WEBVTT - Surveillance: Eurasia Group Top Risks 2021

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. It

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Eurasia top risks Ian Bremmer's with us, the

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>president of Eurasia Group, the driving force of what has

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>become a Jeeves zero America, and joining us now a

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>gentleman from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Joseph Kennedy is a

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>former congressman because he went after that far left Senator

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Mr Markey and went down in flames. That's the latest

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>treatment that we've seen in the newspapers. The former unemployed

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>congressman joins us right now. Joe Kennedy, thank you so

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. I would love to know your

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 1>view of Mr Biden is the last of your grand

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>uncle's Democratic Party, what he needs to do to bring

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>normalcy to the Democratic Party, to find a democratic center

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>versus what is perceived by so much of America is

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a far left looks tough. Good morning, um, and thanks

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for having me, and wonderful to be with you. But

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you have in the president elects somebody whose service,

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>whose dignity and decency, and at his core, a politics

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>that is about building consensus and putting in that hard

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>work to bring people together. Is literally defined who Joe

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Biden is. I think you're you're gonna see that. We've

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>already seen that outstretched hand to an American public across

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the flippal spectrum to try to ask, he has said

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>many times, heal the wounds of of these past years.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>The question is going to be, is that outstretched hand

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be met? And what we've seen already in

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the past coming days you all just alluded to this

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>is from leaders of the United States Senate rather than

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>folks that for people that know better and know the

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>damage that they might very well instill upon this country,

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>on our institutions and honor democracy. Rather than trying to

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>turn the page and actually restore our country to doing

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that hard work, are trying to put ego and political

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ambition ahead of the good of the nation. And I

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not very often these days that I have been

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 1>left speakless because I've been expecting um communi erosion here.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But but this is quite something not all grew up

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with your advantages, the history of the all BBN in

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>school in Boston and not to Stanford and such. Ian

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Bremer took a different path. Tom Kane took a different path,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and all of that was in a different America. How

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>far is this two thousand twenty one America removed from

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that of your father, from that of your grandfather, from

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your family. How far are we removed

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>from the Kennedy of another time? I think part the

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>island as we're seeing is unfortunately, I think, in many respects,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>were not far enough removed from those challenges that the

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>number of times Dolan and Ian and I have had

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this conversation as well, the number of times of the

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>course the past year eighteen months that you hear these

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>questions about comparing are not insignificant. The battles that are

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines today about racial justice, about economic dignity,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>about trying to ensure that this is a country that

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>actually meets its founding ideals of equality in the pathway

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for all those art That's what the end of the

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>sixties was all about. That's what these are the fights

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on the forefront today. And I think in many regards

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that the challenges that knowing what we know that you've

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>got a government as an institution that continues to lag

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>behind the will of its people. And and very briefly

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>here I agree with what in articulated in these challenges.

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But you look at look at what has happened on

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>state ballot initiatives, on public referendum, on minimum wage, on

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>voting rights, on healthcare. It is very clear where the

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>country wants to go. The obstacle at this point is

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the government that continues to put up roadblocks and to

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>prohibit our people from getting there. But Congressman, good morning

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>from London. Is it that clear? I mean, many people

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>still voted for President Trump. And how does Joe Biden

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>actually bring the nation together? You know, as as Ian

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>put it, it's it's a very divided country, probably the

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>most divided in the last couple of centuries. So a

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. One, when you look at those issues

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like ballot initiatives, there's a clear pathway for their minimum

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>wage has raised, a minimum wage has actually brought appeal

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>across many parts of the country. We've seen voting rights

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>have increased um popularity across the country. We saw that

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in Florida two years ago with the ballot initiative that

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>restored voting rights to convicted felons, while Donald while Republicans

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>actually want a governorship there in a Senate race in

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a very tight rate. So there are, in fact policies

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>here that have widespread support. We've had a number of

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>states that have increased access to healthcare through Medicaid expansion,

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>yet having a Republican party continue to put up obstacles

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to it. So I think on many issues here, it's

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not quite as divided as a Republican leadership or Republican

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>base would like you to believe. Without question, it's a

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>divided country. Yes, I'd also point out that for all

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges we're seeing, we're not the challenges that

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. We haven't seen the level of of unrest

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and violence in our streets that we've seen in other

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>parts of our century. So look, I'm not gonna sit

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>here and try to kind of paper over the real

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 1>challenges we have. I think what you have here those

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got a president of the voice of the American

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>public that spoke and elected Joe Biden has said we

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>want to actually heal those wounds. The ultimate question is

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>whether though that effort going to be met with a

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>good faith effort by Republicans in Washington Congress. And let

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>me get in also, Ian Bremer, Ian, Yeah, I just

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>want to say that there's no question I think Joe

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would agree that, UM, Joe Biden has the temperament,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the inclination, the experience to truly try to reach across

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the aisle and bring the country together. But but no

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>one's arms are long enough in this environment. I mean, domestically,

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the ability to pass the two three trillion dollar additional

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that clearly would be necessary this year. Unless the

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats pull off two seats in the Senate races in

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Georgia UM tomorrow, UH is a dead letter UM. And internationally,

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 1>there are so many that prefer to see Joe Biden

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump, but they also recognize that they don't

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>believe that they can trust the United States going forward.

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>They see how divided it is, their skeptical, they understand

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>how Trump could have won, and indeed their watch change.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Everything that's playing out in the United States right now

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>is being magnified all over the world. And when I

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>saw the Europeans cut that new Chinese multilateral trade deal

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>just a week ago, right before Biden becomes president. That's

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a hedge, that's a really significant hedge from a lot

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of leaders that are thinking to themselves. I don't really

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that Biden is going to be able to accomplish

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 1>what he says he wants to do. We can't come

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the United States that we once had and

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly so many people would like to see on the

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>global stage. And I I don't disagree with you, Congressman

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to that, And how do you think, Yeah, I said,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with you. I do think that the

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>optimists in me here just points out the fact that

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this is in fact a choice. Right. This is not

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>because Joe Biden doesn't want to get there. It's not

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think most of the Democratic Party wants we

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>do actually want to heal those ones and move forward.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>What we need is Republican leaders to be able to

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>meet us halfway. And what we've got that that is

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in fact what we're seeing play out. And I think,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>uh shocking ways so far to have twelve U. S.

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Senators that they're going to actively dispute the certification of

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the electoral College and they know better, right, um, So,

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the underlying fundamentals that you point out are

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the question. I think in large part

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to be left to American political leadership to

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have the choice as to whether they want to sew

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that disruption or they want to move our country forward

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>into a more powerful position in the twenty first century. Congressman,

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>has President Trump actually changed US politics forever in US democracy? Uh,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He's certainly changed it for the short and intermediate term.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And look, I think that hud percent agree with in

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the analysis here that what you're seeing is essentially twelve

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican centers as of now that have political aspirations that

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>know in order to be successful for the presidency that

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they are going to need to have the support of

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a Donald Trump base. And I think that Donald Trump

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to remain the loudest voice in the Republican

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Party until there is a next Republican president, or at

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>least for the next four years. And again, that is

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.319
<v Speaker 1>a choice that Republicans have to make as to whether

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to countenance, forget the kind of

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>irrationality or the norm breaking or anything else. Once again,

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>actions that border on, if not cross legality and yet

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>another reason why a president could and should be, in

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>my mind, impeached. Joseph What you just tried to do,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Kennedy. I want to circle back to where we

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>were at the beginning of trying to stagger into two

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one. Republicans, Democrats all disaffected. Dr Bremer and

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>his report mentions college educated urbanites is defining your Democratic party.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>How does your party get to the labor centric a

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>leaf that was in other generations? How do you get

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>back to labor support? What's the what's the actual method

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of doing that? The actual method doing that is showing

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>up and fighting for working families across this country. And yes,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously I think we would all agree we should be

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about expanding access to education and access to higher education.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But that does not mean you leave behind people that,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>as we say, shall or after work rather than before.

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>That means that you've got to understand that the policies

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that for on all a long time Democrats have championed

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>about increasing access to opportunity, that if people still didn't

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>get them because of the get that opportunity, because the

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>barrier's domestic or international, that they've not felt left behind.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>They have been left behind and for Democrats to not

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>recognize that and not turn around and say, hey, we're

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna fight for YouTube. That has been Donald Trump's observation.

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's part of that success um that he's had

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>in his rhetoric, if not the political the policy of him.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>That Ian Bremer within the top risk that you right

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>up here on the United States of America, there's just

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the time ticking on the demographic changes out into the

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirties, the two thousand forties. What do you

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>perceive over the next one, two, three and even five

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>years is being the democratic shift in what it will

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>do for our politics? A demographic shift, I should say. Well,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's exciting, um is that when you look

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>at millennials that are educated around the world. Um, you're

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not just talking about white full You're talking about you know,

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets suddenly dominating and sharing ideas. I mean, when

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid growing up in Chelsea, Massachusetts and

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the projects, you know, not that far from Joe by

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the way, you know, I didn't know any of those kids.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't into K pop, for example, I wasn't share ring,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't on Fortnite, you know, sort of doing gaming

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>with kids from India or Cambodia or whatnot. Millennials today

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>are doing that. And one of the reasons why climate

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>change is really moving. And if there's one place that

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden will truly be effective compared to Trump, it's in

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>actually embracing a post fossil fuel trajectory for the US

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>government in the U s economy, precisely because the markets

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have already been moving in that direction for some for

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>some time. But they're doing that because young people all

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>over the world are connected to a global understanding that

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 1>climate is going to screw them as young people in

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the future if they don't actually take action. So there

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>are reasons to believe that millennials will be more global,

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>they will be more connected, they will be less stovepiped.

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>But but that is those are not the people that

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>are running Washington right now. And and that demographic shift

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, when so many Americans are feeling disenfranchised,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 1>when so many Americans are are are taking it on

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the chin on the back of this coronavirus. Not those

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of us in the knowledge economy that can socially distanced,

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>but those that are stuck, the essential workers that are

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>treated like anything, but and that that gap, that gap

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is immense and painful and drives incredible risk and uncertainty

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in Ian. Thanks so much and Bremer there of your

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Asia group, and we'll talk a lot more about climate change.

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And thank you to the former Congressman, of course, Joseph

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy of Massachusetts. A quick look at the chart of oil.

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it is the chart here of the day Brent

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>crude when we knew it above a hundred dollars of

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>barrel for sustained time, and then the collapse of oil

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and of course in negative prices that we saw earlier

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this year, back to fifty dollars a barrel. That's a

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 1>precursor for Daniel Jurgen. The New Map is his new book.

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It's my book of the year. It is just a

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>beautifully written exercise in our geopolitics and the course of

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>oil and the new oil. I should say as well, Dan,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going wonderful to have you with us here with

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bremer. I need to go right to our immediate geopolitics.

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>What should President Biden's approach be to Saudi Arabia and

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to Russia. I think his approach to Saudi Arabia will

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>be measured to Saudi has not been looking forward to

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a Biden presidency. There will be new stresses in the relationship,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and there will be no sword dance as there was

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>when President Trump made his first visit there. I think,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so it will be a different relationship, and Saudi Arabia

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>will be doing some things to try and uh, you know,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of amiliorated, but it will be frosty. The check

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>on Russia, it's obviously what there will be always a

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>discussion how do we get back into some reasonable relation

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>ship with Russia. But after this massive cyber attack on

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>government and private business, that's just gonna make it much

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>more difficult. So it starts off on a very bad foot.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And you ask, once again what were the Russians thinking?

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>What did they achieve by doing this? The commanding heights

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of oil at fifty dollars a barrel? Are they commanding

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>heights or is it a oil global oil complex that

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is desperate and fragile. I would say it's more of

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the latter, because well, it's said it is creeping out

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of that virus alley of fifty. It's now just a

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>little over fifty if you look at Brent. But you

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>have a big overhang of oil UH supplies in terms

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that OPEC and non OPEQ OPEC plus are holding back.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Plus you have the question of whether there will be

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>some dialogue between the US and Iran that will relieve

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sanctions on Iranian oil. So there's a lot of overhang.

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But the good news is that is virus. You know,

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not as asks it should be, but as vaccination spread,

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>as economies will open up again. One result of that

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>will be more economic activity and oil will get into

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>an area that is would support future investment, which has

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>really been cut very dramatically over the last year. Daniel,

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>good morning from London. Are we going to see peak

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>oil sooner than we think because of climate change action,

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>because of concerns surrounding fossil fuel and carbon emission. Well,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the probably that an energy transition

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are the two big questions that you run into in

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>oil circles, energy circles around and climate circles around the world.

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I still think that peak oil peak demand is probably

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about a decade away. We're seeing these announcements about banning

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engines. Let there will be twenty thirty or

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty five on the other side, you're gonna add other

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>billion people or so to the world economies hopefully will recover.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't think it's as imminent as we think.

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And something else people forget is in for instance, the

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>United States, cars stay on the road for twelve to

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years. You don't just go away somewhere. So I

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think it is an energy transition. I think it's a

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>longer process than snapping your fingers. And how do you

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>see this developing? Well, it's so funny. I mean, you know,

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>the the lifespan of a horse, uh is about twelve

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen years. And you know, once you got the

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>steam engine, you still didn't, you know, crush the horse

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>population until after the existing horses no longer had a lifespan,

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you just stopped. And then within one generation

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>horses went to about ten percent of what they were before.

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>They became useful for entertainment and for food, and that

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was it. And the question is is that where we're

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>going with cars, with with you know, with a mission,

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with with the combustion engines. Uh. Look, it's it's an

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary change. Um, when you have the United States government

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with by far the most important uh, appointment that by

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and is making is John Kerry, who ran for president,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>who was Secretary State, who believes he should have been president,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly thinks he's smarter than than Joe Biden, and he's

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and he's creating a new cabinet position that will be

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>staffed to focus on climate, climate climate. I think it's

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a massive shift. And by the way, I think one

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the more interesting things that we're gonna see over

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the coming year as the Americans as a polity start

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>taking this very seriously as a government, is that we're

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna want to look forward after these ten years when

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer as much about fossil fuels. Who's gonna

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>dominate these new technologies? And you know, under the Trump administration,

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 1>if you want to talk about solar or wind or

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicle infrastructure, you're talking about China. So actually this

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to create more geopolitical competition between the two

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>largest economies, the U. S And China. Then a lot

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of people might have thought thinking, oh, when the Americans

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>talk about I'm gonna be clumb by off for everyone together,

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually a lot more geopolitical competition coming. I think, if

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I can, if I please do it, please do. That

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>means that the supply chains, you know, the supply chains

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of oil have always had a lot of tension around them.

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>As Ian is saying there's gonna be tension now around

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the supply chains because look at the way China dominates

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the lithium ion battery supply chain. One thing about cars,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it's very interesting. If every car in the world today

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>was an electric car running on wind and solar, you

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>would reduce emissions CO two emissions by about six percent.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So you have to look at the whole totality in

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of really having an effect. But if you look

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>at where the automakers are, their investment is certainly shifting

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to electric cars, so they see that there is going

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to be a tipping point. Daniel, you're gonna dr Bremer

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>mentions John Kerry I said on a stage in Davos

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 1>with John Carey, and he was really quite something. The

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>facts involved the knowledge basity on climate change. He also

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>has a knowledge base that there is a U WES

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Senate Heaven forbid, if one senator went from the prize

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and read it, and then they went to the quest

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and read it, and then they went to the new

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>map and read it, could you have a Senate that

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>would go along with President Biden and support some form

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of political climate change policy, or does the Senate block

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>all No. I think well, it depends, uh what happens

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow in Georgia. But on that's in a very near term.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that you would have people supporting it. But

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a question of understanding the time frames

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>involved in the cost. And Ian's report about the risk

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>makes makes a very important point that may not be

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>looked at right now, but it's the cost of COVID

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and the cost of dealing with COVID afterwards. So government's

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>budgets are going to be strained between what they want

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to do in terms of climate and energy transition on

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one side and actually continuing to heal the economy on

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the other. So there will be a fiscal pressure there

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that will also have to be part of the equation. Yeah.

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And you look at the countries like Brazil and India

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that are very carbon intensive on the back of all

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of this that, you know, it's going to be very

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>very hard for them in a post COVID environment to

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>say we're gonna get on in aligne with all these countries. Yeah, yep.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And is it two tenus to make the link between

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Russia oil rich country, sad Arabia oil rich country,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and what role they have to play do you politically?

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So if Russia sees the price of oil go down

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>peek oil, maybe sooner than we think, do they become

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more belligerent? Um? I think Russia is becoming more belligerent

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>because generally they are a country in decline um, and

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they blame the United States for that and Putin has control,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>where in the case of the Saudiast, I mean, I

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>do think that this is going to move them more

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>quickly towards diversifying their economy. It's gonna and they may

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>not be effective, and some of their vision jin is

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously pie in the sky. But but I think they're

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna be buffeted much more by their environment, where in

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the case of Putin, he's angered by that, he's lashing out.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So belligerents is the right question when you talk about

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 1>moscow Ian bremer with us. It is the top risks

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty one. And we think Daniel Jurgen

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of I H. S Market and of course his new

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>book The New Map uh most readable. Dr Jorgina thank

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Right now, not spin but science, and

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to pause here and say that our team

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all through two thousand twenty I thought had great leadership

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>on speaking to science into political experts of how to

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>handle this pandemic. David Nebarrow will join us with the

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>World Health Organization here, but I need to turn to

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of your age, your group, Cliff Cupchain, right

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>now on their take on two thousand twenty one and COVID. Cliff,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>before we get to Dr Nobarrow, help us here with

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the distinction of your COVID risk. The COVID risk is

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that the scar tissue, the lingering effects, the effects, the

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>economic impacts of COVID are going to go away quickly

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>or easily. For a few reasons. We will have within

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>every country the so called K curve. Different socio economic

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>groups recover different rates, usually have growing inequality. Internationally, you

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>will have different rates of recovery, of multi speed recovery

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>based on vaccine access and other rollout factors. So what

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what will you have as a result of this carcasue?

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll have instability, You'll have anti incumbent anchor and a

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of elections coming up in Latin America, for example,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and you'll have a debt crutches as as lenders become

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>more discriminated, a lot of emerging markets are gonna have

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>trouble getting capital and that's going to create big pressure

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in debt markets this year. David and Borrow, thank you

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thrilled to have you answer

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty and for you to provide a voice

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>here to start the year. I want to speak not

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>about cases which I can't count, or deaths general trust,

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but the hospitalization surge in the sinceanity over the long

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>weekend that we can't get vaccinated fast enough. What is

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the the Borrow solution to jump start the rate of

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccinations and double dose vaccinations? Thanks very much. Indeed, there

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is no alternative but to make vaccines available as widely

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as possible as soon as they get approved. I don't

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>want any corners to be cut on the approval process.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So each vaccine must go through their Phase three trials

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and then be properly assessed by national regulators as well

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>as by the World Health Organization. But that's the only

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>option that we have if we're going to rely on

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>vaccines to get this pandemic to subside just one last point.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Vaccines won't be enough on their own. We will need

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to continue to pay attention to the rules that were

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>set over the last few months about physical distancing, mask wearing,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>isolating when sick, looking after those who are frail and vulnerable,

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>because these basic principles, backed up by strong public health

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>work at local level, still will be key for the

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>coming months even years, to enable societies to get on

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>top of this pandemic. Dr Nabarro there were trials with

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>vaccines and they told us, for example, Fiser, that you

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>take the first dose and then you have to take

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a second dose after three or four weeks. Does it

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>make a difference, And how much of a difference if

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you delay that second dose by months. What we're seeing

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>now is more and more countries wondering whether a wide

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 1>spread use of a single dose of one of these

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>vaccines may in the end be more effective at helping

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>slow down the pandemic and reduce suffering than making sure

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that everybody receives their two doses at four weeks or

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>so intervals. I am not really at this stage able

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to come out in favor of one option or the other,

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>because they are so situation dependent. The move towards a

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>longer interval between vaccine doses reflects an anxiety in some

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>countries that this situation is so intense that to protect

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>health services, getting single shots into as many people as

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>possible is the only right way to go. But as

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you picked up during the last few days, there's been

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot of controversy over exactly how to go

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>down this quite experimental path. Yeah, there's also a lot

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of controversy and you know, a lot of citizens calling

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>symbolic vaccination programs because a lot of the European countries

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have the vaccines, but they're just not administering them quickly enough.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Would you ask countries to be quicker to find more

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>ways of finding pharmacies for example, to administer these vaccines

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not only hospitals. Yes, So that what this really means

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is that the administration of vaccines must be thoroughly planned.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>We know from so many different campaigns that if you

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have proper planning at local, state, national, regional and

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>global level for the use of scarce vaccines, especially when

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>you're in a crisis situation, you can end up with

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of waste and indeed quite a lot of

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>potential errors being made. I really would like to appeal

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to every leader just to really slow down a bit

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on the rush to get the vaccine into as many

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>arms as possible and put more time into systematic planning

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of what has to be a really effective global operations. David,

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you went right, David, you went right where I want

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to go. I want to go to you on this

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and then the Cliff if we have time dr to borrow.

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>This is real simple. It's about federalism versus state distribution

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>as well. Do you have any optimism or any trek

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>record that the United States can provide a polio equivalent

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or a diphtheria equivalent from a hundred years ago, a

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty years ago. Can we do that with

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the state mess we're in versus a federal application. Well,

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you will anticipate Tom that I'm I'm to have to say,

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not only should they be national and state planning that

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>he's done from the center in the United States, there's

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>also got to be global planning. This is a global

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>pandemic accelerating just because we must have a global response,

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because just because the time day. But I want to,

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like Cliff in here to be sure he has a

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>voice in this cliff. Do you see any ability of

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>President elect Biden to create a more federal mandate in

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>America versus the state centric mandate of President Trump. I

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think the President Biden president like Biden, is going to

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>have much more moral suasion capability, much more talent to

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do that, much more commitment to do that. These are

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>state state programs. We have to get the funding to them,

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we have to enable the infrastructure. But I do think

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a big voice like Ms Merkel has done in Europe

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna probably make a difference in making this more successful.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The only hope we have, and I think we're gonna

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>get not to a good place, but to a much

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>better place than we are right now. We've got to

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>leave it there. We could go all the guess the

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>quality of this with the Top Risks of Eurasia Group.

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>We could do what we could do, like a ten

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>hour show today, Francine, maybe we ought to do that.

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Do a ten hour show, an hour with Dr bar,

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>an hour with Mr Kupchin and uh and Ian Bremer.

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be great. Dr Nabarrow, don't be a stranger.

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us with the world

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Health Organization. There's a special edition of the show this morning.

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Francing and Lakwad in London. I'm Tom Keane in New

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>York and we've been doing this now for a good

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>number of years with Ian Bremer and Cliff Kupchin, Eurasia

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Group chairman is with us right now the Top Risks

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand twenty one, and I can tell you

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that December of two thousand twenty was more than unusual,

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>which makes for must reading of their top risks. Look

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>for that release today by your Asia Group. It is

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>really terse, sharp reading on climate change, wonderful section that

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot, frankly on the hacking and cyber threats,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and I really want to draw your attention to their

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>oil and climate paragraphs. And of course, Daniel, you're going

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to join us in the next hour. My book of

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the year, the New Map. Last year the Top Risks

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of Eurasia Group absolutely nailed the challenges of Europe, not

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>predicting a successful outcome to Brexit. It has come to pass.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe joining us now is a gentleman from Germany

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>with immense perspective on this. Sigmar Gabriel is a former

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>German Foreign Affairs minister, but that barely touches upon his

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>domestic politics of Germany and his association with length of tenure,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>going back to Billy Brant among others, and were thrilled

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that Mr Gabriel could join us this morning. Sigmar Gabriel.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>What will be the legacy of Chancellor miracle and particularly

0:31:54.120 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the replacement of her European leadership christ and good morning

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to everybody. Um. If you ask me how the Germans

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe others in Europe will look back to the

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>chanceorship of Angela Michael, I would say at first that

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>during her term it's at the end, it will be

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen years. She will be seen as a leader which

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>steered Germany through heavy waters in difficult crisis which we

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>were faced with. I remember when we started together at

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the government two thousand thirteen. After a few weeks we

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>had the crimea crisis, then we had the crisis in Greece,

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>then the euro crisis at then the end of the

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>term the refugee crisis. So her her chanceorship will be

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>seen as a successful leading the country and leading Europe

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>through major crisis at the at the beginning of the century.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Click coption just since you've written the top risk, we

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have of course seen a successful Brexit negotiation. How do

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you and Dr Bremer perceive Europe in two thousand twenty one?

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it fractured or can can it coalesce around a theme? Perhaps?

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>And say Mr mccong, we think that the main challenge

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>facing Europe is lack of leadership, that that after the

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 1>real Queen of hero of Angelo Merkel steps down, mccram

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>will take over. He'll be as your episode pre eminent leader. Anyway,

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he will be distracted by his own domestic politics. And

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and we fear that if we're more stimulus money is needed,

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no sort of space for a creative new fiscal deal.

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>That that foreign policy could get very complicated with Turks

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Eastern Mediterranean, and that we could even see

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a resurgence of populism as the scar tissue of COVID

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>really bites into European economies. So where we come out

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on Europe Sigma Gabriel, how do you think Europe should

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>actually engage with China? And depending on investments or a

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 1>cooperation with China will weaken the relationship Europe has with

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the new Biden administration. My first of all, this is

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not a really big agreement. And Europe and China is

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>negotiating about an investment agreement since more than seven years,

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 1>and China always asked the Europeans to to negotiate about

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a real free trade agreement, and the Europeans said no,

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>as long as investments from European countries in China are

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in such difficult they as they were in the past,

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we will not be able to negotiate a real free

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 1>trade agreement. So the precondition was to have a better

0:34:55.560 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and more secure environment for European investments in China. That's

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's first of all, the starting point to these negotiations.

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>You're right looking to the US and the bipartisan approach

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>to China UM. The new President Joe Biden will be

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not happy about this unilateral approach from from Europe to China.

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>On the on the other hand side, I think there

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is enough room for for for a common approach between US, Europe,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:34.359
<v Speaker 1>South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand towards China UM

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>although the countries like Australian others had a much more

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>developed free trade agreement that the Europeans did. During the

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:52.399
<v Speaker 1>last week, so yes, it may be seen um as

0:35:52.520 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a more strategic um autonomous approach from from Europe to China.

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>But but on the on the other hand, I would

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>say there's another room for maneuvers to join hands. Mr

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel Cliff cooptation. There was talking about, you know, a

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>leadership vacuum in Europe once Angelo mercle leaves. Who's the

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>right person to replace mercle or even before that, we

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a big vote on the CDU coming up

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 1>mid January, who's the right person to actually take on

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that role. I totally agree with what the Cliff said.

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>There is no person who will be in the same

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>position in Germany and in Europe as well. Germany is

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>now a period of transition. Uh Merkele will go out

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of her office, Maybe she will more concentrated on Europe

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>as she did during the very hot time of the pandemic.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she will not so um involved in in the

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>German election campaign and more uh in in in in

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the European uh politics because there she is interested to

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have a long, long scene legacy. On the other handside,

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>France of course want to be the new leader of

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Europe after miracle, but the country is in a very

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult economic situation and uh and mccron has challenged in

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the country, so I don't think that he will be

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>so strong to replace Miracle in the leadership of Europe.

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the next elections in France are

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>on the horizon. So that's I think the difficult situation

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. That's why Eurasia is right to put Europe

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at one of the top risks of the year two

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:04.919
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty one. Cliff Cook, what does the Biden administration

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>actually need from Europe in this bit of what in

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>their fight with China? Is there a role that Europe

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>can play well President Biden. President like Biden has has

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>rhetorically really distinguished himself from from current President Trump by

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>arguing the need the multilateralize China policy, but to d

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>risk the US in a way with unilateral sanctions and

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this head to head slug fest that we've been seeing

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>and bring in the EU, Japan, India encouraged China to

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>change these these you know, perceived unfair policies by putting

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a broader squeeze on them, and that is our fourth

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 1>risk actually at US China tensions broaden. Now the Biden

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 1>people were openly discouraging Europe from this this this investment treaty,

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this investment agreement, and it is going to be a setback.

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to need to find ways to

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>put it back together again to move forward with this,

0:39:08.280 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>with with this broad coalition that they have in mind.

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and the risk here is that we will

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>see a global bidding war between Ching and Big and

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden over over allies. Now that may be good

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>for the allies, but it will just increase tension I

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think between the US and and and trying. What we

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 1>really need from Europe is whether the United States really

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>needs from Europe is a creative way that Europe can

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>still benefit from China's large and productive economy, but stay

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in sync with with with the US striving to bring

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>them bring China around. It's gonna be done difficult, Mr Gabriel.

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 1>We're looking at the top risks that erais you group

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.479
<v Speaker 1>sees for two thousand and twenty one, and of course

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that's an international feel. But I've got to turn to

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the German election this year. It's a huge and important

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>generational election. And Chris writer of our Berlin operation, tells

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>me very simply that this could be your Conservatives in

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Greens together. That is unusual, to say the least.

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 1>How do you get a coalition developed in the new Germany,

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the future Germany? I would say the coalition between Conservatives

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Greens is something which should have happened four

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago. If you look to the German society, this

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is the coalition the majority of the Germans want to have.

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Um it was not able because they needed for four

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago the liberals and the rebels had the feeling

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that they would be the fifth wheel on the wagon,

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and so that they decided not to join the government.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And that only was the reason that we have again

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 1>as a coalition between Conservatives and Social Democrats. Normally, four

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago we should have had a conservative green coalition

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>at that time with the Liberals. Now I would say

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the prospect tip is to have a coalition between Conservatives

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Greens without any party. They will need nobody

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and in in in the terms of German politics, it

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 1>will look like the next Grand Coalition, but only the

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>second biggest party will not be the Social Democrats but

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Greens. But so Mr Gabriel is a red red

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Green alliance actually possible. Who has the most to lose

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>on how the pandemic was handled in Germany. Of course

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the government and and especially the person who is responsible

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:39.919
<v Speaker 1>in the government, Yan Spahn. That's the reason I think

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that all the ideas that he would come out as

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the a new candidate for the for the chair of

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the Conservative Party is will not will not be the case.

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:57.359
<v Speaker 1>He's in a in a tough political position. Of course,

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>um many criticism, what what what was done during the

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>last weeks and months. Uh, He's at the center of

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the criticis so I would say, uh, maybe he as

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.719
<v Speaker 1>a person is in the biggest risk to lose, Not

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Angela Merkel and not I would say not the Conservative

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Party as a whole. They will go down a bit

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when people recognize that Miracle will not be the next chancellor. Man,

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you must know, everybody in the political arena knows that

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Miracle will not be the next chance but ordinary citizens

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:38.879
<v Speaker 1>are not very much aware that for the first time

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>they will have to choose between different candidates for the

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>chances office. But at the beginning of spring, people more

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and more were recognized and then the Conservative they will

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>lose uh some percentage in the opinion polls. But at

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the end the Conservative Party will stay at the biggest

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>party and Gemen and you will not have a chance

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to get a coalition but without them, So I'm I

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that that is any opportunity for a

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Green red red coalition with the Greens and the Chances Office.

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for the insights, Mar Gabriel. They're

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a former German for Affairs Minister. On Cliff Kupchin of

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Eurasia with his top risks on good morning everyone, your

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Raisor Group, the top risks of two thousand twenty one.

0:43:31.320 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got fifteen ways to go here with Francis Lacroix

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>on those top risks. Right now we can look at

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the markets up the ascent of the markets for the halves.

0:43:40.160 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a beautiful chart in Eurasia Group on American income

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>disparity and income inequality. Ian Bremer with us right now,

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Eurasia Group President, and and I want to fold in

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>here something you were so pressing on, and that is

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>China and of course a stronger Reran Membi is a

0:43:56.040 --> 0:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>single chart here about you know, crouching dollar in the

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hidden wheak no that we've seen in the dollar right now,

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Dr Bremer, part of this is also the politics of

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>China is noted by the two months absence of Jack

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Ma within capitalism and within his business affairs. What is

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>the symbolism of Jack Ma, unreported to the China US dialogue. Yeah,

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it's quite something. I mean, Jack Ma basically has done

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a better job of antagonizing powerful actors than probably any

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 1>other individual in the world. And you know, that's a

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty dangerous thing to do. It's not illegal, but it's dangerous.

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can ask navalni Uh, the opposition leader

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that was poisoned in Russia about that. Um, it's quite something.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>He's you know, mys incredibly wealthy, he's prescient, he's a

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hero for the average Chinese, and that makes him a

0:44:56.239 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 1>threat and unacceptable to Jun Paying and the leaders of China.

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And also the fact that the Chinese government has decided

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and you look at their coming five your plan, this

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>dual circulation idea where they focus more on domestic consumption

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but also on securing ing Chinese supply chain for critical

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>strategic sectors. And that because they see that the Americans

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>on five G on Huawei, that they've been hitting the

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese pretty hard, and they know that financial technology, fintech

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>where you know and financial that jack Ma has been

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>dominating that is critical strategically to the success of the

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy. The Chinese government that means they want control.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that jack Ma has said these things

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time that this is that this fight

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Americans coming down the pike has really created

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>big problems global finances, global finance. Certainly the purview of

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Dr Bremer, what is the responsibility of Western banks

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and particularly America can too big to fail banks within

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the US Chinese relationship, what should be their action plan?

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 1>For example, on Hong Kong. I mean, the banks that

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>are in Hong Kong aren't going anywhere, uh. They they

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they understand if your HSBC, if your standard chartered, you

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>understand that Hong Kong as a critical node for doing

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>business in mainland China is much more valuable to you

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>and your global business than standing up for Hong Kong

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:35.399
<v Speaker 1>as a Western uh place where your expats can feel

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>comfortable that there's rule of law. So they're dealing with

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Hong Kong no longer has a separate

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>political system. There is no longer any democratic opposition in

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the leg CO in Hong Kong, there is no longer

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>any capacity UM to speak uh your mind in a

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>free and open media. In Hong Kong. It is no

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>longer a Western environment in any way, shape or form.

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The one country that's done something, it's not the banks.

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the UK. Everyone's talked about how many

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 1>mistakes they've made, but they are actually giving a lot

0:47:07.960 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of passports out UM to Hong Kong. Nationals that you

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>know are are basically getting done over by China, by

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government not willing to support one system, one state,

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>two systems. At number two for your top risks, you

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>have long COVID. Are we underestimating how quickly our economies

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>can bounce back once we have the vaccines? UM? I

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're underestimating that in the developed world. I

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the United States rebound will be fast and

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:43.320
<v Speaker 1>very robust. It's just that it's not going to affect

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 1>as many Americans as I think we would like. UM.

0:47:46.960 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>In other words, in the United States. In Europe, there's

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be much more division of are you in the

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>knowledge economy are you not? Are you able to socially

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 1>distance are you not? Are your jobs coming back? Have

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you in evicted from your from your home. How can

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you handle the closure of schools for a year? These

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 1>things are going to have major knock on consequences for

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>inequality and political and social instability across the United States

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and Europe. Where for the developing world, for emerging markets,

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And we talked with Dan You're going a little bit

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.720
<v Speaker 1>about this in the last segment. Um they're not getting

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>vaccines as quickly as the United States and Europe is.

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>They're not bouncing back as quickly, and their budgets are

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>under a lot more strain. So you have divisions inside

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the wealthy economies, and then you have the growing gap

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.560
<v Speaker 1>between rich and poor countries in the world, both of

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:45.400
<v Speaker 1>which play out as long covid in Ian. Thank you

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so much, I and Bremer there of Eurasia group with

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the top risks of your age. Thanks for listening to

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:48:56.680 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keane Before the podcast, you can

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio