WEBVTT - Brian Robinson Will Bounce Back! | Top 10 Predictions & Prop Bets for Week 17 (Ep. 1502)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the Fantasy pros Football Podcast. I'm

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Warmley, joined not on this Tuesday morning, on this

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning because we're tamping a day early because of

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the holiday, by Chris Welsh and Andrew Ericson Fellas. It

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is not only the week of Christmas, it is the

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>week of the Fantasy Championship. We were just talking a

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>bit before we started recording about how we performed in

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Week sixteen in the Fantasy Semifinals. It was not a

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>good week for me. I will make the title game

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in a few places, but not the leagues I care

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>most about. I'm going to get edged out in the

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>scott Fish Bowl Finals. I had a very strong week actually,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but everybody did and I will not make the finalists there.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, we were talking about some of the content leagues,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the industry leagues were in together. A lot

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of disappointing performances for me at least, and I faced

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor in a number of places, which was pretty

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>much an auto loss. Welsh, how did your teams fair

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this weekend?

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>We did pretty good. The ones that's survived. Coming into

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>this week, I think I'm in going into two Championships,

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and then I'm still in the championship round of the

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Pros Online FFPC. The Fantasy Pros Online Championship. They

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 2>just take the final three weeks, they round them up.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>I had a very strong week. I had Brian and

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 2>one team. It was like Brian Thomas and Bijon. It

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 2>was a very very strong week on that team, so

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>hoping to make some cash, make some cash. But there's

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>a couple others. I had that classic by the way

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 2>where it was like the prior week stinker, and then

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 2>I look at those teams this week, bup, bup, bup

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>would have just like done some demolishing specific can't do that.

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't have. I shouldn't have. Yeah, flex leagues, I

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>would have moved on to the championship. But no, Bueno Erickson,

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>how about you, buddy.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I had three teams left playing in the semi finals.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>One of them was lost. I got destroyed, so that

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 3>team will not be moving on. But two teams and

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 3>the one that I care about the most I've talked

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>about before four on this show, Puku Nakui, even though

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>he didn't really have a good game. A team has

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Brian Thomas on it, So he's been helping a lot.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 3>And Jane Daniels so j Nails obviously had that monster

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>game against the Eagles, and that's gonna propel a lot

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 3>of people, so including me. So unless something very weird

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 3>happens on Monday Night football, I should have at least

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 3>two teams advancing to the championships. So yeah, looking forward

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to Week seventeen and get to these emiss.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it incredible too? I forgot this. So I have

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 2>like two in the championship FFPC and my favorite thing,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.839
<v Speaker 2>because you said your your favorite league is and I've

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 2>done this, mentioned this tons of times the Pentathlon. I'm

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 2>playing in the five event league that my friend Derek

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and Riper at the Athletic Is put together. We are

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 2>first place in one of the events in the super

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Flex League and we had Jalen Hurts and Jalen Hurts

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 2>gets knocked out. Also destroyed my wallet right before Christmas.

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot. I hope he's okay though, But isn't

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>it amazing when you get those other players that pick

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you up, like in that one I had justin Jefferson,

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>like we look like like we're gonna just score low

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and then the rest of your players, like they know

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 2>it's happening, Eric Erckson, They're picking you up, They're bringing

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>They're saying, we're gonna pick up what Jalen Hurts lost

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 2>and we are going to play for you. It's like

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 2>a Christmas miracle, Justin Jefferson and a host of other

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 2>great guys. You just I don't know, We'll always remember

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>those guys that pick up the slack for the quarterbacks

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>or the big players that we lose, you know, in

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter of the most important time in fantas.

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Why team morale is so important, So Andrew Week said,

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>it is. You drop all your bench guys. You pick

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>up Nick Chobb, you pick up Tank Dale, you pick

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>up you pick up Chris Godwin, Rashie Rice, all these

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>guys that deserve to be on the ship, and you

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 3>pick all them, throw on your bench, and then they

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 3>become a league winners.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Get him right your team. You get him a ring,

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Get him a ring that does bring morale. I will

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll be facing Mike Mayer in the finals of our

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros Dynasty league that we have. So that's that's

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>one fun one and I'm hoping if I get a

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>miracle tonight, and again we are recording this on Monday

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>morning because of the holiday, this will be released on Tuesdays.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So we don't know yet what's happened in Packer's Saints.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But if I get a miracle a bad game from

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>both Jacobs and Jaden Reed, then I might be facing

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ericson in one championship as well. But it will not be.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Like luck, because I'm gonna be starting Mason Rudolph so

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Ron Christmas, so you better watch out.

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We will be talking and here about how we did

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in week sixteen, our predictions, and then mostly looking ahead

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to week seventeen, so again, you know, just to emphasize

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.799
<v Speaker 1>again probably too much at this point. We are taping

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this early, so we're gonna do the best we can

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>as far as like if guys are playing or not,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as we might include some Packers and some predictions.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They obviously haven't played yet, so if anybody gets hurt

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>or ends up not playing, you're listening to this later

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>in the week, maybe after the holidays or right before Christmas,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>or however you want to do it. Just bear in

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mind this is early Monday morning. We want to get

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to get everybody a show, but we also wanted to

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>give ourselves and our editing team, who does a wonderful

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>job all year, a break on Christmas, even Christmas, So

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that's why we're rolling early. Let's see how did we

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>do in week sixteen? Ericson as of now, and you

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>do still have one prediction waiting to see how it

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>does tonight. As of now. You got literally nothing right

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>from last week.

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 2>It was the meanest you've ever been. I was like,

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Erickson's gonna have done good. You're like and awful. It

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 2>was a bad one.

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I was updating it throughout the day yesterday and I

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>had like all the predictions written down and it was

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>either deleted if you didn't get it, or leave it

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in the outline if you did, and it was just delete, delete,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>highlight cut.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 4>It was.

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It was brutal for.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Franklin. We knew golf, Yeah, well wrong, try frank That

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>did go over his receiving yards prop he just didn't catch,

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 3>and he didn't catch the store Marvin had the long reception,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 3>not Troy Franklin. Although Bonnicks didn't even really throw the

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 3>ball down field at all. It was all checked out.

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 3>So there's that one. Uh, Christian Watson is on Monday night,

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 3>so we don't know about that, so that one's gonna hit.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yes, Ericson's logic of the world, which is

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty sound by the way, it saved me in multiple spots.

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>That way, there's no chance Erickson can go oh for five.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna now that hard on. Christian. What was

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 2>your what was your prediction on want So?

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 3>I think it was I think it was over his

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 3>receiving and touchdown.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 2>So all right, everybody already knows what happens, and you

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 2>know that.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>He you listed a bunch of the ones you had.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>He didn't list the big one that we've been talking

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>about for like a month, which was traded.

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I swear like Kyler Murray just doesn't. I don't know,

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Like he sees Martin Harrison, He's like, I gotta throw

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 3>a fade to Martin Harrison. He never catches.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Ever, Kyler Murray stinks. He stinks. Oh, he had McBride

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>in the end zone, overthrew him, which then.

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Turned into a past interference call and then they DJ Dallas.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but if you watch that play, it was like,

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, a full set. It was like three tight

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>ends or whatever. It's play action. McBride goes to the

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 2>left wide open. Kyler Murray never even looked over there

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 2>and went to DJ j Ellis because I bet it.

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Of course I ride with Homie. I go, I'm on

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 2>trade McBride two straight weeks on money and I'm like McBride,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 2>DJ Dallas. Kyler Murray hates trade McBride and I don't

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 2>know if you guys saw too trade McBride not happy

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>after the game, had a few words about how cooked

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 2>they got. That was recorded Cayler Murray's rough as was.

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 3>My last one, last one I got wrong, I should say.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>You had it was.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>We did it at a time where we thought that

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz might start for the Chiefs, so you had

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>him having a good game. So that one's a little unfair,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>got butchered. He never really have the opportunity to, uh

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that was to see how he did. But for you,

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Wels. Wels did much better. You know,

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the ones he didn't technically get, but like

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if you are, for example, you had Bucky Irving getting

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a rushing and a receiving touchdown. He didn't get that,

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but he had a good game like that spiritually was correct.

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You were right about Lamar Jackson exercising demons against the stealers,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't technically throw for three hund yards.

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>So like, hey, but I said three touchdowns and I

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>had sad three hundred total yards.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And he was like, you were spiritually correct for sure.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 2>That's manifested accounting.

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And then you were. You were definitely like objectively correct

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on Jerome Ford eighty plus yards in a touchdown and

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle doing well against Miami getting his hundred plus yards.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So you you hit spot on on a couple of

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>these as well.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know what I remember too, Brian Thomas,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I think had that huge play this week, and I

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 2>put it in my brain that I had put that

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 2>on there. The one I got really wrong was Kim

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 2>That was from the previous Thomas having that. Yeah, I

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>would say, soothsayer as Erickson would say, like, I'm gonna

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>give myself the points. I nailed all of those to

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a very high degree. Kem Coleman, big fat, stupid idiot direction.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Why would I think he would do anything whatsoever. But

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna take I'm gonna take four wins on that

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>with one loss.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the rest of them you maybe missed if you

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>were like betting their props like technically, but you a

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>win for the overall prediction on the on the rest,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>and to be clear, you only needed to get one

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 1>of them right to do better than Erickson.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Because again, because if you don't remember Ericson, everything you

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 2>did was wrong, just if you forgot.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get into our week seventeen predictions. It'll

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see kind of what direction you guys

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>took these, given how early in the week we are

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>doing this relative to usual, But we're going to see

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if I mean like, it can hardly be much worse Ericson.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So we'll start with you, what's your what's your number

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>five prediction for week seventeen.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Jackd Abbins is going to come back off of injury

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 3>reserve and rush for one hundred and thirty four plus

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 3>yards against the New England Patriots. First of all, it's

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 3>a great matchup and Jack Obbins is eligible to come

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 3>off the injury reserve. And I just cannot stand any

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 3>more of the Gus Bus experience on just too much.

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 3>On Thursday night, the guy is sitting on like twenty yards,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 3>he rips off this like the longest run of his career,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 3>seemingly and destroys all of the gust Edwards unders that

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 3>I had on Thursday night, but scored two touchdowns. I'm

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 3>sure he helped a lot of people and their fantasy

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 3>champions discuss Edwards, So shout out to the gus Bus.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 3>But I think that Dobbins, if he is eligible to

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 3>play and comes off ir that they're going to throw

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 3>him right back into the fire because I think Dobbins

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 3>he has incentives. There's a reason why I picked one

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty four yards exactly, so he gets an

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 3>additional one hundred and fifty K for each of the

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 3>thresholds that he reaches in terms of rushing yards. So

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>he's at seven sixty six right now, but he gets

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 3>to nine hundred, he gets an additional bonus. He gets

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 3>to one thousand and fifty, he gets another additional bonus.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to expect that, hey, he can get

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 3>to one hundred thirty four yards, get that first bonus

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 3>because I put him over nine hundred and then even

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 3>a week at we could see him run a lot more.

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 3>So I like j Dobbins bouncing back here. It's a

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>great matchup against New England Patriots. They can't stop the run.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 3>James Cook got there on not even that much volume

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 3>last week, going over one hundred yards. So I like

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Dobbins and I think that I wouldn't be hesitant to

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 3>start him in fantasy, Like I think you should start JK.

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Dobbins if he is eligible to play.

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised when I saw on the outline that

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you put specifically one hundred and thirty four plus yards.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess it makes sense that it would be base

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>around some kind of incentive. Welsh, what do you think about,

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe not specific one hundred and thirty four yards,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but Dobbin's having a big day and being a very

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>viable start in what will theoretically be his first game back,

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming he is officially activated.

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like the logica. Again, they'll like the one

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>thirty four. This will be the like he goes for

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and you're going to spiritually say he was

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty right, and I'll be like that was right, but like, yeah,

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>like I probably wouldn't pick the one thirty four because he's,

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 2>like I don't see him like hitting the incentive and

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 2>then pushing at that hard in that first game back.

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 2>But if he has like a hundred, he's probably within

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the distance where next week I would be like, oh,

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 2>now we're gonna go like hard, We're going to go

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 2>on incentive based numbers. But yeah, I think the only

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>thing that worries me is him coming back and you know,

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 2>like having this very very vast history of injuries and

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 2>it happening again this year, that they would want him

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit healthier, and you don't want to give

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 2>him twenty plus carries, so I would be worried he'd

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>be limited to like you know, ten to twelve just

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to get his feet under him. But he has had

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 2>some big explosive plays this year, so I don't know,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, if I were playing Sate, like whatever his

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>rushing yard prop is, I think I'm going to want

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 2>to go over it this week. I think that's a

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>play because incentives are in the uh when say the

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>rear view kind of in the review, they're like, they're

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 2>right there, but I'm not sure, like we're going to

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 2>hit that one thirty four. But I like the logic

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>of what's happening here because you want to get him set,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you want to get him going, and as you know

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Erickson was talking about off air like the other week,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of people do it is incentive time.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 2>This is the time where people are like going heavy

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 2>on yards and catches. That's why Mike Evans is a

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>big play right now, and knowing these type of things

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>are really important. I think it was didn't someone ask

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Baker Mayfield about this last week with Mike Evans and

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 2>He's like, I'm paying attention to more of the you know,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>the thousand yard club incentives than he is. So yeah,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 2>I think that the logic is really sound here and JK.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Dobbins getting some run is good. Just worried about what

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the volume looks like.

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Quickly ericson, I know it's definitely too early for rankings,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but what kind of range do you expect Dobbins to

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>fall in for you.

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Top twenty four? I would say probably at RB two range.

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean looks. I mean James Cook had eleven carries

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 3>last week out one hundred yards against Patriots, right, so

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 3>even if Dobbins gets ten carries, that might be enough

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 3>to get some do some serious damaging. I mean, the

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Page's defense is so bad, like they can't stop anything.

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 3>So the Chargers are muscle wing territory. They're trying to

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 3>make a run at the postseason. It's good matchup, but

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>on Saturday too, so it should be fun.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's let's your number five prediction, all right?

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>The first one I'm gonna go with almost like caveat

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>here because there might be a player issue with it,

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>But the main crux of it is going to be

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>going down the Odric estimate train, and we're gonna go

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Adric estimate pulling off seventy five plus total yards and

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown against the Cincinnati Bengals. Why I'm giving it

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>a caveat. Jalil McLoughlin is fully healthy and available. Let's

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>just move this to him. Let's just put this over

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to McLoughlin. I like this in play for both of

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 2>these guys. What I do like is estimated this past

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 2>week nine carries forty eight yards against Chargers. That's a

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 2>tough one and a touchdown, averaging over five yards per carry.

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>What did I do with Jerome Ford? Last week? We

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 2>picked on the Bengals. Who are the Broncos playing the Bengals.

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 2>The Bengals still giving up the tippy top. This hasn't

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 2>updated here, but going into this past week, the Bengals

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 2>were giving up the most fantasy points to running backs,

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the most receiving yards two running backs. So if McLoughlin

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 2>is active, I really like this plus seventy five because

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be heavily involved in the receiving game.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a little bit of a Javonte william thing

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>on the receiving side. But Arodric Estimate getting more carries.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I know they want to. They want to see more

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>out of him. If McLoughlin is not there, they can

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>get in this game. Adric Estima going to get over

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>those ten carries, have seventy five plus and just rip

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>off what you can do against the Bengals, because we

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 2>saw it from Jerome Ford. So seventy five in a

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 2>score for Adric Estimate, assuming Juliel McLoughlin is inactive.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Ericson, this would be clearly the best game of Estimate's

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>young career for fantasy purposes. Do you think that it'll

0:14:58.240 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>play out the way? Well, She's it.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I hope so, because I love Estimate, but I hate

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Champayn and this is just this is a classic Hey

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 3>like Estimate. It looks like the guy like he even

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 3>started the game last on Thursday night, and the broadcasters

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 3>messed it up saying, oh, Jamanti Williams up the medal

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 3>for blah blah blah. Wait, that's not Jamante Williams, that's

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm just Esterday starting the game. And I'm just I'm

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>just so sick of being bamboozled by Sean Payton when

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh, the trend say that this should be

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 3>the next guy getting the volume, and I'm terrified if

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 3>mcloffain comes back and then adds another wrinkle to this prediction.

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 3>The other thing too, that I concerns about is the

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 3>game script if the Bengals get a lead like his

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>estimate even in the game anymore, because I love Javonte

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>in that's pass catching role. So that's where I get

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>concerned about where this con potentially goes off the rail. Again.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I would love all the conference where it'll be like

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 3>love estimate, it's a great matchup, and I think that

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy football wise, like there are gonna be people that

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>might need to start estimate, you know, even as like

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>a flexor an RB three play because it is a

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 3>good matchup for him and went in doubt. I think

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 3>attacking some of these softer matchups makes a lot of sense,

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 3>But I just I don't think I've ever been right

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 3>like backing one week of a sample size of this

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>broadcast backfield and then following the next week it being correct.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's my only hesitance on it.

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Who do you guys think wins that game? By the way,

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it's huge for the ANC playoff picture. Bengals are laying

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a half at home, it's.

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Only three and a half. I'm on taking the Bengals. Yeah,

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I just I'm taking the bank the Bengals are. The

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Bengals are playing much better right now, like they're winning

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 3>the games that they should beat against bad teams. The

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Broncos defense has not been playing nearly as well as

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>it was to start the year. And I don't know

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 3>if bo Nix can can keep up with Joe Burrow.

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this offense scores like thirty five points a game.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like which version of bo Nick shows

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>up too, because we've seen this incredible, like really accurate,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>get the ball to everybody version of bo Nicks, and

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>then we've also seen that like rookie version just show

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>its head. The thing also is like if you could

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 2>stop Jamar Chase. That's like a feat in itself. But

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 2>then they'll just they got t Higgins and then they've

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>got Chase Browns. So yeah, I don't like hooks like that.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I probably would take the Bengals at this point, but

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, back just real quick on the logic. You're right,

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>if the Bengals were to get out really really quick,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>this could be disastrous. But I would think one of

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>the things the Broncos are going to want to do

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.159
<v Speaker 2>also is you want to control the game, and you

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 2>want to control the clock, and that's something estimate rattling

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 2>off over five yards per carry against a Chargers defense

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 2>last week really works well for them to want to

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>use him to control the clock. But you know, he's

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>probably going to come out third downs. That's where Javonte

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 2>comes in again, assuming McLaughlin's not there. But my assumption is,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 2>if I guess by this logic, maybe I would want

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to take the hook with the Broncos here, but I

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>guess I am leaning a little bit Bengals.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's the highest total of the week at exactly fifty.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean ericson you said, like, you know, the Bengals

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are scoring thirty five a game, you got to keep up.

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If you take out the back to back at Ravens

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at Chiefs where the Broncos didn't score much. Since Week seven,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>their points scored are thirty three, twenty eight, thirty eight,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine, forty one, thirty one, twenty seven. They've been

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a very very productive offense for really the last two

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>months here outside of just that one back to back

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.640
<v Speaker 1>game against the two artist teams on their schedule. So

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that'll be a really fun one and, like I said,

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>very big for the AFC playoff picture. If you are

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>thinking about betting that game, we've got a special offer

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for you all. Unlock a month of Betting Pros Premium

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for free. Download the Betting Pros app today and use

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>code FP free to start betting smarter, not harder again.

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>That's promo code FP free. Betting Pros Premium gives you

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>exclusive access to cutting edge tools that take your betting

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>game to the next level. Our Same Game Parlay tool

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>creates winning parlays with ease. Our prop bet analyzer and

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Prize Picks. Prop bet cheat sheet uncovers the picks that

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>provide the most value. Our betting systems allow you to

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>create and back test custom strategies that help you find

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>value and maximize your bank roll. Take the guesswork out

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of betting. Download the Betting pros app use code FP

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>free and start with today ericson what is your number

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>four prediction?

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Naji Harris is going to finish under fifty rushing yards

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 3>against the Kansas City Chiefs on Christmas. Note presence for

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Naji Harris, just Cole. You look at Najia Harris in

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the way that he's been used over the last couple

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of weeks and hasn't been great. The usage has been down.

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 3>He's been out snapped by Jalen Warren in three straight games.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Harris had a twenty eight percent snap share on Saturday

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and that was the lowest that he's played all season.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 3>So the team is really leaning more on Jalen Warren,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 3>especially since George Pickens has missed so much time. And

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 3>this offense hasn't been as effective overall. They're not moving

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 3>the ball effectively with Russell Wilson, but not running the

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>ball great with Najie Harris, and it's a tough magic

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 3>Againstkansady Chiefs. Joe Mixon struggled. I know we talked about

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 3>mix in on the starter shit show about could this

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 3>be a guy that you're potentially sitting this week? And

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't really productive against the Kansasity Chiefs, So tough

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 3>matchup for Naji Harris on the ground. So I'm going

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 3>to lean towards taking the under on him as I

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 3>think that he's kind of hit a ball at the

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 3>end of this season. Take the underunt Najie Harris in

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 3>his rushing yards against Kansas City.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I strongly agree with this one. Welsh is are

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 1>we all co signing it together or are you going

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to go against us? No?

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Complete co sign Like I was putting together something before

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 2>we did this show about Jalen Warren, like let's go

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>back to Jalen Warren. Let's go into that. And I

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>think they need to lean on him more. It'll probably

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 2>be more in the passing game side. So yeah, I'm

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 2>completely with this one.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>Where do you expect to have him ranked Welsh go

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>first Nase, Yeah.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I haven't even tackled that. I would say it's

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 2>probably going to be in the probably the thirties, like

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the between somewhere between twenty eight and thirty two is

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>my my gut on this. How about this? No McLoughlin,

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Odrick Estime or Naji Harris this week?

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, you think see the way I think,

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 3>I think it seems like could be close when you

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 3>say it like that, But I think about, Okay, well,

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 3>RB committee good matchup, RB Committee, bad matchup. I'll just

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 3>take the running backs and the committee in the good matchup,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 3>which is the Denver Broncos running backs over the Steelers

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 3>running backs.

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Estimate over Nause you heard it. I think I would

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 2>do this. I mean, obviously my prediction without McLoughlin being there,

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 2>I would take If McLoughlin's active, I take him over Nause.

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 2>I just are not going to be able to run

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>super great. So I'm I'm completely with this here.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Eric Santa. If I said Harris was RB thirty one,

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would that be too high, too low or just right?

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 3>That seems right in the range because you can't like

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 3>completely bury the guy, even if you don't necessarily think

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 3>he's in a great spot because he does get enough volume.

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 3>You think he gets touchdown equity. But I mean he's

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.200
<v Speaker 3>definitely gonna be ranked behind Jalen Warren, you know, base

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 3>on what we've seen over the last couple weeks and

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 3>especially if the Steelers are chasing points, you're going to

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 3>see Jalen Warren out there catching passes from Russell Wilson,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 3>probably not from Nause Welsh.

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>What is your number four prediction for week seventeen?

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, number four, we are going to my first

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 2>touchdown boy from this past week. Isaiah likely, Isaiah likely.

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>We're going to get back the game. We're gonna get

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 2>one of those big Isaiah likely games. We're gonna get

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>another touchdown. We're going seventy five yards. We've got a

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>touchdown in five catches up against the Texans, which is

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 2>being played on Christmas. This would be the late Christmas

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 2>game here. So when you're looking at the Texans wide

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 2>receivers currently giving up the fifth less least receptions going

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>into this past week, this hasn't Again we're doing this

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Monday morning, so some of this data hasn't updated. But

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>going into week sixteen, they had given up the fifth

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 2>least receptions to wide receivers on sixty targets only thirty

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>four catches. So they are giving up some big plays,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>but they haven't been you know, they've kind of been

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>locking some of that down. So in a respect of

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>also not being able to like really really run on

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 2>this team, even though they're going to still do it

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 2>with Dereck Henry in that play action. Where are the

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>advantages over the last month, and what I gave you,

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>by the way, was the last month as well. On

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 2>wide receivers, they're giving up the sixth most Fantasy points

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to tight ends over the last month, a couple touchdowns.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>I likely had this touchdown this past week. He's a

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>big breakaway play guy. I think this is a really

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 2>good spot for them to get him in the slot,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 2>get him out for some of those big plays, break

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 2>one of those big plays. Again. On the wide receiver side,

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 2>they're giving up a really low amount of receptions, but

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 2>they've given up only five hundred yards on those thirty four,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 2>So if you take the value of where they're guarding

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 2>against tight ends, and Mark Andrews, by the way, has

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 2>been fantastic and he's going to keep continue getting those targets.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 2>But I think this is really going to be about

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Likely and them locking down those wide receivers and Andrews

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>and Likely getting open and making those big plays. And

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 2>you saw Lamar Jackson was targeting him in the red

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 2>zone as he likes to target his tight ends when

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 2>he gets in the red zone. If they're not running,

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 2>it's going to Andrews or it's going to Likely. So

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>I like Likely to have a big step up spot

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 2>here five to seventy five in a touchdown against the Texans.

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>He's only hit seventy five receiving yards in a game

0:23:58.280 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>twice this season, and one of them was that We

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>one explosion, So since Week one he's only done it once.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this is also a really nice call. Zay

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Flowers is not practicing. There are only two games away

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>from playing because they're playing on Wednesday this week. So

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>with that quick turnaround, they're talking like their optimistic Zay

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to play, but you never know just how

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>limited is or just how the shoulder is going to

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>You look, when we get to Wednesday morning, you know

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Agilore has the concussion seat. Baben played and caught

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, but obviously he's been dealing with the foot

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>injury as well. So Andrews and Likely are the two

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>reliable healthy options in this passing team right now.

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 2>And no Justice Hill. You know, my BET's completely crumbled

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 2>last week. Justice Hill is one of those guys they

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 2>like to have in some of those short line throw

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>with the concussion, there's no chance he plays. Even more

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 2>reason why I like Likely to be more involved in

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 2>that passing game, kind of taking some of that role

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 2>from Justice.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They will use Likely in the screen game, for sure,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>they Hill is better at it, but they do like

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Likely in that role even as a tight end. So

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I really like that. I think the five catches is

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>like definitely happening, and I could see him breaking one

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to get seventy five yards out of them. Ericson do

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you like Isaiah Likely this week?

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? I was going to bring up to Justice Hill

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 3>point too until Wells brought it up. I think that's

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 3>really key because you saw both both tight ends play

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty significant snaps. Andrews was at seventy six percent on

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Saturday and then you had Isaiah Likely at sixty six percent,

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 3>and they combined for three red zone targets. The routes

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 3>were split pretty evenly, so usually it's a case of

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 3>one guy's running route the other guy's blocking, and it

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 3>becomes very problematic. But with all the injuries kind of

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 3>piling up for the Ravens at some of these pass

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 3>catchup positions, obviously Deonta Johnson no longer factor, not like

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 3>he really was anyway, But he's not coming through that

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>door anytime soon to get targets in this offense, so

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Likely Again, it player that when he's gotten opportunities, right,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 3>that's always been the issue with him, When he's gotten opportunities,

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 3>When he's gotten targets, like he has stepped up and delivered.

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I think that this makes a lot of sense.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 3>We know he's got upside attached to a passer like

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson, and Houston's defense is pretty tough against the run.

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.160
<v Speaker 3>A lot of their touchdowns this year have been through

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 3>the air, like that's how they've given up a lot

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of their production. So even if Likely doesn't get the

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 3>seventy five yards necessarily, I feel like you really feel

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 3>good about playing a tight end attached to Lamar Jackson

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 3>has touchdown equity and if they sell out to try

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 3>to stop Derek Henry, then you could see Likely falling

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 3>in the end zone. So I do like that a lot.

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>It's the most wonderful time of the year for getting

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in on all of the hoops, football and hockey action

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings Sports Book. In the season of giving We're

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>being gifted college football and basketball, Pro football and basketball

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and pro hockey too. Almost twenty four to seven. So

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>many games every day, so many opportunities to place your

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 1>first bet. Try betting on something simple like picking a

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>team to win. Go to the DraftKings sports Book app

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and place your bet. We've got the reverse doubleheader from

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Saturday coming up on Christmas Day, the other end of

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the round robin, Chiefs Steelers coming first on Chris Ravens

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Texans second. Both road teams are favored Casey laying two

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half points, Baltimore's laying four. Biggest game of

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the week, though probably Packers Vikings an incredible NFC North matchup,

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's laying a point and a half at home. Also

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Denver Cincy hugely important game for the AFC playoff picture.

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>All in all, it's shaping up to be an amazing

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>week of games. Lines and odds are subject to change,

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, And here's a gift for all new customers.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Bet five dollars to get one hundred and fifty dollars

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets if your bet wins. So download the

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Sportsbook app and use code Fantasy pros that's code

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy pros for new customers to get one hundred and

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins. When

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you betch just five bucks, Happy Holidays from DraftKings. The

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Crown is yours.

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Gambling problem called one night one hundred gambler in New

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 4>York call eight seven seven eight hope and why, or

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 4>text hope and why four six seven three six nine.

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 4>In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling called eight

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 4>eight eight seven eight nine seven to seven seven seven

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 4>or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 4>of boothill case you know. In resorting Kansas twenty one

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 4>and over. Agent eligibility varies by jurisdiction Voyd and Ontario

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 4>Bett must win to receive reward. Bonus bets expire one

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 4>hundred and sixty eight hours after issue ins four. Additional

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 4>terms and responsible gaming resources see dkang dot co. Slash

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 4>b ball.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Ericson let's go to prediction number three.

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Chicken conquo tight end for the Tennessee Titan scores a

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 3>touchdown against the Jacksonville Jaguars. So conco last week, he

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 3>carried over his usage that he got two weeks ago

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 3>double digit targets, he had eight with Mason Rudolph and

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Rudolf came him a relief of Will Levis and they

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 3>carried over. He had eleven targets, thirty three percent target share,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 3>caught nine passes for eighty one yards, but he didn't score.

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 3>And it's funny because on the VP Prop show, Joey

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 3>p said that Nick Westbrookine and Calvin Rearley with ball score,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 3>which of course they both did, and I pushed back,

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 3>It's like, well, I think it's going to be a

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>conco that scores. And of course no touchdowns for Chicka Conggo,

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 3>despite the fact that he let the team and targets

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 3>have the most yards and he played nearly every snap.

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 3>He played eighty five percent of the snaps, which is

0:28:58.480 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 3>one of the highest of the year for him. So

0:29:00.400 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 3>the Titans have really gone away from a tight end

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 3>by committee when they were using some of these other players.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 3>It is really now Chicka Konko as that main tight

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>end pass catcher and I love the matchup against the Jaguars.

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Third most touchdowns allowed to tight ends this season, so

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 3>a Conko always led the team in targets the last

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>two weeks, and that's because Mason Ruff has been the

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 3>starting quarterback. So I think it's going to carry over

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 3>here in a great matchup against a really bad Jaguars defense.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Mason Rudolf has shown that he can be competent, especially

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 3>in plus matchups to get the ball to his playmakers.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 3>I think a Conco's really stepped up so among like

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 3>tight end streamers this week because a Conco was still

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>available on the waiver wire. He's my number one guy

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 3>that you should add this week and potentially start in

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 3>a great matchup.

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I know, again we haven't really settled into rankings for

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the week yet, but like again, give me a range

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for a Conquo that you expect him to fall for you.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's probably going to be in the Breton

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Strange Jake Ferguson type of range, and it's going to

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 3>come down to like matchups, I would say, you know,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 3>this week obviously sure or heading into the last week,

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 3>strangers kind of like the tight end streamer d Jor

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and he laid an egg unfortunately against the Raiders, But

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a Concquo was kind of in that range similar to me,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 3>not as high in that tier, but I think that

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be in the summer range, probably inside

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 3>definitely inside the top fifteen, and probably sneaking inside the

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 3>top twelve. So I mean, he's just been hot the

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 3>last two weeks and I want to ride that, especially

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>in a great matchup.

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Well Chicka con Quo tight end. Let's say thirteen too high,

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>two low? Just right?

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that's like just right. Like when you

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>asked the question, in my head, I was like between

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 2>ten and fifteen, fifteen is probably the floor the target

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>share as of recent That like makes me feel really optimistic.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess what they did in the second half too,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Like that team just they like rough to why and

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>then all of a sudden it's coming back and they're

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 2>doing the thing. So yeah, I think like fifteen, I'm

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to determine it was like him versus let's say

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Brenton Strange. Do you see a con Quo as the

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 2>upside play versus tram Mean Strange as the stupid bumble.

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 2>He can get a nice target share, but it's just

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Brian Thomas ericson when you look at that, if someone

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 2>was like, Okay, Brenton Stranger or con Quo, I need

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 2>to make up points which one are you siding with

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 2>in that question?

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 3>I think a Conquo because you've seen it with him.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, look, he hasn't even scored a touchdown last

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 3>two weeks, right, so he's been doing it without touchdown equity.

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Imagine if he scores a touchdown in a matchup where

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguars allow a lot of touchdowns to tight ends,

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 3>and it's.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Just they don't like that, or they do. But I'm

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 2>saying the Titans, it's just like Taji Spears. It's like

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 2>everybody but him. That's my only problem. But I guess

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, like your point, the matchup is like really

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>good for this to finally happen. I just don't feel

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 2>like he's first or second read in the red zone.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 3>Ever, Well, you could argue that strange. I mean, he's

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 3>clearly behind Brian Thomas Jr. Like he's behind Brian Thomas

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Junior in total targets in volume. But a Conquo he

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 3>has more targets than Callan Ridley last two weeks, and

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Mason Rudolph is the quarterback. So I think just a

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.479
<v Speaker 3>target projection, I think a con Quo will out target

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 3>strained because he's the number one who he's been the

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>number one receiver on his team, and I like the

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 3>matchup for him. Jacksonville defense versus Stranger's matchup against the

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Titans defense. I like it.

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Wellsh what do you got for your number three?

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Fingers crossed the Jordan Love made it out of the

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Monday night game because I'm jumping into Packers play and

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with Jordan Love. We're gonna go three hundred

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 2>three touchdowns and well even I'm gonna throw in a

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 2>little side piece here for Jayden Reed to score a

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 2>touchdown going up against the Vikings. This is gonna be

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'd have to like analyze the slate, like

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>when I'm staring at it, I'm not sure there's a

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 2>game I care about, more like I don't care about

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 2>the Niners anymore. Niners and Lions could have been a

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>good game, it won't be. It's not Packers. Vikings is everything.

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 2>That's everything that I want. So I love Jordan Love

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 2>in this matchup. Also, you know you're gonna get him

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 2>into a dome and you're gonna get him out of weather. Vikings.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Going into this pass game, we're giving up the most

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 2>passing yards to quarterbacks over the last month like a

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 2>wild number. Now from a fantasy points perspective, if you're

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>looking at that, they're not at the tippy because it's

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 2>not a bunch of touchdowns. And going into this past

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 2>week they had had four interceptions. But I love Jordan

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Love in this matchup, I think they are going to

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 2>be slanging, slinging the ball and you can pass on

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the vikings, and I think that is exactly what they're

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 2>going to do. What is the line you were saying earlier,

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I see forty eight and a half. I'm actually surprised

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 2>because what was the game that was fifty?

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It was Denver Cincinnati fifty. I actually when I was

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>putting together, you know, it's kind of preparing the read

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Draftings sports book, I was like, oh, you know,

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a great game, Packers, Vikings. That's gonna be the

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>highest total of the week. And I went to just

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>double check on DraftKings, and since e Denver is a

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>point and a half higher, so they're at fifty and

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and like you said, I think it's forty eight and

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a half for green Bay, Minnesota or forty nine is

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>what I'm seeing now. So it moved up a bit.

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think I would play the over

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 2>anything under fifty, so I'm gonna also, hell, let's go

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 2>with it. Let's tag the over. The only thing I

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.479
<v Speaker 2>think that could hold against that is like Josh Jacobs

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.479
<v Speaker 2>has been incredible again knock on wood for whatever happens

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in the Monday night game. But maybe it's an anticipation

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>of them being able to run and slow the game down.

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 2>But you can pass. You can pass in volume against

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the Minnesota Vikings. So I really like Jordan Love in

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.959
<v Speaker 2>that spot. Christian Watson, Dobb's been getting involved, They've they've

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 2>got the whole crew, They've got the entire crew, and

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Love is going to show off in that divisional matchup.

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 2>So three hundred three touchdowns and like I said, let's

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>throw a Jaydon Reid's score in there. Let's go with

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>the over. Let's play it all. Game of the week.

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I just point of order to make

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 1>sure nobody corrects me. The actual highest total the week.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't scrolled all the way down to Monday. It

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is Detroit San Francisco that's up at fifty one for

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the totals under on the week. Seventeenth slate, I would tend.

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 2>To total for the tick the team total for the Lions.

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Taking a week off from the Lions.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you might want to do that, erics and ericson.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's assume that the Packers take care of business

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>tonight and you know, come out of it looking relatively

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>healthy and there's nothing wrong with the guys that Welsch

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>METSI here for his prediction. And do you like Jordan

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Love having a big game, Jayden Reid scoring a touchdown?

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Yes, because if Jane Reid scores a touchdown week seventeen

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.760
<v Speaker 3>probably means he didn't do in week sixteen and Christian

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 3>Watson scored instead. So love that first of all for

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Jayden Reed, So thank you Welch for that. And yes,

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 3>the Minnesota Vikings are the one matchup that is going

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 3>to force Green Bay for volume, right, because that's been

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.280
<v Speaker 3>the biggest issue with these receivers.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 3>We all know the super talented, we all know, ah

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 3>my god, Dobbs and Reid and Tucker Craft and Christian Watson,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 3>but they all get like four targets and it's not

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 3>enough to feed fantasy football managers what they want to have.

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 3>But the Vikings are the one defense that creates volume

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 3>for their opposing teams. We're seeing it every time that

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 3>the Bears play that team. The Bears are throwing the

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 3>ball all across the yard. So I like Jordan Love

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 3>tier to have a ceiling performance because even in this

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 3>matchup against the Saints, like again, I don't know exactly

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 3>what happened, but it wouldn't be surprised if Jordan Love

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 3>throws the ball twenty times, it is efficient. But they

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 3>give the ball to Josh Jacobs thirty times and he

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 3>scores all the touchdowns because they can just dominate with

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the run game. Minnesota, that's tough to do because they

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 3>have a much tougher run defense, so it could force

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay to throw more. And so when you get

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 3>those ceiling games from Jordan Love, so yeah, I really

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 3>like this call. Welsh.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, for anybody watching on YouTube, you can

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>see I'm starting to get blinded by the lights. I'm

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in my mom's office because I'm traveling for the holidays,

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>so I don't have my usual setup, and her office

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you look like.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 2>A pop star. You look like you've painted part of

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 2>your face.

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I kinda do. Her office has this like nice view

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of a pond in the backyard and the sun is

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>coming off of the the East coast. Well, listen, I've

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>been I grew up on the East Coast. I've i

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was born in the sun's terrible. Yeah, this is this

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is My right eye is getting blind. I'm gonna come

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>away from the show like half sunburns on just a

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter of my face. Ericson, what's your number two prediction?

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Anthony Richardson, He's gonna throw for two hundred yards?

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:57.799
<v Speaker 2>How many attempts have this past week?

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 3>This is part the bit he had eleven yea and

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 3>he averaged over eleven yards per ten. That's what I'm

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 3>saying here, right, So the New York Giants right defense,

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 3>you can easily run the ball on. So I'm not

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 3>expecting a lot of passing volume from Anthie Richardson, although

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the game is on the road sometimes

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 3>weird things happen, especially when it's just like, oh, the

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Colts are going to destroy this team, YadA, YadA, YadA.

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean we saw last week they let the Titans

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 3>somehow crawl back into that game when they were up

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 3>massive and then you look up, this is a one

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 3>score game. So maybe it's a little bit more competitive.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 3>But specifically, looking at the Giants, we were on Darnell

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Mooney last week. We liked him going over his receiving yards,

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 3>which he did even though he didn't catch any like

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>really deep passes from Michael Pennix. Michael Penix was targeting

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the ball downfield, because that's how you beat these Giants team.

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 3>They're dead last terms at EPA per target on deep

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 3>ball passes, and that's the one thing Anthony Ridgarson can do.

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 3>He can throw the ball deep, he can chuck it downfield.

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 3>It leads the NFL and deep passing percentage and average

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 3>depth to throw. So I'm not saying, oh, Richardson, take

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the over on his deep passage or his pass attempts.

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea what that number is going to be,

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 3>but he's he's gonna launch a couple of balls here,

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 3>and if they're ever gonna hit, it's gonna be in

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 3>this particular matchup. So I'm gonna take the over on Richardson. Again,

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 3>his line is probably gonna be at one hundred and

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 3>seventy yards or something extremely low, because yeah, that's kind

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 3>of what we're working with here with me.

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 2>But Uh yeah, it might be like one hundred and fifty,

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 2>like you can't get out. They do not want him throw.

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I will tell you this though, I almost did the

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>same thing. I almost played the same one just because

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the matchup is so great. They didn't need you. They

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 2>did the thing that they want the most, that to

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 2>protect Anthony Richardson, to make him not make stupid decisions

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 2>and tap out and want to leave the game because

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 2>he's tired. So what they do Jonathan Taylor and Jonathan

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Taylor went ballistic and he was awesome. If he which

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 2>here's the only other problem. You might do the same thing.

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 2>You might have another three touchdowns this week. But I

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 2>like I like this call because I do think there's

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a couple big plays involved. And you know

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>what I almost put in here was ad Mitchell. Watch

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 2>out for Mitchell, because I mean, Reggie loves him. They

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 2>want to get him the ball. He's a playmaker. If

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:06.839
<v Speaker 2>I were to have like a little side one, I'd

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 2>add to this. I think I'm gonna play overs on

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 2>ad Mitchell this week because this is that matchup where

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>they can have those big plays, and I kind of

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>think he's going to have one of those they want

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 2>to get him the ball. I just like that guy,

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:18.360
<v Speaker 2>so I'm gonna take overs on him. But I like

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 2>this play even though he throws eleven times.

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys know? And sorry if you said this.

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I was distracted trying to fix the blinds so I

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>could survive.

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 2>You were killing me by the way I'm watching it

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 2>like you had your face up against the camera and

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 2>then you had like a sun mustache.

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Was doing the best I could to do it subtly,

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of impossible. But at least I'm not

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose my vision after this show, So I apologize

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if you said this already? Do you know how many

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>times Anthony Richardson has had two hundred passing yards this season?

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Ericson, isn't it a funny game? Two times?

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>Welse?

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a gues say once?

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>He's actually done it three times, but two of them

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>were Weeks one and two he had two hundred and

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 1>twelve against Houston and week one he had two hundred

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and four against Green Bay in Week two. Since Week

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>three on he is only done it once. Do you

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>remember which game it happened?

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jet, there's Jets.

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, very good? Okay, I have a game I

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 2>want to play. Since you have the stats up, how

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 2>many games does he have more than fifteen completions? Let's

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>first guest, Eric, so boys.

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 3>Guess well, it's probably going to be no more than

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 3>three because he's only gone over two hundred passing yards

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 3>three times, So I would say two.

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:22.359
<v Speaker 2>And I guess one.

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>It is three, but it doesn't necessarily coincide with.

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:32.359
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so what's the least amount of completions he's had

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>going over two hundred yards?

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>The week one, if you remember, he went nine for

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen exactly two hundred and Twelvey.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 3>That's the stat line. In week seventeen, nine for nineteen,

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 3>two hundred yards.

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>That was when he had the big, the incredible sixty

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>something yard pass.

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 3>That's happened again. That's all I can do.

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was nine for nineteen a week one for

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:54.720
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and twelve yards, it was seventeen for thirty

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 1>four and week two for two hundred and four yards.

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's from eleven point two yards for attempt to sit

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>from week one to week two and then and then

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets it was twenty for thirty for two

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy two yards, which was his best both

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of completions and yardage on the season. So

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what he does against the Giants. Well, she

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>give me your number two prediction.

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Number two, Jmo is gonna do it again what he

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 2>did last week, and he is going to light up

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the San Francisco forty nine ers. We are going one

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 2>hundred plus. I actually was gonna go one fifty and

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 2>he just said, like one hundred and forty three. But

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go one hundred plus while also having a

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 2>forty yard plus play. I'm also going to throw in

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 2>first first touchdown might be in play here with Jamison Williams.

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 2>You can get past that fotynd and secondary is just

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 2>not that great, and you're gonna have a manra you know,

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 2>playing that short in line, which is gonna take so

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 2>much focus. You're gonna have Warner who is gonna give

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 2>that middle of the field protection locked up on La Porta.

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 2>They're going to be able to run, and that's I

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 2>think the thing they're going to be the most scared of.

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 2>It's attempting to stop run. Looks like they probably lost

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Dre Greenlaw again and they're gonna be stacked up after

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 2>a couple early runs from Jamier Gibbs. They're gonna rock

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a play action. Jamison william is going deep. He is

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna burn past these this secondary, these safeties that are

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 2>just big hitters, just big hitting safeties. You saw what

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Jameson Williams did this week, whereas just straight line speed,

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 2>He's just not gonna be caught up. And I think

0:42:26.280 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 2>the Lions are gonna do that again. I just think

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have a big blowout game against the forty

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 2>nine ers. He's getting targets. This is what you can

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 2>do against them in general. And you know, if Tyreek

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Hill could catch the ball, he would have had a

0:42:37.400 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 2>much bigger game. Just multiple deep, big drop passes that

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 2>Jamison william is probably not gonna do. Plus, I mean,

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 2>fortd Anders can be really really good tacklers, but that

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>play they like to run with Jamison Williams where they

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 2>go about fifteen in and then they just kind of

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 2>set picks and let him go. That might be the

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.280
<v Speaker 2>play as well. Either way, Jamison Williams one hundred plus,

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.399
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have a forty yard plus play. And though

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a watching the actual touchdown to this, I

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 2>do think a first touchdown is in play against the

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers, and that'll probably look you know, ten

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 2>eleven to one or something like that. So those are

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 2>for the betting people.

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I had a friend of mine ask me a start

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 1>sick question yesterday morning, and I steered him away from

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Williams, So that was unfortunate. Erickson, What do you

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think about this one for Week seventeen?

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I was very wrong about the Lions in

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 3>the entire Actually it's funny because I was watching this game,

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 3>or I was watching on red Zone, I think, and

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:35.919
<v Speaker 3>I went to the other room and then I hear

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:38.839
<v Speaker 3>the screen the TV like blaring like, oh, like something

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 3>big is happening. I run in and I just see

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Jmo just like running freely down the sideline or like

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 3>down the field, and immediately picture that Simpson's gift where

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the guy walks into the bar and he like puts

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 3>his hat down and then he picks it back up

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 3>and immediately leaves the room. Literally how I felt. I

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 3>was like, well, I'm done with this Lions game, Like

0:43:58.800 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 3>this isn't going to work for me.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Have you watched the Simpsons?

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 3>Ever?

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I was about to say, do you know what character

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:04.399
<v Speaker 2>that was it's the.

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Grandpa, right, Okay? Yeah, because you said, like, yeah, that guy,

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, does he not know?

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 3>I don't know his name.

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I've actually I've actually not watched the Sis ever myself,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but I know enough to note that that is like Grandpa.

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Does he have a name or is he just Abe?

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That could be wrong? Yeah, no, I mean it's a

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>total blind spot for me. You know, growing up, I

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, didn't really watch you know, that kind of television,

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and then I just kind of had moved past. It

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was past the Golden Era by the time I was

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>old enough to be interested in a show like that,

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and I just turned to other other shows. So it's

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely a blind spot for me.

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Side note, What do you think is the most shameful show?

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>If you haven't watched that? People will not let go.

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think is by the way, it is Abe?

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I got it right, I just looked it up, so

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>oh good take.

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think is the number one shame

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 2>show if you haven't watched it? People just gasp because

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think mine is Seinfeld. I'm not a Seinfeld guy.

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I never watched Sign. I watch a couple of episodes,

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I know but it's not my thing, and I feel

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 2>like everyone he gets very worked up about that. Is

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that number one? Or with the Simpsons like Trounce.

0:45:11.520 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Seinfeld is a really good call there. I

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>am a huge Seinfeld fan, so that one I know

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>very well. But I think that's when I can imagine

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like getting a gasp from it. From some of the

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like not comedies, you get into some of the like

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.279
<v Speaker 1>like The Wire. You know, people are always surprised like

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a couple episodes, but I haven't finished it

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>all the way through, like I want to know some

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of those big ones people who people who like Game

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones and I am one of them, like are like, oh,

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to watch it. But I don't think people

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are like taken aback when you haven't seen it. It's

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 1>more just like.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 2>Breaking Bad to me is the one where it's like

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:43.879
<v Speaker 2>breaking bad and breaking back. Let's ask ericson how many

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of any of these shows have you watched?

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I watched mostly all these you haven't named. I haven't watched.

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think like you are a Seinfeld guy truly

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>truly probably like friends in the office, like for for

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>my generation at least, that people will be like, holy cow,

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you haven't seen those that's insane.

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 2>What's more offensive to not watch Breaking Bad? Seinfeld or

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 2>those two or that what I was gonna.

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Say different like show I feel like they're on the

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 3>different ends of the spectrum. Or Breaking Bad is like

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 3>something you like need to like lock in and focus binging,

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 3>where Seinfeld you would just like have on in the

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 3>background while you're doing something else.

0:46:20.680 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Because it's like people are gonna let us know in

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:25.480
<v Speaker 2>the comments, what's the show that is the most offensive?

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 2>That's something This is.

0:46:26.320 --> 0:46:30.680
<v Speaker 1>A pretty like male skewed conversation as well. You know,

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a lot of shows that like my guy

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>friends talk about. I have a lot of like female

0:46:34.680 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>friends who talk about like grays and that I mean

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and not that you know men can't enjoy those shows too.

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if like, depending on kind of the demographic,

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you would get a different answer from people that are

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 1>shocked you haven't seen something.

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 2>But yeah we're gonna find out.

0:46:47.000 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well we'll see what the what the folks say

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the comments. I'm really I'm really happy with myself

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that I pulled that Abe name because I have seen

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>one episode of The Simpsons ever, which really it was

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the one where the gift from it that people see

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>is like where Homer's eating a lot of donuts, like

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:06.839
<v Speaker 1>getting like four donuts.

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 2>All the episode. Yeah you okay, so this is a

0:47:10.800 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 2>battle here, me Seinfeld versus you Simpsons. I think Simpsons

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 2>is insane that you haven't seen. I guess culturally, like

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 2>like if you're like twenty five, maybe you didn't grow

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 2>up on the Simpsons, but I don't know.

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little older than twenty five. But yeah, I

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>mean it was like just a hair. I mean, I

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>definitely have friends my age you have watched it. It's

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>like it's not like people my age can't have seen

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Simpsons. I just kind of missed that boat and

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 1>then didn't ever really circle back to it. And now

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like, what, am I going to go watch thirty

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 1>seasons worth to catch up?

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably not?

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah you could, Yeah, You're already so behind. It's like

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 3>I'll never catch up.

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, exactly.

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's like similar with like reality shows, like

0:47:46.880 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>not that I'm that into them, but like I have

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a friend who's rewatching for the first time all of Survivor,

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I'm not going to watch forty seven

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>seasons of you can.

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Watch compilations of someone that already did it, and then

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 3>you can watch it like six hours a.

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Twenty minute video breaking down thirty seasons of something I

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 2>love that rock Stars.

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's That's a lot we do on New

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Year's Day now, right, she's gonna binge the Simpsons episode.

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I yeah, we should. We should make it a pack

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for twenty twenty five that will each knock one of

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>these shows off our list that we we kind of

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 1>owe it to ourselves to watch. I completely lost where

0:48:22.600 --> 0:48:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we were on our Jamison.

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 2>With William burning everybody.

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Did anybody else have any other thoughts at Jamison?

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just surprised, amazing.

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, she didn't have anything to say about Jwan Jennings

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 3>back to back down weeks. But I mean, he's got

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 3>a bounce he's playing. It's right, like listen, he's got

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 3>a bounce back. He has to buddy.

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 2>You know that was in my head. You know, it's

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the first thing I woke up to. But here's the problem.

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 2>They're done. I didn't even know they were eliminated and

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 2>when they played, but it was earlier game. They're eliminated.

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 2>They're planned for nothing. How funny is it when it's

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the most, when nothing matters anymore, Deebo steps up, Deebo

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 2>has his one game. As soon as they're eliminated, nothing matters,

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>and no one cares anymore. That team doesn't care anymore.

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 2>You had George Kittle talking about like, well there's still

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>two games and if there's football in front of me,

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna play, and they're just they stink like

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 2>party's not making good decisions. He's making bad throws. They're

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 2>not blocking for him. They don't have a running game.

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:18.920
<v Speaker 2>They can't establish a running game. They can't establish the

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 2>pass game. Juwan Jennings, you can pass against. The Lions

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 2>is in a great spot. I just don't know if

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 2>brock Purty is gonna be upright the entire game. I

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:30.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know how hard they're trying. I think they're gonna

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:33.279
<v Speaker 2>get blown out. I think they are gonna get demoleg

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>They're playing for nothing. They might have an top ten

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 2>pick in the NFL draft this year. What are we

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about. They're gonna get blown out? What do we

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 2>have an early line on it? I'm gonna look here,

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:47.760
<v Speaker 2>spread Lions by three and a half. I'm gonna ladder

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that up to ten. That's insane. I'm going to let also,

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:55.240
<v Speaker 2>brock Purty sucks at home. He's like the worst quarterback

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 2>at home, and they're at home. I'm going to I'm

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna bet it. As soon as we're done with this

0:49:58.880 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 2>three and a half, four and a half half, I'm

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 2>going up to nine and a half. I'm not gonna

0:50:02.239 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 2>play the ten. I'm gonna gowhere. Bet every every single

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 2>thing I have in my account, everything I want off

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 2>of my first touchdown parlay, I'm betting on that.

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess all the way is maybe like Detroit is

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 1>not going to put everything they have into this game

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:18.439
<v Speaker 1>because they're you know, they're gonna have a short week

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the next week, and that's the week to

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:22.640
<v Speaker 1>really like clinch the on seed division. Like the Vikings

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>keep winning, like Week eighteen is what they're saving it for.

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Like I can't think of another reason why what if.

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The Packers win? If the if the if the Packers

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:33.440
<v Speaker 2>win and beat the Vikings this weekend and then Monday

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 2>comes around, Monday could be critical. They could win, they

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 2>could clinch.

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota wouldn't be able to win a tiebreak I haven't

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 1>looked into that.

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:44.480
<v Speaker 3>So I'm pretty sure. So the Vikings play the Lions

0:50:44.520 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 3>the last week, yeah eighteen, and the winner of that game,

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:50.520
<v Speaker 3>assuming that both teams win in week seventeen.

0:50:50.600 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 1>But if, but if the Vikings lose this week and

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>the Lions win, will we eighteen matter? I I don't

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>know that it does or doesn't. I haven't checked.

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:03.320
<v Speaker 2>They're both thirteen and two right now, so it would

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 2>because then I guess, if I don't know, I to

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 2>lose and the Lions win. If the Vikings win, I

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:16.279
<v Speaker 2>believe I'm looking, they would have the same conference record. Yeah,

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that. I think that might come down

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 2>to like fractional issues here. It doesn't matter. The forty

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 2>nine ers are Trochio original, so many different plays, it

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 2>doesn't Yeah, back to the original point. They're gonna Dan Campbell.

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 2>They went for a fourth and four and they're thirteen

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and one or whatever the hell they are this weekend.

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:36.440
<v Speaker 2>They're not gonna lay down for the forty nine ers

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to play into next weekend. They are going to foot

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 2>to the gas. They're gonna put a forty spot, a

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:44.319
<v Speaker 2>forty burger on the forty nine ers. You know what

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 2>laddered up to twenty the nineteen and a half in

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 2>favor of the Lions. They're gonna kill them.

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:50.319
<v Speaker 3>They don't make glad. It's that big.

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, well, I want to let everybody know that they

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have the chance to help shape the Fantasy Pros Football Podcast.

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully they are hearing this after enjoying that long detour

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:03.279
<v Speaker 1>we took and not rolling their eyes about it.

0:52:03.719 --> 0:52:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Please take them time.

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Please take a minute or two to fill out our

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>quick easy survey at fantasypros dot com slash survey and

0:52:10.880 --> 0:52:14.040
<v Speaker 1>leave a review at fantasypros dot com slash review to

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>help us improve. We want to be putting forth the

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:19.759
<v Speaker 1>best possible product we can, and we hope everybody, whether

0:52:19.760 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the off season talking dynasty or getting an early

0:52:22.640 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 1>look on the twenty twenty five rankings, or in season

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to help you win a title, we hope we

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:29.040
<v Speaker 1>can help and that you have fun listening to us

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and that you, you know, appreciate all the fun we're

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>having on this show and all the work we put

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>into it. So if you want to help us shape

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 1>this show going forward again, you can go to fantasypros

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash survey to fill out our quick easy

0:52:40.200 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>survey or and leave a review at fantasypros dot com

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:47.000
<v Speaker 1>slash review to help us improve. We really appreciate your support,

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and we definitely thank everybody for listening here all season

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:52.719
<v Speaker 1>long and especially you know during the holidays. We've got

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 1>one prediction each left remaining ericson what's your number one

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for Week seventeen?

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, the real b rob please stand Brian Robinson versus

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 3>p John Robinson Falcons Commanders. I believe this game is

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 3>being played on Sunday Night Football, but it will not

0:53:08.000 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 3>be Kirk Cousins revenge game. No, It's going to be

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Michael Pennix under center for the Falcons, and I think

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Brian Robinson for the Commander, is going to bounce back.

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:17.800
<v Speaker 3>He had one of the worst games you could possibly

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.320
<v Speaker 3>ask for. Fro May started running back against the Eagles,

0:53:20.520 --> 0:53:22.319
<v Speaker 3>could not run the ball. He had ten carries for

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty four yards. He had two fumbles. So it was

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 3>an absolute disaster for Brian Robinson in a spot that

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:30.760
<v Speaker 3>yet we knew that the Eagles were was a tougher matchup,

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 3>but it was one that he had produced in earlier

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 3>this season, so I thought that he was okay, like

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 3>a lowland RB two, but I mean he completely underwhelmed

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 3>and tanked in the Fantasy Football semis. But I think

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 3>he bounces his back here. I think that the matchup

0:53:43.440 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 3>against the Atlanta Falcons is much better than against the Eagles.

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 3>In the last eleven running backs to face Atlanta have

0:53:48.520 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 3>gone over their rushing yards projection. I mean, look at

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons, they've been better against running backs over the

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 3>last couple of weeks. But to me, it's a lot

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 3>of the opponents that they've played not exactly the best.

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Giants, the Raiders, like some of these

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 3>teams that don't really have great offenses that haven't really

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 3>been able to establish any type of run game against

0:54:07.760 --> 0:54:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the Atlanta Falcons. But some of these better teams, I

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:13.879
<v Speaker 3>think Atlanta will follows more into that category. I think

0:54:13.880 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Brian Robinson's going to have a bounced back performance. So

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:17.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna say he goes over one hundred and twenty

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:19.320
<v Speaker 3>five yards from scrimmage. I think he scores a touchdown

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 3>against the Falcons. Again, without Austin Eckler, he still has

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 3>an elite role in this offense. Like he still played

0:54:25.160 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 3>sixty three percent of the snaps. He got two of

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 3>his three targets for seventeen yards, so he's still involved

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:32.560
<v Speaker 3>in the receiving game, and he still sees all the

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 3>red zone usage. He went zero for three for rushing

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:36.640
<v Speaker 3>inside the red zone against the Eagles. I don't think

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna happen two weeks in a row. Are we

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:40.280
<v Speaker 3>really going to see double digit touchdowns from a Lamendes,

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Aikias and Jamison Crowder who I didn't even know was

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:46.760
<v Speaker 3>on the Commanders again until he scored two touchdowns last week.

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 3>That's not gonna happen again. So I think Brian Robinson's gonna

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 3>get back of the end zone, get back to producing

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 3>at that level that he's produced mostly all year long.

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you though b Jon Robinson still might outscore him,

0:54:57.080 --> 0:54:58.879
<v Speaker 3>I think Brian Robinson's going to have himself a day

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 3>against the Falcons.

0:55:01.200 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna matter for me if Brian Robinson has

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a good day, because he absolutely finished me in half

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>my leagues this week. I had so much invested in

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Brian Robinson all season long, and it was a good pick,

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the long term looking back, but it

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>really cooked me in Week sixteen.

0:55:20.000 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 3>That was that was sure not the only one.

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm sure I'm not. Well, do you like Brian

0:55:26.360 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Robinson in this battle of b Robinson running backs?

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:31.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if I'm picking between them, I'm gonna.

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Take Yeah, I think like that. I just meant to

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you like Brian Robinson and he happens to be facing Sean.

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they're going to try to like get

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 2>him back and more more involved and you know, get

0:55:42.840 --> 0:55:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the confidence going. It was funny like earlier there, I

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 2>remember us talking about like Jeremy McNichols and he doesn't

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 2>do anything, and they started throwing him the ball because

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 2>they just couldn't trust Brian Robinson. But you're not going

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:55.319
<v Speaker 2>to get these massive, big touchdown games every single week

0:55:55.360 --> 0:55:58.399
<v Speaker 2>from Jayden Daniels and it's gonna be like you said,

0:55:58.400 --> 0:56:00.839
<v Speaker 2>like it was really really rough man up from a run.

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.959
<v Speaker 2>And that was also why, like stupidly I wasn't super

0:56:03.960 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 2>into Jade Daniels. Like the Egals defense is really tough.

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:10.280
<v Speaker 2>It just got a lot worse when you had Jalen

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Hurts out and then being able to control the offense

0:56:12.400 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 2>even more more opportunities for the commanders. But yeah, I

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 2>think Brian Robinson is a much better spot this week.

0:56:18.080 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 2>They're going to give him the rock, they throw them

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the ball, They're gonna get him some touchdowns, get that

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:24.360
<v Speaker 2>confidence back up off the two fumbles. So I'm with

0:56:24.440 --> 0:56:24.839
<v Speaker 2>this one.

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at your final prediction here, Welsh Final one.

0:56:30.440 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans incentive time. We are in Mike Evans' incentive

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:37.440
<v Speaker 2>range and do you remember what they were at you

0:56:37.520 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 2>rattled them off recently on the spot. It was like,

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it's like eighteen catches and two or three hundred yards

0:56:46.600 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 2>he needed to get to. He's under two hundred yards

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for the.

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Ninety I think it's like ninety one yards per game

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 3>the next.

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Two weeks, Yeah, it's he has eight hundred and eighteen,

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 2>so it's like, yeah, essentially ninety It is actually ninety

0:57:01.040 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 2>one on there, and then there's some reception prop I

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 2>think he's got to get to seventy four an incentive

0:57:06.960 --> 0:57:09.200
<v Speaker 2>as far in his contract and as well as a touchdown.

0:57:09.239 --> 0:57:11.719
<v Speaker 2>So I'm saying all of this is this past week

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 2>seemed like a really good spot where he was going

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:15.960
<v Speaker 2>to be involved on the touchdown side. Did not happen.

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 2>This coming week, they're going up against the Atlanta Falcons,

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:23.200
<v Speaker 2>who going into this past week were number two in

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns given up to wide receivers. Also from the fantasy perspective,

0:57:27.240 --> 0:57:30.120
<v Speaker 2>their top six in points given up. Mike Evans is

0:57:30.120 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 2>scoring two touchdowns this week. We are going to lock in.

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 2>He is going to lock in. Mike Evans is going

0:57:34.840 --> 0:57:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to get a litany of targets up against Atlanta and

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 2>we are going to get Mike Evans scoring two touchdowns.

0:57:42.080 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 2>It's as easy as Baker Mayfield only looking his way.

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 2>We went Bucky this past week. Hopefully we get I actually,

0:57:49.560 --> 0:57:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess I went a buck scoring two. This week.

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 2>We're going another Buck scoring two. But it's Mike Evans

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:56.600
<v Speaker 2>in incentive range for the final two weeks.

0:57:56.840 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Ericson what do you think about Evans? Where you going

0:57:58.440 --> 0:57:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to have him right to this week?

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 3>You think top five? I mean all the incentives are there,

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 3>and well, so I'm not sure if you misspoke. You

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 3>meant to say Panthers, right, because that's who Panthers.

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm sorry, I say no products trying to make

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 2>sure I'm glad you did.

0:58:12.440 --> 0:58:15.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So, yeah, I mean this is a matchup that, again,

0:58:15.120 --> 0:58:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Caroline is a team that you usually target for you

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 3>know running backs, but it's really hey, however, you want

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to score, make your choice, right, And and the Buccaneers

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:25.720
<v Speaker 3>their number one priorities like, hey, get Mike Evans into

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:27.360
<v Speaker 3>the end zone, like that's what they want to do

0:58:27.640 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 3>more than anything else. So yeah, Carolina, again, if it

0:58:30.720 --> 0:58:33.480
<v Speaker 3>wasn't for Marvin Harrison unable to catch all these fades,

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 3>he would be scoring touch. I think it's the Panthers too,

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think this makes a lot of sense, especially

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Kate Auten misses again if he's out, just focuses on

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 3>on Mike Evans's that number one target. So yeah, it's

0:58:43.680 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 3>just it's always funny because it's gonna be interesting to

0:58:45.200 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 3>see what the books open as his receiving yards, Like

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I think the last line of closed it like eighty

0:58:49.160 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 3>two and a half yards, which eighty four is like

0:58:52.080 --> 0:58:54.400
<v Speaker 3>you're just like, this is such a big number, but

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:56.400
<v Speaker 3>it's like exactly because that's the pace that he has

0:58:56.440 --> 0:58:58.160
<v Speaker 3>to be on, So that's why they put it at

0:58:58.160 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 3>that number.

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So yes, so no, does he get a thousand, Yes,

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna do it.

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So and by the way he's gonna do it, I

0:59:04.760 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 2>put myself in a rabbit hole as soon as I said,

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons in my head, and then I started looking,

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:10.480
<v Speaker 2>by the way, it's even better. The Carolina Panthers giving

0:59:10.560 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 2>up the most receiving touchdowns and I believe it's like

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:16.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty plus on the season to wide receiver. So it's

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a phenomenal matchup. I undersold myself for whatever reason. I

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 2>was staring at the Falcons and I said that, But yeah,

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 2>it's an even better matchup. And Mike, you gotta you

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 2>gotta smash the Mike Evins stuff, like right when it

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:31.880
<v Speaker 2>opens up, because to your point, it's probably gonna rise

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 2>five yards. If they do anything under eighty, it's gonna

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 2>go back up. I bet you it's gonna push eighty

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.520
<v Speaker 2>five to ninety close to close because of like you said,

0:59:40.640 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 2>they got to get to that ninety marker, and that's

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 2>why we're so close to one thousand. There is one

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.600
<v Speaker 2>touchdown that's a part of the incentives, and I just

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:50.800
<v Speaker 2>I gotta go and look, I have a bookmarkd what

0:59:50.840 --> 0:59:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the reception side of it is. But he's really close

0:59:53.960 --> 0:59:56.400
<v Speaker 2>to one of the levels of receptions, really close to

0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the yards, and he needs that touchdown. So we're going

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 2>too against an abysmal Carolina Panthers defense.

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

1:00:02.760 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers give up receiving touchdowns to all the good

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>players except Trey McBride for some reason. All right, we'll

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>get out of here on that prediction. Thank you everybody

1:00:14.200 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in. Thank you again for everybody like us

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>who've been listening all season. We will be with you

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>throughout this week to help you in the Fantasy championship games.

1:00:23.240 --> 1:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have a few shows that we're not doing

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that we might usually do, just in terms of some

1:00:28.040 --> 1:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>housekeeping to let you know what to expect. But we've

1:00:30.280 --> 1:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously got this show coming out on Tuesday again. We

1:00:32.400 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>did record this Monday morning, and then we're gonna have

1:00:35.200 --> 1:00:38.439
<v Speaker 1>our usual Thursday show and Friday show as well at

1:00:38.440 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the week, plus some betting shows too,

1:00:40.560 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So be sure to stick around and look for most

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of the usual shows that you get every single week.

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And we are here also on Discord and social media

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and everywhere else to help you lock in that Fantasy

1:00:52.040 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>championship and hopefully some nice winnings. Boor Welch and ericson

1:00:56.000 --> 1:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ryan Warmany Thank you again for listening, and we'll

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>see again next time. Thanks for Lis sitting to the

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros Fantasy Football podcast. If you love the show,

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the best freeway to support us is by leaving a

1:01:06.400 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>positive review on Apple Podcasts at Fantasypros dot com slash

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>review or on Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>TikTok at Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

1:01:17.400 --> 1:01:19.439
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros