WEBVTT - The 2020 Ig Nobel Prizes

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to sbot to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert lamp and I'm Joe McCormick. Hey,

0:00:17.840 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it's our yearly Ignobles episode. That's right, This is a

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>tradition for us. These awards go out generally what mid

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to late September. We always come back and hit them

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in early November, after we're done with all of our

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Halloween content. And it's just, you know, a great way

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to dive back in to, uh, to serious scientific study.

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not joking because granted, these are awards that

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's that celebrate and highlight studies that may seem a

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bit absurd and a bit a bit comical, but generally speaking,

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with with with with actual research that doesn't

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at least in some way expand our scientific knowledge of

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. Right, even if it's funny, you can usually

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>learn something interesting from it, right. So the basics on

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the Igno Belt obviously it's a play on the Nobel Prize. Uh.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>These have been awarded each year since nineteen by the

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Annimals of Improbable Research, which is a publication that uh,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, prides itself on seeking out the absurd and

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the humorous and the whimsical within the realms of legitimate

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>scientific research. The purpose of the award, according to the

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>editors UH is to quote to honor achievements that first

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>make people laugh and then make them think. Furthermore, they

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>stressed that the ten prizes aren't necessarily meant to pass

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>judgment on the winners. Instead, the official website emphasizes that

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>the prizes quote celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative, and

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>spur people's interests in science, medicine, and technology. And the

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>key individual in all this is editor Mark Abrams, who

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>again has been heading this up since now. In some

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>previous years we've covered all of the prizes awarded. We're

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to be doing that this year. We just

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pick out a selection and focus on a

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>few of them that seemed fun or interesting for one

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>episode this year. We might come back with multiple parts

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in future years, but this year we're just sticking with

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the one right and if you want the full list

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>of winners then you should go to www dot Improbable

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Now, this year's ceremonies happened entirely online on Thursday,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>septe um and uh yeah, let's let's dive right in.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what which one are we going to discuss first?

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>What we've We've got to start with a knife made

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of feces, because that seems like the perfect metaphor for

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the year is just being menaced with a blade of

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of excrement, blade of excrement, it shall be. This was

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the Materials Science Prize and it does concern a frozen

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>feces knife. Um. Now to to put this in the

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>correct um, you know, frame of reverence, so to really

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>prepare you for what we're specifically talking about here, I'm

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>going to read a segment here from Shadows in the

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Sun Travels to Landscapes of Spirit and Desire. Uh is

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a book came out by Wade Davis, a Canadian US

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Colombian cultural anthropologist, ethnobotanist, author and photographer. Quote. There is

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a well known account of an old Inuit man who

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>refused to move into a settlement over the objections of

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>his family. He made plans to stay on the ice.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>To stop him, they took away all his tools, so

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of a winter gale, he stepped out

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of their iglue defecated and honed the feces into a

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>frozen blade, which he sharpened with a spray of saliva.

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>With the knife, he killed a dog using its ribbed

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>cage as a sled, and it's high to harness another dog.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>He disappeared into the darkness. WHOA, Now that's that's that's

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty awesome little tail there. That's beyond Rambo levels

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of of improvised tools. I mean, that's that's good stuff,

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>beyond the Giver, beyond Rambo. Yeah, so this is this

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is the account or one of two accounts that the

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>study we're gonna get to is going to deal with.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think that I thought I would point out

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>though for long time listeners of the show, you might

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>recognize the name Wade Davis. Davis has written no numerous

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>books over the years, but he was perhaps most famously

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the author of The Serpent and the Rainbow um, which,

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed on the show before, put forward the

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis that tetrato toxin is linked to the zombie legend

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and Haiti hypo and a hypothesis that proved somewhat controversial. Uh.

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>This is a nonfiction book, but it served as the

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for the West Craven film, which was just an

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>infamously troubled production filmed on location in Haiti, starring Bill Pullman,

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>uh Paul Winfield and I can't remember if there was

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>anybody else really have note in that. But um Shadows

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of the Sun, on the other hand, collects various essays

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>by Davis concerning various parts of the world, including the

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>innuits of the Arctic Circle. But let's get back to

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this poop blade, so material sciences aside. We'll get into

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.599
<v Speaker 1>the material sciences here. This seems like a perfectly great

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>legend of a man so rugged and committed to life

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ice that robbed of his tools, he will

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>forge a blade from his own excrement and use it

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to cut a sled and harness from one dog, and

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>then lash that sled to another dog and then just

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>escape into the wilds. Right. It's sort of the ultimate

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>story of of self reliance and resourcefulness. But it does

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>raise the question is this possible? Could you actually do

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this right? Because what works in legend doesn't necessarily work

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. But that's where this study enters

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the picture to shed light on the legend and see

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>if it melts or see if it holds its form um.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to read the entire title of

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the paper just yet because it gives away the answer.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But essentially this was looking to it was. It had

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with experimental replicate replication of a knife made

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>from frozen human feces, and it was by Aaron at All,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>published in the Journal of Archaeological Science in October of

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. Uh. That is meeting I Aaron, Associate Professor

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of Anthropology and Director of Archaeology at Kent State University. UH.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>He's the key investigator in this. He's also the one

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>who's poop they will use. Now, this is interesting because

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it ties into some stuff we've talked about on the

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>show recently. For example, in the Pike Create episode PI

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Crete is. If you didn't check that one out yet,

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that was a lot of fun. But it's a story

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>about an attempt during World War Two to manufacture a

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of floating armored aircraft carrier out of what would

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>have been a mixture of wood, pulp and ice. And

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.279
<v Speaker 1>it kind of gets you considering the different possibilities of

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of tools and even structures or vehicles you

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>can make out of various types of frozen material, because

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the material properties of water with saturated wood pulp in

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it are are very different when frozen than just plain water. Yeah,

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and and really that the work we did researching PI

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>cret I mean it makes you think, well, maybe this

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>could work, right, because what is fecal matter, But you know,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it has water and it obviously, but it also has

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>these these different depending on the diet. Yeah, there's gonna

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>be some other stuff in there that could potentially add

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to the structure and keep it from shattering. H um. Yeah,

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's one of these things that sounds potentially plausible.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And and again that's where the experiment comes into play.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it does make you wonder what should you

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>eat if you want your fecal matter to be the

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>most knife ready. Yeah. Of course. It's also we mentioned

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Mortal Kombat Sub Zero, the the character the

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>warrior in the video games and the movies that that

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the in addition to freezing people solid and shattering them,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.119
<v Speaker 1>also crafts magical weapons out of out of magical ice.

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh So really this is this is essentially fodder for

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a new Mortal Kombat character, like the poopier version of

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sub zero. Okay, I gotta know the answer, all right, Well,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>let's work our way up to the answers. So, as

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the author's point out, Davis's account in the book was

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>attributed to one Olayuk nar Quitarvek, who who said this

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about his own grandfather in the nineteen fifties. Um, I

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>mean the grandfather would have lived in the nineteen fifties.

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the idea here now. Davis himself admitted that he

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>initially took the story as a humorous one and admits

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that it might well be more legend than reality. But

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it was subsequently repeated in various texts and uh and David.

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But Davis did say that, well, okay, there is an

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>account we can look to that could potentially back this up.

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's an account by Danish explorer Peter Frutchen, who

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lived eighteen eighty six through nineteen fifty seven, and uh

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Fruction claimed to have used a similar tactic. His account

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was that he dug a pit to sleep in this

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is in the Arctic, and awoke to find himself snowed in. So,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>remembering seeing frozen dog extreument that looked pretty solid, he

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>he got an idea. He decided to defecate in one hand,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>shape it into a chisel and then wait for the

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>fecal matter to freeze hard enough then to use that

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>chisel to dig his way out. I don't I mean,

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but for some reason, my my skeptical

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>antennae or sort of perking up that something about this

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>story seems wrong, I too, am doubtful. I was doubtful

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. So basically this is where the this is

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>where the experiment comes in. Because again, just because you

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have these two cases, one is is more presented as

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a legend and one also might be an exaggerated or

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>simply made up account. Uh, there's just no way of knowing.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not like in either case someone kept the poop

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>dagger and it was you know, presented, So that means

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to make your own poop a dagger. And

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what they did in this um uh, this

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kid State University study. So first of all, I just

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>want to want to just let everybody know, no dogs

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>are cut up in this experiment. They use pig hide

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>muscles and tendons to stand in for dog fl but

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the poop, well that's a little too essential to the experiment.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>They had to use actual human fecal matter, but they

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>also needed to make sure it was fecal matter in

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>keeping with the diet of an Inuit living on the

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>ice in the nineteen fifties. Oh okay, So what would

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this diet most likely consist of. Well, this is what

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they say in the study quote, in order to procure

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the necessary raw materials for knife production, one of us,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and then they include the in parenthesise m I E

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for meat and I Aaron the again the Associate professor

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of Anthropology and director of Archaeology, I can't state, went

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on a diet with high protein and fatty acids, which

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>is consistent with an Arctic diet for eight days. The

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Innuit do not only eat meat from maritime and terrestrial animals,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and there were three instances during the eight day diet

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that M I E ate fruit, vegetables, or carbohydrates. Okay,

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>so this is a diet that is not exclusively meat based,

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but is largely meat based, right, Yeah, more and more

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>beat based than and um than Aaron would usually UM

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>engage with. So on the fourth day he begins the

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>collection process and this continues for five days. The fecal

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>samples were formed into knives via ceramic molds, but they

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>were also molded by hand into quote hand shaped knives,

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and all of these were stored in a freezer, hopefully

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly marked who molded them by hand. I don't know

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that the study was specific on that matter. I I'm

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a I'm assuming that it's m I. E. Him self

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that is doing most of the molding and the handling

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of his own poop blades. Um maybe this is unreasonable

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 1>taboo enforcement. It seems like weird to make somebody else

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>handle your frozen feces. Yeah, yeah, I would agree, But

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know in the name of science, you know,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with with you know, appropriate scientific restraints in place, you know,

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be okay. So when it came time to

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>put the knives to the test, they were taken out

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of the freezer, they were sharpened once more, and then

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they were turned to even older temperatures via dry ice

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to ready them for the task. And and part of

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>this is really as um as the investigators went onto

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to state like this was trying to create the best

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 1>possible conditions for this uh test to potentially work, Like

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>really to give just make sure everything was just as

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>frozen as possible. Um and uh. And so that they decided.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Then they put them to the test. They started with

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the toughest challenge, however, and that's the hide, because they figured, well,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>if the knives failed to cut through the hide, you

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>can basically go ahead and call it a day because

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. They can cut through fat, etcetera. Here's

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Both varieties of fecal blade. That means, the

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ones that were just put in the mold, the ones

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that were formed by hand. Both of them failed to

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>cut the hide. Oh, your knife sucks. Now, I know

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're thinking. Maybe they got the poop consistency wrong. Well,

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they thought of that they had forged a blade from

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Western diet poop, but that failed as well. They also

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>went ahead and tried the blades out on a layer

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of fat underneath the hide, and quote, only the shallowest

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of slices could be produced and the knife edge still

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>quickly melted and deteriorated. Yeah. I would imagine that this

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>would be a problem that uh, that it just melts

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>too fast to be effective at cutting. I mean, I

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>bet you probably could get a somewhat sharp edge on it,

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but how would you hold the edge for very long,

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>because as soon as you start sewing into something, it's

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>probably just gonna get heated up by friction and then

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>melt away and be blunt. Yeah, because I mean, because

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the one of the keys here is that

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the legend is not a story of someone who stabbed

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the eye with an icicle, you know. It's

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the story of someone who butchers a dog and processes

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>its body to make raw materials. Now, the researcher stress

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that by depending again on very cold materials instead of

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>fresh kills, uh, they gave the experiment the best chance

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of success, but the blades still failed to match up

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to the legend. Now that, they also drive home that

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps additional test with additional fecal matter samples would be

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ideal if anyone else wants to continue this this great work.

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't know, like what would be

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the additional um, you know, dietary um uh formula for

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>fecal matter that would make a better poop knife. I

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, honestly, now that I'm thinking about it,

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if like you could make a

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>very good knife out of pike crete, right, because a

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>knife depends so much on having a very sharp blade

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to work very effectively. And while pike crete is really

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>good at preventing cracks from propagating across the length of it,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty good at melting more slowly than regular ice,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I still think the sharp edge of a pike crete

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>knife would probably melt pretty quickly, too quickly to be useful.

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like you'd be better off if you

0:14:54.640 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>made a pike create or a frozen poop warhammer, right right, yeah, okay, Um. Now,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the in addition to you know, contemplations of regarding different diets, uh,

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>they also contemplate, you know, the idea that, okay, you

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>have this saliva aspect of the original legend, right, that

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>he sprays saliva onto the poop knife and then forges it.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're doubtful that that would really make a difference either.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>They point to the work of McCall and Telton from

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand ten, who looked into the idea of whether

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>humans and cold regions used flaked and chipped ice for

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>butchery tools, and they too found that melting occurred with

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>these when these objects came into contact with warm bodies,

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and that they also melted during use. So um, you

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>know again you're coming down to I think in a

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>case where if you're talking about creating something out of

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>out of ice or frozen poop and you're attempting to

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>use it as a butchery tool, um, you're just asking

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>too much of the material For frozen material. The effectiveness

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of a knife blade depends on it being very thin. Basically,

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the extent to which it's effective is based on its thinness,

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and being thin would make any frozen material likely to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>melt because you know, it's harder to maintain the cold temperatures.

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just gonna acquire heat from the environment from friction

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>too fast. Now you might ask yourself, okay, but seriously,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>why was this necessary research? I think they have a

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>nice uh summary of this in the paper itself. I

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>just want to read this quote. Societal narratives and policies

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are often constructed from anthropological and scientific claims. While the

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>narrative that indigenous and prehistoric people are technologically resourceful and

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>innovative is widely supported, these narratives suffer when an untested

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>claim is used to support it. If one untested claim

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is used to support a stance, even if that stance

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is otherwise supported, ethical, or just, then there is no

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>logical reason why a second untested claim cannot be invoked.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>The use of untested claims then becomes the norm and

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>can be used to support stances that are beneficial to

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>society as well as those that are harmful. Anthropologists must

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>actively seek out unsupported claims, assumptions, rumors, and urban legends,

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and by testing them, ensure any narratives that follow are

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as sturdy as possible. Right, So, there are enough true

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>stories about resourcefulness and ingenuity among the Inuit people's that

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't need like physically impossible stories gunking up the works, right,

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And by investigating a story like this, you can you

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>can make that that decision. Okay, looks like we file

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this more under legend and mythology as opposed to a

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>true tale of survival. Right, So that's the poop knife.

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought that one was really entertaining, and again it

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>does feel kind of fitting for but also it's just

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a really cool story. Uh. And and I do encourage

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone out there who has a dungeon master or or

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a Dungeons and Dragons player keep this story in mind.

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this one will prove useful, especially if you're

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>adventuring and somewhere like ice wind Dale or something. Um

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, usually try and use the poop knife. Maybe

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>your dungeon master has heard this episode or has read

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this study follows the Ignoble Prizes, and they'll shoot you down.

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, dungeons and dragons is a legendary environment,

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so maybe you'll get away with it. You have acquired

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the blade of Latrinius. Alright, on that note, we're gonna

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, but when we come back, we'll

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>discuss another selection from the Ignoble Prizes. Thank alright, we're back.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>What have you got for us, Joe? Okay, it's time

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about professional entomologists who are afraid of spiders.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>So this winning article, this was from the Entomology Prize.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It's by Richard S. Vetter, called arachnophobic entomologists when two

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>more legs makes a Big difference, published an American Entomologist

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in Now. The author of the study, Richard Vetter, is

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>now retired, but during his career he was an entomology

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>research associate at UC Riverside and a quick look around

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the internet at photos of this guy and interviews with

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>him suggests that he has some kind of arachnophiliac. He

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly loves spider as I found a picture of him

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>with a spider crawling on his eye and he's got

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>this big smile on his face. I generally thought this

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was a picture of Dennis Hopper when I first saw it.

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought it's like a younger Dennis Hopper. Yeah, he's

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a warrior poet in the classic sense. So this paper

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>is about arachnophobia, the fear, sometimes irrational fear of spiders,

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>which is very common phobia. And I've read a couple

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of articles featuring interviews with the vetter and he sort

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of tells some personal stories that got him thinking about

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the subject of arachnophobia among entomologists. So a few of

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.199
<v Speaker 1>these stories. For one thing, he tells a story of

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>one time sitting down at a lunch table with colleagues

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and producing a brown recluse spider that was sealed in

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a plastic bag, and he says one of his colleagues,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>an aquatic entomologist, absolutely quote vaporized, just gone from the

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>room all the way down the hall in five seconds.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And then he says another time he was with an

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>entomologist colleague, and he opened the lid on a specimen

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>jar that had a black widow in it, and he

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>said that this guy in the room literally jumped backwards quote,

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>like the spider was going to decapitate him. Now, this

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is kind of surprising to me because you would sort

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>of expect that entomologists would be pretty much immune to

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>irrational spider fear. Uh. Now, quick note on the terminology.

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Entomologists are a specialized branch of zoologists. They study insects.

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>The researchers who specialize in arachnids like spider's ticks and

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>mites are called arachnologists. But I think there's clearly some crossover,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Like it looks like Vetter was technically an entomologist by

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 1>title at his institution, but his passion seemed to be

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with spiders. And uh, I think you just kind of

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>assumed that attitudes about insects and attitudes about spiders, since

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they're both small arthropods, would be pretty correlated, right. Yeah,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess I have two minds on this because,

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, yeah, it just seems like if you're

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>cool with devoting your life to to one variety of

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>creepy crawley. Then you're good with all creepy crawleys. But

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>then I think to my on my own self, and

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, you know, I'll get down and look

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>at something like, you know, a centipede or even a spider,

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but I'm a little wigged out by something like a

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>palmetta bug or a roach, you know. So, yeah, this

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. There's somebody who I think is the inverted

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>version of you in this study. Oh really yeah, so

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to that in just a minute. But anyway,

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I can think of at least a couple of reasons,

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>at least for me, why why I wouldn't really expect

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>entomologists who have powerful, irrational fears of spiders. One is

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 1>self selection in the profession, right, Like, how many people

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.479
<v Speaker 1>with an existing overwhelming fear of tiny arthropods would go

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 1>into a research field where you handle tiny arthropods all

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the time. And then the other thing I would just

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think of would be conditioning. Even if you start off

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of afraid of spiders, wouldn't constantly working with insects

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and various types of small arthur pods just sort of

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>blunt that fear over time. Yeah, it's kind of hard

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to imagine like a Dickensian tale where uh this, uh this,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this kid enters entomology, but he's just following in the

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in his father's footsteps. It's just the family business of

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>studying insects, right in a weird way. That almost does

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>seem like a Dickensian kind of comic character, like entomologists

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>who's terrified of of insects or something. But anyway, there

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>is a different Spiders are not exactly insects, So uh so,

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>let's let's pursue this a little farther. So Vetter, based

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on these anecdotes from his colleagues, he decided to conduct

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a survey that was open to professional entomologists, and he

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>solicited responses from self declared a rack no adverse researchers

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from the readership of the journal American Entomologists. So it's

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>very worth noting that this is not like a huge

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>random sample of the field. This is self selected. This

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is a self selected sample of researchers who were like, yes,

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I raised my hand, I'm afraid of spiders.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>So important to keep that in mind. This is not

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be like indicative of the field as a whole,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but at least, it's showing you what some people in

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the field are thinking. And this survey included a standardized

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>psychology test known as the Fear of Spider's Questionnaire or

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>f s Q, as well as qualitative reports where people

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>could explain their experiences in plain language, and the top

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>line result of the survey was like, Yeah, there are

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>some professional entomologists who are terrified of spiders. Uh So, first,

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I just want to talk about a few general findings

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from the existing literature on irachnophobia, and this is something

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that Vetter summarizes later in his paper. So one of

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the things is that arachnophobia, usually in in the general public,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>starts in childhood, though it's at sometimes different stages depending

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on who you ask. If you ask parents about their children,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it seems to start in girls at an average age

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of four point seven. And this research was specifically in girls.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it would be different or the

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>same with boys, but if but however, if so, parents

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>say it starts at four point seven. If you ask

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>adult women about their own arachnophobia when that started, they

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>tend to give an average age of nine point four years,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>but with a pretty big margin of error. So if

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>those numbers are at least somewhat accurate, that's kind of

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it might mean that people display fear of

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>spiders that like can be observed by others, that parents

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>can observe before they themselves recall being aware of the phobia.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Though qualitatively, many arachnophobes cannot recall an age when their

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>fear began. A lot of them just say I've always

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>been afraid of spiders as long as I can remember.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, there wasn't an inciting incident, though for a

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>few For a few cases in this survey, there was

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a reported conditioning of end. On average, women are more

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>likely than men to report aracnophobia, and the intensity of

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>arachnophobia tends to be higher in younger people than in

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>older people. I thought that was kind of interesting. Spider

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>fear is higher in people whose parents also had spider fear,

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's especially correlated between mothers and daughters. And many

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>arachnophobes rate high on measures of disgust sensitivity, which is

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>an interesting psychometric category. It's basically like how easily you

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>get grossed out by various kinds of things, and that

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that trait is seems to be interestingly correlated to all

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of other stuff, you know, even like political psychology

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Now, there's a lot of interesting speculation as

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to why spiders trigger fear reactions and so many people,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>when in reality spiders don't usually represent much of a

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>threat to survival. There are relatively minor threat as far

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as animals in the environment go. UM. We've talked about

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these speculations about causes for acnophobia before UM.

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But interestingly, some research has tried to understand not just

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a ragnophobia itself, but which particular features of spiders trigger

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it the most, because they're different spiders with different characteristics

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>physical and behavioral, So like what kinds of spiders are

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the worst and which features of spiders bother people the most. Uh,

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And studies have found that the things people really don't

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like about spiders when they don't like them is unpredictability,

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's this perceived lack of control over spiders. H.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>People really don't like the fast, jerky movements and their

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ability to suddenly appear in places where they weren't seen before. UH.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>There was one entomologist actually in this study that Vetter did,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>who said that they would rather quote scoop up a

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 1>handful of maggots with an ungloved hand than get close

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>enough to a spider to kill it. And now you

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>might wonder why they're, Well, they give a rationale. Actually,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this respondent said, maggots don't sneak up on you and

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>jump in your hair. Now, I would say probably spiders

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>don't usually do that either. But I guess the thing

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that causes the fear here is that they, at least

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in theory, could Yeah. I mean, you're you're generally going

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to encounter maggots in in exactly one type of place.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Um where Yeah, if you're more you're more likely to

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>encounter spiders at various parts points in your house. Uh,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're more likely to be on the move. Maggots,

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be on the move, that's right.

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And and the last things about spiders that people disliked

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the most were physical features, including the number of legs.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, people don't like the number of legs.

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>They don't like they don't like hair nous, and they

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>don't like having fangs or being able to bite. Uh.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>And then furthermore, Robbi just included for you to look

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>at here a chart of within Vetters survey. He charted

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>respondents scores of likability for a variety of different animals.

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like just a few dozen random animals, including

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>like butterfly, horse, snake, mouse, earwig, mosquito, spider, and you

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>can you can really see that the worst thing, even

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>worse than a spider, and I think I would agree,

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is a tick. Oh yeah, I were very much on

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the same page there as far as ticks go. Um,

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>far worse than a spider. Uh, Like the tick is

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>actively seeking you out, trying to to attach to your body,

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>drink your blood, and potentially share some pathogens with you

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Um, you know, moments like the

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>mosquito that that ranks beneath the spider. But yeah, it's

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>an interesting chart to look at because you think see

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>things in there that I, you know, certainly would expect

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to see, like the cockroach for example, Um, the slug.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know. I I've made my piece with slugs,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but I used to find them more repellent. Um. But

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>then eels, like people really grossed out by eels. I

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>guess they're kind of weird looking. Well, I mean, this

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is a small survey of people who self selected as

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>saying they were afraid of spiders or disliked spiders. So

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 1>why is the squirrel so high on the list? Like,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the squirrel is rated um worse than a bear, worse

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>than a or let's say, or is that worse than

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a um, worse worse than an earthworm? I mean, more

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>disliked than a bear. But once you get into all

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of the like mammals down here, except for the rat,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they're all on the positive side of the scale. So

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>like the halfway point of the scale, the only things

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that on average were hated more than half were maggots, scorpions, rats, mosquitoes, spiders,

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and ticks. But one thing you all say about hating

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>ticks is that I think that's an important case where

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like your gut level discussed also lines up with your

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>rational knowledge, because I bet a lot of these entomologists

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>hate spiders, but they know it wrong to hate spiders.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like, you know, I can't argue with my gut feelings,

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but I just know that I shouldn't hate spiders. They're

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>not actually bad with ticks. I mean, the heart in

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the head are in the same place, right, There are

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of legitimate, um scientifically proven reasons to

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to not be crazy about ticks. But anyway, so to

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>get into the results of vetter study, how do these

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>self reported araq no adverse entomologists UH differ from the

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>general public in terms of spider fear? Well, actually, there

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of similarities. So he found that for

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the general public and for these arachno adverse entomologists, the

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>arachnophobia begins in childhood, generally before respondents have even considered

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>entomology as a career path, So these people are not

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 1>like acquiring spider fear in adulthood. UH. Vetter says that

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the fear of spider's questionnaire scores between the genders were

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not statistically significantly different. UH didn't seem to be a

0:30:55.200 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>major gender difference among the entomologists. Araq noo adverse entomologists

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 1>seem to dislike spiders for most of the same reasons

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as general arachnophobes do. That don't like the hair, nous,

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the fangs, the number of legs still on the number

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of legs eight is bad, unpredictability, and fast sudden movements,

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but also interestingly better believed that there is a lower

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>prevalence of disgust reactions to spiders among entomologists. Uh, the

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.959
<v Speaker 1>entomologists who don't like spiders are afraid, but they're not

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as gross stout as the general public. And then to

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>read a couple of his final observations quote. One difference

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>from general arachnophobes that may have been present but not

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically documented in the classic literature is that several entomologists

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned being tormented by family members who capitalized on the

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>respondents fear of spiders. That's that's not nice. Don't don't

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>torment your family members with spiders. Um. Another is uh quote.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Another difference is that arachnophobes in the general public assign

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>thropomorphic cognitive behaviors to spiders, such as vengefulness or purposeful surveillance,

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Whereas the general impression I received from the iraqno adverse

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>entomologists was that they realized their fears or dislikes were paradoxical,

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>even though they could not explain the reasoning behind them.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And this gets this gets to the you know, the

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the non rational aspect of phobia. I imagine here, you

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>know that the idea that it's on one hand, you

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>can you can rationally discuss why you shouldn't feel this

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>way and yet still have these feelings. Yeah, totally. And

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>now there was one last thing that I noticed, or

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I at least thought was interesting. Vetter did not draw

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to this himself, but it stuck out to me.

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of these iraq noo adverse entomologists seemed to display

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>what I would guess is an unusually high level of

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>affinity for certain insects. For example, one reported having owned

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a Madagascar hissing cockroach as a pet when they were

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a child, which is probably not normal for many kids,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>but you can kind of see how a kid who

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>has a cockroach as a pet might want to grow

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up to become an entomologist. And other ones rated animals

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like cockroaches and maggots among their most liked animals in

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that big list of animals we were just talking about, uh,

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And in the averages from all the respondents, the top

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>three most liked animals of the entire list, even out

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>performing dogs, horses, porpoises, and other commonly charismatic animals. Uh.

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>The top three were all insects, butterflies, dragonflies, and ladybugs.

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>The entomologists in this survey hated spiders but love those

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>three insects. So could it be that some of these

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>entomologists are also influenced to dislike or be afraid of

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>spiders because they're so fond of the spider's prey animals.

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder that is interesting, um, because when you watch

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a spider do its thing that is, how do you

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>emotionally respond to that? Because I think I may have

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>showed this something the show already, But a few weeks back,

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:06.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe like a month back, Uh, there was this enormous

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>spider web on my front porch and I was enjoying

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>watching and watching the spider set up shop there and

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>repair it. And then I happened to go out there

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>and find some manner of a little stink bug on

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the pillar right next to the to the web, and

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 1>so on a on a whim, I flicked it into

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the web, and then instantly the vibration strength of the web,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the spider rushed out and immediately wrapped up the struggling

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>bug inside the you know, the binds of the of

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the spider web. It was fabulous to watch, uh, And

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and that was my emotional reaction to it. It was like, oh,

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this this was great. I got to sort of engineer

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>this situation that may well have occurred anyway, and get

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to watch this in real time. But on the other hand,

0:34:51.400 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>other people have a different emotional response to seeing something

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. You end up empathizing and humanizing the victim

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>of the spider, right, and you think, oh, what a

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>horrible thing happen, What a horrible experience to have to

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>go through. Yes, totally, so, I have no proof of

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that of a correlation there, but I do wonder about that.

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that could possibly be playing some role.

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Um we end up siding with the prey animals as

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the the predators, because that's the other way

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I always think about spiders in my home, or even

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:23.839
<v Speaker 1>like a centipede in the home. I think, good, you're

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>doing the lord's work, sir or madam, keep at it.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably the spider, right, yeah, yeah, But anyway, so Vetter

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>concludes by saying, despite the assumption that entomologists would extend

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>warm feelings towards spiders because of their habituation to arthropods

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>in general, arachnophobia does occur in some members of our profession.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>For these people, two more legs makes a big difference.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is it the number of legs. That's the thing

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>that people consistently call out as disliking about spiders, like

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>too many legs, but they like a ladybug has only

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>got two less. You know, I was thinking about this

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this This may have no connection, but um, we're putting

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>together some notes for an upcoming edition of our our

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Friday night show Weird House Cinema, where we talk about

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>weird films, and I started thinking about a genre of

0:36:14.440 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>film subgenre uh that entails crawling disembodied hands and how

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>spiderlike they are. Uh. And I but I began to wonder,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like which, like, which is the predominant fear or maybe

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's more on an individual level. Is it that the

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>disembodied hand is like a spider or is it that

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the spider is in some way kind of like a

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>human hand, you know, something, the way that it's often

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>bunched together, you know, in a way that you you

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you typically won't see with with insect legs. Yes, well,

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>well you see you see spiders kind of working things

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with their legs in a way that you don't usually

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>see insects doing. I mean, I guess sometimes you kind

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of do. But I feel like insects are more likely

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate things with their pincers. You can really see

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a spider using the tips of its legs like fingers

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to like roll something up. Yeah, creepy. Yeah, alright, live,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we take another break and when we come back,

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll discuss another award winner. Thank thank alright, we're back, Robert.

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I gotta admit this next study. I wonder if they

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>are drawing a spurious correlation. Yeah, I I had a

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>hard time with this one, but it was their psychology prize. Uh,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so we're we're gonna discuss it. It is eyebrows Q

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Grandiose Narcissism by Miranda Gia Coleman and Nicholas o' rule,

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>published in the Journal of Personality back in May. All right,

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>let's hear it. So the basic idea is this, Okay,

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>narcissists can be charming, but narcissists are often, uh you know,

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in many cases, horrible people best avoided. As such, it

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>pays to be able to identify them. Pastas have linked

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>viewing a person's personal appearance as a means of determining

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>narcissistic qualities, and this study look to isolate the exact

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>facial features, and eyebrows became the focal point in this

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>particular study. It's interesting. I mean, obviously people do. You

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>could say fairly or unfairly, but I mean certainly, at

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>least most of the time unfairly judge other people's character

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way they look. I wouldn't have expected eyebrows

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the most salient thing here. Yeah, I I

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't either. I mean they make they make an interesting case. Uh.

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's the basic summary. In study one, we explored the

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>faces features using a variety of manipulations, ultimately finding that

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 1>accurate judgments of grandiose narcissism particularly depend on a person's eyebrows,

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and studies to A through to C, we identified eyebrow

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>distinctiveness thickness density as the primary characteristic supporting these judgments. Finally,

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we confirmed the eyebrows importance and Studies three A and

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>three B by measuring how much perceptions of narcissism changed

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>when swapping narcissists and non narcissist eyebrows between faces. So,

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>at least, according to their conclusion, eyebrows are not just

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>something that people use to conclude that someone else is narcissistic,

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but to some extent are accurate identifiers. Yeah, which again

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I I just found I've read this, and I was thinking,

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>could this, Could this possibly be right? Because when I

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>think of big bushy eyebrows, I think of uh natural,

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>big bushy eyebrows. I think of say, actor Peter Gallagher

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, like he instantly comes to mind as

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 1>having like big, full, beautiful eyebrows. But at the same time,

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I mean, I don't know enough about Peter

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Gallagher to really chutch him one way or the other.

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think narcissist. I don't look at him

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and think, oh, there's a narcissist right there. I was

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to think, what do I know him from? He

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>was in that spy movie with Bill Murray, and then

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been in an like a million TV shows, always

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in Mr Deed's Great Great film? Is that an eight movie? No? Okay,

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>what am I anything? You've done some checks? We should

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>keep all this. He tends to not play narcissists like

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you would think if if his eyebrows were we're we're

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>we're queuing us into narcissism, And he was legitimately narcissist

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>narcissist himself like he would play a lot of narcissists

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on the screen. I know what I realized. I know

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>him from American Beauty, in which I think he does

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 1>play a narcissist. But also I think that movie is narcissistic. Okay.

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Um Now, now, speaking of of movies, the other thing

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think of when I think of big bushy eyebrows

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are the extreme eyebrows that the Mintats boast in David

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Lynch's Dune. Um. Now, I don't tend to think of

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Mintats is especially narcissistic, but I guess it

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really make any sense because those are like clearly

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>just added to the character to give the some sort

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of distinctive visual flair for the viewer. Surely through Fear

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>how what has has appropriately gone through ego death in

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 1>order to become the human computer who's playing through Fear

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 1>how Loud and the new one. It's Stephen McKinley Henderson. Um.

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>He was most recently, I believe in that that Hulu

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>series Deaths. He's he's really good. I'm looking forward to

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:28.479
<v Speaker 1>checking out his performance. Oh I know him. Oh he's great. Yeah, Yeah,

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 1>he's a wonderful actor. I was trying to remember what

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I recently saw him, and I think he has a

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>small part in Ladybird. Ah. Yeah, well, I don't know

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>if he's gonna I don't think he's gonna have giant

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>eyebrows in the now delayed film adaptation of Dune. But

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, now that it's delayed a year, they've

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>got time to go in and digitally add crazy eyebrows

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to all the mentats. Anyway, back back to the study here,

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So they use neutral expression portraits of thirty nine students

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>at the University of Toronto. Twenty six female is, thirteen males,

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty two white, seven non white, average age twenty one,

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and the thirty nine subjects took a standardized narcissistic personality test.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Then twenty eight virtual volunteers looked at the portraits and

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>rated in them on a scale from one not narcissistic

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 1>at all to eight extremely narcissistic. They also flip the

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>images upside down, as this has been shown to allow

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>humans to better focus on particular features of the face

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 1>rather than the face as a whole, and the eyebrows,

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>according to the study, were always the giveaway. Distinct eyebrows

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to accurately identified narcissists. The inversion of

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the head thing is making me think of one of

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the most hilarious effects we've ever talked about on the show,

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>which is the Margaret Thatcher effect, where when you flip

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a head upside down, you can invert the eyes and

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the mouth so that like they are actually opposite of

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the orientation of the head. But people don't notice it

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:56.720
<v Speaker 1>when they're looking at the head upside down. You should

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>look this up if you've never seen it before. It's

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>really funny now, i'd actually the main purpose of eyebrows

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is to keep sweat, water debris out of your eye sockets. Um.

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>But of course the human faces also, as we've discussed

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 1>many times, a communications array, so we we can't dismiss

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the communicative qualities here. It may play into dog eyebrows,

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:20.600
<v Speaker 1>even as a two thousand nineteen University of Portsmouth study

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>found that human preferences for expressive brows may have influenced

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>selection in domestic dog breeds. Does your dog have have

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>nice eyebrows? He has the most heavenly eyebrows. They're very

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 1>bushy and they are very expressive. See there you go.

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Also has pointed out in a two thousand eighteen University

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of York study published in Nature Ecology and Evolution, highly

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>mobile eyebrows in humans can be used to express a

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>wide array of emotions that may have been key to

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>human survival. Uh, they might even be key to our

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to empathize and identify with the emotions of others. So,

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, think about like all the things you can

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 1>say just with your eyebrows. It's all the even subtle

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 1>um communicative cues you can pick up on with eyebrows.

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Sure so, fair enough. We we can imagine how more

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>distinctive eyebrows might accentuate these communications. But how would that

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 1>be linked to a personality disorder? You know again, it's

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the fact that they're distinctive thickness and density um.

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>In another experiment, they also gave narcissistic individuals new eyebrows,

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 1>this was the eyebrow swap thing, and tested them out

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on people, and they found that they did rate them

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.399
<v Speaker 1>as less narcissistic, and putting more distinctive eyebrows and less

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>narcissistic people produced the opposite effect. So it'll leads to

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the big question, do narcissists have particular morphological characteristics. I

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>guess this is the part I'd be more skeptical about

0:44:43.280 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 1>than the idea that people think they can identify narcissists

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>through certain facial characteristics. I'd be more surprised if it

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>were true that they could, that they actually accurately were

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>finding correlations there with facial characteristics. I guess it's not impossible,

0:44:58.120 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like I need to see really good

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence of that. Yeah, I mean, I guess. Another thing

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind is like this is a study

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that was asking people about narcissism in images of people,

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like is this a narcissist? That a narcissist? And I

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like, for the most part, this is one of

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just many questions we may ask about people that we encounter.

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, Uh, it's probably not your primary question regarding

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>an individual like narcissist or not a narcissist. I don't

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. Maybe that's just me, um, because

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it comes down to them to like how would

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>this work? What would be the tie? You know, obviously

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there's there's not like this, like the personality disorder would

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>make your eyebrows grow more bushy, right, um, And it

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:42.439
<v Speaker 1>would have to be something more in terms of like

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it it changed. It affects the way that you interact

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>with the world, and that and the way that you're received,

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and that ends up nurturing a sense of narcissism. I

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, possibly, I mean you could say that from

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>like a developmental personality where I mean, I guess you could,

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>though again, this is one of those things that seems

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:03.400
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to believe. I guess you could try to

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>say that there's some correlated like genetic component that's like

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>deeper back that happens to have both random effects like

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>happens to give you more distinctive eyebrows and also happens

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to make you more narcissistic. But again, uh, it seems

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to believe that. Yeah, I mean, they

0:46:19.960 --> 0:46:22.680
<v Speaker 1>bring up the idea of messing with your eyebrows, grooming

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your eyebrows, and how you know, you know, they basically

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they said quote though narcissism did not significantly relate to

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 1>eyebrow grooming. Here, grooming mediated how grandiosity related to perceived

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>narcissism when controlling distinctiveness and femininity, and previous research found

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that eyebrow plucking relates to women's narcissism, But I don't

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 1>know that doesn't really um, you know, provide a firm

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>answer for me, like what what we're seeing when we

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>see eyebrows that are somehow queuing us into narcissism? Like

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I can. I can look at a

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>photograph of someone who I either know or believe to

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>how of narcissistic qualities, and I can often lean into

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>this interpretation. I can say, well, I guess those eyebrows

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are pretty wild and thick, you know, Or well, those

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>eyebrows are really well maintained. You know that. I guess

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there are there are things I can I can then

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 1>pinpoint if I'm prompted, But I I just I don't.

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I just have a hard time with this one. I

0:47:19.760 --> 0:47:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have to admit I have. I have a hard time

0:47:21.200 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing the eyebrows as a window into the narcissistic soul. Yeah.

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's one of those things where it just

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it just seems kind of like surface level implausible to me.

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I don't know. It's one of those

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>word if if I saw more evidence than I guess,

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to accept it. But yeah, I mean I

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 1>do have to, you know, give credit to the whole

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>argument of the eyebrows being key to the way we

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>communicate with people, you know, like like in ways that

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we often don't think about. Uh, you know, unless you're

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>just really obsessed with eyebrows. Like you know, we are

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>moving our eyebrows around a lot. They are, they are

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot to communicate how we feel about ourselves

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and about other people to the world. So I mean,

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>on another hand, why not the eyebrow? Sure, we'd love

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to hear from from listeners on this one. What's your

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>relationship with eyebrows? Do you see eyebrows as a as

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a as a clue to someone's narcissistic qualities? Um, we'd

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you. Are you a grandiose narcissist?

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you have really distinctive eyebrows? Yeah, let us know,

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 1>measure them all right? Shall we move on to the

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>final prize that we're going to discuss on this episode. Sure,

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:26.799
<v Speaker 1>this one will be pretty quick, but I thought this

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:29.439
<v Speaker 1>was kind of fun. So you remember earlier this year

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.160
<v Speaker 1>when we were talking about snake pits, and in that

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>episode I discussed research on the vocalizations of snakes like

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 1>king cobras, how they're known, in fact, not just to hiss,

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but to actually growl. Yes, And one of the tests

0:48:47.120 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>conducted in that study about King Cobra's and related snakes

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>growling actually involved getting a snake to inhale helium and

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>talk like Donald Duck. And I thought that was a

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty great experiment, but it uns out this is a

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:04.320
<v Speaker 1>broader genre of scientific weirdness, as proven by this year's

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble winner in acoustics. So this prize went to Stephen A.

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Rebber Takeshi Nishimura, Judith Yanish, Mark Robertson, and W two

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to Fitch And the study was called a Chinese

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Alligator in helios Format Frequencies and a Crocodilian and the

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Journal of Experimental Biology in uh so they the authors

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>here start by saying that crocodilians are among the most

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:35.240
<v Speaker 1>vocal non avian reptiles. Not a lot of reptiles really

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>make you know, voice sounds, but crocodiles do. Crocodilians do.

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Both males and females tend to produce sounds called bellows,

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:49.879
<v Speaker 1>so they'll they'll kind of and this happens all year,

0:49:49.960 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>but especially during mating season. And the question is what

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>purpose do these bellows serve. Scientists aren't exactly sure, but

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they think they might be auditory ad atisements of body size. So,

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're a crocodilian trying to make you want to

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be large, the author's right quote, relative sized differences strongly

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>affect courtship and territorial behavior in crocodilians. Now, in mammals

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and birds, it has been documented that vocalizations are sometimes

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>an honest signal, and that's a term in biology, and

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:26.400
<v Speaker 1>honest signal of body size, meaning an advertisement that is

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 1>basically true. It's hard to fake because body size is

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 1>related to what kinds of frequencies you can make when

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you issue a vocalization, specifically with reference to what are

0:50:38.520 --> 0:50:43.239
<v Speaker 1>known as formant frequencies or vocal tract resonances. And these

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>are like sort of peak frequencies that you hit, say,

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're making certain kinds of vowel like sounds. Now,

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>where does this study fit into everything I've just said? Well,

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the authors here say that format frequencies have never been

0:50:57.800 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>documented before in a reptile, in a non avian reptile,

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and they say quote, formants do not seem to play

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a role in the vocalizations of frogs and toads. Technically

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they're called a neurons, but that means frogs and toads.

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:15.640
<v Speaker 1>They write quote. We tested performance in crocodilian vocalizations by

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>using playbacks to induce a female Chinese alligator or alligator

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:26.400
<v Speaker 1>sinensis to bellow in an air tight chamber. During vocalizations,

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the animal inhaled either normal air or a helium oxygen

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>mixture known as helios, in which the velocity of sound

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is increased. Although helios allows normal respiration, it alters the

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>formant distribution of the sound spectrum. An acoustic analysis of

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the calls showed that the source signal components remained constant

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>under both conditions, but an upward shift of high energy

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>frequency bands was observed in helios. We conclude that these

0:51:55.840 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>frequency bands represent formants. So, according to their theory radical framework,

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.919
<v Speaker 1>they think this is a good sign that actually what

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.520
<v Speaker 1>crocodiles are doing, what crocodilians are doing with these bellowing

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sounds is actually advertising body size via these format frequencies

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in their vocalizations. And uh oh, and also because they

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>say okay, so we've observed these format frequencies playing a

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>role in like mating calls in birds and if it's

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>correct that they're doing a similar thing in crocodilians. And

0:52:27.680 --> 0:52:32.800
<v Speaker 1>because birds and crocodilians share a common ancestor with all dinosaurs,

0:52:33.239 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>they say quote a better understanding of their vocal production

0:52:36.040 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>systems may also provide insight into the communication of extinct arcosaurians.

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's actually a really interesting study. I guess if

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you ask the question why is it funny, I guess

0:52:47.640 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it's the helium giving healing crocodile. Also, I found it

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.719
<v Speaker 1>in the study there was a pretty funny illustration of

0:52:57.760 --> 0:53:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the experimental setup that showed the croc goodisles in the

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 1>sealed chambers either breathing air or breathing the oxygen helium mixture.

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is kind of a humorous illustration. I

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know why, but it's it's like a nice illustration

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it has. It's very colorful. The crocodile looks looks realistic.

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not a cartoon crocodile. But I don't know, it

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>does look a little awkward in there. It just makes

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>me wonder how many different studies have made other animals

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in hale helium to see what their voices sound like,

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 1>so we got snakes and we got crocodiles. Now, where

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:33.719
<v Speaker 1>where else has this happened? We're not crocodile? Sorry, this

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>was an alligator, I guess, say, a crocodilian. Sorry, if

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I've been loose with that terminology. Well maybe, well we'll

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have to come back and do an episode on Helium

0:53:41.000 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and discuss it. Okay, I'll meet you there all right. Well,

0:53:47.120 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>like I said, we're not going to cover all the

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Ignoble Prize winners for We're just covering these four. If

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to check out the full list of winners again,

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 1>go to Improbable dot com and you get to check

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>out the list and see links to the studies. Um,

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's always worth a read, just to see what

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:07.759
<v Speaker 1>they're they're highlighting from, you know, from from recent or

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>not so recent scientific studies. Yeah, give him a look there.

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.479
<v Speaker 1>There was another one that definitely raised my eyebrow this year,

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and it was about it was about looking into economic

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>data via mouth to mouth kissing. Oh okay, yeah, that

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>one looked good. There's also one about hitting man. Did

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you see that one? Yes? Yeah, it wasn't really contact.

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It was just like a news It was a funny

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>news report. Basically, it was a story from China where

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.400
<v Speaker 1>someone had taken out a murder contract that was just

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:42.279
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly subcontracted down to like five or six layers of

0:54:42.280 --> 0:54:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of different people who were hired for successively smaller sums,

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the murder was never done. Yeah, it's it

0:54:48.600 --> 0:54:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it would make a great Coen Brothers film,

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:53.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, like each one gets cold feet and they're

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like okay, yeah, yeah, until like basically they're just being

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:01.920
<v Speaker 1>offered so little money it just doesn't get done. All right. Well,

0:55:01.960 --> 0:55:03.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out other episodes of Stuff

0:55:03.920 --> 0:55:05.759
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind, you know where to find us.

0:55:05.760 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 1>You can find us wherever you get your podcasts and

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever that happens to be. We just asked that you rate,

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:13.560
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. You can always go to stuff to

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com and that will take you

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>right to our I heart listing. Uh. And you also

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 1>see a button there somewhere on the page for store.

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>If you click on that, you go to our t

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 1>shirt store. You can buy a T shirt or a

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sticker or a bag with our logo on it or

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>some manner of monster. Uh. Pretty fun little place. We

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you're gonna get some new designs in there soon.

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what else. So yeah, our former co host

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Christian has a Kickstarter going right now for Corridor magazine

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>issue number one. It's gonna be a whole bunch of

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of cool, weird art, short fiction, UH, comics, essays, uh

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.399
<v Speaker 1>all together. If you're if you want to follow back

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a cool project, just go to Kickstarter and look up Corridor.

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You're in there, aren't you. Yeah. I've got a little

0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 1>story like a sci fi store with sharks in it,

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I said, I think listeners will enjoy, so yeah, and

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but then also just a whole host of other richly

0:56:07.719 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>talented people. And it's from the images I've seen, it's

0:56:10.160 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be gorgeous cover to cover. So that that

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 1>kickstarters ending soon. So if you want to be a

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:17.439
<v Speaker 1>part of it, go look it up now. Definitely big

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson.

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.240
<v Speaker 1>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:56:27.360 --> 0:56:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at contact at Stuff to Blow

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind Pod cover Stuff to Blow Your Mind it's

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.600
<v Speaker 1>production of I heart Radio. For more podcasts for My

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or

0:56:45.719 --> 0:57:02.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening to your favorite shows. Proper time the

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 1>town to b