1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:01,960 Speaker 1: This episode of the Chuck Toodcast is brought to you 2 00:00:01,960 --> 00:00:05,480 Speaker 1: by Quints. A thoughtfully built wardrobe comes down to pieces 3 00:00:05,480 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: that mix well and last. That's where Quince shines. Premium fabrics, 4 00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:12,879 Speaker 1: considered design, and every day essentials that feel effortless to 5 00:00:12,960 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 1: wear and dependable even as the seasons change. Quince has 6 00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 1: the everyday essentials I love with quality that lasts, lightweight 7 00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:23,880 Speaker 1: cashmere sweaters, not too expensive either by the way, short 8 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:28,639 Speaker 1: sleeve Mongolian Kashmir polos, linen bottoms, and shorts. Quinch works 9 00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:31,720 Speaker 1: directly with top factories and cuts out the middlemen. That's 10 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:34,560 Speaker 1: why it's more affordable. You're not paying for the brand 11 00:00:34,600 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 1: markup or any fancy retail stores, but you're still getting quality. 12 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:41,000 Speaker 1: Everything is built to hold up to regular wear and 13 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:44,240 Speaker 1: still look good. Quite often I'm wearing something that I've 14 00:00:44,240 --> 00:00:48,640 Speaker 1: gotten from Quints. It is incredibly comfortable. I've become a 15 00:00:48,680 --> 00:00:50,800 Speaker 1: middle aged man who loves his quarter zips. They have 16 00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:54,360 Speaker 1: plenty of those. I have been very pleased, and it's just, 17 00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:56,560 Speaker 1: you know, when I like a piece of clothing, I 18 00:00:56,640 --> 00:01:00,840 Speaker 1: probably wear it too much and usually tell after about 19 00:01:00,840 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 1: two or three months. That's not the case so far, 20 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:06,120 Speaker 1: with Quinn's. That's been impressive, So right now go to 21 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:08,520 Speaker 1: quins dot com slash chuck for free shipping and three 22 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:10,840 Speaker 1: hundred and sixty five day returns. It's a full year 23 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,399 Speaker 1: to build your wardrobe and you'll love it. Now available 24 00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:16,679 Speaker 1: in Canada too. Don't keep settling for clothes that don't last. 25 00:01:16,840 --> 00:01:22,319 Speaker 1: Go to Qui n ce dot com slash chuck for 26 00:01:22,400 --> 00:01:25,360 Speaker 1: free shipping, three hundred sixty five day returns quints dot 27 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:33,520 Speaker 1: com slash chuck. Hello, They're happy Wednesday, and welcome to 28 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:36,800 Speaker 1: another episode of the Chuck Podcast. So, boy, did we 29 00:01:36,840 --> 00:01:40,600 Speaker 1: have quite the tuesday. If you uh dipped into our 30 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:45,959 Speaker 1: livestream coverage of the first midterm twenty twenty six election 31 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 1: night with my friend Chris Eliza, Jeffrey Scaling and this 32 00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 1: and the team from Decision Desk HQ, you know that 33 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:56,640 Speaker 1: we went all the way close to midnight and did 34 00:01:56,720 --> 00:02:00,680 Speaker 1: not yet have a call in the Texas Democrat primary. 35 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 1: And of course the only thing that we don't know 36 00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:06,880 Speaker 1: is whether Tallarico's number will end up below fifty percent, 37 00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:10,040 Speaker 1: therefore triggering a runoff on that side of the aisle. 38 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 1: We do know that Ken Paxson and John Cornyn are 39 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:15,840 Speaker 1: going to be facing off in a day after Memorial 40 00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:20,760 Speaker 1: Day run off there in late May. It promises to 41 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:26,160 Speaker 1: be an epic, probably among the nastiest runoff inter primary 42 00:02:26,200 --> 00:02:31,600 Speaker 1: runoffs we have probably witnessed in the twenty first century. 43 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:34,240 Speaker 1: I mean, this is going to be nasty, this is 44 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:38,560 Speaker 1: going to be negative. And the question, you know, the 45 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:42,840 Speaker 1: million dollar question or the fifty first Senate seat question, 46 00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,920 Speaker 1: could very well be what does Donald Trump do? Does 47 00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 1: he get involved? Does he try to bail John Cornyan? Out? Right? 48 00:02:49,800 --> 00:02:54,000 Speaker 1: We know John Thune, Senate Republicans, major donors, they all 49 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:58,600 Speaker 1: believe the safest way to hold the Senate is to 50 00:02:59,080 --> 00:03:03,640 Speaker 1: help Cornyn get the nomination. That Cornyn has a better 51 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,440 Speaker 1: shot at holding that Texas senden see than the very 52 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:11,880 Speaker 1: scandal plague ethically and morally challenged Ken Paxton. The one 53 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:14,119 Speaker 1: could argue it seems like no matter what you throw 54 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:16,240 Speaker 1: at him, he just sort of keeps on going and 55 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:20,840 Speaker 1: keeps on surviving. Kind of reminds you of a certain 56 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:24,560 Speaker 1: leader of a certain party that Ken Paxton is a 57 00:03:24,800 --> 00:03:28,320 Speaker 1: member of. But here we are. The votes came in 58 00:03:28,440 --> 00:03:31,440 Speaker 1: a little slower on election day. We had a massive 59 00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: early vote turnout. It does appear as if Democrats narrowly 60 00:03:35,760 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: outpolled overall Republicans, and talking to one Republican polster, it 61 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:44,400 Speaker 1: is important to note, you know, where do these voters 62 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:48,800 Speaker 1: come from? These are mostly Democratic voters who just don't 63 00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 1: normally vote in primaries. They vote in general elections. Well, 64 00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 1: this primary certainly got their interest, and it looks like 65 00:03:57,080 --> 00:04:01,720 Speaker 1: that the Democrats got just you know, maybe one hundred thousand, 66 00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:06,440 Speaker 1: maybe a little bit more than the Republicans. It's a 67 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 1: big deal for Democrats. The question is did they just 68 00:04:10,680 --> 00:04:13,880 Speaker 1: max out all their voters or is this the sign 69 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 1: of something happening in the state of Texas. I think 70 00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:23,200 Speaker 1: the most interesting aspect of the James Tall Rico likely 71 00:04:23,279 --> 00:04:25,320 Speaker 1: victory in this primary. And I say likely. Look, I 72 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:27,480 Speaker 1: don't think Jasmine Crockett. You know, she made it clear 73 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 1: when she decided she wasn't going to stay up and 74 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:33,400 Speaker 1: wait for the results. She went to bed. She made 75 00:04:33,440 --> 00:04:38,479 Speaker 1: the decision to wait until this morning and more votes 76 00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 1: come in to see what the status is. I don't 77 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:48,000 Speaker 1: think she's going to concede until it is she is 78 00:04:48,040 --> 00:04:52,839 Speaker 1: one hundred percent certain there is no shot at making 79 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:59,839 Speaker 1: a runoff. Look, if this narrow lead for tallar Rico holds, 80 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:04,800 Speaker 1: and there's every indication it's probably gonna hold unless she 81 00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:09,520 Speaker 1: just the Dallas County numbers come in some in some 82 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:15,640 Speaker 1: big ways for Crockett. I think a few things are 83 00:05:16,560 --> 00:05:19,000 Speaker 1: fair to look at when it comes to explaining how 84 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 1: did tall Rico win number one? You can't you can't 85 00:05:24,800 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: talk about tal Rico's victory without talking about Stephen Colbert 86 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:31,359 Speaker 1: in that moment. The moment was a pivotal moment. It 87 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 1: was the beginning of early voting, and it was at 88 00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:37,479 Speaker 1: a time when tall Rico was struggling and Crockett was 89 00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: on the rise. She was pulling strongly. Tall Rico was 90 00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: still having to explain what he apparently said about Colin Allred. 91 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:54,920 Speaker 1: That moment seemed to galvanize Colin Allred to support Jasmine Crockett. 92 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: I think ideologically was not necessarily ready to go there. 93 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:01,560 Speaker 1: I think he was ready to be, but he you know, 94 00:06:01,640 --> 00:06:03,920 Speaker 1: and in fact, he felt kind of pushed out of 95 00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:06,520 Speaker 1: the race, I think by Crockett, not by tall Rico, 96 00:06:06,839 --> 00:06:10,159 Speaker 1: but he sort of rallied around her, she rallied around him. 97 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:14,920 Speaker 1: He's now, of course running for a congressional seat. That's 98 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:16,880 Speaker 1: that's also going to end up in around. This is 99 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:20,960 Speaker 1: going to be an extraordinarily busy runoff ballot in Texas. 100 00:06:21,040 --> 00:06:22,800 Speaker 1: It's not just one or two races that are in 101 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:26,039 Speaker 1: a runoff. We've got races up and down the ballot 102 00:06:26,040 --> 00:06:28,359 Speaker 1: that are in a runoff. We're going to have multiple 103 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 1: congressional primaries end up in runoff, including the Member versus 104 00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:38,760 Speaker 1: Member that features Al Green. He trails, but he's gone. 105 00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:40,560 Speaker 1: He's going to at least have a shot and a 106 00:06:40,640 --> 00:06:43,320 Speaker 1: run off. Looks like Colin all Right and Julie Johnson. 107 00:06:45,000 --> 00:06:48,240 Speaker 1: He's running basically for much of his old seat in 108 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:51,719 Speaker 1: the Dallas suburbs. There that's likely to go to a runoff. 109 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:55,039 Speaker 1: We've got the age races on both sides are going 110 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 1: to end up in runoffs, including Chip Roy who finished 111 00:06:57,440 --> 00:07:00,800 Speaker 1: a fairly distant second, but he's going to be strong 112 00:07:00,920 --> 00:07:03,719 Speaker 1: enough to end up in a runoff on that front. 113 00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 1: So it has been a very to say it's been 114 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:10,200 Speaker 1: a competitive and lively primary season in Texas as an 115 00:07:10,240 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 1: understatement and the fact that there's so many of these 116 00:07:14,080 --> 00:07:18,400 Speaker 1: races ended up in a second round that's just the happiest. 117 00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:21,360 Speaker 1: Campers are those that make money off of political advertising, 118 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:24,560 Speaker 1: whether you're the digital side of things or the legacy 119 00:07:25,240 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 1: television side of things. This extended season in one of 120 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:32,520 Speaker 1: the largest states that we have with so many media 121 00:07:32,600 --> 00:07:36,600 Speaker 1: markets is show we say Manna from heaven for some 122 00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:41,600 Speaker 1: of those local businesses. But to break down tall Rico, 123 00:07:42,960 --> 00:07:45,080 Speaker 1: the big difference for him is and the big question 124 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 1: mark was what we were Latino voters going to do 125 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:49,920 Speaker 1: in the Democratic primary? Right, we saw in these voters, 126 00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 1: Tall Rico was strong with independence that lean left and 127 00:07:54,480 --> 00:07:59,880 Speaker 1: progressive whites. Jasmine Crockett was strongest with older voters and 128 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:04,920 Speaker 1: African American voters and those that are self described Democrats. Now, Texas, 129 00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 1: you could pick a ballot, right, you could decide in 130 00:08:07,640 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 1: each side. It's sort of one of those types of primaries. 131 00:08:10,920 --> 00:08:16,200 Speaker 1: So it's possible Tall Rico, right, had, you know, was 132 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 1: perhaps trying to appeal to some of the same voters 133 00:08:18,640 --> 00:08:22,760 Speaker 1: that John Cornet was trying to appeal to. It's just 134 00:08:22,840 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 1: worth noting there. But let's stick to this Democratic primary 135 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:28,560 Speaker 1: here a minute. When you looked at all the polling, 136 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:30,560 Speaker 1: and it was a bit erradic, but one thing that 137 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:33,160 Speaker 1: was pretty consistent is that Latino voters it was a 138 00:08:33,200 --> 00:08:36,079 Speaker 1: fairly high undecided among Latino voters. They were making the decision, 139 00:08:36,480 --> 00:08:40,160 Speaker 1: you know, where they're going to go with a candidate 140 00:08:40,160 --> 00:08:43,520 Speaker 1: that was projecting herself more as a fighter and Jasmine 141 00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:46,199 Speaker 1: Crockett or somebody who was grounded himself a bit more 142 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: in religion, James Tallerrico, And I think the assumption was 143 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:52,560 Speaker 1: that tall Rico might have had the inside track that 144 00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 1: his the fact that he wears his faith on his 145 00:08:56,840 --> 00:09:03,480 Speaker 1: sleeve is something that I think appeals to some Latinos. 146 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:07,400 Speaker 1: And when you look at the dominant performance he had 147 00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:11,760 Speaker 1: in the Rio Grande Valley, that I think shows you 148 00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:15,880 Speaker 1: that that really was the difference. If you're gonna pick 149 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:18,959 Speaker 1: some knits at Jasmine Crockett's campaign, she didn't run a 150 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:22,280 Speaker 1: very conventional campaign. She seemed to run as if she 151 00:09:22,760 --> 00:09:25,240 Speaker 1: wasn't a well funded candidacy. But she did, and she 152 00:09:25,360 --> 00:09:29,160 Speaker 1: ran it slightly more unconventional, a bit more social media 153 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 1: heavy sort of one could argue, sort of trying to 154 00:09:32,679 --> 00:09:35,320 Speaker 1: see if she could win it the new way instead 155 00:09:35,320 --> 00:09:36,800 Speaker 1: of having to do it some of the old way. 156 00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:39,520 Speaker 1: Tall Rico had more money and so they could do 157 00:09:39,640 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 1: some of the more old school ways of blocking and 158 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:46,280 Speaker 1: tackling and getting out the vote and running a more 159 00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:50,280 Speaker 1: statewide campaign in a more traditional sense probably was worth 160 00:09:50,320 --> 00:09:53,280 Speaker 1: the extra two points that tall Rico needed to avoid 161 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:59,200 Speaker 1: a runoff. And so again I'm gonna be a little 162 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:02,040 Speaker 1: tentative here because I think that this is you know, 163 00:10:03,080 --> 00:10:07,520 Speaker 1: I do think that Jasmine Crockett's going to not concede 164 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:11,160 Speaker 1: quickly here, that she's going to exhaust every effort make 165 00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:15,199 Speaker 1: sure this question mark about which bat make sure all 166 00:10:15,200 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 1: the ballots in Dallas County get counted there with some right. First, 167 00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:22,640 Speaker 1: a judge extended vote times. Then the state Supreme Court 168 00:10:22,679 --> 00:10:24,640 Speaker 1: came in and said, well, no, some of those votes 169 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:28,320 Speaker 1: shouldn't count if people didn't wait in line at seven. 170 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:30,080 Speaker 1: So there was a bit of a dispute over that. 171 00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:33,160 Speaker 1: So she's going to exhaust every effort here. So I 172 00:10:33,640 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 1: wouldn't be surprised if this takes a day or two 173 00:10:36,600 --> 00:10:38,720 Speaker 1: for the Democrats to unify. And I think that's going 174 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:40,880 Speaker 1: to be a bit of a challenge for tall Rico, 175 00:10:41,679 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 1: is unifying the party. I assume they get there. I 176 00:10:48,080 --> 00:10:51,960 Speaker 1: think the fact that what you you know, these days, 177 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:56,800 Speaker 1: beating Donald Trump and beating Ken Paxton and getting power 178 00:10:57,679 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 1: usually can pay over these divisions now the question is 179 00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:08,040 Speaker 1: our Democrats, you know, is that going to be easy 180 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:11,960 Speaker 1: to paper over those divisions? We'll see. Like I said, 181 00:11:11,960 --> 00:11:16,400 Speaker 1: I think, I think Crockett feels a bit aggrieved and 182 00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:20,720 Speaker 1: has shown her grievance's face a little bit on the 183 00:11:20,720 --> 00:11:23,920 Speaker 1: campaign trail ever since the Colbert moment, right, which always 184 00:11:23,920 --> 00:11:27,960 Speaker 1: felt a bit manufactured, a bit over over sold for 185 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:34,400 Speaker 1: what it ended up being, for what it was, what 186 00:11:34,440 --> 00:11:38,240 Speaker 1: it was sold as. Right. The FCC never stepped in, 187 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:41,040 Speaker 1: there was nothing about it yet. It was basically CBS's 188 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:46,120 Speaker 1: lawyers versus Colbert's producers. And it's a he said. He 189 00:11:46,160 --> 00:11:48,439 Speaker 1: said that, I still don't feel like any of us 190 00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:50,960 Speaker 1: got the full story. But the fact of the matter 191 00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:54,240 Speaker 1: is the moment worked. It really did change the narrative 192 00:11:54,240 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 1: a bit for tall Rico, and it gave him some space, 193 00:11:57,960 --> 00:12:00,000 Speaker 1: and it gave him some extra money, and it gave 194 00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 1: gave him some extra juice, and it did put Crockett 195 00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:05,000 Speaker 1: on the defensive. And when you look at a race 196 00:12:05,040 --> 00:12:08,080 Speaker 1: this close, it's hard not to look at that moment 197 00:12:08,240 --> 00:12:12,319 Speaker 1: as having been perhaps more decisive. I wasn't one hundred 198 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:14,800 Speaker 1: percent sure of how decisive it was, but perhaps more 199 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:16,920 Speaker 1: decisive now There's another question that I don't know if 200 00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 1: we've got the answer for tonight. Does this mean that 201 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:23,800 Speaker 1: given the choice of a candidate who says he's about 202 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:28,400 Speaker 1: love in tall Rico versus Crockett, who says, Hey, I'm 203 00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:30,880 Speaker 1: meeting the moment, and the moment right now is essentially 204 00:12:31,120 --> 00:12:34,800 Speaker 1: fight and she thinks she used the phrase raw. You 205 00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:37,079 Speaker 1: know what do voters want? Right? Well? I think it's 206 00:12:37,120 --> 00:12:39,840 Speaker 1: clear Democratic primary voters about half of them wanted a 207 00:12:39,840 --> 00:12:43,640 Speaker 1: fighter and about half of them wanted a unite her 208 00:12:44,640 --> 00:12:47,400 Speaker 1: And I think in many ways this is the divide 209 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:51,760 Speaker 1: in the party. What is the best way to get 210 00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:56,040 Speaker 1: power back? What's the best way to win swing voters. 211 00:12:56,480 --> 00:13:01,040 Speaker 1: Is it to show yourself as strong to overcome the 212 00:13:01,080 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 1: perception that the Democratic Party has become soft and weak? 213 00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:08,360 Speaker 1: Or is it better off to be post Trump and 214 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:12,240 Speaker 1: to be the polar opposite of Trump? Or do you 215 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: sort of accept the Trump tactics and get as pugilistic 216 00:13:16,720 --> 00:13:18,960 Speaker 1: on the left as they've been getting on the right. 217 00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:23,840 Speaker 1: I'm not sure this primary resolves that answer. You know, 218 00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:28,520 Speaker 1: when you basically have a forty seven result, right, maybe 219 00:13:28,559 --> 00:13:30,439 Speaker 1: fifty two forty eight At the end of the day, 220 00:13:30,520 --> 00:13:32,640 Speaker 1: something like that. I don't think you could say that 221 00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:40,120 Speaker 1: that fully resolves things, but I think when people look 222 00:13:40,160 --> 00:13:45,720 Speaker 1: at Tallarico's messaging and how he has been pitching himself, 223 00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:51,400 Speaker 1: I do think you will see more more strategists make 224 00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:53,439 Speaker 1: the case that hey make the case that you can 225 00:13:53,480 --> 00:13:57,920 Speaker 1: win and it Democratic primary voters look, this idea of 226 00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:05,080 Speaker 1: electability is incredibly subjective. But if you can convince a 227 00:14:05,120 --> 00:14:08,079 Speaker 1: majority of a primary that you are the more electable candidate, 228 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:12,440 Speaker 1: you can Trump ideology, you can Trump style, if you 229 00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:15,680 Speaker 1: are seen as the more likely to win. Clearly, that 230 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:19,280 Speaker 1: is not how Republican primary voters behave because if Republican 231 00:14:19,320 --> 00:14:22,080 Speaker 1: primary voters behave that way, Cornyn wouldn't be in a runoff. 232 00:14:22,440 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 1: Cornyan would have won without a runoff. And so that's 233 00:14:26,960 --> 00:14:30,320 Speaker 1: where I think the open question and really what the 234 00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 1: next two months are going to be is Cornyn's going 235 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:37,840 Speaker 1: to be begging Trump for the endorsement when all the 236 00:14:37,920 --> 00:14:41,640 Speaker 1: votes are counted. I do think if Cornyn can be 237 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: one vote ahead of Paxton in the first round of 238 00:14:45,480 --> 00:14:50,400 Speaker 1: voting rather than even one vote behind, that those superficial 239 00:14:50,440 --> 00:14:54,200 Speaker 1: things matter to Trump, right he wents tobacco quote winner, 240 00:14:54,360 --> 00:14:59,000 Speaker 1: not a loser. But Paxton in many ways is Trump, 241 00:15:00,480 --> 00:15:03,280 Speaker 1: and Paxton has been a warrior for Trump. Right. He 242 00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:07,720 Speaker 1: filed the original suit that you know, the sort of 243 00:15:08,040 --> 00:15:11,880 Speaker 1: that basically stalled and created the illusion that the twenty 244 00:15:11,920 --> 00:15:15,960 Speaker 1: twenty election was was somehow disputed. But he'd been going, 245 00:15:16,160 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 1: you know, he was. He was an early warrior for Trump. 246 00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:23,840 Speaker 1: Trump is not known to be loyal. We know this, right, 247 00:15:24,040 --> 00:15:28,200 Speaker 1: and you can get to Trump. Do you want to 248 00:15:28,200 --> 00:15:29,760 Speaker 1: be seen as a loser? Do you want to back 249 00:15:29,760 --> 00:15:31,640 Speaker 1: a loser? Do you want to be you want this 250 00:15:31,720 --> 00:15:34,760 Speaker 1: to be on you that one of your acolytes lost 251 00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:38,520 Speaker 1: control of the Senate and lost the single most important 252 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:43,720 Speaker 1: state in Republican party politics over the last thirty five years? Right? 253 00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:47,000 Speaker 1: Do you want to be responsible for that? Does that 254 00:15:47,120 --> 00:15:54,520 Speaker 1: stuff matter to Trump? Do you hate hangovers? Well, say 255 00:15:54,520 --> 00:15:57,080 Speaker 1: goodbye to hangovers. Out of office gives you the social 256 00:15:57,120 --> 00:15:59,760 Speaker 1: buzz without the next day regret. They're best selling out 257 00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:02,760 Speaker 1: of all gummies. We're designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, 258 00:16:02,840 --> 00:16:06,400 Speaker 1: boost your mood and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five 259 00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:09,160 Speaker 1: different strengths, you can tailor the dose to fit your vibe. 260 00:16:09,160 --> 00:16:13,000 Speaker 1: From a gentle one point five milligram micro doose to 261 00:16:13,080 --> 00:16:17,000 Speaker 1: their newest fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. 262 00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:20,960 Speaker 1: Their THHC beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative 263 00:16:21,040 --> 00:16:23,360 Speaker 1: to a glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll 264 00:16:23,360 --> 00:16:25,920 Speaker 1: tell you this, I've given up booze. I don't like 265 00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:29,920 Speaker 1: the hangovers. I prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a 266 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:32,920 Speaker 1: wellness brand that believes feeling good should be fun and easy. 267 00:16:33,200 --> 00:16:37,120 Speaker 1: Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived THHD and CBD products, 268 00:16:37,240 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 1: all designed to boost your mood and simply help you unwine. 269 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:42,960 Speaker 1: So if you struggle to switch off at night, Soul 270 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:45,880 Speaker 1: also has a variety of products specifically designed to just 271 00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:48,520 Speaker 1: simply help you get a better night's sleep, including their 272 00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: top selling Sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep 273 00:16:51,960 --> 00:16:54,840 Speaker 1: restorative sleep. So bring on the good vibes and treat 274 00:16:54,880 --> 00:16:58,280 Speaker 1: yourself to Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my 275 00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:01,600 Speaker 1: audience thirty percent off your entire order, So go to 276 00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:05,679 Speaker 1: getsold dot Com use the promo code toodcast. Don't forget 277 00:17:05,680 --> 00:17:09,840 Speaker 1: that code. That's getsold dot Com promo code toodcast for 278 00:17:09,960 --> 00:17:15,440 Speaker 1: thirty percent off. Having good life insurance is incredibly important. 279 00:17:15,720 --> 00:17:18,399 Speaker 1: I know from personal experience. I was sixteen when my 280 00:17:18,480 --> 00:17:21,240 Speaker 1: father passed away. We didn't have any money. He didn't 281 00:17:21,280 --> 00:17:24,080 Speaker 1: leave us in the best shape. My mother, single mother, 282 00:17:24,240 --> 00:17:27,720 Speaker 1: now widow, myself sixteen trying to figure out how am 283 00:17:27,720 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 1: I going to pay for college and lo and behold, 284 00:17:30,600 --> 00:17:33,320 Speaker 1: my dad had one life insurance policy that we found 285 00:17:33,560 --> 00:17:36,359 Speaker 1: wasn't a lot, but it was important at the time, 286 00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:39,720 Speaker 1: and it's why I was able to go to college. 287 00:17:40,160 --> 00:17:42,760 Speaker 1: Little did he know how important that would be in 288 00:17:43,000 --> 00:17:46,560 Speaker 1: that moment. Well, guess what. That's why I am here 289 00:17:46,560 --> 00:17:49,320 Speaker 1: to tell you about Etho's life. They can provide you 290 00:17:49,359 --> 00:17:52,520 Speaker 1: with peace of mind knowing your family is protected even 291 00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:55,439 Speaker 1: if the worst comes to pass. Ethos is an online 292 00:17:55,440 --> 00:17:59,160 Speaker 1: platform that makes getting life insurance fast and easy, all 293 00:17:59,200 --> 00:18:02,119 Speaker 1: designed to protect your family's future in minutes, not months. 294 00:18:02,560 --> 00:18:06,560 Speaker 1: There's no complicated process and it's one hundred percent online. 295 00:18:06,720 --> 00:18:09,479 Speaker 1: There's no medical exam require you just answer a few 296 00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:11,879 Speaker 1: health questions online. You can get a quote in as 297 00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:13,960 Speaker 1: little as ten minutes, and you can get same day 298 00:18:14,000 --> 00:18:18,000 Speaker 1: coverage without ever leaving your home. You can get up 299 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:20,480 Speaker 1: to three million dollars in coverage and some policies start 300 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:22,439 Speaker 1: as low as two dollars a day that would be 301 00:18:22,480 --> 00:18:26,240 Speaker 1: billed monthly. As of March twenty twenty five, Business Insider 302 00:18:26,280 --> 00:18:29,720 Speaker 1: named Ethos the number one no medical exam instant life 303 00:18:29,800 --> 00:18:34,440 Speaker 1: insurance provider. So protect your family with life insurance from Ethos. 304 00:18:34,640 --> 00:18:37,640 Speaker 1: Get your free quote at ethos dot com slash chuck. 305 00:18:37,960 --> 00:18:43,359 Speaker 1: So again, that's Ethos dot com slash chuck. Application times 306 00:18:43,359 --> 00:18:46,040 Speaker 1: may vary and the rates themselves may vary as well, 307 00:18:46,280 --> 00:18:49,160 Speaker 1: but trust me, life insurance is something you should really 308 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:56,399 Speaker 1: think about, especially if you've got a growing family. I 309 00:18:56,440 --> 00:18:59,720 Speaker 1: do think that Tallarico being the Democratic nominee instead of 310 00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:07,000 Speaker 1: Cricket probably gives, uh, probably gives cornn and John Thune, 311 00:19:07,000 --> 00:19:08,679 Speaker 1: who are going to be making this case to Trump, 312 00:19:09,600 --> 00:19:14,640 Speaker 1: a stronger set of variables to say, hey, this tall 313 00:19:14,760 --> 00:19:18,159 Speaker 1: Rico can win, He can beat Paxton. Tall Rico might 314 00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:19,920 Speaker 1: be able to beat Corny for all we know when 315 00:19:19,960 --> 00:19:24,000 Speaker 1: all of a sudden done on this. So that's you know, 316 00:19:24,080 --> 00:19:27,600 Speaker 1: that's that's the other part of the fallout from this primary. 317 00:19:27,640 --> 00:19:30,560 Speaker 1: It's going to be, you know, can John Cornyn convinced Trump? 318 00:19:30,880 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 1: And if Trump endorses, he's got to do so emphatically. 319 00:19:34,280 --> 00:19:36,960 Speaker 1: And that's the it's hard to imagine he would. He 320 00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:40,160 Speaker 1: might endorse corn but might not do it emphatically. Say 321 00:19:40,160 --> 00:19:43,040 Speaker 1: I like Ken Paxton too, that Republicans will be great 322 00:19:43,240 --> 00:19:47,240 Speaker 1: no matter who wins, but all my people tell me 323 00:19:47,359 --> 00:19:49,200 Speaker 1: that that Cornan has a better shot at winning, and 324 00:19:49,200 --> 00:19:50,920 Speaker 1: we gotta hold the Senate. Right, I'm trying to think 325 00:19:50,960 --> 00:19:53,880 Speaker 1: of the different ways he could communicate this. I could 326 00:19:53,880 --> 00:19:57,000 Speaker 1: picture him communicating it that way. I like him both, 327 00:19:57,520 --> 00:19:59,720 Speaker 1: and I plan to you know, and whoever loses is 328 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:01,360 Speaker 1: going to work for me in the administration. 329 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:01,640 Speaker 2: Right. 330 00:20:01,720 --> 00:20:07,600 Speaker 1: He could do something like that. So it's going to 331 00:20:07,640 --> 00:20:11,920 Speaker 1: be interesting to watch the dance that Cornyn Senate Republicans 332 00:20:12,320 --> 00:20:16,440 Speaker 1: because here's the awkward part for Senate Republicans. If Paxton 333 00:20:16,480 --> 00:20:20,840 Speaker 1: wins the runoff, and look, the history says when an 334 00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:25,639 Speaker 1: incumbent is dragged into a runoff against somebody who's either 335 00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:29,080 Speaker 1: you know, more liberal or more cons or whatever whatever. 336 00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:31,800 Speaker 1: If the Democratic primary, the more liberal candidate wins runoffs, 337 00:20:31,800 --> 00:20:35,280 Speaker 1: in a Republican primary, the more conservative candidate usually wins 338 00:20:35,280 --> 00:20:38,520 Speaker 1: the runoffs. The only time this has not happened that 339 00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:41,760 Speaker 1: way was a Mississippi Senate race in twenty fourteen. In 340 00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:46,280 Speaker 1: that race that Cochrane looked like a sure loser after 341 00:20:46,320 --> 00:20:48,040 Speaker 1: the you know, in the first round of voting to 342 00:20:48,560 --> 00:20:55,400 Speaker 1: Chris McDaniel, a Conservative challenger, and then Cochrane and National 343 00:20:55,480 --> 00:20:59,600 Speaker 1: Senate Republicans ran a campaign to convince a whole bunch 344 00:20:59,600 --> 00:21:02,120 Speaker 1: of voters who didn't vote in either primary to show 345 00:21:02,160 --> 00:21:05,240 Speaker 1: up in a runoff and more. I think the Cochrane 346 00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:07,639 Speaker 1: McDaniel race actually had more voters in the runoff than 347 00:21:07,680 --> 00:21:11,800 Speaker 1: the original first round Republican primary. Well, what did that mean? 348 00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:15,879 Speaker 1: Cochrane somehow changed the electorate and he got in this 349 00:21:15,960 --> 00:21:18,840 Speaker 1: case a lot of African Americans who hadn't voted in 350 00:21:18,920 --> 00:21:22,240 Speaker 1: either primary because the Democratic primary wasn't really highly contested. 351 00:21:22,640 --> 00:21:25,200 Speaker 1: They showed up and he voted for Cochrane. The point 352 00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:30,359 Speaker 1: is it's an outlier. It's an exception. Every other every 353 00:21:30,440 --> 00:21:33,640 Speaker 1: other time we've had primaries go like this with an 354 00:21:33,640 --> 00:21:38,159 Speaker 1: incumbent dragged into a runoff by a challenger closer to 355 00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:41,960 Speaker 1: the political base, the result is just about always been 356 00:21:42,000 --> 00:21:45,840 Speaker 1: the same. It is hard to imagine that there is 357 00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:52,199 Speaker 1: a that they're going to be able to somehow do 358 00:21:52,320 --> 00:21:56,240 Speaker 1: this differently. Right, he needs a higher turnout then you 359 00:21:56,240 --> 00:21:59,200 Speaker 1: would normally get in a runoff. This is taking place 360 00:21:59,240 --> 00:22:02,480 Speaker 1: the Tuesday after Memorial Day, so there are a lot 361 00:22:02,520 --> 00:22:07,399 Speaker 1: of things going against corn In here. But given all, 362 00:22:07,520 --> 00:22:10,720 Speaker 1: given the hand he was dealt in this primary, everything 363 00:22:11,560 --> 00:22:14,480 Speaker 1: basically happened about the best possible way it could happen 364 00:22:14,560 --> 00:22:19,239 Speaker 1: for him to possibly find a way to be Paxton right, 365 00:22:19,280 --> 00:22:21,640 Speaker 1: he needed Tallarico to be the nominee without a runoff, 366 00:22:22,280 --> 00:22:24,879 Speaker 1: so the threat of tallar Ico being seen as the 367 00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:28,080 Speaker 1: more formidable challenger in a general election, he needed to 368 00:22:28,480 --> 00:22:31,159 Speaker 1: himself do better than what the polls had shown he 369 00:22:31,160 --> 00:22:33,199 Speaker 1: would do. Cornan has done much better than what the 370 00:22:33,240 --> 00:22:40,880 Speaker 1: polling had shown he was going to do, so we'll see. 371 00:22:41,520 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 1: But the bottom line is, with Tallarico's the dem nominee 372 00:22:44,680 --> 00:22:47,840 Speaker 1: and the like possibility right now, I'd say it's probably 373 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:50,960 Speaker 1: a sixty to seventy percent chance. Now that Ken Paxton's 374 00:22:51,000 --> 00:22:54,560 Speaker 1: Republican nominee. I can't believe I'm saying this, but Texas 375 00:22:54,560 --> 00:23:01,080 Speaker 1: Senate is in play and Paxton may still win. But 376 00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:03,119 Speaker 1: the amount of money Republicans are going to have to 377 00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:10,040 Speaker 1: spend to bail him out. One two. The rhetorical gymnastics 378 00:23:10,280 --> 00:23:12,640 Speaker 1: that the Senate Republicans are going to have to take 379 00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:16,520 Speaker 1: I mean, they have all and and it's clear that 380 00:23:16,600 --> 00:23:23,800 Speaker 1: Cornyan has promised a scorched earth runoff campaign. I can't 381 00:23:23,800 --> 00:23:25,919 Speaker 1: imagine Republicans are not going to walk away from the 382 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:29,119 Speaker 1: center race, right, they can't afford to walk away from it. 383 00:23:29,680 --> 00:23:32,159 Speaker 1: This isn't you know. As much as they don't like 384 00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:34,000 Speaker 1: Ken Paxton, I don't think they would treat him like 385 00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:39,840 Speaker 1: David Duke in this situation. It's uh, it's going to 386 00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:44,280 Speaker 1: be a tough road, very tough road. And so but 387 00:23:44,359 --> 00:23:46,040 Speaker 1: they're in for a dime, in for a dollar now, 388 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:48,520 Speaker 1: and so there's going to be more money dropped on 389 00:23:48,720 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: Ken Paxton. Now here's a few interesting strategic decisions Democrats 390 00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:59,000 Speaker 1: have to make. Do the Senate Democrats play in the 391 00:23:59,040 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 1: Republican runoff? We were joking on the live stream. Does 392 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:06,160 Speaker 1: the you know, we've seen Democrats have done this and 393 00:24:07,000 --> 00:24:09,200 Speaker 1: especially during the Trump era, have done this a few 394 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:13,760 Speaker 1: times to try to help a candidate win a primary 395 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:15,520 Speaker 1: or a runoff that they think is more beatable in 396 00:24:15,560 --> 00:24:21,800 Speaker 1: a general election. So does the Senate? Does Chuck Schumer 397 00:24:21,880 --> 00:24:26,080 Speaker 1: Senate pack run an ad that says call Senator Cornyn 398 00:24:26,119 --> 00:24:29,959 Speaker 1: and thank him for his vote on gun control, or 399 00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:33,159 Speaker 1: do they run ads talking about how Ken Paxton is 400 00:24:33,359 --> 00:24:37,280 Speaker 1: supports Donald Trump too much to support him in the Senate, 401 00:24:37,560 --> 00:24:41,800 Speaker 1: right support an independent like John Cornyn in the Senate. 402 00:24:42,480 --> 00:24:46,280 Speaker 1: There's all sorts of games, game theory you can do there. Now, look, 403 00:24:46,280 --> 00:24:49,960 Speaker 1: there's risk to that, but one would one could argue 404 00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:52,960 Speaker 1: it is it is a it is a cheaper way 405 00:24:53,000 --> 00:24:57,000 Speaker 1: to play in Texas because look, if it's Cornyn tall Rico, 406 00:24:58,160 --> 00:24:59,880 Speaker 1: tall Rico is probably going to be on his own. 407 00:25:00,440 --> 00:25:03,040 Speaker 1: I don't think the National Party comes in and helps them. 408 00:25:03,960 --> 00:25:06,160 Speaker 1: They do some, but I don't think they go all 409 00:25:06,240 --> 00:25:10,080 Speaker 1: in it's Paxton. I think they're going to be tempted 410 00:25:10,080 --> 00:25:14,040 Speaker 1: to go all in. Right, And it's and if you 411 00:25:14,160 --> 00:25:19,440 Speaker 1: look at the Senate map, it's really not that expensive 412 00:25:19,560 --> 00:25:21,720 Speaker 1: of a Senate map for Democrats. Right, you have North 413 00:25:21,760 --> 00:25:26,040 Speaker 1: Carolina where your candidate is ahead, your candidate's out raising everybody, 414 00:25:26,920 --> 00:25:30,119 Speaker 1: You're in good shape. I mean, I think arguably roy 415 00:25:30,160 --> 00:25:34,040 Speaker 1: if there hadn't if Democrats had won more than one 416 00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:36,480 Speaker 1: Senate race this century in the state of North Carolina, 417 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:41,040 Speaker 1: I think most handicappers would already have labeled this race 418 00:25:41,080 --> 00:25:44,680 Speaker 1: as lean Democrat instead of toss up, but because Democrats 419 00:25:44,720 --> 00:25:48,320 Speaker 1: have only won one Senate race this this century in 420 00:25:48,359 --> 00:25:51,159 Speaker 1: North Carolina. It was in two thousand and eight, So 421 00:25:53,359 --> 00:25:55,399 Speaker 1: you know, John Edwards got elected in ninety eight in 422 00:25:55,400 --> 00:25:59,359 Speaker 1: case you're wondering about that about him. So I think 423 00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:01,199 Speaker 1: it's the only reason why it's seen as a toss up. 424 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,960 Speaker 1: But it's a race that they should you know, they're 425 00:26:03,960 --> 00:26:06,440 Speaker 1: going to have, you know, it's a presidential swing state. 426 00:26:06,480 --> 00:26:09,399 Speaker 1: You don't ever screw around. But they're in pretty good 427 00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:13,160 Speaker 1: shape there. Main's going to be super expensive and they're 428 00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:16,160 Speaker 1: probably going to have to spend even more money because 429 00:26:17,200 --> 00:26:20,400 Speaker 1: it's going to be a messy primary and the eventual 430 00:26:20,440 --> 00:26:25,240 Speaker 1: Democratic nominee is probably going to be starved for resources 431 00:26:25,560 --> 00:26:27,520 Speaker 1: come the end of that primary campaign. So they're going 432 00:26:27,560 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 1: to have to come in and they're going to go 433 00:26:28,640 --> 00:26:34,200 Speaker 1: in big there. So then the question is you've got Ohio, Iowa, Alaska, Texas, 434 00:26:36,080 --> 00:26:39,680 Speaker 1: you know, maybe Nebraska if you expect the National Party 435 00:26:39,720 --> 00:26:42,320 Speaker 1: to go in for an independent like Dan Osborne. Right, 436 00:26:42,600 --> 00:26:45,440 Speaker 1: maybe at Kansas if that other independent candidate takes fire. 437 00:26:45,480 --> 00:26:49,480 Speaker 1: But ultimately you're looking at those aren't super expensive states, right, 438 00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:53,760 Speaker 1: Iowa's not super expensive Alaska's not super expensive. Ohio and 439 00:26:53,800 --> 00:26:57,360 Speaker 1: Texas are. And Ohio is about half the cost of Texas. 440 00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:02,600 Speaker 1: But you know, well, yes, Georgia and Michigan are expensive defenses. 441 00:27:02,640 --> 00:27:06,560 Speaker 1: I think Minnesota is an underrated expense for the Democrats 442 00:27:06,600 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 1: there in that Senate race in New Hampshire. It's the 443 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:13,040 Speaker 1: Boston market. So it's not a cheap state either to defend. 444 00:27:13,119 --> 00:27:17,520 Speaker 1: So you know, now they're not defending a huge place 445 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:19,440 Speaker 1: like Illinois, and they're not going to be defending in 446 00:27:19,480 --> 00:27:22,400 Speaker 1: a California. They're not going to be defending in a Pennsylvania, 447 00:27:22,480 --> 00:27:24,119 Speaker 1: and they're not going to be defending in a Florida 448 00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 1: or something like that. So you could argue that compared 449 00:27:30,040 --> 00:27:35,879 Speaker 1: to previous cycles, the Democrats should have the budget to 450 00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:41,200 Speaker 1: also target Texas if they so choose, But it is 451 00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:44,800 Speaker 1: super expensive and they've never really done it before. Right, 452 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:48,800 Speaker 1: They've always kind of been half in, half out. But 453 00:27:48,880 --> 00:27:51,040 Speaker 1: the Republicans they are, they're going to be in no 454 00:27:51,080 --> 00:27:56,440 Speaker 1: matter what they have to be, right, Democrats can get 455 00:27:56,480 --> 00:27:59,399 Speaker 1: to a setup majority without Texas in their minds, right, 456 00:27:59,480 --> 00:28:02,520 Speaker 1: North Carolin on A, Maine, Ohio, Iowa, Alaska. They just 457 00:28:02,640 --> 00:28:05,240 Speaker 1: win four of those five. We haven't even gotten to Texas. 458 00:28:05,560 --> 00:28:08,760 Speaker 1: That assumes they hold Michigan, then they hold Georgia, and 459 00:28:08,800 --> 00:28:11,800 Speaker 1: they hold Minnesota, and they hold New Hampshire. Of those four, 460 00:28:12,280 --> 00:28:14,800 Speaker 1: I think Michigan's the most precarious. I think I've said 461 00:28:14,800 --> 00:28:16,880 Speaker 1: that to you before. It's why it's the one Republican 462 00:28:16,920 --> 00:28:23,399 Speaker 1: seat in my top five most likely to flip. But 463 00:28:23,520 --> 00:28:28,160 Speaker 1: Texas is a nice to have for Democrats Republicans. It's 464 00:28:28,160 --> 00:28:31,440 Speaker 1: a half to half right, and and it's bigger than 465 00:28:31,520 --> 00:28:34,040 Speaker 1: just losing a Senate seat if they somehow right, if 466 00:28:34,080 --> 00:28:38,680 Speaker 1: the Democrats crack open Texas. I just went you're going 467 00:28:38,720 --> 00:28:41,400 Speaker 1: to later in this Later in this podcast, you're going 468 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:45,560 Speaker 1: to hear my top five all time races in Texas, 469 00:28:45,640 --> 00:28:49,480 Speaker 1: because I think there's a chance this Senate race, if 470 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:52,720 Speaker 1: it's particularly if it's Paxton v. Tall Rico, may end 471 00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:56,240 Speaker 1: up in the all time in an all time list 472 00:28:56,320 --> 00:28:59,160 Speaker 1: when all is said and done. But one of the 473 00:28:59,200 --> 00:29:01,520 Speaker 1: five races in all time list is the first time 474 00:29:01,560 --> 00:29:04,560 Speaker 1: a Republican wins statewide in Texas, and happened in nineteen 475 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:07,880 Speaker 1: sixty one with John Tower, and it was literally a 476 00:29:07,920 --> 00:29:10,040 Speaker 1: foot in the door. And once they won a special 477 00:29:10,080 --> 00:29:12,760 Speaker 1: election in a state wide contest and sort of broke 478 00:29:12,800 --> 00:29:15,560 Speaker 1: the streak. They hadn't won a statewide race in reconstruction. 479 00:29:16,960 --> 00:29:20,280 Speaker 1: Then money came in and funded the state party. Then 480 00:29:20,320 --> 00:29:22,760 Speaker 1: the state party was able to fund county parties and 481 00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:25,840 Speaker 1: so on and so on, and you know, John Tower, 482 00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:29,080 Speaker 1: you know, it took them another seventeen years before they 483 00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:30,760 Speaker 1: were able to win a governor's race, but they won 484 00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:36,400 Speaker 1: that in seventy eight, and then essentially, by nineteen ninety 485 00:29:36,800 --> 00:29:40,640 Speaker 1: it is a it is an evenly divided state, and 486 00:29:40,680 --> 00:29:44,000 Speaker 1: then by ninety four it becomes a solid Republican state. 487 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:46,280 Speaker 1: And nineteen ninety four is the last time a Democrat 488 00:29:46,360 --> 00:29:49,239 Speaker 1: won any state wide race on any level in the 489 00:29:49,320 --> 00:29:55,440 Speaker 1: state of Texas. So the point is is denying Texas 490 00:29:55,480 --> 00:29:59,560 Speaker 1: any Democrats any win is a big deal for Republicans. 491 00:30:01,160 --> 00:30:03,480 Speaker 1: You let, It's sort of like you let, you let, 492 00:30:03,520 --> 00:30:08,520 Speaker 1: you open the door, and all of a sudden money 493 00:30:08,520 --> 00:30:11,720 Speaker 1: starts pouring in. They win one, then there's belief they 494 00:30:11,760 --> 00:30:14,479 Speaker 1: can win two, they can win three, et cetera. So 495 00:30:18,360 --> 00:30:22,600 Speaker 1: pop your popcorn. It's going to be fascinating this Republican primary. 496 00:30:22,680 --> 00:30:25,520 Speaker 1: John Cornyn has promised that, you know, he hasn't even 497 00:30:25,880 --> 00:30:30,240 Speaker 1: that that Ken Paxton hasn't seen what's about to become, 498 00:30:30,280 --> 00:30:32,000 Speaker 1: and I think he've referred to a Judgment Day. It 499 00:30:32,080 --> 00:30:36,280 Speaker 1: sounded like a trailer for a Jerry Bruckheimer movie. Judgment 500 00:30:36,400 --> 00:30:40,160 Speaker 1: Day is coming to Ken Paxton. In a world where 501 00:30:40,240 --> 00:30:42,720 Speaker 1: Ken Paxton thinks he's going to be a United States 502 00:30:42,720 --> 00:30:49,480 Speaker 1: Center incomes John Cornyn. It's going to be something else. 503 00:30:50,680 --> 00:30:52,120 Speaker 1: I'm happy that I'm going to be in the state 504 00:30:52,120 --> 00:30:54,280 Speaker 1: of Texas a couple of times between now and the runoff, 505 00:30:55,240 --> 00:30:58,400 Speaker 1: and I look forward to uh dipping my toe in 506 00:30:58,400 --> 00:31:02,520 Speaker 1: that race. Some other things down the ballot that are 507 00:31:02,520 --> 00:31:06,120 Speaker 1: worth worth noting. My favorite result of the night is 508 00:31:06,160 --> 00:31:10,000 Speaker 1: the two vote margin for the state Senate president in 509 00:31:10,960 --> 00:31:14,000 Speaker 1: I think he trails by two votes in the state 510 00:31:14,040 --> 00:31:19,200 Speaker 1: Senate president in North Carolina. It's to a political rival 511 00:31:19,240 --> 00:31:21,600 Speaker 1: that goes back thirty years. Kind of love an old 512 00:31:21,600 --> 00:31:24,880 Speaker 1: fashioned grudge match, right, But this is a big deal 513 00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:28,840 Speaker 1: for Republican Party operations in the entire state. In the 514 00:31:28,880 --> 00:31:33,960 Speaker 1: legislature of the Republican legislature is extraordinarily influential in North Carolina. 515 00:31:33,960 --> 00:31:36,880 Speaker 1: And here's the state Senate president who is going to 516 00:31:36,920 --> 00:31:39,239 Speaker 1: need a recount at best to survive a primary, and 517 00:31:39,560 --> 00:31:42,720 Speaker 1: who knows, but I think you're going to see a 518 00:31:42,760 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 1: lot of litigation in that state, and that's going to 519 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:49,120 Speaker 1: be a dominant story among political types in North Carolina 520 00:31:49,200 --> 00:31:54,760 Speaker 1: for a few weeks. Incumbents, boy it is. You know, 521 00:31:55,320 --> 00:31:59,560 Speaker 1: the tight incumbent races we expected, a few are going 522 00:31:59,560 --> 00:32:01,640 Speaker 1: to end up a runoffs. I think Al Green's in 523 00:32:01,680 --> 00:32:03,960 Speaker 1: a runoff. Crenshaw does not look like he's going to 524 00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:07,040 Speaker 1: get a runoff. The only Republican incumbent member of Congress 525 00:32:07,080 --> 00:32:09,840 Speaker 1: to seek reelection and not have Donald Trump's endorsement was 526 00:32:09,920 --> 00:32:15,240 Speaker 1: Dan Crenshaw. I think Donald Trump will love making note 527 00:32:15,240 --> 00:32:17,640 Speaker 1: of that. That the that you know, if you don't 528 00:32:17,640 --> 00:32:21,760 Speaker 1: have his endorsement, you can't win. That still matters in 529 00:32:21,880 --> 00:32:28,440 Speaker 1: Republican Party politics, that's for sure. But overall, I think 530 00:32:28,520 --> 00:32:34,320 Speaker 1: that if you're John Cornyn, you probably got the best 531 00:32:34,320 --> 00:32:36,440 Speaker 1: possible result you could hope for it. It still may not 532 00:32:36,480 --> 00:32:41,760 Speaker 1: be good enough if you're National Democrats and you you know, 533 00:32:41,880 --> 00:32:46,960 Speaker 1: tall Rico appears to be probably the more the candidate 534 00:32:46,960 --> 00:32:51,720 Speaker 1: that can win. It has a higher ceiling. I'm not 535 00:32:51,840 --> 00:32:56,040 Speaker 1: as I'm not as convinced Crockett couldn't win. For what 536 00:32:56,040 --> 00:32:59,800 Speaker 1: it's worth, but I you know, tallar Rico certainly has 537 00:32:59,840 --> 00:33:04,640 Speaker 1: a his strength with self described independence that's going to 538 00:33:04,680 --> 00:33:09,960 Speaker 1: be key this In so many of these elections, you're 539 00:33:10,000 --> 00:33:14,520 Speaker 1: seeing independence look more like Democrats across the board. And 540 00:33:14,560 --> 00:33:19,040 Speaker 1: then I would argue the news of the day nationally 541 00:33:19,840 --> 00:33:22,320 Speaker 1: was not very helpful if you're a Republican on the ballot, 542 00:33:22,600 --> 00:33:27,200 Speaker 1: whether it's Christynome doubling down and calling those folks in 543 00:33:27,200 --> 00:33:34,400 Speaker 1: Minneapolis domestic terrorists, to suddenly Americans waking up to finding 544 00:33:34,440 --> 00:33:38,720 Speaker 1: out that we've launched military strikes, and yet another country, 545 00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:45,640 Speaker 1: this time it's Ecuador going after Narco so called Narco Terras. 546 00:33:46,400 --> 00:33:49,200 Speaker 1: You have a president flailing to sort of explain the 547 00:33:49,280 --> 00:33:55,560 Speaker 1: rationale for Iran. Now it appears we didn't do enough 548 00:33:55,720 --> 00:34:00,760 Speaker 1: before the attacks to get Americans out of the region, 549 00:34:01,720 --> 00:34:05,640 Speaker 1: and there seems didn't seem as if the president felt 550 00:34:05,680 --> 00:34:12,160 Speaker 1: like he felt bad about that. So he's not showing 551 00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:17,440 Speaker 1: himself to be a very stable wartime leader at this moment. 552 00:34:19,280 --> 00:34:21,960 Speaker 1: The Iran you know, I go back to something I 553 00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:25,000 Speaker 1: said earlier. The best news he can hope out of 554 00:34:25,040 --> 00:34:28,239 Speaker 1: this Iran campaign has already happened, and that's the death 555 00:34:28,239 --> 00:34:32,279 Speaker 1: of Kamani. Every other headline so far out of this 556 00:34:32,360 --> 00:34:39,879 Speaker 1: war feels like it is it is only stoking voter 557 00:34:40,000 --> 00:34:43,720 Speaker 1: skepticism about this decision and about the timing of this decision. 558 00:34:45,280 --> 00:34:47,359 Speaker 1: This doesn't seem to be wearing well. I mean, I've 559 00:34:47,480 --> 00:34:51,880 Speaker 1: never seen an initial military and this is you've arguably 560 00:34:51,920 --> 00:34:55,640 Speaker 1: been a was a successful start right when you when 561 00:34:55,680 --> 00:34:58,120 Speaker 1: you kill the bad guy, and you know, the supposed 562 00:34:58,160 --> 00:35:00,160 Speaker 1: bad guy in the first twenty four hours, it's a 563 00:35:00,200 --> 00:35:05,160 Speaker 1: pretty good start to your military intervention. And yet voters 564 00:35:05,960 --> 00:35:10,120 Speaker 1: are starting in a negative position. And again, what turns 565 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:13,720 Speaker 1: this around. There's no obvious way this turns around right away. 566 00:35:16,160 --> 00:35:18,839 Speaker 1: And if anything, it looks like and you know, now 567 00:35:18,840 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: there's reports or we're going to try to help the 568 00:35:21,239 --> 00:35:26,319 Speaker 1: Kurds become an insurgent force inside of Iran. I mean, 569 00:35:26,360 --> 00:35:28,600 Speaker 1: that looks like you're opening up a can of worms. 570 00:35:28,640 --> 00:35:32,200 Speaker 1: And we know that the Kurds, well, they're a lethal 571 00:35:32,719 --> 00:35:38,239 Speaker 1: fighting force. Suddenly that creates issues with the Turks, it 572 00:35:38,239 --> 00:35:39,760 Speaker 1: can create issues in Syria. 573 00:35:39,880 --> 00:35:40,440 Speaker 3: It's just. 574 00:35:42,760 --> 00:35:45,839 Speaker 1: A lot of folks had warned that, you know, if 575 00:35:45,920 --> 00:35:50,279 Speaker 1: you start open hostilities with Iran, you don't know how 576 00:35:50,360 --> 00:35:53,839 Speaker 1: this there. You know, it's in the cliche It's easy 577 00:35:53,920 --> 00:35:56,279 Speaker 1: to start a war, it's hard to end one. And 578 00:35:56,360 --> 00:35:59,080 Speaker 1: it feels like more countries are finding themselves involved all 579 00:35:59,080 --> 00:36:04,160 Speaker 1: of a sudden, not less. There's more uncertainty, not less. 580 00:36:06,280 --> 00:36:11,040 Speaker 1: So I would say that when you look at this, 581 00:36:11,960 --> 00:36:14,520 Speaker 1: you look at the what happened in these primaries tonight, 582 00:36:14,560 --> 00:36:17,840 Speaker 1: and then you look at the larger, sort of bigger 583 00:36:17,920 --> 00:36:24,440 Speaker 1: news picture that is impacting the larger political conversation. This 584 00:36:24,480 --> 00:36:28,000 Speaker 1: is about the worst start to a midterm election cycle 585 00:36:28,080 --> 00:36:32,719 Speaker 1: that an incumbent party could have. At the moment, their 586 00:36:32,800 --> 00:36:36,880 Speaker 1: single most important state is suddenly potentially a swing state, 587 00:36:37,040 --> 00:36:42,680 Speaker 1: or at least for this election cycle it is. And 588 00:36:42,719 --> 00:36:47,520 Speaker 1: you've just started a war in the Middle East that 589 00:36:47,719 --> 00:36:51,120 Speaker 1: is starting out very unpopular and it's hard to imagine 590 00:36:51,160 --> 00:36:57,600 Speaker 1: how it gets more popular. And oh, by the way, 591 00:36:58,920 --> 00:37:01,399 Speaker 1: the stock market, which was once a barometer that Donald 592 00:37:01,400 --> 00:37:03,879 Speaker 1: Trump cared a lot about, is not something he wants 593 00:37:03,920 --> 00:37:07,399 Speaker 1: to be pointing people to now. So you've now got 594 00:37:07,400 --> 00:37:11,880 Speaker 1: a disrupted economy due to this war in Iran, a 595 00:37:12,000 --> 00:37:17,359 Speaker 1: disrupted national security space in general, and all of this 596 00:37:17,760 --> 00:37:23,080 Speaker 1: overlays what was already an election cycle that looked like 597 00:37:23,120 --> 00:37:25,400 Speaker 1: it was just going to be an old fashioned referendum 598 00:37:25,440 --> 00:37:31,600 Speaker 1: on the party in power. So there you go. This 599 00:37:31,640 --> 00:37:33,880 Speaker 1: podcast has got a lot more to it. My interview 600 00:37:34,360 --> 00:37:36,719 Speaker 1: today is Josh Seftel. He is one of the he's 601 00:37:36,760 --> 00:37:40,040 Speaker 1: the director of All the Empty Rooms. It is a 602 00:37:40,280 --> 00:37:50,239 Speaker 1: very moving and heartbreaking documentary about the untouched rooms of 603 00:37:50,360 --> 00:37:53,960 Speaker 1: victims of school shootings where parents have just not been 604 00:37:54,000 --> 00:38:00,479 Speaker 1: able to touch the rooms, pack them up, and many 605 00:38:00,520 --> 00:38:05,840 Speaker 1: of them are completely untouched. What's interesting about this documentary 606 00:38:05,880 --> 00:38:10,360 Speaker 1: is it does not you never hear the word guns, 607 00:38:10,360 --> 00:38:15,840 Speaker 1: never mentioned. It is not about the policy debate. It 608 00:38:15,920 --> 00:38:23,320 Speaker 1: is simply about how parents grief and if you're a parent, 609 00:38:25,560 --> 00:38:27,160 Speaker 1: it's going to hit you and it's going to hit 610 00:38:27,200 --> 00:38:32,719 Speaker 1: you hard. That I promise. So that's my interview for this. 611 00:38:32,880 --> 00:38:35,560 Speaker 1: After that, I got my top five all time races 612 00:38:35,600 --> 00:38:38,920 Speaker 1: in Texas and I'll let you decide how I stack 613 00:38:38,960 --> 00:38:42,760 Speaker 1: them up and where you would put a Tallerico Paxton 614 00:38:42,840 --> 00:38:45,080 Speaker 1: Senate race and whether we'll qualify in the top five, 615 00:38:45,120 --> 00:38:48,839 Speaker 1: and of course I've got more questions. So quite a 616 00:38:48,880 --> 00:38:51,560 Speaker 1: start to the week, quite a start to the campaign year, 617 00:38:53,760 --> 00:38:56,640 Speaker 1: and quite a start and finish to this podcast. So 618 00:38:56,840 --> 00:38:59,279 Speaker 1: as always appreciated. Thank you for tuning into the live 619 00:38:59,280 --> 00:39:01,319 Speaker 1: stream last night. Those of you that didn't, you can 620 00:39:01,360 --> 00:39:04,160 Speaker 1: always go back and see some of the highlights. But 621 00:39:04,239 --> 00:39:06,439 Speaker 1: if not, I hope I gave you a good summary here. 622 00:39:08,640 --> 00:39:10,799 Speaker 1: So let's take a break and when we come back, 623 00:39:10,880 --> 00:39:18,600 Speaker 1: Josh Seftler, this episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought 624 00:39:18,640 --> 00:39:20,719 Speaker 1: to you by American Financing. So, if you looked at 625 00:39:20,760 --> 00:39:24,240 Speaker 1: your credit card statement lately, you're working forty fifty hours 626 00:39:24,239 --> 00:39:26,719 Speaker 1: a week just to buy groceries and gas, things that 627 00:39:26,880 --> 00:39:28,920 Speaker 1: used to be able to afford right, and the credit 628 00:39:28,920 --> 00:39:31,840 Speaker 1: card companies are charging you over twenty percent interest for 629 00:39:31,880 --> 00:39:34,359 Speaker 1: the privilege. Think about that. It's a lot of extra 630 00:39:34,440 --> 00:39:36,880 Speaker 1: money out the door. It's designed to keep you under water. Well, 631 00:39:36,920 --> 00:39:40,080 Speaker 1: American Financing is doing something they hate. They're actually trying 632 00:39:40,120 --> 00:39:42,560 Speaker 1: to help people. They have mortgage rates in the fives. 633 00:39:42,719 --> 00:39:45,920 Speaker 1: They're showing homeowners how to take their hard earned equity 634 00:39:46,120 --> 00:39:49,640 Speaker 1: to wipe out that high interest debt. The average savings 635 00:39:49,760 --> 00:39:51,799 Speaker 1: is eight hundred dollars a month. So talk to a 636 00:39:51,920 --> 00:39:57,279 Speaker 1: salary based mortgage consultant, no upfront fees, no obligation, commission, 637 00:39:57,320 --> 00:39:59,040 Speaker 1: none of that to see how much you can say. 638 00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:02,280 Speaker 1: And if you start today, you delay two mortgage payments. 639 00:40:02,640 --> 00:40:06,200 Speaker 1: Give American Financing a call America's home for home loans 640 00:40:06,320 --> 00:40:10,000 Speaker 1: eight six six eight eight five ten eighty one. That's 641 00:40:10,120 --> 00:40:14,120 Speaker 1: eight six six eight eight five one zero eight one, 642 00:40:14,480 --> 00:40:19,759 Speaker 1: or go to Americanfinancing dot net. Slash the Chuck Toodcast 643 00:40:20,160 --> 00:40:23,960 Speaker 1: use that code. This episode of The Chuck Podcast is 644 00:40:23,960 --> 00:40:27,000 Speaker 1: brought to you by Zebiotics. Let's face it, after a 645 00:40:27,080 --> 00:40:29,640 Speaker 1: night with drinks, it's hard to bounce back the next day. 646 00:40:29,840 --> 00:40:32,040 Speaker 1: You have to make a choice either have a great 647 00:40:32,120 --> 00:40:34,919 Speaker 1: night or a great next day. Well, that's where pre 648 00:40:35,160 --> 00:40:39,319 Speaker 1: alcohol comes in. Z Biotics. Pre alcohol probiotic drink is 649 00:40:39,320 --> 00:40:43,400 Speaker 1: the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by 650 00:40:43,400 --> 00:40:46,640 Speaker 1: PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how 651 00:40:46,640 --> 00:40:49,160 Speaker 1: it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a 652 00:40:49,200 --> 00:40:52,000 Speaker 1: toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a build up of 653 00:40:52,080 --> 00:40:55,719 Speaker 1: this by product, not dehydration that's to blame for the 654 00:40:55,880 --> 00:40:59,480 Speaker 1: rough days after drinking. Pre alcohol produces an enzyme to 655 00:40:59,600 --> 00:41:03,040 Speaker 1: break the buy product down. Just remember to make pre 656 00:41:03,160 --> 00:41:06,839 Speaker 1: alcohol your first drink of the night. Drink responsibly and 657 00:41:06,880 --> 00:41:10,400 Speaker 1: you'll feel your best tomorrow. Now, Look, I don't drink anymore. 658 00:41:10,440 --> 00:41:13,880 Speaker 1: So I can't give zebiotics pre alcohol a personal endorsement, 659 00:41:13,960 --> 00:41:17,480 Speaker 1: but my producer Lauren does drink and he tried it out. Lauren, 660 00:41:17,560 --> 00:41:18,960 Speaker 1: how was your experience. 661 00:41:18,600 --> 00:41:20,800 Speaker 4: I'll be honest, Chuck. I was a bit skeptical at first, 662 00:41:20,800 --> 00:41:22,239 Speaker 4: but the other night I went out with my wife 663 00:41:22,239 --> 00:41:24,680 Speaker 4: to our favorite spot from Margarita's and tried pre alcohol 664 00:41:24,760 --> 00:41:26,960 Speaker 4: beforehand and got to admit I was surprised by how 665 00:41:27,000 --> 00:41:28,799 Speaker 4: good I felt the next morning, disable the pop right 666 00:41:28,840 --> 00:41:30,839 Speaker 4: out of bed, get a workout in, have a great 667 00:41:30,920 --> 00:41:31,359 Speaker 4: day of work. 668 00:41:31,440 --> 00:41:33,759 Speaker 1: So pre alcoholic gets my stamp of approval. So there 669 00:41:33,840 --> 00:41:36,440 Speaker 1: you go. You ready to try it, Go to zbiotics 670 00:41:36,480 --> 00:41:40,240 Speaker 1: dot com slash chuck podcast right now. You'll get fifteen 671 00:41:40,239 --> 00:41:43,080 Speaker 1: percent off your first order when you use Chuck podcast 672 00:41:43,080 --> 00:41:45,640 Speaker 1: at checkout. Plus, it's backed by a one hundred percent 673 00:41:45,880 --> 00:41:49,560 Speaker 1: money back guarantee, so there's no risk. Subscriptions are also 674 00:41:49,600 --> 00:41:53,319 Speaker 1: available for maximum insistency. Remember to add to zebiotics dot 675 00:41:53,320 --> 00:41:57,920 Speaker 1: com slash Chuck podcast and use the code Chuck podcast 676 00:41:58,000 --> 00:42:02,440 Speaker 1: at checkout for the fifteen percent cap. Again, use the 677 00:42:02,480 --> 00:42:10,600 Speaker 1: code Chuck podcast. So joining me now. He is the 678 00:42:10,680 --> 00:42:12,799 Speaker 1: directory that you can see on Netflix right now. It's 679 00:42:12,800 --> 00:42:18,440 Speaker 1: called All the Empty Rooms, and this is uh, it's 680 00:42:18,560 --> 00:42:22,160 Speaker 1: it's it's about gun violence, but it's not about gun violence. 681 00:42:23,160 --> 00:42:27,279 Speaker 1: What the doc is is about is going back to 682 00:42:27,400 --> 00:42:31,920 Speaker 1: the victims of school shootings, to their parents who allowed 683 00:42:32,360 --> 00:42:35,240 Speaker 1: my guest and his filmmakers. My guest is the director 684 00:42:35,280 --> 00:42:38,840 Speaker 1: of this film of All the Empty Rooms, called Joshua Seftel. 685 00:42:39,600 --> 00:42:40,000 Speaker 2: And. 686 00:42:41,520 --> 00:42:48,560 Speaker 1: It's in some ways a a it's the bigger picture. 687 00:42:48,560 --> 00:42:50,200 Speaker 1: And I want to talk to josh about this because 688 00:42:50,239 --> 00:42:52,400 Speaker 1: I've I've done my own little things when I was 689 00:42:52,440 --> 00:42:56,400 Speaker 1: doing Meet the Press reports, our document and document series 690 00:42:56,440 --> 00:43:01,279 Speaker 1: that I had put together in conjunction with me, and 691 00:43:01,719 --> 00:43:05,640 Speaker 1: we were constantly looking for different ways to portray gun violence, 692 00:43:06,000 --> 00:43:10,400 Speaker 1: to try to break through the numbness that the public felt. 693 00:43:11,440 --> 00:43:15,960 Speaker 1: And I you know, one time we featured a mortician 694 00:43:17,560 --> 00:43:21,920 Speaker 1: who explained what it was like to deal with gunshot victims. 695 00:43:21,960 --> 00:43:24,799 Speaker 1: And so we did our own ways to do this. 696 00:43:24,800 --> 00:43:28,759 Speaker 1: This was a very powerful, another powerful way to do it, 697 00:43:29,600 --> 00:43:32,600 Speaker 1: and in fact, as powerful as I've seen yet. And 698 00:43:32,680 --> 00:43:35,680 Speaker 1: so the director of All the Empty Rooms, josh Seftel, 699 00:43:35,719 --> 00:43:37,600 Speaker 1: joins me. Now, jefs, it's nice to meet you. 700 00:43:38,320 --> 00:43:39,919 Speaker 3: Same here, Chuck. Great to be here. 701 00:43:40,480 --> 00:43:44,160 Speaker 1: So I mean, that's the you know, in some ways 702 00:43:44,160 --> 00:43:46,960 Speaker 1: you could say, Okay, I already know everything I need 703 00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:50,520 Speaker 1: to know about this doc, right, I mean, it's a 704 00:43:50,560 --> 00:43:54,319 Speaker 1: straightforward thing, and yet if you don't want it, you 705 00:43:54,320 --> 00:43:54,839 Speaker 1: don't get it. 706 00:43:55,920 --> 00:43:59,600 Speaker 3: Yeah. A lot of people have said that they after 707 00:43:59,640 --> 00:44:01,800 Speaker 3: they watched they say, Wow, that's not what I was expecting. 708 00:44:03,040 --> 00:44:09,680 Speaker 3: And I think what has happened is that a lot 709 00:44:09,760 --> 00:44:15,719 Speaker 3: of us in this country have become numb to the 710 00:44:15,800 --> 00:44:18,960 Speaker 3: idea of school shootings. You know, there was a school 711 00:44:19,000 --> 00:44:21,719 Speaker 3: shooting last week, and then there was one in the 712 00:44:21,760 --> 00:44:25,240 Speaker 3: week before, and there are about over one hundred school 713 00:44:25,239 --> 00:44:28,319 Speaker 3: shootings a year. Now we don't even hear about most 714 00:44:28,320 --> 00:44:32,239 Speaker 3: of them. And we've reached the point where it just 715 00:44:32,280 --> 00:44:36,160 Speaker 3: becomes a headline that literally fades away within hours or 716 00:44:36,200 --> 00:44:38,400 Speaker 3: even minutes, and. 717 00:44:38,239 --> 00:44:41,320 Speaker 1: We almost treated like the flu. Oh there's an outbreak. 718 00:44:42,160 --> 00:44:46,000 Speaker 1: It's crazy. We've accepted it as something that's normal and 719 00:44:46,440 --> 00:44:50,480 Speaker 1: it's not normal. And we you know, with this film, 720 00:44:50,920 --> 00:44:55,160 Speaker 1: like your story about the mortician, it's another way of 721 00:44:55,280 --> 00:44:59,920 Speaker 1: talking about the issue, but it's really what we've done 722 00:45:00,040 --> 00:45:02,960 Speaker 1: as we've gone into the empty bedrooms and told the 723 00:45:03,040 --> 00:45:07,439 Speaker 1: stories of each child through the objects that are left 724 00:45:07,440 --> 00:45:11,839 Speaker 1: behind in that room. And there's something about that that 725 00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:17,719 Speaker 1: I think has resonated with people where it forces you 726 00:45:18,160 --> 00:45:23,120 Speaker 1: as a human being to feel something. You know, we've 727 00:45:23,160 --> 00:45:26,000 Speaker 1: shifted on this, and i'd say, you know, you guys 728 00:45:26,000 --> 00:45:28,680 Speaker 1: talked about in the in the dock the media's role 729 00:45:28,760 --> 00:45:32,919 Speaker 1: in this, and when when school shootings first started, and 730 00:45:32,920 --> 00:45:37,600 Speaker 1: and sort of the patient zero in this case was 731 00:45:37,640 --> 00:45:40,680 Speaker 1: the probably the University of Texas. You know, that was 732 00:45:40,719 --> 00:45:45,880 Speaker 1: the modern sort of beginning of this. And in the eighties, 733 00:45:46,400 --> 00:45:48,520 Speaker 1: you and I are about the same age. We grew 734 00:45:48,600 --> 00:45:52,920 Speaker 1: up with the so called postal shootings right where it 735 00:45:52,960 --> 00:45:56,319 Speaker 1: was supposedly post you know, people were going, remember it 736 00:45:56,320 --> 00:46:01,960 Speaker 1: became a phrase, going postal, postal. Then Columbine happens, and 737 00:46:02,000 --> 00:46:05,880 Speaker 1: it shifts and and and it's and there is something 738 00:46:05,920 --> 00:46:11,400 Speaker 1: about this mass shooting virus that's in our society where 739 00:46:13,440 --> 00:46:16,160 Speaker 1: you know, yes, the workplace is still a place that 740 00:46:16,360 --> 00:46:21,319 Speaker 1: is a potential vulnerable spot. But we haven't stopped with 741 00:46:21,400 --> 00:46:25,640 Speaker 1: the school shootings, like we haven't moved past that. Its 742 00:46:25,680 --> 00:46:32,560 Speaker 1: continues to be and and it's a what I think 743 00:46:32,600 --> 00:46:34,640 Speaker 1: we're all trying to figure out, why is it accelerating? 744 00:46:35,719 --> 00:46:43,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, you know, in the in our film Steve Hartman, 745 00:46:43,920 --> 00:46:48,640 Speaker 3: who is the CBS news reporter. He's on CBS Sunday 746 00:46:48,640 --> 00:46:50,160 Speaker 3: Morning and the evening news. 747 00:46:50,680 --> 00:46:53,600 Speaker 1: Right, he's the good news guy. You feel better? Right, 748 00:46:53,719 --> 00:46:55,640 Speaker 1: He's the he is the way do you hear this one? 749 00:46:55,719 --> 00:46:57,439 Speaker 1: And in a in a good way? Right? He makes 750 00:46:57,480 --> 00:47:00,360 Speaker 1: you cry. It's it's one of those, but it's in 751 00:47:00,400 --> 00:47:02,240 Speaker 1: a good cry usually exactly. 752 00:47:02,560 --> 00:47:07,719 Speaker 3: And he decided, you know, seven years ago that he 753 00:47:07,880 --> 00:47:10,200 Speaker 3: was sick and tired of all the school shootings and 754 00:47:10,640 --> 00:47:12,680 Speaker 3: even having to report on them in a way where 755 00:47:12,680 --> 00:47:15,120 Speaker 3: they would say, hey, Steve, go go figure out, like 756 00:47:15,160 --> 00:47:17,319 Speaker 3: what's the silver lining on this one? You know, find 757 00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:21,520 Speaker 3: a hero, find the librarian that you know collected all 758 00:47:21,560 --> 00:47:25,399 Speaker 3: the condolence cards, or find the EMT who got there 759 00:47:25,920 --> 00:47:28,360 Speaker 3: in time to save one of the lives. And he 760 00:47:28,520 --> 00:47:32,120 Speaker 3: and you know, those stories matter, but he just reached 761 00:47:32,120 --> 00:47:33,520 Speaker 3: a point where he said, I don't want to do 762 00:47:33,560 --> 00:47:38,040 Speaker 3: that anymore because nothing's changing. And when he started, when 763 00:47:38,040 --> 00:47:40,440 Speaker 3: he covered his first school shooting, which was in nineteen 764 00:47:40,520 --> 00:47:45,040 Speaker 3: ninety seven in Pearl, Mississippi, he I think there were 765 00:47:45,080 --> 00:47:51,160 Speaker 3: seventeen school shootings a year, which is too many. But now, 766 00:47:52,320 --> 00:47:54,200 Speaker 3: when we were making the film, there were over one 767 00:47:54,280 --> 00:47:58,440 Speaker 3: hundred and thirty school shootings a year, so you know, 768 00:47:58,840 --> 00:48:01,600 Speaker 3: you do the math on that, and it's just insane. 769 00:48:02,880 --> 00:48:05,600 Speaker 1: Well, this is why I understand why many people think, 770 00:48:05,719 --> 00:48:10,040 Speaker 1: is it the media's fault that this is accelerating, Not 771 00:48:10,120 --> 00:48:14,000 Speaker 1: that the media causes it, but that the media helps 772 00:48:14,560 --> 00:48:17,480 Speaker 1: plant the seed. Right, And look, you guys delve into this. 773 00:48:17,560 --> 00:48:19,799 Speaker 1: You know, when we first covered school shootings, it was 774 00:48:19,800 --> 00:48:22,080 Speaker 1: always through the perspective of the shooter. Who is this guy? 775 00:48:22,840 --> 00:48:24,839 Speaker 1: Who is this person that climbed up on the on 776 00:48:24,920 --> 00:48:28,600 Speaker 1: the Texas on the on the bell tower, who is 777 00:48:28,680 --> 00:48:32,720 Speaker 1: this person that was wearing a long coat, leather coat? 778 00:48:33,080 --> 00:48:40,120 Speaker 1: And they became infamous, right, and then we rightly realized, hey, 779 00:48:40,160 --> 00:48:42,800 Speaker 1: what are we doing? You know, don't do this because 780 00:48:42,840 --> 00:48:46,399 Speaker 1: that does you will encourage copycatters. Right. It's the same 781 00:48:46,440 --> 00:48:49,680 Speaker 1: thing with the coverage of serial killers in the eighties 782 00:48:50,920 --> 00:48:54,520 Speaker 1: and how how media covered serial killers in the eighties. 783 00:48:54,560 --> 00:48:56,560 Speaker 1: And I think it's a much different situation now, but 784 00:48:57,960 --> 00:49:00,319 Speaker 1: it's I mean, what is the right way to do this? 785 00:49:00,480 --> 00:49:04,560 Speaker 1: I think we the fact that this gets worse, not 786 00:49:04,680 --> 00:49:07,600 Speaker 1: better means we're not doing this the right way. We 787 00:49:07,640 --> 00:49:08,479 Speaker 1: haven't found it yet. 788 00:49:09,480 --> 00:49:15,520 Speaker 3: There is you know, the most popular nonfiction programming out 789 00:49:15,560 --> 00:49:20,960 Speaker 3: there is true crime. Yeah, there's something about human beings 790 00:49:21,000 --> 00:49:24,719 Speaker 3: that we want it. I personally am not interested in it, 791 00:49:24,760 --> 00:49:28,160 Speaker 3: but we want to hear these stories. We want to 792 00:49:28,200 --> 00:49:31,080 Speaker 3: hear about the person who did something bad. We want 793 00:49:31,080 --> 00:49:36,920 Speaker 3: to understand them, judge them, maybe see them face justice 794 00:49:37,040 --> 00:49:38,200 Speaker 3: or not. Yeah. 795 00:49:38,239 --> 00:49:40,040 Speaker 1: I have a thesis that it's just all about making 796 00:49:40,040 --> 00:49:41,479 Speaker 1: ourselves feel better about our place. 797 00:49:41,520 --> 00:49:43,640 Speaker 3: And you know, I think you might be right. 798 00:49:43,960 --> 00:49:47,120 Speaker 1: Right. That's why this appeals so much because I I 799 00:49:47,680 --> 00:49:50,920 Speaker 1: don't get it either. I don't want to see how 800 00:49:50,920 --> 00:49:52,760 Speaker 1: bad humanity is to each other all the time. 801 00:49:52,840 --> 00:49:55,520 Speaker 3: But I think that the news organizations, you know, are 802 00:49:55,719 --> 00:50:00,360 Speaker 3: are tempted by that kind of storytelling. And it's hard, 803 00:50:00,440 --> 00:50:04,240 Speaker 3: you know, because people are interested. But I do commend 804 00:50:04,360 --> 00:50:08,440 Speaker 3: many of them for shifting over time because a lot 805 00:50:08,480 --> 00:50:13,040 Speaker 3: of the organizations, including CBS News where Steve worked, have 806 00:50:13,239 --> 00:50:16,560 Speaker 3: made a commitment to not focus on the on the 807 00:50:16,600 --> 00:50:20,680 Speaker 3: shooters and to spend less time on that and what 808 00:50:20,760 --> 00:50:23,839 Speaker 3: Steve Hartman wanted to do and this is you know, 809 00:50:23,880 --> 00:50:28,480 Speaker 3: we followed him for this was a seven year project. 810 00:50:29,000 --> 00:50:33,480 Speaker 3: We followed him our film crew for a couple of years, 811 00:50:34,000 --> 00:50:36,239 Speaker 3: of the toward the end of the project, and what 812 00:50:36,320 --> 00:50:38,240 Speaker 3: he wanted to do was to shift it even further 813 00:50:38,360 --> 00:50:44,120 Speaker 3: away from talking about the shooters to completely just focusing 814 00:50:45,000 --> 00:50:48,760 Speaker 3: on the lives lived by these children. And that's where 815 00:50:48,520 --> 00:50:54,080 Speaker 3: the empty bedrooms come in, is we You know, I 816 00:50:54,080 --> 00:50:56,839 Speaker 3: haven't told you how the project started. Steve was fed 817 00:50:56,920 --> 00:51:00,640 Speaker 3: up and he actually wrote a letter to every family 818 00:51:00,640 --> 00:51:03,720 Speaker 3: who lost to child since Sandy Hook and he said, 819 00:51:04,560 --> 00:51:07,719 Speaker 3: I want to come to your house with a photographer 820 00:51:08,719 --> 00:51:10,879 Speaker 3: and I want to take pictures of your child's empty room. 821 00:51:12,320 --> 00:51:17,839 Speaker 3: And to his surprise, a bunch of people said yes. 822 00:51:19,520 --> 00:51:23,920 Speaker 3: And he started to collect these photographs. And then he 823 00:51:24,000 --> 00:51:27,359 Speaker 3: reached out to me three years ago and he was 824 00:51:27,920 --> 00:51:30,120 Speaker 3: he said, you know, I'm starting to collect these photos. 825 00:51:30,120 --> 00:51:32,799 Speaker 3: I don't know what to do with them, and do 826 00:51:32,840 --> 00:51:36,359 Speaker 3: you think there might be a documentary film here? And 827 00:51:36,400 --> 00:51:38,200 Speaker 3: he showed me one of the photos. It was a 828 00:51:38,200 --> 00:51:42,600 Speaker 3: photo of a child's bathroom and there was a toothpaste 829 00:51:42,680 --> 00:51:46,880 Speaker 3: too with the cap left off, and you could tell 830 00:51:46,960 --> 00:51:51,640 Speaker 3: and feel the sense of the child who had once 831 00:51:51,719 --> 00:51:54,880 Speaker 3: been there and left that cap off, went to school 832 00:51:55,280 --> 00:51:58,319 Speaker 3: saying like I'll put that on later, and never came home. 833 00:51:59,560 --> 00:52:04,000 Speaker 3: And you could feel the absence literally, and I just thought, Wow, 834 00:52:04,080 --> 00:52:06,719 Speaker 3: this could be very powerful and a whole new way 835 00:52:06,760 --> 00:52:12,440 Speaker 3: to reframe this issue. And so that was three years ago. 836 00:52:14,400 --> 00:52:18,040 Speaker 3: We set out on the road a couple months after that, 837 00:52:18,520 --> 00:52:21,240 Speaker 3: using credit cards, trying to figure out how to piece 838 00:52:21,280 --> 00:52:25,320 Speaker 3: this together. And three years later, you know, we have 839 00:52:25,440 --> 00:52:29,440 Speaker 3: this film. It's on Netflix, it's nominated for an Academy Award, 840 00:52:30,320 --> 00:52:36,360 Speaker 3: and we're trying to show people a different side of 841 00:52:36,400 --> 00:52:40,799 Speaker 3: the issue, which is the children, Like, what is the 842 00:52:40,880 --> 00:52:44,759 Speaker 3: cost of all of this? What is the cost? What 843 00:52:44,880 --> 00:52:48,759 Speaker 3: is the human toll that we're all facing from this? 844 00:52:48,880 --> 00:52:51,440 Speaker 3: And because we don't get to see that, no, just 845 00:52:51,440 --> 00:52:52,239 Speaker 3: doesn't cover that. 846 00:52:52,680 --> 00:52:55,759 Speaker 1: We when I was telling you about the what I 847 00:52:55,760 --> 00:52:58,279 Speaker 1: actually the piece that we had done. It's about three 848 00:52:58,320 --> 00:53:00,960 Speaker 1: years ago now, it still sits in new YouTube, and 849 00:53:01,160 --> 00:53:04,120 Speaker 1: it was it was part of this. You know, I 850 00:53:04,160 --> 00:53:06,919 Speaker 1: got frustrated that I that the regular meet the press, 851 00:53:06,920 --> 00:53:10,600 Speaker 1: I couldn't tackle these issues right for a variety of reasons, right, meaning, oh, 852 00:53:10,600 --> 00:53:12,040 Speaker 1: you've got to be on the news, and you've got 853 00:53:12,040 --> 00:53:13,680 Speaker 1: to react to what's happening in the White House, and 854 00:53:14,280 --> 00:53:16,560 Speaker 1: the Trump era is the Trump era, right, And you 855 00:53:16,600 --> 00:53:19,160 Speaker 1: realize we needed an outlet. We have all the we 856 00:53:19,200 --> 00:53:21,000 Speaker 1: have all the room in the world and the wage 857 00:53:21,000 --> 00:53:27,080 Speaker 1: of streaming, right, and so we thought we wanted to 858 00:53:27,120 --> 00:53:30,800 Speaker 1: go back to these places where there were mass shootings 859 00:53:30,960 --> 00:53:33,279 Speaker 1: and just find out how people were living their lives 860 00:53:33,320 --> 00:53:35,800 Speaker 1: a year later, two years later. And that's how we 861 00:53:35,800 --> 00:53:38,920 Speaker 1: We were at a bar, where how are people getting 862 00:53:38,920 --> 00:53:41,759 Speaker 1: along now with you know, six months later, because we 863 00:53:41,760 --> 00:53:45,360 Speaker 1: don't go back. You know how often I've had to 864 00:53:45,400 --> 00:53:49,160 Speaker 1: cover a ton of school shootings, just like Steve did. 865 00:53:49,239 --> 00:53:51,160 Speaker 1: I mean, that was just you know, if you you 866 00:53:51,200 --> 00:53:54,160 Speaker 1: were in the main in in television media in the 867 00:53:54,680 --> 00:53:57,040 Speaker 1: in the last twenty years, you've had to and had 868 00:53:57,040 --> 00:53:59,759 Speaker 1: to anchor, You've anchored your shriff of school shootings. We 869 00:53:59,760 --> 00:54:01,759 Speaker 1: all say we're not you know, hey, we'll be back. 870 00:54:03,400 --> 00:54:05,399 Speaker 1: You know, we're not just telling the story right now, 871 00:54:05,480 --> 00:54:10,000 Speaker 1: we're coming back. We don't come back, right, we don't 872 00:54:10,120 --> 00:54:11,680 Speaker 1: we by the way, when we say we're going to 873 00:54:11,719 --> 00:54:15,080 Speaker 1: come back, we do mean it in the moment. You know, 874 00:54:15,200 --> 00:54:17,920 Speaker 1: I really genuinely believe that, like, yeah, we should, we 875 00:54:17,960 --> 00:54:21,920 Speaker 1: definitely will come back. And then stuff happens. More school 876 00:54:21,920 --> 00:54:22,840 Speaker 1: shootings happen. 877 00:54:22,960 --> 00:54:25,640 Speaker 3: Usually, And what was interesting for us was that some 878 00:54:25,719 --> 00:54:30,480 Speaker 3: of the people we visited and photographed the empty rooms 879 00:54:30,560 --> 00:54:34,440 Speaker 3: in their houses was they had never talked to the press. 880 00:54:35,560 --> 00:54:38,319 Speaker 1: It's amazing why they. 881 00:54:38,239 --> 00:54:40,640 Speaker 3: Had said no. They said no, I mean, why would 882 00:54:40,640 --> 00:54:43,879 Speaker 3: they want to talk to the press, you know, after 883 00:54:43,880 --> 00:54:44,319 Speaker 3: they but. 884 00:54:44,239 --> 00:54:45,840 Speaker 1: They need to share that, you know, in some ways, 885 00:54:45,840 --> 00:54:49,600 Speaker 1: I think what you're hopefully with this, what this does 886 00:54:49,640 --> 00:54:53,720 Speaker 1: for families of victims. You have to tell your story. 887 00:54:54,640 --> 00:54:57,720 Speaker 1: I know it's hurts, but you have to tell your story. 888 00:54:57,719 --> 00:55:00,719 Speaker 1: People need to see this. And that was exactly that 889 00:55:00,760 --> 00:55:03,200 Speaker 1: was all the way back to Emmett Till, right when 890 00:55:03,200 --> 00:55:05,800 Speaker 1: Emmitt Till's mother said, you must print these photos in 891 00:55:05,880 --> 00:55:06,600 Speaker 1: Life magazine. 892 00:55:07,080 --> 00:55:08,839 Speaker 3: Yes, that's right, agreed. 893 00:55:08,960 --> 00:55:11,239 Speaker 1: This is in some ways it's a derivative of that. 894 00:55:12,360 --> 00:55:15,840 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a great comparison. The families said to us, 895 00:55:17,440 --> 00:55:21,040 Speaker 3: we don't want our child to be forgotten. We want 896 00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:24,760 Speaker 3: the world to know about them. And we were saying 897 00:55:24,760 --> 00:55:27,879 Speaker 3: to them, we're coming here to tell the world about 898 00:55:27,920 --> 00:55:31,200 Speaker 3: your child and who they were and the life they 899 00:55:31,239 --> 00:55:36,040 Speaker 3: lived through through the empty room, and we were very 900 00:55:36,120 --> 00:55:40,959 Speaker 3: much aligned in that way. And it's what they want. 901 00:55:41,160 --> 00:55:51,200 Speaker 3: They want the world to not forget, you. 902 00:55:51,200 --> 00:55:53,879 Speaker 1: Know, in this day and age where there's record there's 903 00:55:53,920 --> 00:55:58,239 Speaker 1: so many recordings now, and you know, I'm sitting here 904 00:55:58,280 --> 00:56:01,120 Speaker 1: watching your film and I'm thinking at the same time, 905 00:56:01,960 --> 00:56:04,680 Speaker 1: and I'm wondering, if I'm in this position for whatever reason, 906 00:56:04,840 --> 00:56:12,160 Speaker 1: two kids in college, I don't I don't know what 907 00:56:12,280 --> 00:56:14,000 Speaker 1: I would want. I don't know if I would want 908 00:56:14,040 --> 00:56:19,839 Speaker 1: to say videos of them and see them alive, if 909 00:56:19,880 --> 00:56:22,279 Speaker 1: I can't be with them alive. I was just thinking, 910 00:56:22,280 --> 00:56:25,040 Speaker 1: you know, it was one of those It was I 911 00:56:25,080 --> 00:56:26,800 Speaker 1: didn't know if that was gut wrenching or not. The 912 00:56:27,680 --> 00:56:31,279 Speaker 1: keeping the room as it is made that really resonated 913 00:56:31,320 --> 00:56:34,839 Speaker 1: with me. Yeah, it is this day and age where 914 00:56:34,840 --> 00:56:37,600 Speaker 1: you get to go back into time and see see 915 00:56:37,600 --> 00:56:41,799 Speaker 1: these people alive. It's spooky and I don't know how 916 00:56:41,800 --> 00:56:43,880 Speaker 1: I would handle that as a as a parent. I 917 00:56:44,440 --> 00:56:46,600 Speaker 1: that was it was one of those I've just was, 918 00:56:46,680 --> 00:56:48,680 Speaker 1: you know, you do you let your own mind wander 919 00:56:48,719 --> 00:56:50,439 Speaker 1: when you have your own you know, when you when 920 00:56:50,440 --> 00:56:52,560 Speaker 1: you're and I'm sure a lot of people who have 921 00:56:52,640 --> 00:56:55,759 Speaker 1: watched this film have shared with you experiences like that 922 00:56:55,800 --> 00:56:58,160 Speaker 1: where you just start putting yourself in that place. What 923 00:56:58,200 --> 00:57:00,760 Speaker 1: would you do? How would you do it? I really 924 00:57:00,800 --> 00:57:02,640 Speaker 1: connected with the mother who said you know what I did. 925 00:57:02,800 --> 00:57:07,880 Speaker 1: I want the room to smell like my son. Yeah, 926 00:57:07,920 --> 00:57:10,799 Speaker 1: and I thought about that because my kids just are 927 00:57:10,800 --> 00:57:14,919 Speaker 1: in college. They're still here, they're still alive, but their 928 00:57:15,000 --> 00:57:19,200 Speaker 1: rooms smell like them in my empty nest, and it 929 00:57:19,320 --> 00:57:21,840 Speaker 1: means a lot to me. So I don't it is 930 00:57:21,960 --> 00:57:25,480 Speaker 1: it is. That's what made this move film so powerful, 931 00:57:26,240 --> 00:57:29,120 Speaker 1: is that you actually didn't need you barely needed narration. 932 00:57:30,240 --> 00:57:33,760 Speaker 3: Yeah there, well, there's so there's You know that that 933 00:57:33,840 --> 00:57:41,080 Speaker 3: room in Santa Clarita Dominic Blackwell's bedroom, the parents keep 934 00:57:41,160 --> 00:57:44,720 Speaker 3: the dirty laundry basket. Yeah, it's been there for six 935 00:57:44,840 --> 00:57:49,000 Speaker 3: years and they haven't got that. Yeah, and and they, 936 00:57:49,240 --> 00:57:51,080 Speaker 3: like you said, they keep it because they don't want 937 00:57:51,120 --> 00:57:56,720 Speaker 3: to lose the smell of their child. And Frank was 938 00:57:56,760 --> 00:58:00,600 Speaker 3: telling me the other day, Frank's Dominic's father was saying 939 00:58:00,640 --> 00:58:04,400 Speaker 3: that the hardest part is that you start to forget 940 00:58:04,640 --> 00:58:09,680 Speaker 3: what their voice sounded like. And I think that's why 941 00:58:09,680 --> 00:58:13,480 Speaker 3: they liked having the video. You actually start to forget 942 00:58:13,800 --> 00:58:15,760 Speaker 3: what their voice sounded like, and then you hear the 943 00:58:16,000 --> 00:58:22,200 Speaker 3: you watch the video and you remember. So it's it's uh, yeah, 944 00:58:22,240 --> 00:58:23,200 Speaker 3: it's unimaginable. 945 00:58:23,960 --> 00:58:26,000 Speaker 1: How do you compartmentalize when you make something like this, 946 00:58:27,280 --> 00:58:28,960 Speaker 1: because there are days, there were days when I'd cover 947 00:58:29,000 --> 00:58:30,520 Speaker 1: school shooting. So I mean, look, I was at the 948 00:58:30,520 --> 00:58:33,640 Speaker 1: White House lawn for Sandy Hook and my kids were 949 00:58:33,680 --> 00:58:36,920 Speaker 1: the same exact age, right, And I was on the 950 00:58:37,000 --> 00:58:40,360 Speaker 1: lawn with the Jake Tapper and Nora O'Donnell at the time, 951 00:58:40,400 --> 00:58:42,280 Speaker 1: and we all had kids the same age, and we 952 00:58:42,280 --> 00:58:44,720 Speaker 1: were a wreck and we had to do live shots 953 00:58:44,720 --> 00:58:49,240 Speaker 1: all day and it was exhausting, and you know, no, please, 954 00:58:50,480 --> 00:58:53,080 Speaker 1: it wasn't even I wasn't a victim, right, It was 955 00:58:53,200 --> 00:58:57,360 Speaker 1: just you know, having to having to pull it together 956 00:58:58,280 --> 00:59:00,760 Speaker 1: right and not be able to. So how do you 957 00:59:00,840 --> 00:59:04,800 Speaker 1: how did you how did you compartmentalize putting this together? 958 00:59:04,880 --> 00:59:10,160 Speaker 1: Because it's this, this, this really had to hit you 959 00:59:10,240 --> 00:59:10,919 Speaker 1: on some days. 960 00:59:11,720 --> 00:59:14,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean two of the kids in the film 961 00:59:14,960 --> 00:59:18,600 Speaker 3: are this We're the same age as my daughter, my 962 00:59:18,680 --> 00:59:26,960 Speaker 3: oldest daughter, nine years old. Yeah, it is. It's tough. 963 00:59:28,120 --> 00:59:31,400 Speaker 3: I try not to center my experience in the in 964 00:59:31,560 --> 00:59:35,560 Speaker 3: talking about the film, because that, you know, what these 965 00:59:35,560 --> 00:59:37,720 Speaker 3: families have have gone through is. 966 00:59:37,720 --> 00:59:41,160 Speaker 1: Just, yeah, this is their experience. I totally get that. 967 00:59:41,280 --> 00:59:47,200 Speaker 3: It's unacceptable, it's it's horrible, But I think that you 968 00:59:47,240 --> 00:59:52,200 Speaker 3: know the experience of being in those bedrooms. You know, 969 00:59:52,240 --> 00:59:54,600 Speaker 3: I travel a lot for my work. I'm away from 970 00:59:54,640 --> 01:00:00,120 Speaker 3: my family a lot this project. When I was a 971 01:00:00,320 --> 01:00:04,200 Speaker 3: every time I came home I had never been. I 972 01:00:04,240 --> 01:00:07,160 Speaker 3: always love coming home, but it was a different level 973 01:00:08,920 --> 01:00:13,080 Speaker 3: of getting to see my kids again and feeling a 974 01:00:13,120 --> 01:00:18,600 Speaker 3: sense of gratitude for what I have. I think that, 975 01:00:19,640 --> 01:00:22,040 Speaker 3: you know, our hope is that the power of this 976 01:00:22,200 --> 01:00:27,040 Speaker 3: film is in trying to capture what it was like 977 01:00:27,200 --> 01:00:28,880 Speaker 3: to be in those rooms, what it was like for 978 01:00:29,000 --> 01:00:33,280 Speaker 3: me and my team to go into those bedrooms, because 979 01:00:34,040 --> 01:00:38,040 Speaker 3: our hope is that everyone will feel the weight of 980 01:00:38,080 --> 01:00:43,760 Speaker 3: the loss, will feel that absence, and it will, you know, 981 01:00:45,200 --> 01:00:50,439 Speaker 3: reconnect them with something that's already within them. I mean, 982 01:00:50,720 --> 01:00:54,439 Speaker 3: you think about how you felt when you heard about 983 01:00:54,520 --> 01:00:58,040 Speaker 3: Sandy Hook, or how you felt when you heard a valuability, 984 01:00:59,120 --> 01:01:02,920 Speaker 3: or how you felt when you heard about Columbine, and 985 01:01:03,200 --> 01:01:05,400 Speaker 3: I don't think most of us feel that way anymore. 986 01:01:05,400 --> 01:01:09,160 Speaker 3: When we hear about a school shooting, we're not as shocked, 987 01:01:09,160 --> 01:01:12,560 Speaker 3: we're not as outraged, we're not as engaged. We might 988 01:01:12,600 --> 01:01:19,240 Speaker 3: not even read the article. And what we're trying to 989 01:01:19,280 --> 01:01:22,760 Speaker 3: do is to get people reconnected to feel that those 990 01:01:22,800 --> 01:01:26,520 Speaker 3: feelings again that they felt back then, because we Our 991 01:01:26,560 --> 01:01:30,760 Speaker 3: hope is that we can take that empathy we might 992 01:01:30,840 --> 01:01:36,400 Speaker 3: feel from watching this film and channel it into change, 993 01:01:36,880 --> 01:01:40,320 Speaker 3: into re engaging with the issue, into having hope again 994 01:01:40,360 --> 01:01:43,040 Speaker 3: that maybe we can create change because where we are 995 01:01:43,120 --> 01:01:44,400 Speaker 3: right now is unacceptable. 996 01:01:46,760 --> 01:01:49,400 Speaker 1: Look, it's on Netflix, which means a lot of people 997 01:01:49,560 --> 01:01:52,880 Speaker 1: can see it. The question is are the right people 998 01:01:52,920 --> 01:01:57,400 Speaker 1: going to see it? You know, I would love to 999 01:01:57,400 --> 01:02:03,400 Speaker 1: see organized screenings of lawmakers, state houses as well as 1000 01:02:03,880 --> 01:02:08,240 Speaker 1: the US Capital, because you want to know that the 1001 01:02:08,320 --> 01:02:12,800 Speaker 1: people that have the power to do something right, we don't. 1002 01:02:14,960 --> 01:02:18,560 Speaker 1: You know, not everybody agrees on what the something is, 1003 01:02:18,880 --> 01:02:21,320 Speaker 1: but I think there's collective agreement we ought to do something. 1004 01:02:22,680 --> 01:02:27,840 Speaker 1: And in order to motivate people to go find find 1005 01:02:28,080 --> 01:02:31,880 Speaker 1: a maybe not the solution, but a mitigation strut, whatever 1006 01:02:31,880 --> 01:02:34,640 Speaker 1: it is, to at least focus on it, they need 1007 01:02:34,680 --> 01:02:40,800 Speaker 1: to feel this right, They need to you know, It's like, 1008 01:02:40,960 --> 01:02:44,920 Speaker 1: how do you get everybody to watch this that maybe 1009 01:02:46,040 --> 01:02:49,120 Speaker 1: has decided. Look, I'm you know, it is not going 1010 01:02:49,160 --> 01:02:53,439 Speaker 1: to change my view on whether, you know, we should 1011 01:02:53,480 --> 01:03:00,480 Speaker 1: even manufacture weapons that can do this to the human body. 1012 01:03:01,040 --> 01:03:05,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, Well you might have noticed this, but in the 1013 01:03:05,040 --> 01:03:10,760 Speaker 3: film we never mentioned the word gun. Yeah, it's never said. 1014 01:03:12,120 --> 01:03:16,000 Speaker 3: And that was by design because we did not want 1015 01:03:16,040 --> 01:03:18,720 Speaker 3: people to have a reason to ever turn the film off. 1016 01:03:20,240 --> 01:03:23,800 Speaker 3: We wanted to tell a story that was purely human, 1017 01:03:24,520 --> 01:03:29,480 Speaker 3: that on the surface was a political that is about 1018 01:03:29,520 --> 01:03:32,080 Speaker 3: the absence of these children. 1019 01:03:32,760 --> 01:03:37,680 Speaker 5: And and you know, I think what we've been seeing 1020 01:03:37,960 --> 01:03:43,600 Speaker 5: is that people of all kinds of opinions are watching and. 1021 01:03:45,160 --> 01:03:50,520 Speaker 3: Are affected by it. I'll give you a couple of examples. One, 1022 01:03:50,240 --> 01:03:53,840 Speaker 3: we took the photographs from the film. So these are 1023 01:03:53,880 --> 01:03:56,480 Speaker 3: the photos of the objects around the room, the little 1024 01:03:56,520 --> 01:04:00,440 Speaker 3: toys and trinkets and things that are left beyond that 1025 01:04:00,520 --> 01:04:03,840 Speaker 3: tell the story of each child. And they're familiar. You know, 1026 01:04:03,880 --> 01:04:06,560 Speaker 3: there are things that if you have kids, you're going 1027 01:04:06,600 --> 01:04:10,280 Speaker 3: to see things that are in your kid's room. If 1028 01:04:10,320 --> 01:04:12,160 Speaker 3: you don't have kids, you're going to see things that 1029 01:04:12,320 --> 01:04:17,040 Speaker 3: probably were in your room growing up. And and we 1030 01:04:17,280 --> 01:04:20,200 Speaker 3: took those photos and we created a photo exhibit which 1031 01:04:20,240 --> 01:04:23,320 Speaker 3: is actually right now in Los Angeles and New York. 1032 01:04:24,280 --> 01:04:29,560 Speaker 3: And we when when they were when they were installed, 1033 01:04:29,560 --> 01:04:34,160 Speaker 3: they were installed by this guy who apparently was quite conservative, 1034 01:04:34,920 --> 01:04:37,880 Speaker 3: and we found out later he you know, he wears 1035 01:04:37,920 --> 01:04:42,360 Speaker 3: a T shirt that says guns aren't stupid, people are anyway. 1036 01:04:42,360 --> 01:04:45,120 Speaker 3: This is the guy who's hanging the photographs of the 1037 01:04:45,160 --> 01:04:49,840 Speaker 3: empty rooms, and halfway through the day of hanging them 1038 01:04:49,920 --> 01:04:55,680 Speaker 3: up in the gallery, he started to weep and he 1039 01:04:55,800 --> 01:05:00,880 Speaker 3: told his boss that he needed to go home. Anyway. 1040 01:05:00,920 --> 01:05:04,800 Speaker 3: The next day, this guy comes back in, goes up 1041 01:05:04,840 --> 01:05:08,440 Speaker 3: to his boss and he says, I just need to 1042 01:05:08,480 --> 01:05:12,400 Speaker 3: tell you something. I will never wear that T shirt again. 1043 01:05:14,800 --> 01:05:20,720 Speaker 3: And we've heard stories like this where people who you know, 1044 01:05:20,760 --> 01:05:24,880 Speaker 3: you couldn't imagine that they would change their mind. But 1045 01:05:26,160 --> 01:05:28,720 Speaker 3: there's something about these photos and the stories of the 1046 01:05:28,840 --> 01:05:36,640 Speaker 3: kids that like softens people's hearts and we just feel hopeful. 1047 01:05:36,760 --> 01:05:40,120 Speaker 3: You know. Steve Hartman got an email from someone who 1048 01:05:40,120 --> 01:05:43,560 Speaker 3: had been a Sandy Hook denier who saw the film 1049 01:05:43,600 --> 01:05:46,520 Speaker 3: and watched it all the way through, and he said 1050 01:05:46,600 --> 01:05:50,480 Speaker 3: to Stevie, said, thank you for this film. I didn't 1051 01:05:50,520 --> 01:05:54,360 Speaker 3: feel preached or lectured to, and therefore I was able 1052 01:05:54,400 --> 01:05:56,720 Speaker 3: to watch it and it opened my mind. 1053 01:05:58,480 --> 01:06:01,240 Speaker 1: You know what you just described just triggered an interesting 1054 01:06:01,320 --> 01:06:04,920 Speaker 1: exhibit that I remember that's extraordinarily powerful. At Yad Vashem 1055 01:06:05,520 --> 01:06:11,840 Speaker 1: mhm in Uh in Israel, the Holocaust Museum there where 1056 01:06:12,360 --> 01:06:17,120 Speaker 1: fairly recently in the Warsaw ghetto in Poland. You know, 1057 01:06:17,160 --> 01:06:19,680 Speaker 1: they have a where where they know a lot of 1058 01:06:19,720 --> 01:06:23,320 Speaker 1: Jews lived. When there's development, there's an attempt you know, 1059 01:06:23,400 --> 01:06:26,280 Speaker 1: if they dig, you know, and they find stuff they 1060 01:06:26,600 --> 01:06:30,040 Speaker 1: try to preserve, and they ended up finding all sorts 1061 01:06:30,080 --> 01:06:36,840 Speaker 1: of just ordinary everyday stuff that belonged to you know, 1062 01:06:36,960 --> 01:06:41,440 Speaker 1: Jewish families who were rounded up. And the whole display 1063 01:06:41,520 --> 01:06:46,720 Speaker 1: is that it is just the stuff. There's stuff that 1064 01:06:46,760 --> 01:06:50,720 Speaker 1: they lived when they lived in Warsaw, and you know, 1065 01:06:50,800 --> 01:06:56,200 Speaker 1: there's toys, there's you know, costume jewelry, there's and it's 1066 01:06:56,680 --> 01:06:59,360 Speaker 1: and it you know, it just it does bring a 1067 01:06:59,440 --> 01:07:02,600 Speaker 1: humanity to the to the to the victory. You know, 1068 01:07:02,800 --> 01:07:05,200 Speaker 1: these are you know, when it comes to the Holocaust, 1069 01:07:05,200 --> 01:07:10,040 Speaker 1: there's still some nameless and faceless people, right and and 1070 01:07:10,120 --> 01:07:13,040 Speaker 1: there is something about you know that that in some 1071 01:07:13,080 --> 01:07:21,200 Speaker 1: ways having these exhibits, you know, can can just humanize 1072 01:07:21,360 --> 01:07:24,320 Speaker 1: the situation. And it sounds like what the responses you're 1073 01:07:24,360 --> 01:07:28,360 Speaker 1: sharing are the It's like all of a sudden, the 1074 01:07:28,520 --> 01:07:31,720 Speaker 1: victims became three dimensional figures. Right. I go back to 1075 01:07:32,800 --> 01:07:35,240 Speaker 1: I think what we were just chatting about before the 1076 01:07:35,360 --> 01:07:38,200 Speaker 1: before we were talking about just politicians, right, and you know, 1077 01:07:38,280 --> 01:07:40,480 Speaker 1: as a as a reporter, I'm eternally always looking for 1078 01:07:40,520 --> 01:07:44,280 Speaker 1: the third dimension and political candidates. But in some ways 1079 01:07:44,320 --> 01:07:47,920 Speaker 1: that's what we failed to do when we talk about victims. 1080 01:07:48,520 --> 01:07:52,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, there's something about someone said to us they watched 1081 01:07:52,640 --> 01:07:56,920 Speaker 3: the film and they said, you know, you read a 1082 01:07:56,920 --> 01:08:02,240 Speaker 3: headline and you think, oh, that's someone else's child, But 1083 01:08:02,360 --> 01:08:06,560 Speaker 3: when you see the bedroom and you see all the 1084 01:08:06,600 --> 01:08:11,160 Speaker 3: objects in there, it's easier to say that's my child, 1085 01:08:11,360 --> 01:08:13,840 Speaker 3: or that could be my child. And I think that's 1086 01:08:13,880 --> 01:08:18,120 Speaker 3: the difference, is that it suddenly becomes part of your 1087 01:08:18,240 --> 01:08:20,759 Speaker 3: world and your life. 1088 01:08:21,160 --> 01:08:24,040 Speaker 1: And has this been an issue you've tackled before in 1089 01:08:24,520 --> 01:08:27,400 Speaker 1: documentary form or you've wanted to, or you've been looking 1090 01:08:27,439 --> 01:08:29,360 Speaker 1: for a way to, like, you know, what's a better 1091 01:08:29,400 --> 01:08:34,120 Speaker 1: way to get people to focus on this issue. 1092 01:08:35,600 --> 01:08:38,200 Speaker 3: Well, the first film I ever made, when a long 1093 01:08:38,200 --> 01:08:42,160 Speaker 3: time ago, when I was twenty two, was about the 1094 01:08:42,320 --> 01:08:45,960 Speaker 3: abandoned children of Romania, and so it was a different 1095 01:08:46,040 --> 01:08:49,680 Speaker 3: kind of story about children. But at that time, in 1096 01:08:49,760 --> 01:08:53,559 Speaker 3: nineteen ninety, Communism had just fallen, josh Escu had fallen, 1097 01:08:54,000 --> 01:08:57,639 Speaker 3: and it was discovered that there were over one hundred 1098 01:08:57,680 --> 01:09:01,000 Speaker 3: thousand abandoned children in the country, and I went there 1099 01:09:01,040 --> 01:09:04,600 Speaker 3: and I lived in the orphanages and documented the conditions 1100 01:09:04,600 --> 01:09:07,920 Speaker 3: of the children, and there was some you know, obviously 1101 01:09:08,000 --> 01:09:12,400 Speaker 3: that footage of seeing children tied up and treated like 1102 01:09:12,520 --> 01:09:19,479 Speaker 3: animals was had a real resonance with the people who 1103 01:09:19,520 --> 01:09:22,679 Speaker 3: watched the film, and it led to the American adoption 1104 01:09:22,760 --> 01:09:26,640 Speaker 3: of thousands of Romanian children when it was on public television. 1105 01:09:27,760 --> 01:09:31,879 Speaker 3: This film is share some of the DNA, but it's different, 1106 01:09:31,960 --> 01:09:34,920 Speaker 3: you know, this film is about the absence of children. 1107 01:09:35,040 --> 01:09:40,400 Speaker 3: This film is about the empty rooms and trying to 1108 01:09:41,120 --> 01:09:47,479 Speaker 3: feel the presence of someone who's gone. And there's something 1109 01:09:49,360 --> 01:09:53,200 Speaker 3: that seems to be resonating with people about that. We 1110 01:09:53,240 --> 01:09:59,880 Speaker 3: can all imagine that happening to us, and that creates 1111 01:09:59,880 --> 01:10:03,599 Speaker 3: a kind of empathy, I think, which we hope will 1112 01:10:03,680 --> 01:10:06,040 Speaker 3: lead to good things. 1113 01:10:06,880 --> 01:10:09,920 Speaker 1: Did the how many of the parents volunteered sort of 1114 01:10:09,960 --> 01:10:15,120 Speaker 1: like how what? You know, I'm just curious if there was, 1115 01:10:15,160 --> 01:10:18,120 Speaker 1: you know, how many of them have decided to you know, 1116 01:10:18,200 --> 01:10:20,559 Speaker 1: I'm focusing on this right. You know, different parents do 1117 01:10:20,640 --> 01:10:24,840 Speaker 1: different things in response to this right. Some get galvanized 1118 01:10:25,560 --> 01:10:29,080 Speaker 1: and want to, you know, deal with one policy issue others. 1119 01:10:29,840 --> 01:10:33,599 Speaker 1: You know, maybe it's about helping helping other victims who 1120 01:10:33,640 --> 01:10:35,920 Speaker 1: go through this, right, that sort of thing. I'm just 1121 01:10:36,000 --> 01:10:38,680 Speaker 1: curious the various. I'm sure you just heard lots of 1122 01:10:38,720 --> 01:10:43,519 Speaker 1: stories of how how how parents chose to grieve besides 1123 01:10:43,640 --> 01:10:46,720 Speaker 1: keeping the room, that's clearly. I mean, you know, it 1124 01:10:46,800 --> 01:10:50,200 Speaker 1: made me think we all memorialize people we love in 1125 01:10:50,240 --> 01:10:52,559 Speaker 1: some form or another, and there's always something where like 1126 01:10:52,640 --> 01:10:55,240 Speaker 1: I'm not letting that go, you know, I'm not. You 1127 01:10:55,280 --> 01:10:58,000 Speaker 1: can't throw away that painting, honey, you can't get rid 1128 01:10:58,080 --> 01:11:01,240 Speaker 1: of that, you know, this beat up coin. You know, 1129 01:11:01,520 --> 01:11:04,719 Speaker 1: I've got this. I got this tattered two dollar bill 1130 01:11:05,720 --> 01:11:08,120 Speaker 1: that my father gave to me. Was I always got 1131 01:11:08,320 --> 01:11:11,880 Speaker 1: a two dollar bill when I lost a tooth. Later 1132 01:11:11,920 --> 01:11:14,000 Speaker 1: I'd figure out it was the same two dollar bill. 1133 01:11:15,320 --> 01:11:16,680 Speaker 1: You know. We didn't have a lot of money, but 1134 01:11:16,720 --> 01:11:19,920 Speaker 1: it was but I you know, this two dollar bill 1135 01:11:20,120 --> 01:11:22,479 Speaker 1: and it was just I carried into my wallet. He 1136 01:11:22,600 --> 01:11:25,160 Speaker 1: died in eighty eight. I had it. I still have it. 1137 01:11:25,320 --> 01:11:29,040 Speaker 1: You know. It's like this two dollar bill and it's 1138 01:11:29,080 --> 01:11:32,160 Speaker 1: just a little thing. So we you know, like I 1139 01:11:32,760 --> 01:11:35,160 Speaker 1: won't shave because my father had a beard, and I 1140 01:11:35,240 --> 01:11:37,320 Speaker 1: just somehow think I'm going to like lose his memory 1141 01:11:37,320 --> 01:11:42,800 Speaker 1: if I somehow shave. It's irrational, of course, but I'm 1142 01:11:42,840 --> 01:11:48,280 Speaker 1: just curious the various ways parents have chosen to channel 1143 01:11:48,360 --> 01:11:48,880 Speaker 1: their grief. 1144 01:11:49,640 --> 01:11:52,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean, one one of the things that really 1145 01:11:52,240 --> 01:11:56,400 Speaker 3: struck me is, you know, we we spent time with 1146 01:11:56,439 --> 01:12:01,040 Speaker 3: four families, all of them lost a child, two at 1147 01:12:01,040 --> 01:12:06,000 Speaker 3: the Saugus High School shooting in Santa Clarita, one at 1148 01:12:06,040 --> 01:12:08,760 Speaker 3: the rob Elementary School in Uvalde, and one at the 1149 01:12:08,800 --> 01:12:16,519 Speaker 3: Covenant School in Nashville. And what we saw is that 1150 01:12:16,600 --> 01:12:21,360 Speaker 3: each family has a different relationship with the room. Some 1151 01:12:21,520 --> 01:12:24,360 Speaker 3: go in there all the time, even it even varies 1152 01:12:24,400 --> 01:12:29,480 Speaker 3: between two parents in the same family. You know, for example, 1153 01:12:30,160 --> 01:12:35,000 Speaker 3: the Blackwells in Santa Clarita, Nancy the mom doesn't like 1154 01:12:35,040 --> 01:12:38,760 Speaker 3: to go into the room at all, and Frank goes 1155 01:12:38,760 --> 01:12:43,040 Speaker 3: in there every day. So it's they all have different 1156 01:12:43,080 --> 01:12:50,360 Speaker 3: relationships with the rooms. And what is inspiring to me 1157 01:12:50,439 --> 01:12:53,040 Speaker 3: about all the families I met is that all of 1158 01:12:53,080 --> 01:12:57,880 Speaker 3: them have different political points of view, but they've all 1159 01:12:59,200 --> 01:13:05,639 Speaker 3: organized created foundations in memory of their children. All four 1160 01:13:05,680 --> 01:13:09,800 Speaker 3: families to do different kinds of work that they deem 1161 01:13:09,840 --> 01:13:12,760 Speaker 3: appropriate that they think is going to help change and 1162 01:13:12,800 --> 01:13:16,800 Speaker 3: make things better. And I just have so much admiration 1163 01:13:17,080 --> 01:13:22,160 Speaker 3: for them for channeling their grief into something that's helping 1164 01:13:22,600 --> 01:13:27,080 Speaker 3: the world. And that's I've seen across the board with 1165 01:13:27,600 --> 01:13:31,640 Speaker 3: most of the families that we've met. I want to 1166 01:13:31,680 --> 01:13:34,479 Speaker 3: tell you one quick story about one of the rooms, 1167 01:13:35,280 --> 01:13:38,120 Speaker 3: you know, talking about the relationships that families have with 1168 01:13:38,160 --> 01:13:41,920 Speaker 3: the rooms. The mule Burgers Brian and Cindy, who lived 1169 01:13:41,920 --> 01:13:45,479 Speaker 3: in Santa Clarita. Their daughter Gracie was killed six years 1170 01:13:45,479 --> 01:13:49,000 Speaker 3: ago at the Saugus High School shooting, and right afterwards 1171 01:13:49,080 --> 01:13:53,080 Speaker 3: they said to themselves, like, we need to leave here. 1172 01:13:54,640 --> 01:13:56,400 Speaker 3: We don't want to be here anymore. 1173 01:13:56,960 --> 01:14:03,960 Speaker 1: Perfectly rational, be a perfectly rational decision. I mean, widows 1174 01:14:04,080 --> 01:14:06,559 Speaker 1: regularly say, you know what, I can't. I'm not living 1175 01:14:06,560 --> 01:14:10,240 Speaker 1: in the house anymore. I mean, you know, just I 1176 01:14:10,320 --> 01:14:11,400 Speaker 1: get it right. 1177 01:14:11,640 --> 01:14:16,160 Speaker 3: Yes, And in their case, the thing that kept them 1178 01:14:16,200 --> 01:14:18,840 Speaker 3: from moving was they couldn't bring themselves to pack up 1179 01:14:19,439 --> 01:14:20,639 Speaker 3: the bedroom the room. 1180 01:14:20,920 --> 01:14:21,320 Speaker 1: Yeah. 1181 01:14:21,320 --> 01:14:25,200 Speaker 3: And so you know, Brian Muhlberger applied for jobs in 1182 01:14:25,280 --> 01:14:28,240 Speaker 3: different places and he'd get the job offer, and then 1183 01:14:28,240 --> 01:14:31,519 Speaker 3: when it came down to it, he just couldn't. They 1184 01:14:31,520 --> 01:14:34,400 Speaker 3: couldn't do it, and they'd say no. And this went 1185 01:14:34,439 --> 01:14:40,280 Speaker 3: on for for over five years. And in our film, 1186 01:14:41,040 --> 01:14:45,960 Speaker 3: Steve Hartman, after they collect the photographs of the empty room, 1187 01:14:46,360 --> 01:14:50,400 Speaker 3: he gave each family a photo book which contained all 1188 01:14:50,520 --> 01:14:54,400 Speaker 3: the best pictures of the child's bedroom. So he gave 1189 01:14:54,439 --> 01:14:56,960 Speaker 3: them this album. He gave the Muhlburgers this album of 1190 01:14:57,040 --> 01:15:02,240 Speaker 3: Gracie's belonging to all the photos that were taken. And 1191 01:15:02,400 --> 01:15:07,599 Speaker 3: after receiving that book, and after watching all the empty 1192 01:15:07,640 --> 01:15:12,840 Speaker 3: rooms the film, they finally said they were ready to 1193 01:15:13,080 --> 01:15:17,719 Speaker 3: move and they packed up the room. And they've since 1194 01:15:17,800 --> 01:15:21,960 Speaker 3: moved to a different state, and what they've done is 1195 01:15:22,000 --> 01:15:26,679 Speaker 3: in their new home, they're creating a garden in memory 1196 01:15:26,720 --> 01:15:31,439 Speaker 3: of Gracie instead of having the bedroom, so they've kind 1197 01:15:31,479 --> 01:15:34,840 Speaker 3: of turned it into something else. But they were able to. 1198 01:15:36,439 --> 01:15:47,599 Speaker 2: Move out of the home and pack up the room. 1199 01:15:48,479 --> 01:15:53,200 Speaker 1: It had to be hard, I imagine, almost not trying 1200 01:15:53,280 --> 01:16:00,400 Speaker 1: to get prescriptive right when you're it is it is always, 1201 01:16:00,840 --> 01:16:03,200 Speaker 1: you know, the journalist in you, I'm sure, was like, okay, 1202 01:16:03,200 --> 01:16:08,000 Speaker 1: but all right, now what? Right? Now? What? But in 1203 01:16:08,040 --> 01:16:11,000 Speaker 1: some ways we're not ready for the prescriptive. I think 1204 01:16:11,120 --> 01:16:14,400 Speaker 1: that's the lesson I'm taking away from the last forty 1205 01:16:14,479 --> 01:16:17,599 Speaker 1: years of how we've handled these as a society. We're 1206 01:16:17,600 --> 01:16:20,320 Speaker 1: not and so we need more of We need more 1207 01:16:20,360 --> 01:16:23,799 Speaker 1: of these because you need you need more people wanting 1208 01:16:23,840 --> 01:16:25,160 Speaker 1: prescriptive before you can. 1209 01:16:25,080 --> 01:16:28,640 Speaker 3: Get to prescriptive. I think I think the prescriptive exists, 1210 01:16:29,160 --> 01:16:32,560 Speaker 3: you know too, we just have it just will. It's everywhere. 1211 01:16:32,920 --> 01:16:35,320 Speaker 3: It's it's you know, it's on the news, it's in 1212 01:16:35,479 --> 01:16:39,759 Speaker 3: and it's in most documentaries where there's a very strong 1213 01:16:39,800 --> 01:16:44,760 Speaker 3: point of view that you know that is essentially alienates 1214 01:16:44,760 --> 01:16:49,160 Speaker 3: about half the people in the country and invites the 1215 01:16:49,200 --> 01:16:50,280 Speaker 3: other half to feel. 1216 01:16:50,280 --> 01:16:52,839 Speaker 1: Here, you're trying to widen the lens, widen the aperture 1217 01:16:52,880 --> 01:16:53,320 Speaker 1: a little bit. 1218 01:16:53,439 --> 01:16:55,719 Speaker 3: I just yeah, I just feel for me as a filmmaker, 1219 01:16:55,760 --> 01:16:58,680 Speaker 3: I mean, in those films, in that news and journalism 1220 01:16:58,720 --> 01:17:01,479 Speaker 3: is important, But from me as a filmmaker, what interests 1221 01:17:01,520 --> 01:17:06,240 Speaker 3: me is how can you tell stories that invite everybody 1222 01:17:06,280 --> 01:17:11,880 Speaker 3: in and allow them to share in potentially feeling something 1223 01:17:11,960 --> 01:17:16,519 Speaker 3: and potentially experiencing a story together, even if they have 1224 01:17:16,600 --> 01:17:20,360 Speaker 3: opposing points of view, that they could watch a story 1225 01:17:20,400 --> 01:17:23,800 Speaker 3: together and all get something out of it. And you know, 1226 01:17:23,840 --> 01:17:25,760 Speaker 3: in the case of all the empty rooms, we hope 1227 01:17:25,800 --> 01:17:28,559 Speaker 3: that for people who agree that we need to do 1228 01:17:28,640 --> 01:17:33,439 Speaker 3: better with guns and gun safety. That they that those 1229 01:17:33,479 --> 01:17:36,439 Speaker 3: people might feel re engaged with the issue, They might 1230 01:17:36,479 --> 01:17:41,240 Speaker 3: feel like, okay, a little bit hopeful that change can happen, 1231 01:17:41,360 --> 01:17:43,760 Speaker 3: That they might feel feelings they haven't felt in a 1232 01:17:43,760 --> 01:17:46,519 Speaker 3: long time when they when they think about school shootings 1233 01:17:46,960 --> 01:17:50,719 Speaker 3: and feel urged to do something. And then the other half, 1234 01:17:52,240 --> 01:17:56,760 Speaker 3: we hope that they'll feel something too deeply that makes 1235 01:17:56,800 --> 01:18:00,520 Speaker 3: them say, you know what, we need to figure this out. 1236 01:18:01,000 --> 01:18:04,600 Speaker 3: We need to change something because what is happening is 1237 01:18:04,680 --> 01:18:08,720 Speaker 3: unacceptable and we need to restart the conversation in a 1238 01:18:08,760 --> 01:18:15,240 Speaker 3: new place, which says which just simply says like, we 1239 01:18:15,360 --> 01:18:17,639 Speaker 3: all agree that our children need to be safe when 1240 01:18:17,640 --> 01:18:20,719 Speaker 3: they go to school, and how do we build from 1241 01:18:20,720 --> 01:18:26,120 Speaker 3: that place and restart the conversation in a constructive way 1242 01:18:26,280 --> 01:18:30,960 Speaker 3: that could lead to positive change. 1243 01:18:32,520 --> 01:18:35,080 Speaker 1: Did you ever contemplate making this feature length or was 1244 01:18:35,120 --> 01:18:36,280 Speaker 1: it always a short in your mind? 1245 01:18:37,120 --> 01:18:39,800 Speaker 3: We thought about it. We started as a short, and 1246 01:18:39,840 --> 01:18:42,360 Speaker 3: then the first cut of the film came in at 1247 01:18:42,439 --> 01:18:45,160 Speaker 3: like fifty five minutes. 1248 01:18:45,840 --> 01:18:47,880 Speaker 1: And when is the cutoff for the oscars? Is it 1249 01:18:47,920 --> 01:18:48,519 Speaker 1: forty minutes? 1250 01:18:48,880 --> 01:18:51,960 Speaker 3: Forty minutes? So anything under forty is a short? And 1251 01:18:52,000 --> 01:18:55,280 Speaker 3: then anything and then I don't know what constitutes a future, 1252 01:18:55,280 --> 01:18:58,400 Speaker 3: but you know, usually they're like seventy to eighty minutes 1253 01:18:58,680 --> 01:18:59,400 Speaker 3: at minimum. 1254 01:18:59,439 --> 01:18:59,839 Speaker 1: Minimum. 1255 01:19:00,160 --> 01:19:03,360 Speaker 3: We were thinking, okay, fifty five, maybe we add another fifteen, 1256 01:19:03,439 --> 01:19:06,439 Speaker 3: and we're we have a short feature. But as we 1257 01:19:06,520 --> 01:19:11,000 Speaker 3: started editing more, we the film got shorter and it 1258 01:19:11,080 --> 01:19:14,360 Speaker 3: got better, and we finally got down to thirty four minutes, 1259 01:19:15,120 --> 01:19:18,840 Speaker 3: and we looked at it and we said, you know, 1260 01:19:19,000 --> 01:19:21,800 Speaker 3: what if we what did we cut out more of 1261 01:19:21,840 --> 01:19:24,880 Speaker 3: the talking? What did we cut out more of the dialogue? 1262 01:19:25,120 --> 01:19:28,160 Speaker 3: And we started just cutting and cutting and cutting, and 1263 01:19:28,840 --> 01:19:31,920 Speaker 3: eventually we had cut six minutes of dialogue and talking 1264 01:19:31,960 --> 01:19:34,479 Speaker 3: out of the film, out of a thirty four minute film. 1265 01:19:34,680 --> 01:19:37,240 Speaker 3: But we left the film at thirty four minutes, so 1266 01:19:37,360 --> 01:19:42,920 Speaker 3: suddenly we had added six minutes of essentially silence to 1267 01:19:42,960 --> 01:19:48,679 Speaker 3: the film, which allowed people to be in the rooms 1268 01:19:49,520 --> 01:19:54,360 Speaker 3: feel the absence. And we found that that was much 1269 01:19:54,360 --> 01:19:57,840 Speaker 3: more effective because we weren't telling people what to think. 1270 01:19:58,040 --> 01:20:01,760 Speaker 3: We were just them go in these rooms and then 1271 01:20:01,800 --> 01:20:04,760 Speaker 3: you decide, you decide what you want to feel, and 1272 01:20:04,800 --> 01:20:06,439 Speaker 3: you decide at the end of the film what you 1273 01:20:06,479 --> 01:20:06,960 Speaker 3: want to do. 1274 01:20:07,640 --> 01:20:09,640 Speaker 1: This is just such a reminder to me that, like 1275 01:20:09,760 --> 01:20:12,760 Speaker 1: you just certain things you can't convey via the word. 1276 01:20:14,240 --> 01:20:15,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, right, it. 1277 01:20:15,120 --> 01:20:19,160 Speaker 1: Did, It is it is, you know it is. And 1278 01:20:19,160 --> 01:20:22,240 Speaker 1: this is what documentary filmmaking over the last ten years 1279 01:20:22,320 --> 01:20:25,320 Speaker 1: is just grown by leaps and bounds. Part of it 1280 01:20:25,360 --> 01:20:29,080 Speaker 1: is that distribution's never been easier, right, the buried entry 1281 01:20:29,080 --> 01:20:31,680 Speaker 1: has never been never been easier. It's like, I mean, 1282 01:20:31,680 --> 01:20:36,719 Speaker 1: if you thirty years ago, where do you distribute this? Sure? 1283 01:20:37,920 --> 01:20:41,040 Speaker 1: M right? Yeah, I mean I'm just right. I mean 1284 01:20:41,160 --> 01:20:44,800 Speaker 1: just imagine, you know, maybe you convince the folks over 1285 01:20:44,800 --> 01:20:47,680 Speaker 1: at CBS Sunday morning, hey let's do a thirty let 1286 01:20:47,760 --> 01:20:51,840 Speaker 1: me do a thirty minute piece. And of all programs 1287 01:20:51,840 --> 01:20:54,559 Speaker 1: that might green light a thirty minute piece, it's it's 1288 01:20:54,640 --> 01:20:58,160 Speaker 1: a Sunday morning. Right. Yeah, but that's difficult, right, that's 1289 01:20:58,200 --> 01:21:01,599 Speaker 1: a that's a one shot, Like where would this have gone? 1290 01:21:01,640 --> 01:21:03,880 Speaker 1: I mean, this is I mean, this is the beauty 1291 01:21:03,920 --> 01:21:07,240 Speaker 1: of of of what you know. It's funny. I don't 1292 01:21:07,280 --> 01:21:10,440 Speaker 1: think we all realized how hungry people were for documentaries 1293 01:21:10,520 --> 01:21:14,080 Speaker 1: until we got a platform like Netflix in our everyday 1294 01:21:14,120 --> 01:21:17,120 Speaker 1: life in Hulu and all these places now that that 1295 01:21:18,400 --> 01:21:21,479 Speaker 1: that have made that If you know, there's always been 1296 01:21:21,520 --> 01:21:24,559 Speaker 1: these great documentarians out there ready to make these films. 1297 01:21:24,600 --> 01:21:27,400 Speaker 1: There just wasn't any place to put them. 1298 01:21:27,720 --> 01:21:31,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right, that's true. Thirty years ago it would 1299 01:21:31,200 --> 01:21:34,880 Speaker 3: have been it would have played at festivals, maybe in 1300 01:21:34,920 --> 01:21:39,160 Speaker 3: a couple of theaters before a feature, maybe those. 1301 01:21:39,000 --> 01:21:41,080 Speaker 1: And it's always please I grew up, we had the 1302 01:21:41,120 --> 01:21:44,719 Speaker 1: one you know, every town had the one theater that played, 1303 01:21:44,960 --> 01:21:47,679 Speaker 1: you know, that had the docs. Right, it was always 1304 01:21:47,680 --> 01:21:49,880 Speaker 1: the same theater that also had the foreign films, right, 1305 01:21:50,000 --> 01:21:52,200 Speaker 1: you know, that was like the only place you could 1306 01:21:52,240 --> 01:21:53,840 Speaker 1: get that stuff. You know, that's right. 1307 01:21:54,160 --> 01:21:56,479 Speaker 3: But you're right, it wouldn't have been seen by you know, 1308 01:21:56,560 --> 01:21:58,920 Speaker 3: this film has already been seen by millions of people 1309 01:21:58,960 --> 01:22:02,960 Speaker 3: because of because of Netflix, and you know they acquired 1310 01:22:02,960 --> 01:22:07,280 Speaker 3: the film at after the Telluride Film Festival where we premiered. 1311 01:22:07,920 --> 01:22:10,599 Speaker 1: And so hard to get funding for this, I mean 1312 01:22:10,600 --> 01:22:12,960 Speaker 1: you said you used a lot of credit cards, because 1313 01:22:13,000 --> 01:22:17,360 Speaker 1: I can imagine you know, it's not a it. You 1314 01:22:17,400 --> 01:22:19,320 Speaker 1: can't sit there and say, yeah, I definitely think we'll 1315 01:22:19,360 --> 01:22:20,960 Speaker 1: be able to sell this. I mean, you know, you 1316 01:22:21,000 --> 01:22:23,240 Speaker 1: don't know if the folks at Netflix or at or 1317 01:22:23,280 --> 01:22:25,120 Speaker 1: at an Amazon, or at a Hulu or a Peacock 1318 01:22:25,200 --> 01:22:28,799 Speaker 1: might say, yeah, I don't. I don't know that people. 1319 01:22:28,840 --> 01:22:32,040 Speaker 1: We don't want, you know, we don't want something that 1320 01:22:33,280 --> 01:22:35,200 Speaker 1: makes people shut the platform off. I mean I had 1321 01:22:35,240 --> 01:22:36,040 Speaker 1: to be that cynical. 1322 01:22:36,280 --> 01:22:38,479 Speaker 3: Yeah, let's just say that there's not a lot of 1323 01:22:38,560 --> 01:22:43,479 Speaker 3: ROI on short documentaries. We you know, films like this 1324 01:22:43,760 --> 01:22:48,400 Speaker 3: are made out of passion and out of care. 1325 01:22:48,479 --> 01:22:50,320 Speaker 1: Well. I'm pretty involved with the folks at Docks d 1326 01:22:50,520 --> 01:22:52,960 Speaker 1: DC Docs, and we used to do a film festival 1327 01:22:53,080 --> 01:22:55,200 Speaker 1: to meet the Press Film Festival for five or six years, 1328 01:22:55,400 --> 01:23:00,240 Speaker 1: and it was only for shorts. Yeah, and it was 1329 01:23:00,280 --> 01:23:03,760 Speaker 1: a whole world of filmmakers that I was realizing were underserved. 1330 01:23:04,240 --> 01:23:10,240 Speaker 1: It's an underserved community with tremendous content. 1331 01:23:11,680 --> 01:23:15,519 Speaker 3: Yeah. Absolutely, all the people that all the people that 1332 01:23:15,560 --> 01:23:17,599 Speaker 3: were part of this film, all the people that eventually 1333 01:23:17,600 --> 01:23:20,640 Speaker 3: came on board and gave us funding or helped us 1334 01:23:20,640 --> 01:23:23,479 Speaker 3: in different ways where they just cared about the issue. 1335 01:23:23,960 --> 01:23:28,160 Speaker 3: None of them expected to make money. We didn't make money. 1336 01:23:28,200 --> 01:23:30,759 Speaker 3: We lost money, but that's not why we made the film. 1337 01:23:30,880 --> 01:23:33,920 Speaker 3: We made it because all of us want to see 1338 01:23:34,760 --> 01:23:35,400 Speaker 3: change happen. 1339 01:23:35,880 --> 01:23:40,960 Speaker 1: And documentaries are like good investigative story books, right, you know, 1340 01:23:41,080 --> 01:23:42,960 Speaker 1: only about one out of one hundred actually make money. 1341 01:23:42,960 --> 01:23:47,000 Speaker 1: They're not meant to make money, They're meant to amplify 1342 01:23:47,000 --> 01:23:53,439 Speaker 1: a story, amplify an idea. On those fronts, let me 1343 01:23:54,040 --> 01:23:55,640 Speaker 1: let me close with this. What's next for you? 1344 01:23:57,640 --> 01:24:02,519 Speaker 3: Well, in the immediate future, we're about to you know, 1345 01:24:02,760 --> 01:24:05,839 Speaker 3: the voting for the Academy Awards is happening started today, 1346 01:24:06,400 --> 01:24:09,840 Speaker 3: started on February twenty sixth, got it, and it goes 1347 01:24:09,880 --> 01:24:10,639 Speaker 3: to March fifth. 1348 01:24:10,760 --> 01:24:13,719 Speaker 1: So we're kind of, oh, it's campaigning. Huh. 1349 01:24:14,080 --> 01:24:17,280 Speaker 3: We've been campaigning because we you know, our hope is 1350 01:24:17,320 --> 01:24:21,639 Speaker 3: that look, being nominated is amazing. We've gotten so much 1351 01:24:21,720 --> 01:24:26,400 Speaker 3: attention and brought it to the subject of school shootings 1352 01:24:26,439 --> 01:24:32,560 Speaker 3: and gun safety because of the nomination, and we're so 1353 01:24:32,680 --> 01:24:36,679 Speaker 3: grateful for that, and also the families who shared their 1354 01:24:36,760 --> 01:24:39,760 Speaker 3: stories of their children and their dream of making sure 1355 01:24:40,120 --> 01:24:44,400 Speaker 3: the world knows about their kids is coming true. And 1356 01:24:44,720 --> 01:24:47,080 Speaker 3: you know, if we whether or not we win the Oscar, 1357 01:24:47,160 --> 01:24:52,000 Speaker 3: obviously winning the Oscar would amplify that and you know, 1358 01:24:52,120 --> 01:24:56,080 Speaker 3: help with this issue. But we're really happy about where 1359 01:24:56,080 --> 01:24:59,000 Speaker 3: we've gotten to and we're not going to stop working 1360 01:24:59,040 --> 01:25:03,559 Speaker 3: on this. We are going to continue traveling the country 1361 01:25:03,600 --> 01:25:07,599 Speaker 3: and the world with this film and we're we and 1362 01:25:07,640 --> 01:25:10,839 Speaker 3: we have this photo exhibit which is going to continue 1363 01:25:10,920 --> 01:25:13,559 Speaker 3: to travel to different cities around the country for the 1364 01:25:13,600 --> 01:25:14,559 Speaker 3: next year or at least. 1365 01:25:15,439 --> 01:25:19,920 Speaker 1: Well. The photo exhibit feels like an incredible sort of 1366 01:25:20,720 --> 01:25:24,280 Speaker 1: secondary way to bring attention to this, not just to 1367 01:25:24,320 --> 01:25:26,160 Speaker 1: the topic and the and the film itself. 1368 01:25:26,760 --> 01:25:28,600 Speaker 3: And you can put it in public places, which is 1369 01:25:28,640 --> 01:25:32,640 Speaker 3: what we've done. You know, it's currently it's in Sunset 1370 01:25:32,960 --> 01:25:37,799 Speaker 3: Triangle Plaza in uh Silver Lake, and it's in Dumbo 1371 01:25:38,400 --> 01:25:42,120 Speaker 3: in Brooklyn, and you can just walk by it and 1372 01:25:42,360 --> 01:25:45,240 Speaker 3: check it out. And you know, hundreds of people every 1373 01:25:45,320 --> 01:25:48,040 Speaker 3: day are walking by and just taking it in. And 1374 01:25:49,080 --> 01:25:50,599 Speaker 3: we want to keep doing that now. 1375 01:25:50,640 --> 01:25:52,400 Speaker 1: I mean it's look, I don't know whether you can 1376 01:25:52,400 --> 01:25:54,640 Speaker 1: get people to intentionally notice, but in some ways you 1377 01:25:54,680 --> 01:25:57,600 Speaker 1: almost want to get the unintented, get it into unintentional 1378 01:25:57,640 --> 01:26:00,280 Speaker 1: public the public spaces where people stumble into. 1379 01:26:00,880 --> 01:26:01,480 Speaker 3: Absolutely. 1380 01:26:02,000 --> 01:26:06,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, Joshua was great and it's a what to me, 1381 01:26:06,200 --> 01:26:09,080 Speaker 1: what's important about it as a as an artist? Is 1382 01:26:09,080 --> 01:26:13,840 Speaker 1: it how important it was as a visual story? Right? 1383 01:26:13,960 --> 01:26:16,400 Speaker 1: And that you know, I don't know if any judges 1384 01:26:16,439 --> 01:26:18,560 Speaker 1: are listening, but I think that should be a huge criteria. 1385 01:26:18,600 --> 01:26:21,800 Speaker 1: It's not just whether the topic is powerful, not whether 1386 01:26:21,840 --> 01:26:25,160 Speaker 1: the words are powerful. But you're making up film, right, 1387 01:26:25,400 --> 01:26:28,360 Speaker 1: you know? Is it visually powerful? And needless to say, 1388 01:26:28,360 --> 01:26:29,360 Speaker 1: it's visually powerful. 1389 01:26:30,160 --> 01:26:32,760 Speaker 3: Thank you, thanks Chuck for giving me the chance to 1390 01:26:32,800 --> 01:26:33,400 Speaker 3: talk about it. 1391 01:26:33,479 --> 01:26:36,760 Speaker 1: And sure, yeah, absolutely, all right, maybe i'll see in 1392 01:26:36,760 --> 01:26:39,480 Speaker 1: the campaign trail. You've done with campaigns? 1393 01:26:40,040 --> 01:26:40,760 Speaker 3: Huh? 1394 01:26:40,800 --> 01:26:44,320 Speaker 1: Are you done with campaigns? Are you done covering political campaigns? 1395 01:26:44,880 --> 01:26:46,200 Speaker 3: Do you know what? Did I tell you? I made 1396 01:26:46,200 --> 01:26:48,320 Speaker 3: a film called Taking on the Kennedys. Do you know 1397 01:26:48,360 --> 01:26:49,040 Speaker 3: about that one? 1398 01:26:49,360 --> 01:26:50,320 Speaker 1: Oh? Which one was that? 1399 01:26:50,600 --> 01:26:55,280 Speaker 3: It was the familiar It was about Pat Kennedy's campaign, 1400 01:26:56,280 --> 01:26:58,439 Speaker 3: his first US congressional campaign. 1401 01:26:58,920 --> 01:27:03,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, Land, oh, I remember this and the from the 1402 01:27:03,240 --> 01:27:04,000 Speaker 1: other right. 1403 01:27:04,000 --> 01:27:07,960 Speaker 3: For I followed his opponent, Kevin Vigilante, who was a 1404 01:27:08,000 --> 01:27:12,639 Speaker 3: Republican and uh, it was a very kind of funny 1405 01:27:12,800 --> 01:27:17,600 Speaker 3: and maddening story. Yeah, and it was on PBS. It 1406 01:27:17,640 --> 01:27:20,360 Speaker 3: was very it was I do now remember this. It 1407 01:27:20,439 --> 01:27:25,200 Speaker 3: was It wasn't the most flattering portrait, probably not back 1408 01:27:25,240 --> 01:27:28,479 Speaker 3: in the day, and I'm a Democrat, but back in 1409 01:27:28,520 --> 01:27:33,280 Speaker 3: the day it was you know, films like that really 1410 01:27:34,400 --> 01:27:39,639 Speaker 3: got seen, you know, when there were fewer channels and 1411 01:27:39,640 --> 01:27:41,599 Speaker 3: and so it was it was very popular. 1412 01:27:41,880 --> 01:27:45,280 Speaker 1: But right, well that was that was basically actually when 1413 01:27:45,280 --> 01:27:46,960 Speaker 1: we were talking about where would a film like this be, 1414 01:27:48,320 --> 01:27:51,640 Speaker 1: maybe p PBS was the was the the that was 1415 01:27:51,680 --> 01:27:53,840 Speaker 1: the home run. Right, if you got a PBS pick up, 1416 01:27:53,920 --> 01:27:55,160 Speaker 1: you're like great. 1417 01:27:55,520 --> 01:27:58,400 Speaker 3: At least a lot of people watched it there too, right, yeah, 1418 01:27:58,520 --> 01:28:00,840 Speaker 3: right now it's not as much. There's it's harder to 1419 01:28:00,880 --> 01:28:04,439 Speaker 3: get audiences anywhere. Me they're much more you know. 1420 01:28:06,320 --> 01:28:09,720 Speaker 1: Right, who knows how this gets into people's algorithms, right, however. 1421 01:28:09,479 --> 01:28:12,080 Speaker 3: That works exactly these days. 1422 01:28:12,280 --> 01:28:15,280 Speaker 1: Well, Joshua, good luck with the campaign. I mean, you know, 1423 01:28:15,680 --> 01:28:18,200 Speaker 1: with the campaigning, it's it's a it's a I know 1424 01:28:18,240 --> 01:28:19,040 Speaker 1: that's a process. 1425 01:28:19,080 --> 01:28:22,160 Speaker 3: And and are you still involved with DC docs? 1426 01:28:23,680 --> 01:28:25,840 Speaker 1: Yeah? Whenever I can be. I mean, you know, whether 1427 01:28:25,880 --> 01:28:29,200 Speaker 1: it's hope, you know, putting together program helping with their programming, 1428 01:28:29,320 --> 01:28:34,559 Speaker 1: or amplifying their docs and all of that. Jamie sure 1429 01:28:35,000 --> 01:28:39,360 Speaker 1: is you know Jamie I know Sky Sidney Okay, Sky's 1430 01:28:39,360 --> 01:28:39,879 Speaker 1: her partner. 1431 01:28:39,960 --> 01:28:43,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, we Actually I was talking with Sky the 1432 01:28:43,280 --> 01:28:47,559 Speaker 3: other day. So I do a I interview my mom 1433 01:28:47,880 --> 01:28:51,800 Speaker 3: on CBS Sunday Morning, and we're on there regularly where 1434 01:28:51,840 --> 01:28:53,880 Speaker 3: I just talk to her about her life and she 1435 01:28:53,960 --> 01:28:57,519 Speaker 3: lives in DC, and you know what's going on in 1436 01:28:57,600 --> 01:29:00,760 Speaker 3: her life and her opinions on things, and we've been 1437 01:29:00,760 --> 01:29:04,400 Speaker 3: on for thirteen years. Anyway, she recently moved back to 1438 01:29:04,479 --> 01:29:07,040 Speaker 3: d C. And so I was talking with Sky at 1439 01:29:07,080 --> 01:29:11,400 Speaker 3: sun Dance about about this, and we decided we're going 1440 01:29:11,439 --> 01:29:14,479 Speaker 3: to try to have my mom be the person who 1441 01:29:14,560 --> 01:29:18,719 Speaker 3: tells you to turn off your cell phones and other 1442 01:29:18,760 --> 01:29:21,880 Speaker 3: things for the festival. So we're going off. So we're 1443 01:29:21,880 --> 01:29:23,360 Speaker 3: getting involved with DC docs. 1444 01:29:23,880 --> 01:29:26,360 Speaker 1: Well, then I look forward to seeing you in whatever 1445 01:29:26,400 --> 01:29:29,840 Speaker 1: way that Jamie recruits me to get involved. Great and 1446 01:29:29,880 --> 01:29:32,120 Speaker 1: at a minimum, I'd like to use my podcast to 1447 01:29:32,720 --> 01:29:35,760 Speaker 1: amplify And I'm a you know, probably probably at least 1448 01:29:35,760 --> 01:29:38,240 Speaker 1: once a month have some documentary filmmaker on. 1449 01:29:38,520 --> 01:29:41,800 Speaker 3: So grateful for that. And uh, when when do you 1450 01:29:41,840 --> 01:29:42,599 Speaker 3: think you're running this? 1451 01:29:43,479 --> 01:29:46,680 Speaker 1: We'll drop it next week, Okay during voting, don't worry. 1452 01:29:46,720 --> 01:29:48,200 Speaker 3: Sooner the better I know. 1453 01:29:48,400 --> 01:29:52,080 Speaker 1: I got you. We just did a feature length. You're 1454 01:29:52,120 --> 01:29:57,960 Speaker 1: not in competition, but we just had I'm trying to 1455 01:29:58,000 --> 01:30:00,320 Speaker 1: I'm like blanking on the title of the film, but 1456 01:30:01,120 --> 01:30:07,960 Speaker 1: Alabama solution No no, no, no about that used body camera footage? Perfect, yes, perfect, neighbor. 1457 01:30:07,960 --> 01:30:11,040 Speaker 1: Thank you. Yeah, Gita, I agree. 1458 01:30:11,080 --> 01:30:13,360 Speaker 3: I was with her last night. We're all we're all 1459 01:30:13,360 --> 01:30:14,160 Speaker 3: going to the same part. 1460 01:30:14,240 --> 01:30:16,599 Speaker 1: You're on the same circuit. Yeah no, no, no, and uh 1461 01:30:16,680 --> 01:30:18,679 Speaker 1: yeah you're not. Don't worry. You're in two different categories. 1462 01:30:18,720 --> 01:30:22,560 Speaker 1: We are also, you know, we I am so the 1463 01:30:22,680 --> 01:30:25,559 Speaker 1: check podcast is promoting Gaeta and we've got we've got 1464 01:30:25,640 --> 01:30:27,520 Speaker 1: people were promoting in both categories. 1465 01:30:27,520 --> 01:30:31,320 Speaker 3: Here we're we're I'm having lunch with her today too, 1466 01:30:31,479 --> 01:30:32,519 Speaker 3: so I'll say. 1467 01:30:32,360 --> 01:30:45,599 Speaker 1: Hi, please do okay, thanks a lot, thanks, take care well. 1468 01:30:45,640 --> 01:30:50,839 Speaker 1: I hope you enjoyed that conversation about just a different 1469 01:30:50,880 --> 01:30:58,200 Speaker 1: way to try to tackle the school shooting issue without 1470 01:30:58,439 --> 01:31:02,760 Speaker 1: dealing with doing in a different way. And I will say, 1471 01:31:02,760 --> 01:31:06,479 Speaker 1: this is all the empty rooms is. It's it's pretty powerful. 1472 01:31:08,160 --> 01:31:12,680 Speaker 1: It's not you know, you're not sitting there for two hours, 1473 01:31:12,400 --> 01:31:14,160 Speaker 1: and it definitely is worth your time. So I hope 1474 01:31:14,200 --> 01:31:15,880 Speaker 1: you give it a chance. I know, I joked with 1475 01:31:15,960 --> 01:31:19,480 Speaker 1: Josha our interview was longer than the than the documentary, 1476 01:31:19,520 --> 01:31:22,519 Speaker 1: but in some ways it is really visually. I go 1477 01:31:22,680 --> 01:31:27,160 Speaker 1: back to the visually powerful and I'm always very impressed 1478 01:31:28,200 --> 01:31:30,600 Speaker 1: because you know, the the easy way to make a 1479 01:31:30,640 --> 01:31:34,360 Speaker 1: documentary is to do interview and it's really just talking 1480 01:31:34,479 --> 01:31:38,519 Speaker 1: heads and you sort of file footage when you can 1481 01:31:38,760 --> 01:31:41,439 Speaker 1: tell a story in an unusual way, whether it was 1482 01:31:41,680 --> 01:31:44,720 Speaker 1: it was the story of using all that bodycam footage 1483 01:31:45,479 --> 01:31:49,000 Speaker 1: for perfect Neighbor, or on this one, it is it 1484 01:31:49,080 --> 01:31:55,240 Speaker 1: is going back to the empty rooms, the rooms that 1485 01:31:55,720 --> 01:32:02,240 Speaker 1: parents won't touch after they lose a child. It's powerful imagery, 1486 01:32:02,800 --> 01:32:06,040 Speaker 1: but it's a unique way. It's another just another way 1487 01:32:06,080 --> 01:32:09,240 Speaker 1: to do storytelling. But let me pivot here. It is 1488 01:32:09,280 --> 01:32:11,120 Speaker 1: a Wednesday, which means I have a top five list 1489 01:32:11,160 --> 01:32:12,760 Speaker 1: and I'm going to do a twist on it. And 1490 01:32:12,800 --> 01:32:15,240 Speaker 1: it's something I told you I was going to be 1491 01:32:15,439 --> 01:32:18,879 Speaker 1: working on pretty soon, and this will continue to evolve. 1492 01:32:20,280 --> 01:32:25,080 Speaker 1: But that is sort of campaign history. 1493 01:32:26,160 --> 01:32:27,639 Speaker 3: And I have. 1494 01:32:29,160 --> 01:32:31,639 Speaker 1: Those of you that those that know me have known 1495 01:32:31,640 --> 01:32:34,639 Speaker 1: me a long time, know that I've got a file 1496 01:32:34,760 --> 01:32:39,600 Speaker 1: boxes filled with research of unwritten books, whether it's on 1497 01:32:39,840 --> 01:32:42,880 Speaker 1: crazy stories from the presidential campaign trail that my late 1498 01:32:42,920 --> 01:32:45,439 Speaker 1: mentor Doug Bailey was working on and I inherited all 1499 01:32:45,520 --> 01:32:48,240 Speaker 1: of that scholarship, or what I worked on on what 1500 01:32:48,280 --> 01:32:50,320 Speaker 1: I called Tales from the Trail, sort of the crazy 1501 01:32:50,439 --> 01:32:53,800 Speaker 1: Every state has had a crazy campaign at least one, 1502 01:32:53,840 --> 01:32:57,439 Speaker 1: if not more, once you sit back and wait till 1503 01:32:57,479 --> 01:32:59,599 Speaker 1: I tell you a story. But this is the beauty 1504 01:32:59,640 --> 01:33:03,840 Speaker 1: of this format, right is you have an opportunity to 1505 01:33:03,880 --> 01:33:06,200 Speaker 1: test out some of your theories of the case and 1506 01:33:06,240 --> 01:33:09,840 Speaker 1: some of your storytelling. So this episode, obviously it's huge 1507 01:33:09,920 --> 01:33:15,479 Speaker 1: Texas Senate. We kicked off the midterm election coverage at 1508 01:33:15,479 --> 01:33:18,919 Speaker 1: the start of this podcast. Obviously, everything that happened Texas 1509 01:33:18,960 --> 01:33:21,840 Speaker 1: has a chance the Texas twenty twenty six Senate race 1510 01:33:22,320 --> 01:33:25,320 Speaker 1: with these messy primaries and everything that has happened inside 1511 01:33:25,360 --> 01:33:30,080 Speaker 1: both parties a we have Obviously we're still sorting ourselves 1512 01:33:30,120 --> 01:33:35,120 Speaker 1: out with the runoff situation, but it has a chance 1513 01:33:35,320 --> 01:33:40,200 Speaker 1: to become an all timer in Texas history. And it 1514 01:33:40,240 --> 01:33:45,000 Speaker 1: got me thinking what are the all time great Texas 1515 01:33:45,000 --> 01:33:49,120 Speaker 1: statewide campaigns? And my it's just governor and Senate that 1516 01:33:49,240 --> 01:33:52,519 Speaker 1: qualify for this. And I've done I've worked on this 1517 01:33:52,600 --> 01:33:57,160 Speaker 1: for all fifty states, and I've got sort of different 1518 01:33:57,320 --> 01:33:59,400 Speaker 1: lists that I've put together over the years of this 1519 01:33:59,560 --> 01:34:03,320 Speaker 1: and different ways that I've wanted to publish content about it. 1520 01:34:03,400 --> 01:34:07,439 Speaker 1: But I thought today I would at least make my 1521 01:34:07,560 --> 01:34:10,800 Speaker 1: top five lists, my top This is my top five 1522 01:34:10,960 --> 01:34:21,599 Speaker 1: all time statewide campaigns in Texas history. Top five, top 1523 01:34:20,400 --> 01:34:26,240 Speaker 1: top We've had a few minutes here give you a 1524 01:34:26,240 --> 01:34:30,000 Speaker 1: little little background in each of my top five inning 1525 01:34:30,320 --> 01:34:34,000 Speaker 1: we'll also note some races that get honorable mentioned but 1526 01:34:34,040 --> 01:34:36,439 Speaker 1: didn't quite crack my top five. I would love for 1527 01:34:36,520 --> 01:34:40,240 Speaker 1: my Texas listeners, my Texas and my political science and 1528 01:34:40,280 --> 01:34:44,719 Speaker 1: political junkies. If you don't agree with my ranking reranked 1529 01:34:44,760 --> 01:34:46,880 Speaker 1: the five, we'll get to it in a minute. Or 1530 01:34:47,040 --> 01:34:49,559 Speaker 1: what did I leave out? What did you what were 1531 01:34:49,560 --> 01:34:53,840 Speaker 1: you surprised by? Etc? Because look, Texas, you know, as 1532 01:34:53,880 --> 01:34:56,840 Speaker 1: we did with my podcast time Machine earlier this week, 1533 01:34:56,840 --> 01:35:00,960 Speaker 1: it has an incredible history, right being an dependent country 1534 01:35:00,960 --> 01:35:03,519 Speaker 1: for a small period of time, there's a lot that 1535 01:35:03,560 --> 01:35:09,280 Speaker 1: has happened. Texas has produced multiple presidents, political legends, and frankly, 1536 01:35:09,360 --> 01:35:13,080 Speaker 1: some of the strangest campaigns in American history. Not all 1537 01:35:13,080 --> 01:35:15,080 Speaker 1: these races that I'm going to put in the top 1538 01:35:15,160 --> 01:35:19,040 Speaker 1: five were actually close races, but in some cases they 1539 01:35:19,040 --> 01:35:23,200 Speaker 1: were extraordinarily consequential for the result that happened. But these 1540 01:35:23,280 --> 01:35:28,439 Speaker 1: races changed something, something bigger. Some of these races launched careers, 1541 01:35:28,560 --> 01:35:31,479 Speaker 1: some of them ended eras, some of them featured something 1542 01:35:31,560 --> 01:35:34,120 Speaker 1: so unusual you just couldn't make it up. Look, I 1543 01:35:34,160 --> 01:35:37,240 Speaker 1: get it. All time lists are subjective. The point is 1544 01:35:37,280 --> 01:35:40,840 Speaker 1: to spark debate, get people thinking about political history and 1545 01:35:40,880 --> 01:35:44,120 Speaker 1: how it matters to today's politics. And again, if you 1546 01:35:44,160 --> 01:35:48,240 Speaker 1: disagree with my choices, please send me your feedback, your pushback, 1547 01:35:48,280 --> 01:35:53,160 Speaker 1: your own nominees Aschuck atdchucktodcast dot com. So I got 1548 01:35:53,200 --> 01:35:56,000 Speaker 1: five races for you today. And if the Texas the 1549 01:35:56,040 --> 01:35:58,920 Speaker 1: twenty twenty six Texas Senate race turns into the humdinger 1550 01:35:59,240 --> 01:36:02,360 Speaker 1: that some people expected to be by November, it may 1551 01:36:02,400 --> 01:36:05,920 Speaker 1: earn its own place on this list someday. But hey, 1552 01:36:06,880 --> 01:36:09,600 Speaker 1: I'll let you decide. The question is which one of 1553 01:36:09,640 --> 01:36:13,880 Speaker 1: these five would you bump from this list? So this 1554 01:36:13,920 --> 01:36:18,320 Speaker 1: is my top five. Number five is actually one race 1555 01:36:18,400 --> 01:36:21,240 Speaker 1: in the twenty first century. And there's only one race 1556 01:36:21,280 --> 01:36:23,439 Speaker 1: on my list that I include from the twenty first century, 1557 01:36:23,439 --> 01:36:26,719 Speaker 1: and it's two thousand and six. Texas Governor Rick Perry 1558 01:36:26,800 --> 01:36:30,360 Speaker 1: wins this race with thirty nine percent. The Democratic nominee 1559 01:36:30,439 --> 01:36:34,400 Speaker 1: Chris Bell gets thirty percent, Carol Keaton Strayhorn gets eighteen 1560 01:36:34,479 --> 01:36:40,759 Speaker 1: percent running as an independent Republican, and the late Kinky Friedman, 1561 01:36:40,880 --> 01:36:44,280 Speaker 1: who once had a hit song called they Don't make 1562 01:36:44,360 --> 01:36:48,040 Speaker 1: Jews like Jesus Anymore, got twelve percent. So here's what 1563 01:36:48,080 --> 01:36:50,960 Speaker 1: you need to know about this campaign. Rick Perry's running 1564 01:36:50,960 --> 01:36:55,320 Speaker 1: for a second full term as governor, a term he inherited. Right, 1565 01:36:55,400 --> 01:36:59,200 Speaker 1: he be inherited the term when Bush became president. Wins 1566 01:36:59,200 --> 01:37:02,840 Speaker 1: in O two fairly easily. Six is his attempt at 1567 01:37:02,840 --> 01:37:06,920 Speaker 1: a second full term. His approval ratings are not great, right, 1568 01:37:06,960 --> 01:37:09,640 Speaker 1: two thousand and six not a good year for Republicans 1569 01:37:09,680 --> 01:37:15,200 Speaker 1: in general. Right across the board nationally and Poles had 1570 01:37:15,200 --> 01:37:18,400 Speaker 1: consistently showed that roughly six and ten Texans said they'd 1571 01:37:18,439 --> 01:37:21,799 Speaker 1: vote for someone other than Perry. And the final results 1572 01:37:21,800 --> 01:37:24,439 Speaker 1: showed that six and ten Texans voted for someone else 1573 01:37:24,520 --> 01:37:28,400 Speaker 1: other than Perry. So why why didn't this end up 1574 01:37:28,400 --> 01:37:32,240 Speaker 1: a real race? Well, those six and ten Texans were 1575 01:37:32,240 --> 01:37:35,800 Speaker 1: split up between three other candidates. So yet Chris bout 1576 01:37:35,920 --> 01:37:38,760 Speaker 1: he was an accidental member of Congress, ended up member 1577 01:37:38,800 --> 01:37:41,120 Speaker 1: of Congress in the Tom Delay seat for a brief term. 1578 01:37:41,360 --> 01:37:44,400 Speaker 1: He ends up the Democratic nominee because no one else 1579 01:37:44,479 --> 01:37:47,439 Speaker 1: really wanted the job, the most interesting candidate and the 1580 01:37:47,479 --> 01:37:51,480 Speaker 1: chief rival to Rick Perry for This was Carol Keaton Strayhorn. 1581 01:37:51,600 --> 01:37:54,559 Speaker 1: She was the sitting Comptroller of Texas. She decided to 1582 01:37:54,600 --> 01:37:56,800 Speaker 1: skip the Republican primary because she didn't think she could 1583 01:37:56,800 --> 01:37:58,920 Speaker 1: win a primary, but she thought she could run as 1584 01:37:58,920 --> 01:38:03,920 Speaker 1: an independent, herself as one tough grandma, and really was 1585 01:38:04,720 --> 01:38:07,080 Speaker 1: a big chunk of her funding came from travelers, came 1586 01:38:07,120 --> 01:38:10,040 Speaker 1: from the same communities that normally back in the nine 1587 01:38:10,080 --> 01:38:13,200 Speaker 1: eighties and nineties used to support Democrats. She was trying 1588 01:38:13,240 --> 01:38:15,160 Speaker 1: to run a sort of hybrid, trying to get sort 1589 01:38:15,200 --> 01:38:19,320 Speaker 1: of the oppositional funding, you know, to try to sort 1590 01:38:19,320 --> 01:38:22,759 Speaker 1: of you could call it moderate Republican, Republican light, whatever 1591 01:38:22,800 --> 01:38:24,799 Speaker 1: you want to call it. But that was the theory 1592 01:38:24,800 --> 01:38:28,280 Speaker 1: of her case. But she needed the Democrats not to 1593 01:38:28,439 --> 01:38:32,599 Speaker 1: essentially run a series campaign. And in theory Chris Bell 1594 01:38:32,720 --> 01:38:36,040 Speaker 1: really was an incredibly underfunded campaign, didn't really run anything. 1595 01:38:36,080 --> 01:38:39,439 Speaker 1: And of course Kinky Friedman, was it a publicity stunt? 1596 01:38:39,680 --> 01:38:43,519 Speaker 1: Was it a frustration? Well, at that time iMOS was 1597 01:38:43,720 --> 01:38:47,679 Speaker 1: if you remember the late great Don Imis, Kinky Friedman 1598 01:38:47,760 --> 01:38:51,040 Speaker 1: was sort of a regular fixture of iMOS so had 1599 01:38:51,080 --> 01:38:55,200 Speaker 1: his own sort of he had his own sort of 1600 01:38:55,520 --> 01:38:58,479 Speaker 1: persona and as he used to he had a campaign 1601 01:38:58,479 --> 01:39:01,080 Speaker 1: slogan that simply was how hard could it? There was 1602 01:39:01,080 --> 01:39:04,840 Speaker 1: a libertarian on two? Now what's interesting about But it 1603 01:39:04,880 --> 01:39:08,080 Speaker 1: was Strayhorn that was the chief challenger. Now, over the 1604 01:39:08,080 --> 01:39:13,280 Speaker 1: course of her political career she used several last names McLellan, Rylander, Strayhorn, 1605 01:39:13,320 --> 01:39:17,639 Speaker 1: and eventually back to Keaton. She actually wanted to get 1606 01:39:17,680 --> 01:39:22,280 Speaker 1: Grandma officially added to her ballot name, but the Perry 1607 01:39:22,280 --> 01:39:25,920 Speaker 1: appointed Secretary of State denied that request. What was what 1608 01:39:26,080 --> 01:39:30,000 Speaker 1: added to the drama of this Republican inner fighting? Was 1609 01:39:30,000 --> 01:39:32,800 Speaker 1: it one of her sons, Scott McClellan, was the press 1610 01:39:32,800 --> 01:39:36,360 Speaker 1: secretary for George W. Bush. So she had the president's 1611 01:39:36,360 --> 01:39:39,559 Speaker 1: press secretary's mother running as an independent against the Republican 1612 01:39:39,600 --> 01:39:43,280 Speaker 1: governor of Texas who succeeded George W. Bush. Right, that 1613 01:39:44,200 --> 01:39:47,000 Speaker 1: was quite the story. And then of course you had this, 1614 01:39:47,360 --> 01:39:51,880 Speaker 1: you know, to understand this race, the money was really 1615 01:39:52,000 --> 01:39:55,479 Speaker 1: only with Perry at twenty four million, Strayhorn at thirteen million, 1616 01:39:55,760 --> 01:39:58,320 Speaker 1: Kinky Friedman raised about three and a half million, and 1617 01:39:58,400 --> 01:40:01,640 Speaker 1: Chris Bell, the Democratic nomine only two million dollars, and 1618 01:40:01,680 --> 01:40:03,439 Speaker 1: in fact, at one point Strayhorn had more than eight 1619 01:40:03,479 --> 01:40:05,719 Speaker 1: million cash on hand, Bell had less than one hundred thousand. 1620 01:40:05,960 --> 01:40:08,720 Speaker 1: Bell was not at all a serious candidate, and yet 1621 01:40:08,800 --> 01:40:12,400 Speaker 1: he finished second with thirty percent of the vote. And 1622 01:40:12,439 --> 01:40:16,320 Speaker 1: it to me, the reason I find this fascinating is 1623 01:40:16,360 --> 01:40:20,000 Speaker 1: because it was a reminder that the major party line, 1624 01:40:20,000 --> 01:40:23,000 Speaker 1: there is a habit that a chunk of voters in 1625 01:40:23,040 --> 01:40:27,479 Speaker 1: both parties just always pull the lever for whoever has 1626 01:40:27,640 --> 01:40:30,080 Speaker 1: the D or the R next to their name. We 1627 01:40:30,160 --> 01:40:32,960 Speaker 1: know what the baseline number of that is. In Texas, 1628 01:40:32,960 --> 01:40:35,560 Speaker 1: it's thirty percent, because that's what Chris Bell got. He 1629 01:40:35,600 --> 01:40:38,760 Speaker 1: got thirty percent. My guess is the baseline for just 1630 01:40:38,800 --> 01:40:42,080 Speaker 1: an R is somewhere in that same range, right thirty 1631 01:40:42,120 --> 01:40:44,960 Speaker 1: to thirty five percent, probably on the Republican side too, 1632 01:40:45,000 --> 01:40:46,720 Speaker 1: no matter the state you went, which is, you know, 1633 01:40:46,800 --> 01:40:50,000 Speaker 1: unless it's a you know, state of Vermont, but you know, 1634 01:40:50,160 --> 01:40:53,680 Speaker 1: there is a voter that always pulls a lever. You know, 1635 01:40:53,920 --> 01:40:58,639 Speaker 1: had there, had she you know, worked harder to win 1636 01:40:58,680 --> 01:41:02,000 Speaker 1: over some Democrats. There were all sorts of ways, but 1637 01:41:02,040 --> 01:41:09,280 Speaker 1: it's why third party candidacies only succeed when one one 1638 01:41:09,320 --> 01:41:11,040 Speaker 1: of the two parties has to basically give up on 1639 01:41:11,080 --> 01:41:15,799 Speaker 1: a race, has to completely walk away, because just simply 1640 01:41:15,840 --> 01:41:19,599 Speaker 1: having their presence on the ballot will eat into that. 1641 01:41:19,720 --> 01:41:23,040 Speaker 1: And it really it's why I include this race because 1642 01:41:23,080 --> 01:41:26,439 Speaker 1: I think it's one of the great lessons of to 1643 01:41:26,600 --> 01:41:29,680 Speaker 1: independent those trying to break up the two parties, How 1644 01:41:29,680 --> 01:41:32,280 Speaker 1: do you do it? You know, you're just you know, 1645 01:41:32,400 --> 01:41:35,160 Speaker 1: don't assume that just because one of the two major 1646 01:41:35,200 --> 01:41:39,080 Speaker 1: parties only fields a guidfly candidate that's underfunded, that there 1647 01:41:39,120 --> 01:41:42,800 Speaker 1: isn't going to be a strong poll by voters there. 1648 01:41:42,880 --> 01:41:45,880 Speaker 1: So that's why that makes my top five number four 1649 01:41:45,960 --> 01:41:50,240 Speaker 1: on the list. Nineteen ninety four, Texas Governor George W. 1650 01:41:50,320 --> 01:41:52,560 Speaker 1: Bush wins with fifty three and a half percent of 1651 01:41:52,600 --> 01:41:55,799 Speaker 1: the vote and Richards gets forty six percent of the vote. 1652 01:41:56,040 --> 01:42:01,400 Speaker 1: She's the incumbent governor. She's incredibly popular, she's witty, nationally known. 1653 01:42:02,040 --> 01:42:03,920 Speaker 1: You know, she delivered the keynote at the eighty eight 1654 01:42:03,960 --> 01:42:07,160 Speaker 1: Democratic Convention, and is poor George he was born with 1655 01:42:07,240 --> 01:42:10,200 Speaker 1: a silver spoon in his mouth. Was sort of the punchline, 1656 01:42:10,360 --> 01:42:14,120 Speaker 1: and it just went from there. And she actually had 1657 01:42:14,160 --> 01:42:16,160 Speaker 1: a pretty good story to tell. The Texas economy was 1658 01:42:16,200 --> 01:42:19,640 Speaker 1: doing well, crime was down. By most normal political standards, 1659 01:42:19,680 --> 01:42:22,080 Speaker 1: she'd have been in good shape for reelection, but she 1660 01:42:22,280 --> 01:42:26,120 Speaker 1: faced an opponent with an incredibly famous name, George W. Bush, 1661 01:42:26,160 --> 01:42:29,160 Speaker 1: son of the former president, part owner of the Texas Rangers, 1662 01:42:29,680 --> 01:42:34,679 Speaker 1: and he was pretty untested politically. Richards kind of dismissed 1663 01:42:34,720 --> 01:42:38,280 Speaker 1: the candidacy at first, said, ah, some jerk is what 1664 01:42:38,360 --> 01:42:40,320 Speaker 1: she called him at first, and a lot of Democrats 1665 01:42:40,320 --> 01:42:43,720 Speaker 1: dismissed it, thinking, oh, hey, George H. W. Bush just 1666 01:42:43,760 --> 01:42:48,040 Speaker 1: got walloped in nineteen ninety two. There's Bush fatigue. That's 1667 01:42:48,080 --> 01:42:51,200 Speaker 1: not gonna work now. Ironically, this was a race going 1668 01:42:51,240 --> 01:42:53,880 Speaker 1: into election day. Both candidates had their favorable ratings over 1669 01:42:53,920 --> 01:42:58,200 Speaker 1: sixty percent. Both were well liked. Richards wasn't unpopular, Bush 1670 01:42:58,360 --> 01:43:01,320 Speaker 1: wasn't unknown. There was a scandal election or a bad 1671 01:43:01,360 --> 01:43:05,160 Speaker 1: economy election. The initial polling of this race, one poll 1672 01:43:05,160 --> 01:43:07,800 Speaker 1: had a forty seven forty in late nineteen ninety three, 1673 01:43:08,600 --> 01:43:13,280 Speaker 1: and it is basically, you know, that's when you get 1674 01:43:13,320 --> 01:43:15,920 Speaker 1: to start that way, before you're spending any dollars. There 1675 01:43:15,960 --> 01:43:19,040 Speaker 1: you go. The real issue is the race unfolded in 1676 01:43:19,080 --> 01:43:22,160 Speaker 1: the middle of the nineteen ninety four Republican Revolution. Democrats 1677 01:43:22,160 --> 01:43:25,639 Speaker 1: lost fifty four House seats nationally and in governor's races. 1678 01:43:25,680 --> 01:43:28,679 Speaker 1: Bush was one of four Republicans that year to defeat 1679 01:43:28,680 --> 01:43:34,599 Speaker 1: a sitting incumbent governor, a sitting incumbent Democratic governor. I've 1680 01:43:34,640 --> 01:43:36,360 Speaker 1: told you it's one of the hardest things to do. 1681 01:43:36,720 --> 01:43:40,240 Speaker 1: In ninety four, a lot of incumbent governors lost, including 1682 01:43:40,240 --> 01:43:45,880 Speaker 1: Anne Richards, and she basically lost because of this. It 1683 01:43:45,960 --> 01:43:49,680 Speaker 1: was the shift, if you will, Carl Rove understood it. 1684 01:43:49,800 --> 01:43:51,840 Speaker 1: He saw the key dynamic clearly, the rise of the 1685 01:43:51,880 --> 01:43:55,439 Speaker 1: Republican suburbs in Texas in and around the major cities, 1686 01:43:55,960 --> 01:44:00,920 Speaker 1: and the success in those suburbs is why Bush won. 1687 01:44:01,520 --> 01:44:05,240 Speaker 1: And this race is important because it marks the beginning 1688 01:44:05,280 --> 01:44:08,880 Speaker 1: of something his storic. Texas Republicans have held every single 1689 01:44:08,960 --> 01:44:12,880 Speaker 1: statewide office ever since that election. No Democrat has won 1690 01:44:12,960 --> 01:44:16,320 Speaker 1: statewide in Texas since November eighth, nineteen ninety four. One guy, 1691 01:44:16,320 --> 01:44:18,400 Speaker 1: a land commissioner, Gary Morrow, won a race that year 1692 01:44:18,439 --> 01:44:21,280 Speaker 1: in ninety four, and then and then that was it. 1693 01:44:21,720 --> 01:44:25,439 Speaker 1: So no Democrat has held state wide office since that 1694 01:44:25,640 --> 01:44:29,800 Speaker 1: Landmark Bush victory over Richards. Bush goes on to win 1695 01:44:29,840 --> 01:44:31,840 Speaker 1: re election ninety eight with sixty nine percent of the vote. 1696 01:44:32,040 --> 01:44:34,679 Speaker 1: Two years later, he runs for president. You can trace 1697 01:44:34,760 --> 01:44:36,760 Speaker 1: a direct line from a governor's race in Texas in 1698 01:44:36,800 --> 01:44:39,639 Speaker 1: nineteen ninety four to the Iraq War, Bush tax cuts, 1699 01:44:39,640 --> 01:44:43,200 Speaker 1: and a generation of Supreme Court appointments. Right, butterfly flaps 1700 01:44:43,280 --> 01:44:45,320 Speaker 1: his wing. Number three on my list, you have to 1701 01:44:45,360 --> 01:44:48,680 Speaker 1: go back to nineteen twenty four. Texas Governor Miriam ma 1702 01:44:49,240 --> 01:44:53,960 Speaker 1: Ferguson defeats the clan backed candidate Felix Robertson in the 1703 01:44:54,000 --> 01:44:59,160 Speaker 1: Democratic primary. Then she goes on to become the first 1704 01:44:59,320 --> 01:45:03,960 Speaker 1: woman governor of Texas and actually technically the second woman 1705 01:45:04,040 --> 01:45:08,000 Speaker 1: governor in American history, because a woman in Wyoming took 1706 01:45:08,040 --> 01:45:12,280 Speaker 1: the oath a few days before Ma Ferguson did. But 1707 01:45:12,320 --> 01:45:15,519 Speaker 1: here's the story. To understand nineteen twenty four, you have 1708 01:45:15,600 --> 01:45:19,439 Speaker 1: to go back to nineteen seventeen. A man named James 1709 01:45:19,760 --> 01:45:23,639 Speaker 1: pah Ferguson. Man pah Ferguson was the governor of Texas. 1710 01:45:23,640 --> 01:45:26,960 Speaker 1: He was a populist politician known as Farmer Jim, and 1711 01:45:27,000 --> 01:45:30,080 Speaker 1: he was also deeply corrupt. The charges against him read 1712 01:45:30,120 --> 01:45:33,240 Speaker 1: like a corruption checklist that would look familiar today. Misuse 1713 01:45:33,280 --> 01:45:36,120 Speaker 1: of state funds, co mingling his personal bank accounts with 1714 01:45:36,160 --> 01:45:38,920 Speaker 1: state money. A mysterious personal loan of one hundred and 1715 01:45:38,920 --> 01:45:41,200 Speaker 1: fifty six thousand dollars that he refused, to explain, which, 1716 01:45:41,200 --> 01:45:43,439 Speaker 1: of course, would be like nearly a million dollars in 1717 01:45:43,439 --> 01:45:45,720 Speaker 1: today's money. It was later found to have come from 1718 01:45:45,800 --> 01:45:49,280 Speaker 1: San Antonio beer Brewers, which was particularly damaging given the 1719 01:45:49,280 --> 01:45:53,080 Speaker 1: prohibition politics of that era. And then, most infamously, he 1720 01:45:53,160 --> 01:45:56,559 Speaker 1: tried to purge professors at the University of Texas who 1721 01:45:56,560 --> 01:46:00,000 Speaker 1: he personally disliked, and when the ut president refused to 1722 01:46:00,160 --> 01:46:04,120 Speaker 1: fire them, Ferguson actually tried to defund the university entirely. 1723 01:46:04,800 --> 01:46:08,080 Speaker 1: So the legislature impeached him on ten of twenty one 1724 01:46:08,160 --> 01:46:11,040 Speaker 1: charges and barred him from holding state office ever again. 1725 01:46:11,760 --> 01:46:15,040 Speaker 1: But guess what, Pah, Ferguson refused to leave politics. He 1726 01:46:15,080 --> 01:46:19,439 Speaker 1: found another way back. Now. By the early nineteen twenties, 1727 01:46:19,479 --> 01:46:22,439 Speaker 1: the Ku Klux Klan had become a major political force 1728 01:46:22,439 --> 01:46:24,479 Speaker 1: in the state of Texas. It wasn't a fringe movement, 1729 01:46:24,520 --> 01:46:26,760 Speaker 1: it was a pretty mainstream. One clan day at the 1730 01:46:26,800 --> 01:46:29,160 Speaker 1: Texas State Fair, for instance, in October nineteen twenty three, 1731 01:46:29,240 --> 01:46:33,840 Speaker 1: drew massive crowds. The Klan had elected sheriffs, judges, legislatures, 1732 01:46:33,840 --> 01:46:36,960 Speaker 1: district attorneys all across the state. They voted as a 1733 01:46:36,960 --> 01:46:40,280 Speaker 1: block and used violence and intimidation to enforce their political will. 1734 01:46:41,320 --> 01:46:44,000 Speaker 1: Their candidate for governor in nineteen twenty four was a 1735 01:46:44,040 --> 01:46:47,200 Speaker 1: gentleman by the name of Felix Robertson, so Pah Ferguson 1736 01:46:47,200 --> 01:46:49,680 Speaker 1: saw an opening. He couldn't run himself, so he put 1737 01:46:49,720 --> 01:46:53,320 Speaker 1: his wife on the ballot, Miriam Ma Ferguson. Miriam Ferguson 1738 01:46:53,360 --> 01:46:55,160 Speaker 1: had spent most of her life as a private citizen, 1739 01:46:55,240 --> 01:46:57,799 Speaker 1: a homemaker who had no political career of her own, 1740 01:46:57,920 --> 01:47:00,559 Speaker 1: and in fact, her initials were M A. And it 1741 01:47:00,600 --> 01:47:02,960 Speaker 1: was a reporter that combined the initials to give her 1742 01:47:03,000 --> 01:47:05,760 Speaker 1: the nickname MA. And then of course Pa ran the 1743 01:47:05,760 --> 01:47:09,240 Speaker 1: campaign behind the scenes, and then they actually used the 1744 01:47:09,280 --> 01:47:13,080 Speaker 1: campaign slogan two governors for the price of one. So 1745 01:47:13,160 --> 01:47:16,000 Speaker 1: Ma wins the Democratic primary over the clan backed Robertson, 1746 01:47:16,360 --> 01:47:19,439 Speaker 1: effectively the election in a one party Texas back at 1747 01:47:19,479 --> 01:47:22,080 Speaker 1: that time there really was no Republican party back then. 1748 01:47:22,400 --> 01:47:25,559 Speaker 1: She then defeated the Republican George Butte in the general election, 1749 01:47:25,960 --> 01:47:29,960 Speaker 1: and in January nineteen twenty five, she was inaugurated, as 1750 01:47:30,000 --> 01:47:32,599 Speaker 1: I said, the second woman governor in American history, because 1751 01:47:33,520 --> 01:47:37,599 Speaker 1: she took her fifteen days after Wyoming's Nelly Taylo Ross, 1752 01:47:37,640 --> 01:47:41,440 Speaker 1: now one of her early campaign promises targeted the Klan directly. 1753 01:47:42,560 --> 01:47:47,320 Speaker 1: She supported an anti masked law aimed at preventing masked 1754 01:47:47,520 --> 01:47:51,799 Speaker 1: clan demonstrations in public. The courts actually would later strike 1755 01:47:51,920 --> 01:47:55,760 Speaker 1: down the law as unconstitutional, but the political damage that 1756 01:47:55,840 --> 01:47:58,439 Speaker 1: she did to the Klan was real and lasting. Clan 1757 01:47:58,479 --> 01:48:02,240 Speaker 1: membership in Texas once you couldn't use those face masks 1758 01:48:02,360 --> 01:48:05,639 Speaker 1: collapse from roughly ninety seven thousand at it's nineteen twenty 1759 01:48:05,680 --> 01:48:08,200 Speaker 1: four peak to about eighteen thousand two years later, and 1760 01:48:08,240 --> 01:48:12,000 Speaker 1: by nineteen twenty seven, the governor declared the plan in 1761 01:48:12,120 --> 01:48:18,559 Speaker 1: Texas effectively dead. Anti mask ordinance. Anyway, there's number three 1762 01:48:18,600 --> 01:48:20,839 Speaker 1: on the list. Number two on the list. The nineteen 1763 01:48:21,000 --> 01:48:25,639 Speaker 1: sixty one Texas Senate special election, John Tower becomes the 1764 01:48:25,680 --> 01:48:31,040 Speaker 1: first Republican to win statewide in Texas since reconstruction. He 1765 01:48:31,120 --> 01:48:35,240 Speaker 1: defeats William Blakely by roughly ten thousand votes out of 1766 01:48:35,280 --> 01:48:39,000 Speaker 1: a million cast, and he has Liberal Democrats to thank 1767 01:48:39,040 --> 01:48:41,800 Speaker 1: for it. So let me give you this setup. LBJ 1768 01:48:41,960 --> 01:48:45,120 Speaker 1: becomes Vice president January sixty one, obviously vacates a senatecy. 1769 01:48:45,720 --> 01:48:48,640 Speaker 1: The city governor is Price Daniel. He appoints a conservative 1770 01:48:48,720 --> 01:48:51,360 Speaker 1: Dallas oil man by the name of William Blakely as 1771 01:48:51,400 --> 01:48:54,880 Speaker 1: the temporary replacement for LBJ until the special election could 1772 01:48:54,880 --> 01:48:57,639 Speaker 1: be held. And they hold the special election pretty quickly there. 1773 01:48:57,840 --> 01:49:00,840 Speaker 1: And here's the rules of that special were fairly unusual. 1774 01:49:00,880 --> 01:49:03,879 Speaker 1: There were no party primaries, so instead there were seventy 1775 01:49:04,000 --> 01:49:07,320 Speaker 1: one candidates, including future Speaker of the House Jim Wright 1776 01:49:07,439 --> 01:49:09,000 Speaker 1: was on this list, by the way. But there were 1777 01:49:09,080 --> 01:49:13,040 Speaker 1: seventy one candidates that appeared on this single ballot, Republicans, Democrats, 1778 01:49:13,040 --> 01:49:15,320 Speaker 1: and Independence all at once. And the idea was the 1779 01:49:15,320 --> 01:49:18,200 Speaker 1: top two finishers would advance to a runoff, regardless of party. 1780 01:49:18,800 --> 01:49:21,720 Speaker 1: Quite the ballot right, seventy one candidates. So how did 1781 01:49:21,760 --> 01:49:24,960 Speaker 1: Tower break through? Well? John Tower was a political science 1782 01:49:24,960 --> 01:49:29,879 Speaker 1: professor at Midwestern State University in Wichita Falls. Genuinely was obscure, 1783 01:49:29,920 --> 01:49:32,200 Speaker 1: not a political figure anyone had expected to matter, but 1784 01:49:32,240 --> 01:49:36,599 Speaker 1: he was the Republican nominee against LBJ in nineteen sixty 1785 01:49:37,640 --> 01:49:40,479 Speaker 1: and here you know LBJ on the ticket with Kennedy. 1786 01:49:40,479 --> 01:49:42,479 Speaker 1: He was on the ballot twice, both as vice president 1787 01:49:42,560 --> 01:49:44,639 Speaker 1: for the electors and then of course he was running 1788 01:49:44,640 --> 01:49:47,840 Speaker 1: for reelection to the Senate. Tower gets a surprisingly strong 1789 01:49:47,880 --> 01:49:50,439 Speaker 1: forty one percent of the vote against the sitting senator. 1790 01:49:51,320 --> 01:49:53,759 Speaker 1: That gave him some name recognition. So in a special election, 1791 01:49:53,800 --> 01:49:56,240 Speaker 1: he ended up leading the seventy one candidate field with 1792 01:49:56,280 --> 01:49:57,920 Speaker 1: about thirty one percent of the vote, and he advanced 1793 01:49:57,960 --> 01:50:01,120 Speaker 1: to the runoff against the leading Demomocrat, which ended up 1794 01:50:01,160 --> 01:50:05,200 Speaker 1: being the appointed Senator Blakely. But here's where the liberal 1795 01:50:05,240 --> 01:50:10,679 Speaker 1: Democrats get involved. You know how today's Texas Republican Party 1796 01:50:10,760 --> 01:50:13,559 Speaker 1: is divided into and it's the dominant party, right, Well, 1797 01:50:13,600 --> 01:50:15,800 Speaker 1: back then it was the Texas Democratic Party that was 1798 01:50:15,840 --> 01:50:20,040 Speaker 1: the dominant party, and they were divided into So here's 1799 01:50:20,080 --> 01:50:22,559 Speaker 1: where things got a bit interesting, and how John Tower 1800 01:50:22,600 --> 01:50:25,920 Speaker 1: has Democrats to thank for becoming the first Republican senator. 1801 01:50:26,320 --> 01:50:29,920 Speaker 1: Texas Democratic partly was very, very divided between the Liberals 1802 01:50:29,960 --> 01:50:32,920 Speaker 1: and the Conservatives, and the Liberals had been losing their 1803 01:50:32,960 --> 01:50:37,040 Speaker 1: own primary for years. The Conservatives were well backed. Blakely 1804 01:50:37,080 --> 01:50:41,040 Speaker 1: represented everything that they hated about the so called conservative establishment. 1805 01:50:41,280 --> 01:50:44,360 Speaker 1: He opposed Third Good Marshal's appointment to a federal jug ship. 1806 01:50:44,800 --> 01:50:47,479 Speaker 1: He was hostile to organize labor. He was, in the 1807 01:50:47,560 --> 01:50:50,639 Speaker 1: view of Texas liberals, a conservative masquerading as a Democrat. 1808 01:50:50,680 --> 01:50:54,519 Speaker 1: But this was Southern conservatives back then would end up 1809 01:50:54,560 --> 01:50:57,760 Speaker 1: being Republican by the nineteen eighties. Now, some of the 1810 01:50:57,800 --> 01:51:00,840 Speaker 1: liberals strategists made a cold calculation in the sixty one 1811 01:51:00,880 --> 01:51:03,880 Speaker 1: special better to let a conservative Democrat lose to a 1812 01:51:03,880 --> 01:51:06,920 Speaker 1: Republican than keep propping up the conservative wing of the 1813 01:51:06,920 --> 01:51:10,360 Speaker 1: Democratic Party. The theory was that if the conservative Democrats 1814 01:51:10,439 --> 01:51:13,840 Speaker 1: kept losing general elections, they'd eventually just migrate to the 1815 01:51:13,840 --> 01:51:17,920 Speaker 1: Republican Party, where they belonged ideologically, and they'd leave the 1816 01:51:17,960 --> 01:51:22,000 Speaker 1: Texas Democratic Party to its liberal wing. Well, congrats, Texas Democrats, 1817 01:51:22,000 --> 01:51:25,040 Speaker 1: you pulled it off eventually. How did that work out? 1818 01:51:25,240 --> 01:51:28,680 Speaker 1: But I digress. So enough liberal Democrats crossed over and 1819 01:51:28,800 --> 01:51:31,720 Speaker 1: voted for Tower. Tower wins the runof by about ten 1820 01:51:31,760 --> 01:51:35,920 Speaker 1: thousand votes, and he becomes the first Republican Senator from 1821 01:51:35,960 --> 01:51:40,120 Speaker 1: Texas since reconstruction. Of course, it is worth noting the 1822 01:51:40,160 --> 01:51:43,639 Speaker 1: Conservatives didn't just leave the Democratic Party. They took Texas 1823 01:51:43,720 --> 01:51:46,559 Speaker 1: with them to the Republicans, and Tower was the first 1824 01:51:46,600 --> 01:51:49,720 Speaker 1: domino in a realignment that ended with Democrats shut out 1825 01:51:49,720 --> 01:51:52,280 Speaker 1: of statewide office for now thirty two years. 1826 01:51:52,320 --> 01:51:52,799 Speaker 3: In county. 1827 01:51:54,000 --> 01:51:57,360 Speaker 1: Anyway, Tower's victory cracked the Democratic slid south than Texas 1828 01:51:57,360 --> 01:52:00,840 Speaker 1: for the first time. The State Republican Party mediately got 1829 01:52:00,840 --> 01:52:03,840 Speaker 1: to double its budget, hired an actual staff, moved its 1830 01:52:03,840 --> 01:52:07,120 Speaker 1: headquarters to Austin. They realized that they could actually become 1831 01:52:07,160 --> 01:52:10,920 Speaker 1: a competitive second political party. Tower would serve twenty four 1832 01:52:11,000 --> 01:52:13,600 Speaker 1: years in the Senate, ended up chair of Armed Services, 1833 01:52:14,040 --> 01:52:17,599 Speaker 1: mentored a generation of Texas Republican operatives, became a major 1834 01:52:17,600 --> 01:52:21,320 Speaker 1: figure in Cold War defense policy. Ended up essentially being 1835 01:52:21,360 --> 01:52:24,000 Speaker 1: humiliated out of politics in a very When he was 1836 01:52:24,040 --> 01:52:29,240 Speaker 1: nominated to be Defense Secretary by George H. W. Bush, 1837 01:52:29,640 --> 01:52:34,559 Speaker 1: his drinking became a big story. He withdraws, he ends 1838 01:52:34,640 --> 01:52:39,360 Speaker 1: up not getting actually he did. The Senate rejected him. 1839 01:52:39,400 --> 01:52:41,000 Speaker 1: It was so unusually. He actually went for a voke 1840 01:52:41,040 --> 01:52:46,960 Speaker 1: becaus he was a sitting senator. Senate rejected him and 1841 01:52:48,280 --> 01:52:51,280 Speaker 1: Dick Cheney would be the backup plan for Defense Secretary. 1842 01:52:51,520 --> 01:52:54,439 Speaker 1: Tower himself would die two years after being rejected by 1843 01:52:54,479 --> 01:52:58,599 Speaker 1: the Senate. But the most important thing to know about 1844 01:52:58,600 --> 01:53:01,519 Speaker 1: this race is the sixty one victory modern Texas. The 1845 01:53:01,680 --> 01:53:05,439 Speaker 1: modern Republican Texas Republican Party was born with that sixty 1846 01:53:05,439 --> 01:53:10,559 Speaker 1: one special election victory, and the number one race on 1847 01:53:10,600 --> 01:53:13,400 Speaker 1: my list of all timers is the nineteen forty eight 1848 01:53:13,439 --> 01:53:19,960 Speaker 1: Texas Democratic Senate primary, LBJ beats Coke Stevenson by eighty 1849 01:53:20,320 --> 01:53:25,560 Speaker 1: seven votes, eighty seven votes out of nearly one million casts. 1850 01:53:25,960 --> 01:53:28,280 Speaker 1: If those eighty seven votes go the other way, Lyndon 1851 01:53:28,360 --> 01:53:32,920 Speaker 1: Johnson probably never becomes president. So you could argue it's 1852 01:53:32,960 --> 01:53:36,080 Speaker 1: the most consequential eighty seven votes in American political history. 1853 01:53:36,520 --> 01:53:40,080 Speaker 1: Does the Civil Rights Act pass, let alone get signed 1854 01:53:40,080 --> 01:53:44,280 Speaker 1: by LBJ. So let me give you a little backstory. 1855 01:53:44,640 --> 01:53:47,280 Speaker 1: By nineteen forty eight, LBJ had served eleven years in 1856 01:53:47,320 --> 01:53:49,439 Speaker 1: the House of Representatives. He was a protegee of FDR. 1857 01:53:49,479 --> 01:53:53,000 Speaker 1: He was a new dealer, fierce operator in the new 1858 01:53:53,080 --> 01:53:56,120 Speaker 1: deal in the FDR machine. But he'd figure something. House 1859 01:53:56,120 --> 01:53:58,120 Speaker 1: in the House, you climb the seniority ladder, but you 1860 01:53:58,120 --> 01:54:00,360 Speaker 1: have to wait. The Senate was where he thought real 1861 01:54:00,400 --> 01:54:03,639 Speaker 1: power in Congress lived, and he didn't have to wait 1862 01:54:04,000 --> 01:54:07,639 Speaker 1: for seniority. And Johnson didn't have patience for waiting. He'd 1863 01:54:07,640 --> 01:54:09,479 Speaker 1: already run for the Senate once in nineteen forty one, 1864 01:54:09,520 --> 01:54:11,479 Speaker 1: and he lost a race that was itself probably stolen 1865 01:54:11,520 --> 01:54:14,320 Speaker 1: from him. So he decided he wasn't going to wait 1866 01:54:14,320 --> 01:54:18,479 Speaker 1: any longer. So who was Coke Stevenson? This is important 1867 01:54:18,479 --> 01:54:22,160 Speaker 1: context because Stevenson wasn't some unknown challenger. He was one 1868 01:54:22,200 --> 01:54:25,880 Speaker 1: of the most formidable politicians in Texas history. As Robert 1869 01:54:25,880 --> 01:54:31,080 Speaker 1: Carrow in the Incredible biographical series on Johnson, he notes 1870 01:54:31,080 --> 01:54:34,400 Speaker 1: that Stevenson had run for public office twelve times, County judge, 1871 01:54:34,440 --> 01:54:37,280 Speaker 1: state legislator, Speaker of the House, lieutenant governor, governor. He 1872 01:54:37,320 --> 01:54:41,880 Speaker 1: never lost, not once. When Texas legislator summed it up simply, 1873 01:54:41,920 --> 01:54:45,240 Speaker 1: Coke Stevenson was just like Coca Cola. He was quiet, 1874 01:54:45,840 --> 01:54:50,280 Speaker 1: deeply conservative, personally incorruptible. He projected an image of a 1875 01:54:50,280 --> 01:54:52,360 Speaker 1: man who didn't need to seek power. Power just came 1876 01:54:52,400 --> 01:54:55,280 Speaker 1: to him. He'd spent all of nineteen forty seven on 1877 01:54:55,320 --> 01:54:57,800 Speaker 1: his ranch, and friends had talked him in to run it. 1878 01:54:58,480 --> 01:55:01,080 Speaker 1: Johnson ran one of the first his modern campaigns in 1879 01:55:01,120 --> 01:55:03,680 Speaker 1: American history. He was the first candidate in Texas to 1880 01:55:03,720 --> 01:55:07,560 Speaker 1: campaign by helicopter. He swooped into small towns from the air, 1881 01:55:07,680 --> 01:55:12,720 Speaker 1: drawing crowds, working them with his volcanic energy, moving on 1882 01:55:12,800 --> 01:55:16,240 Speaker 1: before the next stop. He broadcasts statewide radio nearly every day. 1883 01:55:16,520 --> 01:55:20,680 Speaker 1: Right Being connected to that fledgling radio industry was a 1884 01:55:20,760 --> 01:55:23,360 Speaker 1: huge so he run a modern media campaign and a 1885 01:55:23,400 --> 01:55:28,080 Speaker 1: barnstorming campaign, and the contrast in styles was itself part 1886 01:55:28,080 --> 01:55:31,200 Speaker 1: of the campaign. One man was the future, one man 1887 01:55:31,280 --> 01:55:35,240 Speaker 1: was the past. So the fight between Johnson and Stevenson 1888 01:55:35,280 --> 01:55:39,160 Speaker 1: wasn't just personal. It reflected a genuine ideological divide inside 1889 01:55:39,160 --> 01:55:42,800 Speaker 1: the Texas Democratic Party. Stevenson was aligned with the anti 1890 01:55:42,920 --> 01:55:46,919 Speaker 1: Truman faction, the Texas Regulars as they were called Conservative Democrats, 1891 01:55:46,960 --> 01:55:50,520 Speaker 1: who opposed both FDR and Truman's New Deal liberalism and 1892 01:55:50,520 --> 01:55:54,720 Speaker 1: were sympathetic to the emerging Dixiecraft movement. Johnson was aligned 1893 01:55:54,720 --> 01:55:58,040 Speaker 1: with the pro Truman Texas Loyalists. They were labor backed, 1894 01:55:58,080 --> 01:56:00,320 Speaker 1: they were the New Deal wing of the party. So 1895 01:56:00,360 --> 01:56:03,640 Speaker 1: Truman understood what was at stake. His entire national operation 1896 01:56:03,720 --> 01:56:06,760 Speaker 1: back Johnson, and in late September eighteen forty eight, right 1897 01:56:06,760 --> 01:56:11,080 Speaker 1: in the middle of the contested post election period, Truman 1898 01:56:11,160 --> 01:56:15,400 Speaker 1: brought his famous whistlestop campaign through Texas. Johnson and Truman 1899 01:56:15,440 --> 01:56:17,760 Speaker 1: were photographed together on the back of that train in Austin. 1900 01:56:19,000 --> 01:56:21,400 Speaker 1: The image mattered the liberal wing of the National Democratic 1901 01:56:21,400 --> 01:56:24,600 Speaker 1: Party had a stake in Johnson winning Stevenson. A Stevenson 1902 01:56:24,640 --> 01:56:26,800 Speaker 1: victory would have been a signal that the Dixie krat 1903 01:56:27,000 --> 01:56:31,960 Speaker 1: faction was ascended in Texas. Johnson also weaponized the Cold War. 1904 01:56:32,280 --> 01:56:35,000 Speaker 1: This was a nineteen forty eight Soviet Union had just 1905 01:56:35,040 --> 01:56:37,200 Speaker 1: blockaded Berlin. China was on the verge of falling to 1906 01:56:37,280 --> 01:56:39,960 Speaker 1: the Communists. The Alger Hiss spy case was in the news. 1907 01:56:40,240 --> 01:56:45,320 Speaker 1: Americans were genuinely frightened. Johnson hammered Stevenson as an isolationist. 1908 01:56:46,000 --> 01:56:48,640 Speaker 1: The kind of thinking that he said invited aggression leads 1909 01:56:48,640 --> 01:56:53,280 Speaker 1: to appeasement. He explicitly invoked Neville, Chamberlain and Hitler. When 1910 01:56:53,320 --> 01:56:55,720 Speaker 1: you don't confront evil early, you end up fighting it 1911 01:56:55,760 --> 01:57:00,240 Speaker 1: at home. So for Texas audiences in nineteen forty eight, 1912 01:57:00,560 --> 01:57:04,560 Speaker 1: obviously that framing landed. It was also the exact argument 1913 01:57:04,600 --> 01:57:08,480 Speaker 1: Truman needed Johnson to be making in the South. Of course, 1914 01:57:08,520 --> 01:57:11,760 Speaker 1: the first primary between these gentlemen was in July, and 1915 01:57:11,800 --> 01:57:14,600 Speaker 1: it produced no majority. Johnson and Stevenson went on to 1916 01:57:14,600 --> 01:57:18,400 Speaker 1: have a runoff on August twenty eighth. On election night, 1917 01:57:19,120 --> 01:57:23,040 Speaker 1: Coke Stevenson appeared to have won his lead held as 1918 01:57:23,080 --> 01:57:26,839 Speaker 1: returns came in, and then six days after the polls closed, 1919 01:57:27,200 --> 01:57:32,600 Speaker 1: officials in jim Wells County reported finding additional ballots Precinct 1920 01:57:32,720 --> 01:57:37,280 Speaker 1: thirteen or Box thirteen in the small South Texas town 1921 01:57:37,280 --> 01:57:41,600 Speaker 1: of Alice, two hundred and three additional votes two hundred 1922 01:57:41,600 --> 01:57:45,720 Speaker 1: for Johnson, three for Stevenson. The names were all written 1923 01:57:45,760 --> 01:57:49,880 Speaker 1: in the same handwriting in the same ink in alphabetical order. 1924 01:57:51,080 --> 01:57:53,120 Speaker 1: Some of the voters listed were not in town on 1925 01:57:53,200 --> 01:57:57,720 Speaker 1: election day, some others were dead. The man behind it 1926 01:57:57,800 --> 01:58:00,440 Speaker 1: was a political boss of South Texas named George Parr. 1927 01:58:00,760 --> 01:58:04,000 Speaker 1: He was known as the Duke of Duval. Parr controlled 1928 01:58:04,000 --> 01:58:06,240 Speaker 1: the machine that ran elections in that part of the state, 1929 01:58:06,960 --> 01:58:10,320 Speaker 1: and he decided his allegiance lay with Johnson. The election 1930 01:58:10,440 --> 01:58:12,800 Speaker 1: judge who actually created the fraudulent ballots was a man 1931 01:58:12,880 --> 01:58:16,160 Speaker 1: named Luis Sallas. He stayed quiet for nearly three decades, 1932 01:58:16,160 --> 01:58:19,760 Speaker 1: and then, in nineteen seventy seven, after so many people 1933 01:58:19,840 --> 01:58:23,120 Speaker 1: had died LBJ was no longer alive, he sat down 1934 01:58:23,120 --> 01:58:26,040 Speaker 1: with an AP reporter named James Mangan and confessed it 1935 01:58:26,120 --> 01:58:28,720 Speaker 1: all on tape. Salas said that on Parr's order, he 1936 01:58:28,760 --> 01:58:30,760 Speaker 1: had fabricated the last two hundred and two votes from 1937 01:58:30,760 --> 01:58:34,480 Speaker 1: Precinct thirteen. Those tape interviews have since been donated to 1938 01:58:34,520 --> 01:58:37,840 Speaker 1: the LBJ Presidential Library. You can go listen to him 1939 01:58:37,840 --> 01:58:43,800 Speaker 1: yourself anyway, Johnson wins by eighty seven votes landslide lended. 1940 01:58:44,280 --> 01:58:46,800 Speaker 1: Stevenson challenged the result all the way to federal court. 1941 01:58:48,680 --> 01:58:51,680 Speaker 1: He even hired Frank Hamer, the Texas ranger who had 1942 01:58:52,000 --> 01:58:55,880 Speaker 1: killed Bonnie and Clyde, to investigate. Johnson's attorney was Abe Forties, 1943 01:58:56,600 --> 01:58:59,200 Speaker 1: successfully argued that federal courts had no jurisdiction over a 1944 01:58:59,240 --> 01:59:02,879 Speaker 1: state party primer Fordison should be noted later was rewarded 1945 01:59:02,880 --> 01:59:07,160 Speaker 1: with a Supreme Court seat by Lyndon Johnson. Johnson was 1946 01:59:07,200 --> 01:59:09,720 Speaker 1: certified the winner the general election in November was against 1947 01:59:09,720 --> 01:59:13,480 Speaker 1: a Republican named Jack Porter. Never in doubt, and let's 1948 01:59:13,520 --> 01:59:16,320 Speaker 1: just say, without those eighty seven votes, real or manufactured, 1949 01:59:16,400 --> 01:59:19,000 Speaker 1: Lyndon Johnson goes, perhaps goes back to the House of 1950 01:59:19,040 --> 01:59:22,440 Speaker 1: Representatives or who knows. No Senate career means no Senate 1951 01:59:22,440 --> 01:59:25,120 Speaker 1: majority leader, Johnson the most powerful Senate leader of the 1952 01:59:25,160 --> 01:59:28,760 Speaker 1: twentieth century. No majority leader means no vice presidential nomination 1953 01:59:28,800 --> 01:59:31,960 Speaker 1: in nineteen sixty, no vice president means no President Johnson 1954 01:59:31,960 --> 01:59:37,600 Speaker 1: after Dallas. It's amazing. Robert Carroll spent decades documenting this race. 1955 01:59:38,000 --> 01:59:40,960 Speaker 1: His conclusion, essentially was the eighty seven vote margin and 1956 01:59:41,000 --> 01:59:43,640 Speaker 1: a South Dexas Precinct is one of those moments where 1957 01:59:43,640 --> 01:59:47,400 Speaker 1: a tiny contingent event cascades and does something that reshapes 1958 01:59:47,440 --> 01:59:53,720 Speaker 1: the world. A butterfly flaps its wings, perhaps illegally, and 1959 01:59:53,840 --> 01:59:56,560 Speaker 1: history has changed. So there you go. You see why 1960 01:59:56,600 --> 01:59:58,680 Speaker 1: I love campaign history. There's so many incredible stories. So 1961 01:59:58,720 --> 02:00:01,040 Speaker 1: those are my top five. Go back and do him again, 1962 02:00:01,120 --> 02:00:04,440 Speaker 1: real fast. Number five the two thousand and two governor's race, 1963 02:00:04,560 --> 02:00:07,080 Speaker 1: Rick Perry winning only governor yet to win under win 1964 02:00:07,120 --> 02:00:09,480 Speaker 1: reelection with less than forty percent of the vote. Number 1965 02:00:09,480 --> 02:00:12,240 Speaker 1: four Bush versus Anne Richards, the birth of a President. 1966 02:00:12,560 --> 02:00:16,240 Speaker 1: Number three Ma Ferguson's win in nineteen twenty four over Klansmen. 1967 02:00:16,760 --> 02:00:20,640 Speaker 1: Number two John Tower, the first Republican to break the 1968 02:00:20,720 --> 02:00:23,560 Speaker 1: mold in Texas. And number one, of course, the LBJ 1969 02:00:23,720 --> 02:00:28,200 Speaker 1: and the magical eighty seven votes that he wins by 1970 02:00:29,040 --> 02:00:31,520 Speaker 1: a few races that didn't make the list that you 1971 02:00:31,520 --> 02:00:34,960 Speaker 1: guys might push back on I didn't put in nineteen ninety, 1972 02:00:36,640 --> 02:00:40,280 Speaker 1: which was Anne richards victory over Clayton Williams, who basically 1973 02:00:41,320 --> 02:00:45,680 Speaker 1: threw the race away when he compared rape to bad 1974 02:00:45,720 --> 02:00:47,920 Speaker 1: weather and he said, just sit back and enjoy it. 1975 02:00:49,160 --> 02:00:52,680 Speaker 1: Let's just say Republican women abandon him in Moss and 1976 02:00:52,760 --> 02:00:57,800 Speaker 1: Texas elected its second woman governor after Ma Ferguson nineteen 1977 02:00:57,840 --> 02:01:01,080 Speaker 1: seventy eight, Bill Clements defeats John Helly becomes the first 1978 02:01:01,120 --> 02:01:04,959 Speaker 1: Republican governor of Texas since reconstruction. Bill Clements would famously 1979 02:01:05,160 --> 02:01:07,200 Speaker 1: be involved with the scandal that would take down the 1980 02:01:07,320 --> 02:01:11,160 Speaker 1: SMU football program, and it actually messed with his eighty 1981 02:01:11,200 --> 02:01:15,440 Speaker 1: six he wins reelection, and he wins election in eighty six. 1982 02:01:15,480 --> 02:01:18,480 Speaker 1: He actually went back and forth with Mark White there. 1983 02:01:19,760 --> 02:01:26,040 Speaker 1: But the scandal that took down SMU football also eventually 1984 02:01:26,040 --> 02:01:28,760 Speaker 1: would end the political career of Bill Clements. And then 1985 02:01:29,000 --> 02:01:32,880 Speaker 1: I could argue nineteen seventy Senate race where George H. W. 1986 02:01:33,040 --> 02:01:37,080 Speaker 1: Bush loses to Lloyd Benson. Here's some fun family lore 1987 02:01:37,160 --> 02:01:40,880 Speaker 1: for the Bushes. Bush's victory. The Bush victory in ninety 1988 02:01:40,880 --> 02:01:45,400 Speaker 1: four launches George W. Bush's candidacy for the presidency. In 1989 02:01:45,480 --> 02:01:49,280 Speaker 1: nineteen seventy, George HW loses a Senate race to Lloyd Benson. 1990 02:01:50,560 --> 02:01:54,080 Speaker 1: Nixon consoles him after being recruited by Nixon to challenge 1991 02:01:54,720 --> 02:01:57,720 Speaker 1: at the time a sitting Democratic senator who everybody thought 1992 02:01:57,720 --> 02:02:01,120 Speaker 1: was pretty weak named Ralph Yawborough. Well, of course, Lloyd 1993 02:02:01,280 --> 02:02:02,960 Speaker 1: Lloyd Benson thought he was weak too, and he beats 1994 02:02:03,000 --> 02:02:05,640 Speaker 1: him in a primary, and then Benson beats Bush in 1995 02:02:05,680 --> 02:02:10,880 Speaker 1: the general. But Nixon felt bad that his recruited candidate Leod, 1996 02:02:11,000 --> 02:02:14,360 Speaker 1: so he gave him a succession of appointments you an ambassador, 1997 02:02:14,440 --> 02:02:18,560 Speaker 1: R and C chair, CIA director, all of those that 1998 02:02:18,800 --> 02:02:21,600 Speaker 1: if he if he wins the Senate race, he never 1999 02:02:21,680 --> 02:02:24,480 Speaker 1: serves in any of those three capacities, and maybe he 2000 02:02:24,560 --> 02:02:28,000 Speaker 1: never has the resume to even be thought of as 2001 02:02:28,040 --> 02:02:33,160 Speaker 1: a viable running mate for then Ronald Reagan in nineteen eighty. Anyway, 2002 02:02:35,280 --> 02:02:37,560 Speaker 1: there's your there's there's my top five for this week, 2003 02:02:37,960 --> 02:02:42,080 Speaker 1: little Texas history campaign history. To me, the five most 2004 02:02:42,560 --> 02:02:47,240 Speaker 1: fascinating and consequential camp statewide campaigns in Texas history. What's 2005 02:02:47,280 --> 02:02:52,920 Speaker 1: your top five? And go ahead, quiz me tell me 2006 02:02:53,160 --> 02:02:56,920 Speaker 1: tell me this great stories of your state. I'm I've 2007 02:02:57,320 --> 02:03:01,600 Speaker 1: I've got these in my various archives, and I hope 2008 02:03:01,600 --> 02:03:05,880 Speaker 1: to be sharing them with you throughout this campaign, yere. 2009 02:03:06,080 --> 02:03:15,480 Speaker 1: I think it'll be a lot of fun, ask Chuck. 2010 02:03:18,560 --> 02:03:21,160 Speaker 1: All right, let's get a few questions in here. I'm 2011 02:03:21,160 --> 02:03:25,880 Speaker 1: going to try to do. Here's I'm doing four because 2012 02:03:25,880 --> 02:03:27,920 Speaker 1: I have four complete questions on my screen, so I'm 2013 02:03:27,920 --> 02:03:30,520 Speaker 1: no scrolling. This is how I'm deciding to do it. 2014 02:03:30,560 --> 02:03:34,840 Speaker 1: So first question comes from Mike from Honolulu and he asks, Hey, 2015 02:03:34,840 --> 02:03:38,160 Speaker 1: thanks for the timely past weekend update, real quick on 2016 02:03:38,200 --> 02:03:41,320 Speaker 1: point if mainstream media educates us. On CNN for Reid Zacharia, 2017 02:03:41,320 --> 02:03:44,440 Speaker 1: I did a piece August thirty first, twenty twenty five 2018 02:03:44,480 --> 02:03:46,680 Speaker 1: that lays out the complex history of the US has 2019 02:03:46,720 --> 02:03:49,440 Speaker 1: with Iran. Would appreciate your take on Secretary Pete eggset 2020 02:03:49,600 --> 02:03:51,680 Speaker 1: briefing on Monday morning. I felt confusing, not sure if 2021 02:03:51,680 --> 02:03:54,040 Speaker 1: he was addressing our armed forces or the public. With 2022 02:03:54,160 --> 02:03:57,120 Speaker 1: a gesture that reminded me of King George six over 2023 02:03:57,160 --> 02:03:59,480 Speaker 1: and over again, we tried to find a peaceful way out. 2024 02:04:00,080 --> 02:04:02,840 Speaker 1: Ron started this, how real are our country's objectives? Thinks 2025 02:04:02,880 --> 02:04:04,720 Speaker 1: for all your work, Well, Mike, I think this is 2026 02:04:04,840 --> 02:04:08,680 Speaker 1: it's clear that there this is they're searching for a 2027 02:04:08,800 --> 02:04:12,200 Speaker 1: rationale that they think the public will buy. They you know, 2028 02:04:14,680 --> 02:04:17,240 Speaker 1: the best reason to do this is not a very 2029 02:04:17,280 --> 02:04:21,080 Speaker 1: strong rationale to do this, which is they're vulnerable at 2030 02:04:21,080 --> 02:04:23,800 Speaker 1: the moment. You're never going to have a time. This 2031 02:04:23,880 --> 02:04:26,240 Speaker 1: might be the weakest they are and if you want 2032 02:04:26,280 --> 02:04:28,320 Speaker 1: to do regime change, this may be the best time 2033 02:04:28,360 --> 02:04:32,440 Speaker 1: to do it. That's not you know, right when you 2034 02:04:32,520 --> 02:04:36,120 Speaker 1: can't tell the truth on your rationale and you start 2035 02:04:36,160 --> 02:04:38,360 Speaker 1: looking for others, Well, they could be this, and they 2036 02:04:38,360 --> 02:04:41,200 Speaker 1: could be that, and they could be this. It starts 2037 02:04:41,200 --> 02:04:43,880 Speaker 1: to look an awful lot like Iraq. And I think 2038 02:04:43,920 --> 02:04:47,480 Speaker 1: that's what they're stumbling into here. And you know, they're 2039 02:04:47,520 --> 02:04:49,840 Speaker 1: finding out that all of a sudden, look at how 2040 02:04:49,840 --> 02:04:51,920 Speaker 1: many Middle Look how many countries in the Middle East 2041 02:04:51,960 --> 02:04:59,840 Speaker 1: have already been hit with stray stray fire, intentional arms. 2042 02:05:01,080 --> 02:05:04,160 Speaker 1: What we get four or five countries already? This could 2043 02:05:04,960 --> 02:05:09,800 Speaker 1: quickly get out of control in a hurry. And I 2044 02:05:09,840 --> 02:05:13,720 Speaker 1: think that this they're really struggling with the rationale because 2045 02:05:13,720 --> 02:05:17,600 Speaker 1: the rationale is thin. There isn't a lot of you know, 2046 02:05:17,640 --> 02:05:21,080 Speaker 1: you want to talk about questioning the intelligence behind the 2047 02:05:21,200 --> 02:05:24,720 Speaker 1: WMD during the run up to the Iraq War, where's 2048 02:05:24,760 --> 02:05:29,440 Speaker 1: the intelligence that indicates where they were with their nuclear 2049 02:05:29,480 --> 02:05:32,440 Speaker 1: and reconstituting the nuclear programmer where they were in ballistic 2050 02:05:32,720 --> 02:05:36,720 Speaker 1: missiles essentially about the best case. I feel like I've 2051 02:05:36,760 --> 02:05:39,960 Speaker 1: heard from Rubio and Hank Set doesn't have it. I mean, 2052 02:05:39,960 --> 02:05:42,160 Speaker 1: he's just not very good at this, and he doesn't 2053 02:05:42,200 --> 02:05:44,400 Speaker 1: have a great grasp of history either, so I think 2054 02:05:44,440 --> 02:05:47,280 Speaker 1: he really struggles here. But if you listen to Rubio, 2055 02:05:47,680 --> 02:05:55,840 Speaker 1: you know the essentially it's a preemptive strike against a 2056 02:05:55,880 --> 02:06:02,440 Speaker 1: country that has the ambition to attack us but doesn't 2057 02:06:02,480 --> 02:06:05,760 Speaker 1: have the means yet, and it goes back. I think 2058 02:06:05,800 --> 02:06:09,880 Speaker 1: we all thought we learned a lesson about pre emptive wars. 2059 02:06:10,440 --> 02:06:12,000 Speaker 1: But I have to tell you this. I'll tell you 2060 02:06:12,040 --> 02:06:15,160 Speaker 1: something that I'm really one of the other rationales that 2061 02:06:15,200 --> 02:06:18,280 Speaker 1: I think say terrible rationale. I don't buy it at all, 2062 02:06:18,800 --> 02:06:20,960 Speaker 1: but I really hate that they're pushing this one. I'll 2063 02:06:20,960 --> 02:06:23,560 Speaker 1: just be honest with you here personally, because I think 2064 02:06:23,560 --> 02:06:29,720 Speaker 1: it impacts a lot of Jewish Americans, which is Rubio 2065 02:06:29,760 --> 02:06:31,320 Speaker 1: seemed to say, well, Israel was going to do it 2066 02:06:31,400 --> 02:06:33,400 Speaker 1: regardless of what we did, and we were going to 2067 02:06:33,400 --> 02:06:34,920 Speaker 1: get drawn in any way, so we might as well 2068 02:06:34,960 --> 02:06:36,440 Speaker 1: be there at the beginning. And you're just sitting there 2069 02:06:36,480 --> 02:06:40,040 Speaker 1: going so you're telling the American people that Israel's making 2070 02:06:40,080 --> 02:06:43,280 Speaker 1: this decision for the United States. What are you doing? 2071 02:06:44,120 --> 02:06:49,880 Speaker 1: You want to talk about stoking more of this of 2072 02:06:50,000 --> 02:06:53,240 Speaker 1: this sentiment out here that to me is in some places, 2073 02:06:53,360 --> 02:06:57,160 Speaker 1: overdone and overcooked in some places, and the conspiracy theories 2074 02:06:57,200 --> 02:07:00,760 Speaker 1: that it's this, it's Israel that drives our pe policy, 2075 02:07:01,240 --> 02:07:02,960 Speaker 1: and then you go out there and say it's Israel 2076 02:07:03,000 --> 02:07:08,360 Speaker 1: that drove our policy decision here. If that's the case, 2077 02:07:08,480 --> 02:07:11,480 Speaker 1: then don't be surprised if you if you know, now 2078 02:07:11,560 --> 02:07:14,000 Speaker 1: you know we're all wondering why is there a rise 2079 02:07:14,120 --> 02:07:19,160 Speaker 1: in anti Semitism, a rise in anti Jewish rhetoric, and 2080 02:07:19,240 --> 02:07:24,600 Speaker 1: how it gets conflated with anti Israel rhetoric. Well, when 2081 02:07:24,640 --> 02:07:29,880 Speaker 1: you now say, use a rationale essentially saying that Israel 2082 02:07:29,960 --> 02:07:31,360 Speaker 1: is going to do this regardless of what we did, 2083 02:07:31,400 --> 02:07:34,840 Speaker 1: so we chose to go with them. You know you 2084 02:07:34,880 --> 02:07:38,520 Speaker 1: already have you have critics and the left and the 2085 02:07:38,640 --> 02:07:46,120 Speaker 1: right who are very skeptical of having Israel Israel's national 2086 02:07:46,120 --> 02:07:53,960 Speaker 1: security concerns become America's national security concerns. So that again, 2087 02:07:54,360 --> 02:07:57,640 Speaker 1: I think this administration searching for a rationale because the 2088 02:07:57,680 --> 02:08:00,720 Speaker 1: real rationale is very hard to sell, which is, hey, 2089 02:08:01,120 --> 02:08:03,480 Speaker 1: they were weak and we thought we can get them 2090 02:08:03,480 --> 02:08:06,040 Speaker 1: in a moment. And oh, by the way, the Saudis 2091 02:08:06,080 --> 02:08:08,440 Speaker 1: thought this was the best idea and the sad So 2092 02:08:08,480 --> 02:08:11,960 Speaker 1: it's not that much better that the Saudis were pushing 2093 02:08:12,000 --> 02:08:15,040 Speaker 1: us either, which you know when you realize that the 2094 02:08:15,080 --> 02:08:19,240 Speaker 1: Saudis are funding the businesses of the President's son and 2095 02:08:19,360 --> 02:08:21,640 Speaker 1: his son in law, Jared Kushner. And oh, by the way, 2096 02:08:21,720 --> 02:08:26,760 Speaker 1: Jared Kushner was one of the negotiators with the Iranians 2097 02:08:26,880 --> 02:08:30,280 Speaker 1: on trying to have a diplomatic exit ramp here so 2098 02:08:30,320 --> 02:08:32,960 Speaker 1: that we didn't end up in war. Yet his biggest 2099 02:08:33,040 --> 02:08:38,360 Speaker 1: financial benefactor, the Sovereign Fund of Saudi Arabia, the Crown Prince, 2100 02:08:38,480 --> 02:08:41,240 Speaker 1: is lobbying the President to take out Iran. Now this 2101 02:08:41,320 --> 02:08:49,320 Speaker 1: is the moment to strike. That's incredibly disconcerting when you 2102 02:08:49,360 --> 02:08:52,960 Speaker 1: start to follow the money and connecting those dots on 2103 02:08:53,040 --> 02:09:00,160 Speaker 1: that front. So bottom line, I think they're flailing at them. 2104 02:09:00,640 --> 02:09:02,680 Speaker 1: And again I go back to something I said to 2105 02:09:02,760 --> 02:09:08,600 Speaker 1: Chris Eliza earlier. The biggest problem Trump has right now 2106 02:09:08,680 --> 02:09:12,480 Speaker 1: is the best, the best news that he could get 2107 02:09:12,520 --> 02:09:14,880 Speaker 1: from this war has already passed, and it's the death 2108 02:09:14,920 --> 02:09:20,640 Speaker 1: of Kamane. There is no other announcement of news that 2109 02:09:20,880 --> 02:09:24,360 Speaker 1: is going to move the public that's more than the 2110 02:09:24,400 --> 02:09:29,240 Speaker 1: death of Kamane. And so every the longer this goes, 2111 02:09:29,360 --> 02:09:32,200 Speaker 1: it is this is again, it's it's at best this 2112 02:09:32,240 --> 02:09:35,560 Speaker 1: is a neutral political problem for him. But the most 2113 02:09:35,640 --> 02:09:38,919 Speaker 1: likely scenarios that this is a net negative across the board, 2114 02:09:39,040 --> 02:09:41,760 Speaker 1: whether it's in his own party and it starts an 2115 02:09:41,760 --> 02:09:44,560 Speaker 1: intra party debate inside his own party or with the 2116 02:09:44,640 --> 02:09:49,120 Speaker 1: vast middle. And we've seen independents look like Democrats in 2117 02:09:49,160 --> 02:09:53,760 Speaker 1: their opposition in the early polling. I've seen on a rock. 2118 02:09:54,640 --> 02:09:56,560 Speaker 1: All right. Next question comes from Frank and New Jersey 2119 02:09:56,640 --> 02:09:59,080 Speaker 1: SYS regular listener here, first time emailer. Hey, I know 2120 02:09:59,120 --> 02:10:01,360 Speaker 1: Congress is considering more Powers Act to restrain what the 2121 02:10:01,400 --> 02:10:03,240 Speaker 1: president can do. Of course it won't be signed by 2122 02:10:03,240 --> 02:10:05,360 Speaker 1: the president even if it passes. But why is it 2123 02:10:05,360 --> 02:10:07,400 Speaker 1: that even is that even needed? If the power of 2124 02:10:07,440 --> 02:10:09,800 Speaker 1: war is already with Congress for the Constitution. So how 2125 02:10:09,800 --> 02:10:11,880 Speaker 1: would Congress restrain the president? Do they bring it to 2126 02:10:11,920 --> 02:10:15,120 Speaker 1: the courts? Can they only act through impeachment? Well they cannot. 2127 02:10:15,560 --> 02:10:18,200 Speaker 1: I know they've got the power of the purse. So 2128 02:10:18,320 --> 02:10:24,360 Speaker 1: in theory they could withhold appropriations they could not fund, 2129 02:10:24,640 --> 02:10:27,720 Speaker 1: or they could withhold appropriations the next time Defense comes in, 2130 02:10:27,800 --> 02:10:30,120 Speaker 1: because guess what the Pentagon's going to ask for a 2131 02:10:30,120 --> 02:10:34,640 Speaker 1: supplemental This is an unbudgeted this was an unplanned war, 2132 02:10:34,720 --> 02:10:38,480 Speaker 1: and we're going to have depleted our munitions, and you know, 2133 02:10:38,480 --> 02:10:44,240 Speaker 1: we're already doing a sort of backdoor sale of arms 2134 02:10:44,280 --> 02:10:47,760 Speaker 1: to Ukraine via NATO, because Trump doesn't look like he's 2135 02:10:47,800 --> 02:10:53,280 Speaker 1: directing directly giving selling weapons to Ukraine, he's doing it 2136 02:10:53,320 --> 02:10:57,120 Speaker 1: through NATO. So there's no doubt that the Defense Department 2137 02:10:57,200 --> 02:10:59,280 Speaker 1: is going to come to Congress with the request for 2138 02:10:59,360 --> 02:11:02,120 Speaker 1: supplemental So in theory, it's it's simply the power of 2139 02:11:02,160 --> 02:11:04,800 Speaker 1: the purse. That is where they where they can have 2140 02:11:04,840 --> 02:11:11,760 Speaker 1: the most leverage. But you know, this this until a president. 2141 02:11:13,120 --> 02:11:15,920 Speaker 1: You know, there's a lot of presidential legal scholar that 2142 02:11:16,000 --> 02:11:18,120 Speaker 1: doesn't accept the premise of the War Powers Act at 2143 02:11:18,120 --> 02:11:23,760 Speaker 1: all anyway, and that it isn't fully tested in the Constitution, 2144 02:11:24,000 --> 02:11:29,520 Speaker 1: and that hasn't been tested in supring court. So it's like, 2145 02:11:29,680 --> 02:11:33,240 Speaker 1: is this a war? Is this something else? You know, 2146 02:11:33,560 --> 02:11:35,640 Speaker 1: I think every time he calls it a war, he's 2147 02:11:35,760 --> 02:11:40,120 Speaker 1: proving how unconstitutional this action is. It looks more illegal 2148 02:11:40,200 --> 02:11:45,200 Speaker 1: or unconstitutional than than than finding a through line to 2149 02:11:45,240 --> 02:11:49,280 Speaker 1: make this to make this constitutional. And I don't see it. 2150 02:11:49,680 --> 02:11:53,520 Speaker 1: But you know, Congress has ceded so much authority to 2151 02:11:53,560 --> 02:11:57,959 Speaker 1: the president when it comes to the use of the military, 2152 02:11:58,000 --> 02:12:00,200 Speaker 1: and then there's you know these well, as long as 2153 02:12:00,200 --> 02:12:03,440 Speaker 1: you inform Congress, well, what is the definition of informing Congress? 2154 02:12:03,480 --> 02:12:05,880 Speaker 1: Is it just informing the leadership or is informing all 2155 02:12:05,920 --> 02:12:10,840 Speaker 1: of Congress? But look, impeachment's the most extreme measure that 2156 02:12:10,880 --> 02:12:12,480 Speaker 1: they have. But they have the power of the purse, 2157 02:12:13,440 --> 02:12:15,840 Speaker 1: and I'll be very curious to see how the supplemental 2158 02:12:16,800 --> 02:12:19,360 Speaker 1: support goes. I mean, it's usually unpopular not to pay 2159 02:12:19,360 --> 02:12:23,880 Speaker 1: the troops, so ultimately you know it, you know, there's 2160 02:12:24,080 --> 02:12:27,080 Speaker 1: usually that gets weaponized and makes it a very very 2161 02:12:27,120 --> 02:12:33,160 Speaker 1: tough vote. But I that I'm not ruling out that 2162 02:12:33,160 --> 02:12:37,160 Speaker 1: that becomes a very close vote when and it's inevitable 2163 02:12:37,200 --> 02:12:39,880 Speaker 1: they have to They've got there, We're going to we 2164 02:12:40,040 --> 02:12:42,800 Speaker 1: have munitions issues that this is going to put us 2165 02:12:42,840 --> 02:12:46,560 Speaker 1: through four to six weeks. You know, the Department of 2166 02:12:46,560 --> 02:12:49,720 Speaker 1: Defense is going to be begging for an appropriation supplement 2167 02:12:50,440 --> 02:12:54,400 Speaker 1: and that's where Congress in theory, could have real leverage 2168 02:12:54,440 --> 02:12:57,320 Speaker 1: if they if they so choose to use it, which 2169 02:12:57,360 --> 02:13:02,760 Speaker 1: of course we know most Congresses don't. Next question comes 2170 02:13:02,760 --> 02:13:04,840 Speaker 1: from John from Annapolis and he writes, Hey, I'm a 2171 02:13:04,880 --> 02:13:06,680 Speaker 1: big fan of the show glad to have more options 2172 02:13:06,720 --> 02:13:08,879 Speaker 1: now for how to get your take on what's happening 2173 02:13:09,000 --> 02:13:11,400 Speaker 1: and what's happened as I work on my taxes and 2174 02:13:11,400 --> 02:13:13,320 Speaker 1: see the amount I pay, it adds a certain sting 2175 02:13:13,400 --> 02:13:15,560 Speaker 1: to the news regarding how our tax dollars are being 2176 02:13:15,560 --> 02:13:17,680 Speaker 1: spent on this new war. Yeah, I bet it was 2177 02:13:17,720 --> 02:13:20,560 Speaker 1: widely noted that the administration waited until after the stock 2178 02:13:20,560 --> 02:13:23,320 Speaker 1: market closed to launch strikes in Iran, signaling at least 2179 02:13:23,360 --> 02:13:25,800 Speaker 1: some thought to the timing. My question is do you 2180 02:13:25,840 --> 02:13:28,560 Speaker 1: think this seemingly optional war would be received better by 2181 02:13:28,560 --> 02:13:31,200 Speaker 1: the American public if it were not launched during tax season? 2182 02:13:32,480 --> 02:13:35,120 Speaker 1: With affordability already a concern in Trump doing nothing to 2183 02:13:35,120 --> 02:13:37,080 Speaker 1: sell the American people on the return on investment of 2184 02:13:37,120 --> 02:13:39,800 Speaker 1: starting a war with Iran, it seems waiting until summer 2185 02:13:39,880 --> 02:13:42,280 Speaker 1: might have been the better option from a messaging standpoint. 2186 02:13:42,640 --> 02:13:46,160 Speaker 1: Go terms, I don't see how there's any good with 2187 02:13:46,240 --> 02:13:49,320 Speaker 1: this Aran deal. Whether you waited till the summer you 2188 02:13:49,440 --> 02:13:54,120 Speaker 1: did it six months ago, I don't know when a 2189 02:13:54,160 --> 02:13:57,680 Speaker 1: good timing. Considering where our heads are at as an electorate, 2190 02:13:57,800 --> 02:14:02,360 Speaker 1: right and how domess focused I think the voters are 2191 02:14:02,520 --> 02:14:07,120 Speaker 1: at the moment. Certainly we have some theoretical fears about 2192 02:14:07,280 --> 02:14:11,480 Speaker 1: communist China or terrorism. But I think our day to 2193 02:14:11,560 --> 02:14:15,000 Speaker 1: day concern continues to be affordability and continues to be 2194 02:14:15,200 --> 02:14:18,240 Speaker 1: sort of you know, I think it's affordability, but it's 2195 02:14:18,240 --> 02:14:20,680 Speaker 1: more than that, right, I think the bigger issue in 2196 02:14:20,720 --> 02:14:23,720 Speaker 1: which is why it's not affordability alone in the economy, 2197 02:14:25,400 --> 02:14:29,320 Speaker 1: I think that that that it's not it's it's you know, 2198 02:14:29,360 --> 02:14:31,440 Speaker 1: it's like, well, people have jobs, we aren't they happy? 2199 02:14:31,520 --> 02:14:34,320 Speaker 1: Though there's this uncertainty. You know, how secure is my 2200 02:14:34,640 --> 02:14:37,360 Speaker 1: job in the age of AI? How secure is my 2201 02:14:37,640 --> 02:14:41,240 Speaker 1: job in this in this unstable war, in this unstable 2202 02:14:41,280 --> 02:14:43,480 Speaker 1: world that we're in at the moment, especially one that 2203 02:14:43,520 --> 02:14:46,880 Speaker 1: feels like we've got a president intentionally making us less 2204 02:14:46,880 --> 02:14:52,600 Speaker 1: stable and secure, not more stable and secure. So, you know, 2205 02:14:52,680 --> 02:14:55,400 Speaker 1: I don't know if I don't I don't know if 2206 02:14:55,480 --> 02:14:57,680 Speaker 1: I buy that it would be any better or worse 2207 02:14:57,720 --> 02:15:02,760 Speaker 1: for taxing. But you bring up an important point. Republicans 2208 02:15:02,920 --> 02:15:05,280 Speaker 1: that are on the ballot in twenty six are counting 2209 02:15:05,280 --> 02:15:09,200 Speaker 1: on tax season to be this positive, to have a 2210 02:15:09,560 --> 02:15:12,800 Speaker 1: to be a positive moment for the average American voter 2211 02:15:13,440 --> 02:15:15,680 Speaker 1: that they realize, oh, I'm getting a bigger refund and 2212 02:15:16,080 --> 02:15:19,520 Speaker 1: all of this, and instead people are going to be 2213 02:15:19,520 --> 02:15:23,560 Speaker 1: looking at it going, yeah, you know, my money's getting 2214 02:15:23,560 --> 02:15:27,880 Speaker 1: eaten up by higher energy prices. Now, oh, look what 2215 02:15:27,960 --> 02:15:30,360 Speaker 1: happened to my What little bit I had in the 2216 02:15:30,400 --> 02:15:36,760 Speaker 1: stock market is now collapsing, right like, So, I just 2217 02:15:36,800 --> 02:15:39,200 Speaker 1: don't know, I just don't know if it you know, yes, 2218 02:15:39,240 --> 02:15:42,160 Speaker 1: I think they've stepped on whatever positive vibe that they 2219 02:15:42,160 --> 02:15:44,720 Speaker 1: wanted to get out of tax season, right which they 2220 02:15:44,760 --> 02:15:46,760 Speaker 1: wanted people to feel like, hey, look, Donald Trump, put 2221 02:15:46,760 --> 02:15:50,280 Speaker 1: more money in your pocket, you can handle this affordability issue, 2222 02:15:50,280 --> 02:15:52,240 Speaker 1: and that that would sort of turn things, turn the 2223 02:15:52,280 --> 02:15:56,800 Speaker 1: perception of this economy, the country's perception about the Republican 2224 02:15:56,840 --> 02:16:00,640 Speaker 1: management of this economy into a positive direction. I do think, 2225 02:16:01,000 --> 02:16:05,280 Speaker 1: you know that the folly of this Iran decision and 2226 02:16:05,400 --> 02:16:07,840 Speaker 1: I and I use the word folly because I, you know, 2227 02:16:07,960 --> 02:16:10,040 Speaker 1: I think it's great that Commenee has gone. I think 2228 02:16:10,040 --> 02:16:15,000 Speaker 1: the possibilities in Iran could be great. I just know 2229 02:16:15,080 --> 02:16:19,800 Speaker 1: that every time we in history tried to orchestrate a 2230 02:16:19,840 --> 02:16:23,440 Speaker 1: regime transition, it just doesn't go well. Uh, And it 2231 02:16:23,560 --> 02:16:27,840 Speaker 1: usually is one of those feelings that it's one step forward, 2232 02:16:27,880 --> 02:16:32,280 Speaker 1: two steps back, and I think that you know, we're 2233 02:16:32,320 --> 02:16:37,360 Speaker 1: seeing why there were so many people quietly preaching caution 2234 02:16:37,520 --> 02:16:40,360 Speaker 1: to Trump on Iran. Right. You know you saw me 2235 02:16:40,480 --> 02:16:44,960 Speaker 1: share an op ed from John Ellis, a Bush cousin, right, 2236 02:16:45,040 --> 02:16:48,640 Speaker 1: part of the Bush clan political observer, longtime political observer 2237 02:16:48,840 --> 02:16:52,600 Speaker 1: is terrific substack that you should subscribe called news items, 2238 02:16:53,080 --> 02:16:56,000 Speaker 1: where he was making the case, hey, don't do Iran. 2239 02:16:56,680 --> 02:17:00,480 Speaker 1: If you if you're looking for an easy, a legacy moment, 2240 02:17:01,120 --> 02:17:06,720 Speaker 1: that might be somewhat easy, go to Cuba. But now 2241 02:17:06,879 --> 02:17:09,720 Speaker 1: by the time he gets to Cuba, it's after a run. 2242 02:17:10,360 --> 02:17:12,280 Speaker 1: He then is going to take away whatever. You know, 2243 02:17:12,480 --> 02:17:16,000 Speaker 1: the potential positives that could have come from Cuba are 2244 02:17:16,080 --> 02:17:18,720 Speaker 1: just simply lessened. They'll be there in South Florida, don't 2245 02:17:18,720 --> 02:17:21,800 Speaker 1: get me wrong, but outside of South Florida this will 2246 02:17:22,560 --> 02:17:25,760 Speaker 1: you know, suddenly it becomes Venezuela, Iran and Cuba. And 2247 02:17:25,800 --> 02:17:28,920 Speaker 1: that's an entirely different way that the American voter will 2248 02:17:28,959 --> 02:17:31,760 Speaker 1: absorb that than if it had been just simply then 2249 02:17:31,800 --> 02:17:38,000 Speaker 1: as will in Cuba. All right, last question comes from Kira, 2250 02:17:38,800 --> 02:17:41,000 Speaker 1: and she writes, Hey, I love listening to your podcast 2251 02:17:41,000 --> 02:17:42,880 Speaker 1: and occasionally my kids here at playing in the kitchen 2252 02:17:42,920 --> 02:17:45,920 Speaker 1: while I'm cooking nice How did you handle explaining complex 2253 02:17:45,959 --> 02:17:49,160 Speaker 1: political topics, particularly international conflicts, to your own kids when 2254 02:17:49,160 --> 02:17:51,800 Speaker 1: they were younger. Of course, each kid in situation is different, 2255 02:17:51,840 --> 02:17:53,400 Speaker 1: but I would love your insights. By the way, my 2256 02:17:53,440 --> 02:17:56,440 Speaker 1: twelve year old is the one who suggested I ask you. So, 2257 02:18:00,840 --> 02:18:03,080 Speaker 1: you know, it's funny you sit there and you think, 2258 02:18:03,240 --> 02:18:06,640 Speaker 1: you know, sometimes you just don't bring it up. Sometimes 2259 02:18:06,680 --> 02:18:11,680 Speaker 1: you you know, my kids went to elementary school here 2260 02:18:11,680 --> 02:18:18,320 Speaker 1: in Arlington, Virginia, and let's just say, you know the 2261 02:18:18,360 --> 02:18:21,960 Speaker 1: fact that their dad was on TV and in Arlington, Virginia, 2262 02:18:22,240 --> 02:18:25,039 Speaker 1: meet the press is like this. It's like a bigger 2263 02:18:25,120 --> 02:18:28,120 Speaker 1: deal in the Washington metro area than it might be 2264 02:18:28,160 --> 02:18:31,680 Speaker 1: someone it's like, you know, other places. So you know, 2265 02:18:31,760 --> 02:18:35,520 Speaker 1: they they would certainly get these, you know, they would 2266 02:18:35,520 --> 02:18:38,080 Speaker 1: always get questions about, well, who's your dad voting for? 2267 02:18:38,200 --> 02:18:40,200 Speaker 1: And I remember one time a teacher told me that 2268 02:18:40,280 --> 02:18:42,080 Speaker 1: my daughter said in class, I think she was in 2269 02:18:42,120 --> 02:18:47,440 Speaker 1: third grade. She said people were begging her, were pounding 2270 02:18:47,440 --> 02:18:49,520 Speaker 1: her as your dad a Democrat or a Republican. And 2271 02:18:50,000 --> 02:18:52,760 Speaker 1: my daughter would say, my dad's a Democrat and a Republican. 2272 02:18:53,879 --> 02:18:58,320 Speaker 1: Because I used to always explain things always from both perspectives. 2273 02:18:58,840 --> 02:19:00,720 Speaker 1: That was what my dad did with me. He did 2274 02:19:00,720 --> 02:19:03,400 Speaker 1: not he had it and he would say, I believe this, 2275 02:19:03,720 --> 02:19:06,680 Speaker 1: here's the here are the two or three arguments about 2276 02:19:06,720 --> 02:19:08,680 Speaker 1: a story. And I think I'd like to think he 2277 02:19:08,720 --> 02:19:13,160 Speaker 1: presented him pretty honestly. I that would be my I 2278 02:19:13,200 --> 02:19:15,760 Speaker 1: would try to try to do my best to explain 2279 02:19:15,800 --> 02:19:18,959 Speaker 1: it that way. I think on some of the international stuff, 2280 02:19:20,920 --> 02:19:24,600 Speaker 1: I you know, you just sort of know, but I 2281 02:19:24,840 --> 02:19:30,480 Speaker 1: guess my my basic advice is don't water it down, 2282 02:19:30,520 --> 02:19:37,320 Speaker 1: don't dumb it down. You know, answer every question. And 2283 02:19:37,360 --> 02:19:41,280 Speaker 1: I had sort of a simple answer, a sort of 2284 02:19:42,360 --> 02:19:44,200 Speaker 1: I'd say, here, well, here's what you might learn in 2285 02:19:44,200 --> 02:19:47,879 Speaker 1: school about this soon. And then there's a there's a 2286 02:19:47,920 --> 02:19:52,280 Speaker 1: more complicated answer that you know that you know would change, 2287 02:19:52,320 --> 02:19:56,760 Speaker 1: and so I kind of, you know, it was never 2288 02:19:58,920 --> 02:20:00,720 Speaker 1: I don't want to say I sheltered them from it, 2289 02:20:00,760 --> 02:20:05,200 Speaker 1: but I actually tried, you know. It was it was 2290 02:20:05,280 --> 02:20:07,959 Speaker 1: more I didn't want to put my kids in the 2291 02:20:08,240 --> 02:20:13,160 Speaker 1: position of having to try to answer questions when their 2292 02:20:13,200 --> 02:20:15,680 Speaker 1: friends would say, well, what does your dad think about X. 2293 02:20:16,480 --> 02:20:18,360 Speaker 1: So there was a time period where in some ways 2294 02:20:19,160 --> 02:20:23,120 Speaker 1: we talked very little about it. But when they asked, 2295 02:20:23,360 --> 02:20:27,520 Speaker 1: I would just tell them, well, look, I think this 2296 02:20:28,680 --> 02:20:31,200 Speaker 1: sometimes if mom and I were on if mom and 2297 02:20:31,280 --> 02:20:33,240 Speaker 1: dad were on different sides of it, your mother thinks this, 2298 02:20:33,400 --> 02:20:36,039 Speaker 1: or we would say, you know, here're the difference. But 2299 02:20:36,200 --> 02:20:38,760 Speaker 1: one of the things that I was obsessed with, and 2300 02:20:40,280 --> 02:20:42,800 Speaker 1: my wife was right is right there with me, is 2301 02:20:42,840 --> 02:20:47,240 Speaker 1: always explaining it from a three sixty perspective. I said, well, 2302 02:20:47,879 --> 02:20:52,160 Speaker 1: here's the flashpoint is this? And so I think it's this, 2303 02:20:52,480 --> 02:20:54,920 Speaker 1: But here's where other people will argue that it's this. 2304 02:20:56,800 --> 02:20:59,640 Speaker 1: Because I wanted them to understand and I didn't want 2305 02:20:59,640 --> 02:21:02,400 Speaker 1: them to be superficial and think that just because somebody 2306 02:21:03,760 --> 02:21:06,240 Speaker 1: thought of something differently than I did, that that meant 2307 02:21:06,480 --> 02:21:09,039 Speaker 1: that they were stupid or whatever. Right I didn't. I 2308 02:21:09,080 --> 02:21:15,360 Speaker 1: didn't want that. So I guess the simplest way to say, 2309 02:21:15,879 --> 02:21:19,680 Speaker 1: answer the question as honestly but simply as you can, 2310 02:21:19,840 --> 02:21:23,600 Speaker 1: and as they get older, you get to add more context. 2311 02:21:24,480 --> 02:21:28,280 Speaker 1: Probably I hope that helps, and I really appreciate the question. 2312 02:21:29,560 --> 02:21:32,120 Speaker 1: And with that, I'm gonna go ahead and put a 2313 02:21:32,120 --> 02:21:35,280 Speaker 1: pin in this episode. As you could see campaign season, 2314 02:21:36,000 --> 02:21:38,200 Speaker 1: I'd like to think, this is what you want, this 2315 02:21:38,280 --> 02:21:41,800 Speaker 1: is why you subscribe, we're gonna have, you know, can't 2316 02:21:41,879 --> 02:21:45,320 Speaker 1: the campaign coverage. There will be no other podcast that 2317 02:21:45,520 --> 02:21:50,160 Speaker 1: goes as in depth, that does as much both history 2318 02:21:50,400 --> 02:21:53,880 Speaker 1: and context and all of this. I promise you Nobody 2319 02:21:53,879 --> 02:21:55,520 Speaker 1: else will do it like we do it here at 2320 02:21:55,520 --> 02:22:00,760 Speaker 1: the Chuck Podcast. So buckle up, it's going to be 2321 02:22:00,879 --> 02:22:05,640 Speaker 1: quite and frankly between now and November twenty twenty eight. 2322 02:22:05,800 --> 02:22:08,480 Speaker 1: In some ways we're going to be NonStop when it 2323 02:22:08,520 --> 02:22:12,680 Speaker 1: comes to campaign season, but it is now here we are, 2324 02:22:14,920 --> 02:22:17,240 Speaker 1: and let's just say the Wednesday episodes are going to 2325 02:22:17,280 --> 02:22:21,040 Speaker 1: be humdingers, because if it's Tuesday, somebody's going to be 2326 02:22:21,080 --> 02:22:24,040 Speaker 1: voting somewhere, and just like we just had with this Tuesday, 2327 02:22:24,600 --> 02:22:26,160 Speaker 1: a lot of people are going to be voting,