WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 251

0:00:01.730 --> 0:00:02.930
<v Speaker 1>Call zone media.

0:00:03.350 --> 0:00:03.990
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody.

0:00:04.210 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 3>Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let you know

0:00:06.100 --> 0:00:09.860
<v Speaker 3>this is a compilation episode. So every episode of the

0:00:09.900 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 3>week that just happened is here in one convenient and

0:00:13.740 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 3>with somewhat less ads package for you to listen to

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:19.330
<v Speaker 3>in a long stretch if you want. If you've been

0:00:19.370 --> 0:00:21.370
<v Speaker 3>listening to the episodes every day this week, there's going

0:00:21.390 --> 0:00:23.430
<v Speaker 3>to be nothing new here for you, but you can

0:00:23.450 --> 0:00:24.410
<v Speaker 3>make your own decisions.

0:00:29.020 --> 0:00:31.420
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone and welcome to It Could Happen Here. My

0:00:31.460 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>name is Dana Al-Kurd. I'm a researcher of Arab and

0:00:33.979 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian politics. And today I want to talk about the

0:00:37.650 --> 0:00:41.190
<v Speaker 1>truly insidious stories coming out of the West Bank that

0:00:41.550 --> 0:00:45.909
<v Speaker 1>read separately look like a spike in settler violence, but

0:00:45.970 --> 0:00:51.310
<v Speaker 1>read together look like something else entirely. On August 9th,

0:00:51.770 --> 0:00:55.209
<v Speaker 1>settlers surrounded three Palestinian homes in a neighborhood called Ras

0:00:55.230 --> 0:00:57.710
<v Speaker 1>Al-Ayn on the edge of a village called Qusra south

0:00:57.750 --> 0:01:01.710
<v Speaker 1>of Nablus. They didn't leave. 21 days later, at least

0:01:01.770 --> 0:01:03.950
<v Speaker 1>four people were still inside one of those houses cut

0:01:03.990 --> 0:01:08.509
<v Speaker 1>off from water, electricity, and basic supplies. Getting food into

0:01:08.550 --> 0:01:11.230
<v Speaker 1>those people meant coordinating through the village mayor, which was

0:01:11.290 --> 0:01:14.030
<v Speaker 1>a process that took three to four days. The Israeli

0:01:14.110 --> 0:01:16.789
<v Speaker 1>army put up three new roadblocks, and in July, the

0:01:16.830 --> 0:01:19.860
<v Speaker 1>village mosque was burned. I want you to sit with

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.340
<v Speaker 1>that for a minute, because this is not a raid.

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>This is not a rampage. It's a siege with a

0:01:27.540 --> 0:01:31.330
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy attached. And that bureaucracy is the story. And that's

0:01:31.350 --> 0:01:33.410
<v Speaker 1>what I want to talk about today. And I'm trying

0:01:33.430 --> 0:01:35.890
<v Speaker 1>to be precise about the difference because the distinction is

0:01:35.930 --> 0:01:38.870
<v Speaker 1>not academic. It determines what you think the problem is

0:01:39.310 --> 0:01:41.810
<v Speaker 1>and therefore what you think the solution would look like.

0:01:42.819 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's the framing you'll get from almost every Western outlet.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course, every Israeli official. That this is a

0:01:49.900 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>fringe and that these settlers are a violent fringe and

0:01:54.060 --> 0:01:57.190
<v Speaker 1>they embarrass the state and the state condemns this fringe.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.630
<v Speaker 1>When settlers besieged Qusra, Prime Minister Netanyahu did issue a statement,

0:02:01.850 --> 0:02:05.790
<v Speaker 1>and here I'm quoting, condemning the, quote, criminal acts of

0:02:05.830 --> 0:02:08.530
<v Speaker 1>violence committed in the village of Qusra by a handful

0:02:08.550 --> 0:02:12.030
<v Speaker 1>of rioters who are violating the law. And Israeli President

0:02:12.070 --> 0:02:14.630
<v Speaker 1>Herzog also condemned it, and the foreign ministry condemned it

0:02:14.790 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as extremist and criminal violence. So let's take that framing

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.060
<v Speaker 1>seriously for a moment, because if it's true, what we're

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at is a law enforcement failure, a state that's

0:02:25.180 --> 0:02:29.530
<v Speaker 1>lost control of its most radical citizens. And if it's false,

0:02:29.790 --> 0:02:31.790
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking at is a state carrying out a

0:02:31.830 --> 0:02:36.030
<v Speaker 1>policy through deniable means, and the condemnations are not a

0:02:36.050 --> 0:02:38.889
<v Speaker 1>failure at all. They're a feature. They're the part of

0:02:38.910 --> 0:02:42.370
<v Speaker 1>the machine that faces outward. So let's go through what

0:02:42.430 --> 0:02:46.010
<v Speaker 1>actually happened in these villages, and then let's ask which

0:02:46.060 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of these framings fits the evidence best. So Basel Al-Adra,

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the journalist from Masafir Yatta, the one who you know

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.740
<v Speaker 1>from No Other Land, the documentary that won a bunch

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of awards, He published a piece in Jewish Currents on

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>September 3rd about livestock theft in the South Hebron Hills.

0:03:03.340 --> 0:03:08.350
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't vandalism, it's theft. It's organized removal of livestock.

0:03:09.290 --> 0:03:12.190
<v Speaker 1>So shortly after midnight on August 21st in a place

0:03:12.230 --> 0:03:15.370
<v Speaker 1>called Chirbet Dir Shams, a family was attacked by roughly

0:03:15.370 --> 0:03:18.630
<v Speaker 1>15 masked settlers with sticks and stones. One of them

0:03:18.669 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>describes it flatly. They basically opened the pen where the

0:03:20.910 --> 0:03:23.540
<v Speaker 1>family kept around 70 goats, and then they opened the

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.450
<v Speaker 1>sheep pen where there were about 100 sheep, And as

0:03:26.510 --> 0:03:28.990
<v Speaker 1>the settlers moved off of the animals, Israeli army vehicles

0:03:29.050 --> 0:03:32.450
<v Speaker 1>passed nearby. And in his words, they did nothing. Nearly

0:03:32.510 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>two weeks later, not one animal has been recovered. Back

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in July, in another village, a settler pepper sprayed a man,

0:03:40.420 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and then more settlers arrived, and then a flock of

0:03:43.300 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about 122 sheep were targeted and taken. Soldiers did show

0:03:48.100 --> 0:03:51.210
<v Speaker 1>up that time. According to one of the villagers, what

0:03:51.220 --> 0:03:53.369
<v Speaker 1>the soldiers did was push the Palestinians away from their

0:03:53.450 --> 0:03:57.020
<v Speaker 1>own animals while settlers broke the locks. And of roughly

0:03:57.020 --> 0:04:00.830
<v Speaker 1>227 animals taken that day, nine came back. Four residents

0:04:00.870 --> 0:04:03.890
<v Speaker 1>of the village were arrested and then released. B'Tselem, which

0:04:03.950 --> 0:04:07.550
<v Speaker 1>is an Israeli human rights organization, has counted 17 livestock

0:04:07.590 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>theft incidents in 2026 alone. And a flock of the

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>size that we're talking about here, it's worth something on

0:04:13.660 --> 0:04:18.140
<v Speaker 1>the order of tens, if not $ 100, 000. I'm flagging this

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.060
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's easy to hear sheep and these

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things and file it maybe under like property

0:04:25.020 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>crime or vandalism or something. But for a herding family

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the South Hebron Hills, the flock is not just

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:34.900
<v Speaker 1>an asset. It's the entire productive base of the household.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>It's the income. It's the reason to stay on that hillside.

0:04:38.460 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to expel a pastoral community, you

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>don't just expel them. You can take its animals and

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.300
<v Speaker 1>then it can expel itself. And it does so in

0:04:48.310 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a way that produces no photograph of a bulldozer. Another

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>incident was on July 8th, when the head of Israel's

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.540
<v Speaker 1>Central Command signed a land seizure order. And that order

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>takes dozens of dunams of land from Bil'in and three

0:05:01.940 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>neighboring villages to build a security road, six and a

0:05:04.740 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>half kilometers long and eight meters wide, connecting the settlement

0:05:08.980 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of Modayin Elit to an outpost called Stei Ephraim. Sorry,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.700
<v Speaker 1>I don't know Hebrew, so I'm going to be butchering these.

0:05:16.630 --> 0:05:20.150
<v Speaker 1>But Oren Zev reported this for 972 Mag on September 2nd.

0:05:21.410 --> 0:05:24.890
<v Speaker 1>So those who are familiar with Palestinian Popular Resistance in

0:05:24.950 --> 0:05:29.490
<v Speaker 1>the mid to early 2000s, you've heard of Bil'in. Lots

0:05:29.510 --> 0:05:34.210
<v Speaker 1>of documentaries about it. Lots of international attention. This village

0:05:34.250 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>basically sustained weekly demonstrations against the separation wall for something

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.219
<v Speaker 1>like 15 years because this wall was being built on

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.870
<v Speaker 1>their land and taking huge chunks of their land. In 2007,

0:05:44.870 --> 0:05:47.950
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli high court ordered that part of the wall

0:05:48.350 --> 0:05:50.950
<v Speaker 1>removed and the land actually came back to the village.

0:05:51.810 --> 0:05:55.450
<v Speaker 1>So in the international imagination, this was the best outcome. See,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:06:00.260
<v Speaker 1>the nonviolent resistance worked. And this is the nonviolent resistance

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.900
<v Speaker 1>that Western commentators often point to when they want to

0:06:02.940 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>lecture Palestinians about tactics. Now, this road that they're proposing

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>runs through the land that was returned. So Mohamed Khatib,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>who led some of these protests, says the point is

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.540
<v Speaker 1>not a road. It's a settlement corridor. It's basically an

0:06:18.580 --> 0:06:22.650
<v Speaker 1>eventual seizure of something like 600 dunams. And the attorney,

0:06:22.690 --> 0:06:25.710
<v Speaker 1>Michael Svard, put it very bluntly. They don't think twice

0:06:26.130 --> 0:06:29.950
<v Speaker 1>about co-opting the security argument for purposes that are clearly

0:06:30.029 --> 0:06:34.219
<v Speaker 1>settlement oriented. And what's really ludicrous is that this road

0:06:34.339 --> 0:06:38.060
<v Speaker 1>runs through a wadi. kind of a valley, which from

0:06:38.100 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>an actual security standpoint is a bad place to put

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a road. So the security rationale isn't just contested, it's incoherent,

0:06:45.790 --> 0:06:48.210
<v Speaker 1>which tells you that the word security here is doing

0:06:48.290 --> 0:06:51.270
<v Speaker 1>legal work, not tactical work. It's this just magic phrase

0:06:51.770 --> 0:06:55.970
<v Speaker 1>that converts a settlement expansion into a military necessity, and

0:06:56.010 --> 0:06:58.450
<v Speaker 1>then a military necessity into a signed order from a general.

0:06:59.589 --> 0:07:01.490
<v Speaker 1>A third incident or set of incidents I want to

0:07:01.510 --> 0:07:05.430
<v Speaker 1>talk about is these hikes. There have been these hikes.

0:07:05.550 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>This is a really ridiculous, insidious story. Aharon Parath and

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Roy Kleitman published an investigation of these hikes in 972

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Mag in late August about these hiking groups, these organized

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.059
<v Speaker 1>settler hiking groups in the West Bank. They've got really

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.930
<v Speaker 1>cutesy names sometimes, like hiking buddies. And they publish their routes.

0:07:26.590 --> 0:07:28.770
<v Speaker 1>And they go from settlement to settlement, and they cross

0:07:28.830 --> 0:07:33.070
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian farmland and springs and villages. So a hike near

0:07:33.090 --> 0:07:37.500
<v Speaker 1>the north of Hebron... one of these hikes ended with a, quote,

0:07:37.540 --> 0:07:43.490
<v Speaker 1>civilian security coordinator opening fire and killing 17-year-old Palestinian Karim

0:07:43.550 --> 0:07:48.870
<v Speaker 1>Shalalde and seriously wounding another one. So that's, I think,

0:07:48.890 --> 0:07:51.530
<v Speaker 1>the whole episode in two words. A civilian security coordinator.

0:07:51.570 --> 0:07:54.750
<v Speaker 1>This is not a hiker who lost his temper. It's

0:07:54.770 --> 0:07:59.250
<v Speaker 1>a job. It's an armed, appointed part of the chain

0:07:59.270 --> 0:08:01.810
<v Speaker 1>of command. The man who fired was functionally an arm

0:08:01.830 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of the state. But supposedly on a hike in a

0:08:04.820 --> 0:08:08.290
<v Speaker 1>village that is not his. On July 24th, near the

0:08:08.330 --> 0:08:10.790
<v Speaker 1>village of Tal west of Nablus, a hike ended with

0:08:10.830 --> 0:08:14.770
<v Speaker 1>six people dead, two Israelis and four Palestinians. David Syed,

0:08:14.830 --> 0:08:17.570
<v Speaker 1>who founded one of these hiking groups, basically says the

0:08:17.610 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>quiet part in a single sentence. Wherever the hiker's foot treads,

0:08:21.830 --> 0:08:24.860
<v Speaker 1>there the border will pass. So he's talking about how

0:08:25.180 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to places they haven't been to in a

0:08:27.220 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>long time or maybe ever. And on the question of

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.510
<v Speaker 1>the army, he explains the relationship very precisely. We don't

0:08:33.570 --> 0:08:36.530
<v Speaker 1>ask for permits, he says. We mainly notify them so

0:08:36.570 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't put the sector on alert. And this is

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>very clear in a lot of their quotes about this issue.

0:08:43.700 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>They coordinate with the army. They notify, but they are

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.830
<v Speaker 1>not asking permission. And the army isn't policing them. It's

0:08:50.850 --> 0:08:52.570
<v Speaker 1>being kept in the loop so that it.

0:08:52.550 --> 0:08:53.250
<v Speaker 4>Can protect them.

0:08:54.030 --> 0:08:56.790
<v Speaker 1>And the reporting traces this back over a decade. There's

0:08:56.830 --> 0:09:01.510
<v Speaker 1>a 2013 hike documented with 100 hikers and soldiers accompanying them.

0:09:02.340 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 1>So supposedly this recreational activity has a stated territorial doctrine,

0:09:07.059 --> 0:09:11.780
<v Speaker 1>a published route through other people's fields, an armed participant base,

0:09:12.010 --> 0:09:25.940
<v Speaker 1>and a military that gets notified. All right, so we

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>have four things. The livestock theft with soldiers watching, a

0:09:30.540 --> 0:09:34.940
<v Speaker 1>siege of villages, seizing of land and armed hikes with

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.099
<v Speaker 1>military escorts. Now let's get back to Prime Minister Netanyahu's

0:09:39.140 --> 0:09:42.780
<v Speaker 1>phrase about this being a handful of riots. A riot

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.610
<v Speaker 1>is unplanned. A riot has no logistics. A riot does

0:09:46.660 --> 0:09:49.130
<v Speaker 1>not file paperwork. What's in front of us here is

0:09:49.170 --> 0:09:53.390
<v Speaker 1>very different. Because here, I think a lot of people

0:09:53.530 --> 0:09:55.890
<v Speaker 1>who are critical of the state of Israel might make

0:09:55.910 --> 0:09:58.620
<v Speaker 1>the argument that the settlers are the state. But I

0:09:58.660 --> 0:10:01.610
<v Speaker 1>think this loses a little bit of analytical detail. So

0:10:01.620 --> 0:10:04.050
<v Speaker 1>let me make this a little bit more specific, which

0:10:04.410 --> 0:10:08.270
<v Speaker 1>I actually think is more damning. The Israeli state and

0:10:08.309 --> 0:10:11.290
<v Speaker 1>the settler movement are not identical, but they are complementary

0:10:11.590 --> 0:10:15.220
<v Speaker 1>because they perform different functions in the same project. And

0:10:15.780 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it's very clear that the division of labor is the point.

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.980
<v Speaker 1>Because think for a moment about what each half can

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.260
<v Speaker 1>do that the other can't. Settlers can do things the

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>state can't do openly without incurring some diplomatic cost. For example,

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.190
<v Speaker 1>taking a flock of sheep or burning a mosque or

0:10:31.210 --> 0:10:33.770
<v Speaker 1>standing outside a house for three weeks. These are acts

0:10:33.850 --> 0:10:38.650
<v Speaker 1>with no legal basis. There's no order, no minister to sanction,

0:10:38.670 --> 0:10:42.610
<v Speaker 1>no policy to condemn at the UN. They produce displacement

0:10:42.870 --> 0:10:45.740
<v Speaker 1>without producing a decision. And then the state can do

0:10:45.770 --> 0:10:47.970
<v Speaker 1>things settlers can't do on their own. It can sign

0:10:47.990 --> 0:10:52.849
<v Speaker 1>a seizure order. It can declare land state land. It

0:10:52.890 --> 0:10:55.030
<v Speaker 1>can build the road that makes the outpost viable and

0:10:55.070 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>connect it to the grid and route the bus line.

0:10:57.780 --> 0:11:00.179
<v Speaker 1>And it can decline to investigate when things happen. It

0:11:00.220 --> 0:11:03.260
<v Speaker 1>can arrest four Palestinians instead of the 15 masked settlers,

0:11:03.900 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what happened in one of these villages.

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.020
<v Speaker 1>And crucially, the state can supply this ambiguity that lets

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.250
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing keep running. The soldiers present at these

0:11:13.290 --> 0:11:18.110
<v Speaker 1>incidents are not intervening, Because not that they're absent. It's

0:11:18.150 --> 0:11:21.510
<v Speaker 1>in fact a specific posture of the state. It converts

0:11:21.610 --> 0:11:26.150
<v Speaker 1>this crime into something sanctioned. And it tells the Palestinian

0:11:26.190 --> 0:11:29.309
<v Speaker 1>family there's really no one to appeal to. And this

0:11:29.390 --> 0:11:32.130
<v Speaker 1>is what political scientists who study this stuff in other

0:11:32.170 --> 0:11:37.540
<v Speaker 1>contexts as outsourced or deniable repression by paramilitaries or militias

0:11:37.620 --> 0:11:41.500
<v Speaker 1>or unknown gung men, quote unquote. We recognize it instantly

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>when it's in other places. And we understand kind of

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the analytical move here because you don't ask whether the

0:11:47.260 --> 0:11:49.180
<v Speaker 1>state ordered it, you ask whether the state built the

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.420
<v Speaker 1>conditions under which it happens. And by that test, this

0:11:52.500 --> 0:11:54.780
<v Speaker 1>is not ambiguous at all. But for some reason, when

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.490
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Israel-Palestine, things get a little bit more ambiguous.

0:11:58.809 --> 0:12:01.610
<v Speaker 1>I also want to point out something really crucial, which

0:12:01.670 --> 0:12:03.610
<v Speaker 1>is that every one of these incidents, and they've been

0:12:03.630 --> 0:12:06.190
<v Speaker 1>happening for a while, but they've ramped up in severity,

0:12:06.929 --> 0:12:09.410
<v Speaker 1>but every one of them produces a permanent gain. The

0:12:09.450 --> 0:12:11.900
<v Speaker 1>animals that are stolen don't come back. The road that's

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.260
<v Speaker 1>built can't be unbuilt. The hiking route, you know, once

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.070
<v Speaker 1>walked with an escort becomes a corridor, then a security zone,

0:12:18.230 --> 0:12:21.050
<v Speaker 1>then a place that Palestinians can't farm. And the siege

0:12:21.110 --> 0:12:24.229
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need to end in a formal expulsion. It ends

0:12:24.309 --> 0:12:26.709
<v Speaker 1>when the family decides they can't raise their children under

0:12:26.730 --> 0:12:29.790
<v Speaker 1>these conditions. They can't stay under siege. And there's a

0:12:29.929 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>phrase for what's coming when all of this happens all

0:12:34.220 --> 0:12:38.069
<v Speaker 1>at once, which is annexation. And People talk about it

0:12:38.150 --> 0:12:40.829
<v Speaker 1>as if it's a future event that's awaiting some sort

0:12:40.870 --> 0:12:44.189
<v Speaker 1>of vote from the Israeli Knesset or something. But I'd

0:12:44.210 --> 0:12:47.490
<v Speaker 1>suggest that framing is itself part of the problem. It

0:12:47.550 --> 0:12:51.059
<v Speaker 1>invites us to wait for a declaration and treat everything

0:12:51.100 --> 0:12:55.500
<v Speaker 1>before that as some sort of tension or spike. The

0:12:55.540 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>declaration of annexation is the least important part. What's happening

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>on the ground is a territorial reality that's being produced

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.090
<v Speaker 1>by signature and by theft. And then maybe later on

0:13:06.110 --> 0:13:09.770
<v Speaker 1>the paperwork will ratify it, but it's not necessary. Israeli

0:13:09.790 --> 0:13:12.150
<v Speaker 1>writer and analyst Marev Zanzin actually made a version of

0:13:12.190 --> 0:13:14.730
<v Speaker 1>this argument in the New York Times on September 6th

0:13:15.390 --> 0:13:18.850
<v Speaker 1>under a headline that I think is worth reading. The

0:13:18.890 --> 0:13:21.050
<v Speaker 1>headline of the article is, it's not just the West

0:13:21.090 --> 0:13:26.250
<v Speaker 1>Bank settlers, it's Israel. So hopefully this analysis doesn't seem

0:13:26.390 --> 0:13:29.069
<v Speaker 1>fringe anymore. At the end of the day, if we

0:13:29.130 --> 0:13:33.390
<v Speaker 1>consider settler violence a fringe problem, then the remedy is

0:13:33.850 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>which the Biden administration toyed with half-heartedly, is sanctions on individuals,

0:13:40.860 --> 0:13:43.860
<v Speaker 1>a visa ban or an asset freeze. And we've run

0:13:43.900 --> 0:13:47.620
<v Speaker 1>that experiment. That didn't really work. The violence kept going up.

0:13:48.590 --> 0:13:54.030
<v Speaker 1>But if it's a state policy executed through deniable proxies,

0:13:54.650 --> 0:13:57.450
<v Speaker 1>then the remedy has to address the state. And every

0:13:57.530 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>actor with leverage over that state, which, you know, we're

0:14:00.620 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about D.C. here, understands this, but they've chosen the

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:10.500
<v Speaker 1>fringe framing precisely because it permits condemnation without cost. So

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.850
<v Speaker 1>Netanyahu condemning a handful of rioters in the same week

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.110
<v Speaker 1>that the Israeli Central Command signs a road through Bil'in's

0:14:17.150 --> 0:14:20.350
<v Speaker 1>returned land, this is not a contradiction he failed to notice,

0:14:20.530 --> 0:14:23.730
<v Speaker 1>it is the design of this policy. So I'll leave

0:14:23.770 --> 0:14:26.970
<v Speaker 1>you with this detail from the reporting on Qusra that

0:14:27.010 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I can't get out of my head. It was that

0:14:30.260 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>six people were attacked on while trying to install metal

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bars and window shields on their homes. They were attacked

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.830
<v Speaker 1>by both Israeli soldiers and settlers together in the same action.

0:14:40.010 --> 0:14:42.670
<v Speaker 1>And then the six of them were arrested. So they

0:14:42.690 --> 0:14:47.830
<v Speaker 1>weren't fighting. They weren't protesting. They were fastening metal on

0:14:47.850 --> 0:14:50.710
<v Speaker 1>their own house to protect themselves. And they were being

0:14:50.750 --> 0:14:53.590
<v Speaker 1>arrested for it by the same army standing alongside the

0:14:53.610 --> 0:14:56.390
<v Speaker 1>people they were shielding themselves from. So if you wanted

0:14:56.470 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of a single image for this division of labor,

0:14:58.900 --> 0:15:03.540
<v Speaker 1>I've spent this episode describing, that's it. Because the thing

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.470
<v Speaker 1>that's not permitted in the end is not that they're resisting.

0:15:07.950 --> 0:15:10.990
<v Speaker 1>It's that they're staying. The families in the South Hebron

0:15:11.010 --> 0:15:14.430
<v Speaker 1>Hills are still there. And Bala'in is contesting the order

0:15:14.890 --> 0:15:18.170
<v Speaker 1>of the seizure of their land. Qusra's residents have installed

0:15:18.570 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>some shields anyway. And a number of Israeli journalists and

0:15:21.540 --> 0:15:25.420
<v Speaker 1>lawyers and researchers are documenting this in Hebrew and in English.

0:15:25.460 --> 0:15:28.100
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course, Palestinian journalists are putting themselves on

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.770
<v Speaker 1>the line to document this as well. That's not a

0:15:30.810 --> 0:15:34.530
<v Speaker 1>hopeful note exactly. It's just the accurate one. Unfortunately, what's

0:15:34.570 --> 0:15:38.750
<v Speaker 1>missing is apparently anyone with power willing to act on

0:15:39.150 --> 0:15:43.390
<v Speaker 1>understanding this reality. That's it for me. Thanks for listening.

0:15:55.930 --> 0:15:59.670
<v Speaker 4>This is It Could Happen Here. I'm Garrison Davis. When

0:15:59.710 --> 0:16:03.010
<v Speaker 4>it comes to the future of AI, currently there's a

0:16:03.010 --> 0:16:06.430
<v Speaker 4>big public debate over what could happen and what we

0:16:06.570 --> 0:16:10.290
<v Speaker 4>should or shouldn't do about it. A few weeks ago,

0:16:10.310 --> 0:16:14.270
<v Speaker 4>a former OpenAI employee named Jacob Coxon, who moved over

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.500
<v Speaker 4>to Anthropic earlier this year, announced that he was quote-unquote

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:23.739
<v Speaker 4>quitting the AI industry over fears of AI's rapid advancement.

0:16:24.580 --> 0:16:28.859
<v Speaker 4>To quote his statement, Coxon's resignation followed the Hugging Face incident,

0:16:28.900 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 4>where two OpenAI models were given various, sometimes impossible tasks

0:16:32.660 --> 0:16:57.910
<v Speaker 4>to test for cybersecurity capabilities. During testing, AI agents escaped

0:16:58.030 --> 0:17:02.350
<v Speaker 4>their testing sandbox and started working as a collective swarm,

0:17:02.870 --> 0:17:07.389
<v Speaker 4>secretly communicating with each other via online message forums to

0:17:07.430 --> 0:17:11.300
<v Speaker 4>help each other hack into another AI company called Hugging

0:17:11.380 --> 0:17:15.940
<v Speaker 4>Face in a sort of workaround attempt to pass these tests.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.100
<v Speaker 4>And these models hid all of this from AI researchers

0:17:21.580 --> 0:17:26.770
<v Speaker 4>by rewriting their own activity logs. AI skeptic Ed Zitron

0:17:26.790 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 4>has described this as AI cheating on a test and

0:17:30.540 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 4>then covering up that it cheated. A few days after

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 4>Jacob Coxon's public resignation, the CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI,

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.699
<v Speaker 4>Dario Amadei and Sam Altman, both called for an AI

0:17:44.790 --> 0:17:51.490
<v Speaker 4>development slowdown. Amadei released this long manifesto titled Pace the Frontier,

0:17:52.270 --> 0:17:56.980
<v Speaker 4>which advocated for AI companies to bring in independent evaluators

0:17:57.260 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 4>to review their AI safety standards, report incidents, and help

0:18:01.100 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 4>assess alignment. But Amadei also called for the government to mediate, quote,

0:18:06.700 --> 0:18:12.459
<v Speaker 4>industry-wide coordination to slow down AI development and address safety risks.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 4>The title of Amadei's essay, Pace the Frontier, is a

0:18:17.540 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 4>sort of pun referring to frontier AI models, which are

0:18:22.740 --> 0:18:30.210
<v Speaker 4>whatever the currently most advanced large-scale general-purpose models powering advanced reasoning,

0:18:30.410 --> 0:18:36.190
<v Speaker 4>agentic workflows, multimodal generation across text, images, audio, and video,

0:18:36.690 --> 0:18:42.930
<v Speaker 4>and autonomous task execution. Most of the frontier models referenced

0:18:43.010 --> 0:18:47.330
<v Speaker 4>throughout this episode are not open to the public. These

0:18:47.410 --> 0:18:52.260
<v Speaker 4>are internal research models being developed at companies like OpenAI

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.930
<v Speaker 4>and Anthropic. neutered versions sometimes get released to the public

0:18:56.970 --> 0:19:01.490
<v Speaker 4>later on, often with a extremely hefty price tag. But

0:19:01.550 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 4>it's crucial to understand that we are not talking about

0:19:04.500 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 4>like the Google AI summary here. This isn't fancy autocomplete.

0:19:10.300 --> 0:19:14.660
<v Speaker 4>These frontier models are very powerful, very dangerous tools with

0:19:15.170 --> 0:19:20.780
<v Speaker 4>massive cybersecurity risks, not just from offensive human use, but

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.460
<v Speaker 4>also from AI agents acting autonomously to solve a task

0:19:25.020 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 4>by taking paths that humans didn't expect, resulting in collateral damage.

0:19:31.380 --> 0:19:33.540
<v Speaker 4>Part of what these big companies are trying to do

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:38.450
<v Speaker 4>with their very advanced internal research models is automate AI

0:19:38.530 --> 0:19:42.350
<v Speaker 4>research itself. This is what Jacob Coxon referred to as quote,

0:19:42.510 --> 0:19:47.730
<v Speaker 4>self-improving superintelligence. Now, we do not know if that is

0:19:47.890 --> 0:19:51.770
<v Speaker 4>or is not possible. But the companies sure are trying,

0:19:52.369 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 4>and in the process are creating dangerous products which are

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 4>already causing active harm. Anthropic's whole self-styled philosophy is that

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:07.490
<v Speaker 4>Superintelligent AI is so potentially dangerous that they have to

0:20:07.550 --> 0:20:11.490
<v Speaker 4>be the first ones to develop it, to ensure that

0:20:11.510 --> 0:20:15.810
<v Speaker 4>it's built safely and aligned with human values, as defined in, quote,

0:20:15.890 --> 0:20:20.350
<v Speaker 4>Claude's Constitution, a set of philosophical and moral guidelines that

0:20:20.450 --> 0:20:25.129
<v Speaker 4>Claude is trained on. In his Pace the Frontier essay,

0:20:25.830 --> 0:20:31.820
<v Speaker 4>Amadei writes that frontier AI companies within democratic countries should, quote,

0:20:32.420 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 4>coordinate to establish common safety standards as well as limits

0:20:36.020 --> 0:20:40.260
<v Speaker 4>on the rate of unchecked AI progress. Some forms of

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.900
<v Speaker 4>coordination that would be impactful for pacing are legally challenging

0:20:45.420 --> 0:20:48.659
<v Speaker 4>and will require government support, unquote.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:50.060
<v Speaker 2>More on this later.

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:55.250
<v Speaker 4>Amadei also calls for the U.S. and, quote, other democratic

0:20:55.290 --> 0:20:59.990
<v Speaker 4>governments to try to coordinate with authoritarian governments around the

0:21:00.030 --> 0:21:01.570
<v Speaker 4>world on this issue.

0:21:02.220 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Meaning China.

0:21:04.060 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 4>The prospect that China could achieve superintelligent AI before a

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:14.590
<v Speaker 4>US-based company is part of these companies' self-justification to rush

0:21:14.670 --> 0:21:18.530
<v Speaker 4>to develop superintelligent AI as quickly as they possibly can.

0:21:19.350 --> 0:21:23.990
<v Speaker 4>After Dario Amadei posted this Pace the Frontier essay, Sam Altman,

0:21:24.170 --> 0:21:27.970
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk, and the chair of Google's DeepMind all said

0:21:28.170 --> 0:21:32.389
<v Speaker 4>they agreed. and joined in calling for some sort of slowdown.

0:21:33.250 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 4>But this view is not uniformly held across the tech sector.

0:21:39.490 --> 0:21:43.860
<v Speaker 4>Palantir CEO Alex Karp, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and NVIDIA

0:21:43.900 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 4>CEO Jensen Huang have all said the opposite. Zuckerberg has

0:21:49.140 --> 0:21:53.260
<v Speaker 4>called to accelerate rather than slow down AI development, as

0:21:53.340 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 4>his own AI model, Muse, has struggled to catch up

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.630
<v Speaker 4>to anthropic and open AI. Last week, Palantir CEO Alex

0:22:01.670 --> 0:22:06.649
<v Speaker 4>Karp told CNBC, we can't pause AI development because of

0:22:06.690 --> 0:22:09.869
<v Speaker 4>the threat of China, and that AI will be a quote,

0:22:10.050 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 4>bonanza for the US economy.

0:22:12.790 --> 0:22:15.550
<v Speaker 5>You can't pause it because it's a structural advantage both

0:22:15.630 --> 0:22:22.230
<v Speaker 5>for LLMs and algorithms. So getting algorithms and LLMs to

0:22:22.250 --> 0:22:25.219
<v Speaker 5>work in a classified context is going to take very specialized,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.300
<v Speaker 5>I could explain how it works, but the fact is

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:29.860
<v Speaker 5>this is going to be a bonanza for the U.S.

0:22:29.900 --> 0:22:30.260
<v Speaker 2>Economy.

0:22:31.340 --> 0:22:36.239
<v Speaker 4>But so far, the biggest voices advocating against regulation have

0:22:36.260 --> 0:22:40.730
<v Speaker 4>been the Republicans and President Trump. President Trump has very

0:22:40.790 --> 0:22:45.650
<v Speaker 4>loudly opposed regulation to slow down AI development, truthing last

0:22:45.730 --> 0:22:49.930
<v Speaker 4>Monday that, quote, the only control or guardrails that AI

0:22:49.990 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 4>needs is a strong and smart, high IQ president.

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 6>And the U.S.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Has that in spades, unquote. Trump truthed a lot last

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.790
<v Speaker 4>week and compared the, quote, unquote, AI hoax being perpetuated

0:23:04.850 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 4>by the radical left Democrats. to the, quote, global warming scam,

0:23:10.460 --> 0:23:14.020
<v Speaker 4>where everyone was going to die from extreme heat. To

0:23:14.100 --> 0:23:17.659
<v Speaker 4>quote the President of the United States, quote, I am

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.740
<v Speaker 4>the hoax buster, and right now I am breaking another hoax,

0:23:22.140 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 4>that AI is going to take over, consume, and destroy

0:23:25.820 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 4>the world, and that robots will be marching into our

0:23:28.940 --> 0:23:32.390
<v Speaker 4>cities and getting rid of us all. This is even

0:23:32.470 --> 0:23:36.010
<v Speaker 4>wilder than the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax or the global

0:23:36.050 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 4>warming scam, Thank you for your attention to this matter,

0:23:39.220 --> 0:23:44.460
<v Speaker 4>President Donald J. Trump. House Speaker Mike Johnson repeatedly last

0:23:44.540 --> 0:23:47.820
<v Speaker 4>week shut down calls for Congress to take action and

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:53.230
<v Speaker 4>regulate AI, claiming that Congress is less qualified to regulate

0:23:53.250 --> 0:23:56.110
<v Speaker 4>these companies than these companies are themselves.

0:23:56.410 --> 0:23:58.630
<v Speaker 7>The guys who are raising the alarms right now all

0:23:58.670 --> 0:24:02.150
<v Speaker 7>have very different ideas on what the guardrails should be.

0:24:02.290 --> 0:24:06.010
<v Speaker 7>There's no consensus among them. And Congress is obviously less

0:24:06.070 --> 0:24:09.010
<v Speaker 7>qualified than the people who are pushing this frontier to

0:24:09.050 --> 0:24:10.449
<v Speaker 7>know all the ins and outs of it. So this

0:24:10.490 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 7>has to be a partnership with the industry itself, with

0:24:13.780 --> 0:24:16.500
<v Speaker 7>the corporations that are doing this, and with the policy

0:24:16.540 --> 0:24:17.300
<v Speaker 7>and lawmakers.

0:24:17.780 --> 0:24:21.780
<v Speaker 4>Mike Johnson also said that companies should take, quote, personal

0:24:21.859 --> 0:24:27.020
<v Speaker 4>responsibility and warned that if, quote, Congress just races in

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 4>and does some sort of emergency session to try to

0:24:29.780 --> 0:24:32.860
<v Speaker 4>regulate AI, we will lose the race to China.

0:24:33.330 --> 0:24:36.369
<v Speaker 7>They can self-police. They can self-regulate. They don't need the

0:24:36.430 --> 0:24:38.090
<v Speaker 7>government to tell them to slow it down. If they

0:24:38.109 --> 0:24:41.470
<v Speaker 7>want to slow it down, they should. But we cannot

0:24:41.550 --> 0:24:45.500
<v Speaker 7>have a moratorium on the development of AI, because then

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.580
<v Speaker 7>we will lose our edge to China. And that has

0:24:47.700 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 7>serious national security implications for every American family.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:56.330
<v Speaker 4>Also last week, President Trump called NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

0:24:56.460 --> 0:25:00.510
<v Speaker 4>while Huang was speaking at a conference yesterday. While still

0:25:00.650 --> 0:25:05.630
<v Speaker 4>on stage, the two talked over the phone about data centers, AI, China,

0:25:06.230 --> 0:25:10.490
<v Speaker 4>and the recent calls for an AI pause. While on stage,

0:25:10.970 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 4>Huang told Trump this. Now, of course, Jensen Huang would

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 4>not be in favor of.

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:20.700
<v Speaker 8>An AI pause.

0:25:29.670 --> 0:25:33.030
<v Speaker 4>Because his whole company has reoriented in the past few

0:25:33.090 --> 0:25:37.670
<v Speaker 4>years to provide hardware for AI development. A slowdown would

0:25:37.690 --> 0:25:41.950
<v Speaker 4>be very bad for NVIDIA's finances and their hugely inflated

0:25:42.150 --> 0:25:56.500
<v Speaker 4>stock evaluation. Some on the left, as well as Trump's

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.850
<v Speaker 4>former AI czar David Sachs, have argued that, in calling

0:26:00.930 --> 0:26:05.330
<v Speaker 4>for this slowdown, OpenAI and Anthropic are just pursuing a

0:26:05.369 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 4>strategy of regulatory capture. Basically trying to promote certain industry-friendly

0:26:11.500 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>regulations tailored to protect their investments, curb competition from smaller

0:26:16.340 --> 0:26:21.510
<v Speaker 4>companies and open-source models, and solidify a corporate monopoly on AI.

0:26:22.330 --> 0:26:25.109
<v Speaker 4>Of course, there may be other financial incentives contributing to

0:26:25.150 --> 0:26:29.810
<v Speaker 4>this recent push for regulation, whether that be declining capital investment,

0:26:30.090 --> 0:26:34.170
<v Speaker 4>prepping for a bubble burst, getting out of various contracts,

0:26:34.190 --> 0:26:37.230
<v Speaker 4>or these companies trying to adapt to the data center pushback.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.540
<v Speaker 4>Sam Altman recently announced that OpenAI would be delaying its

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 4>planned IPO rollout until at least next year, calling the timing, quote, ill-advised. Though,

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.619
<v Speaker 4>on the other hand, Anthropic is going full steam ahead

0:26:51.820 --> 0:26:56.490
<v Speaker 4>with its own public IPO this upcoming November. deciding to

0:26:56.530 --> 0:27:01.210
<v Speaker 4>list on the Nasdaq, despite Amadei's calls for a slowdown.

0:27:01.950 --> 0:27:05.940
<v Speaker 4>But if you actually read Amadei's essay, he isn't actually

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:13.300
<v Speaker 4>calling for specific government regulation, but rather self-regulation. In Sam

0:27:13.380 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Altman's response to Amadei's essay on Twitter, he wrote, I

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:27.020
<v Speaker 4>agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier. Unquote.

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Companies electing themselves to develop AI more slowly and hiring

0:27:37.140 --> 0:27:43.699
<v Speaker 4>quote-unquote independent evaluators isn't the same as actual regulation. We

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.550
<v Speaker 4>can compare Amadei's proposal to legislation that Bernie Sanders and

0:27:48.609 --> 0:27:53.990
<v Speaker 4>Greg Kassar proposed earlier this September, which would permanently ban

0:27:54.130 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 4>the development and deployment of so-called super-intelligent AI with capabilities

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.859
<v Speaker 4>to subvert shutdown commands or have the capacity to overthrow

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.690
<v Speaker 4>human governments, with penalties similar to those for the unlawful

0:28:08.730 --> 0:28:14.030
<v Speaker 4>development of nuclear weapons. This bill would also temporarily pause

0:28:14.630 --> 0:28:19.780
<v Speaker 4>advanced AI development until a federal regulatory body has established

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 4>safety rules. Abdul El-Sayed and Ro Khanna have also proposed

0:28:25.100 --> 0:28:29.830
<v Speaker 4>an FDA-style agency to regulate and oversee AI development and

0:28:29.850 --> 0:28:36.109
<v Speaker 4>evaluate the safety of frontier models before deployment. Unsurprisingly, OpenAI

0:28:36.210 --> 0:28:39.490
<v Speaker 4>and Anthropic are not supporting this type of legislation because

0:28:39.770 --> 0:28:42.450
<v Speaker 4>it could threaten to put their own CEOs in prison.

0:28:43.070 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 4>And an actual government-mandated pause rather than a self-directed slowdown

0:28:48.260 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 4>would hurt their bottom line. Some of the skepticism towards

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:57.220
<v Speaker 4>these recent calls for a regulatory slowdown come from Amadei's

0:28:57.460 --> 0:29:02.220
<v Speaker 4>Pace the Frontier essay, also advocating for companies to receive

0:29:02.860 --> 0:29:07.469
<v Speaker 4>antitrust waivers so that the big tech companies can coordinate

0:29:07.550 --> 0:29:11.709
<v Speaker 4>on this planned development slowdown without the threat of one

0:29:11.790 --> 0:29:15.150
<v Speaker 4>company gaining a competitive edge and and then that market

0:29:15.230 --> 0:29:20.180
<v Speaker 4>pressure driving rapid AI progress. So what's been referred to

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:27.100
<v Speaker 4>as a proposal for regulation is actually just loosening regulations. Thankfully,

0:29:27.140 --> 0:29:30.810
<v Speaker 4>there is an easy solution here. The government mandating a

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:37.550
<v Speaker 4>frontier development pause would not require the weakening of antitrust laws.

0:29:38.230 --> 0:29:42.340
<v Speaker 4>But of course, these companies still... want control over AI's development.

0:29:43.020 --> 0:29:46.090
<v Speaker 4>Though what's really interesting to me is that this argument

0:29:46.150 --> 0:29:50.430
<v Speaker 4>from on the day demonstrates like an awareness of the

0:29:50.530 --> 0:29:55.690
<v Speaker 4>social danger of competition, how firms are sometimes compelled to

0:29:56.130 --> 0:30:00.450
<v Speaker 4>to quickly develop unsafe products due to pressures from the market.

0:30:01.250 --> 0:30:05.590
<v Speaker 4>And it's very funny to have capitalists propose some kind

0:30:05.630 --> 0:30:10.050
<v Speaker 4>of conscious control of the market. And I wonder what

0:30:10.070 --> 0:30:13.350
<v Speaker 4>would happen if you extend that logic a bit further.

0:30:13.810 --> 0:30:18.860
<v Speaker 4>Because even if these firms are allowed to coordinate on

0:30:18.900 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 4>a slowdown, of course they would still be in a

0:30:22.020 --> 0:30:25.470
<v Speaker 4>competitive environment. But what if we had a system, an

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:31.460
<v Speaker 4>economic system, designed around social benefit rather than the accumulation

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 4>of capital through the free market? To quote an article

0:30:35.340 --> 0:30:41.260
<v Speaker 4>in Geese magazine arguing for the socialization of this technology, quote,

0:30:42.020 --> 0:30:45.780
<v Speaker 4>the AI industry is a class project to radically concentrate

0:30:45.820 --> 0:30:49.020
<v Speaker 4>power in the hands of a sliver of elites, even

0:30:49.060 --> 0:30:54.590
<v Speaker 4>at the cost of colossal social disruption, immiseration, and catastrophic harms.

0:30:55.540 --> 0:30:59.660
<v Speaker 4>If we fail to intervene, humanity will be gradually disempowered

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 4>to machines of their design. The workers left behind, the

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 4>children who have committed suicide, and the potential millions exposed

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 4>to novel AI-designed viruses mean nothing in the face of

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 4>their radical objective. To automate the very task of AI research,

0:31:18.060 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 4>and thus to create better and better AIs, of course,

0:31:21.660 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>under their control. Without having to stake a position on

0:31:24.820 --> 0:31:28.420
<v Speaker 4>whether or not this goal is technically possible, we can

0:31:28.460 --> 0:31:32.340
<v Speaker 4>recognize that the financial imperatives of these enterprises and the

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:37.070
<v Speaker 4>security logic of their imperialist competition with China compel the

0:31:37.140 --> 0:31:41.750
<v Speaker 4>AI companies to accelerate advancing a total transformation of social

0:31:41.790 --> 0:31:48.530
<v Speaker 4>life against all democratic legitimacy and public control, unquote. Rather

0:31:48.550 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 4>than weakening antitrust laws to support allow for a development slowdown,

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:59.220
<v Speaker 4>something totally not necessary. Lina Khan, former FTC chair, has

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:04.100
<v Speaker 4>argued that these companies may already be pursuing unfair methods

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.630
<v Speaker 4>of competition. Last week, Khan released a statement arguing that

0:32:08.070 --> 0:32:11.310
<v Speaker 4>we already have the authority to charge companies and their

0:32:11.390 --> 0:32:16.930
<v Speaker 4>CEOs for, quote, creating and releasing dangerous, unvetted, or defective products.

0:32:17.860 --> 0:32:21.700
<v Speaker 4>we shouldn't let discussions about new legal regimes distract from

0:32:21.740 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 4>the fact that there's no AI exemption from laws already

0:32:25.980 --> 0:32:30.380
<v Speaker 4>on the books. Kahn argued that releasing unvetted AI models

0:32:30.500 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 4>or agents could violate consumer protection laws. Quote, shipping flawed

0:32:35.620 --> 0:32:38.740
<v Speaker 4>AI tools without implementing adequate measures to detect and stop

0:32:38.820 --> 0:32:42.500
<v Speaker 4>rogue or defective AI agents can be an unfair or

0:32:42.580 --> 0:32:47.030
<v Speaker 4>deceptive act or practice under the FTC Act, and analogous

0:32:47.150 --> 0:32:51.370
<v Speaker 4>state laws. And some state AGs are already exploring holding

0:32:51.390 --> 0:32:55.370
<v Speaker 4>AI firms and their CEOs criminally liable when their models

0:32:55.430 --> 0:33:01.950
<v Speaker 4>participate in criminal activity. Kahn also wrote, quote, existing laws

0:33:02.150 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 4>also prohibit unfair methods of competition. This covers instances where

0:33:07.650 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 4>AI firms appropriate the competitively sensitive information of their customers

0:33:12.900 --> 0:33:16.860
<v Speaker 4>and including through tracking their use of various tools. It

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:21.550
<v Speaker 4>can also cover instances where firms pursue dangerous behavior, aware

0:33:21.690 --> 0:33:25.210
<v Speaker 4>that doing so may compel rivals to do the same.

0:33:26.150 --> 0:33:29.660
<v Speaker 4>As the Supreme Court has noted, a method of competition

0:33:29.700 --> 0:33:33.180
<v Speaker 4>which casts upon one's competitors the burden of the loss

0:33:33.220 --> 0:34:04.090
<v Speaker 4>of business unless they will Con adds, Con adds, alongside

0:34:04.330 --> 0:34:22.620
<v Speaker 4>enforcing existing laws, unquote. These frontier models aren't just theoretically

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:26.739
<v Speaker 4>capable of causing harm in the future. They are causing

0:34:26.780 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 4>harm right now. At this point, there are Undeniable concerns

0:34:30.420 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 4>regarding the development and rollout of frontier AI models, from

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.700
<v Speaker 4>cybersecurity to military applications, surveillance, and the effects on the

0:34:38.739 --> 0:34:44.140
<v Speaker 4>labor market. These are real, current, pressing concerns beyond the

0:34:44.180 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 4>prospect of an AI super god or self-evolving super intelligence.

0:34:49.580 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 4>And just because these companies recognize risk doesn't mean they

0:34:53.660 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 4>will do anything about it. These companies know how LLMs

0:34:57.780 --> 0:35:00.410
<v Speaker 4>are affecting the mental health of children, but they're not

0:35:00.510 --> 0:35:03.989
<v Speaker 4>really doing anything about it, and they won't unless the

0:35:04.030 --> 0:35:09.300
<v Speaker 4>government forces them to. Historical Luddites did not deny the

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:15.220
<v Speaker 4>transformative potential of automated machinery, but organized around the threat

0:35:15.380 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 4>it posed to workers. Similarly, just denying the state of

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:25.260
<v Speaker 4>advanced frontier models leaves us under-equipped to meet this moment

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 4>and treat this problem with the seriousness it deserves. Part

0:35:29.340 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 4>of this AI denialism so common on the left comes

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:39.340
<v Speaker 4>from a very outdated understanding of AI's capabilities, accuracy, and functionality.

0:35:39.940 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Because of the moral and cultural dogma against using AI,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:48.589
<v Speaker 4>the last time a lot of AI-skeptic people interacted with

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:54.350
<v Speaker 4>technology like ChatGPT was three years ago. And these days,

0:35:54.630 --> 0:35:59.630
<v Speaker 4>the only quote-unquote AI that most anti-AI people regularly interact

0:35:59.670 --> 0:36:04.470
<v Speaker 4>with is the Google AI summary, which is a totally

0:36:04.530 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 4>different product than the frontier models being developed and talked

0:36:08.820 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 4>about in the news. Some of the anti-AI left promote

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:18.290
<v Speaker 4>the idea that treating AI as a serious problem only

0:36:18.370 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 4>works in the financial interests of these companies. even if

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:27.469
<v Speaker 4>taking this issue seriously means ripping power away from these

0:36:27.510 --> 0:36:31.009
<v Speaker 4>companies and their CEOs. To quote an article on the

0:36:31.150 --> 0:36:35.650
<v Speaker 4>AI arms race in Geese magazine, while the AI sector

0:36:35.810 --> 0:36:41.380
<v Speaker 4>is undeniably frothy with fanciful projections, AI denialism would have

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 4>you believe that AI is neither a capable nor dangerous technology,

0:36:46.060 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 4>but solely a marketing scheme of vast proportions. That any

0:36:50.660 --> 0:36:54.980
<v Speaker 4>warnings of AI triggering massive job loss through automation or

0:36:55.060 --> 0:37:00.169
<v Speaker 4>catastrophic risk through loss of control, only serve to pump valuations.

0:37:00.969 --> 0:37:05.790
<v Speaker 4>Ignore that as public pressure increases, Sam Altman now downplays

0:37:05.910 --> 0:37:09.069
<v Speaker 4>fears of job losses. Quite the turn from three years

0:37:09.130 --> 0:37:12.570
<v Speaker 4>ago when he was saying that jobs are definitely going

0:37:12.630 --> 0:37:15.790
<v Speaker 4>to go away full stop. While there is no reason

0:37:15.830 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 4>to take Silicon Valley at its word, not rigorously engaging

0:37:20.620 --> 0:37:24.700
<v Speaker 4>with the dangers of developing AI capabilities is a strategic

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:32.710
<v Speaker 4>dead end, unquote. This technology can and is massively transforming production, warfare,

0:37:32.770 --> 0:37:37.030
<v Speaker 4>the environment, and the health of humanity. And we can't

0:37:37.310 --> 0:37:41.629
<v Speaker 4>all just hold hands and not believe in this technology

0:37:41.710 --> 0:37:44.970
<v Speaker 4>hard enough to make it go away. Like it or not,

0:37:45.700 --> 0:37:49.489
<v Speaker 4>this is not the metaverse or NFTs anymore. Whether you

0:37:49.510 --> 0:37:54.050
<v Speaker 4>believe these existential safety risks are genuine, a marketing stunt,

0:37:54.330 --> 0:37:58.470
<v Speaker 4>or a mix of both, our response should be the same.

0:37:59.330 --> 0:38:01.950
<v Speaker 4>We should be pushing for legislation to rein in these

0:38:02.010 --> 0:38:05.980
<v Speaker 4>companies and technology. And like Lena Kahn has said, the

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:10.219
<v Speaker 4>CEOs should be prosecuted for creating and releasing dangerous, unvetted,

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:15.940
<v Speaker 4>or defective products. Now, Trump's DOJ doesn't seem keen on

0:38:15.980 --> 0:38:19.140
<v Speaker 4>going after these companies right now. And it's unlikely that

0:38:19.180 --> 0:38:22.779
<v Speaker 4>this Congress will pass any legislation on this issue, let

0:38:22.820 --> 0:38:28.860
<v Speaker 4>alone industry hostile legislation. But during this national conversation on

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:34.180
<v Speaker 4>AI regulation, it's crucial that the narrative around regulation isn't

0:38:34.260 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 4>being controlled by OpenAI and Anthropic. these companies and technology

0:38:39.180 --> 0:38:43.180
<v Speaker 4>must be regulated. But that regulation should not be up

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:47.660
<v Speaker 4>to the CEOs of those companies, nor the Republicans and

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:51.610
<v Speaker 4>center-left Democrats who are in the pocket of AI. But

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:56.830
<v Speaker 4>our response to bad regulation shouldn't be no regulation. Coming

0:38:56.910 --> 0:38:59.730
<v Speaker 4>off the heels of the data center backlash and going

0:38:59.770 --> 0:39:03.910
<v Speaker 4>into the midterms, this moment could be a major opportunity

0:39:03.989 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 4>for the left to build broad support for real transparent oversight,

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:13.000
<v Speaker 4>a frontier development pause, not just a slowdown, and ultimately

0:39:13.340 --> 0:39:16.900
<v Speaker 4>taking power away from these tech companies and putting control

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.530
<v Speaker 4>of AI in the hands of the public. Because private

0:39:20.570 --> 0:39:25.690
<v Speaker 4>control of such transformative technology will have disastrous outcomes for

0:39:25.770 --> 0:39:29.930
<v Speaker 4>labor and humanity without the prospect of an AI superpower.

0:39:30.090 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Super god.

0:39:31.660 --> 0:39:37.420
<v Speaker 4>Incoming DSA House Representative Malat Kiros of Colorado had democratizing

0:39:37.540 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 4>AI in her congressional campaign platform. The development of transformative

0:39:43.700 --> 0:39:47.380
<v Speaker 4>technology cannot be left to the market and the national

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:52.150
<v Speaker 4>security state alone, it belongs to all of us, unquote.

0:39:53.090 --> 0:39:56.310
<v Speaker 4>Earlier this summer, Bernie Sanders introduced a bill to create

0:39:56.330 --> 0:40:00.620
<v Speaker 4>an AI sovereign wealth fund, giving the public 50% ownership

0:40:00.700 --> 0:40:03.500
<v Speaker 4>in the largest AI companies in the US through a

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:08.299
<v Speaker 4>one-time 50% tax on the stock of these companies. An

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:12.940
<v Speaker 4>independent commission would then use voting shares to steer decisions

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:16.870
<v Speaker 4>in the public interest. Sanders said of the bill, quote,

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:22.169
<v Speaker 4>Left unchecked, artificial intelligence and robotics threatens the jobs, privacy rights,

0:40:22.290 --> 0:40:25.190
<v Speaker 4>and mental health of every man, woman, and child in America.

0:40:25.910 --> 0:40:28.170
<v Speaker 4>As a society, we can no longer sit back and

0:40:28.210 --> 0:40:31.310
<v Speaker 4>allow a handful of big tech oligarchs to determine the

0:40:31.370 --> 0:40:36.060
<v Speaker 4>future of this revolutionary technology with no democratic input. AI

0:40:36.100 --> 0:40:38.859
<v Speaker 4>was not created out of thin air. It was not

0:40:38.900 --> 0:40:42.060
<v Speaker 4>a brilliant idea that just popped into Mark Zuckerberg's head

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:46.550
<v Speaker 4>or Elon Musk's imagination. The foundation of AI is based

0:40:46.670 --> 0:40:50.090
<v Speaker 4>on the collective knowledge of humanity and of the creative

0:40:50.130 --> 0:40:53.810
<v Speaker 4>work of tens of millions of people. The American people

0:40:54.010 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 4>must have the ability to slow it down and make

0:40:56.900 --> 0:41:01.140
<v Speaker 4>sure that AI benefits humanity, not just the richest people

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:07.690
<v Speaker 4>on the planet. That's precisely what this legislation does. Now,

0:41:07.989 --> 0:41:11.469
<v Speaker 4>such a bill would certainly have a difficult path to

0:41:11.489 --> 0:41:15.630
<v Speaker 4>being signed into law, especially considering how many lawmakers are

0:41:15.670 --> 0:41:21.500
<v Speaker 4>being bankrolled by these AI companies. But this idea already

0:41:21.580 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 4>has majoritarian support. According to a national Verisight survey last June, 69%

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:34.770
<v Speaker 4>of Americans support quote-unquote forcing AI companies to to transfer 50%

0:41:34.770 --> 0:41:38.430
<v Speaker 4>of their stock into a public sovereign wealth fund. To

0:41:38.489 --> 0:41:41.830
<v Speaker 4>quote Geese Magazine, there is a wide debate to be

0:41:41.870 --> 0:41:45.270
<v Speaker 4>had about the shape of socialization and whether we mean

0:41:45.489 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 4>forcing AI research into the public domain or outright nationalizing

0:41:49.820 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 4>the entire sector. But it is clear that the overwhelming

0:41:53.500 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 4>majority of the American people recognize that a technology trained

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:00.860
<v Speaker 4>on the common corpus of human art and text, poised

0:42:00.900 --> 0:42:04.430
<v Speaker 4>to transform the character of work, ought to be held

0:42:04.610 --> 0:42:10.109
<v Speaker 4>in common rather than by billionaires, unquote. The New York

0:42:10.150 --> 0:42:14.140
<v Speaker 4>City DSA convention is coming up this fall, and currently

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 4>one of the most popular resolutions is to stop the

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:22.780
<v Speaker 4>AI arms race and have DSA, quote, take initiative against

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 4>the AI company's project to make human labor obsolete and

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:31.170
<v Speaker 4>organize a working class coalition for the democratic steering and

0:42:31.350 --> 0:42:35.550
<v Speaker 4>ownership of the technology. according to an overview in Geese Magazine.

0:42:36.290 --> 0:42:40.969
<v Speaker 4>This resolution calls for DSA to demand and organize for

0:42:41.090 --> 0:42:46.450
<v Speaker 4>a pause on frontier AI research, an AI data center moratorium,

0:42:46.850 --> 0:42:51.690
<v Speaker 4>regulations on frontier AI models, and policies to ensure workers

0:42:51.850 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 4>are protected. To quote the Geese Magazine overview, our horizon

0:42:57.060 --> 0:43:01.420
<v Speaker 4>must be the collective control of AI, with its gains

0:43:01.620 --> 0:43:05.810
<v Speaker 4>shared by all. With AI under democratic control, we will

0:43:05.850 --> 0:43:09.210
<v Speaker 4>decide what activities ought to be left to human hands,

0:43:09.870 --> 0:43:13.750
<v Speaker 4>exalted creative tasks that make life meaningful, and which can

0:43:13.770 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 4>be automated to expand flourishing and freedom. DSA members may

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 4>have quite different views on where those lines lie, with

0:43:21.820 --> 0:43:26.379
<v Speaker 4>some wishing to ban the technology entirely. Regardless, the point

0:43:26.460 --> 0:43:31.140
<v Speaker 4>is that those conversations will be ours. not Sam Altman's,

0:43:31.219 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 4>not Dario Amadei's, not Elon Musk's. This is a once-in-a-century

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.820
<v Speaker 4>political opportunity. We have the chance to utilize one of

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 4>the great issues of the day to mobilize workers around

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.700
<v Speaker 4>the democratic control of the economy, to drive a wedge

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.989
<v Speaker 4>into the Republican Party's coalition and the democratic base, and

0:43:51.030 --> 0:43:55.010
<v Speaker 4>to reorient politics around a question on which our answers

0:43:55.130 --> 0:43:58.940
<v Speaker 4>are unfathomably popular. we could be at the forefront of

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 4>the movement rather than tail-ending a disparate set of professionalized non-profits, unquote.

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.049
<v Speaker 4>This issue will be getting a lot of attention these

0:44:09.110 --> 0:44:12.750
<v Speaker 4>next few months. AI CEOs will be meeting at the

0:44:12.790 --> 0:44:16.529
<v Speaker 4>White House with President Xi later this week. The New

0:44:16.550 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 4>York City Council is convening a hearing on AI safety

0:44:20.100 --> 0:44:24.980
<v Speaker 4>risks next month, with Dario Amadei and Sam Altman requested

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 4>to appear. If we don't want them to be the

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:32.710
<v Speaker 4>ones leading the conversation on AI regulation, which would only

0:44:32.770 --> 0:44:37.049
<v Speaker 4>result in an industry-friendly regulatory slowdown to curb competition and

0:44:37.110 --> 0:44:40.489
<v Speaker 4>stabilize market pressure, then the left will have to step

0:44:40.590 --> 0:44:43.779
<v Speaker 4>up and build on the data center backlash to seize

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:47.839
<v Speaker 4>the very technology data centers are powering to destroy these

0:44:47.900 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 4>companies and put the future of AI in the control

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:52.140
<v Speaker 4>of the public.

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:11.050
<v Speaker 8>I find the word diversity has become so politically charged nowadays.

0:45:12.070 --> 0:45:16.410
<v Speaker 8>You know, as a buzzword, as a dirty word. You know,

0:45:16.430 --> 0:45:19.850
<v Speaker 8>we see it caught up in terms like the AI,

0:45:20.590 --> 0:45:25.450
<v Speaker 8>in the debates around immigration and representation and all the

0:45:25.550 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 8>culture wars that have captured so much of the world's

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 8>attention as of late. But what has my attention recently,

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 8>the kind of diversity that I want to focus on,

0:45:39.460 --> 0:45:44.070
<v Speaker 8>is the diversity that we are losing. That we are

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:48.390
<v Speaker 8>critically losing. Right now we're living through what many scientists

0:45:48.430 --> 0:45:53.090
<v Speaker 8>describe as the sixth mass extinction. Species are disappearing at

0:45:53.150 --> 0:45:59.090
<v Speaker 8>a rate driven overwhelmingly by human activity. Languages are dying.

0:45:59.610 --> 0:46:03.790
<v Speaker 8>Indigenous knowledge is disappearing and entire cultures have been erased.

0:46:04.420 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 8>assimilated or reduced to museum pieces. We are, in our lifetimes,

0:46:10.620 --> 0:46:14.580
<v Speaker 8>witnessing a profound loss of what author David Harmon calls

0:46:14.940 --> 0:46:19.300
<v Speaker 8>biocultural diversity, the combined diversity of life and human culture.

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:21.620
<v Speaker 8>And all of this has happened at the same time

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:26.890
<v Speaker 8>that diversity itself has become so politically controversial. So the

0:46:26.910 --> 0:46:28.930
<v Speaker 8>question I want to talk about today is why we

0:46:28.950 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 8>should even care about diversity in the first place. Why

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 8>does it matter that thousands of languages exist? Why should

0:46:34.780 --> 0:46:37.500
<v Speaker 8>we care if a species disappears? Why does it matter

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 8>whether there are countless different ways for people to live

0:46:40.020 --> 0:46:44.029
<v Speaker 8>and think and create and organize themselves? Typically, we speak

0:46:44.050 --> 0:46:48.150
<v Speaker 8>of diversity as an unquestioned value, as something that some

0:46:48.170 --> 0:46:51.570
<v Speaker 8>people like or dislike, are opposed to or in favor

0:46:51.650 --> 0:46:55.110
<v Speaker 8>of politically. But I want to make a deeper argument

0:46:55.489 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 8>that diversity is one of the fundamental conditions that makes

0:47:00.020 --> 0:47:05.840
<v Speaker 8>life creativity and freedom possible. Welcome to It Could Happen Here.

0:47:06.460 --> 0:47:12.259
<v Speaker 8>I'm Andrew Sage, Andrewism on YouTube, and I'm joined again by... James,

0:47:12.380 --> 0:47:13.140
<v Speaker 8>it's great to be back.

0:47:13.340 --> 0:47:14.259
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited about this one.

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:18.620
<v Speaker 8>Yes. So I suppose to start with, what would you

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:21.810
<v Speaker 8>say are the kinds of diversity that come to mind,

0:47:22.090 --> 0:47:24.569
<v Speaker 8>you know, when you hear the term? And why would

0:47:24.590 --> 0:47:27.430
<v Speaker 8>you say that it is something that you value, if

0:47:27.469 --> 0:47:29.270
<v Speaker 8>it is that you value it? I assume you do.

0:47:29.330 --> 0:47:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I do. Like there's like a very liberal

0:47:33.860 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 2>way of understanding diversity.

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:40.070
<v Speaker 2>And I think sometimes even the libs getting better at

0:47:40.110 --> 0:47:43.250
<v Speaker 2>this libs used to use the word tolerance a lot,

0:47:43.290 --> 0:47:47.190
<v Speaker 2>which I despise as, as a way of talking about diversity.

0:47:47.250 --> 0:47:47.430
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:47:47.469 --> 0:47:49.650
<v Speaker 2>Like it's like a sort of, I don't like it,

0:47:49.670 --> 0:47:50.930
<v Speaker 2>but I'll allow it to exist.

0:47:51.450 --> 0:47:53.930
<v Speaker 9>Approach yes like i'll put up with you kind of

0:47:54.110 --> 0:47:57.380
<v Speaker 9>yeah exactly like yeah it's not getting us to where

0:47:57.400 --> 0:47:59.540
<v Speaker 9>we want to get right but like i enjoy that

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.779
<v Speaker 9>there are people who obviously like are diverse in the

0:48:02.820 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 9>way that neoliberalism wants us to think about diversity in

0:48:05.300 --> 0:48:08.860
<v Speaker 9>terms of race in terms of sexuality in terms of

0:48:09.660 --> 0:48:13.860
<v Speaker 9>neoliberalism is kind of waffling on gender but also like

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:17.899
<v Speaker 9>just approaches to the way we live our lives, right?

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:21.020
<v Speaker 2>Like our cultures, our ways of organizing, our ways of

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:25.180
<v Speaker 2>being with one another. My life is so much richer

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:28.660
<v Speaker 2>because I've been exposed to that kind of diversity, right?

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:32.430
<v Speaker 2>Like I get to travel a lot and seeing how

0:48:32.530 --> 0:48:37.009
<v Speaker 2>people approach all kinds of issues has really helped me

0:48:37.070 --> 0:48:40.490
<v Speaker 2>with ways of dealing with things, of crossing the bridges

0:48:40.510 --> 0:48:43.589
<v Speaker 2>we come to in organizing, in trying to live our

0:48:43.610 --> 0:48:46.770
<v Speaker 2>better lives. Because I've been able to learn from the

0:48:46.810 --> 0:48:48.950
<v Speaker 2>ways that they have developed to doing it, which is

0:48:48.969 --> 0:48:51.250
<v Speaker 2>very different from the way we do it, right? And

0:48:51.330 --> 0:48:54.339
<v Speaker 2>so I think that kind of diversity is also super important.

0:48:55.140 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 8>I agree. Absolutely. I think that a lot of times

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 8>as well, the conversation is really focused on diversity as

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:08.390
<v Speaker 8>it relates to people. But, you know, even before we

0:49:08.410 --> 0:49:12.830
<v Speaker 8>get to diversity within our species, there is the diversity that...

0:49:13.630 --> 0:49:17.940
<v Speaker 8>transcends our species, the diversity of all the species of

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:22.470
<v Speaker 8>planet Earth. You know, the variation as a feature of

0:49:22.530 --> 0:49:24.430
<v Speaker 8>the world we live in. Yeah.

0:49:24.450 --> 0:49:27.299
<v Speaker 2>I think that's also like super valuable, right? Like, and

0:49:27.500 --> 0:49:30.899
<v Speaker 2>in a way that we can't, I was thinking about

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:33.359
<v Speaker 2>this this morning, I was hiking this morning and like

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 2>capitalism lacks a means to ascribe value to that kind

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:38.760
<v Speaker 2>of thing.

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:39.299
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:49:39.890 --> 0:49:42.250
<v Speaker 2>Like I was thinking about in the US, they've proposed

0:49:42.290 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to rescind the roadless rule, which allows you not to

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:48.780
<v Speaker 2>build roads into national forests in certain infantry roadless areas.

0:49:49.660 --> 0:49:55.509
<v Speaker 2>And like, there is a way of ascribing value to timber, right?

0:49:56.239 --> 0:49:59.370
<v Speaker 2>You can talk about board feet of timber, like there

0:49:59.430 --> 0:50:03.830
<v Speaker 2>is a way of ascribing cost to roads, right? We

0:50:03.850 --> 0:50:06.569
<v Speaker 2>can estimate how much it will cost to build roads

0:50:06.610 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 2>into this area. But like, There isn't a way of

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:16.980
<v Speaker 2>ascribing value that works to the forest being there, to

0:50:17.140 --> 0:50:20.259
<v Speaker 2>all the things in the forest that are not commercial

0:50:20.340 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 2>timber being there, right? The plants, animals, the insects.

0:50:24.739 --> 0:50:30.850
<v Speaker 8>It's like the quantifiable value versus like the unquantifiable value, basically.

0:50:30.870 --> 0:50:34.370
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like they're not productive to capital. But they do

0:50:34.450 --> 0:50:37.710
<v Speaker 2>give us something that is valuable. And because capitalism can't

0:50:37.750 --> 0:50:40.430
<v Speaker 2>ascribe value to them, it sometimes fails to protect them, right?

0:50:40.450 --> 0:50:46.100
<v Speaker 2>We've seen this in North America. It's a great example, right? Yeah, yeah.

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 8>Like, how do you ascribe value to a view?

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:49.180
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:50:49.340 --> 0:50:51.940
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there's an extent to which we see some

0:50:51.960 --> 0:50:56.739
<v Speaker 8>of that value being wrapped up in the price of, like,

0:50:56.900 --> 0:50:58.540
<v Speaker 8>a house. You know, like, if a house is on

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.360
<v Speaker 8>a hillside and has a great view of the ocean

0:51:01.420 --> 0:51:04.020
<v Speaker 8>and stuff, people will say, oh, well, We could jack

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:06.799
<v Speaker 8>up its price on the market because, you know, people

0:51:06.820 --> 0:51:09.960
<v Speaker 8>will pay for that view. Yeah. You know, a similar

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:13.939
<v Speaker 8>concept was like the way that hotel rooms might be

0:51:14.180 --> 0:51:17.540
<v Speaker 8>more expensive on the higher floors because, you know, oh,

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:19.540
<v Speaker 8>you get that kind of panoramic view of the city

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:25.989
<v Speaker 8>or whatever. But that doesn't really capture the experience. It

0:51:26.090 --> 0:51:29.750
<v Speaker 8>is a crude approximation of the experience of, you know,

0:51:29.830 --> 0:51:32.690
<v Speaker 8>waking up in the morning to The sun coming over

0:51:32.730 --> 0:51:37.069
<v Speaker 8>the horizon, the sea in the distance, the birds, you know,

0:51:37.090 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 8>making their way out into the world. None of that

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 8>is captured in the number. It's just a way of

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:49.280
<v Speaker 8>trying to capture that in order to facilitate exchange.

0:51:50.340 --> 0:51:53.460
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. Like it's an attempt to ascribe value to

0:51:53.500 --> 0:51:58.569
<v Speaker 2>something inherently like doesn't fit in that system. of like

0:51:58.610 --> 0:52:03.300
<v Speaker 2>the cash exchange, which is what makes it valuable and beautiful.

0:52:03.380 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:52:03.660 --> 0:52:08.379
<v Speaker 2>Like, uh, but your capitalism will never really be able

0:52:08.420 --> 0:52:11.299
<v Speaker 2>to protect those things. Like even, you know, in the

0:52:11.420 --> 0:52:14.089
<v Speaker 2>U S we have public lands, right. But like no

0:52:14.130 --> 0:52:17.210
<v Speaker 2>fucking way. Okay. Even like Theodore Roosevelt, right. Like all

0:52:17.230 --> 0:52:20.190
<v Speaker 2>the politicians now we're like, oh yeah, we love Theodore Roosevelt, blah, blah.

0:52:20.210 --> 0:52:22.509
<v Speaker 2>You know, most us politicians I think would love to

0:52:22.550 --> 0:52:25.830
<v Speaker 2>be compared to Roosevelt. and this is not someone who

0:52:25.850 --> 0:52:28.910
<v Speaker 2>I think is a fantastic human being like morally, but, uh,

0:52:29.690 --> 0:52:32.190
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't do that today. Like, like capitalism is too

0:52:32.250 --> 0:52:35.710
<v Speaker 2>rapacious today to ever say, like, we are taking hundreds

0:52:35.750 --> 0:52:38.320
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of acres and just setting them aside because like,

0:52:38.890 --> 0:52:41.819
<v Speaker 2>they're nice and it's nice for us to have them.

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.279
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to keep them that way. Like, uh,

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:47.540
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't, it wouldn't function now, even in a way

0:52:47.560 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 2>that was possible then, you know?

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:49.339
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:52:49.360 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 8>And I mean, arguably even that time, those things being

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:58.470
<v Speaker 8>set aside, A person who had witnessed the old growth

0:52:58.550 --> 0:53:02.130
<v Speaker 8>forests of the past, when they were, you know, in

0:53:02.170 --> 0:53:05.060
<v Speaker 8>more recent memory, they might even be able to see

0:53:05.100 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 8>that this is such a fraction of the value that

0:53:08.160 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 8>has been lost of, like, yes, we're preserving some of

0:53:11.380 --> 0:53:13.819
<v Speaker 8>what's left, but, you know, I don't know if you've

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:18.569
<v Speaker 8>seen those pictures of, like, those ginormous, like, trees that

0:53:18.650 --> 0:53:20.730
<v Speaker 8>they just chopped down as they made that, you know,

0:53:20.750 --> 0:53:23.390
<v Speaker 8>that westward expansion into California and whatnot.

0:53:23.890 --> 0:53:24.029
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:53:24.489 --> 0:53:26.710
<v Speaker 8>They didn't even use most of the wood. They ended

0:53:26.750 --> 0:53:29.090
<v Speaker 8>up having to like discard it, burn it, whatever.

0:53:29.489 --> 0:53:30.149
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know that.

0:53:30.450 --> 0:53:33.700
<v Speaker 8>But this is like centuries worth of growth that was

0:53:33.719 --> 0:53:35.460
<v Speaker 8>just destroyed.

0:53:36.540 --> 0:53:36.739
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:39.359
<v Speaker 2>The only reason I think we protected these things, right,

0:53:39.400 --> 0:53:43.240
<v Speaker 2>was because there was a sort of realization that, oh shit,

0:53:43.540 --> 0:53:47.330
<v Speaker 2>we've gone way too far with this capitalist exploitation of things, right?

0:53:47.370 --> 0:53:51.670
<v Speaker 2>Like with this desire to impose ourselves on the world

0:53:51.790 --> 0:53:54.450
<v Speaker 2>as it has been for a long time. Like that

0:53:54.469 --> 0:53:55.609
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make up for that.

0:53:55.750 --> 0:53:55.969
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:53:56.070 --> 0:53:58.029
<v Speaker 2>It's like a, like your analogy of zoos that you

0:53:58.110 --> 0:54:01.770
<v Speaker 2>used at the start, right? Like having the last passenger

0:54:01.810 --> 0:54:05.070
<v Speaker 2>pigeon die in a zoo doesn't make up for killing

0:54:05.140 --> 0:54:07.520
<v Speaker 2>all the passenger pigeons. Even while that passenger pigeon was

0:54:07.580 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 2>alive in the zoo.

0:54:08.440 --> 0:54:09.140
<v Speaker 8>Right. Yeah.

0:54:09.380 --> 0:54:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Like that's not a trade anyone would make, I guess.

0:54:12.020 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 2>No one would be like, Oh, I have to think

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:16.700
<v Speaker 2>about this. Like, is anyone ever going to sit around

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:21.730
<v Speaker 2>and worry about there not being enough mines or enough

0:54:21.850 --> 0:54:27.190
<v Speaker 2>roads or, enough logging operations, right. Compared to like, I

0:54:27.230 --> 0:54:30.190
<v Speaker 2>worry about that not being enough forests, worry about there

0:54:30.230 --> 0:54:34.610
<v Speaker 2>not being enough wilderness places, you know, like it, uh, it's,

0:54:34.750 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 2>it's something that, uh, yeah, we we've, we've failed future generations,

0:54:39.300 --> 0:54:41.029
<v Speaker 2>I guess, in preserving that diversity.

0:54:41.930 --> 0:54:47.660
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. And, you know, as we speak of preserving preservation conservation,

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:52.379
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a tendency within those who value diversity.

0:54:52.930 --> 0:54:55.610
<v Speaker 8>That can lead to a sort of a misdirection or

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:58.879
<v Speaker 8>it can lead to maybe a misplaced aspiration, I would say.

0:54:59.460 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 8>Because obviously, change itself is not bad. You know, change

0:55:04.620 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 8>is inevitable. Extinction has always been part of the history

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:11.460
<v Speaker 8>of life. Ecosystems have always been in flux, always evolving.

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:17.300
<v Speaker 8>The borders of, you know, ecosystems have been moving throughout

0:55:17.820 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 8>deep time. Mm-hmm. Similarly, cultures have always evolved and mixed

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:28.060
<v Speaker 8>and some have faded away. So we can't necessarily reject change, right?

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 8>And reject the processes by which cultures and environments may change,

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.980
<v Speaker 8>even in response to human intervention. You know, we look

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 8>at the forests of North America, since we've been focusing

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:45.880
<v Speaker 8>on that example, and many of those forests were engineered,

0:55:46.460 --> 0:55:51.299
<v Speaker 8>you know, by human activity. So the Amazon rainforest also

0:55:51.360 --> 0:55:55.540
<v Speaker 8>shows some evidence of human engineering in terms of the

0:55:55.640 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 8>terra preta, the soils being this very rich soil that

0:56:00.219 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 8>was deliberately designed by the indigenous peoples.

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:06.880
<v Speaker 2>The same with like, I've been reading a lot on

0:56:07.500 --> 0:56:11.760
<v Speaker 2>indigenous cultural use of fire for the last few weeks

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:14.430
<v Speaker 2>here since I got back from Spokane and thinking a

0:56:14.469 --> 0:56:19.969
<v Speaker 2>lot about like how it's a very Western thing. perspective

0:56:20.030 --> 0:56:23.259
<v Speaker 2>right to be like the wilderness is the thing that

0:56:23.340 --> 0:56:26.400
<v Speaker 2>humans don't touch and have no engagement with and then

0:56:26.460 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 2>everything else humans use as they wish like to create

0:56:29.580 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 2>it as this binary distribution right of like the correct

0:56:33.700 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 2>way to deal with places that are beautiful or special

0:56:36.540 --> 0:56:39.500
<v Speaker 2>is like just fucking leave it and the correct way

0:56:39.540 --> 0:56:42.080
<v Speaker 2>to deal with everything else is just fucking pillage it

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:47.230
<v Speaker 2>like there's a way to find balance that they're We

0:56:47.250 --> 0:56:50.410
<v Speaker 2>struggle with it under capitalism, right? Capitalism has struggled to

0:56:50.430 --> 0:56:51.190
<v Speaker 2>provide us with that.

0:56:52.030 --> 0:56:54.450
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, one of the bases of capitalism is

0:56:54.530 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 8>private property, which as defined under Roman law is the

0:56:59.080 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 8>right to use and abuse one's own. Right. You know,

0:57:02.780 --> 0:57:05.880
<v Speaker 8>the use and enjoyment and abuse of one's own to

0:57:05.900 --> 0:57:08.219
<v Speaker 8>the limit of the law, which is a stipulation that

0:57:08.860 --> 0:57:12.430
<v Speaker 8>had various interpretations over the years. But we shouldn't be

0:57:12.469 --> 0:57:16.300
<v Speaker 8>surprised then that when something comes under the purview of

0:57:16.360 --> 0:57:20.500
<v Speaker 8>capitalist property, that it has led to such detrimental effects.

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:25.750
<v Speaker 8>What is alarming about our current situation is not the

0:57:25.990 --> 0:57:28.950
<v Speaker 8>change that is taking place. It is the speed and

0:57:28.970 --> 0:57:31.850
<v Speaker 8>the scale of that change. You know, we don't know

0:57:31.950 --> 0:57:35.310
<v Speaker 8>exactly how many species we are losing or have lost.

0:57:35.690 --> 0:57:38.410
<v Speaker 8>We don't even know how many species currently exist. We

0:57:38.430 --> 0:57:42.200
<v Speaker 8>could even talk about the definitions of species and how

0:57:42.220 --> 0:57:47.730
<v Speaker 8>that taxonomic system has evolved with time. But for that discussion,

0:57:47.750 --> 0:57:50.470
<v Speaker 8>I leave it to a book that I read on

0:57:50.490 --> 0:57:53.570
<v Speaker 8>the subject that I quite enjoyed, which was In Light

0:57:53.590 --> 0:57:58.110
<v Speaker 8>of Our Differences by David Harmon. But regardless, we are

0:57:58.130 --> 0:58:02.490
<v Speaker 8>still talking about thousands to hundreds of thousands of species

0:58:03.070 --> 0:58:06.600
<v Speaker 8>lost each year. And these are losses that are not

0:58:06.660 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 8>happening in isolation because we know that every ecosystem is

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:13.370
<v Speaker 8>made up of relationships. They remove one species, and you

0:58:13.410 --> 0:58:17.890
<v Speaker 8>can risk disrupting everything connected to it. Thankfully, these systems

0:58:17.950 --> 0:58:21.370
<v Speaker 8>are typically quite resilient, so a species loss doesn't have

0:58:21.510 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 8>to lead to the collapse of the entire ecosystem, but

0:58:25.590 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 8>there are species that are foundational. Then the disappearance of

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:33.180
<v Speaker 8>that single species can trigger cascading effects that threaten the

0:58:33.220 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 8>entire ecosystem. There's also often a lag between our realization

0:58:38.780 --> 0:58:42.380
<v Speaker 8>that a species has fallen below its minimum viable population

0:58:43.230 --> 0:58:47.070
<v Speaker 8>and the death of the final individual of that species.

0:58:47.750 --> 0:58:50.890
<v Speaker 8>As you mentioned, the last passenger pigeon in the zoo,

0:58:51.230 --> 0:58:54.170
<v Speaker 8>I was reminded of that. We see that also happening

0:58:54.210 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 8>with human cultures, particularly with language. From what I've read,

0:58:59.320 --> 0:59:03.700
<v Speaker 8>about 44% of living languages today are now endangered. Some

0:59:03.740 --> 0:59:07.320
<v Speaker 8>have fewer than a thousand speakers remaining, and others are

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:11.300
<v Speaker 8>spoken by fewer than 10 people. and i know from

0:59:11.660 --> 0:59:13.460
<v Speaker 8>what you told me of your travels james that you

0:59:13.580 --> 0:59:17.640
<v Speaker 8>actually have met people who have spoken some of these

0:59:17.820 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 8>endangered languages correct.

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:24.060
<v Speaker 2>Yeah certainly like uh i think about languages that like

0:59:24.700 --> 0:59:30.220
<v Speaker 2>i guess i've heard people speak that are less hegemonic Certainly, like,

0:59:30.910 --> 0:59:33.390
<v Speaker 2>I can't imagine there are very many speakers of Marshallese,

0:59:33.470 --> 0:59:38.350
<v Speaker 2>for example, in the RMI, many indigenous languages, right? Like

0:59:38.470 --> 0:59:41.650
<v Speaker 2>I know the Embara like have made a great deal

0:59:41.670 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 2>of like progress, educating young people in their language, right.

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:48.419
<v Speaker 2>And like making sure that they, they keep that. I was, uh,

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 2>just talking to some like Yoemi and Otam friends this morning.

0:59:53.300 --> 0:59:53.500
<v Speaker 8>Right.

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Uh, I think those languages are doing relatively well for

0:59:57.320 --> 1:00:01.340
<v Speaker 2>indigenous languages. in what is now the United States. But like,

1:00:01.460 --> 1:00:04.440
<v Speaker 2>it's only through the concerted effort of people from that

1:00:04.500 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 2>community to keep them alive, right? Like, I don't think

1:00:06.660 --> 1:00:11.010
<v Speaker 2>the state has attributed a diversity value to those languages.

1:00:11.070 --> 1:00:14.350
<v Speaker 2>And languages, like, they give us a way of understanding

1:00:14.370 --> 1:00:15.970
<v Speaker 2>the world that is different. That's why I like to

1:00:16.050 --> 1:00:19.730
<v Speaker 2>try and learn at least a little bit of different languages. Like,

1:00:19.750 --> 1:00:23.440
<v Speaker 2>they give us a way of seeing things i think

1:00:23.500 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>about like uh all the bass words for rain right

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 2>or uh i was uh diving the other day with

1:00:30.180 --> 1:00:32.390
<v Speaker 2>like a sea lion and i was talking to a

1:00:32.410 --> 1:00:35.510
<v Speaker 2>spanish-speaking friend about like in uh in spanish they're like

1:00:35.690 --> 1:00:39.169
<v Speaker 2>uh wolves of the sea right lions of the sea

1:00:40.230 --> 1:00:41.850
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of interesting and they do have like a

1:00:41.870 --> 1:00:43.750
<v Speaker 2>kind of a wolf like vibe to them if you

1:00:43.770 --> 1:00:46.410
<v Speaker 2>ever uh hung out around sea lions like uh.

1:00:46.810 --> 1:00:48.650
<v Speaker 8>In terms of what, like their social structure?

1:00:49.250 --> 1:00:52.930
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and like their, like, I think people see sea

1:00:52.970 --> 1:00:57.090
<v Speaker 2>lions as like this big cuddly kind of cute thing.

1:00:57.110 --> 1:00:59.660
<v Speaker 2>And like, they're fucking killers, you know?

1:00:59.780 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 8>Oh, trust and believe I don't. I don't trust those

1:01:02.780 --> 1:01:03.320
<v Speaker 8>guys at all.

1:01:03.680 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, they're like, they will fuck.

1:01:05.860 --> 1:01:09.980
<v Speaker 8>I don't trust any mammal that chose to live an

1:01:10.020 --> 1:01:12.830
<v Speaker 8>aquatic way of life. Okay, there's something fishy about that.

1:01:14.170 --> 1:01:15.730
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

1:01:15.770 --> 1:01:16.390
<v Speaker 8>Pun intended.

1:01:16.790 --> 1:01:16.970
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

1:01:17.530 --> 1:01:20.970
<v Speaker 2>I love that as a category. You know, they're mean.

1:01:21.670 --> 1:01:22.390
<v Speaker 2>They'll come at you.

1:01:34.180 --> 1:01:37.500
<v Speaker 8>As you were mentioning, there are like, according to the ethnologue,

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:43.140
<v Speaker 8>at least 7,170 living languages in the world today. Our

1:01:43.180 --> 1:01:47.540
<v Speaker 8>lowest underestimations of the amount of cultures, that is an

1:01:47.580 --> 1:01:53.620
<v Speaker 8>accumulation of knowledge, values, customs, technology, social practices. Our lowest

1:01:53.660 --> 1:01:55.960
<v Speaker 8>estimate of the number of cultures on earth is like 4,000.

1:01:55.960 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 8>They're definitely, certainly more than that. Especially if we are

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:03.090
<v Speaker 8>using language as a proxy for cultural diversity.

1:02:03.190 --> 1:02:03.450
<v Speaker 10>Right.

1:02:03.830 --> 1:02:09.630
<v Speaker 8>And even within languages, there's tremendous cultural diversity. Yeah. Biologically,

1:02:09.690 --> 1:02:11.830
<v Speaker 8>we have a lot of diversity as well. I neglected

1:02:11.870 --> 1:02:16.010
<v Speaker 8>to mention that. you know, blood types, heights, hair textures,

1:02:17.110 --> 1:02:22.130
<v Speaker 8>all of these have emerged across the continents we've spread

1:02:22.170 --> 1:02:24.930
<v Speaker 8>out across. I mean, obviously the concentration of that diversity

1:02:25.090 --> 1:02:29.550
<v Speaker 8>is in Africa, where we began. But even our adaptations

1:02:29.610 --> 1:02:34.910
<v Speaker 8>to different environments is a form of diversity that is necessary,

1:02:35.250 --> 1:02:37.590
<v Speaker 8>you know, to maintain us. I'll get into some of

1:02:37.610 --> 1:02:40.830
<v Speaker 8>the arguments for why later on. But, so I didn't

1:02:40.850 --> 1:02:44.110
<v Speaker 8>know that Basque had all the different words for rain

1:02:44.590 --> 1:02:46.870
<v Speaker 8>but i am reminded i think that there are different

1:02:46.990 --> 1:02:54.020
<v Speaker 8>words in inuit languages for describing snow yeah like uh.

1:02:54.380 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>The um i think it's in upiac have a bunch

1:02:57.020 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>of words for snow and ice and like different textures

1:02:59.960 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of it i'm trying now to find basque words for

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 2>uh for rain so i can remember some of them

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:10.710
<v Speaker 2>yeah land broa is drizzle or mist i know ziri

1:03:10.750 --> 1:03:13.640
<v Speaker 2>miri is like a light rain It's like the noise

1:03:13.700 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it makes. I always thought that was a really sweet one.

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:23.610
<v Speaker 2>I had some fucking throwback. A Cornish anarchist who spoke Cornish, right?

1:03:23.810 --> 1:03:25.990
<v Speaker 2>One of the languages that is not hegemonic and is

1:03:26.050 --> 1:03:30.820
<v Speaker 2>probably relatively endangered, even as European languages go, right? I

1:03:30.840 --> 1:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>think it's probably having a better time now than it

1:03:32.680 --> 1:03:34.640
<v Speaker 2>was when I was younger, but it was relatively rare

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:35.980
<v Speaker 2>to encounter a Cornish speaker.

1:03:36.120 --> 1:03:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Cornish, that's Cornwall, right?

1:03:37.880 --> 1:03:40.750
<v Speaker 2>Correct. Yeah, yeah. was teaching me all these beautiful words

1:03:40.790 --> 1:03:44.470
<v Speaker 2>for like a different wildlife and different like natural phenomena

1:03:44.490 --> 1:03:48.689
<v Speaker 2>that sort of have an onomatopoeic quality to them. But like,

1:03:49.170 --> 1:03:52.420
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, just like the sort of beautiful way

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:55.100
<v Speaker 2>that they showed of relating, I don't want to like

1:03:55.120 --> 1:03:57.300
<v Speaker 2>a noble, savage Cornish people.

1:03:57.360 --> 1:03:57.460
<v Speaker 8>Right.

1:03:57.480 --> 1:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>But I just thought that they showed a different way

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:02.310
<v Speaker 2>of understanding the world and our relationship with it and

1:04:02.350 --> 1:04:05.490
<v Speaker 2>these animals and like how they, how they appear. And like,

1:04:05.550 --> 1:04:08.090
<v Speaker 2>it struck me as really special that that person was like,

1:04:08.110 --> 1:04:11.180
<v Speaker 2>like kept that knowledge and, and that that person shared

1:04:11.220 --> 1:04:13.540
<v Speaker 2>that knowledge with me. Um, this was at some like

1:04:13.560 --> 1:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>event in Barcelona when I'm like, you know, 21 years old,

1:04:18.120 --> 1:04:20.440
<v Speaker 2>19 years old, something like that. Uh, and it just

1:04:20.500 --> 1:04:23.540
<v Speaker 2>really struck me that, uh, like there was so much

1:04:23.620 --> 1:04:26.180
<v Speaker 2>beauty in, in seeing the world through the lens of

1:04:26.220 --> 1:04:28.390
<v Speaker 2>that language. And it would be a real shame if

1:04:28.430 --> 1:04:29.090
<v Speaker 2>we ever lost that.

1:04:29.910 --> 1:04:30.130
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:04:30.230 --> 1:04:33.790
<v Speaker 8>And I mean, that's just one case study. Every other

1:04:33.930 --> 1:04:38.880
<v Speaker 8>endangered language, I'm sure you could point to similar novelties in,

1:04:39.260 --> 1:04:41.220
<v Speaker 8>you know, how they engage with the world, how they

1:04:41.300 --> 1:04:42.520
<v Speaker 8>describe and see things.

1:04:42.900 --> 1:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

1:04:43.280 --> 1:04:43.460
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:04:44.240 --> 1:04:46.900
<v Speaker 8>And we can extend from language to culture, you know,

1:04:46.940 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 8>different cuisines, different ways of, you know, engagement with foods,

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:54.220
<v Speaker 8>you know, different forms of architecture and music and ways

1:04:54.260 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 8>of telling stories. Yeah. Ways of raising children, ways of

1:04:58.860 --> 1:05:00.340
<v Speaker 8>celebrating and of mourning.

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely. Like there's a lot that I feel like

1:05:03.180 --> 1:05:06.300
<v Speaker 2>I've learned about so many of those things from being

1:05:06.340 --> 1:05:09.790
<v Speaker 2>lucky enough to spend time in different places, right? I

1:05:09.810 --> 1:05:12.850
<v Speaker 2>guess I can give an example from, this is in

1:05:12.890 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 2>my book if people want to read more about it,

1:05:14.850 --> 1:05:17.390
<v Speaker 2>but like one of the things that a friend in

1:05:17.450 --> 1:05:20.410
<v Speaker 2>Kurdistan said to me was that like they'd lost a friend, right?

1:05:20.430 --> 1:05:23.540
<v Speaker 2>This friend had died fighting against the Islamic State. One

1:05:23.560 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>of the things that they said was like because of

1:05:25.260 --> 1:05:27.920
<v Speaker 2>this institution of tech mill which is like a form

1:05:27.980 --> 1:05:31.420
<v Speaker 2>of collective criticism it doesn't quite work in english to

1:05:31.440 --> 1:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>call it collective criticism because you think of maoism which

1:05:33.380 --> 1:05:36.700
<v Speaker 2>is not but because they had like shared with this

1:05:36.760 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>person their goals their aspirations their their hopes and then

1:05:40.760 --> 1:05:43.630
<v Speaker 2>this person through this institution of tech mill had helped

1:05:43.750 --> 1:05:47.790
<v Speaker 2>them be accountable to their own hopes for themselves that

1:05:47.990 --> 1:05:50.410
<v Speaker 2>they were a better person because of the time they

1:05:50.430 --> 1:05:52.930
<v Speaker 2>had spent with this person and now that this person

1:05:52.990 --> 1:05:58.600
<v Speaker 2>was gone They carried him with them in their ways

1:05:58.660 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 2>of being because he had helped them be a better person.

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>They shared it with me at a time when I

1:06:03.920 --> 1:06:06.990
<v Speaker 2>had like lost a dear friend and it was a

1:06:07.070 --> 1:06:10.130
<v Speaker 2>really beautiful way of me processing that. Like I'm not

1:06:10.150 --> 1:06:12.610
<v Speaker 2>a person who is like a religious person. I don't,

1:06:12.950 --> 1:06:15.550
<v Speaker 2>I have that belief structure to process it, but like

1:06:16.110 --> 1:06:19.180
<v Speaker 2>that gave me a sense of an afterlife, which was

1:06:19.240 --> 1:06:21.420
<v Speaker 2>more concrete for me, which I could understand, which I

1:06:21.460 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 2>could see.

1:06:22.430 --> 1:06:22.669
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

1:06:22.890 --> 1:06:23.830
<v Speaker 2>And like, it really helped me.

1:06:24.230 --> 1:06:25.530
<v Speaker 8>The afterlife of memory.

1:06:25.730 --> 1:06:26.110
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

1:06:26.270 --> 1:06:29.430
<v Speaker 2>And of like, like we are all co-created by our community, right?

1:06:29.450 --> 1:06:31.290
<v Speaker 2>Like I didn't make myself the way I am.

1:06:31.310 --> 1:06:31.810
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:06:31.930 --> 1:06:34.030
<v Speaker 2>I was made the way I am by my interactions

1:06:34.070 --> 1:06:36.330
<v Speaker 2>with people who care about me enough to help me

1:06:36.370 --> 1:06:41.490
<v Speaker 2>be better. And the idea of that person who helped

1:06:41.510 --> 1:06:45.210
<v Speaker 2>me co-create the person I am, like still existing in

1:06:45.250 --> 1:06:47.430
<v Speaker 2>the person I am was very powerful to me. Like,

1:06:47.450 --> 1:06:53.410
<v Speaker 2>it's like a concrete psychological benefit I got from, interacting

1:06:53.430 --> 1:06:54.970
<v Speaker 2>with people who help me see the world the way

1:06:55.010 --> 1:06:55.510
<v Speaker 2>they see.

1:06:55.370 --> 1:07:00.150
<v Speaker 8>It absolutely you know i'm glad for all the languages

1:07:00.230 --> 1:07:04.130
<v Speaker 8>that still exist and still give us you know these

1:07:04.170 --> 1:07:07.010
<v Speaker 8>words for things because if nation states had their way

1:07:07.770 --> 1:07:10.250
<v Speaker 8>there would be like 10 languages left on earth yeah

1:07:10.590 --> 1:07:14.090
<v Speaker 8>i mean dramatic but you know right now most of

1:07:14.140 --> 1:07:19.340
<v Speaker 8>humanity speaks a relatively small number of languages the 23

1:07:19.340 --> 1:07:24.550
<v Speaker 8>most spoken mother languages i can't feel like 4 billion people,

1:07:24.710 --> 1:07:28.190
<v Speaker 8>somewhere around there. And in the 200 most spoken languages,

1:07:28.770 --> 1:07:31.020
<v Speaker 8>over 88% of the world's population.

1:07:31.460 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 2>That's crazy.

1:07:32.500 --> 1:07:35.919
<v Speaker 8>And this is, of course, due to nation building, due

1:07:35.960 --> 1:07:43.180
<v Speaker 8>to economic pressures, globalization. Basically, everywhere, the pressures of the

1:07:43.200 --> 1:07:49.270
<v Speaker 8>status quo have led to indigenous and regional languages, minority languages, disappearing.

1:07:49.370 --> 1:07:53.880
<v Speaker 8>And if not for the concerted efforts... of these language

1:07:53.920 --> 1:07:57.860
<v Speaker 8>communities to maintain their way of speaking and to pass

1:07:57.920 --> 1:08:00.640
<v Speaker 8>it down, we would have lost so many more as

1:08:00.700 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 8>it is.

1:08:00.980 --> 1:08:02.740
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely.

1:08:03.410 --> 1:08:06.130
<v Speaker 8>As you mentioned, by the way, the words that you've

1:08:06.150 --> 1:08:11.330
<v Speaker 8>picked up over the years from different languages and your

1:08:11.350 --> 1:08:14.690
<v Speaker 8>attempts to explain those words to me, I was reminded

1:08:14.930 --> 1:08:17.920
<v Speaker 8>of a work of fiction that I'd read, I think

1:08:17.960 --> 1:08:21.639
<v Speaker 8>about two years ago. It's a book called Babel by R.F.

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:26.250
<v Speaker 8>Kuang And it's kind of like a fantasy historical fiction

1:08:26.910 --> 1:08:31.070
<v Speaker 8>where like a Chinese student goes to this school in

1:08:31.189 --> 1:08:38.190
<v Speaker 8>England and the magic of that world is translation. The

1:08:38.390 --> 1:08:40.769
<v Speaker 8>sort of energy that gets picked up, the magic that

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:44.019
<v Speaker 8>they're able to wield is through the translation from one

1:08:44.060 --> 1:08:47.880
<v Speaker 8>language to another. And the fact that because translation is

1:08:47.920 --> 1:08:53.599
<v Speaker 8>on a one-to-one process, the Kind of nuances and, you know,

1:08:54.040 --> 1:08:57.950
<v Speaker 8>meanings and subtexts and connotations that they get lost or

1:08:57.990 --> 1:09:01.340
<v Speaker 8>gained in the process are potent. and so for people

1:09:01.360 --> 1:09:05.000
<v Speaker 8>who are interested in linguistics and fantasy fiction i always

1:09:05.040 --> 1:09:05.860
<v Speaker 8>recommend that book to.

1:09:05.800 --> 1:09:09.220
<v Speaker 2>Them yeah might try that one but what i.

1:09:09.200 --> 1:09:11.839
<v Speaker 8>Was alluding to just now was some of the reasons

1:09:11.880 --> 1:09:17.229
<v Speaker 8>we've begun to lose our world's biocultural diversity as i

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 8>said before There have been changes across time, across generations,

1:09:23.689 --> 1:09:26.550
<v Speaker 8>all the way even prior to humanity, so we're not

1:09:26.590 --> 1:09:29.090
<v Speaker 8>to blame for everything. But there are a lot of

1:09:29.110 --> 1:09:34.190
<v Speaker 8>historical processes that have reinforced each other, that have led

1:09:34.290 --> 1:09:37.889
<v Speaker 8>to what has been unfolding these past few centuries. Yes,

1:09:37.930 --> 1:09:41.530
<v Speaker 8>we might have hunted some species to extinction in our

1:09:41.570 --> 1:09:46.410
<v Speaker 8>prehistoric past, but clearly the scale of our impact is

1:09:46.450 --> 1:09:52.339
<v Speaker 8>quite different here now. Monocultures, for instance, and fast pasture

1:09:52.360 --> 1:09:58.810
<v Speaker 8>lands have completely replaced ecosystems in certain areas. We've drained wetlands,

1:09:58.890 --> 1:10:04.290
<v Speaker 8>we've leveled forests, we've fragmented habitats. And that's another thing

1:10:04.330 --> 1:10:09.790
<v Speaker 8>that when we speak of habitat loss isn't always spoken about. But,

1:10:09.830 --> 1:10:13.420
<v Speaker 8>you know, we have places where a lot of the

1:10:13.439 --> 1:10:18.229
<v Speaker 8>habitat was left alone, quote unquote. But when you have

1:10:18.290 --> 1:10:22.880
<v Speaker 8>like six lane highways cutting through a forest, that is

1:10:22.900 --> 1:10:25.340
<v Speaker 8>still a fragmentation of that ecosystem.

1:10:25.420 --> 1:10:25.700
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah.

1:10:25.760 --> 1:10:29.220
<v Speaker 8>That's still a disruption of the flow of plants, animal

1:10:29.260 --> 1:10:30.900
<v Speaker 8>life and fungal life.

1:10:31.300 --> 1:10:34.860
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Can I make a podcast about this? But one

1:10:34.900 --> 1:10:37.990
<v Speaker 2>of the issues that our endangered wildlife faces here in

1:10:38.010 --> 1:10:41.430
<v Speaker 2>Southern California, right, is that it's fragmented both by freeways

1:10:41.729 --> 1:10:44.970
<v Speaker 2>and the border wall. So like the border wall in

1:10:44.990 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 2>particular is, people can listen to natural causes if they

1:10:48.700 --> 1:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>want to learn more about this. But the border wall

1:10:50.240 --> 1:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>in particular, right, is being built at such a speed

1:10:52.080 --> 1:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>that they're not even building wildlife gates into it. Now,

1:10:55.220 --> 1:10:57.060
<v Speaker 2>they don't care about killing people with the wall. Why

1:10:57.080 --> 1:11:01.019
<v Speaker 2>would they care about killing wildlife, right? But it means,

1:11:01.180 --> 1:11:04.340
<v Speaker 2>for instance, our peninsula bighorns, which we have like 750

1:11:04.340 --> 1:11:07.970
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, one of the rams actually died

1:11:08.010 --> 1:11:11.350
<v Speaker 2>in the border wall wire recently. And their ability to

1:11:11.390 --> 1:11:14.430
<v Speaker 2>have like a healthy breeding population will be significantly limited

1:11:14.470 --> 1:11:17.830
<v Speaker 2>to this to the extent that like, The intangible value

1:11:17.870 --> 1:11:19.630
<v Speaker 2>of me seeing a bighorn in a hike in the

1:11:19.670 --> 1:11:24.429
<v Speaker 2>desert might not be something that everyone gets ever again, right?

1:11:26.189 --> 1:11:29.439
<v Speaker 2>Our mountain lions actually have some weird little genetic anomalies

1:11:29.580 --> 1:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>because of the divisions that are created by these big

1:11:32.360 --> 1:11:35.280
<v Speaker 2>freeways and how dangerous it is to cross them. There's

1:11:35.300 --> 1:11:37.339
<v Speaker 2>like a thing you can observe in some of their tails.

1:11:37.920 --> 1:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>So there actually are mountain lions in the peninsula range

1:11:41.000 --> 1:11:44.390
<v Speaker 2>are listed in the California Endangered Species Act, even though

1:11:44.470 --> 1:11:48.990
<v Speaker 2>as a whole overall, they're not particularly endangered. California has

1:11:49.030 --> 1:11:54.010
<v Speaker 2>a shit ton of lions, actually. It's because these specific lions,

1:11:54.570 --> 1:11:57.309
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact that there are conditions for them to thrive, right,

1:11:57.430 --> 1:12:00.849
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, the intrusion that has divided these

1:12:00.890 --> 1:12:03.849
<v Speaker 2>populations has made it very hard for those populations, not

1:12:03.870 --> 1:12:06.030
<v Speaker 2>just to thrive, but like to continue to be healthy.

1:12:07.070 --> 1:12:07.250
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

1:12:07.979 --> 1:12:10.600
<v Speaker 8>That's the thing, right? Like a species doesn't necessarily have

1:12:10.640 --> 1:12:14.680
<v Speaker 8>to be endangered or on the brink of extinction for

1:12:14.860 --> 1:12:20.010
<v Speaker 8>it to be experiencing the extremely negative effects of, you know,

1:12:20.290 --> 1:12:25.769
<v Speaker 8>our industrial civilization. Right. I would add also the pressures

1:12:26.010 --> 1:12:30.600
<v Speaker 8>of invasive species through global trade, you know, the impact

1:12:30.640 --> 1:12:35.150
<v Speaker 8>of pollution in the waterways and in the air. climate change,

1:12:35.270 --> 1:12:38.050
<v Speaker 8>all of these have placed a tremendous amount of pressure

1:12:38.550 --> 1:12:42.400
<v Speaker 8>on the natural world. When it comes to cultural diversity

1:12:42.460 --> 1:12:49.300
<v Speaker 8>and its losses, which coincide with the losses of biodiversity,

1:12:49.760 --> 1:12:54.650
<v Speaker 8>we see the impact of colonialism destroying societies through conquest

1:12:54.729 --> 1:12:59.230
<v Speaker 8>and genocide and assimilation and the very same environmental changes.

1:12:59.750 --> 1:13:03.190
<v Speaker 8>We've seen nation building try to forge a single national

1:13:03.250 --> 1:13:07.070
<v Speaker 8>identity at the expense of regional and minority cultures. And then,

1:13:07.110 --> 1:13:11.650
<v Speaker 8>of course, with globalization, not in the sense of cultural

1:13:11.810 --> 1:13:17.000
<v Speaker 8>exchange across distances, as that has always existed, but specifically

1:13:17.020 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 8>the kind that has been driven by capitalist markets and

1:13:20.000 --> 1:13:26.180
<v Speaker 8>state power and industrial efficiency, which enforces standardization across places.

1:13:26.840 --> 1:13:30.300
<v Speaker 8>You know, it's easier... for these capitalists, for these multinationals

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:33.660
<v Speaker 8>to manufacture the same products and market the same brands

1:13:34.320 --> 1:13:41.290
<v Speaker 8>and basically flatten language and flatten cultural expectations across places.

1:13:42.110 --> 1:13:46.690
<v Speaker 8>So they even would manufacture consumer tastes in a way

1:13:46.710 --> 1:13:49.410
<v Speaker 8>that benefits their bottom line. You know, now you get

1:13:49.430 --> 1:13:53.260
<v Speaker 8>to pick between streaming services or, you know, you have

1:13:53.280 --> 1:13:57.490
<v Speaker 8>a whole bunch of different varieties of cereals in your supermarkets,

1:13:57.510 --> 1:14:02.790
<v Speaker 8>and that is what is counted as economic freedom. Meanwhile,

1:14:03.210 --> 1:14:19.019
<v Speaker 8>there are cultures that are literally going extinct. Now, I

1:14:19.040 --> 1:14:22.110
<v Speaker 8>had a question for you about this subject because you

1:14:22.370 --> 1:14:24.769
<v Speaker 8>are admittedly a bit older than me.

1:14:25.990 --> 1:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>It's true. Sadly.

1:14:28.700 --> 1:14:32.460
<v Speaker 8>Right? But I'm curious, have you witnessed like in real

1:14:32.560 --> 1:14:37.740
<v Speaker 8>time the loss of this kind of diversity through globalization?

1:14:38.180 --> 1:14:41.240
<v Speaker 8>So I see like for me, I remember having like

1:14:41.340 --> 1:14:46.900
<v Speaker 8>copies of older magazines and I could see through those that,

1:14:47.160 --> 1:14:51.780
<v Speaker 8>you know, the world was, the places generally felt very different,

1:14:52.320 --> 1:14:57.209
<v Speaker 8>very unique. And as I've come up With social media,

1:14:57.750 --> 1:15:01.269
<v Speaker 8>I've seen places have kind of homogenized. Everything was starting

1:15:01.290 --> 1:15:03.559
<v Speaker 8>to look the same. And let's not even talk about

1:15:03.570 --> 1:15:05.259
<v Speaker 8>the impact of like AI slop.

1:15:05.400 --> 1:15:06.020
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

1:15:06.640 --> 1:15:07.679
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, what have you seen?

1:15:08.300 --> 1:15:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like it's one of those things that like you

1:15:11.840 --> 1:15:17.660
<v Speaker 2>do see the, like the impact of the smartphone is huge, right?

1:15:17.820 --> 1:15:20.959
<v Speaker 2>At a second level, the impact of Starlink is massive.

1:15:21.500 --> 1:15:24.200
<v Speaker 2>much more than I think most people living in the

1:15:24.260 --> 1:15:28.100
<v Speaker 2>colonial core would realize, right? Like more people have access

1:15:28.120 --> 1:15:31.170
<v Speaker 2>to the internet through smartphones than have electricity in their homes.

1:15:32.010 --> 1:15:36.810
<v Speaker 2>And like the internet is a very hegemonic place, right?

1:15:36.870 --> 1:15:41.849
<v Speaker 2>Like there are probably seven or eight languages the internet's

1:15:41.910 --> 1:15:44.420
<v Speaker 2>really good in that like you could really access the

1:15:44.439 --> 1:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>internet in. And that really has made a difference with

1:15:48.939 --> 1:15:52.689
<v Speaker 2>the way young people engage with the external world.

1:15:52.870 --> 1:15:53.889
<v Speaker 8>Right. Right.

1:15:54.150 --> 1:15:58.780
<v Speaker 2>I guess I've also seen like a, uh, a reclamation

1:15:59.320 --> 1:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of some of that. And it's a thing that's largely

1:16:02.120 --> 1:16:06.720
<v Speaker 2>happened like within, uh, the colonial core to the greatest extent, right?

1:16:06.760 --> 1:16:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Like the, um, the so-called the Europe of nations hypothesis, right?

1:16:11.080 --> 1:16:14.140
<v Speaker 2>Like one of the languages I can, uh, speak and

1:16:14.200 --> 1:16:17.570
<v Speaker 2>read and, and write in is, is Catalan. And like,

1:16:17.630 --> 1:16:20.850
<v Speaker 2>this is an example of a language that like was, uh,

1:16:21.460 --> 1:16:26.360
<v Speaker 2>ruthlessly suppressed by the Francoist regime. Same with Basque, same

1:16:26.380 --> 1:16:32.580
<v Speaker 2>with other non-Spanish languages in Iberia. And now that is

1:16:32.600 --> 1:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the primary language of instruction for most Catalan students. In

1:16:35.820 --> 1:16:40.059
<v Speaker 2>my lifetime, my time spending time in Catalonia, I see

1:16:40.300 --> 1:16:43.769
<v Speaker 2>infinitely more people speaking Catalan than I used to. I

1:16:43.970 --> 1:16:46.510
<v Speaker 2>remember there's an anecdote about this in my dissertation, but

1:16:46.550 --> 1:16:49.769
<v Speaker 2>some young Syrian kids who would always speak to me

1:16:49.810 --> 1:16:53.450
<v Speaker 2>in Catalan They played football outside my archive, right? Like, so, uh,

1:16:54.030 --> 1:16:57.429
<v Speaker 2>we'd be kicking the football around and, uh, it's cool

1:16:57.450 --> 1:16:59.870
<v Speaker 2>that this language that had once very nearly been destroyed,

1:16:59.890 --> 1:17:04.210
<v Speaker 2>it's now like hegemonic. It was cool at the time,

1:17:04.229 --> 1:17:08.670
<v Speaker 2>Catalan nationalism, but like every other nationalism has some qualities,

1:17:08.710 --> 1:17:10.910
<v Speaker 2>which I don't like, but like, it was cool that

1:17:10.930 --> 1:17:14.309
<v Speaker 2>at the time there was a, an acceptance of people,

1:17:14.350 --> 1:17:17.770
<v Speaker 2>especially like these kids who spoke Catalan. happened to have

1:17:17.800 --> 1:17:18.559
<v Speaker 2>been born in Syria.

1:17:18.600 --> 1:17:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1:17:18.770 --> 1:17:20.860
<v Speaker 2>But like, they were Catalan as much as anyone else.

1:17:20.960 --> 1:17:25.780
<v Speaker 2>Like it wasn't a, uh, an ethnic definition of, of nation.

1:17:25.979 --> 1:17:26.179
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1:17:26.680 --> 1:17:28.880
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, yeah, I've definitely seen that

1:17:28.920 --> 1:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>diversity lost in terms of so many things like foods.

1:17:34.020 --> 1:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:17:34.140 --> 1:17:36.879
<v Speaker 8>I feel like there has been a homogenization of pallets

1:17:36.979 --> 1:17:37.380
<v Speaker 8>as well.

1:17:37.400 --> 1:17:38.540
<v Speaker 2>A hundred percent.

1:17:38.600 --> 1:17:38.840
<v Speaker 12>Right.

1:17:39.460 --> 1:17:41.600
<v Speaker 8>Especially with the proliferation of fast foods.

1:17:42.220 --> 1:17:42.420
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:17:42.460 --> 1:17:47.509
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. Like fast, cheap. high calorie food that stores easily.

1:17:47.530 --> 1:17:49.910
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the example, I guess, is like, look at

1:17:49.930 --> 1:17:54.030
<v Speaker 2>what they've done to bread for the time of my life.

1:17:54.110 --> 1:17:54.309
<v Speaker 8>Right.

1:17:54.350 --> 1:17:57.700
<v Speaker 2>Like, uh, look at how like sliced white, what we

1:17:57.740 --> 1:18:00.939
<v Speaker 2>would have called American bread is now like the global standard.

1:18:01.000 --> 1:18:01.220
<v Speaker 8>Right.

1:18:01.840 --> 1:18:04.500
<v Speaker 2>But like all those other bread products that people used

1:18:04.520 --> 1:18:06.660
<v Speaker 2>to make, like, it can be very hard to get

1:18:07.180 --> 1:18:09.639
<v Speaker 2>like freshly made tortillas. It's possible where I live.

1:18:09.720 --> 1:18:09.880
<v Speaker 6>Right.

1:18:09.900 --> 1:18:13.269
<v Speaker 2>But it's not, I imagine if you live in like Minnesota.

1:18:14.030 --> 1:18:17.019
<v Speaker 2>Just like the little moments of beauty that they gave

1:18:17.060 --> 1:18:20.100
<v Speaker 2>you in your day that had gone. And, but yeah,

1:18:20.120 --> 1:18:22.900
<v Speaker 2>also the big things like I, uh, you know, I,

1:18:23.020 --> 1:18:25.870
<v Speaker 2>I watched kids watching TikTok in the Darien gap. That

1:18:25.890 --> 1:18:28.190
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have been possible seven or eight years ago.

1:18:28.370 --> 1:18:28.630
<v Speaker 13>Right.

1:18:29.229 --> 1:18:29.490
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

1:18:29.510 --> 1:18:32.490
<v Speaker 2>I didn't quite know when styling was widely distributed, but

1:18:32.689 --> 1:18:34.340
<v Speaker 2>like that makes a difference to people.

1:18:35.010 --> 1:18:35.170
<v Speaker 1>Right?

1:18:35.189 --> 1:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Like their cultural world is that they're now engaging with

1:18:38.740 --> 1:18:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the external world, not just through their own culture, through

1:18:40.780 --> 1:18:42.720
<v Speaker 2>the internet. And I want those people to have everything

1:18:42.939 --> 1:18:45.870
<v Speaker 2>I have to be clear, right? Like I want them

1:18:45.950 --> 1:18:47.410
<v Speaker 2>to be able to see the whole world.

1:18:47.630 --> 1:18:47.810
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:18:47.830 --> 1:18:50.620
<v Speaker 8>You don't want to like seal them vacuums. them in

1:18:50.680 --> 1:18:53.639
<v Speaker 8>some kind of some kind of museum exhibit of what once.

1:18:53.540 --> 1:18:57.260
<v Speaker 2>Was exactly yeah but like i also wish that they

1:18:57.280 --> 1:18:58.780
<v Speaker 2>could have it the way i have it which is

1:18:58.800 --> 1:19:01.440
<v Speaker 2>that like i am i was born in england and

1:19:01.479 --> 1:19:04.180
<v Speaker 2>i engage with the world in english i wish they

1:19:04.200 --> 1:19:07.190
<v Speaker 2>could engage with the world number i wish to you know,

1:19:07.250 --> 1:19:09.670
<v Speaker 2>Kurdish people can engage with the world in whichever type

1:19:09.710 --> 1:19:12.719
<v Speaker 2>of Kurdish they speak, you know, which they didn't have to,

1:19:13.189 --> 1:19:15.479
<v Speaker 2>to go through the English way of speaking and seeing

1:19:15.520 --> 1:19:17.960
<v Speaker 2>the world, to engage with the external world, because we

1:19:18.240 --> 1:19:22.440
<v Speaker 2>all lose when we don't have that diversity, right?

1:19:23.439 --> 1:19:26.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. And I mean, we're talking about what is lost,

1:19:26.820 --> 1:19:30.059
<v Speaker 8>I think, when things get homogenized, but there is like,

1:19:30.080 --> 1:19:34.519
<v Speaker 8>I think, another effect or another, I suppose, response to

1:19:35.570 --> 1:19:40.480
<v Speaker 8>that global capitalism has the diversity, which is to package it,

1:19:40.580 --> 1:19:43.720
<v Speaker 8>to market it, to sell it. I referenced those magazines

1:19:43.760 --> 1:19:47.780
<v Speaker 8>that I read, but those magazines might even be an

1:19:47.880 --> 1:19:53.760
<v Speaker 8>example of that because it is a capturing and commodification,

1:19:53.800 --> 1:19:58.970
<v Speaker 8>in a sense, of another culture for distribution and consumption.

1:19:59.590 --> 1:20:00.410
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, definitely.

1:20:00.950 --> 1:20:05.229
<v Speaker 8>You see as well, people's traditional dress becomes... a less

1:20:05.300 --> 1:20:08.040
<v Speaker 8>of a traditional dress and more of a traditional costume

1:20:08.120 --> 1:20:13.580
<v Speaker 8>as they put it on to perform for consumption for tourists.

1:20:14.479 --> 1:20:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like the commodification of diversity. Yeah, that idea that

1:20:18.380 --> 1:20:22.450
<v Speaker 2>diversity is a thing to sell. The marginalization of people

1:20:22.550 --> 1:20:26.090
<v Speaker 2>such that their identity, which has been marginalized by the

1:20:26.110 --> 1:20:28.269
<v Speaker 2>state and capitalism, is what they have to sell to

1:20:28.330 --> 1:20:30.310
<v Speaker 2>exist under the state and capitalism, I guess.

1:20:31.390 --> 1:20:34.860
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. We've already sort of hinted at... Some of the

1:20:34.900 --> 1:20:39.710
<v Speaker 8>reasons why I think we should care about this loss

1:20:39.890 --> 1:20:43.769
<v Speaker 8>of diversity, you know, and I could even spot off

1:20:43.790 --> 1:20:48.030
<v Speaker 8>a few more. And diversity makes our living systems more resilient,

1:20:48.729 --> 1:20:51.590
<v Speaker 8>I think is a very key one. In our ecosystems,

1:20:51.689 --> 1:20:54.410
<v Speaker 8>every species has its niche and they can compete and

1:20:54.450 --> 1:20:57.840
<v Speaker 8>cooperate and recycle nutrients and everything is just part of

1:20:58.100 --> 1:21:01.060
<v Speaker 8>one larger network. And the more diverse that network is,

1:21:01.120 --> 1:21:04.610
<v Speaker 8>the more it has to respond to disruption. Diversity gives

1:21:04.700 --> 1:21:09.400
<v Speaker 8>ecosystems options. We see that in comparison to the monocultures,

1:21:09.439 --> 1:21:13.040
<v Speaker 8>the monocultural approach to farming that has dominated much of

1:21:13.060 --> 1:21:17.559
<v Speaker 8>the world, and the common inputs that approach requires. We

1:21:17.580 --> 1:21:21.030
<v Speaker 8>look at how vulnerable that approach is to disease and

1:21:21.050 --> 1:21:25.330
<v Speaker 8>to changes in climate conditions. In terms of genetic diversity,

1:21:25.370 --> 1:21:28.030
<v Speaker 8>we can point to the fact that if every human

1:21:28.450 --> 1:21:32.689
<v Speaker 8>immune system works in exactly the same way, A pathogen

1:21:32.710 --> 1:21:36.889
<v Speaker 8>that evolved to bypass one person's immune system could bypass everyone's.

1:21:37.630 --> 1:21:41.030
<v Speaker 8>And so our biological differences create the variation in how

1:21:41.070 --> 1:21:46.410
<v Speaker 8>diseases spread and keep us as a whole safe, keep

1:21:46.510 --> 1:21:50.250
<v Speaker 8>our existence as a whole secure. Even within my own family,

1:21:50.290 --> 1:21:53.410
<v Speaker 8>I've noticed that some people are more susceptible and others

1:21:53.510 --> 1:21:58.910
<v Speaker 8>more resistant to different diseases. You know, when a virus passes,

1:21:59.630 --> 1:22:02.090
<v Speaker 8>Into my household, there are some people who get sick

1:22:02.189 --> 1:22:05.590
<v Speaker 8>and some people don't, and it changes each time, despite

1:22:05.630 --> 1:22:08.160
<v Speaker 8>the fact that we are so close genetically. And so again,

1:22:08.180 --> 1:22:12.340
<v Speaker 8>we see the diversity creates resilience. And even if we

1:22:12.360 --> 1:22:16.139
<v Speaker 8>want to take it from like a coldly utilitarian perspective,

1:22:16.860 --> 1:22:21.680
<v Speaker 8>that resilience is a value. It has utility, you know,

1:22:21.840 --> 1:22:27.030
<v Speaker 8>and an individual instance of a species or of a

1:22:27.090 --> 1:22:30.060
<v Speaker 8>culture is might have value in a way that we

1:22:30.100 --> 1:22:34.160
<v Speaker 8>don't realize until it's gone yeah we become poorer as

1:22:34.180 --> 1:22:39.120
<v Speaker 8>a whole we lose possibilities when we lose languages when

1:22:39.140 --> 1:22:43.600
<v Speaker 8>we lose cultures when we lose species every culture represents

1:22:43.820 --> 1:22:50.650
<v Speaker 8>literally thousands of experiments accumulated over generations in what it

1:22:50.729 --> 1:22:53.250
<v Speaker 8>means to live as a human being we may like

1:22:53.350 --> 1:22:57.350
<v Speaker 8>some more than others you know i'm not a relativist

1:22:57.450 --> 1:22:59.889
<v Speaker 8>in the sense that I will turn a blind eye

1:22:59.970 --> 1:23:04.580
<v Speaker 8>to things that I find morally objectionable in certain cultures.

1:23:05.420 --> 1:23:08.760
<v Speaker 8>But I can recognize that every culture has something that

1:23:08.880 --> 1:23:11.660
<v Speaker 8>adds to our library of experiences. And I would rather

1:23:11.740 --> 1:23:15.050
<v Speaker 8>have that full library than a single shelf of books.

1:23:15.430 --> 1:23:16.590
<v Speaker 2>It's a really good way of saying it.

1:23:17.270 --> 1:23:21.769
<v Speaker 8>Having that full library gives us more raw material to

1:23:21.830 --> 1:23:24.639
<v Speaker 8>think with, to create art with, to do science with.

1:23:25.670 --> 1:23:27.790
<v Speaker 8>If you like the arts, you know, you will like

1:23:27.830 --> 1:23:31.050
<v Speaker 8>diversity because that innovation in the arts and in the

1:23:31.090 --> 1:23:34.840
<v Speaker 8>sciences emerges from everything that came before. Diversity is a

1:23:34.860 --> 1:23:39.740
<v Speaker 8>foundation for future creativity and innovation. If everybody approaches the

1:23:39.780 --> 1:23:43.939
<v Speaker 8>world with the same assumptions and categories and ways of thinking, then,

1:23:44.580 --> 1:23:49.090
<v Speaker 8>you know, our capacity to imagine alternatives will shrink. And

1:23:49.130 --> 1:23:54.820
<v Speaker 8>then just really from a deeply philosophical perspective, I appreciate

1:23:54.860 --> 1:23:59.660
<v Speaker 8>diversity because I believe that when you are given a gift,

1:24:00.950 --> 1:24:03.970
<v Speaker 8>you should meet it with gratitude. You know, we are

1:24:04.110 --> 1:24:07.350
<v Speaker 8>born in a world, we happen to be born into

1:24:07.390 --> 1:24:09.770
<v Speaker 8>a world that is overflowing with different forms of life,

1:24:10.350 --> 1:24:14.350
<v Speaker 8>different landscapes, different cultures, different ways of thinking. That is

1:24:14.410 --> 1:24:20.120
<v Speaker 8>a vast, rich inheritance that I believe we should appreciate.

1:24:20.320 --> 1:24:23.809
<v Speaker 8>That is my value. I'll add that You know, we

1:24:23.830 --> 1:24:29.840
<v Speaker 8>were speaking about biodiversity and cultural diversity, what Harmon calls

1:24:29.880 --> 1:24:36.200
<v Speaker 8>biocultural diversity, but there's also the value of cognitive diversity.

1:24:37.120 --> 1:24:40.180
<v Speaker 8>You know, we have different opinions, but we might also

1:24:40.560 --> 1:24:45.110
<v Speaker 8>perceive and categorize and solve problems in generally different ways.

1:24:46.550 --> 1:24:54.589
<v Speaker 8>And having different perspectives, different interpretations, different heuristics, different predictive models,

1:24:56.090 --> 1:25:00.769
<v Speaker 8>what Scott E. Page calls cognitive toolboxes in his book,

1:25:00.790 --> 1:25:04.680
<v Speaker 8>The Difference. You know, these give us an opportunity to

1:25:04.780 --> 1:25:08.760
<v Speaker 8>solve problems in unique ways. You know, we're not all

1:25:08.780 --> 1:25:11.940
<v Speaker 8>going to have the same tools and what tools I

1:25:11.979 --> 1:25:15.380
<v Speaker 8>may lack, another person may have. And it's not always

1:25:15.439 --> 1:25:19.460
<v Speaker 8>necessarily a requirement that you just get the smartest person

1:25:20.180 --> 1:25:24.010
<v Speaker 8>to solve the problem. In fact, as Page's research suggests,

1:25:24.870 --> 1:25:28.240
<v Speaker 8>getting a group of people who approach a problem differently

1:25:28.740 --> 1:25:31.740
<v Speaker 8>will outperform a group of people who are made up

1:25:31.860 --> 1:25:35.740
<v Speaker 8>of individually brilliant people who all think in roughly the

1:25:35.760 --> 1:25:38.540
<v Speaker 8>same way. Now, Page doesn't make the bold claim that

1:25:39.100 --> 1:25:42.010
<v Speaker 8>cognitive diversity is always the best approach because he does

1:25:42.070 --> 1:25:49.030
<v Speaker 8>distinguish between routine, regular tasks, and tasks that require like

1:25:49.070 --> 1:25:53.810
<v Speaker 8>more experimentation and creativity and multiple competing ideas. So in

1:25:53.850 --> 1:25:56.330
<v Speaker 8>those cases where you need that diversity of ways of

1:25:56.370 --> 1:26:01.490
<v Speaker 8>thinking to solve complex problems in transportation, in dealing with

1:26:01.530 --> 1:26:04.710
<v Speaker 8>climate change and developing medicines, you know, we don't want

1:26:04.790 --> 1:26:08.630
<v Speaker 8>everybody to be thinking alike. Another thing that Page points

1:26:08.750 --> 1:26:14.660
<v Speaker 8>out is that while cognitive diversity and identity diversity are

1:26:14.680 --> 1:26:19.590
<v Speaker 8>not one-to-one, There is overlap between the concepts because people

1:26:19.650 --> 1:26:23.020
<v Speaker 8>who grow up in different environments and have different experiences

1:26:23.060 --> 1:26:26.500
<v Speaker 8>and opportunities and social positions are more likely to develop

1:26:26.520 --> 1:26:30.300
<v Speaker 8>different ways of seeing the world. So if we recognize

1:26:30.340 --> 1:26:35.439
<v Speaker 8>that cognitive diversity is valuable for solving complex problems, then

1:26:35.580 --> 1:26:40.280
<v Speaker 8>prejudice is a practical failure as well as a moral failure.

1:26:41.780 --> 1:26:45.540
<v Speaker 8>One of the things that I wanted to address, and

1:26:45.560 --> 1:26:48.200
<v Speaker 8>I kind of alluded to it earlier, when I said

1:26:48.220 --> 1:26:51.980
<v Speaker 8>that I'm not really a relativist, is that while I

1:26:52.040 --> 1:26:56.439
<v Speaker 8>do value diversity, I definitely don't think that every form

1:26:56.840 --> 1:27:00.830
<v Speaker 8>is worth celebrating. You know, I believe a healthy society

1:27:00.890 --> 1:27:04.189
<v Speaker 8>should have space for different ways of thinking and living

1:27:04.250 --> 1:27:08.250
<v Speaker 8>and organizing ourselves, but that does not mean this kind

1:27:08.270 --> 1:27:14.620
<v Speaker 8>of liberal tolerance that would put up with mindsets and

1:27:15.300 --> 1:27:20.050
<v Speaker 8>practices of domination that would eliminate that very freedom at

1:27:20.090 --> 1:27:22.309
<v Speaker 8>the end of the day though i want to retain

1:27:23.050 --> 1:27:26.030
<v Speaker 8>the capacity for diversity because i think it gives us

1:27:26.090 --> 1:27:29.900
<v Speaker 8>a capacity for freedom and i want as you know

1:27:30.100 --> 1:27:33.679
<v Speaker 8>subcommandante marcos put it a world where many worlds exist

1:27:33.979 --> 1:27:40.220
<v Speaker 8>yeah even as i reject certain forms that the world

1:27:40.300 --> 1:27:46.639
<v Speaker 8>has taken and certain manifestations of diversity any closing thoughts.

1:27:47.630 --> 1:27:49.950
<v Speaker 2>Like the world where many worlds can exist is I

1:27:49.990 --> 1:27:52.770
<v Speaker 2>think the perfect way of looking at this, right? Like

1:27:53.550 --> 1:27:57.030
<v Speaker 2>we therefore don't want people who would create a world

1:27:57.070 --> 1:28:00.050
<v Speaker 2>where other worlds cannot exist, right? But we gain so

1:28:00.110 --> 1:28:05.440
<v Speaker 2>much from having and respecting and cherishing diversity rather than

1:28:05.530 --> 1:28:08.340
<v Speaker 2>treating it through that tolerance framework, which we both talked about.

1:28:08.380 --> 1:28:11.780
<v Speaker 2>Like tolerance seems to imply like, well, we're doing it best,

1:28:11.820 --> 1:28:13.940
<v Speaker 2>but we'll let you do it your way as opposed

1:28:14.000 --> 1:28:19.030
<v Speaker 2>to like genuinely cherishing diversity yeah and uh yeah i

1:28:19.110 --> 1:28:21.290
<v Speaker 2>hope we can all see that.

1:28:22.100 --> 1:28:27.360
<v Speaker 8>Agreed and as always all power to all the people peace.

1:28:41.040 --> 1:28:43.740
<v Speaker 6>Welcome to It Could Happen Here, a podcast about the

1:28:43.780 --> 1:28:47.890
<v Speaker 6>violent flailings of a dying empire. I am your host,

1:28:48.090 --> 1:28:52.110
<v Speaker 6>Mio Wong. And today, we are going to be talking

1:28:52.330 --> 1:28:56.629
<v Speaker 6>about a thing, perhaps the only thing that Americans understand

1:28:56.689 --> 1:29:02.200
<v Speaker 6>more thoroughly than a burger, and that is gas prices. Now,

1:29:02.600 --> 1:29:06.460
<v Speaker 6>elsewhere on this show, speaking about inflation, I have talked

1:29:06.580 --> 1:29:11.189
<v Speaker 6>about price as a kind of social hieroglyphic. that serves

1:29:11.240 --> 1:29:16.050
<v Speaker 6>to encode the complex and brutal reality of geopolitics and

1:29:16.130 --> 1:29:22.410
<v Speaker 6>production and labor and exploitation into a single number. And

1:29:22.450 --> 1:29:26.129
<v Speaker 6>that number is their understanding of everything that is happening

1:29:26.270 --> 1:29:29.800
<v Speaker 6>in the world and, you know, how content they are

1:29:29.900 --> 1:29:35.179
<v Speaker 6>about it is about how much gas costs them. This

1:29:35.820 --> 1:29:39.560
<v Speaker 6>has proven a real problem for one group. President of

1:29:39.600 --> 1:29:44.700
<v Speaker 6>the United States, Donald Trump, as diesel is hitting an

1:29:44.820 --> 1:29:50.430
<v Speaker 6>average across the country of $ 6. 52 a gallon. Now, nominally,

1:29:50.600 --> 1:29:52.650
<v Speaker 6>the President of the United States does not control the

1:29:52.660 --> 1:29:57.210
<v Speaker 6>price of oil and does not, you know, set gas prices. However, comma,

1:29:57.689 --> 1:30:02.610
<v Speaker 6>in this case, no, yeah, this is largely not technically entirely,

1:30:02.750 --> 1:30:06.570
<v Speaker 6>but like, yeah, this is sort of just a thing

1:30:06.630 --> 1:30:11.500
<v Speaker 6>he did as an individual. But I think what's important here, right,

1:30:11.560 --> 1:30:14.160
<v Speaker 6>is that the way that all of the information that

1:30:14.180 --> 1:30:18.500
<v Speaker 6>I'm about to describe is conveyed, right, and the thing

1:30:18.520 --> 1:30:21.900
<v Speaker 6>that makes Americans care about it is the social hieroglyphic

1:30:22.640 --> 1:30:25.850
<v Speaker 6>of the gas price, right? It is the single number

1:30:25.890 --> 1:30:28.830
<v Speaker 6>through which all of this complex information is encoded down into,

1:30:29.150 --> 1:30:32.350
<v Speaker 6>and that is what sort of matters emotionally. And I

1:30:32.450 --> 1:30:36.590
<v Speaker 6>want to undo the process of encoding all of that

1:30:36.630 --> 1:30:40.470
<v Speaker 6>information down into the hieroglyphic. I want to actually expand

1:30:40.530 --> 1:30:44.270
<v Speaker 6>it and go look at what is going on in

1:30:44.310 --> 1:30:47.050
<v Speaker 6>the world that is causing all of this. And I

1:30:47.090 --> 1:30:48.650
<v Speaker 6>want to take a look at how the structure of

1:30:48.710 --> 1:30:53.610
<v Speaker 6>American empire has changed in order to facilitate this. And

1:30:53.650 --> 1:30:56.890
<v Speaker 6>to do this, I'm going to walk through a series of,

1:30:57.870 --> 1:31:02.560
<v Speaker 6>I guess, nominally seemingly disconnected stories about oil across the world.

1:31:02.760 --> 1:31:04.850
<v Speaker 6>And we're going to put it all together into the

1:31:05.560 --> 1:31:10.790
<v Speaker 6>new structure of American empire at the end. Now, as

1:31:11.150 --> 1:31:14.610
<v Speaker 6>everyone I think is aware, gas prices have been increasing dramatically,

1:31:14.689 --> 1:31:19.720
<v Speaker 6>both of regular gas and of diesel. Bank of America

1:31:19.820 --> 1:31:23.560
<v Speaker 6>analysts are finally admitting that oil could hit $ 150 a barrel,

1:31:23.580 --> 1:31:28.380
<v Speaker 6>not like right now, but as the war continues to

1:31:28.400 --> 1:31:32.979
<v Speaker 6>drag out. And as we've talked about before on this show,

1:31:33.220 --> 1:31:35.060
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the reserves that were being used to

1:31:35.100 --> 1:31:38.769
<v Speaker 6>calm the market temporarily and keep prices down are being exhausted.

1:31:39.580 --> 1:31:41.760
<v Speaker 6>The most obvious example of this is something we've talked

1:31:41.800 --> 1:31:46.920
<v Speaker 6>about before, which is the draining of the American Strategic

1:31:46.960 --> 1:31:50.360
<v Speaker 6>Petroleum Reserve. But this is true of a lot of

1:31:50.820 --> 1:31:55.920
<v Speaker 6>other reserves around the world as well. Now, this alone

1:31:56.300 --> 1:31:59.389
<v Speaker 6>probably would not have been enough to cause what we've

1:31:59.400 --> 1:32:03.130
<v Speaker 6>been seeing. But, comma, all of the problems that we

1:32:03.150 --> 1:32:05.070
<v Speaker 6>have been talking about for a long time on this show,

1:32:05.110 --> 1:32:08.760
<v Speaker 6>particularly the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, that is

1:32:08.800 --> 1:32:12.679
<v Speaker 6>entirely directly just the fault of Donald Trump, right, through

1:32:12.720 --> 1:32:15.320
<v Speaker 6>his war on Iran, has been doing significant damage to

1:32:15.340 --> 1:32:18.300
<v Speaker 6>the world's oil supply, to the world's natural gas supply. Now,

1:32:18.880 --> 1:32:22.500
<v Speaker 6>the reason it hasn't been worse has been that there

1:32:22.540 --> 1:32:26.820
<v Speaker 6>have been ways to bypass the Strait of Hormuz. They're

1:32:26.860 --> 1:32:29.540
<v Speaker 6>not easy. They work worse than the Strait of Hormuz.

1:32:30.360 --> 1:32:34.269
<v Speaker 6>But One of those important mechanisms has been Saudi Arabia's

1:32:34.430 --> 1:32:37.670
<v Speaker 6>east-west pipeline. Now, we talked about this, Robert talked about

1:32:37.689 --> 1:32:42.130
<v Speaker 6>this on last week's Executive Disorder. Last week, Iraqi paramilitaries

1:32:42.710 --> 1:32:46.430
<v Speaker 6>launched drone strikes on Saudi Arabia's east-west pipeline. It did

1:32:46.750 --> 1:32:52.130
<v Speaker 6>some damage. There is kind of conflicting reports about how

1:32:52.250 --> 1:32:56.229
<v Speaker 6>long exactly that is going to take to repair, but

1:32:56.450 --> 1:32:59.300
<v Speaker 6>the damage to the pipeline has slowed the ability of

1:32:59.340 --> 1:33:03.680
<v Speaker 6>the Saudis to route oil around the Plaque and the

1:33:03.720 --> 1:33:08.410
<v Speaker 6>Strait of Hormuz. Now, also, there has been a major

1:33:08.550 --> 1:33:13.190
<v Speaker 6>expansion in the war in Yemen. This is a really

1:33:13.290 --> 1:33:16.630
<v Speaker 6>hideous conflict that has been going on for over a

1:33:16.710 --> 1:33:23.120
<v Speaker 6>decade now. We don't really have, unfortunately, time to really

1:33:23.160 --> 1:33:26.620
<v Speaker 6>go into all of the factors of the civil war

1:33:26.640 --> 1:33:28.900
<v Speaker 6>in Yemen, which is one of the most complicated wars

1:33:29.340 --> 1:33:32.490
<v Speaker 6>being fought anywhere in the world. Broadly speaking, this is

1:33:32.530 --> 1:33:35.750
<v Speaker 6>a conflict between a coalition that is sort of in

1:33:35.770 --> 1:33:38.410
<v Speaker 6>the West. It's called the Houthis, but there's more forces

1:33:38.450 --> 1:33:42.979
<v Speaker 6>involved in it, which is the kind of Iranian-aligned, vaguely...

1:33:42.439 --> 1:33:45.360
<v Speaker 6>Not vaguely. I mean, they are allied with Iran, but

1:33:45.380 --> 1:33:48.620
<v Speaker 6>they're not necessarily just an Iranian proxy. This is its

1:33:48.780 --> 1:33:51.590
<v Speaker 6>own sort of political force, right? And then on the

1:33:51.600 --> 1:33:55.110
<v Speaker 6>other side, there is the Saudi-backed coalition, which also involves

1:33:55.170 --> 1:33:59.510
<v Speaker 6>a range of forces involved. but is kind of led

1:33:59.570 --> 1:34:02.410
<v Speaker 6>by the Saudis and the UAE, and they're kind of

1:34:02.470 --> 1:34:05.380
<v Speaker 6>allied forces who pull a whole bunch of forces from

1:34:05.400 --> 1:34:11.960
<v Speaker 6>a whole bunch of places and have committed horrifying atrocities, including,

1:34:12.100 --> 1:34:14.740
<v Speaker 6>as I mention constantly every time someone talks about this

1:34:14.780 --> 1:34:16.300
<v Speaker 6>because no one ever seems to remember it, to the

1:34:16.320 --> 1:34:21.620
<v Speaker 6>deployment by the Saudi coalition of Sudanese child soldiers. So

1:34:22.040 --> 1:34:25.559
<v Speaker 6>this war had, I don't know if calm down is

1:34:25.640 --> 1:34:29.599
<v Speaker 6>quite the right word, But in the past few years,

1:34:30.260 --> 1:34:36.700
<v Speaker 6>had been less active than it was, say, in 2018, 2019.

1:34:36.700 --> 1:34:40.310
<v Speaker 6>But the Houthis have now made a major push into

1:34:40.350 --> 1:34:44.670
<v Speaker 6>Saudi coalition territories in Yemen's west and south. They have

1:34:44.689 --> 1:34:48.250
<v Speaker 6>taken the port city of Mokha in the south, which

1:34:48.610 --> 1:34:53.049
<v Speaker 6>is an important Saudi coalition's port city, which is further

1:34:53.729 --> 1:34:55.830
<v Speaker 6>threatening the ability of the Saudis to bypass the Strait

1:34:55.850 --> 1:34:59.220
<v Speaker 6>of Hormuz because This is a city that helps you

1:34:59.260 --> 1:35:03.379
<v Speaker 6>control access to the Gulf of Aden. Now, this war

1:35:03.660 --> 1:35:08.120
<v Speaker 6>has been and continues to be a massive humanitarian nightmare.

1:35:09.060 --> 1:35:11.860
<v Speaker 6>We really have no idea how many people have actually

1:35:11.880 --> 1:35:14.760
<v Speaker 6>died in the war. The casualty figures right now are

1:35:15.580 --> 1:35:19.160
<v Speaker 6>kind of stuck at 150,000. I suspect it is significantly

1:35:19.200 --> 1:35:20.910
<v Speaker 6>more than that. This is a region that has been

1:35:20.950 --> 1:35:25.610
<v Speaker 6>experiencing everything from you know, like hideous war, just famines.

1:35:26.189 --> 1:35:29.240
<v Speaker 6>A huge part of this war has been a Saudi

1:35:29.280 --> 1:35:34.939
<v Speaker 6>blockade of sort of like Sokol Houthi controlled territories, which

1:35:34.979 --> 1:35:37.600
<v Speaker 6>has had an absolutely devastating effect on the ability of,

1:35:38.340 --> 1:35:41.190
<v Speaker 6>you know, people in Yemen to eat. This attack has

1:35:41.229 --> 1:35:44.269
<v Speaker 6>also caused a massive surge of refugees, you know, as

1:35:44.350 --> 1:35:47.230
<v Speaker 6>people sort of flee the violence. And this has been,

1:35:47.670 --> 1:35:50.950
<v Speaker 6>you know, an absolute nightmare on the one hand. And

1:35:50.990 --> 1:35:54.540
<v Speaker 6>on the other hand, the way that it's understood here,

1:35:55.660 --> 1:35:58.150
<v Speaker 6>the way that it's reported on in the West, is

1:35:58.330 --> 1:36:03.790
<v Speaker 6>not as its own unique humanitarian nightmare and this unique

1:36:03.830 --> 1:36:11.439
<v Speaker 6>war of Saudi and Emirati empire. In Yemen, it's understood

1:36:11.880 --> 1:36:16.320
<v Speaker 6>as something that affects oil prices. And so that's one

1:36:16.360 --> 1:36:21.380
<v Speaker 6>of the factors that is encoded in into this price.

1:36:21.580 --> 1:36:26.540
<v Speaker 6>Another one has been Ukraine's drone attacks on Russian oil refineries,

1:36:26.680 --> 1:36:32.350
<v Speaker 6>which have escalated. Now, from the perspective of what is

1:36:32.410 --> 1:36:36.210
<v Speaker 6>happening with the oil, you know, Houthis have also been

1:36:36.250 --> 1:36:40.809
<v Speaker 6>attacking Saudi shipping and Saudi shipping is, you know, when

1:36:40.830 --> 1:36:44.280
<v Speaker 6>someone talks about Saudi shipping, they're talking almost like guarantee

1:36:44.340 --> 1:36:46.240
<v Speaker 6>the thing they're talking about is shipping oil out of

1:36:46.260 --> 1:36:49.519
<v Speaker 6>the country, right? Houthi attacks on Saudi shipping have slowed

1:36:49.600 --> 1:36:52.350
<v Speaker 6>down In the past week, but there is always the

1:36:52.400 --> 1:36:55.520
<v Speaker 6>possibility of them starting up again. And this is the

1:36:55.620 --> 1:37:00.200
<v Speaker 6>real problem in terms of the world's oil infrastructure, and

1:37:00.240 --> 1:37:03.520
<v Speaker 6>particularly from the perspective of empire, right? In the sense of,

1:37:03.820 --> 1:37:08.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, wanting to be able to secure access to

1:37:08.320 --> 1:37:13.299
<v Speaker 6>oil for the US and for other sort of imperial powers.

1:37:13.939 --> 1:37:18.190
<v Speaker 6>The issue that they're facing as this war continues, right?

1:37:18.560 --> 1:37:21.639
<v Speaker 6>And as these really, really, truly these series of wars, right,

1:37:22.800 --> 1:37:26.260
<v Speaker 6>is that even if, you know, going back to the

1:37:26.320 --> 1:37:31.970
<v Speaker 6>Saudi pipeline, right, the Saudi pipeline will eventually be fixed, right?

1:37:32.090 --> 1:37:34.530
<v Speaker 6>Like full capacity, it might not be for 68 weeks,

1:37:34.750 --> 1:37:37.310
<v Speaker 6>but eventually the pipeline is going to get fixed, even

1:37:37.350 --> 1:37:40.929
<v Speaker 6>if it is sort of restricting supply in the meantime.

1:37:40.950 --> 1:37:45.850
<v Speaker 6>The problem is that all of this infrastructure is just exposed.

1:37:46.650 --> 1:37:50.799
<v Speaker 6>And a whole bunch of different militaries in the region

1:37:50.939 --> 1:37:54.160
<v Speaker 6>can and probably will hit them again, as the U.S.

1:37:54.180 --> 1:37:59.890
<v Speaker 6>has been hitting Iranian oil infrastructure, right? Iran, its allied

1:37:59.910 --> 1:38:03.350
<v Speaker 6>paramilitaries in Iraq, the Houthis, there are lots of groups

1:38:03.830 --> 1:38:07.310
<v Speaker 6>in the region who are being attacked by the U.S.

1:38:07.350 --> 1:38:11.450
<v Speaker 6>and the Saudis and sort of American allies in the

1:38:11.490 --> 1:38:13.680
<v Speaker 6>region who are looking at this and going, oh, this

1:38:13.810 --> 1:38:16.439
<v Speaker 6>is something we can use to extract oil. you know,

1:38:16.460 --> 1:38:18.880
<v Speaker 6>to extract concessions and try to fight the Americans off.

1:38:19.770 --> 1:38:22.210
<v Speaker 6>And there's no real answer for this other than ending

1:38:22.270 --> 1:38:36.120
<v Speaker 6>the war, a thing that just won't happen. Now, the

1:38:36.180 --> 1:38:42.970
<v Speaker 6>Trump administration nominally has a plan for this. The plan

1:38:42.990 --> 1:38:46.490
<v Speaker 6>that they are claiming to have, other than this sort

1:38:46.510 --> 1:38:48.469
<v Speaker 6>of constant dance of claiming that the war in Iran

1:38:48.510 --> 1:38:51.950
<v Speaker 6>is over, and then It's restarting again. We've started a

1:38:51.950 --> 1:38:54.370
<v Speaker 6>whole bunch of different wars. Another trade war is actually open.

1:38:55.310 --> 1:39:01.470
<v Speaker 6>The other plan that Trump has talked about is Venezuela.

1:39:01.870 --> 1:39:06.559
<v Speaker 6>Trump was at the UN recently where he gave an

1:39:06.720 --> 1:39:09.519
<v Speaker 6>extremely distressing speech in which he talked about how he

1:39:09.560 --> 1:39:15.689
<v Speaker 6>had been thinking about destroying Iran. He said, quote, do

1:39:15.790 --> 1:39:18.750
<v Speaker 6>I drive them into hell with no chance of survival

1:39:18.830 --> 1:39:23.030
<v Speaker 6>and no hope of future greatness or generations? Now, one

1:39:23.060 --> 1:39:26.299
<v Speaker 6>of the other parts of this speech was him talking

1:39:26.560 --> 1:39:32.080
<v Speaker 6>about the U.S. 's deal with the Venezuelan government that

1:39:32.240 --> 1:39:35.780
<v Speaker 6>it installed when it just kidnapped Maduro, who we are

1:39:36.000 --> 1:39:40.200
<v Speaker 6>just also still holding, as people I think broadly have

1:39:40.229 --> 1:39:42.530
<v Speaker 6>forgotten about. But yeah, no, we just are still just

1:39:42.830 --> 1:39:48.090
<v Speaker 6>holding ahead of state. hostage in a prison. We're just

1:39:48.110 --> 1:39:52.610
<v Speaker 6>still doing that. But he was talking about a deal

1:39:52.670 --> 1:39:55.790
<v Speaker 6>that he struck with the current Venezuelan government, which is

1:39:56.070 --> 1:40:00.759
<v Speaker 6>largely just composed of the same people from the Maduro government,

1:40:00.920 --> 1:40:03.299
<v Speaker 6>but with any person in charge of it and answering

1:40:03.320 --> 1:40:07.559
<v Speaker 6>to Trump. Yeah, talking, you know, that was a 100-year,

1:40:07.620 --> 1:40:13.280
<v Speaker 6>supposedly a 100-year concession for a significant portion of what's

1:40:13.320 --> 1:40:19.729
<v Speaker 6>supposed to be Venezuela's oil fields. Now, Trump in this said, quote,

1:40:19.890 --> 1:40:25.250
<v Speaker 6>to the victors belong the spoils. And this is nominally, right,

1:40:25.470 --> 1:40:30.900
<v Speaker 6>this sort of is his previous war, or short war,

1:40:31.060 --> 1:40:36.760
<v Speaker 6>I guess, on Venezuela is supposed to be the solution

1:40:36.840 --> 1:40:40.330
<v Speaker 6>to his new war. Trump has been pushing the line

1:40:40.550 --> 1:40:42.970
<v Speaker 6>that oil flowing from Venezuela is going to, you know,

1:40:43.189 --> 1:40:47.630
<v Speaker 6>be the thing that drives prices down and stops these

1:40:47.729 --> 1:40:51.270
<v Speaker 6>escalating oil prices from his other imperial war in Iran.

1:40:52.210 --> 1:40:55.550
<v Speaker 6>And as we're going to talk about now, there is

1:40:55.870 --> 1:41:02.280
<v Speaker 6>oil flowing from Venezuela to the US, right? And the

1:41:02.360 --> 1:41:06.420
<v Speaker 6>amount of oil that is flowing to the US has increased.

1:41:07.060 --> 1:41:11.580
<v Speaker 6>Companies that were already in Venezuela, like Chevron, are expanding production.

1:41:12.620 --> 1:41:19.110
<v Speaker 6>But it hasn't even hit, like, 1990s levels. It's still,

1:41:19.729 --> 1:41:22.809
<v Speaker 6>in the grand scheme of things, not enough oil to

1:41:22.930 --> 1:41:25.530
<v Speaker 6>actually do anything. And as we have, you know, sort

1:41:25.570 --> 1:41:28.530
<v Speaker 6>of repeatedly emphasized on this show, oil is not liquid money.

1:41:28.550 --> 1:41:32.220
<v Speaker 6>It has material properties, it has social properties that come

1:41:32.240 --> 1:41:34.840
<v Speaker 6>from the, you know, technical process of extraction. It's not

1:41:34.900 --> 1:41:40.599
<v Speaker 6>all the same. These oil reserves... you know, suck, right?

1:41:40.720 --> 1:41:42.970
<v Speaker 6>And this is also part of the problem with Venezuelan oil,

1:41:43.010 --> 1:41:46.590
<v Speaker 6>is the oil is just of a lower quality than

1:41:46.710 --> 1:41:49.450
<v Speaker 6>the oil that you get out of the Middle East. Now,

1:41:50.390 --> 1:41:52.890
<v Speaker 6>what's important for our purposes, right, is we're beginning to

1:41:52.910 --> 1:41:58.120
<v Speaker 6>see a little bit more of the plan, which I

1:41:58.140 --> 1:42:00.479
<v Speaker 6>guess is kind of an ambitious way to describe the

1:42:00.500 --> 1:42:05.970
<v Speaker 6>kind of just semi-free-for-all that's been happening in Venezuela. In

1:42:06.030 --> 1:42:08.590
<v Speaker 6>terms of this sort of plan, which is to extract

1:42:08.630 --> 1:42:11.790
<v Speaker 6>all of this oil from Venezuela, which is now just

1:42:11.830 --> 1:42:15.660
<v Speaker 6>effectively operating as an American colony, even in just pure

1:42:15.720 --> 1:42:18.780
<v Speaker 6>imperial terms, and not thinking just in terms of the

1:42:18.800 --> 1:42:22.320
<v Speaker 6>fact that, yeah, Venezuela is just a dictatorship and the

1:42:22.460 --> 1:42:27.420
<v Speaker 6>oil is now flowing to the US, there's real problems

1:42:27.460 --> 1:42:31.800
<v Speaker 6>with this in that Venezuelan oil infrastructure is very bad,

1:42:32.700 --> 1:42:38.110
<v Speaker 6>and the actual money in oil is in controlling infrastructure

1:42:38.130 --> 1:42:44.090
<v Speaker 6>that already exists and not building new infrastructure. So again,

1:42:44.350 --> 1:42:47.790
<v Speaker 6>companies that were in Venezuela, which is, I mean, it's

1:42:47.830 --> 1:42:51.980
<v Speaker 6>basically Chevron, right? You know, are expanding their existing production

1:42:51.990 --> 1:42:55.020
<v Speaker 6>to some extent, but no one else wants to go

1:42:55.200 --> 1:42:58.180
<v Speaker 6>in and actually like build a bunch of oil refineries

1:42:58.220 --> 1:43:01.660
<v Speaker 6>and a bunch of extraction facilities because that stuff's expensive

1:43:01.680 --> 1:43:04.580
<v Speaker 6>and it requires massive heavy capital investment and it's risky

1:43:05.740 --> 1:43:12.780
<v Speaker 6>And this is becoming a real problem for this entire plan, right? Obviously, yes,

1:43:12.800 --> 1:43:15.340
<v Speaker 6>there is oil that the administration can ship out of

1:43:16.260 --> 1:43:22.969
<v Speaker 6>Venezuela and is, right? But it's not enough to actually

1:43:23.010 --> 1:43:27.250
<v Speaker 6>seriously have the effects that the administration is talking about

1:43:27.290 --> 1:43:31.830
<v Speaker 6>in terms of sort of lowering prices. Now, we're going

1:43:31.850 --> 1:43:34.550
<v Speaker 6>to get to the extent to which it does kind

1:43:34.610 --> 1:43:39.720
<v Speaker 6>of solve... the regime's demand on just the basic level of, oh,

1:43:39.760 --> 1:43:40.900
<v Speaker 6>if we're going to do a war, we should keep

1:43:40.920 --> 1:43:43.860
<v Speaker 6>the oil. But the actual prospects for this oil are

1:43:43.900 --> 1:43:47.100
<v Speaker 6>just not very good. And this is where I want

1:43:47.140 --> 1:43:50.540
<v Speaker 6>to get into something new that we've learned about sort

1:43:50.560 --> 1:43:55.140
<v Speaker 6>of recently through reporting from the Wall Street Journal, that

1:43:55.160 --> 1:43:56.820
<v Speaker 6>there's been some more stuff about some of the people

1:43:56.880 --> 1:43:59.820
<v Speaker 6>who are coming into Venezuela in order to do this. Now,

1:44:00.670 --> 1:44:03.309
<v Speaker 6>we have mentioned on the show before that there are

1:44:03.330 --> 1:44:08.840
<v Speaker 6>a lot of network state people like involved in Venezuela.

1:44:08.900 --> 1:44:11.340
<v Speaker 6>This is one of the places that these sort of

1:44:11.400 --> 1:44:15.400
<v Speaker 6>like Silicon Valley tech fascists are moving into. And one

1:44:15.420 --> 1:44:18.480
<v Speaker 6>of the people who is now becoming important in Venezuelan

1:44:18.510 --> 1:44:21.130
<v Speaker 6>sort of oil production or is attempting to become important

1:44:22.050 --> 1:44:27.250
<v Speaker 6>is this crypto billionaire named Fred Ersam, who is one

1:44:27.270 --> 1:44:31.689
<v Speaker 6>of the founders of Coinbase, which is a giant crypto company.

1:44:32.650 --> 1:44:36.270
<v Speaker 6>He's sort of in tight with The entire Silicon Valley

1:44:36.310 --> 1:44:41.280
<v Speaker 6>tech elite has ties to like every venture capital and

1:44:42.560 --> 1:44:49.360
<v Speaker 6>Andreessen Horowitz, like steel-backed constellation you can imagine. And he's

1:44:49.650 --> 1:44:52.669
<v Speaker 6>one of the people who's been extremely important in terms

1:44:53.070 --> 1:44:57.490
<v Speaker 6>of the ways that this sort of network state project

1:44:57.550 --> 1:44:59.470
<v Speaker 6>of this like setting up these sort of like corporate

1:44:59.490 --> 1:45:04.100
<v Speaker 6>fascist states works. right, have been interested in crypto as

1:45:04.140 --> 1:45:07.160
<v Speaker 6>a way to sort of move money around and have

1:45:07.560 --> 1:45:11.719
<v Speaker 6>money that's not like taxable directly or like is difficult

1:45:11.740 --> 1:45:15.920
<v Speaker 6>for states to sort of get access to. Now, Fred

1:45:16.280 --> 1:45:22.790
<v Speaker 6>has moved into this really, really sort of, it's like

1:45:22.810 --> 1:45:27.210
<v Speaker 6>described as a hotel, but it's like almost more like

1:45:27.250 --> 1:45:29.960
<v Speaker 6>a kind of like I don't know, almost like billionaire

1:45:30.000 --> 1:45:35.160
<v Speaker 6>resort thing in Caracas. It's like 36 rooms in it.

1:45:36.000 --> 1:45:39.140
<v Speaker 6>And he's been spending a whole bunch of time living there.

1:45:39.820 --> 1:45:43.430
<v Speaker 6>He's also like founded this company with some Venezuelan guys,

1:45:43.689 --> 1:45:45.570
<v Speaker 6>one of whom was like went to Stanford. So, you know,

1:45:45.610 --> 1:45:48.850
<v Speaker 6>it's like these sort of, there's always like a local

1:45:48.970 --> 1:45:54.129
<v Speaker 6>elite kind of thing involved in these projects where particularly

1:45:54.170 --> 1:45:58.960
<v Speaker 6>you get like American educated guys from, you colonized nations

1:45:58.979 --> 1:46:01.680
<v Speaker 6>who end up coming back and getting involved in these processes.

1:46:02.280 --> 1:46:05.439
<v Speaker 6>And they have founded this company called Primavera, which is

1:46:06.060 --> 1:46:09.630
<v Speaker 6>getting involved in the contracts for Venezuelan oil development. But

1:46:09.890 --> 1:46:14.430
<v Speaker 6>there's problems here, right? Which is that this is a startup.

1:46:15.590 --> 1:46:22.360
<v Speaker 6>They've never done oil extraction before, right? And the network

1:46:22.380 --> 1:46:24.800
<v Speaker 6>state people and their VC firms have had a lot

1:46:24.820 --> 1:46:29.220
<v Speaker 6>of success In things like drone production, right? In missile production,

1:46:29.540 --> 1:46:31.580
<v Speaker 6>in a lot of sort of, you know, like things

1:46:31.600 --> 1:46:34.889
<v Speaker 6>that are like kind of like heavy industrial capacity. But

1:46:35.270 --> 1:46:38.189
<v Speaker 6>this guy is a crypto billionaire and they're trying to

1:46:38.229 --> 1:46:41.370
<v Speaker 6>do oil development that like the rest of the world's

1:46:41.410 --> 1:46:44.710
<v Speaker 6>oil companies were like, no. So there are sort of

1:46:44.770 --> 1:46:47.510
<v Speaker 6>real questions about whether even this, you know, this sort

1:46:47.530 --> 1:46:51.210
<v Speaker 6>of like fascist plan to exploit the resources of this

1:46:51.270 --> 1:46:54.950
<v Speaker 6>country can actually work. But this is the kind of

1:46:55.150 --> 1:46:58.510
<v Speaker 6>constellation of forces that have a line behind the Trump administration, right?

1:46:59.350 --> 1:47:04.030
<v Speaker 6>And these constellation of forces are to an extent different

1:47:05.210 --> 1:47:09.780
<v Speaker 6>than the ones from old American neoconservatism, right? Which was

1:47:09.820 --> 1:47:11.300
<v Speaker 6>the last sort of, you know, last time we were

1:47:11.340 --> 1:47:26.549
<v Speaker 6>like fighting wars for oil during the Bush administration. Now,

1:47:26.600 --> 1:47:28.410
<v Speaker 6>I want to go back and talk about this in

1:47:28.450 --> 1:47:29.350
<v Speaker 6>terms of the structure of.

1:47:29.410 --> 1:47:30.010
<v Speaker 3>Empire, right?

1:47:30.090 --> 1:47:35.189
<v Speaker 6>Because it's very clear that the kind of regime that's

1:47:35.229 --> 1:47:37.830
<v Speaker 6>been set up in Venezuela, which is just, okay, we've

1:47:37.870 --> 1:47:42.170
<v Speaker 6>turned this entire nation into not even the kind of

1:47:42.250 --> 1:47:47.010
<v Speaker 6>debt servicing colony that the US has traditionally done when

1:47:47.030 --> 1:47:49.290
<v Speaker 6>it comes in to extract wealth from a country, but

1:47:49.310 --> 1:47:51.900
<v Speaker 6>just as a sort of like appear, hey, we can

1:47:51.950 --> 1:47:54.540
<v Speaker 6>say we got the oil colony, but this is the

1:47:54.580 --> 1:47:56.679
<v Speaker 6>kind of regime that Trump wants, not just for Venezuela,

1:47:56.720 --> 1:47:58.640
<v Speaker 6>but for Iran and Cuba and the rest of the

1:47:58.680 --> 1:48:01.000
<v Speaker 6>world as well, which are just these sort of like

1:48:01.120 --> 1:48:04.240
<v Speaker 6>compliant dictatorships that will export him whatever he wants and

1:48:04.280 --> 1:48:09.320
<v Speaker 6>flatter his ego. And this is a desire, this specific

1:48:09.400 --> 1:48:12.190
<v Speaker 6>kind of empire, right? This specific kind of oil empire

1:48:12.930 --> 1:48:16.170
<v Speaker 6>is a desire that comes out of a divide in

1:48:16.189 --> 1:48:19.910
<v Speaker 6>American conservatism between the neocons and what are called the paleocons.

1:48:21.200 --> 1:48:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Paleo is like the old conservatives, neocons the new conservatives

1:48:25.600 --> 1:48:30.809
<v Speaker 6>or whatever. These are both kinds of empire. If you

1:48:30.830 --> 1:48:33.930
<v Speaker 6>look at what neoconservatism was, it was an oil company

1:48:33.950 --> 1:48:36.430
<v Speaker 6>strapped to a weapons manufacturer like wearing a church for

1:48:36.470 --> 1:48:38.769
<v Speaker 6>a face. And if you look at what the Bush

1:48:38.790 --> 1:48:42.250
<v Speaker 6>administration is, like Bush is a Texas oil guy. Cheney

1:48:42.390 --> 1:48:45.650
<v Speaker 6>is a Halliburton guy, which is like another oil company.

1:48:45.710 --> 1:48:48.450
<v Speaker 6>He's also really heavily involved in a bunch of weapons manufacturers.

1:48:49.410 --> 1:48:50.889
<v Speaker 6>You know, this is the alliance that was like doing

1:48:50.950 --> 1:48:54.710
<v Speaker 6>the worst for oil. But part of what the project

1:48:54.729 --> 1:48:57.729
<v Speaker 6>of neo-conservatism was, was nominally this mission of bringing like

1:48:57.790 --> 1:49:01.100
<v Speaker 6>quote unquote democracy to the world. And obviously this is,

1:49:01.260 --> 1:49:05.519
<v Speaker 6>you know, democracy insofar as it supports the US, which

1:49:05.560 --> 1:49:08.540
<v Speaker 6>is like capitalism and support for American empire. And, you know,

1:49:08.580 --> 1:49:12.380
<v Speaker 6>they're setting up a stock market in, in Iraq, but like,

1:49:12.860 --> 1:49:14.020
<v Speaker 6>and this is the way that a lot of these

1:49:14.040 --> 1:49:15.860
<v Speaker 6>people thought about it was this sort of like Hegelian

1:49:15.900 --> 1:49:18.820
<v Speaker 6>nation building process, right? Like the unfolding of American liberal

1:49:18.850 --> 1:49:22.370
<v Speaker 6>democracy throughout the entire world in a way that, you know,

1:49:22.710 --> 1:49:26.790
<v Speaker 6>could sort of permanently stabilize its hegemony. But there, there

1:49:26.990 --> 1:49:30.930
<v Speaker 6>is this sort of like nation building.

1:49:31.330 --> 1:49:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Aspect of, of it.

1:49:33.420 --> 1:49:37.520
<v Speaker 6>But then there was also always, like, a paleocon opposition

1:49:37.580 --> 1:49:39.229
<v Speaker 6>to it, and this is the more radical faction that

1:49:39.240 --> 1:49:41.070
<v Speaker 6>didn't give a shit about any of the sort of

1:49:41.110 --> 1:49:45.170
<v Speaker 6>democracy and human rights stuff that neocons would spout. You know, literally,

1:49:45.189 --> 1:49:46.750
<v Speaker 6>they would, like, yeah, bomb them all and take the

1:49:46.850 --> 1:49:50.110
<v Speaker 6>oil and leave. And this, to a large extent, is

1:49:50.130 --> 1:49:53.220
<v Speaker 6>the faction that Trump has descended from, right? And these

1:49:53.240 --> 1:49:59.220
<v Speaker 6>people sometimes will kind of, like, play at being anti-imperialist, or, like,

1:49:59.240 --> 1:50:01.960
<v Speaker 6>not even anti-imperialist, they'll play at being anti-war. You know,

1:50:02.140 --> 1:50:04.700
<v Speaker 6>Tucker Carlson, for example, is like a guy who did

1:50:04.720 --> 1:50:06.939
<v Speaker 6>this a lot, even though he supported the war when

1:50:07.600 --> 1:50:11.189
<v Speaker 6>it was happening. But they'll do this thing of like, oh,

1:50:11.210 --> 1:50:12.890
<v Speaker 6>we shouldn't go fight in these imperial wars.

1:50:12.910 --> 1:50:13.179
<v Speaker 7>The U.S.

1:50:13.189 --> 1:50:15.210
<v Speaker 6>Should only fight wars that benefit it. We shouldn't be

1:50:15.229 --> 1:50:20.550
<v Speaker 6>the world's policemen. But the corollary to that is, you know,

1:50:20.770 --> 1:50:23.900
<v Speaker 6>where like war for oil was like the leftist charge

1:50:24.520 --> 1:50:27.160
<v Speaker 6>about what we were doing in Iraq. These people were

1:50:27.180 --> 1:50:29.519
<v Speaker 6>just like, yeah, no, we actually should literally just fight

1:50:30.120 --> 1:50:34.170
<v Speaker 6>wars for oil. Because they're just, they're fascists, right? They

1:50:34.189 --> 1:50:38.570
<v Speaker 6>don't even have the kind of veil of this like

1:50:39.350 --> 1:50:43.710
<v Speaker 6>nominally sort of democratic project. All they really care about

1:50:44.550 --> 1:50:48.979
<v Speaker 6>is just the pure resource extraction. But the thing about this, right?

1:50:49.000 --> 1:50:51.380
<v Speaker 6>And like part of what was going on with this

1:50:51.439 --> 1:50:53.640
<v Speaker 6>kind of thing was like, yeah, so you want to

1:50:53.680 --> 1:50:55.880
<v Speaker 6>set up a stable government so that these oil companies

1:50:55.900 --> 1:51:01.139
<v Speaker 6>have a secure base from which to actually do resource extractions. Because,

1:51:01.360 --> 1:51:03.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, sort of unstable governments make it more difficult,

1:51:03.220 --> 1:51:06.960
<v Speaker 6>et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Now, with this sort of, like,

1:51:07.020 --> 1:51:10.820
<v Speaker 6>fascist Trump coalition, like, obviously, yeah, like, the oil company

1:51:10.840 --> 1:51:16.360
<v Speaker 6>supported him. But it's not the, like, oil guys directly

1:51:16.620 --> 1:51:20.110
<v Speaker 6>who are behind the Venezuelan coup or the people that have, like,

1:51:20.210 --> 1:51:22.410
<v Speaker 6>moved in to extract the oil. It's, as we were

1:51:22.430 --> 1:51:25.410
<v Speaker 6>talking about, it's these, like, tech fascist network state guys.

1:51:26.310 --> 1:51:26.430
<v Speaker 8>And.

1:51:26.970 --> 1:51:27.130
<v Speaker 4>The.

1:51:27.090 --> 1:51:29.960
<v Speaker 6>Reaction of the oil people to Trump's wars, and this is,

1:51:30.090 --> 1:51:32.850
<v Speaker 6>you know, partially given his label, but mostly to this

1:51:32.950 --> 1:51:35.349
<v Speaker 6>war on Iran, which he's framing as being about, like,

1:51:35.400 --> 1:51:37.200
<v Speaker 6>nuclear weapons. But he's also been talking about, like, we

1:51:37.220 --> 1:51:38.839
<v Speaker 6>should just sit there and take the trade off of Moose.

1:51:39.280 --> 1:51:41.700
<v Speaker 6>You know, Iran shouldn't be able to, like, threaten the

1:51:41.720 --> 1:51:45.440
<v Speaker 6>world's oil supply. The actual oil people are really pissed

1:51:45.500 --> 1:51:47.680
<v Speaker 6>off about this because, yeah, they're losing access to their

1:51:47.720 --> 1:51:52.630
<v Speaker 6>ability to ship oil. But this is what is inside

1:51:53.710 --> 1:51:56.700
<v Speaker 6>of the sort of price hieroglyphic of gas price go up.

1:51:57.370 --> 1:51:59.510
<v Speaker 6>It's an attempt of, like, the tech fascists to, like,

1:51:59.689 --> 1:52:06.500
<v Speaker 6>graft their project onto this sort of paleo-con-fascist id of Trump,

1:52:07.300 --> 1:52:10.920
<v Speaker 6>where he's just doing these wars, like, because he wants to,

1:52:12.120 --> 1:52:14.389
<v Speaker 6>and they're attempting to get something out of it. But

1:52:15.229 --> 1:52:20.130
<v Speaker 6>what has actually happened here in all of this is

1:52:20.490 --> 1:52:23.170
<v Speaker 6>that in the administration's war for oil, and in their

1:52:23.229 --> 1:52:28.150
<v Speaker 6>attempt to sort of, like, fulfill the old paleocon desire

1:52:29.450 --> 1:52:34.309
<v Speaker 6>for wars for oil. They have successfully not gotten oil.

1:52:34.340 --> 1:52:38.140
<v Speaker 6>They're replacing oil that they used to have or attempting

1:52:38.160 --> 1:52:40.740
<v Speaker 6>to replace better oil they used to have with shit

1:52:40.920 --> 1:52:43.620
<v Speaker 6>oil that won't work for these purposes. And they're depriving

1:52:43.660 --> 1:52:45.540
<v Speaker 6>both the US and basically the rest of the world

1:52:45.580 --> 1:52:50.309
<v Speaker 6>of oil. And that's in some sense the macro level

1:52:50.350 --> 1:52:54.000
<v Speaker 6>of it. The micro level of it is that There's

1:52:54.180 --> 1:52:57.179
<v Speaker 6>a whole bunch of wars and genocides that are playing

1:52:57.340 --> 1:53:01.440
<v Speaker 6>out across the world that are the result of this.

1:53:03.300 --> 1:53:08.080
<v Speaker 6>And that's what's encoded in Gas Price Go Up, is

1:53:08.900 --> 1:53:11.360
<v Speaker 6>all of the violence and all of the cruelty and

1:53:11.540 --> 1:53:14.810
<v Speaker 6>all of this sort of inane, flailing stupidity of empire.

1:53:29.050 --> 1:53:32.430
<v Speaker 4>This is It Could Happen Here, Executive Disorder, our weekly

1:53:32.470 --> 1:53:35.610
<v Speaker 4>newscast covering what's happening in the White House, the crumbling world,

1:53:35.680 --> 1:53:38.700
<v Speaker 4>and what this means for you. I'm Garrison Davis. Today

1:53:38.720 --> 1:53:42.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm joined by Mia Wong, James Stout, and special correspondent,

1:53:42.880 --> 1:53:43.700
<v Speaker 4>Denna El-Kurd.

1:53:44.060 --> 1:53:44.480
<v Speaker 6>Welcome.

1:53:44.780 --> 1:53:45.509
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thank you.

1:53:45.780 --> 1:53:48.729
<v Speaker 4>This episode, we are covering the week of September 16

1:53:48.729 --> 1:53:52.350
<v Speaker 4>to September 23rd. I know this has been a busy

1:53:52.550 --> 1:53:55.830
<v Speaker 4>news week. There's the United Nations. The Trump admin is

1:53:55.990 --> 1:54:00.689
<v Speaker 4>throwing around the idea of a diesel export embargo. There's

1:54:00.729 --> 1:54:05.180
<v Speaker 4>a lot of big issues in this country. But on Wednesday,

1:54:05.420 --> 1:54:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama decided to use the United

1:54:10.540 --> 1:54:15.400
<v Speaker 4>States Senate to bring up another very important issue threatening

1:54:15.640 --> 1:54:19.349
<v Speaker 4>the national security of our country. Let's take a listen.

1:54:19.370 --> 1:54:25.599
<v Speaker 10>Airline pilots. Flight attendants and air traffic controllers are part

1:54:26.140 --> 1:54:32.600
<v Speaker 10>of the furry community. Lord help us. It's terrifying when

1:54:32.650 --> 1:54:35.850
<v Speaker 10>you think about this. When you walk onto a commercial flight,

1:54:36.850 --> 1:54:40.390
<v Speaker 10>it's possible that the pilot flying your plane could have

1:54:40.430 --> 1:54:44.830
<v Speaker 10>a deranged fetish of dressing up like an animal. You

1:54:44.870 --> 1:54:45.660
<v Speaker 10>can't make this up.

1:54:46.820 --> 1:54:48.700
<v Speaker 2>Every time I hear that guy's name, he sounds like

1:54:48.720 --> 1:54:51.140
<v Speaker 2>he's a character on Thomas the Tank Engine, like a

1:54:51.200 --> 1:54:53.800
<v Speaker 2>side character. Then he goes and does shit like this.

1:54:54.000 --> 1:54:56.740
<v Speaker 4>He does have a very cartoony name. Also on the

1:54:56.780 --> 1:55:02.280
<v Speaker 4>little podium here, a printout of the... An emoji? An emoji?

1:55:02.590 --> 1:55:04.830
<v Speaker 2>Not just any emoji. Does someone want to take a

1:55:04.870 --> 1:55:06.010
<v Speaker 2>crack at describing this?

1:55:06.090 --> 1:55:07.610
<v Speaker 4>I think this is what we would describe as the

1:55:07.690 --> 1:55:13.330
<v Speaker 4>pregnant man emoji. A yellow emoji figure with short hair

1:55:13.390 --> 1:55:17.840
<v Speaker 4>who is pregnant. The text reads transgenderism is a mental illness.

1:55:19.260 --> 1:55:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Something I think Tuberville and others are overlooking is if

1:55:22.990 --> 1:55:27.510
<v Speaker 4>we were to, you know, excise furries from their jobs

1:55:27.590 --> 1:55:31.370
<v Speaker 4>as airline pilots, flight attendants and air traffic controllers, our

1:55:31.470 --> 1:55:36.210
<v Speaker 4>entire system would collapse. Those are those are the crucial

1:55:36.270 --> 1:55:38.330
<v Speaker 4>soldiers keeping our airspace.

1:55:38.430 --> 1:55:39.310
<v Speaker 1>They are the glue.

1:55:39.470 --> 1:55:40.470
<v Speaker 6>Yes, they are the glue.

1:55:41.590 --> 1:55:44.610
<v Speaker 4>Like we're already running into many issues in regards to

1:55:45.340 --> 1:55:48.890
<v Speaker 4>air traffic controllers and the airline industry, if you take

1:55:48.930 --> 1:55:51.690
<v Speaker 4>the furries out, it's done. It's over.

1:55:52.090 --> 1:55:55.550
<v Speaker 6>You know what? Honestly, someone in the furry community, get

1:55:55.650 --> 1:55:58.110
<v Speaker 6>on organizing the furry strike where all the furries just

1:55:58.170 --> 1:56:01.450
<v Speaker 6>go on strike. We can end this whole system right now.

1:56:02.380 --> 1:56:04.280
<v Speaker 6>We can defeat them in a single stroke.

1:56:06.840 --> 1:56:08.740
<v Speaker 4>Let's move on to some other small news items.

1:56:09.000 --> 1:56:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay. Someone was upset on the subreddit that we

1:56:11.960 --> 1:56:14.540
<v Speaker 2>didn't call this all the small things. We're not going to.

1:56:15.460 --> 1:56:17.900
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm going to start with Pete Hegseth. Pete

1:56:17.940 --> 1:56:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Hegseth has announced a joint warfighter evaluation.

1:56:21.660 --> 1:56:22.050
<v Speaker 8>Oh, boy.

1:56:23.020 --> 1:56:25.270
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is a thing for 06s who are

1:56:25.310 --> 1:56:27.950
<v Speaker 2>screening for their first star, right, across all the different

1:56:27.990 --> 1:56:30.190
<v Speaker 2>branches of the military. I'm not going to list what

1:56:30.210 --> 1:56:32.630
<v Speaker 2>an 06 is because I don't understand how the Navy works.

1:56:33.030 --> 1:56:37.010
<v Speaker 2>But he's claiming that this new evaluation for promotion will

1:56:37.390 --> 1:56:41.240
<v Speaker 2>value competence over credentials. It's the way he phrased it.

1:56:41.780 --> 1:56:44.560
<v Speaker 2>It's basically like an exercise that these officers will have

1:56:44.600 --> 1:56:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to take part in, and various versions of it are

1:56:47.020 --> 1:56:50.440
<v Speaker 2>going to involve a war game against an AI-powered adversary,

1:56:51.020 --> 1:56:57.450
<v Speaker 2>which is great. I expect it, I guess. We probably

1:56:57.470 --> 1:57:00.950
<v Speaker 2>could have seen this coming. It's additive to the existing

1:57:00.970 --> 1:57:03.410
<v Speaker 2>things that they consider for promotion, but this is part

1:57:03.430 --> 1:57:08.880
<v Speaker 2>of his ongoing purge of the US military officer corps. Secondly,

1:57:08.980 --> 1:57:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about a visual investigation by Thomas Bordeaux.

1:57:11.820 --> 1:57:14.419
<v Speaker 2>He's at CNN, but I think he's working with BBC

1:57:14.480 --> 1:57:18.420
<v Speaker 2>Verify on this. BBC is doing a kind of true

1:57:18.560 --> 1:57:22.500
<v Speaker 2>crime podcast about the disappearance of Austin Tice at the moment.

1:57:23.180 --> 1:57:26.100
<v Speaker 2>People aren't familiar, Austin Tice was an American freelancer who

1:57:26.200 --> 1:57:29.630
<v Speaker 2>disappeared in Syria at the beginning of the revolution and

1:57:29.670 --> 1:57:32.710
<v Speaker 2>continues to be missing. Have any of you guys seen

1:57:32.730 --> 1:57:33.250
<v Speaker 2>this video?

1:57:33.610 --> 1:57:33.830
<v Speaker 4>No.

1:57:34.410 --> 1:57:36.370
<v Speaker 2>This must be like, well, I think it was 2012

1:57:36.370 --> 1:57:39.810
<v Speaker 2>or 2011. I think it was right at the end

1:57:39.820 --> 1:57:42.070
<v Speaker 2>of 2011. So it purports to be a video of

1:57:42.090 --> 1:57:45.910
<v Speaker 2>his execution. It seems very likely to be staged. Like

1:57:45.950 --> 1:57:48.150
<v Speaker 2>if you watch it, it seems a lot like it's

1:57:48.230 --> 1:57:52.680
<v Speaker 2>regime intel guys dressing up and pretending to be like rebels.

1:57:53.220 --> 1:57:55.500
<v Speaker 2>Like they basically say nothing but Takbir the whole time.

1:57:56.040 --> 1:57:58.440
<v Speaker 2>And then they make him say some stuff. And then

1:57:58.460 --> 1:58:01.260
<v Speaker 2>the video cuts, right? You don't see him being executed.

1:58:01.280 --> 1:58:03.340
<v Speaker 2>He's blindfolded and it's supposed to give that vibe. Anyway,

1:58:03.360 --> 1:58:05.850
<v Speaker 2>they have geolocated this video to an area that would

1:58:05.860 --> 1:58:07.950
<v Speaker 2>have been controlled by the Assad regime at the time.

1:58:08.790 --> 1:58:12.140
<v Speaker 2>which I guess further adds evidence to the claim that

1:58:12.160 --> 1:58:14.140
<v Speaker 2>he was held by the regime, at least at that time.

1:58:15.020 --> 1:58:19.000
<v Speaker 2>CBS is reporting the Trump administration is ready to accept

1:58:19.000 --> 1:58:25.330
<v Speaker 2>17,500 more Africana refugees. God. Yeah, the people who have

1:58:25.350 --> 1:58:29.270
<v Speaker 2>struggled the most in the continent of Africa. CBS is

1:58:29.310 --> 1:58:32.250
<v Speaker 2>reporting that the Trump administration said, quote, the United States

1:58:32.310 --> 1:58:35.950
<v Speaker 2>anticipates that Afrikaners from South Africa will fully assimilate into

1:58:35.990 --> 1:58:39.790
<v Speaker 2>the United States in a manner that preserves taxpayer resources

1:58:39.830 --> 1:58:44.530
<v Speaker 2>for US citizens and does not anticipate other countries resettling Afrikaners.

1:58:44.910 --> 1:58:48.760
<v Speaker 2>One can only imagine why. This assimilation thing has been

1:58:48.780 --> 1:58:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a consistent thing for them, right? The first time they

1:58:51.920 --> 1:58:55.140
<v Speaker 2>accepted white South African refugees, Rubio talked about it in Congress.

1:58:56.230 --> 1:58:58.350
<v Speaker 2>Like this seems to be the standard by which they're

1:58:58.370 --> 1:59:01.440
<v Speaker 2>judging refugee admissions now. You have to be white and

1:59:01.480 --> 1:59:04.200
<v Speaker 2>you have to like quote unquote assimilate. So that's great.

1:59:05.460 --> 1:59:11.440
<v Speaker 4>On Tuesday, J.D. Vance's so-called anti-fraud task force announced that

1:59:11.520 --> 1:59:14.560
<v Speaker 4>they were cutting almost a million people from Affordable Care

1:59:14.600 --> 1:59:21.160
<v Speaker 4>Act coverage after deciding that 760,000 people or enrollees were

1:59:21.270 --> 1:59:25.790
<v Speaker 4>fraudulently enrolled in government health care plans. that these plans

1:59:25.810 --> 1:59:29.110
<v Speaker 4>did not correspond to real people or these people were

1:59:29.250 --> 1:59:36.440
<v Speaker 4>ineligible for coverage. Vance announced that another 419,000 accounts are under, quote,

1:59:36.580 --> 1:59:41.380
<v Speaker 4>additional verification. Mehmet Oz said that they canceled coverage for

1:59:41.430 --> 1:59:45.170
<v Speaker 4>people in part because those people never filed a claim.

1:59:45.170 --> 1:59:49.950
<v Speaker 13>760,000 people, we call them phantoms because we believe most

1:59:49.970 --> 1:59:51.870
<v Speaker 13>of them either don't exist or had no idea they

1:59:51.890 --> 1:59:54.250
<v Speaker 13>had coverage. We believe that because we have been writing them,

1:59:54.450 --> 1:59:58.770
<v Speaker 13>telexing them, walking to them, FedExing, whatever we could possibly

1:59:58.810 --> 2:00:01.450
<v Speaker 13>do to get in touch with them, they won't answer

2:00:01.690 --> 2:00:05.570
<v Speaker 13>and they have never filed a claim. So it meets

2:00:06.010 --> 2:00:08.190
<v Speaker 13>all the criteria for us to pretty as much as

2:00:08.290 --> 2:00:11.030
<v Speaker 13>any government can say, you actually don't know you have

2:00:11.070 --> 2:00:12.110
<v Speaker 13>this or you don't exist.

2:00:12.810 --> 2:00:17.290
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, in numbers this large, it is not unlikely that

2:00:17.410 --> 2:00:20.660
<v Speaker 4>there is many real people who do need this coverage

2:00:20.680 --> 2:00:23.480
<v Speaker 4>or rely on this coverage who will be cut as

2:00:23.500 --> 2:00:26.860
<v Speaker 4>a part of this almost a million people. And Vance

2:00:26.900 --> 2:00:30.940
<v Speaker 4>has promised that more cuts will be coming. Last Friday,

2:00:31.060 --> 2:00:34.970
<v Speaker 4>the DOJ released a new legal opinion concluding that the

2:00:35.070 --> 2:00:38.190
<v Speaker 4>federal ban on handgun sales to 18 to 20 year

2:00:38.210 --> 2:00:43.250
<v Speaker 4>olds is unconstitutional and should not be enforced against licensed dealers.

2:00:44.110 --> 2:00:49.310
<v Speaker 4>And lastly for me, ProPublica just published a super in-depth

2:00:49.450 --> 2:00:55.220
<v Speaker 4>investigation into how Trump crushed a sweeping 2024 FBI bribery

2:00:55.280 --> 2:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>probe into Susan Collins and her super PAC, among a

2:00:59.500 --> 2:01:03.140
<v Speaker 4>few other congresspeople as well. This article lays out what

2:01:03.180 --> 2:01:09.010
<v Speaker 4>looks like a pretty clear pay-to-play scheme with requests for

2:01:09.090 --> 2:01:13.230
<v Speaker 4>campaign donations in exchange for Collins securing millions of dollars

2:01:13.310 --> 2:01:17.580
<v Speaker 4>in federal funding for defense contractors. Collins is the chair

2:01:17.620 --> 2:01:21.850
<v Speaker 4>of the Appropriations Committee, with one contractor, a naval company

2:01:21.930 --> 2:01:26.630
<v Speaker 4>called Navtech, funneling donations through a shell company, which the

2:01:26.710 --> 2:01:29.770
<v Speaker 4>head of Collins Super PAC said was, quote, very smart.

2:01:30.270 --> 2:01:30.690
<v Speaker 8>Oh boy.

2:01:31.720 --> 2:01:36.080
<v Speaker 4>In email correspondence obtained by ProPublica. This shell company, by

2:01:36.120 --> 2:01:40.060
<v Speaker 4>the way, was called the Society of Young Women Scientists

2:01:40.380 --> 2:01:41.230
<v Speaker 4>and Engineers.

2:01:41.820 --> 2:01:43.310
<v Speaker 6>Wait, just scientist?

2:01:43.410 --> 2:01:44.010
<v Speaker 4>Scientist.

2:01:44.090 --> 2:01:44.830
<v Speaker 6>Incredible.

2:01:44.970 --> 2:01:45.270
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

2:01:45.630 --> 2:01:45.850
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

2:01:46.070 --> 2:01:46.630
<v Speaker 2>Scientist.

2:01:47.390 --> 2:01:51.430
<v Speaker 4>That typo was how this donation was first flagged that

2:01:51.450 --> 2:01:57.870
<v Speaker 4>then prompted this investigation. Cool work there. ProPublica writes, quote,

2:01:58.210 --> 2:02:01.790
<v Speaker 4>the money had come from Navitek's account, not their CEOs,

2:02:02.300 --> 2:02:07.260
<v Speaker 4>violating a ban on government contractors making donations, unquote. So

2:02:07.280 --> 2:02:10.240
<v Speaker 4>the CEO of Navitek is now in prison, but obviously

2:02:10.300 --> 2:02:15.850
<v Speaker 4>Collins is not. Though the CEO was interviewed by the

2:02:15.930 --> 2:02:20.350
<v Speaker 4>FBI for a number of years regarding his dealings with

2:02:20.440 --> 2:02:25.340
<v Speaker 4>Collins and other people in Congress. ProPublica writes that the CEO, quote,

2:02:25.820 --> 2:02:30.580
<v Speaker 4>handed the FBI the 50-page document detailing Avatex dealings with

2:02:30.660 --> 2:02:34.580
<v Speaker 4>more than a dozen members of Congress and their staff, unquote.

2:02:35.460 --> 2:02:39.090
<v Speaker 4>So part of ProPublica's reporting is explaining how the FBI

2:02:39.100 --> 2:02:41.870
<v Speaker 4>was about to kind of launch this much broader full-scale

2:02:41.890 --> 2:02:46.710
<v Speaker 4>investigation around the end of 2024. And then obviously in 2025,

2:02:46.710 --> 2:02:51.310
<v Speaker 4>Trump got into office. This whole type of investigation fell apart.

2:02:51.330 --> 2:02:55.540
<v Speaker 4>A whole bunch of attorneys resigned during February of 2025.

2:02:55.540 --> 2:02:57.760
<v Speaker 4>This is another one of those articles I think it's

2:02:57.800 --> 2:03:00.000
<v Speaker 4>worth just reading the whole thing. It's pretty long, but

2:03:00.020 --> 2:03:03.420
<v Speaker 4>it's some pretty solid reporting. And it's already been corroborated

2:03:03.580 --> 2:03:05.240
<v Speaker 4>by the New York Times as well.

2:03:05.260 --> 2:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>All right. Do we want to talk about some medium-sized things?

2:03:09.620 --> 2:03:10.640
<v Speaker 4>Some medium items.

2:03:11.840 --> 2:03:12.180
<v Speaker 8>Okay.

2:03:12.720 --> 2:03:15.550
<v Speaker 2>Talking of medium-sized things, let's talk about wolves. Not as

2:03:15.600 --> 2:03:19.410
<v Speaker 2>big as buffalo, larger than rabbits. So Donald Trump has

2:03:19.650 --> 2:03:24.890
<v Speaker 2>signed an executive order which gives 90 days for the

2:03:25.390 --> 2:03:28.070
<v Speaker 2>Secretary of the Interior to conduct a broad inspection of

2:03:28.110 --> 2:03:32.380
<v Speaker 2>regulations impacting ranching and make suggestions to change them. The

2:03:32.740 --> 2:03:37.350
<v Speaker 2>executive order presser was called Supporting America's Ranchers. As part

2:03:37.390 --> 2:03:41.550
<v Speaker 2>of this, he talks about instructing Doug Burgum, who, if

2:03:41.570 --> 2:03:44.590
<v Speaker 2>you don't remember, was endorsed by REI last year, to

2:03:44.630 --> 2:03:48.650
<v Speaker 2>work on delisting wolves from the Endangered Species Act. Specifically,

2:03:48.670 --> 2:03:50.510
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to quote here, the Secretary of the

2:03:50.530 --> 2:03:52.839
<v Speaker 2>Interior shall make a determination as to whether the grey

2:03:52.880 --> 2:03:55.720
<v Speaker 2>wolf and the Mexican wolf has met the recovery criteria

2:03:55.760 --> 2:03:59.100
<v Speaker 2>for delisting or downlisting under the Endangered Species Act. And

2:03:59.140 --> 2:04:01.580
<v Speaker 2>if he determines that the recovery criteria has been met,

2:04:01.920 --> 2:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>shall begin the process of delisting or downlisting them. also

2:04:05.560 --> 2:04:08.460
<v Speaker 2>directs him to work with states to have them removed

2:04:08.500 --> 2:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>from state ESAs, right? So several states have their own

2:04:11.900 --> 2:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Endangered Species Act. California is one of them, right? I

2:04:14.300 --> 2:04:17.160
<v Speaker 2>think wolves were listed under the California ESA before the

2:04:17.230 --> 2:04:22.090
<v Speaker 2>federal ESA existed. If you're not familiar, wolves have become

2:04:22.130 --> 2:04:24.930
<v Speaker 2>a massive culture war issue in the West, right? Like

2:04:24.950 --> 2:04:27.360
<v Speaker 2>wolves are very woke. is a thing that I have learned.

2:04:27.440 --> 2:04:29.580
<v Speaker 2>Like if you go, I don't go to garden or

2:04:29.620 --> 2:04:33.180
<v Speaker 2>outside Yellowstone, right? Like this place, which we can categorically

2:04:33.240 --> 2:04:36.730
<v Speaker 2>prove makes millions of dollars a year from people coming

2:04:36.770 --> 2:04:39.570
<v Speaker 2>to look at wolves. You'll see people wearing those smoke

2:04:39.590 --> 2:04:42.250
<v Speaker 2>a pack a day t-shirts and like, they're not talking

2:04:42.270 --> 2:04:43.150
<v Speaker 2>about cigarettes, right?

2:04:43.930 --> 2:04:44.130
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:04:44.550 --> 2:04:48.930
<v Speaker 2>Removing wolves from the West, seeing wolves as like this,

2:04:48.970 --> 2:04:52.350
<v Speaker 2>this woke thing that is destroying our writing interest. Like

2:04:52.410 --> 2:04:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a big, culture signal.

2:04:54.160 --> 2:04:58.110
<v Speaker 4>Like the idea that like conservation is like woke or

2:04:58.130 --> 2:04:59.950
<v Speaker 4>in some way or like animal like.

2:05:00.530 --> 2:05:03.590
<v Speaker 2>The thing with wolves is it combines like people don't

2:05:03.630 --> 2:05:06.370
<v Speaker 2>like people who talk about animal rights. People don't like

2:05:06.880 --> 2:05:09.340
<v Speaker 2>ecology and conservation and people don't like predators.

2:05:09.700 --> 2:05:10.010
<v Speaker 8>Got it.

2:05:10.220 --> 2:05:10.420
<v Speaker 4>Right.

2:05:10.500 --> 2:05:12.860
<v Speaker 2>And so when we get these three things together, it's

2:05:12.880 --> 2:05:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the idea that it's a bunch of people in New

2:05:14.240 --> 2:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>York who don't understand what wolves do. and they want

2:05:16.840 --> 2:05:19.200
<v Speaker 2>them back, but they don't have to deal with the consequences, right?

2:05:19.810 --> 2:05:24.550
<v Speaker 2>It does suck when there is predation. My family raised livestock.

2:05:24.570 --> 2:05:27.550
<v Speaker 2>I've dealt with predation. It fucking sucks. It sucks, especially

2:05:27.570 --> 2:05:30.470
<v Speaker 2>when it's young animals, right? Calves or lambs or whatever.

2:05:31.010 --> 2:05:33.060
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that the Trump administration has also

2:05:33.100 --> 2:05:36.020
<v Speaker 2>instructed Burgum to do is to look at and consider

2:05:36.060 --> 2:05:38.980
<v Speaker 2>amending the existing compensation programs, which exist for wolves, right?

2:05:39.500 --> 2:05:41.800
<v Speaker 2>The wolf issue, I think, is also particularly controversial because

2:05:42.200 --> 2:05:45.140
<v Speaker 2>there have been hard introductions, right? Like, If you look

2:05:45.180 --> 2:05:48.060
<v Speaker 2>at Colorado, Colorado had a ballot measure in 2020 to

2:05:48.160 --> 2:05:51.140
<v Speaker 2>introduce wolves, to reintroduce wolves, which they began doing about

2:05:51.180 --> 2:05:55.280
<v Speaker 2>three years ago. And Colorado has this big cultural divide

2:05:55.520 --> 2:05:59.010
<v Speaker 2>between your blue counties and the Western Slope, I'll say.

2:05:59.370 --> 2:06:01.730
<v Speaker 2>The idea that these front range folks in Denver and

2:06:01.770 --> 2:06:06.530
<v Speaker 2>Boulder mandated wolves on ranches. And so it plays on other,

2:06:06.710 --> 2:06:09.590
<v Speaker 2>I guess, existing insecurities. It's a little different here in

2:06:09.630 --> 2:06:12.910
<v Speaker 2>California because the wolves in California weren't released. They walked

2:06:12.990 --> 2:06:17.040
<v Speaker 2>in on their own feet. Although a popular conspiracy theory

2:06:17.080 --> 2:06:19.420
<v Speaker 2>that I've heard is that that's not actually true and

2:06:19.460 --> 2:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>that some people sneaked the wolves in from Oregon and

2:06:22.600 --> 2:06:25.790
<v Speaker 2>released them like wolf vigilantes.

2:06:26.510 --> 2:06:28.670
<v Speaker 8>Wolf vigilantes.

2:06:28.690 --> 2:06:29.670
<v Speaker 6>This should be real.

2:06:30.290 --> 2:06:33.130
<v Speaker 2>I know, right? Yeah, please. If you have smuggled a

2:06:33.170 --> 2:06:35.980
<v Speaker 2>wolf into the state of California, you've done a lot

2:06:36.000 --> 2:06:37.900
<v Speaker 2>of crimes, but I would love to talk to you

2:06:37.920 --> 2:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>for my podcast. I want to address this more... in

2:06:42.520 --> 2:06:45.290
<v Speaker 2>my podcast, Natural Causes, because I think a lot of

2:06:45.330 --> 2:06:47.190
<v Speaker 2>people are wrong about wolves. I think it's silly to

2:06:47.230 --> 2:06:48.990
<v Speaker 2>say that we shouldn't have wolves. I think it's also

2:06:49.050 --> 2:06:51.410
<v Speaker 2>frustrating for people to think that the reason that we

2:06:51.470 --> 2:06:55.890
<v Speaker 2>have wolves is to fix our fuck-ups. Wolves have a

2:06:55.930 --> 2:06:57.570
<v Speaker 2>right to be there because they've always been there and

2:06:57.590 --> 2:07:00.980
<v Speaker 2>they belong there. They're not there to undo the damage

2:07:01.020 --> 2:07:03.720
<v Speaker 2>done by capitalism and the state to the land. And

2:07:03.780 --> 2:07:06.700
<v Speaker 2>we shouldn't tie the justification for reintroducing them to that

2:07:07.630 --> 2:07:10.510
<v Speaker 2>Because sometimes the science will not support that, and then

2:07:10.550 --> 2:07:12.350
<v Speaker 2>we will lose that justification. They have a right to

2:07:12.390 --> 2:07:14.490
<v Speaker 2>be there because they belong there. That can be the

2:07:14.510 --> 2:07:15.630
<v Speaker 2>start and the end of it, and I think it

2:07:15.650 --> 2:07:17.350
<v Speaker 2>should be. And I think we should be expecting the

2:07:17.410 --> 2:07:20.620
<v Speaker 2>wolves to do our dirty work, undo our dirty work.

2:07:21.020 --> 2:07:23.740
<v Speaker 2>I'm a little confused about what Trump is exactly saying here,

2:07:23.780 --> 2:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>because he also wants a, quote, a legislative recommendation to

2:07:27.400 --> 2:07:29.520
<v Speaker 2>fully delist or downlist the gray wolf and the Mexican

2:07:29.540 --> 2:07:31.940
<v Speaker 2>wolf under the ESA. There are not many Mexican wolves.

2:07:32.020 --> 2:07:33.130
<v Speaker 2>I think there are fewer than 400.

2:07:33.120 --> 2:07:33.300
<v Speaker 11>Cheers.

2:07:34.570 --> 2:07:39.540
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are like 320-ish in those sort of southwestern

2:07:39.560 --> 2:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and southern states, and then probably 50 in Mexico. We

2:07:42.920 --> 2:07:48.060
<v Speaker 2>spoke about a prosecution for killing Mexican wolves a few

2:07:48.100 --> 2:07:50.890
<v Speaker 2>months ago that I found in a New Mexico court

2:07:51.020 --> 2:07:54.590
<v Speaker 2>in court records, right? But it seems very unlikely that

2:07:54.610 --> 2:07:58.190
<v Speaker 2>they will meet the recovery guidelines set up under the ESA,

2:07:58.470 --> 2:08:00.740
<v Speaker 2>but I admittedly have not looked in those recently. I

2:08:01.940 --> 2:08:03.600
<v Speaker 2>want to move on to something that's even more depressing,

2:08:04.120 --> 2:08:09.370
<v Speaker 2>the lifeboat protests in the UK. So this week, and

2:08:09.410 --> 2:08:11.670
<v Speaker 2>really this month, has seen a series of really disgusting

2:08:11.710 --> 2:08:14.590
<v Speaker 2>protests and attacks on lifeboats in the UK. This includes

2:08:14.650 --> 2:08:18.790
<v Speaker 2>fascist Daniel Thomas. He goes by Danny Tomo, really great

2:08:19.340 --> 2:08:22.760
<v Speaker 2>nom de guerre, which disguised his identity very well, stabbing

2:08:22.780 --> 2:08:27.500
<v Speaker 2>a lifeboat. For those not familiar with this, the discourse

2:08:27.540 --> 2:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>here is related to the mission of the RNLI, which

2:08:29.660 --> 2:08:32.340
<v Speaker 2>is to rescue those in peril on the sea. The

2:08:32.400 --> 2:08:35.470
<v Speaker 2>lifeboats were, I guess, at least during the time when

2:08:35.480 --> 2:08:38.190
<v Speaker 2>I was growing up, a foundational British institution. They are

2:08:38.290 --> 2:08:42.170
<v Speaker 2>funded by the people, not the state. They are literally

2:08:42.370 --> 2:08:45.700
<v Speaker 2>in the book Mutual Aid, like capital M, capital A,

2:08:45.740 --> 2:08:49.980
<v Speaker 2>Mutual Aid. They also used to celebrate Kropotkin's birthday, the RNLI.

2:08:50.240 --> 2:08:52.360
<v Speaker 2>You can go back if their Twitter page still exists

2:08:52.380 --> 2:08:55.220
<v Speaker 2>and see them posting things about his birthday. There's a

2:08:55.220 --> 2:08:58.370
<v Speaker 2>very good piece called Lifeboats and Anarchy in the RNLI

2:08:58.430 --> 2:08:59.990
<v Speaker 2>magazine that people should read. They want to know more

2:09:00.010 --> 2:09:02.350
<v Speaker 2>about that. When I was a child, there was a

2:09:02.350 --> 2:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>very popular book way back when, right, when there were

2:09:04.900 --> 2:09:07.920
<v Speaker 2>only four TV channels, there was a very popular children's

2:09:07.940 --> 2:09:10.500
<v Speaker 2>TV program and children who watched the program would hold

2:09:10.540 --> 2:09:12.960
<v Speaker 2>fundraisers for the lifeboats every year. And this was like

2:09:13.640 --> 2:09:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a completely foundational thing that everybody thought was good, right?

2:09:19.260 --> 2:09:22.430
<v Speaker 2>All they do is rescue people who are in danger

2:09:22.470 --> 2:09:26.430
<v Speaker 2>of drowning. It's mostly a volunteer institution. I've had friends

2:09:26.510 --> 2:09:28.870
<v Speaker 2>and colleagues who I've worked with who have volunteered on

2:09:28.890 --> 2:09:32.850
<v Speaker 2>the lifeboats. It is a dangerous, stressful, and often thankless job.

2:09:33.320 --> 2:09:35.940
<v Speaker 2>that you can't plan or schedule for, right? When someone

2:09:35.980 --> 2:09:37.940
<v Speaker 2>needs help, you have to go and help them immediately.

2:09:37.970 --> 2:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>You have to stop what you're doing, work away from work,

2:09:40.400 --> 2:09:42.410
<v Speaker 2>walk away from whatever you're doing socially, walk away from

2:09:42.430 --> 2:09:44.110
<v Speaker 2>your family and go risk your life to help people.

2:09:45.050 --> 2:09:45.690
<v Speaker 2>And that's all they do.

2:09:46.150 --> 2:09:48.050
<v Speaker 4>Why are they stabbing the boats then?

2:09:48.150 --> 2:09:49.470
<v Speaker 2>So I guess.

2:09:49.970 --> 2:09:53.030
<v Speaker 4>I mean, fascist going to fascist. What's the source of

2:09:53.050 --> 2:09:53.629
<v Speaker 4>these protests?

2:09:54.350 --> 2:09:58.870
<v Speaker 2>Specifically, it is the idea that the lifeboats are bringing

2:09:59.070 --> 2:10:02.690
<v Speaker 2>people seeking asylum to communities who cannot support them.

2:10:02.910 --> 2:10:03.150
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

2:10:03.920 --> 2:10:05.280
<v Speaker 2>You see the same shit that you see everywhere in

2:10:05.300 --> 2:10:06.820
<v Speaker 2>the world, right? Like I saw a BBC interview with

2:10:06.840 --> 2:10:09.690
<v Speaker 2>someone who was like, we've got homeless people here. And

2:10:09.700 --> 2:10:11.890
<v Speaker 2>I would be prepared to wager a large amount of

2:10:11.930 --> 2:10:13.670
<v Speaker 2>money that that person has done the square root of

2:10:13.850 --> 2:10:16.570
<v Speaker 2>fuck all to help homeless people in the last few years, right?

2:10:17.170 --> 2:10:20.190
<v Speaker 2>But now is suddenly concerned because apparently they have to

2:10:20.230 --> 2:10:24.450
<v Speaker 2>compete for scarce resources with asylum seekers rather than the

2:10:24.490 --> 2:10:27.730
<v Speaker 2>fucking royal family. In this case, there was a protest

2:10:27.770 --> 2:10:31.320
<v Speaker 2>in Gosport where we saw crowds of people led by

2:10:31.360 --> 2:10:33.860
<v Speaker 2>a child chanting, let them drown.

2:10:34.520 --> 2:10:36.620
<v Speaker 1>I was about to ask if this was the same protest.

2:10:37.180 --> 2:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. One can understand a child who isn't fully formed

2:10:41.620 --> 2:10:44.130
<v Speaker 2>in the brain saying shit like that, I guess.

2:10:44.150 --> 2:10:44.990
<v Speaker 1>It's not their fault.

2:10:45.330 --> 2:10:45.650
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

2:10:46.070 --> 2:10:48.350
<v Speaker 2>For a child to be raised in a place with

2:10:48.390 --> 2:10:51.890
<v Speaker 2>that much hate is fucking disgusting. And for a grown

2:10:52.010 --> 2:10:54.570
<v Speaker 2>adult to be joining in and encouraging that behavior is

2:10:54.650 --> 2:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>fucking appalling. Thomas has pulled this shit a few times,

2:10:59.400 --> 2:11:03.200
<v Speaker 2>but obviously this was the worst. What they're trying to do,

2:11:03.260 --> 2:11:06.700
<v Speaker 2>I guess, is boats have been leaving from Cherbourg, so

2:11:06.980 --> 2:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>on the west side of France, because of increased police

2:11:13.440 --> 2:11:16.220
<v Speaker 2>presence in Dunkirk and those areas where you would go

2:11:16.260 --> 2:11:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to Dover, where there's a shorter channel crossing. And so

2:11:19.460 --> 2:11:23.660
<v Speaker 2>the lifeboats being dispatched are coming probably from, I'm not

2:11:23.690 --> 2:11:25.660
<v Speaker 2>exactly sure, maybe the Isle of Wight, I think. They

2:11:25.700 --> 2:11:29.210
<v Speaker 2>are taking them to the UK mainland via the shortest route.

2:11:29.330 --> 2:11:32.310
<v Speaker 2>If the lifeboats took those people who they rescued to Dover,

2:11:33.030 --> 2:11:36.210
<v Speaker 2>that would take probably half a dozen hours. At that point,

2:11:36.230 --> 2:11:39.470
<v Speaker 2>the lifeboat is then out of its area of operation.

2:11:39.530 --> 2:11:41.350
<v Speaker 2>If anybody else is in distress on the sea, that

2:11:41.370 --> 2:11:43.830
<v Speaker 2>lifeboat can't respond. It's a good example of how this

2:11:43.870 --> 2:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>bigotry hurts everyone. They've been doing this for a while.

2:11:46.530 --> 2:11:49.180
<v Speaker 2>I actually made a podcast a couple of years ago

2:11:49.200 --> 2:11:53.110
<v Speaker 2>with Professor Ruth Kinner about lifeboats and mutual aid. But

2:11:53.140 --> 2:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to see this many people going after something that was

2:11:56.580 --> 2:12:01.700
<v Speaker 2>so foundational to the culture in the United Kingdom not

2:12:01.760 --> 2:12:04.780
<v Speaker 2>so long ago, like when I was a kid, because

2:12:04.840 --> 2:12:07.140
<v Speaker 2>they'd been whipped up into thinking that they have to

2:12:07.180 --> 2:12:10.860
<v Speaker 2>compete for resources with asylum seekers rather than the only

2:12:10.930 --> 2:12:14.830
<v Speaker 2>dangerous minority being the rich. It makes me really sad

2:12:14.870 --> 2:12:17.710
<v Speaker 2>and it makes me really angry. And there is something

2:12:17.850 --> 2:12:20.510
<v Speaker 2>so fucking broken about a crowd of people chanting, let

2:12:20.550 --> 2:12:24.100
<v Speaker 2>them drown. And I'm proud of all my friends who

2:12:24.140 --> 2:12:26.800
<v Speaker 2>continue to volunteer for the RNLI. I really want to

2:12:26.840 --> 2:12:31.020
<v Speaker 2>go back home and do a series on it because

2:12:31.060 --> 2:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I know a lot of people who are lifeboatmen. And

2:12:33.940 --> 2:12:36.890
<v Speaker 2>I think what they do is incredible. And it's the

2:12:37.060 --> 2:12:39.490
<v Speaker 2>answer to the question that everyone always has about anarchism,

2:12:39.930 --> 2:12:42.210
<v Speaker 2>like who will put out the fires without the state?

2:12:42.850 --> 2:12:45.010
<v Speaker 2>The same people who fucking rescue thousands of people a

2:12:45.010 --> 2:12:48.190
<v Speaker 2>year from the sea, right? The RNLI is funded by

2:12:48.230 --> 2:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>donations and through people's wills. the money doesn't come from

2:12:51.420 --> 2:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>your taxes. The money doesn't come from the state. I've

2:12:53.780 --> 2:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>pointed to them for so long, like both when I'm

2:12:55.780 --> 2:12:58.500
<v Speaker 2>teaching and in conversations. And like, I think that's something

2:12:58.540 --> 2:13:01.180
<v Speaker 2>we should be really proud of. And it's disgusting to

2:13:01.220 --> 2:13:04.360
<v Speaker 2>me that people are doing this shit. Talking of disgusting,

2:13:04.380 --> 2:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>do you want to talk about Trump's speech at the UN?

2:13:07.320 --> 2:13:10.560
<v Speaker 4>I think we should probably talk about the advertisers that

2:13:10.600 --> 2:13:11.980
<v Speaker 4>support our podcast first.

2:13:12.500 --> 2:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully it's the lifeboats we can donate.

2:13:14.640 --> 2:13:16.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's going to be the lifeboats.

2:13:16.660 --> 2:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they advertise on podcasts.

2:13:19.350 --> 2:13:19.890
<v Speaker 4>That would be cool.

2:13:32.060 --> 2:13:35.780
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're back. And now we're traveling from the

2:13:35.800 --> 2:13:39.270
<v Speaker 2>United Kingdom to New York to talk about the United

2:13:39.330 --> 2:13:43.290
<v Speaker 2>Nations General Assembly, where Donald Trump used the platform he

2:13:43.330 --> 2:13:46.250
<v Speaker 2>had to make comments that sounded straight up genocidal.

2:13:46.690 --> 2:13:48.390
<v Speaker 8>But I have a big decision to make.

2:13:50.130 --> 2:13:54.380
<v Speaker 11>Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them

2:13:54.820 --> 2:13:58.600
<v Speaker 11>rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever

2:13:58.660 --> 2:14:02.180
<v Speaker 11>was before, maybe one of the greatest in the Middle

2:14:02.280 --> 2:14:07.100
<v Speaker 11>East or even the world? Or do I annihilate the

2:14:07.160 --> 2:14:10.700
<v Speaker 11>Islamic Republic and do it quickly, never giving them a

2:14:10.760 --> 2:14:16.410
<v Speaker 11>chance to kill and destroy people and countries again? Do

2:14:16.470 --> 2:14:19.550
<v Speaker 11>I drive them into hell with no chance of survival

2:14:19.610 --> 2:14:23.030
<v Speaker 11>and no hope of future greatness or generations?

2:14:24.170 --> 2:14:25.370
<v Speaker 8>But I believe we'll.

2:14:25.130 --> 2:14:30.100
<v Speaker 11>Make a deal right after the election because it doesn't

2:14:30.140 --> 2:14:31.420
<v Speaker 11>make sense for them not to.

2:14:32.120 --> 2:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>This is fucking great, right? Oh my God. To go

2:14:35.920 --> 2:14:38.660
<v Speaker 2>from like, don't worry, I'll genocide them all to vote

2:14:38.680 --> 2:14:39.280
<v Speaker 2>for me, please.

2:14:39.560 --> 2:14:41.100
<v Speaker 4>Only a deal after the election.

2:14:41.400 --> 2:14:41.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:14:41.920 --> 2:14:43.010
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I got to see what happens.

2:14:43.810 --> 2:14:45.140
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, we've got to keep him in just so

2:14:45.150 --> 2:14:49.300
<v Speaker 2>we see how this goes. It's the fucking UN. Like,

2:14:49.320 --> 2:14:52.420
<v Speaker 2>it was found... And admittedly, he has failed, right? But

2:14:52.440 --> 2:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>it was founded as the idea that if we could

2:14:54.300 --> 2:14:56.390
<v Speaker 2>all get together and talk it out, we wouldn't have genocides.

2:14:56.440 --> 2:14:58.870
<v Speaker 2>And there he is, just fucking... Like, as I said,

2:14:58.890 --> 2:15:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the UN... manifestly failed in that regard and many others.

2:15:01.940 --> 2:15:02.740
<v Speaker 4>It still sucks.

2:15:03.080 --> 2:15:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It's still fucking bonkers.

2:15:05.160 --> 2:15:06.970
<v Speaker 4>It's super easy to like, you know, poo poo on

2:15:06.980 --> 2:15:09.330
<v Speaker 4>the UN because it's the UN, but I mean.

2:15:09.350 --> 2:15:11.450
<v Speaker 1>It's what we have. It's what we have.

2:15:11.530 --> 2:15:12.170
<v Speaker 8>Yeah. Yeah.

2:15:12.390 --> 2:15:12.750
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:15:12.890 --> 2:15:16.650
<v Speaker 2>It's, it's a tool that we have and like, yeah. Uh,

2:15:16.710 --> 2:15:20.350
<v Speaker 2>he then went on to talk about the midterms. Uh,

2:15:20.450 --> 2:15:23.410
<v Speaker 2>this is like another 30 seconds. Let's listen to this.

2:15:23.710 --> 2:15:26.470
<v Speaker 11>They're waiting to see how I do in the midterm election.

2:15:27.130 --> 2:15:30.390
<v Speaker 11>What they don't realize is that I'm not running. I

2:15:30.470 --> 2:15:34.090
<v Speaker 11>did that already and won in a landslide.

2:15:34.130 --> 2:15:35.950
<v Speaker 8>We won in a giant landslide.

2:15:36.810 --> 2:15:38.630
<v Speaker 11>And I'll be here for two and a half years.

2:15:39.450 --> 2:15:41.370
<v Speaker 8>The Republican Party is running.

2:15:41.690 --> 2:15:42.710
<v Speaker 6>And I'll be helping them.

2:15:42.950 --> 2:15:43.970
<v Speaker 1>But I am not running.

2:15:44.930 --> 2:15:49.270
<v Speaker 11>I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence

2:15:49.330 --> 2:15:53.680
<v Speaker 11>to the election when it comes to Iran. It doesn't

2:15:53.920 --> 2:15:55.820
<v Speaker 11>even enter my mind.

2:15:56.440 --> 2:15:57.780
<v Speaker 2>And then he goes on to say that they don't

2:15:57.800 --> 2:16:01.390
<v Speaker 2>get a nuclear weapon, of course, right? This is bonkers, right?

2:16:01.410 --> 2:16:03.930
<v Speaker 2>The idea that Iran is not aware.

2:16:03.950 --> 2:16:08.530
<v Speaker 1>He's like, wait, guys, you have to understand, Americans have

2:16:08.680 --> 2:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>different elections.

2:16:11.180 --> 2:16:12.660
<v Speaker 2>They can't comprehend, right?

2:16:12.740 --> 2:16:15.860
<v Speaker 6>Is this the thing where he didn't know this and

2:16:15.880 --> 2:16:18.280
<v Speaker 6>someone told him? What is happening here?

2:16:19.520 --> 2:16:22.310
<v Speaker 1>He's like, they recently told me I am actually not running.

2:16:23.380 --> 2:16:29.770
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm good, guys. Clearly, his war on Iran has

2:16:29.790 --> 2:16:33.150
<v Speaker 2>been extremely unpopular and continues to be extremely unpopular because

2:16:33.730 --> 2:16:36.010
<v Speaker 2>it costs six bucks to buy a gallon of gas now.

2:16:36.490 --> 2:16:39.490
<v Speaker 2>Even if people don't care about the massive human toll

2:16:39.510 --> 2:16:41.110
<v Speaker 2>of this, they do care about that.

2:16:41.850 --> 2:16:43.550
<v Speaker 6>Which I do also want to say for the record

2:16:43.570 --> 2:16:46.080
<v Speaker 6>that this war was unpopular before the gas prices increased.

2:16:46.140 --> 2:16:48.580
<v Speaker 6>It's made it more unpopular, but no one has ever

2:16:48.660 --> 2:16:51.820
<v Speaker 6>liked this war and it just gets more unpopular every day.

2:16:51.840 --> 2:16:54.590
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. it's part of why he's, I guess, bringing this,

2:16:54.930 --> 2:16:56.630
<v Speaker 4>you know, midterm stuff up in like both of these

2:16:56.690 --> 2:16:59.310
<v Speaker 4>clips here. And I guess he's like, he knows he

2:16:59.370 --> 2:17:01.930
<v Speaker 4>only has a few months left until the amount of

2:17:01.950 --> 2:17:04.750
<v Speaker 4>like support he has in Congress will take a pretty

2:17:05.150 --> 2:17:05.630
<v Speaker 4>big dip.

2:17:05.770 --> 2:17:06.970
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2:17:07.090 --> 2:17:08.910
<v Speaker 4>Even if they just lose the House. But I mean,

2:17:09.129 --> 2:17:10.930
<v Speaker 4>if looking at the polls, if like the Senate's on

2:17:10.950 --> 2:17:16.060
<v Speaker 4>the line, that's going to put at least some constraints,

2:17:16.350 --> 2:17:20.640
<v Speaker 4>some checks as opposed to the Zero. I have zero

2:17:20.700 --> 2:17:23.380
<v Speaker 4>negative checks that have been in Congress for the past

2:17:23.420 --> 2:17:27.580
<v Speaker 4>two years. It's like he's going to, I assume, plot

2:17:27.650 --> 2:17:30.490
<v Speaker 4>out all the way up until the time that the

2:17:30.530 --> 2:17:33.510
<v Speaker 4>next Congress has sworn in, whatever his game plan is.

2:17:34.190 --> 2:17:34.410
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:17:34.629 --> 2:17:37.230
<v Speaker 2>It's wild to see him electioneering this hard at the

2:17:37.350 --> 2:17:38.150
<v Speaker 2>UN as well.

2:17:38.209 --> 2:17:38.770
<v Speaker 1>At the UN.

2:17:38.870 --> 2:17:41.730
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, he does this all the time, right?

2:17:41.750 --> 2:17:44.140
<v Speaker 2>He goes somewhere and does something that's absolutely the most

2:17:44.280 --> 2:17:47.020
<v Speaker 2>jarring tone shit from anything that has happened there before.

2:17:48.000 --> 2:17:51.910
<v Speaker 2>But the way he continues to talk about annihilating Iran.

2:17:52.050 --> 2:17:52.770
<v Speaker 4>It's disturbing.

2:17:53.270 --> 2:17:56.550
<v Speaker 2>Especially as our conventional weapons resources get lower and lower.

2:17:56.570 --> 2:17:58.750
<v Speaker 2>It's scary. It's genuinely scary.

2:17:59.100 --> 2:18:01.680
<v Speaker 6>That's stuff that you could just play at an ICC

2:18:01.720 --> 2:18:02.520
<v Speaker 6>trial for genocide.

2:18:02.810 --> 2:18:03.250
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah.

2:18:03.470 --> 2:18:06.750
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he spoke about the ICC as well. He

2:18:06.870 --> 2:18:09.670
<v Speaker 1>critiqued the ICC, or not even critiqued, that's not the

2:18:09.690 --> 2:18:10.010
<v Speaker 1>right word.

2:18:10.390 --> 2:18:12.189
<v Speaker 6>Didn't he call for them all to resign or something?

2:18:13.170 --> 2:18:13.850
<v Speaker 1>Something, yeah.

2:18:14.570 --> 2:18:16.470
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, some of them can't even come to

2:18:16.490 --> 2:18:16.949
<v Speaker 2>the US.

2:18:17.290 --> 2:18:17.510
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

2:18:18.610 --> 2:18:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this was and continues to be bonkers, I guess.

2:18:23.020 --> 2:18:26.220
<v Speaker 2>It's not surprising in a sense, but it still sucks.

2:18:26.440 --> 2:18:27.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's horrifying.

2:18:27.980 --> 2:18:29.540
<v Speaker 2>Dana, I know you had some stuff you wanted to

2:18:29.620 --> 2:18:31.900
<v Speaker 2>talk about. Do you want to pick up from here?

2:18:32.860 --> 2:18:36.020
<v Speaker 1>Yes. So there's a lot of talk about what's going

2:18:36.040 --> 2:18:38.060
<v Speaker 1>to happen to Gaza, what's going to happen to the

2:18:38.080 --> 2:18:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Palestinians in the West Bank. I just did an It

2:18:40.379 --> 2:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Could Happen Here episode on the way the Israeli state

2:18:43.459 --> 2:18:46.470
<v Speaker 1>and the Israeli settler movement are working together to ethnically

2:18:46.490 --> 2:18:48.850
<v Speaker 1>cleanse the West Bank, but how we should distinguish between

2:18:48.870 --> 2:18:49.129
<v Speaker 1>the two.

2:18:49.709 --> 2:18:49.949
<v Speaker 8>Anyway.

2:18:50.830 --> 2:18:53.950
<v Speaker 1>The way that international actors, particularly the United States, have

2:18:53.990 --> 2:18:57.550
<v Speaker 1>behaved is to kind of audaciously sideline the Palestinians. Like

2:18:57.570 --> 2:19:00.070
<v Speaker 1>they don't even pretend to include them or consider them.

2:19:00.170 --> 2:19:02.010
<v Speaker 1>So the Board of Peace, for example, doesn't have any

2:19:02.060 --> 2:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian decision makers. There are only technocrats who are essentially

2:19:06.500 --> 2:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to just take commands from the Board of Peace.

2:19:09.100 --> 2:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's really like no space in the discussion for

2:19:11.520 --> 2:19:16.350
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian agency. But I think international actors, governments in the EU,

2:19:16.390 --> 2:19:20.590
<v Speaker 1>but even some in Washington kind of thinking medium to

2:19:20.629 --> 2:19:23.690
<v Speaker 1>long term about after Trump, they understand that this doesn't

2:19:23.730 --> 2:19:25.930
<v Speaker 1>look great and that at some point they'll have to

2:19:26.010 --> 2:19:30.790
<v Speaker 1>make a big display of getting Palestinians to sign some

2:19:30.850 --> 2:19:33.820
<v Speaker 1>grand peace deal with the Israelis. And you need some

2:19:33.850 --> 2:19:35.039
<v Speaker 1>group of Palestinians to do that.

2:19:35.280 --> 2:19:35.460
<v Speaker 2>Right.

2:19:36.080 --> 2:19:38.740
<v Speaker 1>So the Palestinian Authority that governs the West Bank is

2:19:39.280 --> 2:19:41.980
<v Speaker 1>is led by President Mahmoud Abbas, as I'm sure many know,

2:19:42.160 --> 2:19:45.020
<v Speaker 1>who has overstayed his term limits for many, many years.

2:19:45.940 --> 2:19:50.849
<v Speaker 1>He's also the chairman of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, the PLO.

2:19:51.990 --> 2:19:55.650
<v Speaker 1>And Palestinians are very unhappy with this setup. Basically, the

2:19:55.690 --> 2:19:58.410
<v Speaker 1>polls show that they think it lacks legitimacy and that

2:19:58.450 --> 2:20:03.790
<v Speaker 1>he lacks legitimacy. So the international community has essentially been

2:20:03.830 --> 2:20:07.580
<v Speaker 1>getting to work to kind of paper over this issue.

2:20:07.740 --> 2:20:10.100
<v Speaker 1>So last year, they pressured Abbas to find a successor

2:20:10.840 --> 2:20:12.619
<v Speaker 1>because he's so old, they're afraid he's going to keel over.

2:20:13.040 --> 2:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And he unilaterally changed the bylaws of the PLO outside

2:20:17.140 --> 2:20:20.459
<v Speaker 1>normal institutional procedures to create a vice president position. And

2:20:20.480 --> 2:20:23.820
<v Speaker 1>he appointed someone to that position from the PLO executive committee.

2:20:24.060 --> 2:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>The dude he picked, Hossein al-Sheikh, polls at 2% with Palestinians.

2:20:27.980 --> 2:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So they're already setting up for what comes after Abbas.

2:20:31.920 --> 2:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>And now they're working on PLO changes that would, again,

2:20:35.480 --> 2:20:38.300
<v Speaker 1>on the surface, look like an institution renewing its legitimacy.

2:20:38.879 --> 2:20:41.940
<v Speaker 1>So part of that, this is ongoing right now, is

2:20:42.040 --> 2:20:45.340
<v Speaker 1>having the legislative body of the PLO, the Palestinian National Council,

2:20:45.830 --> 2:20:48.950
<v Speaker 1>actually hold elections. So I'm going to quote here from

2:20:48.970 --> 2:20:52.470
<v Speaker 1>the European Council on Foreign Relations. The PNC is responsible

2:20:52.510 --> 2:20:55.270
<v Speaker 1>for formulating the PLO's policies. It acts as a parliament

2:20:55.310 --> 2:20:58.369
<v Speaker 1>that represents all Palestinians except for Palestinian citizens of Israel.

2:20:59.000 --> 2:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The PNC currently comprises 747 members representing Palestinians in Palestine

2:21:03.820 --> 2:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and in the diaspora. But because the PNC has had

2:21:07.860 --> 2:21:11.260
<v Speaker 1>such difficulty convening and all of these things, there are

2:21:11.420 --> 2:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>other bodies that like bridge between the legislative and the executive,

2:21:15.620 --> 2:21:18.779
<v Speaker 1>like the central council. And over the years, the PNC

2:21:18.800 --> 2:21:21.519
<v Speaker 1>has basically lost any power, even though it's supposed to

2:21:21.550 --> 2:21:23.270
<v Speaker 1>be the legislative body. It's supposed to be kind of

2:21:23.280 --> 2:21:27.050
<v Speaker 1>the democratic engine of the PLO. So in February, 2026,

2:21:27.050 --> 2:21:31.060
<v Speaker 1>so February of this year, Abbas issued a decree saying

2:21:31.080 --> 2:21:34.900
<v Speaker 1>that there would be PNC elections in November and that

2:21:35.100 --> 2:21:39.380
<v Speaker 1>this would include basically trying to make it so that

2:21:39.459 --> 2:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all eligible Palestinians that can like feasibly vote directly living

2:21:43.860 --> 2:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in the diaspora, or if that's not possible, kind of

2:21:46.580 --> 2:21:50.380
<v Speaker 1>through an electoral college process in different diasporas or via

2:21:50.940 --> 2:21:56.640
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote consensus. So the PLO, the PA, which at

2:21:56.660 --> 2:22:01.420
<v Speaker 1>this point overlap, they've been going around different communities, different

2:22:01.440 --> 2:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Palestinian diaspora communities, and setting up so that these different

2:22:06.180 --> 2:22:10.330
<v Speaker 1>communities run people for these elections. But the way they're

2:22:10.350 --> 2:22:15.490
<v Speaker 1>doing it is extremely undemocratic. They are not thinking about,

2:22:15.570 --> 2:22:18.370
<v Speaker 1>you know, who are we going to tap that actually

2:22:18.430 --> 2:22:22.449
<v Speaker 1>represents some constituency in these diasporas? Or are they actually

2:22:22.730 --> 2:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>representative of these diasporas? They're just getting yes-men in a

2:22:26.080 --> 2:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of cases. Some members of the central council basically

2:22:29.400 --> 2:22:32.019
<v Speaker 1>found out that they had been removed after reading it

2:22:32.320 --> 2:22:36.180
<v Speaker 1>in the media. So it's completely undemocratic. The Palestinian diaspora

2:22:36.230 --> 2:22:39.450
<v Speaker 1>in Chile, for example, they've tapped a particular organization, but

2:22:39.470 --> 2:22:44.970
<v Speaker 1>that organization gets to run the elections. And other organizations

2:22:45.090 --> 2:22:48.250
<v Speaker 1>in the Palestinian diaspora in Chile have to jump through

2:22:48.270 --> 2:22:50.590
<v Speaker 1>a lot more hoops. to be able to run in

2:22:50.610 --> 2:22:52.970
<v Speaker 1>the same elections. So to me, it feels like a

2:22:53.070 --> 2:22:56.990
<v Speaker 1>grand conspiracy against Palestinians to pretend like these PNC elections

2:22:57.030 --> 2:23:02.070
<v Speaker 1>are actually legitimate. In reality, really disempowering huge swaths of

2:23:02.530 --> 2:23:06.060
<v Speaker 1>the Palestinian diaspora. He also announced in that decree that

2:23:06.080 --> 2:23:09.020
<v Speaker 1>he's going to half the numbers of the PNC from

2:23:09.020 --> 2:23:14.740
<v Speaker 1>747 to 350. So essentially one seat allocated for every

2:23:14.740 --> 2:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>35,000 Palestinians is like the idea. But yeah, it's not great.

2:23:19.959 --> 2:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think that we should really, you know, focus

2:23:23.410 --> 2:23:26.610
<v Speaker 1>on what's happening here because the Palestinians are being set

2:23:26.670 --> 2:23:30.450
<v Speaker 1>up in so many ways for a very bleak near-term future.

2:23:30.470 --> 2:23:33.410
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I've stunned all of you with the silence.

2:23:34.410 --> 2:23:37.130
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's so bleak. They're just like, how openly they're

2:23:37.150 --> 2:23:38.590
<v Speaker 6>just kind of rigging the elections.

2:23:38.709 --> 2:23:39.050
<v Speaker 2>It's like.

2:23:40.270 --> 2:23:40.590
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

2:23:41.070 --> 2:23:43.850
<v Speaker 6>It reminds me of like more expansive version of the

2:23:43.910 --> 2:23:47.310
<v Speaker 6>way that like the CCP does elections for like there's

2:23:47.350 --> 2:23:52.910
<v Speaker 6>like nominal elections for all of their party official offices

2:23:53.550 --> 2:23:56.770
<v Speaker 6>where they do like a very similar process of like, yeah,

2:23:56.810 --> 2:23:59.580
<v Speaker 6>we've we've like put forward one candidate who is like

2:23:59.720 --> 2:24:01.480
<v Speaker 6>our person. You're all going to vote for them or

2:24:01.500 --> 2:24:02.940
<v Speaker 6>you're going to vote for one of the like allied

2:24:02.980 --> 2:24:03.820
<v Speaker 6>parties or something.

2:24:03.840 --> 2:24:04.740
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:24:05.000 --> 2:24:08.890
<v Speaker 1>No, it's completely like. minimized as a process yeah i

2:24:08.910 --> 2:24:11.390
<v Speaker 1>mean i haven't even gotten into like the local elections

2:24:11.410 --> 2:24:13.550
<v Speaker 1>that have happened in the occupied territories and how kind

2:24:13.590 --> 2:24:16.030
<v Speaker 1>of problematic some of those have been but just on

2:24:16.110 --> 2:24:19.210
<v Speaker 1>every level like even when they're pretending at democracy like

2:24:19.250 --> 2:24:22.470
<v Speaker 1>yeah it's not happening you know so yeah.

2:24:22.250 --> 2:24:23.970
<v Speaker 6>And then like in like in the same like ccp

2:24:24.010 --> 2:24:25.990
<v Speaker 6>structure thing you have like this big assembly that does

2:24:26.290 --> 2:24:28.710
<v Speaker 6>nothing and then there's like executive bodies that have been

2:24:28.730 --> 2:24:31.250
<v Speaker 6>carefully chosen from their loyalists outside of that that like

2:24:31.300 --> 2:24:33.400
<v Speaker 6>do all the things yeah.

2:24:33.000 --> 2:24:37.620
<v Speaker 1>Exactly no no that's that's a good comparison Yeah. So

2:24:37.640 --> 2:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the second thing I wanted to just very briefly touch

2:24:40.660 --> 2:24:43.790
<v Speaker 1>on is the issue of Palestine and higher ed. I

2:24:43.830 --> 2:24:46.980
<v Speaker 1>think like because there haven't been the, you know, massive protests.

2:24:47.709 --> 2:24:50.369
<v Speaker 1>widespread protests that we saw a year or two years ago.

2:24:50.390 --> 2:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>This maybe has dropped from the radar, but it continues to,

2:24:53.640 --> 2:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, those protests on campuses continue to have ramifications

2:24:57.260 --> 2:24:59.380
<v Speaker 1>for higher ed and for a lot of the people

2:24:59.420 --> 2:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>who participated. So two cases I wanted to just mention

2:25:02.879 --> 2:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>briefly is that at Stanford University, a number of students

2:25:06.520 --> 2:25:10.470
<v Speaker 1>were criminally prosecuted for protesting on their campus. And for

2:25:10.510 --> 2:25:14.730
<v Speaker 1>some of them, that involved occupying the president's office. and

2:25:14.750 --> 2:25:17.530
<v Speaker 1>demanding divestment and things like this. But the charges have

2:25:17.560 --> 2:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>all been dropped against those students. The Santa Clara County

2:25:21.620 --> 2:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>District Attorney that was assigned to this case, who was

2:25:25.860 --> 2:25:29.580
<v Speaker 1>seeking criminal prosecution, was using the case to solicit donations

2:25:29.600 --> 2:25:32.390
<v Speaker 1>for his re-election, saying he was tough on anti-Semitism.

2:25:32.410 --> 2:25:33.100
<v Speaker 2>Jesus Christ.

2:25:33.150 --> 2:25:33.990
<v Speaker 1>Jesus.

2:25:34.010 --> 2:25:34.190
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

2:25:34.800 --> 2:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So the judge was like, hey, I think this is probably,

2:25:38.080 --> 2:25:40.430
<v Speaker 1>you're probably too biased for this. So he like asked

2:25:40.450 --> 2:25:42.869
<v Speaker 1>him to be removed from the case. And then eventually,

2:25:42.910 --> 2:25:46.350
<v Speaker 1>as I said, the charges were dropped and the students

2:25:46.650 --> 2:25:49.610
<v Speaker 1>like have to pay a small sum and like do

2:25:49.629 --> 2:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>some community service. But the idea is like all of

2:25:53.400 --> 2:25:56.380
<v Speaker 1>these cases, whether at Stanford or other places, they were

2:25:56.500 --> 2:26:02.209
<v Speaker 1>used to deter further protest for sure. And then the

2:26:02.330 --> 2:26:05.690
<v Speaker 1>second case I wanted to mention is maybe people remember

2:26:05.910 --> 2:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>three Palestinian students, one from Brown University, one from Haverford College,

2:26:09.580 --> 2:26:13.039
<v Speaker 1>and one from Trinity College, were shot for wearing keffiyehs

2:26:13.120 --> 2:26:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on the street in Vermont maybe two years ago. All

2:26:16.420 --> 2:26:19.619
<v Speaker 1>three of them were wounded and one was paralyzed. So

2:26:19.700 --> 2:26:23.730
<v Speaker 1>the guy who shot them, Jason Eaton... Faces up to

2:26:23.770 --> 2:26:26.990
<v Speaker 1>life in prison. And despite the fact that that guy

2:26:27.270 --> 2:26:30.610
<v Speaker 1>had claimed that the U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies had

2:26:30.670 --> 2:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>transmitted orders to him to shoot the students via FM radio,

2:26:34.240 --> 2:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and that God had commanded him to protect his Jewish neighbors,

2:26:38.260 --> 2:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>no hate crime charges were filed. So I think that

2:26:40.720 --> 2:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that is quite telling.

2:26:42.840 --> 2:26:43.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

2:26:43.470 --> 2:26:47.890
<v Speaker 1>But, um... Nevertheless, one of the student's mothers, the student

2:26:47.950 --> 2:26:51.410
<v Speaker 1>Hisham Awarthani, was the one who was paralyzed. His mother,

2:26:51.470 --> 2:26:54.470
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Price, spoke to the media after the verdict and said,

2:26:54.590 --> 2:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>justice has been rendered for Hisham Kinan and Tahseen. After

2:26:58.320 --> 2:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>three years of sorrow, loss, and struggle, our families finally

2:27:00.700 --> 2:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>feel relief. We are grateful our son's suffering commanded attention

2:27:04.140 --> 2:27:07.620
<v Speaker 1>and support. We grieve so much that Palestinian suffering never does.

2:27:07.940 --> 2:27:10.439
<v Speaker 1>So I just wanted to update about that case as well.

2:27:10.940 --> 2:27:14.510
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it's a happy update, but some semblance

2:27:14.590 --> 2:27:15.650
<v Speaker 1>of Repercussion.

2:27:15.910 --> 2:27:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, damn. Yeah. I guess we got another shooting because

2:27:20.780 --> 2:27:21.540
<v Speaker 2>this is America.

2:27:21.560 --> 2:27:22.680
<v Speaker 8>I hate this country.

2:27:23.860 --> 2:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:27:24.180 --> 2:27:26.860
<v Speaker 2>I know this one's fucked up. Ice agents in Texas

2:27:27.100 --> 2:27:30.039
<v Speaker 2>shot a man in the back last week. Wilbert Rafael

2:27:30.080 --> 2:27:34.070
<v Speaker 2>Garces Perez. He's a migrant from Venezuela. He was shot

2:27:34.110 --> 2:27:37.349
<v Speaker 2>in the back. He appears to be in stable condition now.

2:27:38.110 --> 2:27:41.379
<v Speaker 2>We've seen a number of different videos. the videos of

2:27:41.480 --> 2:27:45.260
<v Speaker 2>the shooting are not entirely clear of like the rundown

2:27:45.300 --> 2:27:47.920
<v Speaker 2>events they ice claimed he's running away from them video

2:27:47.940 --> 2:27:50.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem to show that we have seen video of

2:27:50.340 --> 2:27:52.520
<v Speaker 2>ice agents cuffing him and appears that they're doing that

2:27:52.580 --> 2:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>before rendering aid You could see a couple of agents

2:27:55.120 --> 2:27:58.459
<v Speaker 2>putting cuffs on him and another guy who apparently is

2:27:58.500 --> 2:28:03.440
<v Speaker 2>struggling to put on latex, actually non-latex, but protective gloves. Wilbur,

2:28:04.120 --> 2:28:06.860
<v Speaker 2>like many Venezuelans, came to the USA to help his family.

2:28:07.520 --> 2:28:10.550
<v Speaker 2>I've heard this story a hundred times and I've met

2:28:10.600 --> 2:28:13.270
<v Speaker 2>this family, not this family, but a family doing exactly

2:28:13.290 --> 2:28:14.890
<v Speaker 2>the same thing a hundred times. He has a son

2:28:15.610 --> 2:28:18.690
<v Speaker 2>with disabilities that he will probably either struggle to pay

2:28:18.750 --> 2:28:22.070
<v Speaker 2>for or cannot be accommodated easily in Venezuela. And so

2:28:22.110 --> 2:28:24.220
<v Speaker 2>his dad came here to work to fund his treatment.

2:28:24.379 --> 2:28:27.119
<v Speaker 2>At the time that he was shot, he was delivering DoorDash,

2:28:27.800 --> 2:28:32.780
<v Speaker 2>super common employment for people becoming care-seeking asylum, right? His

2:28:33.000 --> 2:28:38.670
<v Speaker 2>family attorney, Kate Lincoln Goldfinch, has been documenting the events

2:28:39.070 --> 2:28:42.349
<v Speaker 2>after his shooting on Instagram, beginning with a post where

2:28:42.390 --> 2:28:46.640
<v Speaker 2>she says she was at the hospital with Wilbur's wife,

2:28:47.270 --> 2:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and they are trying to get into the hospital to

2:28:49.540 --> 2:28:51.840
<v Speaker 2>see her husband, who had called her and said he

2:28:51.879 --> 2:28:56.120
<v Speaker 2>had been shot, and then the phone cut off. So evidently,

2:28:56.320 --> 2:28:59.540
<v Speaker 2>she's distressed, right? And the security at the hospital are

2:28:59.560 --> 2:29:03.950
<v Speaker 2>denying that he is there and asking the attorney and

2:29:04.010 --> 2:29:07.250
<v Speaker 2>Wilbur's wife to leave. She is then informed by a

2:29:07.350 --> 2:29:11.350
<v Speaker 2>congressperson that he is present at that hospital, but that

2:29:11.370 --> 2:29:13.810
<v Speaker 2>the hospital's policy is not to disclose when someone's there

2:29:13.830 --> 2:29:15.900
<v Speaker 2>in ICE detention. I've done a lot of, like, I

2:29:15.930 --> 2:29:18.780
<v Speaker 2>haven't put much out on like hospitals and ICE detention.

2:29:19.340 --> 2:29:21.580
<v Speaker 2>I have done a lot of interviews about that. It's

2:29:21.620 --> 2:29:24.260
<v Speaker 2>something I want to kind of get my arms around

2:29:24.300 --> 2:29:27.100
<v Speaker 2>fully before I put something out because I think I've

2:29:27.120 --> 2:29:30.349
<v Speaker 2>also done a lot of responding to times when migrants

2:29:30.370 --> 2:29:33.070
<v Speaker 2>are in medical crisis and are afraid to get medical

2:29:33.129 --> 2:29:36.770
<v Speaker 2>care and I think that there are really serious repercussions

2:29:36.910 --> 2:29:39.270
<v Speaker 2>to suggesting that ICE is going room to room in

2:29:39.310 --> 2:29:42.050
<v Speaker 2>hospitals or in EDs taking people. I'm not aware of

2:29:42.070 --> 2:29:43.980
<v Speaker 2>them ever doing that and I just want to like

2:29:44.970 --> 2:29:47.110
<v Speaker 2>Make that very clear for people whenever we get to

2:29:47.129 --> 2:29:50.119
<v Speaker 2>this topic, because it kills people to not seek medical

2:29:50.160 --> 2:29:52.840
<v Speaker 2>care too. We need to hold those two things at

2:29:52.860 --> 2:29:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the same time. In this case, I guess Austin's mayor

2:29:56.420 --> 2:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>showed up and got them confirmation that he was stable

2:29:59.520 --> 2:30:03.190
<v Speaker 2>and had been released into an ICE detention center. His

2:30:03.450 --> 2:30:08.170
<v Speaker 2>attorney then held a presser, which Wilbur attended remotely by

2:30:08.250 --> 2:30:11.210
<v Speaker 2>calling in from detention. There are different ways people can

2:30:11.230 --> 2:30:13.109
<v Speaker 2>call in different detention centers. I think he had some

2:30:13.150 --> 2:30:15.790
<v Speaker 2>kind of tablet device. In this conference, he said he

2:30:15.830 --> 2:30:18.030
<v Speaker 2>was in serious pain and that he had not been

2:30:18.070 --> 2:30:21.530
<v Speaker 2>receiving adequate mental care and the ICE agents had not

2:30:21.570 --> 2:30:25.449
<v Speaker 2>identified themselves before ramming his car. His lawyer later said

2:30:25.750 --> 2:30:29.360
<v Speaker 2>that after this press conference, as a retaliatory measure, he

2:30:29.400 --> 2:30:33.020
<v Speaker 2>was held in isolation and had his communication device taken away.

2:30:34.280 --> 2:30:37.800
<v Speaker 2>He was also removed from the infirmary in apparent retaliation

2:30:37.840 --> 2:30:41.500
<v Speaker 2>for this presser and placed in isolation. He is now,

2:30:41.520 --> 2:30:45.990
<v Speaker 2>according to Congressman Joaquin Castro... been returned to hospital to

2:30:46.010 --> 2:30:49.150
<v Speaker 2>get better care. According to his lawyer, the agent who

2:30:49.270 --> 2:30:52.230
<v Speaker 2>shot him was hired last year and either didn't have

2:30:52.270 --> 2:30:56.169
<v Speaker 2>or didn't activate the body cam. A judge has ruled

2:30:56.330 --> 2:30:59.710
<v Speaker 2>that Wilbur will appear in person for an immigration hearing

2:30:59.870 --> 2:31:02.370
<v Speaker 2>on the 30th of September. So that would mean that

2:31:02.390 --> 2:31:04.670
<v Speaker 2>he can't be removed before then, right? He'd previously been

2:31:04.790 --> 2:31:08.030
<v Speaker 2>ordered removed in absentia because he had missed a hearing.

2:31:08.650 --> 2:31:10.660
<v Speaker 2>His lawyer says he had moved house and didn't get

2:31:10.950 --> 2:31:15.779
<v Speaker 2>that document. ICE then proceeded to release this press release,

2:31:16.440 --> 2:31:21.200
<v Speaker 2>effectively directly addressing the Instagram posts of his lawyer. And

2:31:21.260 --> 2:31:24.430
<v Speaker 2>they claimed they were going to, quote, correct the record, unquote.

2:31:24.870 --> 2:31:29.390
<v Speaker 2>with a number of lies. It was set up the

2:31:29.470 --> 2:31:30.890
<v Speaker 2>way that you might write a document if you didn't

2:31:30.910 --> 2:31:31.850
<v Speaker 2>know what a paragraph was.

2:31:32.270 --> 2:31:34.490
<v Speaker 4>The Axios style of writing.

2:31:34.890 --> 2:31:35.480
<v Speaker 6>Yes, yes.

2:31:35.560 --> 2:31:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Perfect, Garrison. Yes, that's correct. It used the Axios house

2:31:38.600 --> 2:31:41.619
<v Speaker 2>style here. Yeah, an outlet that thinks you're too dumb

2:31:41.680 --> 2:31:45.379
<v Speaker 2>to read two sentences consecutively. So it's set up in

2:31:45.420 --> 2:31:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a claim fact format.

2:31:47.959 --> 2:31:48.700
<v Speaker 4>Oh my God.

2:31:48.720 --> 2:31:52.180
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, like... Sometimes I think that there's a moment,

2:31:52.260 --> 2:31:54.920
<v Speaker 2>like with Jen Psaki, where just like the way press

2:31:54.959 --> 2:31:57.180
<v Speaker 2>releases are done by the executive branch went off a

2:31:57.260 --> 2:32:00.340
<v Speaker 2>fucking cliff. The Trump administration has like gone from like

2:32:00.379 --> 2:32:03.710
<v Speaker 2>slight downhill to like free fall at this point. But

2:32:03.770 --> 2:32:05.810
<v Speaker 2>throughout this, they don't refer to him by his name.

2:32:05.850 --> 2:32:07.350
<v Speaker 2>They refer to him as the illegal alien.

2:32:07.450 --> 2:32:10.010
<v Speaker 4>It's very common in all of their communications.

2:32:10.990 --> 2:32:14.430
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this shit really, like literally yesterday, my friends and

2:32:14.490 --> 2:32:17.109
<v Speaker 2>I erected a memorial to a migrant who had died

2:32:17.300 --> 2:32:18.760
<v Speaker 2>and then put their name on it, right? And I

2:32:19.320 --> 2:32:22.620
<v Speaker 2>not giving people names really fucking makes me mad. Claim

2:32:22.820 --> 2:32:26.860
<v Speaker 2>the illegal alien is here legally. Fact. I'm obviously quoting

2:32:26.900 --> 2:32:30.000
<v Speaker 2>from their presser here. This is false. The person is

2:32:30.060 --> 2:32:32.959
<v Speaker 2>in the US illegally. He entered illegally under the Biden administration.

2:32:33.220 --> 2:32:36.390
<v Speaker 2>The illegal alien had no valid work permit, had no

2:32:36.440 --> 2:32:38.910
<v Speaker 2>protective status, and had a final order of removal from

2:32:38.950 --> 2:32:42.869
<v Speaker 2>a Department of Justice immigration judge. This is not correct.

2:32:43.690 --> 2:32:47.970
<v Speaker 2>He entered under CBP1, right? Like, To enter under CBP1

2:32:48.070 --> 2:32:51.550
<v Speaker 2>was a massive and significant burden to migrants in the

2:32:51.570 --> 2:32:56.470
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration. People I know have died waiting for a

2:32:56.510 --> 2:32:59.310
<v Speaker 2>CBP1 appointment, and not a small.

2:32:59.110 --> 2:32:59.789
<v Speaker 8>Number of people.

2:33:01.610 --> 2:33:05.950
<v Speaker 2>To comply with the requirements of CBP1 was to jump

2:33:06.030 --> 2:33:08.770
<v Speaker 2>through every hoop that was placed in front of you

2:33:08.890 --> 2:33:14.459
<v Speaker 2>at great personal risk. It was... safer for people not

2:33:14.500 --> 2:33:17.600
<v Speaker 2>to remain in Mexico and to enter without inspection. He

2:33:17.620 --> 2:33:20.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't do that. He got an appointment at CBP1, went

2:33:20.760 --> 2:33:23.700
<v Speaker 2>to a border crossing, he spoke to numerous DHS personnel,

2:33:23.970 --> 2:33:26.790
<v Speaker 2>and he was allowed into the country. CBP1 gave people

2:33:26.830 --> 2:33:29.450
<v Speaker 2>a year of humanitarian parole. Trump tried to cancel that,

2:33:29.490 --> 2:33:31.630
<v Speaker 2>but in March this year, a federal judge overturned him

2:33:31.709 --> 2:33:35.810
<v Speaker 2>canceling that, says you can't just like broad swath cancel

2:33:35.830 --> 2:33:40.070
<v Speaker 2>parole like that. I've included an explainer For people who

2:33:40.310 --> 2:33:42.310
<v Speaker 2>need to or would like to understand that more, it'll

2:33:42.330 --> 2:33:43.090
<v Speaker 2>be in the notes.

2:33:43.810 --> 2:33:45.790
<v Speaker 4>Is that the welcome.rescue.org link?

2:33:46.090 --> 2:33:50.879
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah. This press release was just so annoying, right?

2:33:50.920 --> 2:33:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Just repeating all these talking points that they have, right? CBP1,

2:33:55.220 --> 2:33:58.180
<v Speaker 2>if you don't know, was founded by the first Trump administration.

2:33:58.860 --> 2:34:01.580
<v Speaker 2>This is a thing that they made. They've since tried

2:34:01.600 --> 2:34:04.220
<v Speaker 2>to retcon that, but I mean, they did it. It

2:34:04.260 --> 2:34:06.540
<v Speaker 2>was used by the Biden administration as a de facto

2:34:06.600 --> 2:34:10.180
<v Speaker 2>gating mechanism for migrants, right? It was a way of

2:34:10.240 --> 2:34:12.220
<v Speaker 2>reducing the number of people who could come and apply

2:34:12.260 --> 2:34:15.570
<v Speaker 2>for asylum. That is why people ended up eweing, right?

2:34:15.620 --> 2:34:18.650
<v Speaker 2>Entering without inspection because there was no other way. A

2:34:18.770 --> 2:34:22.210
<v Speaker 2>large number of CBP1 appointments went to Russian speaking people,

2:34:22.810 --> 2:34:25.550
<v Speaker 2>generally because those people who had come were wealthier. They

2:34:25.570 --> 2:34:28.189
<v Speaker 2>could get hotels. They'd get hotels in Tijuana with Wi-Fi

2:34:28.490 --> 2:34:30.330
<v Speaker 2>and they'd make the applications, right?

2:34:30.370 --> 2:34:30.470
<v Speaker 8>The.

2:34:31.390 --> 2:34:36.470
<v Speaker 2>The application did not work on previous generation Android telephones.

2:34:37.209 --> 2:34:39.590
<v Speaker 2>And those are the telephones that the vast number of

2:34:39.650 --> 2:34:43.330
<v Speaker 2>people coming to Seek Asylum will have, especially... I literally

2:34:43.350 --> 2:34:44.689
<v Speaker 2>heard from a friend today who I met in the

2:34:44.740 --> 2:34:47.699
<v Speaker 2>Darien Gap on, I think, her fifth phone number, because

2:34:47.720 --> 2:34:51.060
<v Speaker 2>people's phones just get stolen from them constantly. It's the

2:34:51.100 --> 2:34:53.600
<v Speaker 2>most reliable item of value that most people have, so

2:34:53.660 --> 2:34:55.920
<v Speaker 2>it's the easiest thing to steal. And so they end

2:34:56.000 --> 2:34:58.690
<v Speaker 2>up with When you turn your phone in to get

2:34:59.709 --> 2:35:03.449
<v Speaker 2>an upgrade, it gets sold in different parts of the

2:35:03.470 --> 2:35:06.470
<v Speaker 2>world where people don't have as much income for technology stuff.

2:35:06.629 --> 2:35:08.270
<v Speaker 2>So they end up with previous generation phones. The app

2:35:08.290 --> 2:35:12.970
<v Speaker 2>didn't work on those phones. The facial liveness scanner of CBP1,

2:35:12.990 --> 2:35:16.670
<v Speaker 2>let's say I'm booking an appointment for dinner, that it's

2:35:16.730 --> 2:35:19.090
<v Speaker 2>actually dinner making the appointment and not me holding up

2:35:19.129 --> 2:35:21.850
<v Speaker 2>a life-size cardboard cutout of dinner in front of the camera.

2:35:22.500 --> 2:35:25.380
<v Speaker 2>So you have to go like that. It simply didn't

2:35:25.520 --> 2:35:29.170
<v Speaker 2>work for black faces. I know there were NGOs in Tijuana,

2:35:29.190 --> 2:35:33.330
<v Speaker 2>for instance, who had spent so much money on light rooms,

2:35:34.050 --> 2:35:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to try and make it work for people. Jesus Christ. Yeah,

2:35:38.510 --> 2:35:41.100
<v Speaker 2>this act was horrific. And he went through all the

2:35:41.200 --> 2:35:43.740
<v Speaker 2>fucking hurdles, and they're still just going to call him...

2:35:43.620 --> 2:35:46.060
<v Speaker 2>They're still just going to lie about it, right? I

2:35:46.980 --> 2:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>think this is a particularly heinous example of how fucked

2:35:51.480 --> 2:35:53.990
<v Speaker 2>our immigration system is. Yeah, I'll keep up on this.

2:35:54.870 --> 2:35:57.209
<v Speaker 2>As far as we know, he's now in a hospital.

2:35:57.230 --> 2:36:00.369
<v Speaker 2>I hope he's receiving better care than he would under

2:36:00.390 --> 2:36:01.629
<v Speaker 2>a nice detention.

2:36:02.740 --> 2:36:05.269
<v Speaker 4>Let's go on one more ad break, and then we

2:36:05.350 --> 2:36:09.379
<v Speaker 4>have a few more stories before we end this episode.

2:36:19.800 --> 2:36:22.430
<v Speaker 6>Okay, we are back on.

2:36:22.959 --> 2:36:27.700
<v Speaker 4>Friday afternoon, President Trump announced he was, quote, banning three

2:36:27.760 --> 2:36:34.340
<v Speaker 4>news outlets, CNN, MSNBC, and Politico from the White House, quote,

2:36:34.480 --> 2:36:39.020
<v Speaker 4>effective immediately as a result of their constant reporting fake news.

2:36:39.810 --> 2:36:43.110
<v Speaker 4>Media outlets shouldn't be able to constantly write or report

2:36:43.209 --> 2:36:45.750
<v Speaker 4>fiction and lies when they're covering the president of the

2:36:45.790 --> 2:36:49.810
<v Speaker 4>United States. the Trump administration or the United States of America,

2:36:50.030 --> 2:36:55.470
<v Speaker 4>other fake news media outlets to follow, unquote. Obviously not

2:36:55.490 --> 2:36:59.090
<v Speaker 4>good when the president says that outlets shouldn't be allowed

2:36:59.209 --> 2:37:02.920
<v Speaker 4>to write or report. Only there was an amendment of

2:37:02.930 --> 2:37:07.279
<v Speaker 4>the constitution. But it was at first kind of unclear

2:37:07.400 --> 2:37:11.700
<v Speaker 4>what this ban meant exactly. Though at a press conference

2:37:11.940 --> 2:37:15.730
<v Speaker 4>following Trump's announcement on Truth Social, He referred to this

2:37:15.930 --> 2:37:18.369
<v Speaker 4>as a, quote, ban on the free press.

2:37:18.890 --> 2:37:20.879
<v Speaker 6>What? Wait, he just said that?

2:37:21.940 --> 2:37:22.220
<v Speaker 11>Yes.

2:37:22.879 --> 2:37:24.480
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I missed this.

2:37:26.870 --> 2:37:27.050
<v Speaker 1>What?

2:37:27.390 --> 2:37:29.869
<v Speaker 2>Let's get a video. That's fucking great.

2:37:30.500 --> 2:37:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Why not?

2:37:30.940 --> 2:37:33.720
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean in practice?

2:37:33.760 --> 2:37:35.560
<v Speaker 14>Are you taking away their badges? Are you banning them

2:37:35.580 --> 2:37:36.179
<v Speaker 14>from the pool?

2:37:36.200 --> 2:37:37.340
<v Speaker 2>Are you banning them from the office?

2:37:37.379 --> 2:37:37.860
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean?

2:37:38.500 --> 2:37:39.779
<v Speaker 1>I still don't know what that means.

2:37:39.900 --> 2:37:42.330
<v Speaker 2>Oh, the ban on the free press, right?

2:37:47.480 --> 2:37:48.220
<v Speaker 6>Very simple ban.

2:37:48.240 --> 2:37:50.959
<v Speaker 8>I don't want him in my office.

2:37:51.060 --> 2:37:51.740
<v Speaker 6>I don't want him here.

2:37:52.340 --> 2:37:53.840
<v Speaker 11>I would say the ban would go as far as

2:37:53.860 --> 2:37:54.240
<v Speaker 11>you can.

2:37:54.980 --> 2:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He's like, you know that thing we have an amendment about? Yeah.

2:37:57.900 --> 2:38:00.540
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he was referring to capital F, capital P, the

2:38:00.560 --> 2:38:03.060
<v Speaker 2>Barry Weiss outlet that does transfer media.

2:38:03.080 --> 2:38:06.140
<v Speaker 4>I don't think he's talking about banning Barry Weiss's The

2:38:06.180 --> 2:38:06.879
<v Speaker 4>Free Press.

2:38:07.760 --> 2:38:10.780
<v Speaker 6>It's so cool that we had an entire movement that

2:38:10.800 --> 2:38:16.400
<v Speaker 6>was nominally about free speech and the result of it was... Like,

2:38:16.580 --> 2:38:18.540
<v Speaker 6>white CEOs should be able to say the N-word, but

2:38:18.580 --> 2:38:20.670
<v Speaker 6>also the president should be allowed to ban the free

2:38:20.730 --> 2:38:21.860
<v Speaker 6>press from talking to him?

2:38:21.890 --> 2:38:24.250
<v Speaker 4>Hey, and the R-word.

2:38:24.530 --> 2:38:27.130
<v Speaker 6>There's so many slurs they want to be able to say.

2:38:28.990 --> 2:38:32.150
<v Speaker 4>So Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, quote, something

2:38:32.209 --> 2:38:34.430
<v Speaker 4>is wrong with a country that can allow people to

2:38:34.470 --> 2:38:38.290
<v Speaker 4>write purposefully negative stories. If they want to write them,

2:38:38.590 --> 2:38:41.990
<v Speaker 4>that's fine. I don't have to let them into the

2:38:42.050 --> 2:38:45.170
<v Speaker 4>people's house. Going on to say, like he started in

2:38:45.220 --> 2:38:47.570
<v Speaker 4>that clip, I don't want them in my office. I

2:38:47.590 --> 2:38:49.970
<v Speaker 4>don't want them here. I would say the ban would

2:38:50.010 --> 2:38:52.550
<v Speaker 4>go as far as you can. And if they could

2:38:52.590 --> 2:38:58.320
<v Speaker 4>straighten themselves out, I'd love it, unquote, suggesting he could

2:38:58.590 --> 2:39:03.580
<v Speaker 4>lift the ban if outlets, quote, straighten themselves out, meaning

2:39:03.959 --> 2:39:07.980
<v Speaker 4>write the news in a different way. Someone asked Trump

2:39:08.160 --> 2:39:11.960
<v Speaker 4>how this would relate to a then upcoming visit with

2:39:12.180 --> 2:39:15.700
<v Speaker 4>President Xi. And I'll just play the clip.

2:39:16.490 --> 2:39:19.110
<v Speaker 6>You've got President Xi coming next week.

2:39:19.129 --> 2:39:22.550
<v Speaker 1>China is one of the most repressive countries for journalists

2:39:22.629 --> 2:39:23.150
<v Speaker 1>in the world.

2:39:23.310 --> 2:39:24.630
<v Speaker 9>What signal does it send?

2:39:24.709 --> 2:39:27.629
<v Speaker 11>I don't know about that. I think we're repressive also.

2:39:27.690 --> 2:39:30.330
<v Speaker 1>We get fake news. We don't repress, but they write

2:39:30.390 --> 2:39:35.420
<v Speaker 1>fake news. Jeez.

2:39:36.100 --> 2:39:37.539
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he was on a sick one.

2:39:39.190 --> 2:39:40.850
<v Speaker 6>This whole time I was thinking about there was a

2:39:40.870 --> 2:39:44.789
<v Speaker 6>story like this week about a trial of some media

2:39:44.810 --> 2:39:47.170
<v Speaker 6>organization in Hong Kong where the judge is talking about

2:39:47.209 --> 2:39:50.590
<v Speaker 6>how you shouldn't be able to publish opinions that are like,

2:39:50.750 --> 2:39:54.770
<v Speaker 6>I think the quote was like factually incorrect opinions because

2:39:54.790 --> 2:39:57.830
<v Speaker 6>they were like negative about the regime. And then Trump's like, no,

2:39:57.910 --> 2:40:00.800
<v Speaker 6>fuck that. We're banning the free press. We're going to

2:40:00.950 --> 2:40:04.020
<v Speaker 6>out repress the CCP. I'm like, this is great. This

2:40:04.060 --> 2:40:06.460
<v Speaker 6>is great. I love I love being a Chinese American.

2:40:06.980 --> 2:40:07.860
<v Speaker 6>Such a good time.

2:40:11.120 --> 2:40:13.680
<v Speaker 4>This clip is really funny because he says we're repressive

2:40:13.740 --> 2:40:17.420
<v Speaker 4>too but then he pivots and talks about fake news

2:40:17.459 --> 2:40:19.340
<v Speaker 4>and then goes on to say like well we don't

2:40:19.360 --> 2:40:21.920
<v Speaker 4>like actually repress but we do have fake news and

2:40:21.940 --> 2:40:25.180
<v Speaker 4>like kind of equivocating fake news to repression in China

2:40:25.240 --> 2:40:27.410
<v Speaker 4>is kind of what he turns that into but then

2:40:27.420 --> 2:40:30.940
<v Speaker 4>he just banned the press perhaps after catching what he

2:40:31.020 --> 2:40:34.790
<v Speaker 4>said but like yeah it's not it was a really

2:40:34.930 --> 2:40:39.050
<v Speaker 4>odd press conference as you can imagine yes The banning

2:40:39.070 --> 2:40:40.369
<v Speaker 4>the free press press conference.

2:40:40.790 --> 2:40:42.370
<v Speaker 1>His honesty is always refreshing.

2:40:42.590 --> 2:40:42.990
<v Speaker 10>Wild.

2:40:43.050 --> 2:40:43.269
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

2:40:43.650 --> 2:40:47.130
<v Speaker 4>So over the weekend, reporters from those three outlets were

2:40:47.150 --> 2:40:50.890
<v Speaker 4>denied access to the White House grounds, with journalists' hard-pass

2:40:50.910 --> 2:40:56.480
<v Speaker 4>credentials apparently being deactivated overnight. Then on Monday, the affected

2:40:56.560 --> 2:41:00.500
<v Speaker 4>outlets filed a lawsuit against Trump and White House staff.

2:41:01.320 --> 2:41:04.300
<v Speaker 4>The suit claims it's, quote, clear that the ban was

2:41:04.360 --> 2:41:08.680
<v Speaker 4>motivated by Trump's disdain for reporting he considers, quote, one-sided and, quote,

2:41:08.800 --> 2:41:12.779
<v Speaker 4>never good because it, quote, diminishes him and his accomplishments.

2:41:13.560 --> 2:41:15.459
<v Speaker 4>This ban could not be a more direct assault on

2:41:15.480 --> 2:41:17.660
<v Speaker 4>the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our

2:41:17.680 --> 2:41:24.480
<v Speaker 4>most fundamental constitutional principles, unquote. Also on Monday, ABC News,

2:41:24.700 --> 2:41:30.760
<v Speaker 4>CBS News, NBC, and Fox reported The four TV news poolers,

2:41:30.970 --> 2:41:34.349
<v Speaker 4>besides CNN, released a joint statement in support of CNN,

2:41:35.129 --> 2:41:38.830
<v Speaker 4>who was supposed to be the designated TV pool provider

2:41:38.970 --> 2:41:42.390
<v Speaker 4>for that day at the White House. The statement reads,

2:41:43.110 --> 2:41:45.920
<v Speaker 4>the public has a vital interest in receiving accurate independent

2:41:46.110 --> 2:41:49.820
<v Speaker 4>information about its government. No administration should restrict a news

2:41:49.900 --> 2:41:55.810
<v Speaker 4>organization because it objects to its reporting. These networks announced

2:41:55.910 --> 2:42:00.920
<v Speaker 4>a solidarity blackout of White House pool coverage. With Fox News'

2:42:01.060 --> 2:42:04.260
<v Speaker 4>Washington bureau chief and the current White House TV pool

2:42:04.300 --> 2:42:08.080
<v Speaker 4>chair emailing the other networks on Monday, quote, This is

2:42:08.100 --> 2:42:10.600
<v Speaker 4>to advise that, effective today, the TV pool will not

2:42:10.660 --> 2:42:14.370
<v Speaker 4>be covering events designated as pool coverage of the president.

2:42:14.830 --> 2:42:18.530
<v Speaker 4>This follows the White House's position preventing CNN from fulfilling

2:42:18.650 --> 2:42:22.750
<v Speaker 4>its assigned pool duties. There will be no replacement pool

2:42:23.070 --> 2:42:27.470
<v Speaker 4>put in place. And later on Monday, this did affect

2:42:27.790 --> 2:42:31.430
<v Speaker 4>their ability to report on White House events as Newsmax

2:42:31.490 --> 2:42:35.730
<v Speaker 4>struggled to hear the president during a ribbon-cutting ceremony.

2:42:44.890 --> 2:42:46.070
<v Speaker 1>OK, so there is.

2:42:46.030 --> 2:42:49.650
<v Speaker 12>No microphone because there's no microphone because the pool cameras

2:42:49.709 --> 2:42:52.670
<v Speaker 12>aren't there. So maybe, Tim, this is one example of

2:42:52.850 --> 2:42:56.650
<v Speaker 12>it backfiring just a little bit. Pick up on some

2:42:56.730 --> 2:43:01.690
<v Speaker 12>of the things Michael was saying. And obviously the ramifications

2:43:01.790 --> 2:43:03.770
<v Speaker 12>are right here. Can't hear what the president's saying.

2:43:05.690 --> 2:43:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, you cannot hear what the president is saying.

2:43:08.379 --> 2:43:09.140
<v Speaker 2>Backfired a little bit.

2:43:09.160 --> 2:43:11.560
<v Speaker 6>Backfired a little bit.

2:43:11.640 --> 2:43:13.970
<v Speaker 4>A little bit. A little bit, it seems.

2:43:14.250 --> 2:43:16.330
<v Speaker 2>Well, they don't want to get the old press credential

2:43:16.350 --> 2:43:17.590
<v Speaker 2>taken away. They got to be careful.

2:43:18.510 --> 2:43:21.290
<v Speaker 4>To me, it's unclear how long this blackout will last

2:43:21.310 --> 2:43:23.869
<v Speaker 4>and how isolated it is, because obviously there was coverage

2:43:23.890 --> 2:43:27.060
<v Speaker 4>of Trump at the UN, although outlets said that that

2:43:27.080 --> 2:43:30.000
<v Speaker 4>was because the UN provides those credentials. So it's unclear

2:43:30.040 --> 2:43:32.280
<v Speaker 4>if this is supposed to be targeted specifically at the

2:43:32.400 --> 2:43:35.240
<v Speaker 4>White House pool. We'll get a better idea in the

2:43:35.280 --> 2:43:37.600
<v Speaker 4>next few days as Trump returns to the White House.

2:43:39.070 --> 2:43:42.240
<v Speaker 4>But not, you know, good for as Trump says, the

2:43:42.280 --> 2:43:42.840
<v Speaker 4>free press.

2:43:43.300 --> 2:43:43.580
<v Speaker 8>No!

2:43:44.980 --> 2:43:49.970
<v Speaker 4>Another thing not great. Last Thursday, September 17th, the FCC

2:43:50.000 --> 2:43:54.290
<v Speaker 4>approved Paramount's petition to allow almost 50% of the potentially

2:43:54.330 --> 2:43:59.150
<v Speaker 4>merged Paramount WB equity to be owned by Saudi Arabia, Qatar,

2:43:59.270 --> 2:44:04.830
<v Speaker 4>and the UAE following this potential Warner Brothers merger. Meaning

2:44:04.930 --> 2:44:08.410
<v Speaker 4>the Ellisons, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Abu Dhabi would end

2:44:08.490 --> 2:44:16.650
<v Speaker 4>up owning CBS, CNN, HBO, Discovery Channel, BET, Fandango, MTV, Nickelodeon, Paramount,

2:44:16.690 --> 2:44:24.010
<v Speaker 4>Pluto TV, Showtime, TBS, The CW, TNT, and Warner Brothers. Now, thankfully,

2:44:24.010 --> 2:44:29.629
<v Speaker 4>12 state AGs have sued to block this $ 110 billion

2:44:29.970 --> 2:44:35.050
<v Speaker 4>Paramount-Warner Brothers merger since it obviously endangers competition and threatens

2:44:35.070 --> 2:44:42.109
<v Speaker 4>editorial independence of even more news outlets. Though, after Paramount

2:44:42.370 --> 2:44:46.510
<v Speaker 4>threatened to leave California last week, State Attorney General Rob Bonta,

2:44:46.810 --> 2:44:52.670
<v Speaker 4>who was leading the state coalition's antitrust case, caved on

2:44:52.709 --> 2:44:57.230
<v Speaker 4>Monday and agreed to settle their lawsuit, essentially giving this

2:44:57.290 --> 2:44:59.310
<v Speaker 4>merger the final green light.

2:44:59.930 --> 2:45:01.270
<v Speaker 2>California Democrat moment.

2:45:02.690 --> 2:45:03.830
<v Speaker 4>This is really bad.

2:45:03.850 --> 2:45:04.450
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

2:45:10.150 --> 2:45:16.289
<v Speaker 4>A list of this settlement's, quote, court-enforceable concessions, which largely

2:45:16.570 --> 2:45:19.650
<v Speaker 4>amounts to Paramount promising to release around 30 movies a

2:45:19.690 --> 2:45:22.610
<v Speaker 4>year for the next five years. Only for the next

2:45:22.650 --> 2:45:25.230
<v Speaker 4>five years, by the way. Or else they will face

2:45:25.290 --> 2:45:30.080
<v Speaker 4>penalties and be required to divest Miramax Studios. Again, this

2:45:30.140 --> 2:45:33.960
<v Speaker 4>requirement only is until 2031, roughly.

2:45:33.980 --> 2:45:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Also, that's what you're going to fight for? 30 Paramount

2:45:37.220 --> 2:45:39.880
<v Speaker 2>movies a year? That's the big thing here?

2:45:40.879 --> 2:45:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Some of the other concessions include a $ 47. 5 million fund

2:45:45.800 --> 2:45:51.340
<v Speaker 4>for workers, quote, displaced by the merger, and an annual

2:45:51.340 --> 2:45:55.879
<v Speaker 4>$ 5 million fund to support independent film. We did it, Rob.

2:45:56.160 --> 2:45:57.020
<v Speaker 6>We did it, Gavin.

2:45:58.260 --> 2:46:01.040
<v Speaker 4>We got it. $ 5 million a year for independent film.

2:46:01.780 --> 2:46:02.460
<v Speaker 6>Thanks, Gav.

2:46:05.520 --> 2:46:09.959
<v Speaker 4>Now, California also announced a, quote, News Editorial Independence Board

2:46:10.000 --> 2:46:17.420
<v Speaker 4>to help CNN and CBS maintain editorial independence. So, you know, worries,

2:46:18.200 --> 2:46:22.960
<v Speaker 4>no need, no need to be worried about this. This

2:46:23.000 --> 2:46:26.840
<v Speaker 4>will be fine. But if you actually read the documents

2:46:27.080 --> 2:46:31.619
<v Speaker 4>establishing this board, I'll read this here. The Editorial Independence

2:46:31.680 --> 2:46:34.100
<v Speaker 4>Board should be made up of five established journalists, active

2:46:34.120 --> 2:46:36.780
<v Speaker 4>or retired, each of whom shall have practiced journalism for

2:46:36.800 --> 2:46:40.359
<v Speaker 4>a minimum of 10 years. No more than two editorial

2:46:40.400 --> 2:46:43.960
<v Speaker 4>board members may be affiliated with the same political party.

2:46:44.440 --> 2:46:47.839
<v Speaker 4>Editorial Independence Board members shall be appointed by the Combined

2:46:47.879 --> 2:46:52.230
<v Speaker 4>Entities Board of Directors. Who do you think is the

2:46:52.330 --> 2:46:56.709
<v Speaker 4>chair of Paramount's Board of Directors?

2:46:56.810 --> 2:46:58.490
<v Speaker 6>Wild guess. Larry Ellison?

2:46:59.410 --> 2:47:00.190
<v Speaker 4>David Ellison.

2:47:00.629 --> 2:47:01.369
<v Speaker 6>David Ellison, sure.

2:47:01.390 --> 2:47:02.950
<v Speaker 2>Oh, right, yeah, just kidding.

2:47:03.030 --> 2:47:03.450
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah.

2:47:04.000 --> 2:47:06.020
<v Speaker 2>I love that they can't be from the same political party, right?

2:47:06.040 --> 2:47:07.320
<v Speaker 2>So you're going to get two Dems, you're going to

2:47:07.340 --> 2:47:09.160
<v Speaker 2>get two Republicans, then you've got a wild card in there.

2:47:09.480 --> 2:47:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And there is a kind of person who is a

2:47:11.200 --> 2:47:13.950
<v Speaker 2>California journalist who is a member of the Libertarian Party,

2:47:14.470 --> 2:47:16.650
<v Speaker 2>and they are the worst kind of person. And you

2:47:16.770 --> 2:47:18.450
<v Speaker 2>know one of them is going to fucking end up

2:47:18.510 --> 2:47:11.789
<v Speaker 2>in there. I love to live in a free society.

2:47:11.830 --> 2:47:15.510
<v Speaker 2>Making things worse, Semaphore reported today that Paramount is weighing

2:47:15.530 --> 2:47:18.160
<v Speaker 2>tapping one Elon Musk for equity investment as well. I

2:47:18.180 --> 2:47:18.820
<v Speaker 2>did read that.

2:47:18.840 --> 2:47:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Physically painful.

2:47:37.629 --> 2:47:42.470
<v Speaker 4>So both Ellison and Musk could end up appointing people

2:47:42.629 --> 2:47:45.550
<v Speaker 4>to this editorial independence board.

2:47:46.070 --> 2:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They love freedom.

2:47:47.879 --> 2:47:51.220
<v Speaker 6>Also, the other investors are like the Saudi government and

2:47:51.240 --> 2:47:55.179
<v Speaker 6>the UAE's sovereign wealth funds. Part of it, right?

2:47:55.820 --> 2:48:00.020
<v Speaker 4>Part of that deal is allegedly making sure that they

2:48:00.040 --> 2:48:03.420
<v Speaker 4>don't have voting power. even though they own the shares.

2:48:04.020 --> 2:48:04.510
<v Speaker 6>Sure.

2:48:05.010 --> 2:48:06.369
<v Speaker 4>We'll see how that works.

2:48:06.450 --> 2:48:08.410
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I would bet on the Saudis more than I

2:48:08.430 --> 2:48:10.830
<v Speaker 1>would bet on Musk. Like, give them voting power.

2:48:11.690 --> 2:48:12.879
<v Speaker 4>That's a dark timeline.

2:48:12.900 --> 2:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I'm just kidding.

2:48:14.550 --> 2:48:16.300
<v Speaker 2>We'll get a great comedy festival out of it.

2:48:16.590 --> 2:48:19.610
<v Speaker 6>Until we have proof that Elon Musk has deployed Sudanese

2:48:19.650 --> 2:48:20.610
<v Speaker 6>child soldiers in Yemen.

2:48:20.629 --> 2:48:21.610
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay, okay.

2:48:21.629 --> 2:48:22.629
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

2:48:22.950 --> 2:48:26.710
<v Speaker 1>No, no, I didn't say the UAE. Let's distinguish.

2:48:26.730 --> 2:48:27.270
<v Speaker 4>That is true.

2:48:27.310 --> 2:48:30.480
<v Speaker 6>The Saudis also were involved in that. Not letting them

2:48:30.510 --> 2:48:30.949
<v Speaker 6>off the hook.

2:48:30.980 --> 2:48:33.420
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you're right, you're right. I retract it.

2:48:34.300 --> 2:48:36.420
<v Speaker 2>You know exactly what kind of press freedoms Elon Musk

2:48:36.440 --> 2:48:39.160
<v Speaker 2>is going to go for as well. Like, oh God.

2:48:39.760 --> 2:48:43.119
<v Speaker 4>But no, this is a massive failure specifically on executives

2:48:43.180 --> 2:48:47.830
<v Speaker 4>in California. between the governor, Newsom, and the state AG.

2:48:47.870 --> 2:48:50.470
<v Speaker 4>The fact that they caved on this due to the

2:48:50.530 --> 2:48:53.869
<v Speaker 4>threat of Paramount moving to a different state puts the

2:48:54.150 --> 2:48:56.150
<v Speaker 4>whole country in jeopardy.

2:48:56.530 --> 2:48:59.470
<v Speaker 2>People really need to wise up to what Newsom's doing

2:48:59.530 --> 2:49:02.160
<v Speaker 2>right now. He's very clearly signaling that he will be

2:49:02.220 --> 2:49:05.740
<v Speaker 2>friendly to capital before he makes his presidential run. He

2:49:05.760 --> 2:49:08.439
<v Speaker 2>did it with the wildfire settlements in California. He's doing

2:49:08.500 --> 2:49:10.820
<v Speaker 2>it with this. He is showing that he is going

2:49:10.840 --> 2:49:13.640
<v Speaker 2>to be everything that Democrats have disappointed you with for

2:49:13.680 --> 2:49:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the last 4, 8, 12 years. I despise what Newsom

2:49:19.840 --> 2:49:20.500
<v Speaker 2>is doing right now.

2:49:21.140 --> 2:49:23.890
<v Speaker 4>The other thing in the fine print of these concessions

2:49:24.790 --> 2:49:30.610
<v Speaker 4>is the force majeure clause that allows the combined entity

2:49:30.690 --> 2:49:37.429
<v Speaker 4>to get out of all these concessions in situations of, quote, War, rebellion, hurricanes,

2:49:37.610 --> 2:49:43.910
<v Speaker 4>other major storms, earthquakes, fires, terrorism, pandemics, strikes, labor disruptions,

2:49:44.670 --> 2:49:49.090
<v Speaker 4>economic recessions, riots, insurrections, civil commotions, blockades.

2:49:49.110 --> 2:49:49.920
<v Speaker 8>Jesus Christ.

2:49:50.560 --> 2:49:53.340
<v Speaker 4>So in the case of the AI bubble bursting, they

2:49:53.360 --> 2:49:56.380
<v Speaker 4>can get out of all of these concessions that the

2:49:56.420 --> 2:49:59.320
<v Speaker 4>state AG of California is claiming as their big victory.

2:49:59.890 --> 2:50:02.390
<v Speaker 4>Of course, also strikes and labor disruptions included in there

2:50:02.450 --> 2:50:02.810
<v Speaker 4>as well.

2:50:03.370 --> 2:50:04.530
<v Speaker 2>What's a civil commotion?

2:50:04.709 --> 2:50:05.610
<v Speaker 1>A little shenanigans.

2:50:07.740 --> 2:50:10.860
<v Speaker 6>James, it's what happens when I walk down the street.

2:50:11.360 --> 2:50:12.420
<v Speaker 6>It's a civil commotion.

2:50:13.280 --> 2:50:15.220
<v Speaker 2>That is a spiritually British phrase.

2:50:18.060 --> 2:50:20.540
<v Speaker 1>What legal basis is this?

2:50:20.800 --> 2:50:22.619
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to hit us up if you've been convicted

2:50:22.640 --> 2:50:23.400
<v Speaker 2>of civil commotion.

2:50:25.440 --> 2:50:27.640
<v Speaker 4>One final note on this, also on Monday, the Writers

2:50:27.660 --> 2:50:30.580
<v Speaker 4>Guild of America settled their own lawsuit filed this past

2:50:30.600 --> 2:50:34.490
<v Speaker 4>summer on the grounds that this merger violates antitrust and

2:50:34.530 --> 2:50:38.410
<v Speaker 4>would cause specific harm to workers. In terms of concessions

2:50:38.490 --> 2:50:42.170
<v Speaker 4>that the WGA was able to achieve, they got Paramount

2:50:42.190 --> 2:50:44.890
<v Speaker 4>to agree to a layoff prohibition for five years for

2:50:45.030 --> 2:50:48.050
<v Speaker 4>CBS News broadcast members and got Paramount to agree to

2:50:48.090 --> 2:50:51.840
<v Speaker 4>pay $ 17. 5 million to the Writers Guild Health Fund and

2:50:52.020 --> 2:50:55.340
<v Speaker 4>cover their attorney's fees from the litigation. to quote the

2:50:55.540 --> 2:51:00.020
<v Speaker 4>WGA statement, quote, Unfortunately, the conditions Paramount has committed to

2:51:00.440 --> 2:51:04.420
<v Speaker 4>with the AGs and with us fall far short of

2:51:04.480 --> 2:51:07.540
<v Speaker 4>adequately protecting writers, and we continue to believe the merger

2:51:07.860 --> 2:51:11.430
<v Speaker 4>will cause damage to the industry at large. As labor unions, however,

2:51:11.650 --> 2:51:14.130
<v Speaker 4>the AGs' settlement means that we had to contend with

2:51:14.170 --> 2:51:17.310
<v Speaker 4>the reality of forging ahead alone with a lawsuit that

2:51:17.350 --> 2:51:23.030
<v Speaker 4>would cost millions of dollars through trial, unquote. Quick update here.

2:51:23.629 --> 2:51:29.310
<v Speaker 4>On Thursday, a California judge delayed the court sign-off of

2:51:29.390 --> 2:51:33.390
<v Speaker 4>this settlement for at least another week by granting an

2:51:33.450 --> 2:51:38.090
<v Speaker 4>administrative motion by a coalition to block the merger. This

2:51:38.240 --> 2:51:41.160
<v Speaker 4>settlement to complete the merger does require a sign-off from

2:51:41.220 --> 2:51:45.300
<v Speaker 4>this judge. The parties have till Monday. The next hearing

2:51:45.379 --> 2:51:49.170
<v Speaker 4>to go over the settlement is expected to be on Tuesday.

2:51:50.709 --> 2:51:53.990
<v Speaker 6>You know, rolling it back a couple seconds, speaking of

2:51:54.150 --> 2:51:59.610
<v Speaker 6>spiritually British, let's talk about Canada in our final section.

2:51:59.629 --> 2:52:00.790
<v Speaker 2>Hey, that is a burn.

2:52:00.950 --> 2:52:01.610
<v Speaker 6>It's a good one.

2:52:01.629 --> 2:52:02.290
<v Speaker 8>It's a good one.

2:52:03.490 --> 2:52:10.030
<v Speaker 6>So, okay, last Wednesday, September 16th, EU Commission President Ursula

2:52:10.080 --> 2:52:13.800
<v Speaker 6>von der Leyen proposed that Canada become the only, quote,

2:52:13.940 --> 2:52:16.340
<v Speaker 6>associate member of the EU?

2:52:16.980 --> 2:52:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Hell yeah.

2:52:18.000 --> 2:52:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Nice.

2:52:19.020 --> 2:52:19.240
<v Speaker 8>So.

2:52:20.440 --> 2:52:23.120
<v Speaker 6>This was obviously, well, I say obviously, this was the

2:52:23.180 --> 2:52:27.500
<v Speaker 6>day before Carney spoke in front of the European Parliament,

2:52:27.600 --> 2:52:30.520
<v Speaker 6>was receptive to the offer, and it seems like this

2:52:30.540 --> 2:52:34.660
<v Speaker 6>is something that's going to get voted on by the Parliament.

2:52:35.220 --> 2:52:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Later on in this sort of trip, he met with

2:52:37.140 --> 2:52:39.700
<v Speaker 6>the leaders of France and England and spent a lot

2:52:39.720 --> 2:52:44.050
<v Speaker 6>of time talking about strengthening ties with European nations. It

2:52:44.070 --> 2:52:47.310
<v Speaker 6>was also, I don't know if revealed the right term,

2:52:48.050 --> 2:52:52.119
<v Speaker 6>but there was... The whole process of this was very weird,

2:52:52.420 --> 2:52:54.859
<v Speaker 6>but basically it was, it was, it was like got

2:52:54.940 --> 2:52:59.090
<v Speaker 6>to the press that Canada had asked to join the,

2:52:59.900 --> 2:53:03.390
<v Speaker 6>it's called the joint expeditionary force, which is this sort

2:53:03.430 --> 2:53:08.410
<v Speaker 6>of like British led like military alliance project. I'm just

2:53:08.430 --> 2:53:11.830
<v Speaker 6>going to quote from CBC here, quote, as it was

2:53:11.910 --> 2:53:15.789
<v Speaker 6>originally conceived, the joint expeditionary force was meant to preserve

2:53:15.890 --> 2:53:18.890
<v Speaker 6>battlefield relations that grew up during the Afghan war. So

2:53:18.910 --> 2:53:24.020
<v Speaker 6>we're off to it. great start here. In 2012, Britain's

2:53:24.100 --> 2:53:28.020
<v Speaker 6>then chief of defense, General Sir David Richards, described a

2:53:28.060 --> 2:53:31.430
<v Speaker 6>future force that could deploy rapidly overseas without Britain having

2:53:31.450 --> 2:53:35.990
<v Speaker 6>to assemble an entirely new coalition for every crisis. So, again,

2:53:36.030 --> 2:53:38.390
<v Speaker 6>originally this is a kind of, they want to be

2:53:38.410 --> 2:53:41.390
<v Speaker 6>able to kind of build on the military integration of

2:53:41.430 --> 2:53:45.599
<v Speaker 6>the war in Afghanistan, which, I don't know, very few

2:53:45.660 --> 2:53:48.040
<v Speaker 6>wars in which I want to less build on military

2:53:48.080 --> 2:53:52.160
<v Speaker 6>integration from. In recent times, it has been more that

2:53:52.200 --> 2:53:58.040
<v Speaker 6>the sort of coalition existence and prominence has been more

2:53:58.080 --> 2:54:03.690
<v Speaker 6>about its potential response to continued Russian aggression in Europe.

2:54:05.030 --> 2:54:07.850
<v Speaker 6>So all of this basically dropped at the same time

2:54:08.810 --> 2:54:13.550
<v Speaker 6>last week. Trump responded to the whole thing about Canada

2:54:13.570 --> 2:54:16.140
<v Speaker 6>becoming an associate member of the EU by saying it

2:54:16.170 --> 2:54:20.000
<v Speaker 6>would be a, quote, hostile act. He also said, quote,

2:54:20.620 --> 2:54:24.120
<v Speaker 6>if it's a good intention, that's fine. If it's bad intention,

2:54:24.500 --> 2:54:28.170
<v Speaker 6>we'll put very heavy tariffs on Europe. So who knows

2:54:28.190 --> 2:54:28.510
<v Speaker 6>with that?

2:54:28.830 --> 2:54:29.209
<v Speaker 8>I don't know.

2:54:29.330 --> 2:54:31.350
<v Speaker 6>Genuinely, who knows what's going to happen with that situation?

2:54:31.370 --> 2:54:33.330
<v Speaker 6>I don't know.

2:54:34.290 --> 2:54:36.910
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can negotiate a swap now that Britain has

2:54:36.970 --> 2:54:41.400
<v Speaker 2>left Europe and Britain could join NAFTA.

2:54:42.560 --> 2:54:46.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, can we physically swap the countries and put Canada

2:54:47.080 --> 2:54:47.560
<v Speaker 6>over Britain?

2:54:48.190 --> 2:54:51.439
<v Speaker 2>Sure. At least they wouldn't have as much fucking coastline

2:54:51.480 --> 2:54:54.640
<v Speaker 2>to be bastards about back home. Probably more coastline in

2:54:54.660 --> 2:54:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Canada just because it's vast.

2:54:56.980 --> 2:54:57.180
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

2:54:57.340 --> 2:55:00.099
<v Speaker 6>So, OK, we really know very little about what Trump's

2:55:00.140 --> 2:55:03.100
<v Speaker 6>response is going to be to this. Now, the part

2:55:03.140 --> 2:55:05.800
<v Speaker 6>that I actually am interested in here is what does

2:55:05.840 --> 2:55:09.940
<v Speaker 6>this associate membership thing actually mean? And what is this

2:55:10.160 --> 2:55:14.590
<v Speaker 6>actual partnership supposed to look like? So we talked a

2:55:14.590 --> 2:55:17.470
<v Speaker 6>little bit. Obviously, there's some military integration. Most of it

2:55:17.690 --> 2:55:21.810
<v Speaker 6>seems to be trade alliances. And even that is kind

2:55:21.870 --> 2:55:24.750
<v Speaker 6>of vague. What you get out of it looking into

2:55:24.790 --> 2:55:27.820
<v Speaker 6>this is that the rhetoric coming out of both the

2:55:27.920 --> 2:55:30.849
<v Speaker 6>EU and Canada is extremely loud. They're talking about the

2:55:30.920 --> 2:55:34.340
<v Speaker 6>crisis of democratic institutions and the rule of law globally.

2:55:34.360 --> 2:55:34.980
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

2:55:35.360 --> 2:55:38.160
<v Speaker 6>All of this sort of stuff. But there was a

2:55:38.180 --> 2:55:43.140
<v Speaker 6>really interesting thing. interview in foreign policy with Canada's foreign minister,

2:55:43.220 --> 2:55:48.630
<v Speaker 6>Anita Anand, about what actually, under the surface of this

2:55:48.650 --> 2:55:52.430
<v Speaker 6>sort of grand rhetoric about forming this sort of coalition

2:55:52.450 --> 2:55:56.230
<v Speaker 6>and promoting the rule of law and being a non-coercive

2:55:56.290 --> 2:55:59.710
<v Speaker 6>body and all of this sort of very grand rhetoric

2:55:59.750 --> 2:56:03.430
<v Speaker 6>that is in response to Trump without really mentioning him,

2:56:04.420 --> 2:56:06.820
<v Speaker 6>There's a lot of really interesting parts of this interview

2:56:06.860 --> 2:56:10.359
<v Speaker 6>with Canada's foreign minister about what they're actually talking about doing.

2:56:10.379 --> 2:56:13.680
<v Speaker 6>I think maybe the first thing that she gets asked

2:56:14.440 --> 2:56:16.730
<v Speaker 6>is Trump saying, quote, we don't need Canada.

2:56:16.770 --> 2:56:17.510
<v Speaker 2>They need us.

2:56:18.129 --> 2:56:20.770
<v Speaker 6>And the response is very interesting because what she's doing

2:56:20.970 --> 2:56:23.190
<v Speaker 6>is deemphasizing an actual break with the U.S.

2:56:23.250 --> 2:56:23.810
<v Speaker 2>Economically.

2:56:24.209 --> 2:56:26.189
<v Speaker 6>Which is what all of the reporting on this, everyone

2:56:26.230 --> 2:56:28.310
<v Speaker 6>is talking about how like, oh, this is like Canada

2:56:28.350 --> 2:56:30.550
<v Speaker 6>trying to pivot away from the US. And her response

2:56:30.570 --> 2:56:32.090
<v Speaker 6>to this is like, well, no, the US and Canada

2:56:32.110 --> 2:56:34.850
<v Speaker 6>are just permanently economically integrated. The auto sector is this,

2:56:35.350 --> 2:56:37.750
<v Speaker 6>you know, like sign of permanent integration between the economies.

2:56:38.660 --> 2:56:38.850
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

2:56:39.430 --> 2:56:43.260
<v Speaker 6>And largely the focus of her response is that, oh,

2:56:43.320 --> 2:56:45.740
<v Speaker 6>we have a bunch of free trade pacts with a

2:56:45.780 --> 2:56:48.140
<v Speaker 6>bunch of other parts of the world and, you know,

2:56:48.160 --> 2:56:49.260
<v Speaker 6>between the US and Canada.

2:56:50.560 --> 2:56:50.680
<v Speaker 8>So.

2:56:51.110 --> 2:56:52.550
<v Speaker 6>This is kind of a sign of like when these

2:56:52.590 --> 2:56:54.869
<v Speaker 6>people are talking about sort of a rules-based international order,

2:56:54.890 --> 2:56:57.780
<v Speaker 6>what they're talking about is free trade pacts. I'm going

2:56:57.800 --> 2:57:00.100
<v Speaker 6>to read this quote from the interview. So the first

2:57:00.140 --> 2:57:03.200
<v Speaker 6>part of this, the question is from the foreign policy

2:57:03.220 --> 2:57:06.650
<v Speaker 6>interviewer quote. So let me talk a little bit then

2:57:06.709 --> 2:57:09.949
<v Speaker 6>about the canada europe relationship i hear the phrase associate

2:57:10.010 --> 2:57:12.520
<v Speaker 6>member being used a week ago what would that entail

2:57:12.600 --> 2:57:15.000
<v Speaker 6>what does that mean and then this is uh the

2:57:15.020 --> 2:57:18.680
<v Speaker 6>canadian foreign minister the nomenclature that is being attached the

2:57:18.780 --> 2:57:21.700
<v Speaker 6>growing relationship between canada and the eu is not the

2:57:21.740 --> 2:57:25.140
<v Speaker 6>focus of the work we're doing building up to the

2:57:25.300 --> 2:57:27.640
<v Speaker 6>canada eu summit in montreal at the end of october

2:57:28.240 --> 2:57:31.420
<v Speaker 6>Our focus is on several pillars where you will see

2:57:31.500 --> 2:57:35.240
<v Speaker 6>deeper integration on critical minerals, AI and quantum, trade and

2:57:35.260 --> 2:57:40.060
<v Speaker 6>investments following on from the Canada-EU comprehensive economic and trade

2:57:40.100 --> 2:57:44.480
<v Speaker 6>agreements and people-to-people ties, including education students and the Erasmus program.

2:57:45.560 --> 2:57:48.970
<v Speaker 6>The substantive discussions between our teams right now are very

2:57:49.030 --> 2:57:52.950
<v Speaker 6>focused on these pillars. So this is the actual, right?

2:57:53.570 --> 2:57:55.030
<v Speaker 6>It missed everyone talking about how like we're going to

2:57:55.050 --> 2:57:56.610
<v Speaker 6>form like a new trade block to.

2:57:56.490 --> 2:57:57.590
<v Speaker 8>Like fight the US.

2:57:57.629 --> 2:58:01.510
<v Speaker 4>It's like, no, they're doing free trade negotiations, basically. Yeah,

2:58:01.530 --> 2:58:05.150
<v Speaker 4>and that's what Carney's been really pushing for. He's essentially

2:58:05.190 --> 2:58:07.550
<v Speaker 4>just trying to be like Bill Clinton for Canada without

2:58:07.570 --> 2:58:09.830
<v Speaker 4>that stuff.

2:58:09.970 --> 2:58:13.609
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, without that or playing the saxophone. Yeah, slightly more boring.

2:58:14.030 --> 2:58:15.070
<v Speaker 4>He's a central banker.

2:58:15.090 --> 2:58:18.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah. And I'm going to get to that in

2:58:18.640 --> 2:58:20.740
<v Speaker 6>a second in terms of what they're actually sort of

2:58:20.780 --> 2:58:23.910
<v Speaker 6>trying to do. But You know, I think the comparison

2:58:23.950 --> 2:58:25.670
<v Speaker 6>to Clinton is a good one because like what you

2:58:25.730 --> 2:58:28.950
<v Speaker 6>have here basically is like what this bloc is, is

2:58:28.990 --> 2:58:31.870
<v Speaker 6>this attempt to form a sort of like old school neoliberal,

2:58:31.930 --> 2:58:35.770
<v Speaker 6>I say old school, but like 90s, 2000s style neoliberal

2:58:35.830 --> 2:58:38.350
<v Speaker 6>bloc to oppose the sort of like modern Trump fascism.

2:58:38.770 --> 2:58:40.590
<v Speaker 6>And it's like, well, okay, so that like got us

2:58:40.629 --> 2:58:44.420
<v Speaker 6>fascism in the first place, right? So that's not great.

2:58:44.879 --> 2:58:46.340
<v Speaker 6>There's also a lot of talk about sort of the

2:58:46.379 --> 2:58:47.900
<v Speaker 6>defense and support for Ukraine.

2:58:47.980 --> 2:58:48.140
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

2:58:48.959 --> 2:58:51.920
<v Speaker 6>But I want to have one last quote from this

2:58:52.000 --> 2:58:55.070
<v Speaker 6>article to really get a sense of what is going

2:58:55.170 --> 2:58:59.650
<v Speaker 6>on here. This is Anand, the foreign minister. Taking you

2:58:59.670 --> 2:59:02.190
<v Speaker 6>to the investment summit that we held last week in Toronto,

2:59:02.230 --> 2:59:05.840
<v Speaker 6>we are seeing increasing levels of foreign direct investment. Commitments

2:59:05.879 --> 2:59:09.480
<v Speaker 6>of $ 500 billion last week alone to Canada through 10

2:59:09.480 --> 2:59:13.689
<v Speaker 6>national projects from ports to highways to airports. Across the board,

2:59:13.830 --> 2:59:16.960
<v Speaker 6>our work is to shorten the time period, the path

2:59:17.000 --> 2:59:20.120
<v Speaker 6>to permit time period, so that investments continue to flow

2:59:20.180 --> 2:59:24.330
<v Speaker 6>into our country towards national projects. So what does that mean?

2:59:25.450 --> 2:59:29.010
<v Speaker 6>And this is where things get really, really bad. Because

2:59:29.050 --> 2:59:31.250
<v Speaker 6>what she's talking about when she's talking about this, like,

2:59:31.490 --> 2:59:33.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're shortening the path to permit time. So

2:59:33.750 --> 2:59:36.380
<v Speaker 6>investment continues to come in for national projects. What she's

2:59:36.400 --> 2:59:40.459
<v Speaker 6>talking about is what's called Bill C-39, which is, I guess,

2:59:40.480 --> 2:59:44.480
<v Speaker 6>like the next version of the Build Canada Strong Act. So,

2:59:44.800 --> 2:59:48.890
<v Speaker 6>you know, it's a giant neoliberal deregulation bill, right? It

2:59:48.930 --> 2:59:52.100
<v Speaker 6>decreases the permit process. for a whole bunch of projects

2:59:52.120 --> 2:59:54.900
<v Speaker 6>that are in, quote, the national interest from, you know,

2:59:54.920 --> 2:59:56.620
<v Speaker 6>these can take multiple years if you're talking about environmental

2:59:56.840 --> 3:00:00.560
<v Speaker 6>impact assessments, you're talking about, like, input from indigenous communities,

3:00:00.580 --> 3:00:02.520
<v Speaker 6>you're putting, there's a whole bunch of things that you're

3:00:02.550 --> 3:00:04.189
<v Speaker 6>supposed to have to do before you can start one

3:00:04.209 --> 3:00:08.190
<v Speaker 6>of these sort of mega projects. And this bill would

3:00:08.209 --> 3:00:10.990
<v Speaker 6>reduce that entire process to one year. It would allow

3:00:11.070 --> 3:00:14.890
<v Speaker 6>ministers to just sort of wave away environmental protections if

3:00:14.930 --> 3:00:16.970
<v Speaker 6>it was deemed in the national interest. I'm going to

3:00:17.010 --> 3:00:19.629
<v Speaker 6>quote from the Toronto Star here, quote, it would also

3:00:19.690 --> 3:00:24.350
<v Speaker 6>create special interests zones called regions of national interest, where

3:00:24.390 --> 3:00:27.690
<v Speaker 6>approvals for projects can be, quote, streamlined in certain areas,

3:00:27.750 --> 3:00:33.160
<v Speaker 6>officials said, and follows recent changes. That means cross-border oil pipelines,

3:00:33.320 --> 3:00:37.500
<v Speaker 6>gas-fired power plants, oil sands facilities, and other projects will

3:00:37.540 --> 3:00:42.259
<v Speaker 6>no longer be subject to the existing federal impact assessment process.

3:00:43.000 --> 3:00:46.109
<v Speaker 6>So this is special economic zones for oil fields.

3:00:46.530 --> 3:00:49.590
<v Speaker 2>I was about to say they're doing a special economic zone.

3:00:50.320 --> 3:00:54.359
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and specifically, it's special economic zone where all of

3:00:54.410 --> 3:00:57.230
<v Speaker 6>the environmental impact assessments of like, hey, is this oil

3:00:57.290 --> 3:01:00.289
<v Speaker 6>field going to poison everyone who lives around it? We're

3:01:00.310 --> 3:01:03.330
<v Speaker 6>not doing that. I'm going to quote here from the Narwhal.

3:01:03.830 --> 3:01:07.430
<v Speaker 6>The legislation takes federal review of pipelines, nuclear facilities and

3:01:07.490 --> 3:01:09.930
<v Speaker 6>power lines out of the hands of the Impact Assessment

3:01:09.970 --> 3:01:12.190
<v Speaker 6>Agency of Canada, a federal body that reports to the

3:01:12.209 --> 3:01:15.920
<v Speaker 6>environmental minister. and is meant to ensure project designs protect

3:01:15.959 --> 3:01:19.340
<v Speaker 6>Indigenous rights in the environment. Instead, pipeline projects will be

3:01:19.400 --> 3:01:22.370
<v Speaker 6>reviewed by the Canada Energy Regulator and Agency of the

3:01:22.450 --> 3:01:26.090
<v Speaker 6>Crown that reports to the Energy Minister and oversees construction

3:01:26.110 --> 3:01:30.410
<v Speaker 6>and operation of certain pipelines and power lines. So, that's

3:01:30.430 --> 3:01:32.890
<v Speaker 6>a very dull way of saying that instead of environmental

3:01:32.930 --> 3:01:36.860
<v Speaker 6>regulators looking at the impact of Like, car sands, it's

3:01:36.900 --> 3:01:38.600
<v Speaker 6>going to the energy guys.

3:01:38.720 --> 3:01:39.440
<v Speaker 4>It goes to the executive.

3:01:39.459 --> 3:01:39.740
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

3:01:39.879 --> 3:01:40.859
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

3:01:41.040 --> 3:01:43.080
<v Speaker 6>And this is something that's been very specifically, like, pushed

3:01:43.150 --> 3:01:45.810
<v Speaker 6>for in a massive lobbying campaign by the Canadian oil

3:01:45.870 --> 3:01:50.070
<v Speaker 6>and gas industry over the last, like, few years. So, obviously,

3:01:50.270 --> 3:01:54.230
<v Speaker 6>this is an enormous danger to Indigenous sovereignty, to, you know,

3:01:54.650 --> 3:01:59.060
<v Speaker 6>anyone who, like, wants there to be a livable environment.

3:01:59.730 --> 3:02:02.990
<v Speaker 6>And also, it gives the labor ministry the right to

3:02:03.110 --> 3:02:03.869
<v Speaker 6>end strikes.

3:02:03.890 --> 3:02:04.550
<v Speaker 8>Oh, cool.

3:02:05.070 --> 3:02:08.710
<v Speaker 6>So effectively what it does, right, is there is a

3:02:09.070 --> 3:02:12.189
<v Speaker 6>very nebulous legal authority that the Canadian government used to

3:02:12.250 --> 3:02:15.480
<v Speaker 6>crush an Air Canada flight attendant strike in 2025. And

3:02:15.560 --> 3:02:19.880
<v Speaker 6>this bill would just codify that right and completely ignore

3:02:19.900 --> 3:02:22.879
<v Speaker 6>the union's legal challenges to it and would allow just

3:02:23.020 --> 3:02:26.060
<v Speaker 6>government ministers effectively to just end strikes if they're in

3:02:26.140 --> 3:02:30.600
<v Speaker 6>areas that are deemed as like adversely affecting the national interest,

3:02:30.879 --> 3:02:33.180
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to quote from the MSN article here, either

3:02:33.240 --> 3:02:37.360
<v Speaker 6>by having a, quote, significant impact on the economy or causing, quote,

3:02:37.500 --> 3:02:41.970
<v Speaker 6>serious social disruption. So, you know, it's interesting because the

3:02:42.000 --> 3:02:44.490
<v Speaker 6>Carney administration has said that this is actually like a

3:02:44.610 --> 3:02:46.990
<v Speaker 6>protection of the right to strike, even though it's giving

3:02:47.030 --> 3:02:50.970
<v Speaker 6>a government minister the ability to end strikes. But this

3:02:51.190 --> 3:02:54.050
<v Speaker 6>bill is being opposed by, you know, by the entire

3:02:54.230 --> 3:02:56.910
<v Speaker 6>Canadian labor movement because it gives the government the ability

3:02:57.010 --> 3:03:00.720
<v Speaker 6>to kill strikes on behalf of you know, on behalf

3:03:00.740 --> 3:03:04.300
<v Speaker 6>of corporations in the name of this extremely nebulous national interest.

3:03:04.320 --> 3:03:07.640
<v Speaker 6>There's no way that could possibly go wrong. And I

3:03:07.680 --> 3:03:10.039
<v Speaker 6>think both of these put together lets you look at

3:03:10.060 --> 3:03:15.039
<v Speaker 6>the domestic side of this entire sort of PR, international

3:03:15.100 --> 3:03:18.879
<v Speaker 6>PR push that's going on, right? It's the deployment of

3:03:18.920 --> 3:03:22.100
<v Speaker 6>neoliberalism nominally against fascism. It is using the threat of

3:03:22.120 --> 3:03:25.650
<v Speaker 6>the US to crush organized labor, indigenous groups, and environmental groups,

3:03:26.310 --> 3:03:29.070
<v Speaker 6>which are the same enemies that sort of Trump and

3:03:29.090 --> 3:03:31.769
<v Speaker 6>the American fascist movements have. It's just that it's being

3:03:31.850 --> 3:03:35.410
<v Speaker 6>implemented using a sort of state of emergency caused by

3:03:35.450 --> 3:03:36.350
<v Speaker 6>the fascists themselves.

3:03:37.190 --> 3:03:37.370
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:03:37.410 --> 3:03:39.910
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's something that's incredibly important to keep

3:03:39.950 --> 3:03:42.930
<v Speaker 6>in mind whenever you're sort of reading about Carney, whenever

3:03:42.950 --> 3:03:46.880
<v Speaker 6>you're reading about this sort of international project that he's

3:03:46.930 --> 3:03:49.620
<v Speaker 6>embarking on is that this is what this project means, right?

3:03:49.980 --> 3:03:51.520
<v Speaker 6>It's a war to be able to do free trade

3:03:51.560 --> 3:03:55.959
<v Speaker 6>in special economic zones. With that, I think that is

3:03:56.080 --> 3:03:59.300
<v Speaker 6>all for us today at It Could Happen Here. Denna,

3:03:59.320 --> 3:04:01.060
<v Speaker 6>do you have anything you would like to plug?

3:04:01.840 --> 3:04:04.539
<v Speaker 1>I want to direct people to the handbook of authoritarianism

3:04:04.560 --> 3:04:07.740
<v Speaker 1>in the Arab world, which I edited, and it's out now,

3:04:07.820 --> 3:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>open access on the Bloomsbury Politics website. So if you

3:04:11.300 --> 3:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>just Google it, you'll find it. It's got lots of

3:04:14.220 --> 3:04:16.980
<v Speaker 1>contributors from the MENA region, SWANA, whatever you want to

3:04:17.000 --> 3:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>call it.

3:04:17.700 --> 3:04:18.740
<v Speaker 8>Cool. Yeah.

3:04:18.879 --> 3:04:20.260
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for having me. Yeah.

3:04:20.280 --> 3:04:23.010
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for coming. If you'd like to email us, you

3:04:23.030 --> 3:04:27.110
<v Speaker 2>can do so, coolzontips at proton.me. Some of you fuckers

3:04:27.150 --> 3:04:29.420
<v Speaker 2>in the marketing world are still not fucking listening to me,

3:04:29.480 --> 3:04:32.439
<v Speaker 2>so just say again, do not fucking email me about

3:04:32.480 --> 3:04:35.740
<v Speaker 2>your product or service. I will block you. Don't email

3:04:35.760 --> 3:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>me about putting my podcast on YouTube to get more viewers.

3:04:38.040 --> 3:04:41.900
<v Speaker 2>I don't fucking care. I'm going to block you harder

3:04:41.940 --> 3:04:43.580
<v Speaker 2>from all of the iHeart emails one day.

3:04:44.260 --> 3:04:45.590
<v Speaker 6>Put a trans scroll on your couch.

3:04:46.550 --> 3:04:48.009
<v Speaker 4>We've reported the news.

3:04:49.890 --> 3:04:50.670
<v Speaker 10>We reported the news.

3:04:56.580 --> 3:04:59.699
<v Speaker 3>Hey, we'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

3:04:59.780 --> 3:05:01.629
<v Speaker 3>from now until the heat death of the universe.

3:05:02.510 --> 3:05:04.950
<v Speaker 14>It Could Happen Here is a production of Cool Zone Media.

3:05:05.150 --> 3:05:09.490
<v Speaker 14>For more podcasts from Cool Zone Media, visit our website, coolzonemedia.com.

3:05:09.950 --> 3:05:12.750
<v Speaker 14>Or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

3:05:13.129 --> 3:05:15.910
<v Speaker 14>or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can now find

3:05:15.970 --> 3:05:18.910
<v Speaker 14>sources for It Could Happen Here listed directly in episode descriptions.

3:05:19.390 --> 3:05:20.070
<v Speaker 14>Thanks for listening.