 466 00:22:36,359 --> 00:22:38,280 Speaker 1: how do we know that neutrino has mass? 467 00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:40,720 Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right. There are particles out there that have 468 00:22:40,800 --> 00:22:44,040 Speaker 2: no mass, like the photon and the gluon. So it's 469 00:22:44,080 --> 00:22:47,280 Speaker 2: not impossible for the neutrino to have no mass, and 470 00:22:47,400 --> 00:22:50,760 Speaker 2: for a long time we assumed that it didn't. There's 471 00:22:50,800 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 2: even an argument about what we mean by the standard 472 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:56,439 Speaker 2: model of particle physics, sort of our description of our 473 00:22:56,480 --> 00:22:59,280 Speaker 2: best understanding. Some people say that the standard model of 474 00:22:59,280 --> 00:23:03,479 Speaker 2: particle physics requires neutrinos to have no mass, though there 475 00:23:03,480 --> 00:23:05,879 Speaker 2: are extensions of it that allow them to have mass. 476 00:23:06,000 --> 00:23:08,400 Speaker 2: Some people say that's beyond the standard models. Some people 477 00:23:08,480 --> 00:23:10,960 Speaker 2: say that's the new standard model. As you might expect, 478 00:23:11,000 --> 00:23:13,000 Speaker 2: this big argument about how we name it. But for 479 00:23:13,040 --> 00:23:16,320 Speaker 2: a long time we assumed neutrinos had no mass. But 480 00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:18,520 Speaker 2: now we do know that they have mass, and we 481 00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:21,440 Speaker 2: know that in two different ways. We know that they 482 00:23:21,480 --> 00:23:24,479 Speaker 2: have mass even without knowing how much mass they have. 483 00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:27,520 Speaker 1: Interesting do you know because they I don't know, pass 484 00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:29,960 Speaker 1: around heavy objects, or because you've weight them. 485 00:23:30,040 --> 00:23:31,800 Speaker 2: So we know in a few different ways. Actually, one 486 00:23:31,800 --> 00:23:35,000 Speaker 2: of the first clues was looking at a supernova. There 487 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:37,880 Speaker 2: was a supernova in nineteen eighty seven that was very, 488 00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:41,120 Speaker 2: very bright, and we saw a big flash of neutrinos 489 00:23:41,320 --> 00:23:44,440 Speaker 2: coming from that supernova. And the neutrinos actually arrived a 490 00:23:44,520 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 2: little bit before the photons because neutrinos come from the 491 00:23:48,040 --> 00:23:50,840 Speaker 2: center of the supernova and they aren't blocked by the 492 00:23:50,920 --> 00:23:53,480 Speaker 2: rest of the matter in the supernova, whereas the photons 493 00:23:53,520 --> 00:23:55,560 Speaker 2: come from the surface and it takes a while for 494 00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:58,359 Speaker 2: the energy to like propagate out and produce those photons. 495 00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:01,080 Speaker 2: But they looked at when the new trinos arrived and 496 00:24:01,119 --> 00:24:04,320 Speaker 2: realize that they don't all arrive at the same time. 497 00:24:04,920 --> 00:24:08,399 Speaker 2: We think they all leave the supernova basically the same moment, 498 00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,280 Speaker 2: but they don't all arrive at the same time. The 499 00:24:11,359 --> 00:24:15,520 Speaker 2: higher energy neutrinos arrive earlier than the lower energy once. 500 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:19,080 Speaker 2: The higher the energy, the faster they go. That makes sense, 501 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:22,400 Speaker 2: but it's actually a property you can only have if 502 00:24:22,440 --> 00:24:26,800 Speaker 2: you have mass. Massless particles like photons, all travel at 503 00:24:26,800 --> 00:24:30,439 Speaker 2: the same speed regardless of their energy. All photons travel 504 00:24:30,480 --> 00:24:34,399 Speaker 2: at the same speed because they're massless. Neutrinos have a 505 00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:37,920 Speaker 2: spread in their velocity, which means they have a mass. 506 00:24:38,800 --> 00:24:40,640 Speaker 1: But I guess it tells you that they're not as 507 00:24:40,680 --> 00:24:43,719 Speaker 1: fast as photons, which means they have mass. Right, because 508 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:46,760 Speaker 1: anything that doesn't have mass would move at the speed 509 00:24:46,760 --> 00:24:47,520 Speaker 1: of light exactly. 510 00:24:47,600 --> 00:24:49,800 Speaker 2: Things that don't have mass always have to move at 511 00:24:49,840 --> 00:24:52,640 Speaker 2: the speed of light. There's no option there, right, Massless 512 00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:54,800 Speaker 2: objects always move at the speed of light. 513 00:24:55,040 --> 00:24:57,239 Speaker 1: Okay, so neutrinos don't move at this speed of light, 514 00:24:57,280 --> 00:24:59,480 Speaker 1: which means they have some mass. But then is that 515 00:24:59,560 --> 00:25:01,199 Speaker 1: the main way that we know they have mass? 516 00:25:01,200 --> 00:25:03,960 Speaker 2: So there's another really fascinating clue which comes from the 517 00:25:04,000 --> 00:25:07,040 Speaker 2: Big Bang. We think that a lot of neutrinos were 518 00:25:07,080 --> 00:25:09,560 Speaker 2: made in the Big Bang, Like all this energy was 519 00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:12,119 Speaker 2: hot and dense, and the quantum fields were frothing, and 520 00:25:12,160 --> 00:25:14,640 Speaker 2: as they cooled down, they sort of dribbled out into 521 00:25:14,680 --> 00:25:16,720 Speaker 2: all the different fields that are out there. So the 522 00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:18,480 Speaker 2: Big Bang made a lot of quarks and made a 523 00:25:18,480 --> 00:25:21,439 Speaker 2: lot of electrons, and made a lot of neutrinos as well. 524 00:25:21,640 --> 00:25:24,639 Speaker 2: And as those particles all mixed together, the amount of 525 00:25:24,640 --> 00:25:28,119 Speaker 2: photons and neutrinos and quarks determined like what kind of 526 00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:31,120 Speaker 2: stuff got made. Later as things cooled, like how much 527 00:25:31,160 --> 00:25:33,800 Speaker 2: hydrogen did you get and how much helium did you get? 528 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:35,719 Speaker 2: And out of those things sort of sloshed together and 529 00:25:35,800 --> 00:25:38,920 Speaker 2: froth together in the Big Bang. So by studying the 530 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,280 Speaker 2: relics of the Big Bang, the leftover bits of it, 531 00:25:41,480 --> 00:25:43,840 Speaker 2: we could actually get some clues as to like how 532 00:25:43,840 --> 00:25:46,600 Speaker 2: many neutrinos there were, and we can even figure out 533 00:25:46,640 --> 00:25:48,840 Speaker 2: something about the mass of those neutrinos. 534 00:25:49,000 --> 00:25:52,359 Speaker 1: But wait, I thought, neutrinos don't interact with regular mass, 535 00:25:52,600 --> 00:25:55,480 Speaker 1: So how can like regular mass relics tell you about 536 00:25:55,560 --> 00:25:57,360 Speaker 1: how many the trinos there were in the Big Bank. 537 00:25:57,440 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, you're right. The neutrinos almost never interact with matter, 538 00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:03,200 Speaker 2: but if matter is dense enough, they will, Like the 539 00:26:03,320 --> 00:26:07,600 Speaker 2: probability is not zero, it's greater than zero. And actually, 540 00:26:07,680 --> 00:26:10,560 Speaker 2: back in the earlier times, when the universe was hotter, 541 00:26:10,680 --> 00:26:13,280 Speaker 2: when things were denser, the weak force was not as 542 00:26:13,359 --> 00:26:16,040 Speaker 2: weak as it is today. We think back in the 543 00:26:16,160 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 2: very early universe, the weak force and the electromagnetic force, 544 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:22,040 Speaker 2: before the Higgs boson broke the symmetry, the two were 545 00:26:22,080 --> 00:26:26,080 Speaker 2: actually equally as powerful. So neutrinos used to interact with 546 00:26:26,119 --> 00:26:27,880 Speaker 2: normal matter more than they do today. 547 00:26:28,040 --> 00:26:29,800 Speaker 1: I think what you're saying is that our models of 548 00:26:29,880 --> 00:26:32,320 Speaker 1: the Big Bang tell us that there were a lot 549 00:26:32,359 --> 00:26:34,639 Speaker 1: of neutrinos at the Big Band, and that they have passed. 550 00:26:34,720 --> 00:26:36,719 Speaker 2: The models of the Big Bang tell us something about 551 00:26:36,920 --> 00:26:40,560 Speaker 2: how many neutrinos there were, like the number of neutrinos, 552 00:26:41,040 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 2: because neutrinos back then were moving really really fast, they 553 00:26:44,080 --> 00:26:46,640 Speaker 2: were very very hot, and so they helped like spread 554 00:26:46,720 --> 00:26:49,800 Speaker 2: energy out. They sort of acted like photons because everything 555 00:26:49,920 --> 00:26:52,880 Speaker 2: was so hot. And when we study the early universe 556 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:56,240 Speaker 2: we can see these acoustic oscillations, like there were these 557 00:26:56,280 --> 00:26:59,879 Speaker 2: density waves. In the early universe. Things were hot and dense, 558 00:27:00,040 --> 00:27:03,000 Speaker 2: and the created pressure waves in the matter photons and 559 00:27:03,040 --> 00:27:05,840 Speaker 2: neutrinos helped us sort of smooth that out a little bit. 560 00:27:06,240 --> 00:27:10,320 Speaker 2: So by looking at those oscillations they're called baryon acoustic oscillations, 561 00:27:10,560 --> 00:27:13,240 Speaker 2: which make these ringing patterns in the early universe, we 562 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:16,080 Speaker 2: can measure how many neutrinos and how many photons there were, 563 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:18,800 Speaker 2: So that tells us something about the number of neutrinos. 564 00:27:19,080 --> 00:27:20,960 Speaker 2: Then we can do a second thing to figure out 565 00:27:21,000 --> 00:27:23,199 Speaker 2: how massive the neutrinos had to be. Like we know 566 00:27:23,480 --> 00:27:26,920 Speaker 2: how many neutrinos there were, and then we can figure out, well, 567 00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:30,119 Speaker 2: how much mass could the neutrinos have without causing the 568 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:33,560 Speaker 2: universe to collapse? Right, We know that the universe has 569 00:27:33,600 --> 00:27:36,240 Speaker 2: been expanding since it was very very young, and that 570 00:27:36,320 --> 00:27:38,800 Speaker 2: tells us something about like how much matter and radiation 571 00:27:38,960 --> 00:27:41,520 Speaker 2: and energy there is in the universe, because if there 572 00:27:41,560 --> 00:27:44,600 Speaker 2: was too much, then gravity would pull everything back together 573 00:27:44,680 --> 00:27:47,160 Speaker 2: very quickly into a big bang. So we know something 574 00:27:47,160 --> 00:27:49,560 Speaker 2: about how many neutrinos there were, we could put an 575 00:27:49,640 --> 00:27:52,679 Speaker 2: upper limit on how massive they could be without collapsing 576 00:27:52,720 --> 00:27:53,360 Speaker 2: the universe. 577 00:27:54,240 --> 00:27:56,280 Speaker 1: But I think the two are sort of tied together, right. 578 00:27:56,320 --> 00:27:59,040 Speaker 1: The number of neutrinos and how massive they are, right, 579 00:27:59,440 --> 00:28:01,359 Speaker 1: I mean you have to assume they have mass in 580 00:28:01,440 --> 00:28:03,840 Speaker 1: order for them to matter at the Big Bang, right. 581 00:28:03,840 --> 00:28:06,119 Speaker 2: Well, they don't have to have mass in order to matter. 582 00:28:06,320 --> 00:28:09,640 Speaker 2: It's funny that we use matter because remember, general relativity 583 00:28:09,640 --> 00:28:12,280 Speaker 2: is sensitive to energy density, whether it's in the form 584 00:28:12,320 --> 00:28:15,480 Speaker 2: of radiation or in the form of matter. It really 585 00:28:15,520 --> 00:28:18,160 Speaker 2: is just sensitive to energy density. So the Big Bang 586 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:21,679 Speaker 2: analysis tells us the number of neutrinos totally independently of 587 00:28:21,720 --> 00:28:24,160 Speaker 2: their mass. And the second step is to say, well, 588 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:27,120 Speaker 2: if neutrinos do exist, how much mass could you give 589 00:28:27,160 --> 00:28:30,720 Speaker 2: them without causing the universe to collapse? So that tells 590 00:28:30,800 --> 00:28:34,199 Speaker 2: us something about how massive they could be. Like an 591 00:28:34,280 --> 00:28:37,120 Speaker 2: upper limit, Yes, exactly, it's an upper limit. That number 592 00:28:37,160 --> 00:28:39,680 Speaker 2: is actually really really low. The number is less than 593 00:28:39,680 --> 00:28:41,720 Speaker 2: the tenth of an electron volt. 594 00:28:41,680 --> 00:28:44,240 Speaker 1: Which I guess to give us some context, how much 595 00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:45,720 Speaker 1: mass does an electron have? 596 00:28:45,960 --> 00:28:50,400 Speaker 2: So an electron has like five hundred thousand electron volts. 597 00:28:50,760 --> 00:28:54,320 Speaker 2: It's half of an MeV half of a mega electron bolt, 598 00:28:54,840 --> 00:28:58,040 Speaker 2: and so five hundred thousand electron vaults. That's not very much, right, 599 00:28:58,040 --> 00:29:01,200 Speaker 2: Electrons are very very low mass. Particles compared to like 600 00:29:01,240 --> 00:29:04,600 Speaker 2: a proton. A proton has like one giga electron bolts 601 00:29:04,600 --> 00:29:08,600 Speaker 2: one billion electron bolts. So we know from the Big 602 00:29:08,640 --> 00:29:12,440 Speaker 2: Bang that all neutrinos added together have to have less 603 00:29:12,440 --> 00:29:14,960 Speaker 2: than a tenth of an electron bolt, less than one 604 00:29:15,040 --> 00:29:17,320 Speaker 2: ten billionth of the mass of a proton. 605 00:29:17,640 --> 00:29:19,760 Speaker 1: You mean all the different kinds of neutrinos, not all 606 00:29:19,800 --> 00:29:22,200 Speaker 1: of the individual neutrinos in the universe. 607 00:29:22,280 --> 00:29:24,880 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, that's exactly right. There are three neutrinos. When 608 00:29:24,920 --> 00:29:26,880 Speaker 2: you add up all their mass together, it has to 609 00:29:26,880 --> 00:29:29,479 Speaker 2: be less than a tenth of an ev where an 610 00:29:29,520 --> 00:29:33,080 Speaker 2: electron is five hundred thousand ev and a proton is 611 00:29:33,120 --> 00:29:35,000 Speaker 2: about a billion ev m. 612 00:29:35,640 --> 00:29:39,000 Speaker 1: Interesting, so then pretty light, very very light, Like how 613 00:29:39,080 --> 00:29:39,760 Speaker 1: much is a quark. 614 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:41,560 Speaker 2: It depends a lot on which cork you're talking about. 615 00:29:41,600 --> 00:29:44,000 Speaker 2: The lowest mass quarks have like a few MeV a 616 00:29:44,040 --> 00:29:48,200 Speaker 2: few million electronvolts. The most massive ones, like the top quark, 617 00:29:48,560 --> 00:29:51,960 Speaker 2: is like one hundred and seventy five billion ev. So 618 00:29:52,040 --> 00:29:55,680 Speaker 2: these neutrinos have mass much much closer to zero than 619 00:29:55,720 --> 00:29:59,480 Speaker 2: anything we've ever seen before. They're like shockingly low mass. 620 00:30:00,040 --> 00:30:01,720 Speaker 1: Okay, so we have a sort of an upper limit. 621 00:30:01,800 --> 00:30:05,240 Speaker 1: You said for how much the three kinds of neutrinos 622 00:30:05,320 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 1: can add up together, But then how do we resolve 623 00:30:08,120 --> 00:30:09,400 Speaker 1: how much each one of them weighs? 624 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:12,120 Speaker 2: So then we have another really fascinating clue which tells 625 00:30:12,200 --> 00:30:15,320 Speaker 2: us about the mass difference between the neutrinos. So so 626 00:30:15,440 --> 00:30:17,560 Speaker 2: far we know something about the sum of their masses. 627 00:30:17,600 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 2: We know it's less than point one ev. We also 628 00:30:20,320 --> 00:30:22,760 Speaker 2: know there are three neutrinos, when we're wondering, like, well, 629 00:30:22,800 --> 00:30:25,040 Speaker 2: they all have the same mass, is it like with 630 00:30:25,080 --> 00:30:27,239 Speaker 2: the other particles, where there's one low mass and then 631 00:30:27,240 --> 00:30:29,280 Speaker 2: another one and then another one. So we can do 632 00:30:29,320 --> 00:30:32,400 Speaker 2: another kind of experiment to measure the differences between the 633 00:30:32,480 --> 00:30:35,360 Speaker 2: masses of the neutrinos. And this comes from how they 634 00:30:35,400 --> 00:30:39,760 Speaker 2: actually change their identities. Neutrinos are weird compared to the 635 00:30:39,760 --> 00:30:43,920 Speaker 2: other particles. In even another way. They're different from the electron, 636 00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:46,800 Speaker 2: the muon, and the towel, and that they can change flavor. 637 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:49,520 Speaker 2: Like if you create an electron neutrino and shoot it 638 00:30:49,560 --> 00:30:52,400 Speaker 2: through space and then wait like a light year two 639 00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:54,800 Speaker 2: light years and try to measure it, you might discover 640 00:30:54,920 --> 00:30:58,760 Speaker 2: it's no longer an electron neutrino. It's now a muon 641 00:30:58,880 --> 00:31:03,120 Speaker 2: neutrino or a neutrino. This is called neutrino oscillation. 642 00:31:03,720 --> 00:31:06,480 Speaker 1: M yeah, I think usually if you shoot anything the space, 643 00:31:06,560 --> 00:31:10,400 Speaker 1: no change flavor. But I guess how do we know this? Like, 644 00:31:10,520 --> 00:31:12,560 Speaker 1: how would we know if it changed flavors? And again, 645 00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:14,600 Speaker 1: flavor is kind of the charge of the weak force? 646 00:31:14,680 --> 00:31:14,840 Speaker 4: Right? 647 00:31:14,920 --> 00:31:17,840 Speaker 2: Flavor is actually which of these generations of particles? It 648 00:31:17,880 --> 00:31:21,720 Speaker 2: is like is it electron, is it muon? Is it tau? Right, 649 00:31:21,760 --> 00:31:23,040 Speaker 2: that's what we mean by flavor. 650 00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 1: Oh, is there a charge the weak force or is 651 00:31:25,560 --> 00:31:26,440 Speaker 1: it just the weak charge? 652 00:31:26,480 --> 00:31:28,240 Speaker 2: The weak force does have a charge member, it's two 653 00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:31,800 Speaker 2: different charges. There's the isospin and the weak hypercharge, so 654 00:31:31,880 --> 00:31:34,760 Speaker 2: both of those count as weak charges. But the neutrinos 655 00:31:34,800 --> 00:31:37,720 Speaker 2: all have the same week charges where they have different 656 00:31:37,800 --> 00:31:41,880 Speaker 2: is this flavor? This different identity, But that identity actually 657 00:31:41,920 --> 00:31:44,120 Speaker 2: turns out to be different. When you create the neutrino 658 00:31:44,240 --> 00:31:46,640 Speaker 2: and when the neutrino flies through space, they have like 659 00:31:46,680 --> 00:31:49,960 Speaker 2: two different sets of identities. There's the identity we talked 660 00:31:49,960 --> 00:31:52,200 Speaker 2: about when a neutrino is made, like the weak force, 661 00:31:52,240 --> 00:31:54,480 Speaker 2: when it makes an electron, it makes an electron neutrino, 662 00:31:54,600 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 2: or if it makes a muan, it makes a muon neutrino. 663 00:31:56,800 --> 00:31:59,640 Speaker 2: But when neutrinos fly through space, they have three different 664 00:31:59,680 --> 00:32:03,600 Speaker 2: ideas entities, and those are their masses. So there's three 665 00:32:03,600 --> 00:32:06,240 Speaker 2: different kinds of neutrinos for the weak force, and there's 666 00:32:06,280 --> 00:32:09,040 Speaker 2: three different kinds of neutrinos for the masses. But those 667 00:32:09,040 --> 00:32:11,760 Speaker 2: are not the same. They're like a mixture of each other. 668 00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:14,760 Speaker 2: So if you imagine this like M one, M two, 669 00:32:15,000 --> 00:32:18,040 Speaker 2: M three are the three neutrino masses. When you create 670 00:32:18,040 --> 00:32:21,400 Speaker 2: an electron neutrino, it's not like it's M one. It's 671 00:32:21,440 --> 00:32:24,960 Speaker 2: some weird mixture of all the masses of the three neutrinos. 672 00:32:25,200 --> 00:32:27,280 Speaker 1: You mean some kind of weird quantum mixture. Is that 673 00:32:27,320 --> 00:32:27,720 Speaker 1: what you mean? 674 00:32:28,080 --> 00:32:30,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a superposition. So you create an electron neutrino, 675 00:32:31,320 --> 00:32:35,560 Speaker 2: it's a quantum superposition of the three different neutrino masses. 676 00:32:35,960 --> 00:32:38,920 Speaker 2: You create a mule on neutrino, it's a different superposition 677 00:32:38,960 --> 00:32:41,280 Speaker 2: of those masses. It's like having two different set of 678 00:32:41,360 --> 00:32:44,920 Speaker 2: axes that are not aligned. It's like a rotation between 679 00:32:45,000 --> 00:32:46,000 Speaker 2: your set of axes. 680 00:32:46,160 --> 00:32:48,920 Speaker 1: I guess maybe the question I have is so there's 681 00:32:48,960 --> 00:32:52,560 Speaker 1: three types of neutrinos, electronion, and town neutrinos, and the 682 00:32:52,600 --> 00:32:54,600 Speaker 1: only difference between them is the mass. 683 00:32:54,920 --> 00:32:57,640 Speaker 2: The only difference between the electron, muon, and town neutrino 684 00:32:57,760 --> 00:33:00,280 Speaker 2: is how they interact with the weak force. Three different 685 00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:02,720 Speaker 2: kinds of neutrinos. There's two different ways to break them down. 686 00:33:02,800 --> 00:33:04,920 Speaker 2: One is how do they interact with the weak force? 687 00:33:05,200 --> 00:33:08,040 Speaker 2: The other is what are their masses? So you get 688 00:33:08,160 --> 00:33:11,120 Speaker 2: two different ways to categorize the three neutrinos. 689 00:33:11,440 --> 00:33:13,240 Speaker 1: What do you mean how it interacts with the weak force? 690 00:33:13,360 --> 00:33:17,920 Speaker 1: Like like it's probability of interaction or its strength of interaction? 691 00:33:18,080 --> 00:33:18,840 Speaker 1: What do you mean by that? 692 00:33:19,080 --> 00:33:21,760 Speaker 2: Like what it's made in association with? Like, if you 693 00:33:21,840 --> 00:33:24,440 Speaker 2: make an electron, what kind of neutrino do you make? Well, 694 00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:27,240 Speaker 2: you make an electron neutrino. If you make a tow 695 00:33:27,400 --> 00:33:29,120 Speaker 2: what kind of neutrino do you make? You make a 696 00:33:29,120 --> 00:33:29,880 Speaker 2: town neutrino. 697 00:33:30,000 --> 00:33:31,960 Speaker 1: But if you already made it, does it matter or 698 00:33:32,120 --> 00:33:34,040 Speaker 1: does it matter in like what it can do later? 699 00:33:34,240 --> 00:33:36,800 Speaker 2: It matters in the accounting of the number of electrons 700 00:33:36,880 --> 00:33:38,440 Speaker 2: or muons or towels in the universe. 701 00:33:38,520 --> 00:33:40,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, But like if you just catch one in space. 702 00:33:40,560 --> 00:33:42,720 Speaker 1: How do you know what it is because you weren't 703 00:33:42,760 --> 00:33:44,040 Speaker 1: there when it was made. 704 00:33:44,160 --> 00:33:46,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, good question. Well, electron neutrino is more likely to 705 00:33:46,720 --> 00:33:49,440 Speaker 2: make electrons and a muon neutrino will make a muon, 706 00:33:49,520 --> 00:33:51,640 Speaker 2: and a town neutrino will interact and make a tow. 707 00:33:51,920 --> 00:33:54,680 Speaker 2: One of our neutrino experiments can see electrons, it can 708 00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:56,960 Speaker 2: also see muons, and it can also see tows And 709 00:33:56,960 --> 00:33:59,400 Speaker 2: so you can tell which kind of neutrino it was 710 00:33:59,600 --> 00:34:02,080 Speaker 2: by how how it interacts. Does it create an electron, 711 00:34:02,120 --> 00:34:03,960 Speaker 2: does it create a muon, Does it created. 712 00:34:03,680 --> 00:34:06,920 Speaker 1: A taw What it can do in the future kind. 713 00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:08,520 Speaker 2: Of yeah, what it can do in the future, because 714 00:34:08,520 --> 00:34:11,320 Speaker 2: the universe keeps track of this, accounting how many electrons 715 00:34:11,320 --> 00:34:13,400 Speaker 2: are there, how many muons are there, how many towels 716 00:34:13,400 --> 00:34:15,879 Speaker 2: are there. But again, that's just one way to see 717 00:34:15,880 --> 00:34:18,680 Speaker 2: these things. Another way to see these things is how 718 00:34:18,760 --> 00:34:21,640 Speaker 2: much mass do they have? And for most particles it's 719 00:34:21,640 --> 00:34:24,160 Speaker 2: the same thing. The weak force creates an electron, the 720 00:34:24,160 --> 00:34:26,479 Speaker 2: electron has a mass. All electrons have the same mass. 721 00:34:26,480 --> 00:34:28,880 Speaker 2: It's just a number. And if you ask, like what 722 00:34:28,920 --> 00:34:31,160 Speaker 2: are the masses of the eleptons, you get three different numbers, 723 00:34:31,160 --> 00:34:33,920 Speaker 2: those align with the flavors of the e leptons, but 724 00:34:33,960 --> 00:34:36,279 Speaker 2: when it comes to the neutrinos, they don't. So when 725 00:34:36,280 --> 00:34:38,719 Speaker 2: you create an electron neutrino, it's a weird mixture of 726 00:34:38,719 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 2: these different masses, and as it flies through space, those 727 00:34:42,120 --> 00:34:44,719 Speaker 2: that mixture can change because mass tells us how things 728 00:34:44,840 --> 00:34:47,920 Speaker 2: move through space. So these electron neutrinos and mew neutrinos 729 00:34:47,920 --> 00:34:50,640 Speaker 2: and town neutrinos, because they're made of three different masses, 730 00:34:50,680 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 2: and those masses are different, those masses like fly through 731 00:34:53,600 --> 00:34:57,160 Speaker 2: space slightly differently, and they can turn from one into another. 732 00:34:57,320 --> 00:34:59,279 Speaker 1: I think what you're saying is that, like, if you 733 00:35:00,120 --> 00:35:02,799 Speaker 1: make an electron neutrino like in the center of the 734 00:35:02,800 --> 00:35:05,520 Speaker 1: Sun and it's flying to us, and it has the 735 00:35:05,600 --> 00:35:08,320 Speaker 1: identity of an electron neutrino, it might have that identity, 736 00:35:08,360 --> 00:35:10,560 Speaker 1: but it might not necessarily have a particular mass, like 737 00:35:10,600 --> 00:35:13,759 Speaker 1: it might have one of three different masses exactly. Or 738 00:35:13,840 --> 00:35:16,319 Speaker 1: if you like find a neutrino during space with like 739 00:35:16,800 --> 00:35:19,719 Speaker 1: one of the masses, like the highest mass for neutrinos, 740 00:35:19,760 --> 00:35:22,840 Speaker 1: then that could still be either an electron neatrino or 741 00:35:22,920 --> 00:35:25,040 Speaker 1: town latrino or a unutrino. 742 00:35:25,440 --> 00:35:28,279 Speaker 2: Yes, that's exactly right. In mathematical terms, if you have 743 00:35:28,400 --> 00:35:31,520 Speaker 2: a weak eigen state, if you have an electron neutrino, 744 00:35:31,600 --> 00:35:34,200 Speaker 2: that's something produced by the weak force. In a pure 745 00:35:34,200 --> 00:35:37,040 Speaker 2: electron state, it's a mixture of the mass states. If 746 00:35:37,040 --> 00:35:39,440 Speaker 2: you have a pure mass state, it's a mixture of 747 00:35:39,480 --> 00:35:40,440 Speaker 2: the flavor states. 748 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:44,840 Speaker 1: I think basically nutrino's kind of have an identity crisis 749 00:35:44,840 --> 00:35:48,760 Speaker 1: going on, both a mass crisis and an identity crisis, 750 00:35:48,760 --> 00:35:50,520 Speaker 1: Like it doesn't quite know what it is, or it 751 00:35:50,520 --> 00:35:53,160 Speaker 1: could be different things, but it could also weigh different things, 752 00:35:53,160 --> 00:35:55,520 Speaker 1: and it could also call itself different things. And it's 753 00:35:55,520 --> 00:35:57,759 Speaker 1: sort of like up in the air, like it can 754 00:35:57,840 --> 00:36:00,400 Speaker 1: change its fluid between these identities exactly. 755 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:03,560 Speaker 2: Neutrinos have two different kinds of identities, and they do 756 00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:06,640 Speaker 2: not align. For most particles, these things align very well 757 00:36:06,760 --> 00:36:07,440 Speaker 2: for neutrinos. 758 00:36:07,520 --> 00:36:10,000 Speaker 1: They don't like an electron. For example, if it's born 759 00:36:10,040 --> 00:36:12,320 Speaker 1: an electron, it's going to have the mass of an electron. 760 00:36:12,360 --> 00:36:14,040 Speaker 1: It's not somethingly going to have the mass of a 761 00:36:14,160 --> 00:36:15,920 Speaker 1: Taue electron or a Newon electron. 762 00:36:16,040 --> 00:36:18,200 Speaker 2: Right, Yeah, And this calls in the question what I 763 00:36:18,239 --> 00:36:20,040 Speaker 2: was saying at the very beginning of the podcast about 764 00:36:20,120 --> 00:36:22,920 Speaker 2: mass being part of the identity of a particle, because 765 00:36:22,960 --> 00:36:25,839 Speaker 2: neutrinos can't really be defined by their mass, Like, well, 766 00:36:25,880 --> 00:36:27,680 Speaker 2: it depends are you talking about who I interact with 767 00:36:27,800 --> 00:36:30,200 Speaker 2: or how I fly through space? Because the same neutrino 768 00:36:30,280 --> 00:36:32,800 Speaker 2: can give you two different answers to that question. 769 00:36:33,360 --> 00:36:36,480 Speaker 1: Interesting, all right, Well, let's dig into how we actually 770 00:36:36,640 --> 00:36:40,120 Speaker 1: measure the mass of a neutrino and what those results 771 00:36:40,120 --> 00:36:55,759 Speaker 1: have found. But first, let's take another quick break. Right 772 00:36:55,840 --> 00:36:58,720 Speaker 1: we're talking about the mass of a neutrino. How massive 773 00:36:58,920 --> 00:37:01,760 Speaker 1: is this ghostly part of that flies through space, barely 774 00:37:01,800 --> 00:37:05,719 Speaker 1: interacting with everybody else in the universe, ignoring everyone. It's 775 00:37:05,800 --> 00:37:06,880 Speaker 1: kind of a snobby particle. 776 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:08,640 Speaker 2: It's just got its own stuff to do, you know. 777 00:37:08,680 --> 00:37:10,680 Speaker 2: It just can't stop and chat with everybody. It's got 778 00:37:10,719 --> 00:37:11,600 Speaker 2: its list of barrens. 779 00:37:12,239 --> 00:37:13,080 Speaker 1: It's very aloof. 780 00:37:14,320 --> 00:37:16,080 Speaker 2: It's just busy, man, It's just busy. 781 00:37:16,440 --> 00:37:19,480 Speaker 1: Just more neutral, has less opinions. I guess it's not 782 00:37:19,560 --> 00:37:23,759 Speaker 1: as interesting, all right. And so we're talking about how 783 00:37:23,800 --> 00:37:26,280 Speaker 1: much mass it has, and we know from the Big 784 00:37:26,320 --> 00:37:29,239 Speaker 1: Bang models that we have that it nutrina has very 785 00:37:29,280 --> 00:37:32,359 Speaker 1: little mass, and the different kinds of nutrino thos can't 786 00:37:32,400 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 1: have a lot of masks combined. We talked about how 787 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:38,120 Speaker 1: the nutrina kind of has an identity crisis, doesn't quite 788 00:37:39,280 --> 00:37:42,200 Speaker 1: knows for real what kind of neutrino it is and 789 00:37:42,200 --> 00:37:45,000 Speaker 1: how much it weighs. It's so sort of fluid and quantumy, 790 00:37:45,160 --> 00:37:48,000 Speaker 1: kind of complex and superposition. So then I guess the 791 00:37:48,000 --> 00:37:50,200 Speaker 1: big question is what can you do with that? How 792 00:37:50,200 --> 00:37:54,959 Speaker 1: do you measure these masses if the neutrino so wishy washing? 793 00:37:55,280 --> 00:37:58,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, So the fact that neutrinos can change flavor was 794 00:37:58,120 --> 00:38:01,200 Speaker 2: a big mystery in particles physics for many decades. Like 795 00:38:01,200 --> 00:38:03,759 Speaker 2: we count the number of neutrinos we see from the 796 00:38:03,800 --> 00:38:06,319 Speaker 2: Sun electron neutrinos, and we don't see as many as 797 00:38:06,360 --> 00:38:08,640 Speaker 2: we thought we should, which is a big puzzle. For 798 00:38:08,680 --> 00:38:10,920 Speaker 2: a long time, we predicted a certain number of electron 799 00:38:10,960 --> 00:38:13,479 Speaker 2: neutrinos being created in the Sun, and we just didn't 800 00:38:13,520 --> 00:38:15,359 Speaker 2: see as many. We saw like a third as many 801 00:38:15,400 --> 00:38:18,640 Speaker 2: as we expected. Now we understand that's because they're oscillating. 802 00:38:18,680 --> 00:38:21,160 Speaker 2: They're changing from electron neutrino to something else, and so 803 00:38:21,200 --> 00:38:24,400 Speaker 2: we're not seeing them because they're not interacting with our electrons. 804 00:38:24,760 --> 00:38:28,080 Speaker 2: But we can also use that to measure the differences 805 00:38:28,120 --> 00:38:31,160 Speaker 2: in the masses of the neutrinos. It's because there's a 806 00:38:31,239 --> 00:38:34,640 Speaker 2: mass difference between the neutrinos because they fly differently through 807 00:38:34,640 --> 00:38:38,040 Speaker 2: space that they're changing their identity as they go. So 808 00:38:38,080 --> 00:38:41,040 Speaker 2: what we can extract from this are two numbers, the 809 00:38:41,080 --> 00:38:43,600 Speaker 2: mass differences. Like you imagine this M one, M two, 810 00:38:43,760 --> 00:38:46,680 Speaker 2: M three. We can measure the separation between those three. 811 00:38:46,760 --> 00:38:49,200 Speaker 2: We can't tell the overall mass, but we can tell 812 00:38:49,239 --> 00:38:52,040 Speaker 2: how different they are. But the gaps are between the 813 00:38:52,120 --> 00:38:53,120 Speaker 2: neutrino masses. 814 00:38:54,520 --> 00:38:57,400 Speaker 1: I guess the question is can we why can we 815 00:38:57,400 --> 00:38:59,560 Speaker 1: measure the absolute value of these masses. 816 00:38:59,200 --> 00:39:01,799 Speaker 2: Because this oscillatetiontion doesn't depend on the absolute value. It 817 00:39:01,880 --> 00:39:04,600 Speaker 2: only depends on the difference. Like if all the neutrinos 818 00:39:04,600 --> 00:39:07,200 Speaker 2: had the same mass, then there wouldn't be any oscillation. 819 00:39:07,480 --> 00:39:09,719 Speaker 2: If the mass differences were really really large, they would 820 00:39:09,719 --> 00:39:12,840 Speaker 2: oscillate more. So by measuring how much they oscillate, we 821 00:39:12,880 --> 00:39:16,080 Speaker 2: can measure this mass difference, but the oscillation doesn't depend 822 00:39:16,200 --> 00:39:18,600 Speaker 2: on the total mass. This's a separate experiment we'll talk 823 00:39:18,640 --> 00:39:21,000 Speaker 2: about in a minute, called the Caturing experiment, which is 824 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:23,920 Speaker 2: going to try to measure the overall mass of the neutrino. 825 00:39:24,280 --> 00:39:27,359 Speaker 2: But this oscillation, something which is quite well established, gives 826 00:39:27,440 --> 00:39:30,760 Speaker 2: us a precise measurement only of the differences between the masses. 827 00:39:31,160 --> 00:39:33,120 Speaker 1: I guess maybe I didn't quite understand why we can 828 00:39:33,120 --> 00:39:34,560 Speaker 1: only measure the differences. 829 00:39:34,160 --> 00:39:36,719 Speaker 2: Because the oscillation comes from the differences, Like if there 830 00:39:36,760 --> 00:39:39,640 Speaker 2: weren't any differences, you would see no oscillation. And the 831 00:39:39,719 --> 00:39:42,560 Speaker 2: larger the difference, the more the oscillation. It's kind of 832 00:39:42,640 --> 00:39:46,880 Speaker 2: like measuring interference between two laser beams. If they're in sync, 833 00:39:47,040 --> 00:39:49,600 Speaker 2: you see no interference. If one of them is delayed, 834 00:39:49,960 --> 00:39:52,359 Speaker 2: then they're out of phase and they interfere with each 835 00:39:52,400 --> 00:39:55,200 Speaker 2: other and giving an effect you can measure. But all 836 00:39:55,239 --> 00:39:58,360 Speaker 2: you can measure from the interference is the difference between 837 00:39:58,400 --> 00:40:02,480 Speaker 2: the beams, because that's what causes the interference. And neutrino 838 00:40:02,719 --> 00:40:05,040 Speaker 2: is a mixture of different masses, and each of those 839 00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:08,920 Speaker 2: masses flies through space differently, and it's that difference that 840 00:40:09,040 --> 00:40:11,080 Speaker 2: causes them to change flavor to oscillate. 841 00:40:11,280 --> 00:40:13,319 Speaker 1: But then how do we measure the oscillations, Like we 842 00:40:13,320 --> 00:40:16,359 Speaker 1: can only measure one neutrino at a time, we don't 843 00:40:16,400 --> 00:40:18,839 Speaker 1: know what it was before. How do we know what 844 00:40:18,880 --> 00:40:19,880 Speaker 1: it was after. 845 00:40:20,000 --> 00:40:22,759 Speaker 2: Well, we don't measure oscillations for an individual neutrino, You're right. 846 00:40:22,760 --> 00:40:24,520 Speaker 2: What we do is measure them statistically. So we have 847 00:40:24,560 --> 00:40:26,480 Speaker 2: like a bunch of neutrinos made in the Sun, and 848 00:40:26,520 --> 00:40:28,799 Speaker 2: we know those are all electron neutrinos because the Sun 849 00:40:28,800 --> 00:40:31,480 Speaker 2: has electrons in it and not muons and towels, So 850 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:33,839 Speaker 2: we can measure how many of those have disappeared by 851 00:40:33,880 --> 00:40:35,560 Speaker 2: the time they get to Earth. We can also make 852 00:40:35,560 --> 00:40:38,080 Speaker 2: a bunch of muon neutrinos and a particle beam on 853 00:40:38,200 --> 00:40:41,279 Speaker 2: Earth and then see how often they disappear. So we 854 00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:43,960 Speaker 2: can make a bunch of these measurements of neutrino oscillation, 855 00:40:44,239 --> 00:40:46,840 Speaker 2: not by looking at an individual neutrino and seeing it oscillate, 856 00:40:46,920 --> 00:40:49,560 Speaker 2: but by making a huge number of neutrinos and seeing 857 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:52,759 Speaker 2: how many of them disappear from their original identity. 858 00:40:53,320 --> 00:40:55,560 Speaker 1: Because you're saying, like the way you measure them, when 859 00:40:55,560 --> 00:40:57,600 Speaker 1: you catch a neutrino, you sort of know what it was, 860 00:40:58,480 --> 00:41:00,480 Speaker 1: or at least the detectors can only as you're one 861 00:41:00,560 --> 00:41:02,040 Speaker 1: kind of neutrino at a time. 862 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:03,920 Speaker 2: Exactly, and all you can do is measure is flavor. 863 00:41:03,920 --> 00:41:06,040 Speaker 2: That's the way we detect them is we interact with them. 864 00:41:06,080 --> 00:41:07,680 Speaker 2: The only way to interact with them is through the 865 00:41:07,680 --> 00:41:10,840 Speaker 2: weak force, and that means using electrons, viuans, and towels. 866 00:41:11,080 --> 00:41:12,520 Speaker 2: That's how we interact with them. 867 00:41:12,560 --> 00:41:15,600 Speaker 1: And then how does that tell us their mass differences? 868 00:41:15,640 --> 00:41:17,920 Speaker 1: Like if I catch in the trino, can I just 869 00:41:18,200 --> 00:41:20,440 Speaker 1: infer its mass from like how much energy it has 870 00:41:20,760 --> 00:41:21,919 Speaker 1: and how fast it was going. 871 00:41:22,000 --> 00:41:23,680 Speaker 2: So there are experiments that are going to try to 872 00:41:23,719 --> 00:41:25,560 Speaker 2: do exactly that, which we can talk about in a minute. 873 00:41:25,600 --> 00:41:29,480 Speaker 2: The oscillation experiments are just counting how many neutrinos have disappeared. 874 00:41:29,800 --> 00:41:33,080 Speaker 2: Neutrinos have such low mass that's very, very difficult to 875 00:41:33,120 --> 00:41:36,520 Speaker 2: measure them individually on a per neutrino basis. But there 876 00:41:36,680 --> 00:41:38,719 Speaker 2: is an experiment in Germany which is trying to do 877 00:41:38,800 --> 00:41:39,480 Speaker 2: exactly that. 878 00:41:40,239 --> 00:41:42,480 Speaker 1: Okay, so then you're saying that we have measured kind 879 00:41:42,480 --> 00:41:45,440 Speaker 1: of the differences between the masses. So what are those numbers? 880 00:41:45,520 --> 00:41:48,160 Speaker 2: Those numbers are really small. There's two numbers there. One 881 00:41:48,200 --> 00:41:50,800 Speaker 2: of them is ten mili electron volts. A milli electric 882 00:41:50,800 --> 00:41:53,440 Speaker 2: bolt is one thousands of an electron volts. The other 883 00:41:53,480 --> 00:41:56,600 Speaker 2: one is fifty milli electron volts. So some of them 884 00:41:56,600 --> 00:41:58,560 Speaker 2: has to be less than one hundred and twenty milli 885 00:41:58,640 --> 00:42:01,719 Speaker 2: electron volts. We know that the gaps between them are 886 00:42:01,800 --> 00:42:02,840 Speaker 2: ten and fifty. 887 00:42:03,760 --> 00:42:07,880 Speaker 1: This feels like a fourth grade logic problem, like Sally, Paul, 888 00:42:08,080 --> 00:42:12,239 Speaker 1: and John money in their pockets and it adds up 889 00:42:12,280 --> 00:42:15,080 Speaker 1: to a dollar twenty. But the difference between Sally and 890 00:42:15,080 --> 00:42:18,880 Speaker 1: Paul is fifty cents, and between Sally and John is 891 00:42:18,960 --> 00:42:22,280 Speaker 1: Paul sense how much does Sally have exactly? 892 00:42:22,320 --> 00:42:24,920 Speaker 2: And so we know that there's two possible solutions. We 893 00:42:25,000 --> 00:42:26,960 Speaker 2: know that two of the neutrinos are close to each other. 894 00:42:27,000 --> 00:42:29,359 Speaker 2: This is a small gap ten MeTV. We also know 895 00:42:29,400 --> 00:42:32,760 Speaker 2: that the third one is further away, it's fifty MeTV away. 896 00:42:32,920 --> 00:42:34,960 Speaker 2: We don't know if the two ones that are closer 897 00:42:35,040 --> 00:42:38,080 Speaker 2: are heavier or lighter, So like are the two ones 898 00:42:38,120 --> 00:42:39,480 Speaker 2: that are near each other at the top of the 899 00:42:39,480 --> 00:42:41,680 Speaker 2: spectrum or the bottom of the spectrum. We don't know. 900 00:42:42,040 --> 00:42:44,680 Speaker 2: There's two possible answers there. We also don't know quite 901 00:42:44,800 --> 00:42:47,239 Speaker 2: how it adds up, like the number we have from 902 00:42:47,239 --> 00:42:49,759 Speaker 2: the early universe is an upper limit, and they could 903 00:42:49,800 --> 00:42:52,520 Speaker 2: all still be very very low values. So there's a 904 00:42:52,560 --> 00:42:54,360 Speaker 2: lot of open questions there. We'd love to know the 905 00:42:54,440 --> 00:42:56,520 Speaker 2: sum of the masses of all the neutrinos. 906 00:42:57,280 --> 00:42:59,279 Speaker 1: Well, you sort of just need to know one of 907 00:42:59,280 --> 00:43:01,279 Speaker 1: the masses right, and then that would click the other 908 00:43:01,320 --> 00:43:01,960 Speaker 1: ones in place. 909 00:43:02,080 --> 00:43:04,279 Speaker 2: Well, there's still two possible solutions if you just know 910 00:43:04,360 --> 00:43:05,480 Speaker 2: one of them. You don't know if you have like 911 00:43:05,520 --> 00:43:08,759 Speaker 2: the inverted hierarchy where the two close ones are the top, 912 00:43:08,880 --> 00:43:10,279 Speaker 2: or if you have the other hierarchy where the two 913 00:43:10,320 --> 00:43:11,400 Speaker 2: close ones are at the bottom. 914 00:43:11,719 --> 00:43:14,120 Speaker 1: Oh, I see, but you're saying, we know this very precisely. 915 00:43:14,560 --> 00:43:17,000 Speaker 1: Like our models of the neutrino. When you shoot a 916 00:43:17,000 --> 00:43:19,040 Speaker 1: bunch of them out and you see how many transform 917 00:43:19,040 --> 00:43:22,080 Speaker 1: into different kinds, dat somehow tells you the difference in 918 00:43:22,120 --> 00:43:24,879 Speaker 1: their masses because it, I guess it affects the probability 919 00:43:24,880 --> 00:43:26,160 Speaker 1: of these transformations. 920 00:43:26,280 --> 00:43:29,640 Speaker 2: Yeah. And we've been doing these neutrino oscillation experiments for decades, 921 00:43:29,719 --> 00:43:31,400 Speaker 2: and we've done them in all sorts of ways, with 922 00:43:31,440 --> 00:43:34,160 Speaker 2: all sorts of different combinations. Make this kind of neutrino 923 00:43:34,280 --> 00:43:36,520 Speaker 2: disappear that kind of trino, make this kind of measure 924 00:43:36,560 --> 00:43:39,840 Speaker 2: the appearance of the other one. We've triangulated that whole matrix, 925 00:43:39,880 --> 00:43:42,120 Speaker 2: and we know exactly how these numbers work out. What 926 00:43:42,160 --> 00:43:45,160 Speaker 2: we don't know is the overall mass, only the differences. 927 00:43:45,200 --> 00:43:48,520 Speaker 2: So the differences are very precisely known. The overall mass 928 00:43:48,800 --> 00:43:51,960 Speaker 2: is limited by this Big Bang cosmology stuff to less 929 00:43:51,960 --> 00:43:54,879 Speaker 2: than one hundred and twenty mili electron bolts. But now, 930 00:43:54,880 --> 00:43:58,640 Speaker 2: this is really cool experiment in Germany called the Katrine experiment, 931 00:43:58,640 --> 00:44:01,000 Speaker 2: which is going to try to measure the mass of 932 00:44:01,040 --> 00:44:03,640 Speaker 2: the electron neutrino as precisely as possible. 933 00:44:03,760 --> 00:44:05,920 Speaker 1: All right, let's talk about this experiment, and now what 934 00:44:06,040 --> 00:44:07,719 Speaker 1: is it? How does it work? 935 00:44:07,800 --> 00:44:11,600 Speaker 2: So this experiment is called the Carlsrua tritium neutrino experiment, 936 00:44:11,680 --> 00:44:14,040 Speaker 2: which is a tortured way to make catrin as an 937 00:44:14,080 --> 00:44:16,000 Speaker 2: acronym to. 938 00:44:15,880 --> 00:44:17,040 Speaker 1: Say the least. 939 00:44:17,200 --> 00:44:21,160 Speaker 2: But it starts from tritium and tretium decays two helium, 940 00:44:21,320 --> 00:44:24,080 Speaker 2: which is like two protons a neutron, and then it 941 00:44:24,160 --> 00:44:27,200 Speaker 2: also produces an electron and a neutrino. 942 00:44:26,960 --> 00:44:29,200 Speaker 1: And tretium is just an element, right. 943 00:44:29,080 --> 00:44:32,239 Speaker 2: Yeah, Tritium is two neutrons and a proton, so it's 944 00:44:32,280 --> 00:44:34,719 Speaker 2: like an isotope of hydrogen. Basically, what happens is one 945 00:44:34,760 --> 00:44:37,600 Speaker 2: of those neutrons turns into a proton and then emits 946 00:44:37,640 --> 00:44:40,200 Speaker 2: an electron. And a neutrino, And this is a nice 947 00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:43,320 Speaker 2: way to measure the neutrino mass because the electron neutrino 948 00:44:43,600 --> 00:44:46,080 Speaker 2: don't have a lot of energy. The comp moving really 949 00:44:46,120 --> 00:44:49,160 Speaker 2: really slow, and so basically you can see the effect 950 00:44:49,200 --> 00:44:52,480 Speaker 2: of the mass of these particles on how fast they're moving. 951 00:44:52,840 --> 00:44:54,920 Speaker 2: It's like, not a whole lot of energy made in 952 00:44:54,960 --> 00:44:58,040 Speaker 2: this reaction, so not a lot of despair. So if 953 00:44:58,040 --> 00:45:00,200 Speaker 2: the electron and the neutrino have a lot of mass, 954 00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:02,799 Speaker 2: they'll come out moving slower. They have less mass will 955 00:45:02,800 --> 00:45:06,080 Speaker 2: come out moving faster, And so we can't see the 956 00:45:06,080 --> 00:45:09,399 Speaker 2: neutrino directly, but we can measure the electron energy very 957 00:45:09,560 --> 00:45:12,640 Speaker 2: very precisely. So that's why this experiment does. It measures 958 00:45:12,680 --> 00:45:15,760 Speaker 2: those electrons really really precisely, and if it sees electrons 959 00:45:15,800 --> 00:45:18,920 Speaker 2: moving with more energy, it means that the neutrino mass 960 00:45:18,960 --> 00:45:21,520 Speaker 2: hasn't taken up some of that energy budget. And if 961 00:45:21,520 --> 00:45:24,080 Speaker 2: it doesn't see electrons moving with sort of near the 962 00:45:24,120 --> 00:45:27,840 Speaker 2: maximum possible energy that this decay can make, it means 963 00:45:27,840 --> 00:45:30,400 Speaker 2: that the neutrino has used up some of the energy 964 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:33,320 Speaker 2: budget that otherwise could have made the electron go faster, 965 00:45:33,600 --> 00:45:36,279 Speaker 2: and that means the neutrino has some mass, so it's 966 00:45:36,320 --> 00:45:38,600 Speaker 2: sort of like a way to measure the neutrino mass 967 00:45:38,600 --> 00:45:42,080 Speaker 2: by seeing how much energy it slurps out from this reaction. 968 00:45:43,200 --> 00:45:44,680 Speaker 1: Okay, so let me see if I got this straight. 969 00:45:45,239 --> 00:45:48,040 Speaker 1: You start with an isotope of hydrogen called tritium, which 970 00:45:48,080 --> 00:45:51,080 Speaker 1: is two neutrons in the nucleus surrounded by an electron, 971 00:45:51,400 --> 00:45:53,240 Speaker 1: and then you just let it hang out and eventually 972 00:45:53,280 --> 00:45:56,200 Speaker 1: it's going to decay into a hydrogen atom like right, 973 00:45:56,280 --> 00:45:58,400 Speaker 1: Like one of those neutrons is just going to disappear, 974 00:45:58,640 --> 00:46:01,280 Speaker 1: transformed to something else. And you're saying that this reaction 975 00:46:01,360 --> 00:46:05,120 Speaker 1: shoots out an electron and an antineutrino, and the electron 976 00:46:05,200 --> 00:46:09,520 Speaker 1: we can measure its mass and speed because it's an electron, 977 00:46:09,840 --> 00:46:12,920 Speaker 1: and so whatever's left because we I guess you assume 978 00:46:13,000 --> 00:46:14,560 Speaker 1: a certain amount of energy at the beginning. 979 00:46:14,920 --> 00:46:17,360 Speaker 2: We know very well how tritium decays and how it 980 00:46:17,400 --> 00:46:20,080 Speaker 2: turns into helium and how much energy is available. Yeah, 981 00:46:20,440 --> 00:46:22,080 Speaker 2: and we know that energy has to go to the 982 00:46:22,080 --> 00:46:23,839 Speaker 2: electron and the neutrino, and. 983 00:46:23,840 --> 00:46:26,440 Speaker 1: So the difference between what you started with and how 984 00:46:26,520 --> 00:46:28,600 Speaker 1: much you measure the electron is the energy that goes 985 00:46:28,640 --> 00:46:31,520 Speaker 1: into the neutrino exactly, But then how does that tell 986 00:46:31,520 --> 00:46:33,399 Speaker 1: you the mass? It could just be like something light 987 00:46:33,480 --> 00:46:35,320 Speaker 1: moving fast or something heavy moving slow. 988 00:46:35,520 --> 00:46:37,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, So there's a spectrum of possibilities, and what we're 989 00:46:37,960 --> 00:46:41,759 Speaker 2: looking for is the maximum scenario, Like are there any 990 00:46:41,880 --> 00:46:44,880 Speaker 2: cases where the electron takes all of the energy available? 991 00:46:44,880 --> 00:46:48,040 Speaker 2: There's like a certain energy budget for producing this subtract 992 00:46:48,040 --> 00:46:50,839 Speaker 2: out the electron mass, and then we wonder like, are 993 00:46:50,880 --> 00:46:53,720 Speaker 2: there scenarios where the electron takes all of the energy. 994 00:46:53,920 --> 00:46:56,080 Speaker 2: If we see cases where the electron takes all of 995 00:46:56,080 --> 00:46:58,920 Speaker 2: the energy, that means the neutrino hasn't taken any So 996 00:46:58,920 --> 00:47:00,640 Speaker 2: it's sort of like a budget. You have a budget 997 00:47:00,640 --> 00:47:03,160 Speaker 2: for the whole thing. The electron mask gets taken out, 998 00:47:03,560 --> 00:47:06,200 Speaker 2: then we wonder like does the neutrino take a cut? 999 00:47:06,239 --> 00:47:08,560 Speaker 2: If the neutrino takes a cut, that leaves a smaller 1000 00:47:08,560 --> 00:47:11,400 Speaker 2: budget for the electron, and you'll never see an electron 1001 00:47:11,760 --> 00:47:15,359 Speaker 2: having energy higher than that limit. The neutrino doesn't take 1002 00:47:15,400 --> 00:47:17,880 Speaker 2: a cut, it leaves more energy for the electron and 1003 00:47:17,880 --> 00:47:20,480 Speaker 2: you'll see faster moving electrons. So you look at the 1004 00:47:20,520 --> 00:47:23,239 Speaker 2: tail of the distribution, like what's the fastest electron you 1005 00:47:23,280 --> 00:47:25,640 Speaker 2: ever see, and that'll tell you how much the neutrino 1006 00:47:25,800 --> 00:47:26,880 Speaker 2: is taken from the budget. 1007 00:47:27,120 --> 00:47:29,400 Speaker 1: M I think I get it. So, like you start 1008 00:47:29,440 --> 00:47:32,200 Speaker 1: with let's say one hundred units of energy, and you 1009 00:47:32,239 --> 00:47:35,600 Speaker 1: measure how much energy electron that comes out has, and 1010 00:47:35,640 --> 00:47:38,000 Speaker 1: you look for, like, what's the maximum energy that the 1011 00:47:38,040 --> 00:47:40,000 Speaker 1: electron can take away from this? And let's say it's 1012 00:47:40,000 --> 00:47:42,399 Speaker 1: like ninety nine out of a whole bunch of times, 1013 00:47:42,400 --> 00:47:44,759 Speaker 1: did you do this? Ninety nine is the maximum, which 1014 00:47:44,800 --> 00:47:47,799 Speaker 1: means like the minimum amount of energy the neutrino can 1015 00:47:47,880 --> 00:47:53,040 Speaker 1: take is one, which, since it's the maximum for the electron, 1016 00:47:53,120 --> 00:47:55,440 Speaker 1: it must mean that it's like it created a neutrino 1017 00:47:55,480 --> 00:47:56,440 Speaker 1: that wasn't moving at all. 1018 00:47:56,520 --> 00:47:59,200 Speaker 2: Maybe, And so they're looking for those scenarios like when 1019 00:47:59,200 --> 00:48:02,439 Speaker 2: you make a motionless neutrino and the electron takes all 1020 00:48:02,480 --> 00:48:06,120 Speaker 2: of its energy, that reaction reveals the mass of the 1021 00:48:06,160 --> 00:48:08,960 Speaker 2: neutrino in the energy of the electron. 1022 00:48:09,520 --> 00:48:12,200 Speaker 1: It reveals I guess, the mass of an electron neutrino. 1023 00:48:12,440 --> 00:48:15,239 Speaker 2: Yes, it's revealed the mass of a neutrino created with 1024 00:48:15,280 --> 00:48:17,760 Speaker 2: an electron. What does that really mean? Remember, the electron 1025 00:48:17,880 --> 00:48:21,319 Speaker 2: neutrino doesn't have a definite mass, So actually what it's 1026 00:48:21,360 --> 00:48:25,480 Speaker 2: measuring is a combination of all the masses of the neutrinos. 1027 00:48:25,880 --> 00:48:30,040 Speaker 2: It's just like incoherent some of the distinct neutrino mass 1028 00:48:30,120 --> 00:48:33,600 Speaker 2: values weighted by how much of each one is in 1029 00:48:33,640 --> 00:48:37,440 Speaker 2: that electron neutrino. So remember electro neutrinos don't have a 1030 00:48:37,480 --> 00:48:40,840 Speaker 2: definite mass, So you're measuring this like weird average mass 1031 00:48:40,880 --> 00:48:41,560 Speaker 2: of a neutrino. 1032 00:48:42,200 --> 00:48:44,200 Speaker 1: If you're going to sort of for like the minimum 1033 00:48:44,200 --> 00:48:46,360 Speaker 1: amount of mass that the neutrino has, then must be 1034 00:48:46,360 --> 00:48:48,600 Speaker 1: giving you the minimum mass for one of them. Right. 1035 00:48:48,680 --> 00:48:51,040 Speaker 2: Yes, it's a bit of a subtle point of quantum mechanics. 1036 00:48:51,320 --> 00:48:54,879 Speaker 2: The mass of that neutrino is not actually determined, right, 1037 00:48:54,920 --> 00:48:56,640 Speaker 2: It's not like it has a certain number and we 1038 00:48:56,680 --> 00:48:59,880 Speaker 2: don't know it. What we know is it's an electron neutrino, 1039 00:49:00,000 --> 00:49:03,480 Speaker 2: which means we don't know what its mass is. And 1040 00:49:03,560 --> 00:49:07,719 Speaker 2: so overall, on average, what you'll be sensitive to is 1041 00:49:07,760 --> 00:49:11,799 Speaker 2: the average mass of those neutrinos. But you're right, what 1042 00:49:11,800 --> 00:49:15,680 Speaker 2: we're doing is looking for the most energetic electron, which 1043 00:49:15,719 --> 00:49:18,160 Speaker 2: means we'd be sensitive to the lower end of the 1044 00:49:18,200 --> 00:49:21,160 Speaker 2: neutrino masses of that electron neutrino. 1045 00:49:21,040 --> 00:49:22,920 Speaker 1: Which would maybe give you like the lightest of the 1046 00:49:23,000 --> 00:49:24,160 Speaker 1: three neutrino masses. 1047 00:49:24,320 --> 00:49:26,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, And what we're looking to do is combine this 1048 00:49:26,640 --> 00:49:30,040 Speaker 2: with our measurements from neutrino oscillation, which tells very precisely 1049 00:49:30,360 --> 00:49:33,600 Speaker 2: the separation between the neutrinos, and now we want to 1050 00:49:33,600 --> 00:49:36,440 Speaker 2: anchor the overall scale and slide it up or slide 1051 00:49:36,480 --> 00:49:36,920 Speaker 2: it down. 1052 00:49:38,040 --> 00:49:39,719 Speaker 1: But I guess even if you do, like you said, 1053 00:49:39,719 --> 00:49:43,120 Speaker 1: there's two possibilities for the other two, right, so like 1054 00:49:43,239 --> 00:49:45,920 Speaker 1: you might know the massive one one of the masses, 1055 00:49:45,920 --> 00:49:49,000 Speaker 1: but you wouldn't necessarily know the mass of the other two. 1056 00:49:49,000 --> 00:49:51,160 Speaker 1: But I guess you would narrow it down to two possibilities. 1057 00:49:51,239 --> 00:49:53,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, we'd narrow down to two possibilities. You're right, This 1058 00:49:53,239 --> 00:49:56,440 Speaker 2: would still leave ambiguity for which higherarchy we have, Like 1059 00:49:56,480 --> 00:49:58,440 Speaker 2: are the two close ones the top? Were the two 1060 00:49:58,440 --> 00:50:01,040 Speaker 2: close ones at the bottom. So this experiment's been running 1061 00:50:01,040 --> 00:50:03,800 Speaker 2: for a couple of years and they have some preliminary results. 1062 00:50:03,920 --> 00:50:07,200 Speaker 2: Their measurement says that this mass they're measuring is less 1063 00:50:07,200 --> 00:50:10,960 Speaker 2: than eight hundred milli electron bolts. Now that's not much 1064 00:50:11,000 --> 00:50:13,239 Speaker 2: information because we already know from the Big Bang that 1065 00:50:13,280 --> 00:50:15,319 Speaker 2: it's less than one hundred and twenty. This is just 1066 00:50:15,360 --> 00:50:18,080 Speaker 2: sort of like their first result. They're going to keep 1067 00:50:18,120 --> 00:50:20,360 Speaker 2: running the collecting more data, and they hope they'll be 1068 00:50:20,400 --> 00:50:21,960 Speaker 2: able to measure this thing more precisely. 1069 00:50:22,200 --> 00:50:24,080 Speaker 1: Wait, so we know that they can be more than 1070 00:50:24,120 --> 00:50:26,600 Speaker 1: one hundred and twenty, but the first measurements say it's 1071 00:50:27,000 --> 00:50:28,160 Speaker 1: less than eight hundred. 1072 00:50:28,320 --> 00:50:30,799 Speaker 2: Yeah, so this is not as sensitive as the Big 1073 00:50:30,840 --> 00:50:32,000 Speaker 2: Bang measurement so far. 1074 00:50:32,239 --> 00:50:33,880 Speaker 1: But it would be really weird if they found that 1075 00:50:34,080 --> 00:50:36,560 Speaker 1: the mass in the try now is eight hundred million 1076 00:50:36,640 --> 00:50:38,439 Speaker 1: electron bolts, because that's way too much. 1077 00:50:38,760 --> 00:50:41,319 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, this sets an upper bound of less than 1078 00:50:41,360 --> 00:50:43,600 Speaker 2: eight hundred. We already know they're less than one twenty, 1079 00:50:43,840 --> 00:50:45,360 Speaker 2: so it'd be pretty weird to measure it at like 1080 00:50:45,480 --> 00:50:48,120 Speaker 2: six hundred or five hundred, you know. But these are 1081 00:50:48,239 --> 00:50:50,920 Speaker 2: very very different measurements, right, the Big Bang versus like 1082 00:50:51,000 --> 00:50:53,320 Speaker 2: experiments we're doing here on Earth. So it's not always 1083 00:50:53,360 --> 00:50:55,040 Speaker 2: the case that they're going to agree. There's a lot 1084 00:50:55,080 --> 00:50:57,480 Speaker 2: of theoretical assumptions that go into both of them. But 1085 00:50:57,560 --> 00:50:59,680 Speaker 2: the good thing about this one is we keep running, 1086 00:50:59,719 --> 00:51:02,480 Speaker 2: and so we can keep getting more and more precise measurements, 1087 00:51:02,920 --> 00:51:05,520 Speaker 2: and so they're hoping by twenty twenty four twenty twenty 1088 00:51:05,520 --> 00:51:07,879 Speaker 2: five they can get their sensitivity down to like two 1089 00:51:08,000 --> 00:51:10,960 Speaker 2: hundred MEB and then they can push even further. 1090 00:51:11,600 --> 00:51:14,319 Speaker 1: Because I guess it's all statistical, right, and so just 1091 00:51:14,360 --> 00:51:16,600 Speaker 1: the longer you run it, the more accurate you can 1092 00:51:16,640 --> 00:51:17,799 Speaker 1: say what the minimum is. 1093 00:51:18,000 --> 00:51:20,880 Speaker 2: And this experiment is also super fun because it involves 1094 00:51:20,960 --> 00:51:25,480 Speaker 2: this huge metal container. They shoot these electrons into this 1095 00:51:25,640 --> 00:51:29,320 Speaker 2: mammoth vacuum chamber to measure their energy super duper precisely 1096 00:51:29,719 --> 00:51:32,760 Speaker 2: this spectrometer. It required a really specialized shop to build 1097 00:51:32,800 --> 00:51:35,120 Speaker 2: this thing. You should go online and google a picture 1098 00:51:35,120 --> 00:51:38,560 Speaker 2: of this thing. It's like a big steel blimp basically, 1099 00:51:38,960 --> 00:51:41,040 Speaker 2: and it was so big that it was really hard 1100 00:51:41,080 --> 00:51:43,799 Speaker 2: to transport from the factory where they built it, like 1101 00:51:43,840 --> 00:51:47,040 Speaker 2: three hundred kilometers to the experimental site. They actually had 1102 00:51:47,080 --> 00:51:49,400 Speaker 2: to put it on a boat and float it down 1103 00:51:49,520 --> 00:51:53,719 Speaker 2: river through the Mediterranean, out through the Atlantic over to 1104 00:51:53,960 --> 00:51:57,799 Speaker 2: the Netherlands, and then up another river to the experiment. 1105 00:51:58,360 --> 00:52:00,759 Speaker 2: So it's only like three hundred fifty twolometers away, but 1106 00:52:00,760 --> 00:52:03,520 Speaker 2: I have to take like a nine thousand kilometer long 1107 00:52:03,640 --> 00:52:06,120 Speaker 2: detour because it was too big to like put on 1108 00:52:06,160 --> 00:52:07,880 Speaker 2: a flatbed truck and drive around. 1109 00:52:08,160 --> 00:52:10,680 Speaker 1: Wow, sounds like they should have thought about it before 1110 00:52:10,680 --> 00:52:14,520 Speaker 1: they built it. I mean they have built it on site. 1111 00:52:14,280 --> 00:52:17,200 Speaker 2: Yeah exactly. But you know, you take specialized techniques just 1112 00:52:17,200 --> 00:52:19,600 Speaker 2: to build this thing, and then specialized techniques just to 1113 00:52:19,640 --> 00:52:22,480 Speaker 2: move this thing. There's some awesome videos of it making 1114 00:52:22,520 --> 00:52:26,040 Speaker 2: its last seven kilometer journey across land from the docks 1115 00:52:26,040 --> 00:52:29,960 Speaker 2: to the laboratory. They like squeezed it through these old villages, 1116 00:52:30,280 --> 00:52:32,560 Speaker 2: you know, with like a centimeter to spare on each side. 1117 00:52:32,560 --> 00:52:34,439 Speaker 2: It's pretty awesome, all right. 1118 00:52:34,520 --> 00:52:37,880 Speaker 1: Well, again, a neutrino is part of our standard model 1119 00:52:37,880 --> 00:52:39,840 Speaker 1: of denvers and so, and it's also kind of like 1120 00:52:39,880 --> 00:52:42,120 Speaker 1: one of the last frontiers in terms of what we 1121 00:52:42,200 --> 00:52:44,120 Speaker 1: know about the standard model, right, Like, once we found 1122 00:52:44,160 --> 00:52:47,200 Speaker 1: the Higgs boson and we know about all the matter particles, 1123 00:52:47,560 --> 00:52:49,959 Speaker 1: the neutrino is sort of one of the last big 1124 00:52:50,080 --> 00:52:52,440 Speaker 1: questions we have about it, right, and which means it 1125 00:52:52,640 --> 00:52:56,480 Speaker 1: sort of helps complete our understanding of matter particles in 1126 00:52:56,480 --> 00:52:56,920 Speaker 1: the universe. 1127 00:52:57,000 --> 00:52:59,799 Speaker 2: Yeah, you're absolutely right. It's the frontier particle physics, and 1128 00:52:59,800 --> 00:53:03,319 Speaker 2: the US specifically has decided to double down on neutrinos. 1129 00:53:03,560 --> 00:53:06,400 Speaker 2: We didn't build the next greatest best particle collider to 1130 00:53:06,440 --> 00:53:09,280 Speaker 2: compete with CERN. Instead, the US has decided to build 1131 00:53:09,320 --> 00:53:12,040 Speaker 2: big neutrino experiments to measure these masses, to measure the 1132 00:53:12,080 --> 00:53:16,240 Speaker 2: neutrino interactions, to understand this weird sector of the universe 1133 00:53:16,320 --> 00:53:18,839 Speaker 2: in more detail. We think there's probably a lot more 1134 00:53:18,840 --> 00:53:19,960 Speaker 2: interesting hints. 1135 00:53:19,640 --> 00:53:21,960 Speaker 1: There, and so learning more about the nutrino what would 1136 00:53:22,000 --> 00:53:23,080 Speaker 1: that tell us about the universe. 1137 00:53:23,200 --> 00:53:26,000 Speaker 2: Well, understanding the neutrino mass will help us understand the 1138 00:53:26,000 --> 00:53:27,880 Speaker 2: Big Bang and like what was going on and the 1139 00:53:27,920 --> 00:53:30,799 Speaker 2: neutrino contributions there. We also don't really know how the 1140 00:53:30,880 --> 00:53:33,520 Speaker 2: neutrino gets mass, like does it get mass from the 1141 00:53:33,600 --> 00:53:36,719 Speaker 2: Higgs boson the way other particles do, or does a 1142 00:53:36,760 --> 00:53:39,399 Speaker 2: neutrino give itself mass? Like it might be that there 1143 00:53:39,480 --> 00:53:42,520 Speaker 2: is no anti neutrino, that the neutrino is its own 1144 00:53:42,560 --> 00:53:45,040 Speaker 2: anti particle. This is a fun story about a physicists 1145 00:53:45,040 --> 00:53:48,439 Speaker 2: called Mayorana who thought about these Mayorana particles that might 1146 00:53:48,480 --> 00:53:51,360 Speaker 2: be their own anti particles and give themselves mass in 1147 00:53:51,360 --> 00:53:53,239 Speaker 2: this weird way. So it might even teach us about 1148 00:53:53,239 --> 00:53:55,160 Speaker 2: what mass is for a particle. 1149 00:53:55,800 --> 00:53:59,200 Speaker 1: HM cool, And that's very important because it it would 1150 00:53:59,200 --> 00:54:00,520 Speaker 1: tell us why we have right. 1151 00:54:00,719 --> 00:54:02,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, it would tell us more about what the 1152 00:54:02,920 --> 00:54:05,880 Speaker 2: meaning of mass is. They might also give us some 1153 00:54:05,880 --> 00:54:08,160 Speaker 2: clues about the nature of dark matter. We know that 1154 00:54:08,239 --> 00:54:11,440 Speaker 2: these three neutrinos are not the dark matter, but there 1155 00:54:11,520 --> 00:54:14,960 Speaker 2: might be a fourth kind of neutrino, hysterile neutrino that 1156 00:54:15,040 --> 00:54:17,560 Speaker 2: could be out there, and understanding the neutrino masses and 1157 00:54:17,600 --> 00:54:20,080 Speaker 2: how they mix and interact with each other might clear 1158 00:54:20,160 --> 00:54:23,360 Speaker 2: up some nagging questions about whether there are other flavors 1159 00:54:23,360 --> 00:54:24,600 Speaker 2: of neutrinos out there. 1160 00:54:25,640 --> 00:54:30,080 Speaker 1: That would be massive. All right, well, we hope you 1161 00:54:30,160 --> 00:54:33,480 Speaker 1: enjoyed that. Thanks for joining us, see you next time. 1162 00:54:41,280 --> 00:54:44,040 Speaker 2: Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain 1163 00:54:44,120 --> 00:54:48,120 Speaker 2: the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts 1164 00:54:48,120 --> 00:54:52,800 Speaker 2: from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever 1165 00:54:52,840 --> 00:54:54,560 Speaker 2: you listen to your favorite shows.